Motley Fool Money - Finding AI in Big Tech Earnings

Episode Date: January 31, 2024

Microsoft continues to live up to its top dog status in its latest report thanks to its cloud segment, and the market is less convinced Alphabet has fully caught up. (00:21) Asit Sharma and Dylan Lewis discuss: - Where AI developments are showing up in Microsoft’s financials. - The concerns over Alphabet’s ad segment, even as it posts a return to growth. - How the market is grading big tech companies this earnings season. (14:12) Is scanning social media a part of your investment research? Chris Camillo, co-host of "Dumb Money Live" on YouTube, Motley Fool Senior Analyst Sanmeet Deo caught up with Camillo to find out how he does on-the-ground research and the bull case for Tesla's humanoid robots. Companies discussed: MSFT, GOOG, GOOGL, TSLA Host: Dylan Lewis Guests: Asit Sharma, Chris Camillo, Sanmeet Deo Engineers: Dan Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This episode is brought to you by Indeed. Stop waiting around for the perfect candidate. Instead, use Indeed sponsored jobs to find the right people with the right skills fast. It's a simple way to make sure your listing is the first candidate C. According to Indeed data, sponsor jobs have four times more applicants than non-sponsored jobs. So go build your dream team today with Indeed. Get a $75 sponsor job credit at Indeed.com slash podcast. Terms and conditions apply.

Microsoft and Apple show us how the market is grading big tech. Motleyful money starts now. I'm Dylan Lewis, and I'm joined over the airwaves by Motleyful analyst. Asit Sharma. Asett, thanks for joining me. Dylan, thank you, as always, for having me. We've got a trick or two for improving your investing research and new earnings from Alphabet and Microsoft. And that's where we're going to start today, Asit.

We have updates from the newly crowned largest company in the world. Asit, Microsoft reported what looked like. an awfully strong quarter, not a very large market reaction, but strong results from the new King of the Mountain Top. Well, Dylan, these were cloudy results, to be honest. And by cloudy, of course, I mean, the cloud was a big part of this picture. As your growth was strong double digits again, Microsoft's cloud business is taking share from competitors when you put all the different cloud parts together.

more than half of Microsoft's revenue this quarter. It helped the company move its top line up 18 percent year over year. The company is generating quite nice profits off of that. Operating income increased 33 percent to a cool 27 billion. So what I'm getting out of this is a company that invested early in generative AI and also has kept up its investments in servers, in GPUs, its cloud business and is executing now and looking like a much younger company than a business that just threw off $62 billion in revenue over the last three months. Awesome. I mentioned the relatively muted response to the results.

I think shares are about flat since the company reported. It is hard to imagine a $3 trillion company growing revenue at 17 percent. Its leading segment growing 30 percent. Do you feel like, really, these were results that Microsoft had to post? in order to back up the valuation that it had grown to recently? I think so, Dylan. Part of the momentum behind Microsoft has to do with its really huge capital expenditure. It's got a really big balance sheet, and of course, throws off billions in cash flow every quarter.

Investors want a payoff from those investments, and the promise has been that our investments in Open AI are purchases of AMD and Nvidia GPUs. and our development of our own Silicon, as CEO Satya Nadella pointed out, all that is going to equate to us being able to provide businesses with the AI layers that they want and need. And it also sort of reassures investors that the demand is out there, right? It's not a case of if we build it, they come. It's a case of we're building it because they're coming in, and businesses really are trying to get a return on their investments in such things as generative AI, distributed artificial intelligence.

Who's getting the benefit of this? It's not really the smaller companies that are offering some solutions that may work. It's the big giants who can onboard customers quickly, whether for Microsoft, it be putting in AI applications into Office 365 or providing businesses, links to their cloud via Azure. You name it. They just seem to have a solution in every last part. of their business. So for investors that are trying to follow the AI story with Microsoft Asset, we're not

going to have an AI line item. It's going to be something that shows up in several different segments, several different businesses. It sounds like the cloud segment, particularly the intelligent cloud segment, is really where people need to zero in on for this business. I think so. This is where we see Microsoft providing solutions that it's developing in conjunction with Open AI, which, just to remind... our listeners was the earliest of the generative AI applications to come to market.

But it's also where you're starting to see Microsoft experiment with its own solutions. It has something called small language models, which is a growing part in foundational models. Small language models are just what they sound like. They're smaller. They require less computational power. Satynazadella talked about this on the call that their model, they're smaller. models are extremely effective. And so this entices business into that intelligent cloud segment.

I think that's where we can find the most traceable growth, to your point. But even, and this is funny, even in places like the gaming and laptop businesses, we're already seeing the first instances of AI being deployed to machines. And this will be something I think we'll hear more about in the coming quarters from both Businesses like Microsoft and manufacturers who play in this ecosystem, being able to put AI on the layer of the computing product. So really, it's hard to identify a part of Microsoft business that isn't focused on bringing AI to the customer.

AI was certainly a theme in the results we saw from Alphabet as well. We're going to talk through how that impacted the business, but most eyes, at least on the initial market reaction to the results, Asset, seem to be. on the company's advertising business. I have to be honest, it feels like Alphabet's ad business can't win. It showed a year-over-year decline for the first time last year. This quarter, they're back to 11 percent growth. Markets still not happy.

Yeah, it's so funny because just pulling all of Alphabet's advertising revenue together, you get a number that's something like $66 billion, which is about what Microsoft did through all of its businesses in revenue. So here's an advertising business that's just humongous. Screw ads, you point out at an 11% rate. What's the rub here? Well, this is where expectations come in. Investors are concerned that Alphabet is going to lose its edge in advertising as new ways

to advertise come into market that are pushed by AI. Microsoft is one company that could take share from Alphabet. and all over the landscape, the ability for search to evolve more rapidly and out of Google's monopolistic hold, it's real. And so investors are looking for any clue that it's not going to grow as fast as expected. And I will note here that the advertising revenue numbers, I think they missed by like a fraction to, I mean, they weren't that far off. Barely miss.

And the stock is down 6%. Here you have a company, okay, not quite as proper. profitable as Microsoft, but a big tech player that just can't seem to win, at least in the near term. What could change that? One of the things that took investors by surprise and maybe is contributed to some of the selling is the fact that Alphabet signaled that its CAPEX, its capital expenditure is going to ramp up. Noticably, it was up this quarter. They didn't give hard numbers, but they're talking about a significantly bigger spend versus 2023. Sometimes, putting out what you're going to spend on your business is in the art of the Tellink.

Microsoft was out early way back at the end of 2022, signaling that AI would be big and they were going to be pouring billions into it. Google has been more circumspect. Their Gemini model has lacked a little bit behind in development versus Open AI and Microsoft's offerings and some other large language models. They really only now are projecting that, hey, with AI, yeah, we're going to pour in those billions too. I think that caught investors a little bit by surprise, but why wouldn't you want that? Again, with a Fortress balance sheet like Microsoft's and this monster cash flow, as an investor,

you want to hear them saying that they're going to step up their CAPEX. So, you know, go figure. But of course, these are short-term moves. The proof will be in the technology that Alphabet is developing and whether they'll be able to accelerate that ad revenue a bit later this year and show that really AI is part of their model, too, and it's not so much a threat as an enhancement to the advertising business. I think for a long time, we've wondered what that next act looks like for Alphabet. It seemed like maybe it would be something that came out of their other bet segment for a while before the AI boom.

There's a lot of market attention there now. I do want to surface a couple things that get into some of the other operations that maybe people kind of let go under the radar with this business. Sundar Pachai said the company's annual subscription revenue reached $15 billion for the trailing 12 months. I was a little surprised by that, Asset. I have to be honest, that has been one of those kind of sleepy segments that's continued to grow and grow, and it's starting to almost become relevant. Dylan, it's a business that, as he pointed out, is up five times since 2019.

And this is another reason, if you're an alphabet shareholder, to feel pretty good today, because that is recurring revenue. And increasingly, it's a part of the business, which has always grown quickly. We look at YouTube's power to generate growth. I think it grew at a 15% rate this quarter year over year. That's part of that subscription business as well. And this is something that Alphabet has excelled at. If you have a company that's able to hit these big numbers in recurring revenue, that itself becomes,

fuel for other bets, big bets, because you can predict your cash flow and then you can take the XX cash flow, invest it thoughtfully. But let's now push back against Sundar Pichai's point on this. The development of AI has lagged a bit at Google, not in a technical sense, but really in a commercial sense. And we so easily forget that for many years, Alphabet was ahead of the curve with investments in its deep mind segment and so many other novel things that they were researching and developing. The issue was, just to remind members or those who might not have heard about this, Alphabet

was very reluctant to bring their models and work on AI into a consumer-facing front because they didn't feel the technology was ready for prime time. Open AI in Microsoft just sort of got the jump and went ahead and put their product out, to the world. So there's a perception that Alphabet is on the back foot with this, and this takes the sheen off that subscription service, the joy you might get out of that as a shareholder, because at the end of the day, it's still a smaller part of their business. It's growing very quickly, but in terms of being enough recurring revenue to let shareholders sleep easy at night and not worry about the competition from Microsoft and from meta and from other big tech giants,

not quite there yet. Let's put the results that we're seeing from Alphabet and Microsoft together a little bit. You were starting to do that as we were talking about AI. Obviously, when investors are trying to grade the way that these companies are posting their results and kind of the rubric that they're looking at, AI is a large part of it, and they are zooming in on the cloud segments in particular for these businesses, What else are you seeing the market specifically look for in the results from these companies? So I think the market is paying attention to that CAPEX. When you evaluate Microsoft and

Alphabet on a forward basis, like looking out three years from today or five years from today, part of that story is about the capacity in megawatt generation from their data centers. This is a metric that some people study to figure out who's going to be the major players, in AI or providing AI cloud services into the future. If you don't have the capacity, you can't sell it. And guess who's number one and number two on planet Earth in terms of capacity in gigawatts for data? It's alphabet and Microsoft. And Microsoft, right? So part of this story, when you look at these companies, investors want them to keep plowing into their ability to provide silicon, if that's going to be the next

thing. I mean, Dylan, if you and I are going to use generative I applications for the cloud, someone has to be able to provide it at a decent cost with speed, without latency, and in a way that will make it fun for us to use and give us fruitful results, whether it's a business application, you're trying to learn a foreign language. And right now, there are a few companies that are actually better positioned than these two to capitalize on that. Just the question is, like, how do you reach businesses? How do you reach consumers? consumers. Right now, Microsoft is doing a slightly better job of that. But let's go back to your original point. Wow, that advertising revenue for Alphabet, they just have to protect

it. They just have to speed up their AI game a little bit and show that Google search isn't going away. And they're going to be fine. We'll have a firmer sense of the big tech picture when we see results from Amazon and meta later this week. Until then, Asset. Thanks for joining me today. Awesome, Dylan. Really enjoyed it. Some of the best lessons don't come from a classroom. They come from experience. On the power of advice, a new podcast series from Capital Group,

you'll hear from CEOs, investors, and founders about how they built careers, took risks, and reinvented themselves. If you're starting your own journey, this is the kind of advice you won't want to miss. Available wherever you get your podcast. Published by Capital Client Group, Inc. Coming up. Is scanning social media a part of your investment? research, Chris Camillo is a co-host of Dumb Money Live on YouTube and was featured in the book

Unknown Market Wizards. Motley Fool senior analyst San Mateo caught up with Camillo to talk about how he does on the ground research and the bulk case for Tesla's humanoid robots. I love Peter Lynch's book, one up on Wall Street. That was one of my first books I read on investing. It was so intuitive to kind of learn investing with what you know, what you see around you, what are the trends, what are the things that the shoes people are wearing or the drinks people are drinking or the shops that people are going to, all that kind of stuff. That's kind of a major investment philosophy here at the Molly Fool, how some of our co-founders, David Gardner, started investing themselves.

He has a quote that says, you know, live a more interesting life, and then you'll be a better investor. So that's a pretty cool, pretty cool way of looking at investing too. And you exemplify that as well. So, you know, one of the terms you use quite often is social arbitrage investing. You said it already, but, you know, so what exactly is that? And what are some of the, like, social media platforms that you're using to follow trends? And how can investors get started with it themselves? Yeah. First of all, to get back to your point on Peter Lynch, I think, you know, he's so out of sight, out of mind for most of the new generation. They don't even know who he is or that he was one of the greatest traders who ever lived. But I think the problem is

most people just don't believe that what I do works, like that you could actually pull it off. Most people believe that Wall Street has this huge edge, that the market is rigged, that you can't possibly beat them by doing this. It just seems too easy and too stupid. And most people just do not believe it. So yeah, like seven years ago, I got on YouTube. We have this channel called Dumb Money Live, and Dumboney.tv is how you find us there. But, you know, we're on once a week just literally talking about what we do for fun, just to try to inspire other people. to be like, hey, you can literally do this. So we literally just talk about what we're seeing in real life and our community.

Like, we just have a conversation and we try to put the pieces together to connect the dots, right, to do this. And I really do feel that, you know, regular people have a really strong edge over institutional Wall Street. We could talk about that later because I actually got to see behind the curtain of institutional Wall Street at the data company I started to mine social data. Social ARB is a really important term. Sometimes I just use the term observational investing. It sounds easier to understand. But almost everything I do now starts on social media because all the world's conversations, or most of them, have turned digital, which is really powerful because you could basically

observe the world unfolding in real time now. And it's like, it's wild. We're talking billions of conversations are happening every day where people are discussing what they're doing, where they're going, what they're buying, what's exciting them, what they like, what they don't like. That's all out there for us to read and interpret and trade off of. And there really is nothing closer to a real-time data set than what I call contextualized, conversational data that sits on social media. So in the past, I used to do a lot of this on Facebook, and then I spent many, many years doing a lot of this on Twitter back in the early 2010s, when Twitter was a place that people expressed themselves in that way. I actually started this

data intelligence company called ticker tags, which I ultimately sold years later to Jeffrey's bank, but at ticker tags, we basically had access to the full firehoser. In that case, it was really a deca hose, 10% of the fire hose of all tweets. And we would basically read the tweets in real time. And we had millions of word combinations that represented all the world's products and brands and anything that would be meaningful to public company. And we would measure the volume of conversation around each of those word groupings. And whenever we thought, whenever our systems and our algorithms saw a word combination that was important to accompany. It could be something as simple as how people speak about one of their products or brands.

When we saw it accelerating, or if we saw a big jump year over year in conversation around a topic that was seasonal, then we would surface that for institutional investors, institutional Wall Street. So we sold this data to hedge funds and to sell side banks. and I spent many years at ticker tags, basically teaching and educating Wall Street on how to interpret contextualized datasets. And it's amazing to me. And I love telling this story to retail investors, individual investors, because, like, I'm telling you, I work with the biggest funds in the world at the highest levels.

And I would literally hold their hand, and they just refused to do the work. Like, they refused. But they thought the data set was too interpretable. Wall Street really likes data sets that are statistically repetitive, and there's a lot of correlation between, you know, when this happens, this happens in the market, right? And they could have years of data to prove that. They're actually really risk adverse. And what contextualize data sets, I can show the same thing to 10 people, and they'll have 10 slightly different. interpretations of what that means. And there's actually a lot of legwork to understand that way,

all these people are talking about the iPhone, maybe, you know, 30% more than last year in the 14 days leading up to the iPhone, you know, first iPhone, you know, launch of the year, right, the new iPhone launch. But are they speaking about it positively, negatively? You know, there's things that they like, there's things they don't like, which are more important, right? You actually have to spend a little bit of time reading a lot of this conversation. to extract knowledge from it, and that takes work, and it takes you putting yourself out on a limb and having insight that could be different from someone else's insight. And Wall Street doesn't love that.

And also, it's so new, right, and scary to them that everyone's like, but Chris, like, why do you talk about this all the time? Aren't you afraid other people are going to start doing what you do? I've been talking about this now for 14, 15 years, and I have more alpha today that I had 10, 12, 13 years ago. I mean, I think my portfolio was up north of 110% this last year, total portfolio, right? And so it's wild, like, that this exists, but people are like, it seems too simple, too easy. It's not, it is simple, but it's also, like, not, right? because it takes a lot of time and mental effort and acuity to kind of connect the dots

and to extract knowledge from tens of thousands of conversations. So I spend like three hours a night, sometimes four, just reading conversations on social media. And by the way, to fully answer your question, I've migrated almost exclusively to TikTok now. So most of my insights come off of TikTok comments, if that makes sense. And so I feel that TikTok comments for the past few years have become the richest data set, and it's completely free. And everybody has access to it. I obviously spend a lot of time on other data sets like Google Trend Data.

I do purchase data. I purchase, you know, web traffic data. I purchase credit card transaction data. So I purchase a lot of data as well, and it's all really good. The data set that I'm most well known for interpreting are those conversational data sets that quite honestly, anyone in the world has access to, if you're just willing to spend the time to read a lot of conversation and comments, right? I did want to get to your recent Twitter thread on maybe one of the biggest trends you probably

are seeing for the future is the Tesla humanoid robot. So tell us a little bit about that thesis. Because I feel that this is one of the biggest opportunities of our lifetime as investors. I'm not a Tesla fanboy. I've always had a little bit of Tesla on and off. I have some Tesla right now, but I don't have nearly as much Tesla as I plan on having this next year. I hope and plan for Tesla to be a huge part of my portfolio the next few years, exclusively because of their optimist humanoid division,

which is, to me, 10x more exciting than anything else Tesla has going on, whether it be an automotive or even energy. I'm obsessed with this humanoid division at Tesla. And I do know that it's because of automotive, it's because of the AI division, It's because of all these other things that Tesla has done that has put them in the poll position to be the leader in humanoid starting in 2007, which is the 20207 is what I'm predicting to be like the chat GPT moment for humanoids. And I think Tesla will be in the poll position because of their manufacturing expertise, because of their access to capital markets. and quite honestly, because internally, whether they admitted or not, I think they're going like a million miles an hour with their humanoid division.

I don't think they want to be, they've released some amazing videos. The Gen 2 Optimus is mind-blowingly cool, considering how uncool it was just a year ago. The rate of improvement is probably one of the most impressive things in the Optimist Division of Tesla. So I think there will be, you know, Elon says there will be billions of human, billions of humanoid, as many as humans, and I do agree with him at some point in the future. But all of my analysis revolves around Tesla having 1.5 million humanoids deployed to commercial and industrial companies by end of 2030.

And they're not selling them. They are leasing. It's like humanoid. You're basically leasing them by the hour, basically. And it's not replacing any human jobs. So this is just basically serving. a small percentage of the job shortage in industry right now that is desperate for factory line workers, for warehouse workers, workers to do dangerous jobs, jobs where you're on your feet

walking five plus miles a day on a factory floor, working at ports. I mean, the job shortage is stunning. We're talking hundreds of millions of humans short. in these manual labor jobs around the world over the next 10, 15 years. And humanoid's are the solution, the amount of revenue that a company that's able to serve just a small piece of the demand. I think we're going to have a massive demand supply imbalance for many years, will be Tesla. And they won't have to sell them.

They'll be able to generate. In my analysis, it's a little under $100,000 a year per humanoid. Because remember, these humanoids are working around the clock. I had them working 16 hours a day. But you have to really kind of read the tweet thread to understand everything I'm talking about. But it's the most interesting thing that's happening right now that no one's talking about. And to be a social arb investor, you have to see things at least a little bit earlier than everyone else. And this is my big thesis.

So I plan on being a humanoid, full humanoid expert the next few. years. And I plan on talking about this a lot. So if you want to hear about humanoids, yeah, dumbmoney.tv, come to our done money live YouTube channel. I'm going to be talking about it. I'm going to be tweeting about it. I'm actually trying to make more humanoid investments outside of Tesla because I feel like while Tesla will be the leader in the space, everyone is going to be a winner in the space. I think that over the next two or three years, what's going to happen is a lot of the other automotive manufacturers,

OEMs, are going to get in on this game and going to acquire these private humanoid companies. There was a big announcement this past week that one of the big humanoid early stage companies called Figure AI doing some. really cool stuff at figure, just did a big, big, big partnership with BMW. I wouldn't put it past BMW if all things go as well as I think they will to try to acquire figure at some point in the near future. One of my favorites is a company called Apptronic out of Austin. I'm invested in an optronic and there's a lot of really exciting stuff. I can't talk about it, but that's going on in aneptronic. I would have to imagine that a lot of these companies, you know, agility,

You know, sanctuary AI, 1X tech. I think those are the guys out in Norway. We all doing really, all have really big opportunities in front of them. I do want to say right now, the biggest misconception that people have when it comes to humanoid is, how about the Boston Dynamics? Why, how can anybody compete? It's not a commercial humanoid. I don't even think they're trying to ever have it be when it's a research humanoid.

It's not designed to ever be commercially used, and it's just, it's not even a competitor. It's literally not even a competitor. As always, people on the program may own stocks mentioned, and the Motle Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or something based solely on what you hear. I'm Dylan Lewis. Thanks for listening. We'll be back tomorrow.