On with Kara Swisher - Robert Reich on Democrats’ Failures, Trump’s Fascism & Populism

Episode Date: August 4, 2025

Democrats have abandoned the working class, according to former Labor Secretary Robert Reich, leading working people to fall for President Trump’s hollow and hateful cultural populism. But he argues that an economic populist message that exposes how corporations and wealthy people abuse their power could turn the tide. Kara and Reich discuss how that would work in practice, why Democrats have repeatedly sided with Wall Street, how Americans should fight back against Trump’s fascist tendencies, and other questions drawn from his upcoming memoir, Coming Up Short: A Memoir of My America. Plus, Reich answers an “expert question” from his longtime debate partner, former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers. Questions? Comments? Email us at [e-mail] or find us on YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, and Bluesky @onwithkaraswisher. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Are you short too, Yuli? Well, not as short as you, but yes, I'm short. When Short People came out, that Randy Newman song, people sent me 900 copies. It was very irritating. Well, I like being short. Well, I think that from an environmental standpoint, we short people are much more responsible. We take less oxygen. If everybody were our size, things would be better, don't you think?

Yes. And if not, we're going to bite your fucking knees. That's what I say. Hi everyone from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network. This is On with Kara Swisher and I'm Kara Swisher. My guest today is Robert Reich, the former Labor Secretary, retired professor of public policy at UC Berkeley and author of over a dozen books, including the forthcoming memoir, Coming Up Short. He is also Louis Swisher's favorite person on the internet, apparently. In his book, Reich tells the story of how he was bullied relentlessly as a child for being short.

I can relate. He didn't receive a diagnosis until he was an adult, but he suffers from Fairbanks disease, a genetic mutation that slows bone growth, and he's only 4 foot 11. But some of Reich's teachers realized how smart and ambitious he was, and they nurtured his talents. He was voted class president at Dartmouth University, and from there he went on to Yale Law School. He eventually got a job in, of all places,

Gerald Ford's administration. And from that point on, he bounced between policy work and academia. Along the way, he maintained a relentless focus on income inequality, money in politics, abuse of power, and the working class. He's also got an amazing social media talent. I'm excited to talk to him for lots of reasons. He's a delightful person, as anyone's ever spent time with him. He's got a lot to say.

He has great debates, and he really is someone who is very open-minded, and he's actually very genuine and willing to debate people. And in that vein, our expert question comes from Larry Summers, the former Secretary of Treasury, Chief Economist of the World Bank Bank and President of Harvard, with whom he has debated for decades. So stick around. Support for this show comes from Robinhood. Wouldn't it be great to manage your portfolio on one platform? With Robinhood, not only can you trade individual stocks and ETFs, you can also seamlessly buy

and sell crypto at low costs. Trade all in one place. Get started now on Robinhood. Trading crypto involves significant risk. Crypto trading is offered through an account with Robinhood Crypto LLC. Robinhood Crypto is licensed to engage in virtual currency business activity by the New York State Department of Financial Services. Crypto held through Robinhood Crypto is not FDIC-insured or CIPIC-protected.

Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Securities trading is offered through an account with Robinhood Financial LLC, member CIPIC, a registered broker dealer. what you are owed and send money quickly and easily, all from the same platform. Sign up in minutes at mercury.com. Mercury, banking that does more. Mercury is a financial technology company, not a bank. Banking services provided through Choice Financial Group, column NA, and Evolve Bank and Trust, members FDIC.

It is on. Hi Robert, thanks for coming. Good seeing you again. Well, good to see you. Kara, how are you? Hi, Robert. Thanks for coming. Good seeing you again. Well, good to see you. Kara, how are you? Good. My son is so excited. He knows everything about you, just so you know.

He said to ask you about your childhood friend who was killed. Yes, Michael Schwerner. Yeah. I mean, it still shakes me when I think about it. When I was about eight years old, I think that Mickey, Michael Schwerner, I didn't know him as Michael Schwerner, I knew him as Mickey, must have been about 13 and had such a kind and radiant disposition that he tended to make everybody around him calmer and happier and less prone to cruelty.

And so I, who had been up until that point, teased and ridiculed and bullied because of my height. You opened the book about that, how you were viciously bullied as a child. Yes, yes. And so Mickey, in that sense, kept me safe from the bullies. And then years later, when I was a freshman in college, I learned that the real bullies of America, the Ku Klux Klan, had murdered him along with two other civil rights workers care that that shook me. To the core because i saw instead of bullying being the tops in my.

Elementary school you know threatening me of bullying really was all over i saw all over society every time the powerful abuse their power with regard to people who are weaker. That really in many ways is the core theme of the book. It's shaped your sense of justice. Many Americans feel like they're being bullied by a rigged system. Many of them voted for Trump. As you put it, quote, the most powerful force in American politics has come to be anti-establishment fury at the rigged system. Talk a little bit about your personal experience being bullied, because I don't think there's

anyone who hasn't been in some fashion. Oh, yeah. I think that's a very, very common experience. The only thing that perhaps was unique is that I was a head shorter than everybody else, and I felt like a freak right from the beginning. And the bullying was a little bit maybe more, I won't say violent, but more uninhibited. You know, the little boys of my elementary school who were in, when I was in kindergarten, five years old, they messed up in second or third grade,

they seemed to take delight in their bullying and their threatening me physically. And I felt something that I only later learned the word for, which is humiliated, powerless. And I think a lot of people in this country, certainly over the last several decades, have felt the same kind of powerlessness and humiliation. But I think that we have become very much a nation of bullies. And Donald Trump is the quintessence. I mean, he is the bully of bullies. But I think in many respects, he is the consequence, the culmination of 40 or 50 years of allowing bullying, economic bullying,

and other forms of bullying in this country to get out of control. So talk about your vision for this idea of, that you have all these people who've come to feel this anti-establishment fury. Give us your vision of how an economic populist message from the left could channel this fury at the rigged system, or is it impossible to do so? Well, it's difficult, but it's not impossible.

I think that instead of looking at cultural culprits like the Republicans do, like Donald Trump does, immigrants and the deep state and transgender people and so on. Cats and dog eaters. Yeah. What you want to do is really talk about the real sources of economic bullying. And those are big corporations. They're monopolistic, they're using their political power to get changes in laws that hurt many, many people. Wealthy people who are also getting changes in laws and rules and regulations and lowering their taxes in ways that ultimately

hurt everybody else because there's not enough money in the system to finance what we need done. because there's not enough money in the system to finance what we need done. I mean, you don't have to go far to see the sources of bullying in our society. Now, I'm not saying everybody is rich or every large corporation is to blame, but the abuses of their power, their economic power, those abuses are to blame. And I think that we have to stand up to them. Now, occasionally there are Democrats like Bernie Sanders and AOC, and I expect Momdani and others who are standing up. But as a strategy, the Democratic Party used to stand up to that kind of bullying, but is not doing it any longer. You say that you watched Democrats abandon the working class and they started abandoning

the labor movement over half a century ago. What goes through the timeline of how the party left behind its working class roots and why it chose to prioritize college-educated voters over working class ones? And was it the only choice, one or the other, or could they have done it? Well, it's certainly not the only choice. They could have done something different. I mean, they abandoned the working class, not just the white working class, but the working class in America. And they did it. I was there. I mean, this book is the story

of what I saw and lived and was frustrated about. And I think it's also, to some extent, I allowed it to happen. I didn't fight as hard as I should have fought. But even in the Clinton administration, and I, Kara, make no mistake, I'm proud to have been part of the Clinton administration. I think we did some important things like the Family and Medical Leave Act and expanding something that makes people's eyes glaze over even to this day, which is the Earned Income Tax Credit. I mean, there are a lot of very important policies. But the problem was that that

administration really didn't understand that deregulating finance and allowing global trade to dominate the way it did and taking their eyes, our eyes, off monopolization and not really encouraging unionization as much as we should have. I mean, all of these ways contributed to disempowering millions of people in this country and ultimately helped lead to Donald Trump. The backlash, right. So why, why do that? Why prioritize college educated voters over that? Well, I think that there was a mythology in the Democratic Party that the swing vote, the suburban swing voters really made all the difference. Clara, I can't tell you how

many conversations I had with Democratic operatives, political operatives who said, we don't want to go back to the old Democrats, the old Democrats who worried about the poor and the working class and had this notion of class in their minds. No, we really want to do something that is very different. I saw this begin in the 1980s with the so-called Atari Democrats. Remember the Atari Democrats? Yes, indeed. You know, I mean, they asked me to help and I would, Gary Hart, who I think had some very important and good ideas, and Walter Mondale, who is not exactly an Atari Democrat, Bill

Clinton, but they thought about where the economy was heading, which is appropriate. But they didn't think about bringing everybody along to where the economy was heading. You also wrote about the abandonment, goes back even further to the Port Huron statement in 1962, that idea that class politics were passe. Yes. And I am guilty of that. I read the Port Huron statement and I thought, oh, this is really exactly right. I read John Kenneth Galbraith, one of my heroes, my intellectual heroes,

and Betty Friedan, all of the people who formed the intellectual basis for the so-called New Left. But what we left out was the working class. Right. You know, there used to be a labor movement. Well, by the 1960s, 70s, there was not any longer a labor movement as such. There was organized labor as an interest group. There was the women's movement. There was the movement toward equal marriage rights and gays. There was a movement. Civil rights, yeah. The environmental movement.

There were a lot of movements, but there wasn't the worker movement. I mean, we forgot about workers. So talk about the psychology of working class voters. And you explained that Americans who have fallen behind their own economic expectations were drawn to Trump. You also quote a former Democratic congressperson who said, many working class men have been humiliated, as you noted,

and emasculated by the economy that doesn't value their work. Talk about that role and that pride, status, and respect play. Well, it's not just economics, obviously. But you see, if you lose your economic base, if you lose your job or if you lose a good job, a unionized job, the chances are you are also going to feel that your pride, your place, your status, your role in the economy and in your community and in the world has altered, has been degraded. You are going to feel looked down upon. And I saw that. When I was labor

secretary, I'd go out to the country and I'd talk to people and people who were losing their jobs, good factory jobs, good unionized jobs. Now, let me just make sure we're all together on this, because bringing back manufacturing is itself not the answer, because if it's not unionized, well, it's not going to be good jobs. The key in the 1950s and 60s and 70s was that these were unionized jobs so that you had a third of the private sector workforce in unions. That gave them strength, solidarity. And if there's another theme that's quite central to this book, it's that we can't take on the bullies unless we are together, unless we are organized and mobilized. We who are not bullies, we who want to take on the bullies, there has to be countervailing power. And

that is critically, critically important in terms of doing anything in this country. So you were Labor Secretary during the Clinton administration, as you noted, and then economic advisor to President Obama. In both cases, Larry Summers emerged as your foil, although you loved getting lunch with him when you were both at Harvard. You write that he played a role in convincing Clinton to join NAFTA and to avoid regulating financial derivatives, which helped lead to 2008 financial crisis.

After the crisis, he helped persuade Obama to bail out banks instead of homeowners. Why did they both side with Summers and other advisors who favored Wall Street interests and why didn't they have the political will to fight for everyday Americans, who you champion? Well, I can't speak for what was in Larry Summers' head, but I can say that Wall Street was becoming more and more powerful. Powerful economically, powerful politically. Bob Rubin, who is a very important character in this story, he persuaded Clinton, I think in part because the financial sector of the economy was so critical, it could bring down Clinton. Clinton

knew that. Obama knew that. They, in a sense, were being manipulated. That's maybe too strong a word, but I think looking historically back on what happened, it is accurate. Being manipulated by the titans of Wall Street. Why did we get a bailout of the financial sector? Well, maybe you could argue that had they allowed big banks to go down, the whole economy would have gone down with them. But there's also something called bankruptcy. Maybe we could have allowed some of the big banks to go into some sort of reorganization

of their debts. Maybe we could have helped the homeowners instead of helping the banks. A lot could have been done. You know, the book is bipartisan in the sense, Kara, that it's not about just the Republicans' failure. It's about Democrats' failure as well. What caused them to not side with you, for example, from your perspective? Well, I mean, number one, maybe I wasn't persuasive enough. I grant that in the book. I mean, it's a confessional in terms of my inability to sway the people I wanted to sway. But it's also, again, I

want to emphasize Alan Greenspan, who is Fed Chair, and the financial markets had huge power and they continue to have huge power. They can bring down an administration. It was very clear. I mean, look what happened to Jimmy Carter. Look what happened to George H.W. Bush. They were brought down. They became one-term presidents because finance turned on them, because the Fed turned on them and the financial community turned on them. So how do you fight that if you're a Democrat? Well, you fight it by, number one, establishing with the public your understanding and the

public's understanding that the real problem here is power. It's power that is allocated in a way that is bad for average working people and bad for most people. And what you want to do is build countervailing power. And a part of building countervailing power is controlling finance, regulating finance, making sure that finance doesn't get out of control. This is a kind of repeat of what we went through after 1933, certainly after the Great Depression, after the crash of 1929.

We learned these lessons, Kara, and we forgot them. We learned them as Democrats, and we forgot them. So you love Bernie, you endorsed Senator Sanders, speaking of someone who's been in that zone in 2016 and 2020, and you said in 2016, the DNC, quote, tipped the scales against him by deriding his campaign and rigging the campaign financing

in favor of Hillary Clinton. Many people feel that's what's happened. Some people do not. How do you persuade voters who think the party is corrupt and beholden to corporate interests that it's still worth supporting? Numbers are in the basement. Even though Trump is unpopular,

so are Democrats. I love Bernie. And I have a whole chapter about my love for Bernie Sanders. I love Bernie because he's right. He has guts enough to say what is going on. He has sufficient intestinal fortitude to go after the big corporations who are abusing their power and the wealthy who are abusing their power. And that's what the Democrats need to do. The reason Democrats are so unpopular is they don't have a coherent and authentic message that translates to average people as authentic and real, because the corporate Democrats, the financial Democrats, the Wall Street Democrats don't allow them to. A lot of Democrats I know are scared. They don't

want to bite the hands that feed them. And the corporate and financial Democrats are the ones that essentially feed them during election time in terms of campaign donations. So I understand this. But my point is that if they actually followed what they ought to be doing and kind of got rid of their dependence on the corporate and financial Democrats, they would actually do much better. They would win elections to a much greater extent. But look what happened to, as you note, Bernie Sanders, someone you are a fan of. Yes, and before Bernie Sanders, you know, one of my great heroes was Paul Wellstone. And Paul, and I used to talk a lot about being authentic politically, that is saying what you understand

to be truth, even if it's not popular. And Paul Wellstone used to say to me, you know, in fact, he laughed about it. He said, Bob, don't worry about my polls because by the time election time comes around again, I can explain to people why I'm voting the way I am, even if they disagree with me, they respect me and they will want me to be their senator. And you write that quote, the central question is not capitalism

versus some different system, it is what form of capitalism. And you want a system called democratic capitalism. So explain what democratic capitalism looks like in practical terms and then tell us how you maintain that dynamism and innovation of American capitalism, which is very clear to both of us, I think, while also curbing its excesses. You make capitalism more humane, its excesses. You make capitalism more humane, and Carrot. We are the most extreme form of inhumane capitalism among all advanced nations. Take something that is as prosaic as paid family leave.

I worked my tail off in 1991, 1992, getting the Family and Medical Leave Act enacted. That was the first thing that Bill Clinton signed into law. But why don't we have paid leave? Every other advanced nation has paid leave. Or take labor unions. We have now, I mentioned over a third of the private sector workforce in the 50s and 60s and early 1970s, they were unionized. Now it's down to 6%. 6%. You can't build a union movement on the basis of 6%. I mean, there's so many ways we can talk policy and I don't want to make this about policy. My book is really about what happened, what should happen, what I saw happening. But we could talk about it. If you want to talk about policy, Kara, I'm here to talk about policy.

But I want you to get an idea of how you do that. I mean, because this is from your history, because you're trying to go with your history to understand how to get to the future, presumably. Again, authentic politics in which you say to people, the reason you are struggling is because big corporations and very wealthy people have too much power and they are abusing that power. And here is how they're abusing it. And you go through five or six or 10 or 20 examples, and then you say to them, the way we get our politics and our economy and our country back is, and then you go through how we actually do that. It's through organizing and mobilizing. And then you say, for example, here are the things that we could do, paid family leave, universal

basic income, the childcare. A whole panoply of policies. But the policy is at the end. I mean, you have to tell a story that people understand and resonates with their lives. So here's a good story. Elon Musk, he spent close to $300 million to get Trump elected. He and a phalanx of tech billionaires lined up to support Trump at the inauguration. It was kind of untoward. I recently asked Democratic Congressman Robert Garcia, the ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, if Democrats should try to win back tech entrepreneurs, and he thought they

should. Do you agree with that, or would they inevitably pull the Democratic Party again away from working-class voters and towards policies that once again benefit the wealthy? Listen, if there are tech entrepreneurs who actually agree with what's happened, see what's happened, and see that corporations have too much power, and see that the wealthy have too much power and influence, fine. That's good. In fact, there used to be some tech entrepreneurs like that. Elon Musk is a completely different creature. In fact, the Democrats ought to be using Elon Musk as an example of what happens when too much money is in the hands of too few

people. You can buy a presidency for a quarter of a billion dollars. That's what he did. Use Elon Musk as your exhibit A. I mean, use Donald Trump as exhibit B, what happens when people are fed up and angry and they think that the system is rigged against them. And they're right, but they don't want to elect rigged against them, and they're right. But they don't want to elect a demagogue who is actually a front for the wealthy and powerful. They want to elect somebody who cares about them and is going to be actually for them. So if we go back to originalist, as working class voters choose bigoted cultural populism Trump offered because there was no economic populist message coming from Democrats to fill the void.

Would economic populism be enough to win them back? Aligning voters on culture issues like religious values, sexual wars, language norms is powerful. I think economic populism is much more powerful than cultural populism. But Democrats have not done it, apart from Bernie and AOC and here and there a little bit. But no, you have not had a Democratic party really since FDR that embraced economic populism. So we don't have a fair test of economic populism, but where it's been employed. And again, I want to emphasize Bernie Sanders, the least likely presidential candidate. When he came along in 2015, 2016, people said, are you kidding? He's an old white man, Jewish. He calls himself a social Democrat. How can he? Well, look how close he came. But Bernie's share of the Democratic primary vote did decline from 2016 to 2020. He won

pluralities in some cases in early primaries, but his overall share of primary vote declined. What's the takeaway from that? Does it mean we need a Bernie version that's more appealing or what? What's the takeaway? I think we need a younger Bernie. And ideally, I would say it would be a female younger Bernie. Sounds like someone he was on tour with. It might be AOC. Make the case for her because she gets a lot of pushback from the Republicans for certain and definitely from the Democrats.

Well, I mean, the fact that she gets pushback from Republicans is probably one of the, it makes my case for me. But Democrats too, I was going to say. What people really value is authenticity and charisma and saying stuff that rings true to average people. And she has all of that. And she's young and she knows everything from social media on through the way people talk. I've been teaching for 42 years, Kara. I know young people.

I hang around with young people. They're slightly different culturally. You know, the 18 to 22-year-olds or 25-year-olds, we've got to get them engaged and involved. And they are, they want to be. This is one of my things that keeps me most optimistic because as dark as it is right now, the generation that's coming up, they are fabulous. Mm-hmm, they are. They are ingenious and bright and dedicated and committed, and they want to change the

world. They want to do it, and they will do it if we give them a chance. So every episode we get an expert to send us a question for our guest, and yours comes from Larry Summers. We called him up and we got a question from him. Let's hear it. Bob, congratulations on your memoir. I have so many fond memories of our conversations and our debates. Here's my big question for you. You have stood for a populist approach to economic policy. Many argue that Bill Clinton's corrective of the Democratic Party's tendency to move too far left

was what reoriented the party for victory, that Joe Biden's move back towards the kind of policies you advocated contributed to Democrats poor standing on economic issues in 2024, which contributed to Donald Trump's coming back into office. People don't have the desire to take from the rich that you think they should have. Isn't the evidence somewhat against your views as to what people want? The debate continues. Larry, if you're listening to this, I appreciate your question, but implicit in your question is bullshit, truly bullshit. I mean, the fact of the matter is that the Democrats have not had an experiment, a president

who is actually an economic populist. I mean, Joe Biden is as close as the Democrats have come, and his problem was largely a communications problem. I mean, he just, you know, we all know it. A lot of people around him apparently did not want anybody else to know it, but we all found out about it. Had Joe Biden been charismatic and younger with the kind of policies that he was using, he would have clearly won re-election over Trump. Remember, put this in context, we are dealing with an authoritarian fascist. If the Democrats ever had a time to show what Democrats can do and what Democrats are, this is the time. In terms of Bill Clinton, I'm

proud of being part of Bill Clinton's administration, but the economic outcome of Bill Clinton's administration was a slight upward tick in the business cycle, followed by the implosion of the stock market in terms of what we had in 2000, after people got less inclined to buy all of these wild internet stocks. Then we didn't really see the underpitting start to fall apart. Unfortunately, Bill Clinton, and I'm going to blame you a little bit, Larry and Bob

Rubin, you wanted to deregulate Wall Street. And look what happened. I mean, your deregulation of Wall Street led almost directly to the Wall Street financial crisis, which made it almost impossible for Barack Obama to do much of anything except try to bail out Wall Street and get the economy back on track. So if you don't mind me saying so, Larry, I love you, but you're full of shit. We'll be back in a minute.

Support for this show comes from OpenPhone. All of us know how frustrating it can be when you need to get in touch with a company for some reason and can't get through. But if you're a business, it's more than just frustration. It's bad for business. With OpenPhone, you'll never miss an opportunity to connect with your customers. OpenPhone is a business phone system that streamlines and scales your customer communications. It works through an app on your phone or computer, so your team can share one number and collaborate on customer calls and texts like a shared inbox.

That way, any teammate can pick up right where the last person left off, and their AI agent can be set up in minutes to handle calls after hours, answer questions, and capture leads so you never miss a customer. That means that for 60,000 businesses that use OpenPhone, voicemail is a thing of the past. OpenPhone is offering my listeners 20% off of their first six months at openphone.com slash cara. That's O-P-E-N-P-H-O-N-E dot com slash cara. And if you have existing numbers with another service, OpenPhone will port them over at no extra charge.

OpenPhone. No miss calls. No missed customers. Support for On with Kara Swisher comes from Upwork. Owning a small business means you got to wear a lot of hats, but sometimes you really could use an extra pair of hands. Upwork is how good companies find great and trusted freelance talent. With Upwork, you get access to a global marketplace filled with top talent in IT, web development, AI, design, admin support, marketing, and more. Posting a job on Upwork is super simple. There's no cost to join. You can browse freelancer

profiles, get help drafting a job post, or even book a consultation. From there, you can connect with freelancers that get you. So when you bring them into key projects and initiatives, you can move your work forward. Hiring shouldn't be a hassle and it also doesn't need to put a strain on your budget. Upwork makes the entire process easier and more affordable with industry low fees.

Post a job today and hire tomorrow with Upwork. Visit Upwork.com right now and post your job for free. That is Upwork.com to post your job for free and connect with top talent ready to help your business grow. That's U-P-W-O-R-K dot com Upwork dot com. The new BMO VI Porter MasterCard is your ticket to more. More perks. More points. More flights. More of all the things you want in a travel rewards card.

And then some. Get your ticket to more with the new BMO V.I. Porter MasterCard and get up to $2,400 in value in your first 13 months. Terms and conditions apply. Visit bmo.com slash VI Porter to learn more. So let's switch gears and talk about recent news items. We'll jump around a little bit since there's so much to talk about. Trump has been using the tariffs or threats of tariffs

to bully other countries into accepting trade deals. In the book, you criticize Democratic leaders for embracing NAFTA and lowering tariffs. On China, in your sub stack, you say Trump's tariffs will lead to higher prices. Should the Democrats have been implementing a smarter version of Trump's tariffs and use trade policy to protect American workers from foreign competition? And how do they do that without also raising prices for consumers? What you want to do is have selective tariffs that are helpful to you in engineering and promoting the industries of the future.

I mean, this goes back to Alexander Hamilton. This is what Hamilton got us to do. But you also at the same time, you want to help gain the skills, help workers gain the skills they need to flourish in these new industries. Artificial intelligence is going to make this more complicated. It's not going to change the thrust of what I just said. So you need a tariff policy that is selective and smart, and you need an industrial policy that complements that tariff policy. And right now, we have the opposite. We've got a stupid tariff policy, and we've got an industrial policy that what the coddles oil and gas and steel and the 19th and 20th century industries of America. That's where you agree with Elon Musk in that regard. Israel is also causing mass starvation in Gaza and death toll in the Palestinian enclave

is close to 60,000. You say in the book that Biden's legacy, quote, will be forever tainted by his failure to stop Benjamin Netanyahu from creating a bloodbath in Gaza. And you recently posted on Blue Sky that Netanyahu is a war criminal and the US must halt military assistance to Israel. Why is the Democratic establishment so reluctant to criticize Israel? And what will it take to change that? I certainly know young people have changed rather dramatically. Well, AIPAC, the Israeli, basically pro-Israeli political action committee, has been a huge problem for the Democrats,

very active in Democratic primaries. If I were head of the Democratic National Committee, I'd say, let's get rid of all special interest groups in primaries. Let's not allow AIPAC to have the kind of influence it has. And the other thing that Democrats need to say, and particularly people like me, Jewish, we ought to say, we're not anti-Semitic. Obviously, we're not anti-Zionist, but we're anti Netanyahu. There's a difference. Netanyahu is, in my view, a war criminal. That doesn't mean I'm anti-Zionist.

I think Israel is extraordinarily important, and I am not anti-Semitic by any stretch of the imagination. We've got to be a little bit more precise, and Democrats, this is not difficult. Democrats can do this. Mm-hmm. Now, the Trump administration has been attacking universities for allegedly allowing the Gaza protests on their campus. It has sent into rampant anti-Semitism. You recently retired after teaching approximately 40,000 students across your career as a professor at Harvard, Brandeis, and UC Berkeley.

Do American universities have this anti-Semitism problem that Trump touts? There were protests that crossed the line and made Jewish students feel unsafe, that's for sure. That's obviously wrong, but many protesters are pointing out what is becoming now conventional wisdom. Even Israeli human rights groups are accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza. Talk a little bit about this, about being on a campus at this point. It's exciting to be on a campus where students are protesting about something as basic as human rights in Gaza and against what is happening there. And let me just say, I am not only taught for 42 years, but I used to be a student myself

in the 1960s of all times. You know, there's a protest or not bad protests that are based in moral outrage are good. Hello. And if some people are offended by them, well, you know, that's unfortunate. And maybe they could be a little bit more sensitive, the protests to the feelings of particular groups and individuals. But I think that the Trump administration is using anti-Semitism, so-called, as a pretext for cracking down on universities. It's doing the same thing with DEI, and it's doing the same thing with transgender people

and students. They are just excuses for the Trump administration cracking down on what conservatives for years have thought were bastions of liberalism. This goes back to the 16th century. Having been on the college campuses as long as you have, where does it go from here? What's the next step? Well, I think the next step is for universities not like Columbia, and not like my alma mater, Dartmouth, universities to

get together, to join together. In unity, there is strength. It's not just labor unions. Universities have to join together and have got to say to Trump, no, we are not going to bow and scrape and we're not going to give up any academic freedom. We're not going to allow you to intimidate us. But there is money at stake. Well, there's a lot of money at stake. But if universities are all together, they have much greater possibility of pushing back than if Trump can divide and conquer.

Which is what he's doing right now. Moving along, you said recently that you fear that Zoran Mamdani and Representative Ocasio Cortez won't appeal to working people and that you fear that, quote, they will be carried in the currents of progressive politics, which right now are overwhelmingly college graduates in urban and coastal centers. That's not bad, but you have to be inclusive. You have to include working class and the poor. What should politicians like them, who are very compelling to people, do to include working class and the poor,

that they aren't already doing. And in the case of Mamdani, a lot of the working class voted for Cuomo. Well, yes, I tried to explain that in a recent interview. I think the reason that a lot of the working class voted for Cuomo is Cuomo has the name and he has the endorsements. And Mamdani is not that well known yet. When he becomes

better known, I think the working class will understand and respond to him. So I don't think it's a major, that neither he nor AOC has got to go through a major change in what they're saying. I think they're saying the right things. But there seems to be a paradox at the heart of the progressive movement. College-educated intellectuals develop policy ideas that are meant to uplift working-class people, but they're oftentimes divorced from many of the core values that working people care about. Well, more to the point, though, I think college-educated people, who are now 40% of the adults in this

country, look down their noses at non-college people. There's a kind of, the divide is not just economic, it's also social and there's a snobbery that goes with being a college graduate. I think that's what we have to, and that's what our leaders should be helping us overcome. So I'm gonna go to a couple more things, I wanna talk about Trump at the end. ICE raids have been in the news since Trump took office and labor unions are lending their

way to protest against Trump's mass deportation plans. But historically, they've been wary of undocumented immigrants. For example, people don't know this, I didn't. Cesar Chavez spearheaded a 300-person effort to patrol the border in the 1970s. More recently, construction unions are often opposed to competition from undocumented workers, even if their businesses are getting hurt right now. What do you say to American workers who believe they're losing work or seeing their wages decline because of undocumented immigrants?

And what's the argument for being against mass deportations if you're a labor union person? The notion that average working people are suffering wage drops because of all of the undocumented people who are competing with them doesn't wash. There have been a lot of studies, Kara, showing that actually they're two separate labor markets. Most American workers, even lower working class American workers, don't want to do the jobs that many of the immigrants who are undocumented are willing to do. They're separate labor markets. They don't compete with each other. That's point number one. Point number two is that certain unions like the UAW understand that if you organize immigrants, you're actually going to have more power in terms of fighting unscrupulous

employers, which gets back to my theme about we are all in this together. Now could we ever have an immigration system that actually was open and fairer and didn't depend on people who are here who are undocumented? The answer is obviously yes. And it wasn't that long ago. You remember when we had almost a consensus in the Senate and in the House among Republicans, Democrats for immigration law reform. But you know, there are too many kind of insidious dark forces out there in American politics that don't want there to be bipartisan reform. They want to harangue and generate a great deal of anger and fear toward immigrants.

And Donald Trump is right up there at the top. So how do you make the argument that undocumented workers, because in some cases do hurt American wages and construction, for example, how do you make that argument to them from your perspective? If you want, you know, to be on the side of the working class, how do you make that argument to them? Well, first of all, even in construction, I mean, I've seen the data, the construction, it's not clear that American workers are hurting because of undocumented workers in construction. Again, there's certain jobs, but we're talking about very low numbers. I think you make the argument

to American working class people who are unions or non-union members, you say, look, we are all benefiting from the labor of undocumented people here in the United States. Now we do ultimately want to regularize this. We don't want to, because they shouldn't have to be second-class citizens. So we want there to be a door that is much bigger in terms of legitimately coming here from other countries to do work.

But let's not kid ourselves, not only do we benefit from their work, but they are contributing to social security and to Medicaid and everything else, but they're not getting it back because they're not eligible for it. But they contribute through their, many of them through their paychecks.

I live in a part of California that has a lot of undocumented workers and I know them personally and they're part of the community and they are woven into the community. We're dealing with human beings who are hardworking community members who have families, everybody knows them.

It's inhumane to do what we are now doing. So let's finish speaking of inhumane, talking about President Trump. His administration is rife with conflicts of interest, obviously. You recently highlighted how Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's family business empire is benefiting from the administration's policies and the Trump family's conflict of interest in their crypto schemes is about as blatant as any corruption we've ever seen. They are saying it's transparent, so that's okay. But so far, voters don't seem particularly upset by it. If anything, Trump seems to have normalized

corruption. How do you change that? Because being shocked is not seemingly working. Your entire premise is that money is corrupting our politics and our democracy. So there's a problem if the public shrugs it off, correct? I don't think the public is shrugging it off. I think it's getting buried under so much other outrageous news. I mean, Donald Trump is the master of deflecting attention from one thing. He doesn't want people to, for example, Jeffrey Epstein. He doesn't like that one. So what does he do? He accuses Barack Obama of treason.

I mean, I think people are outrage-numbed right now. And if we actually focused on some of the corruption going on, I looked at the polls right after Trump got this plane, this palace in the sky, that he says is actually for the United States government. It's not for the United States government. It's for himself. He gets to use it after he leaves office

and it's his own personal palace and Qatar I mean, you know there there is a part of the Constitution that says no emoluments from I get that But how do you get the public to not just shrug it off? The way you do this is you talk about it and you focus the public's attention on it But right now it's hard because there's so much else that is outrageous. Maybe you wait till the August recess.

We're now talking during the beginning of the August recess. Well now maybe is the time for some courageous and thoughtful and articulate Democrats to say, one of the biggest problems of this administration is outright bribery and corruption. We're going to start with foreigners, but even the corporations and the wealthy people who are buying into Trump's businesses. They're getting benefits. Here, look at this, look at this, look at this.

It's a huge and important story to tell. But it takes a life, if you do it in the context of what I've been talking about during this conversation, Kara, and that is the wealthy and the big corporations that are abusing their power. Power, yeah. It's part of the abuse of power. Put it into that context and people can hear it. We'll be back in a minute. Basically everyone except Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appears to be gravely concerned about starvation in Gaza. More than a hundred aid organizations like Doctors Without Borders and Oxfam just signed a letter saying that restrictions, delays, and fragmentation under Israel's total siege

have created chaos, starvation, and death. 30-ish countries, including a bunch of Israel's own allies, have issued a statement condemning the drip-feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food. Even President Trump is balking. Here's a bit of what he said on Monday from Scotland. We have to help on a humanitarian basis before we do anything. We have to get the kids fed. Gaza's breaking point on Today Explained.

This week on Criminal. In 2008, detectives from the Minnesota Police Department were called to investigate a drive by shooting. Everything they did was recorded by a camera crew for a TV show. Those camera people are allowed to ride around in police vehicles. They're allowed to be on the scene of crime scenes that are very active, that, you know, things have just happened, people have just died. Years later, the attorney general's office would say the TV show had completely misrepresented

the case. Listen to our latest episode on criminal, wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, this is Peter Kavka, the host of Channels, a show about media and tech and what happens when they collide. This may be hard to remember, but not very long ago, magazines were a really big deal. And the most important magazines were owned by Conde Nast, the glitzy publishing empire that's the focus of a new book by New York Times reporter Michael Grinbaum.

The way Conde Nast elevated its editors, the way they paid for their mortgages so they could live in beautiful homes, there was a logic to it, which was that Conde Nast itself became seen as this kind of enchanted land. You can hear the rest of our chat on channels, wherever you listen to your favorite media podcast.

So you point out in the book that America needs two parties that are capable of governing, but the Republican Party has turned into a crazed cult. Is it possible to have a functioning democracy in a two-party system where one party doesn't follow the rules? And what happens to the party when the cult leader is gone? Well, we're going to find out. I think JD Vance is a dangerous character from all I know about him. Why is that? I think he's more intelligent than Trump.

Now he may not be as much of a con man as Trump in terms of Trump's natural instinct is to lie. I don't know that JD Vance has that much of a natural lying instinct, although he does a lot of it. I worry that Vance's backers in Silicon Valley, you know, some of the very, very big billionaires who don't like democracy, who are afraid of democracy because they think democracy is going to ultimately lead to confiscation of their income through tax increases. I worry

about that. But I think that once Trump leaves the scene one way or another, I think it's going to be hard to rebuild democratic institutions. But let me make this point, and it's one that I believe in very strongly. We were on the road, even before Trump, to needing some fundamental reforms in our system. I mean, campaign finance was a dead letter. The Supreme Court was allowing just everything in terms of big money.

At the same time, it was narrowing civil rights laws and voting rights. So we do need fundamentally to change course. We've got to get big money out of our politics. We need to change the Supreme Court. Maybe we have to have an amendment to the Constitution if that's what it takes. So I'm going to read a quote from the book. Authoritarianism isn't adequate to describe what Trump wants for America. fascism would be more appropriate. You're not missing words, obviously. Trump is heading us towards fascism. What will it take for Americans to fight back? You have noted younger generations are ready to fight.

You've criticized boomers for leading us into this mess. Are millennials and Gen Zers capable of getting us out of it? Oh, they certainly are capable. And I don't want to, again, it's a little, I try in the book not to tar with too broad a brush. I don't say it's all boomers. I mean, I think that my generation, the boomer generation did come up short in term. We did a lot of good things, but compared to what we were handed by our parents and the kind of legacy and trust that we were given, I think we did come up short. But I'm very optimistic about the future.

I think the young people are fabulous and they have the energy and boldness of vision. They want to support candidates who are as energetic and bold, and they have an uncanny sensibility when it comes to what we might say is authenticity. They can smell a fake a mile away. So a documentary film crew filmed you during your last semester for a film called The Last Class and you say, quote, a true leader helps people overcome cynicism. Some listeners may like your message of inequality and money in politics, but feel jaded about what other possibilities exist outside the current system. Why does our current economic model feel inevitable to so many people?

And how do you persuade Americans, especially young Americans, that it's not? You do sense, if you do know young people, I have two young sons who are in that age group you're talking about, and they are both positive and very negative, I would say. They're like, they feel that they can't overcome it. At the same time, they seem to feel like they can. So how do you persuade all Americans that it's not written in stone? Well, it's a very good question. I draw this distinction with my students between pessimism and cynicism. I say it's perfectly fine to be pessimistic. You can even be skeptical. I want

you to be skeptical. That's part of critical thinking. But I don't want you to be cynical, because once you are cynical, once you think it's hopeless, that nothing can change, then nothing will change. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy. I was fortunate enough and my generation fortunate enough to have been part of the civil rights movement and part of the anti-Vietnam War movement and we saw saw change. And so there's a sense of agency that people, you know, as old as I am, have. We naturally think that it's possible. A lot of these young people, as you just pointed out, really don't have that kind of experience, that direct experience.

No, they have Trump. And so I tell, you know, my students, start locally, start in your communities. Your communities, every community needs, has problems, they need things done. Organize and mobilize locally. You'll see that you can make a huge difference and build on that sense of agency locally. Robert, as usual, you're wonderful and it's a really fascinating career you've had here. It's a wonderful book and I hope everybody reads it. And in fact, I'm going to give it to my son.

Thank you. Thank you so much. Thank you, Kara. I appreciate this and good to talk to you. On with Kara Swisher is produced by Christian Castor-Wisell, Kateri Yocum, Megan Burney, Allison Rogers, and Kaylin Lynch. Nishant Kurwa is Vox Media's Executive Producer of podcasts. Special thanks to Claire Hyman.

Our engineers are Rick Kwan and Fernando Arruda, and our theme music is by Trackademics. If you're only following the show, you're a moral giant like Robert Reich. If not, you use too much oxygen. Go wherever you listen to podcasts, search for On with Kara Swisher and hit follow. Thanks for listening to On with Kara Swisher

from Podium Media, New York Magazine, the Vox Media Podcast Network and us. We'll be back on Thursday with more. Hi, I'm Teffy. Maybe you've seen me on TikTok or TV or interviewing celebrities on the red carpet. But before all that, I'm Teffy. Maybe you've seen me on TikTok or TV or interviewing celebrities on the red carpet. But before all that, I was just another girl running late to her desk job, transferring calls,

ordering printer ink. I don't miss that. But I do miss not working at work, gossiping with my coworkers about celebrities. What's the latest with Bieber? Where's Britney? And which Jonas brother is which? That's what I want my new podcast to feel like.

Like you and I are work besties. We'll chat about celebrities we're obsessed with. How could you be registered to vote and not know who Jennifer Aniston is? Look up their star charts. Sagittarius and the Capricorn, they do clash. And have so much fun avoiding real work together. I'm having a silly goose of a time.

Teffy runs, Teffy laughs, Teffy over shares. Teffy explains, but most of all, Teffy talks. From me, the cut and box media podcast, this is Teffy Talks. Let's go.