Motley Fool Money - Walmart Wins Bargain Games

Episode Date: August 15, 2024

The world’s largest retailer is crushing the market. (00:21) Asit Sharma and Ricky Mulvey discuss: - Walmart’s international growth and pricing power. - What broader retail sales data says about the economy. - The economic side effects of weight-loss drugs. Then, (16:39) Motley Fool Analyst Buck Hartzell joins Ricky to discuss Shift4, a payments company putting up impressive growth numbers. Companies discussed: WMT, COST, KR, WMS, LLY Article discussed: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2024-08-07/ozempic-boom-inside-usa-s-weight-loss-drug-capital?ref=biztoc.com Host: Ricky Mulvey Guests: Asit Sharma, Buck Hartzell Engineer: Dan Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This episode is brought to you by Indeed. Stop waiting around for the perfect candidate. Instead, use Indeed sponsored jobs to find the right people with the right skills fast. It's a simple way to make sure your listing is the first candidate C. According to Indeed data, sponsor jobs have four times more applicants than non-sponsored jobs. So go build your dream team today with Indeed. Get a $75 sponsor job credit at Indeed.com slash podcast. Terms and conditions apply.

Walmart's not seen. in a recession and you're listening to Motley Fool Money. I'm Ricky Mulvey, joined today by Asset Sharma. How are we doing? We're doing well, Ricky. I couldn't figure out if I should put the err at the end of that we or just keep it as we. We're doing well.

But I think we're doing well. We are doing well. Take the preposition out of it. This is a formal time. While many are softening their spend on things like travel and home improvement, shout out Home Depot. Walmart continues to win the bargain games. And they reported this morning.

I'll give you some highlights, and then you can pick from that menu of what interests you. Number one is we got a guidance raise. Wall Street's sure happy about that to almost 5% for the year. Previously, it was 4%. That's remarkable for such a large retailer. International sales are up 8% and that's about double the U.S. comp sales. We've also got general merchandise. So that's appliances and clothing at Walmart.

That grew after almost three years of declines. Anything in the report stand out to you? I think those international sales are pretty interesting because they're differently composed than the U.S. sales. Walmart's been investing around the globe and not just in the same type of formats it has here in the U.S. in the call CEO Douglas McMillan, Doug McMillan called out stuff like India's flip-cart operation, which is more like Amazon.com than it is Walmart. It's a big e-commerce operation over there. and phone pay in India, so P-H-O-N-E-P-E, which sort of means like on the phone or using the phone.

So that's a payments business. And then they talked about trends in China, like Sam's Club in China, which is like the US format, except for half of those sales, they're being digital because China is such an app-based society. So we're starting to see some of these investments around the globe payoff, and they're a little bit higher margin than the traditional Walmart operation. So that stuck out to me. And this may conflict with what I thought previously, but they're also seeing a lot of

the wealthier shoppers sort of trade down for Walmart. And maybe, Asit, that is a sign of at least maybe not a recession, but inflation really hurting people. One other note that I thought was interesting in the call is they're seeing pickup growing faster than in-store or club sales. Remember picking up from the grocery store during the pandemic. I thought everyone was going back in. I was a little surprised to see that trend continuing now in 2024. How about you? I don't think I'm as surprised. Also from the call, this is, again,

CEO Doug McMillan. Around the world, our customers and members continue to want four things. They want value. They want a broad assortment of items and services. They want a convenient and enjoyable experience buying them. And they want to do business with a company they trust. So, that third point there, Ricky, they want a convenient and enjoyable experience buying the merchandise. That really works well with the trends of delivery and pickup. The way Walmart is structured, as we all know, the floor space is huge. So getting around takes a lot of time.

If you're able to use the convenience factor of a pickup or delivery, you're going to do that in this day and age. That's a trend, I think, that's just going to keep growing post-pandemic. Fair enough. I keep thinking about the Walmart. produce aisles, which there is a high amount of variability in. I'm surprised to see so many customers continuing to trade off for that. You pay your money, you take your chances. You want convenience. Here's another part of this. Walmart, Costco, big companies, and they have solidly outperformed

the S&P 500 over the past 12 months. In that time, the S&P has returned 24%. Walmart is it about 40%. Costco, almost it's 60%. I'll throw Kroger in there as well as a shareholder. That's at just 11% underperforming. When you look at this trend, these grocery stores, some of them just really kicking the S&Ps. But what does that say to you? Does it say anything at all? To me, it shows the power of scale.

And yeah, I do talk about this a lot. But look at these returns, you're pointing out. So if you took a dollar bill, split it into pennies. You can't physically do that. But let's just start with 100 pennies. I'll put you on the spot, Ricky. Guess how many pennies both Walmart and Costco take home for every 100 pennies that they sell? Two.

In profit. You're very close. 2.8 something. I didn't look that up, by the way. Hey, I think you are just on fire today. That's pretty good. Better than I guessed actually when I looked this up. But here's the difference.

If you grow sales at 3 or 4 or 5%, you can work on your operating margin, you can do pretty well with huge numbers if you're selling in the hundreds of billions. Walmart increased its profits by about 500 million this quarter versus last quarter on just a little bit of top line growth. And investors start to appreciate that. If you've got a huge funnel, what comes out at the bottom can be significant if you are selling more than almost any other company in the planet. And so far, Walmart still sells more than any other company on this planet. And that's one reason it has is what you like to call pricing, power. Power.

But it's going in the other direction. CEO Doug McMill, you called him Douglas earlier. You're very much on your formality game today. Well, you told me that we were being formal. You split up my contraction. So I was like, all right, I better be on point here. CEO, Doug McMillan saying, quote, for the quarter, both Walmart U.S. and Sam's Club U.S. were slightly deflationary overall, end quote.

You very rarely hear CEOs bragging about how they are lowering prices. But in this case, do you think deflation is a good thing for the price? racing leader. Yeah, first of all, for the layperson, that just sounds so flat and sad. They were deflationary. But of course, what he's saying is we were able to lower prices, as you point out, so exercising pricing power in the other direction, not raising prices, but because of cost efficiencies, being able to lower them a bit to entice customers.

And I think this is good to a point. Just think of it as sort of like a rubber band when you've got a period of extended inflation. That pricing power is going to expand out, but the best retailers are going to let it collapse a little bit back to equilibrium when they feel like they're just at that sweet spot where they've enjoyed a little bit of the pricing power. They don't want to lose their customers, so they pull those prices back. I don't see them really decreasing too much beyond this unless there's a change in commodity prices, and they start heading significantly in the other direction.

Let's talk about retail as a whole because we got some retail sales data today, up 1% month over month. Now, a lot of that has to do with like large auto sales gain is a lot of dealerships could not sell cars in June due to the crowd strike outage. But we also got data just zooming out on the first seven months of the year. And that's where I want to focus because there's some interesting trends here. One is that restaurant spending is up 5% year over year. Non-store retailers like your your electronic stores. That's up almost 9%. But you also have furniture, home furnishing stores, which may be in the same category is Home Depot a little bit, down 6%. So restaurants, electronics, up, furniture down.

Are you seeing yourself in any of these spending trends? Or maybe the companies you own if we want to make it investing. Yeah. I mean, I can see a little bit of myself in here. That restaurant spend going up 5%. I do think I'm eating out a little bit more every year. I like to eat out. And I wonder if they're including the amount that we tip in those totals. Yeah, good point. It's some places which we weren't tipping before, maybe those of us who go to a local baker, just tipping a little bit. I think we've been trained during the pandemic, post-pandemic, to remember that that's

a local business. We should support it. And so I sort of don't think twice now. I know aggravates some people. You hit the button that they put it right in front of you these days. And it almost seems like I'm really not here for the service. I'm picking up a good. But if it is a local business, I say support it.

Now, off of that tangent, let's just hit one more of this. Combine those first two things you talked about. So furniture, home and furnishings down 6%, but non-store retailers, up almost 9%. I do think, again, there's some of that convenience factor going on there, but we'll point out there are certain companies that do a little bit of both of this. Take William Sonoma, for example. That's a company that I own, and they are a furniture, home furnishings company, and they also have a non-store retailer or big online commerce component. They're being able to have a buffer

in the fact that we're buying less of furnishings just by the fact they run this really great branded operation among multiple brands, and they execute very well. So that company has done extremely well over the last couple of years. Just to make a larger point here, Ricky, that you can, as a business, go against the grain, go against the trend if you're focused on your business and not always worried about where the customers, how the customer is going to react. You have to keep that in mind, but you have to put out just a very quality product and make sure from there you're executing on all aspects of the business. Well, and the interesting thing about William Sonoma is that is very much a luxury retailer.

So the people who are shopping at William Sonoma may not be feeling as much of the effects of inflation is those going to maybe, let's say some lower priced home furnishing. stores. I want to move to this excellent long-form article in Bloomberg Business Week. It's about Ozzympic. The title is what happens when Ozemic takes over your town, taking a look at Bowling Green, Kentucky, which now has, it's the highest concentration of people on weight loss drugs, 8.4% of the population, if you look at a very coastal city like Brooklyn, New York, we're looking at closer to 1%. And I said, the reason I'm so interested in this, one is because I'm an Eli Lilly shareholder. But number two is I'm in this place where I really think the

effects of these weight loss drugs are going to be really changed society. I think they're going to affect us in ways that we don't fully comprehend, but I also think there's so much investor hype around it that, you know, maybe I'm reconsidering that position. So within the article, it talks about some of the side effects for the economy, which is that med spot parking lots are fool. This is where people are getting compounded GLP1 medications. The local gyms are unsure if Ozembek is adding more customers to their business. And restaurants are full. When you look at this trend, which honestly might be the greatest marketing material that has ever existed for a company, which is someone you haven't seen in six months, you go, wow,

you've lost 50 pounds. What happened? I can't think of one better than that. What economic like side effects are you watching after I just delivered that word salad to you? So, one is, like, what are the follow-on effects on other businesses? And right now, there seem to be so many washes, so things bounce out against each other. You mentioned the fact that in this article, the businesses around town, especially the restaurants, really haven't dropped off. People are ordering a little less, but they still want this social experience. I'm also just thinking about what it means for consumer goods companies who, who, have to adapt to this. The article mentions grocery stores. I believe Kroger is mentioned in the

article as an example of a company that's adapted to potentially lower sales. I mean, Walmart, we talked about Walmart earlier in the segment. They mentioned GLP1 drugs a few quarters ago as a potential headwin on their business. So they're fighting back now. All these big grocers are mentioning in their calls that, look, we're selling more of these drugs in our pharmacies. So, wherever you look in society, except for maybe, I don't know, some smaller gyms, perhaps, it seems like the effects are that you buy the drug, you lose weight, you really don't change your habits. This is quite interesting when you think about the opposition between industries. So you have one industry, the consumer goods industry, that provides a lot of packaged snacks and drinks.

Great line in the articles, the part of the Kroger Pharmacy, which is actually counseling people to take these drugs, is blocked off from view by a Mountain Dew display. So this is what the package good industry wants. They want to still be able to sell their stuff, even though people have decreased appetite. And so far, there doesn't seem to be a particularly down-draft effect on that industry. So just how things are being held in opposition is really strange to me. But go ahead. You had a follow-up question on this.

Yeah, I want to talk about the hype because there's the weight loss elements and they're finding more potential uses for this. And I want to be careful how I phrase it. There are some studies that suggest that these GLP1 drugs may be helpful for things like potentially slowing Alzheimer's disease for some addictive behaviors such as smoking and maybe drinking where, you know, it's maybe not stopping folks who are drinking completely, but maybe they're stopping after one beer. Goldman Sachs estimates GLP-1s to be a $130 billion annual market. So let's set that aside. So we have a $130 billion annual market. Now, the price for the market cap for Eli Lilly has exploded over the past few years from about $250 billion to almost $900 billion. That's a lot. So I think is all of this hype and then some priced in?

It's hard to say. And I think as an investor, the best advice I can give to newer investors who are seeing this type of thing, maybe for the first time, like you have a big trend, a lot of capital flowing into it, results on the ground, which has more money flowing in. And then the hype factor is to just be a little careful. Don't overload in a particular vehicle. So in this case, don't overload in a particular pharmaceutical company. But I do like the idea of maybe spreading your bets around, it's a regulated industry. So we don't know what the long-term effects are going to be on this class of drugs. So far, it looks promising for weight loss, and there's very interesting preliminary indications. As you mentioned, for all types of disease states,

that doesn't mean that a risk out of the blue can surface in a few years. So you want to just follow along if you're very interested in this. There are already some thematic ETSs. I would advise they're not very liquid right now, and they tend to concentrate in a couple names like Eli Lilly. But as an investor, you can do your own homework and maybe put together a small basket of companies. So my best answer to you, Ricky, is I really can't tell you how much is hyperpriced in because the R&D is still pouring into this idea and commercialization is going to take a few years. So I hope we can just sort of return to this every few months and exchange ideas on what we're seeing. Yeah, something Tim Byers has said is that for something transformational, we often

overestimate the effects in the short term and underestimate the effects in the long term. I think that's a good place to end it. Asa Sharma, appreciate you being here. Thank you for your time and your insight. Thanks a lot, Ricky. This was fun. All right. Next week, a lot of the Motley Full Money Crew is going to be at the podcast movement convention. So if you're attending, in Washington, D.C. Come say, hey, if you'll be there, we'd love to chat. All right, up next, Motley Fool analyst Buck Hartsell joins me to discuss Shift 4, a payment processor playing in one similar sandbox is Toast with a wild mind leading its way. We've talked about the restaurant payment processor Toast on the show quite a bit. It's capturing a lot of investor attention,

but we haven't talked about one of its primary competitors as much. It's called Shift 4, which plays in a similar vertical, but also some others. So Buck, let's differentiate these companies a little bit. Who are the customers that Shift 4 is going after with their payment processing solutions? Yeah, I mean, there is some overlap between them and toast, as you say. And I'd say, that's mostly in the restaurant vertical, Ricky, when you look at it. And so I'd say, if you look at Shift 4, though, they're a diversified business. So I'd say about a third of their business is coming from restaurants. And when I say restaurants, that's, that's a lot of a big kind of term. It's mostly table service places. It's not quick service or fast food

restaurants or the coffee shops or bakeries. Those are kind of different people play there. But they're in the table service restaurant. It's about a third. Then you have hotels, which was their second place that they moved into. And then the third kind of vertical, which is really just evolving right in front of our eyes here, is in stadiums. So you see stadiums and events. And I would also kind of throw in their specialty kind of retail stuff as well. So about a third and third third. One of the most difficult things with, I think, is a retail investor judging any of these payment processing companies is figuring out how they're different from other ones. So like if I'm a restaurant or a hotel, why would I go with a shift four versus a, I mean, not just toast, but block ad, any of these other payment processing companies.

Yeah, you mentioned there's some big ones. And I'd say particularly in the in the restaurant space, that is like super competitive and super. for cutthroat. And that's originally where these guys shift for cut their teeth. And their area of that, like I said, table serves, they've done really well. But what you look at as somebody who buys it is something, well, you want total liver cost. So you want a low cost product that allows mobile ordering and all the different stuff that you see now at restaurants where you used to be able to like, you have to give your credit card to somebody. You hope they don't copy down the number when they take it in the back. And some magic happens they charge it. Now you can do it.

right at the table. And for some of these stadiums, they obviously are doing ticketing. That's a huge deal for shift four, but also mobile ordering and all that stuff where you can just kind of order right from your seat and do all that stuff. So they have SkyTab is what their point of sale solution is called. It's a cloud-based system that also you have a little tablet or whatever else. You can also do mobile ordering from there. That's their solution. So it's a technology solution. It's a low-cost product that basically, I'll put it in Tim Byers way, it solves a lot of problems for people who run restaurants and venues. Something that investors have sort of dinged Shift 4 for, and I don't know if it's fairly

or unfairly, is the company's acquisitiveness. Yeah. I don't have an opinion on it. So just to set the table, how does this company use acquisitions? Yeah, so I'm going to change. I'm going to reframe that a little bit. I'd say, first of all, at that, at the first of all, at the company, so just to set the table, so just The Motley Fool, and I'd say myself in general, I can't speak for everybody, but I think generally

the research has shown that acquisitive companies can, it's difficult. It's difficult to make acquisitions well. But, so we're skeptical, I think, at the outset. But what we see here was Schafore as a company that was founded by Jerich Isaacman, literally in his parents' basement when he was 16 or so years old. So he's been running this for a few decades now and growing the business. And what they've seen is that you can kind of hire a whole bunch of salespeople, load them up with stock comp and incentives and different things, then go in and be competitive and try and win over restaurants and venues, or you can go out and buy competitors,

and by definition, you get their customers. And they've done the latter, so they've done acquisitions, they've done them very well. And what I've seen is people that do acquisitions well, they're rare. But the ones that are good at it can create a, ton of value. And one of the things that I think, there's a few things that they do differently than the typical acquisitive company. But one of them is they don't do auctions, so they're not doing bidding wars against bank. They proprietarily source their acquisitions. And what they do is

they come in and they buy them, and then they basically blow up the business model. So the companies that they acquire may have a lot of one-time, one-off revenues, selling hardware, or selling software once or doing whatever else. They come in and they basically, You remake their business model. They introduce them to SkyTab. They get those customers over there. They cross-sell them other products. And then what you see is over time, there's a high proportion of recurring revenue.

So it's a much higher quality base. At the beginning, it'll go down their revenues, and then they come up. And in the recent conference call, they gave two examples of those where, you know, one, they raised the revenue from that company sevenfold after they acquired it. But, of course, it had to go through this down period and convert their customers over. So they're one that is a serial acquire, and I don't think that's a bad thing. And we notice when you look at the financials of this business, they haven't diluted shareholders very much, on average, about 2% a year.

And that's really good. So all the benefits of those acquisitions, first of all, they've proven they can do them at good prices. They've proven they can run them better. And then most of the value has accrued to shareholders because they haven't just paid any price and gone out there in auctions and given lots of stock. away in order to do them. But payments is a scale business. So you can organically go out and win people and win them over, or you can acquire them. They've done more of the acquiring

side, and it's worked out wonderfully well. So I don't make a distinction. It looks a lot like a customer acquisition strategy than sort of bolt on acquisitions. Exactly. You mentioned the verticals. Is there one, you know, stadiums, hotels, now they're in gaming, casinos, sports betting, that kind of thing. I think the CEO, Jared Isaacman, was the first person to make a sports bet from space when he was flying over Las Vegas. Restaurants, which is kind of what they started with. Is there any of these that are particularly interesting to you as an investor following this company? Well, they're all interesting. But I think the one that's given investors of nice opportunity shares at an attractive price has really been the larger clients around stadiums and those types of

venues. Because what you see, even when you announce a deal with them, the load times are much longer. So let's say you buy a, get a stadium, is a big European soccer stadium. Well, it's the end of the season. So you have to wait till next year to onboard those until you see any benefits from the acquisition, and not acquisition, but the new customer. And then the other thing you see with these large kind of venue stadium deals is the margins are much thinner than what you'd have if you sold a mom pop a restaurant down the street, right? So these are big deals with a lot of volume. And so margins get hit a little bit, and that's fine. They're still going to make plenty of money on these. And obviously, the first move into those stadiums is doing concessions and that kind of stuff.

But then they've had a lot of success winning over ticketing, which is a much larger number in selling all the season ticket holders and all that kind of stuff. So anyhow, I'd say stadiums for me is really impressive, and the amount of new folks that they have coming over from there is pretty immense. There's been a couple of signals from the company over the past, we'll say, past couple of years that have been interesting. Last year, the CEO, Jared Isaacman, told investors that the company was undergoing a strategic review.

This usually means that the company wants to go private. He mentioned being public is a bit of a distraction. And earlier this year, Bloomberg reported that Isaacman said the buyout offers just didn't adequately value the business, not that it's no longer for sale. And now you're also seeing Isaacman buying up stock on the open market. What do you see these signals meaning for Shift 4's retail investors? So originally, when I heard the term strategic review, it scared me, to be honest with you. Nuvei is a company in this same space that's had some similar things go on, and they elected to go private. And unfortunately, what that meant for passive shareholders like myself was we had to sell out a kind of a bargain while the insiders kept their shares, right?

And so that's like the worst of all outcomes. You know, like the stock has some volatility on the downside, and then they go private, and then you have to sell out. and maybe they come back to the public markets later at a higher price. But refreshingly, what Isaacman said, Shafour was he's not going to do that. He's perfectly aligned with other shareholders. And he basically said, we're a nuisance in the industry. And you know what? You can buy us out, but you're going to have to pay up for it.

And I'm fine with that. I'm fine with that as a shareholder. So I think the good news on that strategic review front is they're not selling the company out from us or forcing us to sell it at a bargain price while inside its keep shares. And they also said, hey, at the right price, they're growing at a huge rate, that if they get a price that's reflected, they'll go away, right? And so I'm okay with that. Isaacman doesn't think the open market's giving his stock a proper price, considering he's buying up shares. Yeah. Well, and I would say he's done in the past several forward contracts

where he's basically taken some cash up front, but kept his voting right in those shares. and he's gifted some of that to charitable organizations, but he keeps his voting rights. So I think, and there's kind of caps on that, so he kind of keeps the upside when he gets cash out, but he still gets his voting rights. And so he's done some things where it shows that he believes there's upside in the stock, right, and certainly buying stock on the open market, which I think he did recently at around $67 a share, and it's at $75 today. The other thing I'd say is they buy back stock, too.

So they bought back some in the quarter. They bought back some since they've been public, and they've done it at attractive rates. CEO, Jared Isaacman, definitely sort of has beef with the valuation saying on the latest earnings call, quote, if we were simply known as the toast of hotels and stadiums, we'd probably be more appropriately valued, end quote. This is a company, while it's been around for decades, it still has impressive revenue earnings, free cash flow growth, it's raised guidance. but if you look at the earnings price tag, it doesn't look like a growth stock. So what isn't the market buying about shift force growth story? I think Isaacman's part of that, to be honest with you.

We haven't really talked about him, but he's a colorful character. He flies around in airplanes, but not just airplanes, jets, he's been in space. And to credit to them, I think since they've gone public, and they've been public for 17 quarters now. They've bought back 6.5 million shares at an average price of 54. It's $75 stock right now. So it's not just Isaacman buying on the open market, but the company has bought back shares, and they can do that because they have a history of positive free cash flow and generating profits, which I think a lot of the technology startups have not prioritized cash flow in the way that Shift 4 has. So I'd say what I've learned over many years of kind of investing. If you look at people that are founders, that are visionary folks,

they're not cut from the normal cloth. And Isaac Smith's not either. And so I think he's a little bit of a lightning rod for some folks. But I'd say, I've learned, like, you don't found the company at 16 in your parents' basis. None of us have done that. You don't build it over decades to be a multi-billion dollar company with plenty of critics along the way and question. question marks, it is hard to do. Like, you need to be a special person. And those people are usually optimists. So I think when they look at their business and they know it, they've run it for a long time, they usually can recognize when the market is saying, hey, we don't think you can go this way. Just because you go through acquisition, that's not going to work. And I would say,

arguably, we're coming into a time where it's a much better time to be an acquisitive company. You know, we went through the time with zero percent interest rates where valuations and multiples were sky high. And Shift 4 did fine, by the way. But guess what? Now we're in a part where interest rates are much higher. And some of those firms didn't operate nearly as profitably. And their access to capital is not that great.

So it's a wonderful time for Shift 4 to be coming in and buying some of these companies. Morgan Housel would call him a wild mind. And often with that, you get both sides. of a coin and you don't get one without the other. Yeah. I think that's a good place to end it. Buck Hartzl, appreciate your time and your insight on this. You're welcome.

Thank you very much. As always, people on the program may have interests in the stocks they talk about, and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell anything based solely on what you hear. I'm Ricky Mulvey. Thanks for listening. We'll be back tomorrow.