Motley Fool Money - The Real Risk

Episode Date: August 3, 2025

How can investors separate the signal from the noise? What’s the key to achieving financial freedom? And what’s the real risk investors face?Motley Fool analyst Buck Hartzell and contributor Rich Lumelleau talk with financial theorist and neurologist Bill Bernstein, author of numerous books, including The Four Pillars of Investing. The conversation covers a variety of investing topics: Advice for New Investors Misconceptions about Risk Mindset and Volatility Current Market Host: Rich Lumelleau, Buck HartzellProducer: Mac GreerEngineer: Adam LandfairDisclosure: Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. The Motley Fool and its affiliates (collectively, “TMF”) do not endorse, recommend, or verify the accuracy or completeness of the statements made within advertisements. TMF is not involved in the offer, sale, or solicitation of any securities advertised herein and makes no representations regarding the suitability, or risks associated with any investment opportunity presented. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with legal, tax, and financial advisors before making any investment decisions. TMF assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages arising from this advertisement. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit ⁠megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

We're human beings who evolved over millions of years of biological history. The way that we react to risk or the risk that we respond to is immediate risk. It's seeing the yellow and the black flash of light in your peripheral vision. You're hearing the hiss of a snake or the roar of a lion. And you respond just like that, all right? That's the way most people perceive risk in financial markets. it's the day that the market calls, falls three or four percent, or when there's very bad economic news.

That's not risk. Okay, that's volatility. What real risk is, is living under a bridge or eating cat food when you're old. That was Bill Bernstein, a financial theorist, neurologist, and author of numerous books, including the four pillars of investing, the intelligent asset allocator, and the birth of plenty. I'm Motley Fool producer Matt Greer. Now, Motleyful contributor Rich Lumello and Motleyful analyst Buck Hartzell recently caught up with Bernstein and talked risk, reward, and financial freedom.

Rich and I both have young adults. Some people that are either getting ready to graduate or graduating college and got their first job. And I just had 10 of those people over at our house this weekend. And one of the questions that they got asked during that conversation as we sat down is, how much do we need to save in order to be prepared and reach one day financial freedom? I don't like the word retirement, because I think freedom is something different. You can do what you love.

You don't need to retire, and people aren't met to sit around and watch TV on their couch and stuff. How much is a reasonable amount do you think that they need to save in order to reach their goals, Bill? Well, in recent years, I've changed my mind about this. I used to think that 15% was enough, which is the figure you'll see in that particular book. And 15% is adequate if you're...

have a relatively low income, because what will happen when you retire is you will get a very nice replacement ratio out of your Social Security. The person who has below average income or average income is going to get probably in the realm of about 50 to 60 percent replacement from Social Security. But if you're an upper end, and for that person, 15 percent is adequate, okay? But if you're an upper income person, then Social Security may only replace 30 or 35 percent of your income or even less if you've got a very high income. So that person should be saving at least 20 percent of their income. Bill, you've written that investing is simple but not easy. What do you think makes it so hard for most people to follow sound investing principles?

Well, there's a very precise analogy for that, which is losing weight. Losing weight is simple. Exercise more, eat less. It is not easy. It is also simple to say, I'm going to invest 15 or 20 percent of my salary every month into the financial markets. It's an easy thing to say that. But when the world looks like it's crashing down around you and maybe you're losing your job, it's not such an easy thing to do. Another analogy I like to use is, if you've ever had any flight training, it's flying in a simulator. Preparing for an emergency or a crash landing in a simulator is easy. It's very non-stressful. I've done it. But doing it in the real world, unfortunately, I never had to do it, I imagine is a good deal more stressful. And the financial markets are the same way. It's one thing to have a plan in a spreadsheet or in a beautiful mathematical model. It's another thing to actually execute it in real time.

I guess a follow-up to that is, are there misconceptions about risk that you see from your, you know, from your work and your writings that persist among both amateur and professional investors? We're human beings who evolved over millions of years of biological history. The way that we react to risk or the risk that we respond to is immediate risk. You know, it's seeing the yellow and the black flash of light in your peripheral vision, you're hearing the hiss of a snake or the roar of a lion. And you respond just like that, all right? That's the way most people perceive risk in financial markets.

It's the day that the market calls falls three or four percent or when there's very bad economic news. That's not risk. Okay, that's volatility. What real risk is, is living under a bridge or eating cat food when you're old. And those are two entirely different kinds of risk. And unfortunately, people pay much more attention to the first kind of risk, the immediate risk. what I call shallow risk, then they should pay to deep risk, which is the second kind of risk, long-term risk.

Is there a way for investors to kind of cultivate the discipline to do nothing during periods of market volatility? You mentioned those three and four percent down days. Obviously, three months ago, we had a 20 percent correction. Obviously, you were rewarded if you just stuck. Is there a way to kind of cultivate that discipline? Well, like everything else in life, there's theory and there's practice. The theory is to look at financial history and understand that once every three or four years,

the markets fall by 20 percent, and once every 10 or 20 years, they fall by 50 percent. So it's to have that knowledge in your knowledge bank, so you know that theory, but the theory isn't enough, all right? The practice part of it is to actually live through it yourself and see how you respond. And people respond in different ways. There are people who are utterly impervious to falling. markets and will happily, you know, invest even in the worst of markets. They find it very easy to do. I find those kinds of people are very rare. I'm not one of them myself, all right? And there are

other people who when the markets do poorly and the world looks like it's going to end, they panic. You know, I've known people, I've known men who risk their lives in combat and seem to execute that very well. But on the other hand, when the markets, when their portfolio fell by five or 10% they threw up. It's very odd. Yeah. Yeah, it's funny. Even business owners, you know, people that run their own business and they've been through, you know, swings and upturns and downturns and COVID and all this kind of stuff, and they can handle that fine. But then when they see their stocks go down 5 or 10%, it's, you know, it's something that kind of blows their mind a little bit. And I'm like, some of these people are friends. I'm like, you've run your

business through all kinds of downturns and things that happen. Why does it bother you? And I think it's because they feel like they're in control of their business, and they're calling the shots where the movements in these stocks, and I tell them, just don't watch. This is long-term investing. If up and down bothers you, don't look at it. Go play golf. You like that. As I already mentioned, I like to think about things evolutionarily, and I like to think in terms of analogies as well. And the analogy, I think it's appropriate here is the skunk. The skunk evolved over tens of millions of years to have a given reaction to a large predator that threatened it, which is to turn 180 degrees, lift its tail and spray. And that's very effective. But it's not effective in an environment where your

major predator is a hunk of steel weighing two tons moving 60 miles an hour. That's not the appropriate response. And that that analogy to finance is precise. What does leadership really look like? On The Power of Advice, a new podcast series from Capital Group, you'll hear from athletes, entrepreneurs, and executives who've led on the field, in the boardroom, and in their communities. It's not about titles. It's about impact. Discover what drives them and the advice they carry forward. Subscribe and start listening today. Published by Capital Client Group, Inc. Now, I want to go towards a little bit diversification because Fore pillars was a great book that you wrote and shared a lot of great lessons for people. But one of the comments in there was, when things look the brightest, returns are typically the lowest. And when things look the darkest, returns are the highest.

And so I have a question for you today. You know, we sit here July 22nd, 2025. Where do you think we are on the brightest to darkest continuum as far as investors today? Not a lot of clouds in the sky that I can see. I mean, people are talking about parroups and debt spiral. and the unsustainability of the Treasury market, but that's not the way people are behaving. People are behaving like everything's fine. And that's a really important concept, because in the financial markets, you are paid to bear

risk and uncertainty. So the worst things look, the lower prices have to fall in order to attract people back into the market with higher expected returns. So, the best fishing is done in the most troubled waters. And the time to be wary is when things look the brightest. Warren Buffett very famously said to be greedy when others are fearful, and fearful when others are greedy. And people look pretty greedy to me right now.

Yeah, the risk trade seems to be kind of back on right now. I mean, with most people. And I'd say also, stocks are relatively expensive. And it leads me into another question, and this goes to kind of to very big. certification. A recent Wall Street Journal article posted that over the last decade, small-cap stocks have returned about 6.6%. That trailed large-cap stocks that returned over 13%. So they trailed by about 7.3% per year. And I just, that's the widest gap that we've seen going back the whole way to 1935, as they were mentioned. That includes dividends. So I just wonder from an

allocation standpoint today, where are you on small caps versus large caps? Can you just kind of give us? Do you adjust your allocation based on how well that particular class has done or not done well the last five or ten years? Well, my emotional, excuse me, my discipline, my intellectual discipline tells me I shouldn't do that at all. Okay. But I have to admit that my emotionality, when I see something like that, tells me, yes, I should act on it. So, whatever my given allocation was to small-cap stocks, say, five years ago, maybe it's a little higher now, just for that exact reason. The financial markets do have a tendency to mean revert, which is what that article by Jason's Wig talked about. Mean reversion is a relatively weak

phenomenon. It's at best a 55-45 bet. But if you make enough 55-45 bets over the course of your lifetime, you're going to win some, you're going to lose some, but on average, you'll come out ahead. So, you know, I think that's a bet that's worth making, but don't be surprised if it doesn't work this time. Okay. So intellectually, you say, I stick to my guns. I've had my allocation, but also you say, I might tilt a little bit more in that direction, given that reason data. And can you give for people that are listening at home so they have an idea, what are your rough kind of allocations, would you say, in a simple form to large-cap versus small-cap and say international and maybe bonds in there?

Well, I think the typical investor is well advised to hold the market, the total stock market. And if they want to tilt towards small cap stocks, they can do it with a small portion of that allocation, say a quarter or at most a third of it. You know, understand that there are going to be long periods of time, like the last 20 years when you're sorry you did that. So you have to be extremely patient. How does geopolitical risk, and I'm going to throw tariffs into that, just because it's basically, basically, we're going to dealing with every country in the world. How does geopolitical risk influence your long-term investment strategy? Yeah, I like to channel Ken Fisher, bless his soul, who observed that he pays close attention to the headlines because he knows that if something is above the fold,

that is at the top of the headlines, it's kind of an archaic term, I guess, showing my age. If something is above the fold, then it's already been impounded in the prices so he knows he can ignore it. And those are the kinds of things that fit into that category. Geopolitical risk, what's the Fed's doing? Everybody knows about that stuff that's impounded in the prices. And that's not a new observation. I think it was almost over 100 years ago that Bernard Baruch said that's something that everyone knows isn't worth knowing. If it's in the paper, it's in the price, is usually what I tell people. Exactly. That's a great way to put it. Yeah. We tend to be bottoms up here at the

And so we get a lot of questions, particularly around the tariff noise. But we can point to them and tell them, hey, in 2016, there was a similar conversation that was going on. Here's what happened then. Most of those international stocks traded down pretty significantly once the presidential election happened in 2016. And then the year afterwards, international stocks took off with. I think China was the best performing up probably over 50 percent in 2016 during President

Trump's first year in office. We can tell them the data, but it's hard because people focus on what's in the newspaper. And I'm like, if you can just keep your goalposts focus on how the business is doing and the company and pick good businesses, you're probably better off because the noise is immense that is out there, right? Yeah. If there's one kind of data I tend to pay attention to, I do it as a negative indicator, which is you'll often hear people say, you know, country X, Y, or Z has a great economy.

it's going to take off by its stocks. And it turns out that there's an inverse correlation there. And there are a lot of different reasons for that. But the poster child for that phenomenon is China. Over the past 30 years, economic growth in China has been through the roof, almost 10% real over the past 30 years every single year. And yet over the past 30 years, Chinese stocks have been money losers. They've had terrible returns for, again, many, many, different reasons. So that's one argument that I tend to pay attention to because it's so specious, but it usually works out the opposite direction. Yeah. And I remember when the bricks were all a big thing, and that was Brazil, Russia, Indian, China, and they were the emerging

growth stories where I think over longer periods of time, those emerging market stocks tend to perform less than to develop the world, because, as you like I say, everybody runs towards the growth, and then the multiples get bid up. But we even had, some members that posted some ETFs because they wanted exposure to the growing middle class of China, which is a smart thing, right? I mean, they had huge growing middle class. But if you looked at some of the ETFs that were available for investors, most of those were investing in government-run entities in China.

They were state-owned enterprises like banks and manufacturing and stuff like that. They were getting very little exposure to the rise of the Chinese consumer. So I said, you've got to be careful sometime when you just look at some of these ETFs. that think they're meeting your need, you've got to understand what's in them as well. There's a more general principle, epistemological principle here, which is that narratives and stories are very misleading. We're human beings, we tell each other's stories, that's how we communicate. That's a really lousy way to invest. If you're buying a story, you're very liable to have your head handed to you. What you should be looking at is the data. And what's the data? It's

the valuation. You know, what kind of earnings yield are you getting? What kind of bivitend yield? are you getting that's what you should be that's what you should be paying attention to these days i'm all about quality over quantity especially in my closet if it's not well-made and versatile it's just not worth it that's honestly what i love quince the fabrics feel elevated the cuts are thoughtful and the pricing actually makes sense quince makes high-quality wardrobe staples using premium fabrics like 100% european linen silk and organic cotton poplin they work directly with safe ethical factories and cut off the middlemen so you aren't paying for brand markups or fancy stores, just quality clothing. Everything they make is built to hold up season after season and is

consistently rated 4.5 to 5 stars by thousands of real people like me who wear their clothes every day. The Quince, Mongolian cashmere crewneck sweater may be the most comfortable one that I own. It's light, soft, and it was a lot more affordable than you think quality cashmere would be. Stop waiting to build the wardrobe you actually want. Right now, go to quince.com slash motley for free shipping and 365-day returns. That's a full year to wear it and love. love it, and you will. Now available in Canada, too. Don't keep settling for clothes that don't last. Go to QINCE.com slash Motley for free shipping and 365-day returns. Quince.com slash Motley. You've talked a lot about behavioral finance and psychological tendencies.

I think, you know, investors that are trained in those tend to do better and they protect themselves from making a lot of mistakes. So I want to spend a little bit of time on that. You know, I grew up. We had one investor in my household. That was my mother. And she was probably the best I've ever known because she's had the ability to buy good companies and hold them for six decades. Those are companies like Apple and Microsoft and things like that. And at the end of her life, I mean, your portfolio reflected the fact that she held on to her winners. And I want to just ask you a little bit about people that are just beginning. And I've worked a lot with our interns this summer, as well as many summers before. And I've seen a difference between

men and women investors. Like I said, I grew up lifelong relationship and investing with my mother. She was very patient with her stocks. Men that I know tend not to be. They tend to want to buy and sell and trade a little bit more. I just want to know, like, for people that are beginning investing, and I'm talking about people that are pretty humble here and they're scared to lose money on their first investment. They're scared to take that first leap. And I tell them, if you're great, you're going to be wrong 40% of the time. Don't sweat it. Right. Like, it's, It's fine. What do you tell those people that are a little scared to get started because they're going to buy that first investment, whether it's a stock or ETIA and afraid it's going to go down?

Before I answer that question, the first thing you talked about, the gender difference is quite salient. Testosterone does wonderful things for muscle mass and reflex time. It does not do good things for judgment. And so women tend to be better investors than men are. Now, as far as what you do with your first investment, you have to find out what kind of person you are. I tell people who are starting out to invest relatively conservatively, so that when they hit their first bear market, they find out what their actual risk tolerance is. So the first investment that a person makes, I generally tell them, start with a 50-50 portfolio.

And when the market goes down 50%, which is liable to happen at some point in your first 10 or 15 years of investing, then you're going to find out who you are. Yes. And if you bought more or you held on fine, you know what to do. You're either going to keep that allocation or you're going to up your equity allocation. But if it ruins your life, maybe you should be 3070 for the rest of your life because that may be suboptimal, but a suboptimal allocation that you can execute is better than an optimal one, a stock-heavy one, that you can't execute. That was Bill Bernstein. His books include the four pillars of investing. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about, and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against.

So don't buy ourselves stocks based solely on what you're hearing. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. For the Motley Full Money team, I'm Matt Greer. Thanks for listening, and we will see you tomorrow. Thank you.