Motley Fool Money - Why Income Investors Should Look Beyond Index Funds

Episode Date: November 2, 2025

Should investors take stock in preferred stock? Motley Fool analysts Matt Argersinger and Anthony Schiavone talk with Infrastructure Capital Advisors CEO Jay Hatfield about preferred stocks and why income investors should look beyond index funds. Host: Matt Argersinger, Anthony Schiavone  Producer: Bart Shannon, Mac Greer Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. The Motley Fool and its affiliates (collectively, "TMF") do not endorse, recommend, or verify the accuracy or completeness of the statements made within advertisements. TMF is not involved in the offer, sale, or solicitation of any securities advertised herein and makes no representations regarding the suitability, or risks associated with any investment opportunity presented. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with legal, tax, and financial advisors before making any investment decisions. TMF assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages arising from this advertisement. We’re committed to transparency: All personal opinions in advertisements from Fools are their own. The product advertised in this episode was loaned to TMF and was returned after a test period or the product advertised in this episode was purchased by TMF. Advertiser has paid for the sponsorship of this episode Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

They're high-quality companies that are public, that issue securities that are senior to common, so they get paid first, so they have way less risk than the common of the same company. But yet, they have very good yields, which usually results in very good total return. That was Infrastructure Capital Advisor CEO Jay Hatfield talking about the advantages of preferred stocks. I'm Motley Full producer Mac Greer. Now Motley Fool analyst Matt Argersinger and Anthony Chavone recently talked with Hatfield about preferred stocks and about why income investors should look beyond index funds. Fools, we are so delighted to have the opportunity to speak to Jay Hatfield, the CEO and founder of Infrastructure Capital Advisors.

He heads up the firm's research, strategy, and trading and manages several of the firm's funds, including the Vertis Infra Cap U.S. preferred stock ETF, the tickers PFF, which is a recent recommendation of our ultimate income service here at the Motley Fool. Jay has three decades of experience in the securities and investment industries, including as a portfolio manager at SAC Capital. He also has extensive research and experience and investment banking and played a key role in the formation of NGL Energy Partners, a publicly traded master limited partnership. Jay, thanks for giving the Motley Fool some of your time today. Thanks, Matt. It's great to be on. All right. Well, before we get to know more about you and infrastructure capital advisors, I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about preferred equities in general, because it's not an asset class that I think the vast majority of our Motley Fool members or readers have experience with. What are, in your mind, some of the big advantages of investing in preferred stocks and why is an area of the market than investors should probably pay more attention to? Well, there's really two critical advantages of preferred stocks.

The first is that they're high-quality companies that are public, that issue securities that are senior to common, so they get paid first. So they have way less risk than the common of the same company. But yet, they have very good yields, which usually results in very good total return. So a lot of the yields are $7.89, like our fund yields around nine right now. And so you get returns, potential returns, that are competitive with the market, probably below the market. The market usually does 10-11. If you're all in tech stocks, you might do 15 or 20.

But with way less risks, they're about 40% as volatile as the market. The default rate has been extremely low, about 0.6% a year. So you really retain both of that 8%. So it's a good way to have kind of a baseload, even if you have some. speculative stocks where you know you get paid, you get paid every month, and then you can recycle that money either into other stocks or buy more. It's really a great asset class of public companies, and then we only invest in preferred that are listed, so they're easier for us to trade, there's less friction, and we usually

do it in a way where we don't have to pay substantial commissions. So a really efficient asset class that I would recommend. You can do it yourself, so a lot of work. It's hard to build a diversified portfolio. It should be diversified with fixed income, not necessarily with stocks, but with fixed income. Since they have limited upside, there's no real advantage to concentration. So, Jay, kind of on that point, like, investors have many choices to generate income today.

You can look at dividend paying stocks, investment grade bonds, high yield bonds, real estate, plenty of other income producing securities out there. So what are some of the benefits of preferred equity compared to some of those other income producing alternatives? Well, the way to think about it is they're very similar to high yield bonds. They have lower default rates, but similar yields. So probably in a long run, they'll have better returns. And they do well.

So both high yield bonds and we have a high yield bond fund, BNDS, do well when the stock market's stable to rising and rates are stable to dropping. And so that's, we're in an ideal market for higher risk bonds. For investment grade bonds, so there's a competing fund, BND, that's run by Vanguard, that is investment grade, but they're only yielding four, and they only benefit when the bond, when yields drop, and we think yields are going to drop a little but not a lot. So you can get better total returns when we're coming out of a tightening cycle because the Fed causes all recessions, fed's loosening now. And so when the Fed's loosening, you want to have higher risk fixed income, not lower risk fixed income. The old adage goes, it isn't what you say,

it's how you say it, because to truly make an impact, you need to set an example and take the lead. You have to adapt to whatever comes your way. When you're that driven, you drive an equally determined vehicle, the Range Rover Sport. The Range Rover Sport blends power, poise, and performance. Its design is distinctly British and free from unnecessary details, allowing its raw agility to shine through. It combines a dynamic sporting personality with elegance to deliver a truly instinctive drive. Inside, you'll find true modern luxury with the latest innovations in comfort. Use the cabin air purification system alongside active noise cancellation for all new levels of quality and quiet. Whether you prefer a choice of powerful engines or the plug-in hybrid with an estimated range of 53 miles, there's an option for

you. With seven terrain modes to choose from, terrain response two fine-tuned your vehicle for the roads ahead. The Range Rover event is on now. Explore enhance offers atrangerover.com. Well, let's talk about then the Vertus InfraCap US Preferred Stock ETF. PFF is the ticker. As I mentioned, we recently recommended the fund in one of our portfolio services here at the full. what is the primary strategy of the PFFA fund? And I'd love to know how it differs from other preferred equity ETFs that exist in the market. One example, of course, being PFF, which is the I-Share preferred in income securities ETF. It has a very similar ticker to PFFA. But I will point out that your fund, PFFA, has handily outperformed that fund. In fact, more than doubled its return since inception in 2018.

How you've been able to do that? And what are the key differences? Well, you know, I'm sure your listeners and viewers have, you know, heard from companies like Vanguard that it can be better to be passive when you're buying mutual funds or ETFs. But that only holds true for equities and not fixed income. And the reason for that is with equities, they're cap-waded, and that can be great. Because when you're cap-waded, you tend to get the best stocks and you get momentum, which is wonderful. But with fixing gum, you're doing the opposite of what you should do because these securities are callable apart. So if they're up, then you want to actually sell them, not buy them. And all these large index funds, 70% of the market, PFF is the biggest, are in fact

index funds. So they buy high and sell low. And like I said, that actually can work in the stock market because you get more NVIDIA and get more of the high-flying stocks. But it's a terrible idea. So we manage, we're actively managing call risk was really what I was talking about. So they're doing the opposite. But when security goes above par, we start selling it. Usually the index funds, because they don't have any smart beta rules. And when they get inflows, their market makers just go and buy the securities and we can sell

to them, or if they're rebalancing, which they do every month. We also manage interest rate risk, so we have less interest rate risk when the Fed was tightening because we correctly forecasted that inflation was going to not just rise, but skyrocket. And so we anticipated that. And, of course, we're constantly managing credit risk. You don't want to be in weak preferred stock credits because they don't do well if there is a bankruptcy, so you want to sell them. And then finally, we can do new issue, so participate in new issues. The index funds cannot. They get listed and typically all the index funds and bid up those securities.

And we start selling to them because they're good companies and they're liquid. So we start selling to them at higher prices. So we're able to get significant games without taking a lot significant risk, whereas the index funds cannot do that. That's interesting. I can imagine a lot of investors, retail investors in particular don't know that. But what you're saying is it's actually in the bond and fixed income world and in the preferred equity world, it sounds like active management is what you want to be following. It's really critical. Like I said, you can go look. There's listings and barons and other sources, maybe on Motley Fool for preferred stocks. But you also have to do a lot of analytics because you can say, oh my gosh, this is great. You know, there's a Ford preferred trading at a nine yield, but you don't realize it's trading at 26, callable at 25, and it's going to get called any time, or it might already been called.

So you do have to do a lot of work. You don't want to be in low quality credits, got to manage the interest rate risk. If you can do it yourself, but it's simpler. Like, I don't do it in either my personal account. I have levered PFFA in my personal account. IRA's 60%, 65% PFFA. And the reason for that is that I don't want 200 preferred stocks in my IRA. It's just it would be an unbelievable mess. It's not worth it for me to go in and manage each security and say, oh, well, I have a thousand shares of this preferred and is trading at 2550 and I'll sell it. Like, I don't have time to do that.

I have to, of course, manage PFFA. even for anybody. That's just like, it's not really worth their time. Like, it's, if you have a diversified portfolio, it prefers why bother. But for us, we have hundreds of thousands of shares, and we have institutional trading techniques to, you know, take advantage of that. So there's economies of scale for having an UTF managed, you know, by people like us where it's absolutely worth their time to worry about whether you sell it at 2550 or 25 and a quarter or 2575.75. So a unique situation where, like I said, perfectly reasonable to go buy your own stocks, do your own work, but way simple or buy an ETF that's just an index fund.

But harder to do it yourself on preferreds and bonds. Bonds aren't usually listed and can create a big distraction in your portfolio when you should be worrying about selling Tesla at 475. you're staring at all these preferreds moving around by five cents every day. I guess we'll wrap up here with two more sort of questions on the economy. So I'm curious of any thoughts on the massive KAPX boom that we are currently seeing and the potential implications for real assets. Like when I look at big tech and the the MAG seven companies,

these have historically been asset-like businesses that's almost exclusively invested in the digital world. But now those same companies are investing hundreds of billions into the physical world. So I'm curious if you have any thoughts on how this CapEx boom kind of impacts physical assets, like real estate, energy, and some other old economy stocks. Well, I guess my reaction would be, thank God, because, you know, the normal cycle, so the Fed raises rates, of course, the tenure goes up as well, usually about 100 over whatever the Fed raises it to. And then housing and construction crater, which they have.

And you can get that data on our website. I mean, it's on, that's just public data, but we summarize it for you in a slide on our website. So the old economy, so construction and housing are in recession. So over the last year, those investment categories have dropped. And by the way, investment drops create all recessions. But intellectual property, aka AI investment and equipment, which a lot of that's semiconductor, and also could be data centers and could be power, is actually pretty strong.

And so those two kind of cancel each other out, and we have modest growth. We think next year will be really good. But so we agree with you 100%, because we are around for the Internet boom. And it completely busted. Investment went down, but it was really, as you're pointing out,

just some laptops and a bunch of tech engineers, so it didn't really have that big, an impact on the economy at a very shallow recession, 0.6%, because it didn't impact data centers and chips and all these other categories. So we might get a cycle in the future. It's not housing driven, but solely driven by a cycle in tech because it is kind of impacting the whole economy, not just software and laptops and tech engineers. These days, I'm all about quality over quantity, especially in my closet. If it's not well-made and versatile, it's just not worth it. That's honestly what I love Quince. The fabrics feel elevated, the cuts are thoughtful, and the pricing actually

makes sense. Quince makes high-quality wardrobe staples using premium fabrics like 100% European linen, silk and organic cotton poplin. They work directly with safe ethical factories and cut out the middlemen, so you aren't paying for brand markups or fancy stores, just quality clothing. Everything they make is built to hold up season after season and is consistently rated 4.5 five stars by thousands of real people like me who wear their clothes every day. The Quince, Mongolian Kashmir Cajmere Cure Neck sweater may be the most comfortable one that I own. It's light, soft, and it was a lot more affordable than you think quality cashmere would be. Stop waiting to build a wardrobe you actually want. Right now, go to quince.com slash Motley for free shipping

and 365-day returns. That's a full year to wear it and love it. And you will. Now available in Canada, too. Don't keep settling for clothes that don't last. Go to Q-I-N-C-E-com slash Motley for free shipping and 365-day returns. Quince.com slash Motley. Just to follow up in a recent interview, you briefly mentioned something about what you referred to as the Hatfield rule as for the relates to home building and the economy. Can you just briefly explain to us like what is the Hatfield rule?

Because I think it's essentially a concept, especially considering the current city of the housing market. Right. So that also is meant to be slightly amusing because there's a thing called the Psalm rule, which is when employment rises quickly over six months. So we thought, you know, it's a free country, so we'll come up with our own role. But if you really look historically, as I mentioned, all recessions don't come from the consumer. So everybody's wrong about that. Everybody on television is ringing their hands about the consumer.

Actually, it comes from drop in investment. And 12 out of 13 post-World War II recessions were caused by housing declines. And if you draw a line, we have a chart that shows this. You can see, that once we go below 1.1 million, we do have a recession. And that was obviously the key driver in 2008, but it's been the key driver, every recession, except that 2001 recession, global rates are dropping, so housing hung in pretty well, and all the drop was in the tech categories, but it was an extremely mild recession. So it is critical. So if you buy into our methodology of focusing on my supply, which is the Fed and oil, then the way, though, you need to also assess what's happening is look at the housing market. And that's why we had to call

all year long that the Fed would cut three times because we thought that the housing market was going to slow and then the labor market was slow. We looked like we were wrong for a while because the BLS takes a long time to figure out when the employment market's declining. So if you just have those three components. The Fed is the most important. And then housing, we're really just two. You can predict the inflation and economy nearly perfectly. You just have to make sure, of course, oil's not going to infinity. But that's not going to reoccur unless we have wage and price controls. Everybody kind of forgets. Oil was capped at 10 bucks a barrel. World price was 40. Our production went to near zero, and that made the oil crisis way worse. So,

not likely to occur in the future on the oil side. So what's the Fed in housing? You don't need to listen to me pontificate. You could do it yourself and make your own forecasts. And we've been doing that since the pandemic. And like I said, historically it's been very accurate and strongly. If anybody cares about macro, which you should, if you're an investor. Watch the money supply.

Easier use the base. It comes out every Thursday or look on our website. We keep track of it. I've been keeping track of it for 45 short years ever since I studied monetarism in college, and it's kept me out of trouble. If you followed that, you would have been able to predict every recession, really. Well, Jay, thanks again for giving The Motley Fool some of your time today. I know this is going to be really helpful, not only to our members that own PFFA

or are already interested in preferred equity, but we have a large member base who would probably never explore the asset class. and so I think they're going to find this super, super interesting. Thank you so much. Great. Thanks, Matt, Anthony. Great questions. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about, and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for her against.

So don't buy ourselves stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motleyful editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. For the Motley Full Money team, I'm Matt Greer. Thanks for listening and we will see you tomorrow.