PBD Podcast - Ed Dowd On Pfizer Increasing Their Revenue to $90B After Covid-19 | Ep. 244 | Part 1

Episode Date: March 8, 2023

In this episode, Patrick Bet-David and Ed Dowd will discuss: Pfizer Increasing their revenue to $90B after Covid-19 Why more Americans are dying young  The demographic of people who took the covid-19 vaccine Covid vaccine mandate in schools  FaceTime or Ask Patrick any questions on https://minnect.com/Want to get clear on your next 5 business moves? https://valuetainment.com/academy/Join the channel to get exclusive access to perks: https://bit.ly/3Q9rSQLDownload the podcasts on all your favorite platforms https://bit.ly/3sFAW4NText: PODCAST to 310.340.1132 to get added to the distribution list --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/pbdpodcast/support

Did you ever think you would make it? I feel I'm so close, I could take sweetest theory I know this life meant for me Yeah, why would you plan on delay it when we got bad data? Value payment, giving values, contagious, this world I want yourpreneurs, we can't no value to hate And how do you run home, you look where I become? I'm the underdog

Look at that? Yes, is that when we were trying, was trying to golf you were actually golfing Yeah, it was Maui and it was at the yeah, I remember that gentlemen. We're live wonderful Okay, well listen folks. We got a Another special guest today today. We're gonna talk about a very Non-controversial topic the it's going to be about COVID. Okay, this is what we're going to be talking about today. So let me give a couple of disclaimers before we get into our podcast today. Our guest today is Ed Dow.

He was a former money manager where he grew his fund at BlackRock from roughly $2 billion to $14 billion in a span of 10 years. He's done a lot of different things. He moves to Miami, Maui. He writes this book that just came out called Cause Unknown, the epidemic of sudden deaths in 2021 and 2022. Before he hit the stage here on the podcast, Rob went on Chad GBT and he surged. What did you Google if you want to show to the audience so they can see it? Just put up the pictures. There you go. This is something a little bit. Chad it. Yeah, zoom in a little bit. So you said, what? You said,

provide me a summary of the book, Cause Unknown, the epidemic of sudden deaths in 2021 and 2022. Here's what he said. I'm sorry, but cause unknown is not an actual book. It appears to be a hypothetical scenario or a work of fiction as an AI language model. I am not capable of providing information or summaries I'll be answer books that have not actually occurred or been published if you have any other questions Please ask me anyway, so Rob asks the next question show the next one, which is very interesting. Your next question is, provide me a summary of the book, Alice in Wonderland. Alice in Wonderland is a classic children's novel book written by Lewis Carroll. Anyways, you don't need to know about Alice in Wonderland, but that's what Chad GBT thinks of our guest here today. I do want to say this to you that we are going to talk about the vaccine and

finance and economy and insurance companies and Pfizer and Moderna stock, whether you should buy some or shortage and O'Keefe and a recent story that came out from UK talking about when we're going to releasing the next virus that was written about NCNBC, NBC. We'll talk about the next election, we'll talk about Christopher Ray about Department of Energy and maybe recession in Q2. We'll talk about all about that stuff. None of us today are doctors. CDC till today states that COVID-19 vaccines are safe, effective and reduce your risk of illness. So our guest today is going to give you the counter argument to that based on specific

data. And but for you, if you do agree or not agree, make sure to see your doctor before you make any decisions on vaccines. Having said that, Ed, thank you so much for being a guest on the podcast. Thanks for having me on today, Patrick. Pleasure to be here. It's great to have you on.

We, it's funny because a lot of times we'll do podcasts and we'll do, and say, who do you want to see on the podcast? Eddow. Eddow, Eddow, Eddow. How many people have been asking for Ed? Like it was like constant for like two months. You gotta have a month, you gotta have a month,

you gotta look, okay, so who's Eddow? I know who he is, I've seen in a reason I realized who you were, and that's a great, let's invite him and here we are on the podcast. So if you don't mind, take a moment and share with the audience your background and how does somebody who works at BlackRock that some would call that the face of ESG?

You know, how do you go from an institution like that that is pro ESG to then wanting to expose data about COVID? How does that happen if you don't want to share in your story? No worries. I left BlackRock about 10, 11 years ago. 2012 was my last year there. And so they weren't into ESG and they weren't as big as they are today.

It was a different firm and they were heavily involved in what's called active management where portfolio managers like myself pick stocks. Now they're mostly a passive indexing house. They're still there, or was it? Larry was there. And you know, Larry, I flew in a private jet to Larry with Larry to go pitch business to CalPERS. And at the time he seemed like a fine gentleman.

But I have no idea what's going on there the last 11 years. So whatever's happened, it wasn't on my watch or I wasn't employed. But I started out off my career after college. I went to Notre Dame undergrad and then I went to HSBC, Hong Kong Shanghai Bank, where I was an institutional fixed income salesperson. And that's where I learned the guts of the economy and money markets, interest rates, you know foreign exchange, mortgage asset backs, agency securities, government securities. So I worked there and a lot of my customers were insurance companies and pension funds and state pension funds and banks.

So I did that for five years and that's when I first was introduced to the world of fraud on Wall Street. That's when Kitter Peebody blew up. There was a trader that had some bonds in the desk. This is before trades were entered in in computer systems. You could hide bonds in the desk, I guess. Pretty wild.

Yeah. What years were this? This was between 1990 and 1995. Also Orange County blew up. I remember the best salesman in my office was in the California office. I was in the Chicago branch. And he was selling bonds

to Orange County that blew up when it just rates rose. I remember that. Yeah, you remember that. Yeah, I do. And so that was my first foray into fraud, young man. I went back to business school, Indiana University, got an MBA in finance. Then went to Donaldson, Lufkin, and Genreth, which

was a investment bank, and it was known for equity research. And I was an electric utility analyst, and I was there from 97 through 99. And right down the hall for me were the internet fellows, and they were minting money. And that was when another fraud occurred, the .com fraud. And what was going on there was basically the due diligence process that an investment bank's used to do was to, like, before they brought a company public, they had to have something called revenues and cash flows.

And they were issuing companies with eyeball metrics. And you know, we know how that ended. Now there were some companies that did rise from the ashes, Amazon being one of them, but that was a lot of corporate fraud that led to other frauds like WorldCom, Enron, what have you. That was the error of corporate fraud. I only spent two years at DLJ, and then I went up to Boston to a firm called Independence Investments to be a technology analyst.

Because of what I saw going on in the halls of DLJ, I knew that it was going to, and badly, steered my firm the best I could as a young analyst through that debacle, and partly that into a job at BlackRock as a portfolio manager in 2002. And spent 10 years there raising assets. We started off with $2 billion through performance and asset gathering. We grew, so we had a good track record.

And we also steered our fund through the great financial crisis, which was another fraud I saw. In these frauds, there's always a refrain. In the internet fraud, it's a new paradigm, I met. You could say that was my first mass formation of psychosis. People there were like, it's different. You get to get on board. Then in the great real estate crisis, home prices never go down, right? And of course, all you had to do was

a Google home prices falling. And you saw that 50 years before that they had fallen. And then now the scene that I'm involved in is tracking ones and zeros, dead, not dead, disabled, not disabled. And the refrain I heard for this, I call this a fraud. This is a fraud that involves different silos, media, a pharma government, regulatory capture. So this is the biggest fraud we've ever seen. And the refrain is safe and effective. So every fraud error has a refrain. And this is the most egregious fraud I've ever seen in my life.

And so how did I figure out those other frauds, pattern recognition, following trends. And so I'm just a guy that tries to get ahead of everybody else. That was my job. It was the first. Can you go through that a little bit more? Because I was about to ask you the question, and you said, how do I find out a pattern recognition trend?

So such as what? So what do you look for? So what do you look for? What numbers do you look for? You saw internet, you saw what happened with mortgages. In 08, I think you guys even were calling that, right? When like the whole big short concept, you were also saying that this season is coming where all these mortgage-backed securities

they're gonna go get crushed. So what data do you look for? And what commonalities do you see with how COVID was handled versus the prior three frauds? So what you look for is a Trend change every markets go up and they go down So you're trying to get ahead of the curve. You don't want to be too early because if you're early you get run over You know Michael Barry from the big short was two years early any almost got defunded as investors almost bailed on him,

but they held in and he made phenomenal killing. So there's a bit of timing to this, but what you look for is my sweet spots between perception and reality. So the herd is perceiving a truth, and the numbers underlying that truth are starting to change. The herd is perceiving the truth, and the underlying numbers are starting to change. The hurt is perceiving the truth

and the underlying numbers are starting to change. Correct. And so basically, you try to capture when the perception is going to change to the new reality. And so with this fraud that I saw, from the get-go, it started to seem strange. Before the vaccine was introduced, in 2020, I saw people being suppressed censorship. And, you know, I'm one of those, I'm an information junkie. So

when someone, when someone tells me not to look at something, it's like a month to a flame, I'm going to go look. So there was all sorts of inconsistencies, especially along the lines of the treatment protocols that were coming out. We all know now, in hindsight, that there was a suppression of early treatment to make way for the vaccine. And you had to know something about emergency youth authorization law, which stated that there could be no emergency use authorization issued if there were already treatments available. And that's why there was a demonization of Abermactin and hydroxychloroquine, which of, which have,

you know, as far as I'm concerned work, I've done the protocol myself when I got COVID last year. And I had a sore throat. So early on, there was just a lot of discrepancies, mask, no mask, this unified messaging from the global governments, which we, here's a pattern, here's a recognition of a pattern. One of you are seeing global governments in unison agree on anything prior to 2020, never.

And all at once, same messaging, same phrases, same procedures, all at once. So that was kind of a clue that something different was going on here. What a question. When is the last time you've seen all the world governments, countries being on the same page never? Never. And so so once you once you got, you know, ask that question and the answers, no, then you have you can start a whole series of other questions of exploration. So, okay, so as you're diving in and you're looking through and I'm assuming obviously you're not

vaccinated, right? No, I did not did not but you know what most of my family and loved ones did so I was telling them not to because I knew three things Right that it was an experimental vaccine never been tested on humans I knew that because of my background on Wall Street I knew that Moderna was a sketchy company before they got the contract to do this I knew that most vaccines take seven to 10 years to get safety data before they're approved. And I also intuitively knew the operation warp speed sounded like an absolute disaster to me.

Anything warp speed sounds like safety protocols cut, manufacturing processes rushed. It just sounded like, so I said to myself internally, I'm gonna wait. And then to my dismay, I didn't realize the propaganda campaign that was gonna be implemented upon the population, so the globe. So when I saw everyone around me rushing to get this thing, I was horrified. I was like, it hasn't been tested.

Let me ask you a crazy question. Tom, this goes to you guys as well. If let's just say the president went to these insurance companies and said, look, we are gonna do this warp speed. But to gain the people's trust, you cannot upsell and get a bigger profit margin. You have to sell this at cost.

I don't know if that makes sense or not. So if it's like, hey, if this thing's gonna cost you 60 cents, the vaccines sell it at 60 cents, the vaccines sell it at 60 cents, not build the insurance carrier 50 bucks or 100 bucks, right? You think that would have made a difference in the carrier saying, well, if that's the case, and we're not going to make any money on it, we're just doing this purely out of a world crisis to take care of them. I think we need six more months. I think we need three more months. I think we need nine more months because there is no benefit here. It's just purely we're doing it because

it's a problem that we have. And the downside is big because if if any of these things have any side effects, we're going to be dealing with a lawsuit. You think that would have made any kind of a difference? Are you talking about insurance companies at the drug company? The drug companies who I'm talking about. They would have gone to Pfizer, Moderna, and said, you have to sell this at cost. You cannot make a profit off of it. You know what?

That might have changed their internal, you know, net present value calculations for sure. You know what I'm asking? Like, if you're not the president, I'm like, listen, you want to do this no problem. You can capitalize off this crisis and make billions of dollars. If you're willing to sell the only companies

I will work with to distribute this drug, this vaccine, is those who do it at cost. If you do it at cost, no problem. If not, we're not going to be doing this. That might have changed. That might have changed things. Here's a statistic that everyone needs to know. So it took decades and decades for Pfizer to get to 40 billion in revenues before COVID, after COVID in one year, 90 billion. Wow. Go deeper on those numbers, by the way, when you say when the company was founded. Yeah, from when it was founded to, you know, right before COVID, it took decades to get to 40 plus billion. Pull up one Pfizer, Pfizer was started. And then since COVID, they've 40 to 90 billion one

year in one year they they went to 90 billion in revenues now I did some back of the envelope math prior to you get a good you get to go back to 2021 the idea was we were not decades by the way it's not decades it's 1849 okay long time 60 years yeah On time. 60 years. How many times? Yeah. Go ahead, you were saying. So, I did some back of the envelope math in 2021. You have to go back to when we were at the fever pitch of terror and fear. If you remember correctly, they were talking about quarterly boosters, odd infinite and

forever, with vaccine passports and you have to get your papers checked. This is back in 21. So I did some back in the envelope math. If that had occurred and this had been carried out and flies your good half of the global share of the vaccine, and I assumed five billion people would be vaccinated, two billion would either not or abstain. And I looked at what they were charging for the vaccine,

quarterly boosters, that would have gotten them about 390 billion in revenues. That was that was that was where they wanted to take this and that would be bigger than Apple's revenue streams. Yeah, at last year 2022, if you just show what I just text, use a hundred billion dollars 2022 is what they did. So okay, so a part of it that made guys like you skeptical was warp speed that just doesn't sound right. So name, bad name, all the countries are united on the same page, on doing this. Fear levels are high, mainstream media high,

censorship you can't argue against it. These are way too many red flags that you're looking at. So to those who are overly skeptical, and they don't trust somebody forcing them to do something, that doesn't naturally work well with them. Okay, so the rule breakers, you know, guys like you, Burry, whoever, just some of the guys are like, I don't know if I'm buying into this thing,

you're forcing me to do it, I need some more intel, I need some more data. What happened recently when you started looking at the death rates, because I'm in the life insurance space, I've been in it for 22 years, right? So, you know, I see cost of insurance, I see actuary, we sit there and we talk to carriers, while COVID was going on and they would tell us the data,

here's what we're seeing, here's what we're seeing, here's what we're seeing. One of the things you talked about is the percentages which you know overwhelming data from the insurance industry confirms the dangers of COVID-19 injections according to Dow in his interview with Jones he quoted a specific numbers from multiple major insurance companies that point toward massive increased deaths that claims Unum insurance q4 death claim versus 2019, up 36%. Lincoln financial, up 57%. Prodential up 41%.

Renaissance group of America up 21% heart for up 32%. Met life up 24. A Gan, a Dutch insurance company who might used to be a part of that company, plus 57%. And Q3, in Q4, in Q3, they saw an increase of 258% in claims. That's agon. These numbers are shocking according to Dow. So these numbers, if you can explain to the audience, what does this mean when

you see this? And from there on, what did you start investigating? Right. So that you're going to go back. That was in the first quarter of 2022. Okay. And we were we were starting, you know, we'd we'd already had already gone kind of viral. And I got a team assembled around me. Josh Sterling was a former cell site analyst at Sanford Bernstein for seven years. He was number one ranked institutional investor. So he basically knew what he was talking about. He helped me analyze these results. And what we decided to do was look at group life policies specifically because whole life, as you know, from insurance, it's Byzantine accounting.

So group life is shorter duration contract. So we knew losses would show up there immediately and they did. So that was early days and the numbers were astounding because basically the group life folks hadn't priced the policies correctly. And why is that? Because in 2021, there was a mixture from old to young in terms of excess deaths. 2020 was all about old people dying.

And that's okay for insurance companies because a lot of them already paid in. They're not on group life policies anymore because they're retired. It doesn't matter. But something very striking happened in 2021. And that's when we really started, you know, thinking we were 100% right that the vaccine was doing something. So the big mix shift from old to young was a big tell for us. COVID wasn't killing young people in 2020. What was killing people in 2021? We obviously think it's the vaccines and the

data keeps rolling in. We got all 22 in and it's not looking good. And since those numbers that you spoke about, the society of actuaries has co-related all the numbers from the group life industry. They do a survey 80% of the revenues are covered and they verified our numbers in August of 2022 with the report that they put out table 5.7 is the big table and it's claims. It's not dollars. It's just claims. And right now, if you were to look at the group life policy

results this quarter, they're not that bad because they've priced it up. They've reprised everything. So the losses aren't occurring because they're just raising prices, but the claims, the number of the units, the deaths, is still up. And what we saw in 2021 was alarming. One of the biggest things that I think is a smoking gun is what happened to the millennials

in the third quarter of 2021. In the group life policy holders, their excess mortality prior to that in the spring was running around 30%. Now you get to remember 10% as stated by Scott Davis and at one America is a once in a 200-year flood for this age group 25 through 44. And he was seen 40 percent. 40 percent is off the charts. But in the third quarter of 2021, in table 5.7, their excess mortality rose up to 84 percent. 84 percent.

And then it's come down since then, which is good news, but it's still running around 23 percent. And I, a whistleblower, a mine at an insurance company who has insight to the Society of Actuary numbers just leaked to me, we're re-accelerating this, you know, in the fourth quarter of 2022. So it's not good news. But for me, the spike to 84% was what I call an event.

What was that event? Well, it was called mandates and mass vaccination program. This is a group of people that aren't supposed to die, and especially group life policy holders, as you know, Patrick. These folks are the elite elite. They work at Fortune 500 companies, mid-sized companies, and they have access to the best healthcare. So why would all of a sudden they die in a very temporal spike like that? We're assuming it's the mandates and the vaccines. I've heard the naysayers tell me at its suicides.

So there was a suicide pact in the third quarter, 21 doubtful, right? Was there a mom also told, well, drug overdoses. Well, to get a group life claim, you have to be employed with a company. I don't know too many fentanyl and heroin users that fortune 500 companies that keep their jobs for long. So there wasn't a mass, you know, overdosing situation. And then the third one that I heard was that they missed their cancer screening treatment

or appointments. I'm 56. I haven't had a cancer screening in my life. Certainly young people aren't going to have cancer screening treatment or appointments. I'm 56, I haven't had a cancer screening in my life. Certainly young people aren't going to cancer screening. No. I have a quote. It's easy to appreciate what you're doing because you're a numbers guy, you're a data guy.

So what do they say? The numbers don't lie. The math doesn't lie. So you can totally appreciate that. I'm looking at your book, by the way, which ironically is an actual book, not a courted English LGBT respect, but I'm looking at it and I'm noticing the title of your book, Caused Unknown, is in air quotes and quotes. It was that intentional for a reason because based on your data, I think you do know the

cause. Would you kind of in layman's term break that down? Yeah, no. So we tongue in cheek put it in quotes on purpose because this book was pitched to me by Gavin DeBecker, a roomie afterward, and Bobby Kennedy. They wanted me to talk about sudden athletic deaths. And I said, you know, that's a good idea, but that's mostly anecdotal. I'm a debt.

So we married the two together. So we want to show, we wanted to put a lot of human faces on this. This is tragic. When athletes die, especially young athletes, it's tragic. And any debts tragic, but especially young folks. And that's what's occurring. The anecdotal evidence of the sudden athletic death

is pretty alarming. There was a study done, the Los Angeles study in 2006. A bunch of guys in Switzerland did this. They tried to figure out what was the incidence of sudden athletic death. And they found 111 such cases under age 35 where it occurred on the field or right thereafter after the field.

111 over 38 years is 29 per year. So that's kind of the baseline. Since starting in 2021, it's exploded. We'd be lucky to have a month with just 29 sudden athletic deaths. We've had months with 90. The December of 2021 was 90. So and in my book, my book's not exhaustive.

There's hundreds and hundreds of these cases, mostly local news stories. So just based on my anecdotal evidence, that's a tenfold increase. And the case studies in your book, how many exact examples do you put in your book? And then how many of them are athletes? I can't remember the exact number,

but there's hundreds. And then we put a bunch in the back. It's just, there's just so many, there's hundreds and hundreds. So from 29 a year to 29 worst case a month, with a high of 90 in a month, I'm not even sure if it's 90, that was as if the writing of the book,

it could have gotten, it could, it could be higher in certain months. So, what are people saying when you ask in them? They're saying, the collapses are happening because of what? Like you remember the interview the the the the Mara hamlin is the Dera Hamlin. Yeah. Mara hamlin right when he was asked by my construct about that. He said I would I'd like it was like a seven second pause. And then you can tell they added the video and Michael Strahan asked the question, but I can tell you they did not put it in there.

I don't know if you saw this reaction or not. I've seen my side. Yeah. So, you know, do you have that video? You know, because you, you, it seems like you, I mean, Strahan is asking a question that everybody is going to be asking. It's not like he's asking a question. That's like a genius question. It's a question the world is waiting for asking. It's not like he's asking a question, that's like a genius question. It's a question the world is waiting for. A people want the right question to be asked. Can you go to the part where the question's being asked?

Just fast forward to the part where the question's being asked. Yeah, there you go. I think it's about to be asked. If you wanna put the audio to the right, all the way to the right, yeah, there you go. Can one circle the route me right now? No. How did Dr. Describe what happened to you?

I saw my one stay right from. I know from my experience. So here's my question. That's something I want to stay away from. And by the way, it couldos to ABCs for showing the seven second pause because ABCs could have cut that seven second pause and just not answer, but they put the video out there.

And they even put that thought out there, which maybe ABC, you're gonna wouldn't even put the answer in the question, we don't need to put that because it's gonna create a lot of what? Skepticism and guys like us maybe talking about it, it amplifies. But here's the question. What was the question? The question was what? What did the doctors tell you about this? Has anybody spoken to the doctor that was handling Kim to ask what he said to him? And is that doctor going to say, this is a private client

patient doctor relationship that I can because of hip-hop regulations, but Yeah, I mean, so what are people saying if this number one from 29 year to 29 a month to a high of 90 plus more than 29 I'm at these says we're lucky to have only 20 that's what I'm saying 29 is a worse month like yeah So what are they saying that causes for this? Well, recently Yahoo News and Bloomberg, of the good news is this subject was completely ignored. This death in young people, but recently in the last couple of weeks

that had to at least acknowledge it exists. Bloomberg said, yes, young people are dying, but it's not the vaccines. That was their headline. And then Yahoo News put out a similar headline. And then I read the Yahoo News and they've described the deaths. Again, they named some unknown expert. We talked to some experts and they said that COVID is causing the immune system of healthy young people to go haywire because it's so strong. So you're the immune system of healthy young people to go haywire because it's so strong. So you're strong immune system as a young person

is now deadly because of COVID. You can't make this up. There's no study. They just say it. This is the article you were talking about from Bloomberg. More young Americans are dying, but not from vaccines. The increased start of well before COVID 19 shots

according to mortality data and as plateaued sense, if you can move up a little bit, can we read the rest of the article or you have to, can you zoom in or no? Okay, there you go, go a little lower, a little lower. No, the other way so I can read the top. Yeah, keep going, keep going, keep going. Okay, so for most people on the field, cardiac arrest of Buffalo Bill, safety, tomorrow, Hamlin Jenner, we're second one, that was a frightening potential injury to follow by. We're seeing that looking as happy and vocal minority, those seized and it's as per-purt,

per-purted, what does that word? Where are you? Per-ported. Per-ported evidence of the terrible toll on our NACOVID-19 vaccines have exacted on otherwise healthy young Americans, the medical establishment and the mainstream media have generally dismissed young Americans, the medical establishment and the mainstream media have generally dismissed such concerns,

the medical establishment, well, that's the problem of Bloomberg, right, the word establishment and the mainstream media, you're assuming that some people trust the medical establishment and mainstream media generally dismiss such concerns out of hand, but whenever I hear them, I ask myself, I wonder if there's any evidence of that in mortality data. So go up. Let's see if their argument is gonna get stronger

So US mortality statistics derived from death certificates filled by physicians and medical examiners collected from state and local public health agencies by center disease control and prevention national center There's a available online to anyone on the computer. They used to be updated only annually, but during the pandemic, the CDC began releasing provisions numbers as recent takes a little while to learn how to do XM. Okay, keep going,

they're not giving an answer on the data here. So, you know, zoom in to that one, with mortality data shows that first of all, something has been killing American young people and sharply rising numbers. Lately the 2020 mortality rate from 15 to 34 was the highest since 73 for those 25 to 34, Mr. High since 1950, death per 100,000 population, 15 to okay, that's sharp right there is not a good look.

And by the way, during the lockdown, can you speak to this? You know, I was reading this, and during the lockdown, they also failed to point out that auto accident deaths were weighed down because millions of miles were not being driven by that cohort. And so therefore those deaths were down simply because you're not driving a car. And yet the total number was up. But you're talking about excess mortality, right? Excess mortality. Can you, where would the, like, the reduction in auto deaths down,

where would that show up? Is that in the base number, not the excess number? It would be in the total number. It would detract from excess deaths. So whatever's going on is excess to what would be down from that. Made up for the auto act. Yeah, normal. Correct.

Years and years of decades of data on auto deaths, which are down, it makes up for that and more. Yeah, you know, in my book, I talk about something else that's interesting regarding lockdown. So there's a smoking gun in the UK data that we found where once the vaccines were introduced, all age groups accept one through 14, started having excess deaths. One through 14 age group, their vaccines were introduced later around November of 2021.

Access mortality for that age group was coming down during the lockdowns, because the largest single cause of death in that age cohort is accidental. So less activity. So their excess mortality was coming down, down, down, and even when the lockdowns came off in the spring, in the UK, their excess mortality kept coming down then in November of 2021 and started going back up for age group one through 14. That's when the vaccine was introduced in the UK. It's no longer I think being offered for kids in it. I think they just suspended boosters for under 50 as well in the UK or they're no longer promoting it.

I have a question on the lockdowns that Tom was talking about. So it's almost like accountability and which one is worse. And let me frame this. So get the COVID vaccine because that'll protect you and save your life. Okay, that's option one. Or option two is, all right, you're locked down. And because you're in the house,

even we had this conversation with Neil deGrasse Tyson. And because you're in lockdown, so people are drinking more, they're taking more opioids, fentanyl. You're saying that they're drinking more missing cancer screenings. I guess my question is, well, what'sl, you're saying that they're drinking more missing cancer screenings. I guess my question is, well, what's worse, right? So you're mandating vaccines, so, and then, you know, cause unknown air quotes, or you're

forcing people to stay home. And now they're resorting to not taking care of their health, not working out, drinking drugs, alcohol. At the end of the day, it seems like a recipe for disaster that there's going to be deaths either way. So ultimately, we have to pay the prices Americans for this resounding number of deaths, whether it's from the vaccine or whether it's from lockdowns. Do you see my question here?

Yeah. And I'm sure in 2020, there were some people that drank too much or you know had some bad habits But the predominance of death excess deaths in 2020 was old people. That's in the numbers Let me because I was pre-vaccine pre-vaccine. I think it's important to point that out and that's when most of the lockdowns occurred They kind of we weren't really locked down in 2021 depending on what states you're yeah for the most part here in free state of Florida but but but here's something shocking. So the mixture from old to young is in the numbers. So from 2020 to 2021, 40,000 millennials died in 2020

excessively, 60,000 in 2021. So they added, say that again. In 2020, 40,000 millennials died excessively according to CDC numbers. And then in 2021, it was 60,000. What is the word excessively? That means above and beyond the normal. The normal expected rate. And so that's a 50% increase. And then the Gen X didn't fare much better. That 94,000 Gen Xers died excessively in 2020, 120,000 in 21. Whereas old people were in 2021 and went the other way, there were less. So there was this what we call on Wall Street, a mixed shift. And I would say it's an adverse mixed shift. It's a very weird

data to go. Yeah. Yeah, it's very weird. Because the virus morph, did it only start to attack younger folks that are employed So then I so then I will come back and I would tell you I would say look the elders Who got the vaccine more older people or millennials and genuxes? I would say elders Were elderly was more fearful of the vaccine so like in my family From of COVID. Yeah more careful of COVID. Yeah, so my dad got the vaccine. So like in my family, uh, uh, we're from COVID. Yeah, more careful of COVID. Yeah. So my dad got the vaccine two shots and he got the three boosters. My dad, he's 80 years old, about to be 81 in next month. Nanny got the

vaccine and the, uh, uh, uh, uh, boosters, right? Tidemi was like, what if this, what if dad, what if this people come into the house that were having COVID, my dad had COVID and pneumonia at the same time at 79 years. All of it was a scare that he was going through it. So that data you're saying, why would the excessive number go higher for millennials and gen X's, did they get vaccines more than the elderly did? Uh, they, they, well, they got the vaccines in 21 through mandates.

So there was no vaccine in 2020. Right, so the mixed shift for excess deaths occurred in the young folks in 2021. No, I get started getting the vaccine and then this one cohort goes up 50%. The next cohort goes up 33%. Correct. And why wouldn't older people's numbers also go?

That's what I'm asking. Why wouldn't they're because they also took the back well because there was a pull forward In fact, we took out a lot of the the week older people with some of the The unfortunate Protocols that went down in the early days where they died already they died already Okay, there was a pull forward effect and what so you see in the numbers in 2021 old people excess excess deaths coming down, because we took all the weak old people were taken out by COVID and or bad treatment in 2020. Their numbers came down excessively,

because we just took out a whole bunch of people. But there have been since vaccinations keep rolling, they started to go back up again. What, let me ask you, do you remember when they showed, Rob, if you can find this data, where they showed which cohort got the vaccine the most those without a high school those without a college degree college dropouts Those were the bachelor's degree MBAs PhD. I don't know if you remember this show that MBAs was were the least the least MBAs

Bachelor degree was the highest bachelor's degree was the highest they were's degree was the highest. They were getting the vaccine. And I think high school dropouts or college dropouts were the second lowest after MBA. So when you do think about millennials, Gen X, Gen Y, boomers, which one of them got the highest percentage of seniors, which one of them got the highest percentage of the vaccine? I haven't done that data because because we don't have vaccine,

we don't have that really as granular as we would like. Or other sources of 70% of US over the bachelor's degree had been vaccinated or planning to get vaccinated compared to just half to 53% less education. In other words, a college degree is associated with a 43% increase. And likely that someone plans to get the vaccine the difference by education level is larger than difference in the willingness to get vaccinated, whites

and blacks 32% the difference between interesting, Latino's 3%. So you saw almost those people that are getting a bachelor degree, they're following the system, right? Can you see if you can find the data which generation got the most vaccine while he's doing that, Tom's gonna ask a question. So yeah, there was some whistleblowers that came out talked about hospitals assigning causation to deaths. And whistleblowers came out saying,

I had an elderly person who stroked and got classified as COVID because the hospital was looking to get the combat pay, you know, those payments from the federal government. You're looking at total deaths, which normalizes all that out of why it's causation. You're looking at mass cohorts, not mass cohorts, the mass numbers, and the cohort saying,

look, it's up, which completely normalizes out all of the BS. And it's not BS, that's what we do there. That's what we do there. To get the combat pay from the federal government, yes? Yes, so we That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there.

That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there.

That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do there. That's what we do thereabled. So we stay up there. We're starting to go down deeper.

We're doing a vaccine damage project right now, my team. But yeah, that's what we have is irrefutable. There's just ones and zeros. And the number, and because it was a mass vaccination program, and it was global, these numbers that were seeing occur in all different Western countries. And for me, the smoking gun is the group life folks, the society of actuary numbers, and then we've got to talk about the disability numbers that we've gotten from the US Bureau

of Labor Statistics. Yeah, so the point I was getting to for everybody listening and was to confirm that says, hey, a lot of people talk about all the things who died of COVID, didn't die of COVID, but when you step back and are looking at total deaths over time at the time vaccines are introduced for, oh, now it's okay under 14. Now it's okay for under six. You're tracking that as that came like a wave.

Correct. And the elderly, the calling of the herd but the elderly, that was the one where people were remuted in their attempt to say it, but they were pointing out saying, hey, look, this is far worse than regular flu, and regular flu will take out an obese career smoker on a regular flu season.

This is worse than that, and that was the elderly calling of the herd. And let's not forget different protocols that probably didn't help like Remdesma Vier ventilation has now been proven to be quite deadly for this disease. And not also forget, I lost my turn in thought, but I'll come back to it.

Yeah, but go back to it. I'm really trying to find out what percentage of which generation got the vaccine the most. We can come back to this. You know what I want you to go to? Rob, we were looking at a number earlier. How many vaccinations have been given so far in the last two and a half years?

As of October of 2022, I believe the number was 12 and a half billion. So we're shy of 15 billion vaccines given. In US, shots given. In US, this is from Statista, which, you know, credible source, purely data. Number of COVID-19 vaccine doses administered in the US as of February 23rd, two weeks, old, and if you can zoom in on the numbers, Pfizer number one, Pfizer's number one at 400 million, then their booster is number two at 34 million.

Moderna's number two, number two, when it comes down to the main, 251 million. Their booster's at 19 four. Johnson and Johnson obviously, we know what happened to them. 18.9 million and you got a couple other guys that are there. So give a take on this, what's that? 650, say 680, 700 million just in the US.

Okay, 700 million just in the US. I think the number is 67% 66 or 67% of Americans are vaccinated. If I remember that statistic correctly, I saw 66 or 67% Americans are vaccinated. So how much of this do you believe as a data person? This is either, this is gonna be opinion or if you have any kind of data to prove it, it'd be great. How much of this do you think is, you know, when I was in a relationship

and I was an 18 year old kid or 22 year old kid, and I'm dating somebody, and I was serious relationship. My friends want me to be single. Those who were single want me to be single. Right. Okay. I'm kind of like, dude, you gotta get a girl.

It's great when you're in a relationship. Like, no, bro, you want to be single. You don't have to answer 20 body. I'm like, dude, it's fine. No, it's like, dude, you come to the party. They're asking about you. Okay, great. Then you want to be single.

Then when you're single, married couples want you to get married. It's okay, dude. Let me tell you, man, life is Then when you're single, married couples want you to get married. It's like, okay, dude, let me tell you man, life is better when you're married. You don't have to worry about it and run around all over the, and you're like, dude, okay, let me get married. And you're married like, dude, it's a single people. So then it's like, no, bro, you're married,

but divorce is the way to be. You got to join the divorce party and go, and we were reading a statistic about a wife talking about why statistics in Maui, how it is, you know, we were reading a statistic about a wife talking about why, you know, statistics and Maui, how it is, you know, so, you know, say, hey, you got to get divorced, man, it's really cool when you're divorced because now you have money and you can do this and imagine all those young girls like guys with money and success and the game is a different, oh, I want to be divorced.

How much of this with COVID vaccines, people who got the vaccination is like, no, join my camp because God forbid if I'm wrong, for having taken a vaccine purely by fear. How much of it is people just want to defend their decision that they made the right decision and they don't want to be proven that they were wrong? Oh, it's huge. I saw this on Wall Street all the time. It's, you know, my ethics professor said something that stuck in my head from business school. He said, you can't rationalize facts to someone

whose position is based on emotion. So a lot of people took this out of fear, which is an emotion, and then they convinced others to join them on the ride. And now, Dad is coming out that they may have been wrong. And ego is a big part of what I saw in Wall Street. I saw people ride stocks down to zero, whether, you know, news flow was coming out that it was bad, and they'd keep buying all the way down because they couldn't admit they're wrong.

This phenomenon's now being repeated on a national global scale with this vaccine. People just don't want to admit they're wrong. And it's, the problem is, this isn't money, this is like potentially your health. So I view the vaccine now as a trade, right? You're either long the vaccine or short the vaccine. If you're long it, you continue to get boosters. Because if you took it and now you're hesitant,

that's great don't take, take it. But if you continue to get boosters, that's like buying a stock on its way to zero. And if you didn't take the vaccine, I think the right side of the trade. So it's a trade in my mind. And what was the original thesis of the trade? It prevented you from getting COVID and transmitting.

We both know those are lies. So the thesis is unwinding as we roll through time. So people who keep defending this are now defending it based upon what I call marketing scheme from Pfizer and Moderna, which says it reduces your chance of being seriously hospitalized. There's no paper on that. There's no data.

You know how they say, like, don't throw good money after bad. Correct. So let's say you're the 70 plus crowd, you're like, listen, I'm old, I'm gonna do it. I gotta do to protect my health, or if you have pre-existing conditions. But what would your message be for the 20, 30, 40 somethings? The millennial crowd even, you know,

do they keep riding the stock all the way down? Cause I'm saying for people that I've gotten the vaccine, is it just stop it with the booster? Stop it with the booster. Yeah, you know, I get it, you did it, but here's what you should do moving forward. And a lot of people were forced to do it. A lot of people didn't want to do it, but they did it.

And there's a big, what I call, marginal middle of people that, that enthusiastic about this. Those are the people I'm trying to reach. There's the hardcore covidians who aren't gonna change their mind. They're gonna get jab, jab, jab. Good luck to them.

Covidians. I call them Covidians. Branch Covidians. That's a religion. It's a religion in many ways. It's a lot of these folks. Tribal identity. They did a lot of virtually signaling.

Yeah. Branch Covid. When it comes to playing, line two two when it comes to blame. Okay, there you go. You just found the goat. Is that the one? Good for you, Rob. Let me zoom in a little bit.

Thank you for looking for the nominal. Which percentage of people in each age range receive the COVID vaccine the most? 65 plus is the highest. Okay, and by the worst of difference between, oh, at least one is the pink fully is the navy blue okay 65 is the highest and it's 50 this makes sense to me

So we see what the bottom line is 25 to 49 is that zero to a hundred percent at the bottom Yeah, and the light pink okay extending to the right is all those you're 100 is this American or is this world what? This this I'm is this worldwide? I'm assuming this is gonna be US because it's gonna be tough. This is USAFAC. So is that mean almost 90 plus percent of 65 plus got the job? I remember with the refrain,

getting back to your top at the marketing, you were just talking about the refrain. Safe and effective, safe and effective. Get the elders first and Cuomo on TV, let's protect people in the retirement homes, that's what drove that. Right. Well, they got first right of refusal. And then you started seeing, it's 100%.

99%. Can you go a little longer? 90. I don't think it was a radio refusal. 80. I think it was, let's protect them. And so you had the nation's children and grandchildren lobbying grandma, grandpa to get it. You're first because you're the most vulnerable grandma.

Go get it. Why does this get to the white? Is the second lowest black sort of lowest to get the vaccine? Then the highest is American Indian, Alaska native. Asian is second native Hawaiian, specifically Maui. It's a Pacific Islanders III, and then you got Hispanics, fourth, multiple other, then you got whites and blacks. Go lower, let's see what other data you see here, okay?

That's what you got. Very interesting. Is that by state? Right there. Well, I mean, I'd be curious, you know, if you go to California, that's that's it. That's what you got. Very interesting. Is that by state right there? Well, I mean, that I'd be curious enough if you go to California, what's the California number? Vaccinated. California is what? 85 74. 85% of these ones. Damn. 85%. That that that is insane to me. Go to New York. See what New York is. Left left left of M.A. They right there. Yeah. It's what 93% oh my goodness. What about Florida? Yeah. Florida is 61 is that 61

or 81% okay. So that's seniors. Go to Texas. 75% go to Illinois. What is that? 78 go to Oregon. Yeah, because outside of Chicago Pat, it's 80% interesting. Florida's 81 seniors go to Connecticut. Connecticut is a hardcore, you know, 95%. There you go. Go to Alabama.

Connecticut is 95% that go to Alabama. Go to Mississippi. Go down there. Alabama is 64% We have a higher 6% in one shot African Americans which showed up on the other chart 61 64% Hmm, huh go to Utah Satok curiosity Utah 74% yeah, Hawaii are for our friend Ed

90% yeah, I live as you guys are killing it out there 90 points down. Yeah, I live in. You guys are killing it out there.