Motley Fool Money - Is AI Taking Tech To The Top?

Episode Date: June 1, 2023

With the Nasdaq up nearly 6% in May, tech seems to be soaring. Will earnings from CrowdStrike and Salesforce add to the AI hype? (00:21) Tim Beyers discusses: - If happy days are here again for the world of tech. - Why the market might be missing the greatness in CrowdStrike’s earnings. - How Marc Benioff found religion when it comes to cutting costs at Salesforce. (19:29) The war on cash is evolving. Jason Moser explains how the financial times keep changing and what it means for fintech. Companies discussed: CRWD, CRM, AAPL, MA, SQ, PYPL, V Host: Deidre Woollard Guests:Tim Beyers, Jason Moser, Alex Friedman Producer: Ricky Mulvey Engineer: Dan Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

If you're a small business owner, you already know what it takes to keep everything moving. You're juggling customers, invoices, and about 100 decisions every day. Thankfully, taxes don't have to be one more thing on that list. With Intuit TurboTax, you can get your business taxes done for you with a full service expert. TurboTax matches you with your dedicated tax expert who knows your industry, understands your business write-offs, and gives you the personalized advice your business deserves. upload your documents right in the app, hand everything off, and still feel like you're in the loop the whole way through. You can even get real-time updates on your expert's progress right in the

app, which makes it so much easier to stay on track. And you can get unlimited expert help at no extra cost, even on nights and weekends during tax season. Visit turbotax.com to get matched with an expert today, only available with TurboTax full service experts. May was big for tech. Could June be even bigger? You're listening to Motley Full Money. Welcome to Motley Full Money. I'm Deidre Willard, and I'm joined by Motley Fool analyst Tim Byers. Hi, Tim. Hey, Deidra. Fully caffeinated, ready to go. A lot of earnings. A lot of earnings, a lot of tech. So we've got a shiny new month here. Last month, big month for tech. And the NASDAQ more tech focused, up nearly 6%. QQ, which is kind of be used for this other measure of tech growth. That's up 14%.

for the trailing 12 months. I mean, I don't want to get too optimistic here, but are happy days here again? Or should we be a little bit cautious about what we're seeing? We should be a lot bit cautious. I'm not saying, and not that's not to be the, hey, get off my lawn guy here. I'm just saying that these things tend to come in spurts, and we should expect that there will be skepticism. There will be some reports that disappoint. No, I don't think we're at Happy Days or here again. That's not the moment that we're in. What we are in is where things are starting to normalize a little bit. Supply chains may have loosened up a little bit, and they were really tight. Maybe there's some normalized spending here. So good players that are well-positioned,

that have done the work to become more profitable, more efficient. We're seeing those companies may be doing a little bit better. The market may not be recognizing it yet, and that's okay. What's important is that some of these companies are getting structurally better. That's nice to see. Well, you just mentioned the market might not be recognizing it. And that's sort of a little bit of the theme that we saw for a couple of companies I want to talk to you about today. First one being CrowdStrike. It seems like it seemed like it seemed, It seemed pretty great. Revenue up about 42%. Who doesn't like that? Maybe a little bit of decelerating growth, but the market didn't like this one so much. Why?

It looks like because the forecast for annual recurring revenue just wasn't up to snuff. Like, the market wanted something closer to 48%. That's not what we got. So, whenever the market is forecasting high growth for a forward-looking metric, like annual recurring revenue, when the number is quite good enough, the market suddenly says, oh, that's it. Growth is slowing down, not good. And I don't know that that's true, because if we take a look at the crowd strike numbers, they were quite good. You mentioned that revenue was up 42%. That's right. Remaining performance obligation also up about 41%. So the way to think about remaining performance obligation, there's a couple of components to it, deferred revenue and backlog. But basically,

Basically, this is all of the business that is to come. A lot of it is longer-term business. The fact that that number is as big as it is, it's over 3.3 billion right now. It means that there's a lot of growth still to come for a crowd strike. And on top of that, they're generating tremendous cash flows. They're doing very well. And there are some good reasons for that. I know you want to get into.

Basically, they're doing better selling to their existing customers. Yeah, let's talk a little bit about that because one of the things they do is they've got modules. So the modules, they kind of, as I understand it, and you can maybe clarify here, they add different aspects of kind of like security and intelligence and functionality. And one of the things they said was 62% of their customers have five or more modules. And they're growing their customer base at the same time. So is that part of the future growth story here?

grow more customers and then sell those customers more things? CrowdStrike is essentially a subscription business. So as customers decide that they want to rely on CrowdStrike for more stuff, like they're going to rely on it for endpoint security, maybe they're going to rely on identity, or maybe they'll add some other aspects of security. And each of these modules provides some distinct features that you could add on to you. your CrowdStrike subscription. And so as you scale up your CrowdStrike experience, the more modules you have, the bigger your bill, the more seats that you have, you're going to end up spending more.

And so it's a good indicator of not just high growth, but actual profitable growth as you have existing customers adding more modules. So the specific breakdown, 62% of the customer base has five or more modules, 40%, six or more, and 23%, seven or more. And so as that numbers, as those numbers scale up, we can expect that the existing customers are contributing very high margin growth to the business, which leads to this tremendous cash flow we see at crowd strike. It's an indicator of just how healthy the business is. So just for the sake of argument here, Deidreis, super quickly, if we just look at the cash flow

numbers for CrowdStrike, quarter over quarter, we do the year over year number. Profits were about 500 million. That's a massive improvement on a, you know, close to, well, a big loss. I think I'm reading it wrong if I was to say $30 billion loss. That doesn't seem quite right. I don't think that's right. I think I've got that wrong. The point is the net cash from operating activities year over a year was up to about $301 million.

That's up from about $215 million. Some of that is due to the artificial sweetener of stock-based compensation expense, but not a lot of it. Most of it is coming from better what we call working capital management. So, big increase in accounts receivable. In other words, people are on the phones saying, hey, we need your check. The checks come in. That receivable turns into cash, and that's more cash on the books.

They're just getting more efficient, Deidre. And when you see that, when you see a business that's routinely growing well, but also growing profitably and expanding the cash it can generate as a result of that, you should get very interested. And I think the thing with CrowdStrike that's interesting is that a lot of that growth is coming from existing customers who've become increasingly reliant on the platform. That's a good sign. That's true. And there's also sort of long-term fears over cybersecurity that will continue to kind of drive this. And I want to get into something else with CrowdStrike, because,

you know, if the day ends in why, we're going to be talking to AI. And CrowdStrike, they They announced Charlotte AI. Yeah. It sounds like it's a generative AI security analyst. They called it a, quote, quote, force multiplier for security experts. I read the release. It sounds kind of like an automated security help desk, but I think there's got to be more to it, right?

Is there? Because I'm going to say, you know, not to borrow too much from the great state of Missouri, but I mean, you got to show me. Comey, like, I'll believe it when I can see that this is actually happening because the story with Crowdstrike for such a long period of time is they collect a huge amount of data that provides signals of attacks that might be coming, security threats. They've had what's called a threat detection graph for years, basically since the beginning of the business.

So what's different now? We're going to have a new algorithm that we call Charlotte that's going to have a new algorithm that's going to take a look at that threat detection data and do something materially different? I mean, maybe, but I'll believe it when I see it, Deidre. The good thing is, everybody's talking about AI. I'll believe it when I see it. If CrowdStrike can show me that they are getting materially better at detecting threats earlier by virtue of applying Charlotte to the threat detection graph, okay, I'll believe

it then. Until then, not part of the thesis. Makes sense. And as you mentioned, they've been really doing AI for years. This is just sort of a new layer onto what they've already done. Yeah, they've been using data for the purposes of protecting their customers for a very long time. This smacks entirely of everybody's got to put AI in a press release. So let's call it Charlotte, put it in the press release, and we'll get some bonus points for that. I'm not so cynical to think that that's exactly what they did.

I'm sure they're actually working on something, but it's way too early, way too early to give them any kind of credit for actually achieving something. Maybe they will, and then, hey, it'll be a big bonus if they do. Well, let's pivot and talk Salesforce, because their earnings came out too. And with Salesforce, one of the things they said they were going to do is they were going to improve margins. And their margins are up. They did it.

They were very happy about it on the earnings call. Mark Pennyoff kept using the terms, incredible and amazing. This is a relatively mature business. So should we be focused on those margins? Should we be looking at revenue growth? What are we looking for from Salesforce? We are looking for efficiency. Incredible and amazing.

Our superlatives we shouldn't be using. That's really. And you know what? I mean, Mark Benioff is Mark Benioff, so he has every right to be saying those things. And we should expect that from him because he is a cheerleader. He's a cheerleader CEO. If he wasn't saying those things, I'd be worried. But should we be saying those things? No, not really. But he is right about one thing. The margins are definitely better. So if you just look at the core income statement and the percentages here, total operating income, the operating margin was 5%. So this is where they are on a gross basis here.

That is up significantly. If you consider that 8% of operating expense went to restructuring, without that restructuring, it would be a 13% operating margin. So they are definitely trending in the right direction here. There's no doubt about that. And also the cash flow statement looks, I mean, honestly, Diedra, this, I'm, I'm, I I don't really want to say that Benioff has gotten a religion here, but off air, I was telling you like, this looks like the difference between a formerly drunk sailor that has gotten sober.

I mean, that's what it looks like, which is a terrible analogy, but it does look like that when you look at the cash flow statement. Not only was the cash from operations up, but the contribution from stock-based compensation expense was down. All of the areas where you could generate efficiency in terms of improved working capital were up. So like the accounts receivable, more checks coming in. 6.1 billion added by accounts receivable.

That's awesome. That's up from 5.8 billion in the same period a year ago. Bigger contribution from depreciation. and amortization, net income was up. Most things were up. And here's the other thing that I find absolutely fascinating, Deidre, they are buying back stock and paying down debt, and they are actually buying back stock and retiring it. The diluted share count was down. And they did buy back quite a bit of stock. Two billion worth. They paid back a billion dollars worth the debt. And most of that does look like it's coming through the organic generation of cash.

Most of the money to pay for that is coming from organic cash generation. That's new. So this is, I would still say the beginning, but let's give sales for some credit for showing some real operating muscle here. This is different. Yeah, it is different. It came at a bit of a cost. They had layoffs. They've really trimmed down their real estate portfolio. I wanted to talk to you a little bit too about Salesforce and AI, because we have to talk about AI. On the call, they talked a lot about data security. They talked a lot about large language models that are private or protecting, basically allowing companies, their corporate companies, to use generative.

of AI without exposing their private data to the larger language models. How confident do you feel about Salesforce's AI efforts in general? I'm sorry. I'm going to be get off my lawn guy again. I mean, I think it's too soon. It's too soon to know that. And large language models are arguably dumb to begin with. because they are in constant learning mode, and they need a lot of work. And honestly, the large language model is really only going to be as good as the dataset that it applies to. And so if you can apply really good rigor to the dataset and then apply a really good

algorithm or a really good AI to that data set, you might be able to get some really good results and really interesting things. So, for example, I do think. that there is an opportunity for Salesforce to do fascinating things with private data that a customer generates through Slack, for example, and then allowing AI to teach your internal Slack environment to be smarter, to automate some workflows that are common to your business. Let me be clear. I do think there is an opportunity here, but to give a different, but to give them credit right now would be bananas. I would not do that. It's way too soon to give them credit

for that. So as an idea, sure, but you have to figure out the other side of it. Having large language models in and of themselves immaterial. What you do with a well-trained, a well-designed, well-organized, data, set and applying a good large language model to it or a good algorithm to it, that's where you get real magic. So I'm not even close to giving them any credit for this yet. But as an idea, do I want them to integrate some AI and some good AI discipline into Slack? You're darn right I do. I want them to be doing that right now. Because if they don't, and they don't make Slack, black, more valuable, then I think they face the prospect in the next 24 months of a pretty large goodwill write-off. And as a shareholder of Salesforce, I do not want that.

Well, you called Mark Beniof a cheerleader CEO. He's a big, charismatic guy. And maybe he doesn't play so well with others. He's had a couple of co-Ceos leave. Looking to the future of Salesforce, Do you think he's learned his lesson? Do you think he can partner with another co-CEO? Would he have to leave in order for succession to happen? Looking at the future of Salesforce leadership, what do you see? So are you asking me, is there a Kendall Roy for Mark Benioff? I don't know.

To me, I look at this as the Benioff show, and it will be the Benioff show until it's not the Beniof show. And I think that's okay. Mark Beniof as the leader of this company has been outstanding. He is a visionary leader. The fact that they are generating some real operating discipline while he is still leading the company, I think is a very good sign. But I really framed this, Diedra, as Benioff will at some point leave, and there will be the Tim Cook equivalent for Salesforce, or at least I think that is the ideal scenario. What people may not remember, I think a lot of people do remember this, but what they may not remember is that Tim Cook for a long time was chief

operating officer. And he was outstanding at a turning operational discipline into a weapon for Apple at a time when Steve Jobs was still CEO. There was a point out of which he absolutely killed it. by going and buying up huge amounts of RAM in Asia. He just essentially cornered that market, and it helped the iPhone become a much richer device. They sort of got the best product, the best components they could put in the iPhone, and they took a huge lead on some of their device competitors at that time, and they really never relinquished it. I mean, Cook made moves that made jobs look smart. And he has since become an outstanding leader of Apple. So I think the next phase for Salesforce is, who's the Tim Cook of Salesforce? I don't know

who that is right off the top of my head, but I think that's what I'm looking for. That makes sense. Well, Tim, I always love talking tech with you. Thank you so much for your time today. Thanks, Deidre. Six years ago, Jason Moser put together a War on Cash Basket of Stocks. Alex Friedman checked in with Moser about those companies and how the trend is shaking out. It's certainly been a fun point of conversation over the last several years. And the War on Cash Basket, just for a little background, for those who don't know, I think most probably do at this point.

But the War on Cash Basket ultimately was just a collection of four companies that we felt were playing a very important role in sort of the evolution of the payment space, the way money is moving, so to speak. And so it's made up of MasterCard, Visa, PayPal, and Square. And ultimately, the idea is to devote equal amounts to each company. So you have four companies, you divide that by four. You got 100% divide that before. You can put about 25% into each company in giving yourself exposure to a nice little risk ladder

there of some stalwart type companies in MasterCard and Visa, a little bit more of a mid-range risk in PayPal, and then a little bit of a riskier idea. idea and block formerly known as Square. So looking over the last six years, how has it performed during the pandemic and what's going on now? Yeah. So if you look at the actual performance since inception, I mean, we go back to July 24, 2017. I mean, it's certainly been a bumpy ride to say the least.

But I mean, overall, since inception, the basket has performed very well compared to the market. The basket itself, the collection of four companies is up just a bit over 110 percent. 112% to be exact versus the market's performance over that same stretch, which is about 88%. Certainly, we had seen that delta a little bit greater at other times, but for the most part, the basket has done what I was hoping it would do, make money and outperform the market. Now, you did mention during the pandemic, and I think that's something important to break out here, because while the six-year performance for the basket has been very encouraging, you know, we saw over the stretch of the last three years or so, just a lot of volatility and a lot of change,

right, in some of what these companies are really trying to do. And so just looking at the dates going from March 1st of 2020 to the end of 2023, it was a little bit of a different story, right? The basket actually performed fairly poorly when we thought it would have probably performed better. Now, I think it performed better in the early onset, right? But overall, it's not done so hot. And I think a lot of that has been due to performance from PayPal and Block, whereas MasterCard and Visa have kind of, they've kind of towed the line, so to speak, and filled their role as relatively stable performers.

But again, going back to since inception, you go back to Inception, the basket has performed very well, so I'm pleased. We'll definitely dive into the performance of some of these stocks at a second. Before we do, I'm curious, how do the tailwinds continue to form as consumers use cash less and less around the world? Yeah, I mean, you see these numbers quoted everywhere. The one thing to always keep in mind, this is such a big market opportunity, right? But we're talking about truly a global market opportunity. And so, you know, it kind of breaks down to how often are people using cash, right? I think the general trend is still very much in tech that people are using cash.

less and less. It didn't require a pandemic for that trend to begin. I think that the last three years accelerated that to an extent. But I mean, if you look at some of the numbers out there, according to Pew Research, today, roughly four in 10 Americans, around 40 percent say that none of their purchases in a typical week are paid for using cash. That's up from 29 percent in 2018 and 24 percent in 2015. On a similar note there, you look around, you look around, the world there. European Central Bank recently pulled some statistics on this and cash was used for 59% of point of sale transactions in 2022. That was down from 72% in 2019. So I think all around the world, we're seeing this trend play out. We're just moving more and more towards the

digital movement of money. The best performing stock in the basket has been MasterCard, which is up 187% since 2017. When it comes to MasterCard's business performance, What factors do you attribute to the success we've seen with its stock? Yeah, I think with MasterCard and a lump visa in this conversation as well, just because the two businesses are so similar. And they serve a very similar role in this basket. I mean, they've just done such a good job in leveraging their network to do more. I mean, what we've always liked about MasterCard is the business model, right?

It's that toll booth sort of model where they own the payment rails, where that money kind of has to go along their rails to kind of get from point A to point B, and they collect just that little toll, that little interchange along the way that really affords them that attractive margin picture. And steady, reliable growth, right? This isn't the kind of company that's going to be growing 30, 40, 50 percent a year, but it's very steady, right? It's a steady reliable grower, and that's kind of the point behind it.

But I think with MasterCard and Visa similarly, what we've seen these businesses do is take these massive networks that they've built out. through the years, through this physical card business that we've all come to know and love. And they've really just done a good job in leveraging the network to do more. So you're talking about capturing new payment flows, new ways that money is moving around, disbursements, remittances, commercial point of sale, business to business payments, consumer bill payments, and even buy now, pay later, right? I mean, we're seeing these businesses starting to take their networks and build the technology

on top of that to do more. And with MasterCard, you know, it's not just a payments business. I mean, they bring value-ad services to their customers, the merchants and consumers alike. We're talking about things like cyber and intelligence solutions, data and service. You get insights, analytics, consulting, and marketing. So, again, they're just doing a very good job of leveraging the network to extract more value for both the consumers and the merchants. Up next is PayPal. All of the companies in the war on cash basket have more than doubled since you put the basket together in 2017, except for PayPal, which is only about 5%. This has been a very volatile stock initially rising 420% in the summer of 2021, and then falling

close to 80% to its current price of about $62 today. So I'm curious, what are some of the main factors you attribute to the roller coaster ride that PayPal investors have faced over the years? It's definitely been a roller coaster ride. Yeah, to me, there's a lot going on here with PayPal, and I think there can be a lot of reasons as to why the sentiment is so sour really today on the business. I mean, I think it's fair to say that over the last three years, the last three years resulted in a lot of overconfidence, not just in regard to PayPal, but I think a lot of businesses

over the last three years saw things change so quickly. We saw so much growth being pulled forward at the time feeling like everything was going to be done differently from here on out, right? I mean, this was just like this moment where everything was just going to pivot and we were we're going to be doing things so much differently going forward. And yeah, certainly things have changed to an extent, but I mean, you look at the way things are going today. I don't think it's to the extent that a lot of folks envisioned earlier on. In short, I mean, I think we're kind of back to normal in a lot of ways now.

And I don't know that PayPal necessarily made a lot of the right moves along the way to instill a lot of confidence for investors as to where they are right now. I mean, it's really, it is kind of conflicting. I mean, when you look at the actual business, it's performing well, right? It's not a bad business. But they made some, they made some bets, they made some investments and some decisions along the way that I think if it caused investors to maybe take a little bit, a little bit of a step back and wonder exactly what's really driving the bus here, right? PayPal is, it's an involved business. It's not just PayPal. I mean, you got PayPal, but then you have Venmo, you've got Braintree, you've

got Zoom, you've got Honey and Zettle. And I think one of the biggest challenges with PayPal, quarter in and quarter out is they've not done. Management has not done a very good job at all in really breaking out the business and giving us more granularity into how each facet of the business is performing. We get information on Venmo because Venmo is kind of top of mind for so many people because so many people use it. But other than really kind of understanding where PayPal and Venmo stand, we just don't have much insight as to how these other facets of the assets of the business are contributing. And so I think that's been a big point of contention with a lot of investors, myself included,

but folks that I know who cover the business and folks that I talk about the business with, I mean, they feel the same way. We want more. We want more information. We may get that, right? We are seeing a situation here where the CEO, Dan Shulman, is going to be stepping down. Now, he could be there through the end of the year. I hope, honestly, that he's not.

I don't have anything against him, right? I think he could have done a better job. But the bottom line is the longer that he's there, the more uncertain things are. And we know that old saying, the market hates uncertainty. Right now, there's a lot of uncertainty in regard to PayPal and how they're reporting the data in how the business is performing. There's a lot of uncertainty in regard to leadership. If you remember not all that long ago, they really had these aspirations to build out that

quote unquote super app that could do all sorts of things and you would live your entire the financial life in PayPal. And, you know, those rarely work out. Most consumers don't want to place all of their eggs in one basket. And so, like, as an example, when we saw PayPal touting that they were going to bring stock trading into their platform, I mean, it sounds great. It makes for a good headline, but honestly, like, why? Why would they do that? What can they do to make that experience better than the companies that are already out there doing it? I mean, you're talking about something that a lot of other companies out there do very well already. There's no way it's going to be any kind of a meaningful moneymaker for PayPal.

So it's wasted resources, wasted time. And that was just one example of just many little things that they've been doing along the way that I think have taken their attention away from the core business. And so it's encouraging to see that they're getting back to the core focus of the PayPal app, the digital wallet, the checkout experience, and really utilizing the strengths of the business in PayPal, Venmo, and BrainTree. We may see them trimming this business a long way. There is some word out there that they're thinking about unloading Zoom, the X-O-O-O-M Zoom,

which is that remittance company they acquired several years back. I wish I could tell you why. I wish I could tell you whether that was a good idea or not, but we don't ever get any data regarding how Zoom is performing. And that kind of speaks to what I was saying earlier about management, just not really giving us as much information as we'd like. But when you take a step back and you look at the actual business itself again, I mean, it generates a ton of cash.

It's got this network of 400 million plus users. It's pushing through one plus trillion dollars in volume through its networks. It's got two of the most popular payment platforms of PayPal and Venmo, a tremendous back-end infrastructure provider and brain tree. I mean, just, there are a lot of things going for it, but clearly the sentiment right now on PayPal is very sour. One last question. When you think about owning these stocks through the different periods of volatility, what is

your biggest takeaway that you've learned as an investor? Well, I think my biggest takeaway is just that really this is the purpose that the basket serves, right? And the idea from the very yet go is to be able to identify a really big market opportunity and focus less on trying to pick the winner of that market opportunity and more on trying to pick the winners. Because as often is the case, when we see these large market opportunities, it's not about just one winner. I mean, there are going to be a lot of businesses that succeed, right? It's a rising tide that's going to lift a lot of boats. And so, So, you know, I remember in the very beginning, when I opened up our Next Gen Supercycle service,

the 5G service, and I had recommended all four of these companies in that service. This was three years ago, I think. And at the time, I remember some people saying, I can't believe you're recommending Visa and MasterCard. Those are dead in the water. The world is moving past those businesses. It's all about fintech and PayPal and block and whatnot. And I thought, okay, I appreciate what you're saying, but let's remember those businesses hold a strong position of the value chain. And lo and behold, you fast forward today and MasterCard and Visa are the two businesses that

are really kind of holding their own, whereas Block and PayPal are going through some more challenging times. I think really for me, it's really reinforced the purpose of the basket in the first place. It's always fun to identify this bigger market opportunities and then really try to find multiple winners in the space, because that's usually how it shakes out. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about, and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy our sell stocks based solely on what you hear. I'm Deidre Willard. Thanks for listening. We'll see you tomorrow.