Odd Lots - Just How Bad Will the Energy Crisis Be in Europe This Winter?
Episode Date: August 15, 2022As everyone knows, electricity prices in Europe have soared, due to a combination of factors, most prominently Russia's war in Ukraine and the curtailing of natural gas supplies. But how bad is it goi...ng to get this winter? Will Germany have enough energy to power homes and factories? Or will industrial operations have to shut down. On this episode, we speak with two guests: Bloomberg Opinion Columnist Javier Blas as well as Singapore-based hedge fund manager Alex Turnbull. They walk through how to think through both the European and global energy situation as the weather gets cold.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
The news doesn't stop on the weekends.
Context changes constantly.
And now Bloomberg is the place to stay on top of it all.
Hi, I'm David Gurra.
Join us every Saturday and Sunday for the new Bloomberg this weekend.
I'm Christina Rafini.
We'll bring you the latest headlines, in-depth analysis, and big interviews.
All the stories that hit home on your days off.
And I'm Lisa Mateo.
Watch and listen to Bloomberg this weekend for thoughtful, enlightening conversations about business, lifestyle, people, and culture.
On Saturday mornings, we put the past week's,
events into context, examining what happened in the markets and the world.
That on Sundays, we speak with journalists, columnists, and key political figures to prepare
you for the week ahead. Join us as soon as you wake up and bring us with you wherever your
weekend plans take you. Watch us on Bloomberg Television. Listen on Bloomberg Radio, stream the
show live on the Bloomberg business app, or listen to the podcast. That's Bloomberg this weekend.
Saturdays and Sundays starting at 7 a.m. Eastern. Make us part of your weekend routine on Bloomberg
television, radio, and wherever you get your podcasts.
And welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway.
And I'm Joe Wisenthall.
Joe, things look rough in Europe.
Yeah. We've talked about this. We haven't done a Europe-specific episode in a while,
but something we've been talking about lately is the macro forces shortage of energy,
high inflation, but also sort of mediocre underlying growth, tough position right now.
Yeah, you know, my mother is actually visiting the States.
At the moment, she lives in Austria.
So I'm getting a firsthand picture of a lot of the stuff that's going on there in terms of attempts to save energy.
In the middle of a heat wave, I might add.
And she even had to, she had to trade in her car for, she says, for something more efficient and reasonable in the current climate.
So she gave up this very, like, gas-guzzling convertible in order to get some efficient, like, sedan.
Well, that's the goal, right? Everything becomes a little bit more efficient, conservation, ease of the pain. Will she come on the podcast?
I don't think so. Okay, but, you know, there's a lot going on in Europe with energy at the moment. And it's pretty clear now. You know, we touched on this a little bit earlier in the year, the potential for an energy crisis in Europe. And it now looks like Europe is firmly in one. So, for instance, if you look up the benchmark gas,
futures in Europe Dutch TTF contracts. I think they're still hovering around like 200 euros,
which is pretty close to a record high. We know that before Russia invaded Ukraine,
it was responsible for something like 40% of Europe's energy imports. That has obviously
dropped quite a bit as Russia sort of cuts off gas supplies. But the big question is,
what can Europe do to offset this and exactly how bad could things get this winter?
Yes, this is the key question.
How bad will there be a big shortage?
You know, in the summer, you can sort of, you know, not run the air conditioning as hard.
Or maybe, you know, a lot of places don't even have air conditioning, etc.
Open windows is what my mother keeps telling me.
It's worth noting, by the way, that Dutch natural gas features contract that you quoted is around 200 euros is, you know,
2019 was 11. So I just think it's really, you know, for some context, just an absolutely insane jump. And the gas shortage or the gas crisis is part of it, but also a lot of attention paid lately to the state of the French nuclear industry, disrepair, lots of shutdowns, reactors not operating. So there is a confluence of factors really putting the squeeze on Europe right now. Yeah. And again, like, it is just crazy to think how far we've come, both in terms of prices, which you point.
out. But just in terms of the actions to try to contain this crisis, because I remember when Pierre
Anderand came on the show, you know, in the spring and he was talking about, oh, Europe might have to
ration energy. And that seems so extreme at the time. And, you know, fast forward a few months.
And that is exactly what is happening. There's a scramble not only to save energy, but also a
scramble to store as much gas as possible. So I am very, very pleased to say that we are going to be
speaking with two people on this topic today. We're going to have a real discussion around the issue,
get some varying viewpoints. We're going to be speaking with Javier Blass. He is, of course,
a columnist over at Bloomberg Opinion and an expert on all things energy. And we are also going to
be speaking with Alex Turnbull, who we've had on the podcast before. He's a fund manager based in
Singapore and also a researcher in global energy. So thank you both for coming on the show.
Thank you for having me. Thank you very much. So Havi, why don't we start with you? Let's just do the
basic question. How bad do you think things are going to get in Europe this winter?
Well, it's going to get bad and allow me to give you a personal example and also show you how bad
I am at investments. I just recently closed the purchase of a house in London. In West London,
I resisted for many years. I was very happy with my flat, but I wanted a garden as every middle
class British person likes. And, you know, I did that probably at the very peak of the market.
So that's how bad I am. So I was just recently, I'm just doing my moving and I was thinking,
how bad it will be if I could not carry my gas and electricity contract that I have
and is fixed for a number of months still ahead,
and I have to start from scratch, just get a new electricity and gas contract on the new property.
I'm currently paying about 135 pounds per month for electricity and gas in my current flat.
If I have to get a new contract, because prices have gone so much up,
and because every utility in the UK is already factoring the big price increase that we are going to get from October,
my bill will go monthly from £135 to £475 per month.
That is how bad it's going to get.
Now, just in mind working-class families getting electricity and gas bill
unless the government makes an intervention of anything north of 400, 400,
50 pounds, which is more than $500 per month, just for electricity and gas. Put aside gasoline prices.
That's how bad is going to get in terms of the impact of the cost of living crisis. And that is
across Europe. What is happening in the UK is very similar in Germany, where utilities are
already warning consumers that the utility monthly charge is going to double at the very least
starting on the 1st of October.
So, Alex, I want to bring you in, you know, as Javier mentioned, his energy bill is going to
soar, and of course we're going to see that across Europe if people haven't already had that
re-rating kick in already.
But it's one thing for prices to surge.
It's another thing for, say, people do not have power, maybe people do not have heat,
or probably more likely industry in some countries has to shut down because it's uneconomical.
What do you see as this sort of,
is there risk of something beyond it's just more expensive and something more sort of fundamental
hit and shortages this coming winter? I think in the short term, it's very hard to do a lot of
substitution, which is why we saw not a lot of change in industrial gas demand in Europe around
last winter. There was a sense in which everyone was kind of frozen in place. But you're already
starting to see quite substantial substitution for industrial demand.
The problem is, is that as a consumer, as Javier points out, there's not a lot you can really do in the short term.
But here's where my story of buying a house comes in.
I bought a house briefly before COVID in Australia.
And I was planning on putting solar panels on it, but then I kind of got locked out of the country for two years because of Australia's COVID controls.
And my tenant, who was not happy with the change in power prices, where basically said, like, do you want to put solar on it?
And I said, yeah, actually, I'd love to do that.
And so that's already nuked about 70% of their power demand and their power bill.
So in places like Australia where you are similarly impacted by issues of gas and coal price
has been the marginal pricing source of demand, and certainly New South Wales, you can take remedial action.
And I think you're going to see a lot more of that over time.
But that does take time and that demand destruction, not in a bad way in a sense that people
of work out ways to consume less while preserving their lifestyles.
That is a multi-year process.
And so in the short run, people can't really cut their consumption much.
But over time, that does tend to happen.
You know, I think the real lesson is to be like Tracy.
And when you buy a house, discover that you actually have a mountain of coal in your basement,
which is something Tracy revealed to us on a recent episode.
That's like the ultimate hedge is to buy a house that comes with a house.
Cole. Don't worry, guys. I too bought at the top of the market. So yes, I have some commodity
exposure to offset that purchase. But, uh, yeah. Alex, I mean, I mentioned the, the benchmark gas
contract in Europe earlier hovering around like 200 euros. And Joe pointed out that that's up
from 19, you know, just a little while ago. But it has come down a little bit. Like,
there does seem to be some moderation recently. What's driving that? Is that a sign that may
Maybe we're turning round the corner as some of these energy savings kick in or as Europe
starts to reach its 80% gas storage target.
I'm load to make any definitive comments here.
On the one hand, I'll point out that if you talk to your friendly prime broker about wanting
to trade something which realizes about 400% volatility on a good day, you may find that
actual risk-taking capacity in these markets is heavily constrained and the information
in prices is not quite what it once was.
So there's that.
The other thing I would point out is that that can be both to the upside or to the downside.
So we saw similar dynamics in cooking coal for much of this year when people were concerned
about Russian supply getting taken out of the market, but then China opened the border
to the Mongolia.
So you took 17 million tons out from Russia, but then actually China just bought it all, more
or less. And then you also had Mongolia into the market for 36 million tons run rate currently.
So as a result, Coke and coal went from, say, $250 to $600 briefly and is now back to $200.
So I don't think we're going to get a kind of supply day SX machina in gas or high-caloric value
coal to fix Europe's problem that quickly.
Median women are looking for more. More out of themselves, their businesses, their elected leaders,
and the world are out of them.
And that's why we're thrilled to introduce the Honest Talk podcast.
I'm Jennifer Stewart.
And I'm Catherine Clark.
And in this podcast, we interview Canada's most inspiring women.
Entrepreneurs, artists, athletes, politicians, and newsmakers, all at different stages of their journey.
So if you're looking to connect, then we hope you'll join us.
Listen to the Honest Talk podcast on IHeartRadio or wherever you listen to your podcasts.
I'm Francine Lacqua, an award-winning journalist.
And I've got a new podcast, leaders with Francine Laquois.
from Bloomberg podcasts.
I've interviewed everyone from heads of state to fashion icons about the news of the moment.
But I've always been curious who are these people as leaders.
I don't think there's one right way to be a leader.
Make decisions.
A poor decision is always better than no decision.
Listen to new episodes every other Monday.
Follow leaders with Francine Lacois wherever you get your podcasts.
Javier, can you sort of give us the broader picture of how you wait?
the different factors driving up European prices right now. Because obviously everyone is, you know,
quite aware of the stress and the tensions between Europe and Russia over the war and the declining
exports. But then, of course, you know, there's also, and this has gotten more attention in the
last couple of weeks, the French nuclear industry is operating at diminished capacity.
France is currently an electricity importer as opposed to an exporter. Like, you know, there's
multiple factors and how would you attribute them? So, Joe, you are right. There are multiple
factors that they are driving here the market. On gas, the most important one certainly is
Russia restricting supplies to Europe. You take Germany as an example. Supplies are down 80%
from where they were normally and that is a completely political decision by Vladimir Putin
to put pressure on Europe and drop the support on Ukraine. Then in electricity,
the situation in France is certainly the main driver. About 50% of the nuclear reactors on France
are not working at the moment. Most of them are on maintenance, revised, just checking for cracks
on some welding, and that has really forced France to import and usually large quantities of
electricity from every neighboring country, which is putting pressure on gas because that
means that we are consuming more gas for power generation. Looking forward, well, a lot of the
situation in Europe is going to depend, I think, on three factors. Number one is what Vladimir
Putin does in the next few weeks and months, whether he shuts down completely supplies or not.
Number two is the weather. How cold is going to be the winter in Europe or how warm. If we get
a mild winter like last year, Europe may be able to weather the problem without,
much of an additional problem.
If it's really cold in Europe, then there is trouble in Europe.
If it's called in Japan, there is also trouble in Europe
because it means that Europe is going to have to compete with Japan for LNG supplies.
And the other big question, and Alex was talking about this earlier,
is how much consumers from myself to the big companies are going to be able to save this winter.
We are beginning to see signs that demand in the industry is coming down.
that's in part due to high gas prices.
We are beginning to see some substitution,
some companies trying to run on fuel oil or diesel,
some of their operations.
And I think that consumers are going to save quite a lot of gas,
in part because, to be frank,
I don't want to be hit by a £475 a month bill
for my electricity and gas.
So, yeah, I'm going to put my thermostate a bit lower.
And how those factors are going to interact over the next three months
is going to be the key.
But the big problem for policymakers and for traders is that you cannot really model properly two of those factors.
I mean, you could make assumptions on savings, how much demand substitution is going to be.
You could really try to attempt to answer that question.
But you cannot really answer the question of what Vladimir Putin is going to do and how cold is going to be the weather four months from now.
And that is why it's so difficult and so volatile the market right now.
And as Alex said, add to that that there is very little liquidity.
So the information on the price is rather imperfect at the moment.
That's really interesting.
So I take the point that it's difficult to predict what Putin is going to do,
and it's probably difficult to predict exactly what the weather is going to be this winter.
But could you make an assumption about how, or could you try to model how well-prepared
Europe is for the possibility, for instance, that Russia just cuts off all the
gas? Because I think at the moment, like, the flows through Nord Stream, something like
1 to 20% of normal capacity, what if they just go away? How prepared would Europe be for
that scenario? If the flows of Nord Stream were to stop, let's say, tomorrow, you know,
we are not nearly there. We will not have enough gas in the storage to make it through
the whole winter without having to save significant amount of gas. That means demand destruction
in the industry.
If we can build inventories to the 80% target or 90% target that Germany has put itself,
which is a higher target, by October, November,
and then putting shuts down completely gas supplies.
We will make it through the winter, barely, but we will make it through the winter.
But that's going to still require very high prices,
because you need to make sure that some industries are not consuming gas.
if you have a combination of putting cat supplies, say, September, October, and we have a cold winter,
well, that really requires some significant savings on energy, and that will require the German government
effectively taking control of the energy sector and saying you can consume, you cannot consume,
because we need to make sure that every home has enough gas for heating.
The priority will be the homes, and everything else will be secondary to that.
But all of those scenarios also create a problem.
Even if we make it through the winter without massive troubles just with having to, I mean, an economic recession is a given.
But without additional pain beyond that, we are in a very precarious situation for the following summer and the following winter.
So this becomes a bit of a multi-year problem.
So even if you make it through the winter in 2022, 2023,
Then you emerge in March of 2023 in a very low situation of inventories
and probably with not enough time to rebuild inventories for 2020,
2023, 24 in any meaningful way.
So then you have another year of problem, another year of high prices.
Look, it's not, how to put it, I mean, it's not really good.
It looks very challenging.
Best case scenario, we make it through the winter without significant trouble.
having to reduce demand in the industry and paying very high prices similar to now.
That, I think, is best case scenario.
Worst case scenario is we have to raise on gas significantly and pay even higher prices than today.
Alex, what is your assessment of the inventory situation right now?
And then, you know, if this is like, you know, we're not just talking winter 2022 and 2023,
like, is there more capacity to import gas besides.
Nordstream, like through terminals, or is that just completely maxed out, basically?
I guess on inventories currently, depending on how you configure your model, we're in the
70s now in terms of storage, there's still two months of pretty aggressive storage builds
ahead of us. So we will be, by my estimates, you know, in the mid-80s by the time it peaks,
which is generally a very good place to be in terms of storage levels.
And if you look at, you break down the nodal consumption, the way they present the data in Europe,
and industrial demands already down 20% in a lot of places.
And some of that's were easier saving, some of that's BASF, moving more of the ammonium production to the states.
But industry is already very much doing its bit.
If you assume households do very modest levels of demand constraint, I don't think the winter is going to be that stressful.
However, every marginal gigajoule that comes into Europe, or gigawatt hour or however you want to measure gas, gas, has to come out of the LNG market.
And that is very tight.
And the reason that's tight is because it had to grow to accommodate Europe very quickly when it's normally had quite moderate sort of
mid to high single digit growth at best.
It's had to grow almost 20% this year, and that's not easy to do.
And the reason that's tight is that you cannot get a lot of incremental gas into the market
without more LNG landing capacity in Europe, which is coming in, but also more export capacity
from the US.
So over time, I agree, it's a multi-year process.
But that spread between US gas prices, Henry Hub, and what that translates to and to TTF,
will converge towards Henry Hub plus a spread over times U.S. gas becomes essentially linked to global
LNG prices. Historically, it was linked, but it sort of broke because we suddenly hit a
constraint in terms of export capacity and demand in Europe. Just real quickly, to what degree,
Alex, is this, you know, aggressive demand for LNG in Europe? How is it spilling over to other
LNG importers and I'm thinking, you know, the natural gas dependent Asian countries.
Like, what is this sort of like global knock on effect?
It was quite funny as an Australian because it very quickly blew up Asian LNG prices where
cargoes had to be rerouted or China due to lockdowns consume less gas.
So resold cargoes and spot markets novated them to Europe.
But then in Australia, people thought they were sort of immune.
and then by April May, Australian power prices started moving very aggressively up
because the European grid will first burn gas if it can, will consume it.
If it can't get that, it has to burn coal.
And the coal it burns is 6,000 kilocal coal, which is exactly what is produced in the Hunter
Valley of Australia, where most of Australia's eastern grid's power plants are.
So everyone has got swept up in this to one shape or form.
another. I want to bring Javier in on the same topic, really. I mean, it has been a pretty
rapid adjustment the way the LNG market has done this. And, you know, it used to be a fairly
fragmented market and now it's increasingly globalized because of all these pressures and some
other factors. How do you see that shaking out, Javier? And how does it sort of change the dynamics
of the energy industry as a whole? Well, clearly, the ability of Europe to tap the LNG market
has really saved the day for Europe.
This has happened only 10, 15 years ago
where the global LNG market was not nearly as developed as is today,
and the ability of cargoes was much lower,
particularly on the spot market
with the ability to reroute cargos.
Europe will have had a big problem,
and the dependency on Russia was much, much higher.
So the LNG market is offering a relief ball to Europe in so many ways.
I mean, one of the things that we are seeing
that to me is very interesting,
is Europe at the moment is outbidding everyone else on the market. Taking the LNG, that's one of the
reasons we have these very high prices in the market. I mean, on fundamentals, as Alex was pointing out,
we should not probably have 200 euros per megawatt hour of gas because the inventories are building
in the right direction and we should have enough gas if Putin was to keep the flows. But obviously,
we need to continue outbidding the whole market for LNG supplies and for that,
we need to sustain very high prices in Europe for that to happen. What's happening there is that a number
of countries that were starting to rely on the global LNG market for supplies, middle income and
poor countries. I'm thinking the likes of Pakistan or Bangladesh or even India are now being,
they are seeing now that European nations and European utilities can pay much higher prices,
so they are not getting the cargoes that they were expecting. Some of the cargoes that this will be
going into Asia at the moment are rerouted into Europe. And we are seeing power supply problems
in the likes of Bangladesh or Pakistan, which are affecting the textile industry. So in a way,
it may be a case where Europe avoids the blackhouse that many of us we have been talking
and fearing, but only because the black house moved somewhere else, somewhere else that
cannot really pay the price that Europe is paying for the LNG, and then the blackhouse are
happening in Pakistan or Bangladesh. But the blackhouse are actually happening. It's just
differently. And that global LNG market is allowing that arbitrage to happen, that without
it, well, it will not be happening and the black house will be happening in Europe because we will
not be able to get enough gas. Real quickly, is there any prospect in the sort of near future for there
to be a single natural gas price? I mean, there's not a single,
oil price, but it's close. You know, Brent and WTI and the other benchmarks, they tend to not be
that far off. Whereas with natural gas, you know, the gap between Henry Hub and the Dutch number
are sort of wildly different and it's different all around the world because the transmission
infrastructure is so fragmented. But if this market keeps getting built out and export and import
terminals and so on, is there a point in the future where there's more or less a global natural
gas price? No, I think that we are still far away from that. I think that we are getting a lot more
integration and you see now that something happened in the U.S. and that's moving the rest of
the markets or vice versa, something happens in Europe and moves the global gas market. But we are
going to still have a lot of spreads and you're not going to have Henry Hap trading at TTF level.
I think that that's far, far away from today.
Alex, I want to go back to something that you said earlier, which is that the informational value
embedded in commodities prices might be less than it was.
was because of the volatility in the market and the uncertainty over the outlook.
Can you give us a little bit more color on this aspect of it and what it's actually like
trading energy at the moment?
Well, I think it's with any value at risk model, the more volatile a thing is in general
and the more thinly traded, so the less volume going through the exchange or however you measure
that liquidity, the more you will be charged.
to trade that both by exchange margin and whoever you're trading through in my case.
Or if you're a bank, you trade directly the exchange, but your internal cost of capital for that stuff
goes up pretty quickly.
So, yeah, if something realizes more volatility than extremely marginal crypto tokens,
then you cannot get leverage on it, which means your ability to bet on spread trades
between maybe I think the price is a bit crazy today, but it's the back end price is a,
you know, good value. That just becomes very expensive to put on. And when you model out the
returns, the amount of capital you get tied up and those transactions gets to be wholly unappealing.
As a result, people just pull back from the market. And so if you're a physical trader,
it generally means that the spot market becomes very wide and disorderly, which is amazing,
if you're at Glencore or Trafigura or the like. But for people trying to like,
lock in like industrials or big energy users trying to lock in longer term prices, it becomes
more or less unworkable.
Both of you can come in on this question.
If the price of energy or the price of a given contract, as you say, loses some of its informational value, or it's less liquid or sort of, you know, harder to arbitrage,
what are the consequences of that?
Is it that it makes planning harder?
Is it that, you know, thinking about what you need to do for the winter?
like what are the negative effects of prices losing their informational value?
Yeah, I think it's very hard for people to plan.
I think it's also modeling, people will assume a price on a screen has inherent meaning.
And whereas you've often going to start to take a view as to how, for example,
growth in LNG export capacity from the US and demand destruction in Europe and landing capacity in Germany
will lead to some sort of convergence to some arbitrage condition or close to that arbitrage
condition because right now it's it's it's pretty wild. So I think that yeah, you really have to
have a good view on value to be able to take risk. The other thing you're seeing, of course,
is that if you want to build a solar farm in Europe and get a PPA at what used to be an obscene
price, people will just about take your hand off because it's at least firm. It's a it's a firm source of
and it's going to be a lot cheaper than spot.
So those guys are doing okay right now.
Yeah, I think that, I mean, to Alex's points,
I think that just planning,
it's becoming very, very complicated for companies.
And also the liquidity, particularly in the forward market,
is so thin that anyone that wants to hedge any risk
is facing a very difficult time.
With additional problem that you are hedging any risk,
and particularly you are a power producer and that you want to sell forward.
I mean, this is the moment where you will think, well, you know, prices are a record high.
You are a power producer, sell forward, lock in revenue, a great market.
But obviously, if the market moves against you and it goes even higher, then you are going to be facing huge margin calls.
And those margin calls could just potentially blow a company completely out of the water and run out of credit.
Not because it made a wrong call, actually, it was hedging at risk, selling, selling.
forward the electricity looking fantastic prices, but then marking calls hit you. You don't have
the credit to pay them. And you could go belly up just because of that. So it is a very difficult
market. And I think that for the market right now, in terms of offering a product for laying
off risk, it's just not having the value that they used to have. So we have seen a number of efforts to
obviously mitigate some of the impact of higher energy prices. What do you think is most helpful
or most effective at the moment, Javier? And actually, why don't I ask you also, what do you think
is the least effective? Just because I want to hear Javier rant about things. I think that the most
effective thing that you are going to need to do right now is, I mean, we really are going to have
to support the poorest families through the winter.
It's just going to be catastrophic.
I cannot really think what it's going to be for, you know,
poor working class families in Europe when they start facing a bill that is 400, 500 euros or dollars.
And that is most likely all the discretionary spending monthly.
It's just going to pay electricity and gas.
They may have kids.
They may have elderly people that they need just to keep warm at home.
I mean, you know, you don't need the lights to go off.
to face a problem where people cannot really hit themselves and access electricity.
If it's just too expensive, then you could have the same problem.
So assisting that class of people, it's going to be an absolutely priority.
And I don't see nearly enough in Europe done about that.
Providing blanket support to everyone, no matter what the wealth is, no matter what the salary is,
it's the wrong answer to it. It's just supporting demand in a moment that you need to be restraining demand.
So I think that targeted support is critical, providing blanket support as many governments,
particularly the UK has been providing where everyone is basically getting a rebate and a money
from the government is the wrong way to do. And then we are going to get, we're going to need in
Europe to get a lot more serious about trying to be clear to people of what's coming. I mean,
The Bank of England press conference when they increased interest rates was it was hard to listen to because the governor said we're going to have even higher inflation and we're going to have a one-year long recession.
But at least you could criticize whether he was too slow raising interest rates.
But it's the first time that I see a policymaker, a central bank governor, a finance minister, just telling the public what is coming.
and warning in very clear terms what's coming.
I think that it's time that prime ministers and finance ministers start to be clear to the
population about what's coming and start to preparing the population for it and then
offer some solutions.
But at the moment in Europe, there is not even an acknowledgment of what's coming and how bad
is coming.
So I'm thinking still about, you know, the sort of the tale of the two homes and Tracy's.
with the big pile of coal underneath, and then Alex's house where there's solar panels on the roof.
And it feels like these are like the fork of the road, the two different directions.
I've gone the non-ESG route.
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
So it's like, is this a moment where the world sort of backtracks on some of these ESG goals
and start maybe reopening new coal mines, which maybe a few years ago seemed unthinkable?
or is this really catalyze an acceleration of different renewable energy sources?
And it seems like maybe it's both one of the other.
But Alex, I'm curious, like really both of you, though,
what do you see as the sort of like first and second order effects of this
in terms of where energy investment goes from here?
Well, firstly, if you look at what's in the IRA bill,
there's a lot of clues there, and particularly things that,
that Joe Manchin was very keen on,
the US is going to export a lot more LNG.
There will be more pipeline takeaway capacity
to places like West Virginia.
That is absolutely not an accident,
at least from Joe's point of view.
But I think similarly,
you're starting to see in places in Europe
where Italy basically allows you to write down
the entire cost of getting a heat pump,
that sort of demand destruction
and pretty muscular approaches to that
are going to be more common.
Europe's quite perverse, and particularly the Netherlands until recently, whereby you get sort of protected by the government on gas prices, but you have full pass through of power prices, which are effectively gas prices.
So you're discouraging people from switching their heating to electrification through the structure of your electricity and gas tariffs.
And I think there's a lot of cleanup to be done there.
But in coal, for example, I think, I don't think that's going to happen.
The only grade of coal that is going bananas right now is the one that you can burn
in European coal plants, which have been reopened.
Or the other grades like Indonesian lower calerific grades, 3,800, 4,500 type stuff,
that's already started selling off pretty heavily because China's just importing less coal and
producing more of its own.
So I think the China impact is going one direction.
and the Europe gas shortage and then substitution dynamics going to another.
I think realistically, talking to people in the coal industry, they expect to have a really
good time for two years and then be back to maybe not very good times.
Opening new mines would seem to be a poor financial decision.
But no doubt someone will try it.
Yeah, I kind of agree with Alex.
I think that we are not going to see international coal mining just having a boom.
But we are going to see more coal mining in China and in India.
And the expectation is for this year global cold demand to hit to match the 2013 peak.
And in 2023, on an annual basis, we will set probably a new all-time high.
I think that the biggest consequence of the current crisis is going to be a sharper focus on energy security.
That was, I want to say abandoned, but energy security took a backseat to climate change over the last.
five years or so, I think that you are going to have now energy security at the same level
as climate change in terms of concerns by policy makers. And that most likely is going to
mean a slowdown in some of the climate change initiatives. You are going to have, you are going to
keep a lot more of coal, fire generation on a standby, at least. You're not going to shut down
the plants and dismantle them for good. You will keep them on standby.
I think that it's going to be a reconsideration of nuclear in many countries.
I mean, we are beginning to see even the Germans, despite everything,
they are beginning to warm up to the idea that maybe keeping the plants a bit longer
was not such a bad idea.
But I do think that we are going to see also many individuals were possible
to try to install solar panels on their houses.
So I think that we are going to see on the next few years,
a boom on solar installation on on on individual houses that's going to depend a bit on prices i mean
the price of solar panels is starting to to to go up i'm speaking from from own experience about
this house because that will be my first investment on the house just put the solar panels i do
have solar panels for the hot water so i i think that the shower is guarantee over the winter it
may not be very warm but it's going to be at least there but i i i would have
would not be surprised if in many European countries we see many houses we don't have a solar
panel today that they will have a solar panel by 2025 because I think that people have learned
the lesson and say, well, if I can generate myself a bit of electricity, that is going to be very
important. The other thing that I for the first time beginning to see a lot of attention is
modeling electricity demand for the next few years. Electricity demand in many OECD countries have
been relatively flat, despite economic growth over the last few years, but we are going to put
quite a lot of more electricity consumption into the grids coming from electric vehicles, coming from
heat pumps. And that means that previous assumptions that electricity demand was not going to
increase need to be revised. And I see a lot of people now beginning to spend quite a lot of time
of modelling electricity consumption in Europe and in the US for the next five or 10 years. And the
message is coming is that the demand is going to go up and going up in some cases quite meaningfully.
Canadian women are looking for more. More out of themselves, their businesses, their elected
leaders, and the world are out of them. And that's why we're thrilled to introduce the Honest Talk
podcast. I'm Jennifer Stewart. And I'm Catherine Clark. And in this podcast, we interview Canada's
most inspiring women. Entrepreneurs, artists, athletes, politicians, and newsmakers,
all at different stages of their journey. So if you're looking to connect,
And we hope you'll join us.
Listen to the Honest Talk podcast on I Heart Radio or wherever you listen to your podcasts.
You can get the news whenever you want it with Bloomberg News Now.
I'm Amy Morris.
And I'm Karen Moscow here to tell you about our new on-demand news report delivered right to your podcast feed.
Bloomberg News Now is a short five-minute audio report on the day's top stories.
Episodes are published throughout the day with the latest information and data to keep you informed.
Yes, there are other products like...
this from a variety of news organizations. But they usually rerun their radio newscasts throughout the
day. That's not what we do. We create customized episodes that can only be heard on Bloomberg News Now.
And we don't wait an hour to publish breaking news. When news breaks, we'll have an episode up in your
podcast feed within minutes. So you're always getting the latest stories and developments.
Get the reporting and the context from Bloomberg's 3,000 journalists and analysts. We're all over the
world. Listen to the latest from Bloomberg News Now on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere you listen.
Alex, talk to us a little bit more about what China is doing here. I mean, both in terms of
energy transition, such as it is in China, but also in terms of securing additional gas supplies,
because one of the interesting things we've seen this summer is that while it seems like the
rest of the world is really scrambling to get as much LNG as possible, before.
for the winter, China has mostly stayed out of that market and doesn't really seem to be
ramping up imports or not trying to secure additional supply. What's going on there? And if they
come back into the market, you know, at the last minute, is that going to drive up prices?
Yeah, it may well do if they do that. Though if you look at the data for China's pipeline imports
from Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Russia, they are more or less running those pipelines
flat out at this point in time.
So they have massively increased their purchases from Russia, Kazakhstan.
The data is getting a little bit, well, accuracy is more contested than it was a couple of
months ago.
But they appear to be buying a lot more, and that's relatively uncontested.
There's also longer term, and this is a big question for the LNG market, is that they're
talking about doing a very large pipeline power of Siberia 2, which would then lead to a question
of, well, how much more LNG is China really going to import? Because a lot of the power that China,
a lot of the LNG that China is imported historically is very seasonal. It's often geared towards
heating in northern China in the winter. And recent promulgations from, you know, the relevant
organs have indicated they want to go very hard on heat pumps.
Also for actual load balancing and their power grid, they now want to do, I think it's 250 gigawatts of pumped hydro so that they can better utilize their coal resources.
So China's making a push much like everywhere else for essentially fendenshoring their energy supply to people in the greater Eurasian landmass, as well as also just trying to reduce their reliance on gas full stop because they are price sensitive like everyone else.
And if they have a lot of high quality coal, they can burn instead.
instead and LNG costs 40 bucks or more per gigajoual equivalent, then they absolutely don't have
time for that. Javier, I just want to go back to something you were talking about before and this
idea of energy security maybe becoming on the same level as a priority of climate. But just in
general, or sort of Europe specifically and then more broadly, like, what do people think about
ESG these days, do you see some of the resolve weakening on, you know, some of these efforts that were
very popular in the 2010s to, you know, reduce emissions? Do you see a sort of like actual backlash
coming to this? And maybe like people questioning is like, was going, you know, was trying to
discourage investment really a useful exercise given where we are with, you know, cold demand today.
Like, what do you see as the sort of near-term future of ESG?
either at a sort of like corporate level or just a sort of a policy level.
Well, to me it was very interesting when earlier this month in August,
we have the Glencore first half results.
And they have the conference call.
And obviously Glencore is the world's largest commodity trader.
It's a big miner of coal.
It's the largest exporter or thermal call in the seabor market.
And typically you will expect some investors or sell side analysts,
just giving the company a bit of a hard time,
why you are still investing in call,
why you are not the spinning of the business,
where you're not selling it.
Sell it to the Chinese.
It was a typical question.
And in this conference call,
actually a sell-side analyst
from a big major American bank
as the CEO of Glencore,
he said something like,
you know, the wall is short of energy.
What is going to take you
to start investing?
in coal mines to help the wall in the short term with supply.
And to me, that was the kind of a ha moment.
I mean, like when a sell side analyst is kind of saying,
actually the question here to us is why these guys are not investing more on
call.
That's how a backseat, I think, ESG is taking right now.
I mean, BlackRock put it quite well earlier this year when it was just describing
his views about some of the shareholder resolutions on climate.
climate change. And they said that those resolutions, they needed to take into account the
current geopolitical context, the energy market pressures, and the implication of both into inflation.
I think for the time being, ESG has gone, at least on energy and commodities, has come from
really the must-half item, the hottest selling item to a bit of the model. I asked recently
a big European institutional investor about ESG.
And he was saying to me, that is very yesterday.
It's not really what I'm focusing right now.
Is it going to go away?
No, I don't think it's going to go away.
This is a cyclical business, high prices, give way to low prices.
And I think that at that point, ESG is going to be back.
But for the time being, I think that you are going to have a lot of investors just paying
lip service to ESG and climate change.
and at the same time, ask Glencore, are you going to put more money into the call business or not?
Can I just say something on the ESG thing?
Yeah, of course.
Yes, sir.
I think there is a real problem with the interactions between both investors and the companies
in that people do not make big, good equilibrium models of what demand should be for these fuels over time.
And so when the war happened, obviously there was some quantum of gas and coal taken out of the market.
And then there was sort of a record scratch.
And ESG investors could not change their tune or answer, well, how does this change things?
You know, how do we get the fuel supply?
Should we think about the geopolitical risk weighting of our fuel supply?
There was absolutely no response to that.
But unfortunately, and this has been no critical.
it to people in the energy sector is they have not developed a coherent response aside from,
hooray, let's drill some holes now.
And so I suspect we're going to probably get overinvestment and then the energy sector will
probably look silly again in due course, especially the most marginal fuels, namely thermal
coal.
And so I think there needs to be a lot more of an effort to model the world well so that we can
pick up things, you know, like we did in our paper, that.
China was probably just going to step away from cooking coal maybe forever.
And that stuff's important, but it's hard graft modeling, and it is not done enough today.
Anyway.
Alex and Javier, we want to give you guys the opportunity to ask each other a question.
So maybe we start with Alex.
Is there anything that you want to ask, Havier?
I mean, when you talk to all the trading houses, I mean, what is the general sentiment of the guys who are in physical trading that you talk to?
I talked to a lot of the folks in Singapore, but it's clearly, it just seems like complete disorder in European power right now.
I think that everyone is trying to balance the risk of supply and the recession that is coming in Europe.
I see still most traders quite bullies thermal coal and LNG supplies and gas in Europe.
with oil they have a bit of a less clear outcome because there are so many there are so many moving pieces
and each of those moving pieces is a million to two million barrels a day apiece I mean is it
going to be a deal with iran nuclear deal is it is the sanctions in the european sanctions on russia
are really going to hit hard or not you know is china going to rebound from from covid or it's
going to remain doing with a zero COVID policy. So they are a bit confused, but one thing that
a lot of people seem to think is that we are not yet over on oil with diesel in particular.
And I hear a lot of concerns about the diesel situation coming later this year in Europe.
That is one that perhaps we are not on the season. So it's kind of drop a bit out of the radar
from a lot of people. But there is a lot of concerns on physical trading houses where Europe is
going to have enough diesel this winter.
Just real quickly, what is the issue there? Why diesel specifically and why the seasonal
element of it? Well, obviously, we need more diesel because diesel is also heating oil
for winter and we still use, particularly in Germany, a lot of heating oil for the winter.
And also because we are beginning to get a sense that if there is a problem of gas supply
or companies see these gas, high gas prices remaining,
a lot of the incentive is to try to run on diesel or heating oil through the winter
because economically makes sense.
And we have seen even huge multinational, like BSAF,
the big German chemical company talking about using fuel oil or diesel as an alternative to gas.
Sorry, and a lot of previously, a lot of the diesel was coming from,
from Russia. So from February, in theory, Europe is not going to be importing any diesel from Russia.
And that's when, you know, we have been talking about sanctions, but all the announcements on sanctions
were for tomorrow. But that tomorrow is getting closer and closer by the day. By December,
Europe cannot buy Russia and crude anymore. We are still buying it. And by February, we cannot buy
refined products. And when you take that amount of supply from the market, then it gets complicated.
So, Alex, my question to you, you are based in Singapore.
You have a very, very good view about Asia.
How do you see the response with I'm very, very curious?
Because we sometimes forget about Japan, you know, particularly from the point of view of Europe.
But, you know, it is still the four largest oil consumer.
It's a huge importer of LNG and has a huge nuclear industry.
I mean, to me, it's one of the most important energy countries,
even if the demand there is no lower rowing, but it's still a huge consumer.
What do you think the Japanese government in particular?
And that kind of intersection between the Japanese government of the Ministry of METI
and the Japanese trading companies, so-socha, and what are they thinking,
how they are responding to this crisis that has put the wall of energy upside down?
When I speak to people there and some people at Meta,
they are engaging in as broad and, I would say, as deep a rethink of some of these issues,
both for the energy shock reasons, but also for security reasons due to recent developments,
as much as anything since the 1970s, I'd say.
There is all sorts of things that were considered quite futuristic.
For example, like using ammonia made from renewables in Australia, you can
blend about 20% of it into the fuel of a coal-fired power plant without substantial retrofits.
That's all being pulled forward, I would say, five years.
So they are considering that sort of stuff.
They're also considering, and they have been doing a lot more in renewables as well,
both in terms of looking at agrivoltaics.
So due to heat stress from the recent really a brutal weather they've had,
people looking at basically putting solar in the middle of fields to reduce heat stress on plants
because you don't actually lose much of anything in yield.
So there's a lot of stuff which is a little bit, maybe not science fiction,
but further down the, I guess, critical path that has now been pulled forward,
as well as, of course, trying to get nuclear plants restarted.
But I think there's also recognition that we are unlikely to, unless Saudi Arabia were to,
evaporate or Australia, you know, levitated off into the outer galaxy or something like that.
You're unlikely to generate as big a shock for them in terms of energy ever again.
Real quickly, and we're just about to wrap it up, but Alex, since you mentioned heat stress,
this seems to be a thing that bubbles up everywhere.
And, you know, we have part of the story with the French nuclear is that they had to pare back
because the rivers were so hot that they couldn't dump additional hot water.
We know that there are concerns with real.
levels in Germany. It's also in the American Southwest, very big concerns about water levels.
Like, to what degree is climate itself contributing to strains on the production of energy around the
world? Can I give you a specific example? Please. So there's a, there are a couple of nuclear
plants in Switzerland, one of which was just in the middle of sort of a little artificial island
and a river and does not have a cooling towel. So the, does the, does it?
design was the river's always cold. It's Switzerland. We can just use the river to call the plant.
No problems, right? Unfortunately now, you get to a point where they can't run the plant as hard
because the water level, the temperature in the river gets too high. And it's not that the river's
about to boil off or anything like that, but you will kill all the fish who don't really
handle temperatures above 25 degrees centigrade. So there's all these kinds of subtle constraints in
these systems that you just kind of glide over as an assumption. But as the climate changes and
systems change, these become real issues in terms of how you can run a fleet of power assets.
Right. And then it becomes almost self-reflexive because as the energy crisis worsens climate
change, some of those like second order effects make it harder to transport commodities or
produce commodities and then you have to go back to dirtier energy like coal. I'm thinking,
specifically about the water levels of the Rhine issue, the fact that it's more difficult to
get commodities up the river given that the water levels are so low. All right, Alex and Havier,
that was a fascinating discussion. I feel like we covered quite a lot of ground on what is
a complicated topic. So thank you so much, both of you for coming on all thoughts. Thank you.
Thank you very much. That was great. Thank you so much for coming up.
So Joe, that really was an informative and thought-provoking conversation.
I thought.
So one thing I hadn't realized, but both Havier and Alex kind of brought it into sharp relief,
was just the idea of maybe the price of commodities aren't telling you as much as they
used to in the current environment.
It seems like traders are having some difficulty with volatility.
You know, Havier mentioned margin and the fact that it's difficult to trade if you think
that your position is going to.
blow up, you know, in the next week or two. And then the other thing that really struck me is
the follow-on uncertainty from all of that on actual companies and manufacturers and producers
because I think Javier was the one who made this point. It does seem like a huge impediment to
investment and just normal business if you think you aren't going to be able to hedge your energy
needs. Totally. So many interesting things. That's like a really big one. And of course, you know,
some of our conversations earlier this year with the Zoltan Posa were kind of about that and how these
energy trading shops were the new banks. And if there's a decrease in liquidity, the new balance
sheet. Yeah. Then, you know, that creates all kinds of new issues. You know, the other thing I was
thinking about is this idea of Europe being far and away the top bidder for LNG. You know, one of the
stories that gets told throughout history is EMs, and particularly like frontier markets,
really get hit hard in the Fed hiking cycle. Interest rates go up and the liquidity drains.
And we are seeing some of that, but there's also now this other cycle layered on top of it
where many of those same countries, in addition to seeing higher interest rates are also seeing
the energy that they might have bought get bid away. And so as Javier puts it, you know, it's like
basically shifting blackouts this winter from Europe to poorer countries.
Yeah. And this to me is a very, very big takeaway from the conversation. There are a number of
them, but the globalization of the LNG market that we've seen in recent years. And there's
been so much focus on what's happening in Europe because of Europe's proximity to Ukraine
and because it's the most directly hit by Russia's invasion.
But the knock-on effects are arguably bigger in a country like, say, Pakistan, which, I mean, my mother used to live in Pakistan too.
So I know that there are many, many blackouts in Pakistan.
And it's sort of a constant issue there.
But it seems like they might actually suffer a lot more than Europe, even though the focus is on Europe at the moment.
Yeah, absolutely. So many interesting things had that conversation. It's such a treat to talk to people who are just like so in the weeds and can get so technical and detailed and also can explain things so clearly. I think that last point that Alex made probably deserves its own episode, heat stress on the energy system itself because, you know, he mentioned that situation. It's like you put up a nuclear plant in Switzerland. Yeah, oh, we're always going to have access to plenty of cold water. It's literally Switzerland.
And then suddenly that gets called into question.
And then I think, you know, there's, you know, the water levels elsewhere are an issue.
We saw it in Texas on the flip side when we had those freezes and some of those natural gas power plants that hadn't been properly winterized, went down at the exact moment that everybody was cranking up their heat.
Like all kinds of interesting interplay between climate change or extreme weather events and the production and transmission of energy itself that feels.
like a whole episode at some point in the future.
It's another odd lots episode that has led to another odd lots episode in the future.
Those are the best ones.
Those are the best ones.
Those are two great guests for talking about them.
For sure.
Okay.
Shall we leave it there?
Let's leave it there.
This has been another episode of the Odd Thoughts podcast.
I'm Tracy Alloway.
You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway.
And I'm Joe Wisenthal.
You can follow me on Twitter at the stalwart.
Follow our guests on Twitter.
Alex Turnbull.
He's at Alex B.H.
Turnbull.
And Javier Blas, he's at Javier Blas.
Follow our producer, Carmen Rodriguez, at Carmen Armin.
And check out all of our podcasts.
Bloomberg under the handle at podcasts.
Thanks for listening.
