Murdaugh Murders Podcast - TSP #43 - What Happened to Sara Lynn Colucci? Part One: The Story the Jury SHOULD Have Been Told + Victims Matter Rally
Episode Date: March 21, 2024On today's True Sunlight Podcast, Co-hosts Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell begin their dive down the complex rabbit hole that is the Sara Lynn Moore-Colucci case. Sara Lynn was killed on the evenin...g of May 20, 2015, outside of Charleston, South Carolina, at a jewelry warehouse she owned with her husband, Michael Colucci. She died by asphyxiation mere feet from Michael, who said he was waiting in the car for her to use the restroom. Michael Colucci contends that Sara Lynn took her own life or … barring that … she tripped and fell into the loops of an industrial garden hose and accidentally hung herself. When first-responders arrived at the scene, they found Sara Lynn’s body already cold to the touch and Michael with scratches on his body and a fat and bloody lip, which he says he got from giving Sara Lynn CPR. In 2018, Michael was tried for her murder but that case ended in a mistrial. Now, as the prosecution and defense gear up for a May 13, 2024, retrial, Mandy and Liz break down what went wrong six years ago and the story of Sara Lynn and Michael that the jury should have heard back then. We'll also hear from speakers at the Victims Matter Rally like David Pascoe, Carl Smalls Sr. and Sarah Ford plus a special message from Sandy Smith on her experiences at the rally... Stay Tuned, Stay Pesky and Stay in the Sunlight...☀️ In March we’re offering your first month of Soak Up The Sun membership for 50% off. Join Luna Shark Premium today at Lunashark.Supercast.com. Premium Members also get access to searchable case files, written articles with documents, case photos, episode videos and exclusive live experiences with our hosts on lunasharkmedia.com all in one place. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3BdUtOE. And for those just wanting ad-free listening without all the other great content, we now offer ad-free listening on Apple Podcast through a subscription to Luna Shark Plus on the Apple Podcasts App. Or become a Premiere Member on YouTube for exclusive videos and ad-free episodes. SUNscribe to our free email list to get that special offer for first time members, receive alerts on bonus episodes, calls to action, new shows and updates. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3KBMJcP Visit our new events page Lunasharkmedia.com/events where you can learn about the upcoming in-person and virtual appearances from hosts! And a special thank you to our sponsors: Microdose.com, PELOTON, and VUORI. Use promo code "MANDY" for a special offer! For current & accurate updates: TrueSunlight.com facebook.com/TrueSunlightPodcast/ Instagram.com/TrueSunlightPod Twitter.com/mandymatney Twitter.com/elizfarrell youtube.com/@LunaSharkMedia Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
I don't know why it took this long to get justice for Sarah Lynn Colucci.
But after learning more about Sarah and the details of the case that the prosecution left
out during the 2018 trial, I am hopeful that the trial this spring will finally do her
justice.
My name is Mand Mandy Matney.
This is True Sunlight,
a podcast exposing crime and corruption
previously known as the Murdoch Murders Podcast.
True Sunlight is a Luna Shark production written
with journalist Liz Farrell. Well, hello.
Today is a good day for justice.
We just got back from the third annual Victims Matter Rally, presented by Sarah Ford and
Essie Vann.
It was empowering to stand in solidarity with those who have lost and those who deserve
justice.
I did not speak this year, but Sandy Smith, David, Eric Bland, and I stood in the crowd
and cheered others on.
Sandy even met Attorney General Alan Wilson,
and we will talk about that at the end of the episode.
Real quick, thank you to all of the fans
who showed up today.
I know 9 a.m. on a Thursday is tough,
but it was so important to see our Army in action.
Special thanks to the man who drove all the way
from Charlotte just to meet us.
You made our day and I'm sorry I didn't catch your name.
Now I have to share a few parts of the rally with y'all.
Like they did with me, hopefully these words will leave you ready to fight the good fight and take on this system.
Here is attorney Sarah Ford reminding us of the mission at hand.
We must continue to create and enforce a system where victims' rights and defendants' rights
are both zealously protected.
Victims deserve this system, a system that works for them and with them.
I look forward to the day when judges no longer say they've never seen a victim represented
by counsel in the courtroom, and it becomes commonplace and victims asserting their rights is
as normalized as a defendant's right to have an attorney or asserting their
right to be silent. Victims and survivors are counting on all of us to
center their rights and their voices in a system where they're often pushed to
the sidelines. That is not the case today. Victims are at the heart of who we are and what we do
and why we are here.
The event focused on a case we have been covering
for a year now, Gerard Price, the convicted murderer
who was released from prison 15 years early
thanks to a secret deal between solicitor Byron Gibson,
state representative Todd Rutherford, and Judge Casey Manning.
David Pasco, the man who prosecuted
Price and put him behind bars,
spoke at the victims rally Thursday.
In December of 2002.
Call junior was gunned down in
an horrific act of violence.
On our streets right here in Richland County.
The murderer was and is a high ranking member of a national street gang.
His name, as you heard, Gerard Price.
I was the prosecutor on Mr. Price's murder charge.
And to give you an example of how dangerous he was and still is, he is the only person
of hundreds of violent criminals I've ever tried.
He's the only one where I had to have a police escort to and from my car at court.
He is so dangerous that witnesses were so fearful of him to testify, they fled the state
even though they were under subpoena to testify. They went to jail for contempt of court. The jury
convicted Price of murder. The judge sentenced him to 35 years, a day-to-day
sentence with no parole. And Carl and Lilly on that day, during that trial in
2003, at least for Mr. Price thought they had some closure, that
Price couldn't get out of prison until at least 2038.
As for Mr Price in the Department of Corrections, he was so bad in such a nuisance in our prisons
that they had to transfer him to New Mexico
to go to prison.
And yet, despite his violent record,
despite his leadership in a national gang,
despite his nuisance in our prisons,
he was able to have his attorney, a lawyer or legislator,
go back in a judge's chambers and have a judge sign
a secret sealed order releasing Gerard Price from prison 15 years early.
Carl and Lilly didn't know about Gerard Price's release until about two hours before he was
released from that New Mexico prison. So
the nightmare began again. This is the most outrageous thing I've ever seen
occur in our system of justice in South Carolina and they didn't know what to do.
They called the governor's office no help. They called the solicitor's office
no help and no one knew what to do because no one even knew why Gerard Price
was released from prison or who
released him because it was all sealed.
It was secret.
It was about a month after Price's
release that a police officer.
Good friend of mine called me to ask me
why is Gerard Price out on the streets?
I thought he was joking.
He wasn't joking and Pasco knew this would be a nightmare for the Smalls
family whose son Carl Smalls Jr. Was murdered by Price. Carl's father, also
named Carl, spoke on Thursday morning and I swear the cement of the state
house shook. His words were so powerful. Smalls reminded the crowd how victims are often maligned
and reduced by people who just don't understand.
He talked about how cruel people can be
with their insulting, cutting comments.
The media has been great to us for putting our story out
and exposing this tragedy of
justice.
Also, we know that by the end of the day, we will hear that this family is being used
for political purposes.
Well, if you feel that way, you got us.
We are guilty as charged.
Just know that we are not being blindly laid around by anyone. We are cleared as charged. Just know that we are not being blindly laid around
by anyone.
We are cleared-eyed.
We see you.
This state see you.
This country sees you.
Light always overcome darkness,
and if this case can be used to shine through
an exposed wrongdoing, again, you got us.
We are guilty as charged.
This absolute travesty of justice was brought to us by the unlawful firm of Gibson, Rutherford
and Manning.
Did y'all hear that? He called them out. On the state house steps. That is a big deal.
This was an embarrassment to the state of South Carolina and a black eye to the foundation
of justice in this state. We want to convey to everyone in this state that this is not just about the small family,
but all of us, a family of victims, a family any one of us would gladly give anything not to be a
part of. It's about decent, honest, loud-abiding citizens who go about their daily business
and respect the law and each other.
We are here as a small family to let you know that your hurt and your pain is our hurt and
pain.
We know your dissatisfaction with the system, the level of distrust you have dealing with
a system that is heavily tilted toward criminals instead of you.
We know what you went through, especially
if you lost a loved one through violence, especially a son or daughter. A segment of
this society will say that families need to move on. You hear that all the time,
just move on. The man served his time. In our case, it's been close to 22 years. But to those who feel that way, I would only say,
try watching your son or daughter that you watched being born,
which I did watch my son being born, raised him for 22 years,
now laying in a casket that you had to pick out.
Try that on for size, then we can talk.
You see, we only have memories left.
We wonder what and who they would become.
We hold on to those special moments and memories.
I had one of those moments about a year ago.
There's this song that my son liked called A Thousand Miles.
He would always say to me that he
didn't say daddy I don't know why but I just like that song. Every time I hear
that song it brings me back to him. Last year while I was driving down the road
that song came on the radio and believe it or not I had to pull over to the side
of the road to collect myself and it's been almost 22 years.
Trust me, I would walk 1,000 miles to see my son again.
I would give my life for his.
You never get through this.
This is our burden to bear, our cross to carry,
and to the get-over-it crowd.
If you are somehow annoyed or offended by people who just don't seem to get over the crowd, if you are somehow annoyed
or offended by people who just don't seem to get over it,
respectfully, you need to get over it.
We can't and we won't.
We move forward because we have to.
Life doesn't stop for us,
but we will continue to carry our loved ones with us.
He concluded his speech with words of inspiration.
And yes, it was Stephen Smith he was talking about as he was pointing to Sandy.
When the system can release a convicted murderer in the cover of darkness, yet threatened a 70-year-old woman
who's been displaced from her home for over 13 years,
it just doesn't look right.
A woman by all accounts hasn't robbed,
hasn't killed anybody, or sold any drugs.
Lastly, years ago, while watching the 70 political shows,
I happened upon a wise man by the
name of Mr. William Raspberry. Talking about crime he said, sometimes I wonder
if it's better to build a fence at the edge of the cliff or put an amulet in
the valley. The justice system has to be that fence at the edge of the cliff.
That fence has to be a high fence built on the rule of law, accountability for one's
action with the knowledge that there will be consequences for unlawful behavior.
That fence then has to be fortified by equal scales of justice that gives equal justice to victims as well as those who are accused of crimes.
And it has to act as a bulwark to those who are appointed to execute the law, which again are the suits and robes.
I was once told that when you are going through hell, keep going.
Again, when you're going through hell, just keep going.
Don't stop.
Keep on being advocates for your loved ones.
They no longer have a voice.
You have to use yours.
You have to use yours for Stephen.
You have to use yours for Jimbo.
Yes, your kids need protection too. And yes, you
must stand up for Larry. We must stand up for each other and keep going because we're
going through hell with the system and the tragedy that we were dealt, but we have to
keep going. We have to keep going because our loved ones matter and we matter.
We've got to stay motivated.
We've got to educate ourselves, know our rights.
We have to know who we are electing to public office.
We've got to study them, educate yourself on them, and more importantly, know who you are.
Know who they are. We must have faith
in Almighty God to help us through our pain. God is the answer for the hell that you're going through
dealing with your with the loss of your loved one and the system. And lastly I would say
And lastly, I would say the acronym for PUSH, we all know it, Pray Until Something Happens.
Pray Until Something Happens.
But also while we're praying, we've got to keep pushing until something happens.
Because, well, we all know we've been told faith without works is dead.
So we have to keep pushing until something happens.
Once again, I thank you as part of as for the small family,
along with my daughter and grandchildren back in Charleston.
And we do feel we are part we are family.
And we feel comfortable here.
We are a must family.
And let's keep pushing,
let's keep going.
Thank you very much.
-♪
That said, this rally serves as an important reminder
that our justice system needs to
prioritize victims.
Prosecutors need to prioritize victims.
Police need to prioritize victims.
Reporters, podcasters, journalists, all of us need to prioritize victims.
Only then will the scales of justice tip to the point
where powerful defendants no longer have automatic leverage.
I've been thinking a lot about this
as I've been spending all my nights and days
watching the 2018 Kalochi trial.
It is a frustrating trial to watch for a lot of reasons.
I want to say that I know, I know hindsight is 20-20,
and it is so much easier to critique a prosecutor
than it is to build a case and convince a jury
that a defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
It is a tough task.
And the more that I watch prosecutors in action,
the more grateful I am for the work
of Big Creighton Energy Waters and his team.
Creighton brought the Murdoch case to the jury
with passion, dedication,
and an immense amount of well-researched facts.
He was convinced that Elick Murdoch murdered his wife and son in cold blood, and you could
feel that in his voice, day in and day out.
From beginning to end, Creighton built a case out of bricks, leaving no room for the jury
to see reasonable doubt.
But if Creighton built his case out of bricks, then Megan
Birchdead and Joel Kozak, the prosecutors in the 2018 Colochi trial, built their
case against Michael Colochi out of sticks. And Michael was represented by
Andy Savage, a big bad wolf that makes Dick Harputlian look like one of the three little pigs, but a lot meaner.
And we'll be right back.
One of the biggest similarities and major differences
between the Calucci case and what we saw go down
in Ellic Murdoch's murder trial
is how the defendant was defended.
Shortly after his arrest in early May 2016,
almost a full year after Sarah's death, Michael Colucci hired Charleston attorney Andy Savage.
According to public records that reporter Beth Braden obtained for us from the Berkley County
Clerk of Courts office, Andy wasn't Michael's first attorney in the case. Michael started off
being represented by
a partner of another Charleston law firm that at the time was representing him in a case
that he and Sarah had brought against their daughter's private school.
The school had erroneously sent information about their financial status to another family, which
according to testimony was connected to their non-payment of tuition.
We'll talk more about that in a few minutes because it potentially speaks to Michael's frame of mind around the time of Sarah's death.
Initially, Michael was denied bond. It's a little confusing how this works though.
Because Michael was charged with murder, a violent crime that carries a potential death penalty sentence or life in prison sentence,
he was also able
to have a bond hearing in Circuit Court. So he was denied bond in Magistrate Court where
bonds are usually set under his first attorney. Then days later, his bond case moved to Circuit
Court where his new attorney, Andy Savage, was able to successfully argue that because
Michael had not skipped town after Sarah's death,
he deserved to be released from jail while he awaited trial. Now, predictably, Judge Markley
Dennis, the judge from Bowen Turner's sweetheart, Pleadiel, agreed. He told the prosecution, which
was arguing for no bond, that he could not ignore the fact that Michael had not tried to run away from law enforcement
in the year leading up to his charge. But hello! The guy had just hired his criminal defense attorney.
He clearly hadn't been planning to be charged with murder, at least not practically speaking.
So what exactly was he fleeing from? As you'll remember,
Ellic Murdoch had Dick and Jim nailed down from day one
after Maggie's and Paul's murders. Dick and Jim were doing the absolute most for Elick in trying
to manage his way out of murder charges. Many, obviously including us, believed that Elick should
have and would have been arrested at the scene that night had he been any other
person with any other set of attorneys. And if not at the scene, then at least by August
11th, 2021, at the meeting he had with Sled with Corey Fleming right by his side, when
Sled agent David Owen asked him point blank, did you kill Maggie and did you kill Paul?
The sole reason Ehrlich wasn't charged earlier than he was is because of state Senator Dick
Harpullian. Sled and the AG's office spent over a year preparing their case before serving
Ehrlich charges to him, basically room service style on a silver platter with a sprig of
parsley. As soon as they lifted the lid on that dish, Sled and the AG's office knew
that Dick and Jim would be in there with their noses, inspecting every little morsel on the plates to find any parts that were over-seasoned or under-cooked.
With Kaluchi, the big-time attorney-ing didn't come into play until after he was charged. Why? Because Michael Kaluchi wasn't anticipating this outcome as an eventuality, at least not the same way Ehrlich was.
Now that we're almost nine years out from Sarah's death and eight years out from Michael's arrest and her death,
you can see what money has bought Michael.
Had he not been out on bond, we promise you this case would have been retried a long time ago.
We're going to hammer that point home a lot, by the way, because nine and eight years, plus
it's been six years since his first trial. Sarah Lynn's family has had to live with zero resolution
and with this case hanging over their heads for almost a decade, her daughter Bishop has spent
almost a full third of her life waiting for the justice system to retry this case alone.
It's shameful. The only person that a delay like
this benefits is a defendant who can afford the money it takes to make it happen in the
first place. Now, we've told you over and over about Andy Savage and his brief but irritating
and not unsuspicious role in Stephen Smith's case in 2021, where his chief accomplishment
was keeping Stephen's mother from sharing Stephen's story with the media at a time when she needed all eyes on her son's case.
The only other thing that we knew about Andy before this other than his reputation as a
star attorney was that he had represented Michael Slager, the North Charleston police
officer whose account of killing an unarmed black man was thrown into question when a
video emerged showing the man, Walter Scott, running
away from Slager at the time he was shot. Andy was hired after the video came out contradicting
Slager's account, which is when Slager's first attorney quit.
Andy was hired in 2016 after the video came out contradicting Slager's account, which
is when Slager's first attorney quit. Andy was able to get Slager a federal deal on which he pleaded guilty to deprivation of rights under the law, and his charges of
obstruction of justice and use of a firearm in a crime of violence got dismissed. But,
much to Andy's disappointment, Slager was still sentenced to 20 years in prison.
According to a Post and Courier story, in 2018, Andy considered this the loss of a lifetime
and fell into a deep depression afterward.
Anyway, that's a very short history on Andy.
Anything we didn't know about him before, we've now learned by watching Michael Colucci's
first trial, which was held in May 2018 and is available on CourtTV.com.
To understand how Andy conducts himself in the courtroom,
I'm going to need you to first picture Dick Harpullian.
Picture his arrogance, his entitlement, his rudeness,
his feigned audacity at what he's hearing
when he wants to make a point to the jury
that this response from the state's witness
is not only an affront to his client,
but to society at large.
But remove Dick's sputtering
and his afternoon chair naps in the courtroom.
Okay, take all of those things,
but now place this distilled version of Dick
in a room with the case files
and sit him down at the desk
and picture him actually reading the files and taking notes and not relying completely on his ability at ad libbing and
a gross miscalculation of his own charm.
Now take this new version of Dick after he studied the case beat for beat and imagine
him popping in his well-worn copy of Silence of the Lambs into his dusty old
VCR.
And picture him watching it over and over and over as he practices saying,
Well, Clarice, have the lambs stop screaming in the mirror.
Then take that new version of Dick Harpullian and dip him into a vat of marshmallows a few
times. Pop some glasses
on him, give him a belly-first posture, and there you have Andrew John Savage III.
Oh, one more thing you need to know about Andy. It would not surprise either of us one
bit if we found out years from now that when he entered law school, his name was actually Andy Smith and the savage part came later, like a weird surname transformation or some
Mandela effect thing that occurred after the universe saw how he handles witnesses in the
courtroom.
Because Andy Savage actually is savage. He is more calculating, quicker on his feet, smarter, more terrifying, and
far more effective than Dick Harpullian in a courtroom. He speaks quietly, giving you
a false sense of decorum. He doesn't pace. He stands in one place and just asks questions
that are meticulously designed to misdirect and confuse
the jury and make the state's witness look like they took the afternoon off from their
shift at McDonald's to investigate a murder and present their findings to the jury.
Then when you and the jury are lulled into a sleepiness that can only be solved by a
nap, BAM! Andy pulls out a bag of evidence
and wraps a hose around his neck until his face turns color and his voice is constricted
by a lack of oxygen while he continues to grill the witness. He did that, by the way.
He wrapped his neck in the hose that Michael says Sarah used to kill herself in daylight
while he sat in their car, facing her, mere feet away. And that wasn't even the most
gross thing that Andy did during the trial.
One of his core defenses of Michael is that maybe Sarah tripped into the hose when, instead
of using the gate to enter the side of the building, she squeezed between the fence post
and the building, where she tripped and fell into the hose, which was wrapped around the
post.
When a forensic pathologist testified that she was around the same height and weight as Sarah and could not physically squeeze herself through the fence post,
Andy appeared to pick a random woman out of the courtroom to ask her height and weight.
And yes, it was that awkward.
The prosecution objected.
The jury was sent back and lo and behold, we find out that this random woman is actually an employee of Andy's law firm.
To be specific, she's the only attorney who works with him in his firm and she's a former U.S. Army
attorney with three bronze stars according to the Post and Courier newspaper. Andy successfully argued
for the opportunity to present her to the jury after the woman testified to her height and weight
which was about seven inches taller than Sarah, but only 20 pounds heavier.
I don't have to tell you that the shape of a 165 pound woman who is five foot,
11 inches tall can be very different from the shape of a woman who is 145 pounds
and barely five foot four inches tall, right?
But Andy was setting something up here.
There seemed to be a video of this decorated former U S army attorney
successfully squeezing herself past the six foot fence post and the building.
And Andy wanted the jury to see it in service of that in front of the jury.
He asked the forensic pathologist to guess at whether Sarah's
chest was bigger or
smaller than the chest of the woman, his female employee,
the decorated former U S army attorney who was standing there for all to
examine her body. It was stunning.
Not only did it create this sort of scandalous moment,
it forced the witness to repeatedly bring up Sarah's
breast implants and maybe that was the point. And y'all, that wasn't even the grossest thing he did.
One of the videos Andy appears to have at the ready was of women squeezing themselves between the fence post and the building is
of his wife, Cheryl, who sat second chair to him during this trial.
Like Sarah, Cheryl is a blonde.
Cool, right?
The jury could see Cheryl squeezing through the fence post and easily picture Sarah doing
it that night. And maybe, you know, asphyxiating herself accidentally
on a loop of a stiff industrial hose.
But that wasn't enough for Andy and Cheryl.
No, no, no.
They somehow thought it would be a great idea
to go buy the same dress Sarah was wearing
the night that she died and put
Cheryl in that dress.
And then film Cheryl, who is presumptively sober, squeezing through the fence post in
that dress.
That's right, Sarah's friends and family had to watch a video of Andy Savage's wife dressed like Sarah Lynn
Colucci on the night she died, acting out the defense's theory on how Sarah could
have died that night, which is frankly ridiculous. Sarah had a BAC of.229
when she died, more than twice the legal limit to drive. If she did die by accident, as Michael's team proposed,
alcohol and the cocaine in her system
could have played a factor.
But it's important to note,
asphyxiation by accident by tripping over a hose
is uncommon.
And how could she trip over a hose and choke to death
as her husband sat in the car a few feet away?
And most importantly, what exactly does Annie's wife wearing Sarah's same dress squeezing through a fence at the crime scene actually prove to the jury?
Even if Sarah did go through the fence that night, is that proof that she tripped and fell and
hung herself on a hose while her husband sat a mere few feet away?
Regardless of what Andy was trying to prove, it was one of the sickening moments we have
ever seen during a trial.
And we are saying this as people who experienced Alex Murdoch sit on the witness stand and
give baby nicknames to everyone in his life in an attempt to not sound like a murderer.
Luckily, the judge, Judge Deidre Jefferson, did not allow it.
We will get into that mess in a later episode.
After a mistrial was declared, Andy was interviewed on his way out of
the courtroom and told a reporter that he was disappointed in the outcome. But
from where we sit, the outcome was pretty ideal given the circumstances that Andy
had to work with, meaning Andy did a great job. In short, Sarah's body was cold to the touch when EMTs arrived, and
her body was showing signs of liver mortis, meaning she had been dead for longer than
Michael's timeline of events would allow for. She was found lying sort of on her side
against a building, meaning she wasn't flat on her back the way one would be if
one's husband were administering CPR as he told the 911 operator he was doing.
The car where Michael said he waited for Sarah in while she was using the
bathroom was a mere few feet from where Sarah died, facing her with a clear view.
Michael not only had a fat lip, which he said he got from the CPR he doesn't appear to have administered on Sarah,
he had additional signs of a physical altercation on his body.
He had bruises and scratches, including on his upper right and left arms. He had abrasions on the knuckle of one hand,
and skin was peeled off on the inside
of one of his arms near his wrist.
Sarah had abrasions on both knees
and on top of one of her feet,
the foot where her strappy high heel had fallen off
and was hanging on by her ankle.
Meaning, according to at least one expert's testimony, she looked as if she had been dragged.
Sarah also had what appeared to be a black eye and was missing the tip of her left pinky
nail.
In the car, on the floor passenger seat, police found that pinky nail.
On the driver's seat was the arm of a pair of broken sunglasses, still attached to a
strap. On the passenger side was the rest of those broken sunglasses. So, the fact that Andy was able to convince some jurors that Sarah didn't die at Michael's
hands seems to be an accomplishment.
And Michael certainly got his money's worth because Andy burned down Sarah's village
in an attempt to save his client. He dehumanized her at every turn through humiliation, stereotype,
belittling her, and frankly all women, and bringing in details of her life that
he wanted the jury to believe added up to alleyway suicide. Worse than that, the
prosecution let him do this. Again, it's super predictable that a high-priced defense
attorney is going to take dynamite to a victim's life in order to free his client, right? It isn't
just about using the law to defend their client at that point. It isn't just about holding the state
accountable to the evidence. It becomes about something else. So it's the prosecution's job to,
you know, show some enthusiasm for a case and
actually try hard.
Remind the jury of the human life that was lost here and why justice is so important
in this case.
Again, that's not what happened here.
We're not just talking about technical stuff here either, like the dozen or so times that
the prosecution allowed Andy to testify for the witnesses without
objection. And we're not even talking about the unprofessional stuff like Megan Birchstead rolling
her eyes and snickering at the prosecution table. We mean basic stuff like giving the jury a story
to understand about who Sarah was and who Sarah was with Michael in her life. So we want to take
you through some things that we think the jury should have heard over
those two weeks back in May 2018, starting with Michael's financial problems.
Early on in testimony, the prosecution called to the stand a local used car salesman, and
he was also a bar owner, who knew Sarah and Michael.
His primary purpose seemed to be to show the jury that Michael was possessive
of Sarah. He wouldn't let her go to the bathroom alone at this guy's bar.
And he was protective against people talking to Sarah,
which it's really hard to judge that right without knowing how shady this bar
was. For instance, you heard me say the part where he was a used car salesman.
So there's no telling there.
But also, the state wanted to use his testimony to hint to the jury that Michael had financial
issues. The used car salesman slash bar owner testified that shortly after Sarah's death,
Michael had asked him to borrow $50,000. Great, right? Now we're on to something. Maybe.
Again, it's hard to judge what that means without more context, which we did not get from the prosecution.
Instead, we got Andy coming in with both marshmallow barrels blazing and his best Hannibal Lecter voice.
He was basically like, you're suggesting Michael had financial issues with that testimony?
Did you know Michael comes from family affluence?
You know who I am, right? Well, he could afford me, so...
Now, neither of us are prosecutors, but holy hell, we would have taken that as a challenge.
You better believe that when Andy put his wife Cheryl on the stand, which he did, by the way, we sure would have asked her, as the office manager of her husband's
law firm, to tell us how much Michael has paid for his defense so far, and whether Michael
used his own money there. Would that question have ever been allowed? Probably not. But
man would we try to get there. Why? Because Michael had longstanding financial problems
at the time of Sarah's death and,
according to sources, was bolstered by his mother and his stepfather.
Even absent the ability to ask Cheryl that question, the prosecution had at its fingertips
several ways to show financial stress as a potential motive in the murder they say Michael committed.
Despite Michael's status as a Charleston jewelry store owner, which according to our sources he only attained with his family's help,
he had a chaotic financial history for decades that appeared to be getting increasingly worse.
While the prosecution did point out some of Michael's financial problems, like the fact that Michael and Sarah were so far behind on tuition for their two daughters that the girls received do-not-return notices from the school in March 2015, they didn't attempt to make a strong connection
between the stress of those problems, the already existing toxicity in their marriage,
and Sarah's death, which again, they contend he caused.
During trial, we also learned that Sarah Kaluchi's parents made the down payment on the house that they were living in,
and they did this years before Sarah's death.
But the couple was several months behind on paying the mortgage and taxes on the house.
What we didn't hear in trial was that Michael had a history of not paying mortgages and somehow evading consequence.
We are still digging through his financial records,
and wow, there are so many.
But we found several records of Michael getting enormous loans
and not paying them back.
In 2008, Michael and his ex-wife Camilla owed $1.5 million on a loan, for example.
In 2009, we found another foreclosure where Michael owed over $100,000 to a different bank,
a sum that was settled on after the bank said he failed to pay back a large short-term loan of $550,000.
He seemed to chaotically move from loan to loan with few repercussions.
Does that remind you of someone?
From all appearances of his financial records, Michael never seemed to dig himself out of debt.
Michael never seemed to dig himself out of debt. In June 2016, the month after he was charged with murdering his wife and after he hired Andy Savage to represent
him, Michael's stepfather, Ivo, filed a claim showing that Michael owed him a
whopping $700,000. Yikes! We have seen from the Murdoch case and from many others that increasing financial pressure
can drive a man mad.
Creighton Waters did an excellent job of laying this out for the jury, the pieces of Elick
Murdoch's financial history that built into a perfect storm he could no longer control,
which led him to do the unthinkable on June 7, 2021. I can still hear Creighton's opening statement.
And you're going to hear some of what was going on in Alex Murdoch's life leading up to that day.
Stuff that happened that very day, stuff that was leading up a perfect storm
that was gathering much like the storms
that are coming outside today.
Listen for that evidence.
Listen to that gathering storm that all came to a head
on June 7th, 2021, the day the evidence will show
he killed Maggie and Paul.
This has been a long exhaustive investigation.
It's going to be a fairly long trial because it's complicated. It's a journey. There's a lot of
aspects to this case. There's a lot of factors to this case. There's a lot of factors to this case.
But like a lot of things that are complicated, when you start to put them all together, piece them together like a puzzle, all of a sudden the picture
emerges in this really simple.
The jury in the Calucci cases should have heard a very similar narrative with Calucci
about his mounting debts that he could no longer pay back, and the land deal he was relying on to
fix all of his problems falling through, and the wife who was ready to leave him,
and the divorce he couldn't afford. The image that Calucci so badly wanted to obtain,
afford. The image that Kaluchi so badly wanted to obtain, the family man, the businessman, the
moneymaker, was slipping away from him on May 20th, 2015.
But the jury didn't hear much about that.
There is so much to talk about with this case because of how many twists and turns and unexpected
sets of circumstances
there are attached to it. But before we get into all of that in future episodes, we wanted
to start with the parts of the story that did not get told.
And yes, again, we're going hard on the prosecution here. In Alec Murdoch's trial, we got to see the state rise to the occasion.
The same thing didn't happen here.
Not only did the prosecution drop the ball
with sharing a narrative that the jury could grasp,
they didn't seem to prepare their witnesses enough,
or rather, they didn't seem to anticipate
some of the very obvious avenues
that Andy would go down with their witnesses.
And there were simple
things they didn't appear to follow up on. For instance, we were curious about Michael's story
about Sarah being upset that day at the cemetery where her previous husband, the father of her
daughter, was buried. Michael told law enforcement and people in his life that Sarah was upset that
the cemetery was allowing other people to be buried between her deceased husband and the water, so upset ostensibly that she killed
herself right in front of him. Now, Michael Vieira, who Sarah was married to before Michael
Colucci, is buried in Charleston at Magnolia Cemetery. His burial plot is in a remote section
of the cemetery on a dirt road and near the water with
trees surrounding the area. The state did not present GPS records of the trial, so we are
unsure of where the stop fell during Michael and Sarah Calucci's afternoon and evening together
and how long they stayed there. Because we were curious though, we had reporter Beth Braden look
into the story to find out where exactly Michael Viera is buried
and whether the cemetery had gone back on its word to Sarah in 2015 by burying people between
Michael Viera and the water, like Michael Colucci said happened that day in May 2015.
So here's what Beth found. On May 20, 2015, no one was buried between Michael Viera and the water. Shortly after that, one
person did get buried between Michael Viera and the water. That person was Sarah Lynn
Calucci.
According to a woman Beth Braden spoke with at the cemetery, Sarah remains the only person
buried between Michael Viera and the water to this day.
Like we said, there were simple follow-ups the prosecution seemed to have missed.
So much was said about Sarah during the trial.
Her life was turned inside out by the defense and further indignified by the prosecution.
In closing arguments, prosecutor Megan
Birchstedt did Sarah no favors in convincing the jury that she was a
person that they should care about. In fact, she mentioned several times that
Sarah did drugs, drank, and was quote-unquote mean. She used that word to
describe Sarah twice in her closing argument. One of the
last things she said was Sarah was mean, but she didn't deserve to die. Why would she
think that would help convince the jury of anything? Outside of her abusive relationship
with Michael, as documented by the hundreds of text messages that we
will talk about on a later episode. The jury didn't get to learn a whole lot
about who Sarah actually was, especially before she met Michael in 2009. And we'll
be right back.
back. This week, Liz spoke with one of Sarah's friends, Stephanie Merrill, who told us about
what Sarah was like and how it was ultimately Sarah's relationship with Michael that became
her downfall.
Sarah and I became friends in high school.
We went to high school in the early 90s at Stratford
High School in Goose Creek, South Carolina. And you know we were friends in
high school. We didn't run in the same group but sometimes we just hung out by
ourselves. You know a few parties here and there. We had some classes
together. But we reconnected at our 10-year high school reunion and started hanging out a little bit
more then, but really connected after her husband, Michael Vieira, passed away.
And when she was single, we hung out a great deal for several years until she started dating Michael Colucci.
While Megan Birchsted decided the jury should understand Sarah as a mean person who didn't
kill herself, Stephanie and others in Sarah's life saw her differently.
Sarah is very bubbly and kind of vivacious. She's super cute. She always had this really
cute short, super curly blonde hairstyle and she just dressed really cute and she was just
one of those people that would kind of talk to anybody and I just thought she was just a fun, you know, easygoing personality
but she was like mischievous, I guess.
She was pretty sassy and just funny and you know, she had a kind of a dry sense of humor
too and so she caught on to jokes pretty quickly, you know, always had a little comeback here
and there.
So she had a good personality.
Sarah was definitely one of those people that, you know, would just hang out with who she
wanted to hang out with or really just talk with whoever she wanted to talk with in that,
you know, in that moment.
She was also somebody who would listen and not like try to talk over
you. Like sometimes that happens and especially crowds and whatever. She, it seems like she always
like paused before she said something. And so, yeah, I just remember that and, you know,
she enjoyed being around people. so she enjoyed listening to what
they had to say. In high school Sarah was named most mischievous and that aspect
of her personality carried on through adulthood. Well at the 10-year reunion
I was actually staying because I was coming from out of town and I was
staying at the hotel that the
reunion was at and my son was with me at the time and he would have been about
nine and so she wanted to meet him so at some point you know her and I went
to the hotel room and hung out with my son and then her husband came up and then
they he decided they wanted to order I guess you could order like a Nintendo or
something on the TV and so they ordered that for my son to my son's name is
Hunter and they ordered that for Hunter to play video games while we hung out
downstairs.
After their 10 year reunion, Stephanie and Sarah
continued to hang out together,
along with Sarah's daughter, Bishop Vera,
who is now 19 years old.
After Michael passed away, Michael Vera passed away,
you know, we were both single,
we both had younger children.
So sometimes we did things together.
We took Bishop horseback riding.
I had a friend who had some horses,
so we went out to her place and went horseback riding.
I was playing rugby at the time
and Sarah would come to my rugby games.
Just different events like that.
Sometimes, really, because we had small kids,
a lot of times we just hung out at the house and talked.
Stephanie told us that Sarah was always impeccably dressed, that aesthetics were important to
her, including the way her home looked.
She had this like hot pink velvet embossed twol wallpaper in one area of her house if that makes sense.
And it looked really good with everything.
It wasn't like, you know, gaudy or tacky or anything.
It wasn't too much.
It was just like a pop of this like amazing texture color.
You know, she had this way like even if she wasn't wearing any other makeup, she would
wear like bright red lipstick and then like her sunglasses and she would look like very chic.
She always looked put together pretty much like 99% of the time, you know, she always
looked put together and chic and kind of like effortlessly put together if that makes sense.
Like she one time she met her at the jewelry store and she was wearing
like these white sort of billowy I guess you would call them like sailor pants. They had a high waist
and they were I'm sorry they weren't white they were navy blue. They had a high waist and they had
these big gold buttons and then she wore like a white shirt sort of tucked into it. And it was just like a super effortless sort of put together, you know, look like
essentially a t-shirt and a pair of pants.
But, you know, then she had her red lips and she had her gold jewelry and, you
know, she just looked great every time, you know, she went out, like, I feel like
I could spend a lot of time trying to put together an outfit and just end up wearing like, you know,
athletic yoga pants and um, but she could just throw something on and you know,
everything looks great. She just had a great style.
We talked to Stephanie about how Sarah was presented during the first trial by
the defense as someone who is so heartbroken and destroyed over her
previous husband's death that eight years later she took her own life outside
a warehouse with her current husband sitting mere feet away. The thing we
learned from Stephanie is that Sarah knew how to pick herself up off the
ground. At the time she was killed, Sarah was reportedly putting together a plan
to take Bishop and leave Michael once and for all.
She'd expressed this plan to her family. She was within days of executing it.
I mean, listen, everybody has struggles in their life. And, you know, Sarah had gone through many,
you know, awful things. So it's no wonder that she had some troubles. But you know, there
were some other just really great things about her and like you know she was
funny, she was to be very kind, you know I always, I've gone back just because all
this has come up and just sort of looked at different Facebook messages she would send me and send other people.
And, you know, it was always so sweet and just funny or quirky or just something
like off the wall that I couldn't even remember now what she was talking about.
But she was, you know, just one of those people.
Like she was just thoughtful.
So there's just a lot of things about her.
I don't think there's too many people
from our high school experience that would have,
you know, anything bad to say about her.
Although, you know, everybody faces challenges
and at, you know, some point she was a single parent
and she went through a lot of things
that she was extremely resourceful. She always found a way and so you know once
she had Bishop and then when Michael Viera died she knew she had to pick up
the pieces and create a good life for Bishop and you know so she was very
resourceful. There are some things that happened with the business that her and Michael had after
he passed away.
And so that was not great.
And then she had to get past that and find other sources of income and other ways to
just move on.
So she was very much a resourceful person, a survivor, just kept plugging along.
You know, every time she spoke of Michael Viera,
it was always like a positive thing about him or whatnot,
but she wasn't, you know, wallowing
and self-pity about it at any point that we were together.
At the time of her death,
Sarah had a dependency on drugs and alcohol.
She was also being treated for ADHD, depression, and anxiety.
The idea of Sarah taking her own life
wasn't entirely far-fetched to Stephanie,
who lost touch with Sarah
after Sarah got involved with Michael Colucci,
meaning just hearing that Sarah might
have died by suicide wasn't enough to arouse suspicions on its own. What stuck out to Stephanie
was how Michael said it happened and where Michael said it happened.
When I first heard it was suicide, but no details, I essentially pictured her, you know, in her house and sort of like,
you know, like the wallpaper background, that beautiful hot pink and just like I think like
sort of like how beautiful she looked like, you know, in that moment. And then when I found out that her death occurred in like that dirty alley way, I was like,
there's no way on earth she would have committed suicide in an alley.
I mean, it was just like 100% in my mind impossible.
That would have mattered to her,
how she presented herself to the public,
how she would present herself to her family,
her mom especially,
I think would have been extremely important to Sarah.
And I just don't, I mean, really, there's just no way.
I don't even know what else to say about it.
There's just no way.
About a month before Sarah's death
and years after she lost touch with Sarah,
Stephanie was at a gas station in North Charleston
when she ran into Michael Colucci.
So just, you know, a few weeks prior to her death,
I was at a gas station on my way to,
I was in a play and I was on my way to rehearsals
and so I was kind of in an area that I'm not typically in
so it was a little shocking when I was pumping my gas
and Michael Clucci approached me at the gas pump
and kind of startled me and exchanged a few words with me.
And I don't know, he just made me uncomfortable.
And so I asked him if Sarah was in the car
and he said, yes, she was.
So I walked over to the car, she was in the driver's side
seat and I walked over to the car
and she rolled the window down.
And I just said hi to her
and she kind of stuck her head out of the window
and we just like gave each other
like a kiss on the cheek sort of thing.
And then she got her head back in the car
and said goodbye and we left.
And that was, I got my car and left to rehearsal
and I'm assuming Michael got back in the
car and they left and that was the last time I saw her so it was like you know very shocking a
couple weeks later but I was really glad to have that moment because you know Sarah and I had not
talked since before they had gotten married and so it was just a nice moment to have. We asked Stephanie if Sarah's
relationship with Michael played a role in her drift from Sarah. Oh yes,
definitely. You know they were both all together and toxic and you know, it was like Michael was very much a person that like, you know, he would
do things for you, but it was never just like out of the kindness of his heart.
It was like a running list that he would keep of favors he did for you and then sort of
like throw them in your face or, you know, didn't I do this for you sort of tit for
tat kind of a thing. And,
and I don't know, they just it just ended up being a very toxic sort of relationship between
the two of them. And so that was essentially the end of our friendship. If the state's theory of Sarah's death is that she was killed as a result of this volatile
and toxic relationship, and that is their theory, then the story of Sarah and Michael
is one that needed to have been told in a much more clear and cohesive way during Michael's
first trial.
It needed to be told in a way that connected the dots between Michael's position in their marriage, as a man about to be abandoned by the wife he accompanied to the bathroom and
bars, and his position financially, as a man who was in trouble, whose financial salvation
repeatedly lay in the hands of his mother vis-à-vis her husband, his stepfather.
We'll talk more about that in the future.
Remember, a year after Michael was charged in Sarah's murder, Michael Calucci's
stepfather, who was in the early stages of dementia, shot and killed Michael's mother.
There's a whole story there that needs to be told.
Back to the original point.
The prosecution needed to better connect all of that.
Sarah was a woman who didn't shy away from her opinion.
She had a sharp tongue and knew how to hit where it hurt.
She was also a woman who was still standing after dealing with so much grief and
struggle. In the face of all of that,
she knew there could be light at the end of a very dark tunnel.
And as such she was planning a better future for her and her daughter.
In the face of a failing marriage and failing finances and on the day when the woman he loved was grieving over another
man, a man he could not possibly compete with, did Michael experience the sharper
part of Sarah's personality? The part that could ignite a temper? Here's Stephanie.
Sarah was not a meek, you know. She definitely would have given what she got.
It would have been like a back and forth situation. She would just not have taken something.
taken something and then that was that. It is a little surprising some of the things that you think about and with her personality being such a
strong personality and her being a survivor, I do often wonder
like why she stayed in that relationship so long but I think just
like most people she's just a very complicated person and she
has X personality and Y personality and, you know, you can be so many things and you can
present yourself to the world one way and you can feel another way or behind closed
doors it's another way.
So although it is surprising that you know she stayed in that relationship
for so long being that she is such a strong you know willed person or she was a strong willed person
you know you just don't you don't know why everybody makes choices that they make.
You know, you just don't, you don't know why everybody makes choices that they make. So I'm not really sure, you know, there was the, there were a lot of things about Sarah
that was the sort of, you know, southern, and I think a lot of that comes from her mom
and her wanting to, you know, please her mom.
You know, for instance, the double name Sarah Lynn. And if you notice,
like I call her Sarah, because that's always what her, you know, a lot of people call her Sarah Lynn.
But, and that's a very, very, very Charleston Southern thing. And then also exactly like what
we were saying with Bishop. Bishop always had the big bows in her hair and you know always dressed so cute and Sarah was always put together. But you know I think that Sarah had a
lot of qualities that you know if you kind of think of Scarlett O'Hare that would be a little bit more of an accurate sort of Sarah, you know, very strong-willed
but always beautiful sort of that. That would be more of the the personality.
Before we go, we wanted to again remind listeners who knew Stephen Smith or new people who knew
Stephen Smith to continue sending any photos or video of him so that we can share them
with his family.
We are continuing to dive deep into the evidence in his case and we are getting close to being
able to share our next significant discovery with you.
Also, we've gotten a lot of questions about the Grant Solomon case. We are continuing to go through
the immense amount of documents we have and we are still waiting for some of the foyers we filed
last summer and fall. We plan to visit Tennessee in the next few months to do
some on-the-ground reporting there, so we should be able to get you some updates
soon.
Now to wrap up, I thought it would be important for you all to hear from Sandy
Smith herself, who was front row at the Victims Matter rally wearing her Justice for Stephen shirt. I asked Sandy how she felt after the rally.
It's amazing just to see the support and the people like thanking me for
still speaking. And I have taught them how to speak and not be quiet anymore because, and that's what we need to do.
We need to start raising hell until we get the justice we need for our families.
Sandy was sure to get face time with Attorney General Allen Wilson, whose office is in charge of prosecuting Stevens' case.
While their interaction was brief,
it was a step in the right direction.
It was really good.
It was kind of awkward, you know,
because I wanted to ask questions,
but he was in a hurry, hurry, hurry.
But at least we will have an opportunity
to set up an appointment
so we can actually talk face to face.
And they were so helpful and they sent us to the right directions that we needed to get to.
So, and that's what we're going to do next.
We especially appreciated the employees of the Attorney General's office who encouraged Sandy to sit down with Alan Wilson
and told her that they would help her set that up.
We look forward to hearing about what that meeting will bring. In the meantime,
Sandy is begging everyone to continue to share Stephen's story and to continue to
keep the pressure up on SLED, on the AG's office, on every person who knows what
happened to Stephen Smith.
Well, the main thing I want is if you know something or you know somebody who knows something to please,
I'm begging, just please send in a tip.
Going on nine years. And let's just try to keep this from happening again.
You know, because if it could happen to me, it could happen to you.
And so if you know something or you know somebody that doesn't know anything, please just turn
in a tip.
Stay tuned, stay pesky and stay in the sunlight. True Sunlight is a Lunashark production created by me, Mandy Matney, and co-hosted by journalist
Liz Farrell.
Learn more about our mission and membership at lunasharkmedia.com.
Interruptions provided by Luna and Joe Pesky.