Murder: True Crime Stories - SOLVED: The Talk Show Confession 2

Episode Date: April 9, 2026

Three days after the taping of The Jenny Jones Show, the tension that had lingered off camera turned deadly. What began as a daytime television surprise became a national tragedy, thrusting Scott Amedure and Jonathan Schmitz back into headlines under far darker circumstances. In Part 2, Murder: True Crime Stories examines the murder of Scott Amedure, the urgent investigation that followed, and the courtroom battle that put Schmitz on trial. Carter Roy breaks down the prosecution’s case, the defense’s argument that the televised reveal triggered overwhelming emotional distress, and the broader cultural attitudes toward sexuality that shaped public reaction. As the verdict was delivered, the case raised unsettling questions about media ethics, personal responsibility, and the limits of entertainment built on public confession. The fallout extended beyond the criminal trial, leading to a landmark civil lawsuit against The Jenny Jones Show and forcing a national reckoning over how far television should go in the pursuit of ratings. Head over to our Murder True Crime Stories YouTube channel to WATCH our video episodes: https://www.youtube.com/@MurderTrueCrimeStories If you’re new here, don’t forget to follow Murder True Crime Stories to never miss a case! For Ad-free listening and early access to episodes, subscribe to Crime House+ on Apple Podcasts. Murder True Crime Stories is a Crime House Original Podcast, powered by PAVE Studios 🎧 Need More to Binge?  Listen to other Crime House Originals Clues, Crimes Of…, Serial Killers & Murderous Minds, Crime House 24/7, and more wherever you get your podcasts! Follow me on Social Instagram: @Crimehouse TikTok: @Crimehouse Facebook: @crimehousestudios YouTube: @murdertruecrimestories To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Hi everyone, it's Carter. Exciting news. Video episodes of murder true crime stories are now on YouTube. Every Friday, I'll be dropping a full video episode going deeper into the cases that still haunt us, the mysteries that haven't been solved, and the stories that deserve more than just a headline. Same depth, same commitment to telling the real story. Now you can watch it. Subscribe at Murder True Crime Stories on YouTube.

to catch a new video episode every Friday. This is Crime House. When something awful happens, we want someone to blame. We expect a clear villain and a clear victim. But the reality is rarely that simple, because sometimes it comes down to hundreds of small decisions that eventually end in tragedy, and it's nearly impossible to say who's really at fault.

In March of 1995, this situation played out in real time. Three days after Scott Amador and Jonathan Schmitz appeared on the Jenny Jones show, one of them was dead. In the aftermath, one question was debated in courtrooms and living rooms across the country. Was the shooter the only one responsible for what happened? or did the show that put him on a national stage carry some of the blame too? People's lives are like a story. There's a beginning, a middle, and an end. But you don't always know which part you're on.

Sometimes the final chapter arrives far too soon, and we don't always get to know the real ending. I'm Carter Roy, and this is Murder, True Crime Stories, the Crime House original powered by Pave Studios. New episodes come out every Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday, with Friday's episodes covering the cases that deserve a deeper look. And remember, those Friday episodes are also on YouTube with full video. Just search for murder, true crime stories, and be sure to like and subscribe.

Thank you for being part of the crime house community. Please rate, review, and follow the show. and for ad-free access to every episode, subscribe to Crime House Plus on Apple Podcasts. This is the second of two episodes on the murder of 32-year-old Scott Amador in Michigan in 1995. Last time, I introduced you to Scott and explained how he ended up as a guest on the Jenny Jones Show. During the taping, Scott confessed to having a crush on a mutual friend, 24-year-old Jonathan Schmitz. Although Jonathan knew the segment was about secret crushes, he had no idea that Scott was the one who was going to admit his feelings.

Today, I'll walk you through what happened after the taping. It was immediately clear that Jonathan didn't feel the same way, but no one knew just how upset he was until three days later when he went out and bought a gun. What happened next, shattered the Amador family, and landed the Jenny Jones Show in some very hot water. All that and more coming up. On March 6, 1995, three Michigan residents traveled to Chicago for a taping of the Jenny Jones Show. It all started a couple weeks ago when the show announced they were looking for guests who were willing to reveal their secret same-sex crush on national TV.

32-year-old Scott Amador had answered their. that call. Scott was openly gay, outgoing, and by all accounts, comfortable with who he was. And while being on TV was definitely a selling point for him, it seemed like Scott wanted more than that. He was genuinely hopeful that this strange, risky experiment could turn into something real. About a month earlier, Scott had met 24-year-old Jonathan Schmitz through their mutual friend, 32-year-old Donna Riley. Scott was immediately interested in John. When he told Donna about it, she encouraged Scott to pursue him. John was quieter and more reserved than Scott. He also had a complicated relationship with his family and cared deeply about how others perceived him.

Although John told Donna he was straight, she had her suspicions. She knew his family had questioned his sexuality before. Either way, she thought Scott might be good for him. So when Scott told her that the Jenny Jones show had called him back and wanted him and his crush on an episode, Donna was stoked. She thought it was exciting, romantic even. She agreed to go to Chicago for the taping and be part of the reveal. Meanwhile, John was kept in the dark. The only thing he was told was that he would be meeting a secret admirer. Technically, it could be a man or a woman, but according to John, an employee of the Jenny Jones show had assured him it was the latter.

Still, and John suspected Donna and Scott might be involved somehow, but when he asked them, they insisted they weren't. John believed them enough to get on the plane. By the time John arrived in Chicago, he had no idea what was waiting for him on that stage. And when he walked out in front of the studio audience on March 6th, he quickly realized that his friends had lied to him. As the taping went on, things only got worse. John sat there while the host, Jenny Jones played some clips they'd recorded before he got on stage. Those videos showed Scott talking openly about John's body, how he was attracted to John, and the fantasies he'd had.

All of it was played for laughs, framed as entertainment. John didn't want to be cruel. He didn't want to humiliate Scott the way he himself was being humiliated, and he definitely didn't want to cause a scene that would be caught on tape for all eternity. So he smiled and laughed, nodding along, but it was clear he was uncomfortable. His smile never quite reached his eyes, and you have to imagine he was counting down the seconds until it was all over. He had come to Chicago thinking he was about to meet the woman of his dreams.

Instead, he felt blindsided, set out by two people he trusted. But if John was feeling angry with Scott and Donna, he kept it to himself. After the taping wrapped, the show put all three of them on the same flight back to Michigan. Reportedly, John talked to the strangers sitting next to him. He described his day as bizarre, but he said what weighed on him most wasn't the studio audience. It was how his family back home would react. Even though John insisted he wasn't gay, his family still questioned him, and he knew his father in particular would be angry about the episode. But John had no control over how the show would be edited, when it would air, or how it would frame him.

The more he thought about it, the darker his emotions became. Soon confusion turned into resentment and shame turned into anger. And yet, when the plane landed, John offered to drive Scott and Donna home from the airport. They joked as they walked through the parking lot. Scott spotted a small construction light, one of those flashing orange ones, and started teasing John with it. Maybe John could use it as his new blinker. since the one in his car wasn't working. Okay, so maybe you had to be there to get the joke,

but the point was, things seemed light and easy between the friends. Once they were back in their hometown of Lake Orion, the three of them decided to stop for a drink at a bar called Brewskies. A waitress who served them said nothing seemed off. John was polite and friendly. If he was upset, he certainly wasn't showing it. after bruskees they all went back to donna's apartment to keep hanging out according to john he stayed until around two a m then left by himself donna backed that story up but according to one of scott's other friends

who heard about the evening later that wasn't the whole story the friends said that scott told him he and John actually slept together that night. And we have no way of knowing whether that was true or not. It could have been some misunderstanding or maybe Scott was exaggerating. What mattered was that Scott apparently claimed it had happened. And if that got back to John or John's family, the results could be disastrous. Where are my gloves?

Come on, heat. Winter is hard, but your groceries don't have to be. This winter, stay warm. Tap the banner to order your groceries online at voila.ca. Enjoy in-store prices without leaving your home. You'll find the same regular prices online as in-store. Many promotions are available both in-store and online, though some may vary. On March 6, 1995, the Jenny Jones Show taped an episode titled Secret Crushes on.

people of the same sex. Afterward, 32-year-old Scott Amador, 24-year-old Jonathan Schmitz, and their mutual friend, 32-year-old Donna Riley, all returned home to Michigan. The three friends spent that night hanging out together. They talked and drank and joking around like nothing humiliating had just happened to John earlier that day. After that, they moved on with their lives. It seemed like everything was going,

back to the way it had been before. That lasted three days. On the night of March 8, John stayed over at a female friend's house. According to later accounts, the relationship was platonic. John had been upset, unsettled by everything that had happened on the Jenny Jones show, and he vented to her. The next morning, March 9th, John returned to his apartment around 10 a.m. That's when he noticed something on his doorstep. It was a handwritten note, no name or signature, just a few scribbled lines. Next to it was the flashing orange construction light Scott had swiped from the airport three days earlier. The note was suggestive.

It included a comment about needing a special tool to turn off the light. On its own, it might not seem like much. It could have just been a joke, a harmless flirtation, maybe an attempt to break any tension. But John didn't see it that way. He immediately knew who it was from, and he didn't read it as playful. To him, it felt like Scott was refusing to let things die down, like he was testing John to see how long it took for him to break. In John's mind, the situation wasn't just about how embarrassed he felt. It was about how quickly things had spun out of his control.

And more importantly, it was about whether that moment on the Jenny Jones show was going to follow him for the rest of his life. And standing there, in the hallway of his apartment building, holding that note, John made a decision. vision. He wasn't going to let this go any further. John got in his car and drove straight to the bank. He withdrew $300 in cash, which would be worth more than double that today. After that, he went to Tom's hardware, where he bought five rounds of ammo. From there, he drove to Gary's guns, a firearm store located in a nearby strip mall. He used the rest of his money, to pay for a 12-gauge shotgun. The purchase itself was uneventful.

John chatted with one of the shop's owners, explaining that he was buying the gun because he was going hunting with his father. The entire time, John appeared calm and nonchalant. Nothing about the interaction raised any alarms for staff members. Gun laws in Michigan at the time made it possible to purchase a long gun, like a shotgun, quickly, without a mandatory waiting period.

There was no required cooling off time. So within about an hour of finding the note, John legally owned a shotgun and the ammo to go with it. He drove back to his apartment complex and parked his car. He sat there, assembled the gun, and loaded it. Then he spent a few minutes thinking about what he was going to do next. Those moments mattered. They showed that John wasn't in a rage.

He had moved quickly, yes, but he still paused to think. He gave himself time to change his mind. Instead, he started the car and drove towards Scott's home. Just before 11 a.m. About an hour after he found the note on his doorstep, John pulled onto Bluebird Lane. Scott lived there in a mobile home. John parked outside, leaving the car running.

He didn't take the gun with him at first. He walked up to the door, empty-handed, and knocked. Scott answered. Scott's roommate, Gary Brady, was inside somewhere. Though it's unclear if John knew that, John didn't beat around the bush. He asked Scott whether he had written the note. Sources differ on how Scott responded. Some say he denied it.

Others say he admitted to it right away. Some people think he didn't say anything at all, that he just smiled in a way that John interpreted as confirmation. Either way, John already believed. He believed he knew the answer. This was just a formality. He told Scott he'd left his car running and needed to turn it off. He'd be right back.

He headed to the car where the loaded shotgun waited. John walked back toward the mobile home with a gun in his hand. Scott saw him and tried to shut the door, but John forced his way inside, pushing the door open with the barrel of the gun. Scott yelled to his roommate for help, warning him that John had a weapon. Then in a last-ditch effort to protect himself, Scott grabbed a wicker chair and held it up in front of his chest like a shield. It didn't help. John fired once, hitting Scott in the chest. As Scott collapsed to the floor, John fired again, hitting Scott a second time.

And just like that, it was all over. 32-year-old Scott Emador was dead. After firing the two shots, John got back in his car and drove away. About 15 minutes later, he pulled into a gas station and found a phone booth. He called 911 and reported his own crime, confessing immediately to having killed Scott. Scott. The operator asked why he had done it. Using much stronger language than we can repeat here, John said he'd been embarrassed on national TV. None of this would have happened if it weren't for the Jenny Jones show. And with that phone call, the story immediately shifted from a shocking

act of violence to a legal and cultural reckoning. When West Jet first took flight in 1996, the vibes were a bit different. People thought denim on denim was peak fashion, inline skates were everywhere, and two out of three women rocked, the Rachel. While those things stayed in the 90s, one thing that hasn't is that fuzzy feeling you get when WestJet welcomes you on board. Here's to WestJetting since 96. Travel back in time with us and actually travel with us at westjet.com slash 30 years. After 19 years, they're back. Frankie Munes, Brian Cranston, and the rest of the family reunite in Malcolm in the middle, life's still unfair.

After 10 years avoiding them, how and lowest demand Malcolm be at their anniversary party, pulling him straight back into their chaos. Malcolm in the middle, life's still unfair. A special four-part event, streaming April 10th on Hulu on Disney Plus. He was a young Marine. She didn't care about convention. They made a life together. Then one night, the Marine died.

And then the death investigation took a wild, unexpected, and utterly bizarre turn. I'm Josh Mankiewicz, and this is Trace of Suspicion, an all-new podcast from Dateline. Search Trace of Suspicion to start listening now. After a 24-year-old Jonathan Schmitz confessed to shooting 32-year-old Scott Amador, there was no doubt about what had happened or who had done it. On March 9, 1995, the same day of the shooting, John was arrested and charged with first-degree murder. Given the severity of the charge, he was held without bail while he waited for a preliminary hearing scheduled for April. Right away, both the Schmidt's family and the Amador family came to the same conclusion.

the Jenny Jones show was largely responsible for what had happened. John's father, Alan Schmitz, called the talk show rotten and publicly blamed production for putting his son in a situation he believed never should have happened in the first place. John's grandfather went even further, saying that Jenny Jones had essentially been the trigger man in Scott's murder. Scott's family echoed that sentiment. His brother, Frank, said the murder never would have happened if the show hadn't used deeply personal revelations as entertainment. Four days after Scott's murder, his mom, Patricia Graves, spoke out to.

She said that there'd been complete silence from the people who put her son on that stage. No one from the show had reached out to express any kind of sympathy. As always, they were more concerned about protecting their image than protecting their guests. Behind the scenes of the Jenny Jones show, producers quietly pulled the episode from the lineup. It would not air as planned in May. It took another week for Jenny Jones to even address Scott's murder. On March 15th, six days after Scott was killed, Jones addressed the tragedy publicly for the first time.

She recorded a statement that aired on her show, expressing sympathy for Scott's family, while making one points unmistakably clear. She believed the responsibility for what had happened rested entirely with Jonathan Schmitz. In other interviews around that time, Jones described herself as devastated by the news, but she was firm that her show had done nothing wrong, and she insisted that John had not been misled. She said he knew well in advance that his admirer could be either a man or a woman, so despite what people were saying, it wasn't an ambush show. She emphasized that producers had explained the premise multiple times before John was booked, after he arrived,

in Chicago and again before taping. She maintained there was documentation to back it up and that John had even been asked how he would react if the admirer turned out to be a man. Once Jones delivered her statements, the show moved on. It was back to the regularly scheduled programming. Next up, an episode about desperate women who wanted to get married.

Unfortunately for Jones, the criticism didn't fade after her statement. If anything, it only got more intense. Scott's family realized early on that this case was going to get a ton of media attention. They wanted a lawyer who understood spectacle and knew how to use it to their advantage. That's when they called Jeffrey Figer. Figer was already a well-known attorney. he was loud, combative, and deeply comfortable in front of cameras. According to Scott's brother, when he called Figer's office,

the attorney answered the phone himself and said, quote, I wondered when you were going to call me. And it was a good thing the Amador's did call, because the trial that followed became exactly the media circus they feared it might be. News outlets covered every development, Court TV aired the proceedings gavel to gavel every witness, every argument, every emotional moment. Ratings surged and court TV was raking in money. But here's the thing.

Court TV was owned by Warner Brothers, which also owned the Denny Jones Show. Later, the Amador family would sue Warner Brothers in civil court. those proceedings would also air on court TV. It was yet another example of how the network was profiting from one family's tragedy. But for now, all eyes were on John's criminal trial, which started in late 1996. In their opening arguments, his defense didn't deny that he had killed Scott. instead they focused on why. They presented a portrait of a young man struggling with serious mental and physical health issues,

bipolar disorder, and autoimmune condition known as Graves' disease, and suicidal thoughts. They said his upbringing had been harsh and often humiliating, pointing to times when his father had used physical punishments. like the time his dad once spank John with a belt in front of his sixth grade class. Their main argument was something they referred to as the, quote, gay panic defense. John's attorneys claimed that the combination of mental illness and public humiliation had pushed him past a breaking point. Many gay rights advocates condemned the defense, arguing that it framed LGBTQ identity, as something inherently threatening.

They said it excused violence as a reasonable response to being perceived as gay. They argued that maybe the Jenny Jones show was manipulative, gotcha TV, but that didn't excuse John's actions. In October of 1996, 50-year-old Jenny Jones herself took the stand. She testified that she had very long, little involvement in planning individual episodes, including this one. She described the concept of secret crushes, same-sex or otherwise, as playful and light-hearted.

In her view, there was nothing predatory or deceptive about the format. Jones also rejected the idea that the episode qualified as An Bush Television. She pointed out that the show had covered similar themes before, including episodes focused on same-sex crushes. She even acknowledged that she personally enjoyed those topics, seeing them as a way to include gay people in daytime television. Observers noted that Jones looked subdued on the stand. This wasn't the high-energy host audiences we're used to seeing.

She seemed serious, tired, and at times defensive. Over the course of two hours, the Amador's lawyer, Jeffrey Feiger, pressed her. He asked whether shows like hers had any obligation to consider the real-world consequences of what they aired. Joan said no. Figer kept making the case for yes. On November 13, 1996, after about one day of deliberations, the jury reached a verdict. 26-year-old Jonathan Schmitz was found guilty of second-degree murder. The jury concluded that while John was responsible for Scott's death,

the evidence didn't support the level of premeditation required for a first-degree conviction under Michigan law. As a result, John was given 25 to 50 years in prison instead of a life sentence. but that wasn't the end of the story. John's conviction was later overturned on appeal due to errors in jury selection. By that point, he had already served two years behind bars. Even so, he remained incarcerated while prosecutors prepared for a retrial. In August of 1999, a new jury heard the case, and this time they reached the same conclusion.

John was convicted again of second-degree murder, and the original sentence was reinstated. Meanwhile, the Amador family had pursued a civil lawsuit against the Jenny Jones show, Warner Brothers and other parties involved in the production. They argued that the show had acted negligently, and that negligence had played a role in Scott's death. Initially, they won. A jury awarded the family $25 million in damages.

As a part of the trial, the un-aired episode, the one Scott never lived to see broadcast, was shown publicly for the first time through Court TV's coverage. It clearly showed the role Jones and her producers had played in the segment. But the victory didn't last for the Amador's. Eventually, the verdict was overturned on appeal. Higher courts ruled that while the show's actions could be criticized, they were protected under the First Amendment. The Michigan Supreme Court declined to hear the family's appeal, so did the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Amador's never got their money. After the civil case came to a close, legal scholars who had nothing to do with the case weighed in, Alan Dershowitz, who was famous for his role in the O.J. Simpson trial, argued that while the Constitution shielded the program from legal consequences, it didn't protect it from moral responsibility. Jenny Jones, for her part, rarely spoke about the case in the years that followed. But when she did, her position never changed. In 1999, she repeated her belief that this was not a crime committed by a television show. It was a crime committed by Jonathan Schmitz. Her show continued until 2003, when it finally went off the air.

Over time, shows like hers had lost their appeal. Some limped along as ratings dropped. Others, like Jerry Springer, became cultural punchlines. and in the background of it all was Scott Amador's murder. Although the Jenny Jones show wasn't found liable, other networks had to assess whether they were willing to take the same kind of risks. Some decided it was worth it, but in the end, it didn't really matter. The public was already starting to question the ethics of the genre,

and eventually the format itself seemed to fall out of fear. favor. In August of 2017, after serving 22 years in prison, Jonathan Schmitz was granted parole. He was 47 years old. An attorney for the Amador family acknowledged that John had served nearly his full sentence, which seemed appropriate. And the real sticking point was that the Jenny Jones show never suffered any consequences. even though the Amador's continued to believe the producers were equally responsible for Scott's death. Since his release, John has stayed out of the public eye, but his story hasn't faded. And nearly 30 years after Scott was killed, we're still asking the same question.

Jonathan Schmitz pulled the trigger. That's not up for debate. But did his actions that day begin when he bought the gun or when Jenny Jones booked him? The answer depends on where you draw the line between entertainment and accountability. But one thing is clear. Once that line is crossed, it's very hard to draw it again. Thanks so much for listening. on Carter Roy, and this is Murder True Crime Stories.

Come back next time for the story of a new murder and all the people it affected. Murder True Crime Stories is a Crime House original powered by Pave Studios. Here at Crime House, we want to thank each and every one of you for your support. If you like what you heard today, reach out on social media at Crimehouse on TikTok and Instagram.

Don't forget to rate, review, and follow. Murder, True Crime Stories, wherever you get your podcasts. Your feedback truly makes a difference. And to enhance your Murder True Crime Stories listening experience, subscribe to Crimehouse Plus on Apple Podcasts. You'll get every episode ad-free. We'll be back on Friday. Murder True Crime Stories is hosted by me, Carter Roy,

and is a Crimehouse original powered by Pave Studios. This episode was brought to life by the Murder True Crime Stories team, Max Cutler, Ron Shapiro, Alex Benadon, Natalie Pertzowski, Sarah Camp, Alex Burns, Nicolette Tavallero, Kaylee Pine, and Russell Nash. Thank you for listening. Thanks for listening to today's episode of Murder True Crime Stories. Not sure what to listen to next, check out America's Most Infamous Crimes hosted by Katie Ring. From serial killers to unsolved mysteries and game-changing investigations, each week Katie takes on a notorious criminal case in American history.

Listen to and follow America's most infamous crimes now wherever you listen to podcasts.