No Such Thing As A Fish - No Such Thing As The Northern Lights

Episode Date: August 20, 2021

Dan, James, Anna and special guest Robin Ince discuss hidden sounds, flashing lights and lots and lots of dancing. Visit nosuchthingasafish.com for news about live shows, merchandise and more episodes.

Hi everyone. Welcome to this week's episode of Fish. Before we get going, we just want to let you know that we have a very special guest on this week. So Andy's off away, God knows where, but in his place, we have the wonderful Robin Ince. If you're not aware of Robin Ince, you can't really call yourself a true nerd. Robin is the great godfather of nerdery. He is the co-host of the brilliant Infinite Monkey Cage, the BBC Radio 4 show with Brian Cox. He is also the person who sort of gathers together all the dorks and geeks of the UK and gives them a platform and a place to be heard. One of those places is called Cosmicshambles.com. Robin, of course, as well, is an author. He's published numerous books in his latest book, The Importance of Being Interested, Adventures in Scientific Curiosity, is coming out this October, the 7th of October.

Do get it. He's an amazing writer. I've read all of his previous books, and I can't wait to read this one as well. Also, he's going to be doing something quite astounding to promote the book. He is going on a hundred date tour of the UK to all the independent bookshops around the UK to do little talks and signings and so on. And you can find the dates for those on cosmic shambles.com slash 100 bookshops. And honestly, you must see Robin Inns Live.

He's such a wonder to behold. He is such a fantastic guy and a really nice guy on top of everything else. We've wanted him on the show for years. We're so glad we finally got him. So we hope you enjoy this episode. Do get his book. The importance of being interested. But for now, enjoy him on No Such Thing as a Fish.

On with the show. Hello and welcome to another episode of No Such Thing as a Fish, a weekly podcast coming to you from four undisclosed locations in the UK. My name is Dan Schreiber. I'm sitting here with Anna Tashinsky, James Harkin, and special guest. It is Robin Intz. And once again, we have gathered round the microphones with our four favorite facts from the last seven days, and in no particular order, here we go. Starting with fact number one, that is Robin. The Nobel Prize winning scientist Richard Feynman was allowed to investigate the entirety of the universe except the Aurora Borealis, which is a very beautiful thing.

It has a beautiful story attached to it, which is the fact that his sister, Joan, loved science. This is one of the few times that golf courses play an interesting part in the future of physics. Now, this might be entirely wrong. One of the great lines about golf courses is Steve Eilitt, the writer who once said, the only proof of the existence of God is that once a year a golfer is electrocuted in a thunderstorm. Oh, God. I can feel James getting wound up as you're speaking. But think of all those golfers who don't get hit by lightning.

I know. How evil is the one who God decides must die during that? So what's this about golf? I'm really interested. What's golfing? Well, in fact, actually I've realised there is a... Oh no. I've realised there is another golf link to science,

which is Fred Hoyle's steady state theory was partly influenced by the Ealing horror film, Portmanteau horror film, dead of night. But we can get back to that, I think, at another time. No, let's go there and let's end this whole section on you finally explaining your facts. Go on a long... It's like the other day, I was doing a show about reality

and I suddenly realised that Alice Cooper connected everything that I was going to talk about. And this is the trouble, isn't it, with tangential thinking? But yeah, Port Manto Horror Film, Dead of Night. And I warn you, there's a spoiler alert here. So if you haven't seen it yet, it did come out in 1945. But if you haven't seen it yet, I'm going to give out something about it at the end. So it's about a man who visits a house.

And when he gets to the house, he's like, I'm sure I've been here before. And everyone in the house has a different story, including a terrifying story involving a ventriloquist possessed by his dummy or not. We're not entirely sure, played by Michael Regro. And there's also a beautiful golfing. story from the great Basil Radford and Norton Wayne, two golfers who play golf to win over a woman's heart and it all goes horribly wrong. But at the end of the film, the man wakes up from his terrible nightmare and has to drive to the house, which we then realize is the house where we began.

And he is in this cycle of reality. And that led to Fred Hoyle thinking about the theory of the universe, this kind of cycle of size that we see. So to that, I've suddenly realized, is the other place golfing actually may have played a much bigger part in refuted physics of the 20th century. So first of all, I'd like to apologize. I'm not normally on this show, as everyone realizes. So I'll tell you the story now. I'm sorry. So, yes, so basically.

I'm going to say, that's the thing, Robin. The problem with golf is there's links everywhere. Oh, man. I can't believe it's five minutes to a pun, but when one like that comes out, that is fantastic. What a beautiful thing to see. These two had practiced that for hours beforehand. It's worth the buildup. I can't even remember what the golf link was.

So, Joan Feynman, so Richard Feynman woke up his young sister Joan and took it to the golf course because this was the darkest place to go because that night they could witness from just outside New York, the Aurora Borealis.

And a deal was made and the deal was he could have the whole of the rest of the universe to investigate, but Joan was allowed to have the Aurora Borealis and he could not go near it. We should just explain who Richard Feynman was. He was an extraordinary character

in the world of science. The Nobel Prize winning physicist. He was very much one of the fathers of quantum mechanics. And as a child, the stories that you have to read his autobiography and genius by James Gleke, it is just full of him just doing experiments, including on his sitster. So he rigged up her cot so that it was sort of electrically generated so that it would go back and forth. He paid her pocket money, four cents to be sticking her finger in electrical sockets and

to test ideas. I think she was paid to press switches, and she might have put her finger in the socket just for fun to kind of show off to his friends, right? I don't think he paid her to electric view her. Some reports from her are that he would occasionally say, when his friends were around, pop your finger in that. So I think there's some wonderful interviews that she did with Christopher Sykes, who was the maker of pleasure of finding things out, the Horizon documentary about Richard Feynman. And she just talks about its play. You know, even in her 90s, when someone would say, what is? science, Joan, she said it's play. And it's something that gets missed out so much in a lot of the

science education in the UK. You know, I'm sure all of us have that experience of working with scientists and realizing the excitement when they see a new idea or they see a new snail shell. It's filled with excitement and play and joy. I like that it extends to going to the cinema and watching Ealing horrors and you come out going, oh, I've just invented a model of how the universe functions. I like how golf tells you a lot about physics as well. Okay, I can now see that Dan's going to go to the cinema and James is going to go to the golf course, both expecting to come back Nobel Prize winners, and you're going to be sorely disappointed.

Richard Feynman was great at encouraging science communication, right? And this is obviously partly what inspired Joan. And he even used to come into her room at night, kind of annoying, actually. For instance, she'd cry out for a glass of water in the middle of the night, and he'd come to her bedroom, and rather than give her the water, he'd always swill it around in the glass, apparently, to demonstrate centrifugal forces, which does sound annoying. And also at one point, it did fly.

out of his hand and smash against the wall. So fun, fun and dangerous. Richard was very, very supportive of her, but the world wasn't. When she was trying to do her dissertation, one of the professors who was teaching her said, why don't you write it on cobwebs? Because that's going to help when you're cleaning houses. You mean, sorry, you mean why don't you write it about cobwebs, right? Not on as in sort of like trying in a tiny, tiny pen. Yeah, it turns out he was really supportive when he was trying to innovate. And she actually wrote it in the end on the absorption of infrared radiation in crystals of diamond-type lattice structure. Just kind of cobwebs, infrared radiation. It's not much difference, is it?

I've got to be honest, and I don't want to be the bad guy here, but I would have been more likely to read the cobwebs one than the lattice structure one. Just more catchy, isn't it? I love a cobweb. Ironically, that PhD dissertation is now covered in cobwebs. I don't know one's ever read it, have they? But no, she was brilliant. Yeah, and the mother was quite progressive, but still, said to her, oh, women don't have the minds to do science.

You know, that's how deep the belief was. She was only eight when her mum said women don't have the brains for science, and she sort of sat in her chair sobbing incessantly, which is quite impressive at eight to know you want to be a scientist. I think all I knew was I wanted to climb a tree. I think there's an interesting thing to learn from both the Feynman's here in terms of looking at progress. Richard Feynman didn't get into his first choice university

because at that point in the 1930s there was a Jewish quota. And that is an incredible thing to know, I think. And in the same way, what Joan Feynman had to deal with was also the fact that women can't do this and we're not going to allow. And sometimes, even as a professional scientist, there were rooms where she was told, oh, women aren't allowed to go up there.

And she had to... But she did keep on trying to get into the men's bathroom, didn't she? But that was only because her brother kept coming into her bed, that whole kind of thing. And she was only going into the men's bathroom to show centrifugal force, which of course made a right old mess. But in a men's bathroom, you can't really tell them. much because they're always in such a state in the first place. But I think the importance of

role models. It must not be forgotten because I think in science this is still going on. It's getting better, but we still need that going on all of the time because science is for everyone and it would be crazy not to realize that, you know, the excitement of curiosity is not limited by, you know, an X or a Y chromosome. Yeah, yeah. I think she had an amazing psychiatrist actually, because she went to a psychiatrist to say, what shall I do? Whereas usually, I guess you'd say have these antidepressants and maybe try some CBT. The psychiatrist basically said, why don't you apply to this Earth Observatory at Columbia University?

And that's what you need, isn't it? So great psychiatrist, terrible rabbi, because the rabbi said, what right do you have to have these science jobs that are meant for men? Some of them haven't got a job. So there we go. There's a great battle there between the... Some of them haven't got a job.

You've got to wait until all the men have a job, and then you can start applying. Should we talk about what she discovered? Because it was pretty cool. I mean, she did hog quite a cool thing in hogging the auroras. She essentially realized that it was these kind of charged particles that are flying out of the sun. And when the sun's having a particularly turbulent time, when there's a bunch of storms on the surface of the sun,

then the northern lights get bigger. And so she equated those two and thought one must be causing the other. And I hadn't actually realized these cycles that the sun goes through. It's got an 11-year cycle of high and low activity, and that's caused by its magnetic poles switching round every 11 years, which is very often, given the earth, it has been ages, hasn't it, since we did it? But also it's got this 88-year cycle that's kind of running underneath that, where the 11-year peaks and troughs kind of get higher and lower.

There is another cycle that I know of, which is there's always a trough whenever I go to Iceland to see the Northern Lights, which has been on two occasions. and every single time they were like, oh, if you were here last week, it was amazing. See, I think that's a correlation causation issue. I don't know if your presence is causing a difference. You have to time it right, because if they know that Joanna Lumley's going to be making one of her documentaries

where she goes, I've always been fascinated in the Aurora Borealis, then the magnetosphere, the solar winds go hold back. Joanna Lumley's coming next week. James is mainly doing audio-based stuff. It's really not important to get involved. Do you know what that? The oldest depiction of the Northern Knights is, we think. Is it like on a cave painting or something?

It is, but it's specifically a macaroni. A penguin? No. So this is a cave painting. It's 30,000 years old, which is very cool. I'm not convinced it's the Northern Lights, because you know when you look at cave paintings and it all looks like smears on a cave,

and then everyone goes, well, this is clearly a walrus, and this is a oral borealis. But these are Cro-Magnon cave paintings in France, and it's a specific type of Paleolithic finger tracings in clay, which is called macaroni, which I'd never heard of. So the first Northern Knights is a macaroni. It is quite remarkable when you think, you know, that cave, whether it's true or not,

and I think you're right to probably be sceptical because there's so much new investigation in terms of what cave paintings mean. But I do think, you know, that moment of experiencing something like that, I don't know if you ever went with the tape modern, about probably 15 years ago, there was an artist who created this piece which was basically just the sun rising.

And what he wanted to create was something that had the impact of what it must have been like each morning to see this thing, which was almost like a godlike experience. And he did really create that, I've got to say, standing in that turbine hall, the way that it connected to you, was just remarkable. And when you talk about the Aurora Borealis, I think, you know, I've never experienced it.

I have the same as you in Iceland. I think Paul O'Grady was going to be there the next week, so the Aurora Borealis stayed off. for me as well. But that experience should really hit you in the gut every now and again to go, that is up there, what is going on, how is it that a universe exists that creates these things that we have somehow evolved to find beautiful and fascinating and mesmeric. Yeah, although I've had exactly the same thing as you two in Norway, so I'm starting to suspect the Northern Knights actually don't exist and it's a huge conspiracy.

Okay, it is time for fact number two, and that is. Anna. My fact this week is that at the turn of the 20th century, women were pedometers to balls to track how many miles they were dancing. Wow. Miles, a single ball. That's a lot of dancing, oh God, they were dancing miles and miles. Well, one dance was about a mile, mile, and a half, and this was all the rage. Women would strap pedometers to their knees or their feet, and they'd go to a ball, and there would be competitions over who would dance the furthest. So, you'd show your pedometer at the end of the night and I think the winner of one contest I was reading dance 25 miles in a night.

Oh, wow. Which that girl has not gone without a partner for the evening. Yeah. Were these those dancers where as a big group they were dancing together or were they one-on-one with partners? Partner dancers at the balls. Yeah, you're technically supposed to be going, I think, to find a husband back in the day. It was a debutante era.

But one of the complaints about the pedometers in one of the newspaper articles, as I read is that it was distracting the woman from seducing their husbands because they were so into counting their number of steps and competing over that that they forgot to do their duty. That's amazing. But did anyone sort of just quickly leave the venue and just go for a mad dash, you know, and just clock up the numbers and come back? I don't think a mad dash would help because dancing, you're dancing almost as fast as you're, I mean, you can't really run for 25 miles straight.

True. Obviously can. Have you just watched the, just watched the Olympic marathon that's just how to. I just think it's much harder in heels and a corset. It's probably easier to do a bit of jigging. Do you think that in the bathrooms, when you went into the ladies' bathroom, everyone would just be kind of jiggling around to keep the pedometer going? You know, like, if you really need the toilet, you kind of do that little jiggly run on the spot, don't you?

That's where that comes from, actually. Yeah. What would be the tap dancing, I guess, would be the most. Or like, river dance. Yeah, definitely. you're wasting a lot of leg time in the air though with one of them legs well I think a scar music festival would work very well because you would do something like lip up fatty from the band Bad Manners

there's a lot of movement as in which is kind of a walkie movement so I would say if you perhaps set out this experiment in a series of different butlin's holiday camps across the south coast you would take various different genres I think Northern Seoul would go well but Northern Soul as you said before the high kick element of that possibly means that you're not travelling as far as you imagine that the leg is going high but it's only travelling a metre or so

I think in terms of rave culture of the late 80s early 90s so any of those comebacks that seems to be quite a stoical thing it's mainly upper body stuff so I think there's a lot of research to be done here yeah I'm sure Shakira could clock up some numbers with a bum shake I'm sure if it was attached to the thigh

that would give vigorous penduluming you're going to get a really accurate reading because the hips don't lie of course Well, this is, do you remember the film that they shoot horses, don't they? Which was, it was about marathous, this terrible thing that was done during the Depression in America, which was marathon dance competitions where you just danced. And the winner would then get some money when everyone was desperate for money.

But they would go on for days and days. People actually died dancing. Yeah. I would imagine no one, if they'd had a pedometer, that would have already gone down to the porn brokers. So they wouldn't have had that on that because that was why they were there. But it's just that fascinating thing where, you know, dance becomes torture. And I think when you talk about 25 miles, I mean, that amount of dancing, I'm reckonings if we went for a walk, that's what, seven to eight hours of walking?

Six hours, probably. I walk fast because I have places to go and I believe life is finite. But there's a lot of doodlers. And I would say between doordlers and then kind of people like me, I reckon it's about 3.2 miles an hour. So that's a lot. Oh, dear. Wow.

Yeah, wow. Because Anna and I have been for a walk in the park every now and then, just to kind of chat work. And I must say that is probably the best workout I've had in the last two years, trying to keep up with Anna walking around a park. It's ridiculous. Yeah, it was awkward when I realised you'd collapse to be on 20s to be on a meter sky. So are you one of those people like me, which is I don't mind stopping and looking at things, and I don't mind having a slow walk if there's things around. But the doodle is something which, because, you know, there's a certain way that some people walk where you go, you have no ambition

there's a way that you just... I am like you, yes I judge someone's entire character a level of ambition based on their walk and then I'm furious with them and kind of want to push them in front of a car

and they deserve it. Wow, and the worst thing was you had to push me half a mile out of the park to get to the road. I did, yeah. Really went for it. But yeah, I would have been clocking up those 25 miles and they said

even at the time these women said that it was really addictive just like it is today whenever anyone has step counters because it made a little tick every time you stepped and so you couldn't resist making this tick happen

and people were worried their mother said they're dancing too much it's dangerous and I think some of them may be rigged it because there's this thing with pedometers about whether it's about steps or whether it's about distance

and of course this would tell you how much distance you travelled but that was because you had to set it to your step length so I think you could set it to anywhere between 15 and 41 inch step length so if as a cheek leading lady, you said every step you step 41 inches, then that's going to say you've travelled

further, isn't it? So the modern day pedometers came after the Tokyo Olympics in the 1960s, and there was a Japanese company called Yamazza, the Yamazza company, and they came up with this new kind of pedometer, and they thought that everyone should walk 10,000 steps a day. And there's a lot of controversy, whether that is just a completely random number that they made up, or whether there's actually any science to it whatsoever. There is a professor of epidemiology at Harvard called Aymin Lee, and she reckons, having spoken to the people who came up with the idea that they chose 10,000, because the Japanese character for 10,000 looks a little bit like a man walking, and they thought it would

be a really good way of publicising it. But then there are other people who say, well, actually, they did a bit of maths about it and worked out how many people would have less mortality due to more exercise and stuff. Yeah. Pedometers are the subject of the longest movie ever made. I discovered. The longest movie. Now, previously on Fish, we spoke about the longest movie ever made being called Ambience,

which was 720 hours long. The trailer itself was 72 minutes. That has since been overtaken by a movie, which is 857 hours long. So this was made in 2008 by Erica Magnuson and Daniel Anderson, and they wanted to look at where the podompson. came from. So they had this idea of following the production cycle, but in reverse chronological order. So basically, it's an 857 hour long movie backwards. Wow. Jesus. This sounds actually, I would almost rather read Joan Feynman's dissertation than watch

this. That's amazing. There's a lot of reviews on IMDB, you know. It starts off slow, says one person, first three and a half days of runtime, kind of boring. But oh my God, by the fourth through to the 25th days, things really pick up. So, you know, check it out. Do we know what the point is? Was it some sort of artistic experiment? Was it a bet? It's definitely an artistic experiment, yeah. They didn't just plan to make a feature-length film and it got out of hand. They just had so much material and a bad editor. They can be dangerous, can't they? Pernometers and Fitbits and stuff. There was a pig in Northern England that Etta Poodometer pooed it out and it was in a bit of warm poo and hay and

because it had Olivia May and battery, it exploded and set fire to the entire farm. Luckily, no animals were hurt. Sounds so much like an insurance scam to me. I'm sorry, you know when the farmer's making up the story, when things haven't really worked out on my pig farm, and you will not believe what happened, right? So I left the pedometer over there, and he's always been 100 pique. I would not pay out on that one.

Surely that's more likely to be true than I dropped it in the toilet or something for your phone. Like it's, it's, who would make that? No, no, no, but I'm not, I'm not talking about the claiming insurance on the pedometer. I'm talking about claiming insurance on the entire farm. Of course, yeah. You've got to get bigger ambition, James. Yeah, yeah. You need an arsonist, don't you?

But you can't say there was a crime committed because then the police get involved. So if you say it was the pig, then who's going to arrest a pig? Oh, in France. And I'm sure you've covered many pig trials on this show. Still one of my, one of the greatest films, if people haven't seen the hour of the pig, It's brilliant. It's all about a pig trial. And was it, is it a pedometer-based crime? No, it's pre-pedometer.

And it starts off beautifully with a man and his donkey about to be hanged for some sexual shenanigans. So there's a donkey with a noose around it and the man with a noose around it. And this man running through and he's going, stop, stop, stop. And you see the man go, oh. And he goes, the donkey's been pardoned.

Everyone in the town has said it is on good character. And then you see the donkey's news taken off and the man dropped from the gallows. Wow. I mean, I'm definitely watching that, and I think that's going to be the one takeaway from this podcast. Yeah. Okay, it is time for fact number three, and that is James.

Okay, my fact this week is that Charles Darwin invented the office chair. Did he? Well, did he? That's a great question, Anna, did he? Yeah. Sense my skepticism. Go on. I'm going to say that he invented the kind of wheeled.

office chair that you have. And I'm saying that because his chair had wheels on. And this is the first example we know of. I was reading an article in the New York Times. It was a review of a book called A Taxonomy of Office Chairs by Jonathan Olivari's. And he talked about all the history of office chairs. And he said that Charles Darwin had a customized wooden armchair in his home. And he would wheel around his front room looking from specimen to specimen.

and then I went onto the Welcome Collections website and they have a photograph of this very chair so it definitely did exist. They have a photo of the interior of Charles Darwin's study which shows that it's kind of just like an old armchair with just casters on the bottom of it. But yeah, the evolution of the chair started from there. The origin of this species of chair.

Yes. Robin, I assume you've been to Darwin's house. Have you seen this chair? No, I haven't. That's what I was thinking about. I kind of flash back to think. seen that a downhouse and I don't remember seeing that but they don't let you have a go on the furniture so that's the thing is it depends how discreet it is you know and especially they would

have all known I'm a big Starlight Express fan so of course that would have crows it I mean I love the idea of that wheelchair going around his wonderful thought pathway would go round and round and I think there's something rather attractive about that idea so what is that he used to walk around just to think of things throughout the day he would have these moments and he would basically have some stones in his pockets and he would make a little pile of stones so he would would know roughly how many times he'd walk around. And it would just be to take himself into somewhere else to just mull over whatever he'd recently found out about a pigeon skeleton or whatever else had been boiled down.

But I mean, going back to what we're talking about with Joan Feynman as well, that curiosity and that play, you know, now I want to go and have a look at this particular crab that's over there and now I'll look at this barnacle over there. And that lovely thing when he would go to London Zoo and he would look at some of the viper snakes and he would see if he could stop himself from react. So obviously the snake can't get to him. And he would just stand and just look at the snake, wait for it to strike. And then, oh, I still react.

You know, and that's just plain. People would have walked past thinking, who's the guy over there with the big sideboards, who looks like he's goading snakes? But I've just recently been to London Zoo, and my experience is very different that the snakes just kind of hide. And you spend half your time going, is that a twig or is it a snake? I'm not sure. They didn't do much of the attacking when I was there. Although I did not.

That's the fun thing, isn't it? I mean, Edinburgh Zoo, I think, used to be the zoo that had the most hiding animals to the point where you began to think this is predominantly hay. I love that reptile house is such a delight. I think because you see that, you know, the old structure of the zoo there. I absolutely love looking at the snakes. I don't know. I'm starting to think zoos might be in other northern lights.

They're just a huge con. Only when Joanna Lumley goes so the snakes emerge. Yeah. But yeah, he was. From a super early age, crazily curious, wasn't he? And not a very good student. So I hadn't realized that Darwin's dad thought he was a bit useless, said that, you know, this boy will never concentrate on anything.

But he just was obsessed with collecting stuff. There was one story where he found two unusual-looking beetles that he thought were new species. And then he found the third one. And so he put one of the two in his mouth so he could carry the third one home as well. I don't know why he couldn't just carry two beetles in one hand. But he put it in his mouth and he accidentally bit down on it,

or it squirted some disgusting poison into his mouth. So sadly, lost his Beatles on that occasion. Wow. Yeah, always collecting. It's like with his barnacles, which, Steve Jones, who's a wonderful writer, I'm sure you know. And he is a great expert on Darwin. And I once said to him,

are there any books by Darwin that I shouldn't read? And he said, don't bother with his books about barnacles. He became overly obsessed. So there's a story of, I forget which son it was, who was so used to seeing Charles just look at barnacles all the time and they were being delivered from around the world, people sending specimens barnacles to him, that when he went round to a friend's house, he started running

around all of the rooms and became increasingly confused and rather upset because he couldn't find the room where his friend's father did his barnacles. And that was when it had to be explained that not all parents spend most of their time examining barnacles. I think that's a, you know, there's a, all fathers did barnacles. What's wrong with your dad? No. I was reading about what happened when his son William was born. He just started measuring everything. The sneezing, the hiccoughing, the yawning, the stretching. But the papers are amazing because they really read like a very proud father who kind of thinks that his children are so advanced. He's like, of course, sucking and screaming were well performed by my infant. He wrote at one stage. And then

he said, I touched the naked stole of his foot with a bit of paper and he jerked it away, much like an older child would do when tickled. Oh, no. He's one of those parents at the school gate. My child's too good children. Oh, God, I used to work in a children's book shop where you would always get people coming in and going, my son is four, but he has a reading age of 10.

And of course, you would show them a book for a 10-year-old, go, well, I don't think he'll quite be able to manage that. And then eventually when you sold them a book for a two-year-old, you know, but that was... We're often told that Victorian parents were quite detached from their children. children. I think it's kind of quite a myth. And you would see that the relationship that Charles and Emma Darwin had with their children was an incredible closeness. There's so many beautiful letters between Emma and Charles, which are filled with love and which entirely disintegrate some of the

illusions that we have about Victorian behaviour. Right. Wow. He had a really cool uncle who sadly died quite young, who looked like he might have made a lot of innovations in the medical world. And he was called Charles Darwin as well. And Charles. Darwin, the one we're talking about, was fascinated by him, even visiting the university where he worked at to meet his professors to say hi, because he never met him. He died before Charles was born. But when he was young, he had a stammer. And there was a theory that his father had, that if he taught his son French, he would get rid of the stammer. So he was packed off to Paris, where he learnt and studied under a reverend who taught him to speak French fluently.

And it got rid of his stammer. But only in French. So he always had a stammer in English, but never in French. It's quite weird to picture Darwin's trip on the Beagle, right? Because that was just one huge massacre. And for someone who was kind of too squeamish to be a doctor, when he was training to be a doctor, he once ran from the room because someone was being operated on. But he did love shooting.

And, like, we'll just go around, like bashing things on their heads, strangling them, you know, poisoning them and eating them. All for science. All for science and a bit for fun. one of the things he did was he ate lots of tortoises which we've probably mentioned before and this was one of the things that tipped him off to evolution he ate a tortoise on one island

and then he ate what seemed to be the same tortoise on another island really close by and it tasted a bit sweeter and this is one of the things he recorded he was like why is the tortoise on this island sweeter than the tortoise on this island how have they diverged you know why would God do this make these tiny little differences so close together but wait a minute how come everything

has evolved to taste like chicken then. You actually didn't address that. There's a line that I've often repeated. In fact, the most recent book I wrote originally, this is what I wanted to call it, because it's something that I love, which is when he talks about being around the rainforest, and he says,

one's eyes attempt to follow the flight of a gaudy butterfly, but as soon distracted by some strange tree or fruit. Today, my mind was a chaos of delight. And I think that's the thing. Chaos of Delight, which is a phrase I've used many, many times, is such a good way of explaining what the truly curious are always being attracted to. Well, and also, as well as delighting in your discoveries,

getting so angry when things go wrong, you know, just being passionate generally. Like one of my favourite letters I read of Darwin's recently was when he'd been looking into bees that pollinate red clover. Some had a long proboscis, some had a short one, and they got nectar in different ways. Quite a niche discovery he thought he'd made. He told his friend, John Lubbock, said, I'm really excited about this. And then he wrote a follow-up.

saying he'd realized that he was wrong. And he said, I do hope you haven't waited any time for my stupid blunder. I hate myself, I hate clover, and I hate bees. And that's... Speaking of finding beauty in the banal, what about office chairs? Mm. Can we quickly talk about those, maybe? Let's get some beauty out of that.

Chairs are killing us. Chairs are killing us. What? Because chair sitting puts 30% more pressure on your spinal discs than standing up. Varicose veins only exist in cultures that do lots of chair sitting. If you sit down for long periods, it means your muscles and your legs don't fire, which means your pancreas doesn't get the message to produce lipase, which is the enzyme that you need in your liver to digest fat. And there is an amazing person called Professor Galen Krantz, who says, basically, we all need to stop sitting down too much

because it's killing us. And I spoke to Professor Krantz this morning. And I spoke to Professor Kranz this morning. And she was basically telling me that there's loads of massive studies with epidemiologists looking at really, really, really massive data sets. And they have found correlation with premature mortality and sitting down, which is greater than the correlation for being old, being fat, or being a smoker. So sitting down, according to some studies, is more dangerous than that. Right. And for that reason, Professor Krantz doesn't have any chairs in her house. I read this in an article. She's a terrible host, isn't she?

If you go around for a joke. Yeah, come on. Okay, in fairness, she has a couple for when guests come down, she did say. I read this in an article from new scientists about 20 years ago, and I emailed Professor Crances says, is it still true that you don't have any chairs in your house? And she says, yeah, she's continued that experiment for over 20 years. And she perches at the kitchen island when she wants to eat. She thinks that perching is a good way.

It's like half sitting and half standing. Whenever she's doing any work on her computer she always uses a chaise long Even as a guest If she did put the two chairs out You'd feel so judged sitting in them Wouldn't you? You wouldn't risk it

But yeah There's obviously a lot of chat about How sitting's bound for you now And standing desks which I have are useful And I also try squatting Because I think about a quarter of people When they're at rest or when they're at work They will adopt a squat rather than a seat

So a quarter of people in the world That's around the world Yeah, absolutely. Not in our office. Sorry, not in the office. But I've tried squatting and you can't do it for long or I can't. I always try working in a squat at a low table. And I think once you've had 30 years of not doing it,

it's pretty hard to get back, isn't it? Well, that is the problem, actually. It's like all these things about not sitting down, really. Once you've been sitting down for 30 years, doing anything else can put a lot of pressure on your body and give you pain and discomfort. But we know that in history people have squatted more than they've sat, not least because we haven't found many chairs from history,

but also because when you squat down, the end of your shin bone kind of presses into a little bone on your ankle, and it gets a little indentation, and we can see by lots of old skeletons, that that's how people must have spent a lot of their time. So we know that in history, squatting has been the standard way of resting. Okay. You know, one thing I really loved about this fact was such a seminal character,

is the person who we have the oldest example of an office chair from, but also a bit further back in history, the oldest example that we have of the swivel chair is from Thomas Jefferson. The story goes is that he wrote up the Declaration of Independence while sitting on this swivel chair because it has a little table that is attached to it. A revolutionary chair. Very nice. He also had a pedometer, Thomas Jefferson.

One of the earliest ones we know about. Yeah, he had it made by an expert. watchmaker in Paris. He even sent one to one of the early presidents. I think it was Madison maybe. Yeah, Madison. Yeah. But he gave his swivel chair to Martha, didn't he? His daughter.

And she said that she thinks he did indeed write the Declaration of Independence on it. And his opponents took the piss out of him for his stupid chairs and called them whirly gigs and said, you know, they'll look at Thomas in his stupid whirly gig that allows him to look in all directions at once. Isn't he a moron? They didn't say that. That's my addition. Okay, it is time for our final fact of the show, and that is my fact. My fact this week is that horror movies often have two soundtracks, one you can hear, and one you can't.

Oh, I know that sounds spooky, but what's the point of that? It is literally for spooky reasons. So this is the idea of infrasound, and infrasound is any frequency that is sort of not, 19 hertz below. So humans can hear 20 hertz and above. As soon as you get lower, it becomes out of ear shot. But your body can sort of feel the sensation of the sound if there's a big sound system in the room. You can give you a sense of sort of, ooh, what's going on here? You know, it can give you the shivers. Do you know any examples of movies that have done this? Like sound of music, presumably not, but. Well, it's mainly the examples that they give are for thrillers slash

horror movies, so irreversible was said to have used it, and paranormal activity is rumoured to have used it as well. They sometimes are sounds that are like, I don't know, a fan going or an air conditioner, but they play with the bass as such that it creates an eerie noise. I did read that air conditioning can achieve this effect, which maybe explains why being in the office is such a scary experience. Peacocks can do it. If a peacock kind of wiggles its tail, it makes this really, really deep, sound that humans can't hear but if you were able to hear it, it'll be about as loud as a car driving past you

and they do it to kind of signal to each other. But yeah, I guess if you walk past a peacock, you might feel a bit uneasy. Does that happen? You feel like a lot of eyes are watching you. Well, that's the famous Darwin line. The sight of the feathers and a peacock tail make me sick.

Really? Yeah, he felt that that expenditure felt like such a waste for the nature of survival. You have to have that It's huge expenditure. And it's such a lovely line because it feels like a very modern line. You don't expect to suddenly find that in Darwin. As a horror movie fan, I'm not keen on this idea

because I'm a big fan of atmospheric horror films which really get under your skin. In fact, brilliantly, you mentioned Sound and Music. Isn't it amazing how quickly you can create some kind of sense of synchronicity in any of these programmes? Because, you know, I think it was Robert Wise, I think, he directed Sound of Music, and he also directed The Haunting. And that is one of those films where so much of the unsettling nature of it

is not that you ever see a ghost, but you hear noises. There's a sense that there is something wrong with the house. Yeah. Well, whenever I watch horror films, I was watching horror film on my own recently, actually, and the way to find it not scary is absolutely not to close your eyes. It's to just cover up your ears. And immediately a horror film will become completely innocuous.

It's so weird. I think it's more about the sound. Hitchcock said that 33% of the effect of Psycho was entirely due to the music. Yeah, they did do test audiences with the movie where in the shower scene there was no music originally and it just didn't have the impact. And then they put the music on

and suddenly the scariest scene in cinema to that point. Yeah. That's really interesting. What was the horror film you were watching by the way? It was called His House, My House, Her House. It's fantastic. It's really good. His House.

Yeah, anyone listens to this. If you've not seen it, I think it was a nomin. for a BAFTA very deservedly. I was just watching it at home. And I was like, I hope it stops being scary because I want to go to the loo. And I'm not sure I can risk going down these stairs now because the changing understanding of the narrative in it. And that's why I find that kind of use of infrasound to me that feels like a very Hollywood thing, which is going, oh, we can do this thing instead? No, do you know what? Film something brilliantly. Yeah. But then, do you want to get rid of soundtracks all together then for that reason as well? No, I love I love soundtracks because

I think when they're well used, when you get... I mean, I rewatch Dawn of the Dead, which has a really upbeat. And you go, this is far too upbeat for the number of guts that are being eaten. But it works by being, this meeting of two very different worlds. But that marriage reminds me of tubular bells. To me, it is terrifying. And that's not a frightening tune. That's just because it was in The Exorcist.

And that's actually quite a plinky, plonky, you know, the tune of the terror. terrifying bit from the exorcist. Like, do, do, do, do. It's quite hard to hum. But, yeah, it's marrying that slightly chirpy with the terrifying. Do you think we're going to get sued? Do you think Mike Holfield's going to come in after. He's coming for us.

Yeah. After Anna sang that. Thank God his daughter used to work for QI. She's been on fish. Chat to her. She has, Molly, back in the day. I love that way, though. How can we get away with playing a tune and not having to pay copyright?

By not really remembering it very well, You can't play it. Yeah, it's that Mike Oldfield. Buh, da-ba-t-tit-do la. Just on horror films and their soundtracks, I didn't know that instruments have specifically been built for horror movies. So inharmonic instruments, basically instruments that do the opposite of what good instruments do, and they create notes that don't go together very naturally when you sort of...

All my instruments do that. Yeah. Yeah. No, there are many reasons. why you might make inharmonic sounds. But the most famous inharmonic instrument is probably the waterphone. And so it's like a bowl and it's got like bronze rods that stick up out of the edges of the bowl. And they're all different lengths and like diameters and stuff.

And you get a violin bow or something maybe to tap it and you bow the rods. And they just make a very non-harmonic sound. And it's used in lots of films. It's used in poltergeist, let the right one in, aliens. But what I like about it as well is that the water. phone involves a little bit of water in the bowl, which is why it's called that. It was invented by Richard Waters and used in the horror film Dark Water. Amazing. Oh, wow. Three totally unrelated waters in one fact. That's so cool. The other thing's the tritone, kind of two notes that one comes after

the other and it kind of makes you feel uneasy because you think that it should be something next. It's in the theme to The Simpsons. So you know when it goes, the Simpsons is kind of you think, well, where are you going after that? It's weird. It's just kind of a weird. It's just kind of a weird kind of two notes coming after each other. Is that the one banned in churches, James, or is that a different one? Well, that's the one that the internet says was banned in churches, for sure. Whether it was actually banned, I personally don't think so, but definitely Western musicians really shied away from it for hundreds and hundreds of years because they thought it was

slightly demonic. It is objectively spooky, because I've never thought about it before, but the theme tune to The Simpsons, which is not a spooky show except for the Halloween specials, is kind of scary, regardless of content. I don't know why they did that. Weird. Danny Elfman of Oingo Boingo, which is still one of the greatest names for a band.

Really? Yeah. So funny. Doesn't he sing? He sings that bit of the Simpsons, doesn't he? And as a result, the royalties that he's received ever since

are far greater than any other work that he's done, basically. Did I sing it close enough to the actual theme tune that I'm going to have to send him a tenor in the post? Yeah. Damn it. Yeah, I remember doing a thing with,

I forgot in the name. Who's the voice of, Bart. Nancy Cartwright? Yeah, I remember doing a radio show with her. There was someone in the audience who had a birthday like a little child, and they said, oh, can you say happy birthday as Bart Simpson? She went, no, I can't for copyright reasons. Really?

Wow. Really weird thing. That's all good. Can I tell you guys about the most recent horror movie I watched? Yeah, go for it. It was called Slacks. Have you heard of this? S-L-A-X-X.

Can you guess what the murderer is in this case? I'll give you a clue. It's a non-human. Is it a pair of shoes? It's not. Oh, it's not a pair of slacks? It's a pair of slacks, but that's not what slacks are for many people. Oh God, their trousers, aren't they? It's about a killer pair of jeans.

And I was just Googling about it to see if there was anything interesting about it. And it comes up on a lot of lists of horror movies where the antagonist is a non-human or non-animal. So there was one in 2001. one called The Shaft. Can you guess what the killer was there? Yes, an elevator shaft. Very good, yes. But why is the shaft itself the killer? Well, it was originally called the Lyft, but it got remade in America.

They called it the shaft, and also they were going to call it just down. And the tagline for that movie reads, take the stairs, for God's sake, take the stairs. Sounds amazing. Anyone going to see it, imagining it's a remake of the film Shaft, you know, find themselves very confused. I hope Isaac Hayes still did the music of the wires. Yeah. That'd be amazing.

Has anyone seen the movie, this is relatively famous called Rubber? Is that the tire that goes through the desert and goes, yeah, yeah, yeah, that's a great idea, yeah. It's about a sentient tire that goes around and it has psychokinesis. We never learned why it has psychokinesis, but it could just look at you and start vibrating and then it explodes you. And there was the final one, which was a Korean movie, I think, and it's called the Red Shoes. Can you guess what the killer is there?

I mean, is this a trick? Is it a pair of gloves? Dorothy. It's a pair of purple shoes. Literally no idea why they call it the red shoes, but this woman finds a pair of purple high heels, and then jealousy, greed, and death follows her wherever she walks in them. Right.

Right. But the original red shoes, based on the kind of folk tale, which is a Powell and Pressburger film, is a very haunting piece of work. Robert Heltman, famously the child catcher, who for many of my generation is one of the scariest characters in chit-chitty-bang-bang-bang. You know, come and get your sweeties, children. Come and get your sweeties.

And there's a lovely story of when a friend of Robert Helpins took his kids to go and see Chich-chitty-bang-bang. And then he rang up Robert Helping and he said, Robert, I've got a bit of a problem. You're coming around for Sunday lunch. And, well, my kids, I've just taken him with Chit-chitty-bang. And they were absolutely terrified off you. And he went, oh, yes. He said, well, could you say something over the phone now? so that they know you're an actor and that you're not really the child's catch.

And you went, of course, just bring the children to the phone. And when the children got to the phone, he went, I'm coming to catch you, cheers. Cheers, everyone. Okay, that's it. That is all of our facts. Thank you so much for listening. If you'd like to get in contact with any of us about the things that we have said over the course of this podcast, we can all be found on our Twitter accounts. I am on at Shreiberland, James.

At James Harkin. Robin. At Robin Ince. And Anna. You can email podcast at QI.com. Yep, you can go to our group account, which is at No Such Thing, or go to our website, no such thing as a fish.com, and check out everything that is up there from all of our previous episodes, as well as all of our upcoming tour dates.

And if you're online, you're looking at websites, why not go over to cosmic shambles.com as well? That's Robin's site, and it's a huge network of amazing scientists and general communicators of every field, comedy, you know, geology, blah, blah. They're all there, artists. It's an amazing place full of amazing people. people. Check out Robin's live dates on Robinin's.com as well and go see him for his book tours, his live shows, and his tours with Brian Cox and the guy does a hundred things. Check out. It's all up there. Anyway, we're going to be back again next week with another episode. We'll see you then.

Goodbye.