Motley Fool Money - Motley Fool Money: 12.17.2010

Episode Date: December 17, 2010

Is Facebook Founder Mark Zuckerberg a good choice for Time’s Person of the Year?  What’s been the most undercovered story of the year? What’s been the biggest surprise of the year? And will it be a happy new year for 2010 high-fliers Chipotle and Netflix? In this installment of Motley Fool Money, we answer those questions and talk tech with Forbes Magazine San Francisco Bureau Chief Eric Savitz. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

If you're a small business owner, you already know what it takes to keep everything moving. You're juggling customers, invoices, and about 100 decisions every day. Thankfully, taxes don't have to be one more thing on that list. With Intuit TurboTax, you can get your business taxes done for you with a full service expert. TurboTax matches you with your dedicated tax expert. Who knows your industry understands your business write-offs and gives you the personalized advice your business deserves. upload your documents right in the app, hand everything off, and still feel like you're in the loop the whole way through. You can even get real-time updates on your expert's progress right

in the app, which makes it so much easier to stay on track. And you can get unlimited expert help at no extra cost, even on nights and weekends during tax season. Visit turbotax.com to get matched with an expert today, only available with TurboTax full service experts. Everybody needs money. That's why they call it money. The best thing in life are free, but you can get them to the bread. From Fool Global Headquarters, this is Motley Fool Money.

Welcome to Motley Fool Money. Thanks for being here. I'm your host, Chris Hill, and I'm joined by Motley Fool Senior Analyst, Seth Jason, James Early, and Tim Hanson. Guys, good to see you. Good to see you, Chris. On today's show, we will wrap up 2010 by reviewing some of the major business stories, the companies in the news,

and we'll look at how some of the big names. stocks did. We'll also talk tech companies and Silicon Valley with Forbes magazine editor Eric Sabitz, plus as always a few stocks on our radar. But guys, we will begin this week with Time magazine. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg was named as Times Person of the Year earlier this week. Last year, Ben Bernanke, this year, Mark Zuckerberg. Tim Hansen, I'll start with you. What did you think? Well, you know, it's a reasonable choice given what the person of the year award is supposed to recognize, which is just someone that was influential and may have done something good and or bad, but on a large scale during the year. And Facebook is certainly on a large scale

at this point. I thought it was a reasonable choice. The only other candidate I could think of might have been Jean-Claude Trichet, who's the ECB president over in Europe, who is trying to move heaven and earth to save the euro. But Mark Zuckerberg is a lot more fun. Not Jean-Claude Van Damme. No. Although, you know, I would rather see it back in the day. Absolutely. James, what did you think? I think he's a jerk. I wouldn't have given him in person of the year. That's pretty much my taste. It's not a criteria, though, is it?

That's not a correct. He's a jerk. I mean, that's just... He is a jerk. That's pretty well proven. But he's a very popular jerk, or at least journalists love to talk about it. So here's Time Magazine pretty much saying, hey, here's the guy we talked about most during the year. This is kind of worse than a popularity contest.

The thing about Facebook that's weird is it's... I come from a place where people open a lot of bars, even in failed locations. the next guy comes along and he thinks, if I put the name, you know, Jose's on that bar, then everybody will show up there. Well, Zuckerberg did what had already been done before, 100 times. He created this online community. He just sort of got lucky

and that it became the place that everybody went to and sort of abandoned most of the others. I'm not sure that that makes you person of the year, but Time Magazine thinks otherwise. Am I the only one here who's not on Facebook? I actually recently signed up to see if we could experiment with it for corporate purposes. We were going to try to run our...

You know how we do those Global Games trips every once in a while. We're going to try to post the pictures and notes and things on Facebook in the hopes of when people, if they enjoy it, they'll actually share it with somebody else. So we did sign up, and I've got to say, it's not awful. You know, to Tim's point, you know, being a jerk is certainly not part of the criteria. I mean, again, past winners include Hitler, Stalin, the Aitola-Homania. Us? We all.

2006. Every one of us. Oh, really? We are a jury. It's weak. All of us, I mean. I wonder why Time Magazine and the rest of journalism are just really on the edge financially. I don't even know if time is actually.

I'm just assuming. That's a haymaker. So, James, you wouldn't pick Zuckerberg. Who would you pick? I would go actually with Bill Gates. You know, don't underestimate the power a few really rich elite people can have on the world. And for his call for billionaires to give half their wealth to charity is something that frankly makes me more attracted to him in a platonic way.

But I like him. I think it's a good call. And see, Zuckerberg signed on to give some of his magic. beans is part of this. Exactly. He doesn't have any cash. Here's some shares. I mean, what's he going to give him? Snoopy money or something. Yeah. He's giving him a bunch of IOUs. All right, Seth, who would you pick? I went, I went small. I just went with a CEO who has, in the first nine months of the year, increased his company's net sales 30%, which is about the same as our friends at Netflix. Net income up 129%. The stock is up 160%. And for doing this, he, well, at least last year,

He got paid and probably this year's well, the grand total of zero. He refuses all compensation because he's one of the founders of the companies or more of the early people. And this is Costa Cartsotis, Fossils, CEO. And he's just done a great job with this business, but because he's not popular and his name is hard to pronounce, I probably slaughtered it. Nobody's paying any attention to him or the stock, even those results are better than the majority of any of the other stocks out there. You're listening to Motley Fool Money. We're talking about some of the major business stories of 2010. Guys, as we look back over the year, certainly at least a couple of the stories that stand out from the first half of the year, the BP oil spill. Is that this year? That was this year.

We also had the story earlier in the year where Google was hacked in China. And if you believe the reports coming out of WikiLeaks. Not by the Chinese government. It may have been from the Chinese government. No truth to that. Well, we'll see. when you think about the major business stories of the year, Tim Hanson, what stands out for you? Well, I thought one of the, in the recent months, has been the positive reporting about jobs and retail numbers.

We've gotten all a titter about these numbers going into the holiday season, and the fact is they're not very good still. I mean, yes, they're up year over year, but they're still, you know, in the Johns, so to speak. I think it's a totally overreported story and one that's really not worth thinking seriously right now, but it's getting a lot of play. James, I mean, on Tim's point, is there a story that stands out to you as being that just got way too much coverage or way too little coverage? I've got an underreported story. I mean, sometimes stories are underreported for a reason. This one's kind of boring. In 2009, the FASB, the Accounting Bureau rolled back an accounting rule requiring mark-to-market.

Why would you think a story about accounting would be boring? I don't know. It's a mystery to me, Chris. But it caused the banks in 2010 to do extend and pretend big time. In other words, reduce the minimum payments on these loans so that the borrower who could barely make them would still be considered in good standing. The banks didn't have to write these loans down. And this is actually huge financially because they're carrying all these values on their books that inflated values. So the government doesn't have to bail them out when they might have needed one.

And it allowed them to report better earnings than they otherwise would have. It allowed them to make their capital structure look better than it otherwise would have. But America, we like to pretend in America. We like to pretend everything is fine. Well, that's just not America, Seth. Come on. Seth, Jason, what about you? Oh, boy.

I'm overreported. Can we just get over Facebook and Twitter? Facebook, I think, at least has a little bit of use. Twitter is so dead. I just don't see. Let me throw another one out of you. I hope they IPO and crash so that we can stop talking about them. 3.7 billion, reportedly, was there a reason round of funding valuation?

Twitter. This is Twitter's valuation as a private company? Keep in mind that that's money given to them. by people who can afford to lose every penny. As we look back over 2010, is Toyota an overreported story? Because now we're, lately we're seeing reports that, you know, earlier in the air, all of these recalls, all of these problems about, you know, the gas pedal or the brake sticking and crashes. Now we're starting to see stories that maybe it was actually user error.

Oh, I always thought a large degree of it was probably user error because the alternative drive a large degree. The large degree. The alternative makes a lot less sense. It was sort of an Occam's Razor situation, that the most likely thing is that people are standing on the gas and that they don't realize it. But, you know, the other thing about that

is that there are thousands and thousands of car recalls all the time, and the press rarely reports on them. And so what happened with Toyota's, yeah, they had a couple of big recalls. There were a few problems, perhaps, and unfortunately some people were killed, hurt, and otherwise. But at that point, you know, if they recalled, a Prius because the lighter didn't work. I don't even know if they have lighters, but it made news after that. Prius owners don't smoke, so. So you had the recency effect. You had people, you know,

just a lot of screaming and hand-wringing, and that just made it seem like a much bigger story than it was. Don't know Johnson and Johnson. I was going to corporate recalls are generally over-reported stories. I mean, and that creates buying opportunities for investors because, you know, whether it's the BP story, which you could argue may or may not impair that company for the long term or the Johnson Johnson thing or the Tylenol thing many years ago. You know, usually these companies bounce back and doomsayers are just proven wrong. When you think about the year, was there anything in particular that surprised you? And that could be, you know, either for a company, a business leader, a stock.

You know, Seth, we were talking about Twitter and the possibility of them IPOing. You know, maybe that would be a surprise if the IPO. I was surprised a couple weeks ago when those coupon people told Google to go pound sand because it seems like a business model that's fairly easily replicable. They've got a great name, and they may have a first mover. Six billion dollars of Google's money

wasn't enough for Groupon? Yeah, I mean, that seems to me like the case where you do the Costanza, and you say, thank you very much, and you take it and you walk out the door, and then you've got that kind of money that lets you do whatever you want. James, what about you?

You know, I was surprised that the iPad was not a flop. To me, it was like the car truck or the El Camino of computing. It's neither a small little, phone type thing, nor a laptop is kind of in between. But hey, to Apple's credit, it worked. But I was actually more surprised by one thing, Chris. It's something we learned here that Steve Brodo's toes are fused together.

Yeah. Totally underreported. I totally cannot deny it. It is true. And you should see the guy swim. Yeah. I mean, does that help you when you're swimming? It's a very subtle thing.

Most people would never know. It's just two of the little fellas are stuck together. Wow. It does not help me swim. Does not help me with the ladies? Do you have any superpowers of any kind? Are you able to communicate with fish like Aquaman? Not at all.

So those really trendy sneakers that some people that actually, James, you have a pair of, those trendy sneakers that are actually... Those big ones like gloves for your feet. Unless we buy Steve some scissors, he's not, yeah. Discrimination. There you go. Tim Hansen, what surprised you this year? I was totally surprised by the fact that, as of the most recent report, the tarp.

Remember the tarp? The tarp stands now to only... cost U.S. taxpayers $30 billion, which relative to its original price tag, what was the original price thing? More than 700 billion. And now with AIG getting ready to pay money back, the GM IPO going through, this thing actually seems to have worked. And for a U.S. government that has had many things not work in the recent past, this is

a total surprise and a pleasant one. Of course, the cost of that is a bit bogus in BS, right? Because the government has pumped in a ton of other economic stimulus. list that had the effect probably of making. Yeah, of making. What are you an economist? Yeah. No, I mean, you just talk about low-upers-

Seth, come on. I don't know if it is. It's only a pleasant surprise. If you don't count, it's all the other stuff we've done. So, you know? So you say it didn't cost as much. Well, you paid all this other money over here that didn't get accounted for. So that's why I'd be skeptical for that.

Now we're getting into chaos theory. It's just simple accounting. If you don't count all your costs, then you're, your profits look a lot better. So Tim Hanson, based on the return of the TARP money, do you think that Uncle Sam should start a hedge fund? He'd be doing probably better than 70% of the managers out there, but that doesn't mean he should start a hedge. No, I think hopefully this will end up being a footnote in the annals of history and that the government will never again have to intervene in such a magnitude way. But again, you know, I thought that money was all going to get

lit on fire, regardless of the associated costs that might have been used to prop it up. So the fact that any of it came back at all, I think, is an interesting story. And unfortunately, history shows that in another 10 to 40 years, we will have to do something very similar. It's just the way it goes. It'll probably be the Chinese by then. The United States will be a, maybe potentially also be a footnote in the annals of history. A wholly owned subsidiary of the People's Republic.

All right, coming up, one major bank's employees are about to start looking a whole lot more attractive. We'll explain why right after this. This is Motley Full Money. If you do like I ask me, start me right on Christmas. Try me, try me. Try me on that money. Just try me, honey. Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. For investing commentary and analysis 24-7, go to the Motley Fool's website, Fool.com. You can also drop us an email, radio at fool.com. Ask us questions about stocks, and by all means, let us know if any of your toes are fused

together. Chris Hill here in the studio with Seth Jason, James Early, and Tim Hansen. All right, guys, let's go over a few of the big stocks for 2010. These numbers are, as of this taping, let's start with Chipotle, a company that's certainly very popular with our members here at the Motley Fool. The stock's up more than 150% for the year. When we think about Chipotle, what is the challenge for this company? Is it simply how do they manage growth? Well, you know, challenges and opportunities often go hand in hand. And for Chipotle, I think the answer to both at this point is where are they going to be able to expand next. I think they have two options. One is to take the Chipotle concept over overseas,

which I think will be very, very difficult. And the other would be to grow this new Asian-themed restaurant concept here in the United States, which, I don't know. This is anecdotal, but I feel like Mexican food in the United States is more popular than Asian food. So a lot of growth is priced into Chipotle in both avenues, whether they decide to choose one, the other, or both, are going to be pretty difficult for the company, I think. James? Chris, the Chipotle opened down the street from me a couple of months ago, and it's the only one I've been in, it's never crowded. So I think saturation in established markets

might actually start to become a little bit of an issue like Starbucks, but I think the stealth growth thing for Chipotle could actually be Hispanic markets. I actually see lots and lots of Hispanic people and are eating burritos, even though they could certainly go to other places. So south of the border, I wouldn't discount their growth opportunity there. What about Baidu? This is the leading search engine in China.

The stock's up 160% for the year. Tim Hansen, you're our global gains guy. What's the biggest challenge and opportunity for Baidu? Well, this is crazy for Baidu at this point. As we alluded to earlier in the show, those WikiLeaks cables revealed that Baidu and the PRC government had actively sort of concocted a plan to sabotage Google in China. Allegedly. Allegedly.

Allegedly acted together in concert. Now, the reason... Don't shoot us, anybody. The reason this is crazy is because... So, Baidu's search engine is not very good from a technological standpoint. Google's is better. And Baidu Bulls have long said that the reason why Baidu is succeeding in China with its 70, 80% market share is because they know the local population better and because Chinese people are more likely to use a homegrown brand in a phone. I mean, that's...

Is that bogus? Are they just cheating? I mean, look at Nike. Adidas, Western brands in China are hugely popular. And so the reason I think Baidu has succeeded thus far is because basically the Chinese government has sabotaged Google's website and made it a lot slower. and in search, speed matters. So that's the challenge is as the Chinese government opens up a little bit, maybe Google comes back in, they've got some brand cachet.

They're going to be a much more effective competitor. In terms of the opportunity, it's obvious. There are 400 million people online in China today, and that's only one third of the population, so you can triple the size of the market. James? I didn't have any substantial. It's more of a tangent, but did you guys see the matchmaking love profile

of the WikiLeaks guy from a couple years ago? It's now on the Internet. How is that even a tangent? Okay, Cupid. That's pretty tangible. Somebody said wiki leaks. It's making me think about that. Yeah, wiki leaks. I don't want to know what James thinks of all day at his computer.

I'm going to put a screen cap video thing on James' computer just to see what he's looking at all day. Radio at Fool.com. Keep those emails coming. It's not all accounting rules. I'm pretty sure of that. Let's wrap up with Netflix, certainly a stock that we've talked about in this room before. We never talk about Netflix. We've only talked about how many times today? Seth, Jason, stocks up more than 200% for the year. No luck involved. Hard to argue with that kind of success.

All completely because of smart investing. Netflix, they've got a couple of challenges. One of them is that I think their costs, I've talked about this before, are going to go way up because right now a lot of their growth is coming from streaming video, and the deals that got them their streaming video were sort of ridiculously cheap, and now all of the big studios, all the content providers, are just not going to let Netflix get that content so cheap in the future. At the same time, they're coming up with their own solutions.

Some of them are doing end runs around Netflix. They're producing their own apps. You can, you know, for TVs or for the Xbox, you can get ESPN on your Xbox. You don't need Netflix. Hulu might deliver something like that. So that is a huge challenge for Netflix. The biggest opportunity is just to continue to sign people up and continue to use expanding bandwidth on the Internet to deliver this video. Now, the problem is you need somebody else to pay to expand that bandwidth.

And Netflix is not in a position to make that happen. So you're not expecting us to be sitting here a year from now talking about how Netflix once again is up 200%. Oh, stocks can just keep going up for no reason, but I'm pretty sure there's a big day of reckoning coming for Netflix shareholders, and I don't think a lot of people are paying attention to that possibility. And finally, the Wall Street Journal reported this week that Swiss Bank UBSAG is sending its Swiss retail banking staff a 43-page memo dispensing advice on how to impress customers

with a better appearance. dues and don'ts for men and women, including this gem from the article, and I'm quoting here, UBS's advice for men even extends to underwear, which should be of good quality and easily washable, but still remain undetectable. What is undetectable? Does smell count? I think it's just keep wearing it underneath your pants, not over your pants. Oh, I draw the line there.

I'm glad I don't work there. Tim Hansen. It's a really cheap, detectable one. Any fashion advice? Any fashion tips? that I learned in 2010? Sure. I did learn one important fashion nugget this year,

which is that if you have a newborn, you should not by any means, wear clothes that need to be dry cleaning. Our dry cleaning bill was high in October, November, and we have now learned that lesson. It took you that long to learn? Well, we're slow learners, man. I mean, you should know that.

Nothing but sweatpants when you've got a baby. Coming up, are Google's best days behind it? We'll talk all things Silicon Valley. with Forbes magazine editor Eric Savitz. You're listening to Motley Fool Money. Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. I'm Chris Hill. For more than 25 years, Eric Savitz has been writing about technology and investing.

After writing for outlets like Smart Money Magazine and Barron's, he is now the San Francisco Bureau Chief for Forbes magazine. And he joins me now. Eric, thanks for being here. Hey, my pleasure. Let's start, because San Francisco is Silicon Valley to investors. and Silicon Valley was certainly in the news earlier this week with Time Magazine announcing their person of the year, Mark Zuckerberg from Facebook.

What was your reaction when you heard the news? Wow, well, you know, I think it was kind of a win for Silicon Valley, right? You're a six-year-old Mark Zuckerberg who's already had a year in which potentially Oscar-winning movie was made about him and Facebook. And now there he is man of the year. I think it's a year when the Valley kind of is on a car. comeback. You're seeing lots of interesting new startups, and a lot of them have to do with the web, and none have had more impact. 500 million users and just huge amounts of time that people are

spending on that site. It's really changing the way people use and look at the internet. One of the rivalries that seems to have really grown in the past year is the rivalry between Facebook and Google. There have been reports like Google is Google is, giving people bonuses, if they don't leave to go to Facebook, you know, that sort of thing. I mean, how much of that is true and how real do you think that rivalry is? I think it's actually pretty real. I think there's a couple of reasons for that. As you're suggesting, there is kind of a war for talent right now in the Valley, particularly for talented software engineers. And you did see, you know, Google announced a 10% raise

for everyone in the company from the top. down and you are seeing people leave for Facebook Google essentially has become ironically kind of the incumbent, you know, they're the old man in the story here. They've had

to IPO extravaganza, they've got a huge market it's now a big company. Now the other thing, by the way, is that Facebook and Google are competing in a whole other way, which is really for control of your time on the web. Facebook is becoming the place that some people kind of start

their computing experience, the place they get messages from their friends or watch videos or play games, all those kinds of things. And in some ways, it's sort of replacing Google has had trouble in the social networking space trying to compete with them directly there. Search engine. But when you think about what's at the heart of your experience on the web, these two companies are very much in competition. One of the stories we talked about recently on the show, speaking of Google, was the story that was reported by Bloomberg that Groupon, the Daily Deal website, turned down an offer of $6 billion from Google. That's stunning, isn't it?

I was just going to ask you your reaction, but it sounds like your reaction was very similar to mine. Well, yeah, you know, my reaction was, wow, you better be sure. I mean, $6 billion for a Groupon. A Groupon, of course, is sort of the couponing kind of site, you know, deal of the... the day, they'll give you a discount. And their success, you know, Groupon is really caught the imagination of the bargain hunters on the web. But remember, there's, you know, there's nothing proprietary about what Groupon is doing. I mean, there are, you know, a hundred more other services that do the same thing. Now, remember, at the time that Google bought, say, for example, YouTube,

They spent, you know, a billion-sec vicinity to buy YouTube. And at the time, there were a whole host of online, you know, web video sites. Same thing that, you know, they must be insane. But I think in this case, you know, while Groupon is a thriving young company super sales, there's really nothing proprietary about the model. And I don't know if I were Groupon, I'm not sure that I would have said over time, whether it turns out to be true, but there are lots of examples slightly exaggerating their own. You're listening to Motley Full Money. We're talking with Eric Savitz, the San Francisco Bureau Chief for Forbes magazine.

Eric, I want to switch gears to Netflix now. Shares of Netflix have tripled this year. And despite that amazing run that the stock has had, we're starting to see some pessimism about the company's future report in the New York Times that costs are likely to rise next year, in some cases drastically, depending on which part of the company you're looking at. What is the perception of Netflix in Silicon Valley? Well, you know, Netflix has been an amazing story this year. They have, as you mentioned, had a huge run, and it's really all about their streaming video business.

There are two issues, I think, that people bring up with Netflix. One is that, you know, there's the threat that someone else. There are lots of potential people to do that, But nobody has so far is offering what you can get from Netflix, which is basically unlimited streaming video over the web. Now, of course, for that to be a compelling service, you need content. You need something to stream. Yeah, you actually need all those movies.

You actually need all the movies. You need all the content. And what's happened is that Netflix has deliberately over the last years have one of the issues that keeps coming up. And they have a very, and that contract is nearing completion. the expectations are it's going to car than they are currently paying. They also, you know, they also get a lot of content from other sources, but there's been pushback. There was some pushback from Time Warner,

who, Netflix taking control of the movie industry, which is about as likely as, you know, like the al-bany and green the world. But there is, there's fear. Netflix strikes fear into the hard content business in some ways, and then the fears that they are for free. But there are two sides to the cost equation, though, on this streaming thing. So on the one side, yes, you have content costs.

They're very real and are likely to go up over time. On the other hand, as you shift DVDs watching DVDs. Streaming is way cheaper. I mean, you can stream, you know, two-hour. If I mail it back, they may have to maintain tuition points and pick people to work at them and sort through the DVDs as they come and go from the distribution point. So there's some cost savings as well.

You know, there is this history with Netflix where they just go through periods where all of a sudden people go, it seems. You're listening to Motley Full Money. We're talking with Eric Savitz from Forbes magazine. All right, Eric, before we wrap up with Buy, Seller Hold, and as we wrap up 2010, give me one prediction for 2011 out of Silicon Valley. And, you know, it could be a tech company that's no longer, that's not on anyone's radar that's going to be next year. could be a Facebook IPO, one prediction. One thing I think will happen next year is, I think we're going to see the end of Yahoo, as we currently know it.

Yahoo's situation can't be sustained. Barts will not be running out. There's some amazing, unforeseen something that I can't even think of. I think they're going to end up at least possible that they get acquired. That's a big prediction. All right. Let's wrap up. Let's wrap up with buy-seller hold.

and we'll start with buy-seller hold the likelihood that Twitter will be acquired in the next year. Well, I think that's a tough call. I'd say it's kind of a hold. You know, Forbes actually wrote a, one of my colleagues wrote a – Steve Balmer was actually seen in the Valley having lunch with the CEO of Twitter. I think it's possible that – or, you know, who knows, you will come in and try and make it hold. I suspect Twitter will hold out. I think it's a possibility, but I wouldn't big big on it. You think Google will take that big check that they wrote to Groupon for $6 billion

and just cross out Groupon's name and write Twitter in there? Yeah, I don't know if that would be enough to get to Twitter, but it might be a down payment. Buy seller hold the likelihood that Sirius XM will be a standalone company in five years. There's the ownership structure. I think that's largely a reflection of the complicated liberty media, which are reasons related to things like the applicability of tax laws carry forwards. That's the timing here, but I think in the long run. Automakers are ramping up production of these. Buy seller hold, the future of electric cars. Well, I think that the future of electric cars is probably, it's probably a hold. I mean, I think that, I think that, I think we're beginning to see that there are limitations on electric cars that not everyone's going to like things like the ability to travel or long periods to reach instant, you know,

instant recharge mechanism, pull into the Exxon charging station and juice up in, you know, five minutes. But that doesn't work that way, you know, it takes long periods to recharge. I think there's a, I still think it's a bit of a niche market and I think people are going to be more partial. And finally, she was not Time Magazine's person of the year, but she was on their list of people who mattered in 2010. Buy seller hold, Lady Gaga. Lady Gaga. Well, I think you buy Lady Gaga. I think she's a long-term play. She's, you know, Madonna reincarnated. Yeah, I mean, I was going to say, we both have kids. Come on,

you got to buy Lady Gaga. I think you got to, you know, she's on the radio. Eric Savitz is the San Francisco Bureau Chief for Forbes magazine. If you're interested in tech companies and tech stocks, you've got to get on the Forbes website and follow the stuff that Eric is writing about every day. Eric, thanks so much for being here. Coming up, we'll give you an inside look at the stocks on our radar. This is Motley Full Money. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about.

Don't buy ourselves stocks based solely on what you hear. I'm Chris Hill, and back in the studio with me, our trio of senior analysts, Seth Jason, James Early, and Tim Hanson. Guys, it's that time, once again. It's our last time of the year for stocks on our radar. Tim Hansen, we will start with you. If people have been paying attention recently, they may have seen a spate of recent IPOs from China, many of which are dot-coms.

And as you might guess about a Chinese.com. Are they as good as the other ones? Oh, boy, they're better. And the valuations are higher than ever before. So if I could get a present from Santa this year, it would be a liquid and active options chain on a little website called yoku. com, which is apparently the YouTube of China. I'm going to do that right now. It has.

It is ticker is Y-O-K-U. last year it did over the trillion 12 months period it did 32 million in revenue and was negative lost money on the gross profit line lost money on the gross profit line does anybody want to guess its valuation $2 billion $4,000

$4 billion. Oh wow well look at it you out there can't see it but really truly it's stunning it it looks like YouTube but with Chinese characters and it's fully censored so there is no sort of fun inappropriate video on it So yoku.com, short it, buy puts, don't buy it, do anything but buy it, but that's the stock on my radar for maybe all the wrong reasons.

Let's bring in our man Steve Brodo from behind the glass. Steve, a question for Tim Hanson? Sure. I guess my question is, is investing in IPOs a bad idea if your investment turns out to be insanely profitable? We often talk around here about how investing in IPOs is not, you're generally not in a very favorable position. but it seems like most of the IPOs I've heard of, people make a tremendous amount of money. I've heard of. Yes, there's the rub. Seth says it on that.

So the successful ones, obviously, people talk about a lot, but most IPOs are going to be quite unsuccessful. Investing in a Chinese IPO in particular is a little bit risky because they have almost no operating track record. And like Yoku, have very little in revenue despite a lofty valuation. So I'd steer clear of this one. James Ehrlich, stock on your radar? Chris, I kind of wish I had a crystal ball right now to look deeper into Philippine. long-distance telecom. This is a double-recked, an income investor. It's something I own personally. It's done pretty well. But other companies now are starting to enter the marketplace,

got new competitors. I'm wondering when the penetration, I guess growth is going to die out. This has been an underpenetrated market, all wireless. It's a good company. I just don't know how much more growth is left and how the valuation plays into it. But it's definitely on my radar. And what's the ticker? P-H-I, Chris. Steve, a question for James? Sure. What does the telecom industry look like, let's say 20 years from now? That's a very difficult question. I would say, you know, obviously we're going to see sort of a blend of, you know, like Comcast or Verizon, you know, with fiber optics, with computers, with that. International might be different from domestic. You have places like Philippines or Indonesia where there's never going to be any need to lay wireless for telecom alone, you know, probably not even for computing, for broadband.

I don't know, I guess is the honest answer to that question. But it's a utility. People think it's a growth stock. Telecom is a utility business, and that's fundamentally, it's not a fast growth business over time. I was going to say phones are going to be a lot cheaper in 20 years, and using phones is going to be a lot cheaper. And the hope with a telecom would be that they can make it up on volume, which makes sense in the markets like the Philippines, but which is why telecom in the U.S., I think, is a more dodgy proposition. You know, and James, you're right.

That was a tough question from Steve. So, you know, if you want to ask Steve something, you go right ahead. You know, I'm going to go on a little tangent here. And, Chris, I read that a main man has auctioned off his back to be tattooed by some advertiser. I forgot what company, maybe it's like $25,000. I'm so proud of my home state right now. My question for Steve is, how much would an advertiser have to pay?

I mean, presumably, you'd do it for like $10 million, right? You'd auction off your back. Yes, I would. What would be your lowest price to do that? Would you do it for $5? $5 million? Absolutely. $100,000?

Maybe. Oh, $100,000? I got news to you guys. I'm married. My back is not exactly any high demand by any of it. The market will decide. Fair enough. Fair enough. Seth Jason, a stock on your radar. Wow. Tim's already grinched it up over there, but I'm going to have to do it again. Tesla Motors, T-tickr-T-S. I was going to say, what we were talking about IDOs. Didn't Tesla IPO earlier this year? Oh, I mean, oh, the guy who started PayPal runs it, therefore it's a different kind of car company. And They're making this electric sports car and people want it and now they're going to be a big hit with this very, very expensive electric sedan.

Come on, everybody, please. First of all, the car business has always had lots and lots of players. The vast majority of them have gone out of business or have been swallowed up. The ones that are left have lost investors a lot of money over time. And the guys at Tesla, I just think they've got an R&D deficit. They're right now kind of working from a base of. of ultra-cheap capital because of some government support and everything else. And I just think in the end, competition kills them as it may kill some of the biggies.

All right, Seth, Jason, James Early, Tim Hanton. Guys, thanks for being here. Thank you, Chris. Thanks to our special guest this week. Eric Savitz from Forbes magazine. Our engineers are Steve Roydo and Gail Anyo Nuevo. Our producer is Mack Greer. I'm Chris Hill.

On behalf of everyone at the Motley Fool, have a safe and happy holiday season. Thanks for listening. And we'll see you next week. You know,