Odd Lots - Charlie McElligott on How Long the Stock Market Rally Can Go

Episode Date: July 3, 2025

Stocks plunged after the April 2 "Liberation Day," in one of the worst drawdowns in the market's history. Since then, however, we're basically back to all-time highs and things have been pretty calm in the market. On this episode, recorded live onstage at our June 26 event in New York, we speak to Nomura cross-asset strategist Charlie McElligott, about what's been driving the rally. He says he's seen "relentless" selling of volatility as investors who sold back in April chase the rally. That's culminated in some weird market dynamics. The question, of course, is how long this can continue and what it would take to unsettle things from here.Only Bloomberg.com subscribers can get the Odd Lots newsletter in their inbox — now delivered every weekday — plus unlimited access to the site and app. Subscribe at bloomberg.com/subscriptions/oddlotsSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Thanks for listening to OddLots. Follow the show on Amazon Music for more future episodes or just ask Alexa play the podcast, OddLots on Amazon Music. Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts Radio News. Hey there, Oddlots listeners. You are about to hear a very special episode of the podcast. This was recorded live at our June 26th event in New York. We were talking with Charlie McGilligate. He is, of course, managing director and cross-asset macro strategist, for the global markets America's business over at Nomura. We talked to him about volatility in the market. What else? Yep.

It's been a kind of extraordinary couple of months with stocks basically at all-time highs, despite so much going on in the world. What actually explains what's happening? Charlie does a pretty good job. So take a listen. Thank you so much, Charlie, for being here. Awesome to be here. Awesome to see you guys.

So I didn't actually see where the market closed today, but we're pretty close. like either were at record highs or very close to it. I didn't actually see. But it's crazy to me all that's happened in 2025 and like we're sitting here at all-time highs. It's not intuitive. You have to admit it's kind of weird.

The, you know, I think the message, I'm trying to remember the last time I was with you guys, but probably the message that was communicating at that time was the fixation and kind of the dooming with the left-tail scenarios. Yeah. And as so often is the case when people are not incentivized to see the world burn, which might be debatable to some. Sure. But and you start seeing, especially with regard to negotiating tactics and things like that, where you start getting that not quite as bad as feared scenario.

Oftentimes there's an impact, certainly with the mechanical stuff that we so often talk about. And you really underpriced the less bad outcome. And there's a mechanical impact. There's a lot of, you know, vol distribution stuff. And it creates second order impact, second order flows. I think the most fascinating two points that I would say outside of the, you know, the mechanical flows that we talk about and the volatility component of this is, is two things.

I think back to 2022, where we had our first kind of inflation-driven macro bear case, right? Yeah. You just started the tightening cycle. I think there was nine or nine. or 10 months in a row of inflation upside surprises with CPI. And, you know, the macro bear case for equities at that point was this earnings recession where due to this price shock, it was going to impact consumption. Top line sales go lower and, you know, so on and so forth.

What ended up happening is ironically because of the health of the consumer and tight, tight, tight employment with wages at 40-year highs, you ended up actually getting a dynamic where the corporate world operates on aggregate consumption. They operate in the nominal GDP world. And that inflation perversely for the bears was the earnings catalyst. And all those folks got stopped out in 2023. There is an element of that still to this day right now as it relates to earnings, even though nominal GDP is in a different place to a certain extent,

still kind of five percentage. But the other point to, is that as it relates to the CAPEX spending uncertainty story, right? If corporates don't know what they're supposed to do with their cash because of the, you know, the kind of range of outcomes with regards to, you know, where these tariffs are going to end up, the sand in the gears of the global economy, well, the thought was, of course, you know, if corporates don't know what to be spending on, and consumers are feeling that impact as well,

you're going to get this eventual drag with regards to consumption. you're going to have corporates in a bad place. You either lose the top line sales because consumers are paying through the roof or you have to absorb those costs and your margins go lower. But what corporates have instead done have taken authorized buybacks to all-time highs. So we're not spending on R&D. We're not spending on hiring or building that new plant. We're going to buy back more stock than ever before a year to date.

And that, you know, if you look at corporate buyback flows as a source of demand for equities over the past 10, 15-year period, it's a magnitude's, six, seven, eight times magnitude's largest source of demand. So you've had these two kind of unintuitive dynamics in the market that have actually kept us higher on top of all those kind of vol-scaling things that we like to talk about. Right. So the other thing that's happened is people are back to actually selling vol. So basically betting that, you know, things will stay relatively calm. Why is that happening? It seems like a weird time to bet against volatility. There's so many headlines. I think selling VAL has become a new form of fixed income in a world where bonds are no longer a risk-free asset.

Now, that can go wrong so many ways. In this case, the proliferation of like premium income overriding strategies within the ETH world, exotic, structured products, and kind of more, I would say, complicated, you know, vol selling. strategies like dispersion, things like that, the number of vol suppliers out there, very short-dated, it gets dealers stuffed on gamma, I always like to say. And in that sense, particularly with the amount of short-dated volatility selling, you know, when dealers are stuffed on gamma, it compresses the distribution of outcomes, right? If the market's moving higher, you're selling into that. Markets moving lower, you're shock absorbing. The thing that I would say, back to that point about, you know, selling volatility as some sort of kind of fixed income product. Back in

2022, with that tightening cycle and all the, the bare dooming with regards to, you know, we're going to break something, you know, such a powerful, you know, ultimately over 500 base points of hikes. The trick was that, okay, you, the Fed is telling you to be short assets. You need to be able to sleep at night. Cash was an asset again. So, you know, market was down 30 some percent, bonds were down simultaneously. Did you really sell off that much? Yeah, NASDAQ was, you know, even bigger than that, obviously, because remember it was like this tech-centric growth kind of unwind.

But what ended up happening was that, you know, the Fed was trying to create a negative wealth effect. We've talked about that before because they couldn't impact supply side disruption. They could only impact demand side. And by telling you to be in cash, you could sleep at night. Well, guess what? The next year, you missed a 50% rally in the NASDAQ. So what really smart marketers have done is say, well, I'm going to give you price appreciation of equities, just capped.

And off the back of that, too, we're going to sell out of the money calls against this. And you get this little premium income thing. And they're never telling you you're shorting options. The good news is with a lot of these products nowadays, you're not shorting crash. You're not shorting downside. But also, too, sometimes they're contributing to their own demise in this kind of grinding market where you're stopping into. the calls that you've been selling. There's so much going on. I totally forgot that we had such a big sell-off in 2022. I totally forgot that there was like a 50% like all of these things like,

oh, that actually happened. Zooming out, big picture. Like it seems objectively true. You've been traded a long time. Like there are so many headlines these days and they're always changing and there's just so much to talk about. What is the trading like and how to, you know, does it feel different these days when there's just, we're just facing this? constant wall of news. Is there something that changes in the sort of complexion of how people trade? Well, there's there's certainly different like risk appetite regimes, risk sentiment regimes, you know, where, you know, there was a period of time I remember in those early discussions on like zero DT options where generally speaking at that time coming off the back of like, you know,

meme coins and fos and that whole like yolo phenomenon. Yeah. You know, the speculative excess peak of that kind of 2021, you know, Stimmy check driven madness, that was a very different world where people were kind of like, you know, buying, you know, optionality, creating gamma squeezes, the red-a-boards, Wall Street bats, all that jazz. Now that you're kind of settling into this world, we've been conditioned. We've been conditioned for 15 years of moral hazard, right? Central bankers intervening. Obviously, politicians now intervening.

And this is like, you know, party agnostic with regards of the fiscal stimulus, where it has become conditioned into traders, both retail and institutional, you know, this dynamic where you have to, this is the expected behavior. You have to buy that dip and sell that valour. Right. So, you're constantly trying to like kind of triangulate and kind of sanity check yourself with regards to this reflexivity. And, you know, like August 5th, August 2nd, August 5th last year were really interesting experiment because August 2nd, we finally got that first glimpse at what our market will eventually do this time again, huge VAR event. And, you know, within the fixed income space, certainly.

And then trickled down into all asset classes from there. It was the first time that labor, it looked like labor was cracking. And we had that, you know, four Z score miss and the U rate and two and a half Z score miss and the non-farm payroll print. And that was after a week of already soft labor data. And that was the holy shit moment. Once the consumer goes, this whole, you know, economic miracle goes. And what that then created was this, you know, was this massive dynamic.

where at the end of that day, everybody said, okay, risk is dicey right now. There's going to be a lot of the leveraging off the back of this realized volatility shock. I want to go home to short Delta, like short the market, but I don't be short ball because ball squeezed, ball exploded that day. That was both clients and options dealers. The problem was because of all these second order impacts and de-leveraging impacts and was that NICA on Sunday night opened down 12%. So that short vol position was going to be so smart because we always reflectively sell that, you know,

and you've got to monetize your hedges in like two hours before people start leaning in all that ball supply. The back test says the higher ball goes, the more I have to sell. And that's that sell the ball rip by the dip. Well, those people got their arms blown off, you know, by eight in the morning. And that was the famous like VIX index, right, which is a theoretical calculation based on like fake bidden offers from dealers, basically, you know, printed 63 or whatever it was, not an actual ticking price, but then the VIX future was traded at 38, which is like realistic. But, you know, those are those

scenarios where that conditioning is how things go really wrong because you think you got it figured out and you don't. The most recent example, of course, has been, you know, this Trump collar dynamic where the market finally figured out what was the human VVIX, as I call him, you know, who, you know, the volatility of volatility. You're the only one who calls him. I need it on my coffee mug. I have these like Nomura coffee mugs with some of my favorite sayings. Human VIVX would have been a good one.

It's a trademark. We'll trade you an odd lots mug for a human VVIX numeral. That's done. That is done. But like, you know, he views himself as having a mandate to disrupt the status quo of 80 years of Pax Americana.

Like, and that's clearly like the approach here, right? So the prior distribution of outcomes is now out here. The quick learning from the market, however, after these initial series of Volsharks, was that, okay, we found a pain point. You know, market sold off to such an extent, the interest rate volatility, particularly in the long end, not just stocks. All right, you know, we've activated the Trump put.

However, upon those compromises, the market rallies back. It increases his, you know, willingness to then lean back in from a negotiating ploy. So he's basically selling the call to fund the put. And when you have that collaring effect, you get the opposite dynamic, right? You get this realized of all compression, which is frankly a large part of what the past two months has. been. So you're constantly reassessing how everybody thinks you're going to think, which is like, you're anticipating the anticipators. Today's show is brought to you by Vanguard. To all the financial advisors listening, let's talk bonds for a minute. Capturing value and fixed income is not

easy. Bond markets are massive, murky, and let's be real. Lots of firms throw a couple flashy funds your way and call it a day. But on Vanguard, at Vanguard, institutional quality isn't a tagline. It's a commitment to your clients. We're talking top grade products across the board of over 80 bond funds, actively managed by a 200-person global squad of sector specialists, analysts, and traders. These folks live and breathe fixed income. So if you're looking to give your clients consistent results year in and year out, go see the record for yourself at vanguard.com slash audio. That's vanguard.com slash audio. All investing is subject to risk vanguard marketing corporation distributor.

On April 4th, 23, around 2 in the morning, a man was found stabbed multiple times on a sidewalk in downtown San Francisco. Hey, who did this to you? What happened next turned the story into a political firestorm. Reports have identified the victim as Bob Lee, the founder of Cash App. From Bloomberg Podcasts, this is Foundering, the Killing of Bob Lee, beginning April 16. What separates good leaders from transformative? informational ones. I'm Jessica Chen, and in season two of Leading By Example, we'll sit down with executives like Grace Chen of Bertie Gray to find out. It's important to understand where you spike,

but also really acknowledge where you don't and find people who can fill those gaps. Listen to Leading by Example, executives making an impact on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts. So Joe asked you for basically color, on the complexion of the market nowadays. And I know you just got back from, weren't you on some sort of crazy epic travel schedule where you flew around the world? Yes.

What are you hearing from clients? Like, what kind of questions are they asking you? People are so consensually macro bear, you know, on that stagflationary outcome. You know, and I think like that's one of the tricks. Like it's, you know, at first it was like, okay, you know, let's expect, you know, these early return. Like, mind you, you know,

Smoot-Hawley terrifies, like 90-year tariff highs, right? We, you know, prior to the Trump 2.0, the effective rate was 2.4%. We're 17.3% right now as it stands, right? So like, you know, how does that not bleed through to this, you know, eventual price shock or margin compression, all this stuff that hits, you know, consumption? And, you know, initially it was, okay, midsummer. I think part of what's happening right now is that, you know, from a corporate perspective, as it relates to the consumer, is that Taco has changed their behavior too. Like why, you know, I'm not going to blow up my top line sales and, you know, rush to, you know, price shock my clients at a time. Yeah. So I think there's been a lot of holding

off too as far as, or willingness to even absorb a little bit of that, the price, you know, increases that are coming through. And, you know, so it's been getting increasingly uncomfortable. All these left tail most acute outcomes have have certainly been mitigated away and compromised away and kind of hand it away. The market starts rallying in your face. You're expecting this very bearish outcome. It's starting to hurt. You've underpriced the right tail.

You get a fiscal deal seemingly close to being done. Even just today, right, late in the day, Section 899, which is this kind of like, you know, completely like. Tracy wrote a bunch about it. Now it's all right. Now it's gone. The revenge tax, right? Is there anything worse than like getting a bunch of work done and then having to

trash it? All I'll say is, it's good for content. Yes. There we go. Yes, it is. You talk a lot about hypotheticals over. the past couple months. For sure. Yeah, you know you're well educated with your scenario. But like in this case, you know, that was another, you know, this revenge tax escalation. Well, all of a sudden now,

you know, cooler heads prevail. That increases the likelihood that the digital tax, you know, stuff with Europe that was an impediment for deals goes, you know, right way. So you've just had like left tails turn right tails and nobody has the exposure on. There's just so much chronic macrobility. Now, perversely, you're seeing it with stocks. People are getting stopped in. You're buying. You're buying the highs. You're having to take up your exposure, having to take up your nets after fighting it, kicking and screaming and grossly under capturing the rally, this is when it sets the table for crash. And that's why as you're forced to get longer, you have to start hedge. You have to start hedge. Do you think right now, I mean, I remember, well, like right now today, would you say there's still

a lot, there's a lot of discretionary money where people feel like they're underway at the market, where they feel like they're still fighting this dynamic? They're chasing it. there still feel like, oh, man, every day the stock market goes up, I don't have the exposure I wish I had right now. Those are the classic buyers are higher. Yeah. And there's, that's still out there. They haven't, they haven't fully capitulated yet. But it's, you know, what you're seeing with the market grinding higher every day. And by the way, through the straddle, like, this is the interesting thing. I always say, like, we can't crash until skew is steep. Skew is a relative measure of kind of downside

demand versus upside demand, you know, put skewed, you know, demand for out of the money. And downside versus at the money downside. Both of those metrics in the past week of it 100 percentile over the past year. The past years have a lot of shit going on, right? So, you know, people are hedged because they are back getting long where things get spicy. And when you're hedged, that means dealers are, you know, short downside. They're going to be short gamma and short Vega into a sell-off. That's accelerant flow. That feeds into the prevailing market momentum. The lower that we go, the more, you know, spot equities you have to sell. The higher the vol goes, the more of all you have to buy. Bad scenario. It's an accelerant flow in this case. The trick now that's starting to happen,

and this is why I feel like we're probably getting closer to, you know, a crescendo, is that now you're getting spot, the market up, vol up, and vol of all going up. And what that's telling me is that, okay, people are actually now being forced to chase into upside, right? And right now part of that's our chart for the newsletter tomorrow. Yeah. Stocks, v. Volva. Spot up. Spot up, vol up. And what that means is that people are being forced to grab into the upside. And that's also feeding this short gamma move to the upside because dealers are short calls now. And this, you know, as we hit 6150, 6200, things like that.

Ultimately, I always like to say when you get spot up vol up in and of itself, it, you know, creates kind of like a meltup, like some sort of kind of, you know, squeasy rally on the way up that collapses under the weight of its own delta. Like collapses under the weight of the mechanical buying on the way up, the mechanical dealer hedging on the way up. because you need to keep fulfilling that need and demand, people are getting longer. You know, you're finally seeing that dynamic. People are getting longer. That creates the potential derisking flow on the way down, especially once you're talking about systematic vol-scaling strategies that as vol goes higher, they have to just sell, you know, unemotionally. But what would be a reasonable catalyst for that to happen? Well, I think the near-term one has been, you know, the fact that, you know, July 8th, the original kind of reciprocal deletional

you know, and you saw a bunch of headlines today saying like that's flexible, morally flexible. You know, I think that... Big surprise. Yeah, no, no. Let's make a deal. I would say that right now that's kind of like the most obvious, you know, one out there that, you know, there's still some element of hardball. My view is that that's somewhat overstated, that that is somewhat overstated because he needs to get one big beautiful bill passed first before that. and then potentially you can play the game.

But the fact that this $899 was removed tells me that they know that getting a deal with Europe is probably a larger impediment to what they're trying to do. And that there still is now this new conditioning in the market where instead of like increasing the rhetoric at the highs, you know, Trump is capitulated back into Trump 1.0, which is like, you know, run hot, right? He's now, and they are best in himself with the headlines out at the end of the day. they're trying to squeeze this thing higher. And financial conditions are easing. The dollar is moving lower.

Long and yield has started rallying, ironically, because the market is sniffing a doveish turn within the Fed, including recent comments from people that I don't think would have anticipated necessarily outside of Waller, who's auditioning for the Fed job. And, you know, why are they beginning to turn like that? Yes, there's a normalization dynamic with regards to where inflation is now.

We think Jerome Powell is already at two dots. are right, you know, for the end of the year. And there's just this modest turn, but they're turning for a reason. They're turning because, you know, quits rates and claims, you know, are starting to get a little wonky. And as I said, the whole American economic miracle goes wrong when the consumer cracks. And the consumer cracks is what, you know, becomes of, you know, the labor market. And that's starting to look, you know, precarious about it. So I think, I don't think it's going to be a tariff headline necessarily. I think it's going to be, you know, good old fashioned data. nasty NFP print, that type of a thing.

Is that an acute risk now? Probably not. Probably, you know, safe to say, you know, within, by August, you know, we could be getting spicy. And I think there's a real delta, not just of like the first cut in September, but, you know, if that happens, you know, it's not just going to be, you know, 25 bibs, right? So everyone needs to keep shopping, I guess. Yeah.

To maintain the rally. Do your duty. So the thing is, though, this is what bothers me is, is, everyone sees some of these dynamics. We talk about the labor market weakness all the time. We talk about the fact that due to the tariffs and other factors, the Fed might be a little bit gun-shy or less inclined to cut than it otherwise would have given the set of economic conditions.

And I think, like, Powell has sort of hinted at it before that there are conditions. Like, we all could see this. And yet, like, and yet people keep buying. Like, it's sort of, there's something intellectually unsatisfying about the entire environment. to me. Well, because like all this seems very true. There all this like the stagflation risk. There is going to be a cost of tariffs. There is this cyclical slowdown. And yet, you know, it goes back to those, you know, kind of counterintuitive observations that we started off with, you know, where you get so fixated on like the left side that, you know, perversely, the corporate spending uncertainty

becomes the biggest source of demand for stocks. Yeah. You know. And especially to the market structure stuff, which is just what I always come back to. Like once those puts start roasting because the worst case scenario doesn't happen and dealers got to start buying back that short delta and then people start squeezing that short delta as the market starts rallying back and start buying short dated calls and dealers get short those calls and we go short gamma the other way. You know, those flows and frankly, you know, a world of, you know, not just this market structure that feeds momentum, right, with leveraged ETFs, you know, the prevalence of options trading, the tail wagging the dog. Yeah. And I don't even know if I can say tail wagging the dog now. I just think it is the dog. I like that.

That's good. You know, options are the dog. Yeah. You know, those type of real and synthetic gamma effects in the market are, you know, very high impact. And I think at the end of the day, a lot of this is just about career preservation. Yeah. And when you've kind of missed badly on a call, people, it feels good. You know, in the macro space, like, you know, I'm super sensitive to this idea.

you know, you feel smart to make a bare call because it's rare. Stocks go higher. Yeah, that's right. You know, when you run a back test, you know, in back testing, I know is like a four-letter word, but when you run a back test, you know, this happens in contingent on this. And you actually get negative four of returns over a series of average, you know, over a real number of sample set. You know, it's an outlier.

The problem is, like, sitting in a negative stance when, again, goes back to that point, people are not really incentivized to see the world burn, you know, that's going to be a tough thing. So you've got to be dynamic and pragmatic, I think, about these things. All right. Well, Charlie, let me just say, thank you for giving us a couple of swear words to bleep out. It really helps keep our producers on their toes. This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway.

You can follow me at Tracy Allaway. And I'm Jill Wisenthall. You can follow me at the stalwart. Follow our producers, Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Armin. Dash O'Bennett at Dashbot and Kel Brooks at Kilbrooks. For more Oddlots content, go to Bloomberg.com slash oddlots, where we have a daily newsletter and all of our episodes. And you can chat about these topics 24-7 in our Discord.

Discord.g.g. slash oddlots. And if you enjoy Oddlots, if you like it when we do these live recordings, then please leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. Thanks for listening. The news doesn't stop on the weekends. Context changes constantly. And now Bloomberg is the place to stay on top of it all. Hi, I'm David Gura.

Join us every Saturday and Sunday for the new Bloomberg this weekend. I'm Christina Rafini. We'll bring you the latest headlines, in-depth analysis, and big interviews. All the stories that hit home on your days off. And I'm Lisa Mateo. Watch and listen to Bloomberg this weekend for thoughtful, enlightening conversations about business, lifestyle, people, and culture. On Saturday mornings, we put the past week's events into context,

examining what happened in the markets and the world. That on Sundays we speak with journalists, columnists, and key political figures to prepare you for the week ahead. Join us as soon as you wake up and bring us with you wherever your weekend plans take you. Watch us on Bloomberg Television. Listen on Bloomberg Radio, stream the show live on the Bloomberg business app, or listen to the podcast. That's Bloomberg this weekend. Saturdays and Sundays starting at 7 a.m. Eastern. Make us part of your weekend routine on Bloomberg television, radio, and wherever you get your podcasts.

What separates good leaders from transformational ones? I'm Jessica Chen, and in season two of Leading By Example, we'll sit down with executives like Grace Chen of Bertie Gray to find out. It's important to understand where you spike, but also really acknowledge where you don't and find people who can fill those gaps. Listen to Leading by Example, executives making an impact on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcast,

or wherever you get your. your podcasts.