PBD Podcast - Tulsi Gabbard EXPOSES The Durham Report | Ep. 271 | Part 2
Episode Date: May 21, 2023In this episode, Patrick Bet-David and Tulsi Gabbard will discuss: The military-industrial complex The Durham report If ESG is good or bad for society Putin FaceTime or Ask Patrick any que...stions on https://minnect.com/ Want to get clear on your next 5 business moves? https://valuetainment.com/academy/ Join the channel to get exclusive access to perks: https://bit.ly/3Q9rSQL Download the podcasts on all your favorite platforms https://bit.ly/3sFAW4N --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/pbdpodcast/support
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Did you ever think you would make it?
I feel I'm so close, I can take sweet the theory.
I know this life meant for me.
Yeah, why would you plan on the lie if we got bett David?
Value came and giving values could take us this world
and on your panoras we can't no value to hate it.
I'd be running home and you look what I've become.
I'm the entrepreneur.
Military industrial complex, you know,
we hear about this all the time.
Can you play this clip for me from this gentleman
that I'm starting to really like?
I'm a big fan of what India's doing
and what India's capable of doing.
Of course, they're part of bricks,
but I'm watching them very closely to see what I think
they're gonna be a very, very important force
to be reckoned with the next 20, 30, 40 years.
Dr. Subramanian Jaischenkar, who is an Indian diplomat and politician serving as the minister.
He's a beast.
He is their secretary of state.
That's right.
I think the second sense, and he's become the second ever diplomat to be appointed as
external affairs minister.
Very sharp.
I like what he says.
In this question, someone's asking him a question
about Ukraine, so I'll kind of preface
what the question was and you'll hear his response.
I'm sure you've seen this where it's like,
hey, so we're noticing everybody around the world
is supporting Ukraine, but you guys are not.
Why are you not?
And this is his answer.
Go ahead, Rob.
Just to grow out of the mindset.
No, refresh because you skipped the first second.
Yeah.
You got to refresh and get that audio at the same time. So it says Europe has to grow out of this mindset.
To grow out of the mindset
that Europe's problems are the world's problems.
But the world's problems are not Europe'sps. The world cannot be that Eurocentric
as it used to be in the past.
You're up for us to go.
Sure, if I can pause this,
I'm gonna go to the sit-down you and Tucker hat.
This was one of the ones few months ago,
a couple months ago, where he's talking about,
I was never a Trump guy, you know, I've seen him,
of course, I'm like, what is this guy talking about?
He's out of his mind, and I wonder he asked the question,
and says, who funds an atom?
Like, who gives a shit about who funds an atom? You remember this exchange with them? And it's like, then I started looking at it. Why are we doing this much money?
Why are we putting so much more?
He says, the more and more I saw him asking this question,
I'm like, okay, these are very, very good questions.
So, why do you think, for the longest time,
Europe has gotten away with everybody having to support them,
but when it comes down to them having to pay the bill,
they're like, what's kind of like a friend you go to a restaurant with? And yeah, yeah, but when it comes down to them having to pay the bill,
they're like, what's kind of like a friend
you go to a restaurant with?
And yeah, yeah, I'll do another old fashioned,
I'll palestune another old fashioned,
and when it comes down for the bill,
they get up and go to the bathroom.
Europe seems to be doing that,
and the other guy gets the bill,
and the guy that gets the bill is US.
The mindset of the military industrial complex,
what's happened with Ukraine,
and yesterday Joe Biden talking about the fact he was asked about,
will we give them F-16 fighter jets?
And Biden says, not today.
Will you one day give, I can't answer that question,
but I think we ought to start training.
And the US officials said we will not, you know, turn away from any other country who wants to support them with
F-16. Essentially what they're saying is we went from money to tanks to this, to now
we're probably going to give them some F-16s. So why is your concern so high or a lot
of people, why are so many people concerned about military industrial conflict, why should
that be a top priority for them? As a concern.
There's a number of reasons why.
Let's start with the most important that we're talking about.
As we sit here today, we are on the brink of nuclear war.
That should be concerning to everyone.
It should be even more concerning that we have people in positions of consequence and power and influence both those who hold public office in the highest offices of the land, as
well as those who don't but who are just as influential, talking about the prospects
of nuclear war as though it is just like any other kind of war.
Talking about the fact that Putin and his government has changed their policies to make
it so that they can deploy nuclear weapons, whether they be tactical nuclear weapons or strategic
nuclear weapons, if they feel that they are facing an existential threat, specifically omitting the words an existential
threat because of a nuclear threat or nuclear weapons.
So whatever they deem, for any reason, to be an existential threat, will give them the
authority to be able to deploy these nuclear weapons.
The fact that we have these pundits, these talking heads, these government officials discussing the prospects of nuclear war as though it is something
that can be won is shocking and extremely dangerous. Ronald Reagan had the most famous and most
important statement after he negotiated some of these non-nuclear proliferation treaties,
telling us very clearly, a nuclear war can never be won and should never be fought. Period.
Things have only gotten better since then. We have more nuclear weapons. They have become
more sophisticated. A nuclear weapon would kick off nuclear war that would destroy all of humanity.
The military industrial complex plays a major role in continuing to keep us in some state
of war. Why? And some of them have even said it publicly when we are at war, business
is good. What is the cost? The cost comes out of our pockets. Our bank accounts, the American people,
the taxpayers, we are paying for it,
where those dollars could be and should be dedicated
towards actually serving very real needs
of people that we have right here at home.
The military industrial complex profits
when you see a NATO expansion.
That because who are the people that these NATO countries are buying weapons from?
They're buying the weapons from our military industrial complex.
When you look at the US footing the bill for NATO.
Number one, we should be able to ask questions like, why does NATO exist?
Why are we the ones who are predominantly funding NATO?
Well, with the predominantly funding of NATO comes the very same leverage you were talking about earlier.
Getting these European countries to act not necessarily
in their own interest, but in the interests of those
in power in the United States is done oftentimes
through the leverage of money.
So when Trump is saying, hey, you guys got to pay your own way.
Pay the 2%.
My gosh, pay the 2% of your GDP that the rules require.
Common sense.
Many of them didn't want to.
But then what comes with that, and you
saw recently with, I think it was Macron's visit overseas
into China, largely saying the same thing to the European
countries.
Hey, we need to stop being vassals of the United States.
We need to make our own decisions based on what's best for our countries and what's based
in the best interest of Europe. The criticism he got for having the audacity to say, hey,
we should act in the interest of our own countries. Says everything that we need to know about
the power and the influence and the money that goes behind these decisions. So there's
an economic cost, of course, to us and the American people behind these decisions. So there's an economic cost, of course,
to us and the American people in our country.
And there's the cost that comes to our safety,
our security, and our freedom.
And the human cost of life,
funding all these wars, I mean,
and money's important, I get it,
but not millions and millions of lives that are lost.
That's such a great point you're making.
You know, it's funny, Rob, if you can find that one clip
that I ask you to pull up, you know, the one where the lady says,
how do you feel about the half a million,
you know, which one I'm talking about, you know, this one here.
Man, well, no, all right.
Yeah, so this clip can't be played enough times
if you can play this real quick.
We have heard that half a million children have died.
I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima.
And, you know, is the price worth it?
I think this is a very hard choice, but the price, we think the price is worth it.
We think the price is worth it. We think the price is worth it. Okay.
So.
And she is somebody who throughout her life all the way to the end was lauded and worshiped
by Democrats and the Democratic Party.
You said you're a Democratic Party.
You're not under Clinton.
Exactly.
This is this is a while back.
I don't know what this timeline in the interview is Rob.
If you can find time 98 or 96.
90s.
Yeah. Some like that. But you know, so you know how we kids, and we're like, we all think we're tough guys,
right?
And you're like, well, you're going to kick your ass, then I can say, I'm going to kick
your ass, and then you're like, okay, maybe you got a punch in and everybody breaks it,
you know, that's all, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, fine, no problem.
And that guy's a cool guy, right?
It's funny, as you age, the real tough guys, they'll say run when you get into
fight. What? So for example, I heard this one guy who is a work secret service or president
and his job is to protect me. And I'm interviewing him. He's a little guy. Not a big guy. He's
not six five. You know what the typical body goes. It's six five three hundred fifty pounds
offensive line. This guy's five, ten, maybe 160 pounds. I said, do you know how to fight?
Do you know how to deal with the body?
What are you getting into somebody?
He says, let me tell you what my job is.
He says, if you want to hire a big guy
for commercial to be physically big, I'm the wrong guy.
Because that guy's going to fight the opponents.
He says, my job is to make sure you're safe.
I'm going to show you how to run.
The facet run, he says, we're going to run.
If you want to live, we've got to get you a wife, he says, we're gonna run. If you wanna live, we gotta get your wife and kids out.
We're running.
It's an interesting perspective.
Jacko, fight breaks out, you run.
You don't go on fight.
Okay, so right now, this whole thing
with military industrial complex.
All right, listen guys, let's create a proxy war.
Let's get Ukraine to be the proxy behind closed doors. Let's hop them out to go against
Russia because if shit hits the fan and this thing gets worse, guys, we can really make some money.
Okay, fine. So you can create an instigate, then you make billions, but the part nobody thinks about
is at an older age when you got wife and kids, if you get into a stupid fight,
somebody may have a gun.
And that gun means your life is over with.
In this instance, what if you crossed the line too much
to the point where this man is publicly being
who humiliated and all of a sudden he says,
okay, you wanna go there?
No problem, guy, fine, let's roll the dice.
Here's what we're doing next.
And it's not 500,000 people
It's not 5 million people next thing you know, boom 50 million 100 million
Most people don't think that's possible
It's like when you sell like I've been the life insurance industry 20 years when you sell life insurance
Like you'll hear a lot of attendees macho guys will say I don't need life insurance. I'm 38
Two years that I get a phone call from the wife. Remember that one time my husband didn't want to buy he died
No, I'm I don't have anything left.
I don't know what to do.
OK, we are stories like that.
How close and how possible is it?
Like, you know, OK, a lot of people
will say stuff on podcasts and shows.
You've been a military.
You, I stand corrected not a major lieutenant colonel, right?
You've been to Iraq.
You've been to Kuwait.
You've been part of a lot of these conversations.
Realistically, how likely is it that this thing can get very ugly now that we're willing
to entertain the idea given these guys have 16.
Exactly.
That decision will further escalate it.
We are the doomsday clock that's reported every year.
We are closer to midnight now than ever before.
The question of likelihood and how possible it is very possible and we are in a position
where it is very likely and becoming even more likely, the more this war is escalated
and the longer it goes on.
And we're facing two great risks here.
Number one is the scenario you're talking about.
If Putin finds himself in a position where he feels like he has nothing else to lose,
and he is facing this existential threat, it's not a matter of guessing.
They have already said they will retain the right to deploy nuclear weapons.
How where who remains to be seen.
That prospect is very real.
The second prospect that is just as real,
and perhaps just as if not more dangerous,
is a situation where there's a miscalculation
or there is an unintentional spark
that causes that to occur.
We saw this through the Soviet Cold War.
There were the risk of nuclear war that causes that to occur. We saw this through the Soviet Cold War.
There were the risk of nuclear war and nuclear weapons being deployed because of misunderstandings,
miscommunications, miscalculations.
We see something coming in in the radar and we thought it was a nuclear weapon.
There were so many, so many close calls where nuclear weapons were almost launched because
of mistakes rather than out of intention.
So in both of those situations, whether intentional or unintentional, it's not outside of the realm
of possibility that we could find ourselves tomorrow in a week, a month, or a year facing
the reality of a nuclear attack and nuclear war.
The nuclear fallout that comes after the blast.
The nuclear winter that comes after that blast, the nuclear winter that comes
after that that kills all the crops and takes away people's ability to live.
The gravity of this is difficult to describe because it is so immeasurable.
So for 2024, I wrote a question down here for you.
I said, if you ran today or you advise someone who ran today,
I don't think you have any plans of running,
because that's fair to say or okay.
So if you ran today or you advise someone,
so let's just say the Santa Scott,
some of these guys call you and they're like,
look, just as a person, I want to get some counsel from you.
What would you say would be top three issues to run run for today like the other day president Biden said the most
biggest enemy to America's white supremacists, which is very weird
We're going through all the stuff right now. You're gonna be worried about white supremacists. Okay, fine
Maybe it's a top 50 issues definitely not a top five or let alone number one issue that we have
We know military industrial complexes one Ukraine Russia Ukraine, Russia, totally get that.
What else would you put as a top five issue we should be paying attention to?
Yeah, I mean, this issue we're talking about certainly is at the top of the list.
I think the second issue is, is immigration and securing our borders. We cannot have a nation
without secure borders. We are seeing the consequences of President Biden's open
border policy that's impacting us in just about
every way.
We see the national security threats of having an open
border.
People literally streaming across the border from all
around the world without any kind of vetting or
background.
We don't know who's in our country right now.
We don't know what kind of threats they may be posing.
There's obviously the economic impact,
the social welfare system impact.
There are so many layers of negative consequences
that come from their policy.
And the third would be focusing on bringing our economy back,
focusing on actually truly supporting and investing
and our small businesses.
The people that are often touted
as the number one employers in the country
and yet have the hardest time starting
and staying in businesses actually focusing on
what is in the best interest of the American people
rather than what they are focusing on,
which is themselves and their power
to the detriment of the country.
I think central to all of this, just to wrap it up in a foundational and fundamental way,
is truly supporting and defending our freedom and civil liberties.
Because we are seeing that erosion in so many different ways without our freedom, without
our civil liberties we lose we really
lose what is at the heart of what it means to be an American in this country.
Where would you put climate on that list?
Because I think at one point you were a proponent of the Green New Deal.
No, I never was actually and got some some crap from the Democratic Party for it.
I'm a strong environmentalist.
I have is why I ran for office in Hawaii in the first place back in 2002, protecting clean water, preserving natural resources,
preserving our open spaces, conservation of those resources
is essential, advocating for and promoting things
like regenerative farming versus factory farms,
like actually making sure that this planet
that we live on can stick around and help us survive
is incredibly important.
Unfortunately, what we're seeing with this climate change movement is something that really
isn't even addressing all of these things that are essential for us to be able to exist
and survive.
What about the, part of the inflation reduction act?
There was the largest investment in climate change that we've ever done.
Do you think that was a good move?
What are your thoughts on that?
No, I oppose that legislation because it had nothing to do with inflation reduction.
First of all, so it was sold on a lie.
So funny.
Marketing.
Literally all it was.
And they couldn't even stick with their own story on it.
They kept on calling it exactly that. The greatest climb.
Oh, no, sorry, sorry.
People care about inflation.
Let's just call it the inflation reduction.
But there was a component of it.
I don't know, whatever it was, $200 billion that was dedicated to climate issues.
Was that something you were not to get up?
To, I don't see how, I did not see how what they were advocating for would actually address these basic environmental concerns
that are very real in this country.
I think a lot of people who are advocating for those things, if you look at their own personal
life decisions, there's a lot of hypocrisy there too.
I think the reason why Adams is asking that question is because he's deeply concerned with
the humidity in Miami. And he was hoping you wanted to do something about it. So, but
that's, you know, why? Yeah. So, by the way, I just want to mention on the climate change
question, it's the name of the author who wrote Jurassic Park, famous author, Michael Critan.
He wrote a book and I can't remember the title right
now, but he wrote a book like 20 years ago, fiction, it's a novel, but it was about exactly what's
happening today, where just like we have the military industrial complex, he didn't call it this,
but it was kind of like the climate change industrial complex of people manipulating information and narratives
and quote unquote scientific data in order to support their own industry essentially. And
anyway, it's a fascinating book and the fact that it's almost like the climate change version
of 1984. Yeah, almost. It's just, it was, just I just read it. I listened to a lot audiobooks. So I work
on it. It really is because you you know there's some you know, it's a novel. So there's there's some action
there's some thriller thriller stuff in there. But when you look at the heart of it, it's just one of
those eye opening and kind of insightful things. Just you know how Pat rules he just purchased a book right
now. I want to learn from Tulsi. That just purchased a book, right? No, I love it. That guy doesn't stop.
I want to learn from Tulsi.
That's why she's here with us.
Not trying to live in a state of curiosity.
No.
In the area of it's officially bought.
So curiosity.
In the...
You're welcome, Michael Cretan.
You just got 15 more dollars.
Right.
So curiosity in a follow-on area.
We had a conversation, bucks, sex, then, and clay Travis,
we talked about endorsements, okay,
like the power of endorsements
and what it means, et cetera, et cetera.
Okay, so how much value is there
in getting these endorsements?
Okay, so the weight of an endorsement,
for example, you get it from a heavyweight politician,
a president, a media mogul, right, you know,
like a Oprah Winfrey or a musk or someone like that,
or an entrepreneur, a Buffett, a Bezos, and a musk
or some like a Mark Cuban or triple threat,
like a musk that's got all three sides.
Infoencers, well hey, podcast, Rogan, hey,
Ben Shapiro, hey, all these other guys that got their
info, Logan Paul even, some of these other guys
that are doing what they're're because nowadays they're getting them
Hollywood stars like the rock to angel son
Military general coming and backing you up
How much power and influence is there and these types of endorsement or is it just marketing?
It's not really big. I think it depends. It depends on the person. It depends on their reasoning
Um
It it really depends and it depends on you know. It really depends.
And it depends on, I would say like Joe Rogan, for example, he has a very, obviously,
hugely influential and is a very loyal following.
And he found, I think, over the last few years, especially how the things that he says really
do have a direct impact on people.
I've also heard people say that they, candidates say that they would shun an endorsement from
a Beyonce or a big celebrity figure because that just has, well, you're just one of those
elitists who I can't relate to as an everyday American.
So that actually ends up having, even though she's's like the most powerful talented musician singer in the world. I've heard candidates say, well, actually, you know, I don't want those
kinds of endorsements because it sends the wrong message. I mean, I think I think every
one of these things has its own, you know, pros and cons. And I don't think there's kind
of a cookie cutter impact. Some some are hugely consequential and others not and others
have a negative consequence. How much you think a musk is by the way JZM Beyonce just
bought the most expensive house in California and Malibu for 200 million
dollars. He just closed it this week. Wow. It's a two bedroom apartment.
It's on the water though. Right. But go shouldn't be. Go too bad. How much you
think can't be long musk indoors? How much weight does that carry?
You think it's a big weight, especially for somebody, let's just say, on the middle, center
right?
I think it certainly carries weight for people who like what he's doing and who follow him.
I think it would also, you know, how much weight does it carry would depend on how much of
his own skin in the game.
He's, if he just says, ah, yeah, I like this guy.
And then he never says anything again has has a different consequence than him actually doing
what you were talking about in the beginning.
Hey, your person of influence, a person of means, if you really want to see this change,
how much are you willing to put your own skin in the game to actually make it happen?
Got it.
So if he was, let's just say to a pack pack on Trump or whoever and he put up on it or DeSantis whoever and he put up
Something like a hundred million dollars. Is that a way of other saying damn if he's going like that with this person
There's got to be something we don't know. Do you think that carries a very big stick very big influence?
That would that would make a big impact that would make a big impact. It's amazing what a hundred million dollars that do these days
Yeah, you know, buy some influence.
I mean, Bloomberg tried to do it.
It didn't do anything for him,
but you know, I'm just thinking about how much these things,
because you know, this person got endorsed by that person.
This person got endorsed by that person.
You want to know what it really means.
I think Bloomberg though is kind of an example.
Again, I don't, you know, he was running for president
at the same time.
I never got to know him at all,
but what I saw on the ground was
People were very happy to take his money. Yeah, didn't mean they supported him didn't mean they voted for him
I thought you were gonna say what I saw on the ground was a six inch lift. Oh like this
I'm sorry. I thought that's where you were going with it
And then you took a left turn. I went right my apologies
What was this $100 million for his own campaign? Or was that, okay, gotcha.
But that's a big difference between putting $100 million
backing yourself versus an Elon backing a dissentist,
for example, there's a big difference.
Yeah.
No, no, no, no, no, he spent $100 million on Biden, guys.
He's been in Florida.
No, I, he spent $100 million.
Interesting.
Just for Florida.
Yes, that's what I was to, I know he spent a lot of money
on himself, but I'm talking specifically with Biden okay Durham report comes out
okay mainstream media from nobody even talks about it everybody else like
wait a minute did you guys just see what happened here okay this is a real
thing what was in the Durham report that people need to pay more attention to
what I did see first of all from talking heads on MSNBC,
and I believe even CNN,
was they did talk about it actually, maybe not much,
but what they did say about it was a complete dismissal,
that it was nothing of value that it should not be paid attention to,
that it was just more lies and more bias,
et cetera, et cetera, completely dismissing it and not actually addressing the substance
of it.
The one person who I would say was pretty fair in his analysis was Jake Tapper on CNN.
When he talked about it, he had a fair interview on what was in the report, what wasn't in
the report, and his own statement was that this was essentially an exoneration of Donald Trump. Fox News covered it obviously and I think
overall the major takeaway for people who don't have time to read the report didn't
didn't catch in the news is that it it it absolutely exposed the FBI the FBI is being weaponized essentially by the Hillary Clinton camp.
Barack Obama and his team were aware of it to go after and investigate and try to undermine
Donald Trump's candidacy and presidency.
I want to read this from Washington Examiner.
May 19, Durham report.
Five key takeaways from the bombshell findings into Trump Russian investigation.
No proper basis to launch crossfire hurricane.
Derm report claims that crossfire hurricane, the Trump-Russian investigation, lack the
proper foundation due to the FBI's failure to conduct key source interviews, review its
own databases and apply standard analytical tools.
Two, Hillary Clinton connections.
The report indicates instances of FBI favoritism towards Hillary Clinton,
including defensive briefings, ending an investigation due to illicit campaign funds, and restricted
probes into the Clinton Foundation. Mark Elias, the Clinton Campaign's general counsel and
Michael Susman, his former Perkins call law firm colleagues are criticized for the roles with
fusion GPS and Steel Dacia and
in third Dacia and Russian disinformation.
The report uncovers the use of unverified steel report of Pfizer applications targeting
former Trump campaign associate Carter Page intelligence might have compromised steel
sources and highlights that Igor Danchenko provided steel with rumor and speculation. Number four, no collusion, the Rome's report suggests that absence of tangible collusion
evidence at the onset of crossfire hurricane while the FBI continuously upheld claims from
steel.
Dasia disregarding contradiction, information last but not least, no further crimes charged.
The report culminated in only one guilty plea by X FBI lawyer Kevin Klein Smith for
document falsification despite charges against Susman and then Chinko and report found no
further criminal offenses.
The reason why I'm bringing this up is because back in 2016, this is what Hillary Clinton
said about you.
Russia's grooming her to be the third party candidate. She's the favorite of the Russians
They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far just like Jill Stein did back in 2016
You responded the queen of war mongers
embodiment of corruption and
personification of the rat that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long.
I mean, you went gentle at it the way you did.
So the reason why I'm kind of putting these two together is the following reason.
One, a lot of smart people believed that Trump was tied to Russia, a lot of educated people,
a lot of people that are professionals, they have degrees, they're smarter like,
yeah, you know what, he is, and for three years, most of America actually believed it.
And I know you try to sue Hillary Clinton, and I think that whole thing back and forth,
you know, seven months later, whatever happened with that.
But now Fox pays $7.87, you know, two, a dominion, and there's another $1.7 or 2.1 billion that's right. That's not a smartmatic smartmatic. I mean
You kid of me like do you not have any more where I feel like this is the part of Republicans where they screw up
You have something like this that just came out
Why not get lowered up?
Create a fund of
Americans that would want to fund this. Hey, you know, this is how I would do it
Listen guys. I'm not doing this alone. I'm not gonna pay the legal fees
It's gonna cost a lot of money. You really want this if this hits
50 million dollars on go fund me
We're gonna go get the best lawyers and investigate every single thing Clintons ABC CBS NBC
CNN everybody did.
We will investigate it and we will show documentation
of all our expenses, but we will not do it until it is 50 million.
You want it?
Pay up.
Pay some money to go from it.
Why isn't that happen?
And I feel like a lot of American people are saying,
dude, all this shit, show some back on GoFight.
Give a loss to do something about it.
You're not doing nothing about it.
Yeah. What are your thoughts on that?? I mean it's a great question.
The without any response or true accountability there's no reason why this kind
of thing wouldn't happen again. There's a reason why people believed all of it.
It's a reason why people you know when Hillary Clinton said that to me my my
first reaction was like this is so insane It's laughable. Were you expecting it at all when she said that? No, I wasn't.
Came out of Lafayette. All you said I'm asking is like, were you here behind closed doors
she was saying it to other people? I knew that there were there were murmurs. Okay.
Because because I mean, look, you know, look at look at what happened to Donald Trump.
It became the go to line when they didn't like what someone was saying. It was automatically
like, okay, these are Russian talking points or it became kind of that thing I was not expecting
you know the former secretary of state former US Senator former first lady to spend the
time talking about me in this light and smearing me and trying to cancel me but the reason
why people and as I campaigned and I went out and talked to people, I was confronted sometimes
angrily, sometimes very emotionally.
This woman I'll never forget.
I was at a very small little Democratic party event in a small rural county in South Carolina.
This woman who was the chair of that County Democratic Party came up to me.
There's probably 50 people in the room.
And she put her hands on my shoulder and she was so serious and her eyes are almost well welling up with tears. And she said, I need to look you in the eyes and ask you,
are you working for Putin? She was not joking. It was a very, you know, she obviously, she took
her role seriously. She took her leadership seriously. This was something that was really,
really concerning to her. And it, you know, I looked her directly back in the eye and I
said, I love my country so much so that I'm willing to die, to protect and defend the
United States of America and the American people.
Does that answer your question?"
She said, yes.
Thank you.
But the fact that it impacted her so deeply shows not only, again, the influence of the
Clinton, Hillary Clinton, but what is that machine?
Why is it that these things become believable?
Why are they never questioned?
Why is there never a request for evidence? Why didn't they never question? Why is there never requests for evidence?
Why didn't Axelrod in that conversation say, oh really interesting? What evidence do you have to prove that point?
These things were never asked in the mainstream media. They just repeat the talking point over and over
Just as they did during the Trump campaign and the Trump presidency
without actually asking for evidence. Why aren't they asking because they don't care?
They repeat the talking point enough
to the point where people believe,
well, this is fact.
I heard it on CNN, I heard it on MSNBC,
I heard it from Hillary Clinton.
How could it not be true?
And I've had so many conversations with people,
like even people who know me personally,
and they're like, you know, people on CNN lie,
like, but why would they lie?
They probably just got bad information.
They didn't mean to.
No.
There's nefarious intent here to manipulate the American people
to believe certain things so that then they take action
in the interest of that status quo.
The Hunter Biden laptop, the 51 senior
former intelligence officials, there's unfortunately
many examples of how these lies are created, spread, and perpetuated
in order to achieve a specific outcome.
And your right, Pat, if there's no accountability, if there's no action taken, these are some
of the things that we need to be continuing to look out for as we head into this next
election.
That would be one of my rally cries.
I would say, listen, here's what we'll do.
You want us to find out more about this?
I want you to also put some, you know,
put your money where your mouth is, 50 bucks, 100 bucks,
you're not giving it to me, you're giving it to the
contribution, let's go figure this thing out.
And we'll go get the best lawyers.
But yeah, I, I, I, I see your qualify to talk about this.
That's why I wanted to ask you about it on how much
impact that at if a woman's coming up to you saying,
I gotta look at you in your eyes to see
if you're an asset to pull them.
It broke my heart to hear her say that
because I could tell it was really, it was hurting her.
It tells you propaganda works.
It's very effective.
Where you're gonna say something I love to you.
I just wanted to understand why do you think Hillary Clinton
targeted you of all people of anyone in politics.
What was her goal targeting you and labeling you of all people of anyone in politics, what was her goal targeting you
and labeling you a Russian asset?
Broadly, I was someone who over the years,
even as she was Secretary of State under President Obama,
was very outspoken and very critical of her,
her decisions, her influence,
obviously critical of the president,
at the time of some of those foreign policy decisions.
When I left his vice chair of the DNC to endorse Bernie Sanders
because of his position on foreign policy,
speaking out very clearly and critically on Hillary Clinton's
foreign policy, fairly certain that put me on their list,
which I'm told is a very, very real thing.
Being somebody that they couldn't control and who had the audacity to challenge them
is my guess, is why she has chosen on more than one occasion to try to smear me.
It was interesting, one of the interviews that I did was, I think it was actually on MSNBC
right after I left as vice chair the DNC
The host of the show and don't remember who exactly was the host of the show
It was it was right before a presidential primary debate. They said Tulsi
aren't you afraid of the Clintons and what they might do and
It was live television couldn't it wasn't a pre-taped. And I, my house, had no, I'm not.
Good for you.
By the way, in this, in this moment.
And I like being alive, by the way.
I think we all do.
Every day is a blessing.
Oh my God.
At a curiosity, nothing to do with the war, nothing to do with Ukraine, Russia.
Just what are your thoughts on Vladimir Putin and his mindset these days?
I don't, I don't, his mindset.
I think when we look at it from a foreign policy perspective, I'm not going to pretend to
claim to know what's going through his mind, but I think if we look from the outsider's
view in, as you have NATO continuing to expand, continuing to surround russia you look back to what putin has said has been
his most concern from the very greatest concern at the very beginning which was
uh... not being surrounded on all sides by nato
armed countries
uh... and feeling that threat so this this latest development of
of uh... what looks to be the united states providing f-16s, either directly or indirectly to Ukraine,
this is going to be a very serious escalation in this war that will lead, could lead to
those disastrous consequences nuclear war that we're talking about.
The reason I ask that is there's a large contingency of people on the right who actually
have higher approval ratings of Putin
than they do of Biden, which is concerning.
I get, you know, if you're American, whether you like Biden or like Trump, you should support
our president as a primary focal point rather than a Russian dictator.
Yeah.
Why do you think people are so fast at this?
I won't even begin.
I won't even begin.
I have no idea.
But I think it's more important, I don't think we should blindly support anybody, period.
I think it's more important for us as Americans, regardless of political party,
to stand together on our ideals and principles that we celebrate and that we should cherish in this country.
Those principles of freedom and our God-given rights that are enshrined in the Constitution,
those are things that they are under attack,
they are under threat,
and they are things, unfortunately,
that we cannot take for granted at this time
when people are saying, well, hey,
maybe the First Amendment no longer applies,
that it's okay to silence and censor
and cancel certain people's speech.
These are things that we used to all be able to agree on.
And even something as sacred as the First Amendment is no longer sacred, unfortunately,
and it should concern everyone.
I'll give you my response.
Okay.
I respect anybody that loves their family, defends their heritage,
defends their denomination, whatever faith they have,
and fights for their country to protect their people
and not giving deals to people on the outside
that they're for sale.
I don't have to like you, but I can respect you.
In the industry business,
you've been competing for a long time, guys sold out their people
all the time.
They would sell their agents to get money on the side and nobody knew about it.
They would sell their employees.
They would sell everything they could in a way of running their agency.
They got, you know, 5,000 agents, hey, I'll give you a million dollars if you also sell
this.
Nobody knew about it.
We never sold out.
He has protected his country.
As a nationalist of Russia. That's something you
got to respect. Unfortunately, in America, my sister sent me the national anthem for
Germany. I want to read this to you. This is Germany's national anthem. I don't know if
you just sent it to me. This was a few days ago. It says Germany, Germany, above everyone,
above everyone in the world.
Guess what?
Doigland, Doigland, Ubert Alice, Ubert Alice in their belt.
Okay?
You know somebody, I'm gonna say,
well, you know what, that's what you have Hitler.
I totally get it.
But in America, we're embarrassed to read our
pleasure legions to the flag of the United States of America
or our prayers that we have, these things that we did,
we're embarrassed.
The fact that America was number one for so long.
And I respect anybody that is proud of whoever they are.
By the way, I don't have to agree with your political philosophies,
but I respect the fact that you respect where you come from.
That's a whole different conversation.
I don't want to get into that part. That's a whole different conversation. I don't want to
get into that part. That's just my thoughts on Russia and FYI. No, we shouldn't be supportive of
that guy. America first is what it needs to be. And this criticism that Americans are apologizing
about being America first is the most pathetic thing ever. Can you imagine you haven't apologized
for being married to your wife and every day after apologize for your your kids you have to apologize for your parents you have to apologize.
You mean I have to apologize.
I'm in a Syrian, I'm a man I'm proud.
I'm from Iran.
I'm proud that I was born and raised in Iran.
I'm proud to be an American.
I'm proud to be a veteran.
I'm proud.
I'm proud.
We ought to be proud.
Some people are not proud of being Americans and that's pathetic in my eyes.
Now let's go to the last couple topics that we have.
Great question out of. Here's our couple topics that we have great question at them.
Here's our couple of topics.
One of them is Musk and Cuban.
On what's been going back and forth with Cuban
said a couple comments about Musk.
I missed that.
Okay, no problem.
I'll read it to you.
I'll read it to you.
Maybe even an open-ended question,
I'm sure you're kind of following
what's going on with what he called it
to Musk's recent recent higher the CEO.
Some are happy about it, some are concerned, world economic forum, you know, is he going
this direction, is he going that direction, he doesn't interview the next day, the guy
asked the question, I don't know if you've seen this or not, where there's a 10 second pause,
can you pull this up where he says, I'll say whatever I want to say.
Great clip.
Great clip. Great clip. Right. What do you, what do you, what's the, what title should
he put to find this clip with a 10 second? Do what I want.
A mosque. You know what you want to talk about? I think it's right there. Can you zoom in
a little bit to see if you see the, how long is it two minutes and 40s? No, don't do that
one because you're going to have to find the 10 second clip. Maybe in the search put 10 seconds. In the search put 10 seconds for this to come up
10 seconds to come up. Okay, well you look for it. I'm gonna ask Tulsi. Tulsi, what do you think about the higher of his recent CEO?
I think her name is I want to say Linda is her. Yeah, what are your thoughts on the recent CEO higher?
I mean based on what I I know is extremely superficial.
I've read a little bit of the top lines
about people's concerns about her associations
or things that she said or spoken on.
What's interesting is that the concerns that have come
from people who say that their conservatives
are talking about, you know, she part
of the globalist movement, et cetera, et cetera.
On the Democrat side or on the mainstream media side, the concerns they pointed out was
that she follows a lot of conservatives on Twitter.
And so I just thought it was interesting that you have both sides finding reasons to criticize
her.
I don't know her.
I don't know what, you know, what are the qualities that Elon Musk saw in her to bring
her on the tape to bring her
On board great. Let's play this clip. This is a clip of a recent interview he did and
His response is just powerful go for it
We gotta you gotta play the question. The princess bride
This is short bird the short version doesn't have the question in it.
Yeah.
What was the question?
The question was essentially, how concerned are you that your personal ideology, your personal
tweets, your memes, everything that you do, may affect the stock price of tesla uh... and
you know the ramifications of that
chan this is in regards to his tweet calling George soros magmita gotcha
that was fact check the right that he had had had had had had had had had had
long past
was a seat in the princess bride
awful great movie, great, um, where he confronts the person
who killed his father.
He says, off of me money, off of me power, I don't care. See, just don't care.
See, you just don't care.
You want to share what you have to say.
I'll say what I want to say, and if the consequence of that is losing money, so be it.
Okay.
Got him.
No flinch.
Got a love in this breaking guy.
That's powerful. Yeah, I mean, mean look I hope he stays in this state. There's a lot of concerns
I also have about this new CEO
But you know I ran a poll the other day. Hey
Bad higher good higher. Let's wait and see I think bad good higher was 6% bad higher was like 24%
And let's wait and see was like 60 plus percent obviously the right answer was like 24%. And let's wait and see, it was like 60 plus percent.
Obviously, the right answer for all of us is,
let's wait and see, we're gonna find out what's gonna happen.
Is she just an advertising person
and to come from their defending kind of black rock
and some of that stuff was a little bit concerning?
So let's talk ESG.
That just on that clip, I just wanna say,
I think we earlier were talking about
what do people value?
That says a lot about a person.
What is most important?
What does he value?
Obviously he's a business guy, wildly successful.
He's good at what he does, but when it comes right down
to it, what does he actually value?
I learned that he values awesome movies.
The princess Brian, you've never seen that movie.
I've seen it a few times.
My name is Rodrigo Montoya, you killed my father
prepared the day.
And what an powerful movie.
Andre, the giant shout out to him.
Yeah.
Kind of love him, though, like to see like different.
But what's your favorite movie?
Now that he recorded a movie, do you have a favorite movie?
It's a mini series called Banda Brothers.
Of course.
World War II.
Tom Hanks, I think.
It is.
It is Tom Hanks.
I've over the years seen it a
number of times. I first I think the first time I saw it is actually going through officer
candidate school in the army. And we had to over whatever many weeks it was. We watched
an episode and we had to write an essay on the lessons of leadership either successful
or failures of leadership that came from each episode that was based on
on World War II.
Favorite actor or actress?
Ooh, Denzel Washington.
Really?
Yeah.
Favorite Denzel movie.
Ooh, I can't think of a bad one.
Come on, give me the favorite one.
What's the, I'm so satisfied.
Okay, there's one that Pat wants you to say.
I wonder if he was the one where he plays the bad cop.
Oh, okay.
Training day.
Training day.
Yeah, more ridiculous movie. Yeah. King Kong. With Egon. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. That's that's
definitely up there. Oh, yeah. You go ahead and say what's
on your mind. You know your favorite. For me, movies of
vengeance, redemption, revenge, those movies are like, you
know, it's it's like Skittles to a 12 year old. So what's
your favorite man on fire is with Denzel to me. it's like Skittles to a 12 year old who loves can. So what's your favorite?
Man on fire is with Denzel to me.
That's like John Cue, the scene with him and his kid
and the doc, you know, he buries me, you know,
not the other way.
You feel the talk as a great actor.
Yeah.
But yeah, all time movie, I would probably say,
you know, notebook gone with the wind.
I'm just kidding.
But notebook, you do like the
know what I'm talking about
but it's
I've never seen that movie you know that I've never seen it
really yeah Tulsi you're missing out you're missing out what do you
want it's actually very political
moving it's a very do you go for money or do you go for your beliefs
yes that's what it's about. Interesting. Okay.
So, in regards to ESG, the I, C, I, all this stuff, the other day, we're kind of sitting
around and we're looking at the next episode to shoot and we're seeing the ties with ESG,
the I, C, I, and you look at C, I, that corporate, the quality index, who's behind it, who's
given the scoring.
Are you concerned about the direction they're going with
ESGD, I.C.I.?
You think this is gonna work?
Or you think eventually people are gonna be like,
listen, tell you what this is about like.
This was a dumb move.
What are you doing for the Raptor?
Do you even make Hollywood?
You just made an announcement that a third of everybody
you hire has to be from an underrepresented community
and I have to hire a black, a Hispanic, a women, a LGBT, a this, a that, and even richer
drivers and actors are coming out and saying this doesn't make any sense.
Do you think this is eventually going to be exposed as a terrible idea or do you think
this is going to be used as a way to weaponize small business owners and SMP 500 companies.
Both. I think that it is already being,
it's the fact that you've got some of the biggest actors
in history or in our time at least,
actually, you know, maybe for the first time coming out
and speaking out against this stuff is pretty powerful.
And I think it is starting to expose
the hypocrisy and the insanity of it.
And I think there's already evidence showing how it is being manipulated and weaponized. to expose the hypocrisy and the insanity of it.
And I think there's already evidence showing how it is being manipulated and weaponized.
So they talk about these things with these very altruistic, idealistic intentions and objectives.
We're working for equity without the clip of Bernie Sanders on Bill Mar.
The conversation they had about equity versus equality was very telling when Bill Mar had to describe to Bernie, you know, what equity really means
and Bernie said, so what is it?
Equity or equality?
And Bernie says, well, equality.
There are these acronyms that are being thrown out by people as though it's for the best
public good.
Many of them don't even know what it actually means.
And we've seen with the ESG some of the scoring
and things that have been done that are show
that it's being manipulated for other interests
than the public good they are claiming it to be.
So I think both are already starting
to be exposed as we speak.
That's good.
The sooner the better, because it's not really making people leaders make the right decisions
This a clip you're talking about the equal quality
I think so we play with this as you actually see it. I've never seen this. Yeah, are we confusing?
Equality of opportunity with trying to guarantee equity and outcomes. Okay, that's interesting because part of this
I think this word equity is coming to the language in the last few years and before that we didn't hear it a lot
And I think a lot of people hear equity
and they hear equality.
It's the same word.
And it's not the same word and the same concept.
So how would you differentiate between equity and equality?
I didn't know, yeah.
But equality, we talk about, I don't know what the answer is.
You can't, I was going to say, you can tell.
I'm going to say, you can tell he doesn't know.
You know, equality is equality of opportunity.
We live in a society, we want all people to have,
whatever color you're skinned is.
Equity, I think, is more guarantee of outcome.
Is it not?
I think so.
Okay.
So which side do you come down on?
Equality.
Equality. A quality.
Yeah, okay.
Boys, any comment on that one?
I just still have that's the definition of different.
We can...
Oh my God, that was great.
It's good, it's very straightforward.
And I think he's writing a lot of people don't know the
difference, but they're using these words because it's the
thing that everybody's saying and it's the popular thing
of the moment.
Did you ever think that would come a time
where the feminist woman has tried so hard
to get to a point where it's men and women are equal, right?
Hey, we want equal pay.
We want you to watch WNBA, whether you like it or not,
we want the same amount of viewers.
We want you to pay us the same amount of money.
We want you to give us the same amount of respect, all this stuff.
And then they get so wild and crazy that even the feminist movement ends up losing to men
because they allow men to join their camp and just call themselves, did you ever think
this day was going to come?
No.
No. No.
No.
See, how do we get here?
This is a little weird for me.
How do we get here?
It is, I mean, it is this mental illness that is taking over our society where things that
are not real are being sold as real, things that are not true are being sold as true.
And it's this exercise of power.
And this is the underlying danger that sits beneath
all of these crazy things is that those who are in power
across government, not all of these different entities,
are putting us in a position where we are being told
that we just have to comply and go along with whatever they say, that there is no room
for critical thinking or questioning or common sense
or science or biology even, that whatever they say goes
and we have to just fall in line.
And that's the real danger that is the common thread
with all of these crazy examples that we're seeing,
that aren't just, they're not theoretical,
it's not just for the sake of arguments,
we're actually seeing the very real impacts on kids
on our society and our communities.
Don't they call it the woke mind virus?
You think that's an appropriate name for this?
I do.
What's next, though?
I guess, you know, we had a gentleman here,
I think I can say a gentleman, Frank,
from a gaze against rumors.
We're having a great conversation with him.
And I said, you know, so we talked about
the uncomfortable conversations that nobody wants to talk about
because God knows it could lose votes
and they can lose this and this and that.
I'm like, look, you know, at first, you know,
when somebody, certain, you know, I'm gay
or I'm lesbian, I'm this, okay, it was a certain connotation, there was a certain like, hey, you know, this
purse, this is not a normal behavior. But we said, you know, military, don't ask,
don't tell. I was in a unit with a couple guys that were gay. It's very easy to
tell when you're into showers like, Hey, bro, you okay? Is everything okay with you?
Seeing a little excited. And then you find out six months later.
Now, now I know why you're always fired up.
Okay, you should've told us.
So we would have different schedules for shower.
I'm fired up, Pat.
We're gonna go, little awkward, you're like, dude.
You know, I don't know what he's seeing.
I'd be so excited about it.
We would always talk about it.
Finally, we laughed about it, but you know,
it was a don't ask, don't tell type of a situation.
Today we have to salute, we have to do this.
We have to do that. And then all a sudden do more and more and more and more
We kept buying into this concept that but it's normal, but it's normal, but it's normal
It's normal and I got a book upstairs saying it's normal
Millions of copies sold it's a book for a ten-year-old in school on how boys have sex with boys and how girls have sex with girls
and how boys have sex with girls and all this stuff.
Okay.
It's not the GBC, it's the other one, it's called, it's normal, something like that.
But I asked this question because when the cameras off, people are willing to talk about this
more openly.
When the cameras on, everybody's a little bit careful about it. It's perfectly
normal. That's the book. Everybody's a little bit careful about it because what if this
and what if that and what if this, right? Isn't the reason why we kind of got here where
sports illustrated, I'm not, I have no problem with Martha Stewart. She actually looks good
for an 81 year old. Go to the other one. Yeah, yeah, apparently 81. I thought I was
to look great for 81. I'm a cover of sports. Respect. yes. Yeah, apparently, I do one. I thought I was. It looks great for anyone.
I'm a cover of some of the stuff.
Respect.
Respect.
But do the guy, the guy that's wearing this one piece, do you know what you want to talk to?
You know what you want to talk about?
For such a bit. I think it's a little bit strange, this model.
Anyways, I guess I'll come, I will find it here to picture.
Do you think it's a little strange that the more and more and more accepting we become,
gradually the next thing they could pitch is the fact that a 44-year-old
ends up being with somebody who's 13 years old.
Well guess what?
That's just what it is.
That's who they accept.
And, you know, it's normal.
It's normal.
You know, we should accept the fact that they love each other.
And some people say, you're an idiot.
You're mind.
This will never happen.
We'll never get there.
Nobody ever thought we're going to get here.
Well, that's all.
It's already happening. it's already happening.
It's already happening, the normalization of pedophilia.
The fact that there is such a term
as a minor attracted person.
Oh my God.
The fact that that is a term that's being used
and assigned to people who are adults
who are quote unquote attracted to minors,
yeah, that's a pedophile.
That's a crime against a child.
And those criminals should be locked up
and kept away from children.
How are Democrats supporting that, though?
That's my point.
I have not heard a single Democrat in Congress
in the House or the Senate speak out against this nonsense.
And their response is always like,
oh, it's a non-issue.
Like these things only affect the handful of people.
They don't actually speak to or address what is happening
and how we have people who are teachers
who are out there and on there on social media saying,
well, I'm a minor attracted person.
I shouldn't be discriminated against anyway.
This people who are entrusted with the well-being
and safety of our kids.
So this progression that you're talking about
is very, very real.
And the fact that it is happening not only
with the acceptance but encouragement
of the very same people who are totally fine
with these books that are sexualizing kids
as young as 5, 6, 7 years old.
I'm not a parent, but parents everywhere,
people who care about children everywhere, should be stepping up and speaking out against it.
Can I ask you a question on this topic?
So back to that LGB-TQ-IA plus all this stuff.
Dave Chappelle has an amazing take on this, amazing joke.
And he basically gives the metaphor that they're all
in a car together, they're all in a car together,
they're ahead in the same direction,
but they all have completely different agendas.
Like the L is different from the B,
the versus the G, versus the T,
and he basically summarizing this is like,
the G's driving, because that's the gay guy,
and he's driving, and he's the man, whatever,
and then the L is sitting in the front seat,
and she's doing her thing,
and everybody loves the L's,
because who doesn't like the L's, except for the G,
because he's like, I wouldn't wear that, this whole deal.
And then the B's in the back,
and she's just like, listen,
I'll do whatever anyone wants in this car.
But then you get to the T's.
And the whole premise of his joke is like,
nobody's got a problem with any of this stuff.
But this T thing,
is that's where people are like,
I don't, what's the tea?
Are you a guy or a girl?
You're cutting things off.
You're moving things around.
You're a man, but you wanna play in woman's sports.
And I'm one of the people that are like,
I think that women should be more outspoken about this.
I agree.
So, I host another show, Sawas Cast,
and I have a lot of women on my show.
And I do a lot of men on the street interviews.
I'm not only asking a series of questions about money,
and dating, and relationships.
And then I'll say, hey, by the way,
what are your thoughts on biological men
playing in women's sports?
And that's the one question that women are like,
oh, yeah, I don't want to answer that on camera.
I don't really want to talk about it. And the next question, and then the interview's over, and they're like, listen, I don't wanna answer that on camera. I don't really wanna talk about it.
And the next question, and then the interview's over,
and they're like, listen, I don't really wanna talk about it,
but I think it's really freaking weird.
And I don't wanna share bathrooms with guys.
And I just don't wanna offend people
and say this stuff on camera,
but just between you and me, yeah, I'm not comfortable with it.
I'm like, why wouldn't you say that on camera?
Well, cancel culture, this, that, and the other.
Why do you think young women specifically
are so afraid to speak on this topic?
I think it is that power of self-sensorship
that has been, you know,
that it's kind of a mandate of self-sensorship
that if you don't go along to get along,
then you will be canceled and you'll be attacked
and you'll be called names and you will be smeared.
Bethany Hamilton is a surfer out of Hawaii.
You know what I'm talking about.
She had her arm bent on.
You've been on her shark when she was a kid.
Yep.
Still competing on the circuit.
And once the world's surf league announced biological males
will be allowed to compete against women on the tour
She was the only one who had the courage to speak out. She never talks about politics
She is so pleasant so mellow doesn't get involved with any of the headlines or anything that goes on
but she recognized that
She had a responsibility to speak up and she did and she got attacked heavily for it
Which I think she expected.
And she spoke out in the sweetest, kindest, most compassionate way, just saying that I'm not against anyone,
but this is about what's fair and what's right for women on the tour. And it's just not right.
Shortly after that, we international women's day came around. And every year, the WSL,
We international women's day came around and every year the WSL
welcomes professional surfers men and men who want to put the name of a prominent woman who inspires them on the back of their jersey for the contest on that day. I think there were five or six men
who wanted to put Bethany Hamilton's name on their jersey that day and the WSL said no. Wow. You are not allowed to put her name, her name alone on your jersey.
A woman's name.
A woman's name.
Yeah.
A woman who has, throughout her lifetime, exceeded all of the obstacles put before her
and is thriving as a human being, as a professional surfer, because she had the audacity to speak
out the truth.
This was the consequence.
It's good to see, I think slowly, it's not happening fast enough,
but slowly there are more women who are being directly impacted,
inspired by people like Riley Gaines and Beth Alokin.
I was just gonna bring up Riley Gaines.
The same story is almost like that, just in the swimming with Leah Thomas.
Absolutely.
And but they're inspiring a lot of other women,
girls to recognize
How powerful their voice can be we know just in case you guys are looking to buy some gifts for some friends This is the latest the swim swim wear from Adidas if you want to you girl if you want to zoom in a little bit drop
That kind of sound about I'm so sorry guys. I'm not trying to be funny, but that's a little weird. Okay. I don't care
I said little weird, okay? I don't care what it's a little weird, okay?
For them to try to normalize this is extremely weird,
but you know what this does to them?
It does home women clothing.
There we go.
Do you know what this does to them?
This increases their C.E.I. score, their ESG score.
That's what this does.
What is this? I've been familiar with D.I. Yes, she's not, this is a new one now, C.E.I. score their ESG score. That's what this does. What is this? I've been familiar with D.I.
Yes, she's not this is a new one now C.I. By the way, here's the craziest thing about C.I.
C.I. is a form of a D.I. You know D.I. is what diversity
includes the whole thing C.I. is corporate equality index
And the ones that give the scores to them is a company called HRC. HRC stands for human rights
campaign. HRC is human rights campaign. Here's a crazy part. You ready for this?
Yeah. They got started in 84. You know who funds human rights campaign. George Soros.
It's funded by Open Society Foundation. Okay. Do you know who runs Open Society Foundation?
George Soros. Oh, so yeah, there we go. Yeah, literally.
And they come to your company and they measure the score only 20 people, 20 companies have a perfect
score of 100.
And they'll come back and say, here's what you need to do to improve.
That's all structure, by the way.
Workforce protection, five points possible.
No discrimination.
Is this called the woke rating?
Yeah, it's called the woke rating.
You've not seen this?
No.
Yeah, it's called the woke rating. You've not seen this. Yeah, it's called the walk rating.
That's not a joke though. This is as sincere as real as it gets. Rob, I'm going to send this to your computer.
If you want to show this, Rob, iPhone or I'm going to send it to the, I'm going to send it to your iPhone just to show the No, this is exactly how they are scoring different companies' workforce protection that gives you five points.
Inclusive benefits, 50 points, criteria here includes providing health care for same-sex couples,
supporting an inclusive culture, 25 possible points including gender- dress codes and trans inclusive restaurant facilities policies.
Number four is corporate social responsibility. You get 20 points, marketing or advertising
to LGBTQ consumers, which include Nike and Bud Light's use of transgender spokesperson
Dillam Alveni. That's crazy. And the number five is responsible citizenship. 25 points
deducted. If a company gives money to organizations,
so primary mission includes advocacy against LGBTQ organizations, which is not defined, but
could include Christian groups.
Wow.
Any final thoughts on this?
Tulsi, I'll give you the floor.
If you got any.
I want to I want to show show.
Show the way things used to be just a few years ago.
Did you did you see the Levi's?
Skip on SNL?
The the the the the mom's about the pants.
Yeah, mom pants.
Yes, the mom pants.
Great skit.
I don't know what I'm talking about.
I don't know. Because it's a SNL. Oh, yeah, great skit. I don't know what I'm talking about. I don't know what I'm talking about. Because it's an SNL. I take it down.
All right. I'm about like, hey, we're mom. We wear mom pants.
Well, and it was all about gender nude. It was really pointing out the farce of,
you know, everything that you just talked about just five years ago.
SNL made a great skit. Five years ago.
Five years ago. SNL made a great skit. Five years ago. Five years ago SNL made a great skit about it,
making fun of Levi's shapeless, genderless pants
and rightly so.
Yeah, mom pants, I gotta go see the clip.
You gotta ask.
Last question on this topic.
I just wanna ask you a question about
just normal old school traditional women, you know.
It's a political question, but you know, yourself, you look at Kamala Harris,
current VP, Hillary Clinton, almost president, a lot of people say AOC could potentially be
a candidate in and handful of years, whether you like or not.
There's other women that have run recently, Carly Ferrino, a lot of people are, you know,
advocates of Marjorie Taylorgren, what have you?
How ready do you think America is for a female president now?
I think America is ready for the right woman president.
Some of the, I think it's wrong to assume, and this has been one of the insulting things
that I've experienced even from within the democratic party is that they assume they the sounds ironic saying
this now that they have reduced women to our biological parts to say well if you're a
woman you have to support women that was a whole argument with Hillary Clinton right
for me I didn't support her and literally I was asked by some of the most powerful women,
an influential woman in the country,
how dare you as a woman, not support this other woman.
And my response was how dare you reduce me
to my biological parts and think that I don't have
my own brain, my own mind, my own opinions and views.
And yet where are we today now?
They deny this biological objective truth
that there is such a thing as a woman at all.
It's just madness.
It's the right person.
Whether it be a man or woman, yes, absolutely.
I think we're looking for the right person.
I think we're ready for the right.
I don't think we're not, you know,
Tulsi, I got a text message someone's asking for a right. I don't think it's, we're not, you know, Tulsi, I got a text message someone's asking for a referral.
If a potential candidate is looking for a potential VP,
would you entertain the idea?
Someone's asking for a referral.
I would entertain the idea on the basis of whether or not
I would be able to have an impact, a very real impact
on defending our country,
both our freedom and our security and our future.
I think you would be one hell of a VP.
That would be endless, and I think you'd be one hell of a whatever you choose to do,
your leader.
But that would be some wild, if that were to happen, the draw on who would be attracted to that person as a VP, oh my God.
Like, check, check, check, check, check, and a true believer and a backbone and willing to go
against establishment. I kind of like a lot of that stuff. Well, thank you for that. The person
is thankful for your answers. Well, it's very good tonight. Are you saying that, you know, she has your endorsement?
You know, that's a...
I have her in the endorsement. She has my endorsement as a human being. I think she's very necessary, but Gank, if you enjoy this as much as we did,
we want you to go subscribe to both her channels. One is the YouTube one, link is below, as well as her rumble one, the link is below. In description, Rob, let's put it in description, comment, chat, all of it,
as well as the link to her website. You can go to TalsiGabbert.com, once again TalsiGabbert.com
to get that done. And then Adam has got his event coming up with fresh and fit that we're doing at
the live event. If you want to know more details about this to get registered for that as
well text awards, sauce cast, SOS cast, sauce cast to 310-340-1132. Once again, 310-340-1132
to get intel about that, it's going to be be himself fresh and fit in a bunch of girls to debate and
argue about the conversations of red pill
Man women they're gonna be talking a lot of smack if you want to be entertained. It's gonna be Friday
June 2nd at 59 90 live again text-to-word sauce cat to three sauce cast to 310 340
1132 To see you to mom. Thank you1132, Toasty, Yutobom.
Thank you.
It was amazing.
So good to see you.
The good kind of us.
We are looking forward to doing it again very soon.
Yeah, look forward to it.
Thank you.
Take care. Take care everybody.
Have a great weekend.
Bye bye. Yn yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'n ddol, yw'w'n ddol, yw'w'n ddol, yw'n dol