No Such Thing As A Fish - No Such Thing As A Babysitter's Trade Union

Episode Date: August 14, 2020

Dan, James, Anna and Andy discuss swimming, wrestling, necking, and a very unfortunate giraffe. Visit nosuchthingasafish.com for news about live shows, merchandise and more episodes. ...

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:02 Hello and welcome to another episode of No Such Thing as a Fish, a weekly podcast coming to you from four undisclosed locations in the UK. My name is Dan Schreiber. I am sitting here with James Harkin, Anna Tijinsky, and Andrew Hunter Murray, and once again, we have gathered around the microphones with our four favorite facts from the last seven days, and in no particular order, here we go. Starting with you, James. Okay, my fact this week is that in 1948, a drive-through fly-through cinema opened in New Jersey
Starting point is 00:00:46 where you could watch movies from the seat of your car or the seat of your small aircraft. It's great. Okay, so a couple of things to say before we get into this. Number one is that most of the following material you're about to hear from me comes from an amazing book called The History of Driving Theatres by Kerry Seagrave. And secondly, this fact would have made a lot more sense if it's a lot more sense. have been in its original setting, which was in a drive-in show that we were supposed to do this week. Yes. Yeah, this episode was meant to be in one very disclosed location and unfortunately got cancelled. Sorry about that, everyone. Yeah, much apologies. Not our fault. Not our fault,
Starting point is 00:01:26 but you're going to get the facts anyway. I think we can pretend, guys, we can't just all pretend we're in a car. The people at home won't know. Andy, we weren't supposed to be in a car when we were doing the show. It was the audience that were in a car. We were supposed to. to be on the stage. I was going to bring my car to the stage and then sit in there. So this fly-through, did you have planes and cars next to each other? The planes were behind the cars. That makes sense because if the planes were in front of the cars, then it's a raw deal if you're sitting in your car, isn't it? Just looking at the ass of a plane.
Starting point is 00:01:59 If it's a 7-4-7 or something like that, you don't want a plane in front of you. But this was organised by a guy called Edward Brown Jr., who was a former Navy pilot, and it His driving had capacity for 500 cars and then 25 aeroplanes on the last couple of rows. And what would happen is you would fly into a nearby airfield, and then you would taxi into the, not get a taxi, you would drive the plane on its wheels into the last row of the theatre. And then afterwards, a Jeep would tow you back to the airfield and you'd be able to fly off again. And the charge for the airplanes was 25 cents. Wow.
Starting point is 00:02:34 Extraordinary. I guess this was a bit more in the time when you're out. average Joe sometimes had a plane. People sort of did a bit more in the 40s, didn't they? Did like small piece together aeroplanes. I think it was much, much more common. People used to have hobbyists who would do sort of trick flights in and out of sheds and stuff. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:02:55 But still very weird. Although I read that it sort of caught on. So it must have had a few people going because a few more popped up in the subsequent years, right? In like Alabama and Texas. That's right. Yeah. Some of them opened by the same. guy, so I don't know if that's a huge mark of success. You don't open up a second drive-thru
Starting point is 00:03:15 fly-through unless your first one was successful. Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. That's true. But he really, it was quite exciting what he did because he bought this land and he turned the whole, so he set up the airport, he set up the drive-thru. He bulldozed everything in the way using a World War I tank. And it also had a sort of golf range next to it in an amusement park and playground. There was a great article by someone called Mary Morley Cohen on this. And I'm just going to list the extra things that one particular drive-in had, okay? It had a playground, pony rides, a dance floor, shuffleboard and horseshoe pitching tournaments, cartoon carnivals, midnight spook shows, baby parades and beautiful child contests, dare-devil car rides, circus sacks, high tower dives, anniversary and birthday
Starting point is 00:04:00 celebrations, fireworks, a picnic and play area, potato sack races, and television. What, whoa. extra TV in case you're bored of the film, I guess. That's amazing. There was one in Memphis where you could get your laundry done when you went to driving. So you'd turn up with your laundry, hand it in, and then they'd clean it for you, and as you left, you'd pick it up.
Starting point is 00:04:22 That's so good. It's almost like the films just weren't the main attraction. And I think someone did an experiment because they thought, actually, are people even coming to see the films? And so they didn't advertise what film was showing, and the same number of people showed up. And then they started interviewing people as they were driving in and said,
Starting point is 00:04:39 what film are you coming for? And most people didn't know what film they were going to see. They're just kind of coming because it's a thing to do. But I think the laundry thing was particularly interesting because that was about how one of the appeals of the drive-ins was that it appealed to a much broader audience. And so, for instance, one of the people they advertised to was mothers, housewives, because you could bring your kids. So the idea was you didn't have to find a babysitter to leave them at home, brought your kids along. They also specifically advertised to disable people because you can stay in your car,
Starting point is 00:05:09 you don't have to get up and maneuver into a seat. And they advertise specifically to obese people at the start, didn't they? I think one of the very first adverts from the guy who invented the drive-in was a picture of an overweight lady trying to squeeze into a cinema seat. And then it said something like, Kate doesn't have any problem at the drive-in. So she was called Kate Smith, the lady who was in that image. And she was a really famous singer.
Starting point is 00:05:33 and she was like the South America's version of Dame Vera Lynn. So she was really big during the war and she sang a load of amazing songs and everyone got really patriotic about her. And she was also, she sang for the Philadelphia Flyers. So before the game, before every game, she would sing God bless America. And whenever she sang, they almost always won.
Starting point is 00:05:55 They had a record of 100 wins and 29 losses and five ties whenever she sang. And normally it was more like 50-50. so all the other teams really hated her because she was just this amazingly good mascot for that team. But yeah, she was super famous, Kate Smith. I feel terrible. I've described her as just an overweight lady
Starting point is 00:06:15 trying to squeeze into her cinema seat and she's basically the lucky charm of the whole United States. I'm so sorry. But so that was the reason, wasn't it, for the whole invention of the drive-in? It was 1933, a guy called Richard Hollings Head, was living in New Jersey, and his mother found cinema seats uncomfortable,
Starting point is 00:06:32 and he wanted to fix that. So he thought if she could watch it from the comfort of her car, this would be a much better system. So he rigged up a sort of system for her to test it out on. And it's so clever the sort of innovation that he did in the early days. Once he had the idea that this could be commercial, the thought of, okay, how do I deal with it if it's raining, for example? So he would have his water hose and sprinkler systems going off in the background
Starting point is 00:06:57 while he tested different ways. He thought if cars were going to be parked behind each other, how could they see each other? So he tested out these sort of ramp systems whereby he could levitate, not levitate. No, no, no. He could levitate. That would be an amazing innovation, wasn't it? When Guardian Leve Your So.
Starting point is 00:07:13 That's the helicopter driver you're thinking of, then. Just on bringing your kids, this is a really clever thing and how it was advertised. Lots of cinemas put the playground for the children, because the children might not want to sit and watch the film. They put the playground under the screen. So as you were watching the film, as a parent, you could just check in and see your kids directly beneath the cinema screen.
Starting point is 00:07:35 That's so good. Although actually not everyone was happy about this idea that you could bring your kids because in 1947 there was a picket outside one of the drive-ins by a load of babysitters who said, down with drive-ins, more work for babysitters. And while you drive in movie theaters, babysitters starve. And so they were outside saying, down with drive-ins. because they were losing money. That's amazing.
Starting point is 00:08:03 It feels like they've kind of won now. It feels like babysitters have remained culturally necessary in a way that drive-ins kind of haven't. That's true. Yeah. Have you ever heard of another babysitter revolt? I can't think of that. Is that unique?
Starting point is 00:08:16 They're not very heavily unionized the baby service. I think if I was a babysitter, I would be really angry with, like, you know, recipe box services. Because when I was a babysitter, what you'd get is free reign of whatever was in the first. fridge. But with those recipe boxes, you only get exactly what you have to cook. So there's never any spare food. So it means babysitters are starving in that case. All right, James. As an outfit that does someone advertise Hello Fresh. I don't know if we need to be putting babysitters off it,
Starting point is 00:08:45 driving a wedge between them. Well, these babysitters anyway, near Seattle, they picked it for a while, but then they were bought off with a free movie and a hot dog. Wow. So cheaply bored. I think that's what they were going for. It could be, yeah. I don't think driving movies have ever been popular enough that they've been putting babysitters out of business en masse. I think they just wanted a free film. You know, we know what the first movie was to play in a drive-in,
Starting point is 00:09:13 which is quite cool. So this was in 1933. It's a movie called Wives Beware. And it is the story of a man who tires of married life, and he feigns memory loss so that he can then pursue other women. That's the whole plot. So when his wife's like, hey, you slept with that lady, he goes, did I? That's weird.
Starting point is 00:09:35 And that was the movie. And the reason they had that movie, and this became the thing for drive-thrus was this was a movie that played in cinemas for one week. And then it went off cinemas. And drive-thru specifically were playing films that were not in competition with the cinema. It was the movies that were no longer on screen there. And actually, the popularity of it started dwindling to more B movies and then erotic movies. But I think one of the three movies that was. reasons was, as well, though, Dan, is that there was quite a union between all of the different
Starting point is 00:10:03 movie-making studios, and then America smashed it and whenever it was, the 40s or 50s or something like that. But before then, basically, if you weren't in on it, you couldn't get the best movies. And so all of the theatres really wanted to stop the drive-ins from getting the best movies because they thought that everyone would go to the drive-ins instead of going to the theatres. Yeah, I think they were more forced into the position, weren't they? Because no one would actually sell them the popular releases. kind of says no one really cared what was on, right? They just went there to snog.
Starting point is 00:10:35 They just went there to snog. So, like, there was a real big problem. It wasn't just the babysitters who didn't like the drive-ins. It was also the puritanical people because they were worried about neckers. So when their first one opened in Camden, this first one, Hollingshead's one that we were talking about, a writer noted, perhaps it will occur readily enough to the reader what fun young America could have in a coop under the added stintest.
Starting point is 00:10:59 of a sophisticated romance. So that was the first one that came and they were already saying that people might be snogging in the cars. They were very paranoid, weren't they? They were quite paranoid, but I mean, it did happen. Oh, yeah, a lot of snogging went on. Yeah, one of the owners said,
Starting point is 00:11:17 the only thing that can slow us down is an ugly rumor going around that the drive-in are perfect for neckers. They did have people go around checking, didn't they? Checking for necking. They had necker checkers, yeah. So a lot of them employed policemen or just members of staff who had to go around and look in people's windows because they got this reputation as being passion pits. And the reputation was from people called blue noses, which I'd never heard before, but is a term for sort of prudish church types in America.
Starting point is 00:11:46 And various drive-ins would have rules about what was allowed. So one owner of a drive-in specified, if a man puts his arm around a woman, that's okay. But if she puts her arm back around him, and then they'd go. go into a clinch, that's out. And then they're removed from the premises. So that's where the line is. There was an actual law against it in 1972 in New Jersey, which would fine the operator $100 if any cars remained on the premises one hour after the end of the show.
Starting point is 00:12:17 And they said that the reason was because they didn't want to, they didn't want any carbon monoxide deaths, but actually it was just to stop the neckers. Oh. Stop the neckers. If you can't get your necking done within an hour, then, you know. I genuinely didn't know what the word necking meant, so I googled it. And apparently it's a short, plain, concave section between the capital and the shaft of a classical Doric or Tuscan column. Just in case people were hearing.
Starting point is 00:12:43 You probably need a third person to be in the car with you to not be caught out for necking, right? Because it's hard to see what's going on around you when you're kissing. and general kissing sort of etiquette means you have to have your eyes closed. So if you had your eyes open while kissing, A, you risk being a weirdo, but you are safer, I guess. If the other person has their eyes open as well, then they're a weirdo, so you can usually get away with it
Starting point is 00:13:09 because they have their eyes closed. You're right. One person has to have their eyes open at all times looking for blue noses, and the other person gets on with removing their neckers. You need both with eyes open, because all you're getting is you're getting that window only of your position You can have a mini periscope installed in the car and then you can just see all the way around you at all times.
Starting point is 00:13:29 Oh, that's cool. In which case you only need one eye open. I don't want to be a female in the car with you, Andy, when you say periscope up. The second ever drive-in was built by a man called Wilson Shankwailer. It was wow. He was from Pennsylvania. And they tried to stop it by taxing him. and so they wanted to give him a massive amusement tax. And he tried to avoid it by advertising it as free movies parking 50 cents.
Starting point is 00:14:01 So it was like he advertised it as just a parking lot that just happened to have free movies happening. That's right. Shankwhaling is another activity that was banned. Okay, it is time for fact number two, and that is my fact. My fact this week is that the Beatles once rejected a 50 million pound reused. union gig because the warm-up act was going to be a man wrestling a great white shark. This is according to Ringo Starr, who revealed this in an interview recently in the lead-up to
Starting point is 00:14:34 his 80th birthday, and he was talking about how back in 1975 they were approached by a incredible character called Bill Sargent, who wanted to reunite them, and he had 50 million pounds, which is roughly 200 million pounds in today's money. and the idea was for them to do this gig and according to the Beatles the pitch was that it was going to be a warm-up act of a man underwater fighting a shark.
Starting point is 00:15:01 Now, I think Ringo's muddled this story a bit. I don't think that Great White Shark was going to be the warm-up act. However, Bill Sargent was going to do this. You'd put the Great White Shark on last. There's no way the Beatles can follow a man fighting a shark.
Starting point is 00:15:15 It's going to be such a letdown for the audience, even the Beatles reuniting. You've got a man with a shark and then some people saying, I am a walrus. Come on. Octopus's garden. Now desperately trying to think of,
Starting point is 00:15:27 they would have needed a yellow submarine in order to get to the stage. I can play this all night. Okay. We can wait, Andy, for another one. Also, I'm not sure he had $50 million, because he was like the father of pay-per-view, wasn't he? So his idea was that he would put it on,
Starting point is 00:15:46 and then people would pay to watch it, and then the Beatles would get the money from that one way. I think so. I see. But he said there was an interview with him in 1976, and he said I definitely asked them to do this, and as far as I know, they're considering it. But he said that the problem was that Paul McCartney
Starting point is 00:16:03 was about to start a US tour, a 20-date US tour that was going to be huge for McCartney, and that it was because he didn't want to bring the Beatles back together quite yet that it didn't happen. That was according to Sargent. James, I don't know if we read the same thing about Bill Sargent. I was reading People magazine from 1970s. Same article.
Starting point is 00:16:22 Nice. I reckon for probably about 15 years no one else has read that article and then four people read it this week. Definitely. The people at People Magazine are going to be so excited by the Sun Boost. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:16:33 Do you think the office there was a ping noise that read off four times? But what it said, it was so funny because it reported that this guy, Bill Sargent, had made and lost a million dollars seven times over and he'd also had two heart attacks. And then it said,
Starting point is 00:16:47 as of now, the Beatles seem more like to provide Sargent with coronary number three than Fortune number eight. Yeah, and actually, the guy who fought the Great White Shark, I think might have caused another coronary, because that was also supposed to happen as a pay-per-view thing, and they even made the posters and everything, but Bill Sargent had a heart attack before they could do it, and so they got to go out of off.
Starting point is 00:17:09 I actually found the press release that they issued to companies around the world about this big fight, and it's remarkable reading. It's about six pages long. It's written in such great. So in the most unusual deftifying event ever to come to the screen, Bill Sargent has announced that he will bring a live fight to the death between a single man and a giant live man-eating shark to theater, arena,
Starting point is 00:17:32 and Coliseum screens by satellite closed circuit television. And it was a guy called Wally Gibbons, who was a shark expert, and he was going to be given a spear. And that is how he was going to fight the shark. And the sharks, three of them, were going to be brought five guys, weeks early to Samoa where the fight was going to occur so they could acclimatize to the water. And in the 48 hours leading up to the fight, they were going to be starved. So Wally was going to have to fight a starving shark.
Starting point is 00:18:02 And he said a lot about in this press release about what he thought his odds were of surviving. He thought if he could shoot the shark with the spear gun first time and get him, that was going to bring the odds up. But he needed to shoot it about five times to kill him. But what about the two other sharks? They were back-up sharks. They're holding the towel in the bucket in the corner. Can I ask you, Andy, if you're in the water, what are you keeping in the bucket?
Starting point is 00:18:27 I don't know. I don't think it would have defied death. I think it would have really embraced death. I have a suspicion that old Wally, the absolute Wally, would have died within maybe five seconds. Do you think? Yeah, I think so. I don't know.
Starting point is 00:18:43 I think that he tried this a few times because there was someone called Geoffrey Mamm. who wrote a book later in life about Bill Sargent trying to get him to fight a shark in Samoa as well, which you've got to assume as the same kind of setup. And apparently that was cancelled, according to this guy, cancelled last minute by Jack Cousteau, who I don't know what he was doing being involved in the event,
Starting point is 00:19:07 but famed oceanographer Jack Cousteau cancelled this shark fight. But he was going to have a knife, which I think is going to be quite similar to a spear. And in the end, I was looking up how you'd kill a shark, if you faced it, and stabbing it is the worst possible thing you can do, according to a guy called Brian Johnson. Not the worst. The worst thing is to climb into its mouth.
Starting point is 00:19:27 He actually does say, when he's giving advice, he says, go for the face and gills, because they're quite sensitive. So, you know, like punching them in the face. But do try to keep your hands out of its mouth. That's always the best thing. But Wally Gibbons was an interesting guy, wasn't he? Like, there was a 1952 contest between fishermen and spearmen, which were people who caught fish with spears, and he caught more fish than all the 37 fishermen who were in that competition
Starting point is 00:19:54 on his own. Wow. He was amazing. And during, just after World War II, he swam around the Solomon Islands, picking up like unexploded shells, and then taking them away so that they wouldn't affect people in the future. Isn't that amazing? That's really cool.
Starting point is 00:20:10 Yeah, he was incredible. There's a biography in this press release where they say that he has killed more sharks in Man to Fish underwater combat than it. any other man in Australia and possibly in the world. I mean, yeah, I find it unlikely that anyone from anywhere else than Australia will have killed any sharks in mantarfish. Lichtenstein, probably not. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:20:30 He was known as a manfish. That's what they called him. Merman. We've got a name for a mountain fish. It's a merman. Wellie Gibbons also had the best collection of seashells in the whole of Australia. He had the world's rarest shell. He owned it, the Gloria Maris.
Starting point is 00:20:47 which is also known as the glory of the sea cone. And that shell used to be so rare that there was once a collector who bought one in an auction only to immediately destroy it so that he had the only one because he found this other one. He didn't want two in the world to exist. So he bought one in the auction when it came up and he destroyed it so he had the only one.
Starting point is 00:21:09 That's pretty sick. Supposedly. That was in 1792. But then there was only a few of them in the world. Wally Gibbons had one of them. and when proper scuba diving got invented, they found, oh yeah, they're just down there. They were just a bit lower. They're a bit lower than we could normally go.
Starting point is 00:21:24 So people, you can collect them quite easily now, you can buy them for not too much. I think that would be a disappointing if the shark fight couldn't go ahead. But he said, but don't worry, Wally Gibbons will be showing you his seashell collection. Because I was thinking, Anna said that he would die after five minutes.
Starting point is 00:21:43 If you're the Beatles and you're thinking, okay, we're going on in an hour after the fight. And then after five minutes, they're like, well, sorry, the guy just got eaten, so you're going to have to go on early.
Starting point is 00:21:51 I'd be pretty pissed off. Also, there's a bit of a weird vibe in the audience right now. They probably had a backup, warm-up act, which was a therapist to come out on stage and help everyone deal with the massacre they've just seen.
Starting point is 00:22:05 Can I just say one weird, interesting thing about Bill Sargent, the guy who Dan mentioned at the start, who was organising these shark fights. So he was an inventor. He invented tons of stuff. He had, I think, over 400 patents, sort of gadget patents.
Starting point is 00:22:18 And one thing that I think he invented is something that we think of as new, which is televised theatre. So you know now you can go and see the National Theatre Live at your local cinema, or you could before the theatre stopped happening. And he invented the precursor to this called ElectronoVision in the 1960s.
Starting point is 00:22:36 And so basically it involved him going in and videotaping plays and then broadcasting them in cinemas. And he made loads of money out of it. And the first one he did was a tape of Richard Burton in Hamlet in 1964. And he filmed three separate productions that edited them together to get the best of highlights, showed in 1,000 cinemas and made him millions of dollars. Amazing.
Starting point is 00:22:59 Bill Sargent's first job was a radio repairman, which he had at the age of six. Wow. He started work at the age of six. In fairness, it was in the family workshop, which was attached to his family home. unfortunately a year later he burnt them both down by accident. And then later on, when he got a load of money for his movies, he set up an electronics laboratory in Missouri, but then he burned that down as well.
Starting point is 00:23:23 So you kind of had a habit of burning down electronic shops. That time when he burned down the second one, James, apparently it was because he put down, just not really thinking, he put down a welding torch in the wrong place. He put it onto a drum of paint thinner or thinner. So kind of the winters obviously highly, flammable. According, I guess to him, because I don't think there were many other people around, he was blown 170 feet into the air.
Starting point is 00:23:50 What's a hundred and 70 feet? Someone's flying over to the drive-in theater going, what the fuck was that? 170 feet. Yep, that's what he says. Well, I love him. Love this man so much. So this thing of a man fighting a shark was basically an insane, weird warm-up act. And so I looked into a few other weird acts, like kind of vaudeville acts from, you know, the last century or two. So, have you heard of Hadji Ali,
Starting point is 00:24:21 who was also known as the Egyptian Enigma? Oh. He was amazing. Okay, so he was a vaudeville performer. His act was to swallow kerosene, then he would swallow some water, okay? Then he would regurgitate the kerosene and set it on fire as he did so.
Starting point is 00:24:37 But then he would regurgitate the water to put out the fire that he had lit from the courtesy. I think he was also known as the human volcano or something again. And then there's just one line about him saying he would also regurgitate live goldfish and nuts. The nuts was actually more impressive than it sounds, wasn't it, with Hadjia Li? Because one of his tricks was being able to regurgitate stuff in the order specified by the audience. So he'd swallow a bunch of objects and they'd be like, all right, bring up the goldfish now. Okay, bring up your braces.
Starting point is 00:25:07 and so he'd swallow, for instance, 50 hazelnuts and one almond, and he'd start regurgitating them one by one. And when an audience member said, bring up the almond now, mate, he'd call the almond up. It's amazing. Apparently. Oh, my God. I genuinely think if you gave me a bowl of nuts and said,
Starting point is 00:25:28 which one of those is an almond, I would struggle. Maybe that's what he was relying on. He just told the audience it was an almond. I can say one more Borderville thing related to animals and this was an amazing act which was a group of women
Starting point is 00:25:43 called the Barrison Sisters and it seems like their entire act was to do a little bit of a sexy dance that gets more and more sexy and all the way through they would ask the audience would you like to see my pussy and then when eventually the audience said yes they would lift their skirts
Starting point is 00:25:59 and they would all have a cat in their knickers and this was absolutely massive. They were huge. They were so famous, these people. They played Berlin for eight months with this act. They played...
Starting point is 00:26:16 But were they... Is it like the Mousetrapped, James? Are they like, please don't tell anyone the spoiler when you leave? It must be right. It must be that. They must have been exactly like that. There was a French nobleman who committed suicide because he loved one of them so much. And they were so shocking that after their eight months
Starting point is 00:26:33 in Berlin, they were banned from ever re-entering Germany. I love the fact that they waited eight months to ban them. It's like, okay, now everyone in Germany's had a chance to see you. Now you're banned. Because now that's not appropriate. The censors went countless times, dozens of times. Yeah, we're just trying to assess whether or not it really is offensive enough to ban.
Starting point is 00:26:53 Just like a few more months of seeing them, to be sure. Were the cats alive? Yeah, they were alive. They were in like a little pouch over their crutches. So the cats had to sit there in between their legs for the first. full act. They must have been sedated. I don't know whether they regurgitated them somehow off or what, but they were definitely there. And there was an article about them, and one guy in New York said it was the most audacious
Starting point is 00:27:17 piece of deviltry and abandonment I ever saw offered to a New York public. Wow. I really thought you were going to say that he committed suicide because he was so disappointed when they lifted up their skirts at the end and he didn't see their vaginas. Yeah. Just, oh, it's only a cat. It's all been for nothing. Okay, it's time for fact number three, and that is Anna. My fact this week is that in 1919, it was ruled that women would be allowed to swim
Starting point is 00:27:47 competitively without wearing stockings on the one condition that they quickly put on a robe as soon as they got out of the water. And this was specifically in America. And I think these are nylon stockings because there won't have been any nylon in 1990, would they? So what were it? Was it like wool or what? I think they were wool. I think quite a lot of people had to wear wool and stuff in the water.
Starting point is 00:28:10 That's not going to be conducive to a quick swim, is it? It's like carrying the sheep while you're swimming. Yeah. It's like that did you guys all do that swimming survival test when you were younger where you had to wear pajamas in the water? It was like every time a woman swam in the water, it was like having to do that survival test. In every Olympics, they had to pick up a brick from the bottom of the pool, didn't they?
Starting point is 00:28:29 Yeah. So this was in America and it was the amateur athletics, Union, which had only recently allowed women to take part in competitive swimming events anyway, but it was very controversial what women would wear in the water, and they essentially had to be covered from neck to toe fully. And this irritated the women because they realized that this would put them at a massive disadvantage in the Olympics, for instance, when they were competing against other countries like Australia, who were a bit looser with their regulations, and they would be weighed down by their massive cotton water lot, head-to-to-to-out outfits.
Starting point is 00:29:04 while the Aussies were smashing them. So there was sort of a campaign. There's this amazing woman called Charlotte Epstein, who was a court stenographer, actually, and she'd formed the Women's Swimming Association in 1917, and she campaigned to have the stocking requirement removed. And eventually she did this stunt where she invited some of the best swimmers in the country, female swimmers in the country, to come to a beach in California
Starting point is 00:29:29 and stripped down to ordinary swimsuits without stockings, and they were all arrested. and she invited the tabloids to see them all be arrested. And this kind of created this atmosphere of how ridiculous is this. Women are just being arrested for wearing swimming costumes. Come on, come on, guys. Soot your shit out. And so they relaxed the rules.
Starting point is 00:29:46 But you did have to very quickly put on a robe as soon as you emerged. Yeah, the rules were pretty strict, weren't they, back in the day. Like in 1921, in New York, everyone had to wear a two-piece swimming suit, everyone. And there was a specific law that made it illegal. for any bold men to stare at women. Yeah, I saw that. What does that mean?
Starting point is 00:30:11 I couldn't find. I think that was one person on the beach, like the person who was monitoring that beach who thought that bald men were sort of equated with perverts, and he said, I'm going to stop bald men from staring at women. It's so strange. Maybe there was a specific bold man that they were worried about, like, Stairie Steve, and they sort of said, well, we can't say Stairie Steve's bound from the beach,
Starting point is 00:30:32 but we will say this. Yeah. Well, weren't hats very popular back then? So maybe bald means a hatless, because maybe they were taking their hat down to hide a protrusion below. Is that how... You know how they always say in the older days, whenever you met a lady, you had to lift your hat? It wasn't to hide your protrusion, Dan.
Starting point is 00:30:55 The taller of the hat, the bigger the brag. You remember Mr. Darcy always had a very tall top hat. But that's how you catch them is that you just say, can you show me your hands, please? and if the hat stays where it is on their lap, then you know that there's a protrusion situation. In the Olympics, the first time that women swam in the Olympics, I think, was in 1912,
Starting point is 00:31:16 and the British team had to wear a bra and knickers while they swam as well as their swimsuit. And that's because they had this amazingly awesome silk swimsuit that would help them to swim really fast, but it was completely see-through when it got wet. And so, I mean, it was amazing. and it was so thin the silk that you could take the whole thing and pass it through a wedding ring.
Starting point is 00:31:37 That's how thin the material was. But it did have that one problem that it was see-through, so you had to wear underwear as well. And was it a Superman situation where it's on top of the outfit? I've seen the pictures and they were on the inside, but definitely they should have gone the outside, shouldn't they? Yeah. I found it really bizarre that women weren't encouraged to swim
Starting point is 00:31:56 until about the 19th century. So this only really became a situation then or late on then. because before that, if you were a woman, you just didn't swim. There's very little evidence of women swimming before the 17th century. There is some. Yeah. I found the description of a standard ladies' bathing costume in 1687 by someone called Celia Fines,
Starting point is 00:32:19 who said it was made of fine yellow canvas, which made it that when you went in the water, it filled up with water so no one could see the shape of your body. Crafty. Oh, clever, like a Mr. Blobby costume. like a Mr. Blobbyer, because you can never tell how sexy the person playing Mr. Blobby is, can you? They don't need to be sexy on the inside. If they're wearing Mr. Blobby costume, I'm theirs. And in their 18th century in the UK, they made laws, every town could make its own laws about what you would wear when you were swimming.
Starting point is 00:32:52 So in the city of Bath, they made it illegal for men to swim without a waistcoat. No. No. Is that with, would men have to have the top as well, or is this bare chest with a waistcoat on? I think the waistcoat just referred to anything that would cover your chest, really. It wasn't like a proper, you know, top hat and tails kind of thing. Did you guys come across Donald Clark in your research? No.
Starting point is 00:33:21 He was an early, he was very much fighting the tide of history. He was an opponent to mixed swimming. He was a counsellor in Tonbridge and he said that by making girls look like wet scotch terriers mixed bathing stops more marriages than any other cause and much unrest in the country due to the barbarous license in women's dress.
Starting point is 00:33:42 So he was basically saying women look like such ming as when they've been in the water that no one will want to marry them and he was then, so this was in a sort of furious letter to the papers or something, he was then given a job by the Daily Mail to go around beaches looking for outrageous things to be angry about. Some things haven't changed. That's amazing.
Starting point is 00:34:03 Wow. That's so good. Because I think the Daily Mail does employ a lot of people like that still today, doesn't it? Literally just find something to get angry about. We need to fill our pages. Anything.
Starting point is 00:34:12 Yeah. I was reading about a swimming hero called Gertrude Adele. So she was the first woman to swim the English Channel in 1925. And she was trained by this guy called Jabez Wolf, who was a bizarre character himself,
Starting point is 00:34:28 I don't know why she chose him to train her because he'd tried and failed to swim the channel 22 times previously. And despite apparently he employed a bagpiper for encouragement, and that didn't help. But anyway, she tried. If the bagpipers are behind you, then that will encourage you to swim towards as fast as possible.
Starting point is 00:34:46 You're trying to get as far away from Scotland as you can. So her first attempt, he, Jabez, her trainer pulled her out of the water halfway through, saying that it looked like she was drowning. And she said she wasn't drowning at all. She'd just been having a rest face down in the water. Eventually she did it. She was the sixth person ever to swim the channel.
Starting point is 00:35:06 And she was the fastest ever men and women. She did it in 14 and a half hours. So she beat the previous person by two hours. Did front crawl all the way. And the first thing, she did it from France to England. And the first person to meet her on the beach in Kent when she arrived was an immigration officer who demanded to see her passport. Amazing.
Starting point is 00:35:25 He was actually working. for the Daily Mail, wasn't he, at the time? Do you know what she was fed on the way? I find this so weird which you got fed chicken legs. I think because if they touch you in the water, then that sort of, you're out because you've been kind of supported by human.
Starting point is 00:35:41 But her support boat was apparently full of chicken legs, which, okay, throw someone a chicken leg in the water, oranges and chicken soup to sustain her. She went, and I have no idea how she would fed the soup. Right, what must happen, right, is, I don't want to take her anything away from her swim, but they give her a straw to suck the suit,
Starting point is 00:36:00 and actually she's biting onto the straw while it's attached to the boat, and she's using it to pull her along. She's water skiing there, basically. Basically doing that. This is a great and niche conspiracy theory that needs to see more air. One person who tried to swim the channel before Gertrude was an Australian called Annette Kellerman, who was probably the most famous swimmer in the world.
Starting point is 00:36:24 She was the first woman to publicly wear a one-piece swimming costume. She was arrested on the beach. She was one of these people who was arrested for public indecency for wearing like a too sexier swimming costume. But it wasn't really very effective. And she ended up releasing her own line of bathing costumes and became massively rich because people wanted to look like her because she was so famous.
Starting point is 00:36:45 She was paid by the Melbourne exhibition hall to swim in its aquarium. So people would come and watch her swim. It was like you were said about the Borderville earlier. And it's like you would just go to watch her swim. She was like a swimming costume hero, wasn't she? She was the person who brought us the swimming costume, Annette Kellerman. We've been pitching about the Daily Mail, so for some balance, here's some perspective on the Daily Mirror.
Starting point is 00:37:09 She came between Australia and America, she came to the UK to do some swimming, and she broke a record for swimming from Dover to Margate, and she caused this huge stir, and it was all great. And the Daily Mirror paid her to swim along that coast every single day for two months. and they said to her, she was like, every day for two months. Oh, God. I mean, that sounds like hell. And they said it's a huge thing for women. It's going to go down as a great success for womankind. And what they actually meant was there's a lady from Australia in a swimsuit, which we've never seen before here. And they obviously invited lots of crowds every day to come and watch her in her swimsuit and made loads of money selling their papers.
Starting point is 00:37:46 And it was sort of the first page three type things with these pictures of Annette Kellerman and people like her in swimsuits. I've read about her show. she was called The Diving Venus. And the show ran on Broadway for four years. And then she went to Hollywood and she starred in a film called Daughter of the Gods. She did loads of films, but this was in 1916. And the film used 20,000 extras.
Starting point is 00:38:12 It cost a million dollars to make, which was pretty unusual at the time. And there were scenes of her swimming nude in it, I think from quite a distance. But this led to the formal banning of, as they were called, nude scenes in films. And so, yeah, it's thanks to her.
Starting point is 00:38:29 Yeah, she did all her own stunts in that movie, including a 20-meter dive into the ocean with her hands and feet tied together and also being thrown into a pool with six crocodiles. Wow. Wow. It sounds like a promoter Bill Sargent he really would have made a lot of money out of that woman. When she was on Broadway making all her money,
Starting point is 00:38:49 she made $1,250 a week on Broadway. And when she was doing it, was a Harvard professor who said she was a perfect woman after comparing her measurements to the Venus de Milo. Now, the Venus de Milo doesn't have any arms. No. Useful in swimming, particularly. Okay, it's time for our final fact of the show, and that is Andy.
Starting point is 00:39:15 My fact is that the film of Dr. Doolittle was delayed for days after the giraffe being used accidentally stepped on its own penis. So... How long is a giraffe's penis? Is it like a fifth leg? Well, is it that before or after you've trodden on it? That's the question. They have really long legs.
Starting point is 00:39:34 I just can't work out the mechanics of this, Andy, at all. Well, they, I mean, they're like folding deck chairs. You know, it's very easy to get something caught in a folding deck chair, and I think that's the same principle. You need to stop going on those nudist holidays, Andy. I can't take many more of those injuries. I'll tell you that much. So, to be completely clear, this is.
Starting point is 00:39:54 is the 1967 Dr. Doolittle with Rex Harrison, not the 2021 with Robert Downey Jr., where pretty much all their animals are CGI, and nobody stepped on anybody's penises. And this comes from a great book called Scenes from a Revolution, The Birth of the New Hollywood, which is kind of an in-depth look at five films in particular. It's by Mark Harris, and one of those films is Dr. Doolittle. And there was a guy working on it called Herbert Ross, who was the choreographer, and he wrote to a colleague saying, were postponed for three days, the giraffe stepped on his cock. And so... It stepped on his cock, though?
Starting point is 00:40:30 Are we misreading that? Yeah. Stepped on Rex Harrison. Wow. So that's that. It was pretty chaotic, wasn't it? That film. Apparently, it was revealed afterwards.
Starting point is 00:40:43 One giraffe died, and I don't think we know how, still. But one of the people who worked on it said one giraffe died. But, I mean, the general management of animals, sounds like hell. It had lots of different filming locations, so it was partly filmed in LA and then in the Caribbean and in the UK and because of quarantine laws they had to hire separate sets of
Starting point is 00:41:00 identical animals for each place to play the same characters. And then also the animals grow so far so they had to keep finding replacements like doppelgangers. So I think there was a pig called GubGub in the film which had 40 different piglets play at various times.
Starting point is 00:41:17 I mean it does seem questionable, doesn't it? A lot of the sort of stuff they did to the animals. There was a squirrel that they had to sedate during a scene that they needed him for. By the sedation method they used was a fountain pen where they dripped gin through it
Starting point is 00:41:30 to just get it drunk. But it ended up losing consciousness because it was so drunk that they couldn't properly get the scene done. That doesn't seem very ethical in terms of... I think that's absolutely fine. Elizabeth Taylor used to request that kind of thing before she'd go in front of the camera.
Starting point is 00:41:44 There's a great story where in one scene that Rex Harrison was doing he kept stop. This is the story. that he kept stopping the scene, and the director's going, what are you doing? And he goes, well, you keep calling cut. And he's going, I'm not calling cut. You're definitely calling cut.
Starting point is 00:41:58 And they worked out that it was the parrot that was in the scene. I've learned to mimic the word cut. No way. Yeah, and Rex was getting confused. So they built a set for the house of Dr. Doolittle, whose whole shak is that he can talk to the animals, so he lives with a load of animals. But the whole house, the set had to be built on a slant
Starting point is 00:42:18 because obviously the animals are pooing everywhere, and peeing everywhere. So they had lots of people in the crew just standing around with brooms waiting for when that happened. All the furniture had to be either plastic or painted so that it could be hosed down at the end of each day filming in this set house. They had to have double the sets
Starting point is 00:42:36 because frequently animals would just kick a hole in the walls or the furniture. The trainer's got hepatitis from being bitten. I read one amazing sentence in the link you sent, Andy, which is, unfathomably, the ducks in the pond appeared to forget how to swim and started to sink, which you know you're having a bad time. You'd think you'd be able to rely on the ducks to be able to swim.
Starting point is 00:43:00 So funny. But apparently what had happened was it was the wrong time of year, so they'd lost all their waterproof sheen on their feathers. And at that time of year, ducks don't normally swim or something, and so they all just started sinking. Yeah, I found that amazing. I didn't know that ever happened. Has anyone seen the movie?
Starting point is 00:43:19 Years ago as a kid, yeah. Really? Was there any good? Yeah, I mean, as a kid, it was one of those Sunday afternoon movies, and I do remember loving it, but I've read a lot of things that suggest that I'm completely wrong about that.
Starting point is 00:43:30 It has a very low rating. It got the best pitch in Oscar nomination, but it's the lowest rated score and Rotten Tomatoes ever to get a nomination. Oh, what's it rocking on? Rotten. 32%. Rex Harrison, who was the star of it, was so horrible to everyone
Starting point is 00:43:47 that he was nicknamed Tyrannosaurus Rex. Which is very clever when you think because it's a film about animals that are talking. Yes. He had a good reputation for behaving like that quite frequently, didn't he, Rex Harrison? He was a grumpy bastard. Or a character, depending on which way you want to frame it. But I should say, so I'm a huge, My Fair Lady fan and a big Rex Harrison fan in that. And there's a guy called Will Harrison, who's his grandson, who listens to the podcast.
Starting point is 00:44:13 So we have inside Rex Harrison info. Apparently, if you look at the film poster of Cleopatra, It was supposed to just have Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor on it as Anthony and Capatra. But Rex was like, I'm the big star here, guys. What the hell are you doing? Get me on the poster. And so you see just behind them, Julia Caesar, Rex Harrison, staring really creepily down at this loving couple. And he was always doing stuff like that.
Starting point is 00:44:35 There's one particularly famous anecdote, which is that he'd performed in the theatre and there was an autograph hunter waiting outside. She had her book ready for him to sign. He came out. She asked for the autograph. and he said sod off. And what she did was she rolled up the program, she wanted him to sign,
Starting point is 00:44:52 and she hit him with it. And the co-star of the play Stanley Holloway later said that it was a rare but welcome case of the fan hitting the shit. That's how they viewed him. You know Christopher Plummer, the actor? Yes. His sound of music and stuff, I guess.
Starting point is 00:45:11 He was paid $300,000 not to be in Dr. Doolittle. Really? Which is such an epic fail by the accountants, I think. So basically Harrison temporarily quit the project. He decided he wasn't completely up for it. And then so they said, well, who do we get? We need some Hollywood giant. So they got Christopher Plummer, signed him up for $300,000.
Starting point is 00:45:32 And then Harrison said, oh, fine, I will do the film then. So Plummer never filmed a scene, never set a line of the dialogue, but still got paid his full fee for it. It's the dream job. It's the dream job. It was originally written by a woman called Helen Winston. and they rewrote it. They just completely rewrote the thing.
Starting point is 00:45:49 Apart from, they used loads of her stuff, but then didn't tell her she was going to use it. And so she sued them, and she got 3.2 million pounds out of them for that. Whoa. And it lost 9 million in the box office. So like a third of that was just due to stealing this woman's work. So actually, the two people in it who had their work stolen from them, Christopher Plummer and this lady,
Starting point is 00:46:13 sounds like they were the real winners here. So Dr. Doolittle is incredibly loosely based on the series of stories written by Hugh Lofting in the 1920s and during the First World War. And they bear no resemblance. I don't think the plots, but any resemblance to the stories he originally wrote, but they are about a doctor who talks to animals. And it's quite a sweet story. So I hadn't realized he wrote them while he was fighting in the trenches in World War I. And he was writing letters back to his children. And he understandably thought, I'm not sure, I want to tell the kids about my trenches.
Starting point is 00:46:45 based experience. And so instead he wrote these brilliant stories about a guy who talks to animals. He was a real crusader for animal rights in lots of ways. And he once beat up three men, including one who had a knife because they were trying to tame some wild horses. And they were, I think, not being especially pleasant to the horses. So, yeah. Yeah. Yeah, he was very strong on sympathizing with animals. He was shocked by how horses were treated. They did have a very bad time in the First World War. Yeah, it was the way that he saw horses being treated. and they needed to be looked after by vets, but he was like, well, they can't really tell us what's wrong with them
Starting point is 00:47:21 because they're horses, and that was kind of what gave him the idea of writing Dr. Doolittle. But we should say that if you have read Dr. Doolittle in the last 20 or 30 years, you're probably reading a massively sanitized version of it, because the original is extremely racist. So in 1968, there was a librarian called Isabelle Soule, who wrote an essay about a few different books, but specifically about Dr. Doolittle, who described Hugh Lofting as a white racist and chauvinist,
Starting point is 00:47:51 guilty of almost every prejudice known to modern white Western man. And that was in the 60s, so... Yeah, exactly. And so basically, from then on, he just got pretty much counseled and really all his books went outprint for quite a long time until they got rewritten with a lot of the racist bits taken out. Yeah, with no resemblance to the originals, basically. But on the other hand, loved Halls.
Starting point is 00:48:15 Yeah, I mean, anti-war and pro-animal, for sure. Yeah, yeah. So I've been looking a bit into talking to animals, and people are doing serious work on this right now, and it's really cool. So there is a new device which is trying to train basically lassy technology. So the idea is that dogs will have a vest, and if the person needs help, they can pull a tab to communicate a message, okay?
Starting point is 00:48:42 So it might be someone's fallen down a well But that's probably not going to be it Because it's only one message on the tab that they can pull Right So for example, lots of children with autism Find it very helpful and calming to have a dog And if they are panicking or upset It might be possible to train the dog
Starting point is 00:49:03 To pull the tab on its little vest Because it can spot the size that its owner is upset And then that will read out the dog Saying, could you please pet me now? and then therefore the child will pet the dog and we'll calm down and that will help. So they're trying to see if they can train dogs to have several different messages
Starting point is 00:49:21 which they can say. So either could you pet me now or someone's fallen down a well or whatever it might be. It's just those two they've coded in at the moment, isn't it? Wait, so the dog senses that the child is anxious and so then pulls the tab that says, can you pet me? So the child signals they're anxious without realizing it
Starting point is 00:49:39 and then the dog does something to make the child calm down. Yeah, exactly. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Well, you might be anxious because the dogs just told you that someone's fallen down. I really wish I hadn't mentioned this well thing. Complete red herring. Do you know that I was going to do this as a fact in a future week, but do you know that the traditional way of preparing melon in France
Starting point is 00:49:58 was to put it down a well for four hours? Melon? Wow. A melon, yeah. And it came up perfectly sliced in shock? Who lived down that well? A small child who fell there many years ago. No, basically you wanted your melon to be nice and cold, right?
Starting point is 00:50:17 And they had no refrigeration, but they did have a well, which was cold at the bottom. So they used to traditionally, in France, they would put their melon in the well a few hours before and then bring it up and it's nice and cold. So the dog would, in this case, have a third tab, which says, your melon is ready, sir. That was in an article written by B. Wilson that I read the other day, which is pretty amazing. artificial intelligence might help us to talk to animals or to understand what they're thinking. There is a scientist called Dr. Krista McLennan who is working on a way of using AI
Starting point is 00:50:51 to tell you what sheep are thinking. And apparently it's really hard for farmers to tell what a sheep is thinking just by looking at its face because they don't have much expression on their faces. You often see farmers kneeling down just staring deep into a sheep's eyes, don't you? Going, why can't I down?
Starting point is 00:51:09 I mean, I believe this. So I was reading this article about this AI algorithm that tells you whether a sheep's happy or not happy. And there's part of it on NBC, they had a quiz where they would show you pictures of sheep and you had to guess whether they were happy or sad. And I only got one out of four. And that was a lucky guess
Starting point is 00:51:30 because I just had three sad sheep in a row and I thought the fourth one must be happy. That's gamesmanship. I did that same quiz. I'm very proud to say I got three. Wow. So I'm a sheep whisperer, basically. It's quite specific, isn't it, though?
Starting point is 00:51:44 It is tricky. So the signs of pain or emotional suffering in a sheep are narrow eyes, tight cheeks. Hold on, I don't know if I really want to do the test. Yeah. Okay. Don't tell us your facts. Anna, they tell you the symptoms before you do the test. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:51:59 That's the thing. They say, if it has a nostril shape like a V rather than a U, then it's either happy or sad, even though it told me that I couldn't do it. Although I think, Andy, because there were only four, and it was a 50-50 choice each time, then one out of four and three out of four is within the standard deviation of what you would expect. Okay, all I'm hearing is that I won. I'm going to be the sheep farmer. Okay, that's it. That is all of our facts.
Starting point is 00:52:34 Thank you so much for listening. If you'd like to get in contact with any of us about the things that we have said over the course of this podcast, we can be found on our Twitter accounts. on at Shreiberland, Andy, at Andrew Hunter M. James. At James Harkin. And Anna. You can email podcast at QI.com. Yep. Or you can go to our group account, which is at no such thing. Or there's our website, no such thing as a fish.com. We've got all of our previous episodes up there, as well as links to bits of merchandise. That's it, guys. Thanks again for listening to us during these crazy times. We hope you are well and safe, and we will be back again with another
Starting point is 00:53:06 episode next week. We'll see you then. Goodbye.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.