Murdaugh Murders Podcast - TSP #156 [Part One] - A Dark Day At The House Of True Sunlight After $176,500 Contempt Sanction
Episode Date: July 16, 2026[Part One of Two] Investigative journalists Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell react to a stunning contempt ruling ordering Mandy to pay a $5,000 fine and $171,500 for billionaire Greg Parker's legal fe...es — a sum greater than what many murder defendants pay for their entire defense, and a penalty whose line-item breakdown has been sealed from Mandy and the public. Mandy argues the ruling has nothing to do with a missed deposition and everything to do with punishing a journalist who refused to stay quiet. David Moses reads directly from South Carolina contempt law to expose how the order may exceed its own legal authority. Then Liz breaks down the bigger picture: the evidence connecting Greg Parker to Gregg Roman, the photos of Mallory Beach's dead body, and the documentary that used them — a puzzle hiding in plain sight while Parker's attorneys keep everyone focused on Mandy. This is a fight for the First Amendment for a woman's safety. And it's just getting started. Let's Dive In… 🥽 🦈 Join the LUNASHARK® Premium Community now on Patreon - Together we go further ☀️ 🩷🩷 “Help Journalist Mandy Matney Fight $176,500 Contempt Order” GoFundMe 🩷🩷 Episode Links Fresh LUNASHARK® Merch designs and styles 👚 “SC podcaster Mandy Matney on the hot seat — will Judge Kelly hold her in contempt?” - The State, July 11, 2026 📰 Where is Gregg Roman? 👀🔍 “A Convenience-Store Magnate, Teen Drinking and a Fatal Boat Crash: The Legal Case Shaking South Carolina” - WSJ, Aug 13, 2022 📰 Lawyers & judges: email your insights or offer your expertise to legal@lunasharkmedia.com Fresh LUNASHARK® Merch designs and styles 👚 “SC podcaster Mandy Matney on the hot seat — will Judge Kelly hold her in contempt?” - The State, July 11, 2026 📰 Where is Gregg Roman? 👀🔍 “A Convenience-Store Magnate, Teen Drinking and a Fatal Boat Crash: The Legal Case Shaking South Carolina” - WSJ, Aug 13, 2022 📰 Stay Tuned, Stay Pesky and Stay in the Sunlight...☀️ Learn more about LUNASHARK Premium Membership at lunashark.supercast.com to get bonus episodes like our Premium Dives, Wherever It Leads..., Girl Talk, and Soundbites that help you Stay Pesky and Stay in the Sunlight. Plus BTS content from Murdaugh: Death in the Family AND Mandy's book Blood On Their Hands. Support Our Show, Sponsors and Mission: https://lunasharkmedia.com/support/ Quince - Hungry Root - Bombas https://amzn.to/4cJ0eVn *** ALERT: If you ever notice audio errors in the pod, email info@lunasharkmedia.com and we'll send fun merch to the first listener that finds something that needs to be adjusted! *** For current & accurate updates: lunashark.supercast.com Instagram.com/mandy_matney | Instagram.com/elizfarrell bsky.app/profile/mandy-matney.com | bsky.app/profile/elizfarrell.com TrueSunlight.com facebook.com/TrueSunlightPodcast/ Instagram.com/TrueSunlightPod youtube.com/@LunaSharkMedia tiktok.com/@lunasharkmedia Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Care for your skin like you care for the game.
Dove Men Plus Care is an official sponsor of the FIFA World Cup 2026 and has just dropped their new limited edition deodorant and antipersprint collection for 72 hours sweat and odor protection, helping you stay fresh from kickoff to the final whistle.
Visit dove.com slash CA slash E.N.
slash men dash care to shop now.
I don't know how to move forward after Judge Kelly issued an.
unprecedented order forcing me to pay nearly $200,000 of billionaire Greg Parker's legal fees.
But I know that a lot of bad people in the state of South Carolina want the order to scare me
into silence. And I need your help making sure that it won't.
My name is Manny Matney. This is True Sunlight, a podcast exposing crime and corruption,
previously known as the Murdoch Murders podcast. True Sunlight is a Lunar Shark production,
written with journalist Liz Farrell.
Hey y'all, I don't know where to start, so I will begin with gratitude.
The only reason why I am still standing and still fighting and still speaking out right now
is because of you.
My listeners, my supporters, my team, our Pink Army, who filled up two separate courtrooms
on the other side of the state for me to make sure Greg Parker and his attorneys knew
that the girl that they were going after was loved and supported.
And of course, because of my David.
But y'all are the ones carrying us through the darkness right now,
and I need to start this show by saying that I would not be speaking right now if it wasn't for you.
Okay, there are a few folks who I would like to thank personally to start off,
and trust me, we will get a better system in place for future episodes to properly express our gratitude.
Stephanie France, wow, thank you.
We love you.
Author John Copenhaver. Thank you. You're amazing. My best friend, Chelsea Murray. Thank you.
Megan Morris. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Stephanie Schumer. Lindsay Owen, Chris. Wick.
Rhonda McKinnis. Heather Colusek. Aaron Lee Carr. René Ryan. Jennifer Masservie. Ooh, we love you.
Jennifer Graves. Thank you. Jamie Bostic. Michelle Thompson. Leah James. Megan Linnhoff. Thank you.
Elise Way, Nancy Blaine, Taylor Snodgrass, thank you.
To everyone who joined Patreon today and everyone supporting our mission on Supercast.
And to our rapidly growing appeal team from all over the country, thank you.
I was gobsmacked when David woke me up on Monday morning to tell me that Judge R. Keith Kelly
not only ruled to hold me in contempt, but he ordered me to pay an unprecedented
an unreasonable amount for billionaire Greg Parker's legal fees,
$171,500 just to Greg Parker's attorneys, and then another $5,000 to the court.
Y'all, this is a third of the cost of what Ellick Murdoch claim that his six-week murder trial cost him in legal fees.
This fee, according to a lot of attorneys I've spoken to in the last few days,
is what more than most murder defendants pay for their entire defense.
This fee is more than three times the amount of the average South Carolinian salary.
This fee is outrageous, but the most outrageous part isn't the amount.
Judge Kelly ordered for the breakdown of those fees to be secret,
to be sealed, to be confidential.
So beyond the fact that I know that Jim Bannister's law firm was awarded $39,900,
Deborah Barbiers was awarded $49,950, and Mark Picklejuice Moore's law firm was awarded $85,650.
$45,000 was my annual salary in journalism for a good part of my career, so forgive my rage as I say all of this.
These fees are in no way reasonable.
There is no world where these three attorneys, who could.
clearly don't even understand the basic concepts of social media rightfully earned that astronomical
amount of money on the following. And again, this is all we know. The March 27th deposition,
the failed deposition, which is the same thing, the rule to show cause filing, the attorney's response
to my emergency motion to set deposition location, and my motion for reconsideration, as well as
the preparation for and appearances at the May 15th.
2026 and June 22nd, 26 contempt hearings, along with any pleadings or correspondence related
thereto. This is all because they deposed me on April 8th at the Spartanburg County Courthouse
instead of March 27th at an attorney's office in Bluffton for a deposition related to the Beach v. Parker case.
And in that case, remember, is where billionaire Greg Parker, whose gas station illegally sold
Paul Murdoch alcohol the night Mallory Beach died.
in a boat crash, he is accused of intentionally inflicting emotional harm on the beach family
during the boat crash litigation process to pressure the family into settling for less. The lawsuit
ultimately settled for around $15 million in 2023 from the gas station's insurance carrier.
But let me give you a quick recap on this because it's confusing. But on the week of my
deposition, Jim Seidel, the felon who runs a creepy crime website centered on defaming and harassing me,
ramped up his campaign against me to the point where I was terrified and worried for my safety.
He appeared to obsessively fixate on me day in and day out.
Several times he threatened to attend my deposition, and several sources told me that he was
working with Greg Parker's attorneys and communicating with him.
And now, court documents confirm that.
Greg Parker's attorneys showed zero concern for my personal safety that week, and in fact,
they made me feel like they wanted me to feel unsafe. They posted my phone number on the internet,
along with hundreds of my text messages that were conveyed to Greg Parker by a former Fitznews employee,
and that cost them nearly $9,000. They showed zero concern for me when I had to get a new cell phone number
because the amount of harassing text messages I received after Deborah Barbier posted my phone number on the internet.
Greg Parker's attorneys, in my opinion, helped cultivate my feeling of terror on the day of my deposition.
Are Greg Parker's attorneys billing me for that?
We have no idea.
We are just supposed to trust these people who have been untruthful to us from the get-go.
We are supposed to trust that they are being truthful with these ungodly.
fees. And honestly, the more that they doubled down on this certain location and refused to meet me
down the road at my attorney's office and refused to give us a reason as to why they wouldn't move
a few thousand feet for my deposition, it reaffirmed my gut feeling that something wasn't right.
And I felt deeply that I shouldn't go to a deposition in a case where I am not a party to a
location where I feel deeply unsafe and unprotected. In 2024, two people,
in Las Vegas were shot and killed during their deposition by guess who, an attorney.
My fears that day, I felt were justified in every single way,
and I didn't see a world where a judge would side with Greg Parker's attorneys after what
they did. I honestly thought that they would be the one sanctioned at that point for allegedly
brokering a deal to purchase private text messages that didn't belong to the person providing them.
And then they were used on the internet to defame us and demean us, and taken wildly out of context
and somehow everything bad ever said in all of those text messages was wrongfully attributed to either Liz or me.
This is why we filed an emergency motion to change the location of the deposition,
and the judge apparently denied it the morning of my deposition,
but he didn't file it until the following Monday,
which is a major miscommunication by the judge that this case hinges on.
If the judge filed his order that morning,
I would have risked my safety and complied.
But my biggest mistake in all of this
was believing that common sense and the law would prevail
in a case where a pesky journalist known for bucking the system
was up against a billionaire in his very powerful attorneys.
I knew throughout the Murdoch case that the system was bad,
but I always thought my rights as a non-party party,
witness in this case would prevent me from facing this kind of life-changing punishment for simply asking
that my deposition would be held in a safe place. My lawyers offered a number of alternative locations and
times following the failed deposition on March 27th. And Greg Parker's attorneys refused to even respond to us.
Suddenly, Judge Kelly's clerk summoned us to Gaffney, South Carolina for a hearing. And that was the hearing
that I was screamed at by Deborah Barrier for hours as she handed me printouts of dozens of my
social media posts. And apparently, Judge Kelly believes that suffering through that brutal
ambush of a hearing was not punishment enough. Now I have to pay her for it. At the hearing,
it was decided that I would be deposed the next day in Spartanburg County. And my lawyers and I all had
to stay the night there without notice while Greg Parker's attorneys looked like,
like they had packed an overnight bag and were prepared to stay, which was odd.
The deposition on April 8th was strange, invasive, and mostly very insignificant.
As I said all along, and Liz will talk about in a minute.
They fought so hard for this deposition that, in my opinion, did nothing for their defense.
They heard rumors from trolls that we were getting paid by Mark Tinsley and that I had knowledge
of Mallory Beach's dead body photos, which I do not.
But Greg Roman, who's dodged multiple subpoenas in this case and not been punished at all for it,
he might have knowledge.
Everything that Greg Parker's attorneys wanted me to do from the subpoena was done on April 8th.
And yet they elected to hold these absurd witch-hunt-style hearings and go forward with the contempt charges.
There was never an opt-out button for me to push from that point forward.
And they spent, apparently, over three years.
$100,000 on this month-long witch hunt that I was forced to be a part of against my will.
And now they want me to pay for it.
I would have been fine with paying fees for the day that I missed my deposition and calling it a day.
But looking back, it was clear that this was never about holding me in contempt.
It was about using the court to punish me for everything I have ever exposed on this podcast through my
work. I was punished for my voice, for my opinions, and my refusal to stay silent when others would,
and punishing me in particular for using my First Amendment protected speech to speak out
against the corrupt lawyers I have faced in this case, and for speaking out against Judge Kelly,
who has allowed the circus to proceed. We are allowed in South Carolina to speak out
against court officials without facing persecution from our government.
It is called the First Amendment.
But, turns out, laws don't matter in South Carolina.
That's really what I learned this week.
Which brings me to the civil contempt law in South Carolina.
David, will you read directly from the South Carolina Judicial Branch website?
Compensatory contempt seeks to reimburse the party for the costs he or she incurs
enforcing the non-complying party to obey the court's orders.
See Poston v. Poston 331 SC106, 114-502, SE2D-8690 1998.
In a civil contempt proceeding, a contemner may be required to reimburse a complainant for the cost he incurred in enforcing the court's prior order, including reasonable attorney's fees.
The award of the attorney's fees is not a punishment, but an indemnification to the party who instituted the contempt proceeding.
Lindsay v. Lindsay 328 SC 329-34549 S.C. S.E. 2D. 583-592. C.C. S.E.2D. 583-592. C.T. 1997.
A compensatory contempt award may include attorney fees.
Curley v. Howell. 277.
27. SC 3737386 through 87-287-287-827-S-E2D-915-9191982.
Compensatory contempt is a money award for the plaintiff when the defendant has injured the plaintiff
by violating a previous court order.
Included in the actual loss are the costs of defending and enforcing the court
order, including litigation costs and attorney's fees.
Hear that? The award is not a punishment. It is supposed to only reimburse direct cost
incurred enforcing the order, and the order was enforced on April 8th. Because of the confidentiality
order, Judge Kelly is making me pay $171,500 in legal fees that I apparently can't even dispute the line
items on because I don't get to know what they are, which appears to violate a number of laws,
but we will get to that. Did Greg Parker's attorneys charge me for that steak dinner that they
loudly laughed about was on Mandy on the day Deborah B. Barbier berated me in court for wearing a
swimsuit in my own backyard? How much did they charge me for Debbie, creepily collecting hundreds
of my Facebook posts and printing them out like a weirdo? How much did they charge me for
Mark Moore to spread vicious lies about me on the public index. How much are they charging me for
Mark Moore to type dozens of bitchy little footnotes about me in public documents? And are they
charging me for those copy and paste jobs from Russell Lafitte's filings? Hmm, we don't get to know.
How much was I charged for Debbie and her sad little minions to make four full binders of my
social media posts? They weren't supposed to include that in the cost because it wasn't allowed
into evidence. But who knows? We don't. These sick and disgusting attorneys have lied so many
times to the court in the past nine months. I have no choice but to assume that they have made up
these numbers again to punish me. Punish me for what? It's not for my deposition. They got that.
And it is definitely not about sending a message to the public that folks should show up to
depositions. But rather, I learned from Greg Roman in this case that the only solution is,
to actually dodge subpoenas. Greg Roman, the fake journalist who had the photos of Mallory Beach's
dead body, the photos that are at the heart of this case, he has dodged multiple subpoenas and
literally refused to give his deposition in this case. And yet, Judge Kelly has not done a single
thing to punish him. He just lets him roam. Also, Greg Parker's attorneys, the same attorneys
wanting to lecture the world about the importance of respecting the court, they earn
accused of concealing roughly $383,000 in payments, wired in 2020 to an Israeli spy security
bot farm company called Demo Man International for what the filing describes as litigation
mitigation. And then, according to Mark Hensley, they failed to disclose that in discovery.
And oh, they are also accused of interfering with subpoenas. And yet, Judge R. Keith Kelly has done nothing to
punish them. Just me, the only one brave enough to call out the corruption in the justice system.
When I first started reporting on the Murdoch story the way that I did, so many people from
South Carolina emailed me saying things like no one in South Carolina goes up against the Murdox.
No one stands up against the good old boys. And now I know why. And honestly, I should probably
consider myself lucky that the punishment was a hundred-old.
$176,000 and not jail or my life. Truly, anything could happen in the state of South Carolina
where laws do not matter here. But the thing is, this week's ruling is so much bigger than me.
This ruling will give lawyers in our state unbridled power to summon anyone to any dangerous
location for what they say is a deposition. Dick Harpoutlian could subpoena me for a deposition
at the bottom of the lake, and then I could be fined nearly $200,000 for not going.
Burt von Herman, the attorney who called me a fat hippo non-journalist,
well, he could summon me to a back alley and claim it was for a deposition.
And what about the women who have ex-husbands who are attorneys?
Could they be subpoenaed to an unsafe location under the guise of a deposition too?
Then, found in contempt for not going?
Lose their kids, their homes, their freedom, their life,
You see how this could be dangerous and wrong, and there is a reason that the rules of professional conduct state that attorneys are obligated to avoid imposing a burden on a non-party, which I am.
I think this is about making sure women in this state know that they are second-class citizens.
It is about making sure the few journalists in the state who dare to speak out against the system know that they aren't really protected by the First Amendment.
It's about emboldening the harmful legal system of the South Carolina good old boys that lost its power in the Murdoch murders podcast era.
Judge Kelly's ruling sets a terrifying precedent that will chill the First Amendment for years to come.
So our only option now is to fight it.
We will fight it and we will try our best, but we need your help in the meantime.
There is a massive amount of cash being demanded of us.
So while we get our ducks in a row with filing the motion to reconsider and then the appeal,
we are asking for contributions in the meantime to stop the bleed,
while we hire more lawyers and figure out our next steps,
while keeping our reporting as you have come to expect it.
The best in the business.
I hate asking for money from y'all,
as our listeners have done so much to support us.
And again, are the reason why I'm not curled up in the fetal position on the floor right now?
It's because of all of you.
But if you want us to continue this,
if you want us to keep fighting the good fight week after week
to make the justice system better for all of us,
please support our reporting by joining Lunashark Premium
on our new Patreon platform,
patreon.com slash Lunashark,
or support our legal defense fund
by contributing to our new GoFundMe that was launched today.
The links to both of those are in the description right now,
please go click on them and share them.
Even if you can't donate, sharing helps a whole lot.
If every single listener donated a dollar or shared the links,
we could raise the money that we need by tomorrow.
If a fourth of our listeners signed up for Lunashark Premium,
we could rest assured that the future of our company
will not only be able to fight this uphill legal battle,
but we will be free to continue
to pursue our mission in other cases to expose,
the truth wherever it leads, give voice to victims, and get the story straight. In my opinion,
a truly good journalist exposes the truth that a lot of people don't want the world to see. In a lot
of ways, this legal nightmare has helped me expose the truth of the South Carolina justice system
in a way nothing else could. Thank you again for supporting us during this tough time,
and we'll be right back. When I started building Luna Shark from the ground up with my
We were doing everything ourselves, reporting, recording, editing, running the business.
The moment we started thinking about growing the team, I realized how fast, exciting turns
into overwhelming.
Contractors, contributors, people in different countries with different rules.
You very quickly hit a wall of compliance questions.
I've seen it firsthand and I wish Pebble had existed sooner.
Pebble makes global hiring simple.
Through embedded compliance and AI-driven workflows, the platform takes the delays
and guest work out of global, so founders and HR leaders can move fast without adding risk.
You can hire in over 185 countries in minutes.
Special offer for podcast listeners.
Pebble is normally $399 a month per employee, but right now there's a limited time offer on their site that makes it even easier to get started.
Go to hipebble.aB before it's gone.
That's hip-e-b-l.a-I.T.A.I. Terms and conditions apply.
The Hulu original series Furious is coming to Disney Plus, starring Emmy Rossum.
Furious follows FBI agent Alice Black on the hunt for a mysterious and calculating serial killer.
Both walk their own paths toward justice, and as their lives start to intertwine,
the line between right and wrong begins to blur.
Don't miss the three-episode premiere of the Hulu original series Furious on July 27th,
only on Hulu on Disney Plus.
Let's talk about what is, in my opinion, a retaliatory order that, unsurprisingly, missed the
entire point and stupidly set a precedent that takes away rights from non-party.
Deponents giving even more power to, in my opinion, unscrupulous attorneys who, though
they would deny it, see no problem with using the legal system to settle personal vendettas
against journalists.
I say unsurprisingly and stupidly and personal vendettas because guess who wrote the order.
Oh, you think the judge wrote it.
Nope, he sure didn't.
That order was written by Greg Parker's legal team and edited and signed off on by the judge.
But let's rewind a bit before we talk about that.
During the June 22nd hearing in Spartanburg, South Carolina, which was the third hearing in Mandy's contempt case,
Parker attorney Jim Bannister, aka Little Lord Wannister, called David to the stand.
When Wannister started to ask David about Luna Sharks finances, Mandy's legal team objected.
Let's have a listen to that.
My name is David Moses.
Thank you.
Thank you, Judge.
Mr. Moses, you have been mentioned a couple of times by Ms. Matney as being the one who understands the dollars and the finances of Lunas Shark Media.
Is that correct?
I do my bets, yes, sir.
Objection for all of us, Your Honor.
Your Honor, it goes to financial ability to pay.
We aren't there, Your Honor.
We're trying to get through today, so I'm going to be relatively short.
It's over room. Go ahead.
Thank you, Judge.
All right, so Ms. Madney has described Lunarck Industries or Media as a multimillion-dollar company.
You heard that?
I did hear that.
Okay.
What is multi-million implies to something more than two?
How many is it?
You know, I'd have to check.
What's great about Loon Shark Media is that we are able to hire so many people as contractors.
So while gross revenues may have reached very significant levels,
we do our best to compensate those that work for us in defending the First Amendment
and calling out bad actors in the justice system.
We expose crime and corruption.
And thankfully, people find,
people find that content, yes, very much interesting.
And some people peg us on a monthly basis,
or a yearly basis.
Some people fly across the country to support us
with their finances so that we are better able and equipped
to account with our mission of exposing the truth
wherever it leads, giving voice to victims,
and getting the store straight.
And while gross revenues have been impressive at times,
our nets, allow you to our efforts,
A lot of us have, I would say, a comfortable lifestyle, but we're not flying private yet.
We don't eat at Sophie's Steakhouse all the time.
What we try to do is to honor victims through our reporting and our content.
People across the world find that interesting, and they do their best to help us hold others accountable.
Public agencies, individuals alike.
So multi-million dollars, sure, over the course of the last five years, but we also had to pay immense
expenses along the way, including this, hearing today on May 15th, on April 7th, on April 8th,
private security when deemed necessary.
Okay, so if we wanted to get at what was the net, what would be the documents and where could
we find those?
Objection, Your Honor, relevance.
No, no, he's testifying to what their financial situation is, and he's telling me that
there are other things that are out there that he needs to be able to answer that question.
So I'm asking, where are they?
What are? Because we can speak those and get them and make available to the court.
To parent their own line, what does this have to do with Ms. Madney's contempt?
Because it goes to the ability to pay, judge, which is one of the three things that are part of a rule to show cause.
What's the other reasons that she didn't show up?
And do they have a financial ability to pay?
Because ultimately you're going to have to decide if there was a contempt,
and then how much are you going to find or hold them in contempt for?
Okay.
Your Honor, I'm also objecting to what sounds like a,
fishing expedition for documents, again, non-party, what would be the purpose for this?
Well, I don't need a fishing expedition, if he'll just answer the question.
And remind me your question, sir.
I just asked you, I said you've been described as a multimillion dollar media company,
and I wanted to know how many millions we're talking about.
That implies more than two.
Is there a number you can put on that?
Objection, that's actually a different question than what he had asked.
I know that I was personal income that's not in the billions of dollars.
Permission to approach, Your Honor.
Yes.
And with that, Judge Kelly's law clerk, AJ Cedar, turned on a ridiculously loud track of static
to mask the lawyer's very long sidebar with the judge.
When everyone finally returned to their tables, little Lord Wannister said this.
Your Honor, thank you. Based on court's indication,
from the sidebar, that ability to pay will be something that we will reserve until after
there is a formal finding of contempt, and we will simply reserve our position on that,
and I don't have any further questions for Mr. Manza.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Yeah, you're on.
Thank you.
You got that, right?
Jim Bannister, who appears to be conflating Mandy with Lunashark, was questioning David
to allegedly determine what Mandy's.
ability would be to pay Parker's attorneys ludicrously exorbitant fees and expenses.
Acting like they already knew they had won their argument for contempt, by the way.
But the judge decided that this part of the process could wait until after any formal
finding of contempt. So, first, there needs to be a formal finding of contempt against Mandy.
Then let's talk about Mandy's ability to pay Parker's ludicrously exorbitant fees and expenses.
Guess what didn't happen.
That.
That didn't happen.
Not only did Judge Kelly skip the part where the court was supposed to learn more about non-party deponent Mandy Madnie's ability to pay,
Parker's ludicrously exorbitant fees and expenses, there was no discussion about the fees and expenses themselves.
No ability for Mandy and her legal team to challenge Parker's attorneys on their claims of reasonable and necessary costs.
No method for them to examine the itemized invoices, scrutinize them line by line,
and question individual attorneys about what exactly they did for that money.
It was just pay this.
Enjoy your lack of due process.
Goodbye.
Which, and I know this is going to shock you, is not at all how this was supposed to go.
Oh, and Judge Kelly issued an order of confidentiality,
barring Mandy from being able to talk about the itemized bills from the attorneys,
presuming they ever show them to her.
So, secret court is now in session,
and they wonder why we're so loud about calling these things out.
You want mandate to pay almost $200,000 to a billionaire
who electively pursued a contempt charge to the tune of at least $310,000,
which in and of itself should be regarded as an act of retaliation, in my opinion,
but you don't want to tell her what that money represents,
and you don't want the public to know what it represents,
despite the billionaire using the public's court system
to exact this unprecedented revenge on a journalist.
At the very end of the June 22nd hearing in Spartanburg,
Judge Kelly had told both parties to submit proposed orders regarding contempt,
and he told Parker's attorneys to submit their expenses and fees to him.
Now remember, these are supposed to be reasonable fees and expenses.
And I'm going to be honest.
I was super curious if Jim Bannister would submit his expenses and fees at all because
from where I sit, Bannister, an attorney who practices in Judge Kelly's circuit appears to have
been the friendly local hire for Greg Parker.
Bannister was added to Parker's large legal team only after Judge Kelly was assigned the case
in 2025, possibly because the judge knows or is familiar with Bannister or because
Bannister's familiar with the judge and the system and the clerk of court, and possibly because
Jim Bannister's brother Bruce is a powerful legislator, i.e. one of the guys who gets a vote in saying
who gets to be a judge in South Carolina, and more relevantly, who gets to continue being a judge
in South Carolina. I wondered if Wannister would be too embarrassed to submit his expenses to Judge
Kelly, knowing that the bills, the amounts they were charging for this, would tell a
very clear story, that this was an excessively overpriced and wholly unnecessary passion project
in which their client was using the court system to show a journalist who's reporting he didn't
like that he is the man, that he calls the shots, not her.
Again, that's a question that occurred to me before I learned that Judge Kelly is not
the inscrutable enigma of a studied jurist that I had hoped he was going to be, meaning
I learned that he's exactly the good old boy he seemed to be, standing desk and all.
Anyway, Mandy cannot see what the money was spent on.
She can't see things like how many steak dinners were on those invoices.
We have to ask that because after the first hearing, Parker's legal team was overheard joking to each other about how dinner was going to be on Mandy.
And then there's how many hotel stays are on those invoices.
Why was it necessary that four partner-level attorneys take part?
in this sideshow circus act.
How come Zoom was never an option for these hearings?
It could have cut the cost or significantly reduced them.
And why has Mandy never had a say in any part of her own witch hunt
that they are now making her pay for?
Why was it necessary to create binders of Mandy's social media postings?
How many hours did that take?
Were they trying to charge Mandy for the April 8th deposition that she sat for?
A deposition that they wanted and dragged her into.
a deposition that they said they needed for their defense.
They needed that deposition and yet not one mention of one single thing gleaned for Mandy's deposition
in Parker's motion for summary judgment. Their final argument to get the case dismissed in their
favor. Their big moment, the final battle before trial, their opportunity to use all their
weapons put all their cards on the table for the judge and there's nothing for Mandy's
deposition which no duh there's nothing their whole reason for deposing Mandy despite what the
trolls say despite what the felon Jim Seidel says despite journalist John Monk's inaccurate and
petty reporting on the case for the state newspaper was bogus made up manufactured what is it
John Monk keeps writing about the reason Mandy needed to be deposed David will you
read from Mona John's too poorly written and terribly reported and deeply biased stories that he's written
in the last week about this. In 2023, Parker's company, which sold an underage Paul Murdoch
alcohol before the crash, paid Renee Beach $15 million to settle a wrongful death lawsuit that
Beach had brought against Parker. In a separate lawsuit, now pending, Beach sued Parker,
alleging he had leaked photos of Mallory Beach's dead body to the public.
It is that lawsuit in which lawyers for Parker sought Matney's deposition
to see if she had any knowledge about leaked autopsy photos of Mallory Beach's body.
Ah, yes, to see if Mandy had any knowledge about leaked autopsy photos of Mallory Beach's body.
This is how it happens, y'all.
When all alleged facts are given equal weight by a reporter whose main professional
qualification was never relentless pursuer of the truth, but rather is and always has been man.
Do we tell you about the June 22nd hearing and how John Monk sundowned his way into the courtroom at
the last minute and tried to bark his way into the front row by telling the law students occupying it
that they had to move because he had a job to do.
My name is Peter Parker, but I'm also Spider-Man.
This July, we're faced with a threat.
The world may have forgotten Peter Parker.
I'm just a neighbor.
Friendly neighbor.
But he hasn't forgotten them.
Sometimes Spider-Man has to do the hard thing.
That's my responsibility.
Talk to Banner?
I didn't know you could get that big.
Spider-Man, brand-new day.
In theaters, July 31st.
But back to John's rendition of why Mandy was deposed by Parker's attorneys.
He validates the deposition with that sentence by making it seem like a legitimate inquiry.
He normalizes this idea that it's okay for attorneys to go on fishing expeditions with journalists to see what they know.
He abandons further scrutiny and due diligence because the narrative that he seems to be drawn to is the one that seems to appeal to him the most,
is the one that paints Mandy, who in the past has called John out publicly for his continued use of sources who have lied on the record in a poor light.
Interesting how monk stories don't seem to mention that.
that while Parker's attorneys continue to harangue and bully Mandy in court, while providing
no evidence that Mandy has any information they need about how the photos got into the hands of
Greg Roman, there's a very direct and provable connection between Greg Parker and his legal team,
who had the photos of Mallory's body, and with Greg Roman, the man who caused the photos to be published.
John Monk skips right over all that in his stories. Oh, and also, you can't just depose
people, John. The deposition has to be, quote, reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence.
And you tell me, John Monk, what is the reasonable calculation here? If you're phrasing it as
see if, they deposed her to see if she had information about leaked photos. All you have evidence of
is that Mandy reported on the filings in the public index as a reporter does. And that's all she's
ever done. Report on the story as it unfolds in court filings and exercise her First Amendment
rights in offering her opinion about what she's seeing happen based on the facts of the case.
We've never published photos of Mallory's dead body, ever. We have never had them. Greg Parker's boy
Greg Roman has, though. There's not a single witness out there who could swear under oath that
either Mandy or I have ever had the photos on our possession because we haven't. But oh look,
There's an affidavit right there in the public index, accessible to the public, which includes, John, I have a job to do monk, from journalist Vicki Ward, saying exactly where, when, and how.
She got the photos of Mallory's dead body and from whom.
Greg Roman.
The guy who Greg Parker hired as part of his litigation mitigation team in 2020, according to Parker's spokesperson, in an August 22 story in the Wall Street Journal.
But no, let's feed into the manufactured contempt charge against Mandy, right, John?
And the hundreds of thousands of dollars spent litigating that.
I'm sorry, but this is all so infuriating and I'm tired.
I'm sick of saying the same things over and over and hoping that someone out there with more
power than I have.
Well, listen, every day feels more and more surreal.
How is this allowed to happen?
How do the John monks sit by and think, what, that Mandy deserves this?
that because Mandy is outspoken on social media
about how traditional media in South Carolina
has allowed generations of corruption
to rot and fester in the court systems
by cowtowing to powerful sources
that she somehow must be in contempt here.
All right, Mandy, quote,
failed to give her deposition,
according to John Monk.
That's her crime.
She failed to give a deposition
that she gave.
She gave the deposition, John.
She made herself available for the deposition
on the day and at the time posted on the subpoena. And she used the tools available to her
and everyone else in the court system by asking Judge Kelly for emergency relief for permission
to have the deposition held at her attorney's office. And she waited for his answer. And while
she waited for his answer, she gave Parker's attorneys the opportunity to depose her right then
in there, over Zoom or in person, 2,700 feet away. But Judge Kelly's decision did not come until
after the scheduled deposition time, despite having been decided on and signed off on before the
scheduled deposition time. Where is your journalistic scrutiny on that, John Monk? No red flags there
for you? Nothing fishy about that? Picture this way. At one table, there is a completed 1,000-piece
puzzle. It takes all the public filings in this case, all the public exhibits, all the public arguments
made in public court, and every piece that's been considered weighed and put together so that the
final picture becomes pretty clear. And nowhere in that final picture of all those pieces from the
public index, do you see me? And nowhere in that final picture do you see Mandy. There's just
Greg Parker and Greg Roman and Vicki Ward and a single documentary that had possession of
photos of Mallory's body and used them in a publicly posted and widely accessible video to
promote the documentary. All the pieces are there. But people like John Monk, Judge Kelly, the pro-park
are trolls, the content creators determined to twist the story into being about me, Mandy, and Mark
Tinsley, they all ignore the puzzle, which fine, ignore it. You don't have to use our puzzle. But how about
put together your own puzzle? Using those publicly available
pieces and not these made-up theories based on the hopes and dreams of seeing us fall. No one wants to do that,
though. Instead, they rely on the echo chamber created by Parker's attorneys and shouted into
existent by the trolls in their caves and vice versa. They rely on table number two, where there's one
big, amorphous lump of brown Play-Doh. All the Play-Doh colors mushed together, ruined, and muddied.
And they call that the story. And it makes it.
me want to scream. This entire case is about how photos of Mallory Beach's dead body
ended up in the Murdoch murder's deadly dynasty documentary, produced by Viggy Ward and Greg
Roman, and having 0.00 to infinity percent to do with us. Those photos were never released to the
public. They were never released to the media. We never had them. We've never seen them. There's
nothing John Monk or the others can claim to say shows we did.
And yet, he and the others continue to ignore that the path between Greg Parker and Greg Roman is a short one.
Making all of this one big distraction from that.
Look at the shiny toy, John Monk.
You follow that shiny toy.
Follow this story about the reporter you dislike whose book release you ignored, whose scripted TV series you ignored,
whose name you can barely say, whose professional title you continue to deny.
follow the shiny toy and ignore the publicly available facts.
Not only do we have a Parker spokesperson confirming that Greg Roman was paid by Greg Parker to help with litigating the boat crash.
In July 2021, Greg Roman posted a very lengthy blog post about the murders and the boat crash case.
A blog that concluded Parker's Kitchen ought not to be held responsible for Mallory,
Beach's death. And according to a filing by the Beach family, that blog contained information
that was only contained in unreleased police reports at the time. Sorry, not only contained
in unreleased police reports at the time, but rather contained in something called the Murdoch
report, a dossier paid by Greg Parker that his attorneys had argued that the court was considered
confidential attorney-client-privileged work. Meaning, it appears Greg Roman, who used to
Greg Parker's dossier on the Murdox to glean facts for his blog post.
In a November 2022 email to Parker's attorneys and Judge Bentley Price
that's available in the public index.
To you, John Monk, Mark Tinsley further shows how connected Greg Parker is to Greg Roman
and how it appeared that Roman had used Parker's Murdoch report as sourcing for his public
blog post.
David, will you read from this email?
Roman references an EMS statement which falsely suggests that Paul Murdoch may have taken shots of brown liquor at a restaurant in downtown Beaufort called plums.
Roman wrote on page 19 of 25 of his blog, quote, according to an EMS statement, Paul's ex-girlfriend Morgan Dowdy told her that the boys also drank shots of brown liquor at another downtown restaurant called plums.
That statement from the EMS personnel was not published.
publicly available as of July 27, 2021, to Mr. Roman, meaning it had not been released to the public
by either DNR or the AG's office. Moreover, that statement has never been reported on other than
by Mr. Roman. It is, however, also outlined on page nine of the alleged confidential Murdoch
report, which uses the same phrase of, quote, shots of brown liquor, end quote. Similarly, the
actual statement is published on page 135 of the Murdoch report. Clearly, Mr. Parker knowingly and
intentionally waived any privileges that he now claims by publishing these materials and giving them
to Greg Roman for publication. By the very fact that Parker gave the materials to Roman, a purported
journalist, waives any of his claimed privileges. Once the privilege is waived, it is waived for all
purposes. Mr. Moore knows full well about Greg Roman and his work for Mr. Parker. His refusal to
acknowledge these facts, as he has, suggests that he is, at best, being less than candid with the court.
So, not only is there evidence that Greg Parker hired Greg Roman, an evidence that Greg Roman gave
Vicky Ward the photos of Mallory's dead body, along with other confidential court materials that were
used in a documentary that Greg Roman produced, there's evidence that Greg Roman was quoting from a
super secret dossier owned by Greg Parker, using details that were only known to investigators at the time.
Where's that story, John Monk?
Anyway, let's talk about that order, shall we?
Like we said, Judge Kelly skipped over what seems like a pretty big part of this, determining
whether Mandy can afford to pay these exorbitant and, in my opinion, absolutely unnecessary legal
bills from Greg Parker. Legal bills and giving Mandy the opportunity to question the legitimacy of the
legal bills. Legal bills. What am I saying? What's the legal equivalent of punching Mandy in the face and then
charging her for the bruises on their knuckles? What's that called? Is that also called legal bills?
Hmm, makes sense. Okay, so like we said, this order was written by Greg Parker's attorneys.
which is not unusual.
Judges in South Carolina draft orders for the judges to use in whole or as a jumping off point.
Like I said, Judge Kelly is ordering that I pay for Greg Parker's attorney's fees for the March 27th deposition, the failed deposition.
The rule to show cause filing, the attorney's response to my emergency motion to set a deposition location and motion for consideration, as well as for the preparation for the preparation
for an appearances at the May 15th, 2026 and June 22, 26, contempt hearings, along with any
pleadings or correspondence related thereto. You know, the hearings that I did not ask for.
The hearings that were entirely unnecessary after I did what they wanted me to do and gave my
deposition on April 8th. And the cost of that, Judge Kelly is ordering that little old may pay over
$171,000 for Greg Parker's attorney's fees.
And Judge Kelly is fining me $5,000, noting that it was necessary to deter similar conduct
in the future and promote the respect for the law.
I'm sorry, L-O-L, Your Honor.
L-O-L.
Respect for the law?
So the law says that it is okay for lawyers to drag a non-party deponent into
their case as a distraction from the case in chief and treat that non-party deponent like a criminal
while tearing apart their life from inside out.
The law says that it's okay for lawyers to purchase private text messages that otherwise
they could not get through a valid subpoena that were alleged by Mark Tensley in open court
to be stolen from the non-party deponent's former workplace by a terminated employee who was not
a recipient or owner of those text messages?
The law says that it's okay for a felon who has been on a months-long mission to destroy the
non-party deponent's career and credibility to partner with the lawyers and broker the sale
of the text messages and then publish those allegedly stolen text messages on a so-called
news website that he seemed to create in service of his mission.
a so-called news website? The law says that it's okay for lawyers to inconvenience and instill fear
and a non-party depotent by refusing to entertain any conversation about moving the deposition
to a location where the non-party deponent would feel safe in light of the felons recently
disclosed relationship with the lawyer and his online post about attending the non-party
depotent's deposition? The non-party deponent whose career and reputation, he is seeking
to ruin? The law says that it's okay for the judge to deny the non-party depotent's
emergency motion on the morning of the scheduled hearing but not inform her of the decision
until after the window for holding her deposition is over? Is it the law that lawyers can charge
double and triple what some murder defense case costs to sadistically pursue can tip charges
against the non-party deponent even after she sat for the deposition?
That is the law that needs to be respected?
On that note, we will talk more about what this seemingly retaliatory and wholly unprecedented order
says when we return with part two of this week's True Sunlight podcast.
Again, if you want to help us in this fight, please consider joining Lunashark Premium
on our new Patreon platform today,
or donating to our GoFundMe for legal fees
at the link in the description.
Thank you for all of your support.
Until next time, stay tuned,
stay pesky, and stay in the sunlight.
True Sunlight is a Luna Shark production
created by me, Mandy Matney,
co-hosted and reported by journalist Liz Pharrell,
research support provided by Beth Braden,
audio production support provided by Jamie Hoffman and Grace Hills,
case file management by
Kate Thomas. Learn more about our mission and membership at LunaSharkmedia.com. Interruptions provided by
Luna and Joe Pesky. You know me, I dig until I find the truth. And it turns out, that same
instinct that drives my investigative journalism, it makes for a different, but pretty amazing, new kind
of travel show. Wherever it leads is Luna Sharks' brand new podcast. And it's nothing like the
travel content that you've heard before. We go deeper. We talk to locals.
reporters, and people who actually live where you want to visit, not just the ones who want
your tourist dollars. We cover the food and landmarks, sure, but we also ask the harder questions.
What is the real history here? The often sad and traumatic history. What new challenge is this
place facing? And how can you show up as a visitor who actually makes things better?
My co-host, David Moses and I, along with a team of journalists, are hitting destinations
around the world to expose the truth, give voice to victims throughout history, and get the story straight,
with new destinations and episodes every other week.
Wherever It Leads from Luna Shark.
Find it wherever you listen to your podcast or visit wherever it leadspod.com.
