PBD Podcast - “The Earpiece Was REAL” - PBD Clears Up Candace Owens vs Andrew Wilson Debate Controversy
Episode Date: August 17, 2026Patrick Bet-David reacts to the aftermath of the Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson debate over the Charlie Kirk assassination case. PBD clears up the viral controversy surrounding Wilson’s earpiece, r...eveals what happened behind the scenes, and breaks down the one poll he believes actually shows whether either side changed minds.▶️ WATCH FULL PODCAST: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1xVNhlNt_o🎟️ SECURE YOUR 2026 VAULT TICKETS: https://bit.ly/4xU2SCW🧢 SHOP LIMITED EDITION HAT: https://bit.ly/4zC6TwC👞 GET THE FLB1's: https://bit.ly/4mC4uf6🦁 SPONSOR THE VAULT 2026: https://bit.ly/4mFBPpwⓂ️ CONNECT ON MINNECT: https://bit.ly/4kSVksoⓂ️ PBD PODCAST CIRCLES: https://bit.ly/4mAWQAP👔 BET-DAVID CONSULTING: https://bit.ly/4lzQph2🥃 BOARDROOM CIGAR LOUNGE: https://bit.ly/4pzLEXj🇰 KALSHI: http://kalshi.com/pbdSUBSCRIBE TO:@VALUETAINMENT@ValuetainmentComedyABOUT US:Patrick Bet-David is the founder and CEO of Valuetainment Media. He is the author of the #1 Wall Street Journal Bestseller “Your Next Five Moves” (Simon & Schuster) and a father of 2 boys and 2 girls.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Did you ever think you would make it?
I feel I'm supposed to take sweet that's before me.
I know this life meant for me.
Adam, what's your point?
The future looks bright.
My handshake is better than anything I ever signed, right?
You are a one of one?
My son's right.
I don't think I've ever said this before.
Right.
Hope you guys had a good weekend.
Allegedly, apparently there was a debate that happened on Friday between a couple different people.
and that debate was all over the place.
You heard about that.
And it led to allegations of me selling Dodge cars,
which I would never do in a million years
and I have to address that.
It's a very important matter.
We will get into, and I will give you some insight,
some stuff on the back end that we experienced going there.
What was it like?
Hospitality treatment, the Andrew Wilson earpiece,
the moment of Candace handing me over her phone,
and I wanted to say something,
when I was given the phone, I said, maybe the timing wouldn't have been right.
The different things, the clips that I've gone viral, we will definitely talk about that today on the podcast.
I'm glad they did it.
A lot of people sat there and said, I can't believe this conversation is being had.
And I can't believe they're doing this.
You know, it's only this.
It's only that to me.
I'm glad they had the conversation.
And for those that say, well, Pat was on Candace's side.
Pat was on Andrew Wilson's side.
Let me tell you what the reality was.
the week before doing that debate,
if there's anybody that Candace would have had the biggest issues,
would be Ben Shapiro.
I had Ben Shapiro on the podcast the week before.
So this was as fair as it could have gotten.
We got, I'm glad that they were able to address the issue,
so we'll get into that.
Aside from that, Fauci apparently called ABC and said,
hey, man, don't report on that story, and ABC didn't.
And now we're learning about this.
So we'll get in.
Fauci's just had a rough six months.
This has been a rough 2026
with Fauci.
And Todd Blanche announced that he was referred
to him for a criminal.
He was.
He was.
Okay.
All right.
So we'll talk about that.
And the one story that's a little bit,
by the way, James O'Keefe,
this guy, you guys got to give credit to these.
Oh, yeah.
Anybody that criticizes the James O'Keeves
or the Nick Shirley's of the world that are going,
like Thomas Massey called that Nick Shirley,
what are you doing, Thomas?
You're a heavyweight of a guy that's in the space.
You're in it.
You're discouraging a 24-year-old guy
that's trying to go out there and leave.
to these different types of discussions.
I just, I don't think we need to do that
of some people that have been around the space for a while,
but James O'Keefe did something.
He went out there in Minnesota, tried to vote.
He dressed like a Muslim,
and he showed how easy it is to vote in Minnesota.
And Adam told me this right before I said,
there's no way this is true in the story.
It says, a man can vouch for eight family members
in Minnesota when they vote.
I said, there's no way this is true.
So then we had our team fact check it.
Guess what? You can vouch for eight family members in Minnesota to vote whatever way you want in Minnesota.
Like you know how people say, what a chauvinistic way of some of these guys say a man should be able to vote for his household.
Well, guess what? In Minnesota, you can. And I'll play the clip for you. It's unbelievable of what happened there.
And again, Nick Shirley, for those of you guys that support Nick Shirley, good job for Nick Shirley to do what he does.
I know a lot of you guys communicate with him on the act.
And those help because this guy's not a millionaire.
He's going out there, putting his life on the line and getting all these stories.
So to all the people that support him, good work.
Nick Shirley, keep at it.
Trump said something about the North Korea, South Korea that got a lot of people confused.
You know, Trump orders Pentagon to scale back joint exercises with South Korea.
And one of the tweets got conservatives and folks on MAGA to say, what is this all about?
Why are you saying this?
You know, there's lots of different angles on why he could be saying something like that.
We will talk about that.
Anthropics CEO, you're ready for this one?
this is very weird. Anthropic CEO's wife asked Epstein to help fund her porn business.
And this is not a Babylon Bee or an onion story. This is an actual story.
The CEO of Anthropic, multibillionaire, very brilliant, very smart guy, but his wife was raising
money from Jeffrey Epstein. Now, there's many different angles to take with that, but that's kind of
weird to have that as a tie. And then Hugh Effner, stories comes out that he told the FBI
that there's this guy named Jeffrey Epstein that is sexually assaulting our girls.
Can you imagine Hugh Hefner saying that to the FBI?
And now we're learning about these stories coming out.
Both of them came out, so we'll address those stories.
And then aside from that, Rokana keeps pushing on this 5% wealth tax for a guy that they're saying at the low end,
he's worth 70 million.
At the high end, he's worth 300 million.
And he's telling people that we should do a wealth tax to the 250 billionaires.
and Mark Cuban comes out and gives an argument, and quite a few people went after Rokana,
and then stories comes out that Rokana is planning on running for office president in 2028,
and Newsom is more and more and more getting irrelevant,
because at least some of these guys, whether you like their policies or not, they're sticking to it.
Newsome, like I said, if there's a gift you can send to Newsom, everybody on behalf of supporting him,
buy a pair of flip-flops and send it to him.
Can you imagine he goes to his office,
the actual Newsom governor's office get hundreds of flip-flops?
Future looks bright.
Any kind of flip-flops at this point.
If you want to put a smile on his face,
send a future looks bright.
But very weird.
And then Luigi Mangione, you know, the verdict's out.
He comes out and he says,
hey, I killed Mr. Thompson.
At least he said Mr. Thompson.
He's being respectful about it.
And he explains how he built the gun.
He explains everything.
that he did, but he's flat out coming out and saying, here's what happened. And this, like,
no hiding back. And a lot of people are wondering, why would you take that case? But at least now
everybody knows what happened. That's like Tyler Robinson coming out and saying, I killed him,
here's how I did it. Here's what weapon I used. Like flat out saying it, that's what Luigi
did. Will address that story. And then a, Lindsay, is it Clancy? Am I saying the last time correctly?
Yes.
What a weird situation.
she sends her husband out, and then she at that time when he's out, goes and kills her three kids?
Five years old, three years old, eight months old, blinds him up in the basement and strangles all three of us.
And women on TikTok have raised $750,000 for him because allegedly they say he did it, not her.
Well, there's people saying that he did it, but there's also therapists and women going, you don't know what it's like having postpartum depression.
So, hey, anybody that has a kid knows, like, you've wanted to kill your kids.
basically is what they're saying, and they're trying to get $2 million for it.
And her breaking down in Corpatt was so good because the medical examiner's breaking down what happened.
And she's like, I can't, I can't.
It's a messed up story.
Hopefully we'll have time to get into that story.
And then a couple of the stories here that God willing, we'll get into.
Tim Pool was on Jubilee.
And it was a couple interesting moments.
If we have time, we'll get into that.
And the last finale is Gen Z.
One third of Gen Z steers clear of car insurance.
surveys find. I remember one time on the four or five freeway with a Mitsubishi eclipse. I'm driving
down. This guy in front of me breaks and very bad. And we get into his fender bender. He gets out of
the car. He's crying. He says, please don't call the cops. Please don't call the cops. I said,
what do you mean? I don't have any insurance. Just let me go. Please. He's worried that we got into an
accident. So apparently today, a third of Gen Zs don't want to have any auto insurance. Do you
You have auto insurance? You have auto insurance.
So crazy. Very far.
Got like $300.
By the way, if you were to ask right now, okay, here's a question for you.
They should know this.
How many speeding tickets has Vinny gotten in his life?
In his life, he's 48 years young.
How many speeding tickets has Vinny gotten in his life?
Can you run a poll real quick?
Zero to three.
Let's see how good you are.
Three to six, six to ten, ten plus.
How many speeding tickets?
Let's see how this poll is on how Vinny's done.
third of Gen Z don't want to get any auto insurance for their own reasons.
All right.
With that being said, guys, many of you guys have been messaging saying, hey, Pat,
we haven't had a limited edition hat in a long time.
And I know a lot of people in this say, I want to get a numbered hat.
You can only go buy them on eBay.
You know how this works.
When we launch them, it's once every quarter.
And then when we do, it goes.
And when it goes, the only place you can go get it is on eBay,
and you're paying three to ten times price, whatever the individuals want to sell it for.
If you go on eBay right now, you type in Future,
Looks Bright, just go on eBay right now and type in Future Looks Bright. You will see the merch.
That hat, $2,000, $500, $4.49. At one point, somebody only paid $99 to buy some of these numbered hats.
So we're doing it again today. We haven't done it in months, but our latest numbered Future Looks Bright hat,
250 year anniversary, all black with the gray on it, which looks absolutely sick. It says United States 1776 to 20206 with the American
flag if you can switch the picture so folks
can see what it looks like on the side. That's the front of it. On the side is
the American flag. Keep going so they can see it. And on the other side, it says
value taming. On the inside, it says future looks bright with numbered one out of
250. These will go in no time for some of you guys that collect these.
I know we have kids. Somebody's a kid here at the podcast buys them and she flips him on
eBay and she makes money doing this. And obviously Vinny does have any kids and neither does
Adam, not yet, neither one of them, but somebody, so if you haven't bought them the latest one,
you'd go to vtmerch.com and place your order for the limited edition numbered one out of 250.
We'll put the link below again, go to vtmerch.com, place your order.
These things won't last a long time, and we have some major, major announcement that we'll
be making here in the next few weeks.
Again, go to vtemerch.com, place your order, future looks bright.
With that being said, let's get into our first story.
The first story I want to get into is a Rokana story.
Rokana tweets out a video describing that the wealth tax isn't as bad as you think it is, Vinny.
It's not.
These 250 billionaires can't afford to pay their 5% wealth tax.
And a lot of people are like, wait a minute, what are you talking about?
It is so bad that even, you know, Mark Cuban decides to respond to it.
So watch the tweet.
It says California Democratic Party.
and California labor movement just stood with Bernie Sanders
and me in supporting the 5% wealth tax on 250 billionaires.
California voters won a Democratic Party
that will stand for the working class over the billionaire class.
If you want to play this clip,
and then we're going to read what Mark Cuban said.
Go for it.
California Democratic Party and the California Labor Movement.
Oh, he's just repeating it?
Okay, don't worry about it.
So pause it and just go to what Mark Cuban said about this.
If you can go back to the one tweet.
Okay, so here's Mark Cuban.
Roy, I like you.
You know that.
but you need to read the state of the state.
The number of Deca unicorns in California is growing by the day as investors chase amazing startups.
A unique feature of these $10 billion startups is that even if they raise a billion little,
if any of that money goes to the founders who are now worth billions of dollars overnight,
they are the definition of cash poor stock rich.
I know this feeling when we had a business that's worth a couple hundred million dollars,
and I was stock rich and cash poor.
How are you going to tax them?
Make them borrow money against their shares if they can.
They just raise money to grow their company and bank will come along and loan them money.
A company that has been in business, maybe less than a year.
Go a little bit lower.
Will you take their stock if they can?
Do you really think each of these founders who started an amazing company in Cali is now a billionaire?
Can each just pull out $250 million per billion of their net worth from their raise?
You know they can't.
If this passes and it doesn't directly impact me at all,
I won't be a Cali resident, but you can bet if I'm investing in multi-billion-dollar startups.
I'm asking them to move from California first.
In my opinion, if this passes, only idiot startup founders staying Cali.
I've done this before now.
Do it again.
Dallas, Pittsburgh, Indiana, I will make not being in California a prerequisite for an investment.
Ideology is not a strategy role.
I responded on this Rokana tweet as well if you want to go to my profile, and I took a slightly different angle.
California lost a trillion dollars of wealth twice in the last five years.
If you, Rokana and Gavin Newsom passed a 5% wealth tax, theft tax,
on your 250 billionaires, you'll suffer consequences you've never seen before.
And the biggest impact will be on low and middle income families.
You know this.
Why low and middle income families?
Who creates those jobs?
These guys do.
And they can go anywhere.
You know what states are looking for billionaires?
50.
You know how many of these states are gladly looking for billionaires
and saving them 13.3% and 10%.
taxes, I think it's six or seven of them. You don't think, I was in Tennessee a couple days ago.
You want to know why so many people are going to Tennessee? Zero state taxes. You know why
people are going to Texas? Zero state taxes. You know why Florida's growing the way that it does?
Zero percent state taxes. If you go right now in Realtor.com and go to Palm Beach. Just go to
Palm Beach and go to Realtor.com and type in Palm Beach. You know what you'll notice? Something
you've never seen before. If you type in Palm Beach right there in the search, if you guys don't
doing that in the back, go ahead and type on Palm Beach in there.
Not West Palm Beach, just Palm Beach.
I never said West, just Palm Beach in there, right there.
Type in Palm Beach and click on that first one, right below it, it gave it to you.
If you go to this and go to prices, go to relevant listing and go to the highest first.
Watch this.
$205 million.
Damn.
$200 million, $185 million, $187 million, $85 million, $85 million, $88 million.
You know why?
Because billionaires can afford to buy these houses, and they're moving to Palm Beach.
And what do you think most of these billionaires are coming from?
States like New York, like Illinois, like D.C., like California,
who are pushing their people out to states like Florida, Texas, Tennessee, Nevada, and other places.
Tom, when you hear Rokana pushing this, and the story comes out saying that Rokana,
considering 2020 presidential run, says AOC decision doesn't have any bearing.
This is Rokana.
He's interested in running in 2020.
Is this the clip if you want to play?
Go for it, guys.
Insurance operations today are fragmented,
and policyholders expect more.
That's why leading insurers run on Adion.
From premium collection to claims payout,
Adion supports the entire insurance value chain,
giving insurers full control over how money moves,
a single platform to reduce fragmentation,
complexity, and risk.
Drive revenue, control claims cost,
and power your next move with Adi.
Learn more at adian.com
Hey y'all, it's Kelly Clarkson with Wayfair.
Ever order furniture online and wonder what if?
Like, what if it doesn't hold up?
That sofa was four days old.
You should have ordered from Wayfair.
With Wayfair, there's no what if.
Just style you love and quality you can trust.
Visit Wayfair.ca.
Wayfair, every style, every home.
We're going to need...
It's seemingly in disarray about the party's direction.
And you have been known to lay out your national agenda.
You're doing a little bit today on this program.
Maria Bardo on this show has pointedly asked you, and I did in the break, if you are running in
2028. Are you?
I'm considering it, and I'll tell you why. I'll tell you why. Because I understand the future
economy, and I see that it's only working for a few, and I want it to work for people who I grew up with.
If AOC runs, do you run? I don't think that has any bearing. What matters is, do I have an economic
vision that actually will have success? Look, I am so grateful to this country. It's given my family
everything. And I want to see the kids I grew up with their families be able to succeed in a
modern economy. I understand AI. I understand the future. Can you go to Chad GBT and type in,
what is Rokana's network? Tom, I'm coming to you right after this. What is Rokana's net worth
according to Chad GBT? Can you just go to? Well, let's see what it's going to say.
He can buy one of those. So type in, what is Rokana's network? The way he speaks is a,
what is Rokana's, what is Rokana's net worth?
Networth. There you go. Let's see what it says.
It's more than you think, guys.
I'm telling you right now.
Is it 500,000?
No, way more.
Is it $1 million?
Way more.
Is it $70 to $300 million?
It's somewhere around $200 million apparently.
Adding the disclosure ranging gives roughly $98.7 million network in 2024 to $314 million.
An analysis using open secrets data, which you trust open secrets, said as median estimated net worth is $232.7 million.
But you know who won't be taxed to 5%?
He won't be because he's not a billionaire.
He's only worth $232 million.
Tom thoughts.
Well, you left something out.
Your response to his tweet was correct.
But there's one small thing you left out.
And that is the middle class, not only will they not get jobs, the jobs they do get
Pat, they're going to get tax because there's no one left to tax if you lose your
higher taxpayers.
And you still have to build your rail and provide all the services to people.
and the element here that people don't understand if you create a company.
So let's just look, you know, people often don't understand creating a company and it has a value and that you don't really have that money.
It would be like someone knocking on your door and say, hey, you know, you've been living here for 10 years, your house has gone up in value.
We'd like to tax 5% of the gain because it's not fair that that happened to your house.
Everybody in America owns a house to understand that, but you would say,
Where would your parents who you get that money for that house?
You wouldn't.
You would have to go, wait a minute, I don't have that.
Just, well, Zillow says.
Hang on, Tom.
I'm getting an interruption here from a guy named Dylan Bed David.
Dylan, go ahead.
What do you want to tell us?
I'm in the middle of a podcast.
Dylan.
I just pulled a $4,000 card.
That's why you face it on me right now?
Yeah.
A $4,000 card.
Tell us what the card is.
It's a Pokemon card.
You know a guy named Rocana wants to tax you five.
You're going to get taxed on it.
Would you vote for Roe?
Ray Quaza.
Ray Kwan.
All right, Dili.
I'm going to get back to the podcast.
You keep doing your thing, buddy.
Okay.
All right.
Love you.
Bye-bye.
He's the best.
Dude, that's four grand.
I'm sorry, Tom.
No, no.
So, how dare he?
Go ahead.
Yeah, so let's say, I'll get back to it.
You owned a house or your parents own a house.
It goes up in value, Vinny.
They come knock.
They come knock on your door and say, hey, according to Zillow, you're a millionaire.
No, no, do you understand?
We bought this house, you know, 17 years ago for 350.
Zillow says it's a million, but if the economy crashes, it can be less than that.
Yeah, but since you're a millionaire, we'd like 5% of the 600,000 gain.
You're giving me a bill for 30 grand right here.
That's what, that's the analogy I make to people.
And they say, wait a minute, people don't have that.
If they wanted to put 30,000 of that in their house,
they'd have to go get a home equity line or something to build their kitchen.
They don't understand it.
Yeah.
Well, now multiply that times 100 for someone that goes out,
They're building the company, and a venture capitalist says, I think that thing is worth a billion dollars, and I will give you 50 million this next round of financing to pay for engineers and do things.
And then the state says, hey, let's round up everybody.
This thing's worth a billion.
Everybody, 5% please.
And you're like, wait a minute, we don't have the cash.
We're building a building.
You know, we're building.
We're building this building, which contains this wonderful company.
Building a building.
I like it. Yeah. But the point is, you can't get to it. But Roe Kana, this is populism. What this is
populism. It doesn't matter that it doesn't make sense logically or that it would create a
hellscape of people trying to find the money to do it. It doesn't matter. He knows that these people
wouldn't have the money to pull about it. Can I tell you what I respect. Can I tell you?
He's just running with popular opinion. Do you think, what is different between Rokana and Newsom?
Who's more of a true believer about the 5%?
Him or Newsom?
O'Rocana.
I'm asking Tom.
Who's more of a true believer?
I think Newsom's more of a true believer,
but he tried to distance himself for it this summer
because the polling was showing negative.
See, I'm the other way around.
I think Newsom's full of shit.
I think Newsom is for anything that helps him become a president.
But that's what I mean...
Push back on what I'm saying.
What I'm saying is, that doesn't it make...
What I mean, that makes him a true believer in the flaw.
Oh, meaning that it doesn't work.
Oh, we're saying the same thing then.
Yes.
Oh, you're saying that he knows that it doesn't work.
Straight up.
We're on the same page.
But he's pushing it like the cardboard's cutout that he is.
But I actually believe this is a Rokana policy.
And what is crazy?
What is crazy about Rokana coming up with this policy?
You know what's the craziest thing?
Do you know what district he's in?
He's in Silicon Valley, sir.
Oh, weird.
San Jose.
So I just want to know when this guy goes to restaurants,
what do people say when all the billionaires going to dinner's there?
You don't think they're pulling them aside?
And what is he trying to say,
hey, it's not that bad. You can handle it. You can pay for it. Adam, your thoughts on that.
Well, because for every one billionaire, there's 100,000 people basically agreeing with him.
I mean, it's populist mentality. They're going to pay the biggest price for it. Let me,
let me show some stats in honor of Tom Ellsworth. I do think that Roe Kana is a likable guy.
I don't think Gavin Newsom is likeable. Much more. We've had Roe Conner of the podcast.
He's a nice guy. Just because you're nice. Doesn't mean you're right, though.
Yeah. Look at this map right here. Say to honor Tom Ellsworth. And in honor of sounds
like I'm dead. Thank you, Tom. I appreciate that.
Look at this map right here.
Tell me which part of the country
looks very, very red.
If you could scroll in on that little bit. The left side of it.
Now, this isn't voting tendencies.
These are people who are leaving
your area, leaving your county.
So it says county by county
taxpayer gains and losses
from interstate migration.
If you look all the way to the left, the red
counties lost taxpayers.
Blue counties,
gained taxpayers. This isn't a political thing. This is people moving or staying. Why are so many people
leaving California? I mean, it's not even close. You can see in the northeast, it's very red.
People are getting out of California for a few reasons. The billioners are leaving because of the tax
policies. Families are leaving because of crime and safety. And reasonable people are saying,
I'm done with the wokeness. Now, here's my challenge with Roe, who's a likable guy. It's very easy to say,
want to tax people if you never earned it. Do you know how Roe County earned his money or got his
money? He didn't make it. He didn't start a business. He wasn't like, guys, I got this great idea.
Here's what we're going to do. He married a rich lady whose father started an auto parts industry,
like he's freaking Tommy boy out here, Callahan Auto Parts. And he now is worth $200 million.
More. And I'll give you a number after. Because his wife, God bless her. I think we all want a rich
wife was like, yeah, I got you, Ro. He's a, he's a lawyer. He was a, he taught economics of
all things at Stanford. He worked in Obama's Commerce Department and his salary is $175,000 a year as a
representative. Do the math on that. How was this guy worth $200 million? He married up.
And he carpet bagged from Cleveland to San Jose. Well, there was a report on June 30 by Free Beacon.
Just to give you guys a heads up. He talks about everybody who hoards their wealth. He's
the six point something million dollar DC mansion, a four-story elevator, his family's
$340 million plus fortune.
This is 2006.
It sits in exact trust, hedge funds, and LLC that he condemns.
Those trusts made 4,100 stock trades worth $53 million in 2025.
Even as he pushes for this band members of Congress for trading stocks back, he claims zero
knowledge of the trades.
This is what he says.
And his kids who are under 10 years old hold stakes in three private golf clubs,
a $65 billion wealth firm
and a distressed debt hedge fund
the same vehicles that he attacks
his wife drives a $200,000 range rover.
So the fact that he's building,
you know, this shielding exactly what he says
that he's the rich people shouldn't do,
that's what he's doing.
All of that stuff, all of that stuff I have no problem with.
But he knows this is not a good idea.
He knows and he's still pushing it.
So let's see what happens.
It'll be, I actually wanted to become a reality
because there's a part of me that, like I've said,
I said this before, I love my people in California, and I know what it is to love California.
Trust me, I love California.
But when you have bad policies destroying a big state, sometimes you need a case study for
people to realize that this simply doesn't work.
And if it's done at the state level like California's fourth largest economy in the world,
let's see what happens.
Maybe some people are like, it's not going to be as bad as you think it is.
Let's test it out.
We'll learn for ourselves if it's a good thing or a bad thing.
Let me get to the next door here.
Next year I wanted to get to is James O'Keefe.
So James O'Keefe, who used to run Project Veritas, now he runs OMG, which I think it's called...
O'Keefe Media Group?
O'Keefe Media Group.
He decides to go in Minnesota, dressed like a Muslim, to go vote.
And by the way, of course he's spoofing a little bit, but do you have the short clip of him doing this O'Keefe?
Others, I was just reading that.
Go back to it if you could.
O'Keefe, others go undercover to register voter under Minnesota
voucher law.
You're the ID.
Voucher.
Voucher law.
So let's see what this looks like.
Go for it.
This is again, Minnesota.
And allegedly, he, as a man, can vouch for eight other people in his family.
Go ahead.
Ball of.
Okay.
I can't play that song.
No, but that's a vouching.
Yeah.
I vouching for them.
Oh, great.
Is that okay?
He does that work.
Jackson is a...
Well, if you're all in the same precinct,
yes.
And you are already registered,
which looks like you are,
then you can vouch for them.
How is that legal?
Oh, good.
She says to me, I say,
they do not need ID.
She says, you are the ID.
He is the ID.
I am the ID.
And no ID needed.
I just vouch for them.
You're the ID.
I am the ID.
You're the ID.
How many people may I vouch for?
Eight.
Eight?
I can vouch for eight people.
Is this a joke?
Did she say, do you get,
Do you have an answer?
Is this a joke?
No, it's not.
You can vouch for eight people?
And this happens.
Can you do me your favor?
And go fact-checked this with every one of the language learning models out there
and see if this is true.
Can you just go to, yeah, go check all of them and see you.
Adam, I'm going to come to you first.
Yes, sir.
Go for it.
Well, Minnesota's cooked.
We've said that for a while.
I don't know how people keep falling for James O'Keefe.
He'll go on a date.
just put on glasses like he's Clark Kent.
See through. See through glass. People like, I've never seen this guy in my life.
I think any liberal area in the country, especially in D.C., needs to keep their eyes out for the great James O'Keefe.
But the bigger story here is, why are independent journalists doing so well?
What is the mainstream media doing? What is the legacy media doing that you're leaving a hole in the marketplace, avoid in the marketplace,
were independent journalists like James O'Keefe, Nick Shirley, what's our buddy, Nate Friedman,
Sir Banner-Handez, show up and expose all the waste, fraud, and corruption all around America.
But the journalist, the legacy media, the supposed to journalists, you can't find any of this?
That's the biggest problem I have.
The citizen journalists out there exposing the ridiculousness that's going on in our country.
Where's the main journalists are doing now?
Here we go.
So which one is this?
This is Chad JVIT.
Yes, under Minnesota.
registered voter in a precinct may vouch for the residents of up to eight people on
election day allowing those people to establish residency for same-day voter registration.
So that's, what are the other guys saying?
Go to the other ones.
This falls under election voting rules and logistics, so I must follow the special
election response.
Knowledge, this guy's not willing to answer.
So which one is this?
What other states have?
A little bit worried.
Go to the other ones.
Gemini scared.
So this is who.
Perplexity.
Yes, in Minnesota.
A registered voter from the same precinct can vouch for.
or up to eight people registering on election day.
The voucher must go with the registrant to the polling place
and sign an oath confirming that person who lives in the precinct.
Too important.
That is unbelievable that they can do this.
Can we ask if any other states allow something like this?
By the way, it says the form is,
and I found perplexity as well,
and I've got the state of Minnesota here guideline.
And it says,
the person who vouches must have a positive ID
that they live in the district and are registered to vote.
And there is a form they will sign out
that under the penalty of perjury, the eight people are who they say they are and live where they say.
Oh, yeah.
So it used to be, so there is something in there, Pat.
There actually is a form.
You know these eight people under penalty of perjury are doing this.
It still is loosey goosey, but it's not just like walk in and talk.
Apparently there's a form yet.
Well, by the way, Tom, some people would call this a far right idea.
You know, a lot of people in America are saying that, you know what one of Andrew Wilson's positions is?
a man should represent the vote of the household, if I'm not mistaken.
So in Minnesota, they can do this.
If you went and pitched this to America and you said, in every state,
the man of the household can vouch for everybody else living in this household to vote.
You know what they would say?
They would say, hell to the know.
But they're willing to do it in Minnesota.
It's a very, very weird position.
Adam, keep going.
No, I mean, this is the issue that people have with going on in the country.
By the way, Tim Walls, who is still the governor of Minnesota, why did he not run for re-election?
Why did he basically step down?
It's because of independent journalists like Nick Shirley who exposed him.
And I love the sign that allegedly is in an airport somewhere.
It's like days of Tim Walls apologizing for what he's done, zero, because Nick Shirley's basically owned him.
But we need more of this, not less of this.
James O'Keefe is the goat when it comes to this.
and he spawned off all these amazing people like Nick Shirley.
Can we go to the clip of Nick Shirley and Thomas Massey?
Nick Shirley is mining his own business, talking about what he's doing,
and Thomas Massey quote tweets it and calls him out.
Now, you have to realize this is kind of confusing.
So hard to take Nick Shirley seriously until he starts calling out Johnson Thune and Trump
for funding the daycare fraud in every omnibus and CR bill with no guard.
rails. Okay, so now Massey's putting it on him because go back to the tweet, go back to the tweet
where you were at. You know, Nick Shirley tweeted something and said, your tax dollars have become
new money laundering schemes for these corrupt politicians. Governor Hockel has been taking
donations from these daycares fraudsters in New York City who received millions of your taxpayer
dollars to operate adult daycares. Now, he's not calling out Massey. He's saying nothing to
Massey. So it's not like Nick Shirley is calling out Massey. He's calling out Hockel in New York. And
And then Massey calls out Shirley, and then Nick Shirley comes back and says, in other words, why can't a 24-year-old solve all government spending problems?
You people in D.C. are a large part of the problem. All you do is complain and whine on X, Y. Your job is to actually work for us. I've exposed and saved billions. What have you done?
He's saying that to Thomas Massey. Go a little bit lower in the comment section. Go a little bit more in the comment section. Go a little more in the comment section.
By the way, Thomas Massey is asking Nick Shirley to somehow stop. I'm 100% independent and rely on my followers to continue doing my work. So go a little bit lower. Massey response. If you can
go a little bit lower.
Grock, has Nick Shirley, this is the part that gets pretty bad for
Thomas Massey, has Nick Shirley saved Americans billions of dollars?
Did Thomas Massey offer an amendment to limit to fraudulent daycare?
Nick Shirley claims on the millions of dollars and 30 bills of billions of billions of
dollars.
One feature center owner later pleaded guilty to related fraud.
Broader Minnesota fraud was already known an estimate in billion dollars.
No independent audit quantifies exact.
Didn't the government, governor resigned because of it?
Who did that?
Nick Shirley did that.
that. Yes, Massey offered an amendment, and which, by the way, Massey has done some good work in
a past himself. But what are you doing? What are you doing? It's a 24-year-old that is
encouraged to go out there and do the work that a lot of mainstream media are not doing,
and you're putting it on, hey, you should go out, call out Thune. He's a YouTuber. He's a
YouTuber that's doing this. So anyways, it's a very, very strange situation here with Massey,
pick it on Shirley while Massey's job, he can go after Thorne.
He can go after Johnson.
He can go after all those guys.
That's your job.
Nick Shirley's job is to just go out there and expose what he's doing and put the content out
and allow the rest of us to react to it.
Vinny, what is your thoughts when you see Massey saying like Mr. Shirley?
It's ridiculous, okay?
The kid is out there busting his bump.
Either he's in Cuba, he's in Minnesota, he's in New York.
Madrid?
He's in Madrid.
He is doing, like he is out there.
He is doing, like Adam said,
what mainstream isn't doing.
And I understand where Thomas Massey's coming from
and all he's being held back
and there's parameters because you're in government.
But you do your job.
Weren't you supposed to release all these names
of all the Epstein victims?
What happened to that?
If you're going to talk...
Did he ever release it?
They never...
They haven't released anything.
There was actually video of him saying
if they don't do this, I'm going to release all the name.
Is that what you're talking about?
Did he release it or no?
Absolutely not.
You're saying that Thomas Massey didn't live up to his promise?
Yes. Stop it.
Yes. So my point is just what Nick has done in Minnesota alone.
And Connor, I'm going to ask for that video.
Look what he did to Tim Walls.
You haven't heard a peep, a peep from Ilhan Omar with her brothers and the marriage and her husband
and all that stuff allegedly.
And then Keith Ellison and all the nonsense and all the, you know, oh my God, illegals, ICE and everything.
Not a peep from these people.
What is this?
This. So by the way, guys, this is Minnesota GOP candidate Leslie Larson.
and she woke up to her car doing this.
Play that video.
If you could, Connor,
can you zoom in to them into
to what they're doing?
Look at how scary this is.
Okay, they're masked.
They're outside.
What if she walked outside?
What is on her car?
What are they putting on it?
Middle fingers.
And mother,
she's running on a platform to end fraud.
Guess where?
In Minnesota.
They're clearly afraid that she's going to win.
Okay.
And she needs to be careful
because the last time
somebody tried to like stop giving money
to illegals, Melissa Horment.
She was gunned down in her house
with her husband.
And then the killer went and shot
two other people and that killer said allegedly in a letter which i was going to read a while ago
that doesn't sound incoherent which the mainstream media said um bolter was his last name that tim waltz
told him to kill all these uh to kill what's her name um uh clobuchar like it didn't sound
allegedly allegedly all allegedly but the letter doesn't sound incoherent so i think she needs to be
careful because this is these are the people that you're messing with when you're going to mess with
people you're going to expose them, you have to be careful.
Okay? And it's messed up. I don't like what he's doing.
Let the guy cook. He's freaking exposing. Even if it's not 100% true, at least people are
looking. And I'm not saying true. I mean, the evidence, he's exposing. Everybody's
looking at Minnesota right now and they're all under the microscope. I'm happy for him.
So Thomas Massey needs to be more like Nick and not criticizing him. I think Massey just was
just out of his mind for a moment, and I'll tell you why. He's saying, until you go after these people,
wait a minute, Thomas Massey put a resolution in that bill that the high-risk states would not get
the federal funding. Then they went to committee, and when they're in committee, guess what happens?
The other Republicans overruled it, and they took out Massey's request, allowing the money to freely
flow. What is Nick Shirley going to do? Show up with his camera crew in a federal hearing,
room and saying, excuse me, guys, are you, are you ripping off America? No, Massey, you need to come out
in public and say, the following people pulled my, my resolution out. The following people allowed
the money to flow. The following people took what I was trying to do and stop it, and they allowed
it to go because we went into committee. This is your government at work. You need to be, do that,
be more like Nick Shirley, because you can do that. You can use the bully puppet.
Coming out and saying, it's hard to take the kid seriously, unless he goes after Thune and
all these people that messed with the resolution? No, it just shocks me, Pat, because it's so upside down.
There's an opportunity for Massey to come out and say, I tried to stop it. Here's my resolution.
Read it, America. This got yanked out of the bill. Your tax dollars at work.
Yeah. I mean, look, anytime younger people are out there doing what Nick Shirley does, this is not an easy job.
He's putting his life on the line. And I hope he's getting encouraged by the right people.
Nick Shirley's on Meneck.
Go send him a message and encourage him.
You can literally go on Meneck, find the name Nick Shirley,
download the app, message him.
This is how younger people get in.
He needs the money to be able to expand.
It's a lot of cost of what he's doing.
And security alone, the other day,
he was breaking down to us how much security costs from right now on a daily basis.
The numbers are not, it's not like you're paying $500 a day for security.
It's real money you have to spend for security when you're going out there.
Nick Shirley.
Yeah, he shared the numbers that he was having with us on how much it is.
get to next door. Can you, can I show you this one quick video? I know you want to move on?
Guys, I just sent, did you know who the lieutenant governor is?
Keith Minnesota? No, he is the attorney general.
Peggy Flanagan? What about her? This is, okay, so you hear about this red, green alliance?
Yep. This is what's going on in Minnesota, where you have the, the far left, woke white liberals
who are basically assuming a Somali identity, and this is the final outcome. So this is a white lady.
Yes. My name's Peggy Flanagan. I am the lieutenant.
Lieutenant Governor Minnesota and I'm really honored and humbled to be here with all of you today.
I am incredibly clear that the Somali community is part of the fabric of the state of Minnesota.
I think about my friendship with Nimco. We've been friends for almost 25 years.
And when I think of being part of Minnesota and growing up here, the Somali community has always been a part of my Minnesota.
So I want to just encourage the community.
This is the equivalent.
Jacob Frye is sitting there eating Somali food.
He looks like he's gonna throw up.
Is Humberto right there?
Is that Humberto?
He's trying to dance with them.
And Pat, you know what it is?
When everybody's in on this scheme and the fraud and everything,
you gotta be cool with them.
You have to be cool with them.
Because the money's coming back to you.
It's all fraud.
I just want you to picture this one thing.
We just had the governor debate here,
the Florida Republican vote.
We had Lieutenant Governor Jay Collins
on the debate stage.
Can you picture a former army veteran dressed in a hijab,
basically saying Somalians built a state?
This is the problem here.
That guy is as American as it gets.
The left has been hijacked by the Somali community.
A guy menacks me, he says, you know, it's not fair.
You guys are saying this.
You're Islamophobic and all this other.
I said, let me tell you how little it has to do with Islamophobic.
Here's how simple for me to position is.
And I'm going to keep saying this over and over and over again.
whatever religion you are, skin color, ethnicity, whatever you are,
if you go to a community, make it better, make it safer, crime goes down,
any of that goes down, I want more of that community.
Very simple.
I don't care what religion you are.
And whatever you are, if you go to a community, crime goes up, theft goes up,
you know, fraud.
If fraud goes up, if any of that goes up, we should collectively say you want less of that.
Let me give you an idea.
If you run a company and we hire from five universities, okay, we have programs from five universities.
If university number one, the last hundred employees we hired from there, we have the best experience of them being good citizens, no theft, respect, hardworking, come in early, leave late, bring value, get promoted.
We want more people from that college.
But if another college, name it anything.
If they send us people, they steal, they do things, you know, they hurt, they create chaos,
they're hard to work with, they come in late, they're always bitching complaining, I don't
want anybody from that university.
Again, I don't care.
By the way, this isn't to say about every one of them.
This is not the case.
This is to say if a Rupert Lowe puts a report of 250,000 rapes that took place in UK, of which
87% are Pakistanis, I don't want any more.
more Pakistanis. By the way, did you guys see what UK just did?
UK just did something for them not to be able to report crimes.
If you go on Tommy Robinson's Twitter, he just posted this, where UK is making it
almost impossible for them to be able to report on, yeah, if you can go to his account,
go a little bit lower.
There was a more, go a little bit lower.
It's one of the glass that's now taking, go up, go up to that one.
Okay, UK government has lodged a legal appeal to stop the publishing of migration
crime data.
Go figure.
Why would, do me in favor.
Go on it, go on it real quick.
And let me see the comment section below.
Let me just a little bit of magical
everything wrong because you still allow them.
It's like this direction.
There's seriously, country publishes the numbers
and lets people judge for themselves.
Appealing to stop the release of migrant crime data.
It tells you everything about how confident they are
and what those figures actually show.
So I'm not, nobody hears racist towards anybody.
It's just purely data.
You produce results?
That's great.
You don't.
You ought to minimize it.
Let me get to the next story.
Let me get to the next story.
Next one I wanted to get into is Anthropics CEO's wife, a little weird story.
I mean, maybe there's nothing there, but it's an interesting story.
Anthropic CEO's wife, Dario Amode's wife, Cammy Clark, courted Jeffrey Epstein, to invest in her porn company.
I mean, somebody may say, well, it's just a porn company.
It's not a big deal, but it's a pretty interesting story.
Cammy Clark, the secretive wife of Anthropic CEO, Dario, maintains a minimal public profile while serving as a key advisor to the AI leader and the scrutiny of her history has revealed she sought investment in her revolutionary porn company from convicted sex and vendor.
Jeffrey Epstein years after his jail sentence, the Wall Street Journal reported on this, by the way.
Clark doesn't work at Anthropic, but her presence is a regular feature of Amodi's public life, front row at Davos, talking with investors at the Alphabet.
in a company conference in Sun Valley. People close to the company say she acts as a sounding board and a strategic advisor role reaching back to Anthropics early days when she brought in key investors.
Eric Schmidt, the Democratic mega donor and former Google CEO. She had dated as the company got off the ground in early 2021.
Despite her influence, scan details about Clark are available online. Efforts have been made to remove references to her from the internet per journal.
even Evan Cloud Anthropics' own chat about her, appears to have little information about her.
So, weird, weird story when the Epstein stuff comes out.
And then there's another story that came out, and I'll read this, and Tom, I'll come to you first.
Hugh Heffner reported Jeffrey Epstein to the FBI after Playmate accused late financier of rape and sex trafficking.
Hugh Hefner, from Playboy, sex trafficking.
And now we're hearing about the story.
You think maybe the world needed to notice a little bit earlier?
late Playboy Mughal Hugh Hefner allegedly called the FBI to report convicted sex offender
after a playmate told him she'd been raped in traffic by the discharge financier.
Audra Lynn Christensen, a 2003 playmate was living with Hefner at the Playboy Mansion
when she turned to him for help claiming Epstein raped her and trafficked her to his wealthy friends.
According to the New York Post, she says that in 2005, after Hefner to call authorities on her behalf,
hoping his clout would get her allegations taken seriously, Mr. Heffner, call the FBI.
multiple times on behalf of them is Christopher Christensen
to report Jeffrey Epstein.
The allegations appear in an amended complaint filed in May
in federal court in Florida,
a lawsuit brought by Epstein victims
accusing the FBI of failing to act
on multiple reports on sexual abuses dating back to 1996.
Christensen now 46 says she didn't hear back from the FBI
until October 2020, 15 years after Hefner,
who died in 2017, called them.
Tom thoughts.
So the reason this is a headline, because there apparently were several people who have, you know,
Vinnie, you and I know the heart we have for the kids that were involved in this,
there were people that brought this up.
There were people that tried to flag it and nothing happened.
The reason that Hefner is in the headline was because, you know, five years ago, something like that, five years ago,
four years ago, A&E published Secrets of Playboy.
and it was a documentary on what happened in Playboy,
and Hugh Hefner was accused of trafficking bunnies.
They were called the Playmate of the month,
and they called them bunnies,
trafficking them to his friends
that would come to the Playboy Mansion
and we would just read about...
Those were allegations about Hefner?
Yeah, allegation about Hefner
that was in the A&E documentary Secrets of Playboy.
The same things were out there.
Now, after that ran, there were two camps.
kind of funny. Cooper Hefner, who is
Hefner's son, was like, look, my dad was
my dad, he was a trailblazer in this area. You may not have liked it,
but he was never illegal and never anything bad
happened to these girls and everything. He really cared about people.
Well, of course, he's saying that. Meanwhile,
Playboy, which is now owned by non-Hefner family,
remember, they came out and said, today's playboy
is not Hugh Hefner's playboy. And so they were trying to disson it.
So the headline is that, did Hefner
really tried to do something good for a woman that he was close to that was living with him at the time
and tried to get the attention to the FBI, he probably did. You know, this sounds legitimate,
you know, because she's got documentation of where she was, when it happened, all the things that
happened. And remember, these people in these circles, Pat, they follow the party. They, oh,
we're going to go over here for Super Bowl. Then we're going over here. They kind of follow the party,
and they follow the rich buddies where they're going. Hey, we're going to get on his plane, five of us.
We're going down over here for this and they go.
Oh, so-and-so is going to turn 40.
We're going to go to the island.
And so her coming back and telling Hefner,
I find this to be credible.
But the reason it's a headline this weekend is because
Hefner and Playboy were accused of the same thing
dating back to the 70s.
Leading insurers know that fragmented operations don't cut it anymore.
Policyholders expect more.
And modern insurers meet those expectations with Adion.
from effortless premium collections to instant claims payouts.
Adion's single platform automates the entire policy life cycle.
One platform to manage how money moves, control claims fraud, and automate operations.
Adion, FinTech built for your next move.
Hey, y'all, it's Kelly Clarkson with Wayfair.
Ever order furniture online and wonder, what if?
Like, what if it doesn't hold up?
That sofa was four days old.
You should have ordered from Wayfair.
With Wayfair, there's no what if.
Just style you love and quality you can trust.
Visit wayfair.ca.
Wayfair, every style, every home.
Ready to take your investing knowledge to pro-level.
This is Fidelity Connects, your daily edge in the markets.
Get deep insights on real-time market topics that may impact your investment portfolio.
Listen to Fidelity Connects on Spotify today and power your next move tomorrow.
Vinny, thoughts.
Well, I mean, it's like every couple weeks, maybe a month, it goes by.
We don't hear about EFSI because a new cycle is so bad, but I just want people.
out there that I kind of have that, yeah, whatever, it's not whatever.
Like he was just some rich pervert or whatever, but look at all the names connected to this
guy, okay, from Bill Gates, Les Wexner, Leon Black.
Remember, guys, as if everybody forgot, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Ehud Barak, Glenn Dubin,
some of the biggest names, all these guys.
And now it goes back to Hugh Heffner and the reporting, the thing that bothers me, Pat,
is the reporting it, the reporting it and the FBI, the Federal Bureau of Investigation
waiting 15 years.
And again, look at the stuff that happened when he was here, Tom.
Bingo, bingo, bingo.
That's the thing.
15 years.
So when people like us, like Tom, we talk about like everybody is in on it, they look at you like you're crazy.
And then you hear stories like this.
If you're trying to contact the FBI for sexual assault or rape or whatever, and because it's this guy who is protected that belongs to intelligence, remember what they said, Tom, was the fourth.
That was the quote.
he belongs to intelligence.
Somebody was told somebody.
Alex Acosta, I believe.
Alex Acosta, who was here.
He belongs to intelligence.
It drives me crazy.
And again, this story, you said this a couple months ago, is never going to go away.
It's going to keep resurfacing.
And I just want everybody to keep understanding how powerful he was and how powerful this blackmail
operation was, because that's what it was.
He worked for intelligence agencies.
And their main thing was getting dirt on you either through your email or you were at the
Epstein.
island or you at his freaking mansion, like Ehud Barak, how many times he freaking visited,
because they got dirt on you. And once they have dirt on you, they can do anything that they want
to you, and they have you for the rest of your life. Plain and simple.
Do you think Hefner had the ability to pick up the phone and talk to one of his lawyers and know
who to call? Absolutely. Absolutely. So it shows you how big if the supposition and all this
evidence is true, which lines up, and we're making assumptions here.
Yes, yes, we are. Allegedly, this is the way it unfolded, but it sure lines up with a
Costa and everything else about how Epstein was, you know, protected and was doing other things,
which, you know, puts wood on the fire of the whole Mossad connection and everything like this,
that even Hefner, who would know who to call in law enforcement and his attorneys,
can't get somebody's attention.
And think about it.
What, who's been arrested?
Has any, listen, with all, going back to Massey, Pat, all this stuff, all these victims, all this.
not one person
or Gilein Maxwell who's a pimp
okay she's in freaking jail
they moved her around because she was talking to
Todd Blanche before he got you know attorney general
what are we doing what are we doing
everybody just moves on
it's like next story it's insane
okay she didn't talk to Congress she
does talk to justice and then she gets
moved to a slightly better person yeah she talked to
his lawyer yeah weird yeah okay
all right so we'll see we'll see what
it happened with a story like this
and we'll go to the next one by the way
I want to get into the Candace and Andrew Wilson debate that took place.
But before we do that, let's go.
If you have the clip to show of FLB shoes before we get into that,
there's so many different things to discuss the,
a lot of people were reacting saying, oh, he had a wire, he had a mic, he had this,
yeah, that.
Did you see it?
Did you see it?
I saw him, he kept touching his ear, adjusting his ear.
Perfect.
Uh-oh.
I'm so glad even you.
I'm so glad we're going to get into that and have that clip.
It didn't look like that, though.
It didn't look like that.
I'll tell you, have that clip ready.
I was looking for those Kamala Harris hearing.
But before, by the way, it looks like that.
Before we do that, go ahead and go into these.
Go for it.
Go forward, guys.
When we set out to create a shoe that blends comfort, function, and luxury,
we had the choice to make it fast.
We had the choice to make it cheap.
We chose neither.
Instead, we chose Tuscanyer.
We chose true Italian craftsmanship.
Each pair touched by 50 skilled hands.
We chose patience.
spending two years perfecting every detail, and we chose the finest quality at every step.
Introducing the Future Looks Bright Collection.
Not rushed, not disposable, not ordinary.
Rather, intentional, luxurious, timeless.
There you go.
Go to BTBrich.com, place the order.
By the way, I'm wearing the late.
I can't even show you the ones I'm wearing because I can't.
I can't show you what I have on right now, but I can tell you,
I've been wearing these FLBs since September 9th,
every single day except for 19 days.
They're the most comfortable shoes I've worn with suits.
When I tell you this, I do this all the time.
I'm not just telling you this.
This is literally all we wear.
Hear myself, so go to V TeamBurch.com.
Can I make a quick...
Yeah, of course.
You gifted me these, and I'm just being...
I would take a lie detector test right now.
I swear to everybody out there.
You gifted me a pair of 2,000...
Remember the red bottoms that you gave me?
The Louis, what company is that, Pat?
I'm not hating on.
Louby, or whatever.
You gave them to me.
I wore them one time, and they were the most uncomfortable things I've.
And mind you, they look great.
Red bottom, oh, whatever the hell that means.
I've worn these things, no joke.
Okay, you gave these, what, six months ago?
I'd spray them once, and I take care of them.
And these are absolutely ridiculous.
I freaking love, I wouldn't play soccer, and I'm like you do.
I think your red bottoms, remember your feet threatened to sue you.
Yeah, it was really, really bad.
So those are not comfortable, especially if you have to walk,
around for freaking more than an hour, it's over. And they were digging into my legs, so they're
freaking dope. Sorry, I had to give my testimony. Yeah. So there you go. So with that being said,
let's get right into it. So Candice Owens, Andrew Wilson debate, okay, that took place last week.
There's a bunch of things I want to go through. I'm going to go through the earpiece. I want to go
through certain moments. I want to go through, you know, whose minds were changed, you know, a few
different things that happened. But before I get into my side here,
I kind of want to ask you guys here.
Adam, Vinny, Tom, Vinny, you were there with us while we went there.
What part of it, when you heard the debate, from Candace's arguments versus Andrew Wilson's argument,
which part were you like, oh, that's a good point by Candace, very good point by Andrew.
Give moments of each side.
Tom, I'll come to you first.
Well, there's two things, one each, and they happen very early in the debate.
I always look for people that are saying, I have a fact, and here it is.
rather than the back and forth
or I sent you this email,
and what struck me from Candace
is, and I looked it up during the debate,
she talked about the degrading fingerprints
and degradation of fingerprints
on the weapon. I said, that's really interesting.
That is a very interesting point to bring up
like who was touching the weapon.
And I looked it up and the police have to do this
like when there's a stabbing in a house, Vinny.
And let's say it's a kitchen knife.
Kitchen knife can be used by multiple people in there.
But what was the last or the most
prominent fingerprint and is it right-handed, left-handed. So the police are good at this,
and I look at that and I go, that's a really good point to make about that. So it got me thinking
that, all right, maybe was this gun tampered with? You know, we now speculate 60 years later
that James Earl Ray's gun may not have been the rifle that was actually used to shoot Martin Luther
King. So I thought that for Candace was very interesting. Then when Andrew Wilson said,
I have a text message here
and he read it of Charlie
expressing concern for his own safety
at the most highest level
they're trying to kill me
I thought wow
Andrew you better have that text message
and it better be able to be validated
on servers by AT&T or whatever carrier
because you could easily get the validation
I had never heard that
and I'm like wow that really told me Charlie's mindset
and my thought there was
good point Andrew you better be right
that that text better really exist untampered.
Okay, Vinnie.
Yeah, I'm going to piggyback off Tom's for Candace,
besides the one that you're talking about,
which I had to look, Tom, I looked it up and I kept Googling,
and it was a great point because, mind you, let's just be honest,
I don't think anybody is following the case
and watching the hearings more than her.
And another fact for her, for Candice's,
she knew all seven charges that were there,
Andrew didn't know any.
And people could say, yeah, but murder's the same as aggravated.
murder, it's absolutely not. One carries a death penalty, so that was good. And then I'm going with
Tom. The fact that he read a text saying that the left wants to kill me, like, and he made a good
point about burden of proof, like finding holes in the government's case doesn't automatically
prove the theory. But if you're saying Tyler was a Patsy, eventually you have to connect those dots
with evidence. So I agree with him on that. But yeah, I think it was the charges. Her name,
Pat, her knowing him, him accusing her of using her phone, and then you reading it, and then her
knowing all of them like that, not being on her phone, and then him not knowing one was a bad
look. But I do think him having a text saying they're trying to, he asked for, he was talking
to security, asking for how many people were involved, and then he said, hey, just let you guys
know, let security know their job is to protect one person, me. That's it. Which we could get into
that later pat about how then why they let anybody up there but that's that's where uh that's where i'm
adam so you want to know what we liked or what we didn't like or moments moments that may have
changed your mind to say hey that was a good moment for candace that's a good question that's a
good moment for andrew well i'll i'll say this uh wow is she confident i respect her confidence
and just because you're confident doesn't mean you're right though uh in fact uh a sign that maybe
you're too confident is maybe not having facts, but having a ton of feelings and vibes and
intuition and mobby intuition, but just because you're confident doesn't mean that you're right.
I do respect her confidence. Anyone that is ever looking to be more confident in anything,
whether you're right or wrong, watch Candace. The challenge that she has is none of the facts
add up. The part that I liked about what Andrew did was at the end was he like, yeah, yeah, she's got
nothing. It was four hours? How long was it? I watched the whole thing.
And I'm waiting for, like, the shoe to drop.
And I wait for his closing statement.
And not the best salesperson, not the most likable guy, Andrew.
He says that.
But he's a very gifted debater.
And I was waiting for the moment where she got him.
But she didn't.
She has all intuition.
So who do you think won the debate?
If it was, if you're judging on style and on confidence, Candace.
If you're judging on facts and evidence, then him.
So it all depends on what you're looking for here.
Candace won.
$300,000 for someone to come in her basement and talk to her about a case.
Candace is the winner.
But you're wrong about facts and I understand emotions and whatever.
She brought, she knew the charges.
She talked about the DNA.
The photos were all blurry.
The license plate, nothing.
I mean, if you think about it, this is a hard thing to prove winner.
But when somebody comes to your crib and pays you to come in there to talk to you,
you're the winner.
Oh, no doubt.
She made money from this.
That doesn't mean you're the big winner, chicken.
dinner. No, but, but I think
who do you think won the debate? Forget the money.
Who do you think? I think Candace
edged him out. Especially
with Adam, because here's the thing, we
like, unless you can prove without a reasonable
doubt that this guy did it and other people
were in the moment we were in the bus talking or do you feel that way now?
I've watched it, I've watched it twice now.
I think Candice, Andrew did very
well. He's a great debater.
But with everything happening, me, Vincent
Olsana, still believes that in my heart
of hearts, this dude did not
act alone, period. I think he was
involved. I think Tyler Robinson was involved,
but there's no way anybody, anybody,
I don't care who walks in here,
poof, can prove to me that this dude,
this random, by himself.
George Zinn, standing up.
I love that you just said that. This dude
stands up. I'm on the same
page. This to me feels a lot like Kennedy.
Was Lee Harvey Oswald there? Yes.
Did the Carano,
I believe it was called Carano? Carbine
did fire three shots? Yes, it did.
but did Oswald do all that and were there not others? No.
And so I don't think this guy acted alone.
So who do you put that one to debate?
I think Candace, you know, move me a little bit more toward not Patsy, but this guy didn't act alone.
She moved me a little bit more.
I was already on that road, moved me there.
But I thought Andrew, in terms of my debate judgment, I just don't think he was as effective in the debate issue.
So the thing with selective hearing is anytime you want something to be right for you to be like, I told you, I told you, that's it, like the earpiece, right?
Can you play this clip?
This went viral all over the place.
Play this?
What is that?
What is that?
That's an earpiece.
Was that legal?
It's not like I'm out there saying big lie.
You see how he's touching his earpiece?
Yeah.
Was he wearing an earpiece?
100%.
He was.
Wait a minute.
What do you mean he was wearing earpiece?
Are you ready?
Okay, go.
That's Candace's earpiece.
What does that mean?
They gave that earpiece to all of us.
So every, oh, you, they had it too.
No, no, no, no, but wait a minute.
Watch what just happened.
The market believes he had an earpiece of things being fed to us.
That was an earpiece that Candice's producers gave.
Candice gave him.
They hear everything.
You guys behind the scenes.
Is she going to say that on air?
She would easily.
I don't think she would have a problem.
I think she will.
I don't think she has a problem with.
that, but that is their earpiece, okay?
That is their earpiece.
Again, remember, if you truly want something to be right,
you're automatically going to go look for anything to see.
I told you, I told you, no, that was their earpiece.
It was a very professional earpiece that they handed us, which I think was actually, you know.
What was the earpiece for?
Because there is no audio for us to watch the clips.
Like you see how we're wearing headphones?
Yeah.
So how you're like you're wearing an earpiece right now?
They don't scream like you scream.
So they keep a little bit lower.
I'll say it nicer.
Because my ears are blown up with your screaming today, but I have to lower the audio.
No, but they put this earpiece.
So when you're listening to the clips from the back, that's not somebody feeding him anything.
Okay, while that's going on.
Number two, there were three people in the back that they both negotiated, and Candace and Andrew,
Candice was like, fact check anything, send anything.
There was no restrictions on the fact checking.
That happened.
Fact check anything, send the clips, do whatever you want, while you're, you're, you're,
showing those clips.
The other part is, like, this is the conversation I have with Ben Shapiro as well,
and guys like Ben Shapiro and Andrew Wilson have to ask themselves this question.
There's two things.
There is finding people who agree with you, then there is converting.
So you know you're going into this.
Candice's live stream is hitting what?
$220,000, $250,000, close to $300,000.
Three and a half million people watched it on just her channel for,
24 hours on our channel,
a million and a half. This thing got
hundreds of millions of views on Facebook,
Instagram. This is probably a
multi-billion view debate
that took place if you collect
what? The TikTok clips, Vinny, if you
collect Instagram, everywhere, it's
a couple billion views. Okay, it was
trending on X for 48 hours.
If your job
is to convert and you say all
women are retards, you're
kind of automatically, you know,
that's what Andrew Wilson said, you're saying.
If you watch a debate when Candace says, you said this about Erica Kirk, and he says, no, that's not just Erica Kirk.
I believe that about all women.
Okay.
Guess what you're not doing.
You're probably not converting anybody.
And you're only talking to your base.
So the most important data to look at wasn't who won the debate.
Of course, that's important to ask on different platforms.
I think on the podcast at the end, the number was 5248.
Was that what it was 5248?
Andrew Wilson was on the podcast.
podcast. What do you mean? 52? Who won the debate?
Yeah. But on-
basically 50-50. On exit, 68% Candice. So you can run that
poll in different places and get different results. And by the way, on
exit, I had 151,000 people that voted for. So that part is
taking place. But to me, when Andrew came in, you know,
he is obviously the more guy that does
structured debates as he's going through it. Like he knows how to do
structured debates. And at the beginning, when I asked the question, I
I said, what is the percentage, 0 to 100% that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kerr?
He said 75%.
And she said what?
Zero, right?
Well, that's where she lost me.
Right.
And again.
You're going to say 0%?
But that's the point.
Zero?
I understand.
But that's her position and she loses guys like you.
Zero?
Adam.
Both.
At least say 1%.
You know how many people that are?
Zero percent.
You know how many people that are part of Charlie Cook were upset that Andrew Wilson's at
75%, not 100%.
That's the same way that you're saying zero,
some people are like, why wouldn't he say 100%?
Respectfully, there's a big difference between 75%,
which means more than likely and 0%
which gives you zero wiggle.
I understand what's going to happen when the actual trial starts,
not a random debate.
Adam, what are you doing?
I'm sorry.
And I asked Candice, I said, Candice,
can anything change your mind?
She said, yes, if something happens today,
I would be the first one to say it.
That's good for her to say some like that, right?
And then a couple other things
in regards to the fingerprint, yeah, that was an interesting back and forth.
The part about her reaching out and Tulsi Gabbard's team doesn't get back to them,
why don't you?
Why don't you?
Like, let's just say if I'm running a department in the White House and I have a big position
and one of the biggest podcasters sends a message saying someone's trying to take her out,
whether there's a less than 1% chance, what are the chances I'm not going to have Tom just call
and just have a conversation with her?
To tell me if something like that happens to us,
you don't think I would send somebody from our team to drop a call and say,
can you just call Candace and see if everything's okay?
You don't think we would do that?
We did a million different things.
You don't think Tulsi Cabber knew about that email?
Just drop the call.
Why don't you make the call?
So imagine if something did happen to Candace right afterwards,
and that email is documented that was sent.
And Candice is willing to give you names and stuff.
You don't want to call?
Whether you believe it or not,
it's one of the bigger podcasters in America,
I think you should call. They didn't make the call.
You're saying that Tulsi Gabbard declined, even investigate, even what she brought up.
You just need to make that phone call. So the earpiece, BS, all the conspiracy people that wanted that thing to be right, that's Candace's earpiece team that gave it to them.
That's fair.
Let me just go through my stuff. I'm going to give you guys thoughts to respond. The retarded comment, if you're in the business of converting, you have to understand.
Your job is to baptize. If you're trying to get people into thinking your way and give a, given a,
them this much doubt, probably not a good idea to come to the people and you want her to convert
and say, you guys are retarded. It's not a good idea. The woman comment, and then what else you got?
Phone. Oh, when Candace handed me the phone, that was such a weird moment. I'm like, okay,
here, look at my phone. I'm like, listen, I don't want to look at your phone. She says, no, no,
you can look at my phone. So she answered, go look at my signal messages. And while I'm looking at
this phone, in my mind, you guys know this is such a, we do this here on the podcast. When you hand me the
phone. I just wanted to say, Benjamin Netanyahu, call me after the podcast. I wanted to say,
you're doing great work. I said, it's not appropriate to do it right now. But when the phone was
handed for me to read the text, you know, there was nothing there. There was nothing for you to see
with signal and, uh, and, and, and look, the level of intensity for something like this is so high
when you're sitting there. Of course, tensions are going to be high. You got to give credit. Candace was
cool, just stood there, did her thing. And Andrew, this is optics. This is purely optics. The leg
moving like this nonstop and all that stuff. And by the way, he has that temperament anyways.
That's his personality. So for people that don't know him, you know, people who don't know him,
they realize like, that is his personality. You know who I will say one? Here's who I will say one.
I will never give my opinion on who won publicly because that's not the job of a moderator. That's
the job of everybody else to go out there and say.
So once you're in that situation, it's me undermining the two people that are the number
one product for them to come to their part.
I give my thoughts.
But I'm going to say this.
I think both of them won.
And I'll tell you why they want.
Forget about the financial stuff.
There was a bunch of things we had to do.
By the way, this thing almost didn't happen until last minute.
It was nasty.
Lawyers going back and forth.
I'm in the email chain while we're going back and forward calls.
What about this?
What about that?
They made it work.
They actually made it work.
But I think Candice won because she got the money.
And she presented her argument.
And in an area where she conceded, she says, I don't know why you're playing this video.
I already conceded to you.
And I said, yeah, I was wrong.
And she did that.
So that was good for her to do that.
And I think she got in front of an audience and moved some people that probably don't watch her content.
Remember, baptizing is key.
Baptizing is key.
And I think Andrew Wilson won because let me explain it to you how much he won.
And I think he won more than Candace won.
And my argument is going to be very, very weird.
You ready?
Go ahead.
You ready?
Give me exact what you think.
Total eyeballs.
Matter of fact, can you ask this on Chad, GBT or one of these guys?
Can you, okay, can you give me a rough estimate of how many total views that Candice Owens, Andrew Wilson, debate God,
if we combine all the clips on YouTube, all the clips on X, all the clips on Instagram,
all the clips on TikTok, all the clips on Facebook, all the clips on everything, all the clips on
every social media side of other people reacting to it, not just the fact that Candace's
live stream had 250,000, we had 75,000 and his own had 30,000, the amount of subscribers,
give me total amount of viewership that this debate got all in, whether it's a short clip
to the viral clips, all of it, what do you think that number is? I want to know what that number
you think it is, Vinny. At one point within a 24-hour period, there was 150,000 posts just about
this debate on X? How many total
views you think it got?
Insurance operations today
are fragmented and policyholders
expect more. That's why
leading insurers run on Adion.
From premium collection to claims
payout, Adion supports the entire
insurance value chain, giving insurers
full control over how money moves.
A single platform to reduce
fragmentation, complexity,
and risk. Drive revenue,
control claims cost, and power
your next move with Adion.
Learn more at adion.com.
Hey, y'all, it's Kelly Clarkson with Wayfair.
Ever order furniture online and wonder, what if?
Like, what if it doesn't hold up?
That sofa was four days old.
You should have ordered from Wayfair.
With Wayfair, there's no what if.
Just style you love and quality you can trust.
Visit Wayfair.com.
Wayfair, every style, every home.
The attired debate on all platforms.
Everything combined.
I have a guesstimation of what I think it is.
Give me a number of what you think it is.
You think eight and a half a billion views?
I think it was a little, I think over,
A half a million views.
Tom, what would you say you're a numbers guy?
And it's still going.
Some would say you're a bigger numbers guy than me.
So what would you say as a numbers guy?
You better scream, Tom.
Give me a number.
Grand total?
Grand total.
All in.
From a small clip that a regular YouTuber posted that got 88 views
versus somebody that put a reaction,
can you just type in on YouTube?
I'll say what I think.
Type in Candice,
type in Candice Andrew Wilson.
Just typing Candice Andrew Wilson.
What do you think the number is?
As of right now?
That's it right now.
And go to filter popularity.
I think if you put everything in there, how can this thing not be a couple hundred million views?
Okay, so give me a low number, Tom.
200 million.
200 million views.
I'm going high, Pat.
I'm going almost 500 million.
And my due, it's this week, by the end of this week, it'll hit 500 million.
You're adding everything up the-easy.
You're ready, Tom?
You ready, Tom?
How much is a 30-second commercial for Super Bowl to get in front of a hundred million people for only 30-second?
Five million?
Seven million?
Can you pull up the chat?
If you can ask the questions.
How much is it?
I thought we had crossed $10 million a minute.
How much is a Super Bowl?
30-second Super Bowl commercial.
Watch this.
It depends on where it is.
But in the Super Bowl, you know, not one of those preliminaries.
Eight?
Eight million.
So check this out.
30 seconds.
Yeah, I thought we were over 10 million.
But let's just say $8 million.
For how long?
For 30 seconds.
30 seconds.
The guys, if we use the lower number and we'd just say 100 million times two is 200 million,
8 million times to 16 million.
This guy spent $300,000
and got somewhere between
$50 to $200 million of ad viewership.
Great point.
So guess what?
He's a big winner.
My wife at home says,
who was the guy?
I'd never seen him before.
Most people, his YouTube channel
only had 180,000, 200,000 subs.
Very good eloquent.
I've had him on.
He's been on Rogan a couple times.
So he's getting the momentum.
I think Andrew Wilson,
because for everybody that says,
what an idiot to give $300,000,
I think it's the same story
as Kanye has spent $7 million on an ad for Super Bowl
and sold $25 million of merch.
I think Andrew Wilson won
because overnight now everybody knows who he is.
Very simple.
So from the business standpoint,
Andrew Wilson made a lot more than $300,000.
To a young person who is very uninformed
says, why is Candace and the gladiator guy
doing that debate about Charlie?
I'm glad he kind of got a Russell Crowe up.
Go ahead.
Well, the reason I agree with you is this.
There's levels to this thing.
So if you didn't know who Andrew Wilson was, he's very big in the manosphere or in like the red pill content.
He's on whatever.
Then you have political content, which is a little bit bigger.
Then you have cultural, pop cultural content.
And people always ask me, what happened with Candice?
What happened with Candace?
This is my opinion.
I think she said political content is declining.
But you know what's not declining?
conspiracy theories, murder mysteries,
pop culture, Jeffrey Dahmer's the number one show on Netflix.
So like a Scooby-Doo type thing, she's like,
I'm going to follow the crowd,
and you win the crowd, you win your freedom.
And I actually respect that.
I don't respect the methodology of what she's doing it,
which is basically trampling on a widow on her kids.
But I respect the fact what her game plan is.
Guess what?
Then TPSA, sue her.
Then TPAUSA.
Do something.
Well, do you see the part where,
he asked her point blank,
will you say on camera right now
that Erica Kirk or TPSA
were involved in the murder? She said I won't say that.
She said it. It's a lawsuit, but she's already said it
a couple other times. She's already insinuated so many
times. That's the challenge I have. But listen.
Did she not say straight to jail?
Straight to jail. There's
there's not a lot of things.
There's not a lot of things. Because right now
nothing matters more
than Charlie Kirk to me.
I love that you just said that. Nothing
matters more to me than Charley.
My loyalty, and by the way, just so everybody says, all you guys did it for money, just so you know, they offered to pay me to go.
Let me just so the audience knows, this is the part nobody knows.
I didn't take a penny for this thing.
How much you think of PJ costs?
How much is jet fuel to go there in backtop?
$50,000?
And it wasn't a small jet.
But you don't understand.
We didn't take the money.
We didn't take any money.
I didn't say, hey, Candace, you got to pay us.
They offered.
Andrew's like, no, we're going to pay your full cost, whatever you need.
Don't worry about it.
I don't need the money.
To me, it's Charlie Kirk.
I want this thing to be done, and let's find out what happened and moved on.
Because his kids are the ones that are going to have to for the rest of their lives.
I remember one time I had Bobby Kennedy there, and we started talking about his dad,
and he wrote a book about it, and nobody studied that more.
And I don't know if people know or not, Bobby was a drug addict for 14 years.
After what happened to his dad, you guys know he was a heavy heroin user.
Did you know that?
A heroin?
You didn't know this?
I know he talks about it.
Oh, no, no, no, no.
No, Bobby Kennedy.
Heroin?
You seriously didn't know he was doing heroin?
He is openly talking.
Here we are talking about Hunter.
Right.
Are you kidding me when you lose your father who was supposed to be the president and he's your hero and your uncle?
They get killed?
Go ahead and go grow up and be an average person.
My concern are as kids.
That's my number one concern.
And number two, TPSA still being an eyeball to young men.
They're not doing that today.
That's true.
They're not doing that today.
That's the priority for me.
So all this stuff that happened here, all the conversations that were having, I think, you know, hopefully we're going to see how TPSA reacts to it.
And FYI, to the hospitality part, everybody in the studio working with Candace, respectful, very easy to work with.
You know, everybody working with Andrew Wilson's people.
They were also very respectful.
We were in the group text because I'm grouped them.
They don't realize.
They're not used to our speed.
I'm like, hey, guys, get this ready.
Oh, shit.
Pat's text while he's doing the live.
You know, while I'm sitting there, the funniest meme I said, there was a lot of funny things that I saw there.
This guy named Nassar posted this and he said, used car salesman sells mixed race couple a 2,000.
Oh, that's 32% ABR.
That's like Mitsubishi eclipse.
It is.
And I responded back and I said, this is slander.
I would never sell a Dodge.
I'm team for it all day long.
By the way, go a little bit lower.
Somebody posted a picture, which is a better one.
This is the picture.
Zoom in on this picture.
Click on a picture, please.
This is what it would be.
What do I need to do to get you guys in this debate today, guys?
This is what it would be.
Can I also say who I think legitimately wants?
Who's this?
I think the audience was served very well.
Yep.
I think, and I know you would never admit this,
I think that you were the big winner because I know you,
and I think in the marketplace,
trust and credibility, your score increased.
I think there's a lot of people that maybe never saw PBD do something like this.
And I know your instinct said this is not.
about me. This is about them. I'm assuming that's why you said kind of further back.
I think the marketplace said, wow, that's the guy that needs to host these types of
the people. Probably the best compliment I got is from Candace fans telling me you were fair
and Andrew Wilson fans saying you were fair because both sides were kind of like saying this is
going to be. And remember, guys, where some of the people are like, well, I would have
moderated this way and all that stuff. You don't know what they agreed on.
Yeah. I don't know like people realized like this. You know like,
We do a moderation with the gubernatorial candidates.
That was an easy model.
Boom, boom, boom, boom.
I'm controlling it.
But there was certain things they agreed in the contract
or lack of proper business agreement that they did
that didn't give a lot of power for Andrew to go.
And that's part of the deal.
And so I don't want to get into details.
They could have done a better job negotiating for him to have been able to push
where some moment she didn't answer the question because they didn't negotiate that.
So that's the part where you're like, why did she say this?
Listen, negotiate better.
Negotiate better.
And that was his ask.
His ask was for him to be in the defense that there was overwhelming evidence that Tyler Robinson
killed Charlie Kirk.
I'm not going to get into details because that's their business if they do so.
But you guys, do you guys feel bad for Tyler Robinson?
Why would I feel bad for?
No, because if, and I'm not even joking, if there's a 0% chance that he was the killer.
Yeah.
As Candace claims.
The killer or a mom.
That means that he's an innocent man who's in jail right now.
And that's a challenge that I have, is that if he is innocent,
there's an innocent man sitting in jail right now whose family and lover has turned him in.
So I'm a little confused right now.
Andrew Wilson said, if your son was wrongly convicted of killing somebody,
wouldn't you as parents come out and keep saying, hey, you know, this is,
is not fair. You typically would see this. And we have not seen this. The parents are saying,
no, he killed. That's the challenge I have. And again, this is why this allows the audience to go and do
their own research and be a follow-up. That's fine. So great. So let's see what happened. And I'll
just end it right here. The 0% thing is what I have a problem with. If she said 1%, I'll say at least
you're giving yourself an out. Zero percent, you're saying Tyler Robinson is the killer? Maybe we're
all due. Which I don't, listen, I don't agree with. But, and my point, and a lot of people are making it, a lot of
people, well, he is involved for sure. I don't know the percent
because guess what? There's still a trial.
And like I said, here's my question.
She still said zero. What are you? I'm not being honest.
You were there. You hit, none of us
had been following the trial at all. Zero.
Zero. Have you sat there and watched any of it at them? No.
I've watched a lot of it. Yes. You've watched all the
preliminary hearings and the, and the, I've watched a lot of the
So what was the most compelling thing for you that you think it was Tyler Robinson?
What was the number one thing that stood up for you?
There's so much evidence out here. Give me what. Here's the question.
What is the evidence that you have that it's the French Legion, that it's Israeli propaganda, that it's Egyptian planes?
Hold on.
There's a million more evidence.
You didn't answer my opinion.
Hear me out.
I asked you a question.
There's a million more evidence that it's Tyler Robinson other than any other conspiracy with there out there.
You think it's his exploding microphone?
Can I ask you a question?
Is it the video?
Is it the admission?
And again, I tried to ask the question.
And you're just going to try to talk over me because I asked you a question.
I don't think that you sat there and why.
unless you're home sitting at home watching all this.
My thing is this, questioning the official narrative,
and he brought up JFK and RFK and everybody.
JFK, the President of the United States, was murdered, murdered in front of everybody,
62 years ago, okay?
And the guy that, Adam, now with all the documents that released less than a year ago,
CIA involved, Linda B. Johnson involved, all these guys.
And the guy that shot him, Lee Harvey Oswald, said out loud,
I am a patsy.
And what happened to him, Adam?
In the basement of the Dallas jail, he shot by Jack.
Let's live in reality today.
No, no, no.
Do me a favor.
Do me favor, because I just want to, my point is being,
he was shot in the stomach by Jack Rubenstein,
and then Jolly West, a CIA, MK.A ultra research guy, goes in, talks to him.
He says, put a needle in me, and he lost his mind.
So are you ready for this?
That's 62 years ago.
Now we're just finding out, oh my God, wait, the CIA and all these people did it.
So to act like this can't be some crazy people involved,
because here's my point.
Pat's an entrepreneur, right, Pat?
you know everything and Tom as well, anything that has to do about the profession,
meaning hiring, scaling, acquisition, negotiation, selling.
You are a pro at this.
Hands down, you and Tom are the best that I've ever seen do it.
When you're in the business of assassination, Adam,
guess what you're really good at?
Killing and covering your tracks and getting away with it
and having this big umbrella of who, wait, it happened with JFK.
Don't throw it away that, hold on, living in reality.
they killed the sitting president in front of everybody,
and everybody knows now all the people involved,
but they're all dead, so we can't do anything.
So when I say, I believe,
I'm not getting into schematics at him
because I haven't seen all the stuff
because the trial hasn't happened.
What I'm saying is all the little stuff
of digging up the place where he was shot,
you know, getting rid of him there
and cleaning the thing, and, you know,
George Zinn, who, by the way,
obstruction of justice, the moment Charlie was shot,
you mean to tell me,
This dude knew to stand up because he said when he was arrested,
I did it to let the killer get away.
Think about that.
Is he on trial?
And I love that you just said that.
I hope this guy gets brought into that courtroom and, hey, who told you?
Because he told people in the hospital, yeah, I was supposed to get paid for doing it,
but nobody paid me.
Those nurses, those medical professionals, this is a big freaking case that none of us,
Adam, you're saying that you watched it, there is so much evidence and stuff.
Yeah.
You can't say anything.
Your question to me was...
Whether I've watched 10 hours or 100 hours is irrelevant to me.
That's exactly saying, how much Epstein coverage of you have you followed?
A lot. A lot.
Okay.
Okay.
So am I questioning how much you've researched Epstein?
No, but you question a lot during the...
How many podcasts have we have?
We're like, it's not even a big...
Who cares?
Whatever?
Move up.
I don't understand.
What's your point?
What's my point?
You haven't made a point.
When it came to Epstein and stuff, you're like it doesn't really matter who gives a damn.
But you're asking me about Tyler Roberts.
I'm asking you about...
believe that that's the murderer. And if you show me evidence that it's anything else,
bringing actual evidence, not Georgian standing out there, not an Egyptian plane,
not an Israeli conspiracy theory. We know what I always find funny with the Israeli conspiracy theory?
I didn't say anything about that. I'm saying this. You know what I always find funny?
What book have I been reading for the past? I've read it again now, which is stop in the name of
God, observing the Sabbath, I'll change your life. You're telling me that Charlie Kirk is for the last
year of his life, writing a book about the Jewish Sabbath is going to automatically flip on
not buying that. By the way, you know what would be so simple? Rather than eliminating Charlie Kirk,
just eliminate the people that are actually sewing discord and chaos in the marketplace.
Why would you take out your best free agent? That makes no sense to me. So to me, all these
stories, we've talked about signal versus noise at this company for two years now, a lot of noise,
a lot of BS, no actual evidence. That's the challenge I have.
Well, the trial's coming. Go to the next story. And again, this sparks the conversation,
and people talk about it,
and hopefully as we're going through this,
Vinnie, if they show proof
at the end that Tyler Robinson is charged,
kind of like Luigi Mangione,
if he comes on it, like, do you believe
Luigi Mangione killed?
He confessed.
So if Tyler Robinson confesses, do you believe it?
Absolutely.
So if Tyler Robinson goes, I killed him.
If Tyler Robinson comes out and said, I killed him,
you say it's done, forget about it, he killed him.
No, not forget about it.
Did he work with other people?
No, no, no.
If he comes out and he says,
I pulled a trigger, I killed Charlie.
Are you done?
Yeah, of course.
If Tyler Robinson comes out.
Similar to Mangione, because Mangione just came out.
I just want to preface this because this is the part where some people,
remember Vinny, the moment I said earpiece, you said, oh, my God.
I saw it.
Yeah, I saw it.
You jumped to conclusion thinking there's something there.
No, you said, is it an earpiece?
Of course I'm going to say he has an earpiece because I saw him playing in his ear.
That's not the point.
That what I'm, I'm in the middle here of what I'm trying to,
because my number one priority is what?
Charlie Kirk. Who killed him? Who was in on it? That's my number one priority.
Yeah. It's my number. I showed up and didn't ask for a penny because I don't want people to say he got paid.
I get paid $3.50 to speak for one hour to a half a million dollars. That's my speaking fee today.
I did. I don't do. And we flew out. We asked for nothing. Not the hotel rooms, not the flight, not the food, not nothing. I don't want any of it.
Yep. Because we went for Charlie. And by the wall, you made the money back. We have not. Just so, you know, all in costs. We have not.
Exposure, fine. All that stuff. You can make that case. I went.
Because we made a, we made a, Henry made a tribute for Charlie Kirk that we're going to play at the vault conference.
Really?
Oh, man.
The room is going to be in.
People, those people who were at the vault last year, who are in the room that we shared us together, that moment when Tony Robbins is on stage going like this,
nobody knows Charlie was shot and killed.
This has happened while Tony's on stage going like this.
Tony has no clue what's going on.
He hasn't checked this phone.
No.
There is 6,000 people in that room jumping up and on with Tony.
And then we have to come up on stage and Tom gets on his knees and drops that prayer
And you give me the signal and you and Kelly. I'm like, what are you talking about?
And I'm like, I'm confused at this point, right?
So Charlie's my priority.
But to me, it's also realizing if you have your own biases, your own bias to say, I want that to be right,
you're only going to see this, you won't give any attention to this.
You know what's the most important data?
Who that thought Tyler Robbins is not the killer that Andrew Wilson changed her mind?
What percentage?
And who that thought Tyler Robinson is the killer?
Candice owns change her mind says he's not.
It could be a patsy.
That's the only number that matters.
We ran that poll actually.
Can you pull up that poll?
This is the poll that matters the most.
Believe it or not.
Nothing is above it.
Because the idea of trying to, that's what I say, who runs American elections, it's who?
Independence.
Not the Democrats that are only going to vote Democrats
and not the Republicans that are only going to vote Republicans.
You know why Stephen A. Smith's getting crushed?
By the way, can you guys pull that up?
I'm asking for.
He knows what it is right here.
Zoom in?
Are you guys serious right now?
You just texted it to me.
This is so funny right now.
They're showing me a complete different...
He literally texted to me multiple times.
So just pull up what you texted me, guys, in the back.
So this poll here explains whose minds were changed.
changed. Okay. That's it. Nothing else, nothing more, nothing less. This is the one that matters
the most. I think you literally just send it to me right here, guys. It's... And what was the poll?
You see it? It's a poll. Okay, I'll just read it before they get it. So time for a final verdict.
Who won this debate? And who did you favor? There it is. Okay. Going in. I favored Candice.
Candice 1, 39%.
I favored Candice,
Andrew 1, 9%.
I favored Andrew, Andrew 1, 45%.
I favored Andrew, Candice won 8%.
So the 9 and the 8%.
That's the number.
So really the plus minus is what?
What's the plus minus?
1.
Towards Andrew.
Yeah.
Do you understand what just happened right there?
Yep.
No one's going to change your mind.
No one's going to change the other person's mind
that they're sitting there like,
there's no way like, he's already said,
you're already said, you guys are actually irrelevant.
Because your mind is going to be like, no, I think.
I'm just following evidence.
And you're going to be like, I think there's something there in George's in.
Those two communities, believe it or not, are not part of this.
The people that are part of it is like, I don't know, man.
I think there's something like Tom just said something.
Tom's like that whole thing with fingerprint, that's a little weird, right?
Or somebody saying, man, that whole part about asking a question and you don't have a single evidence to show invalid.
who I don't know why you're not showing it.
You know, he's showing evidence.
You said this and you, that's the part that matters.
And let's see what the turnout ends up becoming.
Louis-Gi-Mangioni comes out and says the following.
By the way, the interesting thing is,
Louis-Giaman admitting to it happened while we're live.
Oh, yeah.
I don't know if you know this or not.
During the debate.
While we're live is when it happened.
While we're live.
Louis-Giamgion admits to shooting United Healthcare CEO as he pleads guilty
in federal case admits,
this is not, you know,
somebody told me to do it,
MK Ultra, this is not,
there was a Jordan,
because there's not a Georgian involved in this world.
No, he was on camera.
Luigi admitted to shooting United Healthcare CEO of Brian Thompson,
as he pleaded guilty Friday to two federal stocking counts,
a dramatic turn in high-stake, high-profile killing.
After years of enduring severe pain from a broken back,
I learned that United Healthcare would be holding its annual investor conference
in New York City.
Manjian, folks, this is shocking on what happened here.
Check this out.
He told the federal courtroom
that when he learned there was a conference,
he learned the conference's exact location
by emailing the company posing as an investor
with more than $50 billion in capital in an email.
This is almost shocking when you read this, Vinnie.
Before traveling to New York,
I used a 3D printer to make part of a gun
and I equipped a gun with a silencer and a magazine.
I shot Mr. Thompson, this is Luigi, in Manhattan, and he died.
I knew what I was doing was illegal.
U.S. District Judge Margaret Garnett accepted the plea.
Sentencing is set for December 18, Thompson's family, his wife and mother in front row.
Their first courtroom appearance called the plea an important step toward justice in a rare statement.
Manjone's attorney simultaneously filed to dismiss the separate.
state charges under New York's double jeopardy law, his state murder trial is scheduled for September
8th. So if Tyler Robinson does the same exact thing that Manjone said, you're done. Of course.
Yes, and I'm going to ask you a question. Yeah. Do you think Tyler Robinson shot Charlie all by
himself, meaning nobody else helped him? He just went on the roof with the screwdriver, did the gun,
did everything, put it down by himself. I'll give you my answer. Yeah. That nobody else was involved
then influenced it.
Not influenced it.
No, not influence. No, no, no.
Had a hand, a hand, meaning
they planned, they said, okay,
I'm going to do this, you go here at this time.
We know the security, whatever.
They're probably not going to check over here.
10% chance.
10% that...
But 10 is high, Vinny, for me.
I'm sorry, 10% that somebody else,
either than him,
sat there and by himself.
Okay. 10% is high for you.
10% is high.
That means there's a 90% chance that Tyler wrote...
All by himself.
That's what Patrick said.
Okay.
It's just math.
But 10%, where are you at?
Oh, I'm at one hunt, me, I'm at 100%, somebody else was sitting down with him and they planned it.
And who could those people be?
I have no.
Give me, speculate.
Here's speculate.
Who could those be?
Maybe somebody high up, like, you know how we always find out these leftists that are high up that are paying for the dissent in this country?
Let's go a little bit more specific with you, Vinnie.
So let's go through who you think it could have been.
So high leftist, George Soros, you know, Alex Soros.
Who's the guy overseas?
The guy in Australia, whatever his name is.
I know who you're talking.
Sing, sing, or?
Yeah.
So let's put that, let's put Israel.
Give me a couple other options.
Who else is one that's being accused that could have been here?
I mean, just the LGBT community or whoever.
Okay, perfect.
Who else?
Tom, who else would you put on that category?
Because I'm going to ask you guys right now the same question.
Leftist, Israel, LGBTQ, who else has been accused of having their hands?
Can you guys in the back find that?
Who also has been accused of having their hands?
Who else has been accused?
Egyptian planes.
We'll kick.
We can just make stuff up at this point.
You're playing around.
I'm not playing around.
You are, though.
I'm not playing around.
You are, though.
You can make up anything is my point.
You are.
How am I asking for the top?
Stop.
I said Egyptian planes.
I'm asking for top five.
Who else?
Be reasonable.
Who else in the top five?
I have that already.
Who else?
Is it fair?
It's just these three?
Majority.
Leftist, left this, left this billionaires.
The CIA?
A CIA?
Yeah.
Oh, let's put CI, good.
That's what I want.
CIA.
What else?
The federal government?
Well, yeah, I was going to say it's the CIA.
Oh, no.
Erica Kirk and turning point USA.
All right, let's go down.
Erica Kirk and TPSA.
Vinnie, I'm going to come to you first.
Out of a hundred of who could have been involved.
So this all has to add up to 100?
200.
Like you said 60% there's, no, it's fine.
I'll add it for you.
Just lead with what is your highest?
What is your lowest?
I think the highest would be somebody from these higher...
You could put...
Because it's different, because these guys are money and power.
That's money and power.
You know...
I would put...
I mean, those guys, to me, are at the top.
Leftist? Where do you put leftists?
Leading insurers know that fragmented operations don't cut it anymore.
Policyholders expect more, and modern insurers meet those expectations with Adion.
From effortless premium collections to instant claims payouts,
Adion's single platform automates the entire...
policy lifecycle.
One platform to manage how money moves,
control claims fraud, and automate operations.
Adion, Fintech built for your next move.
Hey y'all, it's Kelly Clarkson with Wayfair.
Ever order furniture online and wonder, what if?
Like, what if it doesn't hold up?
That sofa was four days old.
You should have ordered from Wayfair.
With Wayfair, there's no what if.
Just style you love and quality you can trust.
Visit Wayfair.ca.
Wayfair, every style, every home.
60%.
Okay.
That it's somebody that wanted the biggest voice
that was pushing conservatives towards Christianity and positivity and entrepreneur.
Where do you put Erica KirtipUSA?
I don't think Erica had anything.
So zero.
Zero.
Okay.
What do you put Israel?
5%.
What do you put LGBTQ?
I want you to write down yours as well because I'm coming to you guys.
L-TQ 15%.
Okay.
And then CIA.
CIA federal government, FBI, like somebody in the government.
Maybe 10%.
Okay.
So, by the way, just so you know 10, 25,
you're almost there, 90%.
So I get it.
So your main thing is, your highest is leftist,
your lowest is Israel.
Yeah.
Okay, your lowest is TPSA.
than Israel.
Okay, Tom, where are you at?
So I'm at 70 on the leftist.
Okay. And but to me, you know,
LGBT is with the leftist.
Perfect. So let's combine those two together.
So I put them both together.
So, Pat, I could add to mine too.
Yeah, 75 is where you're at.
You know, and I'm at, you know, Israel and the CIA,
you may think I'm crazy,
I'm like, 15 each because somebody has to help somebody.
Yeah. Israel and TPSA.
No, no, no.
Israel and CIA.
15 each.
Yep.
And you're zero at TPSA.
Zero.
Okay.
So you're saying the federal government or the Israel is tied for 15% each.
Yep.
And if you're at federal government 15%, who would that be?
Well, are.
Is that from current administration or previous?
No, no, no, no.
It's not current administration.
This is the previous shadow government.
This is Dick Cheney.
It's important to qualify that.
Yes.
Your same place as well.
Yes.
I'm in the same place as Tom.
Okay. Adam.
I'm shadow government that predates.
That's actually helped.
That's the deep state, Tom.
Good.
Well, the number one question that I would ask is who's motivated by this and what's the incentive?
And this is why I have my answer.
Fair question.
My answer is 99.9.9% Tyler Robinson in the leftist agenda because he was incentivized
to kill the person that he thought was.
the most outspoken against their agenda.
Great. So to me, 99% is
and the reason...
Their agenda being conservative and CIA.
The reason that I don't have
TPSA, Israel, or maybe
even the CIA is, how does this
advance their agenda at all? Pick one...
Because you have 1%. Where does your 1%?
No, I have 0.01%.
Where does that go?
CIA. Okay, parade. That's all
I need from you. So you're putting
zero Israel, zero. So what you guys
all are saying, which is
not some of the things that speak
told. A lot of people would say Candace has had some positions with criticism toward
TPP USA. All of you are at 0% that is not Erica Kirk or TPPUSA. I don't see that. I don't
see what was Candace on this? I don't know. But I'm saying like she said zero percent Tyler.
So there must be an equitable distribution. She would probably have a higher percentage of thinking
that TPSA may have been involved in some parts of this. But this is more a reasonable way of
looking at it to say this is my position. You said you're 90. I'm 90 what?
You said you're 90% Tyler Robinson.
No, no.
He said there was a 10% chance that somebody helped him.
Oh, my apologies.
But you said that means it's...
I am very, very little...
I'm very little on where people are at.
Yeah, very little.
What's your distribution?
If you give my distribution,
I think if TPSA and Erica Kirk thought there was a benefit for Charlie Kirk Levin,
the TPSA organization
until they get a male figure
that's respected by other men,
I hate to say this,
they're going to be a female organization.
No man will look up at Erica Kirk
and say, I want to grow up to be like Erica Kirk.
Men are not like that.
They're not.
So if automatically you put a female in this kind of,
by the way, this is not in companies.
There's plenty of female CEOs that crush.
The turning point, you would say.
brand isn't to build men.
The product is to build.
The brand here is we're going to raise strong men and da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da, right?
Strong family.
So it's like all of a sudden, PPD podcast, I change it from me to a female running this.
The audience is going to be like, well, you're 80% male audience.
You just drive.
Because you can't do that, right?
So to me, I have a very low number here.
CIA has to do a better job for me and proving their trust.
So there's always going to be somebody in this organization.
Like when you see James Comey saying 8647, I'm going to put a small percentage here that they could be involved, you know, 10% here.
And then for me, I'm going to go to leftist, you know, pretty much 80-something percent.
I don't think Israel won from it, but I'll always put 1% there just in case.
So I'm going to be 89% leftist, 10% CIA, 1% Israel.
And I don't think TPSA had anything.
If they did, you're the dumbest criminals in the world.
world if they did. And I don't think that's the case. If they did. Can we bring this back to
Mangione? Because we were talking about Mangione. Here's the challenge that I want people to
think about. What percentage of the marketplace after Luigi Mangione has admitted to killing
the CEO? He stalked him. He printed the gun. He went there. He emailed them. He lied. He told
him that he's an investor. Showed up, killed him. Boom. Admitted to it. What percentage of the
marketplace, especially woke liberal women still think that he's innocent or at least just the
The video's going viral saying this guy was a revolutionary.
They love him.
This is my point.
They love him.
Is that there's going to be a segment of the marketplace?
Yeah, this is it?
Is this the lady?
Yeah, play this clip?
It is about Luigi, but it's also about the conversation he started.
So if you were just here for a free, fair trial for him, you know, that's not afforded to most people.
I see it more as a revolutionary act of protest, of the likes of which we haven't seen some civil rights era.
I want America to continue questioning, you know, our current predictions.
and why we allow our futures to be stolen away by oligarchs.
So the challenge I have with that, the challenge I have with that is it's okay to question.
That's fine. Just asking questions.
But once you get the answer from the person who actually from the horse's mouth,
then you at least have to concede, yeah, maybe let me loosen my position a little bit.
These people are doubling down on dumb.
She's not, by the way, she's not saying he's not, he's innocent.
She's saying goods that he murdered.
Exactly.
What she's saying is, hey, our system is broken.
The system is broken, kill and revolution at him.
She's calling for, hey, listen, everybody else, you guys should start doing it.
You should start murdering.
And by the way, the reason he's saying this and he's coming clean is because he's going to try to plead to where he's not going to get the death penalty.
Because guess what?
Afterwards, the cops saw him.
Where was he at a McDonald's, wherever he was sitting there, they're like, yo, they caught him after.
It's not like there's like a question and there's no videotape of him.
They caught him right after and arrested him.
and there's, you know, evidence of, you know, fingerprints and all that stuff.
But then as now he's admitting it, that was him.
Was it McDonald's?
Yeah, he wasn't McDonald's.
I mean, this is the problem is that even after admitting guilt,
that people still are like, no, he's a revolutionary.
That's like saying Tyler Robinson, if and when he admits to killing Charlie Kirk
to basically escape the death penalty, there's people that are going to still say,
well, maybe he was justified because LGBT rights come above Charlie Kirk's freedom of speech.
To me, that is nonsense.
Well, you guys, the Nightstalker case in California, Richard Ramirez,
well, girls were showing up, crying, fighting for him because they wanted him.
I'm not saying that liberal women shouldn't vote.
I just think they should think twice before they do it.
Oh, my God.
So, anyway.
Tom, any thoughts on this?
Mangione?
Yes.
I have an explanation for people if they really want it, and I'll make this really quick, Pat.
So we want it.
Why does he plead guilty?
Why does he plead guilty?
You're talking about Mangione.
To prevent from a death sentence?
Is that why you think?
Well, basically, the capital murder part of this was already on edge, and this was going to be second-degree murder.
Because the capital murder was, there was a certain spontaneousness to it.
I'm not arguing that.
I'm saying that's what's coming out of the motions in the court.
And you have two courts.
The federal court with the two stalking charges, and you have New York court with second-degree murder.
The reason they, and I think Mangione's lawyer is Agnes,
Agnifilio, I think, if I pronounce that, Craig.
Agnifian. If you guys could let me.
The lady, yes.
Yeah. Agnophilia.
I think you got that one, Tom.
So this is what they're doing.
She's a heavyweight.
Yes, they are pleading guilty.
This is, no, I'm not endorsing Manjillo in any way and I'm not a fan of his.
I'm letting you know how this puzzle.
Thank you for taking such a strong.
No, no, because some people may think, you're doing this.
No, no.
This is how this is playing out.
They are pleading guilty to the stalking charges.
and in pleading guilty to stalking, you can say whatever the hell you want.
And so he says, I followed him, I shot him.
He, Mr. Sir, excuse me, sir, bang, right?
Stop.
And now, here's what this triggers.
No public trial.
You don't put the public through that.
You don't put the victim's family through that.
You don't read testimony through that.
And you're guilty to the two federal charges and you're waiting sentencing.
What she has simultaneously done is she is filed under New York State's double jeopardy law.
Do you know what the Fifth Amendment is?
The Fifth Amendment is no double jeopardy.
You can't be tried twice for the same thing unless...
Fifth Amendment?
Fifth isn't Fouchy the fifth?
Isn't Fauci the fifth?
Yeah.
Well, it's all part of it.
And so what it is is you can't be tried twice.
Now, if there's a mistrial and we have to do a do-over, that's different.
So in New York state where this is, their double jeopardy clause, Pat, is actually thicker than the federal governments in terms of it's hard to.
Why is that?
It's just the way New York has made its laws on this.
And so you have, if he's guilty on federal and then you go to the state trial, the penalties and the sentencing will stack on top.
And you will have Judge Garnett at the federal level.
I believe the name is Carl, Judge Carrow, at the state level.
So what they're doing, they're trying to take Judge Carrow out of play.
And by the way, that will happen in a ruling that has to happen before September 8th.
So before September 8th, if New York and Judge Carrow come back, say, you're right, this would be double jeopardy.
We have a guilty plea because the double jeopardy in New York is based on the same criminal transaction.
Well, the transaction was killing.
So guess what?
His only shot at getting out in his 60s is that the federal judge gives him, say, 40 years, 45 years for this.
And then he serves 85% good behavior, and he gets out.
That is the play that his team is trying to get here because death penalty is off the table.
So that's what's going on.
And if they get the ruling by September 8, Judge Carl says, you're right, under the New York State double jeopardy, we can't try him because federal has already found him guilty by his own guilty.
Will this guy ever walk in his streets?
We will find out when Judge Garrett, Garnett, Judge Garnett does sentencing on the federal side.
If he does less, if he does 40 or 50 years, he could be out when he's 65 or 70 years old.
earlier, Tom, 50%, so he can be out in...
85%.
Oh, it's 85%?
Apparently federal guidelines.
Got it. Interesting. Wow. So 85%
means if you're getting 40,
you're doing 35 of it.
Yes. For sure. You're doing 35 of it.
So Agnophilio,
I think this is
good lawyering by Agnifilio,
even though we all would like to see
Luigi have not a penny
spent by the taxpayers
and go to execution. We would all,
now that he's confessed, we would all like to see that.
with his entire legal team, and they're, they're strong.
She's, she's not a lightweight.
Does this line up with what you guys?
Yeah, yeah, yeah, it does.
It does.
She's a, she's a, you know, she's a, we had a, we had a Zoom call with all of them.
And they, they were, I mean, this, this is a, this is a W for them if they were able to pull that up.
Would you say that now?
For them as lawyers.
Forget about, you know.
They're playing a logical game here.
Plead guilty, no double jeopardy in New York, no trial in New York, no trial in New York.
no public reading, and all of that is going to be read to Judge Garnett.
Judge Garnett, we saved the taxpayers money.
We've saved the time.
I know we're moving on.
Weird question.
And I appreciate what Tom is saying about Mangione.
And you're saying a defense team.
And is there any chance that Candace is working with Tyler Robinson's defense team?
I have no idea.
I do think she's spoken to.
She's spoken to a lot of the family.
That's what I'm saying.
Are they working in conjunction on anything?
Conjunction, no.
But if they're in communication, possibly.
Because she actually calls.
Because she believes that Tyler's innocent.
That's the 0%.
That's the 0%.
Interesting.
That's the 0%.
Let me continue.
Let's go to the next story.
Next time I want to get to is Lindsay Clancy.
What a weird, dark story.
Folks, if you're not into it, you're not going to like this.
But if you're into these murdery, mystery, all this stuff,
But this is just one of the weirdest stories I've ever heard in my life.
Literally, it's one of the weirdest stories I've heard of my life.
Lindsay Clancy's phone was used to search,
can you treat a sociopath?
On January 2020, 23, days before she killed her three children,
a state police investigator testified at a trial Thursday.
Jurors heard from Massachusetts state police investigators,
Timothy and Sergeant Kyle Pavaux,
on the forensic analysis of Clancy's phone
and her ex-husband's Patrick Clancy's tablet.
Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three murder charges under death,
a five-year-old, Cora, three-year-old, Dawson, and infant Caelin,
at the family's home in Duxbury on January 24, 2023.
Defense lawyers don't contest she was responsible.
They argue she shouldn't be held criminally responsible
because she was suffering from postpartum psychosis.
Are you kidding me?
I'm struggling so hard because I wanted to parent each of my kids like my first,
And since I can't, that's depressing to me.
Clancy wrote on October 2020 phone note per prosecutors.
This is definitely the root cause of all our problems.
She appeared frustrated with compromises around newborn Callan.
I hate that he has to put himself to sleep.
I'm sad.
I'm not breastfeeding anymore.
Prosecutors are using their searches and notes to argue the killing were premeditated.
The defense says they show a mind unraveling.
That a mind is unraveling.
Vinnie, do you have a clip on this?
I'm sending Connor right now.
Connor, there's a clip of her in the courtroom.
I think one of the medical examiners, Pat,
is talking about Cora's autopsy.
Pat, this gets to be emotional
because these kids are so young.
She was five years old,
and they're reading what was happening
during this autopsy,
and they have to call the freaking,
can you just play this clip?
That's the medical examiner.
It could be a pattern
or it could be more developed
types of injuries such as bruising or abrasions.
And what about
injuries.
Who's crying?
The mom, the murderer.
The murderer.
We're going to take a break
for this time.
All right.
All right.
Insurance, phone's your notebooks.
Place some other chairs, please.
Most disgusting,
stuff.
Insurance operations today are fragmented,
and policyholders expect
more. That's why
leading insurers run on Adion.
From premium collection to claims payout,
Adion supports the entire insurance value chain,
giving insurers full control over how money moves,
a single platform to reduce fragmentation,
complexity, and risk.
Drive revenue, control claims cost,
and power your next move with Adion.
Learn more at adion.com.
Visit BetMGM Casino and check out the newest exclusive,
the price is right fortune pick.
BetMDMDM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly,
19 plus to wager,
Ontario only.
Please play responsibly.
If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you,
please contact connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2,600 to speak to an advisor.
Free of charge.
BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with Eye Gaming Ontario.
Hey y'all, it's Kelly Clarkson with Wayfair.
Ever order furniture online and wonder what if?
Like, what if it doesn't hold up?
That sofa was four days old.
You should have ordered from Wayfair.
With Wayfair, there's no what-if.
Just style you love and quality you can trust.
Visit wayfair.ca.
Wayfair, every style, every home.
She deserves every single emotion she's feeling.
Disgusting person.
Okay, you can stop.
And why should you?
Adam, so think about it.
She killed, Cora was five, Dawson was three, and Callan eight months old.
Okay?
Okay, so now prosecutor is saying that she deliberately, these are prosecutors, not me,
sent her husband out for takeout and medicine, giving herself a window.
So she brought them all downstairs in the basement and used, you know, exercise bands, pat, and strangled all of them.
Oh, my God.
The defense is saying exercise bands?
Exercise bands.
And mind you, yeah, choked, squeezed them out and killed them one at a time.
Well, the other ones are sitting in there watching their other siblings getting choked out, okay?
And, oh, I'm going to get into it.
So you talked about the postpartum psychosis, severe mental illness and all that stuff.
And then there's a go-fund me for her parents that are, they're going to stand about.
behind her daughter. It's raised $750,000. The goal is $2 million. And what makes it darker is the
women on social media going, I know what she's feeling. There was a TikTok of a psychiatrist.
You might be able to find that kind of. I think it's a little bit long. How insane is that?
They're publicly expressing sympathy for a mother who strangled her own children. And when you
send your husband away, that's premeditated. You're like, honey, go do something so I could do
this. All right? And that's absolutely, we're already living in this culture. Adam, we're
abortion has made the killing of these children acceptable.
And now you're watching people find ways to sympathize this.
Okay?
That's dark.
I don't care how you do it.
But here's where we should never get lost in all this talk about postpartum,
depression and psychosis and all the medications and all that.
She took her children in the basement and strangled them one at a time.
Okay?
They were trapped with the one person in this world.
They were supposed to freaking trust completely.
Imagine, imagine, guys, whoever's listening to this wherever you are with your kids
are probably in the house if you're home.
Imagine that fear, the confusion, okay?
There's nowhere to turn to, there's nowhere to run,
and Mommy is choking and killing your other freaking brothers and sisters
and you're sitting there watching it, okay?
Whatever happened in those final moments,
they're dying in the hands of their freaking mother, okay?
And dude, that's why it makes this victim story.
She're not the victim.
The kids are the victim, okay?
What she did was evil.
she was a freaking monster.
I don't care. Call her a demon. I don't care.
How uncomfortable it makes people.
You killed all three of the kids. And if she's found
responsible, Pat, for deliberately murdering
them, she deserves the harshest punishment.
And that's it. I'm sorry.
She's already admitted that she did it. I don't think
that's the deal. Yeah, but they're playing the,
you know, when you have children,
postpartum, you go crazy.
They're saying she was under because she was dealing with bipolar
disorder. Do not consent that Clancy
was responsible for deaths of three of your children.
They argued that she was not a held criminal response before their deaths because she was suffering from, I saw that.
But there's also another one that says, they say she experienced an auditory hallucination, a voice telling her to kill her children and herself.
This is substantial evidence because I experienced some psychiatric problems before.
She suffered severe insomnia, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts, sought help from numerous providers, contacted a suicide hotline,
admitted herself to McLean Hospital, on research, postpartum, depression, psychosis, hallucination.
schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.
Another major defense argued is medication fragmented psychiatric care in roughly four months.
She was prescribed 13 different psychiatric medications and more than 30 prescriptions,
including antidepressants, antipsychotics, and benzos.
Her defense argues that the changing medication and inadequate coordination between providers
contributed to her deterioration.
Yeah.
They're going to try to pin it on the.
medical establishment.
So you all that, all that stuff,
and she's not medically admitted into a hospital,
give me a,
give me a freaking break.
Because at the end of the day,
somebody has to pay for those three kids.
What is this video here?
She's paying.
This is, this is a,
is this therapist.
This is the therapist.
Basically saying, like,
guys, if you've had kids,
you understand.
Press play.
Yeah, go ahead.
Clancy trial is going to be
one of the most significant
trials of your lifetime. We are all experiencing something completely
unprecedented. Never before have we seen so many mothers and women rally behind
somebody who confessed to killing her three children and it is not because
we cannot hold women accountable. Many of us see ourselves in Lindsay. Many of us know
that we could have been only one step away from doing some of those horrific things.
What is she talking about?
Because we experienced significant mental health issues
killing your kids.
After one of our children was born.
And many of us know just how dark some of those thoughts get.
I've never heard of it.
Do me, go back.
Oh, go back to her count, go all the way to the beginning.
Go all the way to the beginning.
Look what it says on her profile.
Strong therapy, Jess,
liberal voice on politics, culture, society,
anti-racist, anti-fascist, pro-LGBQ.
Do you understand what she just said?
She basically just said, the women out there.
Did you think she has kids?
Yes, she does.
No, this lady.
I think she does.
Therapers?
Because you know what she's saying, Adam,
we've all thought of killing our kids when they've gone.
Because, you know, you're depressed after you.
What are you even talking about?
How do you post something like that?
Like, and so basically what?
So they're trying to get this Lindsay freed of what technical.
She was crazy.
She was losing her mind.
I'm sorry.
Three children are dead.
And again, I'm going back to imagine Adam, you're five.
I remember when I was a kid.
I remember five.
I remember things that my mom would do to me when I was that age.
You're watching her strangle and kill your brothers and sisters.
And you're in those final moments.
I am sorry, guys.
I'm sorry.
We always talk about accountability.
she has to be held accountable.
I'm sorry.
I'm so sorry.
Of course she does.
Because my thing is this,
if you send somebody out at him,
if your wife goes,
hey, go get medication,
go get takeout,
you're planning it.
It's not like in a moment
where she just grabbed them
and stabbed them.
She brought them into the basement.
She grabbed the exercise bands
and she strangled them to death.
Okay?
I'm sorry, bro.
I'm sorry.
Let me ask the guys with kids here.
I mean, look, I'm not making light of this.
My mother always says,
like, you know, I brought you in this world.
I'll take you out of it.
I've never,
I've never took that literally.
But have you guys ever experienced anything with this postpartum depression?
Tom, PBD?
Is this something that women have talked about in your life?
Are your wife's friends or anything?
Tom.
Yes.
Women talk about postpartum depression a lot.
And apparently, not apparently, it is clinically shown to be a real thing.
Sometimes after having a baby, there is an emotional response that's here.
Now, that's part one.
And part two is, I do not believe, based on what I've heard, I've heard many counselors indicate that, you know, postpartum depression is made worse by someone who maybe is a drug user or already had, you know, psychological things or is, you know, deep depression or, you know, schizophrenia, you know, bipolar disorder.
it is that it just makes that worse.
So in other words, you know, a person who, you know, already has diabetes that gets lupus,
that's bad, you know what I'm saying, because you're already sick.
I'm using that a stacking effect.
And so postpartum depression and counseling is to be treated very seriously.
But the issue is if somebody was already, you know, had issues ahead of time, Pat,
it just makes it worse.
and the people running to her are people.
Remember, the postpartum tribe is also trying to create a victim tribe,
taking nothing away from the disease itself.
Remember, they become a special interest group of their own,
and they have their own, you know, what do we talk about,
their own concerns, their own motives, your own assumptions,
their own fears, their own asks.
And so they're out there.
So it's very, very real.
But when you stack it up and say, oh, we're coming to her defense,
They don't know her other side.
They don't know if she was bipolar.
They don't know if she was using psych meds
and she was having complication effects
from the combination of meds.
They don't know if she was possibly schizophrenic.
They're hearing postpartum
and they're running out to defend postpartum.
That's what's going on.
Good input.
This is dark.
I'm trying to see if this lady has kids.
I can't find it.
The lady, whatever her name is, something, Jess.
Jessica McNair is her name, and she's a licensed therapist associated with Falls Church Wellness Center.
A church?
And the creator behind Strong Therapy, Jess.
Yeah, I don't know what that is.
City.
But to have kids, this person's got kids, man.
Imagine those kids go to school.
And the friends and the teachers are like, you may want to kind of run away from that lady right there.
It's my mom.
Yeah, yeah.
I'm telling you may want to, like, you know, protect yourself and see, you know, where you're at.
Go to the Trump one.
Go to the Trump one that she has right there.
Yeah, what does she say?
Sorry for the jump scare.
This absurdity posted across official social media channels for Trump and the White House.
Okay, so she's a big-time Trump fan.
No.
Very, very weird that this is going on.
And this is not the case with most mothers.
This is the case with what Tom talked about with the challenges.
you know, if you have additional personality stuff
to add on top of that, some people shouldn't have kids.
I advocate a lot of people to have a lot of kids,
a lot of people to have a lot of kids.
But some people just should not be having any kids, man.
They should not be having any kids.
Some people are still kids dealing with their own trauma
before all of a sudden you shared that.
I'm at a soccer game this week,
and I'm watching Dylan play this game.
And on the opposing side, there was his father.
And the way he was talking to his kid,
I was just listening to him.
What the fuck.
What are you going to get?
And the kid.
In front of all the kids?
In front of all.
But he's screaming at his son.
And I'm sitting right there.
And he's like 10 yards away to my left.
His son is here about to throw the ball.
And for about 20 seconds, he's waiting for the ref to make the call because there's,
what do you call it?
People coming in and out.
Subs.
And I'm just watching him.
And he's just looking at his dad.
And he says, let me play the game.
Let me play.
We'll play the fuck.
And I'm just like, oh, man, just a little too much, right?
When you're watching this, he's probably dealing with the trauma.
And what he's doing is that's how he was raised.
So he's talking to his kid the way he's dad talked to him and passed down.
And I'm just looking at the kid.
The kid has burned out.
And by the way, he was actually a pretty good player.
It wasn't like he was not a good player.
It was a pretty good player.
But, yeah, I don't know.
This is a very, very difficult story to go through.
but we'll wrap it up on this story.
Actually, you know what?
Let me wrap it up on a different story.
Yeah, let's not leave on this note.
If you go to.
Give me a story to go through.
Give me another story to go through.
Something uplifting, optimistic.
Well, let me go to a different story.
I'll tell you, I watched Dudley give a sermon this weekend.
There we shared something that I thought was appropriate to share with everybody else.
It was about marriage, husband and wife.
So we sit there, we're watching the three of our kids are not feeling well.
One of them was throwing up all night.
You know, three of them didn't even go to school.
You know how it is parents, when kids go back to school.
Well, you know how that works.
You know, the only one that went to school today is one of them,
and I'll tell you guys afterwards who it is.
He breaks down marriage.
He says there's five different types of marriage out there.
Okay.
He says, the first one is the beautiful marriage.
He says, very rare.
Not a lot of them.
Beautiful marriage, very rare.
Number two is the blah marriage.
It's just married.
You know, it's just like, ah, whatever, we just married.
We did it.
We're staying it.
We're going to make it work, whatever.
But it's blah.
The third one is the brittle marriage, roulette.
Let's see if it's going to work or not.
You're gambling.
Fourth one is the bitter marriage,
and the fifth one is the broken marriage.
It's too late.
They're getting a divorce.
And then he gave some numbers, which was kind of wild.
He says, you know what divorce happens every how many seconds in America?
Five?
Every 30 seconds.
Which I thought it would be like closer to five.
But he said divorce happens every 30 seconds,
which means during this podcast of you take, you take,
let's just kind of tell you how many divorces have happened
during this podcast. Let's just say two hours. So if a divorce happens every 30 seconds and we did a
podcast for two hours, how many divorces have happened during this podcast so far, so far?
So that's two a minute. That's two a minute, 60, 120, 120, 240? Is that what the numbers?
240. Okay. Yeah. So 240 divorces have happened. Guys, stay together during the podcast. So far,
bringing the people together. And he says, the average marriage in America, how long do you think it last?
Seven years. Marriage. How much you think it is?
Tom, the average marriage. No, no, I think it's, I know this. I'm going to mess this up,
but I think it's three and a half years. 13 years. He says the average marriage.
Average? Him saying this. Tom, you're at how many years?
Oh, average marriage is 13 years. I was telling you average time to divorce.
Well, he says the average marriage.
Yeah, the average marriage happens 13 years. 13 years. The average age of somebody who gets a
divorce is 41 years old. So if you're 41 years old, try to go to 42. You may kind of make your work,
right? And he says the reasons for marriage not working out. Number one is financial issues.
Vinnie, what's going on? MoMA. Number one is financial issues. Number two is communication.
Number three is intimacy. Number four is broken trust. Number five is failed expectations.
Okay. And as he goes through it and he's kind of breaking it down, you know, marriage wasn't meant to
fix your problems, right? You're not getting married because your wife or your husband's going to
fix your problems. Lack of knowledge, poor choices. You stop going to church. You stop going to church.
couples who stopped going to church, divorce increases, I had a couple of ours that had a meeting
with one of their spouses.
They're going through challenging times.
But one of the conversations was when they sat down with me, I said, you guys still go to church
like you used to a lot?
No.
Well, I said that, you know, you haven't gone to church for three years?
No.
You haven't found a home church?
No.
Kind of got to find a home church.
If you did it and you get away from it, it helps you out.
Indifference, selfishness.
He says, what wives wish husbands knew.
He said, and wrote a book many years ago that sold 10 million copies.
The title of the book is, what wives wish husbands knew?
He says, do you know how many of those customers that bought those books were men?
He says, nobody.
Men don't buy books like that.
He says, wives buy it, give it to their husbands, and a husband's never read it.
Apparently this book sold 10 million copies.
Okay.
And then what we are different creatures, biologically behavior, emotional, biologically behaviorally,
emotions and commissions.
and he says, just to kind of break it down for you.
He says, do you know how many products the average man has in their bathroom?
It says, six.
He says, you know how many products the average woman has in the bathroom?
$300.337.
Are you serious?
So let's see.
Is that real?
Let's go in.
Yeah.
Toothpaste, dental floss, deodorant.
You have more.
Cave and green.
Tom, we get it.
You got products.
There's five.
That's it.
We're out of here.
Tom.
You, a lot of people don't know this.
is Tom, when he lived in Dallas, part of a church,
Tom was leading a ministry of a lot of husband and wives
that were about to go through a divorce,
and you saved a lot of marriages.
This isn't public, this is private.
I know this because you and I have talked about it
when you were contributing to that church.
And, you know, when you saw marriages that were getting close,
marriage is not easy.
It's a very difficult thing.
We know this ourselves.
What patterns did you notice?
And what the people that were able to turn it around,
What did they do, Tom?
What did you notice?
You did this for quite a few years.
People that were able to turn around did two things.
Number one, they actually listened to a third party.
And second, they actually stopped to apply it to themselves.
And there's a simple example we give people.
We say, if you're willing to listen and you're willing to draw a circle
and put yourself in the middle of it and only fix what's,
in the circle, this has got a chance.
Do you want to have a chance?
And if they both say yes,
it says, okay, let's start with listening
and let's put ourselves in the circle and do it.
And so it was that simple, Pat,
willingness to listen,
to allow a third party to not give you your solutions,
but to give you a framework,
and then willingness to go look at that.
And we had these chapters
that would take people through
on spiritual self-reflection,
you know, family of origin, things.
And just remember this statement, Pat, it may not be your fault, but it is your reality and how you react is your fault.
There are things in life that may not be your fault, but it is your reality and how you react is your fault.
So, okay, so that's that.
What other feedback would you give, Tom?
What other feedback would you give?
That this here, indifference and selfishness is huge.
forget about affairs, forget about fights, forget about all that stuff.
Believe it or not, you know, recovering alcoholic or recovering drug addiction,
once somebody says, man, I've got an issue and I'm out of here,
there is a greater chance for strength on that because everybody's got like the same objective.
But indifference and selfishness, when people get to the,
what we call the edge of the waterfall, well, that's it.
I don't care and I'm just, I'm going to worry about me,
and I'm going to take care of myself here.
That's indifference and selfishness.
And once you get to that part, now distance, distance becomes so far.
And that's when America, American courts invented the phrase, irreconcilable differences.
And I disagree with that statement so much because I believe with Christ, anything on earth is reconcilable.
So, Tom, so happy brother that.
So how much does faith, because, I mean, being a,
Christian. Like I'm not, I wouldn't be with anybody that wasn't a Christian. How much of that,
meaning solidifying the fact that like, hey, listen, we're going to have ups, we're going to
have downs, but this all comes back. Because Tom, biblically about divorce, it's not, it's not,
like, looked at it as a positive thing. But if you stay in the faith and you stay positive,
like, how much of a, of a factor is that? Faith is huge because it puts a simple rulebook under it.
If everybody used a different rulebook on the highways, it'd be chaos.
Yes.
But everybody, even the ones that don't obey everything, the highways basically work because there's a set of rules out there and people follow them.
Yes.
You know, only drive on the right side of the road, all these kind of things.
And so faith helps people have a place to turn for their own healing and have a place to turn for patience and strength while they're awaiting healing.
Got you.
And that foundation is critical.
I will tell you, you know, one of the guys I was talking to
who's going through marital issues, asked them a question.
I said, so who do you spend time with?
I don't have a lot of people that I spend time with.
It's just the people I do business.
I said, no, no, who do you spend time?
Which other successful marriage couples do you guys go to dinner with on a weekly basis?
That's not currently evolving into your business, nobody.
I said, well, that's a problem.
You got to find a way to be around other people who have successful
marriages who are similar values for that to be a positive peer pressure in your life.
You guys got to spend time together.
You guys got to do things that you look forward to.
You have to have certain traditions and rituals that you create just for the two of you guys.
But I'm at 17 years.
This is not easy.
You know, we got four kids moving parts, business, life, travel, all this stuff.
Health, trying to figure it out.
But if there's one thing that you can do that increases the chances, then go to church together.
Go to church together. Go to church together.
All right, sounds good. So we're ending on a good note.
We're ending on a good note here.
I read a couple books, one that you recommended, 101 questions to ask before you get engaged.
But the biggest difference in my life that I read, this is when I was going through my first divorce.
They recommended reading, men are from Mars, women are from Venus.
And I read the first chapter, and I get it now.
We're from completely different.
need it was read the title. So just act accordingly, and that's what I learned. There you go. Okay,
all right, gang, we will do this again on Friday. I think we have an interview that's going to go out
this week, stay tuned. And, but lots of other big interviews coming here soon, stay tuned. Like,
literally, we may even drop something today. We may drop two in the next two days. Just stay tuned
on what we got going on. Take care, everybody. God bless. Bye, bye, bye, bye, bye. Insurance is entering a new
era. Policyholders expect a fast and flexible experience from the insurers they trust.
That's why modern insurers run on Adion.
From effortless premium collections to instant claims payouts,
Adion's single platform automates your entire policy lifecycle.
A single platform to reduce churn and claims fraud.
Drive revenue.
Stay in control of how your money moves.
Adion, FinTech built for your next move.
Hey, y'all's Kelly Clarkson with Wayfair.
Ever order furniture online and wonder, what if?
Like, what if it doesn't hold up?
That sofa was four days old.
You should have ordered from Wayfair.
There's no what if.
Just style you love and quality you can trust.
Visit wayfair.ca.
Wayfair, every style, every home.
