Motley Fool Money - Disney/Fox: What Investors Need To Know

Episode Date: December 15, 2017

Disney buys a big part of 21st Century Fox. Costco delivers surprising online numbers. And Waste Management once again proves that trash is treasure. Plus, CNBC’s Carl Quintanilla talks bitcoin, business, and what to watch in 2018. To get a limited-edition holiday shave set while supplies last, go to Harrys.com/Fool.   Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This message comes from NPR sponsor Paramount Plus and the new original series The Madison. Taylor Sheridan's most intimate story yet. The Madison follows a family raised in a world of digital distraction, forced by tragedy to truly see one another and come together. Starring Michelle Pfeiffer and Kurt Russell. The Madison, new series streaming now only on Paramount Plus. Support for Motley Full Money comes from our friends at Rocket Mortgage by Quicken Loans. Home plays a big role in your own.

life. That's why Crickin Loans created Rocket Mortgage. It lets you apply simply and understand the entire mortgage process fully so you can be confident you're getting the right mortgage for you. To get started, go to RocketMortgage.com slash fool. Also this week, thanks to Harries for supporting this episode of Motley Full Money. This holiday, give Harries and give Handsome. Get your holiday shopping done early and take advantage of free shipping. Come on, it's free shipping. To get a limited edition holiday shave set while supplies last, go to Harriers.com slash Fool right now. Everybody needs money.

That's why they call it money. From Fool Global Headquarters, this is Motley Fool Money. It's the Motley Full Money Radio Show. I'm Chris Helen, joining me in studio this week from Million Dollar Portfolio, Jason Moser, and Matt Argusinger, and from Total Income, Ron Gross. Good to see you, as always, gentlemen. Hey, Chris. We've got the latest headlines from Wall Street.

CNBC host Carl Kintania is our guest this week, and as always, we'll give you. an inside look at the stocks on our radar. But we begin with the deal that is remaking the entertainment industry. The Walt Disney company is buying the bulk of 21st Century Fox's business for $52 billion in change. Here's what Disney's getting. The movie studios, TV networks like FX and National Geographic, Fox's regional sports networks, and majority control of Hulu. That's all? There is a lot to unpack here, guys. Ron. Let me start with this. Do you like this deal for Disney at this price? I do like this deal. I've been a Disney shareholder for 15 years. And quite frankly, I was waning a bit. ESPN, struggling, sports streaming, Iger leaving. This has reinvigorated me. I like the injection of these assets. I like that Iger is staying longer. I think this bodes well.

He's not just staying longer, Jason. He's staying several years longer through 2021. Yeah, I think that may be the key part to this deal. It probably has everybody feeling pretty good. Just knowing that his track record there with these three big acquisitions before Marvel and Pixar and Lucasfilm, and now maybe this is the Grand Slam here to kind of bring it all home because this is a big deal. It was funny. I was talking to my daughters last night about this. I said, did you guys hear about this in the news? I said, Disney is buying all of these properties, and they kind of had a little bit of a blank look on their faces. And they said, Disney's going to own the Simpsons. And they were like, well, no way!

So that really kind of drove at home for him at this point. So, I mean, to me, look, it's all, Bob Eiker is trying to figure out how to build this business in such a way where it develops a long-lasting, sustainable sort of relationship with the customer, direct-to-consumer relationship. And so that's the whole point behind all of these acquisitions, right? He's trying to figure out how to sort of be part of this over-the-top distribution, take this company to the next level, sort of where the media space is headed here in the 21st century. And I know that a lot of people like to make this sort of a Netflix versus Disney thing.

I don't think this is a shot across the bow at Netflix. I mean, yeah, they're going to be competing directly with them. But I don't think this is a deal intended to try to sink Netflix. It's simply intended to really participate in this tremendous opportunity. It's going to unfold over the next 10, 20 years. I totally agree with that. And I like Chris in your opening that. you ended with the last bullet point was the Hulu, getting the majority stake in Hulu,

because I think the headline to me here is that the whole idea that Iger was rolling with last summer about rolling out the separate ESPN app, the separate Disney app, I think that's out the door now. I don't think that's going to happen. I think the majority stake of Hulu, I think that's going to be, or it should be in my mind, the destination where all this new content's going to go. That becomes the home now. And it positions Hulu against Netflix and Amazon. It kind of gives you the three, what I view, the three mainstreaming video apps. Rolling out a separate ESPN app and Disney have, it's just going to clutter an already cluttered landscape for this entertainment. I think Hulu is now positioned to be the third player.

Well, Iger has signaled that he does want three distinct streaming platforms, and we'll see how it shakes out. One, which is family-oriented, which is Disney, Marvel, Lucas, Pixar, sports, and then something more adult-themed, which is kind of a weird way to phrase it, but the Hulu, the Hulu streaming. So it'll be interesting to see how that shakes out. Now, there's some restrictions on the Hulu, especially because Comcast still owns a 30 percent chug on it, you can't make many changes to that until after September 2018. When that rolls around, then I think it's up for grabs of what changes get made and we'll see what happens to the Comcast stake. But I do want to mention that I saw one really interesting quote that says, this isn't

an entertainment deal. This is a sports deal. And we can argue that probably to the cows come home. But once you add the Fox Sports regional networks into this mix and to help bolster I think that's where it kind of gets interesting. Let's come back to the sports in just a second because there was a lot of great coverage of this story, and there are a lot of different angles to it. The only thing that I saw in terms of the coverage of Disney and Fox that sort of made me raise an eyebrow was some people asking the question with regards to Hulu, well, what about the minority stakeholders? They may not like what Disney is going to do. And I just thought, then they should have figured out a way to be the majority shareholder.

Because, to Ron's point, Maddie, I mean, if they own 60% of Hulu, then guess what? It's kind of game over. Yeah, that's a controlling stake in my view. At least I think 60% is. If we're doing the math, I'm no mathematician. Yeah, I mean, I just think I still am going to push back on the idea of rolling out those apps because I just think customers want less apps, less subscriptions to worry about. And I don't know if that necessarily means that Disney's going to kick off Comcast or other content

or allow other partners to get on there. I just think it can be the go-to destination if you want Disney. or ESPN content. Hulu can be the platform for that. It doesn't mean it can only, it's exclusively Disney or ESPN. Ron, to go back to the sports, because the entertainment piece of this got the big headlines, and probably rightfully so. But as you indicated, the regional sports networks that Fox owns really could be the hidden gem of this deal, because these are sports networks that are spread out across Major League Baseball, the NBA, and the NHL, across 40s, across 44 teams, including little markets like Los Angeles and New York City.

Right. So I think this might have, that's not a little deal. That's a big deal. And I think it may just be what ESPN needed to kind of stem the tide and make this a real offering for, which before, when we talked about, you know, months ago about the streaming service that they were going to offer, I was just unsure about how successful it was going to be. So adding this content, I think, might get them over the top. Jason, right before we started taping, we were talking about sort of featured games in the NFL and how, if you're the casual fan, if your team isn't playing, you're probably not going to watch.

But to the regional sports network, this is all about capturing those local fans. And if they really can do this across the country and take some of that content and serve it up to people wherever they are, it really could be huge for them. Oh, I think it definitely will be huge. I think it's just a matter of sort of looking at it from two different timelines, right? I mean, we can look at it in the short run and admit there are plenty of challenges as sort of all of these sports rights shakeout. And we've witnessed here over the past couple of decades how access to all of these leagues

in their games. I mean, that dollar figure just continues to go up. And at some point, the economics don't make a lot of sense. And we're already seeing where broadcast TV, they're having trouble making ends meet. So then it goes to cable, and now cable's having trouble making ends meet. And so where do you go from there? Well, I think where you go from there is as soon as these deals start expiring and you have to start renegotiating, you make it to where the economics made more sense.

And so I think that the company that holds the majority of these properties or most of these properties, which now it seems like Disney is really going to be the company that does hold them, well, they're going to have sort of a little bit of an upper hand there in those negotiations and how they play out. So I think if you can look at it from the perspective of 10 years down the line, I think it becomes a bit more attractive. And when we talk about regional sports and more local markets, well, I think we're also seeing in the form of social media companies, whether it's Twitter or Facebook or even Amazon Prime to an extent, they're serving distribution now for all of these sporting leagues as well. So they're taking part in bidding for access. And I wouldn't be surprised to see Disney look at those channels as potential points of distribution down the line as they start sort of renegotiating these deals as well.

So, Bob Eiger was going to step down in 2018. Then it got pushed back to the middle of 2019. Now it's the end of 2021. So, among other things, that means he has even more time to figure out who his successor is going to be, which in my mind makes it all the more crucial that that person is the choice. But assuming that the Murdoch family gets their 5% of the company and their seats on the board, it's quite possible that one of Rupert Murdoch's sons is at least going to be on the short list. Maybe, but I've got a proposition. Just hear me out, okay? You know, the United States Postal Service, they've introduced that Forever stamp where it doesn't matter how the price of the stamp goes up, you can use it. I think Iger needs to go on the next Forever stamp,

because really, we are talking about Bob Heger forever, right? Just an idea. Yeah, I mean, he was already going into the Hall of Fame. Whatever Hall of Fame exists for CEOs, but this obviously cements the deal. But am I wrong about the successor? Because it seems like the bar is even higher now for whoever that next person is. There's no question that bar is higher. I think also, in all honesty, we've got to look back at Bob Eager here and recognize the fact that for all of the success he's had to this point, this is likely going to be what we remember about him for the years to come. So when he retires, we're going to be looking at this deal to really kind of judge him, at least in the near term. So it is, granted, he's had a lot of success leading up to this point, but he needs to make sure he kind of goes out in a blaze of glory here because this is going to be, I think, the toughest deal to date because there's so many moving parts involved.

There are two public companies involved in this deal. Let's talk about the second one for a moment here. Fox is a smaller company now. They are going to be more streamlined, more focused with access to a lot of capital. Is it crazy to think that over the next five years, Ron, Fox is the stock you want to own instead of Disney? I don't think it's crazy. I don't know if you're right. It's an interesting business now with Fox broadcasting, basically the 28 Fox stations, Fox News, obviously well-known, and Fox Sports 1 and 2, and I believe the Big 10 network is part of that as well.

So no longer a content producer, and really actually the only kind of broadcast network that's not affiliated with a TV studio, which is interesting, which allows them to go out and get content from others who are not affiliated, like Warner Brothers or Sony or Lionsgate. There is plenty of content out there, but it's interesting. They kind of are now, they're freed up, they're independent, and it is a valuable collection of assets, and they probably will have a bright future. I'm going Disney, if you're asking between the two, but I still think this company looks interesting.

Yeah, I mean, you're just playing a lot of numbers. here. Fox, once this deal happens, you're going to have basically a 12 billion, $13 billion company versus Disney, which is now probably going to be around $200 billion. Trillion. So, you know, I think there's credence to that. I think it's worth looking at Fox and what they may have to offer. What I worry about, though, is that you can see clearly that Disney's got a plan. They've got a direct-to-consumer plan. They're going after it hard. I don't know what that means for Fox News and Fox FS1, things like that, because they are still in the same

situation of the cord-cutting trend and things like that. Do they have a plan? I'm not sure. Coming up, big retail, big tech, and the sexy world of trash. Stay right here. You're listening to Motley Full Money. Hey, it's the holiday season. I don't know if you're looking to buy a home or refinance your mortgage as a gift, which, you know, that would be a pretty big gift. And if you're going to do that, check out Rocket Mortgage. Because getting a mortgage, refinancing your existing home loan, not the easiest walk in the park. And when you're making a big financial decision like that, you want to be as confident as you are at your job or your life in general. And Rocket Mortgage gives you that same level of confidence when it comes to buying a home or refinancing your existing home loan.

Rocket mortgage is simple. It allows you to fully understand all the details and be confident that you're getting the right mortgage for you. Whether or not you get the big red bow to put on top of the refinance mortgage or the house, that's up to you. But to get started, go to rocketmortgage.com slash fool. Equal housing lender, licensed in all 50 states, and MLS Consumer Access.org, number 30, 30. Welcome back to Motley, Full Money, Chris Hill here in studio with Jason Moser, Matt Argusinger, and Ron Gross. Verizon is renewing its contract with the NFL to live stream games to its subscribers. Verizon had paid $1 billion over the past four years, and now over the next five years, Jason, they're paying $2 billion on a percent.

percentage basis, that is quite a leap. That is a leap. I think that when you look, I mean, it's a big deal, and I think that number sort of begs the question, are they paying too much? And I tend to think that, yes, they are, for a few different reasons. I mean, number one, this isn't an exclusive deal. I think it's going to span carriers, which I do understand that because this is less about Verizon per se and more about the properties that they own in Yahoo and AOL and whatnot. And so I understand understand at least having that sort of span carriers. But I think you have to kind of look a little bit further out and think about the NFL and sort of the pressures that we're seeing the league facing right now. And it's not to say that the NFL is going away, but I think in line with the Disney discussion that we were having regarding the sporting properties that are getting there, I think the NFL is hitting a point here where I don't know that they can continue to command the same type of pricing power in the years to come. When we look at sort of the nature of the sport, the injuries that are taking place, there are a lot of people that have a lot of problems with. with what's going on right now. And we have to think about the future of the game. And how many

people really are saying, well, I don't want my kids to be a part of something like that. That doesn't matter now, but it's going to matter 20 years from now, unless they get their act together. So, you know, Verizon, they're really good at delivering that information and data to us, providing the content, a little bit of a different story. I'm not sure this is really a deal that's going to make a whole heck of a lot of sense for them four or five years down the road. And again, I think we're probably hitting the point where the NFL in particular is kind of hit that point where they can't command much more than the way of pricing. Costco's same store sales in the first quarter rose more than 10%. And, Ron, their e-commerce

sales sure are heading in the right direction. For those that thought Costco's best days were behind them, maybe I was one of them. I was certainly one of them. We should scratch our heads because these numbers indicate that that certainly may not be the case. And as you said, the Com store sales numbers are really impressive. Fourteen straight months of Com store sale increases. Overall net sales up 13%. Retention rate, the big, big number here, because let's remember, Costco actually makes most of his money from its membership fees.

So you've got to retain that customer. 90% in the US, 87% worldwide. Very impressive numbers. They're introducing new initiative like Costco Grocery, click and collect, where you can buy laptops and jewelry online, and then go. into the store to pick them up and hopefully spend some additional dollars while you look around. So Costco is not kind of sitting on their old model. They're moving into the e-commerce world and so far doing a nice job. I think the click and collect is going to be worth watching because

I've never heard anyone who shops at Costco talk about how they went to Costco and they bought absolutely everything on their list and nothing more. I hear all the time that it's like as soon As you go, it's like, oh, well, I had my list, but I bought so much more. Fourth quarter results for Adobe Systems came in better than expected, and Adobe Systems Management also raised guidance for 2018. Things are looking pretty good over there, Maddie. Looking real good, but several years ago, you know, things didn't look good because I think everyone, including me, to a certain extent, was worried about this transition

from selling software as a standalone package, what they call perpetual licenses, to software as a subscription in the cloud. Adobe, like many companies, went through this transition, and the worries where well is going to cannibalize revenue, it's going to hurt margins, you're not going to make enough money off upgrades, piracy risk. As it turns out, if you build great products, and by the way, if you're a standard bearer like Adobe is, yeah, people are going to pay for it and they're going to keep coming back, and that's kind of what's happened with Adobe.

Sales were up 25 percent year over year, profit margins at an all-time high. You mentioned they raised guidance. There's a ton of like about Adobe, except maybe the stock price right now, which is about 40 times forward earnings. But other than that, I think everything, and if they continue to grow at 25%, it's not a high multiple. Shares of waste management hit an all-time high on Friday after the company announced. It will increase its quarterly dividend, nearly 10%. Jason, waste management is one of those companies that is easy to miss because it really isn't in the sexiest business.

Oh, come on. Cue the sexy music, man. I mean, this is a very nice business. trash collection. There's nothing like getting that stuff out to the curb on a nice morning and coming back and knowing that it's not there anymore. I think, listen, at first glance, you look at this company and you look at the top line growth, they bring it, and you think, why would I consider investing? I mean, five years, it's about 1% annualized. But then you look to the bottom line, and they're obviously doing something right, because that's growing at about 10% annualized on the earnings per share number. And I think it's because of a few things. I mean, it is a model that spits out a lot of cash, and that cash can be used to pay a

dividend, which they do. It can be used to buyback shares, which they do. And this is a very heavily regulated industry. So, I mean, there are tough barriers to entry, not only on the regulation side, but on the economic side as well. Shares are yielding $1.86 per share now, which is better than 2 percent. This is the 15th consecutive year of raising that dividend. I have a feeling they're gunning for 25. They want to be one of those dividend aristocrats. And I mean, trash is an extremely reliable market. It's happening like the sun comes up. So I think that if you're looking for an income-style play, I mean, I think this is a stock, you kind of always have to have on your watch list.

I completely agree from an income's perspective. I wonder what a company like that can do, though, to increase those margins. As you say, top line, not so impressive. Bottom line, better, though. Fuel comes to mind. I could see, but that'll be a cyclical up and down thing. I wonder how else they can squeeze additional dollars on the bottom line from the top. Depending on the regulation side, I mean, it's a matter of how much pricing power

they can exert over time, but I don't know that's fully in their control. Is it safe to assume that if corporate taxes are cut, that greatly increases the chances they keep their dividend streak going? Oh, I think that's for sure. I think that the tax cut probably is going to result in a lot of these companies buying back a lot of their shares too, which probably won't be too bad of a thing, though. I'm sure some companies will figure out a way to screw it up. We'll see if Adobe does that with their stock at 40 times for earnings.

All right. Jason Moser, Ron Gross, Matt Argusinger. guys. We'll see you later in the show. Up next, a conversation with CNBC host Carl Kintanilla. Don't go anywhere. This is Motley Full Money. Chris Moore. Chris Moore. Welcome back to Motley Full Money. I'm Chris Hill. Carl Kintania has a front row seat when the opening bell rings at the New York Stock Exchange. He is the host of CNBC's squawk on the street, which you can catch each weekday morning at 9 a.m. Eastern. Carl, always good to talk to you.

Happy holidays, Chris. And to you as well, before we delve into the holidays and look ahead to 2018, let's take a moment and look back at 2017. What stands out to you in terms of business stories that are the big headlines of this year? Well, I think to a large degree, it's the measure by which people were wrong about so many different things. Namely, the fear that Trump White House would lead us into recession or that he would spook American business or that he would spook American business or that he, would play favorites or disrupt markets on Twitter. I mean, all of which I guess arguably has happened to some degree, but obviously this White House has shown that they are committed to letting the economy run hot despite some early

legislative stumbles. And the market has come around at that point of view, and there was never a dip that you could reliably buy because it was gone so quickly. So here we are in December, record highs. Hardly anyone cares. You know, money managers are having a great year, thanks to a few very famous names that were also the outperformers last year, namely Fang. So just a lot of people eating humble pie, I think, as the year comes down to a close,

and then next year maybe we'll see will be about the, you know, whether or not how you cool the economy down, but we're not quite there yet. One person who probably had maybe one bite of humble pie, not that I know that he's necessarily admitted it publicly is Jamie Diamond, who is probably the most prominent person in the public markets to be bearish on Bitcoin, which just continues its meteoric rise. Where is this going? I mean, I realize that's a crystal ball type of question, but that's yet another thing that seems to do nothing but go up.

Yeah. You know, we've had a lot of guests on, bulls and bears on this thing that really nobody understands yet. And to me, the formative guest on the topic for us, for me, was Alan Greenspan, who made the following point.

And that was when the continental currency was brand new during the revolutionary years. It, you know, for a while, went sword and value to such a degree that George Washington was, able to finance military services and goods for a long time before it fell in on itself. So I don't discount some of these targets. I mean, they sound crazy now, but could it be $100K in a couple of years?

It's just because there is no intrinsic value, I think to discount that is just the same as discounting a trip back to zero. So I think it would be dangerous to play it. I don't own any. I don't know about you, but I also certainly would be afraid to short it because the learning curve here is just starting. Also, and one last point on Bitcoin, we think it's a U.S. story. It's really an international story. So much of the trading is coming out of Asia. Countries like South Africa and the Netherlands are searching for it on Google more than the U.S. So we need to remember that the whole planet is playing it.

And we may think of it as an American innovation, but it's truly global. When I think back on 2017, one of the enjoyable images for me took place on your network when Panera Bread announced that it was being taken private. And Ron Shake, the CEO of Panera Bread, could not have looked happier. He could not have been more thrilled at the prospect that he was now going to be running a private company and add to that since then, Buffalo Wild Wings being taken private, layer in the continuing struggles at Chipotle. And I'm wondering if restaurants are, at least for the foreseeable future, an industry

that investors would be better off to just avoid altogether. You know, I think your point's a good one, and I remember Shaik Giddy. I mean, you could just see him doing cartwheels, you know, saying farewell to Wall Street and analysts and the SEC and all, you know, just the things that go along with public life. I do think we're in a period with restaurants now where kind of where we were with retail two years ago, and that is there are a lot of restaurants. There are just too many restaurants, just like we were saying there were too many department stores in 2015.

And you layer on top of that, the growth in delivery via Amazon or anyone else, the growth in at-home kits, whether you believe Blue Apron or Martha Stewart. So we're just not going to dine out. I mean, Chris, like we used to, and that's going to crunch margins, especially if commodities take off with inflation. So, yeah, the private game in restaurants I don't think is over. I think people, I even saw something today about, be prepared for more bankruptcies in retail and restaurants in the first quarter,

that's a structural dynamic that it may go up and down a little bit, but we know where the general trend is. Well, I think you just tipped your hand on your answer for my next question, which was going to be about retail, because all indications over the past few weeks seem to point towards a pretty good retail environment heading into the holidays. But it sounds like based on what you just said, that may be a short-term bump if structurally a lot of these retail. retailers are just not in a position to be sustainable. Yeah, I mean, I think definitely whether it was the cold weather that helped apparel, whether it was a pretty decent inventory management going into the season, who knows what. But, I mean, it was a nice gust of tailwind this holiday season, and we'll see how it ends up.

But it looks pretty good. But the overall story, I mean, I think it basically put a dent in the long-term story of retail, But we're not, I mean, come on. We all know that a lot of these sea level malls are going to turn into data farms or server farms or something, amusement parks. There's all this retail space that will have to be repurposed, and that's going to affect vacancy rates and rent. And I just don't, that story didn't end on Black Friday, no way. You're listening to Motley Full Money talking with Carl Cantini, a host of CNBC Squawk on the street. He also hosts Binge, the online interview series with stars and creators of binge-worthy television.

And you just sat down with the star of one of my favorite shows on television, Better Call, Saul. How is Bob Odenkirk? And what did you two talk about? You know, there's always a moment you're about to interview, in this case, someone pretty famous, right? He's been in public life comedy world for years. And when you're micing up and you're sitting down and your camera people are tweaking the lights. And they ask about you. Not just like, how's your, how's it going, but where'd you go to school? And then where were you after that? And then that's Bob Odenkirk. I was, I was so impressed

with his curiosity about so many things. He was such a giant in the world of comedy sketchwriting. He created Chris Farley's Matt Foley character. And through some happenstance, he ends up becoming a performer himself, not his aspiration, but it happened. And he's now playing with house money. Everything that happens from here on out is just upside for him. And the great thing about him is that one day he's writing Mr. Show for Netflix. The next he's in an Alexander Payne indie movie. Now he's doing Spielberg tent polls.

And the guy, you never know which way he's going or which way he could go from here. So I just think he's a joy to watch. How do you think new television shows? shows get oxygen these days because the Golden Globe nominations just came out, and I honestly did not recognize some of the names of the nominees, whether it was the programs or the stars in certain programs. Are we at a point now where the volume of television programming, not just broadcast producers, but cable television and Netflix and Amazon Prime, are critics now more powerful than ever before because they can help people sort out what are the best shows to be

watching because there's just so many of them. Odenkirk makes this point almost exactly like you did. We went through this migration where content creators were migrated from old style media companies, TV networks, movie studios, whatever, to these new players, these new marginal buyers of content like Netflix and Amazon. But what's happened is, as you know, when you fire up Netflix, it is a sea of many of, of, boxes, right? I mean, curation is now our biggest enemy. I don't know what to watch.

My wife and I can't decide. So we spend 15 minutes just waiting through previews and trailers. Odin Kirk's point is that pendulum may now be coming back, where if you and I had the Hill-Kintinia show, we could go to Netflix. and probably get paid, but maybe we'd rather go to a Nat Geo, to an AMC, where it may not be the biggest pool, but we know we're going to be loved, and they're going to make the biggest effort to make sure people know about the Hill-Kentania show through advertising, through a sustained campaign of advertising. And that's going to be a really interesting shift in 18, if in fact

that continues to play out. Let's move to football, even though I realize as a graduate of the University of Colorado and a fan of the Denver Broncos, both of which have losing records. I know this is probably a sensitive topic. But in terms of the business of the NFL, do you think it is starting to show some cracks because I realize that ratings are down, but then so are television ratings in general. So it's not like NFL ratings are dramatically underperforming. total television ratings. By the same token, the health issues continue to get more and more

coverage, and it just becomes harder to ignore. Yeah, I was talking to a banker last night at this event who specializes in sports, and I think, I'm reading between the lines, but I think the lesson that he thinks this year brought us was that at the very least Thursday night was maybe a bridge too far, right? You saw players getting hurt. You saw players complaining about sloppy play because they had only had three, four days rest. It does spread the league viewership a little thin after, what, 36 hours, 48 hours after Monday night or whatever that is. I mean, so I don't envy Roger Goodell. I don't envy him having to manage this incredible evolution and viewership habits. but they've played it probably as well as they could, and they're not done.

They got a new deal with Verizon, and I'm sure there's more on the way. But there's only so much football that you can watch in the course of a given week. And then when you add the Neal issue, and when you add the disciplinary issue, and you add the officiating penalty issue, they've definitely loaded this car down with some weights. And I think that's one reason why you don't sense the enthusiasm we saw a few years. ago. But with companies like Verizon ponying up one and a half, two billion dollars for streaming rights, if the NFL were a stock, you're still holding onto your shares. Oh, yeah, I agree. And there's always people, you know, the bulls on sports are like, just wait until Google,

Amazon, Facebook really dip into the purse and start bidding big for rights. The big question there is, will the leagues say, sure, or will they remain a bidding? in Coussin and argue that broadband penetration in this country is not what it is for television yet. So how broad of an audience do they insist upon are these paychecks going to be so big they can't look the other way? As we look ahead to 2018, is there something in particular you're going to be watching? It can be an industry or it could be an economic indicator, but what's piquing your curiosity as we turn the calendar? Well, you know, inflation is going to be, I think, on everyone's radar, especially going into the new year, whether it's a new tax

platform, infrastructure, I mean, how hot can this engine run before you start seeing those metric spike? Gasoline, you're on years up 16%. Nobody talks about it, but that's like that'll get your attention. So do we start to pile onto that? And then, of course, you know, kind of like what's happened with Bitcoin, do we finally see retail investors? I mean, does your cab driver, doorman, bar buddy, start talking about stocks again the way we saw in 2000? You know, right? Another warning sign of the average Joe being the last marginal buyer who's left holding the bag before a correction. I mean, nobody wants to see that happen, but we're conditioned to watch for it.

So I think those are going to be the two things to watch. You can find them every weekday morning on CNBC. You can find them on NBC when the Winter Olympics start up in a few weeks. Carl Kentinea, have a great holiday. Chris, thanks so much. Up next, we'll give you an inside look at the stocks on our radar. This is Motley Full Money. Thanks to Harry's for supporting this week's episode of Motley Full Money.

I love Harry's products. I've been a customer of Harry's for years. And this holiday season, let's face it, it's not always easy to buy a gift for someone. Because some people like me aren't great about saying, oh, this is what I'm. I'd really like. And whether it's your old man or your kid or someone you're dating, this holiday season, go with Harry's. Harry's is offering custom and limited edition shaving sets that make really great gifts. Foaming shave gel, five-blade cartridges, and special limited edition winter chrome and green, emerald green, not just green, emerald green handles. You can even personalize

it with engraving. And as a special offer for our dozens of listeners, we've partnered with Harris to give you $5 off your order when you go to harries.com slash full. And this offer is only available for the holidays. So this holiday, give Harries and give Handsome. Get your holiday shopping done early and take advantage of free shipping. Don't do what I do. I went up to Boston. I had a Harry Shaf set for my nephew and I took it on the plane with me. At least I thought I was going to take it on the plane with me because I wanted to give it in person. I could have taken advantage of the free shipping, but I said, no, I'm going to give it to him in person. And the nice, the nice thing, you know, I'm going to people at airport security said, I'm sorry, sir, we're going to have to look in your bag,

and you're going to have to explain why this razor set is in your bag. So, by all means, take advantage of the free shipping to get a limited edition holiday shave set. While supplies last, go to harries.com slash fool right now. That's harries.com slash fool. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about, and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against. So don't buy yourself stocks based solely on what you hear. Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. Chris Hill. here in studio once again with Jason Moser, Matt Argusinger, and Ron Gross. Our Twitter handle is at Motley Fool Money. You can hit us up on Twitter with questions.

Question from Cam in London, England, who writes Amazon, Flipkart, Mercado Libre, and Alibaba. Who do you like the most and who do you think is going to do best in the developing world? Great question, Cam. Thanks for hitting us up. Matt Argersinger, what do you think? I guess I have two answers then because he kind of had two questions there. I think Mercodilibre is probably the best investment. I feel it has the most upside given the size and given the dominance it has in the region of Latin America versus the other companies mentioned. But if you ask me who's going to do best in the developing world, I got to go with Amazon. And I think one of the reasons is if you look at the share that they've already taken in India,

which is probably even better than China, I think, the most interesting and exciting e-commerce market. They've already taken so much share from FlipCart and are growing exponentially in that country. So I'd have to give that to Amazon. You agree with that, Jason? Because Alibaba is doing pretty well on their own. Yeah, no, I think I would answer Mercado Libre. Amazon for sure is investing in India like no other. I think Amazon really is going to take more share in India than probably anyone else stands

to. I do like what Alibaba is doing. Corporate structure notwithstanding, it is not the most transparent business of the world. And personally, I'm not going to buy shares of it. just because I don't need to. But I do think that what Jack Ma is doing is he's opening up China to becoming more of an importer. That's kind of the goal there, is to make China more of an importing country, bringing goods in from the U.S. and from Brazil and from Russia, wherever. So I like that. I think he's opening up China, the Chinese consumer, to certainly a decade

and beyond of some great sort of products and services. So I think that all three, you probably can't go wrong. All right, let's get to the stocks on our radar. Ron Gross, what are you looking at this week? I am going to go with Carnival Cruise, CCL. They've got a 48% market share, and it's really an oligopoly-type industry, really only a few major players because there's such high barriers to entry, Royal Caribbean and Norwegian being really the other two folks. There's some favorable demographics going on here where we have an aging population that should bode well for cruises. They're solid balance sheet, improving financials.

rates of return, 2.7 percent dividend yield, which we like over at total income. And I think the stock has some nice upside potential. All right, Jason, Moser, what about you? Sure. You know, I think health care is a phenomenal long-term opportunity there from a number of perspectives. And listeners have heard me talk about Teledoc a lot here over the past couple of years. Now, I'm not pitching Teledoc today, Chris. It's something else entirely. It's United Health Group, UNH, going the other direction there instead of a smaller player. This This is basically the biggest dog in the space, and this is, you know, a big national health care

insurer that runs the business in the United Health Care segment and the Optum segment for benefits and services. I think that regardless of how health care legislation shakes out, United Health Care is going to be a part of the process there. They have vast amounts of data and information already on file. They're calling for earnings per share around $10.15 in 2018, which puts the stock around 21 times full year estimates. I don't make that sound reasonable for a company that clearly is a company that clearly is a

is going to take part in dictating this space for many years to come. Matt Argusinger? What are you looking at? All right. Let's see if I can get through this. The stock on my radar is a little company called Riot blockchain, ticker R-I-O-T. Up until about a year ago, this was a penny-stock biotech company. They actually had to undergo a 1-8 reverse stock split in 2016 just to prevent themselves

from being delisted. Keep going. Fortunately, earlier this year, in addition to changing their name to Riot blockchain, They announced that they were giving up on their biotech failure, and instead we're going to, quote, gain exposure to the blockchain ecosystem through targeted investments in the sector with a primary focus on the Bitcoin and Ethereum blockchains. So since that announcement and in the space about four months, stock is up from about $3 to $28. Just got one thing to say. Folks, be careful out there. Happy holidays. Will end there.

Yeah. Matt Arguson, you're Jason Moser, Ron Gross. Guys, thanks for being here. Thanks, Chris. That's going to do it for this week's show. Our engineer is Steve Broido and Henry helping out behind the glass this week. Our producer is Matt Creer. I'm Chris Hill.

Thanks for listening. We'll see you next week.