Peak Prosperity - Lab Leaks, Lies, and Constitutional Crises

Episode Date: April 23, 2025

This Signal Hour discusses the lab origins of COVID-19, societal fractures, and the potential for civil unrest, with insights into political and international relations.Click Here for Part 2

The following is the audio version of a video released at peakprosperity.com. Visit peakprosperity.com to watch the video and to find other insightful content such as articles, discussion forums, and exclusive subscriber-only content. Hey, hello everyone and welcome to this Signal Hour. We are just going to be having a ripping good time today back here with Evie. Hey Evie. Hey good afternoon great to be here. So we've been having some really wild conversations lately haven't we? It's a lot going on so I guess before we start there look the signal hour is trying to make sense of the world and that's what I do for my followers at peak prosperity and out on the interwebs. And look, it's getting harder and harder to keep track of everything. I am a very high volume opportunity.

I don't know. I consume pretty much vast fire hoses of stuff. You do. Yeah. And even with that, it's hard for me to keep up, because so much is changing so quickly. But this is the model I've been anticipating for a long time because we live

in an exponentially changing world for good and for bad. And with that exponential change, the pace of that just overwhelms our abilities, but you can feel it, right? Multiple fracture fronts. We have things going on in Europe and China and the US and divisions and so today we're gonna go through a lot of the what of that here and then we'll get to the why

of it in part two which we do for subscribers so this is turning out to be very much and I'm just struggling a bit to get this if I can get this here in focus that looks better all right so let's start here with this then today. Remember new format, we're doing two episodes a week now, Wednesdays and Fridays each week. And it has two parts. It has that public part which everybody is watching right now and then it has a part for our premium members back at peak prosperity and the conversations we've been having there have been extraordinary. Yes, they have. So just as a reminder about that now this is live so we're watching the comments like um hello from Germany hello Germany there Jason Boyd and Chicago

Hello Germany, they're Jason Boyd. Hello from Chicago, hello from Tacoma, Washington. Yep, hello, hello everyone. We see you, even if we can't call it all out. Now as a quick reminder for peak prosperity members, you go to that link right there. Of course, it's on the front page of the site. It would have looked like this. You would click there, and you can just watch the whole thing uninterrupted as a peak prosperity member Part one part two by going to that link join the discussion This is what we're going to be discussing in part two today

Which was part of our conversation Evie around the table this morning and is can our societal fractures be repaired? Or does it end? cathartic Lee Such good questions you might say cathartically. Such a good question. As you might say. And by the way, we just got a comment here, Evie, from somebody back at the site, asking this, I think just the parts in yellow. Sure, sure. Hi, Chris. I was wondering what your thoughts are in the apparent change of direction of the Trump administration. He goes on to say, you said recently that it's either a revolution or it's not. And it's looking more and more like there's not going to be a true meaningful revolution at all.

We have to talk about that because my model is very simple. When you are, it's not my model, it's the rules for rulers model. It's just, it's how societies work. If you're going to have a revolution, like if it's a Copernican revolution of thought well you put it out there and the next thing you know you're hiding from the church and they're they want to they want to burn you at the stake and all that because you're heretical person revolutions require you to hit critical mass right if Trump does not arrest the people who were seeking to actively destroy this country, conducted law fair against its own citizens, did all of those damaging things. If there was people, we can't just sort of go, oh, well, let's just shrug past that. We're more about the future, not the past. Let's look forward. Right, right. They'll come back and destroy

you these people. Yeah. And he should know that better than anybody. Don't you think? Yeah. It's surprising to me that he doesn't at this point. But I mean, could it be possible that he has another plan? We just don't know what it is. Yeah, 40 chess, five DMO pull, but maybe not like maybe he's getting ready. A friend of mine was saying this the other day. She was like, what if he's just getting all his ducks lined up? You know, it takes a while when you do put a case together.

You have to have the evidence. You can't just go out there willy nilly and arrest people. You have to have the actual, you know, it takes a while when you do put a case together. You have to have the evidence. You can't just go out there willy nilly and arrest people. You have to have the actual, you know. Well, I can make this very simple. John Brennan lied to Congress. People under the Trump administration like Steve Bannon were put in prison for contempt of Congress. So apparently you can put people in prison for contempt or lying in front of Congress. So apparently you can put people in prison for contempt or lying

in front of Congress, right? Okay. John Brennan lied. He's one of the 52 signatories, former intelligence official. Trump did take his security clearances away, which he was very butthurt about. But that guy, I could type up his arrest warrant in an hour and I'd file another hour now We're into two hours Evie. They're saying well, you have to give time. You have to give time I forget what today is but it's probably close to 92 or 93 days. We're almost at the hundred day mark Wow zero people have been arrested who I consider to be consequential Yeah, zero. That's true. That's true Except except Andrew Como did charges were just referred to the DOJ for Andrew Como Yeah, you're right. Zero. That's true. That's true. Except, except, uh, Andrew Cuomo did

charges were just referred to the DOJ for Andrew Cuomo. Really? For lying to Congress. So that's a governor, but I still, I need FBI officials, Congress critters and weasels. I need a high level HHS officials who did this whole COVID thing. We're going to talk about that today. Um, and we have to we have to talk about this very exciting that the White House came out with a big piece saying, oh, hey, yeah, this thing COVID came out of a lab, right? Great. But we have to understand that this wasn't just sort of like, oh, it came out of a lab and then, you know, we did the best we could. None of that fog of war stuff. it was designed and created by US scientists with the help of Chinese scientists, probably Canadian, probably European, doesn't matter.

We designed this pathogen, then unleashed it, and then did everything we possibly could to inflict as much harm as possible on innocent people, middle-class people, etc. as a consequence of all that. It was just used as an excuse. Misinformation, censorship, lying, the jabs, lockdowns, masks on kids, totally irrational stuff. And if you don't see the totality of that pattern for what it was, this wasn't an accident, this wasn't just, oh we had some less than competent people. No, we had highly competent people. Yeah. Highly competent. And information was out there. Yeah. You know, we had the data, um, pretty early on actually.

And there were a lot of doctors who got in trouble for speaking about what that truth was. So, yeah. So, you know, he says, yeah, you know, we'll win a few small battles here and there, but, but what's going on. and we have all this warmongering going on. So we got to talk about that stuff All right. So here's where we're gonna start today. All right and by the way, this Is Territory I know a lot about For reasons in Aborigines this year's specialty here. It's one of several areas

I feel like I have a little bit of extra knowledge and potentially so This was this is this is the the website it starts with that Trump walking authoritatively, right? Believe this was real. I know Look at that. It looks like a movie trailer But this is how it started out with the origin. This is the first sentence they go with I love this the proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 Publication which was used repeatedly by public health officials and the media to discredit the lab leak theory was prompted by Dr. Fauci to push the preferred narrative that COVID-19

Originated naturally so that that's where it started right there. So, and I'll just we'll go through the timeline very quickly, but so the story we were fed was that code was a novel. That's what that's what ENCOV means, right? It's novel coronavirus. That's right. It was novel. Novel means we haven't seen this before. Oh, actually Dr. Ralph Baric had been monkeying around and he used that term accurately with this virus since the mid 1990s Right. It was not novel. We knew a lot about this particular virus It had came through the ACE2 receptor like there's a lot we knew it was not novel but they came out with like oh no Look at this crazy pandemic that came out. Right. What do you know? What do you know? So here was their first point that they made.

Wow. Point one. Point one the virus possesses a biological characteristic that is not found in nature. PRA. You guys know too. We've been, we've been talking, Chris, you've been talking about this for years now. A biological characteristic. Now, this is cool. It's 2025. I'm glad we're getting there, but I want to say that I first reported on that myself, May 4th, 2020. Not to toot my

own horn, but this was day 102 of figuring stuff out. And I titled this one, lying virologists. And it began here. This was an email from a lying virologist, Christian Anderson, who blocked me immediately on Twitter because, you know, he's concerned about free speech and all that stuff. Anyway, look at this Friday January 31st 2020. Remember we don't know anything about this. What could it be to Anthony Fauci and copying not another government official, not the FBI, not the National

Security Department, not the President, but Jeremy Farrar who is the head of, he's the CEO of a UK NGO that promotes pharma crap all over the world called the Welcome Trust, right? And welcome not welcoming. That was actually the last name of the Brit. Nasty, nasty people. That's like saying, yeah, that's like, yeah, it's a Rob Robert beer moment. But look at he says, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah blah blah in yellow the unusual features So what we're talking about a biological characteristic, what does it possess an unusual feature of the virus? It makes up a really small part of the genome. Just less than 0.1% Yeah four letters PRA

Yeah, right, right So no So one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features potentially look engineered. That's what he said. And this jumped out at me and everybody else who's looking at it at the time is just this is a smoking gun. This is it's not point 1%. That's like saying, well, we've weighed Chris anyways, you know, 190 pounds, but point 1% of him is not is not quite right. Yeah, that's called the bullet in my head, right? It's like some things, like you can't, like the weight of it or the length of it is just like the

totally irrelevant measure. It's very small, it's this 0.1%. It just is the fur and cleavage site that gives it 100% its pathogenicity and its ability to infect humans. It's power. Yeah. And it was a feature that was engineered into this virus and it's completely obvious that that was case at the time. And he says, Eddie, these are all like first-name chummy Mean Girls Club virologists. Eddie, Bob, Mike, and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory. OK, that's January 31st, 2020. A genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory, which is scientific way of saying, dude, this thing totally came from the lab. That's science speak for we made this.

Someone did. I mean, we humans probably is. And by the way, I just want to say if you're listening here today on YouTube or from Twitter, YouTube likes to shadow ban us. I don't know about Twitter, but please if you are listening to this and you find it helpful hit the like button and the subscribe button to help support getting this information out there. You know you've been clobbered by the

getting this information out there. You know, you've been clobbered by the algorithms in the past several years and even given strikes for trying to bring the truth to light. So it's really important that we get this out to as many people as we can because there are a lot of individuals now that are looking back at this and have been severely harmed either by the virus itself and long COVID or those other things that were mandated. Like 9-11, this self-goal manufactured crisis was used as a reason to stomp all over our constitutional rights and really traumatize people and steal lots and lots of money from people and funnel money to insiders, you know, the people who made those tests

that were a totally just gave false positives and were totally stupid, they made bank, right? We funneled over a hundred billion dollars of profits to Pfizer to manufacture the crap in responses. At any rate, it was a looting operation, but one that was very deadly. And I think that we should look at it as a fractal representation because as bad and as large as it is COVID, the whole COVID COVID response,

it's just a little piece of the overall rot that's happening in the system. But if we can't get our heads around this, so that's why I'm so dismissive of you and I, we go to Northampton, there's all these people, Elon's terrible, we hate Elon, he's stealing my right to vote. I'm like, what? But with that, it's like, how can you be this angry over something that hasn't happened when the people who destroyed it up into your lives, you don't even, you have no, like there's blank, they're like blank about that. How can Yeah, we talked about this a little bit. Yeah. Yeah yesterday last week on our signal hour It was the second part. Yeah things got really emotional

Yeah here and and our tribe actually weighed in a lot of people well because of the damage done Because of the damage done and there's a lot of anger and there's a lot of grief and sadness. And when you really look at that big picture you're talking about, it tells a very different story about where we are and where we're headed, which is different than what we're being told by mainstream media and influencers and whatever's going on out there in the secular world. Now you can't, my view is until you cough up these national hairballs, right, the JFK murders one, MLK, RFK murders, our others, the Oklahoma City bombing, 9-11, on and on.

There are a lot of these things where when you sort of scratch at them even slightly, you go, oh, the official story is crap. Now, I don't know what the truth is, but I can tell you the story, the narrative that we're living with is wrong. Objectively wrong. the science is bad. I don't say this is somebody who sort of guesses at motivations I'm telling you for each one of those things. I mentioned I have discrete

Data that says oh no that story is wrong right so it's like with this case where they're like Oh, yeah, there's this thing that potentially looks engineered no duh. This was completely obviously Something and this was the smoking gun for me. So this is Saturday, February 1st. So this is just a little bit later. In fact, if you look, this is, this came out at, um, 10 32 PM on Friday night. So by Saturday at 1229, which is just 29 minutes over the morning goal line there. So this is, you could call that late at night Friday, if you think that way. You have Anthony

Fauci saying to Hugh Alkenclause, whose son actually happens to be a congressman who I just beat on all the time, because he's like, we have to return our country to morals. I mean, oh, you mean the morals that like where your dad covered up like mass murder of the world? Right? That kind of morals? What is he saying here? He says says it is essential that we speak this AM keep your cell phone on. I have a conference call at 745 with Azar. It will likely be over at 845. Read this paper as well as the email that I will forward to you now. You will have tasks today that must be done. So oh my gosh there's there's a giant emergency

there's this novel coronavirus it's a pandemic nobody knows what's coming. Hey Hugh I'm gonna need you to help me conduct a cover-up right away because look at the attachments. Barak and she at all in Nature Medicine it's a 2015 paper which clearly describes performing gain-of-function research on SARS and it's out in nature medicine It's out there and they're like, oh shit. We funded this right? How do we cover this up like not how do we save people's lives? How do we communicate effectively about the importance of vitamin D? What do we know about this, you know prevent huge amount of deaths first things first, dude importantly You have tasks today that must be done You know, prevent a huge amount of deaths. First things first, dude, important.

You have tasks today that must be done. All right. But concern started to mount. So on February 2nd, this is from Jeremy Farrar, who is again the odious head of that welcome trust. And this is going Saturday, Sunday. This is at 1128 in the morning to Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins, the folk guitar playing, you know, yeah.

He says, and Lawrence Tabak, who these are, that's the right hand man of Collins. So just saying I'm just saying, but but note again, this is Jeremy Farrar sending stuff to the highest levels of NIH and NIAID. Nobody else in the government is being wrapped into this. Not the FBI, not the NSC, NSA. Do we know if anybody is redacted that's important in those portions? Although B6 is, those actually probably ought to be B4s. That's the actual email itself. That's all that's redact email itself okay that's all this redacted and that's those parts okay so I guess this is

regarding a teleconference and Jeremy writes to Anthony Fauci Tedros and Bernard have apparently gone into conclave they need to decide today in my view if they do for varicate I would appreciate a call with you later tonight or tomorrow to think how we might take forward meanwhile dot dot dot well this is the zero hedge article and if you look at that Wow coronavirus contains HIV insertion stoking fears over artificially created bioweapon this got the zero hedge made the attention of the top end of this and they worked hard to then crush zero hedge and zero hedge got actually deleted from Twitter

I remember to after this I remember this is how they worked like not hey Let's explain why those four inserts that you see from H. I literally HIV parts of it were taken out From the GP 120 protein that allows us to dock into things like your white blood cells, which is why HIV is An acquired immunodeficiency virus because it attacks your white blood cells in your immune system By attacking the white blood cells you have an immune deficiency problem and that's very bad as we know, right? So they somebody took pieces of the GP 120 Docking protein and put it into this spike protein. Cause why not?

You know, we're just trying stuff out, see what works. Um, and that's why, anyway, so the concern was not, how do we begin to explain this to the American people? It's can we get zero hedge band? Let's call up our friends at CISA. Hey, can we get a band? Right. Call up Jack Dorsey, get, get get get meta on the phone line. You

know, we're gonna need um, yeah. Oh, you know, and then later they said, you know, there's there are vaccine injury support groups popping up on Facebook. Hey, Mark Zuckerberg, can you just put a bullet in those? Yeah, just paying those shut those down. And he got shut down. People were trying to talk about what was happening to them. And in their experience of COVID and or later on their experience of the vaccines and it just wasn't allowed. All right. Wow. So here's the timeline I want to go with them.

Okay. January 31st. They're like, dude, this thing looks engineered. February 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th. I got a bunch of other emails this whole time. There's just emails flying around and they're like, ah, this looks bad. We have to decide what we're going to do. You know what they decided to do?

Eight days later on February 9th, 2020. In February of 2020. Published. That was a nine edit. Sorry. But on February of 2020, they published this draft version of this thing called the proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 and look who's look who the authors are. Christian Anderson, Andrew Rambeau, Ian Lipkin, Edward Holmes, Robert Gary, and the Department of Immunology and Microbiology. Yeah but see down

there look at the people who were on that e- those email chains from before, see all those names. Oh yeah. So all the names that are in these meetings where they're like, oh no. And then eight days later, they come up with this manuscript called the proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 and then it's printed on March 17th and it's in nature medicine and what's that say down in yellow? What's that say down there? It says, our analysis clearly show.

Clearly. Clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus. Whoa, whoa, whoa. How do we go from, dude, this thing totally looks like a lab eight days later, they're like, clearly shows. Our analysis clearly show. And then, so I go to the supplemental tables and, and they put this part, let

me get my little laser pointer thing. They put this table in which shows human SARS-CoV-2 has this furan cleavage site, this PRRA site right here. Sure. Yep. Nothing else has it. No other Corona viruses in the near lineage have it. None of them.

Nothing in nature. Not our rat TGiruses in the near lineage have it. None of them. Nothing in nature. Not our rat TG13, no pangolin viruses, nothing. Nope, it just sort of showed up. How strange. How strange. How strange. How strange.

What a coincidence. So here's, I mean, this is just very quickly the timeline here. But just, you know, people can read that. But I mean, just is just very quickly the timeline here, but, but just, you know, I don't, I'm people can read that, but I mean, just skip through it, but it's just, this is just to, to lay out what just happened here. So Christian Anderson sends an email to Fauci on Friday and then Fauci sends an email to, how do you say that? Q, Auchenkloss.

I think you have to say it with like a little bit. Auchenkloss. Good. I have a cold. Yeah, actually, There we go. Emails fly around from 1pm to 2pm on Saturday, February 1st, 2021. Lots of people copied in from the Welcome Trust, NIH, WHO, and friendly, friendly viral researchers. Then they have a con call at 2pm, which lasts for about an hour.

And they presumably stay on afterwards to discuss something and then eight days later they have this huge manuscript that they publish proving natural origin. Right, so that's what they want. They want this thing, oh it's natural. Now imagine if you will a parallel universe timeline where they go okay look we were doing some experiments seems to have escaped the lab it's our worst nightmare and we're a little we're a little bit we're a little bit up to our eyeballs in this because USAID has been

funding this research NIAID NIH State Department all have been fun DOD we've all been funding this research and we got this guy Ralph Barak down there who knows more about this virus than anybody so So I'll tell you what, we'll just tell the American people, look, this thing came out of a lab. And we can, we can, we can assign blame later. But for now, we just need to understand this was specifically engineered. And by the way, it didn't come with one rattly key that gets into one human lock. It came equipped with four high quality keys to get into human cells. And so it's going to cause a lot of damage.

As a consequence, we're going to have to treat this very differently. We're open to all ideas. We're calling upon the medical community to observe what works, feed that back in. Oh, look, hydroxychloroquine works. Oh, ivermectin works. Oh, people with high vitamin D levels aren't dying. Right. Here's a website where we collect all that data that these good physicians are finding is helpful and works.

Yep. Oh, hey, look, there are these people out there, like Chris Martinson, who are figuring this out and helping to communicate this, right? I'm very proud of all the emails and reflections I get back from people who say thank you you kept me sane I understood what was happening I avoided the jab as a consequence I knew to take this stuff that you mean right it was legitimately

helpful the whole entirety of our government was arranged to destroy any honest inquiry into this that's that's what that was that's what that was. That's right. That was powerful. I think you could say that again. Well, so and then they had a second bullet point. The data shows that all COVID-19 cases stem from a single introduction into humans. This runs contrary to previous pandemics where there were multiple spillover events. This runs contrary to previous pandemics where there were multiple spillover events. Yeah, that means that it's, I mean, it just came into one human and then went everywhere. That's not how these things work. Spillovers are, it's tuned for a bat or something else, right?

And then for it to get into humans, it's a rattly key. You have to, sometimes the lock works, sometimes it's rattly. So you have these multiple sort of spillovers for a while takes a while and then and then finally no this thing just it jumps just came right out okay so in 2022 episode 50 I had this thing lying media and the lies they tell and I like to point this out because I'm still so bitterly angry at the New York Times for being a bunch of retards and here Carl Zimmer had retard and Benjamin Mueller sub retard for the New York Times. They are the science writers and they said, oh, look, new research points to Wuhan wet

market as pandemic origin. I put the wet in there, but that's what they talked about it. You know, and they're like, oh, look, look, it sounds so authoritative. Remember this stuff? Yeah, I do. Scientists released a pair of extensions, extensive studies over the weekend that point to a large food and live animal market in Wuhan, China as the origin of the coronavirus pandemic. Two of them. It's not one, one, two, two. It's two studies. Extensive. And they refer to each other. Analyzing a wide range of data, blah, blah, blah, of all these things, the scientists concluded that the coronavirus was very

likely present in live mammals sold at the Hunan seafood wholesale market in late 2019 and suggested that the virus spilled over into people working or shopping there on two separate occasions. Yeah, concluded. Very likely, it was very likely present in live mammals. That's what they concluded. They concluded that, by the way, they didn't provide any genetic data whatsoever in this paper, right?

Really? Yep. Wow. And look, look, the studies. The study over 150 pages. That's how you know it's good quality stuff. Look at that. 140. We wouldn't take it, but 150. The studies, which together span 150 pages, are a significant salvo in the debate over the beginnings of a pandemic that has killed nearly 6 million people across the world. The question of whether the outbreak

began with a spillover from wildlife sold at the market, blah blah blah, or some other event has given rise to pitched debates over how to best stop the next pandemic. Yeah, don't, don't, don't do this. Don't release it from a lab next time. When you look at all the evidence together, it's an extraordinarily clear picture that the pandemic started at the Hunan market, said Michael Warrabee, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Arizona and a co-author of both new studies. Michael Warrabee, he's from Australia actually, he's in Australia and he is at the University of Arizona. And, and by the way, let's just let's just back up real quick.

You know, he's, he's, he's not on this one, but he's on almost all the other stuff that's out there. Anyway, he's just one of these lying virologist. He's just a cad, just just awful, awful. Wow. And there was another study that came out, you know, this is the other one. And again, it has all these same characters. You see war beyond there right after Christian Anderson on the bottom. But these are the names you ever want to know who's responsible for all of this stupidity and trying to cover it up. Here's your snapshot.

Those are the peeps. Or if another one happens, these are the people you look at first. Right there. I go to these people first. Um, and so here we get into point number three point three Wuhan is home to China's foremost SARS research lab which has a history of conducting gain of research gain of function research Which is gene altering an organism supercharging at inadequate Biosafety levels. Okay. I I have so much data on this, but we don't need my data.

We're going to turn now to foremost expert John Stewart. I think we owe a great debt of gratitude to science. Science has in many ways helped ease the suffering of this pandemic, which was more than likely caused by science Mr. President, I see you as all nervous with yourself. No, no. It's coffee. I wouldn't do that to you. I'm open to spittakes. What do you mean by that? Do you mean like there's a chance that this was created in a lab? There's an investigation.

A chance? Oh my God. If there's evidence, I'd love to hear it. There's a novel respiratory coronavirus overtaking Wuhan, China. What do we do? Oh, you know who we could ask? The Wuhan novel respiratory coronavirus lab. The disease is the same name as the lab. That's just a little too weird, don't you think? And then they ask the scientists, they're like, how

did this, so wait a minute, you work at the Wuhan respiratory coronavirus lab. How did this happen? And they're like, mwah, pangolin kissed a turtle. And you're like, no. You, the name of your lab, if you look at the name, look at the name, can I, let me see your business card. Show me your business card. Oh, I work at the coronavirus lab in Wuhan. Oh, because there's the coronavirus lab in Wuhan. Oh, because there's a coronavirus loose in Wuhan.

How did that happen? Maybe a bat flew into the cloaca of a turkey and then it sneezed into my chili and now we all have coronavirus. Like, okay, okay, okay. What about this? What about this? What's in the mix? Wait a second. All right, John. chili and now we all have Corona. But like. Wait a second. There's been an outbreak of chocolatey goodness near Hershey, Pennsylvania.

What do you think happened? Like, oh, I don't know. Maybe a steam shovel made it with a cocoa bean, or it's the f***ing chocolate factory. Maybe that's it. That could be. That could be. All right, I think that covers it right there. Didn't he get like some, he got some crap for that, didn't he?

Yeah, of course he did. But this is in 2021. I just, June 15, 2021, John Stewart gets it. I mean, it's just completely obvious, you know, the fact that I'm glad the White House has a website now saying, hey, looks like some chocolatey goodness broke out in Hershey, you know? But it's just stupid that it took this much time to even get there. Like we were going nowhere under Biden. And I don't know that we're gonna go anywhere necessarily under Trump but people need to be arrested for this and I think in some cases executed for crimes against humanity. There's

certain things that are just so bad that you're like irredeemable and we have to send a message to other people who might be thinking about doing this because there's a whole lot of virologists out there who need to get the message. They need to be going, I could start a lawn service, you know, or I could accidentally contribute to the next pandemic and be, you know, hung from a yard arm. Hmm. If we're not, if we're not having any consequences, then we're not sending a very clear message to people that are going to try and do this again. And I really don't want gain of function research to be going on all over the world in various places where the biosecurity is sketchy.

And I shouldn't be going on at all. I mean, I don't know why we really need it at this point. Like we seem to have conquered most of the major diseases, like according to science, right? And, and could we just focus on like cancer research and Alzheimer's and other things that really mess with people? Like who cares about a freaking coronavirus? Yeah. A cold virus. Like it's unpleasant.

Well, this is a big deal. They gave us the website, they dropped this EV, they're giving us the they're laying it out. You know, they're giving us a path to follow here. Okay, so point four. Wuhan Institute of Virology or the WIV researchers were sick with COVID-like symptoms in the fall of 2019, months before COVID-19 was discovered at the wet market. True, true and that connects to this one which was

that actually there's no evidence to support the proximal origin tail, not zero, literally zero. By nearly all measures of science, if there was evidence of a natural origin, it would have already surfaced, but it hasn't. Well it hasn't and let me just point out this one piece of data here which came, this is in the New York Post, you can see down at the bottom, it's in May of 2021, and they report that tests of 80,000 animal samples in the first infected areas of China all came back negative for COVID-19. 80,000, they were trying so hard to find an animal, any animal, like is this an centipede, anything. 80,000 they found zero, zero, right? Zero. And then after that, remember that New York Times article came out in 2022. And Waraby is like, Oh yes, we've concluded beyond a shadow of a doubt came from raccoon dogs in a wet market, but we have no genetic data. We have no samples to show that zero, there's zero evidence. And then you have all these people, you have to defend the science. They stand on the roadside, the science, I believe in the science. This isn't science. This is absolute crap. And

these people are monsters. And they did this on purpose. And then they got covered up for by our whole system, which includes the media, our intelligence agencies, so called our government. And then you have all these useless politicians, you know, just sort of like, dancing around pretending what's going on it's terrible terrible and all of that came from this big giant subcommittee report on that okay the lessons learned and a path forward yeah well it's it's it's by the way one of their lessons is um you know the the vaccine as we all know has saved millions of lives so they had to throw in their little liturgy, you know, somebody on here is asking how long

before they release the vaccine, like the true, you know, how many years do we have to wait for the vaccine data to really come back to us the truth? Yep. And but by the way, no, this is that's a hard no on this one it was not the bird flu. We have tons of scientific data we don't need can random conjecture to get through this story. Evie can I do can I do a shameless plug? Yeah go for it. Alright first up the fat

pipe is a thing I do a couple times a week and it's just where I'm sort of gathering things. This one came out two days ago, because today is April 23rd. Came out on 21st. You can see 749 hearts, 118 comments. That's what I want to direct your attention to. What I do is I gather data like I'm gathering right now, put it together, and then as a community we talk about it. That's not just a hundred... That's presented differently. Yeah, that's not 118 people putting an emoji down there these are big fat meaty comments

in many cases right it's a great conversations happening around that that's a premium service for our subscribers as well we have Dave Fairtex's weekly market and news wrap-up it's fantastic people love that especially people who are in the markets but he does a lot more than that he talks about how he sees the world the news gatherings. It's all links and everything. So it's great. So everybody who needs More context and we all do to understand this world It's a critical offering but then we do have part two of the signal hour Which we're coming to at the end of this hour will continue on continue on for our subscribers. And this was last week's, right?

Which was about, we talked about vaccine injuries in that one and we were able to go pretty deep. And I think you even got emotional and cried during that one because we started to add up that this was these aren't we accidentally goofed and we pushed something stupid out there. Like this was a deliberate program of harm. It was. By callous people and confronting that is difficult. Right? It is, it hit me for some reason all of a sudden that what we've done to ourselves and our children

is just unforgivable at some level. And we've all been the victims of it in some way, shape or form. Yeah. And it just, yeah, it hurt my heart and I couldn't help it. Yeah. But it sparked a lot of great conversations, this particular premium. Oh my God, yes.

Part two. Really good. Really good. But that's who we are. We have to process all this together. Okay. Can we talk about our constitutional crisis? Remember this is yours or mine.

This is the possessive hour that's being used. Remember our democracy? Well, now these same people are worried about our constitution. You have to use that hour in the possessive sense, not the collective sense. It's not our, it's our right. Could you just scroll down to the bottom of the comment? OK, cool. Yeah. All right. So let's start here. It's just super important to defend our constitution.

Great. And remember last time we talked about like there's a brego Garcia, right? Or was it a brego Garcia right there. Or what's it? A brego? I think Garcia. Anyway, the MS 13 wife beating, human trafficking, here illegally migrant who was deported, shipped back to El Salvador. El Salvador, yep.

Yeah. Anyway, it turns out, and we talked about it was Senator Chris Van Hollen from Maryland who went down to help secure his release and virtue signal his amazing amazingness has been now followed up by this gentleman. Great. Congressman Robert Garcia. This was I guess about a day ago.

He says we just returned from El Salvador and demanded that Donald Trump follow the nine to zero Supreme Court decision to return Kilmar home. says, we just returned from El Salvador and demanded that Donald Trump follow the nine to zero Supreme Court decision to return Kilmar home. We must fight for due process and the Constitution. Well, obviously, he's very concerned about the rights of well, actually, the Constitution applies to US citizens. So I'm not really clear what Constitution he's worried about. Who is who he? Yeah, he's trying to apply the US Constitution to somebody that's not a US citizen. But now he's very concerned about the Constitution.

Very concerned. And of course he has a long track record. No, he doesn't. Oh, okay. Let's see. He was mayor of Long Beach, California. He led efforts that resulted in the city being recognized as a national model for its COVID-19 response, including achieving a 99% vaccination rate amongst seniors and teachers. He emphasized science-based approaches and ensured access to tests and vaccines for low-income communities.

He opposed a bill on the House floor that would remove vaccine requirements for nurses and medical workers in hospitals, arguing that such requirements protect vulnerable populations. Oh, there's that constitutional link. Oh yeah, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. We need vaccine requirements for nurses and medical workers because that protects vulnerable populations, which as we know are more important when you're talking about our constitution, our constitution protects the vulnerable, not everybody, not, not nurses and medical workers and all of that stuff. He said nothing. He cared

nothing. Garcia cared nothing about the Constitution when it came to American citizens, but he apparently cares a lot when it comes to illegal migrants. Go figure. Go figure. Last, during a select subcommittee on the coronavirus pandemic hearing, Garcia highlighted the negative consequences of vaccine hesitancy, noting higher COVID-19 rates in Republican-led states in areas with lower vaccination rates. He criticized misinformation that undermined vaccine confidence. We need confidence. As you know, it works better if we all believe in it. It does work better.

Mine works better if you have yours. Well mine, yours doesn't work at all unless I have mine because we both have to believe right. It's stupid right. So again he cared nothing about rights, he cared nothing about individual rights, not the Fourth Amendment, First Amendment, none of that stuff. Didn't care. Actually working actively against it. So I just want to point out that for people like Congressman Garcia, our constitution is actually not constitutional at all. It's highly anti-American and it's anti-life and it's also anti-science. These are anti-science positions that he was holding right here. Felt like he was in the center of it though. So it's virtue signaling, Even, you know, it's this is an important thing.

He feels like he's, you know, relevant. Well, he's he's saying the catechisms and liturgy that that that show. Right. That he's a member in good standing of the baitball he happens to inhabit that's swimming around, hoping the sharks don't eat them all or whatever the people are up to. But it's not scientific It's not logical. It's not rational and I have my concerns that we slipped into a type of Irrationalities what we're gonna really dive into in part two. I'm not sure that these people can come back

From this position they're in I think it's a one-way trip and we've talked about Helen Joyce and with parents of transgender children Not able to reconcile in their own minds they may have harmed permanently the reproductive and life cycle of their children. It's very difficult psychologically to come back from. I'm not sure how you come back from this. I'm not sure either. I stand for science and the rule of law.

And he's being, I mean mean I'm sure he's getting all sorts of rewards for for this way of thinking. Yeah oh yeah. So it's just reinforcing that he's he's doing the right thing. Yeah. You know yeah. He probably believes he is. What you got? Next congresswoman Yasemin Ansari says from Arizona. I'm in El Salvador to shine a light on Kilmar's story and keep the pressure on Donald Trump to secure his safe return home. Wouldn't it have been nice if these people had this much energy for protecting the rights of citizens from during COVID? Remember we had these random lockdowns, you know, the health authority

of Valley County could say your store closes, your restaurants close, we'll keep that one open. Liquor store open. Open, essential. Gas station open. McDonald's. Open. Little cafe. Closed.

Closed. It was completely, 100% not following any sort of law, rule of law, rationality, science, anything. It was a complete and utter escape from reality. It was delusional. It was pure fiction. And now she wants to carry on the fiction. Hi everyone. We're here. We are in it. We are in our constitutional crisis. So I'm glad you're having a constitutional crisis finally, but it's over the wrong thing.

What a dummy. What a dummy. Oh, we're not going to get to hear it. I thought no, it's really not. I don't want to subject to nobody needs needs that, okay? But I went to Grok and I said, Grok, hey, you can define the question I asked it from the answer. All right, let's see what the question was. There is no evidence in the provided references or public records that Congresswoman Yasemin Ansari, a Democrat, objected to the constitutionality of lockdowns or vaccine mandates. Instead, her record indicates support for public health measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Instead, no constitutional stance.

No, so obviously, yeah, obviously. Now we get to hear from the governor of our state and this one also is going to be hard to take for me. So when you see Senator Van Hollen going over to El Salvador to try to get one of his constituents out of their, you know, gang jail there, he was exported or deported with no due process. This administration says, too bad, you know, yeah, I was an administrative error, but we're not getting him back this constitutional crisis that we were told would happen when the Administration if it did challenge or refuse the Supreme Court or higher court order. It's here now, right?

It's a it's really quite right? It's a it's really quite unbelievable where we find ourselves. And just so folks understand my background, I was attorney general. I in fact, I served alongside Pam Bondi for a time as the attorney general here in Massachusetts. What we're seeing is something we've never seen before in this country. The weaponization of the Department of Justice, the launching of so we've never seen the weaponization of the Department of Justice, the launching of. So we've never seen the weaponization of the Department of Justice before. Well, not in our America. There were over 400 people charged under Biden's administration with weaponization.

I mean, obviously they weaponized it January 6th, January 6th, the election stuff, anything else they wanted to do. January 6th. January 6th, the election stuff, anything else they wanted to do. They even weaponized it against Eric Adams of New York City because he questions sending all these migrants into his city and bankrupting the city. He just questioned it. And next thing you knew, the Department of Justice was filing charges against him, which they had to drop lately.

Yeah, that's true. But listen to her, we've never, we've never seen weaponization of this before. This is brand new. This is, we've never seen anything like this because I have the memory of a gourd fish. I know, she must. Completely false, false investigations under false pretenses. First time that's ever happened. The refusal to comply with the rule of law, the refusal now to comply with orders from

the United States Supreme Court. Yeah, you remember when Trump, this is this was awful. He, he, he absolutely refused to follow the laws of the Supreme Court when he gave student loan relief to all these people. Oh no, wait, that was Biden. Yeah, I got that wrong. I got that wrong. We've not seen a president of this country ever do this.

And we're on the eve of celebrating 250 years of this great American experiment here, right this weekend in Massachusetts, in fact, never in the course of history has a president so refused to comply with the rule of law. The rule of law. The rule of law. Right. Anyway, it goes on from there. Projection. No, they speak in absolute terms, right? So that's how, you know, you know this from doing psychology work, right? Inner work that when somebody says never or always, they're not operating from a defensible position or they're not operating from logic. They're operating from, in some cases, wildly triggered emotional place.

Yep. Yeah. Wow. Okay. Well, that's disappointing. I didn't think Governor Haley was anybody that I really respected and admired anyway, but no, it's just listen, it's we're at the stage of this story where none of this is logical anymore. It's not rational. We're really gonna dive into this in part two for subscribers. And by the if you aren't one you really should consider becoming one because we We're gonna frame this up and do a lot of thinking around it

It's really important to understand because this is who they are remember the the the most Important thing to remember is Maya Angelou saying when somebody shows you who they are Leave them the first time. Mm-hmm. So she's clearly saying here, I'm going to have this entirely partisan selective memory of history, no nuance, black or white, this team or that team. And by the way, this is all rats in the cage behavior, right? This is designed to be inflammatory and divisive and break us up. And so at a higher level above this, we should ask who is doing this to us because they are breaking us

apart. There are people who are like, Oh, that's crazy. And other people like, I totally see it that way. And we're really far apart. There's no nuance. And by the way, we might notice that it's gotten really bad since the jab. I don't know if that's contributing to this or not. With like, actually remember brain fog is a legitimate. That's true. symptom of being vaccinated. Right? How could it affect your whole body and not your brain and your personality? Brain fog means your brain is affected anyway, but it does. And your decision making and all those processes. It's a

hypothesis we're gonna have to figure out here. Alright, anyway, I can't listen anymore to that. But now, Evie, I think it's time to go for my favorite thing, roast of the week. Oh yeah, I love this for my favorite thing, roast of the week. Oh, yeah, I love this. Okay, time for roast of the week. We're going to Harvard today. Okay, take us there. Well, look at this. Harvard University is suing President Trump's administration for threatening to withhold

public money if the school did not comply with its list of demands. Oh, boy. So first thing we have to ask, obviously, Harvard files this ruling is, well, did they plagiarize it? Remember, their president Claudine Gay plagiarized and Harvard said, oh, we're going to have to let her retire with a $900,000 salary, which my public money would be then going towards, I assume. And they refused to denounce plagiarism because checkmate, it's a black woman whose last name is gay. Can't do it.

What do we do? Well, we're going to have to defend plagiarism is an institution of higher learning. When you're not denouncing plagiarism as as Harvard you have lost the plotline entirely. That's embarrassing. That's just embarrassing right there. Yeah, that's like mechanics for sand in the transmission, right? Third graders know not to do this. Like, this is just well, I hope so. But we've lost the thread, right?

We have. All right. Roasted week. They deserve roasting because it just goes on, right? All right. Newsflash. A federal judge has determined that Harvard Medical School Professor Deepak Panegraphy plagiarized a report submitted to the court. To the court? What? Harvard's plagiarism crisis is spinning out of control. Okay I'm just cherry-picking. No I'm not. It goes on and on and on and on and on and on. Really more? Tons of it. Top Harvard Medical School neuroscientist Kelly Shaw allegedly falsified data and plagiarized images across 21 papers. On and on and on. Data and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and There's some sort of a plagiarism tool and just just I'm just saying Playing the odds would not surprise us at this point time. No, but they've completely lost the plotline Harvard University is I honestly don't think you should spend money to send your child there

I just I think it's totally lost the plotline if you spend half a million dollars or whatever it costs now to send your kid There you're gonna have to spend a half a million dollars on programming them from whatever junk they come back with I think that's right well I mean it's such an interesting place to to be right now right like having kids that are college age or their vouts like would you send your children to any secondary schools at this point would you pay for them to go to mostly not not unless it was STEM or a trade school. Oh yeah. Yep. But alright, so we're gonna have to, we're gonna run a little longer than an hour today because I want to, I said I was gonna talk about this so now I have

to. The EU's frictionless slide towards war. Let's go there real quick. By the way, the EU is kind of synonymous I think with the WEF, right? EV? Oh, yeah? Yep. Just so you know, Klaus Barbie, oops, I mean Schwab. He resigned, right? He resigned. He resigned, and now there's some scandal. He might have sexually something, who the hell knows, but you know, whatever.

But they brought in this guy is the new head. Mr. Conjunctivitis. Wait, what? No, I think he's healing nicely from his initiation in the black eye club. You got a hematoma in the left eye. I hope not. I think. Maybe it's from drinking Nestle products. Maybe. Pretty bad for you too. Meet Peter Brabeck Letmath. How do you say that? Letmath? Letm former CEO of Nestle, who famously stated in 2017, humans have no right to access free water.

Ding. OK. Meet the new guy. Great. And the old one. And by the way, why did I say the Black Eye Club? Because it's just mysterious. There there's a black eye club. Yeah. You know, the questions always asked who is punching them. And I say, I don't know, but he's a black eye club yeah you know the questions always asked who is punching them and I say I don't know but he's a righty because you

can see it's always the left eye you know and and but but more importantly and it just goes on and on you can find tons of these people right you got Prince Philip you got the Pope you got everything right it's a righty all I know is that they these people these are a lot of these are actors and actresses too, right? And they display it prominently, right? No makeup, no sunglasses, right? They're not trying to minimize it. They're showing it.

They're signaling it. That's true. Normally you get a black eye or a face hold sort of a thing. You either hide until, if you're a celebrity, you hide until it's sort of gone or you're covered up with makeup or you wear big sunglasses or something right? Nope Look everybody You know could it be from plastic surgery gone awry no I mean a lot of these people are definitely vain and

I would say that John Kerry George Bush Harry Reid Prince Philip right Adam Sandler. Oh, it's kind of weird Right all right rabbit hole anyway, so the Pope. Yeah, it is kind of weird. Right, all right. It's a rabbit hole, it's gross. Anyway, so the EU is shot through with this kind of junk right now. They have many prominent members of the Black Eye Club, so do we,

but I think, you know, when you look at the Venn diagram overlap here, Evie, what you see is that China is leading in drones and advanced batteries and 5G, and we lead in big tech and advanced physics and biotech and pharma, and contested in the middle, China and US duking it out over chips and advanced manufacturing, next generation in AI. Meanwhile, the EU is leading in regulation. Yay EU! I'm so happy you're doing something well, I guess.

They are awesome. They're so bent. I could do a whole episode just on the EU and they are committing energy suicide, whole other story, but they might get to the suicide suicide part faster. Uh, particularly if we go to this part here, this is just today, Marco Rubio saying this about peace talks that were being held in London. Very soon. And I'm talking about a matter of days, not a matter of weeks, whether or not this is the war that can be ended. If it can, we're prepared to do whatever we can to facilitate that and make sure that

it happens, that it ends in a durable and just way. If it's not possible, if we're so far apart that this is not going to happen, then I think the president's probably at a point where he's going to say, well, we're done. You know, we'll do what we can on the margins. We'll be ready to help whenever you're ready to have peace. But we're not going to continue with this endeavor for weeks and months on end. So we need to determine very quickly now, and I'm talking about a matter of days, whether or not this is doable in the, in the, in over the next few weeks.

If it is, we're in, if it's not, then then we'll have to we have other priorities to focus on as well oh oh oh oh oh and he clearly said if you if there's anything what you know if you if you go the other way and you know you want us to help contribute to peace maybe we could talk further but he's this is him backing up out of NATO saying look dudes and dudettes of Europe if you insist on going to war We got other things to worry about over here. So this is backing off, right? That's actually Inspiring it well for that me too. Me too. I'm extremely happy about that So that's interesting if this war cannot be ended then we're done. You're on your own Europe

Hmm the peace talks are going badly If this war cannot be ended, then we're done. You're on your own, Europe. Hmm. The peace talks are going badly. Ukraine war, London peace talks downgraded as Kiev rejects US plan to recognize Crimea as Russian. Neither the UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy or US Secretary of State Marco Rubio will now attend the summit as had previously been planned. Oh so once you have those the UK and US secretaries of state bailing that summit is now hobbled and in this whole idea that Kiev is gonna reject

the US plan to recognize Crimea's Russian. Crimea was Russian as recently as 1954 Khrushchev and a drunken whatever sort of gave it over but they're all Russian-speaking and they're not getting it back not only if they lost Crimea they've also lost most of the eastern provinces of Donbass and all that it's gone that's just reality so Kiev is saying we reject reality and the US is like oh no this is gonna go bad right this is about to go bad and then and then it leads to what was that wasn't there a whole bunch of stuff that just came out to you about how they couldn't when when it and I don't know if this was true or

not but it was showing the kickbacks that everybody got from the UK and war Ukraine yeah I don't know how much to trust those I can't source that yeah I was curious lists with 62 million and 58 out I don't I've never seen a source for those lists so I'm suspicious yeah. I don't I've never seen a source for those lists. So I'm suspicious. Yeah, but that's been able to account properly for the funds that we've given them. Oh, no, oh, no. But that that is the point of war. Things monies disappear into them. And speaking of money, there's going to be a lot more money because Germany has now declared with this guy, this guy is just dripping testosterone. No, he's not.

No, he's not. Nope. Whatever it takes as Friedrich Meurs. Meurs. Oh goodness. What does he got to say? Nothing. I'm not playing it. You're not playing.

I'm not playing it. There's a link down there for anybody who wants to list. It's in German, but whatever I stole, it's not worth it, but Europe's entering a wartime economy. Yeah. Wartime economy. This is to prevent escal it says Europe's entering a wartime economy. Yeah wartime economy This is to prevent escalation. That's how you prevent escalation. You if you get a lot of guns pointed at each other You're dumb. Nobody will be dumb enough to question our power ever again

Right he's through strength Okay, and then you get that was I believe March 7th March 8th, you know And then you get that was I believe March 7th, March 8th, you know You got this going on when Trump tries to make peace Europe tries to start World War three Hmm president of the EU Parliament Robert Metsola Scar, sorry, excuse me. Robert Roberta Metsola says Ukraine is fighting for Europe and Europe needs to be hand in hand lockstep with whoever is fighting for our security and values.

Our security and our values because let's be clear about that Ukraine's values include no elections, an autocratic dictator, no freedom of assembly, no freedom of speech, right? No freedom for even to practice religion. Yeah. That's right. That that those those reflect our security and our values. That's what she's saying. You're right. They're fighting for our values. Oh, it's so brain dead. It's so brain dead. But if we want to get really cray cray, there's nobody I think worse than and by the way, starting to get a bad taste about white liberal women. Yeah, you said that before. I've said that I'm not doing good because I listen to these people. I'm just like, this is unhinged. This is unhinged. So listen to this is the main the main person callous right who is one of the main diplomats out of the EU for this whole thing. Listen up to what she's very excitedly talking about.

Russia's defeat is not a bad thing because then you know there could be Russia's defeat is not a bad thing. So already she's jumping to Russia's defeat. So this is good for peace talks. You want you want people in peace talks looking across the table saying, your defeat won't be a bad thing. Are you serious? I'm totally serious. Like, what happened to a diplomat? Look at this.

Really a change in the society. And there are many different nations right now, part of Russia as well. I think if you would have more like small nations, it's not a bad thing if the big power is actually much smaller. So imagine Putin comes out and says, I'm really looking forward to the defeat of Europe. But when you look at it, it's actually a collection of much smaller countries. And it wouldn't be a bad thing if those all broke apart and the European Union was dissolved

and it was just down to smaller, more provincial smaller things. We could get handbags from Italy and cars from Germany. That would be great for us. We think that would be really good. Nobody would stand for that. Can you minimize that screen? Yeah. So this, this is nuts.

This is, that is kind of nuts. This is really, really nuts. Yeah. So this this is nuts. This is that is kind of nuts. This is really, really nuts. Nuts. Yeah. I hear clown. Yeah. And this is a possibility to that Europe will fall under Sharia law in like a decade anyway. So white liberal women will be no more fat. That's a good point. Yeah. Yeah. And by the way, our values include this. Ukraine also has Nazis, Bandera, Azov guys, NATO's values. NATO's values. Wow.

Yeah. So at any rate, this is pretty bad. But let's listen in now if we could just very quickly to close out this section Listen, what what does the EU consider to be the most important? This is Ursula van der Leyen laying six geese a lane lies Anyway, this is what's most important. I love the white roses and she's got the white dish, pure background in the pure top, sparkly, this very pure. Let's listen to the pure message of what Europe cares about.

We are here because we all agree that climate change is real, man-made, and it is for all of us to tackle it. The threat of climate change is existential. Year after year you see the snow line rising even higher up at the mountains. You see the melting of the glaciers, but you also see the water line falling even lower. And even if some countries have decided to look away, the protection of our nature must continue to be at the top of our global agenda. And we are helping Central Asia's farmers to adapt to a drier climate, using technology to save water and to monitor its usage. To monitor is usage.

That would set with free water rights for you. No, no. What do you think? Water's free to write. What do you think? And we're helping we're helping farmers in central Asia. I know that sounds like monitors are Vata ID. Doesn't it? It's like their own NGO runaway, you know. I submit to you that Europe has more immediate, more pressing concerns than climate change. So what's insane to me about this, Evie, is that when you look at, let's imagine you think climate change is a thing, it's the existential crisis of our times and is created by co2

Then you pull up a chart and you say who's creating co2 and it's China Mm-hmm, right, but she's not saying we have to now go to war with China because they're like selling us cheap stuff And they're re they're creating this existential threat to our existence because they're gonna causing climate change They're gonna smash down on UK pensioners living in flats making them like Canada I have to tell farts you have you seen the carbon tax in Canada, right? Just people like ordinary people like it lives in a hydrocarbon rich country and like oh well You're gonna have to pay 50% more and you pay that money to the government to fight climate change And you know what the government does with that it hires more people to regulate you with that money

It has nothing to do with climate change. I know it has nothing because if you cared about it, you would just look at the chart of who's making the most carbon. That's right. You say, oh, it's China. Oh, it's China. Or, oh, are all of our insects, you know, the web of insects collapsing and all this other stuff.

Let's get stuff like neonicotinoids off the shelves. Let's let's, you know, regulate. I'd be okay with them regulating that. Good grief. Yeah, to be fair to anybody listening, Chris and I are actually both environmentalists in our own way. We love nature very much and we love the natural world and we certainly want to see it remain something that can support all the wonderful creatures that it currently has. But we're not interested in having it shove down our throats with this propaganda which

really has nothing to do with helping the earth and sustaining anything because of we're worried about the biosphere we immediately have to get rid of all herbicides and pesticides and we'll just start farming naturally and regeneratively I'd be like okay let's do that it's gonna be a little hard for a minute but we'll figure it out okay yeah look homo sapiens the next kind says that uh so we did find an alpha male finally in Europe so that's cool so just to balance out the German guy but I think Kevin oculus is the oculus has it right please he says oh my if I lived there, I would run for any other country.

Logan's runtime. Logan's runtime. Get out. Get out. Seriously. Yeah, that's I would go for that too. If we lived there, would you leave right now? I would seriously consider. Yeah, I would. Yeah, I'd be scared with all the things going on. Yep. Yep. All right well

whole chunk of stuff we didn't get to but we got to turn now to part two of Signal Hour. So for everybody who's been here with us thank you so much for being here on the public side. If you want to follow us we're going to carry on the show at Peak peak prosperity. And we got to talk about, oh my goodness. And, and you can support the work that we're doing by becoming a member. So that's why we do that. We also have to have a police to be able to talk about this behind a paywall because it's safe to actually have free and open discussions about what needs to be said. Indeed. There's nothing more important than having context and talking about what's actually truly going on. So that's what we're going context and talking about what's actually truly going on

So that's what we're gonna be talking about this and this is where we you know it's a this is where we have to wrestle ideas out of the Ether as it were right so we got some really big ideas here I'm a little worried about what's coming next for variety of reasons because again, this isn't a prediction of the future It's just a trend extrapolation. You can clearly see that the devolution of European Diplomacy, you can clearly see the devolution and the fracturing of international relations at this point in time Those are dangerous moments anyway, but you can see it within the countries to dangerous polarization dangerous fracturing. That's right

That's right that they're promoting with their propaganda and their new their news which is BS yeah and I do this a lot lately but everything seems to need air quotes these days yeah yeah that's a huge question can our societal fractures be repaired or does it end in civil war and that's what we're gonna go talk about absolutely so join us thank you everybody else for being here on the public side. If you're on Twitter, YouTube again. Thank you for being here. Thanks for the comments. And now we're going to turn over to part two.