No Such Thing As A Fish - 440: No Such Thing As Death By 1000 Scallops

Episode Date: August 19, 2022

James, Anna, Andrew and special guest Steve Mould discuss bitterness, bricks, bivalves and boiling. Visit nosuchthingasafish.com for news about live shows, merchandise and more episodes. Join Club F...ish for ad-free episodes and exclusive bonus content at nosuchthingasafish.com/apple or nosuchthingasafish.com/patreon

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Hi everybody, just to let you know, we've got a very special guest on the podcast today to replace Dan Schreiber, who was momentarily disappeared. And that guest is the fantastic Steve Mould, very much friend of the podcast, friend of QI. Actually, I think has made an appearance on QI. He's science presenter and communicator extraordinaire. He's one-third of the Brilliant Troop Festival of the Spoken Nerd. Please do check out his work, go to his YouTube page. It's full of amazing, mind-blowing, bizarre, extraordinary science videos. It really is a great place to hang out online and definitely listen to the Festival of Spoken Nerd's podcast, which is called A Podcast of Unnecessary Detail, where they take subjects
Starting point is 00:00:44 you might think are boring if you're a fool and show you that they are, of course, fascinating. It really is worth a listen and we had a great time having him on the show. Okay, here we go. Hello and welcome to another episode of No Substance Thing as a Fish, a weekly podcast coming to you from the QI offices in Covent Garden. My name is Andrew Hunter Murray and I'm joined this week by James Harkin, Anna Tajinsky, and it's our very special guest, Steve Mould. We have gathered around the microphones with our four favorite facts from the last seven days and in no particular order, here we go. Starting with fact number one and that is Steve. My fact is that protons taste sour. How do you, like, you can't get the cutlery small enough for that? How do you taste a proton?
Starting point is 00:01:45 So, actually, every time you taste something sour, you're tasting protons. Oh, okay. Is that a different fact or the same fact? I would say it's the same fact. Steve, doesn't everything have protons in it? Oh, I see what you mean. Free protons. Everything's got protons on their own. So, you know, you have five taste senses on your tongue, sweet, sour, salt, bitter, and umami. And your sour taste, it just works in a completely different way. So, like, your sweetness, taste, it's the old lock and key thing. You've probably heard it a thousand times in biology. So, just in case I've forgotten literally everything I learned. Yeah. So, you've got these gustatory cells on your tongue. And on the surface of those cells, you have these big molecules, complicated shapes. They're
Starting point is 00:02:37 proteins with a complicated shape. And that's the lock in this analogy. And there's one molecule that fits perfectly. That's the key. And in the case of your sweetness receptors, it's the sugar molecule. It's glucose that fits perfectly. Okay. And when they combine in that way, it causes some chemical reaction to occur inside the cell. And that leads to a signal going to your brain. And you experience that as something sweet in your mouth, right? But when you taste something sour, it's because you're tasting something acidic. So, sour is just your, like, acidity detecting mechanism, right? And something is acidic if it has a high concentration of hydrogen ions. Okay. And if we've got all of our chemistry, can we get on to physics, actually? Can we get on to literature?
Starting point is 00:03:32 Well, Andrew, so, I mean, so what is hydrogen, you can tell me what hydrogen is. Yeah, it's an element of a periodic table very early on. It's the earliest one. So what's it made of then? I mean, what's inside is it so it's made of an asset. So the molecule of hydrogen is one. It's the central bit. It's a neutron. It's a neutron. No, I think it doesn't have a neutron. Isn't it one without a neutral? Does every other molecule in reality have a neutral? I've got bad news for you, Andy. You're currently naked. But the good news is you're asleep. So it's a proton within an electron orbiting around it. And that means it's neutral. It's balanced. Yeah. That's it. It's not a charged particle. Hey, what's another word for that?
Starting point is 00:04:25 What a charged particle? It's called an ion, isn't it? Oh, we just mentioned ours before. Is this your card, sir? So to turn a hydrogen atom into a hydrogen ion, you strip away the electron. Okay, leaving just the proton. That's right. So a hydrogen ion really is just a proton. And that tastes sour. And that tastes sour. So when you're tasting an acid, it's because you're tasting protons in the liquid or in the food or whatever. And so these gestatory cells, instead of having like some complicated molecule lock and key thing going on, it's just a hole. And it's a special kind of hole in the cell that accepts protons. It's got a proton channel. So cool. Yeah. So bizarre. So it's not a special shape. It's not one of those like when you're
Starting point is 00:05:16 a kid and you fit bricks into holes. It's not that perfect shape. It's just a big cavern. And it accepts protons. It sounds like my tongue is like something from back to the future. It's like taking protons. Yeah. Okay. Right. So a few questions. Do electrons taste the opposite? As in do we know what electrons taste like? Or do we have a receptor that reacts to that? If an electron falls into this hole? Well, electrons wouldn't fall into the hole. No. Oh, yeah. Interesting. That's your answer, Andy. I don't think we have receptors for electrons to my knowledge. I don't believe we do. We wouldn't necessarily taste of any sort. We wouldn't taste of anything. Yeah. Unless you like put some jam on them.
Starting point is 00:05:57 Okay. Question number two. Follow up question number two. What is the smallest number of protons that we would be able to taste? Because obviously they're tiny. Oh, that's a great question. Yeah. Would you have 500 billion? If you just licked one hydrogen ion, it's not going to taste anything. Exactly. Yeah. So what happens is the concentration of protons in the cell builds up until it reaches some limit. And then it sends an electric signal to your brain. Okay. So I don't know what that limit is. That's okay. No further questions. What I find really interesting about this I was reading is that possibly sourness might be the earliest taste that any animal had. And the reason being that animals are living in the deep ocean
Starting point is 00:06:40 and the danger in the deep ocean might be acidic stuff coming up and you want to get away from the acid. And so perhaps that we learned how to taste this sourness before we learned anything else because it would stop us from getting fried by the acid. That's so cool. That'd be good, wouldn't it? Actually, the way I like to think about taste is those five taste senses that we have on our tongues, you can think about them as chemical detecting mechanisms that we've evolved for survival. So like sugar is really important because it's a source of energy. So it makes sense that we would evolve the ability to detect that bitterness is your poison detecting mechanism. And actually, there's a few different receptors for that because there are a few different
Starting point is 00:07:21 poisons that we can detect. What's really interesting about the bitterness receptor is that it's really in flux in like an evolutionary point of view, because we're in an arms race with plants plants don't want to be eaten, except for fruit, you know, they don't want to be eaten. And obviously anthropomorphizing the plant, we're allowed to anthropomorphize. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I draw faces on all my plants. So plants are producing poisons to stop us from eating plants, but then some plants are producing molecules that interact with our poison receptors poison detecting receptors on our tongues. They're not actually poisonous, but we react to them and decide not to eat them because they taste bitter. Whereas with sourness, you like it naturally from birth.
Starting point is 00:08:09 I mean, no one likes sour sweets more than kids. And yet sourness in a way denotes something's gone bad. Like if milk goes sour, that's bad. And that's disgusting to us. But then if certain fruits are sour, then that's really good. And actually can show that they haven't gone rotten. Yes, that's I love that. So it's the sign that there's a particular kind of acid that is citric acid provides the sour flavor in fruits. And actually, those various acids prevent really harmful bacteria from growing, meaning that, you know, lots of primates will enjoy fruit that's slightly spoiled because it means that it's safer. That's why orange juice tastes bad after you've cleaned your teeth. Because toothpaste tends to have
Starting point is 00:08:49 sodium rhodosulfate in it, that binds to the sweetness receptors in your mouth and stops them from working. So when you have orange juice, then you can't taste the sweetness of the orange juice, you can only taste the bitterness and the sourness. And that's not so nice. On sourness and children and stuff, those sour candies you can get. They're basically the sweet candies, but then they put some acids on the outside. So they put like citric acid, tartaric acid, fumaric acid on the outside. And they also have malic acid, which they put inside palm oil, which means it's like a slow release. So it kind of very slowly comes out. So the sourness kind of stays in your mouth for longer and longer. But the interesting
Starting point is 00:09:32 thing about those candies is something called sour patch kid. You know that? I love sour patch kids. You love sour patch kids. I have them quite a lot. Okay, so the sour patch kid is also a medical term. Can you guess what the medical procedure is that is known as the sour patch kid? Is it? I do know this one. You coat the child in... And then you remove their appendix. It's kind of close. This kid is sour. The kid has gone sour. So the kid is covered in some kind of acid. You put one of those sour astro belts like a patch on a blister or something. Yeah, yeah. And it's, it gives it a what? On a what?
Starting point is 00:10:15 I think. No, you can't do this. I mean, you're not going to get this in a million years. It's prolapsed anuses. Oh God. Wow. I think that might be something to do with what they look like. So I've eaten quite a lot of sour patch kids sweets in my time. I don't think I've ever come across one. What they've all, you're not saying there's a team of surgeons in the sour patch kids factory. It's just a nickname. Basically what happens is if you have a prolapsed anus sometimes to get it back in, you're basically your intestines have come out of your rectum. So to get it back in, you need to shrink. And one of the ways to do that is to remove some of the water from it. And one of the ways that they do that is to sprinkle some sugar on the prolapsed anus.
Starting point is 00:11:01 And you put the sugar on and it kind of goes down slightly. And then you give it a little prod and it goes back inside. And the technique is sometimes known as the sour patch kid, or otherwise sugaring the REM. That I believe is in Mary Poppins. A spoonful of sugar helps the prolapsed anus go down. Why is it called sour when it's putting sugar in it? Do they put acid down on it? I don't know what sour patch kids look like. They're not relevant to this. Would it work as a home remedy if you've got a sour patch kid and used it? Medical professionals do this. They're coated in sugar. And especially at the end of the packet, there's that kind of fine dusting that's fallen off the original sweets. And that's obviously
Starting point is 00:11:45 the best bit. Because they're quite glutinous, right? And some of them red in colour? Some of them red? Could it be what they look like, a bit like a sour patch kid? Do you know what? For the benefit of my future enjoyment of sour patch kids, maybe we could draw a line on this. Have you guys heard of Eli Mechnikov? You might have done, actually. Eli Mechnikov. He was a famous Russian biologist in the early 20th century. He was working and he effectively launched the yogurt craze in Western Europe. Yeah, this is on soundness. So he was especially interested in ageing and the science of ageing and also in the gut and digestion. And in 1904,
Starting point is 00:12:24 he was in Paris and he delivered a lecture claiming that ageing was partly caused by harmful bacteria in the gut and that you also had to eat foods like yogurt to cultivate those friendly bacteria, beneficial bacteria. And he suggested that sour milk didn't spoil because of that lactic acid in it. So it sort of kills off the, you know, the really, the rottenness germs. And he said, hypothetically, maybe if that's happening in the lab to sour milk, the microbes might stop internal putrefaction in you and prevent ageing. And this turned into a huge thing in Paris. There was this mad yogurt rush, basically, where people were rushing to shops and queuing up and saying, yogurt is the thing that's going to keep us young. When was this music?
Starting point is 00:13:05 It was 1904. Oh, wow. And he slightly clarified the next year, look, yogurt is not the elixir of youth, but it was too late by that point, basically. Everyone in Paris was covering themselves in the yogurt. The great yogurt ting of 1905. And then John Harvey Kellogg, who, you know, the very famous dietitian. Oh, God, anything he latches on to, you know, it's going to go a bit weird. He started feeding each of his patients a pint of yogurt. And I appreciate that's a useless, I don't know what time period. There was like a huge craze, wasn't there? And I think like one petty fallou went for 200,000 euros. Yeah, that was the old bubble. Yeah. Everyone was coated in yogurt. Yeah. Well, one other thing to say. So, like,
Starting point is 00:13:49 sweeteners, artificial sweeteners are tricking your sweetness receptors into thinking you've got sugar in your mouth when you haven't. And there are examples in nature of plants that have done that. So, there's a berry in West Africa that has evolved the ability to make this molecule that binds really strongly to the sweetness receptors of primates. And they bind so strongly to those sweeteners receptors that they only have to make a few of them. They don't have to spend loads of energy making loads of glucose molecules. They just make a few of these trick molecules. And all these primates are going mad for these berries. They're running around eating them and they're getting no benefit from it. There's no energy content in it,
Starting point is 00:14:29 but they're still going around then pooing out the seeds. So, the berries get the benefit of having their seeds dispersed, but the primates don't get any benefit from it. And there's one gorilla that has evolved a slightly different sweetness receptor that isn't tricked by the berries molecule. And so, they do a lot better because they're not running around chasing these berries anymore. Are they miracle berries? Are they? Is that what they're called? No, miracle berries are something different actually. Miracle berries is something that binds to your sweetness receptor, but in an inactive way, it doesn't do anything. But then when you introduce an acid, it activates the molecule in such a way that it then stimulates your sweetness receptor.
Starting point is 00:15:11 So, you suck on a miracle berry, nothing happens. Right. And then you drink something sour and it tastes sweet because that molecule then turns into something that can stimulate your sweetness. Got it. Like that old rumor about uzo, where if you drunk uzo and then the next day you drunk water, then it would reactivate the uzo and get you drunk again. Is that a thing? Yeah. Hang on. If I had a miracle berry, then I brush my teeth. Then I had some orange juice. Could I make the orange juice taste sweet? You're a true scientist, Andy. I would say with questions like that. Okay, it's time for fact number two, and that is my fact. My fact this week is that fans of Indiana Jones guessed details of the fourth film's plot before it was released
Starting point is 00:16:00 from the expressions on the faces of the tie-in Lego characters. Were they expressions like, oh, this is going to be shit? Where's my agent when you need him? So, this is Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, which is the fourth Indiana Jones film released in 2008. I saw it at midnight in the cinema on the first night. Good on you. You had all the figurines already, didn't you? I knew the whole lot, basically. Anyway, there were these Lego figures released, and there were these little translucent skeletons, and basically fans worked out, oh, there's an alien plot in the film, which there is because of the nature of the little translucent Lego skeletons. Wow, it's funny. And they also worked out that Cape Blanchett was a baddie,
Starting point is 00:16:45 and again, sorry spoilers. Did she have like a sad, like an angry face? The Lego figurine is frowning, and they released the merch before the film came out, so fans are able to work it out, and as a result, the film was not well received. It was solely because of this Lego thing. I think on your head, beer, as a fan, if you're overanalyzing the Lego to that extent, then you deserve that. Well, this is the thing. Yeah, exactly. Like, if you're a real fan, I mean, they make the merch way in advance, don't they? I have to sign it off and clear it and all of that. Like, it's quite hard to keep things really secret. Although some withhold it. Star Wars now withhold some figurines to make sure that they don't give anything away. Because of what happened?
Starting point is 00:17:22 Because of this terrible event. Yeah, we all learned from the great mistakes, don't we? I think in one of the Star Wars films, again, this is going to be full of spoilers this episode. But only if things released before, like, the financial crisis down the way. There was a character called Ray, who, and the figurine, was holding a lightsaber, which I believe gives away the fact that maybe she is a Jedi knight or master. And you're not supposed to know that. And so they withheld that, smart, until the film had been released. And this is the thing I was most outraged, I was looking at a list of things that Lego revealed in films. And most of it was stuff like,
Starting point is 00:18:03 come on, who cares? But in the first Shrek film... You don't understand film nerds. What do you mean, who cares? It would literally be like, oh, this little thing revealed that there was a scene involving grass. There were three family members. Anyway, but in the first Shrek film, Burger King released tie-in meal toys, kids' meal toys. And there was a figurine, and I've seen it, and it has Fiona, the princess, and it has her normal head with lovely pretty face and ginger hair. And then if you spun it round, it revealed her as an ogre. Now, as we all know, you don't learn that until the very end of the film. Yeah, that's a big twist. It is a big twist. I remember being very excited when I learned that. You haven't seen Shrek?
Starting point is 00:18:49 No, no. Oh, I think you should. Should I? Yeah, it's a good one. Well, I've got a child, I probably will at some stage, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah. On Lego, one thing I found really interesting is that if you have an idea for a Lego set, they might make it for you. All you need is 10,000 supporters on Lego.com, whoever it is. And then if you get 10,000 people to like your idea, then they'll review the idea and possibly make it. That's great. So that's like the parliament thing, isn't it? If you get, or is it 100,000 people you need to sign a petition, then they'll consider. Exactly. So they're not like, if we managed to get all of the fish fans to say we want to know it's a fish Lego, then it might get to a level, but they might just go, well, no, we're
Starting point is 00:19:32 obviously not making that. Could we, could we, could we ask all fish fans to make, ask parliament to make a Lego of fish? We could get. Does parliament make Lego? No, but we could ask parliament to put pressure on Lego to make the fish. That feels like corruption of some sort. I don't like it. There's no money involved. Apart from all the money we'll make from Lego. The merchandise on this, no such thing as a fish Lego experience are going to be huge. Actually, there is money involved because if it's your idea and you get 10,000 people and they make it, you get 1% of all the money that Lego makes out of it, which is quite causing. All right, let's do it. I can't wait for the no such thing as a fish ride at Lego Land. Listen to Dan explain a fact slowly and correctly.
Starting point is 00:20:16 People in the front carriage may get covered in yogurt. So don't forget to pack your anus because we're going to be pouring sugar all over it. So they've made a central perk from Friends, bit through this system. They've made a Seinfeld in general, like a Seinfeld Lego set. Oh, yeah, yeah. And things that are not yet approved, but you can currently go on the Lego website and approve these if you'd like. A pirate dentist currently. A pirate dentist. I think they would go say R. That's kind of a boat in a boat phase kind of entry, isn't it? It's one gag that shouldn't really be. Yeah. The coronation of Charlemagne is currently there. It's really going a long way from what kids want at this point, isn't it? But there are so many adult Lego fans and Lego makers,
Starting point is 00:21:10 Apple. This is completely their fault. The reason that these stupid things happen where lots of sad adults, tens of thousands of signings, petitions for new Lego pieces. Okay, well, lots of them might listen to podcast too, Anna, so. No, I do obviously think it's very cool, but it is apples and they were a huge deal and they used to get ignored. You're going to get a brickthroat through your window, but it'll be a very tiny plastic one. Yeah, look out of that tiny, tiny window you've got in your flesh. A little Lego Seinfeld banging on the door. No, they, so they, there have always been adult fans of Lego and they got more and more vocal up to the nineties and the early 2000s and Lego, the company thought they were quite annoying and
Starting point is 00:21:52 kept getting all these letters suggesting possible design ideas and actually put signs on their website and, you know, on their merchandise saying, we do not take ideas, unsolicited ideas. And, you know, if you speak to people who worked at Lego at the time, they'd say it was so irritating, adults were taking an interest in Lego and it wasn't meant to be for adults. And then they almost went bankrupt because they started almost child defying Lego. So they'd, they'd sell sets that were kind of almost completely made that were just for the play element rather than the build element. 2003 Lego was in serious trouble and someone in the company said, guys, should we start listening to all these adult nerds and disposable income? They did disposable
Starting point is 00:22:29 income and they created an AFOL engagement team, the adult fans of Lego engagement team. Was there a kind of summit where they were trying to bring, bring in the AFOL, the AFOLs? Yeah, there was actually, well, they, Lego went to one of these unofficial Lego conventions and said, okay guys, we'll start listening to you. That, I guess that was their summit. That was their big peace agreement. Did they go in disguise and sort of whip off the robes? And it turns out it's like a massive Lego minifigure. Exactly reveal their yellow claw hands. There is a, there is an app that was released last year. It was not an official one, but it was a Lego app. It was called Brick It, quite a good name. And what it's for when you're nervous about
Starting point is 00:23:10 something. It's terrified of your Lego. Yeah, it's a therapy app. No, it was, it was you photograph your pile of Lego with your smartphone camera and it will tell you what to build and it gives you instructions. Like it says, you've got these pieces you can make Father Christmas out of Lego and it gives you instructions about how to do it. And then if you see your, you know, this design and you think, oh, where's that red one that I need for the, the hat or whatever, you can't find it in your pile of Lego, you go back to the photo you took that you scanned and it says, look, it's there. It's there in the pile, you idiot. That's brilliant. It's amazing. For jigsaws. That would be good, wouldn't it? You just scan it and it says this one goes here.
Starting point is 00:23:51 I suspect that removes the main point of a jigsaw. Well, maybe I didn't know maybe this does too, but it's a, yeah, it's a pretty clever machine learning style thing. So there's a guy called Adam Beedle on YouTube and he's made a machine. It's like a Pez dispenser for little Legos and it's attached to a webcam and the webcam is swivel so it can move around and the webcam can tell where you are. It can, it can recognize your socks, say for instance. And so it can sign a swivel round, look for your feet and then fire Lego under your feet. So wherever you walk, you always stand on Lego. Was this invented by Kevin and home alone or something? I wanted to build a machine learning app to find four leaf clovers. So you take a picture
Starting point is 00:24:41 of a clover patch and it would say, yeah, here's the four leaf clover and I spoke to a lot of people about it and they said that actually for some reason artificial intelligence isn't very good at counting things. So it would be quite difficult because you've got to recognize leaves coming from the same thing and then count how many of them. So like there's a lot of these image generation AIs out there. You say, you know, draw me a picture of a bird with three legs or whatever and it'll draw this picture and it'll have like 17 legs. I don't understand why, but it's an interesting thing. The one thing computers are good at. But not artificial intelligence for some reason. There was, I remember reading years ago, there was a record
Starting point is 00:25:20 for the most four leaf clovers found in a certain area and it was in a prison just outside London, I think. And all the prisoners had started finding four leaf clovers because there'd been some genetic mutation or I think the clovers grow an extra leaf when there's some problem. But I just like. And did they all magically break out of prison the next day? They're just not very lucky, are they? They're in prison already. They've been caught. So I mean, yeah, that's really funny. Do you think it's still lucky if robots find your four leaf clover? That feels like you're cheating. No, I think it's fine. Okay, great. I think it probably is still lucky. I don't know. You can buy four leaf clovers.
Starting point is 00:26:06 That's definitely not lucky. We can buy horse shoes. They're lucky. They're so hard to find in nature. That's true. I thought they were unlucky if you hang them upside down. Yeah, but then everyone says they're supposed to be one way and then everyone, the other people say they're supposed to be the other way. No one can tell whether they're supposed to be the rounded bit down or the rounded bit up. It seems like different parts of the country have different things. So I have a horseshoe in my house, but it's on its side because I thought that's the best. The place they're supposed to be is flat on the ground with a horse turning on top of it. Everything else is misplacing for those.
Starting point is 00:26:53 Okay, time for fact number three and that is James. Okay, my fact this week is that one of the most environmentally friendly ways to catch scallops is to set up an underwater scallop disco. And lure them in with sounds of the macarena. Is that seafood based? That's desperately great for any songs that might be. I was going disco. Aqua. Aqua's quite disco. On topic, Barbie girl. Go on, so they like disco music. They do. Well, no, they don't. They like disco lights. And this is a press release from the University of York that I read and it's about some work that they did with FishTech Marine, which is a fisheries company from Devon. And what they were trying to do is they were trying to put
Starting point is 00:27:42 lights into crab and lobster pots and they were hoping that they would catch a load of crabs and lobsters, but what they actually thought they think crabs and lobsters would be attracted by the lights. They thought they might be, but it turns out that crabs and lobsters, they're more of going to the movies kind of animals. They like jazz. They like going to watch Indiana Jones at midnight. But actually, scallops, they love the lights. They love the disco lights and they kind of went down and looked at these pots that they were expecting to have crabs and lobsters in and found just a billion scallops. And the interesting thing is that the current best way of catching scallops, and when I say best way, I mean most efficient way,
Starting point is 00:28:20 very much not the best way for the environment, is to use dredges. So loads of claws that go down to the bottom of the ocean and drag the bottom of the ocean and the scallops come up and you catch them from there. And obviously this is not a sustainable way to catch seafood. Because it drags up so much other stuff with it. It basically turns over the seabed. It's awful. But this could be a much better way of doing it by putting some disco lights down there. Do you think because they have hundreds of eyes? And do you think they love the disco lights because they've got so many eyes? It's like going to a disco that's 500 times better than ours. There is a suggestion that it might be that because most animals that live under the sea don't have great eyesight, but they do have these
Starting point is 00:28:58 amazing 200 eyes and each of their eyes have two retinas, one that responds to light and one that responds to darkness. And so they have this incredible complex sight. Perhaps that's the reason that they're attracted to the lights. We don't know to be honest, but the fact is that it works and it could save the environment a little bit. And most of the scallop that you see on your plate, if you order a scallop in a restaurant, you'll get this sort of white cylinder of flesh. It doesn't sound as appealing. They're very delicious things. That's kind of what a sausage is, isn't it? It's a cylinder of flesh. Yeah, exactly. They're the sausages of the sea. They're nature's sausage. So that is not the whole scallop. That's not the whole animal. You know, that's just the
Starting point is 00:29:52 adductor muscle, which is this. So they have this incredibly powerful muscle that they use to open and close the shell. And you're not eating the 200 beautiful tiny eyes. And the eyes are so small as well. The eyes are the size of a poppy seed. And each of their eyes is on its own tentacle. Isn't that cool? And they can kind of peer, you know, what's over there? So each of their eyes, because they have mirrors at the back of their eyes. I think, did you say that, James? They've got two retinas, but each eye has a mirror, which is made of millions of small square tiles. It's weird, because it's almost like a disco bowl. Oh my God. Yeah, you're right. They think they're saying one of their own when they see the disco bowl.
Starting point is 00:30:38 So, okay, in the eye, you've got the mirror, which is made of millions of square tiles, but those mirrors are each made of 20 or 30 layers of a substance called guanine. And so guanine is one of the main ingredients of DNA, among other lots of other things. It is what gives fish their silvery tint sometimes on that, you know, that sort of gleamy tint. That's what guanine, that's what you're saying. And it's also what chameleons use to change the color of their skin. There's one chemical, sort of, or substance. Yeah, crystals, doesn't it, in the skin of chameleons. Yeah, so cool. That's just scallops going around, you know. And they have growth rings, like trees. Do they? Yeah, you can tell the age of a scallop by its rings. It's sound that you
Starting point is 00:31:19 have to chop them down first, though. No. Yeah, each ring on their shell is the rings that radiate out of the shell, as it were, obviously. So each ring represents a year of growth, unless apparently it represents a stressful incident. So it might be that they've had an incredibly stressful life, in which case they're going to see much older than they are, much like humans. Like humans, yeah. Like they've got a lot of pressure at work or something like that. Yeah, yeah, big report to hand in and they're trying to raise a kid at the same time, whatever. They've been dredged. It is mostly the dredging that a stressful incident will usually be you're caught in a net, and so you deposit an extra layer in your panic, apparently.
Starting point is 00:32:00 I read an article with some scientists who reckon that if we mass produced oysters and mussels and scallops and stuff, then that could be the way to solve the world's nutrition problems. And the main problem that they found is that most people don't like oysters and mussels. Yeah, but if you mass produce anything, it's the answer to the world's nutrition problem. Well, the reason there's a few reasons. And the reason is because we have a lot of coastline, which is suitable for it. Using just 1% of the available coastline, we'd be able to get the protein for a billion people. Bivalves have higher protein content than beef does. And they also have lots of key nutrients that we need. So vitamin A, they have iodine, they have omega 3,
Starting point is 00:32:41 they've got loads of stuff like that. And the other thing is they've come up with this new way of feeding them with little, they call them bullets of nutrition. So it's a really cheap way of feeding the bivalves. They make it using algae, so it's very cheap to get as well. But also you can put stuff in these little bullets, so you can put flavorings in them, you can put more nutrition in them. What flavors do they like? Do they love sour flavors? Does it matter what they like? Does the flavor end up in them? Yes, because they filter feed us. So because they filter feed, they keep a lot of the chemicals inside themselves. So you can put a little sour patch kid flavor into your muscle. And then when
Starting point is 00:33:23 you eat it, you'll get all of this goodness, all of this protein. And you'll be able to, you'll be able to have whatever flavor you want. I don't want to rub an oyster on my anus though. Well, you have to. You always have to draw a line on a first date. I have a related story about hepatitis A. Oh yeah. So there was an outbreak of hepatitis A in the Netherlands. And by sequencing the genome of the virus, they traced the outbreak back to Bangor in Wales. And none of the people that got it in the Netherlands had been to Bangor in Wales. The family that had it in Wales didn't visit the Netherlands. So this one family visited the Caribbean where it's endemic. And they didn't take vaccinations. Family from Wales? Yeah, in Bangor.
Starting point is 00:34:16 They came back to Bangor. They brought hepatitis A back to Bangor. And they stayed at home because they knew they were real. But they were going to the toilet a lot and they were shedding these virus particles into the sewage system. And by bad luck, there was a lot of rain at the time. It overwhelmed the sewage system. So it ended up in the estuary in Bangor, which is a big muscle fishery. Wow. All three of us are looking at you thinking, how is this going to get to the Netherlands? I think I know that. The muscle fishery was the giveaway. And they're filter feeders. So the tide is moving in and out. This infected water is flowing back and forth over these filter feeders. They're gathering these virus particles. We're harvesting them. We're
Starting point is 00:35:05 selling them around the world. And that particular batch, a lot of it went to the Netherlands. That is incredible. That is also the downside of my plan of feeding the world with high valves. Because it just takes one family from Bangor and we're all fucked. And a downpour. In Poland, they use clams to automatically regulate their water systems in Warsaw. So they have these clams in a room somewhere, but they've got water from the system flowing over them. And if the clams shut, it's because the water quality is low, but they've got a little like lever attached to the shell of the clam. And so when it closes, it hits a little button. So we know the quality of the water in Botticelli's Venus was good because it was open. She was
Starting point is 00:35:59 standing up. And if Dodgy Water had entered that system, she would have been crushed. Do you know why he had a scallop shell Botticelli in that painting? So it's a famous painting of Venus and she's floating on a seashell. Improvisably large one. I think it was a giant clam. I think she was tiny, wasn't she? I think giant clams aren't big enough to hold an entire woman. Well, it was based on a Spanish shrine of Saint James of Compostela. And Saint James of Compostela was associated with the scallop. Few reasons may be why. One, because the scallops lines represent the different routes travelled by pilgrims to go and visit his remains. How does Saint Yerga de Compostela is a pilgrimage? Exactly. This one. It takes a month. And also possibly because
Starting point is 00:36:50 when they got the remains of Saint James originally, they were covered in scallop shells because he was in the water. One of those. Was he devoured? Is that how he was? He was invited. Because one of them lands on you. You think, oh, that's an irritation, but I can deal with that. And then the second one lands and then you see, you know, they're more fluttering through the water towards you. It'd be a terrifying horror movie. Well, it's The Eternal. Would you rather question, would you rather fight like one shark or a thousand scallops? Anyway, one shark sides scallop. Okay, it's time for our final fact of the show. And that is Anna. My fact this week is that scientists, stupid scientists, still. Editorializing in the facts. I've never done it before. I
Starting point is 00:37:43 feel strongly about this one. I'm still saying that climate change is real. That's my fact over and out. No, my fact is that scientists still can't decide if hot water freezes faster than cold water. And it's true. It's a thing called the impenper effect. If it's the case that hot water, you know, if you start freezing a glass of hot water and glass of cold water, the impenper effect is if the hot water freezes faster than the cold water. And it's bizarrely complicated to test. I think there are lots of problems with it. So it's hard to define when freezing starts, like is it when certain crystals start to form? Is it when the whole thing freezes? Is it hard to identify when those crystals have started to form? Or is it when the temperature drops down to zero? And
Starting point is 00:38:30 anyway, people have been saying for thousands of years that this is a phenomenon. Aristotle said it in 350 BC. He said hot water freezes faster than cold. People sort of forgot about it for hundreds of years. So I think, you know, it was it was a thing with like Francis Bacon said it in the 17th century. And then in the 1960s, there was a Tanzanian boy called Erasto impenper, which is why it's called the impenper effect, who noticed it again. And we started studying it. It's great. It's really great. This this effect. Is it real though? Well, in order for it to work, right, when the hot water is freezing, it must at some stage overtake the cold water. Yeah, yeah, yeah. For that to be true. But that means that when those two waters are the same temperature,
Starting point is 00:39:15 the one that was previously hot must somehow remember that it was hot. Yeah. So that was the big thing that they've discovered that they have proved that it's possible in general for a system to behave in this way, like in a really abstract sense, you can have a system that, you know, is approaching some equilibrium point, approaching some temperature. And it's possible in general that if you are further away from that point, you can get there quicker. They haven't shown it specifically for water. It's the tortoise and the hare. I think of it as being like, if you have to heat the oven to 180 degrees, you can, if it was frozen, and you started from frozen, it would be quicker. That's not that's not what I did. I will put it to 250 degrees so that it has to get up. I think
Starting point is 00:40:06 I better get a move on. I've got to rush and very different to what actually is happening. When it gets to 180, you just pop it back down and the light goes off and you've saved time. No, you know you're definitely wasting your time when you do that because of the way ovens work, right? I have a hundredth of my oven nose. There's pressure. He needs to get there. I do exactly the same. It's the way that Addy works with deadlines. I am exactly the same as you. You know every time with the oven, I know it's completely logical. Obviously, it makes no difference, but I do. If you're in a rush, you put it on as hot as possible. It's not going to make a difference how long it takes to get to 100 degrees.
Starting point is 00:40:41 Anyway, that is completely unrelated to the impending phase. Agreed. Just to get back to your point, how can it remember what it did? There are various ways. For example, it might be that the hotter water freezes from the outside first, so you've got this structural difference. You've got this casing of ice around an unfrozen center, whereas that doesn't happen with the other ones. There could be an actual mechanism of accelerating towards freezing. One idea is there might be more Eddy currents in it, which somehow causes it to freeze quicker. And those Eddy currents remain after that transition point has happened. Sort of mini whirlpools. One idea is that cold water might super cool, so it has to go to a
Starting point is 00:41:27 lower temperature before it freezes. Can we talk about Erasto Mpemba, the student who the thing is named after. So he did it. He discovered this effect. If it's real, and clearly opinion varies around this table. But he was making ice cream. He was 13 years old, and he was at school making ice cream. And his method was you boil the milk to make it with. You mix it with the sugar, you put it in the freezer bit of the fridge. But there was a rush for fridge space. He had boiled his milk already, but he saw another boy run to the fridge without boiling the milk and shove his milk and thing in there. So he and the other boy put them milk and sugar mixes into the freezer at the same time. I think it was was it not that the other boy let his milk cool down first and then
Starting point is 00:42:08 put it in, whereas he put it in while it was boiling. They basically put two trays of milk and sugar in at the same time. One of it was boiling hot and the others was already cooled. And when he and the other boy went back, his tray had frozen into ice cream. The other boys hadn't frozen into ice cream. It's proved. And he took the situation to a physics lecturer at his school called Dennis Osborne, and they co wrote a paper which was just called Cool, which I love. He was actually, he first of all took the situation to his teacher who said, you're an idiot. That doesn't happen. He got really slugged off. He got so he asked this teacher about a question about it. And the teacher said, that is Mpembers physics and not the universal physics. It's okay
Starting point is 00:42:49 like a running joke at his school. Every time there was a mistake, he would be told that is Mpembers mathematics. He's been made a mass error. And anyway, Mpembers name has now been remembered and the teacher who took a mickey out of him, his name is now dust. So dead in the water. Do you know by sheer coincidence, when Mpembers discovered this thing about hot water, his effect, there was a Canadian scientist called Dr. Kel, who at pretty much exactly the same time wrote a paper saying the same thing. It having not been mentioned for over a century, he discovered the same thing. That's one of those weird things, isn't it? Like the Dennis the Menace thing when two Dennis Menaces were created. Were they? That's a cool thing. Yeah, the same week Dennis Menace was
Starting point is 00:43:26 created in America as there was in Britain. And they were quite so they were both young schoolboys. Isn't that called Morphic Resonance? Well, that's interesting. That sounds like bullshit. That's Sheldrake's idea of Morphic Resonance. And that's the idea that he said it was in the 70s, there was a few blue tits that learned how to peck into milk bottles. And then suddenly within a week, everyone had noticed that in the whole country, all these blue tits were learning how to do it. And he thought there was some kind of special psychic way that all of these animals have managed to learn stuff. So I was I was trying to explain Morphic Resonance to someone last night. But I couldn't remember what the example was of the and the blue tits and the
Starting point is 00:44:10 milk bottles is a really good one. And I misremembered it as so, you know, cattle grids, that this is real. This is real. So well, I remembered that cows had learned to roll over cattle grids. You're so close. You're so close that within three weeks of each other, cows across the planet were rolling cattle grids. And really close, but it's sheep. And sheep had learned how to roll across them. And again, there was lots of anecdotal evidence from different farmers that that had happened. But no one, even in the world of smartphones, no one has ever been able to video this actually happening. They're not idiots. They're not going to do it in front of people with smartphones. Oh, wow. So I got closer. I feel like a cow, once it's halfway across rolling
Starting point is 00:44:58 across a cattle grid, probably won't be able to get the rest of the way. I cannot believe you confused those because the idea of a cow rolling across anything is I don't know if it can happen. Yeah, it does explain why. Whereas you can roll a sheep easily, can't you? You can roll a sheep. You can roll a sheep roll itself, though. That's the question. That's the big question. You can tip a cow, but you can roll a sheep. And that's how I tell the difference between sheep and a cow. That's why your farming crew went down here. I also have an effect named after me. Really? The mold effect. The mold effect. No, you're just talking about molding. No, no. I made a video about this thing that I accidentally discovered,
Starting point is 00:45:35 which I assumed had already been discovered, but I couldn't find anything about it on the internet. If you get a chain of beads, a bead chain like the type you see at the side of blinds that you used to get about 50 meters of it, feed it into a pot, and then take the end of it and allow it to fall out of the pot. The whole pot empties, which is already known and understood. But what happens is it rises above the pot first. It's really cool. It sort of rears up. The further it has to fall, the higher it goes. I got it to go two and a half meters out of the pot by dropping it back 90 meters. It's a long story, but I was making a video about polymers. There's a polymer called polyethylene oxide. If you make a solution of it and start
Starting point is 00:46:16 to pour it out of the beaker, it all pours out. It's self-pouring polymer. You don't have to tip the whole thing up. It all just comes out in one go. I wanted to make a physical model of that. I'd seen it done with plastic beads before, a chain of beads. The beads self-siphon, but it doesn't rise up if you use plastic beads. I thought, I'll use metal beads because it'll look nicer. And I discovered this thing that goes around. Wouldn't it be amazing if that effect, which you described, then becomes very important in something else? It would be amazing. And then in a billion years' time, everyone's like, did you know that the person who the mold effect was named after was once on a pod. To be able to prove that part of the explanation, it would be amazing to see
Starting point is 00:46:57 the beads moving in zero gravity. And so I put a call out, is there any way to get the beads on the International Space Station? And it's happened. The beads went up in a rocket. I think it was in May. And Commander Samantha Cristoforetti has the beads. She hasn't done the experiment yet. She's got a lot on, probably. She's busy, but she will do it at some point. What if it wrecks the ISS? God, they get loaded with so much crap. I always feel sorry for them. The old mold effect, obviously, is going to be groundbreaking. But I always think with astronauts and NASA, it's like, oh, well, I have to put this weird plant on for this kid, this bloke. I was looking at some experiments that I could try at home.
Starting point is 00:47:44 And as I mentioned a few times, got a new baby. And Jean-Jacques Rousseau thought that he thought that humans were fundamentally good as children. And any kind of evilness in humans was all society corrupting people. And so there was a guy called Richard Lovell Edgeworth, and he was the guy who invented the conveyor belt. What have you done, James? He also thought that he would try and raise his son, who was called Richard Jr., to be like Rousseau said and be permanently good. So he wouldn't let him get involved in society, just let him run around in the garden and stuff. Anyway, by the age of eight, he had become what Edgeworth described as an ungovernable child of nature. And he had to ship him off to a seminary.
Starting point is 00:48:33 He's just sort of gone savage. And there was another psychologist called Clarence Luba. And Clarence thought that children only laughed when they're tickled because their parents laugh. So the idea is I tickle my daughter. My daughter laughs, but she's only laughing because I'm enjoying it so much. And basically tickling is a learned thing. And so he invented some cardboard shield masks that he would, him and his wife would wear every time that they tickle their child in the hope that the child would never learn how to laugh when tickled. But by the time the child was seven months old, it was still laughing whenever it was tickled. But he thought that his hypothesis was still true. And maybe his wife was not fully observing the
Starting point is 00:49:20 tickling rules. Don't blame your poor wife. Don't be making this weird man cut the mask tickle experiment. The child's terrified of both of you at this stage. Darling, we have a tickling protocol. My ad hoc hypothesis about laughing and tickling, which means it's just an idea that I've got, is that it's a way to teach self-defense through play. So the sensation of being tickled is unpleasant, right? So if kids just cried when you tickled them, you wouldn't do it. But they laugh. And so as a parent, you think, oh, I've got to make them laugh. It's, it's someone may feel so good to make my kids laugh. See, and you think about where you tickle kids. It's in those vulnerable places. Yeah, where you could get her like the neck armpits. So I think it's this way of like
Starting point is 00:50:08 encouraging parents to do things that kids that actually don't really enjoy. But it's, it's, it's a form of learning self-defense. Are you saying it's like the sensation of being attacked by a wild animal? And you're kind of so you're not very good at self-defense when you're being tickled, are you? Because I've never successfully fought off a tickle. Maybe I wasn't tickled enough to know. You have to go for the, you have to go for the eyes. Yeah, and the crotch. You know, you're shaking an eye gouging. One theory about the tickling is that it's like if insects are getting on, you like poisonous insects. And it's to the reason that it's unpleasant. And the reason you want to stop it is because
Starting point is 00:50:45 in the olden days before iPads, you might have been in the Saranghetti and there were dangerous insects climbing on you. Yeah, but that makes sense. But why the laugh? But it's not funny. Well, it's not for you. I mean, it's funny for everyone else in the, in the camping trip. I think the same argument then about it being a protection thing. It's a defense thing. Yeah. So we're teaching our children to defend themselves. Why would you laugh as a defense? No, you should defend yourself. You're trying to stop. You're physically defending yourself. You're wiggling. No, no, but why the laughing? Like you want, I understand this tickled. You're obviously fighting off.
Starting point is 00:51:13 To encourage the parents. I get the, I love the parents theory. To stimulate the child so that they defend themselves against insects. So tickling. So no, hang on, we've got it. It's for the, the child laughs to make sure the parent keeps on tickling the child to encourage the child to learn how to fight off an insect swarm. That was the explanation. I completely understood that. Although it's the parent being an idiot, because all parents remember being tickled as kids. And what they remember is this was hell. Don't inflict this on your child. So what you're saying, Anna, is that my experiment where my house is full of dangerous hornets. And I release them every time I tickle my daughter.
Starting point is 00:51:50 This is not a good idea. Okay, that's it. That's all of our facts. Thank you so much for listening. If you'd like to get in contact with us about any of the things that we've said, we can all be found on our Twitter accounts. I'm on at Andrew Hunter M. James. James Harkin. Steve. At Maldess. And Anna. You can email our podcast at qi.com. Also, do be sure to check out Steve Mould's YouTube. He is to be found on YouTube. If you search for Steve Mould, you will find him. And he and his colleagues from the festival of the spoken nerd had a brilliant podcast called A Podcast of Unnecessary Detail. So check that out too. If you'd like to go to no such thing as a fish.com,
Starting point is 00:52:31 you will find details of all of our previous episodes. You will find tickets for the tour dates we've got coming up. There's a tour date we're streaming live to the world. So wherever you're hearing this, you can get a ticket for that. It's going to be great fun. And you can also find the portals for our brand new members area, which is called Club Fish. We're going to be putting so much stuff in there. You can get ad free versions of the regular show. There are going to be things like droppers in line, which is a section where we cover all the amazing, wonderful correspondence that you guys have sent in. They're going to be compilations every month of all the funny outtakes and bonus stuff that hasn't been in the regular show. You can join
Starting point is 00:53:05 up. All you need to do is go to no such thing as a fish.com and all the details are there. Check it out. Okay, that's it. We'll see you next week for another episode of this. We'll see you then. Goodbye.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.