Open Book with Anthony Scaramucci - Is This the End of Fox News and the Murdoch Empire? With Michael Wolff

Episode Date: October 11, 2023

This week, Anthony talks with journalist and author Michael Wolff about his new bestseller dubbed "the book that brought down Rupert Murdoch.”  Michael talks about the dysfunction, greed and future of the world’s most powerful media family. With Rupert aging and the succession in question, who will take the reins of the Murdoch dynasty? And are we in the last days of Fox News? Find out on today’s Open Book... Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

When the weather cools down, Golden Nugget Online Casino turns up the heat. This winner, make any moment golden and play thousands of games like her new slot Wolf It Up and all the fan-favorite huff and puff and puff games. Whether you're curled up on the couch or ticking five between snow shovels, play winner's hottest collection of slots from brand new games to the classics you know and love. You can also pull up your favorite table games like blackjack, roulette, and craps, Or go for even more excitement with our library of live dealer games. Download the Golden Nugget Online Casino app,

and you've got everything you need to layer on the fun this winter. In partnership with Golden Nugget Online Casino. Gambling problem call ConX Ontario at 1-866-531-2,600. 19 and over. Physically present in Ontario. Eligibility restrictions apply. See Golden Nugget Casino.com for details. Please play responsibly.

Visit BetMGM casino and check out the newest exclusive. The Price is Right Fortune Pick. BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2,600 to speak to an advisor.

Free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with Eye Gaming Ontario. Hello, I'm Anthony Scaramucci and this is Open Book, where I talk with some of the brightest minds out there about everything surrounding the written word from authors and historians to figures and entertainment, neuroscientists, political activists, and of course, Wall Street. Sorry, I can't resist. Before we get into today's episode, if you haven't already, please hit follow or subscribe wherever you get your podcast and leave us a review.

We all love a review, even the bad ones. I want to hear the ports you're enjoying or how we can do better. You know, I can roll with the punches, so let me know. Anyways, let's get to it. With the 92-year-old Rupert Murdoch announcing that his son Lackland will be the new man in charge, there has been a lot of Murdoch-related talk circulating. The name Murdoch is synonymous with Fox News, but without Rupert, what happens to Fox? Is there any hope for the future of the Murdoch dynasty, and how will that play out into the

24 election. Someone who knows this world better than most is Michael Wolfe. So let's see what he can tell us on today's show. Joining us now on Open Book, a bestselling author and journalist. Michael Wolfe, the title of the book is The Fall, the end of Fox News and the Murdoch dynasty. Michael, that's a big statement, man. These guys are pretty powerful and they still have pretty decent ratings and a fairly big stronghold on conservative America. I mean, they basically took conservative talk radio and turned it into conservative talk television. You timed this book well, though, because Mr. Murdoch, Rupert is stepping aside, handing the keys over to his son Lackland. Tell me what you saw. Tell me why you wrote the book and what's on your mind. Well, you know, I think I wrote the book for one thing

because it's a kind of an incredible story. But it's also of a piece with the other books that I've been recently writing, covering the Trump years. In order to tell the story of the Trump years, Fox is, of course, a vital piece of that. So this has been sort of in my wheelhouse and really directly in front of me. Also, just some background here, I wrote a book now 12 years ago. ago, I guess a biography of Murdoch, which he cooperated with. So I sat with Murdoch basically for a year, interviewed Murdoch, everybody in his family, all of his executives, even his then 99-year-old mother.

So again, part of my ongoing interest in who has the power or in this instance who is on the verge of losing the power. And that's what I feel is the, this became sort of the pivotal jumping off point for this book that Rupert Murdoch is 92. This is a company, Fox, that is entirely on his shoulders, wholly dependent on him, exists because of him. And when you're 92, that, that begins to suggest that things are not going to last. Things don't last, Michael. We're all impermanent, you know, despite what we sometimes think, right? What did Charles de Gaulle once say? There are graveyards filled with men that once thought they were indispensable.

So that's an example. I want to bring up two things and get your reaction to them because I obviously, full disclosure, I worked at Fox for about three years. I brought Lewis Ruekeiser show over. I don't know if you remember the old show. I bought it from Maryland Public Broadcasting and Mr. Ruekeiser is a widow and brought Wall Street Week over to Roger Ailes. I pitched them on if he liked the idea.

He let me anchor the show before I entered the Trump administration. And so there were two things that happened that I want to get your reactions to. Thing number one was during the Obama campaign of 2008, the Murdox and Roger Ailes met with Barack Obama and David Axelrod. They were coming pretty hard at him. And my question to you is, if you remember that meeting, do you think that had an impact and softened their stance on Obama, or maybe made it worse. And then the second thing I want to ask you about is the relationship with Donald Trump,

because they allowed him to call into Fox and Friends every Thursday morning or whatever it was for years, but they genuinely did not like him in the beginning. And of course, they were defending Megan Kelly in the beginning. And so I want to juxtapose those two things. How do these politicians have influence if they do on the Murdox? Okay. It's important to parse a couple of aspects here and to separate the Murdox and Roger Ailes. Roger Ailes was the longtime chief of Fox. He basically founded Fox, started Fox. Murdoch funded it, but it was always, always Roger Ailes' project baby. He was the guy, also a serious micromanager in everything.

And he created Fox. Fox exists because of Ailes. So on the Obama meeting, and I'm not sure which meeting you're talking about, the meeting that I'm really familiar with in which I first reported on, again, a little background here. Rupert Murdoch's family, his children, his wife, his children, were all in for Barack Obama. So, I mean, Murdoch, who has been a long time conservative, but always attentive to who's going to win and conservative in a kind of a big sea way, you know, basically, you know, not a populist at all. At any rate, Murdoch was under pressure from his family to support Obama and quite inclined to do that, by the way. But the meeting that I know about happened in New York, and it was between Obama and, and, and it was between Obama and. and Murdoch, but Murdoch brought Ailes along with him. And that was a curious thing. Why did he do that?

Okay, he had been unhappy with Ailes' political coverage. You know, he actually, again, you know, Ailes was deeply anti-Obama, had set off on a kind of, you know, the birth certificate, the Muslim thing, all of all of that, which made Murdoch unhappy. But Murdoch is a kind of conflict-averse guy. He was never going to say to Roger, who, by the way, was making him all of this money, don't do that. Roger told me at one point that Murdoch really had never once interfered in Fox News.

So he brings Roger along to this meeting with Obama. Rupert and Obama sit there. They have a nice conversation. And then Rupert kind of turns the meeting over to Obama to talk to Ailes. And Obama rips ails a new one. I mean, it's, you know, apparently just loaded for bear coming right at him. You know, why should we work with you? Why should we trust you? You know, you've done this. You've done that. You humiliating ails. Now, that's, that's an interesting thing because with the Obama administration, Fox takes a further conservative right-wing turn. You know, I mean, this is where the real populism, the real national. the real, you might even say, racist stuff begins. So Rupert kind of, in a way, and it begins here, that Rupert put himself into a place that he actually did not want to be.

He wanted to be less conservative, less right-wing. Instead, he got more conservative, more right-wing with the effect that it further alienated his already difficult relationships with his children and at that point his wife. So this is very Shakespearean, right? You have a founder. Obviously, his father was a publisher in Australia. He takes the platform of his dad. He expands it. He takes it global. He turns it into print, media, television, movies, et cetera. And now he's got sons and daughters, but he's got a family that he's dealing with now. And obviously, HBO spun that into the Roy family, right? Pretty obvious. But what happens? Because you're a student of human beings and you're a student of literature.

What happens to a guy like Murdoch? Is he frustrated by this whole thing? Yeah, let me, you know, two points here. Murdoch's, I would say, two main interests in life are making an enormous amount of money. and of turning over the business he built to people named Murdoch. I mean, this is central to him. The idea of a generational dynasty is involved with every decision he has ever made. Now, he made a curious decision which would come back to bite him is now biting him at this very moment when he divorced his second wife. He divorced his second wife, Anna, in California, community property state. She had the ability at that point to, you know, wreck his empire, to take half of it to demand that large parts of it be sold.

She held the power. The agreement that they made so that she wouldn't do this was the following. She would get, instead of billions upon billions upon billions, she would take only, only $100 million. dollars, but he would agree that he would lock up all of his holdings in a trust for his then existing children. There were four children. Now, the effect of that was twofold. It meant that any children that he had after this, and he would have come to have two more,

would not be part of the trust. But more importantly, he couldn't ever change the trust. And the trust works that when Rupert Murdoch dies, his shares then are evenly divided among his four children, now his four oldest children. They have then the power to decide what happens with this company. So as a succession point, what happens is that he gave up his ability to appoint his own successor. Flash forward now, 20 years later, he has tried to appoint his. his son Lachlan as his successor. His son Lachlan now holds the job of CEO, holds the job because Rupert Murdoch still holds the votes. When Rupert Murdoch dies, and again, he's 92, those votes are

split evenly among the four children who will then decide what happens to the company. And that very well may mean, probably does mean, they throw their brother out because, among other things, They hate Fox. They're kind of liberal kids, no longer kids. They're liberal, international, professional people who don't want the taint of Fox News. Talleyed into the Hollywood crowd. They don't like the Hollywood crowd hammering them related to what's going on in the Fox. Exactly.

So that's where Rupert finds himself. I guess when I was reading your book, it made me think about America, Michael. And you've written Fire and Fury, Best. book and several books about the Trump administration. So I want to reflect with you on something and then ask you to respond to this. Reading your book, there's a group of Americans, primarily white. It could be lower middle class. They feel aggrieved. They feel left out of the establishment. They feel left out of the system. By the way, I relate to that because I did grow up with these people. You know, I grew up in a blue collar neighborhood and a blue collar family. So did I. Totally. So you know family members

yours are Trump supporters. Because if you grew up in that neighborhood, you know they have a grievance. They don't, they have a grievance against the medical establishment, the media. They don't like you, sir. They don't like me. I represent Wall Street. You represent the media. You see what I mean? And there's a grievance. And Mr. Ayles from Warren, Ohio, he understood that grievance. He grabbed the pulse of that grievance and he played it. What happens to that grievance? Or if Fox demises, does something crueler and more ugly come up? Well, yes. I mean, I think two things. There's somebody, I can't remember who said Roger Ailes discovered a niche audience, which turned out to be half of the country. There you go. Exactly right.

But I think what, you know, Fox is is kind of an outlier in the media landscape, in the way that it has maintained its incredible monopoly over its audience. And there's a lot, a lot of reasons, kind of media reasons that that people say that happens because it's an older audience, less techie, less choice, all of that. But I think what happens is that those factors go away and have been going away. And that audience begins to respond just the same as all other mainstream liberal audiences, which is that they find other options. there, the media that has been at the center and has held the monopoly fractures, fragments. So I think that we will see, and we are seeing the growth of a lot of outlets to service this audience,

whether it's Joe Rogan or whether it's Ben Shapiro or, you know, Tucker Carlson is, you know, I mean, fired from Fox and he is now out there on Twitter or X. and raising money and he will start his own own enterprise. And I think we'll just see more and more of this kind of thing. The audience, its nature, its identity, all that will still be there, but it will be serviced across a much wider spectrum. Talk about Donald Trump for a second. You know a lot about him.

You've obviously studied him, interviewed him, wrote about him. You write in this book that the Murdox don't like him. They think he's an idiot. I think he even said in the book that some of them are even Rupert. himself wishes Trump was dead, meaning he was out of the picture. Okay, so would solve a lot of problems for Rupert. So what would the Murdox want then? Let's say we were building them the robo politician for them. Who is that? Well, there isn't because they're, they're undecided, you know, they have different interests. You know, Lachlan Murdoch, you know, his primary interest seems to be

to give his father what his father wants. He's, he's styled himself. as the loyal son. You know, I do, you know, my father is an important man in history, and I want to respect that. James Murdoch has styled himself as the opposite son. Right. You know, the forward-looking, the new Murdoch, and the new Murdoch is a, you know, kind of liberalist, a democratic establishment. Right. Hollywood, you know, MBA, smart guy. I'm elite, no at all. Murdoch. The sister, Elizabeth, very important in this, lives in London. She's, you know, she's quite liberal herself, but, you know, her view is, is a British view and an international view. And then the other sister lives in Australia and has been basically remote from, you know, at a great distance from,

from the business. She's a 65-year-old mother. And actually, you know, of all the children, I've found her the most easy to get along with, the most sort of, you know, she's the one who really kind of gets the family and gets it in the way like saying, well, you know, they're all crazy. So I don't know if you could come up with a single political figure. I don't know in that way. The family has fragmented. Rupert's monopoly on power passes now to people who have no interest in maintaining power. I mean, I mean, there's a speculate here. It feels like Trump is going to get the nomination. He's indicted four times. He's on trial now for fraud in New York State. His poll numbers are up. He's raising money off of these trials. This aggrieved group of people that were both referencing

that this Fox's audience believes that this is a witch hunt. His friend Bill O'Reilly just wrote a book called Killing the Witches, which is obviously tied to the Trump witch hunt. So what happens if Trump gets the nomination? How do you predict that Fox will handle the programming around Donald Trump? I think it's going to be a real kind of fundamental identity question. I mean, clearly they have been supporting Ron DeSantis. They've created Ron DeSantis's candidacy. That bubble is a Fox bubble, and it is deflating very, very quickly, if not already completely flat. So what do they do? Because you're right. I mean, somewhere along the way, the Fox audience became the Trump base. And again, it's one of those internal contradictions at the heart of this business and of this network. This

business is doing something that the owners don't want it to do. Now, there's a further contradiction that the owners like the money, this earns them. But the result of that is to put them into a very unhappy place, an unhappy place personally for Rupert Murdoch, who hates Trump, and among his family, who now hate or at least have stopped speaking to him in part over this issue of Trump and Fox. Yeah, it's fascinating stuff. I want to go to your last chapter. You know, I don't wish anybody dead, of course, Michael, but this is the prediction of the eventual demise of Rupert Murdoch. It does happen. It does happen. God bats a thousand or the universe or every believe. We're all going the same way. So take us through that. Lawyers everywhere. How long do you see the decision taking in terms of the full secession process, if you will? And then what happens to the company? any of you because I think you're fairly prophetic in this book. I, you know, I think it can,

it can go either quickly. There may, there may already be an agreement among the children or something close to an agreement about what happens, or it doesn't go quickly. And it drags out for a year, quite possible, more. There could be an enormous amount of litigation here. I mean, each one of these children of Rupert Murdoch's children has $2 billion in their pocket. That was a distribution that was made in 2017 when they sold off a large amounts of their assets. And they sold those assets partly because they felt that James and Lachlan couldn't get along. James had left the company and Lachlan they didn't feel Lachlan could handle a company of that size. But anyway, with $2 billion in your pocket, that pays for a lot of lawyers.

So I think it's possible we have that kind of clash, you know, in a state clash that goes on for a long time. It is equally possible that now, and with Rupert Murdoch's decision to step back, not down, back, we're beginning something else in which Lachlan Murdoch is going to try to figure out what he has to do to keep control of this company. Now, actually, there's probably one way that he might have a chance of keeping control of the company, which is to turn it into cash, something that nobody really wants to argue about. And, you know, Lachlan is not, I mean, you know, he doesn't really want to be running Fox. He's not a guy who really wants to be at the center of controversy. As a matter of fact, he's a guy who lives in Australia running a largely American company from the maximum number of times. And he's a

zones away. So I think it is very, very, very possible that he says, Jesus, what are, what am I doing this? Let's get rid of Fox. And then, you know, I've, I've a company with a lot of cash in it, then I can sort of decide what I want to do. You know, there's a theory that what he wants to do is buy gambling assets in Australia. Well, okay, they just move away from the, the areas of controversy. and then he could probably come to an agreement with his siblings. Okay, it makes sense. You know, Roger, you know, who is a tough guy, paranoid. He was an anxious guy.

He was a fighter. He probably would have followed you around, Michael. I mean, that would be my guess. You're worried that the Murdox are like that. They're following you around or messing with you? You know, yes, I've been messed with by the Murdox before. I was going to say I'm used to it, but I'm not used to it because when they mess with you, it can be pretty serious. Roger, on the other hand, by the way, I was a good friend of Rogers

for many, many, many years. He was an incredibly good source. One of the sharpest guys I know about the media business and incredibly funny. No, I enjoyed Roger. I had a great relationship with him. He got me. I got him. He hated Trump. I mean, he prepared that statement that they put out after the Megan Kelly debacle. I was actually there. Yeah, yeah, totally, totally. He thought Trump was ruining the Republican Party. Just wondering had he, you know, had not had the fiasco that he had, how he would have handled the programming around Trump during the administration. But, all right, well, we're down to the last part of our podcast. I've got five words for you. I'm going to read the words. You just reacted them any way you see fit, a sentence, a word, whatever. So let's start with

News Corp. When I say the word news corp, what do you think? You know, of the old days of something that's long past newspapers. Rupert Murdoch was a newspaper man, first, last, foremost, and newspapers have passed. Yeah, interesting. The name Murdoch, the Murdoch family, the entire universe of Murdoch. Seventy years in which the name Murdoch has been commanded more influence, more power, and far longer than anyone else in our time. Yeah, politically, monetarily, Hollywood, it's and said it everything. Right? Okay. Yes. Donald Trump. The, the nature of our time, we live in the Trumpian time, whatever, whether he rises or falls, he's at the center of everything. I agree with you. I mean, we have to accept that, actually. Rupert Murdoch. When I say that,

I think about his legacy, who he is as a person. I just an extraordinary story, you know, I mean, which I admire him for. I mean, you know, I think it's almost impossible to imagine anyone, any more with that kind of determination, sweep, vision, tenacity, will to impose himself on the time he lived in. It's interesting. I only had one interaction with Mr. Murdoch. This is way before Fox, I was part of Fox News. It was in 1999, I got invited by Allen & Company to the. the Super Bowl. Fox, the network was broadcasting it, and Rupert had a breakfast party, sort of this

weird thing. And I was an impressional young guy, 35 years old, and I got to sit at his table. And, you know, this is 25 years ago. So Rupert was still, you know, 70-ish, if you will. And I was just blown away about how nice he was. Oh, yeah. No, no. I, totally. I mean, I have, yes, I've always liked Rupert. Always. Every time I've been with him has been a good time. And he's a, I remember Tucker Carlson said to me, you know, he's incredibly polite, courtly, you know, what a gentleman. But then Tucker said, of course, you know, he's also a vicious animal. All right. Well, yeah, and I'll pack your eyeballs out, I'm sure.

But he could have been nicer than me. I remember when he said, well, this guy's quite a polite guy. I'm going to give you the last word here, sir, Fox News, Fox News. You know, it changed everything. It did. It made the country coarser, though, didn't it? Oh, yeah. No.

Change the media. changed the country, changed. Absolutely. Yeah. It's interesting. You know, we're going after each other harder because of the, uh,

the conversion of talk, conservative radio into conservative television. And, you know, it's just interesting that that's happening. Well, your book is fantastic. I enjoyed it,

Michael. It's going to be a best seller if it's not already. The fall. The end of Fox News and the end of the Murdoch dynasty by Michael Wolfe. Thank you for joining us on open book, Michael. Thank you for having me. And let's,

uh, have lunch. Well, we all seen what happened. succession, but what will happen to the Murdoch dynasty? As for Fox News, I have a little bit of a love affair with Fox News. I love the people there. I worked there successfully for many years, not super in love with some of the biases or some of the grievances that the programming engenders in the society. But by and large, I found out a fun place to work. I guess the thing I'm worried

about when I think about Fox is what happens in the accents of Fox. Because, believe it or not, Fox is less radical than a place like Newsmax or One American News. And so if Fox isn't there, there will be a vacuum on the right. And I believe that the voices will become weirder and more radical in Fox's absence. So as much as some of my friends on the left is like Fox, I think it's overly biased, beware of the alternative. That's what I would say to people. Anyway, that was a fascinating discussion with Michael Wolf today. We'll have to see how this stuff shakes out. Ma. Wow. You ready for the podcast or no? You ready?

Yeah, of course. Go ahead. All right. All right. So I had on today a guy named Michael Wolf, who was, his name was Michael Wolf, like a werewolf, except he's bald, except he's bald that has no hair. So he's not really a werewolf, but he's Michael Wolf. And anyway, he wrote a book about the Murdox who owned Fox News. Do you watch Fox News? Ma, I can't remember if you watch it or not. Periodically. Periodically. Okay.

Well, so what do you think of Fox News? What's your opinion of Fox News? I think it's good. Okay. What do you like about Fox News? Well, what do I like about Fox News? Well, Fox News is pretty much to the point. Like, they try to sway you on certain things, but they're pretty good.

Okay, and you like Maria Bartoloma, right? She's like one of your favorites, right? Yeah, I do. What do you like about Maria? Can I tell you what I like about it? You go ahead. Tell me. I think that she's very smart.

She came from being a head check girl to a news forecaster, and I think she has a stance, and she's good. Okay. She's attractive, and she's Italian. Right. You like the fact she's Italian, though, probably more than anything, because I know your personality. Yeah.

But, okay, so the family that owns Fox, the patriarch, is 92 years old. He's still reasonably healthy, and, you know, he's of good, mind and body, but he's giving up power to his son. How do you think that's going to go down? I don't know his son, so it's not fair for me to say. I don't know. Okay. I mean, your son, AJ, is very, very smart. So if you had to give him some kind of power, it would work, but maybe his son isn't smart, so I don't know. Right. But you have seen situations in your life where the power is given to a stu nod, and it doesn't work, right? Right. Okay. All right. So it really depends on what he's like, right?

It depends on what he's like. So, Ma, do you watch any of these other crazy right-wing shows like Newsmax or One American News? No, right? No. Okay, but when I'm not on Chris Cuomo show, do you sometimes watch News Nation or not really? No. I love to watch it when you're on it because you're very articulate when you speak. Okay, Ma.

And I don't think too many people speak like you. Okay, thanks, Ma. And I'm very prejudiced in saying that I think my son. Anthony should run for president. Here we go again. The way he helps himself. All right. I can't put this stuff, Ma, Ma,

I can't put the stuff in the podcast. You're repeating yourself over and over again. People are going to think you're going to have a memory issue, ma. You keep repeating yourself. No, no memory issue, that's for sure. I had to ride a motorcycle right now. I think I could still hop on it and drive it. Eddie?

I'm afraid I'd take a spill. At 86. Do you get handle it? I don't know. But you're driving around in the Maserati doing about 90 miles an hour, right? So that's no problem with it. Yeah, so I think I could probably handle it. What else you want to say?

You got anything else you want to say? No, I love you very much, Kukula. Okay. I am Anthony Scaramucci, and that was Open Book. Thank you for listening. If you like what you hear, tell your friends, and make sure you hit follow or subscribe wherever you listen to your podcast. While you're there, please leave us a rating or review.

If you want to connect with me or chat more about the discussions, it's at Scaramucci on Twitter or Instagram. You can also text me at Plus 1, 917, 909-29-29-69. I'd love to hear from you. I'll see you back here next week.