Motley Fool Money - Big Tech Is Fun Again & The Fed Speaks

Episode Date: September 19, 2025

Meta introduced a new pair of AI-powered glasses, Google announced a partnership with PayPal and AI updates to Chrome, and the Federal Reserve cut interest rates, but is concerned about both the economy and inflation. Travis Hoium, Lou Whiteman, and Jason Moser discuss: - The Fed’s rate cut - NVIDIA invests in Intel - Meta can’t quit the metaverse - Rule Breaker investing - Google’s AI muscle Companies discussed: NVIDIA (NVDA), Intel (INTC), Meta Platforms (META), Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL), Tesla (TSLA), Axon (AXON). Host: Travis Hoium Guests: Lou Whiteman, Jason Moser Engineer: Dan Boyd Disclosure: Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. The Motley Fool and its affiliates (collectively, “TMF”) do not endorse, recommend, or verify the accuracy or completeness of the statements made within advertisements. TMF is not involved in the offer, sale, or solicitation of any securities advertised herein and makes no representations regarding the suitability, or risks associated with any investment opportunity presented. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with legal, tax, and financial advisors before making any investment decisions. TMF assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages arising from this advertisement. We’re committed to transparency: All personal opinions in advertisements from Fools are their own. The product advertised in this episode was loaned to TMF and was returned after a test period or the product advertised in this episode was purchased by TMF. Advertiser has paid for the sponsorship of this episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Will Nvidia be Intel's savior? Motley pool money starts now. That's why they call it money. The best thing. Cool global headquarters. This is Motley Fool Money. Welcome to Motley Fool Money. I'm Travis Hoyam, joined this week by Lou Whiteman and Jason Moser.

We have a lot to cover today from changes to Chrome, Meta's new AI glasses. But we have to start with the elephant in the room. And that is the Federal Reserve. We got our rate cut, guys. The Fed cut rates. the Fed funds rate, which is a short-term interest rate by 25 basis points, which is a quarter of a percentage point. The commentary was interesting because basically they said that there was two bad options. You either let inflation run by cutting rates, but you also have a worsening economy,

which isn't good for investors long term. It's not good for employment, things like that. So this is getting obviously a lot of attention, but Lou, is this a big deal for investors or Is this just the noise that normally happens in the market? It is a big deal for investors. I mean, we should know, too, that stocks were, what, near all-time highs or celebrated the news. I worry about that part of it, because, Travis, to your point, what's going on here is the Fed is sort of sounded the alarm. I don't want to overstate. I don't want to be Chicken Little here.

I don't think we are, like, headed towards 2008 all over again. But the bottom line here is that we had a very, very complicated economic situation with tariffs. We were expecting a slowdown last year. It never came. All of this going on. And the Fed is sort of confirming, yes, there's a lot going on here, and it's only getting more complicated. I hope that works out well for us.

Again, I don't think we are just doomed to just the plane is going to crash from here. But I also don't know if it's a reason for celebration. Yeah, I think, I mean, that's basically right, I would say. I mean, we most, I think most of us expected that, that 25-point basis cut. I think the bigger headline maybe was the commitment to two additional cuts for the rest of the year. I mean, they only have two meetings left to begin with. So it sounded like they're already sort of saying, listen, you can expect more and getting out there and explicitly stating that. To be clear, what is that commitment? Because they don't, they don't explicitly say we're going to cut it to cut raise two more times. But they kind of

give this hand wavy indication with the dot. Yeah, and you see the dot, exactly, the dot plot thing, which basically kind of gives you, that's that anonymous sort of graph that shows you where all of the Fed governors stand on the matter. And I mean, there were some discrepancy there. I know some we're thinking maybe a 50 basis point cut made more sense. I mean, to me, I think, I always kind of think, Sloan's stating wins the race here. There's no reason to overreact, but it has gone from this battling inflation narrative, which inflation is still higher than the target, but it's somewhat in check to now battling unemployment. And I think that's really noteworthy given the recent downward jobs number revisions, right? I mean, that was a big revision at 900 plus

thousand jobs. We're basically wiped off the books there. So it's gone from this sort of battling inflation narrative to now we're potentially going to need to battle unemployment. And like you both noted, I mean, it's showing signs of a weaker economy. So either way, I mean, these are just tools that the Fed can use to try to combat those things. It doesn't necessarily mean it's going to work. But, I mean, I think it's fair to say that we probably will see them continue in this cutting mindset for some time. Because it sounded like they wanted to get that down to about a 3% target, which right now I think it stands at 4 to 4.25. Now, guys, when the Fed cuts rates, the entire idea here is to make it easier for people to buy vehicles, to buy houses, for businesses to borrow money.

That's the idea of lowering rates because when you lower them makes that cost of capital a little bit lower. The interesting thing was the reaction from the market because the Fed sets the short-term rate, that Fed funds rate, but they do not set the 10-year, the 20-year, the 30-year. And the 10 years, kind of the benchmark that things like mortgages are set on. That was actually up about a tenth of a percentage point this week. Lou is, I mean, what do we make of that? Because I think the story that the market has been talking about for six months is we got to cut rates and that's going to help the cost of capital is going to help business. But then if the long term rates go up, that's exactly what you don't want.

Yeah, so two big picture thoughts here. For one, I think the market isn't questioning the Fed, but I believe that we went through a period where there's almost the cult of the Fed, that the Fed can just, the Masters of the Universe, that can just cure all ills. And this is a relatively new phenomenon. If you go back to the 70s, the Fed was being made fun of as the Fed can't do anything. So this idea that the Fed can just solve all of our problems is relatively, you know, a new phenomenon.

And I think it's beginning to break because the truth is, you know, Jason mentioned it, the Fed doesn't really have a lot of control. they have a couple of blunt instruments, and those instruments don't always work. They don't work immediately, and even when they work, they can work in odd ways. The other thing going on here, too, is just, look, the market is looking at a lot more than the Fed, all right? And these long-term rates, where's the U.S. debt going? Where is long-term inflation rates in tariffs and trying to insure and all of that? These are maybe not offset the Fed, but these are just, pulling in different directions than a near-term rate cut. So I think the market is acting rationally.

It speaks to the limits to the Fed and also sort of this may be the idea that maybe, there's still in the markets. There seems to be an impression that if the Fed acts, everything will be fine. I think that explains why we rallied after it. But I don't know if the bond markets really subscribe to that. Yeah, the Fed is not the economy. I mean, I think you put that very well. whether it's, we've seen this going from one extreme to the other where it used to be seen that they couldn't really do much. And now this perspective that, oh, well, whatever the Fed says, that's going to change everything. I mean, this isn't the Wizard of Oz here, right? So, I mean, it wasn't terribly surprising one way or the other in regard to longer term rates.

To your point, Travis, I do think, I mean, the Fed cutting rates can have an impact on consumers in the near term, absolutely. It's going to be very modest, but it absolutely can. Now, when you start talking about things like mortgage rates, yep, I mean, you're right. They're pegged towards longer-term instruments. So it doesn't necessarily mean mortgage rates are going to come down. I did think it was interesting to see mortgage activity did pick up a little bit last week. We saw applications to refinance home loans. That was up 58% versus the previous week. It was 70% higher than the same week a year ago. And the refinance share of mortgage activity increased to almost 60% of total applications versus just under 50% from the previous week as well. So there is some activity picking

up, but purchasers clearly are still on the sidelines. And I think that's going to be something that's going to need to pick back up to really kind of boost the housing market, right? And that, in turn, can stoke some growth and maybe take advantage of this lowering interest rate environment. But keep an eye on companies. The one I'm watching, Rocket Companies, a company recommended recently, in one of our services. I mean, that's their game, right? Mortgages. And they've got this Mr. Cooper acquisition closing at the end of the year, which is essentially going to make Rocket the largest mortgage servicing company in the world. And that is very attractive from a financial standpoint, a lot of sticky recurring high margin revenue there. Mortgages are going to be something to watch,

but that is a little bit of a longer game. The ebbs and flows are years and decades. The one to maybe look at for more short term is going to be, what does the auto business look like? Yeah. In the third quarter, and then also what do they think for the fourth quarter and eventually we'll get guidance for 2026? Things have been pretty good, especially selling big trucks and SUVs. As those interest rates, you know, kind of eat up a little bit more of your costs. Maybe that doesn't continue. But we will see as earning season rolls along. I did want to touch on Nvidia and Intel. This was really the big story, kind of the middle of the week.

Nvidia agreed to invest $5 billion in Intel. This is after the U.S. government basically converted some grants and stuff like that to equity. I don't know if that deal has actually closed, but this agreement really pulls together. The power player in the semiconductor space right now, Nvidia, gives Intel maybe a little bit of a lifeline. Lou, is this something that is actually going to help save Intel, or is this? $5 billion is a lot of money to me. And you know, maybe not a lot of money if you're building a foundry. Travis, it would really help with my.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Five billion would make a dent with me. And look, shout out, Jensen Hong really does have the Midas touch, right? You know, he's already up 25% on that investment based on that. So, well done. I think it does. And each thing to me, when I first saw this, I assumed it was just Foundry, right? It was just going to be video with source chips, you know, just have Intel built.

Right, because Intel needs buyers for their foundry. They basically said, we're not going to build out this next generation if we don't actually have customers, which they currently don't. It's sort of a chicken and egg situation they're in right now. Right, but this doesn't involve Foundry. It involves just kind of working together to integrate Intel processors with NVIDIA's AI chips and their graphics chips to kind of create a more streamlined solution. I think Intel is a winner here, but gosh, I feel for AMD because AMD has to compete with

both of these guys. I mean, I don't think they're cooked now, but having your two biggest rivals working together. It feels like you're ganging up on AMD. I think this is a definitely a positive step for Intel. I don't know if it saves them, but it's $5 billion and a powerful partner. There's a lot to like there. It's definitely a bigger win for Intel, I'd say. I think that we would all agree there than Nvidia.

I mean, you just look at how the companies have performed over the last five years alone. You've got Intel revenue, actually down 7.5% on an annualized basis, while Nvidia is up a whopping 66%. So we kind of know what the market is telling us there. And this deal focusing on specifically PCs and data centers, I think that is encouraging, just given what we know about the growth in data centers and really how dark good Nvidia is at this stuff. But, I mean, listen, Nvidia still has a clear incentive here, too. That $5 billion investment comes at a price of $23.38 cents per share.

You base that on the closing price of Intel today, it's around $30. It's a nice little discount, and it could work out well if the partnership flourishes. Now, it's not necessarily NVIDIA's job to save Intel, but they do have an interest in having a second source. You know, Lou talked about this doesn't necessarily include the foundry, but I've seen reporting that it could include the foundry in the future, but they're going to need more than $5 billion to actually get that foundry business

up to competing with TSM. Now, this isn't my idea, but one of the things that I've seen floated is, now that the government's involved, now that Nvidia is involved, Why don't we just get $100 billion or so from some of the big tech companies, Nvidia, Google, Apple, Amazon? That's kind of pocket change for them and build this, you know, domestic U.S. supplier and second source that should be kind of a win for everybody. There is actually precedent here.

You know, ASML was saved by the industry. You have ARM was effectively saved and funded by the industry. So this has happened before, but we're talking about a lot of money. Lou, is this something that could potentially be in the works? It could. I mean, now note that from a video's perspective, Jensen Wong said that I believe the quote was, Taiwan Semi makes magic. So we don't just need money.

We need the magic of that. He's sounded pretty skeptical of just recreating Taiwan Semi at Intel. But look, it makes sense. If you want a national champion, let's go all in, huh? Next up, we are going to find out if Lou is going to be buying Meta's new Rayban glasses. You're listening to. for money. The old adage goes, it isn't what you say, it's how you say it, because to truly make an

impact, you need to set an example and take the lead. You have to adapt to whatever comes your way. When you're that driven, you drive an equally determined vehicle, the Range Rover Sport. The Range Rover Sport blends power, poise, and performance. Its design is distinctly British and free from unnecessary details, allowing its raw agility to shine through. It combines a dynamic sporting personality with elegance to deliver a truly instinctive drive. Inside, you'll find true modern luxury with the latest innovations in comfort. Use the cabin air purification system alongside active noise cancellation for all new levels of quality and quiet. Whether you prefer a choice of powerful engines or the plug-in hybrid with an estimated range of 53 miles, there's an option for you.

With seven terrain modes to choose from, terrain response two fine-tuned your vehicle for the roads ahead. The Range Rover event is on now. Explore enhance offers at Range. drover.com. Welcome back to Motley Full Money when Mark Zuckerberg has an idea, he really sticks to it despite burning $50 billion plus on the Metaverse and VR. He is pushing forward with AR glasses. You've got to give him some respect here for really sticking with it. They announced the meta-rayband display glasses. This is going to bring artificial intelligence tools basically to your eyes. You can kind of talk to these glasses. It's got a camera on it so you can you can ask questions about the real world.

Silent interactions like responding to WhatsApp messages. If we're not distracted enough driving, maybe we'll be distracted while walking now, too. Jason, what was your reaction to this? I had to respect them pushing forward, but is this ultimately a product that's going to matter for meta as a company? I do respect them sticking with it. I also agree with you. It does seem like they would be a bit distracting.

I mean, having been a part of our. immersive technology service here for some time. I mean, I continue to root for the technology, but it's still nascent in its development. And you've got form factor, the technology. They're coming along, but they're still not fully there yet. But I do see a lot of promise. And they're not the only ones in the market, too, right? We've got Alphabet now with a partnership with Warby Parker. Meta, of course, we're talking about Snap, speaking of sticking with it. They're on their sixth generation, ultimately to no real event. there. So that's a little concerning. And then to top it off, Amazon now is also vying

for share in this market, working on both consumer glasses that are operating under the code named Jayhawk. And then they're also actually working on delivery driver-specific classes to aid delivery drivers with things like maps and directions. That could be interesting. Yeah, I mean, that's a good use case, right? There are language translation. I think it's another great use case for things like these. So I think a lot of it is really just finding those killer apps, why we need these devices. And I think it's happening slowly, but surely. There are things that these devices can do very well, I think, in time. So, I mean, listen, I understand

why Metis's trying, and they're kind of leading the way here at this point. Lou, you're an early adopter with a lot of this technology. $800. Where are you on the waiting list here? So here's the thing. I think I'm much more of a normal. And I'm trying to think as a normal, a normie. I'm skeptical here. Because guys, here's the thing, Travis, everything you've talked about was cool, but they're all things I can do with my phone. And I'm already spending 800 bucks from my phone. I don't know if I, if normies like me are going to spend another 800 bucks to replicate, even if the form factor is cooler. I think you need to have a killer app that differentiates from the phone. And I'm not sure if I've, I've seen that yet. I don't want to be

totally dismissive. I think it's a neat idea. But look, even on the directions, if I'm driving and I'm using my directions, it better somehow shut off all the other apps so I can't be watching a YouTube video while I'm driving. There's just a lot of real world practicality out of the This is Cool that I'm skeptical. And look, I hate to say this, but with all due respect to Mark Zuckerberg, since Facebook, what has he come up with that people actually want to use? It's a fair observation. And I mean, to your point, yeah, I don't know that this is necessarily the new computing paradigm. Now, on the flip side of that, Meta's chief products officer, Chris Cox, is stating very firm. They believe that smart glasses are the future computing platform.

I am skeptical of that. I am truly skeptical of it. I don't think that's, everybody's got a smartphone these days. I don't think the market opportunity is as large as the smartphone. Maybe I'll be proven wrong in time, but I mean, I look to the younger generation of consumers today to see, is that something they want or need? I look at my kids, their friends. I mean, they're not interested in this stuff either. So if this is something that's going to happen,

it's going to be a generational play, which means it's obviously going to take a while. Here's the question I have for both of you. Can it be a hit if it's a just want and not need? It's kind of like the watch market. You know, I mean, the watches are a compliment to our phone. They haven't replaced our phones. We're not Dick Tracy and everywhere, you know, talking to it. It's still kind of a hit, right? But I mean, so I don't know, maybe I'm setting the bar wrong. The challenge is at this level of spending, they've got to cover that operating costs with revenue and gross margin and profit. And I think that's really the challenge. People, it's hard to understand how successful the iPhone is because they have such incredible scale making a piece of hardware.

And this is what I quickly, I want to just touch on. Mark Zuckerberg has been talking about wanting to have a platform business. This is why part of the reason he named the company Meta Platform. even though none of the businesses are really platforms, they're more applications. So, you know, Lou, is this him sort of sticking with this because he needs this kind of product just kind of because that's what he wants to be. He wants to be Microsoft. He wants to be Alphabet or he wants to be Apple, but that's not actually what Meta's business is

and that could make them throw good money after bad. I think you said it well. I mean, you said at the top, he sticks with something. Like, there are better ecosystems out there, period. I mean, what meta is, meta is an amazing ad revenue generation machine, and I will not take that from them. But I see nothing to suggest there are anything other than that. Yeah, glass is notwithstanding. How much do you pay meta on a daily, monthly, or yearly basis? My guess is we're all going to answer zero, right?

I mean, it's an ad business. Exactly. It's an ad business. And yet, making up the investments that they made into this hardware is going to be a high hurdle. Yeah. And the other competitor in this space that we should acknowledge. is Alphabet. They do have a platform in Android. That's what they sort of seem to be leaning on in moving into things like glasses and other wearables, even robotics. They have AI tools. So be interesting to see where Meta stands next. When we come back, we're going to talk about

rule breaker investing. You're listening to Motley Pullman. These days, I'm all about quality over quantity, especially in my closet. If it's not well-made and versatile, it's just not worth it. That's honestly what I love Quince. The fabrics feel elevated, the cuts are thoughtful, and the pricing actually makes sense. Quince makes high-quality wardrobe staples using premium fabrics like 100% European linen, silk and organic cotton poplin. They work directly with safe ethical factories and cut out the middlemen so you aren't paying for brand markups or fancy stores, just quality clothing. Everything they make is built to hold up season after season and is consistently rated 4.5 to 5 stars by thousands of real people like me who wear their clothes every day.

The Quince, Mongolian Kashmir Kru Neck sweater may be the most comfortable one that I own. It's light, soft, and it was a lot more affordable than you think quality cashmere would be. Stop waiting to build the wardrobe you actually want. Right now, go to quince.com slash Motley for free shipping and 365-day returns. That's a full year to wear it and love it, and you will. Now available in Canada, too. Don't keep settling for clothes that don't last. Go to Q-I-N-C-E.com slash Motley for free shipping and 365-day returns.

Quince.com slash Motley. Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. This week, Motley Fool co-founder, David Gardner, released his newest book, Rule Breaker Investing. So I thought there was a good opportunity to talk about some of the lessons that we've learned through Rule Breakers' service from David. And I think one of the things is I look back. I've got 15 years now writing for The Motley Fool.

I remember early on looking at the Rule Breaker's Service, and you could see these huge outliers. But if you took those out, I remember downloading every single one of the stocks and all the returns. And I took out, I think it was Price Line, Disney, and it was actually Marvel that was the stock pick. And then Netflix. Those were the big outliers. But if you took those out, you know, the performance was kind of, eh, it was market average. And I thought, you know what? They just got lucky, right?

You picked a couple of good stocks. You just got lucky. Since then, since I did that exercise, Rule Breakers has picked Tesla, which is actually the best performing stock in the entire portfolio, and just continues to have these massive, massive winners. And, you know, as we think about Rule Breaker investing, and I was going through the book, listening to the book on Spotify, another favorite

Motley Fool stock. I just think this thinking about investing as you have only so much you could possibly lose on a stock, but the upside is so enormous. And I think that's the one thing that I have taken away from listening to David, reading David, everything that the Motley Fool does is those winners are the point. That is the point. the Netflix's, the Teslas, you know, the Marvel becoming Disney, those aren't getting lucky. That is the entire goal is to have the mindset to be able to find those stocks and then hang on to

them for decades. I think he said at the beginning of the book, David now has seven, 100 beggars. That is just a crazy number. So Jason, as you think about, you know, I think we started with the Molly Four. at about the same time, what are the lessons you think about rule breaker investing that have really changed the way that you think about investing in the market? Yeah, you made a lot of good points there. I mean, rule breaker investing is a unique approach.

And it kind of have to take the good with the bad, right? I mean, they're not all going to be home runs, but a lot of them will be. And you want to get to that 100-bagger, well, you got to get to a two-bagger and a three-bagger and a four-bagger first, right? It is, the value comes in the holding of those, of those, tremendous companies. And that's the hardest part, it seems like. You see 100% gain and you go, man, I did it. I think it's human nature to say that. And I think that the longer that you invest and the more that you hang on to those winning companies, the easier it gets, right? I mean, I can look

back and say, well, I'm sure glad I've held on Amazon since 2010 because that's worked out pretty well. I mean, so I've had the good fortune to work with David off and on since getting here. as part of the Stock Advisor team and I enjoyed meeting with him and going through his process and learning sort of about how he approaches investing and views the world. He's just a tremendously optimistic guy. And you just can't help but leave a room, leave a meeting with him just feeling inspired and optimistic. And that really is part of rule breaker investing as well, is being optimistic about the future. I think that one of the lessons, one of the lessons that's always stood out to me, I've said this, I think, since pretty much I've been here.

I mean, I've learned so much about investing from everybody with whom I work. But for me, I mean, David Gardner is the individual who's had the most profound impact on me as an investor because he taught me how to look at things differently, right, beyond sort of the conventional thinking. And one of those lessons that I continue to really appreciate is that concept of adding to your winners, right? I mean, looking at these companies that are performing well in your portfolio and saying, all right, well, why are the companies, why is that stock performing well? Well, chances are, it's because the business is performing well. And isn't that kind of the goal to own good businesses for as long as we possibly can?

So there was sort of this value bent, I think, on the investing team when I first got here that was always looking for stuff on sale. I just think it's really important for investors to realize that adding to your work, winners can be a very powerful strategy, particularly over long periods of time. And that's something I took away from working with David. So much good stuff here. I echo everything you say. I'm the relative newbie here. I think I only got here 2016.

And I came from very different places that don't follow all of these philosophies. The thing that's always struck me about Motley Fool, and I think this is the founder's DNA running through it, is just this mindset, for lack of a better, to form a long-term relationship with a company instead of it just being transactional. The old expression, you know, make your investing the vision of the future you want. And kind of just to climb on board, all these things we're talking about with like long-term adding to it, but just to not think of a stock as, oh, this can run this week or, oh, this is going to be under near-term pressure, but to actually kind of say to become a part owner, to be part of a business and to just make that business,

you know, part of just kind of who you are and to run with it, just that mentality. And I do think that that helps you find winners because, you know, when you're thinking in those terms, you are actually sort of judging something. It's not just, oh, I think I can get momentum here for a week. It's, oh, I looked at what they're doing. I looked at management. And I, I'm a lined here, I think that actually is almost a cheat code to finding good businesses because you're actually taking the time to get to know them, to learn them, if that makes sense. It seems like those intangibles, too, are something that a lot of times with these companies, if you look back on Tesla in 2011, very different from the company that we know today.

They had the roadster. They were not into robotics. They were not into artificial intelligence. Axon in 2015. That was a taser. It was that even called Axon. It was called Tazer International. And that was their biggest business. They were kind of getting into body cameras, but they were not a cloud business. They were not a services business, a subscription business that they are today.

You know, even a stock like Netflix, which is well known in the Motley Fool universe, when that stock was first recommended, they were mailing DVDs all over the place. It was not a streaming company. So there's something too about buying a culture, buying a lot of these are founder stories and sort of understanding that there is uncertainty and that's the point and that's the upside. You don't get that upside by having all the answers.

I like that. If I know the next story, the next product that's coming, then it's already priced in. There just seems to be something too that, that you are investing in the unknown if you're going to hold Nvidia for 20 years. That wasn't bought because it was an AI story. Not at all.

No, I think that's it. We as investors always have to recognize there's so much that we don't know. And that is a superpower if you can embrace it. I mean, another example, Amazon, 2010. We weren't talking about that as a cloud service company, right? We were talking about it as this massively unprofitable e-commerce business that was just on on borrowed time because it wasn't making any money at the time. But you said it, buying into a culture. I think if you can find those companies buying into a culture of innovation, it can be

very powerful. And then the other thing I think I always go back to is just not selling. Because if you own one of these great companies, you could have made the case. I have made the case that Tesla has been overvalued for years. I made the case. I'm sure you could go back to 2010, 2011 making the case that Amazon was overvalued. I do have that analytical mindset and engineering background that I think you were talking about, you know, both Jason and Lou, where the numbers, there should be in the numbers, but I think, you know, what David talks about so much is the story, right? He doesn't have an engineering background. He is an English background, because that is ultimately what we're all investing in. I think Morgan Housel has written,

about this too. You know, the stock price is the earnings today times a story about the future. And sometimes that story is a lot bigger than we really give it credit for. Absolutely. Well, when we get back, we're going to get back to stocks. We are going to talk about the latest from Google and Alphabet, maybe some big changes in their AI business. You're listening to. Motley Full Month. Some of the best lessons don't come from a classroom. They come from experience. On The Power of Advice, a new podcast series from Capital Group, you'll hear from CEOs, investors, and founders about how they built careers, took risks, and reinvented themselves. If you're starting your own journey, this is the kind of advice you won't want to miss.

Available wherever you get your podcast, published by Capital Client Group, Inc. Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about in the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against. So don't buy yourself stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Full editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. See our full advertising disclosure.

Please check out our show notes. The big story from the week in the world of artificial intelligence, last week we had this huge Oracle deal with Open AI. But Google has really starting to flex their AI muscles. And the big partnership, kind of early in the week, we've got to talk about Chrome a little bit. But Google and PayPal announced a deal for agentic shopping. So, Jason, what did we find out from those two companies? Yeah, this is an interesting relationship. It's going to ultimately allow the two companies together.

They're going to work on agentic commerce experiences. They're going to be embedding PayPal solutions across Google's platforms, expanded payment processing. This is something that were PayPal Enterprise payments will be a key provider to processing card payments across Google products like cloud ads and play. And then ultimately working with Google on cloud expansion. I think all of that together, I mean, this certainly isn't bad news. I mean, it could indeed have a material impact on the dollars flowing through PayPal's networks,

as well as maybe boosting its user base in the process, and those are very good things. I wouldn't make the immediate leap that this is game change for either company to the extent that we just don't know how it's all going to shake out. and I'm particularly not so sole on the agented commerce opportunity. Well, that's what I was going to ask about is what is agentic commerce? Because as I look through these announcements, it sounds great. The thing that I always keep going back to is, could this just do my grocery shopping, right? Can I take a picture of my fridge and say, I want to, I need to make dinner tonight. What do I need to get from the grocery store and can you just get it shipped to my house through DoorDash or whatever?

Like, is that sort of the best use case? And then we'll figure it out. Maybe there's like, you know, a couple of use cases like that. There was another one that I saw that was, hey, I'm looking for this product. Can you tell me when the price comes down a little bit? Because maybe not worth paying $50, but maybe I pay $40 for it. You know, it just seems like we're in a world of great headline, but we don't quite know what the there is there. Yeah, it's kind of defining what Salesforce does.

Right. Yeah. It's a big business. but what in the world does it do? I mean, in its simplest terms, right, agentic commerce is a new form of commerce where autonomous AI agents act on behalf of consumers to search for, purchase, and receive goods and services. So it sounds like a big deal when you look at it from that perspective. I mean, I do think there are a lot of challenges there, right? I mean, the process of agentic commerce on its own, there are a lot of things that have to go right

for it to actually be successful. And that starts at the very beginning with, customer or consumer adoption. So that's going to be some, that's going to be challenging, I think, on its own. And then when you kind of look back historically, I mean, the e-commerce hype cycles are just notoriously overhyped. Metaverse commerce. I mean, what happened to that, Travis? Live streaming commerce. Voice commerce, right? Even the Internet of Things commerce. You're talking about your fridge ordering stuff for you. So it sounds great. It's a little bit more difficult to actually execute. I'm not saying it won't be a thing. And I do believe AI is going to offer opportunities for merchants and consumers alike in the retail space. I think it's just

this agentic commerce experience that's still a little squishy and firmly unproven to this point. Yeah, Lou, I want to sort of bring in that maybe the better use case here is these massive supply chain operations. I mean, you think about like a Chipotle, for example, somebody's got to order the beef, somebody's got to order the tortillas. If AI can sort of figure that out and do it automatically, that would be a huge value ad. That's not really what we're seeing in this, but we're We're also trying to squint and see where this is going. But that's it exactly. It makes so much more sense for a corporation than it does for it. Because Travis, even you say the reorder your groceries.

I don't know about you, but I don't want to eat the same thing every day. So I don't necessarily, you know, and I like being a human being getting to figure that out. I don't think it's that practical. I think for a consumer, just stalk the price and tell me when it's lower. I don't know if that's great for retailers, but I see it there. But I don't want a robot deciding what jeans I wear or something like that. So I don't get it. On the institutional side, that, yeah, that McDonald's knows that they have 37 ingredients.

And when this ingredient gets down to this level, it's time to get more. Stuff like that, yeah, I don't know how complicated that is. I don't know how much of a game changer it is. It makes sense to automate it. A lot of this, I think, like Jason said, there's definitely something there. It's neat. But I'm going to take the under on it being on whatever revolutionary scale as far as hype is right now. not buying meta display classes, not buying stuff with agents.

Just a grumpy old man. I want to bring Chrome into this because, you know, OpenAI and ChatGPT are the biggest names in artificial intelligence. But the other announcement that Google had this week is that they're including more of their AI products, Gemini, more deeply in Chrome. And at the end of the day, Chrome is the biggest browser in the world, has far more users than ChatGPT. does, it seems like, Jason, that they're really leaning into this point of distribution. You had Chrome. You've also got Android. That could be the way that Alphabet Google kind of takes a lead in the AI race, which the market seems to be buying into a little bit more now. I agree. I think we're starting to see the sentiment shift on Alphabet and Google's position in the AI arms race. I think

that makes a lot of sense. It ties back to what you were talking about earlier in regard to meta, right? And Alphabet, at having this advantage, Google having this advantage with all of these different platforms and ways to distribute this technology, basically at the snap of a finger. And so then it becomes, all right, it's about changing consumer behavior, which as we know, it's obviously doable, but it's difficult to do. And a lot of us are just used to using our browser, whether it's the app on the phone or the browser on your laptop or however you may do it. And if Google can just roll out all of these features and all of this technology that makes that experience better and more seamless.

And by the way, for free. We also need to bring that up, is that, you know, chat GPT runs on subscriptions. Google has an ad business. I think that's one of the big challenges with AI from that chat GPT perspective. How are they going to monetize it? Right now, it's firmly on the subscription side.

They're going to have to figure out a way to evolve and iterate on that. We do need to get to Stocks on our radar, which is what we like to end with here on the show. Lou, you're going to be up and we'll bring Dan Boyd in to ask you a question. question, but what is your stock on your radar this week? All right, Dan, I'm looking at FedEx. The entire transportation sector has been beaten down, first due to slow down fears last year, and now tariffs. That has been a big deal this year. This is a notoriously cyclical business, and the question has become, when do we get the bounce back? FedEx did earnings this week. They weren't really well, but, you know, expectations

were really, really low. They beat them. But there's at least green shoots. They beat and they are actually forecasting modest growth, which is a lot better and even UPS said just a few months ago. Dan, this is a market where, you know, it's hard to love it long term, but with the transports, it pays to get in ahead of them, sounding the all clear. I'm not ready to call a bottom, but FedEx has gotten my attention. I think we might be nearing time where this works again. Dan, are you a FedEx guy? I mean, I am in so much that sometimes FedEx delivers things. to my house. I don't think I have a reference as to which carrier. You don't visit the FedEx Kinko's near you? No, I don't. Yeah, FedEx. Hey, Lou, you ever notice the Arrow and the FedEx logo?

Yeah, it's a great logo, isn't it? It's beautiful. Jason, what's on your radar this week? Yeah, we talked a lot of tech today. So let's go to one of those boring businesses. I'm talking about Costco here, ticker C-O-S-T. Costco earnings are out next Thursday. And, I mean, wow, talk about boring, but bringing the business. I mean, shares are up 180% of the last five years alone, outpacing the market nicely. We know there's tremendous value in the private Kirkland's brand. Last quarter, they ended. The quarter was 79.6 million paid household members and 142.8 million cardholders.

And, you know, this has always been a renewal story, right? And renewals just continued to impress. And when we saw renewals at this past quarter, U.S. and Canada renewal aid was 92.7% worldwide rate came in at 90.2. So 92.7 and 90.2. That is just consistent. It's amazing. It tells you why this is such a good business. And I can't believe it. But Dan, I'm not even a Costco member. Dan, what are your thoughts on Costco? I'm not a Costco member either, Jason. There isn't one close to me, close enough to me to warrant going to Costco, which is strange because I live in a pretty big area here. But yeah, Costco. Did you, did you, did you, did you,

get any gold bars by any chance when they were selling those things? No, no, no, I didn't. But that's just it just goes to show you. They have a tremendous and diverse supply for all consumers. The biggest problem with Costco is they're so busy, it's hard to get parking. Yeah, it's like an airport. But Dan, which one of these stocks is going on your watch? The logo carries it. Let's go FedEx. There you go. All right, Lou wins this one. For Lou Whiteman, Jason Moser, Dan Boyd behind the glass and the entire Motley Fool team, I'm Travis Hoyam. Thanks for listening to Motley Cool Money. We'll see you here tomorrow.