PBD Podcast - Tucker Carlson's Leaked Video Reveals BRUTAL Critique of Fox Nation | PBD Podcast | Ep. 263 | Part 2

Episode Date: May 3, 2023

In this episode, Patrick Bet-David and Home Team will discuss: Tucker Carlson's leaked video VICE Heading For Bankruptcy Bernie Sanders' shocking prediction Fauci taking no personal responsibility People identifying themselves as handicapped FaceTime or Ask Patrick any questions on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://minnect.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Want to get clear on your next 5 business moves? ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://valuetainment.com/academy/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Join the channel to get exclusive access to perks:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ https://bit.ly/3Q9rSQL⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Download the podcasts on all your favorite platforms⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ https://bit.ly/3sFAW4N⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/pbdpodcast/support

Did you ever think you would make it? I feel I'm so close, I can take sweetest thurries. I know this life meant for me. Yeah, why would you plan on the life when we got bett David? Value payment, giving values, contagious disorder, entrepreneur as we can't no value that hate it. I didn't run home, he looked what I'd become. I'm the under one.

The story, vice is set to be headed for bankruptcy May 1st, New York Times story. Nobody would have guessed this was coming. It was a 5.7 billion dollar company just a minute ago. And now they're talking about going on auction. So Vice Media is preparing for it to file bankruptcy after being unable to find a buyer. Vice's largest debt holder, a fortress investment group could end up controlling the company in the momentum bankruptcy With vice continuing to operate normally and running an auction to sell the company for five forty five day period With fortress and a poll position as a most likely acquired a company which began as a punk

magazine and Montreal more than two decades ago has blossomed into a global media company with a movie studio named Add Agency glossy-shown HBO and bureaus in far-flung world capitals its investors have included Disney and Fox but a bearish market for digital media companies and vices in ability to turn the profit has taken their toll. Jet, thoughts on the story. Did you see Andrew Tate talking about this online, by the way, because they did that documentary on him. Like, I, you know, Matt Lashay or whatever he was was completely

corrupted. I mean, total tool. But, you know, it's interesting. You know, what's going to happen? I guess, I guess, you know, you look at the, if you look at what vice has put forth, you know, for the past several years, I don't know if any half familiar you are with vice in the world. I've seen the documentary. There's a lot of woke stuff. Yeah, yeah. It's a lot of, you know, I think people are really tired of the messaging at these locations.

I think it's going to be really hard for pretend organizations, as I call them. You know, vise was pretending to be, oh, we're here to deliver the news. We're here to be objective. And when you don't do that, people aren't stupid. They look at them. They say, well, I'm just going to turn this off. And I think it was really interesting because Andrew Tate was front and center, that documentary was front and center,

and it was garbage. I mean, I did it on my show, I analyzed it piece by piece. It wasn't, it was just a manifestation of what was going on there, this deception, this manipulation of the public. People are really tired of that stuff. I think Disney is suffering big time as a result of what they're doing

with the wokeness injected into kids cartoons, and people just want you to be straight with them. If you're a hard left progressive as I call it regressive organization, if that's your line, if you're an MSNBC or just own what you're doing, own your agenda, I think a lot of these organizations are getting into trouble because they're trying to trick the public. Oh, this is objective journalism. It's not. People see it and then they just say,

well, I'm not gonna go here for my information because now you've been deceptive of me. I can't trust anything you're saying. I think that's been a big part of why you saw the crumble and I saw just a lot of celebration of just, they feel like, oh, fine, it's been exposed. This was basically a facade for a really long time. I'm not saying they did no good work,

but the challenges when you do some good work, and then in you have peppered all of this nonsense, you ruin your brand. So decide what you want to be, be honest and authentic with the public, and you will receive a good return. If you don't, you get this. Do you think it's a brand worth buying?

What have they've done? The content, anything to have, none of it is worth buying. Like if you could get it out of fire sellers, it's worth buying. Like if you could get it out of fire, sellers would worth buying. I don't know. I think I, why would you need to buy vice? Why, why couldn't you do what they're doing? I, I don't know why you would need to buy it.

I can't justify that. In the same way that Buzzfeed, I don't know if you saw a lot of people tweet, no, should I buy Buzzfeed? Of course, yeah. No, I wouldn't suggest that. Why, do it better. Why do you need to buy that entity that's already failed?

I mean, I don't. Tom, what are your thoughts on this? I tend to agree. And then I see another side of it, too. So I'll take a counter side. I looked at some of these announcements today on Vice. And what I did was I just kind of looked at it through the lens of Twitter. So a large debt holder fortress comes in and then everybody else has to it to the lens of Twitter. So a large debt holder fortress comes in

and then everybody else has to stand to the side, kind of like Elon Musk coming in buying Twitter. And then there's a bunch of stuff going on inside here that is not profitable, they shouldn't be doing. And you immediately cut that same way that Elon Musk said, hey, these 10 projects over here for technology, I'm cutting them, I'm still working on this stuff over here. All you people, wait, another group on censorship, okay, you're gone too.

And by the time he was done, he only had 20% of the people left. And guess what? Twitter works really, really well right now still. And you know, Blue Check's and all the other stuff is done. You can debate that if you will. But he's showing that the company's actually growing. Twitter is growing. And from a pruning to growing. And so I look at this and I'm like,

wow, we got a movie studio, we got this, and this, and this, and this, and this. What if somebody comes in like Fortress? Because Fortress has said, we're gonna continue to operate normally while we're running an auction process. And I think what will happen is Fortress has to look at it through two ways.

One, I'm gonna end up like a PE firm, I'm gonna end up owning this son of a bitch. And now I'm gonna be stuck with it. So what are they gonna do? They're gonna be doing layoffs and trimming things, seeing it do it. So I see like a Twitter comparison where Fortress might end up running vice-light only some things

that are actually profitable and worthwhile. Now, that said, I was also reading, immediate that said, there's not a lot of consumer connect to the vice brand. They don't have stickiness across everything. They're just present, and it's one thing to be present, like a channel on TV, like the USA Network, you're kind of present, but there's no real stickiness to the USA Network.

You know what I mean? That's right, you're right. And also, don't you think, I mean, see to me, the comparison to Twitter is interesting, but Twitter was sticky. Twitter was a place, it had its flaws. I can understand somebody going in like an Elon Musk and wanting to buy Twitter,

because even though it has its flaws, there was so much good about it. It was so much hard about it. It was so sticky, so much so that even people who couldn't stand some of the censorship that was happening and some of the nonsense that was happening the last two years still couldn't take themselves off of it, right? You'll like addicted to it because there's something really cool and interesting and energy energetic about it.

Vice isn't that. It's just kind of existing and for me, Vice feels very much like corporate media right now. It's there. It's happening. But why would somebody go in? If you had the power, your PPD, right? You have the power to go in and say, okay, I can buy this. Why would you buy that? You can do it better yourself. Anybody who's going to have the power to buy that is going to have the power to do it better without any of the tainted nonsense that comes with the baggage of that organization. That's that's what I love what you said to Jen you said on your agenda at

least be honest if you're honest you'll work if you're if you're full of shit people still have a great line on your agenda on your agenda me on the foot on the shirt many not yours that's all you don't shoot me pbd but I'll say this I'm not I'll say this I'm not gone get the gun got you, but I'll say this out loud. Get the gun, get the gun. You know, I took the call today for value team that because they know that we're capable. And I spoke to an analyst at, I can say this one.

I can say this one. Not the second one. You can give the first one not the second one. And Matt, I'll give neither one. But I spoke to two analysts. And both of them are like, Hey, you know, fortress is looking for potential, you know, acquire partners. You guys obviously have the capability, you know, two weeks, there's

going to be a package out on this and I'm like, absolutely, we'd like to look at it. We'd like to look at it. But, you know, we're on to your point, we're on the list and we could do this. And the question is, you bring up a good point. Why would you? How come you don't put Vinnie and I on the call the acquisition? Yeah, please. question is you bring up a good point. Why would you? How come you don't put Vinnie and I on the call on the acquisition? Yeah, please. I think that would be great. Well, listen, I didn't want to be in public,

but that's the final quote. What? What? You guys stay out of it. You know what? I want Vinnie on with these analysts. Oh, yeah. I've got corporate counsel on him.

If you could record that, can you imagine? Yeah, it's Vinnie. Yeah, it's Vinnie and J. What's up? I got your habeas corpus right here. But you know, the one thing that is going on, the one thing that is going on that there's no question about, there is a massive shake up disruption going on in media

as an industry, as a space right now. Whether it's people questioning fake news, whether it's some people transitioning out, whether it's Robert Murdock wanting to go to a different direction, whether it's CNN and Malone saying we're done with Donald Leman and whether it's Vice, whether it's Buzzfeed, there's a lot of this stuff that's going on right now. Even Disney is kind of a packaging ESPN to in a quite way to say ESPN could be for sale. For the right number, there's a lot of shake up going up right now. Let's

talk about Tucker. Obviously at this point in the game, we hear the stories of what's going on with Tucker. Tucker's video was posted. I don't know how many views it got at this point. If it's shy of 100 million, I wouldn't be surprised if it isn't. The world has seen Tucker's video, the message that he gave. And if you speak sign language, you understand what Tucker was talking about. When he's code language, you understand what Tucker was talking about.

And recently, just recently, I think even yesterday, a leaked video derides Fox streaming service. Okay, if you've seen this clip, this video of Tucker, that everybody is playing and we've all seen it. Everybody's seen it at this point. You know, I don't want to be a slave to Fox nation,

which I don't think that people watch anyways. We're gonna, because you know, I may like a representative of the American media now, speaking to an ex-Zal and Romanian, welcome him back into brotherhood of journalists. You know, and he's, you know, this is a, Carlson says on a video footage from 2020 to a leaked to media matters. I wonder who from Fox News leaked to media matters where media matters can't stand Fox News.

But nobody's going to watch it on Fox Nation. Nobody watches Fox Nation because of sight sucks. So I'd really like to just adjust and put the dump the whole thing on YouTube. Carlson was apparently speaking to Representative for In-N-A-Personality, Andrew Tadeh, who was recently detained in Romania on charge of human trafficking. Anyways, there's a lot of different things that's going on with Tucker. Newsmax is at the front. Rumble is saying they may do something with it.

There's talks about Rumble could be doing some kind of stuff with Tucker. Jet, you've been in this world. You speak very, very highly of Tucker. The other day, we're having dinner. You were telling me he was one of the smartest guys you ever worked with. You told us this one, we're having dinner. What can you say about what's going on?

And what do you think this guy's going to end up? I mean, he's a Tucker as a rock star, right? Tucker is one of the people that you actually work with and you know that he believes what he's saying that he's committed to principle, that if he makes a mistake and get something wrong, he's going to say it, which is so incredibly rare in media, Tucker is going to be a rock star no matter what he does. I think he's going to go off into something on his own.

He may start a company of his own. He will get his voice and his content and his message out to people. So I think people could rest assured that he's not going away anytime soon. I think his video that now I think has almost 80 million reach, I think, express that. He's also laughing about these leaks. I mean, this is very predictable. When you work in corporate media, they very obviously fired him. They very obviously silenced him over at Fox.

He was very clearly having editorial conflict with senior leadership and just wasn't going to sit down and shut up. I actually watched that leak video and I liked him more because it was just him being him. They think they've got stuff on this guy and what they don't realize is that what people really love about him is that he wasn't playing the game and that he was on the inside fighting this censorship and fighting this. You can say this, but you can't say that.

And fighting this, you can do these topics because what happens is there are untouchable topics in corporate media. So you do have some freedom to move left and right, but you're do these topics because what happens is there are untouchable topics in corporate media. So you do have some freedom to move left and right, but you're still in a straight jacket. You can't touch this, you can't touch this. And if you do, and if you go against the powers that be, you either lose your job or you have to leave or you have to negotiate and exit,

that's what happened here. I don't believe for a second that this is about some little internal text messages or nonsense like that. They were looking for a reason to get rid of this guy because this guy wasn't playing ball the way they wanted him to play ball. So, I think it's really interesting. You're going to see more of these leaks. You ask, you know, who's responsible for the leaks?

The senior leadership there knows this is happening. They're probably authorizing it in many ways. They love it. They think they're going to have the power to wreck this guy and they don't. They also, if you've seen the ratings, the ratings are destroyed over there. They're destroyed because people, and it's not just about Tucker.

Yes, Tucker was a rock star. You can't just replace Tucker with somebody, but also people are so tired of being lied to. They're so tired of being lied to, and they know that when they watch these networks, these people, these individuals, these talking heads are called talking heads for reason. I was there.

I know the restrictions that were placed on me. Again, you have a little bit of flexibility, but not a lot. They know that they're not getting the real truth. They know they're not getting the real story. They know that people are cow-tow into advertisers and, you know, pharma and corporate, you know, lackeys at the top. And they don't want to watch that anymore. When they can watch stuff like this, we're just sitting here having a conversation.

They can go on Twitter. They can go on sub-stack, they can get real stood as a journalist and get to the truth of the matter. So I think Tucker has a career no matter what. I think he's a rockster no matter what. I think he's completely irreplaceable in that slot, by the way. You think he's multi-dimensional, meaning he can do podcasts? Absolutely.

When I started, so. And the reason why I'm asking this question is because you know when you talk about Rogan why I'm asking this question is because you know when you talk about Rogan, I can't ever see Rogan being put on a box and saying, here's six writers for you. They wrote what to say and go do this. I don't think Joe, I think Joe would be miserable doing that. I think to me, Tucker is a multifaceted talent that wherever you put him, he's going to be able to do it. Tucker is a media savvy star. And I remember coming into this business, I wrote for him over at the Daily Caller for

a little while. I worked with every time I worked them, we worked on Red Eye together, we would sit. He's spontaneous, he's full of personality. Tucker has that thing that I talked about before, by the way, the Rhonda Santa doesn't have. When I'm talking about that thing, it, the factor, he has it. And I always spoke highly of him when I first, and I know there are some people at Fox by the way,

in very high level positions who were highly responsible for Tucker's rise that probably aren't rolling over now, like they don't know what to do because they know his power and they know his talent and they know his capability, but they're fighting the internal machine. They have no, they really have no power at the end of the day. But he is that guy. I think you can stick him in a cable news setting.

You can sit him in a network TV setting. You can sit him in a speech. You can sit him on a stage. You can sit him in a conversation like this. Yeah. He can just roll. This is his thing because you know why he's just him. He's not afraid to just be him to be silly to say, I don't know.

I think I screwed up to get on stage and say something, to say I'm not an expert at that, people are dying for that. So I think he goes, I think this only grows. Whatever he plans to do, he will be making more money and reaching more people post-vox than he did while he was there. People call him a media personality,

and I kind of disagree with that. I think he's a media leader. I look at what he did at DailyColor, I look at what he did on his own show. I mean, he's not just a leading voice, he's a leading think. I think he's a media leader. I look at what he did at DailyColor, I look at what he did on his own show. I mean, he's not just a leading voice, he's a leading thinker, and he's a leader. He's a media leader. And so wherever he goes, if I was sitting there,

I'd be sitting there, okay, where can I really lead? Where can I be more than just this? Because I don't think, I mean, if you want some place like serious for the Howard Stern contract, that's one dimensional, right? Here you go Howard. Here's just a way you want 10 producers, there's 10 producers, 120 writers, there's 20 writers. Now go just go sit and do your show. Stern, that, that worked, I mean, for Sirius. I got the subscribers they wanted kind of, but that's, that's the one dimensional. This guy is so much broader. I believe he's a media leader and I think he's gonna land on his feet someplace that gives him that platform and that canvas

To be the full person. He also Tucker hosted I hosted a show called Fox and Friends Weekend for a while Tucker hosted that show before I got there. He was the guy on the show. He was fantastic He gave that show life He was the reason I wanted to take the job because I was very hesitant to take that job for many reasons. But I was like, oh man, look what he did with it. And you get there and you realize that you've been watching that show with Tucker on it, and then you're part of that show without Tucker,

and it was Missing Tucker. He's the kind of guy that comes into a room, and you really just feel like, wow, this is whatever we do here is gonna be great, because he's part of it. So, and this isn't about whether you agree with him on everything, this is about a guy who was telling you the truth, who was uncomfortable sitting behind the veil

of corporate media manipulation and censorship. And that's a beautiful thing, a beautiful thing. You know, I would say a couple things when you look at the viewership they show. So Megan Kelly showed this on her message. I'm sure on her video, how his episode last Thursday was, two point, okay, Tucker's finale was 2.65 million at the 8 PM Eastern Standard Time.

Monday was 2.59, he wasn't on. Tuesday, one, seven, by Wednesday, half the audience left, okay, literally half the audience left by Wednesday, okay, and it's gotta be, literally half the audience left by Wednesday. Okay. And it's got to be very hard for the person that replaces Tucker. Okay. And obviously, look at tweeted that with the data. Brian Stelter. Brian Stelter, honestly, his show never did the point three three or whatever the site is. So Brian is, you know, went from and now he's talking about the fact that Don Lemon and Tucker are texting each other

and, you know, imagine what could happen if they have a show together to two. And obviously, Megan made a very good point. Megan's like, I don't think Tucker would ever reach out to Don Lemon. Don Lemon is the one that's probably reached out to him because it's shared a lawyer. Whether whoever reached out to who or not,

it's irrelevant. Tucker's number one, period. So it's not like, you know, Tucker needs lemon's advice, lemon needs Tucker's advice, So it's not like, you know, Tucker needs lemon's advice, lemon needs, Tucker's advice, and it's good for lemon and, you know, to talk with Tucker on what to do. I remember the first time we started this, Mario Satella started creating content.

We bought a teleprompter. Do you know how long, how many times I use a teleprompter? For 30 seconds. That was it. They put the teleprompter there, and within 30 seconds, I'm like, take this thing out of here. I mean, we lost money on the teleprompter.

We bought the nice fancy, not the iPad teleprompter. Yeah, yeah. We bought the full-blown teleprompter, thinking it's going to be, I'm like, I can't. So, maybe you put it back in a box, try to return it, but it was already broken. No, no, nobody, it's already broken. Nobody could, there's a very, there's only a few people that can do what Tucker does. And matter of fact, at his level,

he's number one, let's put him up there. Do you think, because here's the, here's the conversation. When Bill O'Reilly left, no one's gonna replace Bill O'Reilly. Everybody said this, oh, it's gonna be done, game over, making Kelly, oh, nobody, it's done, it's over. Tucker Carlson, oh, it's done. It's over. Tucker Carlson. It's done. It's over. What is different, Jed, about Tucker than when it happened with Megan, then when it happened with O'Reilly? I don't know that it's Tucker. I think it's the time and I think it's the awareness that people

have of what corporate media is. And I think it's the options that they have. So it was a time where you didn't have a lot of options. You turned on the TV, that's what you saw. People would, I mean, I know, like my parents even, old school, put the TV on, you watch the news, you shut it off, that's your option. Now what's podcasting is, what it being, what it is, with Twitter streaming, with Rumble, with VT, would all of these options,

people are now seeing what corporate media is. So it's not just a rejection of like, oh, hey, you can't just replace Tucker and expect me to be a drone and keep the TV on. It's not just people saying that. But it's them saying, I know that you're misleading me. I know that I'm not getting an authentic experience here. I'm tired of it.

That people weren't that tired and weren't as informed of how horribly censored this stuff was when Megan Kelly left, when Bill O'Reilly left. So I think it's just a different time. I think they're playing with fire. I think corporate media doesn't really understand that these people that are now on Twitter, that are on social, that are in sub-stack, that are, they just know what you're doing. They don't need you anymore.

They don't need you. And they count on, by the way, the Fox News is over the world, the ABC. And by the way, this is not just about Fox News. The ABC censored that RFK video, I don't know if you saw, they put a big disclaimer, give me a break. If you were so confident, debate the guy. No, you don't have the facts. So you've got a censor, and it happens all the time.

That's like the view screaming at me, oh, misinformation, really? You didn't have the facts, honey, or you want to let me say my piece, and you would have said yours. So I think there's just a deep awareness now. There's a rejection of the same. Fox is counting on people just leaving their TV on like, oh, they'll get over this. Yeah. I just, I don't think so. I think your time is coming to

an end where you think it's coming to an end. I really think I think Fox is changing drastically. I think when they did that segment about, you know, the trans stuff as it related to kids and it was like a celebration day, I think people were like on Fox news. I think when they did that segment about the trans stuff as it related to kids and it was like a celebration day, I think people were like on Fox News. I think there's been a lot of censorship. I think there's been firings that people have noticed. Wait a minute, these are free thinking people that no longer have a home. I think their brand is changing.

I think someone may make a purchase of that brand at some point. Fox is not the Fox of 10 years ago. And I think even the older audience, my parents even, you know, it's funny. I left Fox. This is people left about this, but I left Fox. And even occasionally they would still put the TV on. What were they watching though? Tucker.

Tucker. Tucker, because it was like the last batch of a guy who wouldn't play ball the way they wanted it to play. You know, it's crazy. Right now, there's talks that Maria Bartoromo is next and Judge Piro's next that those conversations are being thrown around left and right. And everybody is, you know, sitting there wondering if there's

going to be a decision like this being made. Here's my thing. Here's a question that I have a conversation with somebody this weekend. And I may be making a very strange announcement sometime today, weird announcement, bold announcement on behalf of our team. And so stay tuned.

Uh-oh. I'm on. We're all like, what is that? Weird and bold. I'm talking to Megan Kelly today at one o'clock. I may announce it on Megan Kelly today at one o'clock when I talk to her. But here's a thing.

Here's the one thing I think about. We were having dinner. If it's me, you, Tom, Vinny, and this guy, what's his name? This good looking guy. He's the second best looking guy in the building What's this guy's name Adam Adam is a man Vinny took over looks right and oh wait math as you're talking about Jeremy the Jimmy's looking like no no the bearded muscle he's the he's the muscular bodybuilder a hunk which we got to have you ever put his picture

Do people know what he used to do yeah do that one your episode maybe on the next episode show what Jeremy look like. Okay, so anyway, he's the whisperer. So we're having dinner. We're having dinner and I ask you a question. I said, I said, do you know, I'm talking to this guy. I said, do you know who Stefan Marbury is? Most people don't know who Stefan Marbury is. But Stefan Marbury at one point was top three best guards

in the NBA. The guy was ridiculous. If you take, type in Stefan Marbury and go to a stats. Just go to a stats. If you type in step on Marbury and go to a stats, just go to a stats. If you go a little lower, you'll see what a stats. So step on Marbury was playing in the NBA right there, right to click on that. And if you go a little lower to show a stat, zoom in a little bit, right there, zoom in a little bit to show what his numbers were. Okay, if you look at the right side points per game, points per game, 23.4, 22.2, 23.9, 20, 22, 20, 20.

This guy was an incredible player in the league, but something happened. He started having an attitude. And all of a sudden, one of the teams said, you know what, we're gonna pay you, but we're gonna bench you. And we're gonna take away the best years of your playing years away from you.

And then I posed the question to you guys. And I said, do you think Fox has sitting there saying, our agreement, we will continue to fulfill our obligation of what we have to pay you, the remaining whatever time is left on the contract that you're two years. But you can't go anywhere. And you can go somewhere two years from now, what we're gonna continue paying you. And then everybody had a different opinion to say, well, you know this, this, that, all this, all this,

because typically somebody can come and buy that contract out from another team. The team that Marbury was playing for, they're like, no, we're not even selling a contract. This guy didn't play his best for us and we're paying them money, they're paying him $16,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 get any playing time. Do you think Fox at all, any percentage, that the strategy Fox is playing right now is to keep them benched for as long as possible

to hurt Tucker Carlson? Do you think that's what a strategy Fox may be playing today? I don't think it's to hurt Tucker Carlson, I think it's to keep him quiet, through potentially, through maybe the next election cycle. I mean, this guy is a danger to the system. This agenda goes really deep.

This isn't just about Tucker. This is about what Tucker is talking about. This is about what he's putting in front. It's your center. So there was always this idea that, you know, if you were battling the system, you were battling the left versus right. That is not what's happening. That is not what's happening.

These are regular people who care about their freedom, battling the system. Some people call it the system, some people call it the matrix. Corporate media is that system. It's the censorship system. It's the B quiet sit down, shut up, do what I tell you.

And there's so many talking heads willing to play by that game. So it's less about Tucker. It's about what Tucker was shining a light on. It's about the powers that be, that the people at Fox and answer to, who's their boss? Who are they getting messages from? Who do they report to?

What you think there is a possibility that they're benching in between. Yeah, I do think that, well, right now, especially now because they're negotiating now. Typically, what will happen is there's two options. Either they're going to bench him the full duration of that contract, and he's going to get paid, but he's not going to be able to go anywhere,

which is a horrible thing to do. Or they're going to negotiate an exit, and they will have to do some type of payout, but he will have freedom to go find another position or do whatever he wants. And once he starts that, then he will no longer get paid by Fox News. But I mean, they lose big time if they silence this guy long term. If they make a decision that they are going to cave to whoever they answer to in the system,

and we know there are people you answer to, if they make that decision, people are going to be aware that they've they've silenced this guy. Let me throw a crazy thing out there, crazy thing out there. And if there's anybody qualified to speak on this guy's jet, I just crossed 200,000 subs. If you're a support over message, let's get that channel and her voice to million subs as soon as we may even put a party to get and do a jet event

at 500,000 subs. And we'll make some announcements on that. We'll go jet this up too. But jet, there's two guys you speak about a lot. One is a guy named Andrew Tate, which I don't know if you've heard of this guy before, he's a very loud guy. And another guy named Tucker Carlson, is it fair to say you respect both of these guys?

Yes. Okay. So, I just got a word from Andrew's camp. Literally right now the text just came in and the text says, the peel against the house arrest extension was rejected today again. So the boys will remain under house arrest until the end of May. So here's another one that they're doing. The last one they can do this on is June.

I'm going to jump on a call with these guys right after this, right after I'm done with the dream team call. So, um, okay. I'm having a conversation with their camp. And the concern is every month, Romania extends this delay, more and more and more and more and more. The Red Pill community that talks about what they talk about, the cream of the crop at the top of the Red Pill community is one guy right now, it's Androtate.

Okay, when he's out there, everybody's doing what they're doing, and you know, you're able to drive that, and I think Tucker kind of placed to that at the cream of the crop of his space today. We're Tucker's Adam, we're Tate's dad, right? How crazy of an idea would it be that those two names would be the two names that we don't want to do a lot of talking right now for them to stay quiet. Are you going in a direction where the same way Romania is kind of maybe if there isn't anything, because every month is allegedly, allegedly, allegedly, there's nothing ready. Yeah, no charges at all.

Do you think there is really the crazy strategy that the people that are the leaders of the matrix are trying to silence a Tucker NA Andrew? I, there's a possibility of that. Of course. I mean, these are two guys that again, they're not playing ball. They, they refuse to be silenced. I mean, you see, entertain. He's under house arrest, but he's tweeting. He's reaching so he's reaching more people on Twitter than people on cable news, who get on TV every day, get their hair and makeup done and put on a big show.

So they're still powerful. And if you don't think that folks in the system, the powers that be are looking and saying, we try to take this guy out. He's not even able to go do interviews yet or anything for probably legal reasons. And look at his reach. Tucker Carlson puts a tweet out.

And it reaches more people than the guy who was hosting in his old time slot on a cable news network that is the leader in cable news. So of course they want these guys silence. And what's deeply threatening about the Androtates and the Tucker Carlson is that when you take something away from them, you know, putting Androtate and jail, look what you took away from him. A lot.

He was away from his family sitting in a jail cell. I mean, this is not, this is not easy for people to go through. You look at you tight, take away from Tucker Carlson, an amazing platform. You take something away from them and they turn around and they say, I'm not being quiet. And you take comment just as controversial, saying what needs to be said in the same way as before. Tucker Carlson puts a video out after being fired and silence talking about silencing. They're not messing around. You cannot shut these guys up. That is the golden ticket.

So they will continue to be influential. And do I think the system is targeting both of them? 100%. Do I think the system's gonna win? Nope. No way. We're on the same page. I'm completely incipient.

And you know, there's two sides to this. There's the censorship in the messaging and playing ballside that Jed's talking about. And then there's also the legal side. And the legal side has been a river of failures every time people have tried to block people. And one of the things you can go back and look at is a lot of you are not old enough to remember. But when Letterman

and Leno, they were both under the property of NBC. And NBC decided we're going to Johnny Carson's retiring and we're going to put Leno in the tonight show. Letterman was at the 1230 times slot, the late show with David Letterman. And it was, you know, Letterman said, I think I earned that chair. I earned the 1130 chair, Johnny Carson's chair. And they said, well, no, we're gonna keep you on your on your contract. And Bob Wright and Warren Littlefield completely fumbled it.

And Mike O'Vitz put together a counter offer that that delivered their position. And that's how CBS got Letterman and put him in the 1130 times. And for the next five years, Crush Leno and ratings. And this is the legal side, folks. There is always a way out. It's just like Fight Club.

There's always a way out, just on the legal side. But now, in the modern time, you also have this other side where you have this, you got to play ball with our message. And there is, we can go down the rabbit hole even further to what I believe is a, you know, a single party system in the United States with two kind of colors in it, rather than really a two party system. You're talking my language on the Uniparty Tom. You can be very, very excited here talking about the Uniparty. I'm just saying. very, very excited here talking about the uniparty. I'm just saying.

No, but I'm saying you can go back and look at this. And so, yeah, it's not the contract that they're going to have a trouble with. The contract is extricatable, very extricatable. The issue is they don't want the voice out there to compete with their programming. But at the end of the day, they got to make a buck. And right now, they are not making a buck and they are slipping. And if they're just waiting for the smoke to clear, to come back, there's nothing there on the plate that people find appetizing at Fox.

What you once were, you have given up. You're not there anymore. And that's why decentralized media is where it's going to. Large corporate media is not just dead. It's in hospice and those that are still alive are in hospice and are dying, but you just don't see it. The opportunities tomorrow is in decentralized new media that is distributed in new and different ways. Ladies and gentlemen, and you gotta thank God for like Elon Musk.

Imagine if he didn't buy Twitter, yet, and there were still all that censorship with the FBI and everything. You wouldn't hear none of these guys speak. Rumble and all that. I mean, all those other like what's that truth social? Now, but the reach will do. Thank God for Elon Musk, man.

Oh my God. I tell you, Spotify and Ealec, which by the way, he made a very strange announcement recently saying we will promise to not make any major offers anymore. Uh, uh, uh, uh. He said this from Spotify. I think Spotify, rumble, you have to give credit to what rumbles on the point of very important role. Twitter, credit to what Musk was doing. Fox screwed up because Fox was also one that was at least Tucker was there to, that he can talk and say the stuff that he was saying. But those

guys play very important role with what's going on today. Let's go to the next story. A few things with Sanders talking about Biden. You guys saw this last week with the White House Correspondence dinner, a bunch of different things was said, you know, the jokes, you know, I actually thought some of the stuff that was written. The writers were good, that. I, you have to give credit to the writers on what they said.

But Biden joked about his age needing a helmet for DNC events and mid-report on his declining work hours. He just wasn't like holding back. If he's gonna be running again, he'll be an 86 year old president. You know, some of the jokes were, you know, I promise you, I'm working like hell to get home.

You know, a bunch of other things. You know, one of the things he working like hell to get home, you know A bunch of other things you know one of the things he said he says look There's a lot of media companies here CmbC is here the owners of CmbC the owners of this and the owners of Fox Dominion is here You know these things when he said it was actually funny so credit to the writer. I thought that part was funny now At the same time there was a Bernie Sanders came out and says Biden could win in a landslide, okay? Senator Bernie Sanders said Biden, who kicked off his reelection campaign last week, could win in a landslide in 2024, given the current backdrop of a major political party, the Republican party, where many of the leadership doesn't even believe in democracy.

Sanders stressed that he thinks Biden is the clear choice for voters and if Democrats and the president get stronger on working class issues and take on the greed of the insurance companies working class. He believes Biden is going to win a landslide Sanders waved off concerns about Biden's age and stress that what voters have to look at is what does the candidate stand for? Which sat are they on? Jet when you hear a story like this, do you agree with Bernie Sanders that Biden could win in a landslide? I do. I do think he could win. win in a landstack? I do. I do think he could win.

I think people need to be prepared for that. And I said this last time, in fact, we had a debate in my house. My parents are different degrees of conservative, but they were like, oh, there's no way. There's no way Biden's gonna win. I said, he's gonna win. Mark my words, he is going to win.

And he did. And I think people need to be prepared because corporate media wants Biden to win And by the way that includes Fox News They want Biden to win they they do better when they're going against Biden that that is their business model That's how it works Corporate media wants Biden to win Hollywood wants Biden to win the entertainment business at large wants Biden to win the system wants Biden to win Biden has a lot of very powerful people in his corner.

I think when you couple that with the fact that the Republican base is so split right now between the San Jacentronpe as we talked about before, I think there are weaknesses, big weaknesses in both of those candidates. And I think you have obstacles like young, female, single voters. They're not voting Republican. It's not happening. They're looking for big daddy government to be what, you know, they're missing.

Male head of household used to be, I know I'll get he for that, but it's true. And you have a growing segment of the population that wants something for nothing. They want something for nothing. And you have a lot of people in this country now that are deeply compliant, that prefer for the government to tell them what to do for them to figure out

how to do it themselves. Do you have freedom lovers? Yes. Do you have increasing number of people who aren't that way? Yes. So do I think Joe Biden could win a landslide? Yes, I think that's a sad reality

that people should start to wrap their heads around. And I do believe by the way, the bigger fight and the more worthwhile fight is in local politics, is in community politics. Go set yourself up somewhere, city, state, that you feel supports and protects the values that you believe in. And those are the votes that matter more than these national elections. So I would not be surprised.

So are you saying you may run for some reason? Can you imagine me running for the show? I would fall. I would fall. I would fall. I actually can. You'd have my vote. Tom, thoughts on this.

Tom's going to be my running mate. You're going to put the business ahead of me. By the way, that would be all my job. It's very interesting. Can you imagine me and Tom, that could be really interesting. So, Chad, what are you gonna do with the economy? Tom? Tom?

Tom, you got to do the bill. You got to be bill clueless. I love it. You got to fucking bill clueless. I think we got a plan for the economy. And, honey, Hunter here is gonna lead this country in ways that you don't understand. I would vote, you guys got my vote.

Hey, I'll say it, tall crown and water. Remember, if the line's right. The, um, so what I think is going on here I would vote you guys got my vote. I'll say it. Tall crown and water. Remember the line. Right. The um. So what I think is going on here is judge right. You know, if this is misplayed by the GOP, this could be a Biden land side, but that's not going to be a Biden-lad side by decision. It'll be by default.

Here's what I mean by that. If the Republicans don't put together a compelling case and a compelling candidate served up in the right way, then it's going to look confusing. And if it's a blood bath in the primaries and everything kind of goes, hey, why are, then there's nothing for the voter to really latch on to. Then you'll have a Biden landslide by default, meaning there's nothing for, there's nothing to move that 10th, 12% of the independent voter in the middle, which is what the election, all national elections now hinge on.

So I think it could happen, but they've got to get their act together now and make a compelling case on the candidates and not overpack its candidates and let them be themselves because I think there's a candidate in there, the voters are gonna love and they're gonna see the contrast

and they're gonna want a difference and it's gonna to be stark. But if that gets fumbled, then you'll get a, you'll get a landside by default, not because I love it, but just by default, because the 10%, 12% of the independent middle aren't going to move. But it blows my mind though that that independent 10, 15, 12% cannot just look at what the hell is going on. Nothing is going right.

I don't care how you see it where you left the right. How, how, like, do you think, Jed, that the, uh, the whole abortion stands that, that can sway the election one way or the other. Well, I think again, you have those like young female. It's a very important voting block. People always underestimate that young, single woman.

That's who hears these, the wokeness, who hears the platitudes. Biden talks in these like ridiculous platitudes. Like he's promising you the sun, the moon, and the stars.ess, who hears the platitudes. Biden talks in these like ridiculous platitudes, like he's promising you the sun, the moon, and the stars. Who's receptive to that? You have to be an emotional voter to be receptive to that. You have to be willing to be the exact opposite of what Tom was describing.

Tom was asking before, well, do you think that, you know, voters are gonna be more practical that they're gonna look at the economy and they're gonna be able to get past character? No, the emotional voters looking at all, that was a mean tweet. I can't vote for him. I'd rather vote for this guy over here

who told me that there's leprechauns and rainbows. You know, I want that. That makes me feel good about myself. It's about feelings, not about actually benefiting from policies. Yeah. What's this video? What is this? So this is a joke. This is an eyelapse.

So as a comedian, this is, he's up there and he's talking about how Joe Biden talks and doesn't know where the hell he is. I saw the one when they split it where he actually saw the video Biden, but this is one of the funniest. This is Trump is back and he's in full force and he's talking crap. Go ahead Rob, you gotta show this. Did you think at least one time you'd get up and say I'm running for president? Where am I going? Where the hell am I going? I want to get out.

Look, come here. No over there. Over here. Where where am I going? I want to get out A prepackaged video that took supposedly seven takes to get it right. The right is what you want to call it. Oh man. And he says he's running because Trump and Maga pose a threat to democracy. Can you believe it? Dude, and, and, and, and, like, come on Pat, don't you miss that? Don't you miss that? You can't teach that.

He's an entertainer. He did that off the cuff. He didn't plan that. He just in his Trump world said, you know what? He is. I'm going to go find it. Are you more likely, you know, into the people watching at home right now? Are you more likely to watch a debate if Trump is in it or if Trump is out?

Let's say, you know, half the debates have Trump in and half the debates have Trump. I guarantee you the viewership takes a nose dive just because people find this so entertaining. It's like watching a television show unfold and he's totally on rehearse. I love you can't teach it Love it. By the way also newsmax has seen when we were talking about Fox News before newsmax has seen some rises Interestingly enough at this time whether they can sustain it. I yeah Eric the three X. Yeah, I was on with Eric last week Very interesting to see what happens with that as well from 180 to 589. From 180 for eight o'clock. He's the eight o'clock. Right? So what is there? From 122 to 562. One, even more than I said, it's like 5x nearly, four and a half

x. Because there is an age bracket of the population that's very used to that. Like my dad, he watches, he's watching right now, but he, you know, he doesn't understand. I do. I do. Hi, Tony. Very conservative. used to that like my dad he watches he's watching right now but he you know he doesn't understand all this new media hi Tony very conservative but pony how you don't but he you know they don't understand all the inner workings of this new media and they're used to click the TV on they they'll change the channel though they'll stay within that forum maybe but they'll change the channels by the way did you did you see one of your favorite people the last three years Fauci no. Did you see, Rob?

Can you go to Twitter? Flip flop? For me, I want to see how this guy's handling this issue and what he says, I just want to get your reaction. Jet, you and Vinnie specifically put reaction, I want to go to my Twitter, go to, just go to my account, Rob, just go to my profile. Untouchable, he's the untouchable.

And if you go down on videos, go a little bit lower, go, go, should be like the fourth one. Keep going, keep there it is, right there. Make that bigger. And I want you to see, we have to get away from this blame game folks. It's too much blame in going out. Go ahead and play this clip for us. But I want to know what you think. You and the community got wrong. Was the closing of the school's two draconyms? Well,'d take responsibility. How much of a delay did the fact that nobody fully understood the asymptomatic spread of this? Nobody figured out that it could actually bust through

certain vaccine levels as well. What are the real takeaways, the real lessons? I think, yeah. I think we have to get away from the blame game because so many things that you have mentioned are known at the time. I think we have to get away from the blame game because so many things that you have mentioned were unknowns at the time. It's so easy and I made that comment in my response to one of the questions that Davis

Wallace well asked me in the New York Times profile. In the New York Times profile. And I didn't mean it as an affront to him, but I said, you know, this is really big time Monday morning quarterbacking here. But I was just, he's not listening to me. And I know the viewer, the real viewers that get what I'm saying. This is the most protected bureaucrat rat. They brought him out.

He did exactly what he did. He's been, I have videos on my phone with him flip, flip flopping about the mask. And this is what pisses me off. Zero accountability. How many congressional hearings, judiciary hearings were Ron Rand Paul screaming at him and They're in your face evidence. You funded this. You did all this. Nothing will happen to him. Zero Pat was talking about Investigation year and all this all that stuff now. I get that you will never see this guy for all the people that died for all the shit that he funded. He'll never see a prison. None of them do and it frustrates somebody like me because I'm sitting there and I'm saying, okay, the left is the left.

It's the right just there to bark and bark just to show us. Oh, look, there's two sides. And I don't think there is any side yet. They don't give you shit and they just have us. They have us by the... Well, it depends what part of the right you're talking about. If you're talking about controlled opposition, which absolutely exists. They're just, you shit and they just have us. They have us by the... Well, it depends what part of the right you're talking about. If you're talking about controlled opposition, which absolutely exists, they're just, you know,

they do this, they give you the illusion of actually fighting guys. Like this guy's a loathsome. I hate you. He is a loathsome creature. Yeah, I love you. He makes villains, you know, when you turn on a superhero movie and you see a villain,

this guy makes them loathsome. 100%. He is that guy. Yeah. The only person that really rivals him in turn in terms of villainous energy is like Klaus Schwab. I also can turn that guy on and there's a darkness that emanates from them. Juck's supposed him by the way with like a Tucker Carlson who we talked about the strength

of Tucker Carlson is being able to say, I got it wrong. I did something wrong. You know, I would do it differently now. Even when he was talking about when Tucker, there was a video he was on a podcast. I think it was full-send podcasts. I'm not sure. And he was talking about corporate media and he there was a video, he was on a podcast. I think it was full-send podcasts. I'm not sure. And he was talking about corporate media and he was saying, I've been on those panels. I've done that myself.

And it's loathsome. The ability to do that, all Fouchy has to come out and say, you know what, we got it wrong. If we had to do it again, we'd do things differently, but he can't. He's so committed to the talking point. And he also knows there's going to be no consequence for the lies in the deceit He is a loathsome creature my skin crawls when he speaks I love your decision. He's a man. He's me and you're right. Then jet going off your thing about Tucker Tucker literally in this interview. He said and he you know, he said you and he goes like he goes

I was pro-Irat war he goes I Fucked up. He goes. I I'm telling you guys I messed up and that to me Ground you as a person and makes me go cuz you're trustworthy. I you guys, I messed up. And that to me, grounds you as a person and makes me go, okay. Because you're trustworthy. I trust you, because you messed up, I admit it in the wrong. How can you trust a guy who, when all the data emerges that he was wrong, still can't take responsibility.

Fauci was responsible for giving directives about the lockdowns, for giving directives that led local and state leadership to enforce mandates, to enforce all of this stuff. He was at the top of the chain. He's the reason that people lost their businesses. He's the reason that little kids were going to school with masks on. He is the reason.

The data does not support those decisions. So what kind of human could you ever trust again if they can't own up? He's disgusting. I love that you hate him just as much as I do. He's loved some. He is the system. Yep. He's disgusting. I hate him. I love that you hate him just as much as I do. He's loved some. He is the system. Yep.

No, it's worse than that. I think it's even worse than that. I think that it's not just Fauci. It's everything that protects and abets Fauci right now. That is the soulless leadership of the country. And we need much different leaders to emerge. This is really stark. You mean you do have people like Rand Paul, but Rand Paul gets portrayed, well he's a far

right wing guy. He's medically trained and everything. He's going to scream a lot. Let's just get through this whenever he's in a hearing. You get that. That's how media puts Rand Paul in a box. Okay, here goes Rand Paul. Get ready. This is what you're going to see. But really, what you have is a soulless government that is, um, eating in a bedding, everything that happened here. And it's, um, it's disgusting. It's not just

here, too, just doesn't know. You say eating a bedding, soulless government. It's, remember, this is bigger than the United States. Fauci is not only supported by soulless, horrific leadership in this country, but you gotta bring in your three-letter organization. You gotta be both bringing in WHO, the WEF. This guy is supported by heavy, big, pharma institutions is a deep, deep dark.

I thought when you said, it's not just that, I thought we were getting into Satan Con, frankly, because there's a deep darkness going on here and people don't want to I know even chocker invoke the supernatural the other day something ugly is happening here when it comes to the evilness of these policies there's something really dark happening there's a battle of good versus they have to be a kind of a little bit of a man that has to be accountability there has to be accountability so by the way whoever runs next if there's no accountability people who's trust in the system there has to be accountability. There has to be accountability. So by the way, whoever runs next, if there's no accountability,

people who's trust in the system, there has to be accountability for what he's doing. What is always great, what is always great is the following. Here's what's always great. It's for somebody to invest money into doing a real documentary on him who is willing to go do the interviews and the legwork. It may take a million, it may take three million,

it may take five million, and Netflix and Hulu and some of these guys may not even take that documentary. You may need to go to a independent OTT to put it out there for people to see. There's a lot of different ways to do it, but somebody needs to make the right investment, maybe even get involved with an RFK from the research standpoint, go interview some of the older people that used to work at the places and put that documentary up. I'm not talking about like Vax or any of that.

Give both sides, give stuff that he's done right, give stuff that he's won as well, and then give the other side of the argument, and then put that documentary out there, because somebody like this, if there is anything there, he says we can't talk about blame. You know, we have to blame where Where the origin came out of you blamed Trump you blamed a lot of average people that are sitting there saying, dude, I don't want irresponsible governors,

irresponsible this. No, there needs to be a blame and you being held accountable for it. So this goes to two last stories I got here. I want to wrap up with one from transgendered to trans abled. Guys, this is a real story. Now people are choosing to identify as handicap. This is not an onion story, this is not an onion story, this is not a babel on B story. This is a Fox News story, trans-ableism or body integrity identity disorder. Can you actually Google this to see if this is a real thing?

I did, that is real. I ID, I actually go copy paste identity disorder. Can you actually Google this to see if this is a real thing? I did that. It's real. B-I-D. B-I actually go copy paste and see if something will come up, B-I-D. Okay, it is a societal issue in, this is not it. This is an IA. It's a real, this is not a joke. It's a societal issue in which individuals identify as handicapped and may even ask doctors to amputate healthy limbs,

SNP sniper cords, spinal cords, or destroy eyesight. This term has been relabeled to align with the trans community with some advocates harnessing the cultural power of gender ideology to cause of allowing doctors to treat BII patients. Some people would B. mutilate themselves, which is why culturally transabelism is being called the next abyss. The National Institute of Health notes that those would be I.I.D. desire for a desire amputations or paralysis. One North Carolina college

student has called transabelism a cry for attention and Arizona in turnist has labeled a delusional disorder while some doctors may be willing to perform procedures to these doctors have issues for Transabelism most will only perform those they feel are medically indicated. I don't even know where to start. I came, I'm flabbergasted. I don't think I've ever used that word.

But when are we as a society gonna stop pretending, okay? This isn't trans, it's a probabilism. It's called it for what it is. It's trans stupidityism, okay Pat. These people have mental disorders, okay? They're dying for attention. And instead of going out, being at, go be an actor, go do something.

You're gonna cut your, like, one lady, she was on that Dr. Phil jet. She poured acid in her eyes. She's sitting there looking, that she even know where the hell to look. How do you think these people that are actually handy, Pat? What do you mean, poured acid on her eyes? This lady, Pat, she goes,

I was born and I identify, I want it to be handicapped. So she poured acid in her eyes, Pat, and she went, that lady risked this lady right there. Look at her. And the, can you play this? Just play it for a second.

Just see how she sounds. Go ahead. Look at her regrets about taking your own vision or the process with which you did take your mission. Look, I don't have any regrets taking my vision. I believe I should have been born blind. This is not a spoof. No, I don't want that. I don't want that. This is not a spoof. No, I'm out of the way I am.

I do have some regrets about the way I did it. But in the end, I'm happy. It's like a transition to shimmy. This is unbelievable. This is a cycle of spoof. Look, Dr. Frollo is trying to help me. He's so good. He's a really hard time sitting next to this guy.

Really hard time sitting Sitting next to this. Really hard time. Sitting so close to someone who traumatized herself, who damaged herself, we took an oath in medicine to help people. We see horrible tragedies every single day as doctors and people who would give anything to go back and restore their vision, their health. My heart is beating out of my chest.

I can't even make sense of the emotions I'm feeling because to hear someone say, I've always felt I should be blind. Well, I've always felt I should be the queen of England, but I'm not going out to become the Queen of England. Oh my God. That is a microwave. And my truck turns her off. And listen, I understand, like, listen,

everybody here wants to park in the handicap spot, but chopping off your leg or doing this type of stuff to park close to a building is absurd. And yet, I said, like, a lot of this stems from this whole movement, the whole trance, all of it, I I think it started when disciplining your children became taboo because think about it. If Pat, be honest, if one day you're like, you know what, Dad, I'm not, I'm Patricia.

Now what would your father have done to you, Pat? Be honest with me. What would Gabriel have done? And I'm being general. If you came home to your dad was probably watching and you said, Papa, you know what? I have Patrick, this Patrick, I want to be Patricia.

What is your father and your dead serious? What does your father do to you? I couldn't even tell you because that thought is confusing for me to even think about. You know, I mean, I played a lot of great pranks on the guy that you fell for. But this is above that, though. This is like to allow people to get to this point.

OK, so we're having this conversation with my sister at the house. Yeah. We went out this weekend. We're watching Blue Angels. We had a great time. Jess, all this was sick, right? But we're having this conversation, my sister,

about LGBTQ and the direction has gone and trans-redding and all this other stuff. I think you, parents are playing a very slippery slope where they're kind of like, no, it's okay, you know, do whatever you want to do. No, no, it's okay. You know, to each a zone. No, it's okay. It's not to each a zone. This person got three and a half million views. Okay. How many other women see this kids and they're gonna be like, well, I related this. If I'm gonna get this much eyeballs and I'm finally gonna get some attention,

I'll do something like this. I'm willing to do this to my body and if they don't have love in their household, they don't have any encouragement in their household, nothing like that's gonna be happening. Kids are gonna make some stupid decisions with their lives because of this. People can't sit on the sidelines

and say the argument of it's their choice, letter to whatever she wants to do with her body. No, you have to have mental issues to be willing to do something like this to yourself. That has to be clear, and it can't be like sitting aside and saying, now I'm good with my life. I think the lack of calling out bullshit

and calling out insanity is causing a lot of people to think this is the norm. The way in which the other day said, I have to leave the state of Florida because it just didn't match my values and principles. And we decided to go to a different place where our son, daughter, is it a son or daughter now? What is it now?

It's a guy that wants to be a guy. I don't, I don't, I'm confused, I don't know. But the point is we had to leave the state of Florida. Okay, well good for you, bro. Congratulations to wherever else you move to because you are trying to protect your transgender child. Now what are you gonna say to this 26 year old kid one day? This kid of yours one day is 26 and says,

Dad, why did you let me do that at 13 years old? What are you gonna do? Well, I don't know how old a kid is by the way. What are you gonna do when one day is 26 and says, Dad, why did you let me do that at 13 years old? What are you gonna do? Well, I don't know how old a kid is by the way. What are you gonna do when one day your kid says, Dad, why did you let me go through that process? I was delusional at that time. Then what's your argument going to be, Dad? What are you gonna say then?

There's a lot of stuff that kids will say to their parents and 15-year-old now it's a 15-year-old kid. Just a lot of things that kids will say to their parents. We have to straight up start calling out weird, strange, crazy ideas like this that we're even doing an episode today about trans-abelism. What are your thoughts on this, Jet? Well, I mean, what's interesting is you see the audience

reaction and we can all be like, look at the audience, look at the people on the panel, they're all horrified. And my response is give it 10 years. Give it 10 years because, you know what, 20 years ago, if you had brought somebody in that was a child that was on, you know, the whole these hormone pills and whatnot, and if you looked at mutilation that people are doing to their own bodies, you know, to, I'm a girl, I want to be a boy, this, that, people would have commented on that in the same way, would have said, well, wait a minute, this is very concerning. But now these same people, if you brought out what I just said,

if you brought out people in the trans community, and whatnot, these very same people on the panel will be very hesitant to say anything bad about that. So you have this like, we're adjusting to a new normal all the time. And what you have is a lot of people, I mean, this is mental illness, right? 100% I mean, 100% something wrong.

Either it's mental illness or it's social contagion or it's a desire for popularity and there's been a lot of allegations against Dylan Mulvaney, by the way. Dylan Mulvaney, the people say, who knew him said, oh, this is all to get popularity. There's a lot of money that Dylan Mulvaney is reaching now. There are people that are willing to do anything for money. So I think there's a lot of undiagnosed mental illness. There's a lot of normalization of mental illness. There's a lot of social contagion on social media

where people who are lost and struggling and maybe going through some mental stuff on their own, think this is their way to find new, oh, this is where I'm really gonna find my space where I'm gonna be happy. You see kids being manipulated heavily in those spaces. Did you see Duke? Did you see Duke held my sister just sent me,

there's Duke medicine, opened its gender clinic in 2015, okay? And they offer a wide variety of services under one roof if you can find this, okay? Put Duke medicine, gender clinic, Duke medicine, gender clinic, right there. So they offer a variety of services under one roof. to clinic treats children as youngest two for gender dysphoria. Yeah, this is sickness now. I mean, I have a three year old, right? We saw him in here.

And this is Duke University. That's right. And that's the other thing that people don't take it that extra step because again, these are, the American, you know, all of these traditional medicine facilities. Again, I always bring in pharma. There's a lot of cash cow here. There's a lot of money to be made off of lifelong commitment to once you have a surgery. You have to take these hormones.

There's so much pharma money to be made here that you're going to have media endorsement of strange things. You're going to have, you know, medical institutions that you once deemed respectable. And you were like, well, this was a respectable institution. First of all, was it? And secondly, who do they report to? What is their end game? There's a lot of money to be made in this very, very disturbing, sick stuff. And who suffers? People, mostly young, young kids that are now being roped into this. I think there's a lot of money under it. When we look back at this in five, 10 years, you're going to see the money lines be so clear. I mean, this is Duke. Duke used to be known as slightly more conservative. University of North Carolina,

Chapel Hill was slightly more liberal, but they weren't enemies, but they were kind of on a spectrum like that path. That was the difference. And at, I think it's Flagler, which was the MBA school at Chapel Hill, and then you had Fuqua, a few QUA, which was the MBA school at Duke. And it was a little bit more conservative, actually a lot more conservative. And now you look and you see the med school that's at Duke and it's really stark. It's really, those of us that know people that 15 years ago, 20 years ago graduated either school, I am shocked to see this. But I think there's but I think there's a money path here that's even bigger. And I agree with what has already been said.

This is all about attention. Everybody wants a box to check to get their attention and to get their vibe. And you've got people that are doing this for sport. I think when I'd love to see where still in Movania's in 10 years. And find out if he's back on the other side and kind of jokes about the fact that he cast the check. Okay, this is crazy to me folks.

If you're listening to this, it's absolute insanity that this has taken place. By the way, if you enjoyed today's podcast, I believe Mario and Kai just sent me a message saying, we were the number one live on YouTube in America on the homepage of YouTube showed us today as a live, we were 10,000 plus people live the entire time.

Let's go. But I'm no just people love jet, do people love any? They love time. This was a great show here today, but we got also a message here, an announcement to make. I want to show you guys a box. I just got, I'm going to show you a box. I got a box. I want to show you guys. box. I just got I'm gonna show you at a box I got a box. I want to show you guys it's a crazy box

It's a crazy box if you can bring the box here for us to show to everybody. Oh, well, there's a surprise in this box You have a box now. There is a small little pet that we have fine What if you guys can bring it in can you open a door to see if they're outside or no? Can bring it in can you open a door to see if they're outside or no You're not a state president. All right, so here's what the box is the box is Today today and yesterday were Vincent Oshana and Mario Aguilar's birthday So come on in we gotta sing happy birthday You got me good Vincent Oshana and Mario Agno come around Mario come around on three will sing along if you guys know Mario

VT wouldn't be what it is without Mario and Vinnie's birthday today as well on three. We gotta sing for you guys on three one two three Happy birthday to you Happy birthday to you Happy birthday to you. Happy birthday dear Vinyan Marlion. Happy birthday to you. Thank you guys. We're both 25 years old. 25 years old, look how good we look. I love it. Sexy to tell us. So tell us, go ahead out to the entire audience because we're without you guys watching We wouldn't have a v i team of branch out out to pbd I'm nervous somebody who can outlast this long and be working with you for 18 years and if it wasn't for Patrick Sticking it out. We wouldn't be here shout out to our team who makes every day possible and to our talent who has a makes a future

Look bright. Thank you everybody Mario and shout out to your future son I look at that was awesome. Thank you again again congrats happy birthday to you guys Jet you have a show today or you're shows When one day Wednesday Friday one PM Eastern time be there one PM Eastern time Friday, one PM Eastern time be there. One PM Eastern time. Time. Monday. What you got?

The original shot the show. It's a comedy of a variety show. It's on Wednesdays at four PM Eastern time. Eastern time. We have links to everybody under description. So they know to go find them. Game Monday 11 30 in. Gangster.

We will do this again. Do we have podcasts on Thursday or no? We do. It'll be at 12 o'clock on Thursday with Peter Navarro. Peter Navarro. Yes, sir. Wednesday. No, Thursday 12 o'clock, Peter Navarro. Peter Navarro, is that okay? Sounds good. So Wednesday, no Thursday, 12 o'clock, Peter Navarro. Take care everybody.

Bye-bye-bye.