PBS News Hour - Full Show - September 3, 2026 - PBS News Hour full episode

Episode Date: September 3, 2026

Thursday on the News Hour, remembering feminist icon Gloria Steinem, a trailblazer who helped transform the fight for women's rights and equality. NATO countries confront the threat of sabotage from Russia, while in Ukraine, a high death toll means more Russians could soon be forced to fight. Plus, we speak with Shiyazh Pete about his quest to become the first Navajo player in the NFL. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy

Good evening. I'm Amna Nawaz. And I'm Jeff Bennett. On the news hour tonight, we remember feminist icon Gloria Steinem, a trailblazer who helped transform the fight for women's rights and equality, and whose influence span generations. Shadow warfare. NATO countries confront the threat of sabotage from Russia, while on the front lines in Ukraine, a high death toll means more Russians could soon be forced to fight. The goal of this war for now is continuation of the person. power of President Putin. He needs to have more people on the battlefield.

And we speak with Shiaj Pett about his quest to become the first Navajo player in the NFL. To represent my community in the best light possible has been a privilege, to say the least. Welcome to the News Hour. Gloria Steinem, the pioneering journalist and fierce activist, who is a icon of the Women's Liberation Movement, has died at the age of 92. For more than half a century, Steinem challenged. entrenched ideas about gender and power, helping bring the fight for women's equality from the margins of American life into the mainstream. Jeffrey Brown has this remembrance.

It is so obvious that... For more than five decades, Gloria Steinem was one of the most prominent faces of American feminism. A trailblazing journalist, political activists, and public intellectual, she helped lead a movement that revolutionized both the professional and personal lives of women across the country. We've marched for every other movement that exists, and we've worked for, you know, everything else except ourselves. And now to see women supporting other women and standing up for their own rights is really very, very moving and gratifying. Born in Toledo, Ohio in 1934, Steinem overcame a tumultuous childhood, which included her parents' divorce and taking care of her mother for many years. She graduated from Smith College in the late 1950s and soon moved to New York to begin a career as a freelance.

journalist. As a young writer, she famously went undercover as a playboy bunny for show magazine, exposing exploitation and sexual harassment. You had to have an internal physical exam, which they told us was a requirement of the food servers in New York State. She became a columnist for New York Magazine and established herself as a leader of so-called second-wave feminism, with thoughtful and often pointed commentary. She also covered the fight for abortion rights, a topic that hit close to home, as she told the news hour in 2019.

I would have had a profoundly different life if I had been responsible for rearing a child. I had had an abortion in England. It allowed me to live my own life, not to marry someone for whom I would have been the wrong wife and he would have been the wrong husband. She also said the fight for reproductive rights was a catalyst for her own career in activism.

And I began to see what, of course, the radical feminists were saying in the first place, which was that, you know, it is a caste problem and that women are in a press group. And then finally I understood that even though I was not married living in the suburbs, you know, that it was a problem that affected absolutely every woman. In the early 70s, Steinem co-founded Ms. Magazine, a radical break from traditional women's

publications. With a masthead made up entirely of women, it tackled topics like sexism, harassment, and equal pay, and became a clearinghouse for some of the biggest names of the Women's Liberation Movement. It started in desperation, I think, because there were just a great many women writers and editors who didn't feel that they were working on magazines. magazines that they read and that they had the opportunity to really be honest about their own experiences in a magazine.

Shirley Chisholm has not got the depth and breadth of the coverage she deserves. As a political activist, she worked to elect women to office and was a co-founder of the National Women's Political Caucus, traveling the country, speaking out against sexism and economic exploitation. It's the kind of blue-collar working woman who needs these reforms the most, I think, And also poor women and welfare women. But I think it really is going forward on all levels at once. And it's an important bridge between black women and white women.

She remained a prolific writer, a best-selling author, and prominent public speaker for much of her long life. Just this march in Washington today. Advocating for women's rights internationally, opposing apartheid, and campaigning prominently for Democrats, including Hillary Clinton. with others in the movement, she helped solidify gains that many these days may take for granted. Still, when she spoke with Judy Woodruff in 2020, she said she felt that much remained unfinished. We have the right to vote. We still don't fully have the right to our own bodies.

We are still subject to bodily invasion at a rate far exceeding that of men. I think we have yet to understand the rights that the female half of the human race need. as females. She condemned the Dobbs decision in 2022, which overturned abortion rights. I'm old enough to remember, you know, before there were any real abortion rights, nonetheless, about one in three American women had had an abortion at some time in her life, even when it was maybe not legal. And as she told Omna in 2020, she felt each person could be part of the fight for equality.

I just want to say that we should stop asking passive questions. I mean, it's not what will happen, what should happen, what is what am I going, what are we going to do? You know, and and that means tomorrow morning, you know, what are we going to do? Steinem, who in her trademark Eviator glasses became nearly synonymous with women's liberation in the media was not without her critics. In the late 80s, black feminist Alice Walker resigned as a contributor from Ms. Magazine, citing a lack of diversity on staff and in its pages. And Steinem had a major falling out with Betty Ferdan, herself a towering figure in the movement and an erstwhile ally.

They battled over many issues, including Steinem's critiques of men and traditional marriage, which Ferdan felt could be counterproductive. Through it all, Steinem emphasized she was just one part of a much larger struggle, as she said before receiving the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2013. I'm grateful to have the opportunity to say here that I would be crazy if I didn't understand that this was a medal for the entire women's movement. Over the years, Steinem dated a number of prominent men, including director Mike Nichols.

She married briefly later in life but had no children. Today, tributes poured in from across the globe, including from Oprah Winfrey, Jill Biden, and Hillary Clinton, who called her one of the architects of the entire structure of women's equality. In a 2015 interview for her memoir, I asked what advice she'd give young women today. Here's my advice. Do not listen to me. Really? Do not. No. I want to support their listening to themselves. Each of them has things that they love, things that they do, that they love so much. They know their own life and situations. I'm here to support that and say, you're not a okay, you're not more important than somebody else, but you're not less important either.

Gloria Steinem was 92 years old. For the PBS NewsHour, I'm Jeffrey Brown. For more now. On the life and legacy of Gloria Steinem, we're joined by Julie Tamor. She's director of the 2020 film The Gloria's, a biopic that spanned eight decades of Steinem's life. Julie, welcome to The News Hour. Thanks for being with us. Thank you for having me. So I saw you smiling there as you were hearing Gloria's voice. listening to her answers. I just want to start with your reaction to the news.

What did you think when you heard the news that she had passed? Well, you know, we knew she wasn't well, but it's such a terrible passing. We need her right now. We need that voice. And I'm glad we're bringing out the film right now again because, you know, you have to understand, this woman was an extraordinary pioneer.

She really was. And she was humble all the time. You know, she never wanted her face on the cover of a magazine. people would steal it and put it there. She really, she said things like, without me, there would still be a woman's movement. You know, she really was just an extraordinary person, a friend, and an inspiration for men and women.

You once said, I thought I knew her, but I didn't when you began working on this film. What do you think people might not have understood about Gloria Stein and what did you learn in telling her story? Well, I know the inner fears. I know what she went through when she had to keep that power face on. Even her little laugh at the end of things that she says for people when she's critical, she had to navigate that territory that many women do, especially leaders,

where they don't want to come on too strong, but they have something strong to say and to do. I also think the joy and what she and the other women of the time of her period, of them working together was such a lesson that people have to see. Most movies, they're about women who want to get a husband or have to get a divorce or dealing with an affair or awing at each other. And here was a woman and other women who really, really had a love affair with each other as they were working to make it better for all women all over the world. I didn't know things about how she had learned about the talking circles in India. I mean, there were many things in the book, but one of the things that was so great with her when I was making this movie

was her openness to me doing things that were surreal, her inner journey, her inner story. She was so supportive of me being the film director I am, dealing with real material in a, sometimes with documentary, but sometimes in a surreal way, instead of saying, oh, I don't think that way. She was extremely generous, had a great sense of humor, was gorgeous. And that didn't stop her. You know, people always would say things like that,

but that was what was great about her, that she had a sense of style and knew how to simplify her dress and yet people loved her for how she was her. She stayed true to herself. And she navigated so much, including, as we noted in that report from Jeff Brown, criticism from other women that were in part of that feminist movement. you saw some of the concerns from people like Alice Walker, Bell Hooks, prominent black leaders and thinkers who, Alice Walker even leaving Ms. Magazine, you know, for the lack of diversity there. How did Gloria take that criticism and how did she handle it moving forward? Well, it's one of the scenes in the movie when a black journalist says, how do you respond to the women's movement saying that the white women's movement does not include them? And she said, I wouldn't say anything. I'd listen.

Now, the thing is that Gloria Steinem always had a black partner, whether it was Flo Kennedy or Dorothy Pittman Hughes. She was always working with women of various locales. Dorothy, what was it, Wilma Man Killer, the Cherokee Chief, they were best friends. This is the most important friend that she had who was an extraordinary woman, or Dolores Huerta, who I, I spoke to when I was doing this film, but I heard that Alice Walker was a very close film of Gloria. So that might have been a period of time right there on Mids. She wasn't running Mizz by herself, you know. She was always part of a collaborative team.

But I know they were friends. And Betty Friedan is an interesting thing. I didn't put her physically in the movie, but I had Bella Absoub played by, oh God, Bet Midler, perfect. say, you know, you have to basically confront Betty Friedan. And she says, I'm not going to do that. If she wants to be the head of the National Women's Caucus, let her do it. And they said, no. So she wasn't really ever seeking conflict, but she had to confront it sometimes.

And there obviously there would be competition. Like there's competition among men. So it's not like every that women are going to be pristine and can get away with what's not. essentially human. Julie, in the minute or so I have left, I have to ask you because you were with her within a couple of key moments, election night in 2016.

You were there with cameras. You thought that you would witness her witnessing the first woman president in America, and then you followed her instead on the women's march that followed that election. What did you learn from her and take away from her in those more fraught moments? Yeah, well, we were at Samantha Powers' apartment,

the ambassador to the UN. And there were 40 women from different countries there, and you watched the night go on as each of these women, these ambassadors knew that it would be difficult for them, for the women in their countries. The last person in that room that night, before she went over to see Hillary, was Gloria Steinem. And these were her words, we have to look at the upside of the downside. And if there was any haiku for her spirit, that's what I get from her, which is always looking to, okay, don't be defeated, do. You have to act. And then we did. We took the documentary crew to Washington, D.C. It's in my film. The film has four gloria's plus the fifth, the real one. And to listen to your speak at that and say that this is what democracy is about it,

it makes you cry right now. It actually, I haven't seen it today. I saw it this summer. It was being screened and I hope it gets screened now so people can really see her in action and understand her full life. But she was a positive energy, positive force, and not just for women. This is the thing, was about relationships between men and women, how to live in an equal society. So, yeah, Julie, I know it's a tough day for you. We can't thank you enough for taking the time to join us. Julie Tamer. Thank you very much. In the day's other headlines, the Trump administration is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to lift a block on a plan to restrict mail-in voting just a day before the first ballots are set to go out for this year's midterms. Under President Trump's executive order, the Postal Service could refuse to deliver certain ballots and force states to submit lists of eligible voters to an online portal.

The federal judge in Boston had paused the order last week. Federal prosecutors are reportedly charging a U.S. Immigration Enforcement Officer with lying to investigators about the shooting of a Venezuelan man earlier this year. That's according to the Associated Press and other news outlets. The charges against Christian Castro mark a rare instance of the Trump Justice Department accusing a federal agent of breaking the law while on duty. Castro was among thousands of officers who were part of an immigration crackdown in Minnesota earlier this year. He was released from jail last week after Texas Governor Greg Abbott refused to hand him over to Minnesota authorities to face charges there. Also in Minneapolis, prosecutors say the gunmen who carried out a deadly shooting in an apartment building yesterday had been investigated by police in June but was not charged. At a briefing today, officials identified the man as 35-year-old Carlton Johnson saying he had a legal permit to carry the gun.

Court documents say he was facing eviction and had threatened a fellow resident in the months before the shooting in which two people were killed and five others were injured. That's according to police officers. The shooter was later killed by police. Billionaire investor Leon Black is defying a congressional subpoena to address his ties to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and is instead suing the House panel. Black is asking a federal court to block two subpoenas, one that calls for him to produce non-disclosure agreements and other documents. and another for his appearance itself. In a statement, his lawyer accused the committee of being on a, quote, fishing expedition that oversteps its authority.

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, who was named in the suit accused Black of hiding behind litigation. I would hold him in contempt right now of all the powerful billionaires and political people we brought in for interviews and depositions. This is the first time anyone's filed suit. The top Democrat on the committee, Congressman Robert Garcia is calling for Black to be held in contempt. Black denies any wrongdoing. The jury in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial ended a sixth day of deliberations without a verdict.

Today, her defense attorney called for the removal of a single juror who is said to be holding up a verdict. The judge refused the request and once again urged the jurors to keep trying to reach a unanimous decision to avoid a mistrial. The jury is deciding whether to hold Clancy criminally responsible for. for killing her three children in 2023. Deliberations are set to resume tomorrow. Turning now to the Middle East, Iran fired on Kuwait today as part of its retaliation for U.S. bombings earlier this week. Kuwait says its air defenses intercepted the missiles and drones.

U.S. allies Jordan and Bahrain say they also intercepted attacks yesterday. Meantime in southern Iran... Hundreds gathered for the funeral today of four of the victims from a reported U.S. airstrike that hit a wedding. At a White House press briefing today, Vice President J.D. Vance said the U.S. is investigating the incident and said the military never targets civilians. We never will do that. We never have done that. And unfortunately, obviously, sometimes things happen. When our military makes mistakes, they learn from them to try to get better from them. Vance was also asked if the war would be over by the November midterm elections. He responded by saying that he, quote, wouldn't call it a war and said it depends on Iran's actions.

In Thailand, sailors and Marines from the USS Lincoln are finally on dry land following their long deployment in the Middle East. Some 5,000 service members streamed into the beach city of Pataya by bus after more than nine months at sea. Multiple media reports had raised concerns about poor living conditions aboard the ship, though military officials and President Trump largely dismissed those reports. Once Sailor's mother flew all the way from New Jersey for an emotional reunion with her daughter. I just can't wait to see her smile. I can't wait to hear Mom. I know that's the first thing she's going to say.

I can't wait to hear her see Mom. The crew will enjoy several days of R&R in Thailand before their weathered ship is sketched. to resume its journey home to San Diego on Sunday. In Nepal, thousands of displaced people are struggling to access essential supplies after last week's devastating floods cut off major access routes. Residents in some of the worst affected areas are using temporary zip lines to cross a major river after flooding damaged bridges and roads. Meantime, search and rescue efforts are increasingly focused on tunnels at several hydropower projects,

where authorities believe some workers may still be. alive sheltered by pockets of air. One worker who managed to escape as the disaster hit described the ordeal. When the flood came, I hung on to floating debris to keep my head above the water. I felt like I was going to die. There were so many people who had died there, and we could see bodies everywhere. Specialized rescue teams from India, China, and the U.S. are involved in the rescue efforts. Officials say the death toll has risen to more than 1,200 people in Nepal and Tibet. with at least 4,700 others still missing.

Well, stocks on Wall Street rally today as bond yields eased a bit more. The Dow Jones Industrial Average jumped more than 600 points. The NASDAQ rose nearly 1.5%. The S&P 500 also ended sharply higher. Still to come on the news hour, Russia considers calling up more soldiers given the high death toll in its war against Ukraine. The NBA hits the Los Angeles clippers with a record fine for circumventing the salary cap. And our Settle-in podcast discusses the rise in Islamophobic rhetoric among politicians.

This is the PBS News Hour from the David M. Rubenstein studio at WETA in Washington, headquarters of PBS News. Today, German police arrested two people suspected of attacking a weapons manufacturer in Munich. The incident comes after Germany officially blamed the Russian government for another kind of sabotage attack last month, when armed drones came close to downing an aircraft as it landed in Leipzig. European officials say these so-called hybrid attacks are part of a wave of sabotage by Russia, targeting members of NATO. Here's Nick Schiffran. In the distance, an electricity substation explosion,

and what German officials fear is another Russian provocation. A swarm of police descend on the scene, a phalanx of officers comb fields for evidence and find ten other bombs. It's the second such incident in two days. and German officials say it was no accident. Let me be clear, this was not a faulty switch. It was deliberate. It is a criminal offense. Sabotage directed by a foreign state or left-wing extremism.

We cannot rule out either possibility. The apparent Russian sabotage threat became very real early last month, when in the Leipzig airport, a bomb squad found drones with military-grade explosives. The suspected target, a U.S. target, a Ukrainian cargo plane. But authorities also said another drone exploded next to a plane as it landed. This week, Germany cast blame officially. We assume that Germany is the target of further hybrid attacks by Russia. Let me make one thing clear. We are not at war, but we are a daily target of hybrid warfare.

European officials accuse Russia of years of hybrid warfare, from attempted arson outside the British Prime Minister's home. to firebombing warehouses in Latvia storing aid for Ukraine, to an assassination plot against a German weapons manufacturer, as well as drones that cross into NATO territory and have destroyed property. But Russian President Vladimir Putin calls all the accusations fiction. It is unclear why all these accusations are being made. Yet, there is one explanation.

The need to counter an aggressive Russia. But where is the evidence? Well, they have planted the evidence. Germany is Ukraine's largest European benefactor. European officials say it's no coincidence. Moscow's reported sabotage targets Kiev's supporters. Germany vows it will close a Russian consulate and seek more sanctions. But collective European punishment is still under debate.

It is clear that it has all the hallmarks of state-sponsored terrorism. The question is, what do we do about this? Also, today, Denmark's National Security and Intelligence Service accused Russia of recruiting Danish citizens for sabotage against Danish defense firms with ties to Ukraine. For perspective on all this, we turn to David Katler, a former senior member of the U.S. Intelligence Community and former Assistant Secretary General for Intelligence and Security at NATO from 2019 to 2023. He's now a senior fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis.

Thanks very much, David. Welcome back. Well, thanks. It's great news hour. It is very rare that Germany actually calls Russia out on one of these sabotage attempts. How significant is the calling out, and what does it say about the seriousness of the Leipzig airport incident? Well, I think it's very significant that the German government has taken this step now to publicly attribute a broader campaign, not just the attack on Leipzig, to Moscow, saying that they are orchestrating and directing these sorts of hybrid attacks. I think it also matters because a hybrid attack doesn't mean that the attack is harmless. And just because the attack failed doesn't mean that there aren't and shouldn't be consequences for it.

There's almost certainly a lot of intelligence in the background here, but the fact that they've taken this step is a, it's a big deal. What we need to wait and see now, though, is what consequences come. And does that actually provide the deterrent effect that Berlin and NATO and other allies wish to have happened? Before I ask about the consequences, let's talk about the attacks themselves. Are they increasing in number? Are they increasing in location? and does the Leipzig attack especially indicate that Russia is willing to take more risks when it comes to the sabotage? So yes to all of those things.

And I think where you end it is exactly the key point for people to understand that what you're seeing is an increase in the pace, you're seeing an increase in the scope, and in the range of activities. You have the Leipzig attack. You have arson, sabotage, murder, attacks on critical infrastructure also. And Russia has more than one service. likely engaged in this campaign. You have military intelligence in the GRU,

and you have the FSB that's sort of a combination of the CIA and the FBI. And if they're not checked, if they're not deterred, you should expect to see some tests of what the risk tolerance is of the victim also. How far can they push before they provoke a response? European officials tell me Putin is trying to test what he can get away with,

he's trying to test NATO resilience, he's trying to undermine support for Ukraine, perhaps all three. Why do you think Russia is apparently launching these attacks? Well, all of those reasons, and I think at the strategic level, he's really trying to accomplish two things. One is to break support for Ukraine. So let's go and try to conduct an arson attack at a weapons depot,

or let's try to assassinate the CEO of a major German arms company that's made statements and is investing, not just an increased arms production, but direct cooperation with Ukraine. And at the same time, that can support an even broader goal, which is to break solidarity within Europe. and within NATO, to try to change the security architecture for Europe as a whole.

And if you can accomplish those two things through these activities without a direct conventional attack on NATO, all the better, I think, from Moscow's perspective. And I should mark, of course, Russian authorities deny any involvement in this, and we heard Vladimir Putin himself saying this is all fiction. The German response, as you brought up before,

to Leipzig, was to close the Russian consulate in Bonn, terminate its agreement with the Russian House Cultural Center in Berlin and summon Russia's ambassador. Is that sufficient to create that deterrence that you described before? Well, we'll see, right? Because again, those are the steps

that Germany says publicly they're prepared to take. They may be taking other steps in private also. And other nations likely will take actions in solidarity with Berlin. But I think it's too important for people to understand when you hear things like, we're gonna close a consulate, we're gonna close a cultural center, you think, okay, it's no big deal.

But there have been longstanding allegations about Russian activities conducted from those facilities. Signals intelligence, human intelligence collection, influence operations. But is, there's kicking out some intelligence agents really deter Russia? It might not deter them, but it makes the operations more difficult to conduct.

They have to do them remotely. Might have to use the internet, communications, that sort of thing. I had the Latvian foreign minister by Brazni on the show last week, someone you worked with at NATO. And she said that while European intelligence services, are indeed concerned about these sabotage attacks and the attacks themselves might escalate.

There's no immediate military threat to NATO because Russia is bogged down in Ukraine. Do you think that's right? I think it's right that we don't see signs, I don't see signs of Russian preparation for a conventional attack on a NATO ally. I think in that case, the deterrence and the defensive capabilities that NATO has a raid

are sufficient to convince Moscow that the cost of that attack would be too high. be too high. But they're doing this hybrid campaign. And they are trying through the hybrid campaign to achieve the same results that they might have sought through a conventional attack, the risk there is too high. So they've decided to go in a different direction. David Katler, thank you very much. Yeah, thanks, Dick. Shifting our focus now to how Russia is supplying the soldiers to fight this war. This week, Russian President Vladimir Putin for the first time addressed rumors that the Kremlin is preparing for a full military mobilization to boost its manpower, calling them complete nonsense.

But Putin made much the same promise back in 2022, not to send conscripts to Ukraine before ordering a partial mobilization that remains in effect today. Now, with Russian military losses estimated at some $40,000 a month, there are signs the Kremlin is preparing for the possibility of a much broader call-up, perhaps after parliamentary elections later this month. Special correspondent Simon Ostrovsky reports from Georgia. This is the state of Russia's new recruits being sent to the front lines in Ukraine. In social media videos from this past winter, men say they were tricked and drunk when signing their enlistment papers.

This man says he's injured and is barely able to live. lift his flack vest. Putin's Spitz-Nass. Look at your special forces, Putin, he says. Russia, it seems, is running out of men who are fit and willing to fight. Until now, Russia has mainly used financial incentives to get men to join the military, sometimes offering some's equivalent to a year's salary to get them to sign a contract.

But with increasingly high casualty rates on the front lines, due to Ukraine's newfound drone dominance, Even those high numbers aren't the same draw they once were. That's putting the Kremlin in a bind. Either halt the war now, without achieving its declared goals, or find new ways to compel men into the army. One option would be to take the highly unpopular and potentially destabilizing step the Kremlin has avoided until now, instituting a draft or a general mobilization, as it's known in Russia.

The word mobilization is all over the Russian airwaves. The question isn't, will a mobilization be announced? The question is, what will it look like? Scenes like this offer a clue. Men being pulled off the street by the authorities in legally questionable recruitment drives are becoming all too common and illustrate the Kremlin's desperate need for men for the front. If the decision is made, the mobilization of men from the general population would only take place after parliamentary elections this month. That's according to Kirill Martinov, the editor-in-chief

of Russia's leading independent newspaper operating in exile, whose groundbreaking reporting about the Russian war effort has resulted in the Kremlin banning the newsroom as a quote, undesirable organization. The mobilization, I believe, is very likely in September or October of this year. This is a very dangerous moment, both for Ukraine and for Europe. Russian army is losing more than 40,000 people every month for now. So that means if Putin wants to put more pressure on Ukraine, We basically need more soldiers. Over four and a half years of war, Putin's escalating campaign of pressure on Ukraine has failed on a number of fronts.

Not only has he been unable to capture the capital Kiev, Putin hasn't even taken full control of three Ukrainian regions that already appear on Russian maps as part of Russia. On top of those failures, the cost of the war in Russian lives has been devastating, some one and a half million men. Seven months after launching his full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, President Putin launched a partial mobilization, with recruitment quotas assigned to local draft offices all across the country. It was Russia's first mass call-up since World War II.

It led to scenes like this along the country's land. borders. Hundreds of thousands of men converged on crossings like this one to try to get out of the country to avoid the draft. More than 700,000 Russians arrived here in neighboring Georgia in just a matter of weeks. Augustine was one of them and now lives full time in the capital to Belisi in order to avoid military conscription. Second wave of mobilization, I think it's definitely happening, you know.

After election, very, yeah. The situation looks pretty bad for Russian army, in my opinion. I know how it's working in Russia. They can Tokyo with no reason. They will find the reason they bring you in the front. So I'm pretty scared, but I'm here. I feel safety here. Alexei, who also left because of the war,

thinks it's becoming much more difficult to avoid military service in Russia. Do you feel like going back to Russia now, it's even more risky that you would get drafted into the military? I think, yeah. They just can start picking people wherever they want. I really fear of myself crossing the border. You're afraid of crossing the border.

Yeah, yeah. Recruitment statistics published by the independent Russian outlet Vyorskka show that in the spring of this year, the number of new recruits from Moscow fell by a third, with the same trends seen across the rest of the country. The publication also learned that many of those who did sign on were forced by police. Well, say, all of them all have been all signed a contract. I strongly believe that basically the goal of this war for now is the continuation of the personal power of President Putin. He has no clear way out.

He needs to have more people on the battlefield. Because we don't have tool to stop Putin, politically, diplomatically, there is a kind of high risk that war will become even broader. It will affect Europe directly. Last month, the Russian military tested how a mass mobilization would look in Kaliningrad, a Russian region situated between NATO members, Lithuania and Poland. The idea, according to the Wall Street Journal's reporting, was to work out any glitches before a possible future mobilization. And for sure, I believe if Putin started this forced campaign to bring people back to the battlefield, I think a lot of people try to find some way how they can escape.

During September, a lot of young men, they will prefer to spend a few weeks on vacation. on the day of election before the most risky time to wait and see what will happen next. But for fighting age Russian men, the path ahead won't be easy. Since the first wave of mobilization, Russian authorities have upgraded a digital registry of all-male citizens eligible for service, making dodging military conscription far more complicated now than it was at the start of the war. For the PBS News Hour, I'm Simon Ostrokes in Tbilisi, Georgia. The NBA handed out one of its harshest penalties in history against the LA Clippers for circumventing the salary cap with its star forward, Kauai Leonard.

The league suspended the team's owner and fined the Clippers $30 million. William Brangham has more. The NBA's powerful rebuke followed a year-long investigation, which detailed how Clippers executives allegedly set up four separate side. deals where other companies would pay Leonard. That boosted the star's income and thus violated the NBA's salary cap. In addition to the $30 million fine and suspending team owner Steve Balmer for a year, several other team executives were barred. The team will lose five consecutive first round draft picks starting in 29, and the Clippers will be monitored by the league

for five years. Quai Leonard won't be facing suspension, and his The contract remains intact. He has to pay a $700,000 fine, and it's expected that he's going to be traded to the Toronto Raptors. So for more on this scandal, we are joined by David Aldridge. He's senior sports columnist for the athletic. David, thank you so much for being here. In a column that you wrote today about this scandal, you noted that NBA commissioner, Adam Silver, in bringing this punishment down, quote, met the moment.

What do you mean by that? Well, William, you know, everybody in the league has been following this for the last year, you know, since the initial podcast by Pablo Tori, who's been, you know, doing an incredible job on this over the last year, multiple episodes detailing multiple instances of things that just didn't make sense, right? That he was getting information about the Clippers and the deals with Coah Leonard that didn't make sense. So everyone in the league wanted to know what was Adam Silver going to do if the investigation from Wachtell Lipton said that, yeah, the clippers have circumvented the cap, in our opinion. And here's the reasons why we say that. Because Steve Bulmer is not your ordinary NBA owner. Look, they're all billionaires. And Steve Bulmer's richer than all of them.

Okay, Forbes has him as the 15th richest person in the world. We all, I think your viewers surely know about Steve Ballmer's background in history. So, and he's well liked amongst the other owners. Nonetheless, the other owners are competitors, and their view was if the clippers have violated the salary cap, they need to be punished. And the detail to which Wachtell Lipton showed that alleged behavior, I really think left the league with no option. a slap on the wrist, you know, a light suspension, a second round draft pick, no suspensions of personnel would have really told the rest of the league, you can do whatever you want. It's okay. The league said unequivocally with these punishments that the cap is sacrosanct

and you can't do whatever you want to violate it. What do you make of Quay Leonard's involvement in this? We know that his uncle, who apparently was involved in some of these deal negotiations was barred also by the league. But what do we know about Kwai's involvement and his future going forward? Well, you know, he put out a statement on Wednesday saying that he, you know, took responsibility for his company or his people's actions. And, you know, he didn't, he didn't say that I knew about the circumvention, but he said he took responsibility for the actions, right?

Look, as you mentioned, there was a trade already in place that. was held up by this investigation that would have sent Kauai Leonard to the Toronto Raptors for a couple of players and multiple draft picks. I think the NBA looked at this and said, we could suspend Kauai Leonard. We could try to, you know, void his contract. It would almost certainly go to arbitration. The players union has done this before in the past. And successfully, I might add, gotten players' contracts restored, gotten suspensions reduced. and I don't think the NBA wanted to fight that fight. I think they felt like the Clippers had to be the entity

that bore the brunt of the punishment in this case. But Kauai's going to go on. I'm sure I don't think anything's going to keep the trade from going through, and he'll go back to the Toronto Raptors, the team that he led to an NBA championship in 2018. The last minute or so we have left, in the losing all of those first round draft picks, this seems to deal pretty serious blow to the Clippers,

going forward. Yeah, I think, William, that's what a lot of people around the league were looking at, because even though the league find the clippers $30 million, again, Steve Ballmer is an incredibly rich person. They can pay it. That's not as punitive as losing the draft picks. That was really, in my view, the only thing the NBA could do to really demonstrate the harshness of what it considered the cap violations and what it would do to punish teams that tried to do it.

They did it many years ago to the Minnesota Timberwolves. They took five draft picks, and ultimately they wound up giving two of them back. So the Clippers might well get one or two of their picks back down the road. But I think this was the best way the league felt to send a message that it was going to take cap circumvention very seriously because draft picks are really the most important way to build rosters and try to create superstars in the NBA. David Aldridge of the Athletic, thank you so much for sharing your reporting with us. Thanks, William. Most professional football players gain fans and win fame from what they do during the game.

In the case of rookie offensive linemen, Shi'ash Pete, millions came to know him from what he said after. After his Dallas Cowboys preseason win over the Arizona Cardinals on August 22nd, Pete was invited by the coach to address his team in the locker room. His words went viral. Take a listen. Fate brought us here as strangers, but this game, this star, this team will make us brothers. Pete already made history as the first Navajo player ever to sign an NFL contract. But just this week, as teams made their cuts, Dallas announced that Pete had not made the squad. He's now hoping to continue his football journey with another team, and Shi'aj Pete joins us now from New Mexico.

Shiash, welcome to the show. It's great to talk to you. Yeah, thanks for having me on. Good to be here. So I have to start with that moment that we just showed after the Arizona game, you're in the locker room, everyone's celebrating. Coach Schottenheimer invites you to say a few words. What do you think in that moment? What's going through your mind? Well, I mean, it was all inspiring to see such a massive crowd, you know, show out for the game.

And specifically for me, it was awesome. But I will say, you know, that couldn't have happened without the Cowboys and for that I thank him for it. without their reputation and status as an NFL club. I wouldn't have been able to obtain that kind of platform. So I'd like to say thanks to that. What was going through my head was a lot of stuff, about the game, about my performance, about what's for lunch after or what's for dinner after.

But most importantly, what am I going to say? I know I'm going to have to say something about that. And those words that I mentioned, They were my own, but I will say the speech, the structure of it was heavily inspired from a video game series, Halo 2. So there was some inspiration to it, and I'm not going to say it was like all me, but I got it from a really cool video game. I used to play as a kid. I mean, it was just 59 words that speech inspired headlines and media coverage and your face, like, splashed across TV screens across the country.

Did the reaction to the speech surprise you? But from the moment, the words left my mouth, I knew I was like, dang, that was some really good stuff. Really good energy, positive energy. The ability to speak from my heart was displayed there. And it was a really good moment and a really good night. And it was something I've always wanted to showcase. And so it was quite special indeed. You mentioned the crowd.

At that game, there was a very large, very vocal contingent. thousands of fans, members of the Navajo Nation, who drove to Arizona, traveled just to see you. They were chanting your name. They were waving Navajo Nation flags. What was that like for you during the game? I will say I wasn't expecting that large of the turnout. And I got to see firsthand of strength and power of the Navajo Nation people. And it was really special to be appreciated and welcomed and supported and in and supported and for by the Navajo Nation people, all of native people in general. It was quite special. We mentioned you're the first ever Navajo player to even sign an NFL deal, and now you're looking for a new team. I know hoping to continue your career. Do you think about what that means

for all the other young players out there, members of the Navajo Nation, to watch you, to see you in this position right now? I'm very thankful I got the opportunity with the Cowboys, and I'm excited to see what the future brings. When it comes to the youth, And the fans and people looking from afar to me, I've done a great thing. And to be able to display that and to represent my community in the best light possible has been a privilege, to say the least. And I've been taking some time outside of football, outside of my career, to pay it back, to pay it forward to the youth. I have attended my former high school and I've been motivating. and giving words of wisdom to the youth and enlightening them about the how far the journey can take you

if you put in the hard work and dedication. And if you have a vision and you really want to do something and you stick your mind to it and you put in the work day in and day out to be an impact on so many people again is a huge responsibility. And it's a privilege again. Shiaj, Pete. I know you have a lot of fans out there cheering for you who want to see you join a team. We wish you all the best of luck and your journey ahead. Thank you so much for joining us today.

Thank you, I'm not. In her new book, Seasons of Fury, journalist Rosina Ali traces the history of Islamophobia in the U.S., from FBI monitoring of Muslim and Arab communities in the 1960s to the sweeping surveillance programs launched after 9-11. I recently spoke with her for our PBS News podcast, Settle in. I'm curious how you look at America today contextually, on this because, yes, on the one hand, you have the kind of commonplace anti-Muslim rhetoric

that you see from the president of the United States, from some of his closest advisors, from sitting members of Congress. But then you also have Muslim Americans who've risen to very powerful positions. They've been elected to Congress, people like Ilhan Omar, Rashida Talib, you've got the first Muslim mayor in New York City. You have another candidate for the Senate in Michigan. How do you look at the context? of where we are today and what it means for this. It is remarkable the rise of Muslim politicians in this country, but I also think it was inevitable.

Only because Muslims are a growing population in the country, that said, there's still about just 1.5% of the American population. But what is different since 9-11 is a lot more Muslims have protection in the sense that they were either born, here or they were naturalized. Unlike Muslims who were mostly immigrants after 9-11, a lot of the Muslims we see today who are rising up in political circles do have a sense of security. But what has also happened after in the last 25 years is a cohering of a political Muslim voice. That in a sense is a reaction ironically to 9-11. Before 9-11, there were disparate Muslim voices, but mostly people

really considered themselves, again, South Asian or immigrant or so forth. But 9-11 really started co-hearing a Muslim social political identity. And so when we see the rise of people like Sauran Mandani or Abdullah al-Assad al-Huhr, they do talk about themselves as being Muslim. That said, there is a level of Islamophobia that we see today that I have not seen in my lifetime. It is a level of acceptance of Islamophobia. The ways in which senior officials, policymakers, Laura Lumer, for example, the advisor to the president, speaking about Muslims and Islam as if they are second-class citizens,

calling for a complete ban on Muslims, calling for a complete ban on anything that is related to Islam in the United States. And to me, what that says, is not so much about the Muslim American community. It says a lot more about the American community as a whole. What do you mean by that? I think what we've done is we've reached a point where, you know, tolerance of religion and freedom of religion was a founding tenet of this country.

And what we see now is a society that is actually okay with, dismantling that very pillar of the United States. We are now openly calling for Islam not to be part of the United States or part of its social and political fabric. And I think what we're doing is actually changing ourselves as a society in really damning and worrying ways. This is not a problem just for the Muslim community. It's actually a problem for American society as a whole.

And it's changing the face of what we think of as the values of American society. You can watch that full conversation and more episodes of Settle In on YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. And that is The News Hour for tonight. I'm Amna Nawaz. And I'm Jeff Bennett for all of us here at The News Hour. Thanks for spending part of your evening with us.