Motley Fool Money - Big Tech, Big Payments, Big Burrito

Episode Date: April 28, 2023

A huge week for earnings reveals a theme for investors: bigger is better (0:21) Matt Argersinger and Jason Moser discuss: - Amazon's 1st-quarter revenue impressed but questions remain about AWS - Alphabet's $70 billion share buyback plan (and 1st-quarter results) - Visa and Mastercard beating Wall Street's expectations and providing insight into consumer spending - The latest from Microsoft, Meta Platforms, and Chipotle (19:11) Motley Fool senior analyst Tim Beyers talks with Jay Chaudhry, CEO of the cloud cybersecurity company Zscaler, about "zero trust" security, under-the-radar threats, and Zscaler's growing opportunity in federal government contracting. (31:17) Matt and Jason share thoughts on UPS, advice for NFL draftees, and two stocks on their radar: Activision Blizzard and Cloudflare. Stocks discussed: MSFT, AMZN, GOOG, META, V, MA, CMG, ZS, UPS, ATVI, NET Host: Dylan Lewis Guests: Jason Moser, Matt Argersinger, Tim Beyers, Jay Chaudhry Producer: Ricky Mulvey Engineer: Dan Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This episode is brought to you by Colagard. Do you know what's really scary? Not screening for colon cancer when you turn 45. The Colagard test is non-invasive, requires no special prep or time off work, and ships right to your door. In just three simple steps, Colagard takes the scare out of colon cancer screening.

If you're 45 or older and at average risk, ask your health care provider about the Coligard test. Coligard is available by prescription only. Learn more or request a prescription today at colagard.com slash screen. We've got earnings from big tech and an insider's look at cybersecurity. Motley Fool Money starts now. That's why they call it money. The best thing.

Fool Global headquarters. This is Motley Fool Money radio show. I'm Dylan Lewis sitting in for Chris Hill. Joining me in studio, Motley Fool Senior Analyst, Jason Moser, and Matt Argusinger. Great to have you both here. Hey, hey. Hey, Dylan. We have earnings from Big Tech, big payments, and Big Burrito, thoughts on the state of cybersecurity from Z-Scalers, Jay Shodry,

and, of course, stocks on our radar. Before we dig into the latest earnings results, I want to ask you both broadly. We're about halfway through earnings season. We've seen big company reports. Matt, how are you feeling about what we're seeing so far? You said the word, Dylan, big. And I think that works for this earning season. It seems like the bigger you are, whether it's social media, technology, banking,

the big companies are winning this earning season. They've got the right balance sheets. They've got the customer retention. And you're seeing a lot of smaller companies who either are having liquidity issues or other customer spending slowdown problems. That's where the damage is being laid. So it just helps to be big. I mean, it always helps to be big.

But just for this earning season in particular, it feels like the bigger companies just have a much bigger advantage. Jason, what about you? Yeah, no doubt. I mean, I fully agree there. And it does seem like we are starting to see really the beginning of the end here, so to speak, as far as this move to a recession, right? I mean, we've been talking over the last year, year and a half as a recession, when is it going to happen.

More and more headlines, businesses, cutting their workforces. You just saw Lyft with an announcement. I think they're cutting 26% of their executive workforce or the workforce at their headquarters. And that is something that is continuing. So companies pulling back on spending, obviously the bigger companies are able to weather this store more.

We saw the GDP number come out this quarter, I think it was 1.1% growth well below what was projected. It does seem like we are getting to a point here where those numbers are going to continue to come down. Probably not a bad thing. We've got to get to the bottom at some point so we can start climbing our way back up. So it's always worth keeping that in mind. I'd say, yeah, it doesn't feel like it's the most predicted recession of all time. Like you said, Jayce, we've been talking about this for months, and it's just like, can we get there already?

I mean, it's just, but, you know, earnings have held up. I'd say my other big takeaway, I think, is earnings have held up a little bit better than I thought they would. I thought we'd see a little bit more of a slowdown. I thought guidance would be a lot weaker than it is across the board, and it doesn't seem like it's been that way. Well, you mentioned big. It doesn't get much bigger than Microsoft. Shares of the company are up almost 10% this week, and earnings certainly played a role. The company reported top-line growth of 7% ahead of expectations.

The company's Azure Cloud segment grew 27% for the quarter. Jason, that came in line with expectations, but it's the lowest growth that the segment has posted in its history. Yeah, and that seems to be a theme I think we'll cover here for the show, along with another theme. Don't say it. Don't say it. Around AI, they did not miss an opportunity to highlight the investments that the company is making an AI and how that is driving off facets of the business. And we can hold that against some companies, but with other companies, it really does matter. I think in Microsoft's case, it's legitimate, right?

I mean, the real strength in Microsoft is they have so many facets to this business that capture a ton of share. And you really started that out there with the cloud side of the business. But the numbers, I mean, revenue, $52.9 billion, up 10% excluding currency effects. Earnings per share, $2.45, up 14%. Operating expenses up 9%. But, yeah, we go to that cloud side of the business delivering over $28 billion, $25%, and actually saw margin improvement in there as well.

But back to that point of Microsoft having so many different facets to the business that are doing so well, Office 365 commercial revenue was up 18%. They saw strong renewals there. Paid seats grew 11% to $382 million. That's a lot of seats, Maddie. Teams usage. I mean, golly, we're beyond sort of right, the remote stay-at-home economy, right? Things are kind of getting back to normal, but what Microsoft has done so well is made teams,

an integral part of the workforce, wherever you may be working at home, in the office, or somewhere else. Teams usage is at an all-time high. They surpass 300 million monthly active users for the quarter, also growing their total active market opportunity, kind of like what Zoom's doing in building out things like Team Phone, Teams rooms, teams premium. So, yeah, look out Zoom. I think Microsoft has you square in their sites. and are definitely taking some share there. LinkedIn continues to confound. I just, I don't know. Every time I log into LinkedIn, I ask myself the question,

why did I just log into LinkedIn? And yet, that business continues to grow. That revenue up 10 percent, record engagement, more than 930 million members. They saw 19 percent growth in India. I would say the one spot of weakness was personal computing. And a lot of that just has to do with these inventory channels and just the challenges that we've seen in personal computing in general, but all in all, a very strong quarter impressive business. I mentioned earnings were part of the story for Microsoft this week. In addition, earnings news, this week, UK regulators came out in opposition of the company's planned $69 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard. Jason, I want to stick with you here. That actually

seemed to boost Microsoft shares from the Microsoft perspective. I'm curious, how should investors be processing this? Well, it seems like they're not going to be spending $70 billion. anytime soon, and maybe investors think there might be something else they could do with that money. I think that probably the response to that is appropriate. I don't know that this one is dead in the water, but it sure seems like it's pretty close. And I think Mattie will probably dig into that one a little bit later for us. Amazon reported what seemed like a strong first quarter, revenue of $127 billion and earnings over $3 billion. Both beat estimates.

But an 8% jump in shares was erased when management indicated they're seeing decelerating revenue growth in AWS, the company's segment. Matt, AWS is the engine that makes Amazon go. What did you see in the results? Yeah, talk about raining on Big Tech's parade. It was Amazon late in the week, right? I mean, the mistake. Here was the mistake, Dylan, Jason, was that CFO Brian Lossov and Andy Jassy collectively only mentioned AI once in their prepared remarks. Unforced error. That is a no-no this earning season. Only were mentioning AI once. Okay, on a serious note, though, the stock did pop coming out when the results first came out. It was the conference call, Dylan, that you mentioned when they started talking about AWS.

Andy Jassy used the word optimize. Should have been talking about AI, but he used the word optimized, which is not a bad word necessarily. I think when you're talking about business and efficiencies and things like that, except when you're describing customer spending on your biggest and most profitable platform, AWS. So even though AWS net sales were up 16% to 21.4 billion, not bad, given the size and scale of that business. And it's up to an annualized rate of $85 billion, by the way. Jassy did mention that a lot of its customers are evaluating their cloud spending on ADOS, AWS in light of economic conditions, hence that word, optimize.

So that kind of spooked investors a little bit. He also mentioned that April revenue growth rates for ADWES were running about 5 percentage points below where they were in the first quarter. I think that probably has investors thinking about, okay, what does this mean for second quarter results when they come? Amazon is famous for having a wide range for revenue and operating income, and they do again for the second quarter. so that's going to come into play. I was going into earnings. I was actually more worried about the core

e-commerce business. And I think those fears were kind of founded here because online store sales were virtually unchanged from a year ago, maybe not unexpected coming off a quarter in 2022, where a lot of people were at home still buying things online, but still just flat growth there was surprising. And then third-party seller services, still up 18% year-over-year. That was more solid there. So, sum up, we're seeing, I think, a fairly large deceleration in E2ES, more than we thought. Companies' e-commerce business is also slowing down. And unlike Alphabet and Meadow, which are other companies that reported in Microsoft, Amazon going in, their valuation was a lot higher than those other companies.

That could be also playing a role in why the stock is selling off. You mentioned Alphabet. Shares of Google Parent Alphabet are up after the company reported 70 billion in revenue and 15 billion in net income for the first quarter, beating expectations. Jason, this is a company that was able to post-growth, despite a decline in its ad business, thanks to growth in the cloud segment. We look at the major tech players, and we're kind of seeing different stories and slightly different states in the cloud markets.

Yes, yes. Well, I mean, it was not a bad quarter. Microsoft stole its thunder a little bit, but certainly AI, unfortunately, we've got to say that, I think I'll show long. It is the big theme that continues to form in big tech. But with Alphabet specifically, like you said, it's nice to see the cloud business continuing to gain traction. They are number three, right, behind Amazon and Microsoft, but they are gaining traction and it's contributing to the bottom line, finally. So that's encouraging. But with revenue growth

6%, you've got to remember that's coming off of 26% from a year ago. So a significant slowdown there. Earnings per share, $1.17 versus $1.23 from a year ago. Worth noting, they took a $2.6 billion charge on workforce and office-based reductions. That helped guide operating expenses up for the quarter, 19%, which obviously played out on the bottom line. To your point on search, search grew modestly, held up in a difficult environment, but we saw YouTube revenue at $6.7 billion. It was actually down 2.5%. There are other bets, and this seems like a broken record here. Revenue, $288 million, operating loss of $1.2 billion. But really, the story, I think, for Alphabet this quarter was the cloud revenue, revenue up 28%, and they were able to record a $191 million

operating profit. I've been saying for a while, keep an eye on this because at some point that switch flips, and that becomes a nice tailman for this business, much like it is for Amazon today. Now, clearly, the disparity between Alphabet's cloud business and Amazon's is very significant, but this is a positive sign. What we'll want to look for next is just can they do it sustainably, right? Let's look for this to continue. I'm not necessarily sold that they will consistently do this quarter in quarter out yet, given current economic conditions, but I think they're on the right path. One thing that I think kind of flew under the radar with this report with so much of the focus

on cloud is adding to some of the enthusiasm for Alphabet Matt. The company authorized a $70 billion share repurchase program. I know you have some thoughts on that. I always have some thoughts on Alphabet's share buybacks. So, yes, it's a big number. Not so big relative to the company's market cap, though, about $1.3 trillion. But, look, Alphabet has spent $170 billion buying back shares over the last five years, including $50 billion, by the way, in 2021 when the stock price was much, much higher than today.

So that's roughly 13% of Alphabet's market cap. But how much is their share account come down over the last five years? About 7%. So the rest is really just offsetting Alphabet's stock option expense, which just continues to be obscenely generous, including, especially given today where we are with that stuff. So I really wish, and I've been saying this for, I think, at least two or three years now, is I wish Alphabet would pay a dividend. Stop assuming you can invest at high rates of return. Most companies can't for the long term.

I think they do much better if they just start paying a dividend. Facebook parent meta had good news across the board with its report this week. Revenue income and daily active users all came in ahead of expectations. Shares are up 13% on the report in large part because the company was able to post year-over-year revenue growth of 3% after three straight quarters of declines. Jason, aside from the growth story returning, what else jumped out to you? The year of efficiency, and that's what this is for them. They stated it, right? It's off to a good start, at least.

And I think this is a good response to what was a respectable quarter in a stock that really has been beaten down on a multiple basis, at least for a number of good reasons. But one of the problems, one of the tricks with meta here is trying to understand the focus. And the longer you stretch your timeline out with this business, the more point did those questions become because there's so much uncertainty in this whole metaverse concept, right? As you noted, the revenue growth, very encouraging, seeing them sort of break that streak and get back to growing the business. Costs and expenses grew 10%.

That included some restructuring costs, and they saw the bottom line with earnings per share of $2.20. That was down from a year ago, but beat expectations, which was encouraging. Add impressions delivered across the entire family of apps grew 26% from a year ago. average price per ad fell 17%. They did note some strong performance in online spend, particularly in China with targeting outside markets as things start to normalize a bit over there. So that was an encouraging sign. But really, the story with meta beyond this, it goes to reality labs. It's just this big question mark right now. It was talking earlier about

alphabet and that other bet segment, and that sounds bad. But then when you look at what they're doing in reality labs, I mean, this is the home to the metaverse ambitions. They brought in $339 million in revenue and booked an operating loss of $4 billion for the quarter. And the thing is, that looks like it's just poised to continue. And so as that goes on, I think these questions are just going to get more pointed. They're going to get more heated. Can you connect the dots for me and show me really how you're going to monetize this metaverse ambition?

Of course, they refer to AI and how this is driving everything. And they are right to a point. I mean, that's driving the ad business today. The metaverse is the big question. After the break, we've got more earnings coverage with updates from Chipotle, MasterCard, and more. Stay right here. This is Motley Full Money. Welcome back to Motley Full Money. Dylan Lewis sitting in for Chris Hill and here in studio with Jason Moser and Matt Argersinger.

The payment giants reported this week. Visa and MasterCard both released earnings results and both reported top and bottom line beats. MasterCard registered $5.8 billion in revenue and $2.4 billion on the bottom line, while Visa posted nearly $8 billion in revenue and net income of $4.3 billion. We lump these two companies together because they are helpful as a barometer of consumer spending. Before we get into some of the broader takeaways, Matt, what jumped out to you from the Visa report? Yeah, I mean, consumers continue to spend. I mean, that's, of course, the theme here.

I mean, payments volume was up 10%. But for Visa, the cross-border volume is really impressive. If you exclude intra-Europe transactions, cross-border volume was up 32%. And that tends to be pretty profitable for them. Total process transactions, 50.1 billion up 12%. And on the conference call, management mentioned travel spending, dining at quick-service restaurants. Those are strong. While spending at retail and fuel, we're kind of holding up but kind of flattish,

and we kind of expect that with people spending less on goods again, and maybe gas prices have come down. But clearly, consumers are spending and they're getting out there. Jason, what did you see inverton MasterCard results? Yeah, I mean, what stood out on the call, they said, I quote, consumer spend has remained remarkably resilient. I mean, you like to see that, right? We're talking about potential recession here, and apparently people are still spending money, and the numbers bear that out. Revenue grew 15%. Adjusted operating income was up 17%.

Earnings per share of $2.80 of 4%. Gross dollar volume, up 15%. One thing I found very impressive with MasterCard, their acceptance footprint has now surpassed 100 million locations globally. That's effectively doubled over the last five years. for all of this talk about MasterCard and Visa being disrupted from the process. Looks like it might have been a little hyperbole, Matt. Credit card companies aren't going anywhere, and neither is America's love for burritos. Chipotle up almost 15% since reporting top and bottom line beats in its first quarter results. Net income nearly doubled year over year to $290 million,

thanks to price increases and same store sales coming in at almost 11%. Both significantly higher than expectations. Matt, you dug into the results. What did you see? Well, there was no mention of AI on the conference wall, which I was happy to see. But, no, you hit it, Dylan. I mean, the same store sales up almost 11%. The restaurant level margins, I mean, wow, up almost 500 basis points to 25.6%. And that's because they had a number of menu price increases last year in last year's first quarter that are coming through. And there were lower prices for avocados in the

quarter, which always helps. But I think most impressively to me was that their labor costs year-over-year were lower. That's not something we're seeing from a lot of companies this quarter. So labor costs were down for Chipotle, not really because they're paying people less, just they're scaling across a larger store footprint. 33 million rewards members in the quarter of the open 41 new stores, bringing their total store count to 3,200 as the end of March, and CEO Brian Nicol sees a pathway to 7,000 restaurants in North American long run. That's far greater than I think anyone thought several years ago. And it's not going to get, it's not going to take them long to get there. They remain contract quote to grow new restaurants 8 to 10% per year for the foreseeable future.

Jason, I know you celebrated Chipotle earnings with a trip over to the store. What'd you see? Well, I tell you, what becomes very impressive is more and more, it's less about just worrying about throughput of the store, right? That was the big challenge for this concept early in its inception. You go in there now, and the lines are tolerable, but then you see where you go pick up your food if you order on the app. Not only are there just bag upon bags of food, But it's not just people picking up, but it's all of the delivery options as well. So it's good to see that they've separated those kitchens, right? They've got a customer-facing line.

They've got kind of an operation behind the scenes that's really taking care of a lot of those digital orders. And the digital orders continue to be a very strong side of this business. To Maddie's points, they're on operational efficiencies and labor costs. I wonder the future for a business like this, I mean, how's Chippy going to really help them save on the bottom line here, right? I mean, you know, they're automating their chip making. I mean, what else could they automate? And I think that's something we'll see play out a little bit more maybe in fast food proper. But with your fast casuals like Chipotle, they're incorporating certain levels of automation into their models,

which is definitely helping the cause. Jason Moser, Matt Argusinger, fellas. We'll see you in a little bit. But up next, we've got an insider's look at the cybersecurity industry. Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. I'm Dylan Lewis sitting in for Chris Hill. Jay Chaudry is the founder and CEO of Z-Scaler, a cloud cybersecurity company with a market cap of over $13 billion.

While shares of Z-Scaler have crushed the market over the last five years, the stock has been cut in half since last fall. Motley Fool's senior analyst, Tim Byers, caught up with Chaudry to talk about the concept of zero-trust security and cybersecurity threats that are flying. lying under the radar at the moment. Tim kicked off the conversation by asking about Z-scaler's growing opportunity in government contracts. There's a couple of key products for Z-scaler, Z-scaler Internet access, Z-scaler private access, and then you have a number of products built around those, and the ecosystem has been

expanding a bit. But there's also some additional features that are coming into both of those. One that I think is pretty important is FedRamp access or FedRamp certification for Z-Scalar private access. And that is pretty fascinating to me, Jay, because that's the idea of a cloud-based security product getting into the federal government for securing sensitive information. Presumably, I mean, this does feel like a pretty big deal. What can you say about this and what you've achieved there? When it comes to Z-Skiller product portfolio, the dream from day one was to build a platform because when I talked to lots of CSOs, they were tired of appoint products.

They said, I've got appliance fatigue, appliance overload. And since I had started with a clean slate, I could reimagine security, I could reimagine network. You can do that if you don't have legacy boxes and legacy technology to worry about. It was natural for us to expand our business into federal government. So about four, five years ago, we started to go after some of these certifications, FedRAM certification, was one of the most important one. And it took us a while, I can tell you, it was a bit frustrating and tiring,

but it was good because once the certification got done, it opened the market for us in a federal market. And rightfully, FedRAM requires to make sure security is tight, it's well done, it's make sure, for example, The code gets checked in with verification by a second person. No single engineer can check in code because otherwise you could have situation like solar vents where some bad code got embedded. So we have gotten the highest level of FedRamp certifications. FedRamp has many levels. At the highest level, the only five vendors in the entire IT space.

It is vendors like AWS, it's Microsoft, it's IBM. it's Z-scaler and I'm missing a name or so. Now, what this does for us is a lot, two things. One, when federal employees need to access internet or SaaS applications, they go through us. They used to be their own gateway called TIC, which is centralized sitting at one place or two places, traffic coming back to a choke point, going out, user experience gets bad, cyber can't be updated as quickly as it can be done in the cloud. The second part, which you alluded to, which gets even more exciting, is Z-Scuiler for private access. This is private-ax application sitting in either government-sanctioned data centers or it is

sitting in a public cloud and the like. And we act like a switchboard and exchange that connect a user to an application, not to the network, which is a fundamental difference between us and firewall and VPN-based companies. Today, we have 12 of the 15 cabinet-level agencies as our customers. They all started small. There's a significant opportunity for us to go to the next level. When it comes to public sector, including state, local, and education, we have over 700 organizations who are our customers.

To me personally, while it sells a good business, business for Z-Secure. It's more than business. In today's cyber world, we all worry about national security. We worry about securing our infrastructure, securing the transportation, our gas centric companies alike. So we're doing a lot of that. I'm so glad that Biden administration has taken so much focus to make sure organizations really take care of implementing zero trust, and we are playing a big role in that area. Let's follow up on that quickly because just to remind folks, so Z-Scaler is a widely followed company at the Motley Fool, and your specialty is zero-trust architecture. The idea that if you are going to operate inside a network, inside a cloud-based network, everywhere you go in that network, you must be continually verified.

We don't trust you just when you get in the door one time. We are continually verifying that you are who you say you are. You have the credentials to be here, which does feel very important for something like a government network where you're dealing with very sensitive data. I wonder, Jay, this idea of zero trust, which you've been advocating for years, and I understand that I have listened to your conference calls and heard you bang the drum for this, I wonder if this idea, of zero trust and now sort of finding your way into these big cabinet agencies, does that to you reflect maturity of the cloud, maturity of zero trust? What do you think this signifies? Or is it just, frankly, what you've been able to achieve a Z-scaler? So it's a big change. You know, technology incrementally changes all the time. But every 20 to 30,

years, there's a disruptive change that takes us to the next level. The network and network security we do today was invented 30 years ago. It's the same firewall technology. It's the same VPN technology. Yes, there's some incremental changes to it. But the zero trust approach, we pioneered when I start the company, basically said, we don't put people on the network. We don't do network security. Network should be simply plumbing and transport. You really need to secure data. And data is sitting either with applications or sitting with users.

And we'll make sure the right user talks to the right application. Right workload talk to right workload. You rightfully said in this architecture, we are constantly verifying and checking. It starts with zero trust, trust no one. But zero trust is a misnomer. It's kind of trust no one, trust someone with the minimal trust you need to grant them to do a specific application. So not being on the network means this. If I come to see you at your headquarters, they're going to stop me at the reception and say, stop, who are you?

Show me your ID and I'll give you a badge. That's authentication, the starting point. And then the old world, they'll say, take this badge, go to 7th, floor, meeting room 23. Then I come in. I can be wandering around the hallways, go to any room that's open. That's what can happen in today's world of VPNs and firewalls. You're on the network. Then you try to do segments here, segment here. It's a mess. In our architecture, once they give me a badge after checking me idea at the reception, they say, stop. You will be escorted to your meeting room and meeting room only, you can't go anywhere. So I get escort to the

meeting room. They only allow me to go there. They're very fine to make sure I'm not trying to get anywhere else. And once a meeting is done, they escort me out. That's like connecting a use to application. I personally believe that the whole world is moving in this direction. The legacy architecture will fundamentally change. Now, unfortunately, there are forces that are trying to hold it back. Who would that be? The vendor who's getting disrupted. So these firewall and VPN companies are claiming we got zero trust too, which kind of is doing a disservice. But what's helping us is the CSA organization that Biden administration put in place. It is an agency whose focus is to make sure security gets done, zero trust gets implemented properly. And it's really helping us. We got

to do this to protect our country organizations. Otherwise, you see so many attacks on all these healthcare organizations, banks, and whatnot, are customers far more safer than people who aren't using Z-scater. Last question for you. So before I let you go here, what security threats are we not talking about that we should be talking about? Because you've talked about platform. You've talked about zero trust. I am certain because I've been around this block a few times that there are new and creative attacks constantly. So what are we not talking about that is a threat we should be paying attention to? Team mates are raised with bad guys. They keep on innovating. We need to innovate. In fact, I think the biggest risk is inertia. Some of these are large company. They're slow in

embracing new technologies. So they need to. do that. We're seeing faster adoption of that. But from Threat's point of view, we all have seen ransomware and fishing type of stuff happening over and over. I think the next big area for us to worry about is some of the email-based stuff, chat GPD kind of stuff. Imagine what all can be submitted to chat GPT. In fact, a number of customers I talked to recently with the coverage of chat GPD, the developers are submitting source code and saying, tell me how good is my source code. They don't think that source code not belongs to chat GPD. It's out there somewhere. So we had to develop a feature pretty quickly to identify

something being submitted to chat GPD. And it's not just one. There's so many versions of it out there to protect the IP and all that kind of stuff. Chat GPD can become a tool by bad guys to find information that could have been much harder to find. So we are working in many of those areas. But Chad CheapT is also helping us to identify things and build better protection. So it's a new big area that all of us need to leverage in a proper way. Coming up after the break, Jason Moser and Matt Argusinger return with a couple of stocks on their radar. Stay right there.

You're listening to Motley Full Money. As always, people on the program may have interests in the stocks they talk about, and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. I'm Dylan Lewis, joined again by Matt Argersinger and Jason Moser. Matt, when we were talking credit card companies before, we hit on this theme of softness in the goods category, seeing a lot of that spending going elsewhere. It seems like that's flowing through to the results that we're seeing this week from UPS. That's right. UPS came out with results. I kind of got lost in the shuffle with all the big tech noise and things like that.

But this told, I think, a bigger story about what's happening in the economy. Revenues for UPS were down 6%. Steep drop in operating profit. But it's a volume story. Their average daily volume in the U.S. was down 5.4%. It was down 6% internationally. And on the conference call, CEO Carol Tom, noted that volumes were as expected in January and February, but we're significantly lower than our plan in March, quote.

And UPS blamed a shift in consumer spending. Customers are spending less on discretionary items and more on grocery and consumable items. And the company side kind of an overall shift, as you mentioned, down away from goods to services, something that really doesn't help UPS. And this meshes with a first quarter report from Packaging Corp of America, another company I follow. It's one of the largest corrugated packaging producers. Their shipment volumes were down 12.7% in the quarter as well.

So this is a shift away from goods to services. And so that's why I wasn't surprised when Amazon reported kind of really flat growth in their core online stores business. People are just ordering less online and spending more out there beyond the home. So putting this together with what we're seeing from the credit cards seems to me like bullish to be spending on travel, and we should probably see some decent results from travel companies. We're seeing some service spending. But is there anything else that really jumped out to you trying to put these two together and kind of find some narratives around what's going on? Well, I think if you want to make a call on what, gosh, we've been predicting recession.

forever, as Jason mentioned. I mean, it's just, I think you can make a case now that we probably are in a recession in the good space. And how long can this service aside the economy, which is the bigger part of consumer spending, how long can that sustain? That is the big question. If that falls off, then I feel like we're finally in that recession that we've been predicting for years. The NFL draft began Thursday with the first round, and because everything in sports is a spectacle, will continue into the weekend. All told, over 200 college players will join the rank of professionals, many of whom will be seeing a million-dollar or six-figure checks for the first time in their lives.

Jason, any advice for folks that are now joining the workforce as professional football players? Very easy to forget when you see those big numbers, but just remember, the tax man is going to get his shares. Whatever that number is, cut it in half and put that money aside so that you can make sure to cover that tax obligation. Maybe it doesn't require all half. whatever you have left over, you can just put into a savings account for a rainy day. Let's get to the stocks on our radar.

Our man behind the glass, Dan Boyd, is going to hit you with a question. Matt, you are up first. What are you looking at this week? Well, we talked about this company earlier in the show. Activision Blizzard, ticker ATVI. So, of course, we know the UK has rejected the acquisition by Microsoft. That caused shares to drop sharply this week. I think as an investor, and I'm a holder of shares of Activision Blizzard,

You've got to start looking at the company now independently again. And if you look at Activision's first quarter results, which came out right away this week after they learned that the transaction was going to get blocked, first quarter bookings up 25%. Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 launched last October, still paying dividends this quarter. Blizzard revenue, which is more of their online subscription business, up 62%. They had monthly active users of 368 million. Diablo, which our man behind the glass, Dan Boyd knows and plays well.

one of the most massively popular games. The fourth version of that game is coming out in June. So the growth there is tremendous, and I think as an investor, you have to look at it this way. The transaction might still go through, and therefore you've got a $95 stock, probably in the next year. If it doesn't go through, you still have a business that's growing really well and is going to get a $3 billion breakup fee if this deal doesn't happen. And if you believe Bobby Kodick, CEO Bobby Kodick, who spoke on CNBC this week, That means by the end of this year, Activision Blizzard could have $18 billion in cash on its balance sheet. 15 billion, if you net out the debt, that's about 25% of its market cap.

Probably will resume the dividend. I think as an investor, you can win either way by owning shares today. Dan Boyd, our man behind the glass, and noted Diablo player. Any questions about Activision? Yeah, Maddie, why does the UK get to, you know, jump in here and say you can't merge? Can't Microsoft and Activision just tell them to go kick rocks? I would think so, Dan, but the way the regulatory system is set up, and because they do so much business in the UK, the CMA there in the UK does have a say over this transaction.

So, yeah, they're the blocker right here. Jason Moser, what's on your radar? Yep, big drop on Friday for Cloudflare, ticker N-E-T. You know, we say it often when a company revises guidance downward, the price is almost sure to adjust based on those new expectations. With a business like Cloudflare, that's still in full-on investment mode, it's going to be even more pronounced. and that's what we're seeing, unfortunately. On the one hand, the results for the quarter met or exceeded targets management set out a quarter ago.

That was encouraging. However, the market, as we know, is a forward-looking mechanism. And clearly, there are some clouds on the horizon. They guided down for the year about 4% on the top line. That's still going to grow about 31.5% from last year, based on what they're saying today. But I think it's fair to say that right now the market just doesn't fully trust that, given language in the release, like increasing macroeconomic uncertainty in lengthening of sales cycles. And we also see Dubner, right, that dollar-based net expansion rate that's down 5% for the quarter to

117%. I think with this company, and I'm a shareholder, by the way, it's fair to say this leadership team is aggressive. I think that's probably putting it lightly. I think they lack a certain level of humility. Maybe this opens their eyes a bit. But the market right now is saying, I don't believe you. prove it, right? It's saying, show me, with this new guidance, and I think that's more than fair.

Dan, a question about Cloudflare. Am I allowed to combine the word cloud with literally any other word and start my own tech company? There's no question. There's no question on. We give you a $1 billion market cap just for coming up with that idea right there. Especially if you throw an AI somewhere there, Dan, you've got a home run. I was just thinking starting a company called Cloud AI and then just, I guess, printing money? You throw Diablo in there, Big Bo. Oh. Then you're honest.

Now we're talking. You got a stew. One question I do have, Jason, on cloud business and Cloudflare, is this what we're seeing a little bit with bigger getting big and smaller players suffering a little bit? Well, there's no question. We're seeing the bigger companies that are able to deal with a little bit of that pullback in cloud spending. We saw the Amazon, Microsoft, and N-Alphabet, all to an extent, right?

They're portending headwinds in that cloud space. And again, going to that language in Cloudflare's release there, talking about the increasing macroeconomic uncertainty and lengthening of sales cycles, it's just going to be a little while longer. All right, Dan, which one is going on your watch list? You know what? I think I'm going to go with Diablo and Activision Blizzard. Maddie, you convinced me. There we go, Dan. Matt Argusinger, Jason Moser.

Thanks so much for being with us today. Thanks, Dylan. That's going to do it for this week's Motleyful Money Radio Show. The show is mixed by Dan Boyd. I'm Dylan Lewis. Thanks for listening. We'll see you next time.