Motley Fool Money - The Autonomy Economy is Accelerating
Episode Date: March 24, 2026Autonomy is popping up all over the place. What was once the world of experiments and testing stages is scaling into full blown businesses at a rapid pace. A slew of recent announcements shows how aut...onomous driving and delivery is advancing in 2026, and we break down how investors can benefit from these major trends. Plus, OpenAI’s growing pains, and more. Tyler Crowe, Lou Whiteman, and Travis Hoium discuss:- OpenAI trying to pivot to monetization- Investing opportunities in AI- Autonomous taxi service Zoox starting commercial operations this year- Where the opportunities in autonomy lie- Following oil prices, private credit, and consumer credit. Companies discussed: MSFT, GOOG, WMT, AMZN, MBLY, TSLA, LYFT, UBER, WRD, DASH, BX, KKR Got investing questions for the podcast? Email us at podcasts@fool.com Host: Tyler CroweGuests: Lou WhitemanEngineer: Kristi Waterworth Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. The Motley Fool and its affiliates (collectively, "TMF") do not endorse, recommend, or verify the accuracy or completeness of the statements made within advertisements. TMF is not involved in the offer, sale, or solicitation of any securities advertised herein and makes no representations regarding the suitability, or risks associated with any investment opportunity presented. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with legal, tax, and financial advisors before making any investment decisions. TMF assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages arising from this advertisement. We’re committed to transparency: All personal opinions in advertisements from Fools are their own. The product advertised in this episode was loaned to TMF and was returned after a test period or the product advertised in this episode was purchased by TMF. Advertiser has paid for the sponsorship of this episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Autonomy is kicking into high gear in 2026.
This is Motley Full Money.
Welcome to Motley Full Money.
I'm Tyler Crow, and today I'm joined by longtime full contributors Lou Whiteman.
And pulling spot duty today, we've got Travis Hoyum, the host of the Wednesday and Friday shows.
We're going to take the pulse of the race for autonomous, everything, really, not just driving.
We're going to talk about some stories that we've been following, such as oil prices,
private credit, whatever fits your fancy.
But before we get started, we're going to talk about AI, specifically OpenAI.
Now, guys, there's a lot of AI companies out there.
QuickPulse, when you're going to go use a LLM or anything like that, do you have a preferred one?
Depends on what I'm using it for.
Gemini is kind of my go-to for just random questions, but I've been using Claude to kind
of build stuff a little bit more, experimenting with that.
So those are the two that I use.
I do not open chat GPT anymore.
See, I'm part of the problem.
Gemini, if I'm on my phone, because that's just right there.
But Claude, if I'm actually sitting at a desk and type you on a computer.
And that kind of gets to what we're going to be talking about here because you guys both
just mentioned Gemini, Claude, which is Anthropic and me, probably the most technologically
Luddite person in their 40s.
I've been going to Claude because it is incredibly useful.
And that is the topic is OpenAI because we didn't mention chat TPT when we were talking.
about this nearly as much as the other ones. And this is why we wanted to get into this. Last
week, the company announced it was planning to double its headcount as a push to win back
market share from Anthropic. Then this week, news broke that Walmart was ending its agentic
commerce deal with Open AI after Walmart kind of said, you know, the results were not great
in terms of conversions and things like that. And then there was a leak that the company was looking
to raise money from private equity. And they were guaranteeing as high of as a 17.5% return for
preferred investments before an IPO. Now, I know I'm probably missing quite a few headlines here,
but I think what's striking is that the narrative around Open AI has shifted from like six
months ago when we were talking like signs incomprehensibly large dollar figure deal with
supplier to today. It's like try to make a coherent business that makes money out of this.
We even got a Cheryl Sandberg-esque profile of Fiji Simo who is Open AI's head of product today.
It was a business insider, I think, last week. And this all comes.
comes when we assume, like, a couple months from now, the Open AI is planning to go public. And I'm
sure there's a fair amount of listeners here are interested in Open AI as a potential investment
or a stock when it is available. So I want to put this to you both. Based on what we've seen
so far, kind of these news stories and the shifting narrative that we're seeing with Open AI,
what would you need to see from Open AI that would make you interested in the stock should
it go public and say like the next 12 months? And Travis, you're the fill in guest here, so you get to
go first this week. I have got to see a real business model. And I think that's always been the challenge
for me with Open AIs. How do you make money? If you look back historically on some of these
phenomenal companies, so Alphabet, Microsoft, they were profitable before they ever went public.
It's really a relatively new phenomenon that you have the Ubers of the world that are still
burning through money a decade or more after they began, still trying to build that mass of customers,
but there was a real benefit for being the aggregator there, the ultimate winner. I'm not sure that's
the case with artificial intelligence. And so if you don't have a business model to start with,
you're not going to beat Google and Amazon and all these other companies in advertising.
So what are you going to do? Are you going to be subscriptions? Are you going to follow Anthropic
into this enterprise market? That was the thing. It's a little bit unclear. The headlines were
the 17.5% guaranteed return. What the reporting is, is those were enterprise AI development
deals. So there would be a joint venture. But even then, if you're guaranteeing a private equity
investor, a 17.5% return before you get anything back from those joint ventures, that's telling
you that you're not in a great position to be raising funds. And I think that sort of shows the
weakness. And then Walmart backing out of their agentic AI, this was so many times they've thrown
spaghetti at the wall and we've found that it hasn't actually stuck. Walmart, this was supposed to be
the big deal, agentic shopping. Just go into chat, GBC, say, you know what, I'm going to Florida.
I need a new swimsuit, find something for me.
It doesn't seem like it's working.
And that's really a challenge because investors, eventually, we're still in the hype cycle.
But eventually they're going to say, how are you going to actually turn this into a real
business?
And they don't have a great answer from what we know right now.
That's exactly.
Yeah.
And I mean, there's a huge history here.
What was it?
I'm blanking on the name of that virtual reality company, that it was the huge whale splashing
down and a school gymnasium and that everybody loved this thing.
And it just wasn't a business.
And we are, Open AI has nailed the parlor tricks portion of this revolution, whether or not they can nail the actually make money off of it kind of remains to be seen.
If this ends up, and again, it seems like that the Walmart experiment was they just were getting fewer conversions.
So it's just kind of, if this ends up a trillion dollar version of the search engine that happens to burn down the rainforest every time you use it, that's going to be not money well spent.
What do I need to see to be investing? I need to see that this is actually a sustainable business
at a valuation that it's been assigned at something near what private equity is put in.
Otherwise, if and when it does go public, those investors are going to be racing for the
door and it's going to mean it's not a very good investment for the bagholders, us last people
in. Yeah, and with the numbers that they're putting out for an IPO valuation is
approaching a trillion dollars, it is pretty astounder.
Because it has to be.
Yeah, and doing so while somehow not quite figured out the monetization strategy is quite astounding.
And reading the tea leaves between the three, it's no secret.
I think we're all a little dubious about Open AI compared to what's going on,
at least from a product perspective, compared to Claw, Gemini, what the other companies are doing this.
But one thing that I do want to try to remind myself as an investor is that whatever we're seeing for many of these companies,
it's probably the worst version of whatever product they're going to have put out from here.
It's like watching a rookie in football, basketball, baseball, whatever.
It's like, this is probably the worst they're going to be for much of their career.
And that drives home like a challenging topic for investors, like looking at this space.
This is an extremely fast-moving industry.
And six months from now, a new AI model from any of these companies could come out and blow everything else out of the water.
With that in mind, like you as investors looking at, you know, whether it be the LLM's,
or the picks and shovels or whatever part of the AI universe that you're looking at,
how are you approaching investing in this space right now?
So if we are moving towards commoditized models, and I think at least for the generalists,
we are moving towards kind of commoditized models.
Access to the consumer is what matters.
That's what Open AI is really trying to fight, the fact that they don't have this installed
customer base.
Alphabet, Microsoft, way out in the lead for me, they can just shove,
these new innovations at their existing user base, see what sticks, iterate from there,
whatever they want. Open AI ramping from zero, that's a much harder game to play. I don't know if I
really want to invest in anything just based on AI glitter right now, but there is a there there.
And it seems like the established players are the best able to profit from it, at least for now.
Yeah, these big direct AI plays. I'm largely staying away. I own shares of alphabet. That's one of my
bigger positions. But that's exactly what Luset. They own the customer base. They own the methods
of distribution, things like Android, YouTube. There's tons of ways that my wife uses Google and
just happens to be using their artificial intelligence tools because they're just built it into search.
So they've got the monetization model. They have everything that Open AI should be trying to build.
But the way that I'm thinking about this largely is that historically we go through hype cycles.
So we go through this, it's called the Gartner hype cycle. We go through a hype cycle. You get really
high valuations. Companies eventually go public.
And then the bubble burst or something happens and the economics don't kind of live up to that.
So then high valuations that we typically put on these kind of companies come back to reality.
And that's when you get to what's called the trough of disillusionment.
That's where I want to be finding those winners.
That's where I want to look at who is the companies that survive the dot-com crash.
Who's the companies, the banking companies or the solid companies that survive the Great Recession.
When we get to that point, I'm trying to follow this closely enough.
I'll be able to at least have a reasonable expectation of understanding who those winners are.
But right now, I'm not really interested in buying into the hype cycle because that's typically
not a great place from a risk-reward perspective for investors.
Yeah, it's a great kind of takeaway message when you think about patient long-term investing.
We always think about it as patiently holding something through the ups and downs, but there's also
patiently buying at the right time when you're looking at certain types of investments, like you
said with when you go through hype cycles, trothelusion, things like that. After the break,
we're going to do a check-in on the advancements in autonomy. At Medcan, we know that life's
greatest moments are built on a foundation of good health, from the big milestones to the quiet
winds. That's why our annual health assessment offers a physician-led, full-body checkup that provides
a clear picture of your health today and may uncover early signs of conditions like heart disease
and cancer. The healthier you means more moments to cherish. Take control of your well-being
and book an assessment today. Medcan, live well for life. Visit Medcan.com slash moments to get started.
AI and autonomy seem to go hand in hand these days, in large part because AI is required to make
things like autonomous driving work. It's a story we've been following quite a bit. I know Travis,
you did a show quite a while back doing like a breakdown of the whole industry. It's a fascinating
topic we want to keep checking in periodically. And like the story we just had on OpenAI, a lot of
these AI companies that are starting to pivot towards viable businesses, we're seeing this in
autonomous driving and autonomous delivery as these companies are expanding their offerings at pretty
drastic paces here in 2026. Waymo, which is from Alphabet, they've already operating intensities
with another 21 listed on their up next on their website. Amazon subsidiary Zooks announced
that it's targeting making its autonomous taxis a paid service in Las Vegas by the middle of this year.
Tesla is always lurking in the background. It's announced some ambitious plans on how many
robotaxies have wanted to put on the road. It's working in Austin. I think the Bay Area is still
right now. I haven't heard recent updates beyond that, but it's all moving pretty fast so far this
year. And it's not just autonomous driving either. Alphabet subsidiary wing this week also announced
its plan to start an autonomous drone delivery service earliest this year in the San Francisco Bay Area.
I think it's fair to say that 2026 is going to be the year where the wheat separates from the chaff
in autonomy. I don't think that's going to be hyperbole here to say this is going to be.
be a massive year for how these things shake out. I don't think I'm being way off course here,
don't you guys think? And what are you seeing in the autonomy market today that excites you the
most? Lou, I want to start with you. So, this is a terrible day to ask me this question, Tyler,
because last night I was late for a dinner reservation because there was a Waymo trying to figure
out a three-point turn. And it just, we literally traffic stopped in both directions for it.
Talk about first world problems, Lou. They are everywhere. And, you know, I mean, I guess to their
credit, it eventually did it. And wow, I'm talking about a driverless car trying to navigate
streets. And so that is kind of cool, right? I don't know if this is a year where the have
separates from the have-nots simply because if we're honest, a lot of the so-far have-nots
have done a very good job of presenting themselves as not trailing. And we're still in that
phase where if you are making progress, you're still in the game. You know, I don't think
its first-mover advantage is really going to matter if you get there eventually. But I do think,
it's worth noting the progress that some are making. I kidding aside, I'm very excited about
Waymo and Zox and the robotoxys that are out there. I'm less excited about serve robotics
and delivery bots. I don't know what to think about wing drone delivery, but I think it's there.
You know, I think we need to celebrate this incremental progress. I know it's boring. I know we want
to take, hot takes, it's here, it's, this is the year, whatever. But incremental is how this is
going to happen. And as I said, it is pretty amazing that I was watching a robot car on the streets
last night trying to figure out a three-point turn. And it kind of was just la-di-da boring.
As investors, it's close enough to pay attention to this. It's definitely we're making progress,
but I don't know if we should really be expecting a payoff anytime soon. Yeah, it's wild that we
were writing about this as kind of the next big thing a decade ago. And now we're kind of at the
point where it's actually here. I think the big thing in 2026 is we're finding out who can actually
do the thing. So you have Waymo really starting to scale their business. They have proven the
safety of their of their vehicles. Let's not forget, Zooks is operating a vehicle that had to get
approval from the government to not have a steering wheel or pedals. Tesla does not have that
approval with the Robo Taxi that they have at least shown people. Then you have companies like
MobileI, Neuro, May Mobility, there's at least a half dozen more that are testing with a safety
driver today with plans to pull that safety driver potentially by the end of this year.
So we're really getting to that point, that show me point of can you operate in even a single
city with no safety driver in the vehicle and operate efficiently and effectively?
The next challenge is probably even bigger.
That's what is the business model behind this.
You know, the theory with a company like Tesla was always they were going to own transportation
demand forever. I think with this many suppliers, that's not going to be the case. So do these other
companies have a sustainable business model? And that's where I think as investors, you know,
you've got to look at should we be counting out the Ubers, the Lyft, DoorDash, even retailers
that have a physical location. The hardware business is really hard and even technology hardware.
If you have followed the auto industry for any period of time, you see these periods of great
profitability, stocks still go nowhere, you have low price to earnings multiples. And then
eventually a company goes bust, we're going to see the exact same thing in autonomy because I don't
think that this is playing out in a winner take all space. That said, there are going to be companies
that are going to get to that very real doing the thing phase by the end of this year. And that's
exciting. I think this sets it up really well because you kind of laid out the various ways that we can
kind of invest in autonomy. It's not just we have to invest in Alphabet or Amazon with their
ride share business or Tesla. There's the hardware suppliers. There's the,
How would we describe Uber and Lyft?
It's like a network provider app, I guess.
The aggregators of demand would be the way that I would...
There's tons of ways that we can actually invest in autonomy in this.
This was just, again, that was just the driving part.
We could be talking about autonomous electric vertical takeoff helicopters or the replacement
for that or delivery, as Loua alluded to with server robotics.
Lots of options, picks and shovels.
We could be looking at specially component manufacturers or just the tech giants because
they're just like these little subsidiaries on a giant multi-trillion dollar company.
So as you both look at the landscape, there's a lot of opportunities here.
Where do you see the most lucrative ones?
I'm going to start with the things I think I know.
If we are not going to be in a world of vertically integrating where a Waymo or a Tesla
just eats everything in autonomy, I think that the companies that are aggregating that
demand, the lifts, Ubers, Doordash, any of those companies in that space, are probably
going to be fine.
That's why we're seeing a ton of partnerships from those.
companies. I wouldn't be surprised if we see one get bought out too. Does Amazon want to pull all this?
They've got a ton of demand. Do they want to pull a lift in-house? Really scale out their Zook's
vehicles under that brand. That could be really interesting. The other area to think about is that if we
are going to this kind of business models, there's going to be somewhere in the value chain
where a modular supplier is going to take a lot of value. So I think an area to think about is
chips in the technology stack.
So a company that can sell their technology and their chips to multiple OEMs.
So I think MobileI kind of played that role in the original ADAS systems.
But there's Wii Ride, AV, Ride, Neuro.
There's a half dozen other companies that could kind of fall into that cohort of category.
Some of them are public, some of them private.
Somebody in that area is going to, we're going to suddenly find out that there's, you know,
100 million vehicles, all powered by the same company with just different badges on them.
Those are the two areas that I'm kind of looking.
is that aggregation space and then the modular supplier space.
It's interesting how similar this list is to what we just talked about the AI,
because what Travis was talking about there with Uber and Lyft is the same thing we were talking
about with AI is who owns the customer.
And I think similarly, if I mean, my boring answer here would be Alphabet.
And not because I think Waymo or Wing is definitely a slam dunk,
but just the optionality of having all of those ways to win plus this versus just
betting on a pure play.
If you want something kind of more exotic, I do think that this comes outside of a consumer
faster than it does for the consumer. There's a lot of defense tech where definitely this is
the Pentagon priority. I don't think they have to worry about all of those pesky safety regulators
and transportation boards if they want to roll this out. So there's a handful of companies,
none of which are undervalued right now, but are just kind of leading the way on autonomy and
defense tech. I think those are the first winners.
here. Coming up after the break, we're going to do a lightning round of stories that we're following in the
news today. You might be tempted to let Taco Bell's new Lux Value menu go to your head. Because 10
indulgences for $5 or less makes you feel fancy. Like you might think you need cloth napkins. Well,
you don't. Just use the ones that come in the bag. Don't let the lux go to your head.
Hey, one quick note before we move on here, we wanted to make you part of the conversation here at
Motley Full Money. If you have a question about a stock or something involving investing for Travis,
myself or anyone else on the show. You can now email us at Podcasts at Fool.com. We'd love to have
mailbag segments whenever possible, so send in your questions. But remember to keep them foolish.
That email again is Podcasts at Fool.com. Podcasts at Fool.com. Finishing up, we're going to do a
quick roundtable of stories that we're following what we find most interesting this week and what
we'll be looking for in the next couple of months. Travis, again, the guest of the week,
you have honors. What did you seem? Yeah, I've got to be following oil. I haven't followed oil
all that much. I have a history of writing about the industry. I know enough to be dangerous,
but that's really the challenge here. Oil is up about 60% this year. We're close to $100 per barrel.
We've fallen over the past day or two. But this is a huge deal in the economy, and that can really
ripple across all of our investments. So for the first time in quite a while, I'm waking up in the
morning. And one of the first things I'm checking on is what's going on with the oil markets.
Are traders freaking out about what's going on in the Middle East? Do they think things are over?
because if we go back to $60 a barrel, you know, it's kind of back to business as usual as it was
just a few weeks ago. If we're going to $150 or $200 a barrel, there's a very, very high likelihood
that a recession is coming next. I was also wanted to do something commodities related, but I didn't
want to bore everyone to death with two commodity stories right in a row because I wanted to talk
about LNG. I'll save that for next week. So I'm going to go back to the well and talk about
what I was following up from last week, we was talking about kind of the boogeyman of private
capital problems. It's been a recurring news story for, I want to say, six months to like a year now.
What's the problems? Capital markets, or private capital, excuse me. I feel like it's been this
weird place, whether or not it's actually a thing or it just makes great fodder for news stories.
There was another one that came out this week where Aries Capital is a private equity company,
private capital. They were actually limiting withdrawals to about 5% of their total AUM, which, again,
ties into that idea. Like, is this really a thing? And this is where,
I'm starting to land because there are more and more stories of limiting withdrawals in private
capital versus the stories of like, oh, you know, debt covenants are light. It's maybe more risky
than people were thinking. What I'm starting to come around to the idea is we're seeing all these
withdrawals. It reminds me a little bit, I don't want to be hyperbolic when I say this on like
the Silicon Valley Bank in like 2022 when we were talking about deposit runs and things like that.
But there does become a point where fear becomes the driving narrative. And if there's enough people
wanting to get out of private capital deals with these withdrawals and everyone's always hitting the
max on their withdrawals, it eventually does become a problem in and of itself versus the actual risk
in the portfolio itself. And so this has been something I think is fascinating and could be a much
bigger story in the coming weeks or months if we continue to see these things where private capital companies
are trying to limit withdrawals. And it's going to be big for companies that are publicly traded
companies, thinking about the Blackstones or the KKRs of the world that have these massive private
capital investments. If they have to take withdrawals, there's going to be consequences.
The funny thing about that is that really, the withdrawal limits are a feature, not a flaw.
That's what makes it all possible and it's written into the contracts. But you're spot on
that whether it is or not, once the headlines start, it could become a problem, even though
it's built in, and that's the way it's supposed to go. I want to look at another side of lending,
and this is just something kind of watching kind of short term and long term. One in three
Americans now have an unsecured personal loan. That's a new record. I'm interested in this,
in part because the obvious maybe macro sign here is that the consumer is stretched and they have
to get creative, I think that might be it. But I also can't help but wonder if this is a signal that
maybe an early warning sign that the age of the credit card is diminishing. I think that there's been
a lot of press about credit card rates. Credit card rates have extended beyond what they were just even a
decade ago. I wonder if this isn't the beginning of a long-term shift that could impact profitability
at a lot of the large banks if we as Americans just start using our credit cards less than we have in the
past. It's more on my radar than anything, but I think a fascinating trend to watch. Kind of a
bummer with the three of us having slightly, like, not the most exciting, most optimistic stories
that we're following here. But hey, you know what? Maybe we'll come back next week. We'll
try to be a little bit more optimistic. But that is all the time we have for today. Travis,
Lou, thanks for sharing your thoughts. I'm going to hit the disclosure and we'll get out of here.
As always, people on the program may have interests in the stocks they talk about, and the Motleyful
may have formal recommendations for or against. So don't buy ourselves stocks based solely on what you're
here. All personal finance content follows Motleyful editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers.
your sponsored content and provide for informational purposes home. To see our full advertising
disclosure, please check out our show notes. Thanks for producer Christy Waterworth pulling spot duty this
week and for the rest of the Molly Fool team. For Travis Liu and myself, thanks for listening,
and we'll chat again soon.
