Motley Fool Money - Disney Pops, Alphabet Drops

Episode Date: February 9, 2023

Disney’s latest results and plans were just what Wall Street wanted to hear. (0:21) Tim Beyers discusses: - How the parks & experiences division drove Disney’s 1st-quarter results - ESPN+ being a bright spot among streaming properties - Alphabet shares falling over a botched AI demo and concerns about Microsoft (13:20) Just in time for Valentine’s Day, Jason Hall and Ryan Henderson engage in a bull vs. bear debate over Match Group. Motley Fool premium members, click here to link your Motley Fool membership to a Spotify account and check out the latest episode of our exclusive podcast, Stock Advisor Roundtable! And if you're not a member, you can get a preview of the show and learn how to get access here on Spotify! Stocks discussed: DIS, MSFT, GOOG, MTCH Host: Chris Hill Guest: Tim Beyers, Jason Hall, Ryan Henderson Producer: Ricky Mulvey Engineer: Rick Engdahl Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hi everyone, I'm Charlie Cox. Join us on Disney Plus as we talk with the cast and crew of Marvel Television's Daredevil Born Again. What haven't you gotten to do as Daredevil? Being the Avengers. Charlie and Vincent came to play. I get emotional when I think about it. One of the great finale of any episode we've ever done. We are going to play Truth or Daredevil.

What? Oh boy. Fantastic. You guys go hard, man. Daredevil Born Again official podcast Tuesdays, and stream season two of Marvel Television's Daredevil Born Again on Disney Plus. We've got the latest plans from Disney and a bull versus bear debate over match group. Motley Fool Money starts now.

I'm Chris Hill joining me today, our man in Colorado, Tim Byers. Thanks for being here. Thanks for having me. Fully caffeinated. Ready to go. You know who else is fully caffeinated? Bob Eager. Disney's first quarter profits and revenue came in higher than expected.

Although one of the headlines here is they did lose about two and a half million subscribers for the Disney Plus streaming service. Maybe not a big shock because they recently raised the price of the service. And there are a bunch of things we can get to here, but I'm, I'm sure, you know, because among other things, Eiger talked about something that Wall Street loves to hear, which is cost-cutting. So where would you like to start? Because there's a lot to cover here. I mean, if you remember the old, you know, we're in Super Bowl week, and it used to be after, this is years ago, after the Super Bowl, the winner would say, I'm going to Disneyland or I'm going to Disney World. And let me tell you, folks, a lot of people going to Disneyland, going to Disney World.

I think that's the story here, the headline of the Disney earnings here, Chris. The parks and experiences segment in terms of revenue and in terms of operating income just absolutely crushed it. It is true that Disney did not have the greatest quarter. because it does have some anchors that will get to in terms of its media business. But Parks and Experiences is absolutely crushing it, Chris. So just some quick numbers on this. Overall, for the Parks and Experiences segment that includes consumer products, that was up 21%.

But domestic parks and experiences revenue, that was up 27%. International also up 27%. And here's the thing that I really like, Chris, domestic. So this is basically U.S. visits to Disneyland, Disney World, parks and experiences, revenue up to $2.1 billion. That was up 36% year over a year. That's in terms of operating income. So I think it's fair to say, Chris, that people deciding like, nope, you know what?

I need to get out. My kids have been just yanking at me to go to Disneyland, go to Disney World. They said, I yield. We are going, and we will pay whatever is required. And boy, did that show up in this earnings report, Chris. It really did. And thanks for shining a light on that, because we've talked so much over the last few years about the streaming business.

And it is worth remembering that when Disney is getting it done at the parks, that really is such a strong financial engine for the overall business. Let me go back to Iger for a second, because when he was talking about controlling costs, he talked about how they are going to cut the amount of money they spend on content by $3 billion. And I found it interesting. If you think about Disney, everything that Disney has and all of the content it produces, movies, television, and of course ESPN, which is now its own division. Essentially separated all of the content that the company creates into two categories.

Sports and non-sports. He very specifically said, we're cutting this $3 billion from the non-sports category, which, you know, again, it's Super Bowl week and maybe not surprising that the success that businesses have with live sports, media rights, everything. that goes with that. Yeah, that's where he didn't say ESPN is untouchable because in some ways the division is going to be under more scrutiny as its own division, but that's not where they're looking to cut. Right. Yes, exactly right. And for good reason. So let's get to some of the direct-to-consumer business here, starting with Disney Plus. If we look at Disney Plus overall, Disney

plus overall was down slightly in terms of total subscribers. So to 161.8 million from 164.2 million in October of 2022. So that's a quarterly number, quarterly decline of about 1%. But most of that was driven by essentially India. So Southeast Asia, Disney Hot Star, Disney Plus Hot Star was down. percent over this period. So to 57.5 million subscribers from 61.3 million. So that drove the decline in the Disney Plus core business. That was up about 1% year over year. But here's the thing. Just getting to your sports comment, Chris. So ESPN Plus up very slightly, 24.9 million from 24.3 million in the prior quarter, that's up 2%. but in a quarter where it's really hard, like Disney Plus, domestic, average revenue per subscriber down,

international, down, Disney Plus Corps overall, down, Hot Star average revenue per subscriber up 28%. But that's probably due to price increases and people left. Where's the one where people are joining and paying a little bit more? Well, that's ESPN Plus. $5.53 in the latest quarter up from $4.84 and total subscribers up. So there is some real kind of staying power with sports. And I'll say one more thing on this. It kind of supports while Iger's thinking about this. There is a lot of appeal to not just domestic sports, but international sports. Like it's becoming more global. You have people in other countries,

for example, paying attention to LeBron James setting the new NBA scoring record. Like, that's a global event now, the Super Bowl. That's a global event. You have association football in other countries becoming more popular here in the U.S. So it does make sense to me that Iger wants to spend more in this area. I don't think he's just talking about more 30-for-30 documentaries, Chris. I don't think he is either. And because we've also talked about this recently, worth pointing out that activist investor,

Nelson Peltz, has declared victory in his proxy fight with Disney and basically said, okay, we're good. And I get it. I mean, you look at just the recent past shares of Disney are up nearly 30 percent in 2023. I mean, it's, it's, they have a lot of work to do. Iger talked about wanting to reinstate the dividend by the end of the year, but they are saying and doing a lot of things that is resonating with Wall Street. Well, and they're also, I mean, I hate this part, but this is something we see a lot when the cost cutting includes a lot of job cutting, and that will be the case here.

About 7,000 jobs the Wall Street Journal is reporting. I mean, Wall Street tends to like that because Those are permanent cuts for the moment, and that will dramatically reduce the cost profile here. I think there's also where I want to focus, like that I don't love because those are real people and those are real jobs. But I do think there is clearly some room for optimization inside the Disney Plus business, because there's a lot of really good, long-lived content, and you could probably focus, like, The Mandalorian is amazing. It has a huge audience.

People love it. People can't get enough of their baby Yoda. Give me more Baby Yoda. And there is a new season coming up. So like double down on the things that you know really work. I think that's probably more of what we're going to see from Disney because the cash flow numbers are not great. Like they're still burning cash about $2 billion. Disney does have cash.

It's not like they don't. But when you're burning $2 billion, that seems very undisney, Chris. And I think Iger wants to fix that pronto. Absolutely. And thank you for mentioning the job cuts. I mean, it's about 3% of the overall workforce, and it's very much in line with what we've seen from a lot of other companies. I want to move off of Disney before I let you go. We had talked earlier in the week on the show about Microsoft rolling out its partnership with Chat, GPT.

Shares of Alphabet are down 12% in the last two days because Google held their own event to show off Bard, which is the company's new AI chatbot. The demo included a mistake. On the one hand, I look at Alphabet as a business that has not really methodically changed in the last 48 hours, and I look at the stock drop and think, well, that's an overreaction. At the same time, what are they doing at Google? Why do they allow this to happen? That's a good question.

And it is Gaff. It is worth noting. But the overreaction here, I mean, what? The internet overreacts? Please, come on. No, but I do think it's a bit of an overreaction. Having said that, you are right. Like they had time to plot this out, to get it right.

You want it to be perfect. So it is embarrassing. Having said that, please let's not forget that this is a company on its balance sheet that once you subtract the debt has a net $100 billion of cash available to itself, like right now, to invest in this thing. You could take it down to closer to $85 billion if you're going to include the lease obligations, but still, Chris, that's $85 billion. Google's got time to get this right. And please, let's not forget that the brains. behind OpenAI and Chat GPT, in large measure, come from Google. There's a lot of experience here inside the Google machine to build something that is comparable.

Let's also not forget that ChatGPT is amazing at making hilarious mistakes. Just ask it enough questions and you will get hilariously bad answers. Or as Bill Mann put it on the morning show as we recorded this, about an hour ago. He called it mansplaining with like confident and confidently delivered bad answers. That is chat GPT in a nutshell. It does that quite a lot. So Google isn't alone in this area. So I think the main concern about this, and I'll wrap around this point, the main concern is that when chat GPT gets better and it will, the idea of chat GPT, not just giving you a place to go to, but actually giving you the thing, sort of eliminates the need for Google. Because Google's like, hey, here's where you find the stuff.

And here's some of the stuff you need. And here's where to go find the rest of it. Chad GPT just says, here's your thing. You know, I called it this morning as we were talking about this. It's like the thing that asked Jeeves, the old 1990s Butler search engine, the thing that Asked Jeeves actually wanted to be. Like, here's all of your stuff. Your Butler delivers everything to you.

ChatGPT is trying to be like that full service. Let's just give the whole thing to you, not show you where to go. And that's a difference. Microsoft's got a lot of cash. Maybe they can buy the Ask Chief's name and like this just to, you know, just to throw it on there for nostalgia. Tim Byers, always great talking to you. Thanks for being here.

Thanks, Chris. Valentine's Day is just around the corner, and one company is a leader in helping you, yes, you, find a date. Ricky Mulvey hosts a Bull versus Bear debate on Match Group, the online dating conglomerate with more than 45 brands around the world. We've got a very special Valentine's Day edition of Bull versus Bear. Today, the company is Match Group, the online dating service that has brands including Tinder, hinge, and plenty of fish, taking the Bull case.

It's Ryan Henderson. Ryan, good to see you, as always. Good to see you, Ricky. Looking forward to this. And Jason Hall, thank you for taking the bear case on this. Hey, Ricky. Yeah, this is one that looks so interesting because everybody seems like online dating is a thing. But there's some things you've got to really understand before you jump into this one with both feet.

Jason, if you thought Twitter had a good dopamine burst, wait until you hear about these online dating services. That's why we're doing the bull case first. Ryan Henderson, five minutes is yours. Awesome. All right. Well, I think it's best to probably set the groundwork because maybe not everyone knows exactly what it is, but Match Group is the largest online dating company in the world, and they've basically been the pioneers of the space altogether. So kind of started with Match.com, as some people might remember in the early days, but today it's comprised of a dozen or so digital properties. They segment it into four different parts, so Tinder, Hinge, Asia, and then they have Evergreen and Emerging. So Evergreen's a lot of the legacy ones. Emerging is kind of the smaller, more niche ones. But to kind of start, I know there's still sort of a stigma around online dating among certain age demographics and especially in certain geographies. But regardless of what people think about it, the results have been astounding. According to one study conducted by, I believe it was initially conducted by Stanford, the percentage

of couples in the US who met online was at about 10% in the year 2000. That number jumped to around 20% by the 2010 timeframe, and then by 2018, it had reached nearly 40%. I think a lot of the remaining percent, you could maybe say, are bending the truth. People maybe say that they didn't meet online or they met in a bar, but really they started messaging online, something like that. And it's even higher in same-sex couples. In developed markets, this is really the number one way relationships start. One of the great characteristics of Match Group is that within dating, there's a really prominent

network effect. So the more singles or potential partners that are online or on a platform, the greater the the values of the service. That alone further attracts new users. And this cycle goes on and on. Additionally, that means there's kind of barriers to success here. Even though the barriers to entry are low, all you have to do is write the code and ship it. It's hard to scale and have success, because if you're a user, you want to be on the properties that have the widest selection of other people. So this provides really low-cost growth for Match Group. And then this is part of why I think the opportunity is so large. They have a number of levers they can pull to make people pay.

This is obviously, finding a partner is obviously something that a lot of people are willing to pay for. It kind of varies depending on the brand, how they generate revenue. But at Tinder, they've been growing both payers and average revenue per payer consistently. Hinge, they've seen remarkable growth of the last three years. For those that don't know the app, it kind of caters to more serious daters, people that are willing to spend more, a little more affluent, older. And so that's kind of the way I look at it.

Two primary brands. There's Tinder and Hinge. Tender is the leader in terms of users and influence globally. It's going to grow seamlessly, I think, just through the sheer network effect. And then Hinge has seen remarkable success in the U.S., and it's just beginning its push into Europe. In fact, it's the number two most downloaded app in the UK, Ireland, Sweden, number three most downloaded in Germany, Austria, Switzerland. Some of these they haven't even officially launched in. People are so eager to get on the app. They're doing it before.

They have sort of the native language app version. And so it really is, it kind of shows, I think, that there's the demand for it. It'll take some time to monetize, but I think there's plenty of users around the world that want an app like Hinge. So that's the way I see it. Two online dating giants and potential cash cows in Tinder and Hinge, and then you're getting sort of a basket of potential upside or call options that can leverage the best practices from the successful brand. So I think the opportunity here is clear. I think investors are getting a really attractive valuation as well.

So, over the last 12 months, Match Group generated just over $3 billion in revenue. And if you exclude a one-time litigation settlement that they paid out to the Tinder founders this year, they would have earned just under a billion dollars in free cash flow. The value of the business stays about $16 to $17 billion. So you're paying roughly 18 times last year's cash that they generated. And I think it's one of the premier assets in a booming industry. I really like that. And I think it's a fair price to pay.

Ryan Henderson with the bull case for the match group. Also the most polite distinction I've ever heard between Tinder and Hinge. Thank you so much for that. On to the bear case, Jason Hall, up to five minutes is yours. I'm going to start with a couple things on the bull case that Ryan talked about that I think are important and they are true and they are real. I'm going to challenge a little bit the stigma because I think that stigma has certainly started to fall away, particularly for younger singles who are. who are using these apps, they grew up with them and that stigma isn't really there. And as a result, we've seen more online relationships for other parts of our life expand for older

people. So I think that stigma has certainly gone away. And again, if you look at the data, particularly like you said, for younger people and the data for older people, when people tend to most likely be single, those are certainly good trends when you combine that with the global population growth. I agree with that completely. I also think that if you look at the electric vehicles and the total growth of electric vehicles over the past five years and over the next 10 years, you see really attractive tailwinds to like. The thing that I question with this industry broadly is how much of those tailwinds are going to result in per share cash flow growth for investors. Ryan, you talked a little bit about with the per share free

cash flow that we've seen from Tinder and the free cash flow for 10, or the free cash flow for Tinder, there's some positive things there to like. But what we're also seeing happen as more people are going to these apps, as a match group is beginning to expand outside of the U.S. and into Europe and into other emerging markets, is we're also seeing increased competition. Now, that's a good thing, again, because it means there's a lot of opportunity. But a quick search just in the U.S., there are more than 20 dating apps right now that come up just when you type in the word dating app in iOS. It comes up that quickly. And they become very, very targeted based on lifestyle, based on demographic, based on gender, based on sexual

identity that makes it harder and harder as you grow your scale to necessarily deliver the right customer-facing product. And I think that as Match Group continues to grow, that could be a thing that it faces and that it deals with. You talk about international expansion. There are a few things that are more affected by social norms than establishing a relationship. And I think we're really going to find out how well-run this company is and how good its talent acquisition is with its ability to develop and launch successful dating products where cultures are very, very different than they are in the U.S. where the company kind of gets started. And I think that's going to be the thing that it struggles with to grow outside of the U.S.

and we're going to find that maybe it's total addressable market, there's the number, and then there's the realistic part of what can actually go after. So I think the scalability of the business, as attractive as it sounds, may not be as attractive as it really seems to be. So you look at this business, you look at the TAM, you think about all of the complexities and challenges that are there, and I really think maybe this isn't such a great, guaranteed no-brainer that it might seem like it is today. Because part of that scaling up and that talent acquisition is scaling up its costs.

A lot of times we think of these businesses as having really wonderful operating leverage where their growth rates for their revenues are going to vastly exceed the growth rates of their operating spending. I'm not convinced that that's truly going to be the case with Match Group over the long term. I think investors look at EVs. I'll use that example again and say, well, I want to find the next Tesla of dating. we always fight the last war. And I think sometimes the risk as investors, as we look at these industries, we look at the great growth, we look at the TAM, and we say, okay, I'm going to find the one that's going to be the winner.

And sometimes it's harder to be a winner in a growth industry than we think, and while it looks compelling, I think investors should be really careful about thinking that the things that they've done that have been successful are going to scale up around the world and continue to generate cash flow per share growth. that we've seen. Don't fight the last war. Great advice for forward affairs, dating and investing. Jason Hall, thank you for the bear case. You get to decide who made the better argument at Motley Full Money on Twitter. That's because today's lucky winner is going to receive a date night package. That's right, a buy one, get one coupon for a Wendy's entree and a steady cam recording of Phantom of the Opera. Make sure to decide who won again at Motley Full Money on Twitter. Ryan Henderson, Jason Hall, appreciate your time. That's all for today, but check out the latest episode of Stock Advisor Roundtable.

It's our member-exclusive podcast available only on Spotify, and the latest episode is out now with Andy Cross, Asa Charma, and Emily Flippen talking about the new stock recommendations in our Stock Advisor service and a whole lot more. We've got a link in the show notes for how you can connect your Motley Fool Premium account to a Spotify account so you can start listening today. And if you're not yet a member of Stock Advisor, we've got another link in the show notes so you can join. As always, people on the program may have interests in the stocks they talk about, and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against. So, don't buy yourself stocks based solely on what you hear. I'm Chris Hill. Thanks for listening.

We'll see you tomorrow.