On with Kara Swisher - Survivors Speak Out: Taking On the ‘Epstein Class’

Episode Date: March 9, 2026

It’s been more than a month since the Justice Department released the latest tranche of files related to its investigation of Jeffrey Epstein — around 3 million in total — yet the fallout shows no sign of slowing down.  The release almost certainly wouldn’t have happened if it weren’t for survivors who fought for transparency and accountability. In this episode, Kara sits down with three women who're still in that fight: Dani Bensky, Jess Michaels and Liz Stein. Kara,  Dani, Jess and Liz talk about how Epstein’s survivors came together after decades of being siloed, who’s helping them in their fight for justice, and who’s standing in the way. They also talk about what the files reveal about the “Epstein Class” and what they says about how power works in this country.  Questions? Comments? Email us at [e-mail] or find us on YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Threads, and Bluesky @onwithkaraswisher. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This has really permeated every single area of society from the medical industry, the entertainment industry, the arts industry, academia, banking and financing, politics, literally everywhere. And powerful people are protected. Hi, everyone, from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network. This is on with Kara Swisher, and I'm Kara Swisher. Today, I have a really important episode, important to me, and it should be important to you. I'm talking with three survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse who are fighting for transparency and accountability. Danielle Bensky, Jess Michaels, and Liz Stein. This is a critically important story. It's about a lot of things. At the heart, it's about a crime. It's about a sex crime. It's about sex trafficking. It's about the abuse of power. It's about the abuse of young women. It's about misogyny. It's about power in America and how it is used and abused. It's a critically important issue, and it's the heart of so much that's going on today. I know,

People have read and listened to a lot about the Epstein files. A lot of it has gotten sucked into conspiracy, but at the heart of it is about the women who were abused at young ages by Jeffrey Epstein and the repercussions of it and people who are involved that have gotten off. No one has been exonerated here. Let me be clear. I don't care what President Trump says they haven't been properly investigated. And these women and so many others deserve that. A note to our listeners, we don't normally explain the booking process for On, but this episode is all about transparency. We are connected by someone I've covered a lot in the tech industry to a communication strategist who has worked with World Without Exploitation, a coalition that

fights human trafficking and sexual exploitation, that has also been working directly with Epstein survivors. The strategist introduced us to Danny, Jess, and Liz. The reason I need to tell you this is because the initial connection was made by Reid Hoffman, a well-known Silicon Valley investor and entrepreneur whom I have known for decades. This is relevant because Hoffman knew Jeffrey Epstein, which was evidenced by numerous emails between them in the recent release of the Epstein files. Hoffman hasn't been accused of any crimes. He's also expressed regret over any engagement with Epstein. To be clear, none of the Epstein survivors interviewed by me here had any knowledge of Hoffman's connection with the booking. And Hoffman had absolutely no influence on

the interview, as it should be, but we always air on the side of full disclosure to our audience. All right, let's get to my conversation with Danny, Jess, and Liz. The focus absolutely needs to be on the Epstein survivors. It's a powerful show. It's a long one, and it's worth listening to. So please stick around. At Desjardin, we speak business. We speak equipment modernization. We're fluent in data digitization and expansion into foreign markets. And we can talk all day about streamlining manufacturing processes. Because at Desjardin business, we speak the same language you do.

Business. So join the more than 400,000 Canadian entrepreneurs who already count on us and contact Desjardin today. We'd love to talk, business. Bare walls, clear surfaces, the minimalist aesthetic is having a moment. And for some, it's a form of resistance. I think a lot of people have a sense that, like, we live in this very consumerist society and feel kind of a desire and need to, like, push back against that. How to Live with Less.

That's this week on Explained It to Me. New episodes, Sundays, wherever you get your podcasts. Danny, Jess, and Liz, thank you so much for coming on on. Thank you for having us. Thank you so much for having us. Thanks for having us. To start, can each you just tell us a little bit about yourself, who you are, how you ended up in Epstein's orbit, and how, old you were at the time. Just tell your story, essentially. First, Jess, then Liz, then Danny.

My name is Jess Michaels, and I'm a 1991 Jeffrey Epstein survivor. I was 22 years old when he raped me. I'm the earliest publicly known survivor that's out there advocating, but I'm not the earliest survivor. Okay. And what do you do now? What do you do in your life today? Thank you for asking. I've actually created sexual assault first aid, and I have put it into an app called the With You U2 app, and it teaches young people to know what to do when someone says me too. Okay. All right. Next, Liz.

My name is Liz Stein. I was 21 years old in 1994 in a senior in college when I met Jeffrey Epstein and Gilleen Maxwell. I am now a human trafficking specialist and a survivor advocate in the National Anti-Trafficking Movement. Oh, great. Okay. Danny?

Yeah. So I was 17 years old in 2004. And I was in Jeffrey's orbit 2004 to 2005, and I was a ballerina then. Now I am a dense educator and a choreographer. And I work for a Disney theatrical group. And I work a lot with kids age ranges between 15 and 19. But like the sweet spot is really 17 and 19. So around the time that I was abused by Jeffrey as well. Let's talk a little bit first about what compelled you not just to come forward with your stories of abuse, but also to do so publicly. I've covered this issue many times in different ways in Silicon Valley and elsewhere and with powerful men. But what compelled each of you to come forward? And again, publicly is a big move by women.

I know this. Let's start with Jess, then Liz, then Danny. Yeah. Back in 2018, when I read Julie K. Brown's article, the perversion of justice, it was the first time I saw his face in 27 years. It was the first time I realized that I wasn't the only one because all that time I thought, I thought he had only ever raped me. When I heard those first four women come out, Virginia, Courtney, Chante, and Michelle,

it was life-changing for me. And at the time, I was actually working for one of the Sandy Hook foundations, and I was teaching young people to stand up for other people in circumstances where they couldn't stand up for themselves. And there came a point where I couldn't continue to teach young people this if I wasn't willing to do it myself in my own circumstance. So that's what led me to start speaking out. And obviously we had a wonderful example with Virginia Roberts Juffrey.

And when I saw her being able to do that, I believed it was possible. So it was just seeing that story and understanding you weren't alone, right, obviously. Understanding, because we always think we're alone. That's a big, the whole point. The whole point is the silence and the isolation. Mm-hmm. Liz. So when I met Epstein and Maxwell, I looked like I had a really bright future ahead of me. And after meeting them, the trajectory of my life completely changed and it looked nothing like what I had expected. And so for decades, I lived with this enormous amount of shame and guilt and kind of this failure to thrive and feeling like I didn't exactly fit in with my peers. And that's, That was a big burden to carry. And so when Epstein was arrested.

Is that because of shame or that, obviously the abuse itself, but what led to you feeling that way? I think that the way that we view survivors, it's detrimental to survivors. We don't necessarily know what we're looking at when we see survivors of sexual assault. The way that this manifests in women's lives is through, you know, interpret. personal relationship difficulties. A lot of times you see substance abuse issues. You see really just people who are not able to thrive like others. And a lot of times we look at these women and we stigmatize them and we say,

well, what's wrong with her? Why can't she do this? Or why isn't she performing the way that we expect her to? And so the guilt is put on the survivor of the crime. and it's not, we're not looking at, well, why is her behavior like this? Why did someone, in my case at least, why did someone who has some bright, promising future, someone who was so good with people, how did that person turn into someone who was in and out of behavioral health hospitals, in and out of therapy, unable to hold a job, unable to have interpersonal relationships,

and it was trauma. And I will tell you that I really lived with that for a long time until someone looked at me and said, you're not crazy, you have trauma. When that happened, it was treatable. Right. And you were able to speak out. Yeah. Yeah. Because a lot of people, when they're in situations like this, it's always like, why can't you get over it? It's the identification of what the problem is. You know, doctors were saying, you have this, you have that, and nothing ever seemed to been. No one said you have trauma until, you know, 20 years ago. And when that happened, when someone tried to understand what was going on with me, instead of, you know, labeling me with different diagnoses, that was when healing began. Right. Danny? The PTSD is absolutely real. It's so well said,

Liz. For me, coming forward, it was, you know, I teach kids. I teach dancers. And, And I was working at a private school, a prep school in Brooklyn, and I was listening to a group of dancers talk about parties that they had been to. And there was a mansion that one of them had gone to and nothing happened. Thank goodness. But just hearing them talk, I just realized that the world needs to be a much safer place for these kids because, you know, things like this are still happening. And if we don't get to the core of it and we don't, you know, the powerful people that are in positions of power are going to stay there unless we do something about it.

You know, so I think that that was just something that felt like we need to make sure that the right people are in those positions of power, right? Did you think about the repercussion, the price on yourself that it would cost? Well, when I came forward, it was 2021 and I had no intention of coming forward, actually. I had gone to the courthouse for Gieland Maxwell's hearing, really just to thank my lawyer, Sigrid McCauley. I had never met her in person, and we had always, you know, it was during the pandemic. And so we had always talked over Zoom, but I really wanted to just, like, have that face-to-face connection and interaction with her. And so I had gone to the courthouse that day, you know, and as I was standing in a hallway talking to her, she talked to me about community. And I had said that, you know, I watched the Jeffrey Epstein, Guelty Rich, and I had seen Maria Farmer's story.

And I remember feeling like, wow, if she could have been victimized, I could be victimized too. And I was able to sit with it differently because she was an artist and she was, you know, so talented. And I felt like, wow, that level, like she talked a little bit about this association and about how, like, it changed the way she created art. And I saw myself in that. So I talked to Sigrid for a moment about that. And then we talked about Virginia Giffrey and just really seeing myself in Virginia and thinking about how she turned this shame into power. And I felt to myself like, wow, I hope that I can be brave enough to do that one day. And so we left the courthouse media everywhere. And I was, you know, I was masked because we were just off of the pandemic. And everybody's screaming Virginia, Virginia, Virginia, because I'm blonde, right? And so I was walking out. And she had said, no, this isn't Virginia, but they said, do you want to give a statement? And they were like, you know, are you at Epstein Survivor? I said yes. So I gave my first statement, but they didn't know my name. And so then they followed us for blocks. I mean, just like people falling into the street was like nothing I'd ever experienced.

Wow. Until finally, I just, I felt this immense responsibility to other survivors to say my name. And I did, and then nothing for quite some time. And then all of this came up again, really this July. And so, yeah, I think there's a price to being public about all of this. But there are Jane Does that I know that can't come forward. And I feel like it's it is our duty in a way. Like it just feels like there's this big responsibility to keep making change. Absolutely. Jessin-Less, what is the price each of you have paid? I'm curious. So for me, living with post-traumatic stress disorder now going on 35 years, I had severe physical debilitation. When your body lives in survival mode for a very long time, the nervous system affects every single system, your digestion, your immune system, your cardiovascular system, your endocrine

system to a point where I was bedridden for two years, physically incapacitated. And it was actually that article in 2018. And that's one of the things that kind of, Joe Graham, like, raised me from the dead. Like, I actually found some hope in there and found a great doctor. But what happens for me is that my capacity is really limited when I'm doing these so much media. And I wouldn't change it. I want to be really clear. There's nothing I would change about what I'm doing, what we are doing together.

And the voice that is now happening collectively around this issue. and sometimes I am stuck in bed for days. Yeah, it definitely takes that out of you. What about you, Liz? I would agree with all the things that just described. You know, it's two sides of the coin for me. There is a great physical and emotional cost to me. Absolutely.

You know, there are days when we're just in bed and that's it. But the reason that I'm doing this is because I couldn't talk about this. I couldn't talk about this for so long. I am also, like many other survivors, a survivor of childhood sexual abuse. And it was just for me decades and decades and decades of not being able to talk about it. And we are in this position of visibility. And we would be remiss if we did not use it to change the narrative and to do better. And so for me, you know, the cost of the...

this is worth it if I am able to change the narrative for even just one person who is experiencing this, if I can open someone's eyes as to what they're looking at. Really, I just, I'm going to go back to what I was talking about earlier. If people understood that what was going on with me was trauma, my life would have looked very differently. And so that's why education is so important. All right, Danny. Yeah, I mean, I think the shame was really great for me for a long time. You know, at one point, Jeffrey had said to me, I turned 18 while I was there, right? So I was between 17 and 18.

And so when I turned 18, he had said to me, well, now you can be brought up on prostitution charges, right? So you better not tell anybody. And I believed him, you know, when he spoke, I believed. And so, you know, that sat with me for years of like, don't say anything, you know. And then in 2008, I was subpoenaed to talk to the FBI, and a friend of mine said, you know, you can't talk to them because, you know, Jeffrey threatened me and he's going to threaten you too. So they were like, it's twofold. It's the threats that are real. And then there's the threat like that you feel in your body. And that is shame, right? And it sits in the darkest places. And I just think that like having conversations already takes it out of the dark. And that's really important. when I think about the teenagers that I work with, I think about if, you know, my friend and I were both there at the same time and yet, and we knew that the other one was going, but we never, ever

talked about what happened there. And I think that this generation already is bold enough to say, like, hey, this is a bad thing that's happening to me? Is it happening to you too? And already then go and tell an adult, right? Because we're having these conversations and we're opening the door so that it matters a great deal. Yeah, but I mean, it doesn't, it's not to say that I still have, you know, I have nightmares regularly, and since I've been doing this work, I, like, walk the halls of the house in my sleep. Like, my partner turned around and is like, are you okay, you're twitching, and your eyes are going crazy, fluttering, because it just lives in this place psychologically that, you know, when you start talking back into it, it's very real. Yeah, you're definitely paying a price. This is not even close.

I don't know if you know this. I testified against a sexual harassment in John McLaughlin in a trial, and I was 20. It was 20-some years ago. I was not sexual acts. I was testifying. half of someone who was who I'd witnessed. And they threatened me and threatened my career, actually. I was just a young reporter. And they said, if you do this, we're going to get you. And I then went on to use my name, my actual name, not a source said or source who saw it,

because I felt like it was critically important for people don't believe if they don't have a name attached to it. You know what I mean? And I remember being warned by like your career is going to be hurt by this powerful man. And I said, you know, and I did run into a, later and he said to me it was everyone stabbed me in the back and you stabbed me in the front you know because I went I was so public and so everything and I was in my 20s and I said anytime you son of a bitch and it was great I have to say and it didn't have a price it didn't I mean the price was a good one it was worth it it was and it was nothing like what you've been through obviously yeah and I love what you just said it was worth it like when I expressed you that at 22 you know you're launching out

to the world, you're still looking to adults to mentor you and to really find your way and to succeed. And when your identity and your sense of self and your voice get shut down at those younger ages, it's really hard to find it again. And so being able to speak now, I find I have a really difficult time shutting up. I have to keep talking. And I need to make sure my point is heard. And I've even allowed myself the, I was like, I'm going to be messy because there's a learning curve to having a voice at 57, you know, 35 years later. And that's okay with me. We'll be back in a minute. Support for the show comes from Quo. If you're a small business, you can't afford to leave money on the table. One missed call could be one missed opportunity

for growth. Quo, spelled QUO, can help you and your team share. one business number, reply faster, and stay on top of every customer conversation, so you never miss an opportunity to connect. That's why Quo says they're the smarter way to run your business communications. Quo is more than a phone system. It's a smart one. Its AI automatically logs calls create summaries and flags next steps, so nothing slips through the cracks. It can even respond after hours, helping you stay responsive and deliver a more personal customer experience. Quo works by allowing your entire team to handle calls and texts from one shared number. No more missed messages or disconnected conversations. Everyone sees the full thread making replies faster and customers feel

genuinely cared for. See why more than 90,000 businesses rely on Quo to stay connected, professional, and consistently reachable. Make this the season where no opportunity and no customer slips away. Try Quo for free, plus get 20% off your first six months when you go to Quo.com slash Kara That's QUO.com slash Kara. Whoa, no miss calls, no miss customers. Support for this show comes from Framer. If you're a business owner, you know that a website should help your business grow. If updates to your dot com feel harder than they should, Framer is the shortcut you've been looking for.

Framer is a website builder that can transform your dot com from a formality into a tool for growth. They've already helped thousands of businesses from early stage startups to Fortune 500's build better websites faster. Framer is an enterprise-grade no-code website builder used by teams at companies like Perplexity and Mero to move faster. With real-time collaboration, a robust CMS with everything you need for great CEO and advanced analytics that include integrated A-B testing, your designers and markets are empowered to build and maximize your dot-com from day one. Changes to your Framer site go live to the web in seconds with one-click without help from

engineering. So whether you want to launch a new site, test a few landing pages, or migrate your full.com, Framer has programs for startups, scale-ups, and large enterprises that make going from idea to live site as easy and fast as possible. Learn how you can get more out of your dot com from a Framer specialist. Start building for free today at Framer.com slash Kara for 30% off, a Framer.com slash Kara for 30% off. Framer.com slash Kara rules and restrictions apply.

Support for this show comes from Serval AI. Having an IT department is fundamental to your business. business. But if they're being bogged down by password resets, access requests, and onboarding, then that department is not being used to their full potential. But with Serval, they say you can cut about 80% of your help desk tickets and that can help free up your team to focus on more meaningful work. Unlike other legacy players, Serval was built for AI agents from the ground up. Serval AI writes automation in seconds. Your IT team just describes what they need in plain English and Serval generates production-ready automations instantly.

Plus, Serval guarantees 50% help desk automation by week four of your free pilot. But try it now because pilots are limited. Serval powers the fastest growing companies in the world like perplexity, Mercor, Verkata, and Clay. Get your team out of the help desk and back to the work they enjoy. Book your free pilot at serval.com slash cara. That's Serval, S-E-R-V-A-L-com slash Kara K-A-R-A. Let's talk about people who are trying to stop you still about the Trump administration's haphazard release of the files. It only did so after Congress forced its hand.

There are possibly millions of more files still being withheld. And this week, the Department of Justice also acknowledged that tens of thousands of documents have been taken down for review. It says it plans to republish them. Danny and Liz, your names have appeared in the files unredacted. You already shared your stories publicly, but what went through your mind when you saw them there? Danny first. I mean, for me, it was just, it's a gutting feeling that, like, you start shaking and feeling this reach, it is PTSD, classic PTSD.

And what I was feeling was not necessarily even for myself. There was a Jane Doe that was in my 302 and her name was out. And it was somebody that's close to me that I had said, like, You know, you never have to worry about this because you've been redacted from the beginning. You've never come publicly. Like, you have nothing to worry about. Could you explain what a 302? I happen to know because I was with a bunch of lawyers last night.

But what's a 302? Yeah, so your 302 is your statement that you gave to the FBI, right? So in 2008, when I was so scared, I talked to the FBI and it was actually, it's not, you know, I was so scared. And so it's not exactly the most, like, illuminating piece. but I did bench in names, right? And so in that FBI report, you know, there were a couple of names in there that were not redacted. And so we were looking at a scared, you know, 20-year-olds reporting on something that happened before they were ready to talk about it, to be honest. And then you're adding names in there. And so now that piece is out there for everybody to see. And it just feels really unfair because, It was never meant to be, you know, public. Or those people were never meant to be.

It was supposed to have been part of an investigation. So I just think, yeah, I also, my dog was redacted, but my name and my information was not. And so I think that that is like the most classic look of just the sloppiness of it all and just the carelessness of it. Because I had my MySpace page and they literally blocked out my dog. Right. Well, your dog didn't need that trauma. No. I'm teasing.

What about you, Liz? So, you know, for me, I was just kind of blown away at the incompetence. My information was unredacted in a sentence that said, Stein was a victim of Epstein and Maxwell, so that, you know, that was just kind of mind-blowing. But zooming out and looking at the bigger picture, there are a lot of ways that you can threaten

and intimidate a survivor, right? Yeah. And it felt like in exposing people's personal information, you see us and you see us at press conferences and you see us speaking out and I know that we look really strong. We are really strong, right? But it takes a toll on us and think about these women who for three decades have not been able to really grapple with what happened to them and have kept it inside. and now their friends and family are reading their name, their information,

things that you might have said in a deposition, things that you might have said in your 302 that you never, ever expected anyone to hear the most intimate details of your life are out there for everyone to see. And that's a way to intimidate. That's a way to make it so people don't feel like they are safe coming forward because, you know, everything that your promise that you'll be, protected, just went out the window.

Yeah, absolutely. Jess, in an interview with the Times of London, you said the release of the document feels, quote, purposefully chaotic like it's meant to mess with your head. Let me expound on this. As we said, there's millions of files in some way chaos was unavoidable, obviously. Talk about what the Justice Department might have done to release these files in a way that better helps the public understand what's in them and the scope of the crimes. Yes, and just to clarify, I'm not a lawyer.

No, but as I understand it, this, redaction for a case is a really common and simple skill. It is. And millions of files being sent from, say, a prosecution or to a defense or defense or prosecution when files are shared, a tactic that is used, as I understand it, is to make them as chaotic and send as many files as you can through. So it makes it very difficult for people to go through. So they seemed to be following what is typically done when you're trying to thwart an investigation or a trial. And that's really hard to look past as, oh, it was just innocently done. There were so many.

There were so many. I mean, it's such a short period of time. But a couple of things happened. One of the things we've heard from Congress members is when they've gone to look at the redacted files, they found that the supposed unredacted files were redacted by the FBI, and the DOJ never let anyone know and never had those files cleared of redactions so that they truly were unredacted

when Congress wanted to look at them. And that feels purposeful. And so, you know, one of the things we have talked about is that they've miscategorized things. And that feels really... They're trying to get you to lose them. Oh, yeah. That happened during the Japanese internment thing.

They put them different places. couldn't find the files. Exactly. So they didn't make sense. So it was very purposeful in being chaotic. And yeah, that feels like intimidation. That feels like a lack of transparency. That feels corrupt.

Like we're really trying to keep this cover up going and delaying transparency as long as absolutely possible. To create a mess. I love to, how are you able to find documents related to you? I mean, I searched myself, and there were two mentions. He'd been reading my articles, and in one case, one of a conference I had, we bought a list, and he must have been on it. And so he got sent something. Luckily, I went back and checked, and he tried to get into my conference because he was very up and with the tech people all the time, as you know.

And on the thing, it says, Kara says absolutely not. Like, you're not letting him in. But how did you find yourselves? Let's start with you, Danielle, and then Liz and then Jess. Yeah, for me, I mean, initially I searched my name. And then a bunch of stuff came up, which was crazy because I was like, oh, nothing's going to be here. But of course, there was. So there was that.

And then once they started redacting, you know, they put everything up and then they took everything down. Like as far as my things related to me went. So I called my lawyer. I said everything's gone. I don't know where, you know, why it went. I had the EFTA numbers. And she said, well, they're pulling everything down to redact everything now. And it was like, a little late for that, but here we are. We're doing it.

Right, because people could have gotten them. Yeah, which also feels a little bit like... People instantly downloaded the whole thing. Lots of people did that. Yes, but also, like, what else are they pulling down? Was this all part of the plan, right? To, like, not redact survivors to have to be able to pull everything down so that we didn't know what was missing and then put everything back up, right?

And so, anyway, when I was told that things were coming back online, I knew that there's an ID number. Actually, I don't know exactly, I haven't written down somewhere, but it has like your number and then it's like a point to five or whatever unless you were a part of a trial and you gave testimony and then you have like a full number. So somebody that's an illegal analyst who actually works for MS now, you know, told me that this was there and I think I found you and is this your file? So she gave me that information. So at least I was able to find the majority of my file there. And all of them are there. from what you can understand.

You know, okay, so I was looking for my 2019, in 2019, the FBI came to my house, and we spoke for hours. It was like almost two hours. And I remember talking quite a bit about just what had happened, but nobody said, like, can you give an official statement? And they just kept asking me sort of about who I knew and about different names.

and I felt like I gave them a lot more information. It's basically one paragraph that is written up in 2019. So that does not feel whole to me. So I am still curious if there's more author. But again, with the mislabeling too, there's a manila envelope with my name on the side of it, and that is not redacted. My name and it has, I believe, my birthday underneath it.

And on the front of that manila envelope, it has nothing to do with my story. It's about Florida. Tony Figuera is mentioned in there, which is not my story at all. So I'm like, so whose notes are on my file? So there's just mislabeling. It's a disaster. It's a chaotic disaster.

All right, Liz. So I also just put in search terms that I thought would bring something up. And I found the information from the Maxwell trial that involved me. And I also found my FBI intake form. That's really all of the information that I've found. I called the FBI and the FBI didn't take form on me, but they never contacted me to do a victim statement. So that's something that, to me, is just really glaring. They have this intake from me saying that I'm a victim of this crime, yet they never followed up with me.

Followed up. That happens a lot. That happens a lot in general. But in this case, it seems like they dropped the ball a lot. We'll get to that in a minute. What about you, Jess? So the very first file, which was the email between me and especially Amanda Young was found by a journalist and the journalist reached out and said, I think this is you. And they were correct. But then the second round of files that were found, someone publicly, and it is public. So, you know, it should be fine, said, hey, I heard you on a podcast and I think this file is yours and put the EFTA. number publicly. And so I went and yes, it was. And then they found other files for me and DM'd me. And they've been the only ones to actually find them. And there's files missing. So it took a year and a half after I gave my information on the hotline tip in September of 2019. The first response that I got was from Detective Harkins who had called me back after the

hotline tip. I told him what happened and he said, well, what do you want us to do? It was 30 years ago. And yes, I said, well, you asked me to call you. That's why I'm calling you to tell you. And I was calling to tell him about my roommate, who was the person that had brought me to Epstein, because I knew that she had worked for him a minimum of eight to ten years. And obviously, would be a person of interest. It would take a year and a half for Special Agent and Mandy Young to actually ever call me back. So it's both incompetence and possible, all manner of things. So all of three of you were at the House Judiciary Committee hearing last month with Attorney General Pam Bondi.

I want to play a little bit from that hearing, and this is an exchange between Bondi and Washington Democratic Representative Pramila Jayapal. Will you turn to them now and apologize for what your Department of Justice has put them through with the absolutely unacceptable? release of the Epstein files and their information. Congresswoman, you set before Merritt Garland sat in this chair twice. Attorney General Bondi, I'm going to finish my answer. No, I'm going to reclaim my time because I asked you a specific question that I would like you to answer. This is the same woman who bragged about having the Epstein client list on her desk about a year ago, even though there's no evidence it exists. What's it been like to watch the Trump administration go from championing

the release of these files to this? They campaigned on this issue where Bondi can't even acknowledge you. Talk each of you about that moment. Danny, why don't you start? Yeah, I mean, it's whiplash, but I also think the retramacization is so great. It's exactly what Jeffrey did to us, and it's the same pattern, right? Where it always felt like, you know, he would hold the carrot, or at least for my story, he would hold the carrot in front of my nose always about you're a ballet dancer. I know all the top people. I can introduce you to the most powerful people and where I can give you studio space. I can give you anything if you do these things for me and then would turn around and treat you like trash after that. My story includes my mom had a

brain tumor and I brought the scans to him. And after that moment that I brought brain scans to him, my abuse really revved up because he had said, he basically threatened me and said that he can help with her care, meaning like not paying for anything. He had a piece of information he could use. Exactly. He used the information against me. So without going too deep into my backstory, because you can find it out there. But it is that using the information and the manipulation that is involved, you know,

it is definitely, it feels like. You know, they had all this information on us. And then it's that the feeling of like feeling like a ghost again, right? Where I would walk through the halls of the house and so many people would see me and I would be there, but I never felt like I was a person. I felt like I was. She not turning around was like that, not even acknowledging. Exactly. Exactly like that.

I just felt like, you know, that image of just drifting through the house was so similar in the sense of like she will not even turn around and acknowledge a survivor's existence. And so just having that inhumane, just completely, there's just such a lack, profound lack of empathy and compassion that it just feels like she's not even a human being. Yeah, well, that might be true. Jess? Yeah, when you were playing it, it really just hit me in the gut again. I think that sometimes when I'm in those rooms or we're in the house, I might disconnect a little bit

because it's all really overwhelming. But what I still can't get past is that no one was asking her to apologize for what Mayor Garland did. Yeah, no one was. Asking her to apologize for the damage that her Department of Justice did. And that should be a really simple thing to do

to even acknowledge that we were standing there. It was as if we didn't exist and that is a, as Danny said, that is just the crux of the injury. Mm-hmm. For me, it was really upsetting, you know, as Danny and Jess just expressed, to sit there and for her to not react to us. But I let go of that moment of upset for a moment, and I really just looked at it. And I thought, wow, by her actions, she's telling everyone exactly who she is. And so in ways, I think that her reaction couldn't have been better because it was so telling that she could not even be human.

And I think that we're seeing over and over and over again where our Department of Justice is, it feels like to me, Kara, it feels like they are trying to push a narrative despite the fact that it's false. But what we're seeing is that people see through that narrative. And so I think that the more they behave like this publicly, the more people are going to demand that this all come out. That's correct. That's exactly what that photo did. I have to say, it had enormous impact. And her trying not to was so awkward and strange.

It happens a lot at these congressional hearings. And a lot of Democrats are promising to investigate the Trump administration over the Epstein Files, obviously politically expedient for them to say they will. And what the representative Jaya Paul was doing was a very typical tactic, right? Turn around and say, you're sorry, it happened with Mark Zuckerberg and others around parents whose children had died because of issues around there's bullying and things like that. But it's also incredibly effective, as you said. Now, one of the things, Liz, I know you said that issue isn't political, but lawmakers are political, creatures, right? Talk about, do you think the people that are pushing for this generally care

about survivors, or is it a political thing? Maybe both. It could be with some and not others. I'd love each of you to sort of weigh in. Danielle, why don't you start? Yeah, I think it varies by person. I think we're having great conversations, you know, and I think a lot of the time people see us in media, but they don't understand that there is a core group of us that are always in these Zoom calls and congressional meetings. And we are telling our stories. And I think it is because these are human stories. We're not, you know, these political ponds, we're not here to be pundits, right? Like, we are here to really tell our story and hope that it doesn't happen and perpetuate again. Yeah, I think it's definitely both and it really depends on who you're talking to.

We have some lawmakers that have been just instrumental and really communicating with us, asking us what our thoughts are, what our feelings are, and we have had a lot of really important meetings with lawmakers on both sides of the aisle. We've seen a bit of a shift, and it's not with everyone, but we're now going into Republican lawmakers offices, and they're listening to us. They're sitting down and they're really hearing us, I feel like for the first time, really understanding what this story is. Because when you peel back what the headlines are and you frame it in such a way that you make people understand that this is a crime and it's a crime of sex trafficking, and we were girls and young women. And when you put it into language that people can understand and relate to, what if this was your daughter? What if this was a friend of yours, your aunt? And when you take all of the emotion, the political emotion out of it, and you ask people to look at it for what it is, then they understand the issue in a very different way. And so what we're starting to see with some Republican lawmakers is we really hear you.

We're understanding this issue in a way that we just did not understand it before. We want to support you, but. or we're behind you 100% here in this call, but we're not sure how we feel about that publicly. What's the but? I think that people are reluctant to go up against this administration. I think that that's what the butt is. Yeah, it starts with Donald and's with Trump.

You know, we're living in a country right now that is not, the America that I grew up in. And the America that I grew up in, we crossed the aisle, we listened to each other, and we stood for what was right despite what our political parties were. And so when you say to someone, are you okay with girls and young women being sexually victimized, is that right with you? It changes the tone because you're not saying, do you believe Donald Trump or do you believe Bill Clinton, or do you believe any of these men because they're men on both sides of the aisle. So you're not polarizing yourself politically.

You're focusing on what you're looking at. What the actual thing was, the actual naming. And how, you know, we wouldn't let this happen in our communities. We wouldn't let perpetrators of these crimes go free in our communities. So why are we doing that as a nation? And so dialing back the political emotion here is really important. Absolutely. Go ahead, Jess.

Yeah, I do think that it is being used. politically. I do think people care about it as well. I do think it's both. And I think there's an opportunity here that politicians are jumping on because this is the one bipartisan issue that has come up in the country in the last 10 years that everyone can agree upon. I mean, we got an act of Congress. It wasn't just Congress that pushed that act through. It was us. It was us advocating in rooms with Republicans, with Democrats, to get everyone on the same page. We worked really hard to help get that law passed. And I think that this administration, if you were to ask me, where I think the big error that's going to be made is that sexual harm happens in every single school, in every single community, in every single state, and at volumes in this country that this administration doesn't even believe.

And so I believe that this issue will sneak up on the administration, that there are many more people that haven't necessarily voiced their opinion about it, even though we have a ton of support on both sides. I think that this administration is going to be shocked. Yeah, of course. We'll be back in a minute. Support for the show comes from IQ Bar. IQ Bar Protein Bars, IQ Mix, Hygration Mixes, and IQ, Joe, mushroom coffees are delicious, low sugar, brain and body fuel you'll need to win your day. Listen, we all need a snack now and then, but not all snacks are created equal.

All IQ bar products are clean label certified and entirely free from gluten, dairy, soy, GMOs, and artificial ingredients. I've tried their bars and their mixes, and they're quite good. I really like them. I use a lot of energy bars, and I mostly don't like them. They don't taste good. They taste like cardboard. These are actually really flavorful. I've tried. Their mixes, very good, and they're giving me all the nutrients I need, and they're very easy and on the go. With over 20,000 five-star reviews and counting, more people than ever are fueling their busy lives with IQ bars, brain and body boosting bars, hydration mixes, and mushroom coffees. Their ultimate sampler pack includes all three. Again, I've tried them all. They're all excellent, and some of these things, as people know, aren't.

And right now, IQ bar is offering our special podcast listeners, 20% off all IQ bar products, including the Ultimate Sampler Pack, a good way to test the stuff out, plus free shipping. To get your 20% off, text Kara to 64,000. Text Kera to 64,000, that's Kara, K-A-R-A-to-64, message and data rates may apply, see terms for details. Support for this show comes from Delete Me. Delete Me makes it easy, quick, and safe to remove your personal data online at a time when surveillance and data breaches are common enough to make everyone vulnerable. Getting off the internet altogether is unrealistic for most of us, but your privacy is worth protecting. Instead of pulling the plug altogether, let the experts that delete me help you

remove the personal information you don't want online. This isn't a one-time service. Delete me sends you regular personalized privacy reports showing what info they found, where they found it, and what they removed. I use Delete Me all the time. I look and try to be clear about what's happening with my privacy. I've found surprising things. A lot of it inaccurate, actually, which is also a problem. A lot of stuff compiled in a way that's a little terrifying that people could take advantage of you. And a lot of stuff that is just dangerous to be out there, especially about my kids and other things like that. Take control of your data and keep your private life private by signing up for Delete Me. Now at a special discount for our listeners. Get 20% off your

your DeleteMe plan when you go to join DeleteMe.com slash Kara and use the promo code, Kara, at checkout. The only way to get 20% off is to go to join deleteme.com slash kara and enter the code kera at checkout. That's join deleteme.com slash kara code kara. In communities across Canada, hourly Amazon employees earn an average of over $24.50 an hour. Employees also have the opportunity to grow their skills and their paycheck by enrolling in free skills training programs for in-demand fields, like software development and information. technology. Learn more at aboutamazon.ca. Let's talk a little bit more about how you've been personally navigating the release of the Epstein files. Two congressmen were part of getting these files release. California Democrat Roe Kana and Kentucky Republican Thomas Massey, two extraordinarily different people.

I have to tell you, I know Roe quite well for many years. I don't know Massey, but certainly couldn't be more different. Talk about very briefly, who else? else is helping, would you say, getting accountability? Because accountability is the critical element here, as you all noted. And of course, internationally, the fallout has been even bigger. They're actually doing something about it. We've seen high-profile resignations. Investigations, I assume, will go on. Dan, you said that the U.S., as you noted, didn't feel like it was taken seriously. So who is helping and who is hindering from your point of view? Let's start with Danny? Yeah, I think, I mean, the Democratic Women's Caucus has been extraordinary for us. I think

there are almost too many to name, but Melanie Stansbury has been amazing on this topic from the very beginning. From the get-go, I was at the House Oversight Committee in September, and there were six of us in that room. And for the first time, I shared my story, along with so many others, and she had come to Annie Farmer and I after and just looked us dead in the face and said, this is a cover-up, and we're going to fix this. We're going to figure this one out. And I believed her. She's just the most genuine, you know. So she's been amazing, but Robert Garcia, I mean, it's like so many to name. And there are Republicans that are, we're in Republican offices all the time. And I think we're having amazing conversations in those Republican offices, you know. We're recently in Kat Kamik's office and we've been, we've spoken to Joni Ernst, right? There are Republicans that we leave feeling like, we're, we're recently in Kat Kamik's office and we've been, we've spoken to Joni Ernst, right? There are Republicans that we leave feeling like, wow, we were so seen, and then there's really no follow-through. And that feels so frustrating, right? When we were at Kat Kymick's office, we were talking about, it was the day before the Bondi hearing,

and we did a press conference that was hosted by the Democratic Women's Caucus. And we said to Kat Kik, who is the head of the Republican Women's Caucus, can you please talk to your constituents and come and stand with us because it's about women? It's not, and not just, about women. It's about survivors, right? But in that moment, we were like, can you just talk to your constituents and please, you know, stand in solidarity with us? And the only Republican that showed up was Nancy Mace. And so it's like, where is the disconnect? Where are we not having that sort of just follow through from them? So that feels a little disheartening. But of course, Thomas Mass has been incredible for us. And Nancy Mace has been amazing. So I would note our insid as a sexual

I saw the survivor in Mace also. Liz? I want to touch on something Jeff said earlier about how we were able to get the Epstein Files Transparency Act pass. That was something that no one ever thought that we would ever be able to do. And the only way that we were able to do it is because constituents reached out to the representatives and they spoke.

And that's how our government works. So that's how it's supposed to work. Right. So citizens. Citizens, right? You know, I think that a lot of people out there might be sitting, listening to this story and feeling powerless, not knowing what they can do to help. And really, what you can do is you can call your lawmakers and let them know how you feel about this issue because they're in office because of you. Sometimes they don't act that way. No, they don't. But I think that we need to remind ourselves of that right now in our country. Absolutely. 100%. Jess? That's actually a complicated question because I'm, though I believe that we are getting as much support as we possibly can from the Democratic Women's Caucus, from people like Robert Garcia, from the rep who invited me to the State of the Union, Representative Wachenshaw,

who had the best answer for why, as a guy, he was getting involved in this that I had heard. And he said, look, I've worked a long time in gender-based violence, and what I see often is women doing all of the work, women shouldering the complete burden of this issue. And he said, I wanted to jump in and I want to support, not because I want to center myself, because I want to lift some of that burden. It was one of the best answers that I had heard.

So we do have people that are in there that are really trying. And it's 60, probably over 70 days, is past the deadline. And I'm kind of like, all right, why aren't we suing Congress? Why hasn't Pam Bondi been impeached? Where are the consequences for them not meeting the deadline? That wasn't when things were supposed to start. That was supposed to be the deadline. And there was zero communication about that. Well, I think that's the point. Who's going to stop them? Yeah, who's going to stop them? And I think once that line was crossed and nothing happened, I believe that it set a very bad precedent. And I do, this is an administration who crosses lines and sees nobody stops them and then just stays there.

And that shows the weakness of our government in a lot of ways. So amid all the redactions in the Epstein files, there have been a lot of calls for survivors to name Epstein's co-conspirators. Liz, what do you make of those calls? I think it's important to remember that it's not our job to release names of people. That could put us in a lot of danger physically, danger of legal free. repercussions, but we have told our lawyers, right? And I think that if these crimes are ever going to be investigated seriously, it means to be done in collaboration with our attorneys who have this information. It's just, it's such an enormous weight to put on the burden, to put that burden on the

shoulders of survivors. And it's just, it's, it's, it's impractical. And in any other case, we wouldn't be, we wouldn't be saying, you know, the survivors of these crimes need to name the perpetrators of these crimes publicly. I mean, you know, public. I mean, we have a Department of Justice for a reason, right? Like, it shouldn't be on the survivors. Yeah, the problem is some of the, there's NDAs involved. There's all kinds of things that, in order to get testimony, but there are, what people don't understand. And I think actually in New York Times just did a great piece about the people, the doctors around it, the lawyers around it, the people that enable it happen. And it's always, you know, we tend to try to isolate Epstein as a single impresario of everything, but there were people

helping him, bankers, all kinds of people, which I think are critical to name or to at least understand. People understand. But they are named. They're in the files. And that was the point of the files being unredacted. And yet those names are often being protected. And so what we need is people to start putting pressure on the DOJ rather than pressure on survivors. Like Maria did this in 1996. There have been multiple times that this case should have been investigated, that more arrests should have been made, and it's not for lack of survivors coming forward. Yeah, absolutely.

It shouldn't be your burden whatsoever. It should be. And these enablers in many ways have gotten off and have been as dam, not as damaging as Jeffrey Epstein, but in that same thing. I had one of the people helping this guy who had threatened me when I was in my 20s come up to me at a party when I was very recently, recently, relatively a couple of years ago, and said, I hope you can forgive me. And I said, I just can't. And I said, you need to move away from me right now. And they're like, well, forgiveness is really important. I said, I know, but I'm not going to be doing that for you. So good luck. And I said, you're a terror. I said, you scared a 20-year-old girl and try to scare into silence. And you can fuck off. all the way off as far as I'm concerned. But never paid, never paid, too, at the same time, which was really disappointing. It was a woman, too, which was just horrible.

Let's end by talking about where things go from here. Can look at the big picture, the crimes committed against you and countless other women have exposed this so-called Epstein class, many of the richest and most powerful people in the world turned to Epstein for access to women he trafficked or they turned a blind eye. That's also the case to his crimes

and accepted money and connection. are just social, you know, social parties, dinners, and everything else. Danny brought this out for us because there's been a lot of comparisons to the Epstein files in the 2008 financial crisis where millions of Americans lost their homes while the banks got bailed out, like the same idea. Talk about the way the files reveal how power works in this country. Because, you know, I think it's very much linked to a lot of different things, you know, whether the tech moguls taking over things and making people.

decisions for the rest of us, et cetera, or the attempts to make us feel powerless and that some people get theirs and others do not. Danny, why don't you start and then the others can chime in? Yeah, I mean, it's always power versus vulnerability, right? It's at the heart of all exploitation. And so when we are these young girls in this country, it's very easy for a powerful person. I think, like, especially if you've had any sort of grooming in your background where you've been room to be a people pleaser or groomed to always strive for perfection, it's easy to walk into a trap. And I think that we really need to get to the core of the power structure, you know, because power protects power. And so we have to find a way to, you know, just make sure it's the right

people that are at the top. Jess. One of the things that I have noted in the minimal amount of files that I've gone through and what I've read from others online is that this has really permeated every single area of society from the medical industry, the entertainment industry, the arts industry, academia, banking and financing, politics, literally everywhere. And just like Danny said, powerful people are protected. I think that that has been a secret and what I hope is that one of the levels of transparency that happened is that how that is kept secret is revealed. Because we're seeing it. Now it's not a secret.

People are talking about it. And I do hope, in one of my areas of hope, that is that transparency, the transparency of everything that's come before us, like everything that's happened up to now to show those vials is what's going to change that level of secret protection. Instead of people saying, oh, the rich get off kind of stuff. Yeah. Yeah.

Liz? We're used to seeing powerful people protect each other. And I think that the only way that we change things that live in darkness is by bringing them out into the light. And I think that now this is on display for everyone to see. You know, I think that 10 years ago, if we talked about what? what our experiences were, people would have brushed us off and thought that we were, that we were crazy and, you know, all of those, all of those stigmatizing stereotypes that people throw on us. But now we're seeing it. And so now that we're seeing it right in front of us, what are we going to do

about it? We have the chance to change the narrative here. We have a chance to hold people accountable in various ways, whether it's losing their positions of power. whether it's legal repercussions, we have the opportunity to change what this looks like for the future. And I really hope that we take that opportunity when we seize it because we need to change this narrative. 100%. I think one of the things my other podcast says is the rich are protected by the law but not bound by it and everybody else is bound by the law but not protected by it, which is really absolutely true. And Epstein was very deep into tech. He was around at all these events. I never met him, but he was there,

and he was funding things just to insidiously involve himself in academics or technology and tried very hard to get sort of made whole after his first bout with the law where he got off rather easily. So he was trying to reestablish his reputation. And in that vein, every episode we get a question from an outside expert, And yours actually comes from Julie K. Brown, an investigative reporter at the Miami Herald, who helped expose the extent of Epstein's crime with her incredibly groundbreaking piece much later about the first conviction. So let's listen to what Julie has to ask you.

Hi there, everybody. My question to you is Donald Trump has frequently said of late that he believes that he has been exonerated as far as these files are concerned. and I was wondering what your thoughts are about him being exonerated. Okay, Jess, then Liz, and Danny. Well, we know that the president speaks in broad gas-liding strokes and throws words out that don't necessarily equate to anything that's actually happening. And so, interestingly, gave no proof of any of that at all. And there is plenty of instances in there. I am one of the survivors, and I think we're on agreement,

that he is in there enough times. He should be testifying, and there should be investigations done. He should be investigated. He's not exonerated. Clearly hasn't been investigated. He's not exonerated. As a matter of fact, we have way more questions than answers now, and he needs to be part of that investigation.

Absolutely. Liz. Yeah, in no way has Donald Trump been exonerated by this. We haven't exonerated anyone, and that's why these investigations are so important. Donald Trump's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein really needs to be looked at under a microscope, and he needs to be questioned just like any other one else. Anyone else is being questioned right now about what he knows about Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. Right, absolutely.

Everyone deserves the right to be investigated properly so that they can be exonerated if they are, in fact, not guilty. Danny? Yeah, everything that everybody already said, but I mean, it has to move through a process. It has to move through a legal channel. So this idea of being exonerated, we would love for him to go and be investigated and move through a legal process. You know, do I think that he'll be exonerated? I don't know. But, you know, I think that we really need to see, we've been saying we need to see the investigations, but we also need to stop putting survivors in places where, you know, I think part of this conversation of exoneration came up when many of us were in a room and they said, raise your hand if Donald Trump has ever done anything to you. And it's like the safety of that is so, is beyond lacking. And of course, nobody in the right mind is going to raise their hand in a situation like that. That's why we need the files released and investigated. So yeah, no, nobody's been exonerated. Nobody's been exonerated. That's absolutely true. It hasn't been properly investigated. The three of you, speaking of which, have been advocating for the passage of Virginia's law.

This is proposed legislation named after another Epstein survivor, perhaps the most famous Virginia, Jouffray. If passed, it would lift the statute of limitations on civil sex abuse cases. This is a critical thing in the case I testified in, and it was too long for the person I was testifying for, and I couldn't believe it. I was shocked by this. Like, why doesn't it, why doesn't have a statute of limitations? And I didn't know this. I was flummoxed as to why it was. Liz, talk about the legislation why it's important

and what else you'd like to see from Congress. This is such an important law because the way that your brain processes sexual trauma, it can take you decades to fully unfold what happened to you. And, you know, someone's disclosure can't operate on a legislative timeline. And so a lot of times we see people who were exploited in their teens and their 20s not understanding what happened to them until their 40s or 50s. And by that time, it's too late. And it's not that the crime didn't happen.

It's that the time had run in law. And so we've seen this approach in states. We've seen New York the Adult Survivors Act, which opened a one-year look-back period for anyone who'd experience sexual assault. So the importance of Virginia's law is that it would open that up on a federal level. And I think that there's no better way to honor the memory of Virginia Roberts Joufrey than to pass this law. Let me move on to another one. Jess, you told Katie Kirk that you think Congress needs to call more people into testify or just noting that. Anyone who lost their job over the use of the files or who resigned and whose names appeared in the files multiple times and in very significant ways.

the Clintons recently testified. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnik has said he's willing to. The House Oversight Committee just voted to subpoena Bondi over the Justice Department's handling the case. Bill Gates and Leon Black have also been asked to testify. What happens next if this happens? And, you know, most people feel President Trump should be called to testify about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. What do you think happens next, Jess? My personal hope is that there is enough information from these testimonies to prove that a full-blown investigation needs to happen. And hopefully... Special counsel. Yes. Yes. And that survivors will be able to come in and give testimony because many of us feel like we had information that was never, ever listened to by the FBI. And so there's been these, you know, so-called investigations, but we have no idea because even the investigation notes were in.

in the files. What I'm hoping is that the testimonies will make way for, yes, it's clear, we need to do some thorough investigations, and that needs to start now. So have any of you spoken to federal investigators about ongoing investigations? Or no? Nope. Not since, you know, 20, what was that, 2019 when they came to my house? So they're not investigating. No. I mean, Pam Bondi said in the hearing, supposedly there are ongoing investigations on her desk right now, but you know, you've gotten, not gotten a call. No.

In other words, no. No, I said, what are those investigations? You know, when she said that they're, you know, there are active investigations, okay, great. Is that why you're holding, you know, certain files? Then what are they? And why, you know, so we just all have, we have so many questions. So to be clear, none of you have been called by federal investigators. No.

No. Okay. All of you've made advocacy a huge part, and it's incredibly brave. You've lobbied hard for the passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. you've been meeting with lawmakers, pushing for Virginia law, etc. Jess, you released an app to help people navigate the days and weeks

after someone reveals they've been sexually assaulted, like a first aid kid, as you noted. Liz, you're an expert on human trafficking and you've helped bring Epstein survivors together for the first time. Danny, you've done a whole bunch of things with kids and trying to get people to be safe and figure things out.

Talk about how advocacy has helped you come to terms with this abuse and help you heal. It's a very heroic thing to do. I hope you all understand. that. Thank you for saying that. Yeah. I think it's so funny when people are like, oh, it's, it's very courageous. And Annie Farmer said it best, it's like you're just walking, you're putting one foot in front of the other, and you just keep putting the feet in front of the other. It just feels like the next thing to do. And a lot of this does come from for me. That is heroic,

just so you know. Thank you for saying that. But, you know, it was, it's, I watched Virginia you free, turn shame into power. And I knew that I wanted to be able to do that for, like, for her and for survivors. And I just felt like, you know, the laws need to change. I mean, there are so many things. It's the rabbit hole. Once you start, it's like, or not even the rabbit hole. It's like cleaning your house, right? It's like you move one thing and then you're like, oh gosh, now I have to like windax. Now I have to, you know, and it just keeps building. because it's like, oh, well, okay, we did the Transparency Act, we got a law passed. Like, that's incredible. And then we're like, we need to change statute of limitations. Like, that is the next

step, right? Because there shouldn't be a time limit on justice. I mean, I'm almost 40 now, and I'm just now coming to terms of being able to handle my own abuse and look back and actually see what happened to me, you know? So it's just crucial that we do this. And so it's just having that belief and knowing that you have to do something about it. Right, absolutely. Jess? I was talking with my therapist recently about, you know, because she was so proud of me, and she's like, and your grand therapist is really proud of you. You know, it takes a lot of courage.

And I told her, I can't really feel that. I can't feel it. And she goes, that's because you just are doing the thing that's right for you. And for me, I feel like, like Liz, I was a child sexual abuse survivor. then came Epstein to thwart the amount of healing that I had already gone through. And I just can't see myself doing anything else. It's the right thing to do. And all of the people that came before me that helped me be able to get to hear

before I could even speak the words, I remember how much it made a difference for me. And so I think what I'm doing is what other people did for me is all I'm doing is taking my hand, reaching down to the person, behind me and giving them a pull up, and that's how we all heal, and that's how we stop being silent, and that's how we make cultural change. Absolutely. Absolutely. Liz, why don't you finish up? For me, I also, when people say that I'm brave, I don't see that or feel that necessarily. I can't imagine doing anything else, and really what fuels me in doing this work is I see my

six-year-old self, and I see myself throughout the different ages that I can. couldn't speak and that I didn't have anyone to talk to. And it would be irresponsible of me to have this position and to not use it so that others did not feel alone in this. Because if I could go back and tell myself anything, it would be to tell someone. And if they don't listen, tell someone else and just keep telling until people listen to you. And even if you feel like they don't, be proud of yourself because you at least were able to sit in your uncomfortable truth when other people weren't. And that's really what fuels me doing this advocacy, being the person that I wish was there for me when I needed them. Which is critically important to think about yourself because

people don't mourn themselves in previous versions of themselves. Let me then ask. Can I just add one thing? We've talked about how this trauma is overwhelming and how it impacted our lives negatively. But I just want to leave people with, when you experience trauma, it's possible to recover from trauma. And so you're looking at three women here who've done a lot of work on ourselves and really invested time and energy into finding who we were before all of this happened. And that's possible for all survivors of sexual assault. Absolutely. 100%. It doesn't have to completely overwhelm you. It can. It absolutely can. I would also. Go ahead.

I would also love to add that community is hugely important, and it was underrated. I siloed myself. I was in a pretty horrible relationship for quite some time after my abuse of Jeffrey, and I was really, I siloed myself on purpose because I felt like I could never connect to people the way I had before abuse, and finding, you know, we have the survivor sisters and truly finding this incredible group of people and knowing that there's a lot of people. there's something that is unsaid, that you just understand the depth of darkness and you're doing something actively to change it. So to be able to work on it, it's like the best group project

we possibly can ever have, right? Because it is like where the support that you feel from one another is everything and it changes everything for me. I think that like when I wake up in the morning and I listen to any one of these women talk, it's like, okay, Danny, get up. You can do this too. You got to keep going, right? And so just find out. your community and finding those spaces to be able to just speak about the unspeakable. It's really important. Absolutely. Can I ask one last final question?

If you don't like the word brave or courageous or heroic or whatever, I want you each to think of one word to describe yourself right now. One word. Who wants to start? I want to use strong. Okay. Strong. Because you are. Yeah, but I didn't always feel that way.

you know, how often as women do we quiet those voices inside of us that is telling us who we are and we're listening to what other people are saying. And so the strength was definitely always in me. It's just, yeah. Great word. Great word. Tenacious. Because I would say I don't quit. You know, I get an A in therapy. Good job. whatever whatever I attempt to do, I'm like, I just, I don't quit.

No. And so I would say I'm tenacious. Excellent word. I think for me it's honest because I couldn't be honest with myself. Every time I looked in the mirror for so long, I didn't. It just always felt like that imposter syndrome of even being alive because I knew that this abuse had happened and it was tucked away in the darkest parts of myself. So I think that every day this has been a pursuit of real honesty for me.

This is great. I would call you all inevitable. Eventually. We hope you're right. I am right. I hope so. We're holding you to it. It's just because you don't know how the story's going to end that you feel hopeless,

but it's not the case. I love that word. Inevitable. Thank you. You are. Anyway, I really appreciate it. Danny, Jess, and Liz. Thank you so much.

Thank you, Kara. Thank you, Kara. Today's show is produced by Christian Castro Roussel, Michelle Alloy, Catherine Millsop, Megan Bernie, and Kalyn Lynch. Nashat Kerwa is Vox Media's executive producer of podcasts. Special thanks to Bradley Sylvester and Madeline LaPlante Duby. Our engineers are Fernando Aruda and Rick Juan and our theme music is by Trachidemics. Go wherever you listen to podcast, search for On with Caroushisher, and hit follow.

Thanks for listening to On With Caraswisher from Podium Media, New York Magazine, the Vox Media Podcast Network and us. We'll be back on Thursday with more.