My First Million - #222 - How to Get a Slice of Harvard's Billion Dollar Case Study Industry
Episode Date: September 24, 2021In this episode Sam (@theSamParr) and Shaan (@ShaanVP) break down Harvard's publishing arm and how you can create something to get a slice of the action. Sam also shares how he would approach Trends i...f he were to make it again. They also talk about the end of the MFM NFT auction and Shaan recaps a LinkedIn post about the early days of Canva. --------- * Want to be featured in a future episode? Drop your question/comment/criticism/love here: https://www.mfmpod.com/p/hotline/ * Support the pod by spreading the word, become a referrer here: https://refer.fm/million * Have you joined our private Facebook group yet? Go to https://www.facebook.com/groups/ourfirstmillion and join thousands of other entrepreneurs and founders scheming up ideas. * The Canva story - https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/21-questions-from-aussie-startups-highs-lows-lessons-learned-perkins/ --------- Show notes: * (0:59) Shaan is jacked * (2:53) Strength correlations to longevity * (11:02) The MFM NFT * (15:06) Harvard Business Review * (25:35) Getting in on the case study game * (31:37) Other spaces to make this work * (34:58) Maybe don't fake it til you make it * (39:50) On investor due diligence * (45:33) Don't be this guy * (53:42) The long path for Canva's success
Transcript
Discussion (0)
There's a whole bunch of big money industry financial players that will happily pay $25,000, $50,000, $100,000 a year just to be like, explain this shit to me.
I feel like I can rule the world.
I know I could be what I want to.
I put my all in it like no days off on a road.
Let's travel.
Never looking back.
Sean, what are you wearing?
You get so offended when I don't have sleeves.
I forgot.
I'm not offended.
I just think that.
I'm like shook.
You're completely flabbergasted.
I think a sleeveless hoodie is an interesting choice.
I think you look nice and then you look jacked.
Thank you.
I'm trying to be jacked.
Are you?
I'm like thick jacked.
Like I have a lot of muscle, but they're still fat on the muscle so it doesn't look very good.
I took this.
So I got, you know, you know those cars that kids get where it's like a mini version of a car
so they can drive it around like whatever?
It's cheap.
So we got one for my daughter's birthday.
It's like a little mini range rover thing.
And so I posted on Instagram.
I never posted on Instagram.
So I posted on Instagram like a close up of like the Rangerover logo, the wheel, where you couldn't, you couldn't tell it's like a kid's car.
I was like, yeah, new ride, you know, work hard.
It always pays off.
And then I posted like a zoomed out version of it in my driveway and it's like two feet long.
And then I take a picture posing with it.
And then, yeah, I didn't realize that.
I forgot that most of the world has it seen me in like two years.
And so, you know, I have long hair now.
I never had long hair.
So everybody in my Instagram is like, what the, what's going on?
Is this you?
What is this?
And then also I've gotten like considerably like bigger, more muscular, I guess.
Yeah, you're, you've, you've, over the last, I would say four years, four years.
It's been like a three year journey maybe.
You've changed significantly.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So I got a bunch of DMs of people just being like, well, like,
Like how that's funny what you were doing like because I was like, you know, like, you know,
proving the haters wrong.
Like, you know, hard work pays off.
You know, like the cringy Instagram stuff that people do when they like get a new car.
I was doing that.
I was just doing it for a joke.
And then also jokes on me because people are like, you look weird.
That's all right.
They are actually complimenting you.
So do you know that I was reading stuff on.
We talked about examined.com.
I was reading about examined.com.
So I enjoy reading about things that have core or that are correlated to longevity.
and so like different studies on that.
And so there's two findings that I've discovered.
The first is grip strength.
So grip strength is highly correlated with longevity.
The second thing is...
Yeah, I'll explain why.
And the second reason, or the second thing is quad strength.
So your thighs.
How strong your thighs are.
Now...
So you're living until 300.
Yeah, I think I'm going to be old.
However, there's not a correlation.
between muscle size and longevity.
So just because you have big muscles doesn't necessarily mean that you're going to live a long time.
But what it means is grip strength and quad strengths are both really the most perfect of an
imperfect test to test your upper body and lower body strength.
And so if you're strong, you're going to live to be longer.
Or it's correlated with longevity.
So strength is.
So I think it's good.
You're lifting weights.
Yeah.
but I feel like my grip strength and quad strength is not great.
And I also feel like that's not what the show is and nobody cares about my grip and quad strength.
But I do think it's cool.
The longevity thing is cool.
I've been like, you know you have these things where you're like, okay, I'm not doing a project in this area.
It's not my work.
It's not my job.
I also don't even really know what I'm looking for, but I just keep going down this rabbit hole.
I just keep watching videos or reading stuff or kind of like talking to people about this thing.
And I kind of, I don't have like a destination I'm trying to get to.
And that's what it's been with this longevity, anti-aging stuff.
I've just been watching a ton of interviews and reading a bunch of the science about what is the latest in this space.
I think I talked about it on the podcast.
Aubrey Gray.
De Gray, yeah.
And then there's like Laura Deming.
Do you know who she is?
No.
So she's a, I don't know if she's an entrepreneur.
I think she's kind of like, she started doing this, but she was like 16.
I think she was a Teal Fellow.
So she dropped out of college to take the Teal Fellowship, which was basically Peter Thiel made this thing where it's like, I'll give you $100,000 if you just drop out of college and work on whatever project you want to work on.
So he's paying people to drop out.
And so she took that.
And she was like, okay, do I start a company?
Do I do this?
Do you do this?
And I think she ended up creating something called, I think it's called the longevity fund.
And it's basically it was the first major, I don't want to say first.
It was one of the first, at least, major.
VC funds that was like only investing in anti-aging and longevity companies.
And so she raises money.
She's still probably, I don't know, under 25.
But she's like, you know, a veteran in this space now.
So I think she worked under Auburn de Grey.
And then I think she knows him at least.
And then she's got this longevity fund.
And she was talking about like, you know, what's been, what gives her hope?
like what breakthroughs or advancements make her think, oh, shoot, like the products are really being made?
And like, what are some things where 10 years ago you thought this would be here by now and we're still 10 years away or more?
And I feel like there's a bunch of self-driving cars is like that.
People have been thinking about this for a long time or VR.
People have been thinking about it for a long time.
It always feels like it's five years away.
But it never hasn't clicked yet, but you do feel like it's inevitable.
And that's kind of like what anti-aging is.
Yeah, I've been reading it a bunch.
one of my favorite books is it's like the
pop culture version of all those blue zones. Have you read Blue Zones?
No. What is that?
You don't know what the Blue Zones is?
No. Blue Ocean, I know, but not...
All right. So the Blue Zones is fantastic.
So it's a book that studies five different cultures
that have an incredibly high number of centarians.
So a large population of people who are above 100 years old.
I believe the five locations are the seventh,
the Seven-day Adventists,
which is a religious crew in mid-California.
Then there's a group in Japan.
There's an area in Greece, an area of Korea,
and maybe Costa Rica.
I forget the other ones.
And he tries to narrow down to the handful of things that they all do.
And those things include eating meat and vegetables,
particularly large amounts of vegetables,
drinking moderately,
not exercising vigorously,
but exercising like walking to work
or walking around all day.
So the seven-day Adventists, they believe their body's a temple.
And so they walk throughout the day and they work jobs where they got to lift stuff above
their head.
But they don't exercise in the traditional sense.
They don't damage their body to try to get superstore and grow the muscles.
Yeah.
And they under eat.
You know, they don't overeat because they believe that their body's like sacred.
And then a few others are the old folks don't go to nursing homes.
They stay at home.
So they have a stronger sense of community.
typically they drink moderately.
I also believe a lot of them have some type of religion or spiritual thing that they're looking towards.
And that's mostly it.
But there's maybe a few more characteristics that they all share.
And do you, there's a whole bunch of like drugs that are like, you know, possibly, possibly linked to longevity, like whatever, metformin and stuff like that.
Have you dabbled in any of those?
No, but as of today, for the past handful of months, I've been taking.
a variety of magnesium.
What, Ashaganda,
the thing that you mentioned.
Right.
Elf,
what's it called?
Elthian.
It's one of those words
that like I write all the time,
but I never pronounce.
Thianine, yeah.
Kava.
And I believe that's it.
But I have been interested
in some of that stuff.
I just haven't.
What's it called again?
It's called,
I forget, the stuff
that's proven in mice for longevity.
I don't know. Rapsomyosin or something like that. Repamycin?
Yeah.
Anyway, so, yeah, I'm interested in longevity stuff. We'll have to talk about it.
I don't have slack open, by the way. If you're going to message me, I don't have slack open.
I've got Zencaster.
No, I was just going to some of the things you were talking about.
Yeah, they're all, it's all meant for like lower mood.
Also, the blue oceans, a lot of it, a lot of it, they have low stress.
Right. Yeah, I think stress is the killer.
That's what some people talk about with Warren Buffett because Buffett's diet is like famously garbage.
Like soda McDonald's.
Yeah, he like, I think he eats, you know, McDonald's for breakfast every day on his way to work or something like that.
Like a sausage McMuffin every day.
I remember watching some video following a day in the life.
This was like 10, 15 years ago.
So maybe he's, maybe he's sharpened up.
But at the time, he was saying this is what he does every single day.
And then he drinks Diet Coke and he eats M&Ms.
It's like all his portfolio companies, you know,
that he like lives by basically.
And so, you know, it's like shocking because he's, you know, he's in pretty good health
and he's got like he's got his wits about him, even though he's almost 90 years old or whatever.
He's like very sharp mentally, has high energy, that sort of thing.
And obviously he's still performing like extremely well at his job even at that age.
And so a lot of people are like, well, that defies the odds.
And then some people say, well, one thing that Buffett does right, he may do a lot of dietary
things wrong, but one thing he does right is he is extremely.
extremely low stress. And it's, if I was betting, I would bet that stress ages and hurts you more
than any other like dietary input. Now, I'm not a scientist. This is just like my observation of
people. I could see people who are glowing, who have high energy, people who stay healthy and who don't.
And it's like, if I looked at what in my life, the people around me, what would be the common
denominator? It's actually not their diets. It's more of their stress and their mindset.
Yeah, I, it's it's it's it's hurt me in the past. So we're in the, we're on the same page. Do you, do you want to talk about the results of the NFT thing?
Yeah, dude. I mean, it's kind of insane. We, uh, so the, we did this NFT auction, which was, uh, here's like the, the quick summary if you, if you didn't follow. So basically I was, I was, I'm really into crypto. I did this thing called crypto week where I was just deep diving and my goal was to actually use all the different parts of crypto, not just like be an investor.
but be a user of what they call Web3,
which is all these different technologies,
different things you can do.
One of which is NFT.
So I bought some NFTs.
I played with the tools that help you value them or scope them out and all that stuff.
And the last thing I did was I wanted to mint an NFT.
And I thought, all right, what would be an NFT I would do?
Well, we're not great artists.
So I'm not going to, you know, I'm unlikely to have this visual art that just speaks to you.
But I was like, what do we do well?
And I thought, well, one thing we've done.
we've created this audience through my first million. And what if we created an NFT called
Five Minutes of Fame? And Five Minutes of Fame is real simple. It basically just says, hey, the owner of
this NFT, owner of this token, it's like the Willy Wonka Golden Ticket. If you have this golden ticket,
you get access to the Chocolate Factory. So for us, it was if you own this token, you get access
to the pod. You get five minutes of airtime on the pod or you could talk about whatever you want.
If you want to talk to us and just shoot the shit, bring your ideas to the table, fantastic.
if you want to ask questions or promote your company or whatever you wanted to do,
that five minutes is it's yours.
And so kind of on a whim, I just texted you being like, hey, idea, what do you think?
You're like, cool, go for it.
And I minted it on OpenC, so I paid a little bit of Ethereum to create it.
I set up an auction for seven days.
And I started the auction at 0.25 Ethereum or Ether.
And so that was the equivalent at the time about like $700, $800.
And it just closed last night at midnight.
The auction closed.
And I think it made $33,000.
So I think it closed at 11.55 Eth, which is about $32,000.
I think it was a little more.
Let's see.
11.5 times $1.5.5.3,000.
5.5.
35 grand.
Yeah.
So that was, that's what it closed at last night.
and so we should shout out the winner.
I thought it was going to go at about 2530K.
That's what I would have predicted.
How much what did an ad cost on this podcast?
Maybe $10,000 and we would do a couple of them?
Yeah, I think, you know, $10,000 would be, you know, maybe.
I don't know, we don't sell ads anymore.
So I don't know what the going.
$10,000 going ad rate would be for it.
But you can't, we don't sell them.
So you can't even get it.
But yeah, who's the winner?
The winner is his username just like D2D something.
So I don't actually know the person.
You know,
it's sold to kind of an unnamed,
unnamed artist.
And we have to figure out.
They can hold it.
So they can basically say, all right, cool.
Y'all are growing 20% month over month.
I'm in no rush.
Let me let me just hold this for the foreseeable future.
And let's let this thing grow.
And then, you know, they could cash it in later.
or so the username, the person who won is D2D 628.
And then you can go look at their profile about some other stuff that they own.
They own some other NFTs that are 5Eath, 3Eth.
They own one that's valued at 335.
So they definitely have like a portfolio.
How much is that?
335.
I mean, that's like, is that 900,000?
Yeah, it's like a million dollars.
That's the set price for it.
I don't know if that's what it'll go for, but that's the, that's the list price
that's asked.
So anyways, this person won, and they can sell it so they can just say, cool, I'm going to flip it.
They can use it.
The way they use it is they send it to our wallet.
So they will have to burn it by sending it to our wallet, which takes it out of circulation.
And then that's how we know you were the owner of it and you cashed it in.
All right.
You want to talk about Harvard?
Yeah, we talked about this.
We hinted at it last time.
So let's do it.
I think you did a bunch of research.
Yeah, but I want you to kick it off and explain to me why you, you,
you got interested in this.
Basically, I've known about this for a while.
So I launched trends because I read all about this.
And so I want to know what caught you.
I think I brought this up on the podcast a little bit.
But what caught your eye?
You initially told me about the Harvard Business Review in passing.
You just said something very, you were like, I think they do like $100 million.
You said something like that.
And Zackat my eye, this was maybe five years ago.
And at that time, I kind of stashed that away.
And then when we sold Bebo, one of the thing, I did a brainstorm.
of like, would I start another thing?
And one of the things that always interested me was education, education, education.
I was like, okay, well, I like business.
I mean, this is before the podcast, even.
I was like, I really like business and kind of digging in and nerdy business stuff.
Could I package that into a product?
It became this podcast.
But one of the ideas I had was could I compete with Harvard Business Schools, HBR,
kind of their media arm?
Because what they do, at the time, I was looking into their case studies.
So what they do is if you ever go to business school and there's many,
business schools that do this, they have kind of like case-based learning, project-based learning,
basically. And so you go into class and you get this printed out piece of paper that says,
here's the scenario. You're the CEO of Sony and you're coming up at the new PlayStation and you're
competing with Xbox. And right now Sony's market share is going down and you need to figure out a way
to get it to go up. Here's some of the background. And it basically gives you a case to walk through
and basically give your kind of like your two cents on what you think the strategy should be and all
that good stuff. And then the teacher has kind of like an answer key essentially. It has the results of
how things played out and what worked, what didn't, and kind of a guided discussion. And so it's
basically like the curriculum for a business school. So I, the reason I got interested in this,
because I was actually going to go start a company making these case studies focused on technology,
focused on kind of like cutting edge tech and either sell it to schools or sell it to companies
who wanted to train their managers. So that was my like idea. I still kind of want to do that
someday. But I did back away from it when I realized that Harvard really had a monopoly. I think the
stats at the time were that 80% of all the case studies, all the business school case studies were Harvard
business school case studies. And then the second thing was, if you go talk to a professor,
I think I talked to two. And I was like, hey, I'm going to do all these great case studies.
It's going to be so much better. And they were like, yeah, but like, what's that phrase?
Like, nobody gets fired for buying IBM. It's like nobody gets fired for buying the Harvard case study.
if I go by the Sean case study, and if anything is off about it, or even if it's good,
it's just going to have lower perceived value than the Harvard one.
So actually, I need to stick on the Harvard sauce.
And I was like, oh, that's a problem.
It's the credential.
It's the brand of Harvard, not the content of the case study.
That really makes a difference.
So let me set the stage here and give some numbers to explain what we're talking about.
Okay.
So every number I'm going to tell you is from 2019.
All of these numbers are public.
So this isn't ideas or theories or rumors.
This is fact.
In 2019, Harvard Business School made $925 million.
I'm going to rank in order where that revenue came from.
So 25% or, yeah, 25%, which is-
We can round a $2 billion basically just to make the math easy.
Yeah, well, I have the number.
We don't do public math.
We don't do public math.
25% or around $250 million came from endowment in gifts, okay?
That's the second largest thing.
I'm going to save the first largest for last.
The third largest thing, 24% or around $240 million,
executive education tuition.
We made from Tyra Banks for saying she went to Harvard because she went to an executive
education.
That's what she's talking about.
The fourth largest thing, get this, only 15% of revenue, MBA tuition.
Right.
Tuition is the fourth largest one.
The final two are Harvard Business School online.
So basically online courses, which is 5% of revenue.
And then finally, housing rents and other 3%.
So the biggest one, their biggest revenue stream is 28%.
Roughly $280 million.
That makes almost two times what tuition makes.
What is that?
Their publishing arm.
So they make money in publishing through a couple different ways.
Basically, two or three.
They make a little bit of money through advertising, but it's nominal.
but they have 400,000 subscribers, and subscribers pay anywhere from $10 to $50 a month,
depending on which package you get.
But the bulk of their revenue comes from the 15 million case studies they sell to around
4,000 universities.
Now, that number of around, let's say, I think, I believe the exact number is $262 million
in revenue.
How does that rank?
So let's put this in perspective here.
The New York Times, I think probably the large.
print publication or text-based publication in America, revenue of $1.8 billion. The Economist,
another 100-plus-year-old brand, $429 million. Harvard Business Review, 262. Forbes, which has,
you know, all they do is publishing, $180 million. Fortune, $100, and Axios $58 million. However,
amongst all of those, Harvard Business Review has the highest revenue per employee, so they're the
most efficient. So $582,000 per employee. So that's some of the numbers. Shockingly big.
Shockingly big. So just to break that down into kind of the different categories, so let's focus
on HBR. So what are their products? They have the, they have the review they publish, which is kind of
like a magazine, right? Essentially, it's like a sort of like a smart kind of smart person magazine.
Then they have the case studies. What's the split between those?
Case studies and subscriptions?
Yeah.
Well, they sell about 15 million to 20.
They sell like 18 million case studies a year and they cost like $10 to $20 a piece.
So if we route here, I actually have the exact numbers.
They have 400,000 subs and they sell 18 million case studies.
So I would imagine that of the $262 million, $200 million is from case studies.
Wow.
Yeah.
So that's kind of unbelievable.
And that's basically recurring revenue because they're going to pay for it each.
year. Yeah, the way it works is your professor who's teaching. So professors who are teaching at any
MBA, they basically, one of the 4,000 universities in America, they've given, Harvard their credit card,
and the professors just scroll through and they go, click, I want that. Oh, I have 120 students,
therefore 120 times $20.20. That's how much I'm going to pay. Just click and bill it to the university,
and that's how it works. Right. Yeah, I still want to compete with this. Actually, now that you've brought
this up again, it just makes me want to go do this. So I tweeted this out.
I put this in my newsletter, actually, yesterday.
I go, top universities are an amazing business.
Imagine having hundreds of millions in recurring revenue through tuition or publishing.
A huge venture capital fund, basically a huge fund, not venture capital, a huge fund, which is their endowment.
You own your real estate and you pay virtually no taxes because you're a nonprofit.
And so like I think Harvard paid, I remember reading this one year, they paid $12 million in federal taxes.
taxes on all that revenue that you said because they're, you know, a 501 or a 3C or whatever
it is. They're basically like, you know, they're a non-for-profit university. And I think they just,
there was just some new bill that like now they have to pay some tax on their endowment. So their
bill went up to like 50 million, which is still, you know, not very much for, you know,
a billion dollar, billion dollar a year enterprise. And so check this out. Dude, Harvard's endowment
is $40 billion.
So let's just say that they get a 7% return.
So that's a little bit less than $4 billion, right, that they get an annual profit.
I would have to run the numbers.
But I believe I did this one time.
If they gave free tuition to all of their students and they only paid their bills with
their endowment profits, they would still net, make a profit of a few hundred million
dollars a year.
So, like, you have to keep in mind that Harvard, like, you say you want to compete with Harvard.
Okay, cool, I hear you.
They have not infinite, but close to as many, as much resources as you could ever possibly need to build.
Yeah.
So what is Harvard worth, right?
Like if you were going to value Harvard, how would you value Harvard?
The same as Nike or something like that.
I mean, you have to look at what the multiples are for Nike.
And interestingly, if we did do, if we just looked at the Harvard Business Review revenue,
Harvard Business Review had $262 million in 2020 revenue.
If we added the same multiple that the New York Times currently has,
it would be worth just the business school portion would be worth $1.2 billion.
Yeah.
Oh, sorry, just the publishing arm of the business school.
Right.
So just the publishing arm, but the media company would be $1.2 billion would be valued at that, right?
Is that what you said?
Yes.
And so the whole thing is probably $50 billion or more.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I mean, it's a lot.
And one would argue that they're not exactly optimizing to make revenue.
revenue and profit. I mean, I don't know too much about it, but I would have to imagine that they're
not like, you know, smack in the whip and saying, telling everyone like, you know, we've got to improve
margins. Right. Yeah, it's kind of crazy. So. And let me give you some more stats. You know
MIT Tech Review? You've read that, right? Yeah. You'll see them floating around. I recruited a person
from MIT Tech Review to work at the hustle. And that person told me all about it. And they were doing
north of 20 million in revenue, and it's archaic. It's a very, very old enterprise.
Columbia has a popular one. University of Virginia is the second highest sale of case studies.
And get this, here's another big one. You know Oxford Press. Have you heard of Oxford University
Press? They own the Oxford Review and they make books. So they do close to a billion a year in sales.
Wow. From their book publishing.
From their book publishing. Yeah, and case studies, lots of books.
All right. So how would I do this? Sorry, let's brainstorm with me. So I think people get the idea that, hey, these are much bigger businesses than you would have thought. What would you do if you wanted to go get some of this action? If you said, wow, that's a lot of money being spent on. Let's just start with, let's just take case studies.
Well, look. You're advising your buddy, Sean. Sean says, you know what? I think I want to do this, but I don't have the angle. What would you, what would you say? So I did this, dude. So my company, trends, the ones that I just sold, we did this.
At the end of this year, trends will potentially be a 10 million plus a year recurring revenue
business.
So we did do this.
We built this exact thing.
And if I owned it and what I was trying to make as much revenue as possible, I would
start in knowing what I know now, I would charge probably 10 times the price.
So I'd probably charge $20,000 or $30,000 a year.
Well, 10 to $30,000 a year.
And I would start in different niches.
And I would slowly start checking off the box.
and I would build this elite kind of scary brand, you know, something like a Viacom or a Blackstone,
something that has this like, or like, what's the university at starts the D?
Dartmouth, like something like kind of like cool sounding.
I think what's the, what's the research report?
Okay, here we go.
Yeah, or Gartner.
We'll just call it like a, like, I don't know.
I'd have to look around and just like, you know, it's like your porn star nickname.
I'd be like your favorite piece of furniture.
Right.
And you're like, you know, like the hardest, the hardest metal or rock surface near you.
Okay, granite.
And then like, you know, a word that means research.
Yeah, we're going to call it like Macklin, Inc.
Like the street that I grew up on, Maclin, Inc.
And you start doing these like, and you start do, you hire salespeople.
You know, you build like a gardener.
And then I would branch down and start hiring a few more pop culture-centric writers.
And then I would do a little bit more broad.
a little bit more broad one.
But, you know, this is what Gartner does,
and Gartner does has a significantly large business.
And doesn't Priceonomics do this, too?
You know about them.
They tried to, but they didn't execute that well.
That doesn't mean the business sucks,
but they failed at executing it.
I think they ran out of steam or lost interest.
I see.
Okay.
And what, you sold to basically small business, freelancers,
entrepreneurs, agency owner types.
Yeah, dude.
And we have like, you know, over 20 or I don't know,
tens of thousands of subscribers, okay?
And we did that well,
but I'm an idiot because the reality is
those same people would have spent $1,000,
and right now they spent $300.
And so I fucked up the pricing.
I should have charged either way more or way less.
So another way is I should have charged $100 or $99
and made that an impulse buy.
$300, which is what we charge?
That's not an impulse buy.
$99 is.
So you charge $99 for a couple small things.
then you have an upsell of $2, $3, $4,000 and very few people buy that,
but you use the $99 one as to get in the funnel.
That's what you should have done.
I did $2.99.
That was a dumb.
So you have two things you would have done differently.
One is the price point.
And then the other you're saying is you would have niched into certain categories
and like really built those categories out.
What would be the first two or three categories?
Oh, I would probably, let's see.
I mean, it would have to be like what I know.
So I bet I could have done media pretty well.
I also think I could have done D to C.
And what I could have done is I could have gotten like the Nikes of the world to give me $20,000 a year.
And they would have gotten two things.
One, I would have published one or two case studies a month, maybe four or five case studies a month on the latest and greatest e-com.
Like the D to C folks, like who's who in the category is crushing it?
Why are they crushing it?
And then every single month, I would host a digital or sometimes in-person panel where I would go out.
and fine, you know, the Sean, the Sewelly and the Ramon or the Moises, like, you know,
three or four young companies that are crushing it. And then all these gray hair Nike
executives would want to come in and be like, oh, that's how you guys are doing it.
That's how you're thinking about X, Y, and Z. And I would do that panel once a month.
And you guys would get free access, the young guys, but then the companies would have to pay
$20,000 to $50,000 a year. And then here's the third thing that I would do.
I would come up with a very cute graph or some type of signature.
thing where I rank and I have a ranking. So I have a power ranking. Here's all the power rankings
of the latest and greatest D to C brands that are under eight years old. Here's the best up and coming ones.
Here are the incumbents, the older guys. Here's the power rankings. And I would create some,
it wouldn't be bullshit. It would be some type of legitimate ranking, but I would come up with some
proprietary thing. And that's how my ranking would be. And I would keep that updated at all times.
Right. Yeah. I agree. And I think you could do this right now in crypto.
That was a great idea, by the way.
The idea I just gave was great.
That would fucking work.
That will work.
Yes, it was an absolutely great idea.
Now, I think you could do this in other spaces.
I think you can do this in crypto.
Why?
Because there's a whole bunch of different brands to keep track of all the different tokens.
There's a whole bunch of big money industry financial players that will happily pay $25,000, $50,000, $100,000 a year just to be like, explain this shit.
And tell me what I need to be paying attention to do?
Crypto would be way easier to sell than D to C because crypto is fear.
So you want anything that's fear-based.
Exactly.
And it goes after the biggest wallets.
People who, people who, like, it's one thing to say, oh, these brands are crushing it.
But if you know which tokens are crushing it, which networks are crushing it, you can actually make money off them.
And on the other side, you're afraid of them if you're the incumbents that have huge wallet.
So I think that's why it's better.
Additionally, with crypto, you've got all these guys like Sean and Jack Butcher who are spending 24 hours a day on Discord and Twitter and like studying and they're like, oh, Kevin Rose just tweeted this out.
And then you have some gray hair guy at Morgan Stanley.
They're like, why do I care what Kevin Rose does and what the fuck is Discord?
And you're like, forget about it.
I'm just going to spoon feed this to you.
Like, big name influencer just tweeted this.
Likelihood of it getting big, pretty high.
Right.
You know what I mean?
Yeah, for sure.
Yeah.
So I think that's something.
By the way, if somebody does this, let us know there's a guy who reached out.
I got to show you this.
There's somebody who reached out that said, hey, you guys were talking a while back.
I think I came on the pod one day and I had this idea.
I was like, somebody needs to do bar stool for tech.
And this person reached out and they're like, hey, you had this idea a while back.
I want to do it.
I'm actually pretty uniquely qualified to do it.
And he explained why, like, I did this.
I did this.
If anybody can pull this off, it's me.
And I'm like, actually, that's actually pretty believable.
And so I'm going to like kind of help this person, you know, think it through and maybe
launch this thing.
So I'm going to share that with you.
But I love when ideas come to life with a legit.
By the way, I also hate the exact opposite.
Hey, I love that idea.
Would love to talk to you about it?
No, no, thanks.
Yeah, I'm just like just zero appeal in that one.
Yeah, I think it's far more appealing to someone say, oh, I've been working on this for
three months.
I've made $15,000 so far.
Exactly.
Okay, let's talk.
I have a stock reply now, which is like, hey, glad you liked the idea.
You know, would love to support, but I get a bunch of DMs.
all about the same idea every time we release one of these.
So my rule is basically if somebody shows me that they're actually,
like there's a lot of people who talk about it,
very few people who do things.
If you end up doing something actually building a product,
getting some users or making some money,
definitely hit me up.
That'll get my attention and I'll happily help then.
But just for, you know, peace of mind,
I can't help everybody who just says,
that's cool.
I'd love to think about it.
Dude, that's so much nicer.
I just say, let me know when you have traction.
That's usually what I say.
I also, if someone comes to me saying they're considering
working on X, Y, and Z, or they say, this was amazing, I'm starting to work on it.
And then a month later, they say, this is amazing.
I'm starting to work on this other thing.
I say, oh, you are disqualified.
I will no longer think about it.
You're one of them people.
You have no grit.
I do not want to talk to you about if you jump from idea to project to project to project
and you don't without like a really, really good reason, you're done.
Yeah.
I just miss you.
I'm super guilty of that.
But I understand why you feel that way.
And I think you're correct.
Okay, let's do some other topics.
Let's see, what else you got?
You got something else you got on to do?
No, you lead.
You got something?
Well, I see this O'Maze thing, and I kind of want to talk about that.
And then there's another one which, let's do actually, I think this one's more, this one's
funnier.
The topic on our sheet says, maybe don't fake it until you make it.
It's like, it's timely, right?
So I tweeted out that, I retweeted this story of this guy who was like,
you know, the Elizabeth Holmes, the founder of Theranos, her trial starts today.
Funny story.
I actually interviewed at Theranos after all the scandal happened.
So I thought that was kind of interesting because there's a lot of people that were like,
oh, yeah, I met her back when everybody thought they were hot shit.
And it was a $10 billion startup.
And she was the next Steve Jobs.
And I had this funny experience.
This guy's experience was all the news had come out.
And then a smart mentor of mine was like, hey, you should take a look at this role at Theranos,
like this high level exec roll.
He's like, Therone.
Are you joking?
And they're like, no, no.
Like, you know, they're misunderstood and she's amazing.
You should talk to him.
And then like another person said it.
He's like, okay, I guess at least I'll get a good story out of this.
So he flies there and he interviews with her and he like kind of tells this story.
I don't remember all the details, but it's an entertaining story that you can find it on Twitter.
And actually, you can't because Twitter search sucks.
But like, yeah, just take my word for it.
It's an entertaining story.
So the topic here is like there's been a bunch of these, I feel like that have like happened
in the tech world lately.
And I think in the tech world there was this gospel of fake it tell you make it.
Yeah, that's the cool way to go about things.
That's the hustler way.
And then you see things like Theranos.
You see Nicola Motors, which was like this like fake Tesla basically, literally like took the name.
Like Tesla was the inventor's last name.
Nicola was his first name.
So Tesla was successful.
So he names his company Nicola.
And he claims that that's not why he did it.
But obviously it is why he did it.
Takes the company public via a SPAC.
It runs up to this like,
$40 billion valuation and then somebody's like, hey, bro, have you ever seen a Nicola car on the
street? And like, no, nobody's ever seen a truck of theirs ever. And it's like questionable
if it even exists. They have like one video of their truck and it's basically like just going
downhill. It's like they just had a truck and they release the neutral, the value, put it in
neutral and just let it roll. And they're like, look, electric self-driving truck. And so anyways,
you know, eventually the CEO, Trevor Milton, uh, has to
to resign. He forfeits some of his stock, but he gets away with billions still.
But he's charged by the DOJ with securities fraud this year. And so, you know, he's got to still
at its peak, like a $10 billion fortune. Now it's a $1 billion fortune, but likely to lose
it all. My buddy worked at this company called Headspin and was like, he was like, he was like,
he had worked at a bunch of, I won't say the name, so I don't want to give them away. But,
you know, high profile tech company you've heard of, high profile tech company you've heard of.
He worked at them pre-IPO, and then he was like, I'm at Headspin.
This is the next one.
And he sent me a investor deck for it.
And it looked great.
I was like, oh, I should invest in this company.
Like, it's a SaaS company.
What Headspin does is they like, if you have a mobile app and you want to test it,
you want to see, how does this work on a shitty Android phone in Thailand on low network
conditions?
Well, like, how are you going to sit in your office in San Francisco and test that?
They basically had phones everywhere in the world in these like little like data rooms.
and they would run your app and they would report back how your app runs.
That's cool.
It was a great idea.
And they would give you performance testing, performance data, benchmarked against your
competitors in every region on every phone and every cell network.
And so in their deck, they had $100 million of recurring revenue.
It was like, oh, this is clearly going to be a multibillion dollar company.
Fortunately, I just, for whatever reason, didn't invest.
I just got busy and I forgot about it.
And it came out that the CEO had just literally made it up.
So he's like just making up the revenue numbers.
And so he's charged with fraud.
The company is kind of like, you know, disarray a little bit.
And he was just reporting false revenue and like telling all the kind of bookkeepers in the company.
Like, you know, they're on a need to know basis about what they can know.
And hey, if we're going to raise money, I need the number to show this.
My take on this is there's good news and there's bad news here.
The good news is most people are good and they don't lie.
There's amazing things that I've done just off a trust.
For example, I've told you this.
I bought a car one time.
I just called the guy and I go, hey, you have it.
I'll take it.
And he goes, cool, just send me the money.
Sent him the money.
And then just like I was hoping that he was going to deliver.
I do that all the time.
That works most of the time.
The bad news is that these people exist and it's very easy to get away with this.
I mean, get away with it for a little while.
You know, most of the time you're caught.
But it's really easy to lie.
and it's to get away with it for a while.
So how many of your startups,
how many startups have you invested in?
Maybe 40.
Okay, I've done probably 25 or 30.
How many of them could be lying to, you think?
And like if 100% of them could be lying to me and I would not know.
And that's for two reasons.
I'll just explain why.
I'm going to be honest about this.
Most people are not honest about this.
Great.
I didn't want to call you out.
And I do the same thing, but I didn't want to call each other without, so I wanted you to volunteer.
Most investors, myself included, do zero due diligence.
We do not, we meet the founder.
Yes, we play with the product, right?
Those are the two easy things.
We see if, you know, I can use your product that tells me something.
I can kind of just check Twitter.
Do people talk about this?
Is there good reviews about this product, whatever?
And I talked to the founder and I just see, you know, were they like, you know, a drug dealer
before this or did they work at Google, right? Does the stuff they're saying add up or are they saying
things that just like, you said this number the last time, now you're saying this other number,
which one is it? But do I go audit their financials? No. Do I audit their data room?
They don't usually even send a data room, but even if they do, do I go in there and look at the numbers?
No, even if I look to the numbers, would I know that these numbers are real? No, these are their
self-reported numbers. No, they're oftentimes a Photoshop of their QuickBooks.
exactly. I don't know if you mean Photoshop as in edited or just like screenshot.
A screenshot of their QuickBooks, which could be Photoshopped or their analytics tool.
And it's like, oh, what does active user mean? It's like, ah, it's a lot of effort to figure out what
the heck they're talking about here. But, you know, directionally, I can see what this is going.
So I do so little diligence. Most legit investors do so little diligence. We are all banking on
the fact that there's some angels out there. I mean, angel, I mean, I mean, as angel investor,
I mean, like, good person on Earth who actually does dig in.
And I know some of them.
They're rare.
And they only do it with a few companies.
I co-invest a lot.
I can barely name of them.
That means I don't really know that many of them.
I co-invest a lot with Anker from Teachable.
And he does diligence.
And he'll send me.
Ryan Hoover does diligence.
Like when I meet with a founder, usually on the call within maybe 10 minutes,
I've decided yes or know whether I'm going to invest.
usually no, but if it's yes, it's like, I'm in in principle. I'll even tell them that.
I don't want to confirm. I want to sleep on it, but like, I'm in principle. And I want to
sleep on it is just because I've learned the hardware that like my impulse investing is not always
going to be the best. So like there's no harm in letting it cool off and just digging in a little bit.
But like Ryan Hoover, I send a lot of deals to Ryan Hoover. He sends a lot of deals to me.
And he always is like, great, we're going to dig in and get back to you. And that means they go,
they talk to customers of the product. They use the product.
themselves. They look at competitors. I don't think they audit financials or audit metrics or anything
like that. I still don't think that they do that. But they do more diligence than anybody out than
most other people I know who go off of. Cool. If you're saying this, I trust that what you're saying
is factual and true and that you are not, you know, essentially lying and committing fraud.
So this whole fake it to the make it thing is what we're talking about. And my point here is
it's so easy.
It would be totally easy to do this.
Yes.
Intellectually speaking, it's obviously you got to go, you got to be fucked up and you
got to be willing to, you know, hurt folks.
But intellectually speaking, this is very easy to do.
It's also easy to.
And by the way, if you're smart, even if you looked into it, it's easy to fake it.
So like I remember one company we bought, we did an investment in a purchase of.
We looked at their Google Analytics.
We're like, okay, you're saying you have this much traffic.
Let me see your Google Analytics dashboards.
They send us access.
We go in ourselves, not screenshots.
We're looking at Google Analytics.
Okay, all looks good.
And then I don't even remember how this came out, but we looked at the code of the website,
which again, most investors don't even know how to read the code, let alone are they going
to take the time of go read the book?
They put their analytics code on someone else's website.
No, they had it on this website, but they were multiplying it.
So they just doubled every event.
So if it said one user's here, no, actually.
users are here. They just inflated by 2x. I don't remember if they just put two pit two. They told the
pixel to fire twice or they were doing something else, but it was a multiply by two on their traffic
and usage. And I was like, wow, like, you know, shit, do I need to go read the code or like you go use
crypto? Am I really going to know how to audit the smart contract? No, I don't know how to do that.
A handful of people on Earth know how to do this. And so there's a lot that happens that is trust and
there's a sort of a cost of doing business of getting into business with liars. The good
thing about Silicon Valley is, it's unlike crypto and unlike, you know, some other other industries.
It is a long-term players game. You see repeat players in the game. And so what that means is your
incentive to have a good reputation matters. Now, does it fully matter? Well, no, because if you could be
Adam Newman and you could walk away with, I don't know what he walked away with over a billion dollars,
I think out of the WeWork thing. And maybe his reputation is tarnished, but he's got a billion
dollars now, right? The size of the prize makes it worth it to like flush your reputation for some
people sometimes. But at the early stages, with early stage startups where I invest,
your reputation matters more than what you can walk away with financially from that
round. Additionally, I think that you can actually screw your reputation, but as long as you have
a reputation as someone who turns $1 into $2, regardless of how big of a piece of shit you are,
you'll always be able to commit someone to give you money. For example, there's this guy named
Garbos, I believe. He started a company called Radium 1 and Blue Lithium. Am I getting all these names right?
That's amazing if I am.
You got that one wrong.
It was something like that, I think.
I think so my sister worked for him.
So I know, I know this guy very well.
So give the background of this guy.
It's crazy fascinating.
This is actually a great story.
The guy's a young, successful entrepreneur.
I think his first thing was like a, he got big an ad tech.
So he did like an ad tech company.
He sold it for like $200 million.
And I think he raised very little.
So I think he owned a lot of that.
So he became $100 million.
He goes on Oprah.
Oprah's like, wow, you're amazing.
You're like a bachelor.
Like, wow, any woman would want to be with you.
He's good looking.
Yeah, he's like, he's like, you know, has some charm.
He's got a lot of confidence.
I don't think he's that good looking.
He's got a lot of confidence.
He was very rich and successful at a young age.
And he would say very motivational things.
His Instagram was all about you can do, right?
Like he was Barack Obama with the Hope poster on his Instagram.
So fast forward, he does another ad tech company.
But things start to go a little bit weird.
He ends up getting busted.
So there's a corporate weirdness and then there's a public weirdness.
Most people only know the public weirdness.
The public weirdness is he got caught on tape kicking his girlfriend or beating his girlfriend.
He kicked her like 127 times on tape.
Basically, he had kidnapped.
He was charged with kidnapping.
He wouldn't let her leave the house.
Like she was his girlfriend.
She was there.
They got to fight.
They got an argument.
And he's assaulting her.
And the cops, literally the footage is out there on the internet.
You go see this now.
Cops take this footage.
He goes, so he gets fired as CEO of, I think, Radium 1 at the time or whatever, whatever.
kind of like new ad tech company he had built that was like valued at 500 million to a billion
dollars something like that he gets kicked out of CEO because like okay even though he hasn't
been charged yet dude there's a video of you you know beating a woman on on the internet like you're
not the CEO anymore and he's like I'm I'm innocent I don't even know how you tried to say I'm
innocent but he said try to say I'm innocent basically so he goes to court he ends up getting off
because the footage was collected improperly like they collected the evidence uh in an improper way
so you couldn't use it so even though everybody saw it everybody knew
it, he ended up getting charged for like kidnapping instead of assault or something like that.
It was like, you know, something softer. I don't have all the details right. But basically,
I remember there was some problem with the way the evidence was collected. And so he goes,
you know, has to do some public service and rehab. He goes, lays low for a bit. But he comes back with
a new company, Gravity 4, I think was the name of it. I think, and do you know Nick Sharma?
Yes. I think Nick Sharma was his, was that Nick Sharma, Nick Sharma was his assistant.
Nick Sharmer was like his chief of staff, I think.
I think it's his uncle, if I'm correct.
Like blood uncle?
I think it's his blood uncle.
Wow.
Or relative in some way.
I hope I'm not wrong on that, but I'm pretty sure I am.
So basically, so here's some other kind of inside stuff that I know.
So then, so he's building gravity for it.
And it's like in the ad tech space.
Ad tech's a very competitive space.
So my sister worked at a startup that was a different ad, ad network platform.
They did like retargeting for a bunch of big brands like booking.com.
and whatever. And they were doing all right, but they go and they start to pursue an acquisition. Why? Because
Facebook's always changing the rules. And today we're a preferred partner. But tomorrow, Facebook,
you know, might give that out to every agency or whatever. My business is very fragile. I'm super
dependent on Facebook and being one of these preferred partners. And so they go out to sell the company.
And I think they get some good interest. They get some offers. Maybe it's from Facebook, Google,
other ad networks, whatever it is. And Grubosh wants to buy the company. So this is what I heard.
So, you know, rumor.
Burdy tells me, no, no, I can't confirm any of this.
Bertie tells me that he hears about this.
He goes to bid on it and he's a low bid.
He's not the winning bid.
And they're also like, dude, you're no way we would ever sell to you, knowing what
we know about you.
And what he does is he goes and he basically gets, he tanks their, their prospects in the
market.
How he basically goes and spreads fear, uncertainty and doubt to the other bidders.
And he gets Facebook to pull their, their,
access or their privilege or whatever it was. So he somehow gets them basically like he takes away
their one like core business asset and like just ruins their ability to sell the company. And now
they're like short on cash, can't go raise money. Everybody knows they just tried to sell the
company and it flop for some reason. And he goes and gets it for pennies on the dollar. And like has a big
falling out with the fact like, you know, not on good terms. It's not a happy sale. It was a fire
sale. And, you know, they got something out of it because they needed to get some value, but like against
their good, against their will, sell to gravity forward. He's rolling up these ad tech companies.
And from the start, he's saying, in 18 months, we're going to take this public. We're going to go
get to $100 million in revenue. We're going to take this public. It's like, dude, we have like no
product. We have like no team. You're just buying these companies and we're supposed to like
integrate them like instantaneously. Like you just bought five companies this month that none of them
like are succeeding and we're supposed to make them all work. And this was after he got caught.
This was after he got, he got arrested twice, I believe, twice for beating two different women.
And both, I think both caught on camera.
What, like, blatant, blatant horrible crimes.
This was after, right?
And he's got, like, a bodyguard at the office, like this huge bodyguard that travels
with him everywhere.
He's got this, like, model, like, supermodel, like a 12 who just comes into the office
and out.
That's his new girlfriend, I guess.
I don't know what's going on there.
Why would anyone work for this guy?
Completely erratic behavior.
And, like, on one hand, like, very ambitious, inspiring.
And, like, you're seeing your shares go from one penny to he's saying.
we're going to go public at a billion dollars. So you're like, oh, shit, okay, we're going to make,
I'm going to make $10 million if I see this out. Like, I'm going to make $25 million if I see
this out. Like, okay, maybe I should do that. And the other hand, you're like, this is a house
of cards. Like, there's no, like, we don't actually have like a stable product. We haven't
integrated all these acquisitions. The revenue is a little bit flimsy because, again, like,
we're just rushing this whole thing through. And then he got in trouble again and that whole thing
fell apart. And I think he's back now with another company. Like, if you go look him up,
I think he's back again. And that's my point.
which is you can have a horrible reputation, but if you make money, you will always be able to get money.
I'm not saying that's good. That's just what it is. What did your sister do for him?
Well, she was at the company that got acquired by him, by his company. So then there was like a temporary period where like the whole company went over there.
And then like, I think within six months, there was not a single employee left from the 40 that got acquired or 50.
I don't know how many was, like something like that. There was like one person left at the company by.
Why would anyone choose to work for this guy if they know that he is a piece of shit?
That amazes me.
I don't understand why you would continue to trust someone like that.
Yeah.
So now he's doing something called vendor cloud.
He says on his Twitter profile, three exits for $400 million plus.
Philanthropist.
And I think he, I don't think he lives in America anymore.
I think he like moved to Bangladesh or, I forget where.
Yeah, yeah.
It says Hong Kong.
Hong Kong. Okay.
Yes.
So we got ran out.
He's going forward again.
I don't know.
And, you know, who knows?
Who knows what the other side of the story is?
I only know one side of the story.
And, yeah, Ben, make sure I don't get sued from this.
Bleep out whatever gets his name.
Everything that we just said is, it's just a story.
And a lot of it was factual, but we definitely could have gotten some of the facts
incorrect.
Yeah, exactly.
But the story is like 10.
The story is like eight.
years old maybe or six years old. It's not that recent. Yeah, it's pretty wild, dude. Go watch
the Oprah video with him. It's just, it's pretty crazy. Yeah, he was a piece of shit. So fuck that guy.
That's what I say about that. That's a fact. We tried to hedge briefly. We tried to hedge so
briefly. No, dude, fuck that guy. Like, I think like, maybe I didn't get all the facts right,
but I saw a video of him being this lady. Yeah. My eyes saw this video. My eyes saw this video.
Yeah, my opinion is go fuck yourself, Garbash, or whatever his name is.
All right, what do we want to do now?
Do we want to wrap up or we want to do one more?
Let's do one more thing.
You got anything quick?
No.
Let me see.
One second.
Let me look at my little stash file here of things.
Did I talk about Canva last time, dude?
Just how it raised more money at a $40 billion evaluation or something.
Yeah.
So, do, okay, so check this out.
This is going to be a bad segment because it's really,
all I'm going to say in this is go read this article, but go read this article. So what I want
you to do is just Google Canva Journey LinkedIn. So what happened was the founder, Melanie Perkins,
she posted on LinkedIn a kind of like- She's pretty amazing. Full history. And when I say full
history, I mean like details. And I love details. I love the art of the start. And so like I just want to share
with you some of the things. Okay, so what's the story with Canva? Canva awesome product. I use it.
It's basically like it lets you design things like marketing brochures, infographics, ads, banners,
emails, whatever, without being a designer. So you don't have to have design skills. They have enough
templates. It's easy enough to just change photos and colors and text that you'll get a good looking
output without being a designer. That's great because it brings a whole new group of people into the world
design. All right. So what's what's interesting about this? So first, they, I think, just raised it a
$40 billion valuation, which is insane. It's one of the most valuable companies to come out of Australia.
And secondly, this story is wild. I actually didn't know a lot about it. Can you link to it?
Link to it for me. I'm just going to tell you about it and then I'm going to link to it.
I want you to just hear me, hear me tell it and then ask the stories. I ask questions.
All right. So basically, she was, I think, a design teacher or she was like,
teaching part-time at like a school for like design and art or something like that.
And I think the way they started was actually not with a product called Canva.
It was with a product called Fusion Books.
And all they were doing was they were trying to solve the problem of if you ever put together
like a yearbook or like a photo book, it's very hard to like lay it out.
And I want this collage with like eight photos, but I need them to fit right.
And then I want the background to look pretty and have a flower.
and then like, you know, page two, I want it to be a big picture and two small pictures, whatever, right?
The layout of photo books.
So they created Fusion books, which was basically like software slash like, yeah, software basically that would make
that easy.
And so they were like, okay, they got a little money back from their tax return and like their
part-time jobs.
And they were like, all right, that's our funding for Fusion books.
And it's like, you know, you don't need a year to make a yearbook.
do it in minutes with fusion books.
And it's like the most like non-impressive looking startup ever.
And she doesn't just like what a lot of people do when they tell the story is they,
what I say,
fast forward through the hard part.
It's like, yeah,
we started Fusion Books.
And then, you know,
after a couple years,
we started Canva.
We realized Canvas is a better opportunity.
And what Canva is trying to do is empower design.
It's like blah, blah.
It's like,
wait,
what happened to those two years.
So what I love about this post is it actually talks about those two years.
And so it's like a photo of her at some like trade show.
with her like fusion books yearbook thing and she's standing there like a dork behind the table
no no people are at her booth and she's like smiling she's like yeah this booth was a huge waste
of money because like there were more exhibitors than attendees so that was a flop and then like she's
like I didn't know how to code and like we didn't know how to find a technical person and so just me
and my boyfriend trying to do this and like we convinced this one part-time engineer to do this but like
here was the problems and like here's our printer we're literally printing books yearbooks for people
and dropping them off, and we're trying to go get every school to use us, blah, blah, blah.
All right.
So they start doing all that.
And so at one of these, what's it called?
I think it was like either a competition or like, you know, inventor of the year, like
Western Australia inventor of the year competition.
They come runner up.
And she's like, you know, I'm wearing this dorky suit.
I'm holding this runner up prize.
But at that event, I met this guy named Bill Tai.
And Bill Tai is like a kind of like a famous investor in Silicon Valley.
He's definitely famous now because he was the seed investor of Canva,
but he's done many, many big deals.
I think you can probably Google him.
And he was a VC who just happened to be speaking at the event.
And he gets there and he's like, oh, you know, like they talk for five minutes and he's like,
hey, if you ever end up coming to Silicon Valley, like, let's meet up.
And she's like, oh, cool.
And then she does the thing.
This is the fake until you make it that actually works.
It's not fraud till you make it.
It's fake until you make it.
Where she's like, wants to meet up with them but doesn't want to be like, hey, Bill,
I booked a flight to,
to fly from Australia to San Francisco to see you.
So instead she says,
I happen to be there this month.
Like, would you be free?
I would love to chat.
And like, if he says yes, then she'll book the flight.
And so he's like,
he's like, yeah, sure.
You know, happen to me.
And you should also meet this guy Lars from Facebook.
He's ex-Google.
Like, you should meet him.
And she's like, wow, this is amazing.
And then she posts every step of the way,
she posts the full presentation that she made for him,
which I love because she released slide by slide,
the good, the bad, the ugly.
Like this one's like,
the future of publishing dot, dot, dot is the cover.
And it's like fusionbooks.com.
com.
Right?
It's like this shitty thing.
Oh my God.
And it's like, she posts this pitch deck and like, you know, she posts like five of them in this blog post.
Like you can see the evolution all the way to Canva.
So she goes to meet with Bill.
And so she's like, she's like, she's like Google's like how to dress at a Silicon Valley investor meeting.
It's like, you know, dress, just get comfortable, you know, just look smart, casual, you know.
you don't have to dress up too much.
So she's like, okay, I'm not going to wear my like woman pantsuit track suit thing.
Like my power suit.
She wore like, you know, business casual.
And then she gets there and he's like, oh, you don't, you didn't need to dress up for this, by the way.
And she's like, fuck, I thought I was dressing down.
She's like, I started off the meeting just like totally mortified.
And, you know, whatever.
And so then she's like, you know, I presented him this pitch deck.
And, you know, you know, he's.
She's like, I'm explaining the future of publishing, and he's like, cool.
Like, do you have an iPad or an iPhone?
She's like, no.
You're like, you're telling me the future of publishing and you don't own an iPad or an iPhone?
And she's like, uh, shit.
But she shows this slide in her thing.
And it's so funny, dude, you'll see it when you get there.
So I'm going to send you the link now.
Scroll down to where you see this cartoon character.
It's like clip art cartoon character.
And it says Fusion Books, and it's right by the finish line.
And there's a trophy at the end of the finish line that says the dominant online
publishing system. That's the trophy for winning. And then behind her, you see two cartoon characters
of Google Docs and Microsoft Office, like falling behind, falling over and fighting each other.
And it's like, basically she's saying like, we're going to beat Google Docs and we're going to
beat Microsoft Word. And so even at this point where she had like terrible name, terrible design,
didn't know how to dress, didn't know how to pitch an investor, didn't have an engineer.
She had the like the thing that is like porn to investors, which is the ambition to say, we're not
just building yearbook software. We're going to be.
beat Google Docs in Microsoft Office.
And like, if you're crazy enough to say that, an investor will listen to like the next three lines you say to be like, oh, you're just delusional or actually, maybe this person is crazy enough to pull something like this off.
So one with a turning point.
So then she hits, so there's like a long period of time where she's trying to find an engineer.
So Bill's like, I'll invest in you if you can bring on an engineer that this guy Lars, this Facebook Google guy I'm introducing you to, he's an engineer.
if he improves of the engineer, I'll back you because then I think you have the software skills to pull this off.
So she goes to Lars, she's like, hey, can you introduce me some engineers?
And he's like, you know what?
Like, yeah, but it's hard to introduce you engineers.
How about this?
If you find engineers, I'll screen them for you.
So she finds like 20 engineers.
He screens all of them and just thumbs down initial screening.
And like, no matter how good she thinks the engineer is, he's like not even close.
And she's like, oh my gosh, she's getting demoralized because he's like, Bill's not going to invest unless Lars signs off on the engineer.
And Lars, like, I don't know what the hell he was.
wants, but he's just not signing off on any engineer. And so this goes on for like a year.
And so then she like hustles like crazy. Bill Tye is famous for kite surfing. She had like kind of
kite surf. So she's like, fuck it. I'm going to become a kite surfer. So then she's like,
hey, Bill, I was just kite surfing. And he's like, oh, you should come to come kite surfing with me.
So she like gets in with him again to like do this thing. Completely not the way I would advise
anyone to do this, like just chasing one investor like this. But whatever, this is her journey.
And so then she posts this thing where she talks about it.
She's like, I was so down, like, as large as rejecting engineer after engineer.
She writes this note to herself.
And she posts it, she goes, Mel, you're extremely tired.
You're in a challenging situation, though you could pull through.
Nothing bad is really happening, but you're feeling depressed because you were used to achieving
things quickly.
This is a hard environment.
And there's no doubt you will succeed.
You will find the team that you need.
You'll get the investment that you need and you will build the company you always want it.
You have chosen to put yourself in a challenging situation.
If it wasn't challenging, that you wouldn't feel satisfied when you get to the end goal.
And I love it.
She was like, you know, riding herself these pep talks and she posted it, which is like, you know, kind of vulnerable to do.
She looks exactly the same now.
Like she's handled this woman, she's a CEO, right?
Yeah.
So she's been through hell building this business.
She looks totally the same now.
It looks like the stress did not bother her.
That's crazy.
I'm looking at these photos.
But these photos are 10 years old.
She looks exactly the same.
Yeah.
I love this woman.
So she goes.
Okay, so then she finally, okay, let me just fast forward some of it.
She finds the engineer.
Laura's like, hey, this guy is like the best engineer I've ever worked with.
You should hire this guy.
She's like, oh, man, amazing.
This guy's already pre-screen.
So she talks to him.
The guy's like, interested.
But he's like, oh, I got my own startup right now.
And I have a team of six.
I just can't do it.
So she just checks back in like three months later.
She's like, hey, how about now?
And she checks back in again three months later.
He's like, hey, Bavana.
And one of those times he's like, yeah, you know what?
Let's do this.
And so he says, let's do this.
She's like, oh, that's amazing, blah, blah, blah.
Let me fast forward this story because you should really just go read the post.
But I have it up.
This is amazing.
There's a whole bunch of things like she posts every investor, like a bunch of investor
rejection letters, which is just like, sorry, I just don't feel comfortable investing in
Australia or like, you know, would love to stay in touch.
it looks like we're going to have to sit and wait this one at or the evaluation's too high or,
you know, it's pre-launch or, you know, whatever.
I don't think the timing is quite right.
And she's just like, you know, whatever.
We just kept going, kept going, kept going, kept going.
And then, and so she recruits this guy out of Google.
She, like, Google almost retains them.
And she puts a presentation, it's like, you know, this is, I don't know his name,
but let's just say his name's Greg.
This is Greg.
He worked at Google.
We had a great life, but he started to get bored.
Started to wonder, is there more for me out there.
And each one of these is just one slide.
This is like a little flipbook.
And he thought to himself, what if I could go and help a small team where I could bring my
expertise and do this? What if I could bring the power of design to like a billion people on
earth? What if I could do this? Wouldn't that be better than just sitting at Google for another five
years? But then Google said, oh, we need you, Greg. But then you remember, Google's going to keep
Googling whether he goes there or not. But Canva may not if he doesn't join or whatever.
You know, he makes this pitch. And he's like, oh, I love it. You know, you really like made me feel
special so like I'll do this. So I feel like it just showed a lot of the grit and the hustle and it did not
fast forward the ugly part to the point where I'm like, dude, get to the Canva part. Like what is all this?
But it's like, yeah, that's probably how imagine if I'm feeling that.
Amazing. I'm looking at this post. Imagine how she felt living this for three years or whatever it is.
And then yeah, like, you know, they launch it. It takes off. It's like, you know, super successful.
And it's 40 billion dollar company now. So happy ending at the end of that one.
Yeah. And I think her, I don't know if she was dating or.
or if she's now married after they started,
but her and her co-founder are married.
Yeah, they were dating then married now, I think.
So it's pretty badass.
They have two times the wealth now.
This is a good-ass story.
I miss this.
I don't know how you found this.
I guess you found this on Twitter.
It's on LinkedIn, which is funny.
Somebody sent Ishaun, who used to,
who used to get my original podcast editor.
Oh, because he's Australian.
Yeah, he's Australian.
And I have him in a Slack channel with me still,
and where we just post cool links.
And so he posted this one.
He's like, damn, this is actually really good.
This is amazing. This is good find.
Cool.
Totally badass.
All right.
That's it for today.
Good episode, I think.
What do you think?
How do you think that was?
Dan, how was it?
The Harvard business stuff is really cool.
I really liked that segment.
All right.
We'll see.
I think that was well researched.
We'll see.
Oh, by the way, we got to give a shout to Mario.
What's Mario's last name?
Mario Gabel or something like that?
Yeah, he's actually, I actually stole a ton of information from him.
So good job, Mario.
Mario, Gabriel.
all, sorry. He's badass. He has a, the generalist is his newsletter. That's right. So that was
awesome. All right. That's it. All right. We're outy. See you.
