Motley Fool Money - Boeing Cruising to New Altitudes?
Episode Date: June 26, 2025Will innovations from the Paris Air Show be enough to lift airlines to new heights? Tim Beyers and Lou Whiteman discuss: - More AI-fueled earnings from Micron and changes at the Fed? - The Paris ...Air Show’s big reveals - Debating the better stock: Boeing or Airbus? Tickers: Companies discussed: BA, EADSY, MU, RYCEY, TXT Host: Tim Beyers Guests: Lou Whiteman Engineer: Dan Boyd Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. The Motley Fool and its affiliates (collectively, “TMF”) do not endorse, recommend, or verify the accuracy or completeness of the statements made within advertisements. TMF is not involved in the offer, sale, or solicitation of any securities advertised herein and makes no representations regarding the suitability, or risks associated with any investment opportunity presented. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with legal, tax, and financial advisors before making any investment decisions. TMF assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages arising from this advertisement. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Will innovations from the Paris Air Show be enough to lift airlines to new heights?
You're listening. Mottley Fool Money.
I'm Tim Byers here with Lou Whiteman. Lou, how are you? Fully caffeinated?
At least partially caffeinated. Hopefully that's good enough.
I mean, I'm fully caffeinated, ready to go. Let's get into it. We had some news straight off the top.
President Trump preparing to a possible nominee to replace Fed Chairman Jerome Powell.
this is according to the Wall Street Journal, the president could announce his choice for a successor
as early as this summer. And this is despite Powell still having 11 months remaining in his term.
So look out. I don't know. We'll see here, Lou. And then Micron reporting really strong fiscal
Q3 earnings. Stock was up 1.5% roughly in pre-market trading. Overall revenue jumped 15.5%
sequentially, 36.6% year over year to 9.3.3.5%.
billion. Looks like they're on track for 10.5 billion next quarter. No shocker here, Lou. AI is a thing
and is still a thing. Yeah, it seems to be doing all right for Micron. Yeah. Palantir teaming to
build AI software for building nuclear plants. This is a partnership with a nuclear company will
result in new software called a new software system, I should say, called NOS, the nuclear operating
system. Honestly, I get fast and furious vibes on this one, because when I hear Nas, I think
like cars going really, really fast. And then finally, Mark Zuckerberg is continuing his AI
recruiting press landing three Open AI researchers in the latest round here. He's spending
loads of money. Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, and Xiao Zhaev have all joined meta for
Zuck's super intelligence effort. All three had set up the Zurich office.
of Open AI just last year, Lou. I mean, have you gotten an offer from Mark Zuckerberg, Lou?
I haven't, but hearing what they've been quoting, I really wish I would. I'll say this. Sam Altman,
the CEO of OpenAI, he sort of telegraphed this. And look, we need a good feud. We need a good
rivalry. So I'm all for this. Let's let this happen. This could be fun. There you go.
The Lakers Celtics of the AI world, meta versus Open AI. We love it. Let's move on to the Paris Air Show, Lou, which is an area of your expertise. I want to talk about the CFM Rise Engine. This was something I thought was absolutely fascinating because to me, this looks like a prop engine, because essentially you take away the Nassel, you have a prop engine, but is running like a jet and apparently has 20%
fuel efficiency. So tell me, what is this thing? And, I mean, is this a thing that saves airlines? It saves
them a bunch of money? Maybe. Okay, so it's definitely real. The question is if and when it's practical,
right? The idea has been around for decades. It goes back to the 1970s, the oil crisis. But,
you know, composite materials are better. We've made other advancements. So it is getting towards
realistic. You know, there are downsides. The nature of this engine would kind of, we need to rethink
aircraft design. There's a lot of safety considerations, weight considerations. Pratt and Whitney, the
RTX company, one of the rivals here, they seem to think they'd be better off just getting
efficiency gains by refining their geared turbofan than not doing something new. But, hey,
the manufacturer, CFM, that's GE Aerospace and Safran. It's a joint venture. They really hope
commercialize this by the early 2030s, TBD, but it's really cool looking. So I'm with you. I'd love
to see it on an airplane. I mean, some of the concept designs look really fascinating. Moving on to
Rolls-Royce, Ried Airlines has chosen to outfit its Airbus 350 aircraft with Rolls-Royce engines.
I remember seeing Rolls-Royce engines on DC-3 aircraft when I was flying back when I was a kid.
How big a player today is Rolls Royce in the commercial air market? Because this stock is trading
near the cusp of 52-week high. So tell me, are you a buyer here? Is this a big deal?
They're a decent third, but they are definitely third. GE Aerospace has more than half of the
market, including that joint venture we just mentioned. Pratt and Whitney is also ahead of Rolls-Royce.
Look, Rolls-Royce, by the way, they don't make the cars anymore. So don't think.
about it like that. It's a quality manufacturer, but they are limited. They only make engines for
these big, wide-body jets, like the A350 and the Dreamliner, the 7th, Triple-7. That's a small
part of the overall market, less than 40% of the global fleet, and it's growing at a slower
pace. So that means, from the business point of view, a lot less spare parts sales, a lot less
servicing revenue over the lifetime in the engine. Overall, do I like the stock? Look, it's a well-diversified
company, European aerospace stocks have gotten a lot of attention for good reasons. It's a double
right now. I don't know if I'd be jumping in right now, but look, they should have good tailwinds,
pardon upon. They should be, they're set up nice to perform from here. I mean, we like tailwinds,
Lou. We do. We do. We need tailwinds. Textron. Let's talk about Textron here. Having been to Hawaii
more than a few times, I am a big fan of the King Air platform. Those,
are little planes that I have flown between islands, they're inter-island planes, and they're fantastic.
I love them. And it looks like there's a new multi-mission version of the Beechcraft King Air.
So let's talk a little bit more about this. And honestly, Textron, you know, ticker TXT,
this is a stock that we don't talk about very much. Does it deserve a little bit more love
from investors? I think it probably does. But in fairness to investors,
Textron has made themselves a tough company to love in recent years.
I don't know if it's all our fault.
Textron is one of the last great industrial conglomerates.
Aviation, as you mentioned, the beachcraft, but also Cessna, business jets.
They own Bell helicopters, Jacobson lawnmowers.
They make golf carts.
They make all sorts of things.
And for a while, every quarter, it seemed inevitably one of those businesses just laid an egg.
and earnings followed, and it has just been a lot of one after the other.
In fairness, though, they've done a lot better of late.
We're entering a big refresh cycle in business jets, all those CEOs that got shamed in 2008
and held off on buying new business jets.
Those are finally coming due for replacement.
So, Cessna, there's, again, tailwinds there.
Bell Helicopter just won a big competition to replace the Black Hawk helicopter.
By the way, they'll be using Rolls-Royce engines for that, too.
so that's another thing for Rolls Royce.
Look, Textron, they traded a discount to most big aerospace names.
I think they are set up well for at least some of their most important businesses like
Bell and Cessna to outperform.
And if not, I don't know if I'm rooting for this, but this is a conglomerant in an age
where a lot of breakups, if they don't catch up with that multiple, Tim, I can really see an
activist coming in and start looking for ways to kind of do to them what we've done to GE or so many
others. I mean, that would be, that would be interesting. All right, up next, which is the better stock
that we saw at the Paris Airshow? Is it Boeing or is it Airbus? The old adage goes, it isn't what
you say, it's how you say it, because to truly make an impact, you need to set an example and
take the lead. You have to adapt to whatever comes your way. When you're that driven, you drive an
equally determined vehicle, the Range Rover Sport. The Range Rover Sport blends power, poise, and
performance. Its design is distinctly British and free from unnecessary details, allowing its raw
agility to shine through. It combines a dynamic sporting personality with elegance to deliver a truly
instinctive drive. Inside, you'll find true modern luxury with the latest innovations in comfort.
Use the cabin air purification system alongside active noise cancellation for all new levels of
quality and quiet. Whether you prefer a choice of powerful engines or the plug-in hybrid with an
estimated range of 53 miles, there's an option for you. With six,
Seven terrain modes to choose from.
Terrain Response 2, fine-tuned your vehicle for the roads ahead.
The Range Rover event is on now.
Explore Enhance Offers at Rangerover.com.
All right, Lou, let's talk about which is the better stock here.
Boeing had, I think it's fair to say Boeing has had a rough maybe three years,
but in particular it's had a past, you know, really bad couple of weeks.
Some real heartbreaking tragedy with the Air India crash of the 787 Dreamliner here.
And Airbus, as the European competitor, I mean, we've often talked about this.
This is the commercial aircraft duopoly.
They came out of the Paris Air Show with some deals in hand.
Tell me what you think here.
Who did it better?
It's the who wore it best of the Paris Air Show here.
Is it Boeing or is it Airbus?
So, yeah, normally these are huge PR events where Boeing and Airbus will trumpet all the orders
they have. But as you say, with the Air India crash, both Boeing and GE Aerospace kind of stayed on the
sideline. So it was kind of a somber show. We didn't see all the announcements. We can count
planes, though, and know how they're doing. Boeing's actually outperforming Airbus for the year,
and they may be on track for a thousand or so orders, which would be really, really good.
because, you know, you said, I'd actually say it's been a tough decade for Boeing almost now.
And I do hope they're on the upswing.
You know, they're still under regulatory restrictions on how many planes they can produce.
And that's stemming from the 737 Max tragedies and all of the fallout from that.
That's important because back when COVID hit, they basically mortgaged every piece of equipment they could find.
I mean, Tim, they were taking the staplers off of the desk of the finance department and saying,
what can we get for this? And it was probably a good move because, you know, they didn't know
what was coming and they needed to just make sure they had to cash to survive. But today, Boeing
has 50 billion or so of debt up from, say, $10 billion in 2018. They need to bring that down.
And the way you bring that down is by selling more airplanes and generating the cash flow, right?
So, you know, I think investors need to understand that even if it all goes perfect from here,
we are still years away from Boeing just getting back to normal.
Patience is needed and Airbus is definitely then a cleaner story.
But hey, look, this is maybe the greatest commercial aircraft cycle we have ever seen in the history of the business.
Between Airbus and Boeing, the backlog is almost 13,000 planes.
that's well into the 2030s.
So if you are patient and you do believe that the worst is behind it,
there's a pretty compelling case for Boeing to make gains as the balance sheet heals
and as they just get back to normal in the face of all this demand.
I mean, you bring up a really interesting point here that that backlog is absolutely extraordinary.
And so there are years of what you would hope is predictable cash flow here.
But we do have this tragedy, and that is going to be yet another black mark on Boeing's record.
Meanwhile, Airbus continues to do, I mean, relatively well.
The A320 platform, the A320 Neo platform has been solid for quite some time, and it looks like that will continue to be solid for a while.
What do you need to see, if anything, from Boeing in its response to the Air India tragedy,
that they haven't already done. Is there anything?
I think Boeing is doing what they need to do. I mean, we will see. It takes months,
if not longer, to figure out what happened. We will see. It's all speculation right now.
If it is a material design flaw, I think that that would be material for investors.
The Dreamliner has flown for 25 years. And without-
That's amazing, isn't it?
Yeah. Well, you know, and this is an interesting point, too, not to sidetrack.
but one of my biggest fears about Boeing long-term is that's their last clean sheet design.
They have not sat down a group of engineers in a room and designed a plane since the Dreamliner.
They're in no position to do it now, but eventually they really need that mid-market, that
757 replacement now. They need to at some point. And Tim, you know, people retire. By the time they
do a clean sheet, it's going to be all a group of people that basically don't have that
institutional memory. So, I mean, that to me is scary. I think, hopefully with Air India,
it was a tragedy kind of, no, you know, whoever, whatever the finger pointing ends up. But
I do think that this is on course to be a more typical tragedy with this. And it shouldn't,
I don't think, stunt the turnaround. But, I mean, we're talking years for this turnaround anyway.
So there is a lot that can just go wrong in the business cycle and all sorts of things that I think investors need to get in mind before they just get too excited.
Right. All right. Up next, a little trivia, little airline trivia. You're listening to Motley Fool Money.
These days, I'm all about quality over quantity, especially in my closet. If it's not well made and versatile, it's just not worth it. That's honestly why I love Quince. The fabrics feel elevated. The cuts are thoughtful.
and the pricing actually makes sense.
Quince makes high-quality wardrobe staples using premium fabrics
like 100% European linen, silk and organic cotton poplin.
They work directly with safe ethical factories
and cut off the middlemen,
so you aren't paying for brand markups or fancy stores,
just quality clothing.
Everything they make is built to hold up season after season
and is consistently rated 4.5 to 5 stars
by thousands of real people like me who wear their clothes every day.
The Quince, Mongolian, Kashmir Kru Neck sweater
may be the most comfortable one that I,
own. It's light, soft, and it was a lot more affordable than you think quality
cashmere would be. Stop waiting to build the wardrobe you actually want. Right now, go to
quince.com slash motley for free shipping and 365 day returns. That's a full year to wear it
and love it. And you will. Now available in Canada too. Don't keep settling for clothes that don't last.
Go to QINCCE.com slash motley for free shipping and 365 day returns. Quince.com
slash Motley. All right, Lou, we've got a little trivia game that I want to play with you and all of our
listeners here. So get your guests in. We would love to see what you guessed in. You know, leave a
comment below in whatever you're, wherever you listen to your podcast, just let us know what your
guess was. But Lou, you're a long time follower of this industry. And I know you've got some
real history related to this question. So let's talk about it. My question for you,
is, how many towers help guide aircraft across the United States airspace? Is it more or less than 550?
See, 550 seems so specific there. And I think, Tim, that you're playing a game with me here,
which you kind of, yeah, you're in my head already. I would never do that. I would never try to
trick you, Lou. No, go ahead. Keep going. I will say in your part of the world, you can still see, like,
the way we did it before when we actually, when we first started aviation, when we put huge
giant arrows in the ground, so the pilots could see those from the ground. I think it's, I think
550's close. I'd probably go over, but I don't know. It feels really close to 550. If it's exactly
550, I'm going to be annoyed with you. It is over. It's 648. It's 648. So you got that right. And the reason
I wanted to kick this up, and we'll, as we close down the show here, just a quick conversation
about the long-term opportunity here, the way that we manage air traffic here in the United States
is ancient. So, Lou, any thoughts about what is the investing opportunity here? Because you
would think, after a while, I mean, surely we're going to get to the point where we're using satellites.
We're going to use more advanced technology to route planes more efficiently.
Right now, we route planes according to where the towers are, not the fastest route.
And that is striking.
So your thoughts on this, Lou, before we close up today's show.
Yeah, no, definitely.
I mean, we're using Windows 95 and in some cases, DOS systems, which, I'm old enough to remember that, but not to enjoy it.
So, yeah, look, I was telling you that I was actually in 2001, I was at a hearing where
they were just talking about just this, modernizing air traffic control. And I'm pretty sure most,
I'd have to find my notes, but we are still in that process. It is happening. It's slow. It's expensive.
It's behind schedule. But if you think about this, five-nines at least, right? You need redundancies.
You need to get it just right. You can't shut down the air system for six months to kind of do a clean reboot.
So it's just a really complicated problem. Satellites are part of the issue. I don't.
I don't think that it's just a clear one vendor thing.
There's a lot of companies from L3 Harris to Lidos and some of the contractors that are involved.
But really, it isn't so much of like a huge government boondoggle project.
It's just in a million different places, backfilling, digging through, trying to figure it out.
It is just a tedious slow process that requires a ton of funding.
those tend to be nightmares when, you know, annual government budgets come around. So we'll get
there. It's just really hard. Yeah. A rule breaker opportunity to come. We'll see. But it hasn't,
it hasn't happened yet. But we're going to keep an eye on it. Lou, thanks for being here.
Always a pleasure. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only.
The Motley Fool and its affiliates, collectively TMF, did not endorse, recommend or verify the accuracy or
completeness of the statements made within advertisements. DMF is not involved in the offer sale or
solicitation of any securities advertised herein. It makes no representations regarding the
suitability or risks associated with any investment opportunity presented. Investors should conduct
their own diligence and consult with legal tax and financial advisors or making any investment
decisions. DMF assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages arising from this
advertisement. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm. F.m. forward slash ad choices.
Thanks for listening, Fools. I'm Tim Byers, Fortale-Lew Whiteman. Dan Boyd is our engineer.
We will see you again next time. Move along.
