Murdaugh Murders Podcast - MMP Remastered #46 - Alex Murdaugh's Ground Zero: The Case that Changed Everything

Starting point is 00:00:00 When we first released episode 46 back in May 2022, it felt like we were peeling back a hugely important layer of the good old boy machine protecting Elyke Murdoch and his allies. And at the center of it all was the Beach family's pursuit of truth and accountability. This episode dove into how the 2019 boat crash that killed Mallory Beach set off a chain reaction that would eventually bring down the Murdoch Empire and shine a light on the ghouls perverting the justice system for their own appalling aims, too. Liz and I talked about how Parker's Kitchen,

Starting point is 00:00:43 through its CEO, Greg Parker, wasn't just fighting a lawsuit, they were fighting to change state laws to protect themselves. Since then, Parker's lobbyists have continued to push for legislation that would reduce corporate liability in alcohol sales, a move that would make it harder for victims like the beaches to hold big businesses accountable. That fight isn't over, and it shows how power still protects itself in South Carolina. As of now, the boat crash, wrongful death, and personal injury cases have been settled, to the tune of millions of dollars.

Starting point is 00:01:20 But one case remains tangled, active, and a grotesque perversion that still annoys Liz and me, Because we have been targeted by Mark Moore, that Mark Moore, who defended Russell Lafitte, that Mark Moore that siphons tax dollars from South Carolina for fruitless but very expensive investigations. That Mark Moore, who was so offended by us calling his team a gaggle of duffices that he included it in his last ditch filing for Russell before Russell pleaded guilty in state and federal courts. Well, that soulless pitiful man has subpoenaed me and deposed Liz Farrell, in our opinion, an attempt to intimidate us and inflict emotional harm for our support of the Beach family. The Knife Fighter case revealed tactics that were as cruel as they were calculated,

Starting point is 00:02:12 hiring consultants, investigators, and so-called social media strategist to harass victims online. Wesley Donahue and Sarah Capelli became household names for all of the wrong reasons, and their roles eliminated just how far some people will go to control a narrative. And then there's Mal's pals, the organization created in Mallory's memory, the light in all this darkness. It's a testament of who she was, compassionate, kind, and someone who wanted to make the world better. Amid all the noise, her spirit continues to inspire real good in Hampton County and beyond. To learn about Mal's Pals, which was prominently featured in episode five of the Hulu series, visit Mals-pals.com, or click the link in the description. That's M-A-L-S-P-L-Z.com.

Starting point is 00:03:08 This episode reminded me that while Ellick's crimes grabbed the headlines, the Beach family's fight exposed the systemic corruption that allowed them to happen in the first place. I don't know how long it'll be before the boat crash case goes to trial, but the case is ground zero in the Murdoch murder saga. Without this case and without the perseverance of the plaintiffs, the victims in this, South Carolina wouldn't have the chance it has now to reform its broken justice system. Without this case, the Murdoz's grip on the low country might have never been loosened. My name is Mandy Matney.

Starting point is 00:03:56 I have been investigating the Murdoch family for more than three years now. This is the Murdoch Murdoch Murders podcast with David Moses and Liz Farrell. Before we get started, we have some very exciting news. As this saga has so many twists and turns, we decided to add to our episodes with video content which will give our audience a more immersive experience. We are relaunching our. our YouTube channel on June 1st, as we roll out all our episodes over the next few months.

Starting point is 00:04:42 We'll have special Q&A content with Liz and I, evidence deep dives, forensic profiles, and more. Search for the Verified Murdoch Murders podcast channel on YouTube, and don't forget to subscribe to stay up to date on all things MMP. It's been a long time since we've done a full episode on the Mallory Beach. case. As we've been chasing breaking news updates and the insanity and all the other crimes associated with Elyke Murdoch in the last few months, the Mallory Beach lawsuit and cases attached to it have become increasingly complex, and you guessed it, more and more shocking. So today, we want to take you back to the story that was the beginning of the end of the

Starting point is 00:05:30 Murdoch family's 100-year dynasty in the fall of the good old boys in South Carolina, the boat crash. This case is ground zero for everything we talk about in this podcast. The Beach case, which started out as a fairly direct wrongful death claim, has become incredibly complicated. Because of its intricacies, it can become lost in all the headlines. But this case is by far one of the most significant aspects of the murder. rock murder story. For any of you who have watched the show damages, this case gives us heavy

Starting point is 00:06:06 damages vibes, which is to say that it's dark and dramatic, tense, ruthless, and also highly technical. It's a lot of legal procedure, so it's boring until it really, really isn't. We're going to break it down so you can see what we see when we talk about this case. So first, when we refer to the Mallory Beach case or the boat crash case, this case, this case, this can sometimes mean the original 2019 wrongful death claim filed by Mallory's mom on behalf of Mallory's estate, or it can mean the entire collection of cases. There are now six boat crash cases altogether plus one other. I'll explain. The first is the 2019 one, which is being litigated by Mark Tinsley. Mark is also representing two other boat crash victims, Miley Altman and Morgan

Starting point is 00:06:57 Doughty. Those two cases were formally filed this year right before the statute of limitations ran out in February. All three of these cases have included the same defendants, which is Parker's Kitchen, as well as its corporate parent. For the sake of simplicity, when we say Parker's Kitchen, we mean both the convenience store and the corporation it's under. Ehrlich Murdoch and Buster Murdoch. The estates of Paul and Maggie were added in January and were included in Morgan's and Miley's complaints as well. All three of those cases reached prior settlements with Randolph Murdoch, the Wood family, and Luther's, which is the bar where Paul and Connor got shots before getting back in the boat. The next case is Connor Cook's case,

Starting point is 00:07:38 which was filed last summer. Conner's case is the one that officially brought the obstruction of justice and conspiracy accusations against the Murdox and certain law enforcement members to light. Connor is suing Parker's kitchen, Ellick, Buster, and a Parker's clerk named Tagia Cohen who sold the kids the alcohol that night. Then there is Mallory's boyfriend Anthony Cook's lawsuit, which was filed in December. He is suing Parker's Kitchen, the clerk from Parker's that I mentioned, and Ellick.

Starting point is 00:08:06 The sixth case is what we're calling the civil conspiracy case, which is also being litigated by Tinsley. This case is connected specifically to the Mallory Beach action, but the plaintiffs are different. In this case, it's Mallory's mom, her dad, her stepmom, her sister, and her brother-in-law. The defendants are different as well.

Starting point is 00:08:24 They're Greg Parker, who is the CEO and founder of Parker's Kitchen, his corporation, two of his attorneys, a reporter named Vicky Ward, and two private detectives, as well as their investigative agency. It's quite the lineup. This case was filed at the end of last year after a trailer was made public for a documentary by Vicki Ward and People magazine. The trailer featured photos of Mallory Beach's dead body and clips from a video that was created by the Beach family as part of the mediation process. This case has now become where the central action is taking place. So those six cases make up the entirety of the quote-unquote boat crash case. The plus one case that I talked about is a federal case that was filed in 2019 by Elex Insurance

Starting point is 00:09:08 Company where he had a $6 million policy. The insurance company was like, we're not helping you with this one. We're not covering you on that. And Elex team was like, wait, but you have to. So in September, a summary judgment was filed for the plaintiff, meaning Elex's insurance company won. The significance of that case is this. In June 2021, things weren't looking good for Elyke Murdoch. He knew he had four more boat crash cases awaiting him, and he knew his insurance company wasn't going to roll over for him this time. This is why the quote-unquote

Starting point is 00:09:40 boat crash case has been so important and why it has loomed so large behind the scenes. In some way or another, it is the catalyst for everything. So number one, if Elek Murdoch had anything to do with the murders of his wife and son, the boat crash case could certainly be seen as providing that motive or understandably putting him in such an unraveled state that it was inevitable he'd succumb to the stress of it all in some way. Add to that what we know now and didn't know then, which is that Ehrlich had storage units full of secrets that he was trying to keep undercover. Elick was running out of time. It was unavoidable. He was going to have to comply with the subpoenas asking him for an accounting

Starting point is 00:10:24 of his finances. Number two, this case is the reason the state grand jury began looking into the Murdoch family's alleged actions in the boat crash investigation. The accounts of the victims, as well as others, led to state grand jury subpoenas of Ellick's bank accounts shortly before the murders, which we all know what that would show. Number three, the case provided the first meaningful cracks in the Murdoch Citadel. It provided cover for people who have been kept silent by the very real fear they felt and still fear to finally talk about Stephen Smith and the injustice suffered by the Smith family. Number four, the case meant more people were studying the Murdox, which led to Mandy's discovery of the strange Satterfield settlement. Number five,

Starting point is 00:11:11 the case is the reason Ehrlich's assets were frozen and the co-receivers were appointed to account for the totality of his worth. There's no doubt in our minds that this work has been absolutely critical to holding investigators and PMPD attorneys and others as accountable as they can. Number six, the case could end up making our roads safer and prevent needless death and injury

Starting point is 00:11:35 if convenience stores are held to account for the alcohol sales they make. Number seven, the case could also end up making our roads less safe because it has prompted the CEO of Parker's Kitchen to fight hard for a change in legislation that could lessen the liability for the purveyors of alcohol in the state. But there's also a good argument to be made, and personal injury lawyers might not want to hear this for the tort reform that Parker seeks.

Starting point is 00:12:00 Number eight, the case has also helped expose the sloppiness and accommodating behavior of judges in the 14th Circuit, and it has helped the public gain a greater understanding of how the juries in the 14th are seen to the rest of the state. Hopefully, this exposure leads to meaningful change. At nearly every turn of the screw in the last three years, Greg Parker of Parker's gas stations and the Murdox have attempted to evade all accountability for Mallory's death. Those outside of South Carolina tend to forget

Starting point is 00:12:33 just how big of a story the boat crash was here locally before the world found out about the Murdoch family in 2021. Because of the local publicity, a lot of people thought it was unusual that Greg Parker and the Murdox didn't settle initially to avoid the bad press. And now that this saga has turned into an international news story, it's even more bizarre for Greg Parker especially to continue to drag the Beach family through this very public lawsuit, especially when Parker's has settled similar and less public cases. Why would Greg Parker want his business, which has gas stations throughout Georgia and South Carolina, in the middle of the most well-known and infamous low-country murder case in decades? We all know why Ehrlich Murdoch really wanted to avoid a lawsuit that would lead to his finances being exposed. But why has Greg Parker fought the Beach family so aggressively and so publicly for the past three years?

Starting point is 00:13:38 We'll be right back. So the civil conspiracy case has sort of morphed into the quote-unquote knife-fighter case because this is the central conflict right now. And plus, no one doesn't pay attention to the phrase social media knife fighter. Let's talk about that phrase for a second and where it came from. It first appeared in a motion from Mark Tinsley in the original 2019 case. It refers to Wesley Donahue, who is a political strategist and a consultant. He and his two companies, the Lawrence Group and Push Digital, which are basically marketing agencies of a sort, were hired by Greg Parker and his camp in January 2021, according to Wesley.

Starting point is 00:14:21 He stopped working with Greg and his team sometime in April 2021. I talked to Donahue about the accusations from the Beach family that Parker had hired Donahue and his agencies to, in part, bully them out of continuing with their lawsuit against Parker's. He completely denies that. He wouldn't tell me why he stopped working with Greg in April, but attributed it to a difference of opinion in the direction they wanted to go with the account. Here's what he said about whether he helped target the beaches. David will read that.

Starting point is 00:14:52 I can damn well tell you it wasn't us. That is so beneath anything I'd feel comfortable with I don't even know how to describe it in words. It would damn my soul to hell forever. So Wesley is a former Marco Rubio guy And the term social media knife fighter came from a BuzzFeed article written about the Rubio operatives during the 2016 presidential campaign. It's not exactly clear what that means, but we're told aggressive social media can include

Starting point is 00:15:17 the use of fake accounts to spread tactical messages that are favorable to a particular person or company and detrimental to whoever that person or company is going up against. To be clear, we're not saying the Lawrence Group or Push Digital did this on Parker's Bath. We're just sharing the origin of the phrase. Now, West Donahue, as part of his strategy, engaged the services of a Charleston area private detective named Sarah Capelli. We'll get to her in a second and what it appears she was hired to do on behalf of Parker. But it's important to understand this part because it can get confusing. Neither Donahue nor Capelli are parties to the civil conspiracy or the Knife Fighter case.

Starting point is 00:15:56 They both produced work for Parker that the Beach family believes will show the lengths Parker's might have gone to in fighting their case. to include a strategy that eventually led to attacks on them, and to Vicky Ward getting the confidential court materials and those photos of Mallory's body. So I want to pause here and comment on a few things. I first learned about Vicky Ward parachuting into the Murdoch story back in September when she sent me what I think was a condescending email about how she was coming down south with, quote,

Starting point is 00:16:28 two camera crews and a podcasting team from Audible. In her email, she mentioned her work on the Epstein story, and I immediately figured out who she was. Vicky Ward is the opposite of everything I wanted to be as a journalist. In summary, she got famous from the Epstein story, and I'm really not sure why. Vicky Ward knew about Jeffrey Epstein's horrific crimes back in 2003, and she wrote a puff piece about him instead of telling the victim stories. She blames her editors at Vanity Fair for this instead of blaming herself. After Julie K. Brown, my personal hero, exposed Epstein's crimes finally in a way that no one could

Starting point is 00:17:14 ignore it anymore, Ward appeared to swoop in and reap the benefits of Brown's phenomenal reporting. You know, early on in this story, I was accused of being protective of the story, and this is exactly what I was afraid of. Not because of the competition. because when ruthless reporters like Vicky Ward parachute into a story after a local reporter has already done the messy work in the trenches, it's obvious they're desperate for an exclusive angle and they have dollar signs on their mind. And that is scary and not fair to victims.

Starting point is 00:17:49 The thing is, reporters like Vicky Ward never do the work that puts pressure on authorities and actually helps victims. They do self-serving things. like this. I want to stress this. Vicki Ward released a trailer for a Murdoch murder's documentary on Vimeo that was available to the public, which contain graphic photos of Mallory Beach's dead body when she was found in March 2019. The lawsuit filed by Tensley included a link to the trailer, and Liz and I watched it before it was quickly taken down. I remember that morning very clearly, and I was so, horrified, I personally contacted the Beach family before our story went up to warn them

Starting point is 00:18:35 about it. The video was tasteless and salacious, and the photos of Mallory Beach used in that trailer served zero journalistic purpose whatsoever. Think about it. It was never a question about how Mallory died. We filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the Sheriff's Office for a list of anyone who might have received the specific set of photos, including law enforcement. agencies. Turns out, they were not released to any member of the media, general public, or any

Starting point is 00:19:06 other law enforcement agency. They were released to only two people. One was the Beach's attorney, Mark Tensley. And the other person was E. Mitchell Griffith, an attorney who was representing Parker's in the wrongful death case. This is why Tensley is accusing Parker's of providing Vicki Ward with confidential information. And right now, I feel like I have to mention this. Parker's is also arguing that Tensley showed me a confidential video back when I was covering the case in 2020. But I just want to make this clear. Tensley never showed me any videos. Fitznews published a quote from Mallory's mother, Renee Beach, which Tensley gave me when I asked for a response to the story I was writing.

Starting point is 00:19:51 That quote, which was basically Renee saying that she hopes Parker's is held accountable, apparently was also said in a video. But despite what Parker's attorneys like to claim, we did nothing wrong here. And one last thing about Vicky. On May 16th, her attorneys argued to have her dismissed from the civil conspiracy case. They basically compared her work on the Murdoch case to the Pentagon Papers. You know, when the New York Times and the Washington Post exposed reports that showed four presidents had lied to the American people about the Vietnam War, On Tuesday, we found out that Judge Bentley Price ruled against her, so she's still going to have to be a party in this case.

Starting point is 00:20:34 That could be a big win for the Beach family. So Tinsley subpoenaed both Donahue and Capelli for all the work they did for Parker's, including all correspondence between them and Parker or his attorneys. And that is when all hell really broke loose because Parker sees all of that work, or most of it anyway, as fitting the definition for attorney-client privilege, which means, to their mind, Tinsley should get none of it.

Starting point is 00:21:00 And that seems to make Tinsley even more suspicious that there's something pretty bad in those files. I'm going to try to summarize this hell that is broken loose so we don't get lost in the details, but first, I think we should hear from the Parker's team. Prior to an emergency hearing that was held earlier in May, we reached out to Parker's marketing agency to get a statement about the court battle

Starting point is 00:21:21 over the knife fighter documents. The marketing agency sent us a statement from Columbia attorney Deborah Barbier, who was representing Greg Parker. You might remember Barbier from earlier episodes. She also represented Corey Fleming at his bond hearing. We're going to have David Rebarbier's statement on behalf of Parker's. Parker's denies any wrongdoing against the Beach family. Parker's involvement in this case stems from a completely legal transaction conducted by Togia Cohen, with no citation issued by SLED following investigation.

Starting point is 00:21:55 We have filed an emergency motion because plaintiff's counsel is attempting to obtain documents to which he knows he is not entitled, and which do nothing to prove his case. He has done so before, an order was issued by the court, and before Parker's had a chance to object, as is our right, the documents are protected by well-established doctrines of attorney-client privilege and work product. This is yet another attempt by plaintiff's counsel to cynically influence the media in order to harass and intimidate Parker's. And it will fail. Okay. To summarize the back and forth over the night fighter documents.

Starting point is 00:22:36 Now, this didn't happen as such, but imagine Donahue and Capelli standing in the middle of a courtroom with an absurd number of boxes in their arms, waiting for the court to tell them what to do. Mark Tinsley is on one side and Parker's team is on the other. Now, picture everyone looking up at the judge's bench. Tinsley is like, I need those to prove what they did to the beaches. And Parker's is like, nice try, and absolutely not. Donahue and Capelli start to tentatively hand Tinsley the boxes. But Parker's is like, no, do not give those to him. He can't have them.

Starting point is 00:23:07 They're protected by attorney-client privilege, et cetera. Judge, help us out here. And the judge is like, I don't agree with you, sorry. And he motions to Donahue and Capelli, and they start to hand the boxes to Tinsley again. But then the Parker's team throws themselves in front of Tinsley and screams, no, wait, wait, wait, stop, stop. You got to reconsider this, Your Honor. He just wants these documents to help him in the boat case. This is ridiculous.

Starting point is 00:23:30 Then the judge is like, okay, okay, how about this? You give me all the documents, and how about give Parker's team all the documents, and I'll look over them to see what's what and whether I think they qualify as privileged, and they can look over them too and figure out which parts are privileged. Everybody cool? Okay. So Donahue and Capelli go home. The judge goes into his chambers and goes through 6,000 pages, the videos, the photos, etc.

Starting point is 00:23:54 After a while, and in reality, it took weeks, the judge's clerk comes back out, and she tells the attorneys, he's decided Tinsley can have them. Once we see what parts of this Tinsley thinks he wants to use to prove his case, then we can discuss whether it's privileged. Okay? Have a great weekend, everyone. The Parker's team was like, ugh, but also, woo-hoo, it's the weekend. and they pack up and they leave our pretend courtroom. In the meantime, Tinsley is like, cool, it's the weekend? Huh, didn't notice.

Starting point is 00:24:23 And so he reaches that to Donahue's attorney. Capelli doesn't have an attorney. And he's like, FYI, the judge ruled in our favor on the docks. And sometime over the weekend, Donahue's attorney was like, ding dong, did somebody order boxes of knife fighter documents? Actually, I think she put them in a drop box, according to the emergency hearing that happened after this. Anyway, the Parker's team comes back to the office Monday, and they're like, Hmm, what should we do about that thing that happened Friday?

Starting point is 00:24:48 Let's appeal it even though it's not a thing we can actually appeal. Wait, let's do a petition for a writ of mandamus. And they all high five, and late Monday night, they're like, hey, everybody, regarding the judge's ruling for the plaintiff's thing from Friday, we're going to be objecting to all that. The next morning, so it would seem, they find out that, well, maybe they should have acted a little faster because Tinsley already has the files. They're like, what? So then they call an emergency hearing, and they're like,

Starting point is 00:25:15 Judge, your law clerk telling us about your ruling is not the same thing as you filing an order, and also we object, and also we're filing an appeal, and also we were supposed to have time to object to all this. Before this maniac got our knife fighter docs, I mean our attorney-client privilege work product. So let's pretend for a moment that these documents were a giant three-tiered chocolate cake. At the emergency hearing, the judge is like, okay, I hear you. Let's find out how much of those documents Mr. Tinsley looked at over the week. Everyone in the courtroom turns to Mark Tinsley and his face and both his hands are covered in frosting.

Starting point is 00:25:51 There's a pile of crumbs everywhere and he just shrugs. Like, I mean, what? Am I not going to eat the cake? That sent Parker's team over the edge because this is the exact opposite of what they wanted to happen. Recently, Parker and his team of high-priced attorneys have gone even further. This week, they filed a motion saying that they might try to remove Mark Tensley, the Beach's attorney, from the case. So there's two ways to look at this. One from the perspective of Parkers.

Starting point is 00:26:23 They believe that it was a violation of the judge's order when Tensley got the Knife Fighter documents. So, of course, they're going to fight this one hard. However, threatening to remove Tensley from his own case, from a case he's been invested in from the very beginning, from relationships of trust he's built with the victims, honestly feels like the same bullying tactics that the beaches say they were using in the first place. The idea they would move to disqualify Tensley from his own case is mind-blowing.

Starting point is 00:26:56 Can you imagine? We live in South Carolina where lately things haven't been all that great for attorneys and the old trust our profession department. In the beaches have an attorney they trust because that relationship conflicts with the agenda of a multi-millionaire gas station owner who once publicly stated that he was within reach of becoming a billionaire, that they might lose their attorney, the one they chose. In America? We'll be right back. Tinsley has accused Parker's of using extremely aggressive tactics to decrease their liability in the case. Before Maggie and Paul were murdered, it appeared like Parker

Starting point is 00:27:43 strategy was to villainize the Murdoch family. In fact, Greg Parker is accused of hiring a private investigator to follow Buster and Paul Murdoch to collect information that could lessen his business's potential liability in the boat crash case. The private investigator was allegedly tasked with gathering details of Buster's sex life and Paul's underage drinking escapades according to transcripts from a recent hearing. I know it's a lot, but there are least three private investigators to keep track of here. There are Max Fratty and Henry Rosado, who are the parties to the civil conspiracy case. And then there's Sarah Capelli, who again is not a party to the case, but someone who was allegedly hired by Wesley Donahue

Starting point is 00:28:30 as a part of his strategy with Parker. So the first two private eyes, it's not clear who their client is, they will not say. They apparently signed a non-disclosure agreement, and they appear to be sticking to that. But according to multiple sources, these guys were allegedly hired by Parker or his attorneys to find anything they could to tie Buster Murdoch to the death of Stephen Smith. So why would they do that? Because no one likes a murderer, least of all juries who are assessing what percent Buster contributed to the boat crash with the alleged loaning of a spare license to Paul. As a part of this P.I.'s plan, they allegedly presented themselves to Sandy Smith, Stephen's mom as good guys who wanted to help solve her son's murder. Think about it. Think about

Starting point is 00:29:19 that moment and this was back in 2020. Two guys might be able to find her answers who have impressive credentials show up one day and actually listen to her after years of fighting for someone with any amount of power to listen to her. In the course of their investigation she gave them Stephen's iPad and they allegedly took it. and when it didn't have what they were looking for, apparently they destroyed it and didn't give it back. If this is true, it definitely seems dangerously close to getting in the way of law enforcement. Remember, this was still an open case with the South Carolina Highway Patrol. Now the third investigator in the civil conspiracy case is Sarah.

Starting point is 00:30:06 She was apparently instructed to get pictures and video of Paul Murdoch drinking and acting like a fool, she was also tasked with uncovering details about Buster's sex life, which feels really wrong and invasive. Here is David reading as Mark Tensley from a March 16th hearing. They had this narrative that they were pushing out, that the Murdox were terrible people, and they may very well be terrible people. But because they are terrible people, then a jury ought not find against him in the boat crash. In a hearing in March, Tinsley told him, told the court that Capelli has, quote, diarrhea of the mouth and told him everything she was hired to do. We've asked for the time and the billing records because those records will

Starting point is 00:30:52 indicate when these activities started. Parts of what they did and significantly, one of the things that Ms. Capelli did was she bought alcohol for some underage people in Colombia in order to get information about Paul Murdoch. And we believe that Parker's reimbursed her for those charges. There's a photograph. This happened in November 2020. This is Ms. Capelli at a bar, and I'm, I've got copies I'm willing to hand up. So in the course of her investigation for Parker's Sarah Capelli apparently tried to ingratiate herself with Paul's underage friends by buying them drinks at a bar. You got that, right? The alleged strategy for Parker's fighting this lawsuit in which they're accused of not following their policies to prevent

Starting point is 00:31:36 underage kids from getting alcohol, apparently included more minors and plying them with alcohol? It's crazy. So this photograph, and I apologize, I thought when I printed it, this is Miss Capelli in the striped jumpsuit there with her mouth open. In the foreground, you see there is a camera with a selfie. This underage girl took this photograph because, and this is a signed copy of Miss Capelli's card, she bought this girl alcohol. She then went and followed another girl to a gas station.

Starting point is 00:32:06 who is also underage and bought her alcohol. And so we've asked for the billing and the time records and the receipts for reimbursement because we think that Parker's reimbursed her for buying alcohol for minors to get new information about Paul. A gas station, guys. We should also note, by the way, that at the same hearing,

Starting point is 00:32:26 Tinsley also mentioned that Capelli claimed she had mounted cameras at the driveway to Moselle and that everything she collected in this case has gone to sled. We haven't heard any indication that her videos have shown anything worthwhile to investigators, but you never know. So the question is why is Tinsley bringing all this up? Why is he telling the court about Parker's apparent strategy to get dirt on the Murdox? Wouldn't this be an enemy of my enemy as my friend scenario?

Starting point is 00:32:51 It seems like they should be on the same page about the Murdox. Instead, it seems like he's trying really hard to show the lengths Parker's was willing to go to and proving that the Murdox were awful, which seems like something Tinsley would also want to show. In looking at all this, we think Mark Tinsley is trying to show that Parker's was willing to do all this and allegedly expend all these resources to vilify Paul and Buster to lessen his liability, but then, uh-oh. His PIs say they can't find anything that definitively links Buster to Stephen's death, and Paul gets inconveniently murdered. Let's say our theory is true. This means Parker's would need a new legal strategy.

Starting point is 00:33:31 What was left? The beaches were. However, it's possible after the double homicide last June, Parkers switched their strategy specifically to target the boat's passengers, including Mallory, and therefore lessen any liability Parkers might carry. If you have paid attention to social media chatter following the Murdoch case in the last 11 months, I'm sure you've seen some really vicious post about the kids who were in the boat that night. I'll tell you that there are two groups in particular that have allowed and encouraged this incredibly heartless and pointless discussion about the victims in the boat crash. And if you are still a member of any of those victim bashing groups, I encourage you to leave. Anyways, those awful Facebook groups who shall not be named, have promoted a narrative about the beaches, Mallory, Miley, Anthony, Connor, and Morgan. And we hope to find out through this night fighter lawsuit which social media users,

Starting point is 00:34:38 if any, were paid by Parkers to push this victim-bashing narrative. But of all of the horrible post I've seen about the boat crash victims, I think Morgan has gotten the worst of it. Not only did Morgan lose her best friend Mallory and her life was forever changed by that night, but full-grown adults have trolled and harassed her online and in-person person in the last year. They have posted photos of her in a bikini on Reddit. They've called Morgan, who is 23, and again, who was recently lost both her ex-boyfriend and her best friend to unforeseeable tragedies, a gold digger. And Morgan is one of the many victims in this saga,

Starting point is 00:35:22 who has been gravely misunderstood by both the good old boys and those watching this case for for the sake of entertainment. Morgan is brave. Morgan is so strong. And unlike so many of the awful people judging her online, she is not afraid to do the right thing, no matter how terrifying it is. As we said, one of the elements of this case that makes it so significant is the co-receivership. The co-receivers helped put a stop to the wasting and hiding of Alex's assets, which seemed to be occurring even as he was in jail. And the co-receivers have undoubtedly helped investigators on not whatever it is that Ehrlich was up to.

Starting point is 00:36:07 Earlier this month, Elex's attorneys, State Senator Dick Harpoon, and Jim Griffin argued for an end of the receivership. Their argument was that the boat crash case wasn't showing any signs that it had enough merit to win in court and that what they termed the, quote, Murdoch loophole, meaning that the court froze Elex assets and appointed a receivership, would set a dangerous precedent. The way Dick made it sound was as if lawyers all over South Carolina were running straight to their nearest courthouse to take over their opponent's finances.

Starting point is 00:36:35 It is so fun to watch them pretend that their client is a regular guy who had a hiccup, a slight stumble, a temporary fall from grace, instead of the potential mastermind of who knows what. At any rate, clearly their argument about the boat crash triggered Mark Tinsley, who seems to have squirled away a mountain of receipts in this case because he came out of the gate with a doozy. He was like, oh, you think this case won't go anywhere? And that's why we should stop looking into Alex Dodgey records. Let's ask Morgan Doughty for her thoughts. I want to tell you a few things about Morgan Doughty, a heroine who has emerged in this tragedy. Morgan dated Paul Murdoch for several years. They both attended Thomas Hayward Academy, where they both graduated in 2017.

Starting point is 00:37:21 Their relationship was on the Rocks in February 2019. and they technically weren't together on the night of the boat crash, if you ask Morgan. That night was not the first time Morgan was abused by Paul, but it was the last time. Because Morgan ended their tumultuous relationship the morning Mallory died. Like myself and like many of you listening to this podcast, Morgan made mistakes as a teenager. She partied, she drank, she dated a boy who was wrong for her.

Starting point is 00:37:55 She got caught up in an abusive relationship at a young age and didn't listen to her parents when they told her they didn't like Paul. And before anyone judges Morgan for staying with Paul as long as she did, I want you to stop and think about this for a second. For years, Morgan had a front row seat to the Murdoch family, one of the most powerful and feared families in the region. She went on vacations with them. Morgan saw their worst and most intimate moments. She knew their secrets, and she knew that was scary. It's hard enough to leave an abusive relationship as a teenager. Imagine having to come up with the courage at 19 to not only leave Paul, but his family too.

Starting point is 00:38:44 That takes a whole lot of strength, but Morgan broke up with Paul for good on the morning her best friend Mallory died. The second thing I want people to know about Morgan is that she truly wants justice for all the victims related to this case. Justice for Mallory, justice for Gloria, justice for Stephen, justice for Paul, and justice for Maggie. And instead of taking her insider knowledge to every sleazy news organization in the country who's begged her for an interview in the past year, Morgan has been working diligently behind the scenes with law enforcement and lawyers. If Morgan wanted fame or fortune out of this story, she could have gotten it. Instead, she has chosen to do the right thing. So earlier this month, when Dick and Jim tried to get the court to remove the receivership

Starting point is 00:39:38 arguing that the beach case didn't have a chance, Morgan had no choice but to play all of her cards. And she became a heroine in this story. and another woman who was underestimated by the good old boys. Like any other Gen Z girl, Morgan has a phone full of photos and videos documenting her first relationship. She has proof to counter the lies made by the Murdoch camp, especially when it comes to Paul's excessive drinking and his parents' encouragement of it. Something else to know about Morgan, she's hard on herself,

Starting point is 00:40:15 and she's quick to admit to her mistakes. Morgan has never denied that she participated in illegal drinking with the Murdoch family. But the thing is that now she is 23, now that she has lost her best friend, now that she has seen how wrong it all was. She wants the Murdox to be held accountable for the damage that Paul's drinking has caused others. As we said before, Morgan has been targeted and harassed so many times and the fact that she has allowed her attorney to publish screenshots of these videos, knowing just how vicious people can be, that is heroic.

Starting point is 00:40:59 Morgan's affidavit included short descriptions of around two dozen videos she had on her phone. And this is a tough part. The Murdoch story is obviously very surreal, and unlike anything we've seen before. It's everything all at once. They are a multiverse unto themselves. And as such, they don't always seem real to people, right? Well, Morgan's affidavit, which included still shots from each video, was sort of a gut punch because you realize how young Paul was and how young all the kids were, and honestly, the adults in their lives failed them.

Starting point is 00:41:29 It is sad to see a baby-faced boy drunk, no matter what kind of jerk that kid might have been. In the affidavit, Morgan told the court that Elic and Maggie and Corey Fleming and John Marvin Murdoch were not only aware of Paul's drinking, it was a fully incorporated thing. Yes, Paul drank to troublesome excess in front of them, but his parents often provided the alcohol. And every time Paul got into an alcohol-related scrape, they cleaned it up and thus began the cycle again. Morgan's videos included examples of when Ehrlich and Maggie provided the alcohol for minors to drink, such as at a 4th of July boat party, on a family trip to Guatemala, at a New Year's Eve party at Moselle, at a party for Buster, and for games of beer pong.

Starting point is 00:42:10 One time, Ehrlich and Maggie gifted her with a sleeve of fireball. The videos also included examples of Paul's repeated bouts of gross intoxication in front of his parents to the point he couldn't speak or stand up. She told the court about how he crashed Ehrlich's truck, which he was driving with Eleg's permission, into a friend's car after one of the videos was taken. And how Ehrlich paid cash to have it quietly fixed. How Paul shot gunned a beer at the Beaufort Water Festival. How a year before the boat crash, Ehrlich and Maggie had helped.

Starting point is 00:42:40 load alcohol into that very same boat so that kids could drink, how Maggie sometimes had to pick up Paul because of how drunk and crazy he was acting, how Paul would get into fights, and once, in the Bahamas on their senior trip, had to be escorted back to their cruise ship by police. All of this stuff, she says, happened with Eleg and Maggie's knowledge, and with Buster's knowledge. Reading her affidavit makes it so clear that these kids were being encouraged by Maggie and Ehrlich and other adults to drink in excess. From this distance and considering everything that's happened, it actually feels very close to child abuse. Who would Paul Murdoch have been had his childhood not featured so much binge drinking? A lesson we keep learning is that the good old boys

Starting point is 00:43:25 never give up. They will continue to cover the facts and they will continue to seek every avenue to get themselves, their family, and their friends out of trouble because they want to hold on to their power and in most cases their money. Eleg's motion to end the receivership is proof of that attitude. After everything that has been revealed about what he was allegedly up to, it seems crazy he would think he ever had a chance of ending that receivership. But this is South Carolina, and we're never actually sure. and always surprised when the good guys win,

Starting point is 00:44:05 because honestly, there's always a chance they won't. What's been so interesting to watch over and over is how smartphones and social media, particularly when they're being used by women, seem to be the only weapon that works against Elyke Murdoch. There was a day when all he had to do was say something was true and everyone around him had to agree, but not anymore.

Starting point is 00:44:32 Morgan Dowdy was like any other teenage girl when she documented the moments of her friends and her first love and his all-consuming family who welcomed her with open arms and held on to her tight. She had no idea at the time her videos would one day

Starting point is 00:44:48 helped put an end to the old way of doing things, to the time when people accepted whatever Ehrlich Murdoch said was true. And in the end, the judge ruled a good, against Ellick, ruling that the receivership stays in place, in large part because a teenage girl had turned into a very brave young woman. Mallory Beach loved animals, and her dream was to see that every animal was loved and cared

Starting point is 00:45:26 for. Mouse Pals is a 501 C3 nonprofit created to keep Mallory's dream alive by raising money to build a new animal shelter for her community. Part of our mission is to be a voice for the victims and that's why we will donate 100% of our merch with the mission sales through the end of June to Mal's pals. All funds donated to Mals Pals, go directly to building a new animal shelter in Hampton County and supporting local animal shelters. You can learn more about this great organization at Mouspals.com. That's M-A-L-S-P-A-L-Z.com. Or go to the Murdochmurterspodcast.com slash merch to show your support for a show while helping communities in need. Thank you for listening.

Starting point is 00:46:21 Stay tuned. Revisiting this episode now, it's heartbreaking how much the Beach family continues to endure. Their pursuit of justice has outlasted Ehrlich Murdoch's trial, but it's also drawn harassment from Greg Parker's high-priced attorneys, Mark Moore and Deborah Barbier, who also served as criminal. criminal defense attorneys for Murdoch co-conspirator Russell Lafitte and Corey Fleming, respectively. Threats, aggressive depositions, and attempts to intimidate both Liz and me for simply reporting the truth. That's why this story still matters.

Starting point is 00:47:05 It's not just about a boat crash. It's about power versus accountability. It's about how institutions from corporations to courts often side with money over morality. And yet, through it all, the beaches have not backed down, and neither will we. Perker's legal team can bully, threaten, and file endless motions, but what they can't do is silence the truth or the resilience of the people demanding it. As we continue shining sunlight into these dark corners, we honor Mallory Beach's legacy, not through fear or fame, but through courage, compassion, and persistence. because justice, no matter how long it takes, is worth the fight. The Murdoch Murder's podcast is created by me, Mandy Matney, and my fiancé, David Moses.

Starting point is 00:48:07 Our executive editor is Liz Farrell. Produced by Luna Shark Productions. Oh!

Murdaugh Murders Podcast - MMP Remastered #46 - Alex Murdaugh's Ground Zero: The Case that Changed Everything

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.