Murder: True Crime Stories - UNSOLVED: The Federal Prosecutor Murder 1

Episode Date: January 13, 2026

Assistant U.S. Attorney Tom Wales dedicated his life to public service, integrity, and the belief that the law should protect everyone equally. But in October 2001, his commitment to justice may have made him a target. In Part 1, Murder: True Crime Stories traces Tom’s journey from an ambitious law student to a respected federal prosecutor and outspoken gun-control advocate in Seattle. As his influence grew, so did the list of people who resented him. The episode walks through Tom’s final months, the cases and causes that put him in the spotlight, and the chilling night when a gunman fired through his basement window, changing everything. If you’re new here, don’t forget to follow Murder True Crime Stories to never miss a case! For Ad-free listening and early access to episodes, subscribe to Crime House+ on Apple Podcasts. Murder True Crime Stories is a Crime House Original Podcast, powered by PAVE Studios 🎧 Need More to Binge?  Listen to other Crime House Originals Clues, Crimes Of…, Killer Minds, Crime House Daily and Crimes and more wherever you get your podcasts! Follow me on Social Instagram: @Crimehouse TikTok: @Crimehouse Facebook: @crimehousestudios YouTube: @crimehousestudios To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Hi, Crime House community. It's Vanessa Richardson. Exciting news, conspiracy theories, cults and crimes is leveling up. Starting the week of January 12th, you'll be getting two episodes every week. Wednesdays, we unravel the conspiracy or the cult, and on Fridays we look at a corresponding crime. Every week has a theme. Tech, bioterror, power, paranoia, you name it. Follow conspiracy theories, cults and crimes now on your podcast app, because you're about to dive deeper, get weirder, and go darker than ever before. This is Crime House. Some people choose the easy road, the one that doesn't involve conflict or

confrontation. Others take the hard one because their conscience won't let them do anything else. These people believe that rules, matter, and integrity is important. Assistant U.S. Attorney Tom Wales was part of the second. group. He wasn't loud or flashy. He didn't chase headlines, but he did believe in fairness and public service. He had a voice, and he felt it was his duty to use it. Tom pushed for what he thought was right, even when it made him enemies. As a federal prosecutor in Seattle, Washington, he had plenty of those. For the most part, that didn't bother him. and came with the territory.

But certain people he convicted did mind. And one night in the fall of 2001, Tom learned that sometimes doing the right thing comes at a very steep price. People's lives are like a story. There's a beginning, a middle, and an end, but you don't always know which part you're on. Sometimes the final chapter arrives,

far too soon, and we don't always get to know the real ending. I'm Carter Roy, and this is Murder True Crime Stories, a Crime House original powered by Pave Studios. New episodes come out every Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday, with Friday's episodes covering the cases that deserve a deeper look. Thank you for being part of the Crime House community. Please rate, review, and follow the show, and for early, add free access to every episode, subscribe to Crimehouse Plus on Apple Podcasts.

This is the first of two episodes on the murder of 49-year-old Tom Wales in 2001. Today, I'll introduce you to Tom, tell you about his journey to Seattle and his career as an assistant U.S. attorney. After devoting his life to public service, Tom Starr was on the rise. But it all came to an end when someone walked into his backyard, took aim, and pulled the trigger. Next time, I'll discuss the explosive investigation that followed. As the FBI searched for Tom's killer, they tried to understand why Tom was targeted. If it was because of his work, that meant Tom was the first federal prosecutor in U.S. history to be murdered in the line of duty. and finding his killer was more important than ever.

All that more coming up. If you drive about nine miles south of Boston, Massachusetts, you'll hit the gates of Milton Academy. It's a prep school with brick buildings that look straight out of an Ivy League brochure. It's the kind of place where future senators, CEOs, and power brokers spend their teenage years. In the late 1960s, a tall, ambitious kid named Tom Whale stepped onto that campus, determined to make something of himself. Although Tom didn't come from an insanely wealthy family, he was certainly well off.

His parents, Thomas and Sonia, lived a quiet life in Southborough, Massachusetts, about 45 minutes away. They'd both gone to Milton, and Tom was eager to follow in their footsteps. Luckily, he was accepted. On campus, Tom was known for being kind and caring, kind of person who could help those who were struggling. And in 1968, there was one student who really needed his support. A few months earlier, Robert F. Kennedy, the U.S. Attorney General, had been assassinated in Los Angeles.

His son, Joseph Kennedy, attended Milton. That fall, 16-year-old Tom. Tom was assigned to be his roommate. The staff knew Tom could help him through his grief. Tom didn't seem intimidated by Joseph or any of the famous family legacies he encountered at Milton. If anything, they inspired him to do better. Before long, Tom was the captain of the football team and class president, and he had plans

for the future. He had a girlfriend, Elizabeth, who was another member. Milton student and a path to success. His senior year, he was accepted to Harvard University. Tom headed there in the fall of 1970. While he was in his undergraduate program, he and Elizabeth got married on his 21st birthday. Over the years, they welcomed two children, first a son, also named Tom, and then a daughter, Amy. In 1974, Tom graduated from Harvard and moved on to Hofstra Law School in New York. He thrived in the small but fiercely competitive environment.

He became editor-in-chief of the Law Review, a coveted position reserve for the most meticulous students. He was quickly reaching the type of success his parents had dreamed of the day they enrolled him at Milton, and he was just getting started. After law school, 27-year-old Tom clerked for a federal judge in New York. Jersey, then took a job at the corporate law firm Sullivan and Cromwell in New York. The hours were punishing, but the salary was sky high, and there was a clear path to the top

if he played things right. For most young lawyers, that's the dream. But something about it didn't sit well with Tom. He was good at the work, but the goal of making a fortune just didn't resonate with him. He wanted to do something that mattered beyond the bill of hour. So he looked for other jobs that might give him a purpose. He got his wish in 1983 when he got hired as an assistant U.S. attorney in Seattle, Washington. The distinction between a U.S. attorney and an assistant U.S. attorney is important. U.S. attorneys are appointed by the president. They're the ones who speak at press conferences

about high-profile indictments and arrests. Assistant U.S. attorneys are more like civil servants. They're the ones performing the day-to-day work on federal court cases. The role of assistant U.S. attorney is generally seen as a stepping stone. Lawyers spent a few years in the job before moving on to a judge ship, a political appointment, or a lucrative private law practice. That wasn't Tom's plan. He'd tried the high-paying lawyer route and found it wasn't for him, but he quickly discovered that he loved being an assistant U.S. attorney. He was passionate about upholding federal law, and he took great pride in his work. Every time he took down a corrupt business or a white-collar fraudster, he felt like he was making a difference.

Over time, he developed a reputation for his discipline, integrity, and compassion. He preached strict consequences when they were called for, but also believed in second chances. It made him a rare type of prosecutor. Tom also really enjoyed Seattle. It was the perfect backdrop for the life he wanted for his family. He and Elizabeth raised their kids with an appreciation for the outdoors. On weekends, he took his son and daughter hiking through the Cascades and the Olympic Mountains. He pushed them toward tougher climbs and steeper summits.

His daughter, Amy, would later remember how her dad never treated her like she was weaker than her brother. He expected her to keep up, and she did. At home, Tom enjoyed cooking, experimenting with recipes, sharing wine with friends. He also had a love for bad action movies, the kind with wild explosions and cheesy one-liners. Despite the seriousness of his job, he was lighthearted when he wasn't on the clock. He got involved in the community too. He served on the Seattle Planning Commission, where he advised the mayor on new builds and pushed back on unnecessary development. In many ways, he was the ideal public servant.

He didn't just care about fixing things in the moment. He wanted long-lasting solutions that would benefit everyone. And in 1995, an issue came up that Tom couldn't ignore. It started with a fight between two kids at his son's high school. Afterwards, one of them went home, grabbed his grandfather's gun and shot two classmates. Thankfully, both children survived and no one else was hurt, but the shock rippled through the community.

This was four years before Columbine, so school shootings weren't as common. Tom was especially shaken up by the incident. He couldn't believe his son had been so close to danger and that a 15-year-old had been able to get his hands on a gun so easily. Tom decided to take all the fear and anger he felt and channel it into something productive. He joined Washington Cease Fire, the state's leading gun control organization. And within a short time, Tom became the group's president. Now, federal prosecutors aren't allowed to run for office or campaign for political parties,

but on ballot initiatives where issues are decided directly by voters, they have some, flexibility and fired up by the shooting, Tom used every ounce of his. In 1997, he led a statewide gun control campaign. The referendum required gun owners to use trigger locks and get licenses for their handguns. Most importantly, if someone's unsecured gun was used by another person in a crime, the owner would be held liable. To Tom, it was common sense. The gun rights lobby saw it differently. They poured nearly $4 million, which would be double that in today's money, into fighting the initiative. And by the time Election Day rolled around, public opinion was on their side.

71% of voters rejected the measure. It was a devastating loss, but there was an unexpected upside. The campaign had put Tom in the same. spotlight. Now, people in Seattle and the surrounding areas knew his name, and it was all because he'd taken a stand. Tom's ceasefire peers suggested he run for city council. After that, who knew? Maybe he could climb higher. He was a clean-cut federal prosecutor with an Ivy League diploma, a passion for public safety, and a knack for communicating big ideas. He could be a clean-cut federal prosecutor with an Ivy League diploma, a passion for public safety, and a knack for communicating big ideas.

He could be the next mayor, governor, maybe even senator. It seemed like the sky was the limit. But like they say, when you fly too close to the sun, you might get burned. For years, Tom Wales built a reputation inside the U.S. Attorney's Office as a prosecutor who combed through case files with a magnifying glass. Some colleagues said he was meticulous to the point of being excessive, but to Tom, the details mattered. They were the difference between bringing a criminal to justice or letting them run free. And in the mid-90s, there was one case he just couldn't let go.

It had to do with military helicopters that were converted into civilian aircrafts. After the Vietnam War, thousands of military helicopters flooded the civilian market. Entrepreneurs bought them for cheap, stripped them down, and rebuilt them to sell as passenger aircraft. Legally, they were allowed to do this. They just had to follow the Federal Aviation Administration guidelines, which included getting the aircrafts inspected and certified. But the FAA suspected that some operators were, bending the rules or outright ignoring them to get certifications faster and cheaper. A properly converted helicopter could sell for $1.2 million, but every safety issue that had to be

addressed cost of money, which tipped away at the profits. Cutting corners meant tens of thousands of dollars in the seller's pocket, as long as they didn't get caught. Unfortunately for them, people like Tom Wales were paying attention. Tom teamed up with a colleague from the U.S. Attorney's Office and a special agent from the FAA. Together, they launched a year's long inquiry into helicopter conversions in the region. Most of the people they looked into hadn't done anything too bad. Usually they'd fudge the paperwork a bit, things that could be fixed with fines or warnings. But two men stood out.

a pilot named James Anderson and his business partner Kim Powell. They ran a company called Intrex Helicopter, which they operated out of Powell's home in Seattle. They were in the midst of renovating a single chopper for civilian use. But something was off about their paperwork. To Tom, it looked like they'd used cheap military parts to retrofit the helicopter instead of shelling out for the proper materials. Then, they'd forge their records to make it look like they'd done it the right way. Besides being illegal, the way they'd rebuilt the chopper was incredibly dangerous for anyone

who tried to fly it. So Tom put together a case. And in 2000, he indicted Anderson and Powell on eight federal charges. These included mail fraud, false. identifying records and conspiracy to defraud the United States. The evidence seemed straightforward. Anderson and Powell had submitted false FAA logs for the helicopter. They'd even signed some of them using the fake signature of a mechanic who died in a plane crash.

And in doing all of that, they put lives at risk. After years of piecing it all together, Tom felt confident. he had a career-making case on his hands. But soon he learned that things don't always go according to plan. In 2001, a year after the indictments, the government's own FAA expert witness abruptly changed his position. The expert now said the helicopter didn't pose any real safety concern. That didn't change the fact that Anderson and Powell had defrauded the government.

But without the experts supporting testimony, Tom's case collapsed. The U.S. Attorney's Office decided to fine Anderson and Powell rather than chasing a federal conviction. For Tom, it was humiliating. He later called it the most frustrating case of his career. But he had no choice. He had to let them dismiss the charges. Anderson and Powell walked away with a combined fine. fine of $10,000. It was a slap on the wrist after facing serious federal charges.

And yet, Anderson wasn't happy with the outcome. Within a month, he turned around and sued the state, and essentially Tom, to recover his legal fees. He claimed he was owed more than $125,000. He used a law that allowed defendants to get back their legal fees. costs if they could prove the prosecution was baseless. Tom disagreed with Anderson's portrayal of the case. So did the U.S. Attorney's Office. They argued that Anderson wasn't actually after the money. He just wanted to know who had told the feds about his operation.

But Tom didn't want that information getting out. He and the U.S. Attorney's Office had spoken with at least two sources who said that Anderson could be violent and vengeful, and they were worried Anderson might go after them. In the end, the lawsuit was dismissed, and 40-year-old Anderson was forced to absorb the full cost of his legal defense. He returned to his job as a pilot for U.S. Airways. He was free, but he had a bitter taste in his mouth. Two years of legal fees, stress, and the threat of a felony didn't just evaporate. And it certainly wasn't something he could forget about. Tom, on the other hand, tried to move on. Outside of work, his personal life was changing. During the helicopter case,

Tom's wife, Elizabeth, came out as a lesbian, and they divorced. The separation was amicable, and luckily they didn't have to worry about the kids who were grown adults by then. They agreed that Tom would keep their house in Queen Anne, a nice suburb of Seattle, but Elizabeth would still run her literary agency from the basement office during the day. Meanwhile, Tom had become a well-known figure in Seattle. His work with Washington ceasefire, the state's leading gun safety organization, had thrust him into public debates. He'd spent years advocating for better gun safety laws.

He had enemies because of that, but he also had supporters. And in the late spring of 2001, when he delivered a commencement speech at a Seattle Community College, both groups were waiting for him. As he looked out at the audience of hopeful graduates, Tom spoke about fighting for the issues. that mattered. He explained that for him that issue was gun control. He told the students how he had spent the last decade building Washington ceasefire into an organization that took on the NRA. When Tom left the stage, two mothers came up to him. One slammed him for giving the worst speech she'd ever heard. The other told him it was the best thing he could have said.

Tom welcomed both stances. He just wanted people to care. Three months later, Tom's principles were tested. On September 11, 2001, two planes hit the World Trade Center in New York City. The entire country reeled from the attacks, and the panic led to some hasty new policies. One of the ideas that quickly gained momentum was the possibility of the of arming commercial airline pilots. To some, it felt like a necessary step in preventing future attacks. Tom thought it was a terrible idea. He worried that introducing firearms into cockpits would create more risks, not fewer. His colleagues at Ceasfire agreed with him, but cautioned him

to stay quiet. Emotions were raw. The public wasn't ready to hear any arguments against anti-terrorism measures. But Tom had never been someone to wait for the right political moment, not when there was something he cared about on the table. On September 25th, just three weeks after 9-11, Tom appeared on the Seattle local news for a half-hour debate about arming pilots. He made it clear that adding guns to commercial airlines wasn't the path to safety. He argued that asking pilots to fire.

fly planes and act as law enforcement was too much of a burden. It was a bold and controversial move that put him in the spotlight once again. And it seemed like not everyone appreciated his input. Because 16 days later, Tom Wales would be dead. On October 11, 2001, 49-year-old Tom Wales was busy at work. He was drafting a proposal to require background checks at state gun shows. Even in the fog of post-9-11 politics, when any gun regulation was a non-starter, Tom didn't let go of the issues that mattered to him. There was a long day. Tom didn't get back to his home in the Queen Anne neighborhood of Seattle until after 7 p.m. He was supposed to go out to dinner with his girlfriend, 46-year-old Marlis de Young.

She was a court reporter he'd been seeing for about a year, but Tom had called earlier to say he needed to cancel. He had some projects to finish at the house. As he walked through the front door, Tom greeted his elderly cat and coaxed her arthritis medication. Then he went upstairs to prep some drywall that he needed to install on the second floor stairwell.

Around 10 p.m., he finally set his tools aside, But he wasn't done with work yet. He went into the kitchen, poured himself a glass of wine, then headed down into the basement office he still shared with his ex-wife Elizabeth. That room was where the magic happened. It was a small space with bookshelves, piles of papers, and a desk in front of a picture window that looked out onto the backyard. Tom had written countless briefs, cranky letters to elected officials,

and in passioned fundraising appeals for ceasefire at that desk. Tonight, he was writing one of those appeals. At 10.24 p.m. Tom took a break to send an email to Marlis. It was nothing too wild, just Tom letting her know he was thinking about her. Then he returned to his appeal. Tom had no clue that outside, a dark figure was more. moving through his backyard.

They slipped through the shadows, avoiding the light centers that would have triggered floodlamps. They positioned themselves where they knew they wouldn't be seen. Then, at approximately 10.40 p.m., the basement window shattered as several gunshots pierced the night.

The bullets tore through the glass and struck Tom in the neck, throat, and torso. The shooter didn't stick around to see their handiwork. They fled the scene, disappearing into the darkness. Next door, an elderly woman heard the gunfire and called 911. Within minutes, a nearby off-duty officer arrived at the scene. He forced his way into the house, with back up close behind.

In the basement, officers found Tom collapsed beside his death. alive but unable to speak. He was rushed to Harborview Medical Center, the region's top trauma center. Word spread quickly about the shooting. Harbor View's waiting room filled with people who knew and loved Tom, friends, colleagues, and neighbors who couldn't understand how this happened. Among them were the acting U.S. attorney, who lived close enough to have heard the gunshots, Seattle's chief of police who also lived nearby and one of Tom's closest friends, Eric Redman,

a fellow assistant U.S. attorney. They waited throughout the night, the hours dragging into the early morning. Just before dawn, a surgeon came out to speak with the group. She bowed her head as she broke the news to them. Tom hadn't survived. Tom's death raised an obvious question. Why had someone killed a federal prosecutor in his own home? Was it personal?

Was someone angry with him for his gun control activism? Or was it revenge for one of Tom's cases as an assistant U.S. attorney? If it was the latter, it wouldn't just be a tragedy. It would be an unprecedented moment. No federal prosecutor in U.S. history had ever been killed in the line of duty. But figuring out the motivation was important for other reasons, too. If Tom had been murdered because of his role as an assistant U.S. attorney, the investigation would fall under the jurisdiction of the FBI.

If the motive stem from his personal life or his political activism, then Seattle police would handle it. the answer would shape everything that came next. In the end, it seemed like his work was probably the reason, which meant the FBI took over the case. But at the time, the Seattle Field Office was drowning in post-9-11 counter-terrorism work. Priorities had shifted to preventing future attacks. Agents were stretched thin, running on adrenaline,

and little sleep, chasing down threats that seemed to multiply by the hour. According to multiple sources, the earliest phase of the Tom Wales investigation was disjointed and unfocused without any clear strategy. It didn't help that they had so little to go on. According to one investigator, it was as close to a perfect murder as you could get. There was no DNA anywhere, no footprints, no witnesses, whoever it pulled the trigger had been careful. The only physical evidence left behind at the scene were the bullets in shell casings. They immediately became the center of the investigation.

The first thing the FBI did was send the bullets away for analysis. Ballistics experts at the Washington State Crime Lab determined that Tom had been killed with 380 caliber rounds fired from a Makarov semi-automatic pistol. The Makarov was cheap, reliable, and extremely common in the United States, which meant that tracing one particular gun would be almost impossible. But the experts noticed one detail that might be helpful. There were tiny, distinctive markings on the bullets. These weren't from a standard factory-issued. barrel. They came from a replacement barrel. That wasn't unusual. Most original Makarov barrels wore out over time, but replacement barrels were far less common than the pistols themselves.

The FBI tracked down the manufacturer of the replacement barrel. They learned that roughly 2,600 of those barrels had been sold in the U.S., so FBI agents began the painstaking process. of tracking each and every one of those barrels down. They worked through purchase records, old addresses, federal firearms licenses, gun show vendors, anyone who might have touched one of those barrels. It was incredibly slow work, but it was something. While some agents worked the ballistics trail,

another team began assembling a list of potential suspects. They cast a wide net, They looked into former girlfriends, strained friendships, and political opponents. They even tracked down a limo driver who Tom had gotten into a minor fender bender with a few months earlier. They scrutinized Tom's role in gun control advocacy and considered whether someone from the pro-gun lobby might have targeted him. And, of course, they pulled records on every defendant Tom had ever prosecuted. Maybe there was someone out there who blamed Tom.

for ruining their life. Like the ballistics work, making the list of enemies was an enormous undertaking. The names piled up, every one of them a possibility, however remote, and each one had to be cleared. The agents were looking for a needle in a haystack. There were a million tiny hints pointing in different directions, but there was one person who stood out, someone who was $125,000 in debt, whose reputation was ruined, and who thought it was all Tom's fault. James Anderson, the pilot who Tom had recently prosecuted. There was no hard evidence linking Anderson to the crime, just a gut feeling that he was involved, but a hunch

wouldn't hold up in court. And investigating Anderson was a long and frustrating journey, one where the truth always seemed just out of reach. Thanks so much for listening. I'm Carter Roy, and this is Murder, True Crime Stories. Come back next time for Part 2 on the murder of Tom Wales and all the people it affected. Murder True Crime Stories is a Crime House original powered by Pave Studios.

Here at Crime House, we want to thank each and every one of you for your support. If you like what you heard today, reach out on social media at Crime House on TikTok and Instagram. Don't forget to rate, review, and follow Murder True Crime Stories wherever you get your podcasts. Your feedback truly makes a difference. And to enhance your Murder True Crime Stories listening experience, Subscribe to Crime House Plus on Apple Podcasts. You'll get every episode early and ad free. We'll be back on Thursday.

Murder True Crime Stories is hosted by me, Carter Roy, and is a crime house original powered by Pave Studios. This episode was brought to life by the Murder True Crime Stories team. Max Cutler, Ron Shapiro, Alex Benadon, Natalie Pertsovsky, Sarah Camp, Alex Burns, Molly Quinlan Artwick, Honeya, Said, and Russell Nash. Thank you for listening. Looking for your next listen? Hi, it's Vanessa Richardson, and I have exciting news. Conspiracy Theory's Cults and Crimes is leveling up. Starting the week of January 12th, you'll be getting two

episodes every week. Wednesdays, we unravel the conspiracy or the cult, and on Fridays we look at a corresponding crime. Follow Conspiracy Theory's Cults and Crimes. now on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, or wherever you listen.