Motley Fool Money - Crucial Steps for the “Pre-Go” Years Before Retirement

Episode Date: August 22, 2026

We spend years squirreling away money that we eventually hope to live off of in retirement. What should we be doing as we get closer to the big day? Host Robert Brokamp discusses potential strategies with Dana Anspach, who has been a financial planner since 1995 and is the CEO and founder of Sensible Money, a fee-only planning firm in Arizona. She is also the author of three books, including her latest: “Living Off Your Acorns: Your Guide to the Four Phases of Retirement.” Topics covered: -How to systematically de-risk your portfolio as you get closer to retirement-Deciding when to retire, and planning for the possibility that it may be sooner than you prefer-Strategies for lowering your tax bill over the course of retirement-The benefits of categorizing the often-complex decisions about retirement as green, yellow, and red-The “arrival fallacy” and steps to take to ensure your retirement is as fulfilling as possible Host: Robert Brokamp, CFP®, EAGuest: Dana Anspach, CFP®, RMA®Engineer: Kristi Waterworth We’re committed to transparency: All personal opinions in advertisements from Fools are their own. The product advertised in this episode was loaned to TMF and was returned after a test period or the product advertised in this episode was purchased by TMF. Advertiser has paid for the sponsorship of this episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠megaphone.fm/adchoices⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

What you should be doing right before and as you enter retirement. This week on the Saturday personal finance edition of the Motley Fool Hidden Jems Investing Podcast. I'm Robert Brokamp, and you know, retirement is the number one financial goal for most people. We spend years squirreling away money so we eventually hope to live off it. What should we be doing as we get closer to the big day? Well, you're here to provide some suggestions is Dana Ansbach, who has been a financial planner since 1995 and is the CEO and founder of sensible money,

of the only planning firm in Arizona. She is also the author of free books, including her latest, Living Off Your Acorns, Your Guide to the Four Phases of Retirement. Dana, welcome to the show. Great to be here. It's my first time on this podcast. I'm excited. Well, we're excited to have you, and you talk about four phases in your book. I think most people have probably heard of three of those phases, the go-go years, logo years, terms that come from a 1998 book by Michael Stein. But in your book, you added the pre-go years, which you believe can actually be the most important. So when do the pre-go years begin? And what makes this time period so crucial when it comes to retirement planning? You know, I think the pre-go years begin about 10 years before

retirement or whenever you really get serious about, wow, I'm going to retire one day. And for some people, that doesn't happen until the year before retirement or until they get a layoff notice. It's not the way we want it to happen. I'm lucky being in this profession that I think about these things more. And for me, my pre-go years began about two years ago at the age of 53, where I really suddenly connected emotionally to the idea that I was going to really retire one day. I'm a self-professed workaholic. I love what I do. I'm very lucky. but for me that idea of retirement, even though I do retirement planning for a living, just I thought not for me, right? That's just not for me. And that has shifted dramatically

over the last two years because of this awakening, this idea that, wow, you know, I'm in those pre-go years, I'm starting to talk about and think about these four phases of retirement, connect more with them. Other people may connect with the idea of retirement more strongly, but not have the financials in order. And I talk about the importance of both. You have to have the emotional connection and the finances. I have the finances. No emotional connection. You know, if you have the emotional connection, then that 10 years prior, that's when you really need to get your finances in order and make sure what you want to do is feasible. I think one of the trickiest aspects of this, and perhaps one of the least appreciated aspects, is that workers in general

aren't actually that good about predicting when they were retired. And you kind of touched on that. And I think some studies show that the difference is about three years. But, you know, some people retire sooner because they maybe made that emotional connection and they had enough money. Might be they didn't have a choice. They got laid off or health issues, either their own or their spouses. So do you think that everyone should plan on retiring sooner than they probably expect? I love that idea from the financial planning perspective. So, when we have someone who isn't sure about their retirement date, we like to align both the plan and the portfolio as if they do retire a few years earlier. Some people reach financial independence and

decide they enjoy what they do and, you know, they're going to keep doing it as long as that enjoyment is there. And so they may work longer. But you're going to be much better off if you've planned for an earlier retirement than if you are caught off guard and expecting those last few years of savings to get you over the hurdle of where you need to be. Or if you simply didn't plan ahead and you're caught off guard because, oh my gosh, you know, I thought I was going to have five more years. I wasn't really going to think about it until the year before retirement. Suddenly, here I am having to make these readjustments very quickly. That's not a great place to be. And the research also shows that when retirement is forced upon you, people have more trouble

adapting, more trouble figuring out that next step of how to be happy and find purpose in retirement. So there's some work there on the emotional side that has to be done when these events occur. I think of it as instead of, whoa, my gosh, can't believe this happened to me, being realistic about this could easily happen to me. I could be out of work at 60 or 62 or 65 if I'd been planning to work till 70. Once you reach that point in your career, you can call it maybe the fourth quarter of your career, 10 years before retirement or so. Obviously, one aspect of this is the derisking of your portfolio. Does that begin 10 years, five years beforehand? And practically speaking, how do people do that? Ideally, the de-risking would begin 10 years out. You know,

I like the concept, most people don't do it, but I like the concept of staying 100% equities until about 10 years from retirement for your retirement money. You know, I'd rather have the potential for the returns that equities can deliver, and if I'm investing over a 30 or 40-year time horizon, to me, that makes a lot of sense, and then to begin making that shift about 10 years out. I have encountered people that stayed 100% equities until six months before retirement. Wow. Until retirement. I have a paper out there called the Wind Down that talks about how you begin this shift, and it compares that strategy of waiting until the cusp of retirement to de-risk.

or starting farther out. And of course, it all depends on the markets. I don't want my retirement or client's retirement depending on the market outcomes. If we were to get another recession right on the cusp of retirement, I wouldn't want to take that kind of risk with my money. Ideally, you would start, let's say you're 10 years out from retirement, you are still 100% equities. You would have a financial plan that shows you, okay, year one of retirement in 10 years, I'm going to need, let's say that's $50,000 of withdrawal from my portfolio. So I'm going to sell $50,000 of my equity holdings. I'm going to buy a, we like to use the concept of an income ladder, a CD, an agency bond, a safe investment that's going to mature at that 10-year time frame. And so I know when I get there,

that $50,000 is secured. It's going to earn interest along the way, but when that principal matures, that's what I'm going to use to fund my withdrawal. And then the next year, your nine years away from retirement, you'd do that again, and then the next year, you're eight years away, and you do that again. And by the time you got to retirement, if the equity markets were solid along the way, you would have this 10-year income ladder, or I think of it as a runway, to say, okay, I now have, you know, 50,000 a year maturing for the next 10 years. That is what I'm going to live off of. And along the way, when equity markets are strong, I will sell some and replenish what I've used. And when equity markets are not strong,

I'm just going to let that part B and give it time to recover. So that would be the mechanics of how you would get there. It never happens exactly like that. Like so much, right? We have how it would work on paper. And then realistically, we could have two strong years of equity markets where you're doing a lot of de-risking and then a bear market comes along and you don't de-risk that year. And then a good market comes along. You may have another year of de-risking and then a flat market. You don't de-risk that year. So realistically, by the time you get to retirement, if you started 10 years out, you could have anywhere from maybe a 5 to a 10-year income ladder in place, depending on that de-risking path and what the markets delivered to you over that timeline. So that's good advice for managing the portfolio. But as IRA expert, Ed Slott likes to point out that we're not the sole owners of our portfolios.

Uncle Sam is a part owner. And in your book, you talk a good bit about taxes. and you emphasize that when it comes to tax management, it's not just how am I going to lower my taxes this year, but how am I going to lower my taxes over the course of my retirement, which is really over the course of our lives? So given that, what do you think people in the pre-go phase should be thinking about when it comes to taxes?

I think they should be thinking about something that's objective. And so we often see people still in the mindset that I should not withdraw from my retirement accounts until required minimum distributions begin, which is now age 73 or 75, depending on when you were born. And that's a long time to put off withdrawals. And in reality, there are many, we call them the opportunity years between retirement and when those required minimum distributions start, which could be a 20-year window in some cases. If you retired at 55 and your required minimum distribution start at 75, there's a 25-year window there where,

tax planning opportunities are often plentiful by looking at when your different income sources are going to start, Social Security, maybe a pension if you're lucky to still have that, maybe you have a rental property that you're going to sell somewhere in that timeline. You could have deferred compensation plans coming in. You could have bonuses from former employment. There's all kinds of things that can make your income path very uneven during that 20-year timeline. And so that means there's planning opportunities, years where your taxable income could be quite low. We're doing either a Roth conversion or a withdrawal from retirement plan, a 401k and IRA, could fill up some of those lower tax rates. And that money is then taxed at a lower rate than perhaps

it would be if you waited and put those withdrawals off. And so it's complicated math that software now does. I also tell people be cautious about some of the simplistic calculators. They don't take into effect some of the nuances of the tax code. For example, your Medicare Part B&D premiums are tied to your adjusted gross income. The way Social Security is taxed is dependent upon your other sources of income. So some very simplistic calculators that just look at your tax brackets aren't going to take all of that into effect. But there is tax planning that can take all of that into effect, planning it all out and saying, okay, this looks like an opportunity to strategically take withdrawals or strategically realize capital gains in a year where I might be at 0%.

And that can make a big difference. We've seen tax planning make as much as half a million dollars or more difference over the lifetime of someone's plan. Wow, that's amazing. In Toronto, every arrival is a statement, and nothing says it better than this. Cadillac Optic was the number one selling luxury EV in Canada for 2025. Find your rhythm across a seamless 33-inch display and an immersive 19 speaker AKG surround audio system. This city demands agility and optic delivers with precision to make every drive extraordinary.

Let's take the Cadillac. Find out more at Cadillac Canada.ca. Luxury sales claim based on SMP Global Mobility Canadian New Vehicle Total Registrations for calendar year 2025 for the Cadillac definition of luxury. Real Canadian Superstore has everything you need this back-to-school season. lunchbox savers like Ziggy's sliced deli meat products for always 375 and get life brand pure vita shampoo or conditioner for $8 each at real Canadian superstore when you're ready we're ready with a whole world and more. These are the pre-go years. Eventually the big day comes, the worker retires and they're entering

the go-go face. First of all, why do you think they're called the go-go years and roughly speaking in your experience as a financial planner about how long do they last? I think they're called the years because generally we're healthy. We suddenly have free time that we didn't have before. It's often when people get excited about traveling, sometimes remodeling the home, sometimes moving to a different area of the country that they've always wanted to live in. And those are times where we have both usually the financial means and the energy and health to do these things. How long do they last? There's a great blog post by Dan Haylid. He runs the humans versus retirement podcast, you're familiar with him out of the UK. And he calls it your 12 good years.

Does that mean it's only 12 years for all of us? No, but looking at the stats, many people have, let's say, between 60 and 72 or between 65 and 80, if they're lucky. Around age 80, for most of us, but not all of us, cognitive changes begin to impact us. We're often not even aware that these changes are happening because the part of the brain it's impacting is also impacting the self-awareness that we have around our behaviors. I have a good friend who helps place people into long-term care facilities, Denise Kay, and she describes it as we become basically a full-grown adult, but with suddenly middle school-age decision-making abilities. She sees this often happens at around age 80. There are some people that are called super cognitive agers that this doesn't seem to happen to, or they remain fully capable well into their 90s.

That's what we all hope for. But we need to plan that it could come earlier. And for that reason, I think it's important to do the things you want to do in those go-go years. We've seen people so concerned about safe withdrawal rates, which are already calculated as if the great depressed, began now at the point of retirement. And then to be even safer, they'll use a withdrawal rate lower than that. And the research shows that many of those people who were great savers end up with even more funds at the end of retirement than they had at the beginning. And there's nothing wrong with that. If that's your goal, if that's where you really want to pass along wealth to the next generation.

But if you are foregoing opportunities or things you wanted to do or helping the kids while you're here to see the benefit of what you're doing, or maybe that's a charity or an organization you want to contribute to, many of those things are possible if you step away from a safe withdrawal rate mindset and look at the plan holistically and you look at it through the lens of these phases. Oh, I can spend a little more during this go-go time because spending naturally slows down during these slow go and later years. Yeah, that's another aspect of safe withdrawal rate research that is perhaps too conservative. They almost always assume that retirees need their income to go up every year along with inflation. That's generally not what happens. We had David Blanchett on the show a few weeks ago

talking about his research into that. And so I was going to ask you as an actual financial planner who likely works with people who have above average wealth. Is that what you see in real life with your clients? It is what we see. So, you know, we try to help people spend more during those go-go years, but invariably they will get into their mid-70s, and we have withdrawals planned and inflation increases built into the plan. So we may say, hey, you know, inflation, especially the last few years, we know food costs more and gas costs more and electricity certainly costs more. Do we need to increase your withdrawal? We built in an extra thousand dollars a month. And they'll say, no. Matter of fact, we're not even spending what you're sending us now. And even despite the

inflationary times as someone enters that mid-70 time frame that is still often the answer we hear. And so that tells us they're comfortable. They have the means to continue to spend at the level that we have projected, but they're not needing it. And the research shows J.P. Morgan has some great research on the spending that even in the demographics with a one to three million net worth, spending often shifts toward gifting, toward more aspirational things. And I think there's that shift that happens where people really realize, wow, okay, I'm not going to run out of money. I'm okay. And now they start to look for things, not to spend frivolously, but things that are meaningful, things that give them a sense of purpose, things that benefit someone they care about or an

organization they care about. And so you will see spending shift, but even including those gifting elements, overall spending in real terms is declining. It's not keeping up with inflation dollar for dollar. I think the takeaway here is, and I talked about this with David Blanchett as well, is that for many people, they might be able to either retire a little sooner or maybe spend a little more in those go-go years and feel safe and enjoy the money while they can. Yes, absolutely. I mean, and enjoy it without that constant fear. of, oh my gosh, you know, we find as financial advisors, one of the key things we're bringing to retirees is truly that permission to spend. And sometimes it's alignment between spouses.

Sometimes it's simply someone who realizes there's a level of self-awareness. Wow, I've worked so hard to save. I'm anchored to this net worth number into watching my account balances, and I will not enjoy these years unless someone is telling me, yes, you can do this. You know, here's your monthly paycheck, direct deposited into your account. And it is important. I mean, we have a limited time on this earth, this amazing place, and doesn't take money always to be happy, but there are things that can bring us comfort. I use the example of someone who I, for years, I tried to convince them to hire house cleaner. Either they could afford it, but in their mind, that felt perhaps extravagant, not the way they were raised. And so I was so happy one day when

I received the email that we hired the house cleaner. You know, it might be something simple that makes your life easier like that. It doesn't have to be big or grandiose or, you know, a fancy car or eating out at the fanciest restaurants. It can be things that make a difference in our lives. Tell them that story. You know, anyone who reads a book about retirement planning, such as your book, might feel at times a little overwhelmed because it could be pretty complicated, a lot of things to think about.

And what I enjoyed about your book is that you provided this framework for, you know, or sort of categorizing decisions. Red, yellow, and green. Talk a little bit about that and how that can help people sort of figure out where are the rays zones in their retirement planning. Red, yellow, green is a framework I love. So red would be a decision we look at

and financially, the numbers say, don't do this. Green would be a decision we look at and the numbers are like, yes, you must do this. And so many decisions fall in the yellow. So I'll use a simple example of paying off your mortgage. We've had people who have mortgage rates under 3%. And we would categorize that as financially, it really doesn't make sense to pay off that mortgage. You're not going to see rates like that again. It just doesn't make sense. Now, if there's not a long time frame where the mortgage isn't that large, when we run the numbers,

perhaps the couple thousand dollars of, you know, potential earnings that they could have in an account in excess of the mortgage rate aren't going to materially impact that plan. And that would then turn that same decision into, well, you know, just from interest rates, we would say red, but when I run the numbers, maybe you're $10,000 ahead if you earn 5% in your accounts and don't pay off the mortgage. That then shifts that to a yellow decision where it really becomes about your values. And given that decision, one household may say, I just have so much peace of mind from having that mortgage paid off. I know financially I might be a little better off if I didn't pay it off at this low rate, but I'm just going to feel better. And that's an okay decision when it's in that yellow

area. Another household might go, I love leverage. I love the idea of arbitrage. I love the idea that I can earn more on my investments than this mortgage rate. I get it in an inflationary environment. kind of low-cost debt makes sense. And they might say, absolutely, I'm not paying that off. And, you know, both households made a decision that was right for them. And that's the amazing thing about finances. It's not all math. We can run the math and quantify a decision, but ultimately people have different values. And especially as you approach retirement, I think that sleep at night factor has to be part of the equation. And so that's what red, yellow, green really does, is it helps quantify things and then talk about that sleep at night factor your values and help you weigh that

out and make a decision that's right for you. I love it because it helps you narrow in on the tougher decisions, right? You have many decisions related to retirement, but if you can get the red and the green out of the way, and then, you know, I just need to focus on these in the yellow zone, and it doesn't feel quite so complicated. Yeah, and those decisions can come down to, you know, Roth conversions often fall in the yellow decision. Delaying Social Security, not so much for most retirees. You know, I would call that a green decision that the higher earner needs to delay unless there's some extenuating circumstances. But we've had some very high net worth households that look at those numbers. And for them, it's an immaterial decision. And they may say, yeah, I'm going to claim it full

retirement age. And that's where it depends on the demographics too. The materiality of a decision for one household can be far different than that same decision for another household. So for one household, a decision could be absolutely green like you need to do this. And for the next household, that same decision could fall in the yellow area. Let's move on to the emotional side of retirement. You talk in the book about the arrival fallacy, which is that belief that achieving a certain goal is going to bring lasting happiness and fulfillment. And we've all had that, right? We think if we just got a raise or if we just got that new car or that. that new job, something. We feel good about it for a little while, but then at some point,

we're like, I'm not quite as happy as I thought I would be. And the research on happiness and retirement is somewhat mixed. But for many people, it is the best thing that ever happened to them. For other people, there's the honeymoon period, but then they feel a little lost. So given your experience, what have you seen in terms of happiness and retirement and preparing for that transition, that period of your life where you're completely unstructured? What I've found is that our clients are probably experiencing some of that loss, and as I realized in the last few years in writing the book, they hadn't necessarily been talking to us about it. And so I did interviews with clients for the book, and one of my clients told me about this year long, essentially depression. She had left. She ran her own business. She was used to the social connections with her staff and her clients. And that sense of not feeling like she was earning every day and contributing to the household and not having the social aspect really weighed on her. And by the time she shared it with me, she'd found a solution. She and her

husband moved to an age 55 plus community. They love all of the activities. They rebuilt these friendships. It's not the original house that they had planned to retire in, but when they realized what they were doing wasn't working, they were quick to recalibrate and figure out what exactly is missing and how do we regain these types of social connections that we lost through our employment. And so that was a positive story, but it made me realize how many people really do go through that sense of loss of identity, that sense of, wow, you know, what am I here for? I've heard particularly high achievers with, you know, what we might call big jobs. I always thought of myself as this. It's why I did not identify with retirement. I loved helping us. I loved helping

other people retire. We celebrate. We send them retirement baskets. But when I thought of it myself, it felt like this black hole. Like, oh my gosh. And it's just amazing, really, the awareness around this and the identity and the conversations my husband and I have had, particularly him reading my book, has shifted the way he thinks about it. And suddenly I find, while I still love what I do and I have a tremendous amount of energy for work, I now simultaneously have this energy around retiring one day that I never had before. And it feels good. I'm so excited because I was terrified, like, truly like, oh my gosh, like that is just never for me. And so now we have this 15-year plan. We've broken it into five-year chunks, you know, 55 to 60, and then the 60 to 65 phase, and then the 65-to-70 phase.

and of course it'll never go exactly like we laid it out. But having that framework in place and the way we think about it now is a game changer that makes me think, okay, I won't go through that depression because I've spent enough time thinking about it and even just mentally exploring possibilities and figuring out what will make me excited and what I'll find shiny when I get to that phase. And as you alluded to in the beginning of an interview, part of it was you taking the time on a vacation, really, and having that experience, I kind of had the same sort of experience recently. I know you were born in Iowa. I did Ragbri a couple times, the annual bike ride

across Iowa. Yeah. And it gave me a taste of like, you know what? Maybe having some time to hang out and ride my bike wouldn't be so bad, actually. And I also kind of moved up my idea of when I might retire. I'm not sure, but maybe. We'll see. I love that. That's how it started for me. I describe it as like a little dimmer switch went on. I was in this dark room and then that little dimmer switch went on two years ago. And I would say, now my dimmer switch is a fully lit room. Not a room I'm ready to step into yet, but a room that I can see more clearly and a path I can see on how to get there. And I'm truly shocked. I'm actually shocked myself that like, wow, one day I'm going to be excited about retirement. This is cool. Well, Dana, are there any final thoughts or recommendations you have when it comes to retirement planning? You know, the last thing is really around planning ahead for those slow-go and no-go years. As I studied cognitive decline, as I had the experience with clients we've served for 25 years in some cases, we often think we'll plan when we get there.

But because our decision-making ability changes, it's very important during those go-go years. to decide what you want your later life to look like. Just like during the pre-go years, you want to do that thought around, well, how will I transition and what will my retirement look like? Once you're five, 10 years into those go-go years, you really want to give some thought to things we don't like to think about, which is what will the last five or 10 years of my life look like and where will I want to live and how do I want to handle that with my family and my children and begin having those discussions. Not something that we all love talking about, but if we do, it can be a beautiful and peaceful transition that we have just like the transition into retirement can be. Well, Dana, this has been a great conversation. Thank you so much for joining us.

Thank you. And that, my fullest friends, is the show. Thanks so much for listening. And thanks to Bart Shannon, the engineer for this and every Saturday episode. As always, people on the program may have interest in the investments they talk about in the mountains. Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against. So don't buy or sell investments based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards.

It is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. I'm Robert ProCamp. Full on, everybody.