Motley Fool Money - Would You Buy the SpaceX IPO?

Episode Date: December 15, 2025

Bloomberg and Reuters are now both reporting that SpaceX plans to go public in 2026 at a valuation that could reach $1.5 trillion, making it the biggest IPO of all time. Would you buy the SpaceX IPO? Leave a comment to let us know. Rick Munarriz, Karl Thiel, and Tim Beyers: - Talk about the prospective SpaceX IPO. - Debate the company’s status as a Rule Breaker. - Make a call on whether we’d buy the SpaceX IPO. - Answer listener Mindset questions! Companies discussed: RKLB, SpaceX Host: Tim Beyers Guests: Rick Munarriz, Karl Thiel Producer: Anand Chokkavelu Engineer: Annie Pope, Dan Boyd Disclosure: Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. The Motley Fool and its affiliates (collectively, “TMF”) do not endorse, recommend, or verify the accuracy or completeness of the statements made within advertisements. TMF is not involved in the offer, sale, or solicitation of any securities advertised herein and makes no representations regarding the suitability, or risks associated with any investment opportunity presented. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with legal, tax, and financial advisors before making any investment decisions. TMF assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages arising from this advertisement. We’re committed to transparency: All personal opinions in advertisements from Fools are their own. The product advertised in this episode was loaned to TMF and was returned after a test period or the product advertised in this episode was purchased by TMF. Advertiser has paid for the sponsorship of this episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Would you buy the SpaceX IPO? You're listening to Motley Fool Money. Welcome, Fools. I'm your host, Tim Byers, and with me our two old friends and teammates, Rick Minarez and Carl Teal. We've been on rule breakers together. Guys, give it a couple more years, and our tenure on rule breakers will be retirement age. That's real. Should we be signing up for AARP? I don't know. But we're looking at the youth today. So I hope you're fully caffeinated because we got to talk about. SpaceX here in the prospective IPO. Bloomberg has reported that the company could go public at a $1.5 trillion valuation. We'll talk a bit more about that report and then answer some mindset

questions you sent us. But first, we need to start with the SpaceX news. So let's quickly review what we've heard. But I'm going to start with a question for each of you before I give you some data. What do you know about SpaceX? Carl, I'll start with you. What do you think this thing is? So, SpaceX is obviously closely associated with Elon Musk. You know, certainly gets a lot of publicity for its rocket launches. Sometimes they go great, sometimes not so much, but they certainly capture a lot of attention. What maybe isn't quite as widely known is that about 17, 80% of SpaceX's revenue comes from Starlink, and Starlink is the network of satellites that allows people to essentially make an internet connection, even when they are not near the

infrastructure that usually allows that to happen here on firm Earth. Yeah, it's satellite internet. Rick, how about you? What's your indelible memory of SpaceX? Yeah, again, you think of a spaceship. because that's what we see in the news. But Starlink is up to 8, 8 plus million subscribers now. It's just like a million just a few years ago. So it's a fast-growing global telecom platform. So that's definitely a viable part of the story. The whole space part of it, yeah, there's payload to take up there.

But frankly, I'm not 100% sold on the whole throwing AI data centers up into space or or colonizing Mars when there's no beachfront property. Tim, there's no beachfront property in Mars. I think you need to know that right from the get-go. So my travel agent lied to me. So, but, you know, but, you Yeah, it is a very wide, varied companies with a lot of optionality, surprisingly enough, but it's not just this one-dimensional company that's just we launch spaceships into skies, and that's it. Let's talk a little bit more about what this is. The closest comparable from a public market perspective, I think would probably be Rocket Lab.

And Rocket Lab is, you know, ticker RKLB, is a much smaller company at a market cap of just about 30.3, billion as of this recording. SpaceX wants to go public if Bloomberg is to be believed at a market cab of $1.5 trillion, trillion with a T. That would be the biggest of all time, raising somewhere over $30 billion. There are three pieces to this business. And the most interesting one to me, you both mentioned the rocket launches. So they do launches for NASA. For example, they do a lot of payloads, they get satellites up into space, they get paid for that. They get paid for Starlink, satellite internet. But the thing that's most interesting to me, and I'm going to have a follow-up question about this for each of you, is this idea of the spaceship. The spaceship,

which is you go up, you launch, and then you come back down and you land, and you have a reusable rocket. That is not something we have had in rocket science ever. Like, everybody's working on this. SpaceX is working on this. We hope that, you know, at least a couple, Blue Origin is a competitor that's also working on this. But presumably, SpaceX thinks they can do this, that they can take down. I'm just looking at a number here, which I found somewhat remarkable that the payload launch cost is somewhere around, I believe it is $1,500. Yeah, here it is. I said spaceship. It's starship. I got that wrong. Apologies. $1,500 per kilogram for payload. If you have a reusable rocket, if you have a reusable starship, they believe they could get that down to less than $100 per kilogram. That's insane. That's some serious economic power here. So given that, Rick, I'll start with you. SpaceX. This is a big IPO, but is it a rule breaker? If it can achieve that, of course. I mean, the whole Starship formerly known as Jefferson Airplane,

if Starship can actually get this to happen, obviously the cost dynamics of everything and the fact that everything is reusable, it's a game changer, of course. But again, saying you want to get there and being able to actually prove you can do it are two different things. But yeah, it definitely would be a game changer. And it's how quickly can the competition catch up? Not that there are that many competitors doing this anyway. But yeah, I'm still skeptical, but definitely an interesting wrinkle. And again, you know, turning this ceiling into, you know, a retractable roof sometimes. Right, right.

Carl, let me give you some numbers. And then the same question. So this is, I pulled these numbers. Bear in mind, this came from Gemini. So let's not call it perfect. These are estimates. But the sourcing that Gemini gives me is that in 2020, SpaceX had $1.4 billion in revenue and net loss and a private market valuation of $44 billion. As of this year, the estimate is for $15.5 billion, so five years later, $1.4 billion to $15.5 billion, positive cash flow, and an $800 billion private market valuation.

want to go public at about double that private market valuation. So same thing now. That's, presuming that scale is roughly right, is SpaceX a rule breaker? SpaceX is sort of synonymous with breaking the rules. I mean, the idea of a reusable rocket is a massively rule-breaking idea. It's obviously disrupted its industry. I don't think we're really going back in the foreseeable future to sort of government-funded, completely government-sponsored space program. So in that sense, it's absolutely a rule breaker. That does not mean I'm necessarily interested in the IPO. I mean, you mentioned $15 billion in revenue. A $1.5 trillion valuation on IPO would mean that they're trading at 100 times sales. I don't think that there's anything remotely

in the company as it exists today that justifies that. I don't even think that if you take the current trends and project them forward linearly, it justifies that. To justify that, you need to see a meaningful acceleration of a number of trends, which means that you need to be betting that things that have not happened are going to happen. And they become increasingly riskier. I mean, the one big thing is that Starship needs to work. And Starship is the fully reusable rocket, right? So Falcon 9, which is, you know, commercially used, is partially reusable. Starship is supposed to be entirely reusable.

And if that happens, it's a game. I mean, the two things about Starship is, you know, one, it's entirely reusable. And two, it's absolutely massive, can carry a huge payload and critically can carry satellites into space that currently cannot be carried by Falcon 9. So that becomes a game changer for the company. Can SpaceX do that? I believe they can. I mean, this isn't just on paper.

This is actually being tested. I mean, it's not sort of fully ready for prime time, but they've had some successful tests with Starship. And so I believe they can get to that part of it in all likelihood. And that itself is kind of a game changer. The second part, though, really involves taking Star-Larling. link to a new level that I have some doubts about. And we can talk about that further, Tim. Maybe you can talk about this in your answer, because the final question on this, and I'll

give you a lead-up to this, Rick. So Carl said 100-time sales. Now, that would be 100 times 2025 sales, but the projected revenue for 2026, the target date for the SpaceX IPO would be like summer 2026, and the implied revenue growth from what I'm seeing here. Again, these are Gemini estimates pulled from different sources between $22 and $23 billion in annualized revenue. So about 65x forward sales. So there's your multiple. Here we know we've talked about the business. Are you a buyer of the SpaceX IPO, Rick? And this multiple is just for Starlink? Or you're talking about Starlink and everything else that's there. That is all of SpaceX.

Yeah, all of SpaceX. So, yeah, I mean, I'm hesitant to say yes, at a $1.5 trillion valuation, because paying 65 times for a global telecom company is not something very smart. But again, it's all these unknown variables, again, that the story will change over time. And we see this even with Musselt Tesla company. The stock has pretty much doubled since April, but if you bought it a year earlier, you're not doing so well. So I think it's a matter of finding the right spot to get in a new.

to SpaceX, there's going to be a lot of hype when the IPO happens. But out of the gate, knowing that there will probably be an IPO pop and take it even higher, at least temporarily, I'm not into chasing that kind of rocket. Yeah, I agree with that too. I mean, and I will say, just to take a populist bent here for a moment, I mean, the question of, will you buy the IPO is largely an irrelevant one for us. You can't really buy the IPO in all likelihood. You can buy the post-pop IPO. And I would say for most people, it probably makes sense to just sit back and see what happens for a while. You know, you're, you know, it could continue to go straight up, but I would suspect that there would be a better

opportunity if you're interested in the company. I think if you want an opportunity in this, and again, not that this is, but I mean, again, so 10 years ago, Google Alphabet through Google Ventures paid $900 million, got a 7% stake, a little more than a 7% stake in SpaceX. If it is a $1.5 trillion dollar company. This is basically a 100 plus bag, 120 bagger, you know, $110 billion stake that Alphabet will have in SpaceX. Not going to move a lot that need a lot in Maffovets' massive world, but at least that's a safer way to potentially play SpaceX. So, Rick, with the reckless prediction here, your other bets line item in the next alphabet earnings. Ernings call is going to look a lot better. Yeah, I think I'm with you guys. But we want to know what you.

you think, let us know, leave a comment. Are you buying the SpaceX IPO? Up next, we are going to answer some mindset questions. You're listening to Motley Full Money. These days, I'm all about quality over quantity, especially in my closet. If it's not well-made and versatile, it's just not worth it. That's honestly why I love Quince. The fabrics feel elevated, the cuts are thoughtful, and the pricing actually makes sense. Quince makes high-quality wardrobe staples using premium fabrics like 100% and linen, silk and organic cotton poplin. They work directly with safe ethical factories and cut out the middlemen so you aren't paying for brand markups or fancy stores, just quality clothing. Everything they make is built to hold up season after season and is consistently rated 4.5 to 5 stars

by thousands of real people like me who wear their clothes every day. The Quince, Mongolian cashmere crewneck sweater may be the most comfortable one that I own. It's light, soft, and it was a lot more affordable than you think quality cashmere would be. Stop waiting to build the wardrobe you actually want. Right now, go to quince.com slash motley for free shipping and 365 day returns. That's a full year to wear it and love it. And you will. Now available in Canada, too. Don't keep settling for clothes that don't last. Go to QINCCE.com slash motley for free shipping and 365 day returns. Quince.com slash motley. All right, fools. Welcome back. Tim Byers with Carl Thiel and Rick Bionares. And we're going to talk mindset. Thank you so much for answering the call for mindset questions.

As a reminder, this occasional segment will be aimed at helping you master the most important skill in investing, keeping the discipline to get in the market and stay in the market for the long term. We've got a question from Mark, I hope I'm pronouncing your last name correctly here. I'm going to say Mark Degner, but Mark is asking, Rick, what's the harm in sprinkling a few dollars on FOMO stocks as long as it's done with funds I'm not relying on? to fund my retirement and can afford to lose in the worst case. What's the difference between FOMO? For those who don't know what that is, FOMO is fear of missing out. So, fear of missing out investing and seeking a bright future for a company whose stock is gaining momentum.

So, Rick, what advice you have for Mark? I want to say that again, at Rule Briggers, we tend to swing for the fences. So FOMO, I know it's almost seems like a demeaning thing, but it's not necessarily a bad, thing. If you're missing out, but the caveat here is, if you're missing out is one thing, oh, I want to buy this because it's, you know, I want to keep up with the Joneses. I see something shiny. I have to chase that before it gets away from me. That's bad. But to me, FOMO, what really needs is FO, which is fear of homework or omission. So if you're going to just buy FOMO without doing your due diligence, that's where you get messed up. So FOMO without FO is a

no-no in my book. But FOMO, as in finding an exciting stock and you want that to be part of your portfolio. I do not have a problem with that, especially with a small part of your portfolio, swing for the fences just next time you're up to plate, up to plate, you know, maybe try to be be a contact hitter to balance things out. I mean, I like this. FOMO without FO is a no-no. No, no. Carl, what do you got for Mark here? Yeah, I mean, I guess not saying anything radically different than Rick, but just calling it a FOMO stock implies that you are buying it for no reason other than that you are chasing momentum and you're fearful. And the same stock might actually be a good investment if you have a thesis that you're watching play out.

So basically the same thing Rick is saying, you know, have a reason that you're buying it. And then I don't think there's anything wrong with that. Yeah. I mean, the main issue here, Mark, is if you are interested in a stock, what you want to know is what you want to see so that you. you can follow the stock accordingly. If you go in like, I don't know, this thing could be amazing and I have no idea what I'm getting into, that's probably suboptimal. But if you have an idea of what it is, you think you're going to see. So then you can measure it and follow it

and be a curious investor, then I think you might be rewarded. Keep sending in your mindset questions. I am at T-Buyers at fool.com. So that's T-B-E-1. Y-Y-E-R-S-at-Fool.com, and you could be featured in a mindset question on a future show. Up next, we're going to preview Tuesday's show with Emily Flippin. You're listening to Motley Fool Money. The old adage goes, it isn't what you say, it's how you say it, because to truly make an impact, you need to set an example and take the lead. You have to adapt to whatever comes your way. When you're that driven, you drive an equally determined vehicle, the Range Rover Sport.

The Rangerover Sport blends power, poise, and performance. Its design is distinctly British and free from unnecessary details, allowing its raw agility to shine through. It combines a dynamic sporting personality with elegance to deliver a truly instinctive drive. Inside, you'll find true modern luxury with the latest innovations in comfort. Use the cabin air purification system alongside active noise cancellation for all new levels of quality and quiet. Whether you prefer a choice of powerful engines or the plug-in hybrid with an estimated range of 53 miles, there's an option for you. With seven terrain modes to choose from, terrain response to fine-tuned your vehicle for the roads ahead. The Range Rover event is on now.

Explore enhance offers at Rangerover.com. All right, welcome back, fools. For Tuesday, Emily Flippen has Jason Hall and San Mateo, so you are going to want to be sure to tune in as we start putting the wraps on not only another earnings season, but also another year. How did 2025 treat your portfolio? Let's just go round the horn on that. I did, I've, I've, I've, I've, I feel like I did okay. Rick, how was 2025 treated your portfolio so far? A lot better than I thought it would be in early April of this year. So, yes, I'm pleasantly surprised with how my portfolio went up on a year. I was embraced for the worst. So, yes, well done. Well done. Well done. Markets. Yeah. Carl, how about you?

It's been a pretty good year overall. And I own a lot, just a lot of biotech stocks, you know, in number, not necessarily a huge part of my portfolio. portfolio, they're not, but I do own a fair number of them. And it's been a kind of a banner year for biotech. So that's been helpful. Yeah, I like the way you do this, by the way, just as a pro tip on our way out here. Carl does, I think, what I like to do. Like, I own a lot of tech, but I like to buy really small and then build positions up over time. So I don't think you're like overwhelmingly over-indexed on tiny speculative biotech. And I neither am like not over indexed at all on tiny speculative tech. But I do have a fair amount of it. Fools, thank you for

tuning in to Motley Fool money. We hope you're getting ready for a fantastic holiday break. As always, people on the program, they have interest in the stocks they talk about, and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure,

please check out our show notes. Bulls, we're getting down to the last few shows here. So thank you for tuning in. Our engineer today was Annie Pope. Our producer is Annen Chuck Ballou. Thanks very much to our guest, Carl Thiel, and Rick Munares. I am your host, Tim Byers.

Stay tuned for Emily Flippen, Jason Hall, San Mateo tomorrow. Pull on, everyone. See you soon.