Motley Fool Money - Streaming Wars, Retail Surprises, and Home Improvement's Growing Problem
Episode Date: November 22, 2019Target hits a new all-time high on earnings. Macy’s and Kohl’s tumble. Lowe’s rises. Home Depot slips. Nordstrom surprises. And Schwab and TD Ameritrade may be teaming up. Analysts Andy Cross, R...on Gross, and Jason Moser tackle these stories, weigh in on the latest from Intuit, and dig into Tim Hortons’ holiday menu. They also share why they’re keeping an eye on Dave & Buster’s, PayPal, and Box. Plus, corporate governance expert and film critic Nell Minow talks WeWork and New Coke, Disney streaming, and must-see movies. (To get 50% off our Stock Advisor service, go to http://RadarStocks.Fool.com.) Thanks to Audible for supporting The Motley Fool Podcasts. For a limited time, get 3 months of Audible for $6.95 a month at audible.com/FOOL or text FOOL to 500500. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
If you're a small business owner, you already know what it takes to keep everything moving.
You're juggling customers, invoices, and about 100 decisions every day.
Thankfully, taxes don't have to be one more thing on that list.
With Intuit TurboTax, you can get your business taxes done for you with a full service expert.
TurboTax matches you with your dedicated tax expert.
Who knows your industry understands your business write-offs and gives you the personalized advice your business deserves.
upload your documents right in the app, hand everything off, and still feel like you're in the loop
the whole way through. You can even get real-time updates on your expert's progress right in the
app, which makes it so much easier to stay on track. And you can get unlimited expert help at
no extra cost, even on nights and weekends during tax season. Visit turbotax.com to get matched
with an expert today, only available with TurboTax full service experts.
This week's Motley Fool Money is brought to you by TD Ameritrade. You have an investing style.
TD Ameritrade has a mobile app to match it. Check out TD Ameritrade mobile and think or swim mobile
to find the one that's right for you. Remember, SIPC. Thanks also to Audible for Sporting Motleyful
Money for a limited time. Get three months of Audible for $6.95 a month. Choose one audiobook and two
Audible originals for free, go to audible.com slash fool or text the word fool to 500, 500.
Everybody needs money. That's why they call it money.
From Fool Global Headquarters, this is Motley Fool Money Radio Show. It's the Motley Full Money
Radio show. I'm Chris Hill joining me in studio this week's senior analyst Jason Moser,
Andy Cross, and Ron Gross. Good to see you as always, gentlemen.
Hey, hey, you're doing. We've got the latest news from Wall Street.
Mnoh is our guest, and as always, we'll give an inside look at the stocks on our radar.
But we begin with retail and best in class this week is Target.
Shares of Target hit an all-time high after a monster third quarter where pretty much everything
was higher than expected.
Target also raised guidance for the full fiscal year.
And Ron, big tip of the jester cap to CEO Brian Cornell and his team.
Really getting it done.
Investment in e-commerce, roll out a curbside pickup, same day of deliveries, really bearing fruit.
Com sales up 4.5%. Online sales up 31%. Adjusted earnings up 25%. Really, very, very strong quarter.
Yeah. And 80% of the digital comparable sales growth was really from those same Dave initiatives.
So drive up, ship it, or pick up that Ron mentioned. The investments they're making in this space,
they've really been able to leverage the uniqueness to target, which is their brand, I think,
and what they offer in there, their merchandising, but also their locations. They have all
all those locations, 1,800-some locations, and they continue to innovate in that way that
has really made them the class of the industry.
Yeah, they've been smaller locations.
They're focusing on groceries.
They're expanding their private brands.
Doing a lot of things right.
Now for the holiday season, making a big bet on toys.
Well, a lot of momentum going into the holiday season.
But you mentioned the private brands, and I'm reminded of the story a few years ago, where
Cornell decided, we're going to sell our pharmacy business.
And there were legitimate questions at the time.
of, is this a good move because that's a profitable part of the business? And he made the case
then. Now, we're going to invest in private brands. We're going to invest it in other ways.
And it's hard to look at that move now as anything other than smart.
They've literally made a series of very smart moves all along the way. If you had bought the
stock three years ago or even a year ago, you're a very happy investor. I think they're set
up well, as we were saying for the holiday season. Big bit on toys, two.
two dozen mini Disney stores within certain locations. And something I didn't know is they've
kind of taken over the fulfillment of the Toys R Us website, which I didn't know that that was back.
Yeah, I think, though, when you look at the performance of companies like Walmart and Target
versus a lot of these other retailers, you're starting to see that, them separate
a little bit. It really, to me, grocery is turning out to be one of those major differentiators.
We wouldn't have thought about it all that long ago, because it's just so obvious, right?
It's right there in front of you. But grocery is just such a tremendous.
us opportunity. Walmart and Target have made so many investments in that space really clearly
starting to pay off.
Well, and part of the reason is because grocery stores, publicly traded grocery stores,
weren't necessarily a great stock to have in your portfolio. If you're just thinking about
sort of the generic grocery stores, giant Safeway, etc.
Yeah, and they're still not very good stocks that hold in your portfolio because they're just
a razor-thin margin business to begin with, with the exception of your Costco's of the world,
thanks to that membership model.
From a stock perspective, okay, so they raise full year guidance, which is appropriate, they're doing really well, still only 20 times earnings based on that new guidance.
So even though the stock's up 91% this year, I don't think 20 times is expensive for a business that's firing like this.
By the way, if you're Amazon, doesn't this make you feel good to see this?
I mean, yes, they're in competition, but isn't it harder to make the case that Amazon is destroying retail when Target and Walmart and Costco are doing well?
Well, I think there's plenty of other retailers that Amazon can point to that haven't been doing quite as well.
Just a few.
But clearly, to Jason's point, he mentioned grocery.
That's been a big driver for both, certainly for Walmart, big supporter there and also for Target.
And what those guys are doing is so much different than what we're seeing from the other competitors
is that I think Amazon has plenty of bragging rights for what they've done to the industry.
Speaking of other retailers, if Target's third quarter was a thing of beauty,
the third quarters of Macy's and Coles, not so much, shares down 10.
percent and 20 percent respectively this week after Macy's and Coles are really struggling, Jason,
to get any momentum going into the holidays.
Well, this is like that. Well, we have some good news and bad news. We gave you the good
news first, listeners. Here's the bad news. Macy's and Coles. Wow. I mean, it just, you know,
with Macy's, I'm never surprised. I don't feel like I'm never surprised, really, when they
miss expectations or guide down. I mean, that's just what you've kind of come to expect from a business
like this. And they really just continued that trend. Back in August, some of the numbers I was
looking at with this company, just to figure out where they were headed. I mean, top line
revenue down 11 percent since 2015. Net income down 33 percent. Earnings per share down 22 percent.
They burned through a lot of cash along the way, too. I will give them credit. At least that
cash is not going towards share repurchases over the last few years. So that's good. Not yet.
Yeah. Five times earnings. Somebody's going to be tempted.
You look at something like Coles, and I tell you, it recently went into a Coles to return an Amazon package.
Number one, I'm never going to do that again because it was just, it wasn't enjoyable.
I just stand in line.
But then what I did after I got done with it, I took a lap around the store because I haven't been in a Coles, and I can't remember how long.
I felt like I was walking around a J.C. Penny, and that's not a good thing.
So, I mean, when you talk about a company with financials that are trending in the wrong direction,
Coals very much the same picture.
Interestingly, their dividend yield now at 5.7 percent.
payout ratio is creeping up. I think we really have to pay attention to this one because
the financials don't look like they're going to be able to support that payout.
Well, and we were talking at our production meeting. You look at the number of locations
that Macy's and Coles have combined. It's somewhere in the neighborhood of 1,700, 1,800 locations.
That just seems too big and too many locations for retailers that are struggling like this.
It does seem like a lot. And I appreciate them partnering up with Amazon, for example,
is another option for returning. But they're not the only ones due.
doing that. I mean, the UPS store, for example, is doing the same thing. We were in a UPS store
recently as well, and they said most of their business day-to-day, people coming in to return
Amazon packages.
Yeah, Macy's was concerned that their report wasn't weak enough, so they threw in a data
breach just for good measure. I guess they set target weather the storm, so hopefully
they will do that as well.
Shares of Intuit falling on Friday, despite first quarter profits coming in higher than
expected. Andy, got to give management at
Intuit credit for being very upfront about the fact that they're about to spend a lot of money
on marketing.
Well, also, just think about what Intuit has done, Chris, over the last.
I mean, how they have really changed this business, moved it aggressively into the cloud,
where they now provide their financial management software, QuickBooks, TurboTax.
They even have Mint.
They've made this adjustment, and it's really benefited then.
The stock is up 34% year to date and up 176% over the last five years versus 46%.
percent for the market. The quarter was actually pretty, I thought, was pretty impressive.
Revenue was up 15 percent. That was ahead of their own guidance. Their operating income
up 26 percent. Their earnings per share was at 41 cents. That was way ahead to analyst's expectations.
Their guidance may have been a little bit weaker than I think people were looking for, certainly
from the analysts. But overall, Intuit continues to do exactly what investors love to see for
this business. Their small business and self-employee, which is their main business for QuickBooks,
that ecosystem revenue that they talk about, which they want to see grow more than 30% every year,
that was up 35%. That continues to be a stretch of their success and a part of their business where
they can get more and more clients into that ecosystem and be able to charge them for more and more
services. Who is attempting to compete with into it? I'm scratching my head trying to think of who is
the Coke to their Pepsi or the Pepsi to their Coke. It's a great question. Not to the success.
When they have more than 50 million clients, they really have done so well on the small
business and the individual. Really, the small business, though, with their QuickBooks and now
their accounting. They continue to push into new and newer services, too. They now offer
credit, some credit scoring services into there. So as they continue to evolve, they're not
going to continue to grow at 30, 40 percent a year like they did this quarter on their profit
side, so it may be more like 10, 15 percent, but that's still pretty respectable for a $70 billion
organization. Coming up, the retail angle that a lot of investors are missing. Stay right here. You're
listening to Motley,
money. It's that time of year again, people. It's the holidays. You're running around, giving gifts.
And when you're doing that, think about giving yourself a gift. Give yourself the gift of listening with
an Audible membership. For a limited time, you can get three months of Audible for $6.95 a month
at audible.com slash fool, or you can just text the word fool to 500, 500. You can access an
unbeatable selection of audiobooks, including mysteries, memoirs, bestsellers, and more. And
And with the Audible app, you can listen anytime, anywhere on any device, listen at the gym while you're in the car, shopping.
Anytime you can't read, you can listen with Audible.
Last week on the show, we had the interview that I did earlier this year with David Epstein about his awesome book, Range, Why Generalist Triumph in a specialized world.
That's the book I just picked up on Audible.
Fantastic to listen to.
For a limited time, get three months of Audible for $6.95 a month.
That's more than half off the regular price, so that's a deal. Be honest.
Each month, choose one audiobook plus two Audible Originals for free.
Visit Audible.com slash fool or just text the word fool to 500, 500.
Give yourself the gift of listening.
Welcome back to Motley Full Money, Chris Hill here in studio with Jason Moser, Andy Cross, and Ron Gross.
Home Depot and Lowe's both out with third quarter reports this week.
Lowe's having the better week with profits higher than expected and the company raising guidance,
while Home Depot stock down more than 8% on lower revenue and same store sales, Jason.
So, Chris, Home Depot's quarter wasn't as bad as the sell-off would have you believe,
and Lowe's quarter wasn't as good as perhaps the buying in the stock would have you believe.
I mean, this really is all just about expectations at the end of the day
and what they see happening in the coming quarters.
But if you look at the way the companies are performing, Home Depot reaffirming earnings for share guidance,
they did guide down 50 basis points on comps. So there could be some traffic concerns there. It could just be poor forecasting earlier in the year. They're using language in the call, like the housing market is healthy and stable. And certainly with Home Depot, they saw growth in both the number of transactions and the size of those transactions. Now, Lowe's, on the other hand, while they raised earnings per share guidance, they see their comps around 3%, which is a little lighter than Home Depot. But while Lowe saw some growth in ticket size, transactions were actually down. So there's
still trying to figure out how to generate that traffic that has been on the decline recently.
At the end of the day, you've got Home Depot trading at 22 times full year estimates.
You've got Lowe's trading around a 21 times full year estimates.
It never changes.
And I mean, Home Depot yielding 2.5%.
Lowe's yielding 1.9%.
So I think you make your decisions based on those numbers.
What do you make of lows closing the stores in Canada?
Not that they have a huge footprint there, but on a percentage basis, part of their announcement,
was, we really need to rethink what we're doing in Canada.
Well, yeah, it's just, it's not Canada-specific in the sense that they're just trying to find
areas of underperformance.
And so right now, this is a business in transition.
Marvin Ellison, the relatively new CEO, is really trying to get things back in order and
make the investments count.
And so if you have underperforming stores in retail, you just, you have to shut them down
and focus on where you're seeing more success.
Something that got talked about on the Home Depot call was the amount of theft that
that Home Depot is dealing with, third quarter in a row that shrink, which is where
employee theft and just shoplifting in general comes under.
And I got to give credit to Courtney Reagan at CNBC because she just did a pretty eye-opening
report.
I didn't realize the extent to which both Home Depot and Lowe's are dealing with a rising amount
of theft, how that is impacting their margins.
And retailers in general, National Retail Federation out with a survey, nearly 70 percent
retailers are reporting higher theft than they were a year ago.
Yeah, I really, over the next, I don't know, two or three quarters, I'm just going to
search through every retail call for that word shrink to see how many times it comes up,
because I suspect we'll see it come up often.
For Home Depot, they actually quantified it.
And it came out to about a 31 basis point drop in gross margin, thanks to that problem
of shrink.
And that's everywhere from just inventory mismanagement, return issues, to theft.
internal and external. They even had an interview with the former CFO of Home Depot. We've
seen the development of this black market, which is just really astounding. And she was attributing
a lot of this to the opioid crisis, desperation, people looking to figure out new ways to just
get money. It's a fascinating thing, but it shows you a lot of the risks still out there for
those big box retailers. Shares of Nordstrom up 10% on Friday after third quarter profits in revenue
came in higher than expected. Ron Nordstrom,
stock has definitely bounced back from the low that it hit in August. Still down for the year, though.
Down 21% for the year. So this report, they did beat expectations, but not everything was great.
They did sell more off-price clothing. They kept inventories at reasonable levels. Their investments
in their loyalty program, digital marketing have helped, but total revenue was down 2%. And that's
a result of a 4.1% decline in their full-priced stores sales. Off-price was stronger.
up 1.2%. Digital sales was even stronger, up 7%. But when you boil it all together, total
sales down too. Not great. You did have gross margins widening a bit, which helped profit.
That led to a 90.5% increase in adjusted earnings. They were able to raise the lower end of their
2019 guidance. Stock's only trading at 11 times. But let's face it, it's because they have not
done a great job over the last several years.
There are stretches of time where Nordstrom, as a business, has done well,
and therefore the stock has done well. But every time I think about taking this retailer and putting
it on my watch list, I'm reminded of the fact that this family wants to sell the business.
I mean, does that alone just keep a stock off to the side for you? Because it's hard for
me to think in terms of, this is a stock I want to own for the next 10, 20 years, when I know
that the family has talked openly about selling it.
I don't mind if a stock gets taken out from under me at a premium, as long as the premium is fair,
But I just think it's real hard to get people interested in mall-based retailers right now.
That's the main reason they're having trouble selling the company.
It's the main reason people don't want to own this company.
And their operating performance is just not great.
Big deal brewing in the financial industry.
Charles Schwab is reportedly trying to buy TD Ameritrade.
If it happens and the deal goes through, the resulting brokerage would have roughly $5 trillion in assets, Andy.
It's a lot of money.
That's a big number.
It's a big number, but when you're competing against the likes of Vanguard and BlackRock,
who also have numbers that begin with T's, you got to expect that consolidation.
We've talked about this, especially after Charles Schwab made that blockbuster announcement earlier this fall.
They were going to zero dollar commissions.
And then TD Ameritrade Trade Fidelity all followed along.
So those stocks all really got hit, and Schwab is sitting there, one of the better run,
discount brokerage as the largest discount broker and saying, how can we continue to get more
and more scale? That's really important in this business. T.D. Ameritrade looking at saying that
their revenues would drop by 15%, probably with the lack of the trading revenues now from the zero
percent for the zero dollars commissions, and they need scale. And so the rumors have been in the
kind of conversation zone. We've talked about them, not really surprised to see this,
and not surprised to see that Charles Schwab is looking to make that acquisition.
Td Ameritrade is a $25 billion company. I'm, I guess I'm not surprised that Schwab is making this move. I guess I'm just more surprised that E-Trade, which is a much smaller company at $10 billion, is still out there as a standalone public company.
Well, I think, yeah, it's a scale play, right? So, this will give Schwab and TD Ameritrade probably like 15 million clients. They are really strong in the RIA, the registered investment advisory in the custodial business. That's actually where they're going to start a season pushback from the regulation.
and from the regulators. We look at the financial industry regulation authority, the Federal Reserve,
the SEC. They may start pushing back on how, from a competitive perspective,
does this give a Schwab, TD Ameritrade, an unfair advantage against the other players?
They better not lose sight of the customer either. I'm just thinking back to when TD Ameritrade acquired Scott Trade.
And as a Scott trade user, that integration, that transition was not seamless for me.
I mean, it wasn't, I wasn't losing sleepover, but it took a little work.
And now it sounds like I may have to do it all over again because I'm a TD Ameritrade user because they bought Scott trade.
So, yeah, scale's great. You want to be as big as you can, it seems, in this space.
But I do hope that they don't lose sight of the customer throughout this rapid growth.
Agreed. But having said that, it's never been a better time to be an individual investor where we can buy and sell stocks for free.
Fractional shares are coming to Charles Schwab so we can buy those stocks that are higher priced if we want.
There's services, websites are better than they've ever been. It's a good time for investors.
But in the next 12 months, is E-Trade a standalone public company still or is someone, and
I'm looking at you, Capital One, is someone going to snap them up?
I really feel like, I mean, we were just beginning to see the consolidation in this space.
I mean, you see Square now laying a foundation to be able to offer these types of services.
I mean, you've got to wonder what exactly is going to happen to Robin Hood.
Just going to be a fascinating year, I think, in this space.
week is Thanksgiving, which means it's going to be time for our Thanksgiving special edition
of Motley Full Money. A tradition unlike any other, actually.
True.
Obviously, there are special foods that come with the holidays. And Tim Hortons is here to help.
Tim Hortens is coming out with what the company is calling a holiday product lineup that includes
specialty coffees and specialty donuts, including, and I'm quoting here, the festive vanilla dip,
a yeast ring donut topped with green fondant and red and white sprinkles.
Ron, do you think this is going to help restaurant brands international, the parent company?
You think this is going to help move the stock?
Not a fan of fondant.
It's not good.
It's for decoration.
It's not tasty.
Who is doing the communications at this company that they're using phrases like yeast ring donut?
And for that matter, holiday.
Antibiotics clear that right up.
And holiday product lineup.
I mean, you're selling food.
Why are you referring to it that way?
It seems so easy, and yet people make it so difficult.
All right, guys.
We'll see you later in the show.
Up next, our friend Nell Minow has a few things investors should know about governance and a few
movies to check out this holiday season.
So stay right here.
You're listening to Motley Full Money.
Welcome back to Motley Full Money.
I'm Chris Hill.
Nell Minow is the vice chair of Value Edge Advisors.
She is the film critic known as the movie mom.
And she joins me now.
Well, good to talk to you.
I'm very glad to be back.
Lots to talk about.
Lots to talk about.
Can we start with WeWork?
Yes.
Because it never fails to amaze me.
It's like the impeachment hearing that keeps getting crazier.
So in the span of just two months, we have gone from WeWork planning to go public at a valuation of nearly $50 billion to essentially the implosion of certainly the value of the business.
And there are some people that I've talked to who say, you know what?
The system worked.
We work filed their S-1.
Investors got to look at the numbers and said, not even remotely interested in this.
And that was that.
That's some of the people I talk to.
I'm talking to you now.
So when you step back and look at what has transpired over the last couple of months,
what goes through your mind?
Well, I think that you're 100% right about that.
You know, this was the new Coke of initial public.
offerings. They put it out in the market, and the market said, basically, bitch, please,
you know, I don't know where you came up with this valuation. The corporate governance is whack.
I don't think it's worth anything. And so, yay, the market work there. However, that doesn't mean
that there's not a lot of blame to go around, starting with, of course, always the board of
directors. And I blame them for agreeing to go on the board when the founder had,
so much control 20 votes per share. That's somebody who's telling you, I don't want a real
board, and that is when you say, thanks, but no, thanks. But I particularly blame the other players
in this. I blame the Wall Street guys, because we literally pay them the big bucks so that we
don't have new Coke coming onto the market, so that they do some vetting, and they come up
with a supportable valuation and an initial public offering that people are not going to laugh
out of town. And so that was just a train wreck on their part. I completely hold them responsible.
And the people who should really be angry here, I think, are whoever the investors are in
SoftBank, because that was bananas for them to put so much money in and then find themselves
kind of stuck in quicksand as it all started to go under and put even more money in.
And of all the crazy stuff that went on, and gosh knows, there's a truckload of crazy in this story.
Nothing is crazier than that departure package for Newman.
Yeah, it really is when you look at what SoftBank did.
It's the classic example of sunk cost and just the idea that, well, we've already put this money in,
so we're going to put some more in and hope that we can recoup some more.
more. Yeah, it's also the classic case of putting good money in after bad and not knowing when to
cut your losses. And they never came up with a legitimate explanation for it. They never came up
with anything persuasive to say why they knew something more about the value there.
You know, the very thing that made this company appealing is the very thing that makes it hard
to value, and that is that there's just no stickiness for its revenue stream.
The reason that we like real estate is that people sign long-term leases and we have some idea of what our revenues are going to be going into the future.
But there is nothing to keep people going to WeWork any more than you might say going to Starbucks.
We don't know.
They could something better than Starbucks could open up, something better than WeWork could open up, and that's the end of it.
And so aside from all the self-dealing and volatility of Adam Newman as a CEO,
nobody really knows what this company is worth.
Also, in the past couple of months, we've had more CEOs leaving or announcing their intentions
to leave the corner office, T-Mobile, Nike, McDonald's, Under Armour, and more.
2019 is going to be a record year for CEO departures.
Is it just tougher to run a public company these days than it was 10, 20 years ago?
I don't think so.
And the departures are kind of cyclical.
There was a whole big run of departures in the late 80s, too.
And I think boards sometimes get jittery and have kind of quid of hearts off at their heads thing going on.
But I guess I would say that if a particular company is too big and complicated to run,
then maybe it's a good time to sell off some non-corps.
assets and make some strategic decisions because if it's too big to run or too complicated to run,
then the market should respond to that in some kind of rational way.
And the problem with booting out your CEO is that you then have the onerous task of trying
to find somebody better.
And that's not always easy to do.
But in the list that you've just given of the CEO departures, I think probably the weirdest
has to be the McDonald's one, don't you think?
Absolutely, although I was struck by the swiftness with which the board of directors showed Steve Easterbrook the door and appeared to have the pieces in place, not just to replace him, but to move other people up the chain.
Well, that's true. And, of course, we always advise boards that they should have that envelope in the drawer.
What if the CEO gets hit by a bus or gets some great other job?
and so that's, you know, good for them.
But, you know, how many times did they use the word consensual in their statements
about the relationship that he was having with an employee?
And, of course, the whole thing about me too and times up is that it's inherently not consensual
if there's a power dynamic there.
And adults have options of getting other jobs or making other decisions.
And, you know, and the company, of course, like every other company,
got rules about that. And yet somehow that's not termination for cause, and he still gets to go home
with all his parting gifts. Before we move on to movies, earlier this month, the SEC put forward
new rules that would require proxy advisor firms to give companies the chance to review proxy
materials before they were sent to shareholders. I know you're a fan of shareholders being involved.
Do you think this proposal improves on the current process? Well, I think it's a disaster. It's a
disaster. It's catastrophic in every way. And in fact, Bloomberg just wrote a great expose yesterday
of how many of the comment letters that were cited by this, which is just a proposal, by the way,
it's not final yet. It's in the comment period. Many of the comment letters that were cited
by the commission in coming out with this turned out to be completely bogus. How do we know?
Well, a lot of them have the exact same typo in the address. And when they called the commenters,
the people who signed the letters. They said, what? A letter? I didn't write a letter.
So it's been a bogus process all the way through.
You've heard me complain about the fake Dark Money Front Group, the Main Street investors
that have no connection to Main Street investing or coalitions, although they claim to have one,
that's funded by National Association Manufacturers.
Basically, this is a kill-the-messinger idea. They want to be able to make sure that the sole
source of independent research and analysis on proxy issues in corporate governance is shut down.
On top of everything else, it's clearly unconstitutional. One thing that we know about the
First Amendment is that the government cannot impose a prior restraint on written material.
And by forcing ISS, which it voluntarily does anyway, by the way, to share their drafts with
companies, I think the courts will throw that out immediately.
Before we get to the movie theaters, let's start with the home theaters.
Disney Plus launched last week.
Are you a subscriber?
I am.
Not only am I a subscriber.
I'm a little embarrassed and admitted, but it's true.
I was up at dawn and watched the Mandalorian first thing.
So you're a fan?
Yeah, I am.
I had to really think about it.
I mean, I'm pretty profligate in subscribing to streaming services, but I just was not going
to do both the end.
Apple and the Disney.
And I had to really think about it, but Disney's just seems so far superior that that's what
I went with.
Yeah, it seems like a lot of people tend to think in terms of Netflix, of course, being the
dominant player in video streaming, as being the target of all of the threats.
But at least based on the early reviews of the newest programs from the newest services,
it seems like you could look at Disney Plus and Apple Plus being much more direct competitive.
like, I'm assuming you're not the only person who's looking at the early offerings from Apple Plus and Disney Plus and saying, I'm going to stick with Disney.
Yeah, I think that's probably right.
I mean, Disney, let's face it, they've spent a long time accumulating and creating probably, you know, the core, the canon of our culture.
And if Disney Plus has got not just their own backlog, but also Marvel and Star Wars,
and Pixar. I mean, seriously, that's a murderer's row of the Yankees when they had, you know,
when they owned the penit. That's, that you can't beat that. I think what's interesting is how
many other people are getting into this, including NBC coming up with Peacock, the HBO,
and how difficult it's going to be for people who are currently getting that material
to decide whether they want to pay extra for the same thing plus what?
I don't know how that's all going to work.
Let's get to some of the big releases this holiday season,
and obviously this weekend it's Frozen too,
which I'm assuming I feel pretty confident
is going to win the weekend and probably Thanksgiving weekend as well
in terms of the box office receipts.
Any early sense of if this movie can live up to the first Frozen?
Well, I've seen it, and I thought it was great.
I don't think it's going to be a cultural juggernaut in the same way,
and I don't think we're going to be hearing the new songs in the same way we heard Let It Go,
but I think it's going to do very, very well, and important for investors in Disney, which I am,
it's got some new characters who I think are going to be very, very big under a lot of Christmas trees this year.
I thought it was great.
It's a very thoughtful story that has a very accessible and reassuring treatment of issues that are of a lot of concerns, not just to children, but to everybody.
How do we do with change?
How do we fix problems?
And I love there's a song called Just Do the Next Right Thing.
And I think that's a good idea for all of us.
So Frozen, I thought, was terrific.
It's going to make boatloads of money.
but it's going to have some tough competition this week from the Mr. Rogers movie,
A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood, which is amazing,
and everybody should go see it with their family on Thanksgiving.
How big is the crossover audience there?
I'm assuming there are people like me who are going to not only watch Tom Hanks as Mr. Rogers,
but also try to have my kids do it as well.
But I don't know.
I'm not picturing a ton of small children pouring into that movie.
like they're going to be pouring into Frozen 2.
Even though it's rated a PG, it's not an episode of Mr. Rogers.
It's really, and Mr. Rogers is not the main character.
It's really the story based on a real story of a journalist who went to interview Mr. Rogers
and really found his life transformed by him as kind of a proxy for all of us
and what we all learn from Mr. Rogers.
I promise everybody will be a better person at the end of that movie than they are at the beginning.
And you'll cry too.
But that journalist, the main character,
played by Matthew Reese from the Americans, he has to struggle with some real family issues.
There's some sad and angry stuff that happens in this movie.
And so it's not for little kids.
It's not for the audience of Mr. Rogers.
It's for the people who grew up with Mr. Rogers.
And so I would say maybe 11 or 12 and up for that movie.
But what a great movie.
If there are expectations about Frozen 2, they probably pale in expectations to the final
Star Wars movie.
this latest trilogy, The Rise of Skywalker.
Any sense of how this is going to do?
As someone who is not only a Disney shareholder, but also just a fan of these movies in general,
I'm hoping it does well, not just financially, but just from a story standpoint as well.
Me too. I've really got my fingers crossed. I've been a Star Wars fan since what we now call
Episode 4, A New Hope, and I'm very excited about it. I've heard that they have
beautifully treated some of the footage that they have of our Princess Leia, Carrie Fisher.
So I'm looking forward to that.
And the Mandalorian actually made me feel very hopeful about it.
Even though it's being done by different people, it shows that they understand the characters
and they understand that universe very, very well.
We've got a lot of great stuff coming out between now and the end of the year, including
the new little women, which looks phenomenal.
I think that's going to do very well.
I think the clunker probably coming out this season looks like cats.
I think they spent a fortune on that, and I don't think it's going to do well at all.
Yeah, I can't say I'm excited to shell out my money for cats,
or for that matter sit on a plane and watch it for free.
I'm afraid you're right.
That one may be streaming very, very, very soon.
I want to bring to your attention a movie that I think you might be interested in.
And that is, have you heard about the banker?
I've heard a little bit about the banker.
It's based on a true story that I didn't know anything about,
about two black men who started a bank because the regular banks were not making loans to people of color,
and they had to hire a white guy who knew nothing about banking to pretend to be the banker.
He was the front?
He was the front.
Exactly.
And that looks really good, Anthony Mackey.
So I'm very excited about that.
Well, you just answered what was going to be my last question, which was, you know, obviously Star Wars Frozen, Mr. Rogers, they're going to get a lot of the oxygen and attention.
So I'm always interested in your thoughts on what are the under-the-radar movies to look out for.
But it sounds like the banker is the one.
That could be. But I'll also mention Knives Out, which is opening up next week.
If you are like me and you like stories about big old houses where there's a murder and everybody's a suspect and the detective gathers them all in one way,
room to tell them who did it on acid.
That's basically knives out.
It's got a great all-star cast with Daniel Craig and Jamie Lee Curtis and Don Johnson and
Chris Evans.
And it will keep you guessing right up until the end.
Sounds like a great movie for anyone who's getting ready to get together with the extended
family over Thanksgiving.
You can follow Nell Minow on Twitter, get her thoughts on corporate governance movies, and a lot more.
Have a wonderful Thanksgiving now.
You too. Thanks again.
Coming up, we'll give you an inside look at the stocks on our radar.
Stay right here. This is Motley Fool Money.
Before we get to the stocks on our radar, just a reminder that this episode of Motley Full Money
is brought to you by TD Ameritrade.
So you've done a ton of research on a trade, but you can't decide if you want to go through
with it.
TD Ameritrade's Trade Desk might be the secret to figuring it all out.
Just go to Td Ameritrade.com slash trade desk.
to see how they can help gut check your trades. Remember, SIPC.
That's money.
As always, people on the program may have interests in the stocks they talk about,
and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against.
So don't buy ourselves stocks based solely on what you're here.
Welcome back to Motley Full Money, Chris Hill here in studio.
Once again, with Jason Moser, Andy Cross and Ron Gross.
Time for the stocks on our radar. Our man behind the glass, Steve Brodow, is going to hit
you with a question. Ron, you're up first. What are you looking at this week?
I got a radar stock. I talked about yesterday on YouTube Live. Dave and
Busters, P-L-A-Y, restaurant and arcade company currently have 133 locations.
Stock got crushed in September and then again in June and then again in September on weak negative comp sales.
So things are not going great, but they've got a plan. Don't worry about it.
They're going to remodel the stores. They're going to cut costs.
They are returning capital to shareholders through buybacks, raising the dividend.
You get a 1.6 percent yield right now.
Now, stock's only trading at a forward PE of 12.5 times.
If they can turn this around a little bit, you probably have 50% upside in the stock.
Steve, question about Dave and Busters?
You bet. Where does the money come from? Is it games? Is it beer?
Is it food? Where's the money?
It's actually 50-50 between arcade games and the food and bar bill.
Jason Moser. What are you looking at?
Yeah, well, you probably heard of the PayPal acquisition of honey this week.
So PayPal is my radar stock ticker P-Y-P-L.
And this is a big deal, right?
$4 billion. It sounds really big.
Let's put it in a context, though.
PayPal acquired Braintree back in 2013.
That was about 2.5% of the value of PayPal back then.
This deal is a bit more than 3%.
So it's a big acquisition, but it's not crazy on a relative basis.
Honey, interesting business has some pretty key partners with companies like Walmartbooking.com at C
and even Alley Express.
They are looking to become more a part of the overall relationship, not just being there at the checkout.
This is one way to do it. So, I think instead of looking at it as the 17 million monthly active users, they'll get from honey,
it's about figuring out ways to plug their 300 million monthly active users into that network and grow that side of the business.
This is certainly one way to do it.
Steve, question about PayPal?
You bet. Is PayPal trying to get into the space where you use your cell phone, you hold it up to the little RFID reader, and it just works?
Are they getting into that space? Are they in that space?
I don't know, actually. I'd have to look a little bit more into that.
Andy Cross, what are you looking at this week?
I got Box symbol B-O-X, no surprise there, reports quarterly earnings next quarter.
The cloud storage and content management provider serves almost 70% of the Fortune 500 companies.
They've really struggled over the past year to continue to hit their ambitious revenue goals.
So I want to see how Aaron Levy, who is the founder and CEO, continues to turn this ship right.
Steve, question about Box?
You bet. Are there things you're afraid to store in the cloud personally, Andy?
My children's photos, I don't like to put them out in the cloud.
Box, PayPal, Dave and Buster.
Steve, you've got a stock you want to add to your watch list?
I own some PayPal, and I think I'd add to it.
All right.
Interesting.
Sorry, Ron.
Always surprise me.
Jason Moser, Andy Cross, get some rest because next week, it's the Thanksgiving special.
Thanks for being here, guys.
That's going to do it for this week's edition of Motley Full Money.
Our engineer is Steve Broido.
Our producer is Matt Greer.
I'm Chris Hill.
Thanks for listening.
We'll see you next week.
