Motley Fool Money - The Market Takes a Breather
Episode Date: December 19, 2024The S&P 500 is still up about 25% this year, far outpacing historical averages. (00:14) Anthony Schiavone and Ricky Mulvey discuss: - Why traders are sour about the recent Fed meeting, and what long-t...erm investors should focus on. - How American diners are responding to Darden Restaurant Group’s value offers. - Rising home sales at Redfin. Then (13:29) Motley Fool Senior Analyst Alicia Alfiere and Mary Long look at Upwork and Fiverr and the gig workplace economy. Companies discussed: DRI, TXRH, RDFN, FVRR, UPWK Host: Ricky Mulvey Guests: Anthony Schiavone, Mary Long, Alicia Alfiere Engineer: Rick Engdahl Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This episode is brought to you by Indeed.
Stop waiting around for the perfect candidate.
Instead, use Indeed sponsored jobs to find the right people with the right skills fast.
It's a simple way to make sure your listing is the first candidate C.
According to Indeed data, sponsor jobs have four times more applicants than non-sponsored jobs.
So go build your dream team today with Indeed.
Get a $75 sponsor job credit at Indeed.com slash podcast.
Terms and conditions apply.
Some of the steam is coming off your cup of coffee. You're listening to Motley Full Money.
I'm Ricky Mulvey, joined today by Anthony Chavone. And what a day to get you on the A segment. There's a lot going on in the market.
I could not think of a better time to come on to a segment. Have it be here, Ricky.
Yesterday, the Federal Reserve wrapped up its open market meeting. And here's what seemed to happen.
Jerome Powell, the chair announced that the Fed would take rates down by another quarter point, but that the rate of further.
cuts may slow. Yes, he prefaced it by saying, don't take this literally because that may change,
and also that inflation needed to behave. This rate news triggered a sell-off in the market
yesterday afternoon. S&P was down about 3%, which is a lot for the broad index. So,
and I got my markets in turmoil lawn sign. We don't have the Chiron that they do on CNBC,
so we go a little bit more old school. Should I put my markets in turmoil lawn sign
out in my front yard. Well, Ricky, as somebody who owns a lot of REITs, I've had my markets and
turmoil sign staked out in the lawn for about three years now. But seriously, though, I mean,
the S&P 500 is off like 4% from a tie. And I mean, if anything, I think Wednesday's selloff was
healthy. I mean, last year, the SP 500 was up nearly 30%. And this year we're up about, I think,
25% now. So it's been two great years for the market. And this year, we've really had no volatility
in the market whatsoever. I mean, we get the yen carry trade in, and I think August. But I mean,
other than that, that's about it. So, I mean, who knows where this market sell off might give from here,
but just know that, you know, a potential larger sell-off is possible. I mean, the market tends to
sell off. I think it's 10% once out of every two years. So as a long-term investor, I don't think
this Fed meeting or reactionary sell-off is really anything to worry about. You know,
Chair Powell may have cost us a Santa Claus rally, but it's hard to be unhappy with the returns
investors have seen over the past few years.
Who amongst us could forget the yen carry trade madness of August?
A lot of this comes down to the dot plot projections, which is when the central bankers
guess where they think interest rates are going to go.
Why is this something that the market cares about?
And then when you're looking at businesses as a stock analyst, is a REIT analyst,
is this something that you're paying a lot of attention to?
So with the dot plot, right, the big news was that the Fed's dot plot is signaling two quarter point rate cuts in 2025.
That is down from four quarter point rate cuts back in September when they had their meeting.
So I think that was a little bit unexpected by the market, and that's why you saw that the market sell off.
And then, you know, adding to that Powell's remarks thirdest press conference, you mentioned that, you know, cutting rates this time around was a close call and that the Fed would have to be cautious with further rate cuts.
So I think the market itself really kind of accelerated from there. As far as why the market cares about the dot plot, I think it gives them some type of concrete data that they can hold on to to give them the sense of what Fed officials are thinking. But I mean, to me, at the end of the day, that the bond market is really going to set the interest rates and kind of signal to the Fed about where to take the Fed funds rate. So personally, I don't look at the dot plot at all. I don't think there's much signal in there for a long-term investor. Like Peter Lynch said, if you
If you spend 13 minutes a year on the economy, you've wasted 10 minutes or something along those lines.
So it's not really something that I pay much attention to.
Well, we're already three minutes into our macro talk.
And I did think it was funny that there are economic headlines, financial headlines saying like, Jerome Powell signals caution.
He does that every single meeting.
I've never seen a meeting where he's like, you know what?
Now we're going to get wild with interest rate cuts.
Let's see what happens.
Then this morning, moving away from the Fed, traders started getting a little excited.
That's why you're seeing some green in your portfolio is the U.S. economy grew more than the Commerce
Department thought 3.1 percent annualized pace. That was better than they initially thought
that the economy grew. And these numbers represent macro forces hitting stock prices.
But I just, I don't see it meaningfully impacting the businesses when the Commerce Department
makes a small change in the revision. However, in some of the stories we are going to get to,
I think it is interesting what individual companies have to say about the economy.
Yeah, yeah, no.
I don't think those macro revisions really impact the businesses that I follow.
Like you mentioned, it might impact the stock price in a day.
But at the end of the day, it really doesn't impact the businesses.
Personally, I like to learn much more about the economy by listening to the companies that we follow, like you said,
listening to what they're saying about the consumer rather than looking for these small macro revisions.
So the better than expected GDP growth really tells me nothing about the current state of the housing market.
I mean, that's a sector that's been in a recession for like two years now.
So as a bottoms up investor, I'm much more interested in what the companies themselves have to say about the economy and their businesses.
Let's get to some company earnings.
Let's get to the business.
Darden Restaurant Group, the owner of Olive Garden, Longhorn, Yard House, and Ruth's Chris.
That's always a tough restaurant to say.
Basically saying people are going back to the restaurants, the stock is up about 15.
when I checked this morning. Here's a rundown of highlights for you. And 6% sales growth in 2.4% comp
restaurant growth. More people are going to the existing restaurants that are already opening
and spending more. 14% never-ending postibles are at Olive Garden. They let you know that early in both
the conference call and the investor presentation. And also CEO Rick Cardenas focusing on how
Darden's brand teams are filling menu gaps, including a healthier chicken dish at Longhorn Steakhouse,
something I'm personally opposed to. But what stood out to you from the quarter?
Yeah, all those results were pretty impressive. I think the stock, what is it up? Like 15% as a
recording this. Is that an all-time high? So it's a really good quarter from them. What kind of caught
my eye was that Longhorn Steakhouse, they increased same store, restaurant, tables by 7.5%. So the American
consumers eating a lot of steak, they're eating a lot of pasta too at Olive Garden. And, you know,
that's coming at a time when really the U.S. consumer is pulled back a little bit on discretionary
spending. So, you know, I think the strong results are kind of a testament to their brand concepts.
And like you mentioned, the recent promotional activity, like the Pasta Bowls, and then rolling
out partnerships with Uber, I think I just rolled them out with Uber a couple months ago. So I think
those value deals are really resonating with their consumer. And, you know, overall is a
right quarter of them. So there's one restaurant that got me searching to see if it exists in the
Denver, Colorado area. This chain cheddar will sell you a 16 ounce bone in ribby with two sides
for $22. And when I'm looking at that, I know you follow another chain steakhouse. I keep thinking,
like, are you seeing these restaurants getting competitive with even grocery stores now,
especially when they're selling these value conscious steaks to people? Yeah, I think absolutely.
I mean, I've never heard of Cheddar before being on the East Coast, and I've never been to a Longhorn Steakhouse.
But I recently went to a Texas roadhouse, which I think was the company you were referring to that I follow.
Very similar concept, right?
My girlfriend and I, we went a couple months ago, ordered two meals, two drinks.
We got free rolls, peanuts.
And I think the bill came out to something about $35, which is an incredible value, right?
That's not really competitive to grocery store prices.
But then you get the experience of dining out.
and you know, you save time by not having to prepare that food for yourself.
So I think that's definitely, you know, competition for the grocery stores.
Do you like Texas Roadhouse as a stock?
So I went there too.
And I can't get over this.
They put their steak on a flat top.
They're not putting it through a broiler.
And it's also a restaurant trading at about 30 times earnings, which is a lot.
I like the business, absolutely.
I mean, for 35 bucks and you get all that food, I mean, that is just an incredible value.
Every time I go, there's always a line out the door.
It doesn't matter what day of the week, always align out the door.
So, yeah, 30 times earnings, that sounds really, really expensive.
I know they have some other store concepts as well that they're starting to expand a little bit.
I actually put Texas Red House my watch list, about a year ago, and I thought it looked expensive
at around 20 times earnings, you know.
So now with the stocks, of course, up like 50 percent and turning out 30 times earnings.
But to me, you know, this is one where you do research now in preparation for a better
valuation down the road.
we'll tie this back to the macro economy talk. I want to see if you got a better gauge on the economy
from one of two things. One, you got Jerome Powell's commentary on inflation, which excludes
volatile energy and food prices, which is what people spend money on. Or you have Darden CEO,
Rick Cardenas, saying, quote, it looks like the consumer is starting to feel a little bit better
than they were in prior quarters. Which one are you taken for a macro thumb in the wind?
That's a tough one. But I would probably say,
Darden, but with the caveat that other companies are seeing the same thing as well.
So a company that I follow fairly closely, Simon Property Group, which on some of the nicest
malls around the world in the U.S., and they released the press release a few weeks ago,
saying that Black Friday traffic was up more than 6% this year.
So that tells me that the consumer, which, you know, it's definitely still feeling the impact
of inflation, but they're starting to feel a little bit better.
So I think taking that bottoms up view with Simon Property Group, Darden and another,
large companies as well, that can be just as useful as to listening to what Jerome Powell has to say.
Anything else you want to hit with Darden before we go to Redfin?
Just quickly, I wanted to note that they acquired a company called Chewis in October.
I'm not familiar with Chewis, but it's a Tex-Mex concept.
Not to be confused with Chewy, the pet retailer.
But I mean, tech-mex concepts like Taco Bell and Chipotle, they've performed well in recent years.
So I think it's going to be interesting to see, you know, how they fold that new concept
into their third portfolio brands.
Let's take a look at Redfin, which I also had some economic data that it was happy to report
this morning, saying that its overall home sales were up 7% from one year ago.
This is the largest annual increase since June of 2021, where it had a little bit of a
different baseline going on back in June of 2020.
The median sales price is up about 5.5% from a year ago.
And the median price for a home right now in the United States on Redfin is a median sales price.
$430,000. When you're looking at that number soup, what's it mean for Redfin?
Yeah, to be honest, I'm not really sure what to make with those numbers, because the numbers
look pretty good right now. But I mean, with mortgage rates now above 7% again, you know,
what are the numbers going to look like over the next few quarters, next few years?
I mean, existing home sales for the full year, they're still in line with last year.
And the weakest since 1995, according to Redfin. So I just think it's a really,
interesting dynamic that we have in the housing market right now. We have historically low inventory
on the market right now because something like 75% of homeowners have a mortgage rate below 5%.
So that's essentially an asset to them when current mortgage rates are above 7%. So homeowners
don't want to give that up and list their homes on the market. And then sales are down because
home buyers can't really afford a 7% mortgage rate combined with the price appreciation that you
just mentioned. So I mean, there's a lot of demand for new housing, but the numbers just
really aren't penciling out from both the buyer and the seller's perspective. And I think that's why
we're seeing such a frozen transaction market that's impacting Redfin as well as some of the other
real estate related companies out there. Seems like Homebuilders are going to have plenty of demand
based on all the forces you just talked about. So with Home Builders, something I've been thinking about
recently is, you know, what happens if interest rates, mortgage rates do fall? You know, they do
go back to kind of 4%, 5% range. Demand will probably increase.
right, because it's more affordable for new buyers to come into the market.
But what I'm thinking about is, like, will supply actually increase faster than demand?
And could that actually lower prices and hurt home builders?
I don't know anybody who would have expected home builders to perform so well when interest rates were increasing in 2022, but they were great performers.
So, you know, could we see the opposite scenario unfold if interest rates come down and home builders have to compete with more existing home inventory?
And, you know, since homeowners have so much equity built up in their homes, you know,
might they be willing to sell their homes at lower prices in order to move?
So that's just something I'm kind of, you know, thinking through now.
Something to noodle on over the holidays.
Anthony Chavone, good to get you on an A segment.
Appreciate your time and your insight.
Thanks for being here.
Thanks for you.
Investors have soured on gig workplace platforms since their pandemic highs.
But maybe it's time for a second peak.
Motley Fool senior analyst Alicia Alfieri caught up with my colleague,
long for a look at Fiverr and Upward.
Peak pandemic, we heard a lot about the gig economy, and Alicia, that economy obviously
very much still exist, but it hasn't really boomed in the way that we were once told it likely
would. Bloomberg published an article about this a couple of weeks ago. They were citing data
from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and stated that the percentage of the U.S. workforce in the
gig economy has barely budged in the past six years. In 2017, that share was 10.1 percent. In
In 2020, 10.2. Very minimal movement. Do you got to take on this? Why hasn't the gig economy
taken off in the way that many predicted it once would? Well, first I would say the gig economy can be
really difficult to measure. And back in 2017, which is, I think, the last time, the BLS did this
survey. They only really reported main jobs, so people whose main job was a freelancer. And it looks
like Bloomberg is doing the same thing in this article that you're talking about. The government did
recently tweak its methodology. And in the latest report, it also counts freelancers with more
than one job, which I think helps us get a better handle on what's happening in the freelancer
gig economy. The problem is back in 2017, they didn't have that number. So it's hard to gauge
what the growth has been. If you look at another data source, so Statista, for example,
there has been roughly a 13% increase in freelance workers since the pandemic, though perhaps
not at the same rate that we were expecting at the height of the pandemic. So still growth,
not gangbusters like a lot of people were expecting. And the last year has been kind of tricky, too.
So both Upwork and Fiverr have mentioned in their earnings calls that there have been layoffs
and businesses also tend to cut back on spending during an uncertain economy. But even so,
freelance or gig economy isn't going away anytime soon.
And Upwork also has its own data that it kind of contributes to this pile of information that we can pull from.
They tell a slightly different story than BLS.
The company said in 2023 that nearly 40% of the U.S. labor force was involved in some kind of freelance work,
which kind of gets at the same point that you just mentioned, like, you know, we can measure this in different ways.
And is the important measure how many people are using freelance work or gig economy work, temporary work as their full-time job?
or how many are tapping into this as a side hustle.
And there are kind of, so not only are there different ways in which people use this work,
whether it's like a more full-time position on a temporary basis or as a side hustle,
there's also different kinds of gig economy work.
You've got your ubers and door dashes, but for those who are looking to offer digital services,
so copyrighting, marketing, software development on a freelance basis,
there are many platforms, but two major ones that allow you to do so.
and that's Upwork and Fiverr. Upwork is the larger of the two. They make about double Fiverr's revenue,
despite charging a smaller fee. They've charged 10% to Fivers closer to 20. Apart from those,
any major differences between these two freelancing platforms? Yeah, so both have pretty similar
customer bases of small to medium-sized businesses as well as individuals. But I would say Fiverr started
off as a platform where services could start as low as $5, hence the name.
Since then, it's grown beyond that price point and now has a variety of prices and services.
But right now, I think the buyer spend is a little bit different on these platforms.
So Fiverr, average buyer spend, something like $278 in the last full year, so 2023.
And Upwork looks to have a higher spend on the platform.
It's close to $5,000 in 2023.
So that is a big difference.
The number of buyers on the platform is different.
well. So Upwork had 855,000 as of its most recent quarter, and Fiverr had 3.8 billion buyers on the
platform. Another difference is how buyers and sellers connect. So on Fiverr, buyers can search through
a bunch of freelancer listings and hire for specific jobs. On Upwork, freelancers can apply to jobs.
So it can involve a lot more sorting through applications on the buyer's side.
Whereas the gig economy broadly has flatlined by some measures, the share prices for both of these platforms have been absolutely decimated in the past five years. Both are bad. Fiver's downturn is especially steep. Stock is down nearly 90% since its late 2020, early 2021 highs. But for all that negativity in the share price, Fiverr's revenue has it's grown its revenue pretty steadily and impressively since 2019. It became profitable on a net income basis in fiscal 2020.
Today, it trades at a PS ratio of a little over three. Is Fiber Story one of a still promising
company that had expectations that got out of hand and have now kind of come back down to Earth?
Or is this a stock that you wouldn't touch with the 10-foot pole?
That's a good question. I think it's more of the former. I think expectations have come back
to Earth. And I think that, you know, as we talked about before, freelance work isn't going
anywhere. On the surface, it's easy to note some of the negative things about Fiverr, right? So one of the
things is the number of buyers is falling. But as you said, there is more to the story. Revenues
have been growing in those years since the pandemic, though not at the same clip. And the company
has been generating cash, which is great. And despite the number of buyers declining, average spend per
buyer is going up. And that's pretty interesting. This can be a function of Fiverr getting bigger customers.
Like we talked about, they started as more for individuals, $5 a pop for this freelance activity.
And now they're continuing to move upstream, getting small and medium-sized businesses,
which can help the company grow the platform into the future. Most people appreciate customer
growth and it's easy to appreciate customer growth, but customer spending growth is also pretty
impressive. And I think it can be a sign of future growth activities. It's not hard for me to imagine
a world in which a buyer and seller find each other on Fiverr. They work together and then they say,
hey, we can make this cheaper for the both of us and avoid this 20% take rate and then proceed to
continue doing business off of the platform to avoid paying that fee. So you talk about growing
average spend per customer. Retention, I would think, is a pretty important piece of that puzzle.
How does Fiverr retain both buyers and sellers?
Yeah, I think the power is, again, the network. And to your point,
sellers and buyers, if they create a relationship that's a positive one and they have a need
for each other in the future, they can definitely work together offline in theory in the future.
But again, the power of these platforms are in the network and in the platform itself. How else you're
going to have access to a big pool of talented freelancers that you could easily sift through
and see reviews, which are really important, or have a large group of buyers view your profile,
and the network helps you gain exposure in that way. Fiverr sellers can also advertise their
services off of Fiverr's website. Fiverr even has a page for some ideas of how to do that,
but on Fiverr's platform, sellers don't have to worry about advertising on their own or figuring
things out like SEO, you're on the platform and people can easily find your services. So I think
it's beneficial to both sides. I think it's easy to think of AI as presenting an existential threat
to these companies and the kind of freelance work that they support. But Upwork President and CEO Hayden
Brown stated in her 2023 letters to shareholders that Upwork was making great strides and was only
in the early innings of its AI journey. What do those strides look like? How is Upwork using AI to help
buyers and sellers rather than handing work solely to machines rather than the human freelancers that
want that work? Well, they have a few different options that they offer. So they have an AI
Services Hub that gives clients resources and tools and also helps them connect with freelancers
specifically that have those AI skills. The AI Services Hub also helps freelancers use AI in their
work and the company has AI courses and content to help freelancers increase
or build their AI skills, which I think is important as more and more people are interested in
AI.
Last year, the company had Upwork Chat Pro, which was designed to help freelancers with their work
and job post-generator to help talent buyers post-jobs quickly and accurately.
But there's more ahead.
So this year, Upwork released its Upwork's Mindful AI or Uma.
And on top of improving on those AI capabilities released last year, the company has hopes of what the AI
companion will be able to do.
So, for example, the company is hoping that Uma will be able to help companies assess
freelancer proposals and compare freelancers' experience and skills side by side so they can
help find the right freelancers for their needs.
And they're also hoping that Uma can help freelancers.
plancers build proposals that can help them win those job opportunities.
So it could really be beneficial to both sides of this two-sided marketplace.
The idea of building out this AI companion that can help evaluate proposals, help you write proposals,
to me that kind of gets to like the long-term growth story of both of these companies.
What do those growth stories look like?
Do you think there's any interest in growing these platforms into an all-you-can-eat hiring and HR management software?
Is that within the lane here? Or is it better, hey, just focus on what you know best and focusing solely on the freelancer workforce?
I like this idea. And we've kind of talked about this before. A company's optionality and increased capabilities can help them grow faster and longer than you expect.
At the same time, if you grow into some of these areas, the company opens itself up to more competition as well.
perhaps people who have, or companies that have been in the space longer, who are innovating,
and that sort of thing. There are some things that they can potentially do that would feel like
a natural extension of a freelance platform, maybe adding a recruiter function, right? So if both parties
create a positive relationship and they want that to continue on a full-time basis, I think that could
be a nice natural outgrowth. They can grow into, you know, becoming temp worker companies as well.
So that could be interesting, but honestly, I think the freelancer market in general is enough for
for Upwork and Fiverr to continue to grow into to be able to perform as companies going forward.
Both of these companies right now are trading at relatively low valuations, Upwork slightly below
three-time sales while Fiverr slightly above.
You like one of these companies better than the other?
Well, I think so. So I usually like to look at price to free cash flow. So it's a similar, similar idea, right? We're using these as a thumbnail for valuation, right? So Fiverr is 15 times and Upwork is about 18.6 times. And those are helpful in terms of determining which one is cheaper, if that's what an investor makes their decision on. But it's more than that, right? It's what's happening at each of these companies, what's the story that?
that allows us to make sense of the numbers.
So Fiverr and Upwork, as we pointed out earlier,
both have seen share prices fall after the high-flying days
of the pandemic.
Both are seeing their revenues grow,
both are generating cash,
both are operating well despite a somewhat difficult market.
And neither of these companies are really market darlings right now.
If I'm in a contrarian investing mood,
I think either can fit the bill.
Fiverr is a little bit cheaper,
which could mean my investment would have
lower hurdle to clear, but Upwork isn't that much more expensive. Plus, they have an activist investor
who's looking to push for changes there, which could be interesting as well. So I think just like
freelancers that can utilize either site, I could go with either. Alis Al-Fieri, thanks so much for
the time, for the insight and for the look at these two freelancing platforms. Always a pleasure
to talk with you. So glad to be here. Thanks.
As always, people on the program may have interests in the stocks they talk about.
The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against,
so don't buy yourself stocks based solely on what you hear.
All personal finance content follows Motleyful editorial standards
and are not approved by advertisers.
The Motleyful only picks products that it would personally recommend to friends like you.
I'm Ricky Mulvey. Thanks for listening.
We'll be back tomorrow.
