Passion Struck with John R. Miles - Honoring Emile Bruneau: Using Empathy as a Path to Peace w/John R. Miles EP 504
Episode Date: September 6, 2024In this episode of Passion Struck, host John R. Miles dives into the groundbreaking work of cognitive neuroscientist Emile Bruneau, who explored the psychological roots of conflict and how our brains ...can be rewired to foster empathy and peace. Discover how cognitive biases like in-group favoritism and dehumanization fuel division and learn actionable strategies to cultivate empathy, bridge divides, and resolve conflicts—whether in your personal life or on a global scale.John connects Bruneau’s insights to intentional living, showing how we can apply these lessons to transform our relationships and live more purposefully. If you're looking to understand human conflict on a deeper level and find ways to create more meaningful, peaceful connections, this episode is a must-listen!Link to the full show notes: https://passionstruck.com/a-tribute-to-emile-bruneau-neuroscience-of-peace/In this episode, you will learn:How cognitive biases like in-group favoritism and dehumanization drive conflict and division.The role empathy plays in bridging divides and resolving conflicts at personal, societal, and global levels.Actionable techniques to cultivate empathy, including shared storytelling and perspective-taking.How Emile Bruneau’s groundbreaking research reveals the psychology behind conflict escalation.Ways to challenge your own biases to foster understanding and create more meaningful relationships.Practical applications for reducing conflict in everyday life and large-scale disputes.How to integrate empathy and intentionality into your personal growth journeySponsors:Babbel: Master a new language with Babbel’s comprehensive learning system. Get 60% off at babbel.com/PASSION.Hims: Start your journey to regrowing hair with Hims. Get your free online visit at hims.com/PASSIONSTRUCK.Quince: Discover luxury at affordable prices with Quince. Enjoy free shipping and 365-day returns at quince.com/PASSION.For more information on advertisers and promo codes, visit Passion Struck Deals.Special Announcement:Join us for the Passion Struck 50-Week Challenge! This year-long journey is designed to help you unlock personal growth, fulfillment, and self-discovery through weekly challenges that push your boundaries and enhance every aspect of your life. Join a supportive community, benefit from expert guidance, and start your transformative journey today. Learn more and sign up here.Tune In:If you found this episode insightful, please share it with others who might benefit from these powerful lessons. Don’t forget to join the conversation on social media using the hashtag #PassionStruck and connect with John R. Miles on Twitter and Instagram at @John_RMiles.Catch More of Passion Struck:Check My solo episode on The Power of Choice — Why Our Choices Are PowerfulCatch my episode with Emile's good friend Jamil Zaki on how hope can conquer cynicismWatch my interview with Alex Edmans on Critical Thinking in a Post-truth WorldCan't miss my episode with Jeffrey C. Walker On The Criticality of Collaboration in Systems ChangeMy episode with Lori Gottlieb on Embracing Self-Compassion for a Better LifeCatch my solo episode on 7 Reasons Why Acts of Kindness Are More than Meets the EyeIf you liked the show, please leave us a review—it only takes a moment and helps us reach more people! Don’t forget to include your Twitter or Instagram handle so we can thank you personally.How to Connect with John:Connect with John on Twitter at @John_RMiles and on Instagram at @John_R_Miles. Subscribe to our main YouTube Channel here and to our YouTube Clips Channel here. For more insights and resources, visit John’s website.Want to explore where you stand on the path to becoming Passion Struck? Take our 20-question quiz on Passionstruck.com and find out today!
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Coming up next on Passion Struck.
Emile Bruno once said,
the biggest challenge to conflict
is not to understand the other side,
it's to see them as fully human.
And Brene Brown said,
empathy is the ultimate form of human connection.
Without it, we build walls.
With it, we build bridges.
In episode 504,
I delve into the groundbreaking work of Emile Bruno,
who dedicated his life to
understanding and transforming the psychological roots to conflict.
Discover how his revolutionary approach to empathy can bridge even the deepest of divides,
offering a path to peace in our most divided world.
Welcome to Passion Struck.
Hi, I'm your host, John R. Miles.
And on the show, we decipher the secrets, tips, and guidance
of the world's most inspiring people and turn their wisdom into practical advice for you
and those around you.
Our mission is to help you unlock the power of intentionality so that you can become the
best version of yourself.
If you're new to the show, I offer advice and answer listener questions on Fridays.
We have long-form interviews the rest of the week with guests ranging from astronauts to authors,
CEOs, creators, innovators, scientists, military leaders, visionaries, and athletes.
Now, let's go out there and become Passion Struck.
Hey Passion Struck Tribe, welcome back to episode 504.
And let me just start by saying a massive thank you to each and every one of you Passion Struck. and to create lasting impact. If you're new here, welcome to the movement. Or if you've been thinking about introducing it
to a friend or a family member,
and we so appreciate it when you do that,
all it takes is introducing it to one person.
We've got you so covered.
With over 500 episodes now in the catalog,
I can't even believe we've reached that point,
it can be tough, I understand, to know where to start.
That's why we've created episode starter packs,
curated playlists to help you dive right in.
We've organized them by theme,
like top behavioral science episodes,
or shows focused on physical and mental health.
Astronauts, military leaders,
or women at the top of their game.
Head over to Spotify or passionstruck.com
slash starter packs to get started.
In case you missed the earlier episodes this week,
it has been packed with just fascinating conversations, including the eye-opening one that I had with Stanford
psychologist Dr. Jamil Zaki, where we explored how cynicism can erode trust and how embracing,
hopeful skepticism can help rebuild it. If you're ready to see The Good in Humanity again,
don't miss that episode. It's one that will truly change your perspective.
I also had the pleasure of chatting with Gabriel Rylik, head of content at Good and Upworthy
and co-author of Good People, Stories from the Best of Humanity. Gabriel's on a mission
to spotlight the positive side of human nature, and our conversation dives deep into why sharing
stories of goodness isn't just uplifting. It can actually drive real change.
We talk about how Upworthy created
one of the kindest spaces online
and how its positive stories can help reshape
how we see the world.
This is a conversation along with Jamil's
you don't wanna miss.
And as always, your ratings, reviews, and feedback
mean everything to us.
If today's solo episode resonates with you,
then please leave us a five-star review and share it with your friends and family.
Your support not only helps us, but also our incredible guests. And to that end, I wanted to thank a listener, Matt Gerlach, for writing my favorite podcast ever.
I found this a few months ago, and it's mind-blowing. It feels like every time I need to pick up some inspiration, I turn on passion struck and find all I need. like for that truly inspirational review of the show that was so heartfelt and meant the world to me.
Thank you so much for being a regular listener. Earlier this week, I had the privilege of
interviewing Dr. Jamil Zaki about his new book, Hope for Cynics. During our conversation,
we delved into the life and impact of Emile Bruneau, a figure who had a profound impact
on both Zaki's life and my own. Inspired by our discussion, I felt compelled to pay tribute to Bruno and the remarkable
contributions that he made to our understanding of human conflict.
Conflict is as old as humanity itself, manifesting in every corner of the world, from the battlegrounds
of international wars to heated arguments in our own living rooms.
At its core, conflict stems from the same human vulnerabilities,
fear, misunderstanding, and the inability
to emphasize with the other.
But what if we could better understand the psychology
behind these confrontations?
What if the key to resolving conflicts on any scale
lies not in military strategies or political negotiations,
but in the way our brains perceive and respond
to one another.
Emile Brunot, a cognitive neuroscientist, believed just that. His pioneering work
focused on how the human mind fosters conflict and, more importantly, how it
can be rewired to cultivate peace. Brunot's research reveals that the path
to resolution, whether in war zones like Ukraine or Gaza, or in everyday
disputes begins with empathy, perception, and dismantling cognitive biases.
In today's episode, I'll explore Emile's insights and how his work can be used to build
understanding and reconciliation, whether at a personal, societal, or even a global
level.
As we unravel the science behind human conflict, we unlock the potential to create lasting peace,
even in the most challenging circumstances.
Let's dive into the groundbreaking work of Emile Brunel,
beginning with an experience that highlights
the psychological complexities of conflict.
Thank you for choosing PassionStruck
and choosing me to be your host and guide
on your journey to creating an intentional life.
Now, let that journey begin.
In the summer of 1997, Emile Bruneau found himself in a dusty square in Belfast,
witnessing a scene that would shape the rest of his life. A minor argument between two young boys,
one Catholic and one Protestant, had erupted into something
that was far more dangerous, which should have been a brief scuffle over a trivial matter
quickly escalated into a full blown out brawl.
A crowd gathered, their loyalties split along religious lines, and the tension thickened.
In that moment, Bruno realized that this was not just a fight between two children. It was a manifestation
of something much deeper, decades of distrust, fear, and ingrained group identities. The
violence felt automatic, driven by forces that felt both primal and psychological. This incident
crystallized a question that would guide Bruno's research for years. What psychological forces turn minor disagreements into full-scale
conflict? Why do seemingly rational people so easily slip into hostility when their group
identities are threatened? The brawl in Belfast was a microchasm of how conflict unfolds at
any scale. It wasn't just about physical violence. It was about how we perceive each
other, about the cognitive biases
that turn neighbors into enemies. The same dynamics play out across battlefields around the world,
in political arenas, and even with families and friendships. For Bruneau, understanding these
dynamics was key to finding ways to prevent conflicts from spiraling out of control. This
experience propelled Bruneau into exploring the psychological
mechanics of conflict, particularly how biases, empathy gaps, and dehumanization shape our
perceptions of people from other groups. His journey from that square in Belfast to the
forefront of neuroscience was driven by a singular goal, to understand how the mind
fuels conflict and how it can be trained to foster peace.
The brawl in Belfast revealed something deeply embedded
into human nature, the instant to view those
outside our group with suspicion and hostility.
Emile Bruno recognized that this just wasn't a product
of cultural or historical tensions.
It was rooted in the brain itself.
The way that we categorize people into us versus them
is an ancient survival mechanism
that in the modern world fuels division and conflict.
Cognitive biases ingrained in our brains over millennia
are at the heart of many conflicts.
One of the most powerful biases that Bruno studied
was in-group favoritism,
the tendency to show favoritism and empathy towards those whom we identify as part of
our group, whether based on religion, race, nationality, or political beliefs. This bias
creates an empathy gap where we view those in out-groups with indifference or even hostility,
making it more easy to justify harm.
Renault's research also highlighted the stark effects of dehumanization, another cognitive bias.
When we perceive individuals or groups as less than human, it becomes psychologically easier to justify violence and cruelty.
Renault's work using neuroimaging demonstrated how the brain reacts differently to members
of outgroups, often showing reduced activity in areas associated with empathy as well as
emotional connection.
The dehumanization is not limited to times of war.
It plays a role in everyday social divisions, from political polarization to racial discrimination.
It explains why a protester might be hailed as a hero in one context but labeled a threat
in another.
It also sheds light on how media portrayals of refugees or migrants can shape public opinion
with dehumanizing narratives fostering fear and opposition instead of empathy.
Renault studies also underscored the power of confirmation bias, the tendency to seek
out information that reinforces our existing beliefs.
In conflict situations, people are more likely to accept information that supports their
view of the opposing group as dangerous or inferior, while ignoring evidence that might
humanize the other side.
By understanding the psychological roots of conflict, Renaud aimed to develop strategies
to bridge the divides that so often lead to violence. side. By understanding the psychological roots of conflict, Bruno aimed to develop strategies
to bridge the divides that so often lead to violence. His work continues to inspire efforts
to build a more empathetic and peaceful world.
So now let's explore the cognitive mechanics of conflict. Empathy, dehumanization, and
bias.
Neil Bruno's groundbreaking research share the feelings of others,
plays a critical role in resolving conflicts.
However, Bruno uncovered a troubling truth.
Empathy is often biased.
Through his exploration of the cognitive
and emotional processes that drive conflict, Bruneau demonstrated that conflicts are frequently
ignited by a failure to understand the perspective of the other. When people perceive those from a
different racial, religious, or political group as fundamentally different, empathy diminishes, biases intensify, and dehumanization escalates,
paving the way for violence. In group-based conflicts, people tend to feel more empathy
for members of their own group and less for those they see as outsiders. Or still, when opposing
groups are dehumanized, viewed as less than human, empathy is severely diminished, making it easier to
justify aggression and violence.
Renault's research published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology revealed how dehumanization
strips individuals of moral considerations, allowing for acts of violence to be rationalized
with alarming ease.
However, Renault's research didn't stop identifying the cognitive biases fueling conflict.
He was deeply committed to finding ways to counteract these biases, particularly through
cultivating empathy.
Let's explore these core concepts and how they can be applied to resolve conflicts of
any scale.
The first was using empathy as a tool for conflict resolution.
For Brunot, empathy wasn't just a feel-good concept, but a
powerful psychological tool capable of bridging divides between opposing groups. He defined
empathy as the ability to understand and share another person's feelings. Yet in conflicts,
empathy is often selective. People tend to extend empathy more easily to those within their own
group while withholding it from out-group members.
This empathy gap deepens divisions and complicates conflict resolution.
Renault's work focused on narrowing this gap, showing that empathy can be cultivated
even in the most divided societies.
His studies revealed that empathy-building exercises, such as shared storytelling, perspective
taking, and direct contact between opposing
groups could significantly reduce prejudice.
By encouraging others to step into the shoes of the other, these interventions help dismantle
the psychological barriers that perpetuate conflict.
In one experiment, Renault found that individuals who read personal stories from opposing groups
exhibited increased empathy and decreased
dehumanization.
Renaud's work also addressed the challenge of empathy fatigue, the idea that too much
empathy, especially in the face of ongoing conflicts and crisis, can lead to emotional
burnout.
His research suggested that while empathy for individuals can be taxing, fostering empathy
for groups through systematic and scalable interventions might offer a more
sustainable path to long-term conflict resolution.
So how can we apply Renault's research?
In everyday situations, such as disputes with family members or colleagues, practicing empathy
by actively listening to the other person's perspective can change the dynamic of the
conversation.
Engaging in shared storytelling or simply spending time understanding the other person's perspective can change the dynamic of the conversation. Engaging in shared storytelling or simply spending time understanding the other person's
perspective can close the empathy gap, making it easier to resolve underlying issues.
In community or organizational settings, empathy-building initiatives, such as workshops that encourage
participants to share their common narratives, can help bridge divides between different groups.
These exercises can foster mutual understanding and reduce tensions, whether in a workplace
dealing with internal conflicts or in community groups seeking to address racial or cultural
divides.
Second, Bruneau's work also revealed that cognitive biases like in-group favoritism,
which leads individuals to favor members of their own group, and out-group hostility, which
fosters negative attitudes towards those outside their group, can be counteracted
through deliberate interventions that promote positive interactions between
opposing groups. By creating environments that encourage cooperation, as well as
mutual understanding, individuals can challenge and reduce these inherent biases.
So how can you apply this?
In personal context, engaging in activities that bring you into contact
with people from different backgrounds can help reduce biases.
For example, volunteering for community service alongside individuals from diverse communities
can foster new perspectives and build positive relationships.
In broader societal contexts, organizing community events that encourage interaction between
different social, cultural, or political groups can promote understanding and reduce prejudice.
Initiatives such as cross-cultural festivals, collaborative community projects, or dialogue
circles can create spaces where biases are challenged and empathy is fostered.
Third, one of Bruno's most significant findings was the power of perspective taking to reduce conflict.
Perspective taking involves trying to see the world through another person's point of view.
This doesn't mean agreeing with them, but rather understanding their thoughts, feelings, and motivations.
In his book, The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, Stephen Covey emphasizes this concept
through the habit of seek first to understand, then to be understood. Covey explains that
effective communication and conflict resolution begins with a genuine effort to understand the
other person's perspective. This approach fosters empathy and reduces the likelihood of misunderstandings that often escalate into conflicts. So how do
you apply perspective taking? In personal conflicts, when disagreements arise, making a
conscious effort to understand the other person's perspective can help prevent escalation. This
might involve asking questions to clarify viewpoints, or simply listening without interrupting,
allowing you to address the root causes of the conflict, rather than just the symptoms.
In community or international contexts, perspective-taking can be a powerful tool in diplomatic negotiations
or peace-building efforts.
By understanding the historical, cultural, and political contexts of another group or
nation's actions, stakeholders can reduce the risk of misinterpretations and work towards solutions that acknowledge
and respect each side's concerns.
And finally, Bruneau played a critical role in advancing our understanding of dehumanization,
particularly its blatant forms.
While modern research had shifted towards examining subtle and implicit forms of
dehumanization in everyday situations, Brunot, alongside his colleague,
Noor Khateli, argued for the need to refocus attention on the more overt and explicit
expressions of dehumanization. Their work highlighted the disturbing prevalence and potency
of blatant dehumanization in contemporary society, urging researchers and
policymakers alike to confront the issue head on. Renault's research was particularly groundbreaking
because it sought to systematically assess the roots and consequences of blatant dehumanization
across different cultural contexts. One of his key contributions was the development of a measure
that taps into blatant dehumanization. This measure used the Ascent of Humans diagram,
a popular representation of evolutionary progress, to ask participants where they believed various
groups belonged on the scale, from ape-like ancestors to fully evolved modern humans.
The results were stark and revealing. Significant portions of the population
rated marginalized groups such as Muslims,
Palestinians, and Mexicans much lower on the scale,
indicating a widespread denial
of these groups' full humanity.
In response to these findings,
Renault's research also focused on strategies
to counteract dehumanization.
He emphasized the importance of humanizing the other side by recognizing their individuality
and their shared humanity.
Renaud advocated for interventions that could break down the psychological barriers leading
to dehumanization.
These included prompting personal stories, highlighting common values, and fostering
mutual interest to bridge divides.
So how can you apply this research?
In personal contexts, Bruneau's research suggests that sharing personal experiences
and finding common ground can be powerful tools in humanizing the other party.
For example, engaging in meaningful conversations about shared challenges or values can help
shift perceptions and reduce animosity.
In broader societal context,
Bruneau's research can be applied
by encouraging media and educational initiatives
that portray marginalized groups with nuance and empathy.
Balance reporting that highlights the complexities
and humanity of each side in a conflict
can play a critical role in combating dehumanization and fostering
a more inclusive and peaceful society.
Bruno's work offers a powerful framework for understanding and addressing the psychological
roots of conflict.
By applying these insights, we can foster empathy, counteract biases, and work towards
a more peaceful, connected world.
So this begs the question of how we can apply
empathy-based interventions in real-world conflicts.
Emile Brunot's commitment to translating his research
into real-world impact was as strong as his dedication
to understanding the psychological roots of conflict.
He believed that the true measure of his work
lay in its ability to make a difference
in the most challenging environments,
places where decades of violence, fear, and dehumanization had created deep, seemingly unbridgeable divides.
By partnering with NGOs, policymakers, and conflict resolution experts, Bruneau brought
his empathy-based interventions to life, offering tangible pathways to peace.
One of the most challenging contexts in which Bruneau applied his strategies
was the enduring conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians.
Generations of violence and mistrust had left both sides deeply entrenched
in narratives of us versus them, often dehumanizing the other in the process.
Bruneau believed that breaking the cycle required a fundamental shift
in how each side viewed
each other.
Working closely with local peace-building organizations, Reneau helped design programs
that brought Israelis and Palestinians together for structured dialogues.
These encounters focused on sharing personal stories, narratives of loss, fear, and hope
that humanized participants on both sides.
Reneau's research showed that when individuals are exposed to personal experiences of those
they might otherwise see as enemies, empathy begins to replace hostility and biases start
to fade.
The impact of these interventions was profound.
Participants who had previously viewed the other side as fundamentally different and
less deserving of empathy began to see them as fellow human beings with shared emotions and experiences.
This shift in perception reduced support for violent retaliation,
marking a crucial step toward a more peaceful coexistence.
Renaud also extended his work to address the refugee crisis,
where millions of displaced individuals face overwhelming hostility and
dehumanization in their host countries. He recognized that empathy for refugees often
diminishes as they are increasingly portrayed in negative or threatening terms by media
or political rhetoric. To combat this, Renault advocated for direct, meaningful interactions
between refugees and host communities, interactions that
could diminish prejudices and foster understanding. In Europe, where waves of refugees from war-torn
regions like Syria and Afghanistan have sought refuge, Renau collaborated with organizations
to bridge the empathy gap. Programs were developed to facilitate everyday interactions between
refugees and local citizens,
shared meals, community projects, and storytelling events. These interventions,
informed by Bruneau's research, led to significant increases in empathy amongst host communities
and a decrease in xenophobic attitudes. Bruneau's approach was not about fostering momentary
sympathy, but about building lasting connections that could lead to more compassionate
and inclusive communities.
He showed that when people engage with refugees
in a personal and meaningful way,
it's possible to counteract the dehumanizing narratives
that often dominate public discourse.
In addition to international conflicts,
Renault's empathy-based strategies proved effective
in addressing political polarization
within countries, particularly in the United States.
In an era marked by deep political divides, Bruneau realized that the same in-group, out-group
dynamics, driving global conflicts, were at play within national borders.
The challenge was to see if his empathy-driven methods could reduce tensions and foster understanding
between people with
opposing political views. To test this, Bruneau worked with organizations that foster cross-partisan
dialogues, creating environments where individuals from different political beliefs could engage
in structured conversations. These dialogues were designed not to change minds, but to foster mutual
understanding by encouraging participants to share personal
stories about their political journeys rather than debating policies.
The results were promising.
Participants from both sides of the political spectrum reported increased empathy towards
those with differing views.
They often discovered that their opponents' beliefs were rooted in personal experiences
rather than malice,
leading to a decrease in the demonization of the other side.
Renaud's work demonstrated that even in highly polarized environments,
empathy could be a powerful tool for bridging divides and reducing the toxic polarization
that threatens democratic processes. So now let's discuss the enduring legacy of Emile
Brunot, who created a blueprint for
peace.
Emile Brunot's work has reshaped the landscape of conflict resolution, leaving a legacy far
beyond academic theory.
His groundbreaking research into the psychology of empathy, as well as dehumanization, has
provided a transparent, actionable framework for addressing some of the world's most entrenched
conflicts, whether in war-torn regions, refugee crises, or deeply polarized societies.
Renaud's insights have shown that fostering empathy is not just a lofty ideal,
it's a practical tool for building peace. Renaud's approach was rooted in the belief
that even the deepest divides can be bridged when we learn to see each other's humanity.
His interventions,
which often focused on personal storytelling and direct engagement between opposing groups,
were designed to break down the psychological barriers perpetuating conflict. By encouraging
people to share their stories and listen to others, Bruneau's work has demonstrated time and time
again that empathy can transform relationships, reduce hostility, and pave the way for reconciliation.
One of the key takeaways from Bruneau's legacy is the critical role of education in
cultivating empathy and resolving conflict.
When individuals are made aware of their own cognitive biases and the psychological forces
that drive conflict, they are better equipped to approach disputes with understanding and
compassion. Educational initiatives focusing on conflict resolution, emotional intelligence, and critical
thinking can empower people to manage disagreements constructively and foster positive community
interactions.
Integrating these lessons into schools, workplaces, and public discourse can build a culture that
values empathy and seeks peaceful solutions to conflict.
Emile Brunau's life and work remind us that peace is not the absence of conflict.
It's the active process of understanding and addressing the psychological roots of division.
His research provides a roadmap for how we can engage with others in ways that promote
empathy, reduce dehumanization, and ultimately resolve conflicts.
As we reflect on Bruneau's contributions,
the challenge is to apply these lessons to our own lives.
This means committing to practices that foster empathy,
such as perspective-taking and active listening,
and challenging our biases
when encountering those who differ from us.
Emile Bruneau's work offers hope and a clear path forward
in a world that often seems divided.
By embracing his strategies and making them a part
of our everyday interactions, we can each contribute
to creating a more empathetic and peaceful world.
The time to start is now, whether in personal relationships,
community engagements, or broader societal efforts.
Let's carry forward Brunot's legacy by actively working to understand and connect with those
around us.
In doing so, we honor his life's work and contribute to a future where empathy and peace
prevail.
Thank you so much for joining me today.
If this episode resonated with you, I'd love you to share it with someone who could benefit
from these insights.
Remember, we're all in this together, And by spreading this message, we can help each other find
peace in an often chaotic media landscape. Join the conversation on social media using
the hashtag passion struck and hashtag conflict resolution. You can find videos from today's
episode on YouTube. And if you're looking for advertiser deals and discount codes, you
can find them at passionstruck.com slash deals.
Your support for our sponsors directly supports the show and it means the world to me.
Don't forget to connect with me on all the socials at John R. Miles where I post daily
bits of inspiration.
Curious to know where you stand on your passionstruck journey?
I've created a quiz that reflects the core ideas from my latest book.
It's a quick and easy way to gauge your progress.
Head to passionstruck.com and take the quiz.
It's just 20 questions and only takes about 10 minutes.
Don't miss this amazing opportunity to learn where you are on your path.
And now a sneak peek of our next episode.
In remembrance of 9-11 featuring Lieutenant Commander Dan Knosson,
Dan's story is one of unparalleled resistance.
From recovering from a life-altering
injury in Afghanistan to becoming a Paralympic gold medalist and earning multiple degrees
from Harvard, his journey is a masterclass in perseverance and the relentless pursuit
of excellence. Whether you're facing your own challenges or just need some inspiration
to push your limits, Dan's story will leave you empowered and ready to tackle whatever
life throws your way.
Don't miss this powerful conversation on turning adversity into triumph.
As much as we like to think that we are national assets as operators, these missions have go and
no-go criteria. And the loss of me, it doesn't affect the no-go criteria. The mission continues.
And they stayed on scene as they should and continued with the mission. But I do still to this day remember this light in
my face from the flight surgeon. I don't know if he put me under immediately or
if I just let myself go after all that effort of just trying to stay in the
game on that drag down the hill. But I let myself go and the next thing I
remember waking up in a hospital room with my mother. She'd be the way looking at me.
And I didn't know, where am I?
What is going on?
Remember we rise by lifting others.
If you found value in today's episode,
please share it with someone who can benefit
from this discussion.
All it takes is you sharing it with one person.
Apply what you learned today, live what you listen,
and we'll see you next time.
As always, live life, Passion Stride.