Pablo Torre Finds Out - Shaq, Sinbad and Shazaam: Why a (Fake) Genie Movie Feels So Real
Episode Date: October 17, 2024You may remember Kazaam, the 1996 family film starring Shaquille O'Neal as a genie. But you may have also heard about Shazaam, another '90s family film starring Sinbad as a genie — allegedly. Corres...pondent David Gardner finds a true believer who remains convinced that she has seen this non-existent work of cinema, then puts Pablo's memory to the test of the Mandela Effect. And, yes, we got Shaq himself to debunk the myth of a movie that never was. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to Pablo Torre finds out.
I am Pablo Torre, and today we're going to find out what this sound is.
It's got a fake movie.
Right after this ad.
You're listening to Giraff Kings Network.
So Dave Gardner, thank you for being here.
Thank you. First time, long time.
I want to initiate you into a tribe of people who take stupid things very seriously.
These are my people.
Because you've brought us here a story about movies.
Yeah, it's about two movies specifically. One is one of my favorite movies from my childhood. It came out in
1996. That was the year that Space Jam came out. Everybody wanted to be like Mike. I wanted to be like
Shaq. I was from Tampa, Florida. I was an Orlando Magic fan. The pinstripes, of course. I had the
Shaq shoes from Walmart. I was a blistering four-foot power forward for my Episcopalian Elementary
School basketball team. I look at you right now and I'm like, this was
a real intimidating force on the block.
I heard that this movie was coming out called Kazam, starring Shaq.
In a deserted building.
The voiceover is the first most important part.
You know there's going to be one.
You just know.
In a world.
He served some of history's most notorious tyrants.
Always the great premise for a children's movie.
Somebody who served tyrants.
What if dictators had a genie?
And together, they're about to fall
into something big.
Something big.
There's smoke screen.
A child has fallen through several floors of a building.
And here's Shaq.
Wearing a turban of some sort.
Make you be wishing an amylia thing.
I don't think you're watering anybody.
Has inherited a genie.
CGI.
She does have lightning coming out of his fingers.
He does, yep.
A happy deal?
Wait a bit, a happy deal?
So his first wish is that he wants for junk food to rain
down from the sky.
And I guess they didn't have the rights to happy meal as a legal term.
Yep.
Perfect.
This was a low-budget movie.
They spent all their money on Jack.
Flying bicycle, of course.
The child comes out of his drinking water in a glass for some reason.
This is, it's lighting up pleasure centers of my brain that really only got activated.
When I, too, was a young basketball fan wondering, are all movies going to be like this forever?
And in case you're wondering, do they wink to the fact that Shaq is a real-life basketball player?
He takes one of his enemies.
Wish not granted.
Now watch him become a basketball.
Oh.
And the two-handed tomahawk for the finish.
Into a garbage shoot?
What language is that?
It's not clear.
I don't think it was clear.
It was the language of the other, David.
I may be one of the few people in the world who genuinely enjoys this movie.
Do you want to give a guess for the Rotten Tomato Score?
I'm going to, I will go with 32.
32 would be high, but I appreciate the Shack reference there.
Yeah, 5% is the number.
You said that this is a show.
We're doing here about two movies.
Yep.
Your second movie, this is the high bar you've set, is what?
So the second movie is a very similar sounding movie, both from a title perspective
and from a plot perspective.
It's called Shazam.
It was also a 1990s family comedy.
This is not the DC superhero.
Correct.
This is not 2019-Shazam.
Yes, exactly.
This is 1990s, vague for reasons that we'll get to, Shazam.
And it also involves a child with an estranged relationship with his father, who stumbles upon a magical genie.
The two of them embark on some journey together.
Life lessons are learned, relationships are healed.
And instead of Shaq, in the...
eponymous role of genie.
We have one of my other childhood heroes.
The comedian, the actor, the legend, Sinbad,
is starring as the genie in this movie.
Jingle All The Way is actually a good movie.
Jingle All The Way is a Christmas classic in my family.
I mean, it's Arnold Schwarzenegger and Sinbad.
Arnold Schwarzenegger was on a heater for kids' movies back in the day.
They were running through malls trying to get Power Man.
It's Turbo Man.
My son wants one, too.
You know it's all employed, don't you?
Turbo Man.
Fuck.
Yep.
I'm sorry.
So I admit...
You clearly never got a turbo man as a child.
I admit that my memory here is a little...
Is a little f***.
Yeah.
And it's interesting that you say that
because this movie,
nobody's seen it.
There's no trailer online.
There's no VHS copy in somebody's attic.
There's no IMDB page.
But there are a ton of people
who vividly remember
having seen Shazam starring Sinbad in the 1990s.
They can tell you where they were
when they watched it.
They can tell you.
tell you what the VHS cover looked like. They can tell you who the actors were in the movie.
They can describe the plot in detail. And yet, they've never seen this movie, certainly.
This is the part that made me say, David Gardner, it is time for you to crawl inside of this
fake lamp and help me, help grant me the wish of figuring out what the fuck is happening here.
Why do so many people claim to remember this movie that clearly does not exist? A movie that
should not be confused with any other major motion picture.
Of course not.
And also, does Shaquille O'Neal himself have any idea what is happening?
Let's find out.
It is safe to say that we live in an unprecedented era at this point of misinformation,
of government-controlled hurricanes and armies of blue-check bots,
and everybody secretly being a transgender AI clone of John F. Kennedy Jr.
or something.
It's actually gotten to the point where you now see real actual news on your timeline
about how, say, the best postgame show in sports history inside the NBA is suddenly ending.
And the default assumption is that that news must be fake.
But it's true.
Turner Sports lost the TV rights to the NBA after being outbid by NBC.
And so this season of Inside, which begins with Turner's preseason games tonight,
marks the last time we'll see Chuck and Ernie and Kenny and Shaq
at their legendary and enormous desk.
The show is fundamentally inimitable,
as evidenced by the many failed attempts to engineer knock-off versions.
And all of this brings us back around to Shaq.
Shaq, the star of Kazam himself,
who has never decided.
discuss this story in public, it seems,
and who also remains the childhood hero of reporter David Gardner,
who's written for Sports Illustrated in the New York Times and GQ and the Washington Post,
and yet remains singularly obsessed with the phenomenon
of an extremely fake Shaquille O'Neal knockoff movie called Shazam.
Like so many wonderful and confusing things on the internet,
it traces its origin back to Reddit.
Yeah.
The online fascination started here.
There's a user named Epic Journeyman on Reddit.
And about eight years ago, he posted a very long post in which he described the details of this movie.
And he also claimed that he worked at a video store at the time.
And he remembered both ordering and stocking this movie onto the shelves.
So because there's no trailer, because there's no movie, people have taken to various levels of photoshopping VHS mockup covers, should we call them.
There's a Chinese version of IMDB.
And it had a listing for this movie, and it listed actors for this movie.
And you'll also notice David Adkins.
That's his Christian name there instead of Sinbad.
So I love how it says David Atkins dot dot, dot, genie slash, in parentheses, Shazam.
As if they're two different characters, like the genie is a Shazam persona or the other way around.
Everything about this is solid gold.
So then we've got some people who have gone out of their way to create fake VHS covers.
Now, my favorite thing I think about this one is that the review, which is very believable, is just Family Fun exclamation point.
Yes.
I also want to zoom in on the person who delivered the review of Family Fun Exclamation Point, because that would be Roger Ebert.
That's right.
So this is legit.
All right, we've got another one here for you.
Even better.
Did Jonathan Taylor Thomas?
Absolutely, it is.
They were standing back to back.
Yep.
JTT and Sinbad.
Although the first one I think is like
all laudable Photoshop.
This one like Sinbad's head is too big
for the genie costume.
And Jonathan Taylor Thomas's fingers
disappear beneath the genie lamp.
But me weekly
assures us that this movie is outrageously funny.
Sinbad is just in giant red letters here
just to say if you were wondering who this is,
it's Sinbad.
And if you're wondering what the title of this movie is
from this movie poster,
Actually, it's not clear.
There is no title on this movie poster.
What's the real Kazam's tagline there?
The world's most powerful genie has just met his match.
Damn.
Mm-hmm.
He's worked for tyrants, remember?
But 14-year-old Max is his match.
Yeah, Pol Pot had nothing on Max.
So, okay.
You mentioned the name of a perfectly named online character
named Epic Journeyman.
Where is that guy?
where did you end up going?
So I DM'd Epic Journeyman on Reddit.
I was in the Reddit DMs.
I'm in the minds down there for you, Pablo,
just to let you know, sliding into DMs of these poor souls.
So Epic Journeyman originally agreed to do an interview with us,
but unfortunately he backed out over time.
His journey was too epic for us, apparently.
Absolutely, unfortunately.
But I did find someone else who has a very similar epic journey to go on with us.
So my first job was at a video store,
and as a kid, I just absolutely loved movies.
Like, even before I worked at a video.
Her name is Melissa Garza, and she also worked in a video store.
She also remembers ordering this movie.
She also remembers watching this movie.
And so I gave her a call to talk about it.
I remember seeing, like, information in the booklets that we would get at the video store
before it actually came out.
And so I knew it was coming out.
I liked Sinbad, I like to stand up.
So it was something I looked forward to seeing.
So the first time I remember getting it was when I worked at the video store.
I remember watching it a few times.
And I even remember watching it on HBO.
In fact, in 2004, it was on HBO when I watched it.
And she actually worked as a movie reviewer online and even wrote a review of the movie, Shazam.
So this is a 1700 word review.
This is a serious business.
You were wondering how into this review, Melissa,
reviewer for Scaredstiff Reviews at Scaredstiff Reviews.com was,
the answer is extensively.
It begins like this.
After talking with a few of my movie buff friends
who are tearing their hair out and feeling insane
while remembering the film Shazam,
I decided I'd put myself 100% out there.
Somehow this film disappeared off the face of the earth,
so knowing I'll be called
a nut, I've decided to write what I remember because I saw this movie several times.
It aired on TV. It was in video stores I worked at. It was a fun little film.
As for the plot of the movie, yeah. So from what I recall directly, there was no mother figure
in the film. The film starts with Sinbad, parentheses, genie, close parentheses, in his lamp
slash man cave. There were purple curtains or blankets on the wall, large round bed and a TV
across from it. Sinbad saunteres over, sits on the bed with two waiting female genies hanging out with
them. Sinbad says, quote, let's see what's on TV. It zooms in as the opening credits roll on the TV.
The song that played reminded me of the theme of the Adams family movie, but it wasn't the same tune.
I don't recall hearing it on MTV or the radio, but if I heard it today, I'd know it.
So while the sun goes to the attic, he's moving some boxes as they're moving in, he comes across
the lamp, he takes it, he puts it in his room, he goes and he rubs the lamp and Sinbad appears.
The kids start making wishes. The son wishes to go back to his school, his original school where his
friends is and where his girl is. He goes back with Sinbad, but it's kind of like Scrooge to
where nobody sees them, but they can see what's going on. Sadly, like the kid sees that life
has gone on without him.
Sinbad asks if he wants to wish to be permanent.
John says, no, forget it.
Sinbad means to snap his fingers, but says Shazam,
parentheses, I think that was the magic word
and not Sinbad's name in the film.
Here, I may be wrong.
When I think back to the father, the actor,
I think that is closest to the portrayal
as Sam Waterson, but this was around
the time of Serial Mom.
She remembered Teddy, the best friend
from Full House, Michelle's best friend from Full House, as the neighbor, the annoying neighbor in this
movie as well. So she's remembering these people. What happened once Melissa put this out into the world?
So basically it went viral. I mean, she said it's the number one review that she ever posted.
And the curious thing is, in the comments, you can see a bunch of people are talking about how they
vividly remember seeing this movie that's being reviewed. I think we should be clear about this, too.
as this community of people is all testifying publicly to this being their memory as well.
Sinbad has what to say about this.
I mean, unfortunately, Sinbad is pretty unequivocal.
This movie never happened.
And to answer the million dollar question, did I do Shazam?
No.
Did I look like her do Shazam?
Yes.
Did I do Shazam?
No.
This feels like a pretty persuasive argument for Melissa.
to hear. You would think that.
It's bizarre. I have no idea.
I wish Sinbad would come out and be like, yeah, I did this movie. But he doesn't remember
it, I guess. Or did they wipe Sinbad's memory clean? I have no idea. It's weird.
Like, Sinbad, I just love the idea of him being haunted by these people who refuse to give
He even went so far as to do an April Fool's Day video a few years ago where he recorded himself as Shazam.
Don't come any closer.
Okay, this is what we're going to do.
We're going to start all over, right?
I'm going to introduce myself.
I am Shazam!
I'm the genie of the land.
You're not a genie.
Genies aren't real.
Every time I come out the lamp, I hear the same thing.
And so again, I ask you, what did Melissa think of that?
I asked her.
So when I saw it, yeah, you know, I love Sinbad.
I thought it was funny.
At the same time, there was that, like, part of me and me saying,
no, it's real, though, stuff, you know?
The only part of that that irks me is when people will take that and write, like,
proof that Shazam existed and used that for clickbait.
And you go and you're like, no, you know, this is something he did five years ago.
But otherwise, I thought it was funny.
So just to recap here, my assumption was that everyone is just,
shit posting. Like, it's a fake movie, but people are saying it's real in the way that J.D. Vance
you know, fuck that couch. I thought this is all just a joke that everybody was in on.
Pablo, I am troubled to report to you that these people are 100% true believers.
Sinbad denies doing this, unsurprisingly. He's now parodying everybody who believes it.
And everybody who believes it is this community of people that seems to be so much larger and so
much more sincere than I ever dreamt of when you first.
came to us with this premise.
Yeah, it's a troubling trend, but there is some research behind it that I'd like to tell you
about. But to do that, I'm going to have to ask you some questions, Pablo, starting with a
question about Pikachu. I don't like where this is going. So this is where I admit that I know
a lot about Pokemon. Fantastic. And Pikachu was where you left me before the break. So where
are we now? Yeah, I know that you're the host here. This is your show, Pablo, and I'm the guest.
but I am going to turn it around on you
and I'm going to ask you some questions here.
Okay.
As promised, we're going to start with Pikachu.
So I'm going to show you three images
and I want you to tell me which one is Pikachu.
So for listeners, there is a Pikachu
with a little red in his tail at the base of the tail.
On the left, in the middle,
there's a Pikachu just with a straight yellow tail.
And on the right, there's a Pikachu with black at the end of his tail.
Right.
And which one is Pikachu, Pablo?
The one in the middle feels like the right Pikachu to me.
I'm sorry to tell you that the answer is A, it is the Pikachu on the left with a little bit of red in his tail right there.
That is shocking.
For clarity, this is not a bit?
Yeah.
I've never seen these photos before.
You came in blind.
I came in blind.
The one on the left is the one that looked least likely to be real.
Yeah.
Let's see if we can get you again.
Okay.
So now let's look at the Monopoly Man.
Okay?
You played Monopoly Man?
I love that boot.
Yeah, for sure.
That's your go-to.
Absolutely.
Bootstraps.
On the left, we've got Monopoly Man with a monocle.
In the middle, we've got Monopoly Man with glasses.
On the right, we've got Monopoly Man no eyewear.
At the risk of falling into what feels like a psychological trap.
Definitely.
I'm going Monocle.
Yeah.
And unfortunately, you'd be wrong about that.
The Monopoly Man has no monocle.
no glasses.
I don't like, I really don't like this.
Okay, let's do one more here.
Did you do Where's Waldo as a child?
I did.
Okay, let's take a look at Waldo up on the screen.
We've got Waldo with nothing in his hands,
Waldo with a cane in his hands,
and Waldo carrying an umbrella that has stripes on it
that matches the sweater that he wears.
Right, right, right, right.
I am going to go for the cane.
Okay.
Pablo, does this restore your sense?
of reality, that is the correct, Waldo.
You have found him.
Thank God.
I feel like we would have had to take a pause in the taping
if you had gotten all three wrong.
This episode wouldn't run.
For sure, yeah.
If I had gone over three on this.
Absolutely. You'd have to kill that.
The obvious takeaway here is that I thought I knew
from my childhood,
I am 66.6 repeating percent wrong.
Yeah.
And so this goes to some research
that's been coming out of the University of Chicago.
I spoke to a professor,
there who ran the research name is Wilma Bainridge.
And I'm an assistant professor of psychology at the University of Chicago.
And she has been studying this thing called the Mandela Effect.
So the Mandela Effect is when you have this really striking false memory that you're
very confident about, but you're actually very wrong about.
And also these Mandela effects occur across many, many people cross-culturally.
So it's usually a false memory that's not just your own, but one that tons of people have.
And so the Mandela in question here is Nelson Mandela.
Yes.
It gets its name from a group of people also on the Internet
who really stridently believe
that the South African civil rights leader died in prison in South Africa in the 1980s.
Which, again, all of what I know and consider real is a bit shaken right now.
But he became the president of South Africa.
I recall sometime after that.
Correct.
Nelson Mandela,
to be released tomorrow, and as you might expect, that is a moment that this country will not soon
forget.
After 27 years in prison, he served as the president of South Africa from 1994 to 1999.
He didn't die until 2013, so that's not a trick, Pablo.
You are back with us in base reality now.
Okay, great.
Got to confess, I don't like the dynamic that you've created here.
Yeah, it's a troubling reality, and that's what Wilma set out to research.
So she set up a series of four experiments.
And in the first experiment, they showed people Mandela Effect items,
and they showed that they would consistently choose the wrong image
as you did, unfortunately.
Yeah, this is me with the Pikachu Red Tail thing, missing that,
and the monocle, I presume, was on the Monopoly Man.
Exactly.
And an interesting thing here is that the more confident people were
in having the correct answer,
the more likely they were to be wrong.
And for the Mandela Effect items,
we found people consistently chose the wrong one.
They chose the same wrong one.
They're really confident that they're really familiar.
So they all say that the monopoly man has a monocle and they're confident about it.
So that showed us, okay, the Mendel effect is real.
So this is a verified pattern that Wilma Bainbridge is finding at the University of Chicago
in which people are very convicted in their belief,
despite not at all having a grounding in reality.
Absolutely.
And so in experiment number two, what they were trying to find out
was, is this something where our brains are just filling in the rest of the image? And they had people
on computers and they were showing them the images and having them very specifically look at these
things like the fact that the Monopoly Man has no monocle. And even after showing them the complete
image and emphasizing this, people were still making the same mistakes and choosing the same wrong
images. Right. I still don't believe the Pikachu Red Tail thing is real. Yeah. So in experiment number
three, what they try to figure out is, is this just an internet phenomenon? Like we've been talking
Like, is this just a meme, right?
So we basically did a Google image search of all of the Mandela Effect items
and looked at the top hundreds of results
and then scored which ones were the correct version versus Mandela version.
And basically, a majority of them were the correct version.
So it seemed unlikely that this Mandela Effect is some amplification of, like,
someone uploads an image and that causes everyone to have a false memory, etc.
So why, again, is this happening?
Right. Why is there this stickiness that makes this not just some meme, but something that is actively replacing what they otherwise should and would have probabilistically have seen as somebody who was online?
Exactly. And before we get to the fourth experiment, which explains this a little bit more, I want to see if I can get you one more time. So let me set the scene back in your childhood again, Pablo.
I did not consent. You're just moving forward, but I guess we'll go with this.
Yep. So there's a famous scene in the Empire Strikes Back.
maybe the most famous scene in all of Star Wars,
maybe the most famous scene in all of cinema.
Luke has just lost his hand.
Darth Vader, the towering sonorous James Earl Jones voice is playing.
There is no escape.
And he tells Luke something stunning,
something startling that changes the course of the Star Wars universe.
What's that line?
As somebody who has seen every Star Wars movie
and can do a pretty good RIP James Earl Jones.
Yeah, the line is...
Luke, your father.
It's like he's in the room with us right now, Pablo.
I mean, that's pretty good.
Right down to the breathing.
I mean, I'm chilled.
Labored breathing.
Let me show you the clip.
No.
No is also my first reaction to hearing him say no.
Yeah, it's deeply disturbing.
I certainly remembered it as Luke.
I am your father.
I feel like I have a 1700 word blog post to me.
Definitely.
Yeah, we're going to get you back under the desk,
Ready to write.
God damn.
Pablo, there's plenty of these Mandela effects that are out there.
People remember C-3PO without a silver leg.
He has a silver leg.
The Fruit of the Loom logo, a lot of people remember it having a cornucopia in it.
There's no cornucopia.
Barronstein bears.
It's spelled Baron Stain with an A-I-N at the end instead of E-I-N at the end.
And people are confused about all of these.
As they should be.
Definitely.
This pattern that you've established, which I,
which many of us, I presume people listening to this
are not leaving me alone here and just laughing at me.
No. I presume that people are in on this with me,
in on the sensation of,
okay, what dimension are we actually is?
Yeah, it's funny that you mentioned that
because I asked Melissa a sort of similar question,
and this is what she had to say.
So I would say that the only logical conclusion I can come to,
that my brain understands is computer simulation.
It is hard to avoid this feeling that I'm in the company of outright conspiracy theorists.
Yeah, what's interesting is that I think Melissa is kind of a sympathetic test case against that idea.
Like she did talk about conspiracy theories,
but she herself doesn't believe in these conspiracy theories with the exception of Shazam.
That I don't have any rational explanation for.
Especially when you have somebody like Sinbad, who I love, I think is great saying that, in fact, he's never done that movie, you know, that I don't know.
Like, I don't see a real reason for this film to be something that had to be, like, wiped off the face of the universe.
It just, I think, shakes a foundation in me where I'm seeing something that I can't come out with even a rational answer to in.
my faith, which isn't the most rational of faiths to begin with.
I do like the part where she is apologetic towards Sinbad.
For sure. As if she doesn't want to impugn his credibility here.
How has he gotten caught up in this mess? She's concerned for him as well.
And I think Pablo, you know, while I've still got you in the guest chair here for a second,
I do want to say one of the most popular theories of why this is happening among people on the
internet, has something to do vaguely with the large Hadron Collider at CERN and Switzerland,
and they sort of have this theory that we split off into a parallel universe, one from which
Shazam was made, into one in which there is no actual Shazam.
Yeah, I mean, what we're getting to is something that is also shockingly mainstream,
and by that I mean, I would suppose you would call Elon Musk and Joe.
Rogan at this point, the closest thing we have to main characters online, and they say
like this.
This could be some simulation.
It could.
Do you entertain that?
Well, the argument for the simulation, I think, is quite strong.
The theory, basically, for people who don't know, is that if you can imagine a future in
which we as humans are able to create a universe via computer, like the Sims, except the Sims
are sentient, right?
what are the odds that someone hasn't done that to us as well?
Games will be indistinguishable from reality.
The idea that there's a glitch in the matrix,
what I am reckoning with is the idea that there is a glitch in our brains
way more often than we would like to admit.
And there is something where an image, an idea,
some sticky concept replaces the truth.
And this does, of course, connect to conspiracy theories
as a concept, but it does speak to the power of our feelings to overpower the facts.
In that weird inversion of, you know, again, I hate to quote another of these online gremlins,
but like Ben Shapiro.
These are facts, and facts don't care about your feelings.
It's the inversion of that.
It's actually feelings don't care about facts.
Researchers have shown that they can implant false memories into people.
Research has consistently shown that eyewitness testimony is far less reliable.
You can watch really funny psychology videos online where even like short-term memory, like you can see there are experiments where a guy comes up to an office to take a test and a white person gives him a clipboard and then he ducks beneath the desk and then he comes back up and it's a black person and they haven't noticed the difference.
Our short-term memories can be so faulty and our long-term memories can be even worse.
Yes. Instead of our brain being this objective camera, it is a selective mechanism.
that we are choosing, at times, to reject.
Is this fundamentally a story about remembering and forgetting?
Yes.
Because Wilma's fourth experiment goes and shows that even people,
when they haven't thought about this,
even when they haven't been primed,
they will still come up with these Mandela effects.
It's not exposure to a meme.
It's not anything like that.
Because the fact that we can induce a Mandela effect
in someone who doesn't even know the character,
it's unlikely they see Pikachu,
and then during the experiment we leap,
dimensions and then they have like a Mandela effect.
So this shows that it's really something about those images that just cause us to save them
in memory in the wrong way.
But Pablo, to quote another great movie, I think that the time has come for you to choose
either the blue pill or the red pill.
This is your last chance.
After this, there is no turning back.
You take the blue pill.
The story ends.
You wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe.
You take the red pill
You stay in Wonderland
And I show you
How deep the rabbit hole goes
I feel like we're resembling
The political discourse
In all of these ways
A little too closely
Yeah
But I will be redpilled by you
Okay
That's what you're offering
No I'm gonna take us back
From the Large Hadron Collider
To the Big Aristotle
And what do you know about rapping
I know a few things
You're all right
My name is Max so get these facts
I'm on my heavy BMX and I make some tracks.
That's whack.
I do want to remind you, David Gardner, that this is a show about journalism,
about investigations and interviews and not just cruel psychological pranks that you pull on the host.
Although that is fun.
Debatable.
But I do want to point out here that your quest to find Sinbad, your quest to find the people on these movie posters,
getting to Sinbad was not exactly as easy as we thought because Sinbad's life himself,
in reality had taken something of a turn.
Yeah, so in 2020, Sinbad had a stroke,
and it was a pretty severe medical episode.
The great news is, though, that he's made a recovery.
He's learned to walk again.
He's started making public appearances again,
and he's posted messages to his fans.
It's wild that the kids even know who I am.
That's beautiful.
Thank you to everybody who's been praying for me
and saying good things
and supporting me during this
time in my life, it means a lot to me. Thank you so much.
It seems like he is on the mend, but has perhaps more things on his plate than answering interview
requests from me. And just to be clear, we 1,000% understand truly why Sinbad would not be able to
get back to us. I was mostly just glad to see this iconic figure from my childhood recovering well.
What proved to be more frustrating, though, for a show that prides itself on investigative journalism,
as aforementioned,
was how difficult Shaq was
to get a hold of here.
Because we tried for months
to get David Gardner's childhood hero
to talk about both Kazam and Shazam.
And we kept on getting false starts
and bad leads and no response.
And it was maddening.
It was. It was the opposite of summoning a genie.
At one point, we thought about
ambushing Shaq with a microphone in real life,
only to think better of it,
at least because it seemed like the dude just didn't want to talk to me, or David.
But then, I got an idea.
I got an idea to try one last source, one last hope,
named Adam Lefco,
who was a great host over at TNT,
and also, crucially,
the co-host of the big podcast with Shaq.
And we made a wish.
My good friend Pablo Torre has a show,
Pablo Torre finds out,
and he's doing a story,
and he needed help with research.
Got it.
First question.
It has been 30 years since Kazam.
What do you think the legacy is now?
Do people still come up and ask you about this movie?
Yes, and then I'll get mixed reactions.
I get from you weird old adults
who shouldn't have been watching a movie anyway.
It was terrible.
But I get from guys that are adults now that were kids.
say, oh, that was one of my favorite movies.
Wait.
Just want to clarify for those not watching on YouTube
or the Draf Kings Network,
Shaq is wearing sunglasses and pajamas.
Absolutely.
With a shirt that has his name across it.
He looks phenomenal.
Number two, have you ever heard
of a Sinbad movie called Shazam?
And do fans ever ask you about that?
They say, they mix it up all the time.
Oh man, when I was a kid I watched Shazam, like, no,
Kazam.
So they actually get a mix up all the time.
And you've heard about this.
This Sinbad movie.
Yeah, but I didn't hear about it from Sinbad.
Shazam used to be a cartoon.
You don't remember that?
The guy used to look up with this guy,
open his shirt and say Shazam,
and then he had the Thunderbolt.
So what's weird is this Shazam Sinbad thing,
it's a fake movie that's never existed.
Oh.
But people swear that they've seen this movie.
Do you think people are confusing it with Kazam?
No, I think they are confusing it with the cartoon
that used to be called Shazam.
This is Billy Batson, star reporter for station W IZZ TV.
He has been picked by the aged wizard Shazam
to carry on the wizard's lifelong crusade against crime and the forces of evil.
When Billy speaks the wizard's name, Shazam!
I was not prepared for any of how Shack would be unfamiliar.
Yep.
With this thing we've now spent 50 minutes discussing.
As far as I know,
he's really never been asked about this.
And my favorite thing about his answer is he is totally nonplussed by the existence of this fake movie.
He's like, that's fine.
That's fine.
I think it's the cartoon that they're confusing with.
I didn't expect him to go this deep a dive into this line of questioning.
And he actually took us one step further, which is helpful because there has been this confusion, right?
There is a more recent Shazam movie like we talked about at the top of the show.
Freddie, I swear, it's me.
Okay?
Look, I know we're not really close friends or anything,
but you're the only person that I know
that knows anything about this Cape Crusader stuff.
Shack actually met the actor who plays the current Shazam,
and it's a phenomenal story.
So we were in the NBA All-Star Green Room one time,
and the actor that was Shazam was in there.
Oh, right.
And then Ernie goes, hey, Kurt Warner,
because the same actor played Kurt Warner,
and Shaq looks at me, he goes, is that Kurt Warner?
And I go, no.
He goes, who is he?
I go, he's this guy in this movie, Shazam.
and he does the classic like Shaq thing where he winks at you
where he's going to do something with this information
and the guy sat down and Shaq goes
I'm Kazam, you're Shazam, we're brothers
and the dude's face like lit up he's like you know about it he goes
oh yeah and then he looks at me and winks
and I was like he just this this actor now is like
Shack knows my movies and I have to say
if this is a computer simulation
if you wake up as Shaq you're staying plugged into the Matrix baby
that guy is living his best life. I was going to say, whatever fake alternate hypothetical world
we've been musing about, I just know that it pales in comparison to the world in which Shaq has
woken up, put on those pajamas, and a shirt with his name on it, and said, what are you guys
talking about? That's his exact attitude in this question. So let me just say, Pablo,
again, I'm not on the computer simulation theory train, but there is one part of this story
that just deeply troubles me, and we had Adam-ask Shack about it.
A 1993 Rolling Stone story said you had a Rottweiler named Shazam.
Is that true?
Yes.
Okay.
Good boy?
Yeah, good boy.
Okay.
Is it spooky that it's the same name as this fake movie to you?
It's not a fake movie.
Shazam was a freaking cartoon.
I didn't write these questions.
Okay, but no.
I'm just asking.
Shazam was one of my favorite characters besides Superman.
So that was like a bird man.
Yeah, Birdman, yes.
And what was Shazam like?
Shazam we just, like all the characters were similar.
White guy working in the office, gets mad, just says a word or just does something.
But like Shazam you saw, we just open.
You know, it always had to look at the guy and then Thunderbolt would hit him.
Okay, so Pablo, just to be clear, just so I can recap here for you, what's happening.
Shack was in a movie called Kazam.
Sinbad was never in a movie called Shazam.
This all did and did not happen in the 1990s,
a time during which Shack had a Rottweiler named Shazam.
I just want Melissa to know that I didn't mean
to further radicalize you.
Yep.
But I get it now.
Yep.
I think that she's going to come away firmer in her beliefs
after this, and I think that many of our listeners will as well.
David Gardner, thank you for reporting this story.
Thank you for being a good boy.
You're welcome, Pablo. It's my absolute pleasure. My tail is wagging beneath the desk.
This has been Pablo Torre finds out a Metal Arc Media production.
And I'll talk to you next time.
