PBS News Hour - Full Show - April 23, 2026 - PBS News Hour full episode

Episode Date: April 23, 2026

Thursday on the News Hour, tensions rise in the Strait of Hormuz as Iran seizes ships and President Trump orders attacks on vessels laying mines. The federal government reclassifies marijuana, changing the way it's regulated and researched. Plus, we report from Uganda on the Trump administration's conditions for foreign aid and the potentially drastic impacts on disease prevention. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy

Good evening. I'm Jeff Bennett. And I'm Amna Nawaz on the news hour tonight. Tensions rise in the strait of Hormuz as Iran seizes ships and President Trump threatens to attack vessels laying mines. The federal government reclassifies marijuana as a less dangerous drug, changing the way it's regulated and researched. And we report from Uganda on the Trump administration's conditions for foreign aid and the potential impacts on disease prevention. It's about protecting them from HIV. protecting them from unplanned or unwanted pregnancies, but also other sexually transmitted infections. Welcome to the News Hour. President Trump announced late today that the ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon will be extended by three weeks.

That ceasefire covers fighting between Israel and Hezbollah, the Iran-backed militant group based in Lebanon. Separately, Mr. Trump told reporters earlier he was in no rush to reach a deal with Iran after his latest ceasefire extension. Our Stephanie Syne begins our coverage. Just two days after President Trump extended his two-week ceasefire with Iran, the prospect of talks is giving way to more tensions and brinksmanship from both sides at sea. Iranian state TV broadcast this highly produced video, complete with drone footage and a soundtrack, purportedly showing the country's Revolutionary Guard taking control of two vessels yesterday in the Strait of Hormuz. The vessel, Majestic X, we intend to conduct the boarding of your vessel.

The Pentagon released its own footage of U.S. forces on the deck of an oil tanker today in the Indian Ocean, a ship accused of smuggling Iranian oil. And President Trump posted to social media that he had ordered the United States Navy to shoot and kill any boat that threatens the strait by laying underwater mines or otherwise without hesitation. Speaking to reporters today, the president said he's in no rush to set a deadline on his latest ceasefire extension. He said that was to allow Iran time to sort out what he characterized as its fractured leadership. They're not doing well economically, financially. They're not doing any business because of the blockade. They want to make a deal. We have been speaking to them, but they don't even know who's leading the country.

They're in turmoil. They're in turmoil. thought we'd give them a little chance to get some of their turmoil resolved. When asked, the president also backed off any threat to use a nuclear weapon against Iran. Why would I use a nuclear weapon? We've totally, in a very conventional way, decimated them without it. No, I wouldn't use it. A nuclear weapon should never be allowed to be used by anybody. The escalating standoff in the street has led to another uptick in gas prices, and crude oil is back over $100 a barrel. I'm told this is a rather historic meeting.

Meanwhile, a second round of high-stakes talks between Israeli and Lebanese diplomats took place at the White House today. President Trump insisted on meeting them personally. He then announced a three-week extension of the ceasefire. But Israel and Iran-backed Hezbollah have already accused the other of breaking the troops up to this point. In southern Lebanon today, thousands of mourners marched in the streets alongside the cops. the coffin of journalist Amal Khalil, her press helmet placed on top.

Death for Israel, her pallbearers shouted. Lebanese officials and the paper she worked for said an Israeli air strike yesterday killed her as she took cover inside a house. Israel's military says they'll review the incident. Thousands of miles away in Pakistan's capital Islamabad, banners still flutter in the breeze, teasing another round of talks between Washington and Tehran that have lately shown no signs of moving forward. For the PBS News Hour, I'm Stephanie Sye.

The Israeli military said it intercepted rocket fire that crossed into northern Israel from Lebanon today. Hezbollah said the attack was in retaliation for Israel violating the 10-day ceasefire that took effect last week, an extension to which President Trump announced earlier. Now, earlier this week, we brought you an exclusive interview. with the senior Hezbollah leader who rejected Israel's demand to disarm. Tonight, we're joined by Israel's ambassador to the UN, Danny Danon.

Mr. Ambassador, welcome to the program. Thank you for having me, Jeff. So President Trump, as you know, a short time ago announced a three-week extension of the ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon, specifically Hezbollah. As we sit here and speak, details are few. What more can you tell us? First, we welcome the direct talks between Israel and Lebanon. You know, we have the same goal.

We all want to get rid of Hezbollah. We want to see sovereign Lebanon controlling the territory of Lebanon. And as we speak, we see that Hezbollah is trying to create chaos, attack Israeli communities in the northern part of Israel, and again try to ignite another cycle of violence. We will continue the talks with the Lebanese. We are grateful for the U.S. for their involvement. But we have to acknowledge that Hezbollah should not be a part of this equation.

They shouldn't be in southern Lebanon. They shouldn't be part of the Lebanese government. They are the one who's throwing chaos in the region. When the president says the U.S. will help Lebanon protect itself from Hezbollah, what does that look like in practice beyond what's already being done? Well, we all acknowledge the weakness of the Lebanese government. government. You know, we welcome the statements coming from Beirut about kicking out the ambassador of Iran, but he is still there, about gaining control over southern Lebanon, but it is

not the case. Hizvala is still there. So there's a huge gap, Jeff, between the declarations and the abilities or the actions of the Lebanese government. And I think the U.S. and other country who wants to help Lebanon should help them actually have control over the situation. that they can actually mobilize their military and be effective. You know, if they are not controlling the military, they will not be able to change much. A question about Israel's military action. I want to play video from April 8th,

when Israeli forces struck more than 150 locations simultaneously across Lebanon, killing more than 300 people, wounding more than 1,000 others. When Israel targets Hezbollah in dense urban areas, as was the case here, How does it determine what level of civilian casualties is considered acceptable? So first, we try to minimize civilian casualties period.

Unlike Hezbollah, we're doing exactly the opposite. They target communities. We actually gave notice to many communities to evacuate southern Lebanon, and many people left southern Lebanon. And we welcome that because it allows us to attack Hezbollah without risking civilians, and we will continue to do our best to minimize civilian casualties. But we have also to admit, Jeff, that Hezbollah is hiding behind civilians. They are hiding behind UN facilities, the launching rockets from those places,

and we have the right to defend ourselves. So we will continue to do that. We will continue to fight terrorist organizations. We saw it also in Gaza in the path with Hamas, They're trying to use civilians as human shields, but we will do our best to minimize civilian casualties. And to your point, we know that Hezbollah does indeed embed itself in civilian areas. So how many civilian deaths per Hezbollah target is acceptable? Is it 5? Is it 10? Is it 300? Or is there no ceiling at all?

Well, without going into the numbers, but I will tell you that, before each attack, we have a legal team that actually looks at the intelligence we have. and then reach the decision regarding the attack. So we don't just attack the process in the IDF, and I think we have the most moral military in the world, if you compare our actions to other militaries that engage in the past with terrorist organizations. It's not easy for us. And as I said earlier, we want to have peace with the Lebanese people.

We pray for that day. You know, when I was a child, we used to call the fence between Israel and Lebanon. We call it the good fence, because they were good neighbors. But unfortunately, a lot changed since that day. And today we have to deal with Hezbollah that is trying to hijack Lebanon. The Lebanese journalist Amal Khalil was killed yesterday in an Israeli strike.

Lebanon's prime minister responded by saying that Israel's targeting of journalists, and this is a quote, is no longer isolated incidents, but has become an established approach. The Committee to Protect Journalists has documented a pattern of journalists killed by Israeli strikes. What military objective is served by killing reporters? Well, I beg to differ about your question. You know, it's biased. With all due respect, we are not targeting reporters' period.

Unfortunately, if you have reporters who are next to Hezbollah terrorists or Hezbollah bunkers or Hezbollah launchers, those incidents happen, and we regret that. But to accuse Israel that we target reporters, you know, that's a bloodline. You know, what are we actually implying? Excuse me, sir. Excuse me. You gather intelligence? I take issue. I take issue.

We actually want to kill reporters and not to kill terrorists of Hizbalah. You say that Israel does not target journalists. Amal Khalil is dead. CPJ has documented a growing pattern of targeted Israeli attacks in Lebanon where 15 journalists and media workers have been killed by Israel since the October 7th attacks. your government continues to state that Israel does not target journalists, but my question is simple. At what number of dead journalists does that answer become one

that the international community can no longer accept? Jeff, it's outrageous. When you say we target journalists, you imply that we have the intention to kill journalists, and that's a lie. You should ask the other questions. Where were those journalists during the time of their attack? where they were spending their time.

Maybe they were next to Hezbollah terrorists. And that's why they were in line of fire, unfortunately. Do you know that to be true? Do you know that to be true? Do you know that to be true, sir? We will focus our efforts, our abilities, our intelligence, targeting Hezbollah terrorist period. We are not doing it against civilians, and for sure not against reporters.

Danny Donone. Thank you for your time this evening. We appreciate it. Thank you, Jeff. We start the day's other headlines in Georgia, where hundreds of people have fled their homes and more than 80 homes have now been destroyed as raging wildfires continue to threaten areas in the south of the state. My house is gone. Today, distraught residents returned to their properties, reduced to ash and ember. Georgia's biggest blaze broke out over the weekend, and at last check, it was only 10% contained.

Officials say that dry, windy conditions are to blame, but also fallen tree limbs still scattered from Hurricane Helene, which devastated the area more than a year and a half ago. What we're finding out here, what's driving this, somewhat is there's just a ton of old Hurricane Helene debris down in the woods, right? It's just a silver's laying around and it's just a tender box out there. So we're definitely seeing some of those flare-ups. Hundreds of fires have also spread this week in neighboring Florida. officials have called it the state's worst fire season in decades.

Warner Brothers shareholders voted today to approve the company's $81 billion sale to Paramount. It's a major step in a deal that could dramatically reshape Hollywood and the broader media landscape. The combined company would bring the likes of CNN, HBO Max, and Harry Potter under the same umbrella as CBS and the Paramount Plus streaming service, but it still requires regulatory approval. And critics, including some big names in Hollywood, have said the deal would lead to job losses and fewer options for filmmakers and moviegoers. Overseas, the European Union formally approved a loan package for Ukraine today valued it more than $100 billion. The much-needed

funds were announced during a meeting in Cyprus, attended by Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky. The loan comes as Russian oil began flowing again to Hungary and Slovakia through a pipeline in Ukraine that had been damaged during the fighting. Hungary had previously blocked the loan. The money will help Ukraine meet its economic and military needs for the next two years. Without it, economists had warned the country would start running out of cash in June. The U.S. Senate took a pivotal first step toward funding ICE and border patrol and potentially finding a way to end the shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security in the coming weeks. On this vote, the yeas are 50, the nays are 48, and the concurrent resolution as amended is agreed to.

DHS as a whole remains unfunded, but the measure voted on early this morning would allow Republicans to get around a Democratic filibuster of ICE and Border Patrol. It still has several more steps to go before it could take effect, and it comes amid a push by Democrats for policy changes to the agency after two protesters were killed by federal agents earlier this year. The meantime, Republicans accused Democrats of wanting to defund crucial. immigration operations. To prevent Democrats from deciding that they want to defund law enforcement again in September, we're going to fund these critical functions for the next three years.

Republicans hold a slim majority in the House, so even a few objections within the party could derail the budget plan. DHS has been shut since mid-February, making this the longest partial government shutdown in U.S. history. Round one of the NFL draft kicks off in Pittsburgh tonight with the city expecting hundreds of thousands of visitors for the three-day event. Officials are advising residents to use public transportation instead of driving to avoid the crowds, and city schools have moved to remote learning. Authorities pledged a, quote, significant law enforcement presence both on the main draft campus and around the city. The NFL draft has become a blockbuster event in its own right as top prospects hope to hear their name called to join one of the NFL's 32 teams.

MEDUP is cutting 10% of its workforce or about 8,000 jobs as the company pushes deeper into AI. The owner of Facebook and Instagram is just the latest tech firm to announce layoffs as part of a broader effort to embrace the possibilities of AI. Separately, Microsoft is reportedly planning to offer voluntary buyouts to thousands of U.S. employees. It's the first time the software giant has ever offered buyouts to employees as it looks to cut costs. In the meantime, on Wall Street, stocks fell following the latest spike in oil prices. The Dow Jones Industrial Average lost nearly 200 points on the day. The NASDAQ handed back more than 200 points or nearly 1%. The S&P 500 fell back from its latest all-time high.

And conductor and composer Michael Tilson Thomas has died. Born and raised in California, Tilson Thomas was a gifted pianist from a young age. He later committed himself to conducting and led orchestras in his own. Buffalo, Miami, London, and eventually San Francisco, where he stayed for 25 years. Tilson Thomas told the American Masters program that a conductor's job is to, quote, get a hundred or so people to agree where now really is. He was also a devoted teacher of classical music in the tradition of Leonard Bernstein. In 2015, Tilson Thomas explained the importance of mentorship to the news hours Jeffrey Brown.

It's essential for me, this sense of confidence. with a new brilliant spirit of another generation with whom I feel so much in common. But why is it essential? Because it reminds me too of the relationship I had with mentors of mine who were 50 years older than I. My major piano teacher was a pupil of a guy called Moritz Rosenthal who had been a pupil of List, who was a pupil of Cherney,

who was a pupil of Beethoven. Among his recognitions, a staggering 12-Bronautil Grammy Awards, the National Medal of the Arts presented by then President Barack Obama, and a Kennedy Center honor in 2019. His publicist said Tilson Thomas died at his home after years of battling an aggressive form of brain cancer. Michael Tilson Thomas was 81 years old. Still to come, on the news hour, the State Department proposes sending Afghans who helped

the U.S. war effort to Congo. A DACA recipient speaks out about her deportation and return to the U.S. And an art exhibit shines a light on the lesser-known persecution of Romani people during the Holocaust. This is the PBS News Hour from the David M. Rubenstein studio at WETA in Washington, headquarters of PBS News. The federal government is reclassifying medical marijuana, categorizing it as a drug with potential medical benefits and less potential for harm. While this doesn't legalize marijuana nationally, it does open the door to further research into its effects. Our William Brigham has been covering this and joins us now. So, William, this is a move that President Trump tried to enact via executive order last year and is now being pushed by the Justice Department.

What are the practical implications of this reclassification? I mean, the biggest implication is what you mentioned, Jeff, which is research into marijuana. By moving marijuana, and they're moved state-level medical marijuana from this category, Schedule 1, where hard drugs were class. down to Schedule 3, which is drugs that have medical benefits like Tylenol with codeine, that will allow greater research to be done. In fact, acting attorney general Todd Blanche wrote as much today. He wrote, these actions will enable more targeted rigorous research into marijuana safety and efficacy, expanding patients' access to treatments, and empowering doctors to make better informed health care decisions. I mean, researchers had always been able

to research marijuana, but there was an enormous thicket of bureaucracy to get through. This will make it a lot easier. This will also create quite a financial windfall for the companies that produce the recreational marijuana products that are sold all over the country. This change in status allows them to deduct a lot of their expenses off their taxes, and so that's why some critics have called this move a giveaway to Big Pot. And is that who wanted this shift to happen to have the third? government more overtly say that marijuana isn't such a dangerous drug? I mean, yes, in part, those companies wanted that.

Because, as you mentioned, this is still illegal on the federal basis, but there's 40-something states where medical marijuana and recreational marijuana is flowing out of stores all over the place. But also, drug policy reformers have wanted this. As you said, they have argued for a long time that marijuana has been unfairly demonized. that it is not the same as heroin or cocaine, and we shouldn't call it that. They argue that there was a whole generation of people who were arrested and incarcerated for simple possession, often minority communities, and they say that this is high time that we move away from that.

So if this doesn't legalize marijuana, is it likely to change the national landscape where different states have different systems of licensing and selling it? Not really. I mean, there will be an FDA hearing later this year to try to reclassify all marijuana, recreational and medical. But those states will still continue to operate as they are doing right now. The hope is that better research will help us understand this massive rolling experiment that we are doing, which is basically all these different states are slow rolling a legalization of marijuana across the country. Marijuana use is up.

There were polls in recent years showing that more people are smoking marijuana than cigarettes. And with this classification, while it says that marijuana is not as harmful, that is not to say that marijuana does not have serious problems. People can have real substance use disorders with it. There's increasing evidence that heavy chronic use, especially among young people, can be very detrimental to their brains and their emotional and mental development. And so the idea is, let's study this. a little bit more, let's make better policy decisions for this big experiment we're doing.

William Brigham. William, our thanks to you as always. Thanks, Jeff. Since the dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID, the Trump administration has been revamping aid policies, focusing on smaller, narrowly focused deals with recipient governments. They will be required to finance part, and it's hoped eventually entire programs now receiving American assistance. In his second report, Fred De Sam Lazaro reports from Kenya and Uganda, two nations that have signed agreements under the new America First Global Health Strategy.

On a recent afternoon in this Nairobi Public Health Center, Evelyn Minayo was girding herself for a dose of perhaps the most significant drug developed so far against HIV. Minio is considered at high risk. for the virus, but on Lena Capoeira, she'll be protected. Lena Capovir is not the first HIV prevention drug. There have been daily oral medications, for example, but this one is called a game changer because it's just one dose taken every six months, and it's been found nearly 100% effective in preventing HIV infection.

Lena Capovir is also the first drug made accessible in low-income countries soon after its release in rich nations. Why Searly Prep is here? It was approved just last June by the Food and Drug Administration in the U.S., where it is sold under the brand name Yes Tugo. The list price in America is $14,000 per dose, but under an agreement with the U.S. government, its maker, California-based Gillian Sciences, is making Lena Capoeuvre available for 2 million people at, quote, no profit,

targeting patients in several nations that the U.S. has approached with a new model for health care assistance. Sometimes I forget to take the pills, so this gives me some reassurance that I won't get infected. Evelyn Minayo, who struggles on meager earnings, selling second-hand clothes, is one of the earliest beneficiaries.

I sometimes visit the clubs to see if I can get a client who can supplement what I earn by having sex with a man for payment. The role of the woman. The goal out here of Lena Capavir is part of a new America first policy that, among other goals, aims to promote and showcase American products. It will be added to drugs that treat HIV, which the U.S. PEPFAR program, aside from a brief

interruption last year, has provided for years to some 20 million people worldwide. I express profound gratitude to the United States. Kenya's agreement signed in the presence of its president late last year will see the U.S. provide $1.6 billion over five years, the Kenyan government pledged to chip in 850 million. Diseases like HIV, TB, and malaria are targeted, particularly among young women. And Kenya will share data, pathogens, and biological samples with U.S. experts for disease surveillance and emergency preparedness. I assure you that every shilling and every dollar will be spent efficiently, effectively, and accountably.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the new approach works directly with governments and cuts out international agencies and non-government groups that contracted extensively to implement programs under USAID. Bottom line is, if you want to help a country, work with that country. That money is not just going to be spent to provide medicine and care. going to be spent to improve the domestic infrastructure, health care infrastructure. As part of that, Gilead Sciences has agreed to allow six generic drug makers to make and sell anacapivir in 120 low- and middle-income countries. Some estimates predict a potential cost as low-as-dollar-per-dose. However, the low-cost generics cannot be sold in several

middle-income countries like Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina, even though they have high-age. HIV rates. So this is where Lena Kappavir will be produced. Ajay Kumar Pahl is CEO of Kusil, a generics maker based in Uganda, which also signed an aid agreement with the U.S. He says the deal helps not just his company, but the continent. It brings sustainability of access. Because if you look at access in the continent, it's mostly externally funded. Even today imports more than 75% of its treatment from outside.

In about three and a half years, he says up to 11 million doses could be produced here targeting East African nations. As for demand and pricing, he says, it's too early to predict. It depends upon the interest of people and how much advocacy happens about it and how the market accepts it because, again, it's not a private product. That is, governments will have to buy most of the product and promote it to generate public demand. It's just one of several concerns that experts have for the new aid agreements. If you don't get a product to people's hands or into people's bodies, then it's not helpful. And we've seen that with a number of products.

Doctors Kenneth Inguri and Elizabeth Bukusi are leading HIV scholars in Kenya. I think we've heard commitments in the past, and there has been attempts to do it, but the funding doesn't always follow through in the same way. African governments burdened by debt and other compelling demands are often hard-pressed to fulfill commitments, she says. And the new agreements also emphasize U.S. priorities, she adds. And right now, those do not include family planning services for the young women targeted for Lena Kappa VIR. They fear getting pregnant, even more than they fear, getting HIV. We do need to find products that do more than one thing.

It's about protecting them from HIV, protecting them from unplanned or unwanted pregnancies, but also other sexually transmitted infections. In fact, Dr. Ngori was working on a research project to combine HIV prevention drugs with contraceptives. You have injectable contraceptives like the provera and sort of work towards a mechanism where they can combine these drugs in a single injection. His research into the idea ended abruptly last year, he says, along with its chief funder USAID. The U.S. government has been clear, America first,

and I think there's no, they have that right. Dr. Peter Weiswai is a public health scholar at Uganda's Macarera University. Given its deep pockets, he says, America will always have the upper hand. And he's concerned about what he calls strings attached to the U.S. assistance. The only right we have is our data and samples.

For example, he says African nations will be required to quickly detect outbreaks and send pathogens, data and biological samples do the United States. Once the samples have been exported related to the U.S., who knows what is going to happen. In fact, some countries have resisted citing unfair terms, with Zambia drawing the ire of the Trump administration, which reportedly demanded a share of its mineral ores as a condition for receiving HIV assistance. We need to be looking at these pathogens as actually of the economic potential. Potential that he says could be realized if aid agreements included training

to analyze data in Africa and build a biomedical industry here. He sees a historic pattern being repeated. Africa exports raw materials but derives little benefit from products made from them. The biological samples can be a basis for making vaccines. making medicine, doing genital therapy, and more. And this is the future of science. One office visit every six months. Lena Kappavir is blockbuster profitable for its maker

and touted as an American innovation, Weisswa says. But crucial clinical trials in its development were conducted across Africa, including here at Makarera University. For the PBS News Hour, I'm Fred DeSam-Lazero in Kampala, Uganda. of Afghans who helped the United States war effort in Afghanistan and who are detained now in Qatar may soon be sent back to Afghanistan or to the Democratic Republic of the Congo by the U.S. State Department. However, the DRC is in the midst of its own deep humanitarian crisis, with millions displaced by war and now seeking refuge outside their country. The push to send

the more than 1,000 Afghans elsewhere comes after President Trump halted the Afghan resettlement program more than a year ago. That program offered help to Afghans who faced threats after they aided the Americans during the 20-year war. For perspective on this and what could come next, we turn now to Sean Van Diver. He's a Navy veteran and president of Afghan Evac. That's an organization which aids in resettlement efforts. Sean, welcome back to the show. I know you briefed members of Congress on this potential plan a short while ago. What did you say to them and what was their reaction about this plan? Well, thank you so much for having me on today.

I talked to staff from a bipartisan, bicameral group of staff from all of the relevant committees to this. And people were pretty shocked. People are shocked, one, that folks are being sent or that the State Department is planning, even considering sending these folks who stood beside us and who believed in the idea of America to a war zone, to the Democratic Republic of Congo. They were shocked that these folks are still stuck there and haven't been able to make it to the United States, in particular because the camp is 42% children and there's 150 plus family members of active duty military.

And I'm happy to say that we got a lot of interest in running a bill or two that would help Afghans both here at home and abroad in Camp Asalia to get to safety. Camp Asalia, we should point out, in Qatar, where they have been currently held now for many, many months. I do want to put to you part of what the Trump administration says here is their concern. They say that some people in the resettlement program were not thoroughly vetted. That's part of the reasoning for this potential plan. What do you say to those concerns? I would invite people within the Trump administration to go to Afghanevac.org slash vetting to see how much extraordinary vetting happened.

In fact, the Biden administration didn't lessen the vetting standards. They didn't reduce the vetting standards. They kept President Trump's enhanced vetting, a big thing from his first administration. And in fact, they built on it. They leveraged AI. They leveraged all sorts of classified tools. They built out a pre-travel vetting effort to make sure that everybody who came through the enduring welcome pipeline, which ended up being the safest, most secure legal immigration

pathway in history, they made sure that everybody who even left Afghanistan was already vetted and medically screened before they even got to Qatar, the first. Philippines, Germany, or Albania for even more betting. And I just say that they're either lying or they're poorly informed, and I have suspicions as to which it is. The more than thousand people or so who are currently waiting include interpreters, folks who helped the U.S. war effort over those 20 years, as you mentioned, their families. Tell us about the conditions that they've been living in.

And if you're in touch with them, what are they telling you as all this plays out? Oh, goodness. Well, look, I'm in touch with them every day. I made a big group chat with a lot of these folks and their family members and another group chat with the active duty military service members whose families are stuck there. And to a person, one, they're pissed off that the government is even considering sending them anywhere but the United States of America.

Number two, the kids are very worried, right? We're seeing a lot of advocacy from the youth, from the 14 to 25-year-old age range, and we're seeing them be very powerful voices. We're also seeing a lot of folks that have been there for a while losing hope. People are devastated. The people that are in the military are losing a lot of faith in their country. But Afghans still believe in the idea of America. They still know that the American dream is real and they want to get here.

And so we're hoping that by shining some light on this heinous plan that we can get them here to safety, those that are able to clear. There are a few folks at the camp who cannot clear, and that's who the State Department should be focused on helping get somewhere else. If these families were to return to Afghanistan, what would await them there? Well, certain death for many. There are women who served in the military and fought the Taliban, fought our war for us. There's a lot of people who the Taliban would like to have retribution against.

And look, it's not as though the Taliban is sitting at the airport with a folding table and some chairs and a green visor checking resumes and exactly how long they worked for us. No, now that they've been at this camp for years, they have a relationship with the United States, even more so than before, so it's going to be a lot harder for them to hide. And frankly, it's a violation of the promise of America

that is squarely on the shoulders of President Trump, Stephen Miller, and Marco Rubio. Sean, can I just ask you to take a step back here? You yourself are a veteran. You have made this advocacy your life's work over the last several years. You're in close contact with a lot of these families. If this plan ends up going through, and I should ask you if you think it is inevitable, what does that say to you about the U.S., the place it holds,

and what are the other options for these families? Thank you for asking that. The message that this is sending is that the U.S.'s promises are temporary and conditional and dependent on who is sitting behind the resolute desk, and that just cannot be. You're right. I have made this my life's work. I've given up a career. I've given up a lot. But look, it is so important. This is, Afghanistan was not my war. I didn't serve it. But this is my fight because it's a fight about the very promise and idea of America. And we've got to make sure that when people with flags on their shoulders are making promises downrange,

that those are checks that can be cashed by the people who are believing us. I'm irritated. I don't think that this is going to go through. I think that this work is going to thwart their plan. And we're going to keep working every day to get in the way every time that they try to cause harm to vulnerable people. And if folks want to learn more, they can go to afghanevac.org slash donate if you want to support our efforts. We're really grateful you're covering this. That is Sean Van Diver, president of Afran Evak joining us tonight. Sean, thank you. Good to speak with you. Thank you so much.

Well, in addition to clamping down on the number of immigrants being let into the U.S., the Department of Homeland Security says it deported more than 675,000 people in the first year of Trump's second term. Although the administration claims to be targeting violent criminals, others continue to be caught up in the crackdown, including some who are protected from deportation. Liz Landers spoke recently with one woman who was detained, deported, and then allowed to come back into the United States. United States. Maria de Jesus Estrada Juarez entered the United States at 15 years old and has lived in the U.S. for 27 years. She was a recipient of a deferred action program established under President Obama that protects certain undocumented individuals from deportation if they came to the U.S. as children

and do not have a criminal record. Maria was on her way to citizenship with a family petition through her U.S. citizen daughter, but on February 18th, she was detained at her green card appointment and deported to Mexico within 24 hours. A judge ruled her deportation was illegal and ordered her return on March 23rd. She joins us now from her home in California. Maria, thank you for joining us this afternoon. You're welcome. Thank you for having me.

So like many others, you were arrested by ICE at a normal USCIS appointment that you were at trying to get your green card through your U.S. citizen daughter. Can you describe what happened that day? We show up to the appointment at USCIS in Sacramento. We walk into the office. We had my interview.

At the end of my interview, the interview agent told me that he needed to speak to his supervisor. And as soon as that I know, they knock on the door and I got arrested. And I was told that I was being detained and I was going to get deported back to Mexico. Did they handcuff you? Were they polite? How did they treat you during that moment? They did handcuff me. They handcuffed me from my daughter.

Never feel so humiliated my life being treated as a criminal that I'm not. I don't think nobody should ever be treated that way, especially when you're not doing anything wrong. That is one of the topics that really, gets to me. Officer agents, they were referring to us that we're picking this, like we're not human beings, that were things, that were items, we're numbers. That is something that I think is going to take a little time to you.

What was that moment like when you realized you were going to be separated from your daughter? My daughter to me is everything. She is who keeps me going every day. I am the head of household for her. So knowing the fact that I am her go-to for any situations that she encounter, that is really, that was really not a pleasant moment. It was very devastating. It was really hopeless and knowing that my daughter was going to be struggling now,

trying to even survive at that point, you know? You had active DACA status and no criminal record. We reached out to the Department of Homeland Security for a statement. And a spokesperson said, quote, DACA does not confer any form of legal status in this country. Any illegal alien who is a DACA recipient may be subject to arrest and deportation for a number of reasons, including if they've committed a crime. How do you respond to that? And why do you think you were deported?

I know that the deferred action, DACA, it protects people that they brought into the country when there were children for deportation. That's what the DACA program was created for. You remained in Mexico for more than a month. What was that time period like? There was moments that I feel like I couldn't breathe. I feel like I was losing my strength. But just thinking that my daughter was. fighting for me and doing everything that she could for me to come back home, gave me hope and kept me going.

That judge ruled that your deportation was illegal and ordered your return to the United States. What was your reaction when you heard that news? I was excited. I was happy. Everything paid off, you know, my daughter's sacrifice, my daughter's hard work. I feel like justice was made and that coming home was happy. was relief. You are a rare case of someone who was deported,

but then told that you were wrongfully deported and then ordered back. Can you explain the final order of removal that you apparently had back in the 90s that you didn't know about? It seems like that is the reason why you were able to come back, because that was not formally signed. Can you sort of explain what happened there? In order for the final removals, they have to be signed by a supervisor, which my final removal didn't have that signature for what my understanding is. And that's the reason why it was one of the discrepancies that they were in my case.

You are now back together with your daughter. Is life getting back to normal? Definitely not. That is something that I don't think it's going to happen for a minute. I'm going to say there's a lot of trauma after there's a lot of insecurity, especially from my daughter. You know, she's afraid of her mom be taking away. I think it's going to take some time to trust the system again because I always trust the system. I always follow the system. I always wanted to make sure I do things the right way. Somehow, you know, it end up being too, you know, not as I expected, but I think that's going to be part of the healing process to trust again.

What does being an American mean to you? This is my home. I've been in this country for 27 years. I went to school. I worked. I built my community here. So it means everything. thing, you know, especially because my daughter's here. My daughter's here and my life is my daughter.

And she calls the U.S. home. So that's my home too. Maria, thank you for sharing your story. I appreciate it. Thank you very much. Thank you guys. It is a lesser known chapter of the Holocaust, the murder of some 500,000 Roma and Sinti people, members of a long marginalized and often persecuted minority in Europe. One way into that history is through the work of an artist who survived it herself. Jeffrey Brown reports now for our Art and Action series,

which explores the intersection of art and democracy as part of our canvas coverage. Auschwitz, 1944, Ravens and Smoke in a Dark Sky. A tattooed forearm floating in space. The letter Z for the German word for gypsy, used as a derogatory term. The works, an actual serial number,

of Chaya Stoica, who survived the camps as a young, girl and many decades later in her 50s turned to art as a way to remember the horror, honor her fellow Romani people, and warn the world of continuing threats of right-wing nationalism. Stoica died in 2013 at age 79, a writer, artist, and activist, who says Rutgers Professor Ethel Brooks, herself of Romani Heritage and chair of the European Roma Rights Center, became a hero to many in her community and beyond. She was there to say, no, we are, we have this history, and we have each other, we have beauty, and we have art,

and we have stories that should be shared with each other and with the world. It's just, it's everything. Chaya Stoika, making visible at the drawing center, a museum in New York, is the first major U.S. exhibition on the artist, with more than 60 paintings and drawings made between 1992 and 2011. Not documentary in style, but acts of memory and imagination, based on her own experiences and stories she was told. Stoiko was self-taught, often working at her kitchen table in Vienna. But says exhibition curator Lynn Cook,

she developed a sophisticated style of contemporary artmaking. She restlessly experimented with processes and materials, and invented new vocabularies to get at the same set of questions over and over again. And that's very rare in my experience for someone who hasn't had formal academic training. But she had an aptitude for it certainly. And she had an inquiring mind, a great deal of visual sophistication and a real purpose. That purpose. to tell the stories of her people and advocate on their behalf.

Documentary films by Karen Berger showing at the exhibition capture Stoica's personality and drive to bring Romani history and culture, including music, to a larger public. She did it first through writing, including a 1988 memoir, We Live in Secrecy. Next, through art, some of it recalling a pre-war life, as in this untitled painting from 1990. This idea of a Romani encampment and of making home wherever you are in the world is something that is really central to who we are and what we do because so often home has been denied

to Romani people because of the ways in which we've been treated by the majority society. And then the end of that life, when the Nazis rounded up Romani people and brought them by trains to the concentration camps. Daka, where Stoika's father was first taken. He, one of Stoika's brothers, and nearly 200 members of her extended family, were killed. Stoika, her mother, and four of her siblings barely survived. One of the most powerful paintings, I think, is an early one where she's mapped the central space in the Ravensbrook forced labor camp for women.

And you see the barracks to the side. and this large zone where roll call of thousands of women took place every day, several times a day, sometimes, where they were made to stand for hours in freezing cold weather. And it's the way she's painted the ground and the kind of liquidity and the kind of the cold palate that speak very effectively to our motions. They devoured us, she titled this 1995 watercolor, color, referencing a Romani term for the Holocaust, the devouring. She portrayed what she called the beautiful women of Auschwitz, and later made abstract blotch-like images with ink on paper,

including one titled, The Destitution, the Suffering, I Feel It Still. In fact, Stoiko was also speaking very directly to new developments she feared in the 1980s and beyond. The election of Kurt Waldheim as president of Austria despite revelations of his Nazi past. A rise in far-right nationalism, including anti-Roma rhetoric and Austria and elsewhere in Europe. Stoika painted works such as this titled Victory to Our Furor. When we talk about Holocaust denial, there was never, there was a denial. There were no Roma who were invited to testify at Nuremberg, for example, right? There was no, no one was asking Romani people, what was your experience in the war?

Because it was seen as something that wasn't important. And that was becoming kind of a larger issue for Roma, but also, you know, the kind of racism and nationalism that was resurging in Europe was something that she was watching very carefully and speaking out against. Today that resurgence continues even grows in many places. In the works of Chaya Stoica, says curator Lynn Cook, viewers can experience the thrill of discovery of an artist they might never have previously encountered. And also a warning that what has happened could once again.

For many people, the Holocaust and the Second World War are so distanced as to be a very little part of their sense of history. And I think that Stoica's work can very eloquently speak to the audiences of many kinds. including those who really don't know about that earlier history. And through that history, make us more vigilant and make us more aware. Chia Stoica herself put it more bluntly, saying Auschwitz is only sleeping. For the PBS News Hour, I'm Jeffrey Brown at the Drawing Center in New York. And that's the News Hour for tonight. I'm Jeff Bennett. And I'm Amna Nawaz.

On behalf of the entire NewsHour team, thank you for joining us.