Open Book with Anthony Scaramucci - The Secretive Family Behind a $13 Trillion Financial Empire

Episode Date: August 11, 2026

Fidelity is one of the most powerful financial institutions in America, but the story of the family behind it has largely remained hidden. Justin Baer joins me to reveal how the Johnson dynasty built a $13 trillion empire, and how Abigail Johnson had the courage to reinvent it before the old business model became a relic. Justin Baer is an award-winning journalist and an editor for The Wall Street Journal. In a career that includes stints at the Financial Times and Bloomberg News, he has covered almost every significant financial event over the past two decades, including the dot-com bubble, the 2008 financial crisis and the economic fallout from the pandemic. Along the way, Baer has chronicled the ups and downs of such major institutions as Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway. Get a copy of his brilliant new book, House of Fidelity: The Rise of the Johnson Dynasty and the Company That Changed American Investing Anthony Scaramucci is the founder and managing partner of SkyBridge, a global alternative investment firm, and founder and chairman of SALT, a global thought leadership forum and venture studio. Pre-order my next book, All the Wrong Moves: How Three Catastrophic Decisions Led to the Rise of Trump, out on the 17th of September in the UK and the 22nd of September in the US: ⁠https://www.scaramucci.net/allthewrongmoves Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This episode is brought to you by Accenture. When your advertising operations fall out of sync, everything else follows. Spotify and Accenture are working together to reinvent the rhythm of ad sales, using automation, analytics, and smarter workflows to simplify campaign delivery and access better data across the business. The result? Less time spent on operations, more time connecting brands with the moments and fandoms that matter most. Learn more at Accenture.com slash Spotify.

Hello, mid-sized business. We see your big ambitions, but how do you achieve the wins you want when your technology is holding you back? SAP Grow is built to grow with your business, no matter its size, with AI embedded at its core, working across every system,

all ready to go from day one so you can hit the ground running. Bring it with SAP Grow. AI Cloud ERP for any size business. Hear that? It's your money calling. It wants to be it. a promotion.

Elevate your savings with the Scotia high-interest savings account. Always earn high regular interest rates that grow the more you save and invest. Conditions apply. Visit scotia bank.com slash h-I-SA to learn more. Scotia Bank. You're richer than you think. What is the central triumph to me is the pivot? You're sitting there all mutual funds all the time.

That's your copper wire. The world's going wireless. You can send the copper wire and end up losing your business. Say the word mutual fund. I feel it's dying and I think it's getting replaced. I think a relic. You say mutual fund. I think of Museum of Natural History.

That's where it's going. It seems that way. It seems though even if they can level the playing field between mutual funds and ETFs with respect to tax benefit. But still, I think it's people like ETFs a lot. I think people prefer that mutual funds. You're a much more generous journalist than most. You're supposed to be more cynical and say, this thing is dead.

Welcome to Open Book. I am your host, Anthony Scaramucci. Joining us today is Justin Baer. He is an award-winning journalist. He's also Deputy Markets Editor for the Wall Street Journal. And he's got a great new book out. It's called House of Fidelity, The Rise of the Johnson Dynasty, and the company that changed American investing. And we, you and I actually talked about Diana Enriquez's book, which I guess is almost three decades old now. So a lot has changed the fidelity. But congratulations on this. You know, it's an amazing story, you know, and it's an amazing story about one big thing, Justin,

is do one thing, do one thing with great excellence and stay doing one thing. And you too can have $13 trillion, right? I mean, that's basically the story. So it's great to have you on. Tell us something about your background first. Thanks so much. And how long have you been at the journal? What drew you into?

reporting. Yes. Yeah, that's that's a different story. Yeah, I've been to the journal, I guess, coming up 15 years at this point. I had worked at a few other outlets before that, the Financial Times here in New York and Bloomberg News, also in New York. And then I got my start at a newspaper, daily newspaper in Indiana, called the Journal Gazette. And, you know, I had kind of a I was kind of a late bloomer in terms of my interest in journalism. I was not one of those people that, you know, wrote a newspaper, you know, a newspaper on their neighborhood or their, like, fifth grade class, like a lot of people. Kind of came to it late, discovered it very late when I was in college. And, you know, I knew I was interested in finding a role where you could do a lot of writing.

I didn't think I was cut out for or interested in getting the news business and ended up, you know, sort of luck, getting, you know, working at an internship at a newspaper. Just really love the idea of, you know, showing up and going to interview people and then going back to the paper and writing about it and then seeing your date and seeing the article the next day. But it took me a few more years after that to get going. And I worked in a different related field, went back to school, and that really began, you know, my life as a reporter as I was getting into my mid-20s. Just that's just an existential question before I get into the book. So journalists. Let's talk about journalists for a second.

You go into journalism because you're trying to find the truth. You're going into the journalism because you're fascinated by human stories or human stories connected to business. And I find journalists, appropriately so, by the way, I'm just wondering if this is you, cynical. They look at things a little bit of a jaunt to side. They're trying to figure out if they're getting bullshitted by somebody or if what they're actually seeing is what you get. So is that you? I mean, to a certain extent, yeah. I mean, I think all the above, I think wanting, enjoying learning new things and being able to gather that information and share it, you know, maybe for the first time with the broader world.

That's very exciting. That's a big part of the allure. You know, the cynicism. I also think there is also, I've always found almost the reverse of that at times, you know, going into reporting a story with a certain naivete and openness to find out where the truth is and where the real story is. And it's difficult to do that if you're cynical all the time. So I find a lot of reporters, I've always tried to look at things the same way, that to be open to making the wrong, to the open, the fact that your gut instinct or your, your notion of what a thing might be is off base, right? So, I don't know. But, yeah, I mean, you have to be, you have to look at things critical and critically and as your.

I'm starting there, if you don't mind, Justin, because this is the, this is what makes. makes this book so interesting. There's been more than one book written about Goldman Sachs. You cover Goldman Sachs. There's been more than one book written about J.P. Morgan. As far as I can tell, there's really been one book, Diana's book three decades ago. And this is, to me, one of the most private, it's one of the most influential financial institutions in America. But it's also one of these things that is incredibly private. And it's so hard to understand. something drew you to this, what drew you to it. And then I want you to tell us about what you discovered, which I think, this is one of the more fascinating stories for me because this is a monarchial story where you, that's somebody that's supposed to succeed and they don't believe in the person. Turns out that that was the right person, right? I mean, I mean, that's basically, I read the book.

But anyway, go ahead. Yeah, yeah. I, I was drawn to that story for all those reasons, right? the challenges and learning. You know, in Fidelity, like a lot of, you know, they're essentially what consumer companies, right? They appeal to and their customers are, you know, consumers and they reach out to them directly.

So they do have, and they always have had for decades, this massive sort of marketing machine where people know the existence of a lot of their services. And yet at the same time, the inner workings of the place and, of course, the family that has controlled it for eight years, far more elusive, right? And so that was, you know, as I was covering them, you know, the journal, you know, I kept discovering things and talking to people who had worked there over the years that I didn't know. and I didn't think really was known broadly, right? And, you know, in Diana's book was really good. It was written at it, you know, as you point out, 30 years ago, a much different point in history of fidelity and even, you know, finance in general, right?

It was the sort of peak of this of the mutual fund, right, where people, you know, couldn't get enough mutual funds, You can get enough stories and books about them. And the world's a much different place today. And Fidelity is a much different place today. And, you know, as I was covering them and they're in the industry that they're in, even people that were part of that business did not have a real current feel for what was happening at Fidelity. You know, this was, this is going back maybe eight years ago or so. and it was the point in which there was this massive shift of money into index funds.

And it appeared as though those that were the sort of kings of stock picking and bond picking funds were really struggling with this trend. And yet at the same time, we're in kind of denial that it was happening. And people serve through, you know, again, these are people that work at either. competitors or would be, you know, wealth managers who would know fidelity very well, you know, kind of viewed them as sort of being a little bit listless and not really adapting or certainly at least, at the very least, not really talking about how they were adapting to this new world. And so, you know, as I got to know the company and got to understand better

what was happening under the surface, it seemed like this was outdated. So if all all the more reason to think, like, well, this is, you know, there's a really great story here. And then what happened after COVID is they just went through this massive growth surge that really kind of continues to this day. Not only did the number of people that were signing up for accounts and the money they were managing was skyrocketing, but also, you know, at under like 18 or so months, they had increased their work. for global workforce by like 50%, which for like a company that at that point was 75 years old, that was pretty unusual. So all these things were pointing

to in the direction that there is a really good story. And then, of course, what I had known that sort of some of the contours of was this very sort of dramatic moment in time where

the families hold on this company and its future seemed to slip a little bit. And I knew there was a great, there was a lot more to say about what exactly happened and what were people's motivations in that

saga. So I, I, I was a serve for me, from day one, it was the no doubter. This is a great, great story, as you said. It then became up to me, like, it was more of a shift toward, like,

am I going to be able to to pull this off and to pull this all together in a way that really does this justice. So just so I tried to do. Guys, thank you so much for listening and subscribing to open book. You know we've had 200 authors on this show. It's been a lot of fun for me, but I'm also an author now too. And I've got all the wrong moves available. Go to scaramucci.net backslash all the wrong moves.

You can buy your copy today. It's a lot of fun and lots of commentary. about what's gone on in the U.S. over the last three decades. You did that, okay? So the book is the book is the crown meets succession. That's what the book is. And in it, it's a true story. It's a true story about a three-generational family.

The, you know, she reminds me the way you write about her, and I'd like to get your reaction to this. She reminds me to Catherine Graham in a way. And what do I mean by that? she's a reluctant warrior. She doesn't seem to have the skill set to replace the legendary father or even some of the Peter Lynch's. But she does have that skill set. She's actually a pretty brilliant visionary and she's doggedly determined. And I think the stuff on Bitcoin is fascinating. Obviously, I'm a bitcooner. You just imagine she's a privately trade. She's a private company.

So she overrules everybody. This is we're going to be. We're going to be putting up some mining rigs. And, oh, by the way, people can deposit their Bitcoin here at Fidelity. And I do have Bitcoin at Fidelity fully disclosed. So tell us a little bit about her personality. And, of course, this is Abigail Johnson, who runs Fidelity and is the daughter of Ned Johnson. Yeah. I mean, you almost have to go back to her father's rise and his, the moment in which he takes over to,

to offer sort of the context of her experiences because he, like her, did face a lot of skeptics as he, as it became clear that he was going to succeed his father. And, but also, Ned ended up, you know, he was a very different, different guy. And he ends up being in his differences in what made him such an unusual thinker and, you know, he was a very different, different guy. And, um, he ends up being, in his differences, builder and businesses. It ends up being the perfect skill set for that moment in time, which was sort of get through the 70s when the only thing that they sold, which was stock mutual funds, no one wants, right?

It goes on for almost a decade. So let's find all these other things that we need to do. Abby, much different in that respect. But Fidelity is a much different place when she, She's making her way through the organization. And it's her focus on operations and making the play, making these, what at this point are these massive platforms, investing platforms, whether it's a foreign K record keeping business or the brokerage, retail business,

or the custody business, making them run as efficiently as possible. lowering unit costs, improving customer service, all these sort of big, you know, weighty challenges that these kinds of business, you know, there's certain companies where you think of like Amazon, Walmart, or others have been made them so successful and sort of applying to a lot of the discipline in those rules to fidelity. It's something that they really need it at that point in time as we get into the 21st century. You know, personality-wise, yeah, she has always been very introverted. And, you know, beyond that, just very uncomfortable with the notion that, you know, she's successful because she's part of this family.

You know, as far back, you know, when I talk to lots of people, as far back, you know, when I talk to lots of people, as far back as when she was in college, you know, she goes to a college. It's not in that sort of, you know, narrow corridor of, you know, leafy colleges and universities around, you know, England. She goes a little bit further afield. And no one, you know, and doesn't really tell you so that even close friends of hers don't realize that her father is the chairman of Fidelity, which, By that point, you know, when they're getting into the 80s and the height of the Peter Lynch era is the most famous investment firm in the world.

And that really continues. You know, for each stage of her life and career, she starts working. Her first job is at a consulting firm in New York. It's painfully shy there. It kind of goes to business school. again, you were there. So you know like the level of networking and striving that was in place. I mean, she would never remember this, but I took a course in 1987 called New Financial Instruments at the Harvard Business School when I was at Harvard Wall School. She was in the class with us. And remember, it was class participation. And so, you know, I got a good memory, pretty observing guy and knew who she knew who she was. was. She was very well prepared. And when she was called on, she answered the questions, well, not a flamboyant person. You could definitely seem she had levels of introversion and her

personality. And I think the cool thing about her, and there was a book about this introverts win or something like that. You know, she's an introvert that's one. And, you know, you talk about the weight of being a Cian and a family, right? And so there's a weight to this. And this is something, you know, I didn't know. My dad was a cronon. operators. I didn't feel that way, but the flip side is he didn't know anybody at the country club to help me out to get my career started, right? So, you know, it's just one of these things. You're always in that tug of war. But I think what you've done a beautiful job in the book is you've explained how she has triumph and you've explained how Fidelity has triumph. And what is

the central triumph to me is the pivot. You know, you're hitting there, you know, all mutual funds all the time. That's your copper, that's your copper wire. The world's going wireless. You can send in the copper wire and end up losing your business. You know, Mike Novogratz and I are good friends. We, we work a lot together. And we always say if Skybridge or Galaxy, the same business that I have right now, three years from now, not going to be in business. I got to move the business to where the, where the puck is going. And I admire her for doing that. Um, What other elements do you think are going to make the company continually successful? And she's in her 60s now.

So who replaces her? So that is a big question. You have to look back at, okay, well, what was this state of play when her father was in that same age group, right? And it was still relatively early in Abby's career. and you could squint, you know, if you work there and just assume that, oh, yeah, she's probably going to run the company someday, but it wasn't really, you know, it was probably equally likely to people that she was not going to stay, right? And that she would want to do something else or that this was something she wanted to spend more time with her children or whatever it would be. It was only, you know, it was too worldly to say definitively she is, she's, she's, making her way up this organization with the goal to to take over.

And her father was, you know, was a lot, he was also extremely reluctant to signal that that was preordained in any way and would, and would tell people so he's, you know, surrounded him. you know, I don't know if she's going to, you know, ever be ready to do this or I don't know when it's going to happen. And so it was, so I think we're kind of in a similar situation, similar part of the timeline now with her being your 60s having been in charge for 10 years. You know, there are, there are members of the next generation of the Johnson. So we're talking, you know, Ned had three children. Abby being the oldest and Abby as a younger brother and younger sister. And so there are some of the kids who are in their,

you know, oldest of whom are probably just very at this point or so. That, you know, where they are and where they might be is, you know, in the organization long term is still probably too early to determine. So I, you know, I think there's, you know, that's the expectation was that they were going to keep it in the family. But, you know, things happen, right? And people, and I think, you think it'll go public, Jocelyn? I mean, that would, you know, if they were to pursue that, that would be a reversal of their long time. They've really enjoyed being a private company and not just because for the family reasons.

They have seen it as critical for them to be able to invest in long-term ideas and that if they were beholden to all these sort of outside constituents, including shareholders, that would make it much harder for them to try things out, right, and which has proven to be. so successful for them. Obviously, not always, and lots of times it didn't work. But it was, it's so culturally, it's a big part of who they are. I think the most fascinating part of the story to me is the consistency. I think these great companies, you know, I mean, Henrique, as Diana told the story of them literally taking the motif from Procter & Gamble,

the branding, the idea that you were going to sell mutual fund investing the way Procter & Gamble sold soap or the way McDonald sold French fries. And you were going to create a consumer brand around the idea of investing. And of course, with the introduction of the 401K, it became very exciting and very well placed. And now, you know, she's part of the future.

She's one of the big first movers. in digital finance, and she sort of morphed that business into something that is ready for the next decade, if not the next quarter century. So, yeah. So I guess, I guess where I'm getting at as a journalist, when you started your research on this, sometimes we have presuppositions in our mind. Maybe you didn't, but I usually do. What were your presuppositions?

Then you did your research, Justin. And did your presupposition, were they confirmed by your research or was something different come out related to your research? Yeah, I guess maybe there's some very specific things that. So we talked a little bit about the challenges around succession from Ed to Abbey. And this moment in time where things seem to go sideways between them. And that was known. You know, I'd written a little bit about a colleague of mine written about it about what, you know, this essentially

what looked like a coup attempt by Abby, I guess, her father. And I sort of began this process thinking, okay, well, one of the things I have to do is I have to figure out why this happened, right? What came between them in this moment that would lead to these These very dramatic things that happen in very quick succession. One, Abby's removed from her role, a very big job in running the mutual fund business, which at the time was the flagship.

And then a few months later, this is what looked like a boardroom coup that was thwarted at the last minute. So I had to figure out, like, what was her motivation and what was going on? And so I said about doing that and learned that there was a lot going on. And including the consideration for the first time, you know, in at least her lifetime that her father was open to maybe selling the company, right? And to me, that was, I did not necessarily expect that twist. You know, and as I pulled, you know, pulled everything together and filled in the in the blanks. talking to lots of folks. It all made sense, but that was something that I was,

did not, did not see that, necessarily that, that twist coming. I would say, I was surprised to, to learn a lot, what I guess to Ned ended up emerging as a much more complicated and fascinating figure than I thought.

he you know even throughout his career very high profile you know there Watson magazine covers with him on it and

and yet just learning a lot about his life from his upbringing and some of the some of the learning disabilities

he had from an early age and overcame to the very the very interesting way in which he solved problems

and what he was, you know, with infidelity as someone who would sort of move from one very narrow problem that needed to be fixed to the other. And what he wasn't, he was not this sort of, you know, commanding control, big picture strategy guy, right? That he was someone that was remained for his whole life and tinker or someone who would look for things and then and then devote 110% of his time

until he fixed it. Like the time he looked at the website that launched in the 90s and it didn't look right. So he spent like three weeks sitting next to the developer like figuring out that should be blue, no, that should be green and all that

stuff. So that level it was just a much more interesting and fascinating. person that I expected is when I started. So we're at the point in the podcast where I, you know, my producer and I, we took five words out of your book. I'm going to read the word. I want you to tell me what first comes to mind.

And, you know, from the lens of the book. So, because there's a way of investing here that they think about. So if I say the word investing, Justin, you say what? I say, gosh, I would. say. I mean, the first which comes to mind, I guess, is picking stocks, right? Yeah. That's what I exactly.

I think Peter Lynch, these are hardcore stock pickers. They've morphed the business. But if you went up there right now, there are people that have individual stocks in their portfolios, guaranteed. Yep. Right? Okay. So I would say, and if I say

Johnson, and I don't mean Johnson and Johnson. I meet Ned and Abigail Johnson, the Johnson family that runs Fidelity. I guess I would say New England. I would say Boston. I mean, to me, they just invite so many ways embody that region and history and not only with fidelity, but the other previous family business they ran, which was a department store right downtown. I would say, But the Johnsons are, you know, are a twist, right? They were, they, each of them were, were mesmerized by the market, right? In a way that a lot of their, their peers in that, you know, Brahmin or however you want to define that, the community up there, of well-to-do families, they were, they were pulled into this,

the market and the excitement and the potential. And that is, to me, that's something that is kind of really sets them apart. And what even other members of the family apart from say, Abby, Ed, Ed's father. The word fidelity, what a great word, right? Well, I always thought like one of the best names for an asset management company ever, right? I say the word fidelity. What does it mean to you? I mean, I know the backstory, which was, it was, that was not, you know, the name did not come from the Johnson's.

You know, Edward Johnson the second bought out the guy who ran the originally Fidelity Fund. So that takes me back to this, you know, the post period after the crash, right? and the origins of that fund firm and the Johnson, Edward Johnson's takeover of it. So I, but, you know, but yeah, I mean, finality now, like, it's, it's the financial, it's often, you know, the financial services company that is the first one you deal with, right, is you enter your, you know, your professional life, right?

your first day of work. Meaning, yeah, you filled out the thing. And then they said, okay, what do you want to do with your investments? And guess why? Your firm, my firm, fully disclosed, my IRA, my 401ks are all at fidelity. Yeah, and you're often defaulted into them, right? So if you show up your first day, oh, you know, this is your account and your money, you know, it's zero right now. But every paycheck, it's going to accumulate and it's going into this target day fund.

And for someone who's like 22 years old, you maybe, you probably have a bank account, but, you know, most people, this is their introduction to finance, right? Right. Exactly. So I think, so it's different. I mean, again, I think back to the yield days. All right. So two last words. Okay. One is, one is mutual fund. I say the word mutual fund. Yeah, I feel it's maybe dying, right? I mean, I think it's a relic. I think a relic, yeah. You say mutual fund, I think of a museum of natural history.

That's where it's going. Am I wrong? It seems that way. It seems though, even if they, you know, if they can level the playing field between mutual funds and ETFs with respect to tax benefits. But still, I think it's people like ETFs a lot. I think they prefer that, you know, and I think the arguments for mutual funds. You're a much more generous journalist than most.

You're supposed to be more cynical and say, this thing is dead. But, you know, you're like, you're like too nice of a guy, do you? Are you sure? You're like the nightside journalist or what? I mean, too nice. No, I don't, no, not at all. Yeah, yeah. I, um, no, I just think, I, I, I just know that that's, that's, that's, that's a big reason, right?

Well, you've seen such a. All right. So the last, the last word is tied to mutual fund and then I'll give you the last word. And that's ETFs. Yeah. I mean, I think they're taking over. They are helping to, um, save the active management industry, right? I think, you know, they're, they're, the success that firms have had.

in active ETFs is obviously they're much much much smaller that the big pension funds but there is a very very healthy you know number of new ATFs that that appear and some of them are not for everybody right there's all those levered TTS but they they seem to you know as far as the house trap itself. It seems to work very well. And it is, I think, it is, it is a way in which you can still grow as an active manager, as a stock picker is through your ETS. It's got at least another decade, perhaps longer to go as a product. I'm sure that there will be an ETF that's run by AI. That'll kick all of our asses in, you know, but hopefully that'll give you and me a four-day work week.

will be fat and happening anyway. So that's the goal. But listen, you wrote a great book. I mean, the title of the book is House of Fidelity, the Rise of the Johnson Dynasty, and the company that changed American investing. Justin Bear, thank you so much for joining us on open book. And congratulations on the book getting out there. Thank you. It's great to be here.