PBS News Hour - Full Show - May 14, 2026 - PBS News Hour full episode

Episode Date: May 14, 2026

Thursday on the News Hour, China offers President Trump a grand welcome but also a warning over support for Taiwan. A new generation of reality TV stars trying to turn on-screen fame into political power is reshaping the way campaigns are run. Plus, the expected closure of "Alligator Alcatraz" and a change in Border Patrol leadership. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy

Good evening. I'm Jeff Bennett. And I'm Amna Navaz on the News Hour tonight. China offers President Trump a grand welcome, but also a warning over U.S. support for Taiwan. The new generation of reality TV stars is trying to turn on-screen fame into political power and reshaping the way campaigns are run in the process. There's not a lot of reality to be found yet in reality television. And quite frankly, there's not a lot of reality to be found in politics. and so it's a very unholy union.

Plus, the expected closure of the so-called alligator Alcatraz Detention Center and a change in Border Patrol leadership, the latest developments in the Trump administration's immigration policy. Welcome to the News Hour. Chinese leader Xi Jinping hosted President Trump today and offered the U.S. a, quote, new vision of relations, more focused on trade and collaboration than on confrontation. President Trump, in turn, offered a future in which he,

He and Xi were, in Mr. Trump's words, united and together. But China's president also had a stark warning to his American counterpart about Taiwan. Nick Schifrin is in Beijing again for us tonight. Today, through empty streets, an American president arrived in the heart of Beijing. To fanfare and an outstretched hand. Xi Jinping and President Trump met at the Great Hall of the People, the ceremonial center of communist China. The goose stepping was synchronized, the cheering choreographed. And two geopolitical rivals suggested they both wanted a new era where confrontation could

be replaced by collaboration. It's been nine years since any American president came here, and the relationship between the United States and China has become much more fraught since then, in part because of President Trump's policies. But President Trump today seems to be coming here determined to make deals, and the Chinese are determined to bring out all the pomp and circumstance. It's an honor to be with you. It's an honor to be your friend and the relationship between China and the USA is going to be better

than ever before. At an expanded bilateral meeting, President Trump and Xi Jinping echoed each other, what she labeled a new vision for bilateral relations. China and the United States should be partners instead of rivals, helping each other succeed and prosper together. But in the Chinese readout of the meeting, Xi Jinping. delivered a warning about Taiwan. Quote, if it is handled properly, the bilateral relationship will enjoy overall stability.

Otherwise, the two countries will have clashes and even conflicts putting the entire relationship in great jeopardy. She didn't specify his demands, but U.S. officials say China wants President Trump to block a future Taiwan arm sale. And if possible, change U.S. diplomatic language from, we don't support independence for Taiwan to we oppose independence for Taiwan. Today, Secretary of State Marco Rubio told NBC there would be no policy change. From our perspective, any forced change in the status quo and the situation that's there

now would be bad for both countries. But if there were any tensions today over Taiwan, technology or trade, they were not public. And at a lush state dinner, the two leaders both connected centuries of history to a shared future. We agreed to build a constructive China-U.S. relationship of strategic. strategic stability to promote the steady, sound, and sustainable development of China-U.S. relations and bring more peace, prosperity, and progress to the world. This bond of commerce and respect that stretches back 250 years is the foundation for a future

that benefits both of our nations. Together, we have the chance to draw on these values to create a future of greater prosperity, cooperation, and happiness, and peace for our children. We love our children. This region and the world is a special world with the two of us, united and together. That language is a world away from the end of President Trump's first term. ...in or war against the Chinese virus. When his administration labeled China strategic rivaled, and announced an era of great power competition. The age of AI has begun. Today, that competition continues over advanced chips, military

presence in the Pacific and trade. And China buys 90 percent of Iran's oil, which President Trump today admitted to Fox would continue. They buy a lot of their oil there. And they'd like to keep doing that. He'd like to see our most straight open. But for President Trump, today was a day for detente and deals. It's so great to be back to China.

He even brought CEOs to help push China to open for business. President Xi was so gracious, so welcoming, and welcome all of us to be part of China. So it was an excellent meeting. Thank you. But the reality is for years, China has blocked some of the investments that Xi Jinping was promising today, and U.S. policy, at least officially, has been making it harder, not easier, for the U.S. and China to invest in each other's countries. Omna?

Nick, meanwhile, the president talks a lot about a closer relationship to China. At the same time, many of this administration's policies treat China as a rival. So how did those two ideas go together? It's a great question. You can go through the list. Export controls. For example, as we mentioned in the story, the U.S. is trying to restrict the most advanced computer chips from China for fear that those chips will end up in the Chinese military and perhaps confronting the U.S. military. One day, of course, the president has maintained tariffs on China, saying that China needs to be confronted in terms of economic policy. And, of course, the military posture in the Pacific is designed to make sure that Taiwan, is not engulfed by China. There's not a fait accompli of a Chinese invasion over Taiwan. Of course, Xi Jinping got to make that statement, make that red line about Taiwan. And at this moment, at least, the U.S. hasn't really responded to it specifically yet. And while we heard the president also emphasize economic deals as he's talking on this trip,

this administration has also been trying to reduce that historic economic dependence between the two nations, right? Yeah, no, it's a good point. I mean, most U.S. officials, from governors to mayors, over the last few years, have begun to turn away from Chinese investment. The consensus largely has been that Chinese investment is a national security risk, bad PR for some of these states and cities. And so, therefore, they have not been wanting this. And again, the U.S. policy officially is not to increase those mutual investments. Furthermore, the policy is also to repatriate factories, try and bring manufacturing back into the United States. And if you were to do big deals with China, that could possibly move manufacturing toward China at a moment when a new American Chamber of Commerce study says that China policies, industrial policies, are trying to increase foreign dependence on China, therefore increasing Chinese geopolitical leverage over these countries. But perhaps most importantly from the Trump administration's priorities recently,

it has been to diversify supply chains. The U.S. believes it will take about seven years or so to get China out of critical supply chains, and the notion of increasing investment into China could, again, lead to a moment that the U.S. saw during COVID, where we were over-dependent on China, and we realized how vulnerable those supply chains were. But look, from China's perspective,

Xi Jinping wants to be seen as open for business, open for investment, both into China, as well as into the United States. And today, at least, certainly had an eager ear, it seems, in President Trump. And so to talk about China's perspective and what Xi Jinping was after today, I talked to Orville Shell, a longtime China watcher, author, and he runs the Asia Society's Center for U.S.-China Relations. Xi Jinping used a phrase that seems to me to be very important today,

Ding Wei. What does that mean and why is it important? When he used that term, he was suggesting that we should have and may be able to now confect a new position, a new posture towards each other. Closer trade relations and a more amicable form of interacting so that competition isn't so intense. But isn't that the bargain that China has been asking for for a while? I think they do want collaboration economically.

At the same time, they are, I think, irremedially going to go towards greater autarky. So Xi Jinping's game plan is this. Become as independent as we can in everything from critical minerals, rare earths, to EVs and battery technology. But get Europe and the United States and Japan, et cetera, more dependent on our supply chains. So we have the levers in our hand. they don't have so many in their hands. But is Beijing also asking the U.S. to ignore U.S. concerns about Taiwan and technology

and trade and tariffs and all of that that has really been at the heart of U.S. policy over the last few years? It's interesting that one of the first things that got lofted and before the summit actually began to start in an interactive way between the leaders was that Xi Jinping said Taiwan is the most important issue. We heard Xi Jinping say that Taiwan is his red line is the most important issue, but that was in the readout, the Chinese readout. We did not see him say that on camera. Why is that significant? I think it may have been a tactical move. They said to themselves, let's say it early, make it clear, but not let it bollocks up the rest of what we're doing. This is a little like Nixon and Kissinger. They had the Taiwan question, too.

They pushed it aside until the very end when they had to come to grips with it. It seems to me that the U.S. policy on economics has been to bring factories back in the U.S., diversify and supply chain, rely less on China. But the message today has been we want to be in China. We want to be investing in China. Is there a way to square that circle? I think there's a contradiction here. I mean, I think we're bound to find some offers of China.

investment in areas that aren't of national security interests for the United States. The only rub is we know what the pattern is, how this game gets played out. The industry goes in, China learns how to do it, they do it better, and the foreign industry gets shut out. And China has an ascendant share of that market and undersells everybody else, everywhere else. Beyond President Trump is the U.S. system, is Congress, our U.S. laws open to some kind of new way with China that is less focused on national security

and more focused back on economic cooperation. I think it's possible. Now I don't know if Trump has that kind of adeptness to sort of make a, reach an inflection point and really change the terms of the game. But we've had an expression here in this last day of a willingness on both sides to try. But now we have to put, as Mao Zedong always said, theory into practice, and that's not easy. And there remains a lot of contradictions that are unresolved. Orville Shell, thank you very much.

For additional perspective now on President Trump's trip to China and the broader U.S. China relationship, we get two views. Myron Brilliant is a senior counselor at the DGA Group, an international consulting firm, and former executive vice president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. And Liza Tobin is a former intelligence officer and was the China director at the National Security Council during the Trump and Biden administrations. She's now managing director at Garno Global. That's a geopolitical risk advisory firm. Thank you both for joining us this evening. As Nick Schifrin reported, both President Trump and Xi seemed to want stability in this relationship. President Xi said that China and the U.S. should be partners instead of rivals, helping each other succeed and prosper together. China, excuse me, Liza, is China's stated vision for the U.S.-China relationship? Is that in the U.S. interest?

Hey, good to be on with you. Thanks for the question. Yeah, the word stability is really interesting in the context of the summit. Moving up to the summit, the U.S. has been messaging, hey, we just want a stable, calm relationship with China. But there's been this interesting new catchphrase, this new Chinese Communist Party term of art that's come out in the last couple days to describe their relationship with the United States in terms of what they call constructive strategic stability.

Jin Shishing, Zhang Ne Wunding. It's, you know, it sounds like a bunch of CCP garble, but it actually has deep strategic meaning. And what they're saying is, we hear the U.S. just want stability. They just want to have a call. They just don't want China to be a problem. And we're going to stick our foot in the door and try to get the U.S. to agree to framing the relationship in terms of constructive strategic stability.

This has a long history in how the CCP approaches the U.S. They've tried this before in the Hu Jintao era, and after that saying, we'd like to describe our relationship with the U.S. in terms of new type major power relations. So it's a very weighted term that basically signals, hey, we are on par with you guys. you're no longer the sole superpower, where you're equals or your betters, and we're going to use rhetoric

to sort of try to trap you with words. It's a little bit as if, you know, you're in a business relationship with someone, and they start pressuring you to sign an MOU, and it's vaguely worded, but they kind of get you to sign, and there's a poison pill in there, and then later when you start doing things they don't like,

they start coming after you with this thing. So the optics of the summit, were extremely positive. You know, Xi Jinping was happy, President Trump was happy. But what's very interesting is that the Chinese are playing a longer game and trying to lock the United States into this sort of relationship within narrow guardrails where China can have a vote and a veto power over U.S. national security decisions.

Marron, how do you see it? Well, first of all, it's great to be back on. I would say that this relationship is defined by high competition, high distrust, and low cooperation. And I think both sides want stability, but I agree with Liza. I think the United States is playing short-term game here with, you know, trying to get concrete deliverables, more selling of American beef and more airplanes and energy, and China's playing the long term, which is to try to gain global influence by being on part. with the United States.

And so we're going to have to see not just the pageantry and the symbolism of this visit, which I think has been very positive, and it's important to most consequential leaders, to most consequential countries getting to talk about a wide range of issues is important and should continue throughout the year. But we're not going to measure the success of this summit just simply by these two days. We have to see what happens the day after, 100 days for now, six months for now, next year. We'll see whether we make progress and whether we can really get to some of the underlying tensions in this relationship. Let's remember we're going to compete on areas like AI and technology.

We're going to compete for global influence. And can we find in some areas limited cooperation? I think we can. I think the two leaders have personal chemistry. But we're going to have to see really much more than just a high-level visit to really unlock some of the distrust. that's been building over a long period in this relationship. Let's shift our focus to Taiwan, because that's one of the things that really stands out

in the Chinese readout or official summary of the diplomatic conversation. Beijing emphasized it heavily. The White House barely mentioned it. Liza, what does that suggest to you? Yeah, this was, it was clearly the number one priority that the CCP brought to this summit. And there was a lot of concern, a lot of curiosity,

a lot of rumors ahead of the summit that maybe the United States would offer some kind of grand bargain, trading away its support for Taiwan in exchange for maybe some help on Iran or something else. As far as we can tell, the United States did not walk into that trap.

President Trump got a question from reporters in Beijing and he kind of brushed it aside. He didn't answer it. So it looks like the president was listening to his advisors who would be, warning him to say, hey, Mr. President, we don't want to walk into this trap where we inadvertently say something about Taiwan that Xi Jinping then takes as a concession and uses later to demoralize Taiwan. I think what's key is that the United States runs its own foreign policy, and we have

our own relationships with allies and partners like Japan, Korea, Europe, and including Taiwan, and that we don't, you know, make that an issue that we negotiate on with China. And as far as I can tell, that didn't happen at this summit. And, Myron, as you know, these readouts, they're carefully worded, they're strategic. The Trump administration in the past has used them as messaging documents. What stands out to you about that on the Taiwan issue in particular? Well, I've been following U.S.-China relations for over 30 years. So certainly you expect differences in the readout from the government officials, and that's what we're seeing, right?

The United States who have emphasized that China has made certain commitments on Iran that are important to opening up the straits, getting Iran to back down from having nuclear weapons, and even further to get Iran to agree or China to agree not to sell defense equipment to Iran. We haven't seen that yet from China. China has pushed, certainly leaned in on the Taiwan issue, a central component always in U.S. China talks, but we have not seen the administration or President Trump signal that he's made any commitments there. I would not expect it. We have five decades of longstanding policy on Taiwan. It would be a huge mistake to change course now.

The big question will be after this summit, what happens with the arms sales deal that is pending? Will we see a delay? Will we see a different number? What will we be selling to Taiwan? That would be a signal that there has been quietly an agreement between China and the United States. I think that would be the wrong signal. So let's wait a little bit to really get the read out after the summit. It's always a mistake to just judge it from the symbolism in the packaging of the summit.

We've got to give ourselves a little time to see how things develop over the next 60 days to 100. 100 days. Myron Brilliant and Liza Tobin. Thank you both for your insights. We appreciate it. Thank you. We start the day's other headlines on Capitol Hill. The Senate unanimously passed a measure to withhold their own pay during future government shutdowns.

All in favor say aye. Aye. All opposed say no. The ayes appear to have it. The resolution passed by voice vote and would block senators from getting paid whenever a shutdown affects one or more agency. one or more agencies. But like federal employees, they would get back pay once the government reopens. Its sponsor, Republican Senator John Kennedy, says the measure is about, as he put it, putting our money where our mouth is. It's set to take effect after the midterms and does not

apply to members of the House. The CDC says that 41 people are currently being monitored for Honta virus in the United States. They include passengers from the cruise ship at the center of the outbreak who have been repatriated, plus those who left the ship before the outbreak was identified, and others who may have been exposed to someone with the disease while traveling. The WHO says there are 11 hanta virus cases around the world, including three people who died. But the CDC says there are no confirmed cases in the U.S., and the risk to the public remains low. In the U.K., pressure ratcheted up further on Prime Minister Kier-Starmer today, after his health Secretary announced he's quitting. West Streeting is the first cabinet member to step down and is

widely expected to make a bid for Starmor's job. He was seen at 10 Downing Street yesterday as speculation swirled about his future. Two others, including a former deputy prime minister, have also positioned themselves to possibly challenge Starmor. The embattled leader faces mounting pressure from within his party after heavy losses in last week's local elections, though he has vowed to stay on. In Cuba, rare protests have broken out over fuel shortages and crippling blackouts made worse by the Trump administration's energy blockade. Hundreds marched in the streets of the capital of Havana overnight, banging pots, burning trash, and shouting, turn on the lights. Earlier in the day, Cuba's energy minister said that emergency oil reserves sent by Russia

had, quote, run out. Many in Havana are going without power for up to 22 hours a day. In January, President Trump threatened tariffs on any country trying to send oil to Cuba as he seeks to oust the country's leadership. The U.S. in Cuba said today that CIA director John Rackcliffe visited the country to meet officials there. A CIA official confirms to the news hour that Rackcliffe delivered a message from President Trump that the U.S. is prepared to engage with Cuba, but only if it makes, quote, fundamental changes. Russia is stepping up its attacks on Ukraine just days after Russian President Vladimir Putin signaled the war could wind down soon. Ukraine's air defense systems tried to knock down Russian projectiles above Kiev overnight, but as dawn broke, the destruction was clear. This apartment building was leveled, killing at least nine people and wounding dozens of others. President Belodemir Zelensky says Russia fired more than 1,500 drones on Ukraine since early Wednesday.

Officials say it's the largest two-day aerial assault since the war began. FBI Director Cash Patel reportedly took what's being called a VIP snorkel session at the USS Arizona Memorial at Pearl Harbor last summer. That's according to government emails obtained by the Associated Press, which says the FBI had not previously disclosed his visit. The ship sank during the 1941 attack by Japanese forces and currently in tombs more than 900 sailors and Marines. It's considered one of the nation's most hallowed sites, and snorkeling and diving are largely off limits. But an FBI official said tours are routine, and that Patel had been invited by the commanding general for what's being described as a, quote, historical tour to honor heroes who died on the USS, Arizona. On Wall Street today, stocks posted solid gains thanks to some strong corporate earnings. The Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed back above the 50,000 point level today.

the NASDAQ added more than 230 points to hit a new record. The S&P 500 also ended firmly higher. And Beyonce, Taylor Swift, and Shaka Khan are among the artists whose works are being added to the National Recording Registry. Beyonce's Single Ladies is one of 25 selections by the Library of Congress for what's also known as the National Playlist. Taylor Swift's album, 1989, Weezer's self-titled debut album, and turn, turn, turn by the birds were also chosen.

The recording spanned seven decades of music and were selected for their, quote, cultural, historical, or aesthetic importance to the nation's recorded sound heritage. And soul legend Clarence Carter has died. Carter has died. mainstay in the 1960s and early 70s with hits like patches, slip away, and the Rieskeh holiday favorite backdoor Santa. The Alabama native grew up blind, but gravitated to the

guitar at an early age. He was known for his rich voice, bluesy guitar, and body sense of humor. Carter's being remembered today as a towering figure in soul and blues. Clarence Carter was 90 years old. Still to come, on the news hour, why the controversial Alligator Aller Alcatraz camp for detained migrants is now expected to close. And the prestigious Bellevue Literary Review celebrates its 25th anniversary. This is the PBS News Hour from the David M. Rubenstein studio at WETA in Washington, headquarters of PBS News. The Supreme Court has once again extended access to the abortion pill Mitha Pristone for now.

Late today, the justices extended a pause on a lower court ruling that would have blocked telehealth prescriptions and male distribution of Miphyprisone. To help explain what this means for people seeking the medicine and the legal fight still to come, I'm joined again by Mary Ziegler, professor at the University of California Davis School of Law. So Mary Ziegler, there's been a lot of back and forth just to clarify for folks, what does this mean for access to the abortion pill? Well, at the moment it means that access is unchanged, so it's still available on the same terms that it was before. it just, there's obviously some future legal uncertainty about whether that continues.

But for now, we're in the status quo. So this does allow litigation in lower courts to play out. I want to note, Planned Parenthood issued a statement in response to today's ruling, saying that the Supreme Court did the bare minimum with this ruling, but calling it a relief for patients seeking the pill. What does this mean about what happens next? Could this issue end up before the Supreme Court again? And do we have any idea which way they might go?

I mean, the short answer is it will inevitably end up before the Supreme Court again. This case will inevitably come back to the Supreme Court probably next year. And there are any number of other challenges to access to Mifipristone that are moving through the lower courts as well, some of which are seeking to take the drug off the market altogether, not just to block telehealth access to it. So it's just a matter of time as to when the Supreme Court gets this case. And I think we're also quite likely to see lower courts trying to, pause access potentially before the Supreme Court weighs in again. So this is just the tip of the

iceberg. And that's not including the fact that we've now seen major changes at FDA with the resignation of Marty McCarrie. So this is very much kind of an ongoing story, I think. I want to point out, justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito both wrote very strongly worded dissents in today's ruling, saying that they would have allowed the lower court ruling to go into effect. Alito went so far as to call this a scheme to undermine the court's earlier Dobbs decision that eliminated the constitutional right to abortion. What's notable to you about those dissents? Well, Justice Alito clearly is pretty frustrated by the way Mitha Pryston access has been guaranteed by Shill laws, which is noteworthy because those cases, too, these clashes between the states

could end up at SCOTUS. I was also struck by the fact that Justice Clarence Thomas, um, called the drug manufacturers who mail Miphypristo, a criminal enterprise because of the Comstock Act, which is another argument that we're likely to see return to the Supreme Court and one that could have ramifications for abortion access beyond just Mipipristone. So the fact that we know that there are two justices already thinking in this way, is pretty important going forward. And just to remind people before we let you go, Mary Ziegler, about how widely used, commonly used, Miphypristone is. Remind us how that is.

is? So two-thirds of all abortions in the United States involved Miffa-Pristone, and we know that well over a quarter of all abortions involved telehealth, and that may well be an undercount given that, of course, some of these procedures are considered illegal under this relevant state law. So this significant number of Americans who'd be affected by this one way or another. All right. Mary Ziegler from the University of California, Davis School of Law. Thank you for once again joining us. We appreciate your time. Thanks for having me. The Department of Transportation raised a few eyebrows this week after announcing that Secretary

Sean Duffy, his wife, Fox News host Rachel Compos Duffy and their children filmed a reality show that's set to be released online in the lead-up to the nation's 250th anniversary. DOT says the Great American Road Trip was funded by a non-profit, not taxpayers. But ethics watchdogs are concerned that several corporate sponsors, who are regulated by the department also contributed funds. The program will show off some American landmarks filmed over a seven-month period. It's also a return to form for the Duffies who first met filming for MTV in the 1990s. Now, a new batch of reality TV stars are hoping to transition into elected office.

Ali Rogan reports on these candidates and how their campaigns could change American politics. I was just enjoying myself with my wife, and I get crazy. my wife and I get crying sisters in front of me. Screaming matches. You are a stupid woman. Expensive drama. I'm a shitting to myself. And sometimes a hint of self-reflection.

What's normal for me is not normal for you. American reality television has always promised spectacle on demand. We're clear you're not welcome here, right? Increasingly, American politics has too. There's not a lot of reality to be found yet. and reality television. And quite frankly, there's not a lot of reality to be found in politics. And so it's a very unholy union between two things that need serious overhauls.

Roxanne Gay is a writer, cultural critic, and a keen observer of reality TV. I wish more politicians understood the power of performance. The challenge is that that performance has to be backed up by real practice and substance. And there's a little disconnect there for some. people. You know you live, we know you lie. This year, several reality TV stars are hoping to bridge that divide. Betting that fame in front of the camera can translate into votes.

You're the biggest poser in this town. Spencer Pratt, the love to hate villain on MTV's The Hills, they let my home burn down. Launched his conservative challenge to Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass after the Palisanes wildfires destroyed his home last year. Your breast things too. Dr. Heavenly Kimes, the sharp-tonged dentist on Bravo's married to medicine, is time for a fighter who can deliver results, is running for Congress as a Democrat in Georgia. I wasted your time. Okay, cool.

And Luke Goldbronson is hoping to go from Bravo's summer house to the U.S. House. I'm running to get Congress working for the people again. Recently announcing his campaign to represent his home district in Minnesota. I've been on reality TV. That's drama for show. What's happening in D.C. is real drama. with real consequences. He's running as a Democrat in a district that Donald Trump won by 14 points. The key for his campaign?

I had hockey. Putting the focus on his roots, not his reality TV past. I don't look at myself as a reality TV person. Obviously, for me, it was a part of my life. And it was a job. He gave me a platform, which I'm thankful for, but I'm just me. I'm just a normal kid who loves to swing a hammer and ride his motorcycles and spend time with his dog in the woods.

Celebrity and politics have always overlapped. Ronald Reagan went from Hollywood leading man to California governor to president. Arnold Schwarzenegger paused his action movie career for two terms in Sacramento. But the explosion of reality TV has created a far larger pool of quasi-famous faces with a direct line to their audience and a template for how far that fame can go. Before Donald Trump descended that golden escalator in 2015, setting a path toward the White House. He spent a decade on NBC's The Apprentice. Welcome to the boardroom. Building a larger-than-life persona watched weekly by millions of Americans.

You're fired. It was a character, and it worked. Everyone, go. His successful campaign permanently changed the calculus for anyone with a camera and ambitions. That kind of tough. taught many other unconventional candidates that entertainment media is a great political capital to utilize. Junji Kim is a political science professor at Columbia University and author of The American Mirage, how reality TV upholds the myth of meritocracy. He built himself as a character of a successful businessman,

of someone who can provide American dream for many Americans, and I think that kind of translate into his campaign of platforms and agenda later on in politics. Mr. Trump isn't the only one who's made the transition. To live in a home. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy got his start on MTV's The Real World. Nick, the tribe is spoken. Washington Attorney General Nick Brown was one of the earliest castaways on Survivor. It's tough to be a believer in the city.

Even Turning Point USA CEO Erica Kirk appeared on Summer House before marrying Charlie Kirk. Cheers, cheers. And in Washington, D.C., public service is under the spotlight in new ways. The celebrity gossip outlet TMZ opened a Washington bureau. TMZ is changing the way we do things in Washington. And is already giving politicians the paparazzi treatment. Did you like the tweet that he put out today, like where he was like, as I said, I've given you my answer. And asking tough questions.

Housewives on the Hill. Real housewives are flocking to Capitol Hill, too. lobbying on issues like HIV prevention and testifying about small businesses. You lose sleep, you lose money, you lose hair. That's the kind of thing where I do believe they can actually affect some change. And it does show that they have an awareness of the world around them. Anytime someone wants to advocate for the greater good from whatever position they have, it's a good thing. But for those who want to make the transition from

advocate to candidate, it can be hard to move beyond the television persona. In general, I think people are voting for the character more than the candidate. And most people who would vote that way don't even know what the candidate stands for. These people are relying primarily on name recognition and personality recognition. Which means candidates like Luke Gobranston in Minnesota are focusing on the issues. He's emphasizing affordability. Our health care system, people are paying more on co-pays, premiums, The cost of living, we're in a reckless war right now, so you feel it at the pump every time you have to get gas.

Your everyday essentials are costing you more. Goldronson's reality TV passed gave him a visibility boost at the start of his campaign, but there can also be a downside. What is your issue with me? Living your life on camera means everything is up for scrutiny. I think we have to take ownership of who we are and things we do. That's how we grow as people. Regardless if it's reality TV or if it's just you out in your everyday life, you're not out of right. Your ego doesn't have to be that big.

And moments like this. You laughed at my boundary of not texting me after 9 o'clock. I'm sorry, I text my friends after 9 o'clock. When a female castmate accused Goldbronson of not respecting her boundaries, just admit that you love controlling females. Become politically relevant, as Congress once again grapples with sexual misconduct allegations that so far this year have forced two members to resign. I don't like you.

We asked about it. If you believe everything you see on reality TV, I got some motion from property on the Iron Range I can sell you. What are you saying? We all saw with our eyes and ears what you did. It's reality TV. I think there's a big difference between that and who you'll meet on the campaign trail. Of course, the campaign trail sometimes ends in disappointment, and fame alone is no guarantee of victory. Katie. Caitlin Jenner's run for California governor fizzled. Clay Aiken lost his congressional

bid in North Carolina. And Sarah Palin completed the full loop, from governor to vice presidential hopeful to reality star to failed congressional candidate. Audiences tend to cement their favorite celebrities in their minds based on what they saw when they liked them or hated them the most. And they don't really create room for those people to grow. So it's both a blessing and occurs. And the successful candidates are going to have to find ways to show that that's not the whole of who I am. I'm calling on Congress to fix this thing. While the latest hopefuls continue to campaign, thank you everyone for being here.

There's no doubt. Win or lose American politics is already becoming another reality show. For the PBS News Hour, I'm Ali Rogan. We're going to take a closer look now at the Trump administration's immigration policy, given some recent developments from questions surrounding a controversial detention facility in Florida to new leadership at U.S. Border Patrol and ICE. Our White House correspondent, Liz Landers, joins us now. So, Liz, let's start with the reporting that Florida might shut down Alligator Alcatraz. This is that controversial detention facility in a remote area of the Florida Everglades. It's faced criticism over its treatment of detainees. What more do you know? This is a highly controversial facility

that opened up less than a year ago. And the New York Times is, and several other news outlets are saying that it's going to start winding down operations just in a few weeks at the start of June. There are about 1,400 current detainees there as of last month, and President Trump visited this facility last summer, touted its opening.

But the Department of Homeland Security is sort of pushing back on this and saying in a statement to us that any reports that DHS is pressuring the state to cease operations at Alligator Alcatraz are false. Florida continues to be a valuable partner in advancing President Trump's immigration agenda and DHS appreciates their support. Governor DeSantis has been asked about this in the last few days in press conferences in Florida.

And he said yesterday that the state hasn't received definitive notice about the future of the facility and whether it'll close. What about the conditions there? What's the latest reporting on that? Immigration attorneys and advocates have said basically from the beginning that this was unfit for humans. Amnesty International's Amy Fisher spoke with us earlier today. She was the director of migrant rights there, and she has worked with some of the detainees there. This was her reaction to the news that this may shut down. Everything about this detention facility was made to make people suffer, to make our immigrant friends and neighbors, you know, have no access to clean water or adequate food or adequate housing. We need to ensure that the people that are detained inside of Alligator Alcatraz are.

set free so that they can return home to their families, to their jobs, to their communities where they're needed. And what we need to see is accountability for what has happened inside. One of the other issues with Alligator Alcatraz 2 has been the cost. The DeSantis administration has been spending more than a million dollars a day to run this center. And there are some reimbursement issues with the federal government reimbursing the state of Florida. On top of that, Jeff, there are still lawsuits from environmental groups that are trying to close the facility because of its location in the Everglades. And this is all unfolding as the administration is changing leadership at ICE and Border Patrol.

What more do you know? There are some shakeups that are happening in the last few days. Today, for example, the U.S. Border Patrol chief Mike Banks stepped down. That was confirmed by the Department of Homeland Security. They told us in a statement they called this a second retirement because he'd worked at the agency before, had left during the Biden years and had come back during this second Trump administration. thanked him for his service. DHS also announced on Tuesday in a statement that they have a new ICE director. This person is David Venturella. He's a longtime ICE employee. He worked there in the

Obama and the Bush administrations and then left. And most recently, he's been working for a private company called the Geo Group. Now, this contracts with the government on private prison and detention facilities. This comes to, Jeff, as DHS has seen a lot of leadership. Shakeup, of course, Secretary Christine Nome, being replaced just a few months ago, and then Greg Bovino, another top immigration official retiring recently, too. So new leadership, but so far as we know, the approach hasn't changed. How is the administration looking to move ahead in the coming months? Well, Trump's top immigration official has said that they're still pushing for these mass deportations.

The border czar, Tom Homan, said this in some comments that he made last week. This was at the Border Security Expo in Phoenix, Arizona. and he said that the high number of these arrests and deportations is going to continue. Of course, this is something that President Trump campaigned on. He campaigned on deporting a million people a year. Here's what Homan said. He said, quote, if you think last year's historic number is good, wait till next year and we'll have 10,000 more agents on the border.

You ain't seen blank yet. Mass deportations are coming. Jeff, this comes, though, as we are moving into a heavily contested midterm cycle, And President Trump has really seen his immigration polling numbers dropped, despite this being one of his signature issues. The president has been asked about this issue, in particular after what we saw in the winter in Minneapolis, where two American citizens were killed in the streets by immigration officials.

And Trump said at the time of lessons learned, I learned that maybe we can use a little bit of a softer touch. So we'll see you going forward, Jeff. Liz Landers, our thanks to you as always. Of course. Three doctors, two poets, and a fiction writer walk into a windowless hospital conference room. Not the start of a joke, but of a prestigious journal, Bellevue Literary Review, now celebrating its 25th anniversary. Our senior arts correspondent Jeffrey Brown reports for our ongoing coverage of the intersection of health and arts, part of our Canvas series.

As it turned out, rehab centers like young stroke survivors, they liven up the place. On a recent afternoon, more than a dozen writers took to this stage. We talked about suspicious rashes, aches and pains. We were all afraid to tell anyone about. Reading works on the themes of illness, recovery, and discovery. The specialist's recommendations were clear. Removal of all the parts of me that made me, biologically at least, a woman. The gathering, lunch, and literature at New York City Winery was a collaboration

between the nonprofit Writers' Read and Bellevue Literary Review. The medical system beckons. It's safe. We'll guide your child across the glass bridge, but your eyes and your emotions, they see only the abyss. Dr. Danielle Offrey is the founding editor-in-chief of BLR, as it's known, and was a contributor to this event, time to celebrate its quarter-century anniversary. There's lots of writing about health out there, but most of it is very prescriptive. you know, top 10 tips for your asthma or diabetes. Yeah.

But not a lot dealing with what it feels like to be ill. The experience. The vulnerability of illness is so intense and universal. It was pitipunaboka. Offrey is a clinical professor of medicine at NYU, an attending physician at Bellevue, a large public safety net hospital in Manhattan. And it was here that she and colleagues first had the idea

to start a small, informal collection of writing. We took out a one-line call for submissions, you know, poetry, fiction, nonfiction about health, illness, and healing. And we got a thousand submissions from the first just a couple of weeks. Like, it just poured in. This was paper submissions. You surprised you? It surprised me, but didn't surprise me because I think that our medical system does not deal with the entire aspect of what it means to be ill, to go from the sort of land of the healthy to the land of the sick. That whole journey, we don't talk about that at all.

Many years and 50 issues later, it's an unlikely literary success, publishing short stories, poetry, and essays by a wide range of contributors, medical practitioners and others, including work by then emerging writers like Celeste Ing. The journal has also grown into a larger literary arts organization with events, writing workshops, and more. Writing enabled me to take a step back from the nursing. process. Chavon McKenna, who worked as a traveling nurse during the COVID pandemic, was published by BLR in 2024, writing of her experience caring for people at the end of life. Growing up, I had a lot of anxieties about death and dying, and I wanted to be able to face that in a really intimate manner and see that process and demystify it a little bit. What does the writing do for you? The writing, Writing allows me to see the humanity in my patients because when you're in an ICU or even

in an outpatient clinic, you're not always able to take the time you need to reflect on the patient as also a person in that moment. So writing allows me to process those emotions and feel what I couldn't necessarily feel in real time. There is, of course, a grand tradition of Dr. Writers that includes Russian playwright Anton Chekhov, an American poet William Carlos Williams. I'm addicted to patients. I can't do without them. More recently, Oliver Sacks and novelist and memoirist Abraham Verghese. At the recent reading, pediatrician Vidya Viswanathan wrote of her

experience as a doctor parent. To her, a button battery was just another toy, not poison. But the pediatrician in me screamed, you're losing time. The thought of the battery burning through LACA's esophagus was paralyzing. She says storytelling is integral to her job as a physician. A big part of it is learning how to listen and how to make a space where a patient feels comfortable sharing their story. So, you know, if I come in the room and I'm not approachable and I'm not ready to listen, then I might miss a big part of what could lead me to the right diagnosis.

So in many ways, the storytelling of the parent or the child is as important as the work I'm doing in managing their condition. BLR has also been a home for all who interact with the medical system. I remember the chronically ill mother I wasn't ready to become. Rebecca Dimmian is author of Chronic, a memoir about her experience with endometriosis, a chronic disease that can cause severe pelvic pain during periods. It's a very personal, like, intimate thing to write about illness, to write about pain, you know, to write about emotions. Even though they're oftentimes experienced by other people, you know, it's still kind of an uncomfortable topic. But it started with a few little essays that I had published here and there, and people would reach out and they would send me emails and they'd be like, I'm so glad you wrote about this. So even though I might be reluctant, it's something that I feel better about once I talk to other people.

people and they come up and they share their own experiences. Does the writing about it end up helping you as doctor or me as patient or is it about processing the experience? All of the above. The experience of people who write for sure they find that grappling on the page with this is very helpful for them to sort out their experiences. But then people read and say, oh, that's what I experienced or that's how I was feeling. From its origins in a windowless hospital conference,

conference room, BLR now receives some 5,000 submissions a year. Danielle Offrey says there's plenty of writing yet to be shared. Illness never goes out of style. There's always a new set of people getting sick and dealing with, you know, those same diseases again. Cancer is new for every single person, right? And every new medical student, every new nursing student who faces their first patient who dies is grappling with that. So it's always there. For the PBS NewsHour, I'm Jeffrey Brown at Bellevue Hospital in New York. Remember, there's a lot more online, including a look at a new poll showing just how worried Americans are about their finances right now.

That is on our Instagram. And that's the News Hour for tonight. I'm Jeff Bennett. And I'm Omna Navaz. On behalf of the entire News Hour team, thank you for joining us.