Murdaugh Murders Podcast - Who Killed Stephen Smith? Part One - (S01E2)
Episode Date: June 30, 2021In 2015, Stephen Smith was killed in Hampton County, South Carolina and the case remains unsolved. Recently, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) opened a new investigation into Stephen's d...eath. On this episode, we take a deep dive into case files to find out what went wrong in that investigation and how its connected to the Murdaugh Murders of 2021. Thank you to Haskins & Co for sponsoring this episode. Haskins & Company helps law firms grow online. Learn more at Haskins.co. And a special thank you to the Bannon Law Group for supporting our mission. From the big house to your dream house, the Bannon Law Group has got you covered. BannonLawGroup.com This episode of Murdaugh Murders Podcast discusses horrific community tragedies. Hopeful Horizons creates safer communities by changing the culture of violence and offering a path to healing. If you or someone you know is experiencing interpersonal violence please go to hopefulhorizons.org to learn more about their mission. Support Our Podcast at: https://murdaughmurderspodcast.com/support-the-show Please consider sharing your support by leaving a review on Apple at the following link: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/murdaugh-murders-podcast/id1573560247 For current and accurate updates: Twitter.com/mandymatney This podcast is produced and developed by Luna Shark Productions. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
I don't know who killed Stephen Smith, but I do know that his family has been waiting 2,180 days
to get justice, and I am determined that someday they will get answers. My name is Mandy Matney.
I'm the news director at fitsnews.com. I have been investigating the Murdoch family for more than
two years now, and this is the Murdoch Martyrs podcast. So to start off this podcast, I just want
to say thank you to everyone who tuned in and listened and to everyone who gave us a five-star
review. My fiance, who's also my producer, and I were just shocked and overwhelmed by all of the
support, so thank you. Also, this week, I learned what vocal fry was for the first time. I hear it.
Thank you, commenters. I am a journalist, not a podcaster. For the last three weeks, I have been
on the phone all day, every day, chasing down leads in this case. Unlike the YouTubers and the other
podcasters out there, literally all of the other podcasters working on this case. I'm actually doing
real reporting here. It's exhausting. My voice will not be perfect, but the information will be
accurate. I can promise you that. Also, it's just plain mean to say that somebody's voice sucks.
I'm sorry, but that's like saying somebody's face is ugly. Like, I can't change it, so I don't know
what you want me to do with that information. To all of you that emailed me, to the girl that said,
I sound like Kim Kardashian, so change your voice. I can't change my voice. This is it. Take it or leave
it. In our first episode called South Carolina's Chepaquidic, I gave a 30,000-foot view of the saga.
All of that information is crucial if you want to fully understand this case. This story is
extremely complicated and deserves so much more time and attention before jumping to conclusions.
On June 22, huge news broke in this case. I was the first to report that the South Carolina
Law Enforcement Division, also known as SLED, the same agency investigating the Murdoch murders,
opened an investigation into Stephen Smith death. SLED told me that this was based on information
gathered during the course of the double homicide investigation of Paul and Maggie Murdoch. We don't
know what information led them to that position, but it's important to look back on the 2015 case
and see what went wrong. So what happened to Stephen Smith? Like the probe of the 2019 boat crash
that killed Mallory Beach, the 2015 investigation into Smith's death was chaotic from the beginning,
derailed by jurisdictional perplexity and suspicions of investigative interference. Smith was found
dead just before 4 a.m. on July 8, 2015. He was found in the middle of Sandy Run Road in Hampton
County, South Carolina.
Hampton County now, where's your emergency?
Hello, I just calling down the wrong fucking real road. I see somebody laying out.
In the road. In the road? Yeah. Uh-oh.
Uh-oh. Somebody going to hit him. Uh-oh.
Somebody going to hit him. All right. We'll get him also headed out that way.
Okay. All right, sir. All right.
At 4 o' 7 a.m., a man named Michael Bridges of the Hampton County Sheriff's Office arrived on
scene just seconds after he was dispatched. I'll be clear here. It's hard to understand from all
of the reports when exactly the Hampton County Sheriff's Office arrived on scene. Whatever
time deputies arrived, what they found was horrific. I know this because I've seen crime scene
photos. Stephen's face was covered in blood. The bright young nursing student was dead. He was
lying in the middle of a remote country road. Stephen had a 7-inch gash on the right side
of his forehead. His head was warped by blunt force. Considering he had no other major injuries,
investigators on scene were completely stumped. At first, they thought it was a hit and run
and called Highway Patrol to the scene around 5.37 a.m. By 6 a.m., the South Carolina Law Enforcement
Division, also known as SLED, was called to the scene. The coroner rolled a death of shooting
homicide, forcing investigators to search the area for ballistic evidence. Investigators from
the South Carolina Highway Patrol, the Hampton County Sheriff's Office and the state police
found virtually no evidence. No bullets, no gunshot residue, no tire marks, no debris from a vehicle,
nothing. Here is Corporal Michael Duncan, who was one of the initial investigators for the
South Carolina Highway Patrol on scene. It is a two-lane roadway level.
Site distance, not an issue. However, exclusion occurred approximately at night,
approximately one o'clock in the morning to four o'clock. So visibility will be used with
headlights only. There's no other ambient lighting in the area. As far as evidence here,
there's only evidence of where the body was found. There's no car parts, no any type of
parts to a car, or truck, or any other vehicle.
Photographs and video were taken of the scene by Sergeant Booker. Also visited the mortuary to
the pictures of the body at the mortuary. There is no body trauma other than to the head area. There
is some scrapes and scratches on his left and right arm, on his knuckles, some across his face.
It does not appear to be, in my opinion, struck by a vehicle. In fact, after coming through
over a hundred pages of documents, it's hard to find any officials who believed that Stephen Seth
was a hit and run. Hours later, Dr. Aaron Presnell, a pathologist at the Medical
University of South Carolina, also known as MUSC, ruled that Stephen was killed in a hit and run
incident. While the coroner believes that the death was a homicide in South Carolina, a pathologist
who is a medical doctor must perform an autopsy on the victim to decide the cause and manner of
death. Here is what the autopsy report said. The cause of death was blunt force head trauma due
to a motor vehicle crash. There was a 7.25 inch laceration on the right side of Stephen's forehead,
along with bruises on both sides of his forehead. The right side of Stephen's skull had multiple
fractures, bruising and contusions. His right eyebrow was cut. His right shoulder was dislocated.
He had cuts and bruises on his right hand. There were cuts on his right arm. There were cuts on
his right fingers. Blood was in his airways. The autopsy report mentions historical information
that led the pathologist to believe that Stephen was killed by a vehicle. But there is no mention
of any specific historical information that would lead them to this conclusion. Highway
investigators were baffled by this ruling because they were told by sled and the sheriff's office
that they were not needed at the autopsy. They didn't think they were needed because they didn't
think that this was a hit and run. The South Carolina Highway Patrol typically does not
investigate murders. Highway Patrol investigators went to the scene multiple times to search for
evidence. Time after time, they found nothing. The body was found right on the YL. The head was on
one side of the YL and his feet were on the other. There's no marks from a vehicle, no
skid marks in the roadway, nothing in the grass. Again, the evidence did not suggest that this
was a hit and run. His loosely tied shoes were still on his feet. That is a big deal.
I have been a journalist for a long time and I have many sources to turn to in cases like this
and they all say that this is basic science. When a car hits a person, the shoes come off due to
force and friction. Stephen's shoes stayed on. Hours after the accident, investigators found
Smith's car about three miles away on the side of Bamberg Highway. His wallet was inside his car.
Investigators noted that the car's gas cap wasn't screwed and hanging outside of the gas
cap door. Law enforcement officials believed that Stephen ran out of gas and started walking home
before he was killed. The toxicology report showed that Stephen was completely sober.
Investigators theorized that Stephen was killed by a truck mirror that struck only his face,
which is why he didn't have any other serious injuries. From the reports, it appears like
highway patrol officials were completely thrown off by the decision to give them the case.
After the autopsy, Sergeant Moore was calling around to find Stephen's body. He then found out
that Stephen's body was at the funeral home and his clothes were left in a paper bag completely
unattended. This means that the chain of custody was broken. Sergeant Moore of the highway patrol
does not understand why Stephen's death was ruled a hit and run. He then calls Dr. Aaron
Presnell to get more information. Presnell's explanation to Moore was simple. She said because
she didn't find a gunshot wound or any bullets or any fragments and because Stephen was found in the
road, the only thing that she could theorize was that he had to have been hit by a motor vehicle
that caused his death. Moore asked Presnell if there were any other injuries on Stephen and she
said only a dislocated right shoulder. Moore then asked Presnell if she found any glass fragments
or any other evidence from a motor vehicle and she said no, according to his notes. Moore then
asked Presnell why she made the ruling that it was a motor vehicle accident and what she thought
caused Stephen's head injury. It looks like Presnell snapped back at Moore at this point.
Moore wrote in his report, quote, she told me it was not her job to figure that out. It was mine.
I have read thousands of police reports in my lifetime and I've never seen anything like this.
For a public official to describe a confrontation with another official in a report, that is very
weird. Okay, so let's rewind here. First, Sled and the Hampton County Sheriff's Office told the
highway patrol that they shouldn't be at the autopsy because it was not a motor vehicle accident,
since there is no evidence of it being a motor vehicle accident. And remember, Sled combed the
scene searching for evidence of a shooting. Also, I want to be clear that Sled was never in charge
of this investigation. They were called to the scene for assistance. This investigation was not
theirs until they opened it in 2021. At no point does anyone in any of these reports mention the
possibility that he was beaten to death or struck by an object like a baseball bat and then they
would search for evidence for such things. Also, in all of these reports, I never saw them talking
to any neighbors nearby to see if they saw anything or heard anything. And if you know anything
about investigations, you know that canvassing the area in the immediate hours after something
happens is so essential. People do not remember days later or weeks later or now years later if
they heard something weird on a Wednesday night in July. So now we are left with a situation that
is a skew from the get go. We're left with an agency that specializes in accident reconstruction,
investigating a man's death where there is no evidence of a vehicle accident. After pouring
through hundreds of documents in these case files and listening to hours and hours of audio,
it is hard in this case to determine if it's incompetence or corruption or both that failed
Stephen. But either way, we failed Stephen. The justice system failed Stephen and his family.
Stephen's family immediately rejected the idea that Stephen was killed by a vehicle. Stephen was
smart. He was hyper aware and he was very careful. They all told me there was just no way he would
let a vehicle hit him at night. How would a smart sober kid get hit head on in the face by a truck
near on a roll lightly traveled road in the middle of the night? It just does not make any sense.
On July 11, 2015, Stephen's family held awake. The family kept the casket open so that people could
see what was done to him. On July 14, 2015, the first of three death certificates for Stephen Smith
was issued by Coroner Ernie Washington to Stephen's family. According to the death certificate,
the time of injury was 3am. Stephen's actual or presumed time of death was also 3am. Stephen's
cause of death was blunt force trauma and it says probably pedestrian in motor vehicle accident
possibly struck by side mirror. So at this point in the investigation on July 14, 2015,
Highway Patrol detectives start interviewing people. This is weird because if you were investigating
for a random hit and run according to the death certificate, why would you interview people
close to Stephen as if it was an intentional homicide? One of the first people interviewed
by Highway Patrol was a man who identified himself as Stephen's boyfriend. However,
the family very much disputed this title as boyfriend. He was older. He was apparently
paying for Stephen's phone. There was some kind of fling happening between them of some sort,
but from what the family says, he was not Stephen's boyfriend. He claims to be one of the last people
who spoke to Stephen before his death. I'll be clear here. It's hard to follow this man's interview.
He talks about a lot of things that he's not asked about. He has said that he has memory
problems and that he's done a lot of drugs and also has brain injuries. It's very hard to follow.
The frustration sets in as far as you can remember this, but you can't remember that.
Because you're pulling, you got to understand, I got a lot of brain injury. Okay. I got,
and you're trying to hit me with it just to get a timeline. I mean, I had to think because I'm
thinking in my head that these calls are coming in Thursday morning. However, he does say some
things that seem like they could be relevant. And he's been harassed in this town. They've been
messing with his lubs on the car. They've been screwing with his battery. And when you say they,
who are you talking about? I don't know. The only one that he told me that he made it very clear to
the guy with the tattoo. When they later pressed this man about specifics, he said Stephen was
harassed on the night he was killed at Snyder's crossing. Is that where he said he felt like
he was being followed? Yes, he said that he was being harassed at that store. He didn't say he
said it was a couple of guys in the pickup truck. If I called correctly, he said they were rednecks.
On July 17, 2015, Corporal Duncan of the Highway Patrol interviews one of Stephen's family members.
During the interview, it's the first time that the Murdock name is brought up in the investigation.
We're going to alter the voice of the person that speaks here due to the sensitive nature of this
topic. How about the rumors that you've been hearing on the street that you told me earlier
today and possibly were involved? A bunch of people, like I just left the house
the first official time yesterday and I went into the store and a bunch of people kept coming up
and you know, like, did you know the Murdock boys are behind it? You know, sending a buster Murdock,
the one who went to school with it and some of his friends and I'm just thinking like, why?
You know, it makes no sense. He's never saying anything bad about Stephen. He's never been around
Duncan doesn't ask Stephen's relative a lot of follow-up questions to the statement. They just
ask her where she got the information. She mentions a few people and they move on. And then the Murdock
name comes up again. No lawyers have contacted you about anything. Well, the day that Stephen passed
away, Randy Murdock was the second person to call my dad after the corner and he said he wanted to
take the case and it would be free of charge and everything. And my dad's a little iffy on that,
so because it's kind of weird. No lawyers, it says it'd be free and you can have whatever money you
want. Okay, so I know that the highway patrol is not used to investigating homicides, but here
Duncan doesn't ask any follow-up questions about this. He just learned a few minutes before that
this relative heard rumors that the Murdock boys were involved in Stephen's death. Then,
a few minutes later, he heard that Randy Murdock was the first person to contact the family after
the corner to offer his services. Granted, Hampton is a very small town, but Duncan appears to not
even make the connection between the Murdocks being mentioned twice in the interview. He just
asked a few more questions that don't have anything to do with that and he ends the interview.
And Duncan's notes from the interview he does not mention the Murdocks. According to his notes,
this relative told him that Stephen became very secretive about two weeks before the incident
and this relative didn't know of anybody who had a problem with Stephen. Later that day,
Duncan calls Sandy Smith, Stephen's mother. Sandy tells Duncan different things about her son.
She says that he'd recently been cutting school, which is unusual for him.
But he would stay at my house and he was a study person. He'd study. But he would come to my house
and stay there until about one o'clock in the morning before he would go home. Okay.
During the interview, Duncan asks Sandy if she's heard any rumors about her son's death.
The rumors just going around him saying that everybody keeps coming up to me and saying it was
Murdoch boys. The Murdoch boys? Yeah, whoever they are. Okay. Duncan didn't ask any follow-up
questions to this. He doesn't appear to connect the rumors with anything Stephen's other relative
said just hours before. He asked Sandy a few more questions and Sandy told Duncan about a young man
who worked at Bylo who was making Stephen feel uncomfortable recently. In his case notes, Stephen
writes about the man at Bylo and suggested that another detective follow up by tracking him down.
There is no mention of the Murdoch rumor in his notes again.
Sandy's voice here just breaks my heart. She's so polite and sweet and hopeful that the investigation
will give her and her family answers. Fast forward almost six years on a Saturday night, Sandy texted
me. Days after her son's case was reopened by sled, almost every major news organization in the
country was saying Stephen Smith's name. She said, quote, there is nothing in this world I want more
than to hold my baby in my arm one more time. The media wants a story I just want justice.
A lot happened in the Stephen Smith case after Sandy's interview in July 2015. The case took
a couple strange turns before it went cold in 2016 and we will get to all of that in a later
episode. It's too much for one episode. So that brings us to the latest developments in the double
homicide case. So there haven't been a lot of updates in this case recently, but I don't think
that that's concerning. We have to remember that it took the Attorney General's office two months
to charge Paul Murdoch with three felonies after the BUI crash that killed Mallory Beach. So we
still don't know who, if anyone, will be charged in the double homicide of Maggie and Paul Murdoch.
But I do know that we have to give law enforcement space and time before jumping to conclusions.
In another development this week, a spokesperson for the powerful Murdoch family released a
statement about a reward that they are offering for information in the high-profile investigation.
Ellick and his son Buster Murdoch offered the $100,000 reward. In another update,
Maggie Murdoch's cell phone was found along a rural South Carolina road just outside of the
family's hunting property where they were found dead. And we still don't know what information
sled obtained in the double homicide investigation that led them to reopen Steven's case. I've seen
some talking heads on TV say that it was reopened because of something that was found on scene,
but we don't know that. We can't guess that. We have to wait on law enforcement. And I just want
to say again, be careful when you watch national news and YouTubers and other podcasters,
really most media, unfortunately in this case, because no one is being careful with their facts.
We don't know a lot of things and we can't jump to conclusions and we
certainly can't just make things up to fill up airtime.
So for the latest developments on this case, visit fitsnews.com
or follow me on Twitter at twitter.com slash Mandy, M-A-N-D-Y, Matney, M-A-T-N-E-Y.
And don't forget to leave a five star review unless you're going to be nasty and talk about
my vocal fry. The Murdoch Murders podcast is created by me, Mandy Matney, and my Beyoncé,
produced by Luna Shaw Productions.