Motley Fool Money - Capital Market Earnings Crashout

Starting point is 00:00:01 Digesting today's earnings duds on Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. Welcome to Motley Full Hidden Gems Investing. I'm your host, Tyler Crow, and today I'm joined by longtime full contributors, Lou Whiteman and Matt Frankel. So earnings season is in full swing here. We've got a whole bunch of companies reporting. We even related to the oil market. We're going to touch into Halliburton's earnings,

Starting point is 00:00:26 but more on like a state of the oil market sort of analysis. We'll also hidden in the mailbag. But today we're going to start with the two companies that, that reported earlier this morning, and we could say were the duds of the earnings reports so far because they were MSCI and Equifax. Shares of both stocks were down more than 10% in pre-market trading, and as of we're recording right now,

Starting point is 00:00:48 MSCI is still down about 11%. Equifax is down about almost 7%. So obviously the market didn't like what they were seeing. The funny thing was, as I was looking at the results, just as a cursory glance before I got to talk to you guys, is it looked like they both posted improving results and even MSCI's earnings per share was up almost 20%. So guys, what happened here? I mean, Matt, I know you looked at Equifax, Lou, you looked at MSCI. What was going on? Yeah, and I mean, Equifax earnings on the surface, at least,

Starting point is 00:01:18 were not a dud. I mean, 11% year-over-year revenue growth. Earnings per share grew 13% on an adjusted basis in beat estimates. Revenue from the U.S. mortgage business is up 25%, which is nice to see given the state of the mortgage market. The company actually doubled its AI-driven cost reduction estimate to $150 million through 2028. Cost reductions are a good thing. The stock was down, like you said, double digits in pre-market.

Starting point is 00:01:45 It's rebounded a little bit despite the, but it's still down despite the earnings beat. A few potential reasons and things to flag here. There was a $100 million charge related to a credit miscalculation glitch that happened in 2023. Gap earnings were down for. percent year every year as a result. So that's worth noting. The adjusted EBITDA margins actually fell in all of the segments of the business year every year. Essentially, you know, rising compensation costs,

Starting point is 00:02:14 incentives are, they're both rising faster than revenue. And, you know, most importantly, there's no easier way to make a stock go down than to lower your guidance. And while they didn't really lower their guidance, they kept their full year. The third quarter guidance was a little softer than expected. The adjusted EPS estimate would actually represent a sequential decline. And investors aren't thrilled. So really, this was a solid quarter with a disappointing outlook and margin trends that seem to be scaring investors. Kind of a similar story over to MSCI. I don't know if people know this one as well. This former Morgan Stanley unit, it's a market data and analytics company, separate from Morgan Stanley now. They grew revenue and earnings by double digits. The earnings number

Starting point is 00:02:57 was a little light relative to expectations. Guys, I'm tempted to blame AI here. The company said that expenses were up 9% primarily due to, quote, higher IT costs among other expenses. So, you know, maybe they are adding to their tech stack. There are also some accounting things going on. They recognize some amortization on related to acquisitions. Tyler, as he said, stock is down double digits. The market just has this one wrong, period. I'm just going to say it. Company is in growth mode. It launched twice as many products in the first. half of 26 is it didn't all of 2024. Growing does come with costs, the costs are investment in the business.

Starting point is 00:03:34 There's nothing wrong with the core business here. I want to pick it something a little bit because reading through the lines of both of these, you know, Matt, Equifax says that it, you know, these AI driven cost reductions of 150 million, but then their margins were down. Lou, as you said, like higher IT costs. It's all kind of like, some of it seemed to me implying like, you know, tech costs, IT cost, AI costs, token, whatever cost you want to associate with, you know, using AI in their business seems to be rising. And, you know, the whole theory here was that,

Starting point is 00:04:08 you know, AI costs were going to drive down personnel costs, you know, put, you know, the, the big doomer sort of approach was people out of jobs. But it appears that, you know, this is actually starting to, you know, for high data companies doing a lot of data processing like Equifax. and MSCI. It is becoming a real cost headwind. And I'm curious your thoughts. How is this going to play out? You know, people continuing to jump into these frontier models that are getting incredibly expensive and are they going to have to kind of change their AI strategies? Well, with Equifax in particular, it would have been easier if they gave the explanation MSCI did that, you know, higher IT costs while lowering personnel costs and things like that.

Starting point is 00:04:54 but their margin compression was specifically blamed on rising compensation and incentive costs. So it's a bit of a head scratcher. I mean, there are a few possible explanations to, you know, in order to, you know, train AI models and things like that. They need to bring on some new talent. That could definitely be a part of it. But yeah, it's kind of a, it's a two-way street, right, when it comes to AI cost savings by making your business more efficient.

Starting point is 00:05:22 and having to pay more for the personnel that are putting those cost reductions in place. So it remains to be seen if that's kind of a temporary margin headwind as they ramp up these AI savings or if it's something that is worth further discussion. Yeah, I don't think we know yet if it's ongoing. There's definitely going to be investment. Just like I said, investment in growth. There's always one-time investments as you're implementing. Is it one-time investments or is this tokens and it's just going to be an ongoing thing?

Starting point is 00:05:52 I don't know if we know the answer to that. I don't think the companies know the answer to that yet. But for now, I think there's at least an argument to be made that this is more investment capital than it is just permanent ongoing expense. All right. I want to put a last question here because we've got two companies. Stocks are down quite a bit today in particular. Equifax is actually down 34% over the past year. MSCI has done a little bit better than that.

Starting point is 00:06:20 So looking at stock prices right now, where the businesses are right now, which one do you think is the better buy today, Equifax or MSCI? So on the surface, Equifax is definitely the cheaper stock. It trades for like 18 times forward earnings last I looked versus about 24 for MSCI. But there are concerns. I mean, dependence on the mortgage market for growth, for one thing. There's margin trajectories I mentioned. It's a bit of a head scratcher that their compensation costs are rising while AI is making the business more. efficient. MSCI is more expensive stock, but you get what you pay for. It's a higher margin

Starting point is 00:06:55 business. It honestly has a more defensible moat, which is validated by its record high revenue that we're seeing, or retention rate that we're seeing. It's more of an expense problem with them than anything else with rising IT costs and things like that. To be clear, I'm not buying either of these right now and don't really have any plans to, but I'd probably lean toward MSCI if I were forced to choose one today. Yeah, I just don't want to buy a credit bureau more of an ethical stance. I want them to be disrupted out of business, so I'm not going to buy it, but that's not a business case. Look, MSCI is a fantastic company.

Starting point is 00:07:30 It scores really well on our Hidden Gems Moneyball database, which I think is a great place to go to screen for ideas. Definitely MSCI would be my choice. It's been on my radar for a while talking about it now, so I'm not going to take advantage of this drop. But it's a really good company. Coming up at the break, we're doing an analysis of the oil market. In 2026, I've been trying to improve my health, but here's the thing I've found. If you're not tracking your blood work, you're basically flying blind. That's why I'm excited to partner with Rhythm.

Starting point is 00:08:01 Rhythm is the world's easiest blood test to help you learn what's happening inside your body. It takes about two minutes at home, no needles, just a sleek and painless collection device that sticks on your arm. Once your blood is collected, you put the sample in the package that Rhythm provides, and they will even arrange to have it picked up from your front door. I did my first test about a month ago. The rhythm kick came in the mail. I drew my blood in about two minutes. Couldn't be easier.

Starting point is 00:08:25 The results were live in about two days, and their portal makes it easy to understand what's going on. They've even got an AI health coach to help explain your results and recommend actions. Since I got my labs, I've changed the way I've eaten. Pounds are starting to come off, and it's easy to determine if something like a GLP1 is right for you. I'm not one to run to the doctor.

Starting point is 00:08:44 So the fact that I can do this at home and get fast results is what has me hooked. and my second kit is already on the way. Rhythm is only $79 per month, a fraction of traditional lab testing. Ships right to your door and you can cancel any time. Right now, Rhythm is offering our listeners 15% off for your first month

Starting point is 00:09:01 and free shipping at rhythm.com slash fool. That's Rhythm with 1H RY-T-H-M-Health.com slash fool for 15% off your first month and free shipping. Stop guessing, start testing, rhythmhealth.com slash fool. You know, there's this small, set of companies out there where even if you don't really have a financial stake, like owning the stock or I don't know if you're one of those people's short stocks does that too. It just listening to what they have to say about their respective markets can be incredibly

Starting point is 00:09:32 illuminating and Halliburton is one of those companies. It may not be on everyone's radar as a potential stock to buy, you know, being a oil and gas service company, but often it's market commentary that it provides. It gives a rare window into the oil market that we can't really. get elsewhere because they work with the biggest companies, the world, the ExxonMobiles, all the way down to the Wildcat drillers and they can really give you a sense of like what the vibes, if you will, of the market is in any given moment. And, you know, with the war in Iran escalating again, traffic through the state of Ramos is grinding back to a halt.

Starting point is 00:10:07 It seemed like a good time to check in with what Halliburton was saying on its most recent earnings report, which came out earlier this morning. So guys, we had a task of looking through the earnings report, a little bit of market commentary. What were some of the key takeaways for you when you were looking at this report? Yeah, so, I mean, a few things to unpack here. I mean, Halliburton's international strength, especially when it comes to Latin America and Europe, it's helping to offset the disruption they're seeing from the Middle East. They're keeping their Middle East crews in place, which really kind of sets them up nicely to capture demand once the war de-escalates, which hopefully happens. Hopefully we actually get a lasting agreement at some point,

Starting point is 00:10:46 and the war doesn't start and end another 72 times or whatever it is. It's also worth quantifying the disruption, which management did. They set on the call that, you know, rerouting due to the Hormuz situation and other conflict-related disruptions could cost seven to nine cents of earnings per share, but they did sound very optimistic when it comes to the, you know, the next quarter. Most interesting part about this report, and maybe I'm just showing my ignorance of the oil market is, but it was the North American numbers, they posted. North American revenue was flat at $2.2 billion, due and part. to lower specialty chemical activities, but also due to decreased drilling activity in the Gulf of Mexico. That really surprised me. Given the geopolitical backdrop, everything we're talking about with the Middle East,

Starting point is 00:11:28 I thought that was interesting. Now, I note that CEO Jeff Miller said he was encouraged by signs that drilling and fracking are picking up in the U.S. So I get, and maybe it's just a timing thing that we're getting there. It just takes time. There's a lot of noise about, you know, the global picture. But North America is Halliburton. largest market. So I think that that is good for the stock if it's picking up. I'm just surprised that given all of the attention that North America was flat and it's just now starting to ramp up. Yeah, the Gulf of Mexico, Gulf of America, whatever you want to call it these days, that's kind of been a weird sticking point for a lot of major oil and gas drillers because,

Starting point is 00:12:08 you know, it takes like 10 years sometimes to get one of these from exploration to production. And so it's committing that much capital that long has been challenging when you got fracking companies. It's like, well, in 30 days, I can have a well up and running. Yes, it's less oil. But the turnaround on the investment is much sooner. So I can see why that might be the case. But you would think with oil prices rising that would start to ease a little bit. But we haven't seen that.

Starting point is 00:12:35 And one of the reason we haven't discussed the oil market as much and it has been the challenge of kind of translating what we're seeing with the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the Iran conflict, and the Russia-Ukraine conflict as well, you know, it's been hard to translate that into something that's thesis-altering for a company on the long-term basis

Starting point is 00:12:56 because we kind of see these as, hopefully things will get better sooner than later. And I think the prevailing sentiment was that things would get resolved in Iran, Middle East area, so that movement of oil were some relatively short order when things kind of started to happen. But, and there was some supply and demand responses to soften the blow of the closure of straight-of-h-h-h-h-moos.

Starting point is 00:13:16 But now we're several months in. Fighting's escalating again. And we just got a report today from Quartz that said that the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve is now at a 45-year low. So I want to ask, and we can go in any direction you want here because oil, straight-of-hormuz, the Middle East, in general, has some wide implications on other markets and not just oil here. Has anything happened in the past days, weeks, months related to this conflict or the broader conflicts of Ukraine and Russia as well that's changed your position or thesis on anything in your portfolios? It doesn't necessarily mean you are you looking more at oil companies?

Starting point is 00:13:58 Are you, you know, what is something that you're seeing or maybe changing your thesis based on what we've been seeing? Yeah, so I'm not much of an energy investor in my own portfolio. So I'm not going to be buying oil stocks based on this. But you're right, this does affect a lot of other areas of the market. Any company that depends on shipping costs, it could be potentially affected here. And you're right, the strategic petroleum reserve or SPR, it ended the week at the lowest level since 1983,

Starting point is 00:14:28 and it now sits at about 44% of authorized capacity. So even if oil prices cooperate, you're talking about years for a full refill in the most likely scenario. I mean, the biggest thing, the biggest takeaway for me is that this doesn't specifically change anything right now, but it gives the U.S. a lot less of a shock absorber if the conflict escalates or if something else goes wrong. Remember, we're at the beginning of the worst part of hurricane season right now. That can cause oil disruptions. The point is there's a lot more that can go wrong for oil than the Iran War. So keep that in mind, and we now have less of a cushion to, you know,

Starting point is 00:15:04 bolster prices artificially, I guess you would say. And I'm not buying energy here. I mean, to me, this year is the reason you have energy, just kind of lurking in the portfolio for a decade. And so, you know, now it's not the time to buy. I don't think I've made any moves yet, but I am watching closely because I do think kind of what Matt was saying, the macro implications could get interesting for a lot of different companies. The biggest surprise of 2026 in energy to me, bigger than the Middle East war, was China's demand flexibility. I'm oversimplifying in a bit here, Tyler, you can tell me if I'm wrong, but the way I read it is the biggest reason we didn't see oil spike to 200 or whatever the way oil experts thought it might if the

Starting point is 00:15:45 straight was closed was Chinese demand just came out of the market, which kind of took the pressure off others. We know nothing about Chinese reserves. We don't know if that demand pullback is sustainable, if they're just tapping into massive reserves they have, if there's something else going on. We now have the Red Sea potentially closing to go along with issues in the straight. We don't know what China's going to be able to do from here. It's impossible to predict, but we do at least have it on the radar as a potential headwind that does finally zap to consumer in the U.S., and that would have a lot of ripples through the economy. Yeah, when it comes to the oil market, it always seems like the price of oil tends to move the most when you see, like, reports of

Starting point is 00:16:28 American drilling activity, American storage activity. There seems to be some sort of oil price movements when we get those sorts of reports, in part because it's the most information we get when it comes to oil in general. Like you said, the Chinese inventories, consumption, things like that, those numbers are, I don't want to say that they're necessarily state secrets, but they're not nearly advertised or published like we see here in the United States. And to that point, there's been a lot of either draws on capacity or not filling unknown capacity that they have had for a long time. that has been, you know, in some ways, a massive sell for this. I think the numbers I saw was something like 5 million barrels per day of Chinese imports

Starting point is 00:17:14 just kind of went away for reasons undetermined other than they just said, we're going to stop buying, whether or not that was going into storage or actual consumption. We don't really know. It's coming up after the break, we're going to dip into the melt back. In Toronto, every arrival is a statement, and nothing says it better than this. Cadillac Optic was the number one selling luxury EV in Canada for 2025. Find your rhythm across a seamless 33-inch display and an immersive 19-speaker AKG surround audio system. This city demands agility and optic delivers with precision to make every drive extraordinary.

Starting point is 00:17:50 Let's take the Cadillac. Find out more at Cadillac Canada.ca. Luxury sales claim based on S&P Global Mobility Canadian New Vehicle Total Registrations for calendar year 2025 for the Cadillac definition of luxury. I've been wanted to do a story about cartel presence in the US. with a murder investigation of this woman who was tortured and they cut off her fingers and then eventually killed her. And she was killed by the cartel. And it was in the middle of nowhere in Georgia.

Starting point is 00:18:17 And then we followed the investigation and, yeah, realized that they're everywhere and particularly like to operate in small town America. If you want to hear how cartels hide in plain sight, check out episode 1302 of the Jordan Harbinger Show. Hey, everyone, quick reminder. If you want to get your question answered live on air, go ahead and email. email is at Podcasts at Fool.com. That's Podcast with an S at Fool.com. Also, the email is in the show description. Three requests that we always have is, number one, keep it foolish, keep it short,

Starting point is 00:18:45 and three, keep it as impersonal as possible so we don't get in trouble for giving individualized advice. So today's question comes in from Thomas Hanks. And it's actually kind of oriented towards you, Matt, so we wanted to make sure you were on when we did this. The question is, Hello, Fools, I believe on one of your episodes, Matt said he had exposure to different banks through ETFs. I was wondering if you could tell us which banking financial ETF he likes. And I had looked up a few and was looking at the tickers are XLF and VFH. And I know XLF is a State Street ETF and VFH's VFHs as VNCards. They're both financials ETFs. Could you discuss the pros and cons of each or let me know if there are better choices? I've been wanting to hold it long term and obviously

Starting point is 00:19:28 lower expense ratios. Thomas. So I did a quick cursory glance. And to be honest, over the past 20 years, I think the difference in performance on a net basis for both of these was something like 10 or 15% difference in terms of total performance. So part of me says splitting hairs here, but guys, what are some of the things that may be different about these two ETFs or if maybe there's some better alternatives out there? Well, first of all, I had no idea Tom Hanks was a fan of of the show. That's pretty awesome. I'm a fan of myself. That would be great, right. So those two, yes, you're right. And I actually ran a statistical correlation, and they have a

Starting point is 00:20:09 0.99% correlation between the performance of the two over the long term. So you're absolutely right. It's hard to make the case for one versus the other. They are rather different, despite the big, you know, the similarities in performance. The XLF is by far the most popular financial sector ETF. It is a more concentrated play. It owns about 75 stocks. It's market cap weighted. And both of these also have a lot of exposure to insurance and payments processing. Berkshire Hathaway is the largest holding in the XLF. The Visa and MasterCard are among the top 10. So it's not pure banking exposure. So really the big thing, and the VHF has, you know, it's more than 400 stocks and significantly more exposure to small and midcaps. But like you said, the long-term returns are the same. The big

Starting point is 00:20:57 thing you want to look at is how directly do you want to invest in banks versus the financial sectors. Like I said, the financial sector includes insurance, payment processing, and other things. You might want to look at the one with ticker symbol is KBE, that's the SPDR, S&P Bank ETF. Expense ratio is a little higher, 0.35%. That's not outrageous. And it has an equal weighted approach to bank stocks, meaning that J.P. Morgan Chase and a regional bank would have the exact same weighting in the fund. So you might want to take a look. at that one. Then there's another one that's called the KBWB. It's the Investco KBW Bank ETF. That only has about 25 stocks, mostly large banks. The top 10 positions are 65% of the

Starting point is 00:21:38 assets. So if you just want to invest in the large banks, that's one that could be worth a look. But yeah, the two you mentioned, they're the lowest cost options. They're the most diverse options and the performance is very similar. Right. Matt did a good job breaking it down. But I think those are the two things, just no matter what sector it is, do you want to look for in ETFs, A, what is actually in there? There's a lot of examples of things that have a name, but if you actually look at what's in the portfolio, you might be surprised.

Starting point is 00:22:08 So always go to their website, it lists their holdings and see if it is actually, if you're getting the exposure you want. To Tyler, the question, Thomas said, you know, I focused on expense ratios, but said, I'm willing to pay a little more for upside. I'm with you on the expense ratios, but Thomas, personally, and this is just me, given that upside is never guaranteed and actively managed funds for the most part tend to lose to the market over time, I'm less willing to pay a little

Starting point is 00:22:37 more for the potential upside. So I think trust your gut there with just get low fees and that's the one thing you can guarantee. Yeah, I would add to that. I'm not willing to pay more for potential upside for the reasons Lou just mentioned. I am willing to pay more to invest in exactly what I want. Like I said, pure banks versus kind of a mix of banks and insurance companies and things like that. So I am willing to pay a little bit higher of an expense ratio to get exactly what I want in my portfolio. Always, probably the most important things when it comes to ETF. And whenever we have these sort of questions, it's always going to be, you know, the fees and, you know, exposure to what you want. It's, when we're talking about ETFs, it's pretty much

Starting point is 00:23:17 going to distill down to that in any given moment. As always, people on the program may have interest in stocks you talk about, and the Motley Fool may have had formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy yourself stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provide for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. Thanks for producer Dan Boyd and the rest of the Motle team for Lou Matt and myself. Thanks for listening and we'll chat again.

Motley Fool Money - Capital Market Earnings Crashout

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.