Motley Fool Money - The World Grows More Uncertain

Episode Date: June 13, 2025

And yet, the market remains close to all time highs. (00:21) Jason Moser and Matt Argersinger join Ricky Mulvey to discuss: - Macro uncertainty and market bullishness. - A record amount of unsold housing stock in the United States. - Chime’s IPO. - Earnings from RH and Adobe. (19:11) Malcolm Ethridge, Managing Partner at Capital Area Planning Group and author of "Financial Independence Doesn't Happen by Accident". (35:00) Jason and Matt share two radar stocks: Chipotle and Whirlpool. Companies discussed: RDFN, CHYM, RH, ADBE, CMG, WHR Host: Ricky Mulvey Guests: Jason Moser, Matt Argersinger Engineer: Dan Boyd Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. The Motley Fool and its affiliates (collectively, "TMF") do not endorse, recommend, or verify the accuracy or completeness of the statements made within advertisements. TMF is not involved in the offer, sale, or solicitation of any securities advertised herein and makes no representations regarding the suitability, or risks associated with any investment opportunity presented. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with legal, tax, and financial advisors before making any investment decisions. TMF assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages arising from this advertisement. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This episode is brought to you by Indeed. Stop waiting around for the perfect candidate. Instead, use Indeed sponsored jobs to find the right people with the right skills fast. It's a simple way to make sure your listing is the first candidate C. According to Indeed data, sponsor jobs have four times more applicants than non-sponsored jobs. So go build your dream team today with Indeed. Get a $75 sponsor job credit at Indeed.com slash podcast. Terms and conditions apply.

The world and markets shake upon Israel's airstrikes on Iran. This week's Motley Full Money Radio Show starts now. That's why they call it money. Global headquarters. This is Motley Fool Money. It's the Motley Full Money Radio Show. I'm Ricky Mulvey. Joining me on the internet today are Motley Fool senior analysts, Matt Argusinger, and Jason Moser.

Great to have you both here. Ricky, what's going on? Big news is going on. Last night, Israel struck Iran's nuclear. your sites and military leadership, these moves have created big questions that go beyond the scope of the content promise of this show. Like, what will retaliation look like? What does this mean for America?

And I want to set aside the business part because this is, you know, there are parts of history that exist in punctuated equilibrium. And last night was a stark reminder that our peace in the world in America should not be taken for granted. So before we get to the show, I'll start with Moser. Jason, and any broad reflections about what's going on? I mean, it's obviously not good news. It does sound like it's something that could be somewhat protracted.

I mean, we've seen retaliation already from Iran. And from what I was reading, it sounds like Israel had essentially planned out 14 days of operations to ultimately accomplish their goal. So let's hope that it's not something that continues to escalate. It will lead to continued uncertainty, obviously beyond the markets, just around the world, particularly when you consider our role here in the U.S. in regard to all of this, right? Now, I mean, they're saying we don't really have a role in this, but at the same time, they're saying, well, we knew what was going to happen.

And so it just kind of gets into a back and forth that is, you just hate to see it. From an investing perspective, I mean, no surprise, we've seen oil prices pop on this news. We're seeing, interestingly, a flight to the dollar, I think. So maybe the dollar still got a little bit of a reputation there. I know there were some concerns recently. And then I think your obvious winners, weapons manufacturers, government contractors, government contractors, whatnot, they have seen a little bit of a boost from this. But, yeah, I mean, it definitely makes you think of things beyond just investing.

And it's really sad to hear. Matt, anything you want to add or we can keep it moving to the content promise of this show. I'll just say as investors, I think we yearn for certainty in an uncertain world. And this is just a reminder that there's so much out of our control and so much uncertainty, as Jason said. And that is one of the things you have to live with if you're an investor and a citizen of this world. Let's move to the business side. There is uncertainty. That's the key theme. Trade uncertainty. Geopolitical uncertainty. Uncertainty about the job market and artificial intelligence. And yet, Matt, the standard impores 500 is still within spitting distance of all-time highs. What's that say about the market to you? I know. It is remarkable that we're so close to new all-time highs. And we have all this trade uncertainty still. We have a new one, but we have multiple large-scale conflict.

now around the world that could escalate, that we don't have an end time for. And, you know, treasury yields, interest rates are still at multi-year, if not multi-decade highs. And that, to me, just doesn't feel like a stock market that should be within two or three percentage points of an all-time high. We can go through the positives too as well, though. You do have a strong labor market. We have consumer spending that keeps holding up, for the most part. And the AI revolution, right? We have all this massive amounts of tech expanding that's going to change the world, hopefully in a positive way. But, Ricky, the macro backdrop could not look worse for me as an investor right now. And I guess I'm just amazed by the market's resiliency and, you know, Friday's sell-off, notwithstanding.

Jason, I can't tell if you were shaking your head because you just really disagreed with what Matt Argusinger had to say, or if it was because dogs were barking in the background. It's the latter. It's the latter. Okay, okay. Yeah, I think, Mattie said a lot of good things there. I mean, it does feel like we shouldn't maybe be in such a good position in regard to the markets, given the macro backdrop, given what has developed here over the last 24 hours. But I guess when you look at it, at its core, right? I mean, we continue to see strong corporate earnings, and that's obviously very encouraging.

I mean, the economy, we were talking about this last week, it is still ultimately fairly resilient. And I think that most recent jobs report number is starting to create a little bit more of a belief that we will see the Fed jump in there and start cutting rates in the back half of the year. If that happens, obviously, that frees up some capital with lower rates. And maybe we see more money moving around that way and housing. But the AI conversation continues to dominate. There's just a lot of enthusiasm out there right now. So I'm not complaining, but it just, it doesn't feel like it quite squares up. Yeah, I agree. Let's move from big macro to big real estate. Matt, since you're the real estate guy,

I need you to explain this to me. And it's a Redfin report saying that U.S. home sellers are sitting on $700 billion worth of listings. That's up 20% a year ago and an all-time high. And another Redfin analysis found that there are nearly half a million more home sellers than buyers in today's housing market. What's going on behind these numbers? Well, can you explain it to me? Because I don't quite get it either. No, you're the analyst. I'm the host. I know. Well, what happened to those golden handcuffs that we thought homeowners had to their low-fix mortgages or the fact that inventory has been so stubbornly low for years? I mean, what happened to all that? You mentioned it. We're seeing all-time high value of listings, according to Redfin, and that data goes back to 2012.

and the number of homes for sale on the market is up 17% year-over-year, and that is at a five-year high. And at the same time, houses are sitting on the market for longer. 330 billion, so almost half the number you mentioned of home values, have been sitting on the market for 60 days or longer. So what does that say about demand? I mean, we've assumed that demand has always been the strong factor here, and it's the supply that's lacking.

But I think there are a few things going on. People may be trying to move, Ricky. like you suggested, but I don't think they're in a rush. I mean, if you look at the median U.S. home sales price, it's up 1.4% year over year. So I think a few things. Sellers want to sell, but they're not willing to cut the price, at least enough to really move inventory. Second, that contributes to this affordability issue we've been having, especially for younger first-time home buyers who have sticker shock.

And when you compare the monthly rent for an apartment in most markets and compare that to what it cost to buy a home in most markets. The spread is hundreds of dollars, if not thousands of dollars in some cases. So it's much more expensive to buy the rent. So the housing supply might be getting unstuck, but maybe now we actually need to start focusing more on the demand side. If mortgage rates don't come down or sellers aren't willing to cut the price, we might still have this mismatch in supply and demand.

It's just the opposite side than what we thought. Well, in a non-cheeky response, I'm in Denver, Colorado, and it makes a tremendous amount of sense to rent versus buy. For me, my personal situation in this market. And I think you keyed in on it there, which is this is all about price. Yes, sellers can want to sell, but unless you really want to sell, you need to cut the price. And until sellers are willing to do that, this is a simple supply demand game that's not going to go back in balance.

So, Matt, more of a personal finance question. If you are a home buyer right now, you're not used to being in a buyer's market. So for someone looking for a home listening to the show, any advice to them right now? I would say, you know, to potential homebuyers, stay patient, keep paying that relatively cheaper rent and saving for that down payment because I do think eventually something breaks your way. Either mortgage rates come down at some point soon or sellers finally start cutting prices maybe by the end of this year and enough to move inventory. So I think the power is getting on the side of the buyer. You just might have to be a little more patient.

Up next, we're looking at big tech earnings. In an IPO, yes, IPOs are back. Stay right here. You're listening to Motley Full Money. The old adage goes, it isn't what you say, it's how you say it, because to truly make an impact, you need to set an example and take the lead. You have to adapt to whatever comes your way. When you're that driven, you drive an equally determined vehicle, the Range Rover Sport.

The Range Rover Sport blends power, poise, and performance. Its design is distinctly British and free from unnecessary detail. allowing its raw agility to shine through. It combines a dynamic sporting personality with elegance to deliver a truly instinctive drive. Inside, you'll find true modern luxury with the latest innovations in comfort. Use the cabin air purification system alongside active noise cancellation for all new levels of quality and quiet. Whether you prefer a choice of powerful engines or the plug-in hybrid with an estimated range of 53 miles, there's an option for you. With seven terrain modes to choose from, terrain response two fine-tuned your vehicle for the road's head.

The Rangerover event is on now. Explore enhance offers at Rangerover.com. Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. I'm Ricky Mulvey here with Matt Argusinger and Jason Moser. Fools. We had a big IPO this week. I can't remember the last time that happened, but also the internet has atrophied my attention span and memory. But let's talk about the one that happened. And that is chime, Jason. This is a company that offers banking services, but is importantly not a bank. Don't call it a bank. They do high yield savings. They do some interest-free payday loans. and the stock rose 37% on its first trading day. Seems like investors are excited about the IPOs again.

Yeah, I guess that is the case. I mean, in the first quarter of 2025, we definitely saw an increase in the number of deals. There's some reports that show to 55 to 76% year-over-year rise here in the U.S. And total proceeds from these offerings also increased. And there is this feeling that private equity firms, firms are looking to start divesting some holdings, which ultimately leads to more IPO activity. And so I think we could see in a back half of 2025 and going into 2026. I think we'll continue to see sort of this modest enthusiasm in getting IPOs coming back to

public market. We have some companies to look forward to out there. I think Stripe is a big name that folks are paying attention to. Klarna is one. They've kind of put it on hold for now. But yeah, I think with chime, I think the one thing to keep in mind is, remember, this IPO, and you get the company value today at 10, 11, 12 billion dollars. That's down from like, it was a valuation of $25 billion at their last fundraise in 2021. So that valuation has certainly come down, which is just, I think, something to pay attention to. Modest enthusiasm is the key theme that I think we should dig into. I really like that phrase,

Jason. When you look at the business of Chime, the fundamentals, this is a company that handled $121 billion in transactions over the year before it went public, 8.6 million active users. And when you look at the financials on the S-1, you can see that nice trend line as this business scales closer to operating profitability. I know you don't like to jump into an IPO. You're patient. You like to wait and see what's happening. But is this the business itself here? Is this interesting to you? It could be. I mean, I think fintech certainly is a fun speaking. to follow. As you noted, this is not a bank. It partners with a couple of banks in order to be able to provide these services, what the Bank Corps Bank and Stride Bank. So there is the FDIC

angle there, which is encouraging. I think the one thing to keep an eye on with this business is the way it makes its money. Ultimately, it makes most of its money just through card interchange processing fees. So essentially, it's a card company. And so on the one hand, There's an interesting growth profile here that could be in play. Again, looking at that valuation, how far it's come down from 2021. You do have to start asking yourself in regard to the growth prospects there. And on the flip side, if you're looking for a payments company that's making its money off of card swipe fees, well, I mean, you got Visa and MasterCard out there right now. Those companies have just really been lighting it up here lately. So there are a lot of qualities

that I think make this a compelling business to follow. You've got co-founder, Chris Britt, the CEO of the company, and Ryan King, another co-founder, who's a director. They're still with the company as well. So you have that skin in the game, which is always an attention-getter. So it's definitely one that I'll be paying attention to in the coming quarters. But you're right, Ricky. I think investors likely should exercise patience here.

And let's see exactly how they behave as a publicly traded company. For newer listeners, Jason did something there that you should do anytime you're looking at a new company. And that's key in on the fundamental value drivers. How does this business make money? How does this business make more money? And in the case of Chime, it is those processing fees, something that you want to pay attention to. Let's get into the earnings rundown.

And we will start, Matt, with R.H. This is the aspirationally priced furniture retailer that sells inside of stores that occasionally look like Scooby-Doo mansions. But the important part is that the company reported a surprise profit and the stock jumped 20% this morning. What did you see in the results? Well, a few things, Ricky. It was a good report. And a shout out to CEO, Gary Friedman, who I think is the only CEO that can quote Pablo Picasso, Warren Buffett, and Teddy Roosevelt in the same shareholder letter. I love that. But yeah, a few things. I mean, they maintain their full year guidance as well,

which is something few, I'd say consumer-facing companies have done this earning season. So that's good. One thing I am a little bit worried about, revenue grew 12% year over year. Nice growth there. but inventories up 26% year over year. Now, they've opened some big galleries over the past year. They're opening more. That explains some of the inventory build. But generally, you don't want inventories to grow faster or so much faster than revenue over time.

That can lead to trouble. They did, however, generate nice free cash flow, $34 million in free cash flow in the quarter versus a loss of $10 million a year ago. And so the business is sound, and the profit was nice to see for the quarter. When you look at Friedman's commentary, I think when he was talking about tariffs, is that when he uses the Pablo Picasso quote of

every act of creation starts with an act of destruction. What a mind. What a mind behind R.H. I know. But you mentioned tariffs, a slow housing market. RH is still predicting double-digit sales growth. And we've talked about the slowing housing market. What's that say to you about RH? What's that say to you about the economy? I think it says to me that RH, and we know this is a very, a very unique company. It's an outlier in its space. I don't think I can glean any big insights about the economy. I think it's an outlier brand. It's aspirational. It's got a very loyal member base of buyers. And so I don't think it gives me many clues by the economy, but it does tell me that RHS business is very sound and, you know, that it's holding them very well in a lot of uncertainty.

So for newer investors, this is a letter that I would encourage you to read because it is, Gary Friedman is a wonderful writer. It's actually a fun read. And it is also a time for you to exercise your, your skepticism radar. And here's a part that sort of got my skepticism radar going, Matt. And it's when he said, quote, our debt is reflective of a washtub bet on ourselves. We repurchase 60% of our outstanding shares that greatly benefited our long-term shareholders post the publishing of Mr. Buffett's letter in 2016 to 2017. he goes on to say that he makes these big repurchases when he believes the stock is undervalued. Then here's the key part. In addition, we believe another washtub bet is to play offense in the current environment

by increasing our membership discount from 25% to 30%. Wait, what? You just went for repurchasing more than half of your existing shares to talking about a 5% increase for a membership discount. What is this guy saying, Matt? He says he's unconventional. That's what he said. And I have to say, when you take on a lot of debt to buy back stock, and their net debt, by the way, is almost twice where it was before the pandemic.

You better be right about the business. And so, Freedman's making a big bet on his business. Like you said, they've got a lot of real estate. They've got assets. They have an inventories. A nice quarter of free cash flow. So the debt right now is probably pretty manageable. Just watch out if the business falls off, though.

And the membership discounts going up 5%. We'll also call that a wash tub bet. Let's quickly move on to Adobe earnings. JMO, Adobe reported yesterday. This is a rare bird that is actually raising guidance right now. What did you find in the results? Yeah, I think the results were better than the market would have you believe today. Stock down a little bit after the report, and there seemed to be at least some minor questions regarding deceleration in subscription growth and remaining performance obligation growth into the back half of the year in quarter four in particular. But, as you noted, I mean, they raised guidance all the way around, which is very encouraging.

And the quarter was a good one. Revenue was up 11%. So earnings per share, $5.6. And in raising the guidance, I think that's really encouraging. They raised a midpoint of $20.60 per share, which puts shares now at around 19 times full year estimates. They're going to grow earnings this year, about 12 percent from a year ago. So that multiple makes sense. That multiple sounds low for a business that is historically. commanded a higher valuation. But that's ultimately why that is. So then you just have to ask yourself

a question, is this company going to be able to continue to grow? I mean, the big question, the big question about the growth is AI. What does AI mean for Adobe? Can creators get to good enough with free and other tools? And Adobe's response seems to be, if you want the best tools, you still come to Adobe. We have this product called Fireflyware. First time subscribers to Adobe grew by 30 percent. Are you buying that explanation from Adobe? To a degree, yes. I mean, there are a lot of tools out there, and Adobe is considered to be one of the leaders in the space. But there's no question its competitive position is under more attack today. And we're seeing encouraging numbers with things like you Firefly, like you mentioned, and how it's bringing AI into its portfolio.

I just think the question really is, is this a business where AI makes it better or is this a business where AI displaces it? I think it's the former, but again, we're going to have to see the numbers, and that'll tell the tale here in the coming quarters. We're going to see JMO and Matt a little later, but up next, we're taking a look at cybersecurity with Malcolm Etheridge. You're listening to Motley Fool Money. These days, I'm all about quality over quantity, especially in my closet. If it's not well-made and versatile, it's just not worth it. That's honestly why I love Quince. The fabrics feel elevated, the cuts are thoughtful, and the pricing actually makes sense.

Quince makes high-quality wardrobe staples using premium fabrics like 100% European linen, silk and organic cotton poplin. They work directly with safe ethical factories and cut out the middlemen so you aren't paying for brand markups or fancy stores, just quality clothing. Everything they make is built to hold up season after season and is consistently rated 4.5 to 5 stars by thousands of real people like me who wear their clothes every day. The Quince, Mongolian cashmere crewneck sweater may be the most comfortable one that I own. It's light, soft, and it was a lot more affordable than you think quality cashmere would be. Stop waiting to build the wardrobe you actually want. Right now, go to quince.com slash motley for free shipping and 365 day returns. That's a full year to wear it and love it.

And you will. Now available in Canada, too. Don't keep settling for clothes that don't last. Go to QINCE.com slash motley for free shipping and 365 day returns. Quince.com slash motley. Welcome back to Motley full money. I'm Ricky Mulvey. Malcolm Etheridge is a managing partner at Capital Area Planning Group,

a boutique financial planning and investment management firm. He's also the author of Fight. financial independence doesn't happen by accident. Etheridge caught up with me earlier this week to chat about the state of cybersecurity and why investors may be a little too pessimistic about Apple's future. Malcolm, an under-discussed story that you brought to my attention is that virtually all the top officials at the cybersecurity and infrastructure security agency have departed the agency or will do so in this month.

That was according to an email obtained by Cybersecurity Dive. and the latest spending bill that's going around slashes the budget for this agency by about $500 million. It currently spends about $3 billion a year. So this is all new to me. What is the cybersecurity and infrastructure security agency? And what does this mean for the cybersecurity companies you follow? Yeah, it's really one of those things that we as American citizens don't really want to have to know that it exists.

Frankly, I probably hear more about it and talk more about it just because, you know, in my day job running a wealth management firm, a lot of the clients that we work with happen to be executive level folks at some of the most important largest companies in cybersecurity. And so, you know, as I'm having dinners, playing golf, whatever, casual conversation, these kinds of things tend to come up. And so the way to think about CISA, though, is they are the foremost or the most important cybersecurity agency within the U.S. government structure. So the DOD is the largest that people would typically think about, but CISA kind of runs the show. So they coordinate with companies like Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services, and share information back and forth to make sure that each other is aware of bigger threats that are coming at us from state agencies, more specifically our adversarial countries that actually sponsor a lot of this

cyber warfare that happens. And this overall bill actually does add spending. It adds deficit spending, but there are some cuts going on. This is one of them. Are there any companies you think in this zone in the cybersecurity area that are particularly prone if there are federal spending cuts to cybersecurity? Well, so one of the things that I think is interesting, I started investing in standalone cybersecurity companies about three years ago, started making a case publicly about

this on shows like MFM and others about the opportunity to invest in these companies. And one of the reasons that I made that case was because at the time, the Biden administration had about $13 billion set aside for cyber defense. And there was talk about the importance of increasing that number, which meant that any standalone cyber firm that existed at the time was going to be bidding for contracts to help defend the different U.S. agencies, because all of our infrastructure, as you can imagine, is just years and years behind where it should be. And when I say our, I mean the countries. And so the DOD specifically was kind of leading the charge along with CISA, trying to get to

what's called the zero trust environment, which is sort of the standard today as far as how we're supposed to interact with our technology inside of an entity. And so all of the different standalone companies are cyber arcs, your fortinets, octa, all the smaller ones, in addition to Palo Alto, Crowdstrike, Z-Scaler, names like that, were looking to be bidding on those bigger contracts, and that was how they were going to grow top-line revenue. It just so happens that Palo Alto Networks is one of the largest suppliers of those services to the government today and the government deciding at least showing its hand with what's happening with CISA, which I should assume means that that's going to be their stance with all the other agencies with

future bills. The fact that they're reducing that expected spending at a time when they should be ramping up how much they plan to spend means that you have to investigate a little bit closer or listen to the earnings calls a little closer for some of these companies. And I've even heard, as recently, you know, Z-scalers call, I'll use them as an example. They spent a decent amount of time talking about how much of their business does not come from the government, sort of just to say to potential shareholders, nothing to worry about over here. Yeah, and a lot of these cybersecurity is at this time of federal spending uncertainty, there is a lot of excitement about what artificial intelligence means for the needs for

cybersecurity, as spoofing becomes easier, spearfishing. We were talking before we started recording about how it's easier. it just becomes immensely easier to fool for adversaries to fool companies and people. And I think that's one of the reasons you're seeing a lot of these companies, including Palo Alto Network, Z-Scaler CrowdStrike, at or near all-time highs. And it's a lot of that excitement around artificial intelligence, or maybe not excitement, but recognition of the need for cybersecurity spending. But I know you've become more bearish on this space.

Do you think there's something that investors are missing with that story? Well, I'm not necessarily bearish on the space. I'm hesitant to cast such a wide net and say anything calling itself AI security, cybersecurity with an AI tilt, we should throw money at it without really investigating, right? If you think about just not that long ago, anything online calling itself ABCC Company.iote, right? Internet of things was automatic. a thing that investors were throwing money at because that was the new wave. That was where we were going as far as technology is concerned. Then 2022 maybe, anything.aI, all of a sudden investors are just throwing money at it. And so I hear stories of people who are doing,

Control F and doing chat GPT searches for how many times did this company mention AI on the earnings call? And that's the thing that they're using to determine whether they should invest in this company or not. And when we hear companies talk about using AI in their cyber defense capability, that doesn't necessarily mean much of anything, right? So where we talk about what AI has allowed bad actors to be able to do, there's this new thing called a zero-click attack, which basically is a text message that comes to you or an email that comes to you that you don't even have to interact with it the way you do with a fishing scam. You don't need to click on a bad link. The fact that you opened it and it's in your environment, it now can talk to the AI agent inside of whatever.

that device is. So if Siri was a little bit smarter, it would be vulnerable to this. So maybe Apple is at an advantage by being at a disadvantage with their AI component so far. But Microsoft co-pilot is an example. Every one of the large language models has their own version of a co-pilot, which is vulnerable to these types of zero-click attacks because the AI is the thing that's acting as if it's you coming into the environment and telling it, give me access to this information because I am Malcolm. Give me access to this set of data and then share it with Ricky because I am Malcolm and I normally will share that information with it. And so that's what we have to be concerned about and guard against. That is what a lot of these cyber companies are using AI to help defend against,

but not everybody, right? And so just because the CEO gets on the earnings call and says AI or we've struck a new partnership with XYZ company doesn't necessarily mean that that's where your dollars as an investor should go. In cybersecurity, where are your, you? dollars as an investor going? Have they changed? Yeah, so right now, the only two companies that I own as a direct cyber investment are CrowdStrike and Z-Scaler. The reason being one, I do believe that when it comes to AI, those two companies are leading the charge as far as being able to build to meet that, you know, AI-enabled bad actor who can run these attacks at scale. But separately from that, I like the flex model that both of them have adopted, which both CEOs say was born

out of a request from their core customers. Hey, we don't want to have to go through a procurement process over again from scratch. Each time you want to add an additional module that you have to offer, it's a pain in the butt. Can you give us a way to flexibly move between one product and another on your platform? And both companies said, hey, listen, sounds reasonable. Let's throw some some capital at figuring out how to solve it, and both have rolled those flex models out very recently. Z-Flex and Falcon Flex, I think is what they both call them respectively. So I think that's a place where both companies will grow their annually recurring revenue, which is the core target financially that they are telling shareholders to focus on. That is a story I can buy

into and I love. I sold out of CIBR, the first trust cybersecurity ETF recently because I noticed that the underlying holdings inside of that ETF are no longer cybersecurity focused the way you'd want them to be. The top five holdings in there were CrowdStrike in Palo Alto, yes, but also AVGO, as a Broadcom, is the number one holding at a 9 to 10 percent waiting, depending on which day you look at it. Also, InfoSys, also Cisco. So these are companies that, yes, they tangentially have an AI component.

They have exposure to AI. And by mandate, this particular ETF doesn't require the majority or all of your revenues to come from cybersecurity related activities. It just has to be one of your service offerings. But because of the way it's structured and the growth that has happened in legacy tech or old tech, whatever you want to call it, that's really gotten the holdings inside of that ETF out of whack. So if you're looking for something like a pure play, something like BUG is probably a better way to play it. But then you're investing directly into small caps, and that might not be where every investor wants to be. So all that to say, I've decided, rather than go the ETF route today, I've pivoted to just owning

the two lead horses in the race, and then I'll figure it out from there. A good reminder for people to check under the hood when they buy an ETF because the headline might not always be what you're getting. And for me, that's something that's attractive as an ETF for cybersecurity, especially this is a space that I know I'm less knowledgeable about. And it's hard for me to parse through the earnings calls and say, okay, so is this one the best at using AI agents? Or do I just, do I want zero trust or do I want a holistic approach like CrowdStrike? And that's been to my detriment since a lot of these companies have done fabulously well. One other story I wanted to hit with you is Apple.

They just had their developer day. We got liquid glass. And it was a lot about the user experience. But what did you think of Developer Day or where Apple's at right now? Yeah, so Apple is in a tough spot in the sense that we are looking to them, we as investors, are looking to them and saying what's next. And so you listen to Mark Zuckerberg over at Meta talk about what's next. And it sounds fascinating. Or you listen to some of the smart folks over at Alphabet talk about what's next. And it's fascinating.

You see these new partnerships that are being struck with OpenAI and all the different companies that they've either committed to acquiring or partner with. And you look around and you say, well, where's Apple? Apple is usually one of the loudest voices and one of the trendsetters, if you will. And so we as consumers don't really have a consumer-facing AI tool yet that satisfies that. Most of what we've done with AI so far for the last three years since Chad GPT hit the scene has been at the enterprise level. It's a workplace tool. And so for Apple, maybe the, you know, the liquid glass reconstruction is meant to mirror what the vision goggles will show you. And there's a goal to kind of tie those in together because we've been told a few times by some

futurists in the space out of Silicon Valley that the physical device is no longer going to be the way that we interact with apps five to 10 years from now. And so maybe for Apple, this is a bridge right? I get you used to the interface of the liquid glass. and then everybody will put on the headset and feel less out of place. Maybe. I don't know. I don't know anybody internally on that team who's told me anything.

But in the meantime, investors are looking and going, yeah, but, right? Like, that's not exciting to me today. That's not enough of a reason for consumers to line up outside of an Apple store the way they were in 2007 to say, I got to have that next device, right? however many iPhone owners there are in that number that are supposed to be upgrading all at once and what they refer to as the super cycle, the super upgrade cycle, that hasn't come to fruition because Apple intelligence wasn't really what we were told it was going to be. I personally got the iPhone 16 only because I was holding a brick of an iPhone 8 or S.E

or whatever it was, and I literally needed a new phone. But for most people, they looked at it and they went, eh. So for Apple, they really need to be able to tell a compelling story about how they are going to participate in the next leg of AI-enabled smartphone device interaction, whether it's the MacBook or the iPad or the watch or anything else. And they haven't yet. But I personally have gotten to a place where I feel like we've been saying that about Apple for the last two years. We saw with quote-unquote Liberation Day when tariffs were enacted, the freak-out. moment there. We saw as the president of the United States was attacking the CEO of Apple, Tim Cook, on Twitter, what happened to the shares there. We saw at last year's WWDC where everyone

was underwhelmed and then again this year, all that taken together and the lack of movement in the share price in one direction or another leads me to believe we've reached peak pessimism on Apple shares. So I as an investor actually just added to my position in the, the company earlier today before we recorded. So that's why I'm allowed to share it with you without violating our trading rules. But I think personally, this is about where we go as far as Apple's shares are concerned, because all the bad news is out there and investors still seem to be sticking with it and giving Apple the benefit of the doubt based on what they've been able to do for the last 20 years. And perhaps a underappreciated capital allocation story. They've been

aggressively taking shares off market. And they still, I think, have $100 billion. dollar buyback plan. Good place to end it. Malcolm Etheridge, appreciate your time and your insight. Thanks for joining us on Motley Full Money. As always, people on the program may have interests in the Stocks they talk about in the Motley Full may have formal recommendations for or against. Don't Buy or Sell stocks based solely on what you hear on personal finance content. Follows Motley Full Editorial Standards and are not approved by advertisers. Advertisants, and your sponsor content and provided for informational purposes only. See our full advertising disclosure. Please check out the notes in our podcast description. Up next, radar stocks.

You're listening to Motley Full Money. fans behind because your friends don't dance and if they don't dance well there's no friends of mine i say we can go where we want to a place well they will never find and we can what does leadership really look like on the power of advice a new podcast series from capital group you'll hear from athletes entrepreneurs and executives who've led on the field in the boardroom and in their communities it's not about titles. It's about impact. Discover what drives them and the advice they carry forward. Subscribe and start listening today. Published by Capital Client Group, Inc. Welcome back to Motley Full Money. I'm Ricky Mulvey, joined by Jason Moser and Matt Argusinger. It is time for radar stocks.

Each week, our analysts pick a stock catching their attention, not just because they think it will go up, or not only because it could be catching their attention for a variety of reasons. And our man behind the glass, Dan Boyd, will hit them with a question, concern or a backhanded compliment. We'll go with JMO first, what you got this week. Yeah, taking a look at Chipotle. CMG is the ticker. And this is the stock I've owned for many, many years and I anticipate owning for many, many more years to come primarily because I like the food. But it's also a very well-run business. To that end, though, the stock has had a lacklester year to date, down about 15 percent as we've got new leadership in place there. We don't see it

all that often when they announce a new offering at Chipotle. It's every once in a while. But it's worth noting when they do it. And I just, I thought this was interesting news. They're bringing a new dip to its menu, Adobe Ranch, Ricky. It's the first new dip since the company introduced its Caso Blanco, and it will be available starting on June 17th. So I think it's just going to be something to watch and see how it's received. Typically, when they bring something new to the market, it's usually well received because it's

backed by a lot of data. They're not bad in a thousand, but pretty darn close. Now, I'm not much of a ranch guy myself, so I'm probably not going to be. to be trying this, but I do know that people love them some ranch. And so I think, you know, like I said, new leadership there in CEO Scott Boat, right? He's got some big shoes to Phil taken over for Brian Nicol. And bringing new things to market that sell are going to be very important. And this will be an early litmus test, I think. Dan, question about Chipotle, its ranch offerings, or a comment about Jason Moser's pronunciation of Caso Blanco. No comment there, Ricky. I am.

I am a Chipotle shareholder, and it's done very well for me, but I will say, I'll go on record and say that ranch is terrible, and people that have to dunk all their food and ranch have the palate of children and should be ashamed of themselves. Whoa. I mean, power ranking of condiments. There is ketchup number one, maybe a good mustard. Nice relish on a hot dog. Ranch can be there, and it doesn't have to be for everything and every time. But Jason, it is a nice offering when you go to Chipotle. Let's go to Matt before we get too deep into the argument.

Matt Argusinger, what you got this week? Ricky, I'm going with Whirlpool, ticker WHR, obviously leading appliance maker here in the U.S. So earlier this week, the Commerce Department announced that increased steel tariffs would also apply to consumer appliances, such as dishwashers, refrigerators, and washing machines. Guess who makes a lot of those here in the U.S. So under the new rule, imported home products will be taxed an additional 50% depending on how much steel they contain. So U.S. manufacturers like Whirlpool have long complained that Chinese and other foreign-made appliances have avoided tariffs on their products, which are often made with relatively inexpensive parts and cheap labor, making Whirlpool's products less competitive. This is a positive development if you're a Whirlpool shareholder. Dan, you were talking trash about this company before we started recording, but any questions or snarky remarks about Whirlpool? Well, I want to be honest with the listeners here, Ricky. When Matt brought this up as his radar stock today, I thought it was a hot tub company.

was about to disparage it because, come on, who's buying hot tubs in 2025? But now that he's mentioned that it doesn't make a hot tub, it actually makes important home appliances, maybe I'm thinking it's a good bet. 8% yield. 8% dividend yield roughly. That's good to watch for the dividend investor. Dan Boyd, what's going on your watch list this week? Well, I'm already a Chipotle shareholder, and I'm very happy with them. So I'll go with Ripple. A twist. That's going to do it for this week's Motley Full Money Radio show. I'm Ricky Mulvey. That's Jason Moser. Matt Argusinger. The show is mixed by Dan Boyd. Thanks for listening.