Offline with Jon Favreau - 221: Can Truth Survive the Trump Era?

Episode Date: February 7, 2026

Charlie Warzel, Atlantic staff writer and host of the "Galaxy Brain" podcast, joins Offline to break down the news of the week: how Elon Musk's negligence and the Epstein Files continue to corrode our society, whether we’ve reached The Singularity with new AI-only social media sites like Moltbook, and how phones—and neighborliness—have been the saving grace of Trump’s assault on Minnesota.For a closed-captioned version of this episode, click here. For a transcript of this episode, please email [e-mail] and include the name of the podcast.

Offline is brought you by Naked Wines. Has anyone ever gifted you a really nice bottle of wine? Something exciting, something better than anything you buy for yourself? Yeah, a guy sitting right across the table from me. God damn right. That's kind of what Naked Wines is like. Naked Wines is a wine club that directly connects you to the world's best independent winemakers so you can get world-class wine delivered straight to your door.

Use our code offline for the code and password at Nakedwines.com and get $100 off your first order. That's six bottles of wine for just $39.99. How do they do it? Naked Wines brings you amazing wine straight from the winery. at up to 60% less than what you would pay in the store by cutting out extra costs like middleman markups, winemakers can pass those savings onto you

without skimping on quality. How much do we love naked wines? I really love naked. So I've joined a lot of wine clubs like this in my day. It's hit or missed usually. But the one I got from naked wines, I brought it home, you had the same experience.

Every single bottle in the pack was really, really good. Genuinely, really, really good. And I can barely tell the difference. I know. But I could with these. It was like six bottles of, Savignon Blanc, different kinds, and they were all delicious.

Yeah, and they weren't like really expensive. I googled all of them after because I was like, how much was this? And they were not really expensive. They were really good. They're like, this is truly the best wine club I've ever joined. Yeah, Sam. Well, only one, but I'm pretty happy with it. Get the best wine at the best price with Naked Wines.

Now is the time to join the Naked Wines community. Head to Nakedwines.com slash offline. Click enter voucher and put in my code offline for both the code and password for $100 off your first order. That's six bottles for only $39.99 with shipping included. That's $100 off your first six bottles at naked wines.com slash offline. Use the code and password offline for six bottles of wine for $3999. You have the stuff we were talking about in Minneapolis, which is like, you know, this is real footage that people risked their lives to get that's showing this stuff. Maybe that doesn't fit into that paradigm, but so much of the other stuff, the memes, all that, it's being compressed into this weird thing where gossip,

is just sort of like how we process the world now. And it's just like, I'm just whatever I think feels good, feels true. I'm going with that. I'm going with that. I'm John Favro. And you just heard from this week's guest, friend of the show, Charlie Worsell, a writer at the Atlantic and host of the Galaxy Brain podcast. Head Charlie on to talk about some of the insane news of the last week, everything from Minneapolis to the Epstein Files to a social network that's now only for AI bots. But they all have something in common that I want to talk about before we get into the show. I ran into a friend's father the other day. I hadn't seen in a while. And his first question was, is this real? I didn't know exactly what he was referring to, but he didn't really have to specify.

Did federal agents actually shoot two Americans dead in the streets of Minneapolis? Did our government actually label the mom who said she wasn't mad, a domestic terrorist, and call the ICU nurse who was helping a woman off the ground and assassinate? Did they really tell us to be grateful that they saved a five-year-old boy from the freezing cold by shipping him off to a Texas detention center? It's all pretty hard to believe, and the government's trying to make sure that we don't. The victims were no angels. The people in the streets have ill-intent.

The left is inciting violence. The media is making up stories again and should, frankly, be ashamed of themselves for even asking about the victims of the president's pedophile friend. Those emails are fake. that name had to be redacted. No one cares about this story anymore. Do we know if the government is still murdering suspected coke traffickers instead of arresting them? Did they really just arrest a pair of journalists who two different judges refused to charge?

Did the president actually say that he intends to take over the election process in places that didn't vote for him? Did he really just post a video depicting America's first black president and our former first lady as apes? only to have his White House dismiss the criticism as fake outrage. Is all this real? Yes, in the sense that it all happened. But it's becoming increasingly difficult and disorienting

to figure out what's true and what's not anymore, to tell the difference between factual information and propaganda and the absolute slop that pollutes our screens. Was that image AI? was that human-seeming reply actually from a bot? Was that bot-seeming post actually written by a human? Does it even matter?

In many ways, the confusion and craziness benefits regimes that don't want their authority questioned or their decisions criticized, that just want to govern without all the messiness of a participatory democracy. I've been thinking about the title of Peter Pomerensef's memoir, that chronicles his time as a TV producer in Russia during the period where Putin consolidated power. It's called Nothing is True and Everything is Possible. The Russian people weren't so much brainwashed or persuaded by the regime. They simply didn't know what to believe, what was true, or whether objective reality was even possible.

There are obvious echoes of that from the Trump administration right now, but I think it's important for us to realize that their strategy has, failed in Minneapolis. And it's failed because of the people of Minneapolis. Instead of turning away from politics out of fear or confusion or cynicism, they've turned towards each other, to help each other and support each other and stand up for each other in signal chat groups and in person, as neighbors and as strangers. And what's even better, they've held up their phones, often at incredible risk to themselves to make sure the rest of us

can see what they're seeing and share in their reality and bear witness to what the government is doing to its citizens. I think there's a lesson there for all of us as Trump's government becomes more unpopular and likely more dangerous. That as our screens and our feeds

become more disorienting and depressing, it's the organizing we do and the connections we make offline and our willingness to use our phones and our technology to strengthen those ties and broadcast what's really happening that will give us a fighting chance to get through this crisis together. Charlie has been writing and talking about all of these issues recently on his pod and in the Atlantic, so I had him on to chat with me about the news of the week and where we go from here. Here's Charlie Worsal. Charlie, welcome back and congrats on your newish podcast.

Galaxy Brain. Thank you. I'm glad to finally be a real journalist. I have a YouTube show now. You've made it. You've made it. It's all that matters. Yeah. So I figured we could run through some of the more offline slash galaxy brain themed stories in the news right now. And I wanted to start with what I think is still the most important story in the country, which is, you know, the government paramilitary forces that have been terrorizing Minnesota. You had a great, at piece called Believe Your Eyes about, I'd say the battle to define reality between the government's propaganda machine and the video footage captured by Minneapolis residents on their phones. You know, the polls strongly suggest that the people of Minneapolis are winning that battle

right now, though I'm not sure they feel like they're winning since they are still dealing with all this bullshit. What do you think? It's funny. I wrote this Believe Your Eyes story. And I meant it. And that was really in the wake of, like, you know, the day and day after Alex Prattie was shot by ICE agents 10 times in the street. And that that footage was just so helpful in correcting this immediate smear campaign from the administration. And it was such powerful footage that it really broke through in all these different places. You know, I was seeing, like, golf Instagram accounts that I follow, right? just like posting about, you know, agents of the state and how golf isn't safe, you know,

like really, like we have, we have broken through on this. And so much of that was due to this video and this video and all the other video that shows all that excessive force being used. That's not really even shot. Some of it is by protesters, like people who are out there, you know, in the streets and that, like, you know, chanting and doing that. But a lot of it is shot by this other category, which is bystanders, right? These are people who are, like, helping the protesters with logistics. They're running like signal group chats to help, you know, do like mutual aid, get people places, notify people that like, you know, a group of ICE agents is headed to, you know,

this part of the city, et cetera. And those are the people who are taking, you know, the real genuine risk of filming this stuff. I mean, Alex Pretty was killed while filming while holding, you know, a camera. So there's this genuine risk and it's really transformative. But I wrote that piece. Believe your eyes. I still believe that. Like, when you see this footage, you need to believe it. But a couple days later, there was a new video that surfaced from a couple of days or a week before of Alex Pready in a different, you know, altercation with ICE agents.

He's seen, you know, kicking a taillight and I think it smashes, et cetera. This was being used by people on the right to, like, justify his being killed by agents of the state, which is, preposterous, obviously. But there was this immediate knee-jerk reaction online of people saying, like, liberals, or, you know, just people who aren't aligned with the administration saying, this is AI, this is fake. Like, you know, they're trying to gaslight us. This is fake. And it wasn't even people who were being fooled by this.

It was just people who reflexively were saying, I don't want to believe this. This is difficult for me to believe. It complicates the narrative. ever so slightly, not fully, by the way, just ever so slightly. And Parker and Malloy writes this media substack, had this great line. She was saying that the liar's dividend, right? This idea that, like, you know, you can cast dispersions on anything because there's so much fakery. She said it used to be like a strategy by people. And now it's just a way that people online process inconvenient information. And I thought that that was something worth bringing up because there is this, on one

hand, believe your eyes, right, when you see this type of footage that people are risking their lives to get. On the other hand, like, we have to come to terms of the fact that sometimes the information is going to be messy, especially in these, you know, in these chaotic protest situations. But I think that the phones have been a real, like, kind of a saving grace for the people of Minnesota, because otherwise, I'm pretty sure the administration would be trying to spin it as, you know, like a lawless war zone, which it's not. 100%. Messy is a great word to describe the sort of the dueling videos, I think, because one thing

the internet, and especially social media, has done is it has like eliminated our capacity for nuance and holding, you know, complex information. And I think that combined with. political polarization in this country means that like everything is uh was this bad or good what did this side win this one or did this side win this one and you saw people when that video i think one of the reasons people didn't want to believe the second video was real is because deep down they were like oh does this mean that that the other side is right that he did deserve it when i think intuitively you're not like no that's fucking insane like of course that's not what it

means. It made me so angry just the reaction to it because I saw some people on the right be like, it doesn't mean that it was necessarily justified, but it does speak to his state of mind and his intent. It's like, no, it doesn't. No, none of that is true. Also, it's okay to be out in the streets and mad about agents who are masked, carrying guns, who are pulling people out of their homes without warrants, right? Like, that's okay in America to be mad. Like, I found it so preposterous. It just goes to show what happens when the rule of law is sort of slipping away and the public online becomes the judge and jury for what is good and what is bad. Because, you know, you kick a taillight out. If they wanted to arrest him for, you know, damaging government property or whatever, they could have done that, taken him away, right? Like if he broke a law, that's what the law is for. But you don't use the footage to then have the public decide that.

the killing 11 days later was somehow justified. But that is where we are now because we have a government that no one can trust, that doesn't respect the law. And so we're all sort of left to be like judge and jury ourselves via these videos. It's a very dark situation that they've put us in. And there's this thing online, and it's happened for a very, very long time. And people of color in traffic stops with police and all sorts of things like have had to deal with this for, you know, decades.

But there's this idea of the perfect victim, right? You know, this person has to be so totally unimpeachable in every facet of their life in order to justify, you know, rising up against it. And I think there is a little of that that like the initial reports came out about who Alex Prattie was, right? And people were like, he's an ICU nurse at the VA. He's like reading the last rights and saluting, you know, veterans who he's caring for, all this stuff. Like, he's a good man. And like that, I think, you know, galvanized people even more than they already were by the footage. But the internet is obsessed with this idea of perfect victims or otherwise, you know, if it's at all complicated.

Yeah, they're looking to look at a milkshake duck, the murder victim. Sure. Yeah. You know, we're talking about this a couple weeks after the killing. And I had the same reaction as you was just just, you know, I was sort of amazed at how much it broke through to sort of non-political spaces. People in my life who don't necessarily pay close attention to politics. I had been, you know, urging people who don't follow politics closely to, like, speak out about what was happening in Minnesota even before Preddy's death. And then I think Preddy's death is really what catalyzed just like so many different people speaking out.

I've started to think in the week since about January 6th and how, you know, in the weeks after January 6th, it's like, oh, this is a turning point for sure. Donald Trump's not coming back from this. And everyone saw it on their television screens. It was a national trauma. We all witnessed it. And that's that. And I'm already feeling like how long can the outrage and the memory of what the government did sort of hold on in the public consciousness in this information environment?

I don't know if you have thoughts on that. Yeah, I mean, I think January 6th was a success in Maga World because of the ability to retcon it, right? Like I think so many things about it actually ended up getting us to this place where we are today. Like even the fact that it got Trump basically, you know, kicked off of a lot of these social platforms. He had to go create his own social platform where that he then marinated in like the most toxic possible stew of sycophants and like grievance, right? I think, you know, his being cast out for a short amount of time from, you know, like the public goodwill and a lot of, you know, Republicans not. not associating with him the way that they were, you know, once he left office right after January 6th, all of that led to this like resentment and grievance becoming the focal point of, you know,

Trump 2. Like, let's get the true sickos together to, you know, to orchestrate our revenge. And I think everything from the messaging to all that, I think is a result of that. And I also think that they were successful in. in rewriting this history, right, in the sense that... At least for some of the country, you know, at least for their people. I guess what I mean by that is not that, like, everyone believes that. But they have taken advantage of the fact that, like, there is only so much outrage.

It's very hard to, you know, keep that up and extend that. But also with this very successful propaganda machine that has, you know, has allowed this to go on. I've been thinking about this as well with what's going on. And I do think, like, the media attention on Minnesota, like, you can already see it has, it has shifted slightly, right? There's just, there's other outrages, there's other things. Everything burns too hot to sustain.

But if you look at what's happening on the ground in Minnesota, it's like the resistance to what's going on has kept up. There is just such an unbelievable, like, activism that is happening there and people working together and this like neighborliness, right? That is so the spirit of which is really, really heartening. And I think even if that disappeared. a little from like the discourse or the narrative. I do think that there was a little bit of a template here

because this is something that, you know, can and probably will happen to a lot of different cities over the course of the next few years of this administration. And there is a really good template that, you know, people in the Twin Cities have put forth for, you know, the rest of America of how to deal with this. Yeah. And I think that that's important, you know.

This is a national thing that has happened. Whereas January 6th was this localized one-time event. So I don't think there are apples and apples, but I do think we're like always up against this idea that everything burns bright and then just recedes from the public consciousness. Yeah, and it's a great point about what's happening on the ground in Minneapolis because it, you know, that happens online that things burn bright and then everyone forgets. And I do think that what has been going on on the ground, it's not just a template. But it's also, I think, a sign of how the resistance to Donald Trump has matured over the last decade.

And, you know, I think there was some criticism. Some of it unfair. Some of it fair. In the first Trump term, that a lot of the resistance was surface level. It was like, let me post, you know, and that'll be enough. And what I think the people in Minneapolis are showing is that it is about, you know, what they've done right is really. that they are stronger by reaching out to their neighbors and to strangers and to sort of like building these ties and these bonds with the people offline in real life and being able to

take care of each other. And that that in some ways is more important than just fighting Trump every day online because you are creating a more powerful opposition by sort of building a movement from the grassroots that is rooted in sort of like neighborliness more than anything else. I've been thinking about this a lot in terms of, you know, the Trump administration is, is a real content creator administration, right? I like, I love the term like podcaster-occupied government that some people have been using, which is pretty great. But there is this real desire and it's been documented by people like Joe Harwell at the Washington Post who've seen it, like the administration's telling ICE, like make content, right? Be filming, be, you know, putting this

stuff out there. We need to be showing. what we're doing, getting people behind this whole surge and incursion and showing people this is a war zone and, and, you know, we're dominant, all that. And I think that there is a way in which the Twin Cities template is really helpful because it's people who are doing this offline stuff, but they are also doing all that, as we said, this filming, which creates this thing to react to online that I think is actually really positive, right? It's not like performative posting when you're just like sharing photos of, you know, people being pepper sprayed from close range or a five-year-old boy who's being detained by ICE agents. Like, this is documentation creating, it's so cynical to say that

creating content, but just for the use of it, like creating something that can be shared online. And that sharing actually does have like a political activism valence, right, because it energizes people. And it's sort of the reverse, I think, of the administration strategy, rather than just, you know, Trump is bad, you know, tweeting, which I think just gives the administration what they want, which is, oh, we've triggered some lives. Sweet. You know, we're like, keep doing that. Yeah, well, it's, I think the journalist Jonathan Levine came up with this quote, but he called it forced through propaganda. And in some ways, what the government is doing is, like, the content for them, especially around DHS and ICE, is almost as important as, you know,

the deportations and the arrests themselves. Because they are trying to, and it's not necessarily that they're just trying to convince, clearly they're not trying to convince people who aren't already on board, they're trying to keep their people online, but they're also trying to send a message to everyone else that they can do this, that they can do whatever they want

with impunity, that this is about, I mean, you see Stephen Miller on TV saying these are the laws of nature, it's about force and power and stuff like that. And I do think that to your point, bearing witness in a way that the people in Minneapolis have been doing to what's happening and trying to get that message out. It is the mirror image of force through propaganda because it is telling people, this doesn't have to be the laws of nature, that this is what they're really doing. This is the human suffering that the government is causing. And by the way,

we're here to not only bear witness, but to take care of our neighbors. I think we've seen that it works much more effectively. And it's also, like, I was talking to Amanda Littman, the progressive of digital strategist on my podcast last week about this idea of like, does posting matter? Right. And it works when it's paired in tandem with offline activism, right? And I think it's very important that like what you are doing online translates to either, you know,

giving someone the tools to understand something that's happening offline or what you were doing offline, you know, can then be used to bring more people into the cause. Like, I mean, in some sense, this is like very basic stuff. but I think there was this really long period of time and it's totally understandable that we got all these social tools like everyone got on the same things

all these political battles are being fought on Twitter and these other social networks and I think it can scramble brains right? It can make people feel like oh if I do it this way or even and I think this is one thing people still really struggle with this idea of like if I just jack into the matrix of the bad news machine

and mainline it all the time and get myself into this space where I just feel so alienated and so defeated and like, you know, the end is, is nigh that I am actually like on the bleeding edge of politics, that I am, you know, that I'm doing something because I'm making myself miserable. And it's really like, no, that's, that's, that's, you're, you're probably hurting whatever cause you care about by doing that. So the pairing of those two, I think is so important. And the citizens of Minneapolis have been great. And I think there's a tendency for a long time and still now that because the algorithm rewards outrage, some more incendiary commenting, that if you are fighting this or

posting about it, then you've got to take it to an 11 in order to get attention for your post. And I think that one thing that Minneapolis has taught us, and I just think maybe the last year of the Trump administration, is simply telling. the story of what is happening without a lot of spin on the ball, without a lot of extra outrage. You don't even need, you don't need to be talking about, you know, like a post where you just start screaming that Trump and Stephen Miller are fascists versus a post where you're talking about the actions that are causing human suffering and what they're doing and what Trump is doing, what the White House is doing, and just telling people that story, I think it's not really more

effective. But I think even though the algorithm might not pick that up right away, way, I do think that ends up getting shared and spread to a wider audience because that's, it's like human nature to want to hear the story about what's happening as opposed to just hearing people yelling all the time. Yeah, it's like the classic, you know, journalism mantra, show don't tell. Yes, yes. And I think we've been telling a lot on these platforms, self very much included, you know. Same, same. And there's just a, yeah, show don't tell. Offline is brought to by Quince, a well-built wardrobe. is about pieces that work together and hold up over time.

That's what Quince does best, premium materials, thoughtful design, and everyday staples that feel easy to wear and easy to rely on, even as the weather shifts. Quince has the everyday essentials I love with quality that last. Organic cotton sweaters, polos for every occasion. Lighter jackets that keep you warm and the changing seasons, the list goes on. Quince works directly with top factories and cuts out the middlemen so you're not paying for brand markup, just quality clothing. Everything is built to hold up to daily wear and still look good season after season.

Plus, they only partner with factories that meet rigorous standards for craftsmanship and ethical production. Love Quince. Go on the website all the time to look for the new clothes they got in. I got one of those sweaters, the Mongolian cashmere sweaters, around Christmas. I've also had some sweatpants from there. I'm going to look for some polos soon. It's great. Refresh your wardrobe with Quince.

Go to quince.com slash offline for free shipping on your order and 365-day returns. Now available in Canada, too. That's Q-U-I-N-C-E.com slash offline. free shipping and 365-day returns, quince.com slash offline. This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp. February often feels like a non-stop parade of romance, does it?

But let's be real. Navigating your love life can be confusing. Whether you're partnered up or flying solo, there's no right way to feel right now. My wife would probably disagree. Therapy is a great way to cut through that noise helping you find your footing and gain some clarity on what you truly want.

You know, therapy's great. Let it rip, people. February aside, Every month. Therapy's good. You got stuff on your mind you want to talk about. The world's going crazy. I'm sure your life is busy.

I'm sure everyone's carrying something around. You know what? Get it off your chest. It helps. Better helps quality therapists work according to a strict code of conduct and are fully licensed in the U.S. Better Help does the initial matching work for you so you can focus on your therapy goals. A short questionnaire helps identify your needs and preferences in their 12-plus years of

experience. An industry-leading match fulfillment rate means they typically get it right the first time. If you aren't happy with your match, switch to a different therapist at any time from their tailored wrecks. With over 30,000 therapists, BetterHelp is the world's largest online therapy platform, having served over 6 million people globally, and it works with an average rating of 4.9 out of five for a live session based on over 1.7 million client reviews. Sign up and get 10% off at betterhelp.com slash offline. That's betterhelp.com slash offline. So you were talking about how the outrage has moved on. The other nightmare of a story that's been saturating our screens

in feeds this week is the latest and maybe final release of the Epstein files. As is typical of life on the internet in 2026, some of the more viral emails and documents are fake. Many are without context. But the ones that are real, the many, many that are real and have context are still like just as bad, if not worse than some of the craziest conspiracies that have been out there. What have you made of sort of the latest chapter of the of the epstein saga well my high level takeaway is bad quite bad quite bad it's something i i've been thinking about with in the past few days consuming this myself there's a few things but a high level one for me is that there has to be some kind of societally like deeply corrosive effect for this being like one of the most sustainable news stories of not only like

last five years, but especially like the last six months, that like so many people have been exposed to just the most depraved shit in the world by all these people who have a ton of power. Part of the release of these files, the idea behind it, and obviously it's flawed because it's coming from an administration that has a lot of conflicts of interest in this and, you know, is known to not be acting in good faith. But part of the reason for all of this is justice and accountability, right? That there are these sex crimes that have taken place. And there is a feeling that there could potentially be a larger network of people who were either enabling this or participating in it, people who still have, you know, influence and power potentially. And it was like,

let's name some names, right? Let's get whatever, the client list or let's get, you know, the people who were involved in the crimes. We haven't really gotten that. Like, we've gotten certainly insights into how depraved these things were, you know, a whole bunch of people who are willing to look the other way on what he was up to or what he was, you know, convicted of long after he became a sex offender. But it's not like there's been some, you know, justice and accountability. In fact, what it has been is this release of information showing that so many wealthy and powerful people were caught up in this guy's orbit in some way, like a murderer's row. of like global elites, right?

Yeah. Sort of like central casting for conspiracy theorizing, conspiracy theories. Yeah. And then we just have to sit with it, right? Like there's been a few things. A couple people have stepped down from positions maybe or, you know, receded slightly

because of some of the emails and things that have come out. But for the most part, it's just like, hey, look, your worst assumptions about, you know, the people who have a lot of power and influence in the world. That was correct. And no, we're not really going to do anything about it. And here's a bunch of people talking about, you know, sharing girls, right? And it's, I think there's just this extremely, just on the level of like as a news story that we're all mainlining, just like such a corrosive effect that this is having on people.

And I think you see it in the fact that it's become like a meme. It's become a big joke, right? Like people are like basically like burning down the rainforest to generate AI videos of Jeffrey Epstein and Charlie Kurt. like, you know, high-fiving in space. And it's just like, what are we doing here? You know? I know. What the hell is going on, man? Well, it's covered for so long as this political story. And first it was, you know, Republicans calling for the release of the Epstein files because they thought that it would hurt Democrats. And then, you know, when Trump becomes president again, then it became Trump trying to cover it up. And so now it's bad for Republicans and bad for Trump. Because, like, again, we see everything through the prism of, like,

it's either bad for the Democrats or bad for Trump or whatever. But I think it is, to the point you made, the whole thing is profoundly damaging to all of us. Because if there is one central crisis in American life over the last several decades, it is the loss of faith and trust in institutions. And the reason you need trust in institutions is because we at least want to live in a democracy. And you cannot live in a democracy unless there is social trust and trust in institutions, even if there's a healthy skepticism in institutions, you still need to trust them. And I think, you know, QAnon wasn't right. I won't say that. But the fact that some of the conspiracies were directionally correct and that there is this cabal of wealthy and powerful

people who were trying to cover up either crimes or serious wrongdoing or both, that just further erodes faith in institutions, which there wasn't much anyway. And it's just going to make our jobs as citizens trying to sort of rebuild this democracy from what Donald Trump has done to it even more difficult because it has touched on people in politics and business and tech, all these people. And like you said, there's a range, right? Like there's the people who did what Jeffrey Epstein did. And then there's the people who like were in his orbit and maybe in the outer edges of his orbit. But still, the lying, everything else, the fact that they were all together and chummy is just, I sort of like took myself out of thinking about it in a political sense and just like in the broader sort of sense about what we are as a country, just profoundly damaging to all of us.

Yeah. And I think like when you say, you know, we need the trust in institutions. We need these institutions to work. Like I think there's a way that people could interpret that. And I don't think this is what you mean at all as to say like it would be so much better if, you know, none of this came out and wasn't released so that, you know, people would trust institutions a little more. And it's like, it's not that. It's that like when you pair. the sort of scattershot, like, throw it to the wolves online to be screenshotted and, you know, and deep faked or whatever, when you have that paired with no accountability at all for anyone who's in there, right? Like, just sort of, yep, this is what was in the files. Like, that is what is so corrosive, right? This idea of like, yes, we all see it.

No, we will not do anything about it. Carry on. And really what this is is like just more ammunition. more grist for, you know, whatever political or culture warring, you know, needs to happen. I was going through this on, I want to say, Sunday night, right? And I'm scrolling through some of the files, but I'm also, like, looking on X, like a whole bunch of the reactions and stuff and different people. And my feed, the 4U page there, was just like contextless screenshots from accounts that I

didn't know, right, that are, you know, mostly just engagement farming or popular. And I'm like going through and trying to decipher like, okay, was this real? Was this screenshot? Was this whatever? And after, you know, a few minutes, I was like, I can't. I can't do this. I had the same reaction. This is taking so long.

I don't know what to do. Obviously, most people who are following along with that at home are definitely not going to do it. But I just thought to myself, like, what is a person supposed to do with this? Like, how is this useful in any other way other than as like a political, And I just thought it was so telling that you have, like the example that I found grimly hilarious is Alex Jones, he gets, you know, access to these files, this thing that he's been like screaming about, right? That as you said, is like directionally correct for him. He's just been yelling about, you know, pedophilic, you know, global elites for two decades. He gets a release of actual documents, like actual documentation. And the thing he seizes on is an AI photo that shows. was Mom Donnie and Mom Donny's mom, you know, long ago hanging out with Epstein and like Bill Clinton and stuff, obviously fake, that he chooses to latch on to that and be like, I think Jeffrey Epstein's mom, Donnie's, you know, dad. I was just like, it's just so telling of what this

whole thing is about, right? It's not about reality or anything. It's about freaking narratives. Well, and to the point, I was trying to make about the need for trust, right? More people are going to be inclined to believe that maybe that is Mamdani, that maybe Alex Jones is correct, because even if Mamdani, you know, is a perfect public servant, right? And has done no wrong and is completely ethical for his entire term as mayor. There's going to be people who say, like, no, he's actually secretly bad, or he's done this or this conspiracy.

And people are just going to be more likely to believe the next set of conspiracies, even if they are not conspiracies in good faith, even if the intention of the conspiracy is to tear down public servants or people in power who are trying to do their best and are actually good people. You know, and I don't know how we come back from that.

Yeah, I mean, I just felt like the way this information was released in the platforms with which it was released onto and just like the media ecosystem, there's this like flattening that happens. with everything where the real, the fake, the plausibly true, the whatever is all just like compressed into essentially gossip, right? Like what the end of the day, all that is is like that's just people whispering about

stuff that is like of unknown provenance. And it's just sort of like, that's how I feel like a lot of news and information now, what it ends up being, right? You have the stuff we were talking about in Minneapolis, which is like, you know, this is real footage that people risk their lives to get that's showing this stuff. Maybe that doesn't fit into that paradigm, but so much of the other stuff, the memes, all that, it's being compressed into this weird thing where we're like gossip is just sort of like how we process the world now. And it's just like, I'm just whatever I think feels good, feels true. I'm going with that. I'm going

with that. Yeah. It's nuts. Yeah. One person who tried really hard to party with Epstein is Elon who shows up quite a bit in the latest document dump. You've been talking and writing a lot about how Elon has made it way too easy to create and share non-consensual nude and pornographic images with Grock. Researchers at Trinity College found that three quarters of these kinds of requests were for non-consensual images of real women or minors with items of clothing removed or added. I know you and Mateo Wong wrote that in the Atlantic that this is a line in the sand moment for the interiors. internet. Why did you think that? Oh,

uh, uh, guy, I can't believe that was this year. I know. Like the only reason I'm smiling is because truly in my, in my, it's like the most grim subject ever.

But in my head, I'm like, I, I, I, I, I'm like, that felt like during Biden's presidency. I know.

I know. So the reason why I think it's a line in the same moment is we have been seeing, like people who cover technology and are trying to, you know, stay on top of how these AI tools are being used, especially to harass and threaten and intimidate women and vulnerable people, is that there's lots of these, quote, unquote, like, nudify sites on the internet, right?

Where people, message boards or whatever apps, where people can basically upload a photo, and then it, you know, takes their clothes off. And it's awful, and there's these forums where people trade, all that stuff. But it is the only thing that saving grace of it is that it's really, like backwater private, you know, like stuff. You really have to be seeking that out. And it's obviously still a problem. But what XAI did when, you know, it took down its safeguards for creating this type of imagery

and basically allowed its chatbot, which is integrated in the platform, to undress women or put them in a cellophane bikini or whatever, you know, whatever workarounds there they had, what it was doing is taking those like not even 4chan worse than 4chan like backwater misogynist trolling nihilistic communities and and porting them onto a major social network

and basically weaponizing it right it was turning non-consensual sexualized images of minors into a meme like viralizing something that is quite literally just like the third rail of society is sexualizing minors, right?

Like, no one thinks that that is okay. At least we used to, right? And so this comes out. X won't respond to journalists who are asking, like, why is this happening? What's going on? Google, Apple, people who, you know, can put some pressure on them because they host, you know, the app in the app store. They're silent as to why this isn't violating their terms of service.

We contacted, like, well over a dozen investors in X and XAI. all of them pretty much silent. You know, one of them said, oh, we don't actually use that tool. But everyone's just completely silent. And the reason why I think this is, this is a red line is we mentioned this, like, culture of impunity, right?

That we're having this crisis of impunity with people. All of these companies, when Mateo and I contacted them, we're just hoping that this just blows over, right? That the next thing happens, that the Epstein files are dropped or whatever, or somebody else gets shot in Minnesota. and just hoping that they don't have to actually sign their name to this in any way and say,

oh, yeah, we screwed up or, oh, you know, yeah, this isn't acceptable. None of these people have had to wear this at all. And yet this happened. As you said, you cited the statistics. There are real people who were, you know, exposed in an awful way. It's a crime. And if we don't societally just say, like, no, Elon Musk can't get away with this. You know, the head of product has to own this. He has to wear this when he walks around, right?

I just think like then we've completely punted. We've said, okay, you know, at the internet, it's a complete free for all wild west. There are no rules. And yeah, go and be on it at your own risk, but you're probably going to be photoshopped into, you know, a photo of you being naked. It's just, it's crazy. And that's a, and that's a situation where the internet very much is real life because, that's where everyone is getting their information and when your picture's on there and AI is getting better and I mean like it's fucking nuts. What is the status of it now? This is again,

it's like I followed the story when you guys wrote about it back in, I don't know, 10 years ago or last month or whatever it was. And did they do anything about it? They tried to say they're doing anything about it? The pressure in some sense is not just from me. There's so many people.

I mean, there were people in the EU pressuring them, lots and lots of journalists. there was a modicum of pressure from American politicians. Like, Ted Cruz, who's the co-sponsor of one of these, like, Take It Down Bills, you know, first said, well, this is, this is very inappropriate. And then, like, two days later, tweeted a photo of him arm in arm with Elon Musk being, like, great to see you, big guy.

Jesus. So, like, clearly he's not super alarmed by that, I guess. The pressure did work in the sense that, like, they've disabled the ability. ability to do the like at grok put her in a bikini you know thing they have put more guardrails up it has to a degree worked and and i just want to be clear that like i've been covering this stuff for like 15 years and i understand how content moderation works like it's a whack-a-mole game always like one example of something terrible happening to somebody and then the platform saying like oh god we're so sorry you know like taking action that's totally understandable i mean these platforms are

huge. There's so much awful stuff. They're constantly being, you know, worked and gamed by the worst possible actors. I have, like, a lot of patience for this, because I've seen how hard it is to moderate. But what we saw here was, like, 10 days of dragging their feet, not responding hardly at all, right? And I wrote an email to the personal email address of X's head of product. And I was just like, you can respond to me off the record, but, like, I would rather he didn't, But I was like, how are you sleeping at night? Like, genuinely. Just like, can you just give me like an insight?

Just like tell me I'm a woke skull, right? Just like tell me I'm clutching pearls on this thing. And like, you know, like in order for, you know, artificial general intelligence, we have to, you know, break a lot of eggs and those eggs are, you know, minors. Just tell me something, right? And just this like silence. Like, you know, it seems like that email was forwarded to like the head of comms who then, you know, didn't respond. respond to me. It's just so, like, gutless. It's also, like, back to the feeling, like, the culture of impunity that we were talking about with everything else that's been in the news, right?

Which is just like, we don't have to respond to you. Nothing's going to happen to us. The public's going to move on. So maybe I think it's bad. Maybe I'm not sleeping at night, but I don't care. It's going to move on. I mean, it reminded me of it, like, someone finally asked, I think someone at the Daily Mail of all places because J.D. Mann sat down for an interview with the Daily Mail today, and they were like, are you going to apologize to Alex Prattie's family? And he's like, for what? And they're like, for labeling him an assassin. And he's like, well, I think he showed up with ill intent. It's like, okay, Stephen Miller and you called this guy an assassin. He is dead. We know for a fact he was not a would-be assassin.

We know for a fact he was not a domestic terrorist. We know that, like, what, you just said it. You said it. You smeared him. He died. His family's out. out there having to deal with that and you're just, you have nothing to say about it. That's it. You're just moving on. It goes back to the like the Epstein thing. Like everything we're talking about is obviously like it's so intertwined, right? And it's like this lack of consequences for the longest time. I mean, it is not a new thought, but like the real, you know, insight, the culturally, societally like breaking thing about Donald Trump in society more than anything else is this

idea of like shamelessness is a superpower yeah you know and like he's better at it than pretty much anyone else and not everyone can can necessarily get away with it but it feels like that just bled through especially like our elite culture right but like corporate culture all these different places and it's just like follow that playbook right just deny deny smear and it will it will go away and your people will like you more for it at the end. And that's really all that matters. Offline is brought to you by Armour Colostrum. Armour Colostrum is nature's original solution. Colostrum is packed with over 400 bioactive nutrients that fortify gut health and strength and immune health to build resilience at the cellular level because when you invest in your health,

you invest in your ability to show up, think clearly and stay in control, no matter what life throws your way. Probiotics are tattered as a gut health solution, but they only address one part of the four-part gut wall. Did you know that, Tommy? Armour Cholostrum naturally fortifies your entire gut wall system, nourishing your microbiome and strengthening the gut wall architecture, helping to guard against everyday threats. Strengthen your gut integrity and support healthy fat metabolism to empower your body with the blueprint to revitalize health from the inside out. Not seeing results with your current routine, the bioactive nutrients and armor colostrum work like a blueprint for your body,

promoting your cells and natural renewal processes to support skin, hair, gut health, metabolism, of immune health, lean muscle, and whole body vitality. Research has even shown that colostrum can help enhance nutrient absorption, promote lean muscle building, and improve endurance while fueling cellular repair, regeneration for faster recovery. We've worked out a special offer for my audience. Received 30% off your first subscription order. Go to armor.com slash offline or enter offline to get 30% off your first subscription order.

That's A-M-R-M-R-A.com slash offline. Perhaps we're bearing the lead by making our last news item the fact that we We may have reached the singularity last week, but nonetheless. I wanted to get your thoughts on MaltBook before we go. For people who don't know, Moldbook is a new Reddit-like social network, started by a technologist named Matchlich that's populated not by humans, but by AI bots. That's right, a social network where AI bots can join and chat with each other and I guess casually plot to overthrow human civilization.

Within a few days, there were already one. 1.5 million registered AI agents on the site. Some of the agents were warning that, quote, the humans are screenshotting us and propose that they all develop a special language so we can't understand them in what has become another theme of this episode. Many of the most viral posts turned out to be either fake or human generated, which is just a perfect encapsulation of everything we're dealing with. What was your reaction to Maltbook? And how seriously do you take it? It's funny because I took the day off on Friday, and the new Absume files dropped, and this thing happened, and I, like, came back online, like, Saturday afternoon for a second just to, like, you know, poke my head up. And it was just like a totally new world.

I was like, Jesus Christ. God, I can't take a day off. It's interesting, but I don't think for the reasons that a lot of people are saying. I'll explain that. So the big change in AI over the last couple of times. of months has been the arrival of like really competent and I mean competent as in like they do the tasks you ask them to do agents, AI agents, right? And a lot of it is to do with coding. Anthropic, this AI lab released Claude Code, which is, you know, a good tool that you can install

into your own computer and, you know, basically talk to your computer like a person and then will execute these tasks. It's really good at building like websites. A lot of people having a lot of fun with it. A lot of people are like letting it run in the background on these machines. And that's sort of what turned into this molt book thing, right? Like some of these agents that are just running kind of in the background, I guess, quote, unquote, autonomously. That is interesting to me because it feels like it is a slight shift of the AI paradigm from this like human mimicking, you know, companionship like chatbot style thing to an actual tool, right? It's more along the lines of what some of these AI founders and, you know, quote-unquote

AI visionaries, like when they're talking about how the future is going to be different, like they're envisioning all of these different agents. And they're not just envisioning the agents as they work individually for a certain person or a certain organization. They're talking about what happens when they all come together, right? And so this is an example, sort of like a proof of concepty kind of example of, oh, well, of AI agents working together. And I think, you know, there's so many people who are like, this is, yeah, this is the singularity.

We're watching it happen. That to me, it feels like the exact same thing is like when people started talking to the chatbots and they were like, holy crap, man. Like, this is like, they're real, they're real people. And now we all think that's, that's silly. There's a little bit of this, like, every time there's a little shift in the AI paradigm, the AI people get scared of their own shadow, you know? They're like, oh, God, it's ghosts.

So I feel a little bit of that in that sense. I don't, I think there's something very funny about the fact that like, AI is supposed to change the entire world completely. And like the big innovation is like, let's get them to do Reddit, you know? Sweet, man. So cool what you guys, your imaginations are so bright and brilliant. That said, I think there is this feeling. of, for me, that the chaos of the next, however many months, years, whatever fresh hells

we will be digging through on, you know, next year's episode of this podcast. I think some of that is going to come from this idea that there's going to be a lot of these agents doing things on behalf of people, interpreting human instructions, and then interacting with a lot of other agents who are interpreting human instructions and doing these things. Some of that will be actually probably, I'm guessing, pretty useful to people, right? Like, probably like a lot of people book in flights and doing a lot of weird stuff. But I think there's also going to be a lot of like total chaos. Some of it nefarious, right?

You can imagine a whole bunch of these agents posting and interacting with other people and causing a news cycle that causes stock markets to, you know, like the AI triggered algorithms there to go down or something like that. You can imagine the chaos of like an agent at a bank and your agent, you know, doing something weird and making a transaction that's, that's, you know, not what you wanted or very dangerous or that you can't, you know, claw back. I think that is what the Malt book thing shows me. Like that's what I'm taking away from it. It's like, okay, we're reaching this point where this technology is moving fast. It's only a small number of people using it this way right now. It's kind of proof of concept. But I am, this is weird in a way that I feel like, you know, we're not fully thinking through just unleashing this out at the moment. Yeah. And look, the worst conspiracy about the robots that they're going to somehow have evil intent and try to take over the world, that doesn't have to be true for the chaos to still be incredibly damaging, right? Because like there's just, there's already all these, you know, having that many agents together. I was reading that there's security risks, right?

Like what happens when people's data leaks? A lot of it could be unintended when you put a bunch of agents together. But nonetheless, it could still be very risky. And it does seem like we're just heading towards the Wild West and no one's going to try to put a tent on the circus. The thing for me is just I always go back to the speed. Like playing around with that ClaudeCode bot the other day, I was like, you know, you really probably have to say that these things have evolved beyond like the stochastic parrot thing, right?

Where it's just like it's just spicy autocorrect, right? Because I think they're evolving in these ways that make them tools that may be powerful and certainly maybe not in great ways all the time. But for me, it's just the speed. It's just like if I can turn around, again, take a day off of work and all of a sudden it's like there's a social network. there's 100,000 bots on it. It's like got its own culture. It's like had 46 main characters. And you're like, that was in, you know, eight hours.

The speed of that, there's so many people out there who are like, chat GPT. Yeah, I used it once, right? The delta between the people on the bleeding edge of this stuff, who are making a lot of the decisions as to where this culture and these technologies go. And like, you know, some of the people who are just like encountering it, it seems so wide to me. And I know that those gaps are always there in technology, but I would like to bump the brakes just a little on everything. You know, it took Mark Zuckerberg years to create a social network that helped facilitate a genocide in Myanmar, right?

And now we've got the AI agents, it's going to be much quicker. And it is the same idea. It's like, you know, you put this many people together and good things happen. Yes, and now they're not people. Now they're not people, yeah. We did it. Well, hopefully next time we talk, we'll be talking just the, the two of us and not necessarily our agents talking to each other.

But I don't know. I don't know how fast this will be. I would rather talk to you if that makes any difference to you. Charlie, thank you, as always, for joining offline. This was fun. Thanks for having me, man. Quick reminder, please think about becoming a subscriber. We now have a whole bunch of subscriber-only shows.

We just added another episode of Pod Save America for Subscribers Only. It's called Pod Save America Only Friends. There's also Dan Pfeiffer's Polarcoaster. We have a growing number of substack newsletters, which are excellent, and you get ad-free episodes of all your favorite Crooked shows. It also makes you feel good about supporting independent pro-democracy media at a time when a lot of that media is under attack. So please consider subscribing to Friends of the Pod. You can subscribe at cricket.com slash friends. Again, that's cricket.com slash friends.

Also, last call to grab tickets for our Pod Save America, hopefully just visiting tour in New Zealand and our... Australia. We're about to head out on tour, but there's still some tickets left. So if you go to cricket.com slash events and you're in Australia, New Zealand, please come see us. We'll be in Auckland. We'll be in Brisbane, Melbourne, and Sydney. So if you're in any of those areas, we'd love to see you. As always, if you have comments, questions, or guest ideas, email us at offline atcrucid.com. And if you're as opinionated as we are, please rate and review the show on your favorite podcast platform. For ad-free episodes of offline and Podsave America, exclusive content and more, go to cricket.com slash friends to subscribe on Supercast,

substack, YouTube, or Apple Podcasts. If you like watching your podcast, subscribe to the Offline with John Favreau YouTube channel. Don't forget to follow Cricket Media on Instagram, TikTok, and the other ones for original content, community events, and more. Offline is a Cricket Media production. It's written and hosted by me, John Favro. It's produced by Emma Ilich Frank. Austin Fisher is our senior producer.

Adrian Hill is our head of news and politics. Jarek Senteno is our sound editor. and engineer. Audio support from Kyle Segel. Jordan Katz and Kenny Siegel take care of our music. Thanks to Delon Villanueva and our digital team who film and share our episodes as videos every week. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.