Motley Fool Money - Peloton's Turning Point?

Episode Date: February 1, 2023

It's been a rough 12 months for Peloton, but the fitness company just offered shareholders a glimmer of hope. (0:21) Asit Sharma discusses: - Peloton's 2nd-quarter revenue surprising to the upside - A sluggish digital ad market hurting Snap's 4th-quarter results - How Snapchat+ could be a potential lever for management to pull  (11:00) Jason Moser and Matt Frankel discuss the 30th anniversary of exchange-traded funds and how stock investors use ETFs today. Stocks discussed: PTON, SNAP, GOOG, GOOGL, SPY, VNQ, RSP, CIBR Host: Chris Hill Guest: Asit Sharma, Jason Moser, Matt Frankel Producer: Ricky Mulvey Engineer: Rick Engdahl Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This episode is brought to you by Colagard. Do you know what's really scary? Not screening for colon cancer when you turn 45. The Colagard test is non-invasive, requires no special prep or time off work, and ships right to your door. In just three simple steps, Colagard takes the scare out of colon cancer screening.

If you're 45 or older and at average risk, ask your health care provider about the Coligard test. Colagard is available by prescription only. Learn more or request a prescription today at colagard.com slash screen. We've got two stocks going in different directions and a special anniversary shoutout. Motley Fool Money starts now. I'm Chris Hill, joining me today, Motley Fool Senior Analyst, Asset Sharma. Thanks for being here. Chris, I appreciate you having me on. Once again, we are in the position of recording before the Federal Reserve makes its announcements

regarding the rate hike. And people are listening to this after that news has broken. So, we're going to talk about the Fed and interest rates later in the week on this show, and you and I are just going to focus on earnings results. And let's start with Peloton, because shares are up nearly 20 percent because second quarter revenue came in higher than expected. Next week marks the one-year anniversary of Barry McCarthy being appointed CEO. He called these results a possible turning point. I'm not a shareholder, but I hope he's right.

It could be a turning point, Chris. Here we see a company that's cut its cash burn down tremendously. Just two quarters ago, Peloton burned 547 million in cash. So, that's negative free cash flow. This quarter, it came in at negative $94 million. McCarthy has done, I think, a lot of your basic turnaround playbook in pretty convincing fashion. He has changed the go-to market strategy, so forming relationships with companies like Amazon.com and Dick's sporting goods. He's focused on reducing the inventory that was so bloated and has emphasized that subscription revenue.

Subscription revenue this quarter came in at $411 million. So that's more revenue than they took in from selling equipment at $380 million. that's important. Well, number one, it's a trend for the last couple of quarters. But number two, they actually make money on subscriptions. So we have positive subscription gross profit of 278 million bucks. You have a cash burn in gross profit on the equipment side, the connected fitness product side of 43 million. If this trend continues, then conceivably that subscription gross profit can make this a positive business. McCarthy said today, you know, if you If you strip away some of the extraneous cash flow items, we really were sort of break-even

on cash flow or slightly positive. If you adjust any number enough, of course, you can get positive, as we both know, Chris. But he's got a point there. So yes, this potentially is a floor in all the bleeding we've seen in Peloton over the past several quarters. I went back and looked at my notes from a year ago when McCarthy was an appointed CEO. Bill Mamm was on the show at the time. One of the questions I posed to him was, hey, do you think they brought this guy in just to

sell the company? And in summary, Bill said, no, I don't think so. I think that, you look at McCarthy's experience at Netflix and at Spotify. He's someone who's been brought in to try and turn the business around. I'm glad, again, I'm not a shareholder, but I'm glad the results turned out the way they did, and the stock is reacting the way it did. in part because even with the pop today, shares are basically trading at half of where they were when McCarthy came in as CEO.

And I think if they didn't have this glimmer of light in their quarterly result, I think we would be talking about, you know, okay, McCarthy's been on the job for a year. He's done what he can. But it might be time to sell this company to someone else. I think some large companies are still interested, at least sniffing around at Peloton, but he really is managing this company, not just to present it for sale, but to make something of this business. And Pelton is still a market leader in the connected fitness industry. It's still a really strong brand among consumers.

So there's no reason that this couldn't be a successful business, whether the stock ever fulfills the promise that it had when it IPO. I don't know, but there's a bigger point here in that every manufacturing business, which this is, has to find its equilibrium point, has to find that profitable equation. It looks like Peloton 2.0 is going to do it by not bleeding so much cash on the equipment and finding a way to keep pushing those subscriptions. still have a pretty decent base of connected fitness subscribers. Subscriptions are over 3 million unique subscribers.

So there you go, Chris. Like I say, I think there is something here in this business. And I think McCarthy, as you point out, isn't in the hottest seat now. The seats cooled down some. Let's see if he can continue this performance over another year. Absolutely. Three months from now, it's going to be interesting to see if this is. is a trend or if this was the positive version of a speed bump.

Let's move on to, speaking of speed bumps, let's move on to Snap. Shares are down to 13 percent because fourth quarter revenue was a little lower than expected. Average revenue per user was lower than expected. And probably not a surprise, given what we've seen over the last few months in the digital ad space from companies like Google that are a lot bigger than Snap. Oh, Snap. I can't be the first analyst to have said that. But you have a point, Chris. There's a really pronounced pullback among middle market companies, among enterprise companies to rein in their advertising. And that directly affects companies like Snap. Snap itself is more of a targeting advertising company. So when you have this double whammy, of Apple instituting its privacy changes and companies just not wanting to spend as much on

targeted advertising. I think Snap finds itself in this uncomfortable position. They're already burning cash. Their business model has never yet realized its potential to be this hugely positive operating model. So what we have here is a company whose balance sheet is getting slimmer. You look at its working capital versus its convertible debt, and there's not much room there, not much breathing room. And you also have a company, on the other hand, which keeps increasing its daily active users. Those increased 17% year over year in the fourth quarter. They still dominate a certain demographic. They're starting to compete with TikTok. They have an alternative offering. And they also have a burgeoning AR business, which some think could

be a revenue generator in the future. So I don't want to try to pull out too many silver linings here because there aren't a lot in this report, except to say that SNAP has the user base. It's got the engagement over time. Maybe the numbers were bits off this quarter. The question is, how do you make this model profitable and cash flow generative on a per-use? user basis. Well, and we've seen this story before within the Alphabet Empire. I mean, this really, you know, for as strong as YouTube is, you know, there's a very healthy stretch of time where that was the question around YouTube.

People looking at it and say, how can YouTube be as dominant as it is as a video platform? And it's still not really the profit machine that Google search is. You said there aren't a lot of silver linings to snap. And I agree with that. I would also add as one more thing that is not a silver lining is they're still not technically offering official guidance, but they are talking openly about what they refer to as their internal forecast. And that forecast is projecting a drop in revenue.

Which can't be good for their cash flow. There are few levers to pull. Let's just briefly talk about one. Snapchat does have a subscription service. It's called Snapchat Plus. They now have 2 million paying subscribers. You mentioned YouTube, Chris. That's something that YouTube has done to increase the monetization of its business model.

This is an area where potentially they can stabilize revenue a bit, but it's just not growing quickly enough to sort of cover the shortfall. When you talk about a decline in revenue for a company that is barely generating free cash flow, that worries investors. because, as I mentioned before, look, the balance sheet is a little thin. It's 3.7 odd billion of convertible debt on their books at the moment. And their working capital, which I referred to, has only an excess of about $300 million. So what if the company is subject to this weak economy doesn't have that lift now that Apple's pulled back on its privacy changes?

and at the same time, you can't grow the other parts of the business quick enough. You can't pull up the subscription base. You can't get enough monetization out of the VR venture. It's just hard to see where this business starts to gain its momentum unless and until the economy as a whole recovers. Then you can maybe see a little bit of breathing room here. Yeah, and maybe on some level, it doesn't make sense to talk openly about this, but perhaps privately, they're just crossing their fingers. The TikTok just gets banned in the United States

across the board. That seems like that would be a boost. It would be a boon. I bet a lot of companies where TikTok is, some kind of market share are hoping the same thing. Let's be clear. Snap is not the only business crossing at fingers that TikTok just gets banned in America. That's true. To the consternation and dread of millions upon millions of teenagers, on up and some people, even our age, Chris. Asa Charma, always great talking to you. Thanks for being here. So much fun. Thanks a lot, Chris. The first exchange-traded fund celebrated its 30th birthday this year.

What started with just a few million dollars of capital is now a 10 trillion dollar industry. Jason Moser and Matt Frankel look back on the history of the ETF and how stock investors use them today. Hey, Matt, it's great to catch up with you again. with you again. We say a lot on these shows, but it's always worth reiterating. We're big fans of index funds. I know that seems maybe a little out of sorts, given that we focus primarily on individual stocks here at the Mali Fool for the most part. But our ultimate goal is to help people achieve their financial freedom. Index funds are a great way, a great part of that overall strategy. Index funds, ETFs, exchange-traded funds, those are just great

ways for investors to achieve that overall strategy. And this year marks a special occasion for a special fund, right? The SPDR, the Spider, S&P 500, ETF, Exchange Traded Fund Trust, just turned 30 years old this month, Matt. Now, I'm older than that fund. I think you are, too. But, you know, hey, listen, they grow up so fast, right? We thought it would be a good chance to dig a bit more into exchange-traded funds, ETFs. Dig into the history. what they are, why they are often a great option for investors, both passive and active. And so to kick this conversation off, let's just start with the very basics. What is an ETF? Who started this?

Yeah, so the first part, an ETF, it's a way for investors to buy a whole bunch of stocks with one single investment. If you buy an S&P 500 ETF, you're buying all 500. companies that make up that index. They trade on major exchanges, just like shares of stock. That's the biggest difference between them and mutual funds. You mentioned index funds. Most ETFs are index funds, meaning that they just passionately track an index. But they don't have to be. There's a lot of active ETFs out there as well. The Kathy Wood, the Ark Invest ETFs are a really good example of that. But yeah, they are kind of a mutual fund alternative, if you will, that It kind of just trades like a basic stock on the stock exchange.

Okay, so you said the word there that a lot of people are very familiar with, and that is mutual, right? Mutual funds. I grew up in the age of mutual funds, and I'm sure they were very popular offering early on in your investing career as well. We've certainly seen a pivot here over the last several years away from mutual funds, towards more index fund investing, exchange-traded fund investing, exchange-traded fund, investing. So let's talk a little bit about the advantage and the disadvantages. And let's go ahead and let's go with the bad news first. What are the disadvantages to actually investing with exchange-traded funds? Or are there any disadvantages?

Well, first of all, mutual funds are still very popular. There are about three times as much assets invested in mutual funds as there aren't ETFs, even today. Wow. The big reason is that's the main choice of retirement plans and things like that. Those are mostly in mutual funds still. But there are some disadvantages, as opposed to individual stocks. Most exchange-traded funds are just designed to match in indexes performance, not beat it, which is kind of the goal of investing in individual stocks. There's always some sort of expense or fee that comes with it. Now, with a lot of index funds, that's very small, but it's still more

of a fee than you're going to pay to develop your own portfolio from scratch in a brokerage account. So, there are a few disadvantages. Another one is that most ETFs are weighted, meaning that they can be very top-heavy. The S&P 500 ETF that you mentioned has 20% of its assets in just seven companies. It can be very top-heavy. You're putting a lot more of your money in the biggest positions in a given index fund. But those are just kind of minor disadvantages. For the most part, these are actually really great investment products. Well, what are some of the advantages with them? Because it feels like you run across every day, sort of a new theme, right? I mean, as we see new themes develop in the investing

world, I think a lot of that is kind of dictated by technology. But it does seem as if we see new ETFs coming online every day that are following some sort of theme. So at least one of the advantages to me, it strikes me at least that maybe there's a little bit more choice for investors in sort of the thematic investing, right? You have a little bit more opportunity to chase the things that you're really interested in, and that choice didn't really exist before. Is that a fair assessment? Yeah, that's definitely an advantage. The biggest advantage in my mind is that you don't have to worry about your investments as much as with individual stocks. This whole episode's

kind of about the history of ETS, so I want to give a one-minute history lesson. Okay. ETFs, as you mentioned, started in 1993. They just turned 30, but they didn't really gain steam for the first decade or so. The reason that they ultimately wound up getting popular is because of the dot-com crash. Investors didn't want their money tied up, or, you know, all invested in one or two or three individual stocks. They wanted to buy the tech sector for a long-term investment.

We went from having about 80 ETFs in 2000 to 2,700. 100 ETFs today. Wow. And that momentum really took off after the dot-com crash. And it's because it has that benefit of you're not investing too heavily in any given stock. You're just trying to match the market or the sector's performance overtime, which is, you know, after a big crash like that, really showed its appeal. Yeah. Yeah, no kidding. Well, how do you recognize the, you mentioned earlier the expense side of things. I just want real quick for investors to be able to, if they're interested in looking more into the expenses that are involved with something like this. How do you find out the expenses associated with investing in a mutual fund versus an ETF? What is that called where we look for

that information? They're both pretty easy. There's two main ways to do it. Number one is you could go to the ETF providers page. If I go to Vanguard's website and type in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, it gives me a whole fact sheet. One of the top lines on there is the expense ratio. The alternative is just log into your brokerage account, type in the ETF's ticker symbol, or just to look for it in the search tool, and you can find the expense ratio. That way, it's usually, like I said, one of the top things listed, just because it is a big differentiator between different funds and ETFs. Yeah.

Well, it does feel, I mean, again, the start of the segment here, I did mention, I mean, we focus a lot on individual stocks right here at the Motleyville. That's kind of what we do for the most part. By the same token, I would be willing to wager that all of us, you know, all of us on the investing team, we like ETFs, right? I mean, I think most of us do. I think probably most, if not all of us, actually own ETFs in some capacity, too. I mean, they're excellent tools, right?

They're excellent parts of your overall portfolio. They give you that instant diversification and can kind of help you sleep at night, which is what we often say. You want to own stuff that helps you sleep at night. But ultimately, do you feel like ETFs are a better option than individual stocks? Or is this really, you need to have both? I mean, every money should own them along with individual stocks. Is it one or the other, or really should we be focused on the opportunity?

Yes, can be a great way to create a backbone to a portfolio. I feel more comfortable having money in individual stocks. If a certain percentage of my assets are just in a S&P 500 index fund. But they're also better than individual stocks in certain senses, specifically to invest in things you're not necessarily comfortable with analyzing individual stocks in. I can give a personal example as I have no idea how to evaluate biotech companies. So I use an ETF to invest in that part of the market. They could be better than individual stocks in that way, as opposed to going outside of your

circle of competence and investing in things you're not comfortable with. So I like them for that reason, bonds especially. Who wants to go buy individual bonds? The ETF route is actually better than the individuals in that respect. Yeah. Yeah, I'm glad you brought that up. It reminds me of a recent piece of content I published in my NextGen Supercycle service, the 5G service.

I'll pull the curtain back a little bit here. I don't think I'm giving too much away. But we have a radar stock feature. Every other month, I introduce a radar stock feature. It's not a recommendation, but it's a stock that's on my radar, something that I'm interested in. In this past month, I actually introduced an ETF as a radar stock that was focused on cybersecurity. And the basic idea is, listen, man, cybersecurity is tough. I am fully not an expert on it.

And furthermore, it feels like that's a market that just is constantly changing as the threats constantly evolve and as tech constantly evolves. And so I saw that ETF as one way for investors to consider investing in cybersecurity without having to try to place all of their chips, so to speak, on one horse. I don't know. It just seems like it's a very difficult space to pick one winner when you probably have a few that are going to help drive performance there. So I found, again, I didn't recommend it.

Maybe I will, but it did seem like an ETF in the cybersecurity space was perhaps one way for investors to consider getting some exposure there. And speaking of exposure, I guess before we leave today, I want to just to ask you, are there any recommendations out there? Do you have any recommendations for ETS beyond the SPIDER, right? Beyond this S&P index fund that's celebrating its 30th birthday? Anything out there on your radar? I mean, I'm sure it's probably something real estate-related, but I'd figure I'd check. I don't know why you would think that.

No. I'll give you three. Two Vanguard funds in particular I like are the VYM, which is the high-dividend ETF. It's above average. dividend payers. Companies like Exxon, like Microsoft, I think, is one of them. Companies to pay above average dividends, if you want yield plus growth potential, that's a good one to look at. The VNQ is the real estate one that you just mentioned, that invested in the REIT index. It could be a great way to diversify your portfolio away from stocks, just because real estate and stocks don't really correlate too well. And third is a ticker symbol called RSP. It's an equal-weight S&P-500 ETF. And the benefit of

that, as I mentioned, that a lot of ETFs can be very top-heavy. If you buy an S&P 500 ETF like the Spider, 12% of the assets are in Apple and Microsoft alone. So what an equal-weight fund does, it takes your money and invests it equally in all 500 companies, kind of eliminates the top heaviness. So that's one to look at if you don't like the kind of concentrated nature of weighted ETFs. I love it. And I'm not going to leave listeners hanging just so that we're clear. The radar E-TF that I announced last month in the service. It's the NASDA First Trust CTA Cybersecurity Index. Man, it's a mouthful. The ticker is C-I-B-R. Again, not a recommendation, but certainly

something I'm digging in a little bit more to as far as looking at the cybersecurity space. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about, and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy yourself stocks based solely on what you hear. I'm Chris Hill. Thanks for listening. We'll see you tomorrow. We're