Peak Prosperity - Vaccine Deaths and Child Predators

Episode Date: May 8, 2025

Today’s Signal Hour covered alarming vaccine death studies and the FBI’s operation against online child exploitation.Click Here for Part 2

The following is the audio version of a video released at peakprosperity.com. Visit peakprosperity.com to watch the video and to find other insightful content such as articles, discussion forums, and exclusive subscriber-only content. Hello everyone and welcome to this Signal Hour. It's so good to be back with you. Welcome everybody. Welcome from all over the place. Germany, Oklahoma, Northern Michigan.

It looks like Miami. So welcome, everybody. And Evie, so good to be back here with you today. Hi. Good afternoon. So glad to be here with everyone. Thanks for joining us today. Now remember, signal hour is where we find the signal

within the signal. Today we're going to be discussing three big topics. And in no particular order order they are these. Well, actually it's in this particular order. We have to talk about vaccine deaths. Revealed now new studies have just come out. We're gonna take a look at those. Very solid studies.

It raises a lot of questions obviously. We have to talk about this so-called 764 threats to our children, particularly young females that's been surfaced. You see the FBI talking about it now, the Department of Justice, they've just swept up a couple hundred arrests, but this is pretty dark.

And then we're gonna talk about, Canada has a growing communism problem. It has had one for a while, but we're gonna go there. And it's getting worse. It's getting worse. So as a reminder for everybody, prosperity members this carries on one hour out here in public with everybody one hour ish Back at peak prosperity if you're watching it at peak prosperity at that link right there It's a continuous thing. You won't even notice we just switch over and then you just keep watching and for everybody who's wondering

We're gonna be talking about this, though, after we hear about the 764 stuff. Why isn't the FBI actually arresting high-level targets? Got a point of view on that. Got some data on that. The United States has an absolutely obvious national security problem that's barely bubbling under the surface. We're going to have to talk about that.

And I'm not saying we have a world war, three on our hands, but the world is certainly at war. We got to talk about that huge implications for that. So Evie, we're going to start here today. Great. Vaccine deaths. And you know, why do you think I put the quotes around that word? Are they trying to redefine things?

Well, because it's not a vaccine. Oh, well, yeah, that's true, too You know a vaccine let's talk about the you're right some things vaccines do they protect you from a disease, right? Right. Cove of jobs didn't stop you from catching it or transmitting it, right? So what did they do and they are supposed to give you a better all-cause outcome? Yes, yes, and they are supposed to give you a better all-cause outcome. Yes. And we've now found out a lot of very dark things, which I think fits into the larger sweep. We look at these dark things, we say,

wow, what are they doing to our children? Where did the insects go? Wait, how did they get the vaccine so wrong? If you stop thinking that these were accidents and oh my gosh, we just flipped the coin and it came up snake eyes, you know, to mix metaphors. Oh, again. Right? The pattern emerges. Oh my gosh, we just flipped the coin and it came up snake eyes, you know Right The pattern emerges. There's there's it's an obvious pattern at this point you and I

Communicate it. Well, it's hard. I mean you you don't want to think that it's there And so I think there's a part at least for me There's a part that really wants to believe that the world is a good place and that people, you know, on large part mean well for us, right? And I don't think this, this data is definitely not communicating that. Right. Um, which is, it's hard. It's hard to digest that emotionally. So well, as you know, I spent a lot of time going over things about, uh, vaccines and things like that. And the whole time I was doing that, YouTube was busy censoring me, putting up helpful, this conflicts with what the CDC says.

And it was all this appeal to authority, and it was all, you know, there's a centralized correct view. There's a one true and approved truth about these things. And no questioning was allowed, even though a very novel platform, and this is one of the even though a very novel platform. And this is one of the side effects of these novel platform.

We now found out April 1st that we have the proof, peer-reviewed and published. I've been talking about this for a while with Kevin McKiernan and other people who found it. But scientists are shocked. World's first peer-reviewed paper, made it all the way through the process, Pfizer mRNA vaccine, contaminated not just with DNA which is

very bad all by itself but with SV 40 which is a simian virus 40 it's a promoter region it's associated with cancer to have your mRNA gene product experimental therapy your experimental gene therapy be contaminated not just with DNA but DNA and the SV40 component of DNA. Very bad. And the SV40 as we know is is known to be cancerous or cause cancer. Is that right? Yeah. Now this isn't the entire SV40 it's the SV40 promoter and effector regions but those are actually kind of the it's like saying the trigger on a gun. It's, it's, it's, it's still a gun. It's not good. Anyway, obviously you wouldn't want this to happen.

You would want to have complete studies before you would go live with something like this. But of course, it went completely live. Um, somebody says the video has stopped for me. Is anybody else having a problem? Any, if anybody else has that problem, let us know. Looks to be not well on our end. And oh, this one, the lack of pollinators, Ben Keegan. Oh, yeah, right there. Just a second. But the sapiens, the next kind said it's also COVID that makes people primarily primarily I'm going to guess that means sick, not the vaccine. I'll disagree. I agree that COVID can make people primarily sick, but the worst that we're

seeing clinically from all the doctors I talked to are people who've been vaccinated, multiply vaccinated, particularly if they've gone past the triple vaccination stage, right? So they've had a booster. That means their IgG four levels start to come up and they no longer can fight the disease correctly. Right. Because IgG four is your body's way of

saying, oh, dial it back. We're seeing this antigen so often, like pollen. Just don't worry about it. Let's not fight this. Yeah. And that's okay when it's pollen, but when you're facing a replicating pathogen, it's not good. So in fact, this isn't actually an accurate statement as far as I understand. So sure. What else did you have when I saw? It was up there close to the one the lack of pollinators Ben Keegan right there Yes, the lack of pollinators is disturbing. What should be a field? Buzzing insects is quite literally to a bumblebee and honeybee. No small wasps or flies Yes, we're finding the same here. I was actually hand pollinating,

which breaks my heart actually. With a paintbrush. With a paintbrush are plum trees because I found the same thing to be true. It's bad this year. It's really bad. We didn't have the bumblebee population and the smaller bees. I don't know all the different varieties but we were missing a whole bunch of them and turns out my daughter was saying that honey bees when you bring them in it actually displaces the population of all the native bees and then those it and they're very territorial with their pollen and the flowers that they like to utilize and so it ends up that your local bees die off and then eventually when the honey bees die off too, nobody's left.

Okay. Anyway. There's a whole side subject. I know, that was a squirrel. It was a squirrel moment. I'm just saying. I'm very sad about the bees and I don't know what the problems are but. I know, I know, separate issue.

But we're gonna get back on the vaccine injury and unfortunately death. This came out, it's a pre-print so it hasn't made it all the way through peer review. Two important names both in yellow start with the last one first Joseph Lapidot Latipo. That is the Surgeon General for the state of Florida. Mm-hmm, right and Cool, and then red cef levy is an MIT very highly regarded Statistical researcher so this is what they came up with 12 months of it.

They always have these banal bland titles, 12 month all cause mortality, all cause, not just COVID 12 months dying from anything, everything, mortality after initial COVID-19 vaccination. And they did, they were just comparing Pfizer to Moderna. They didn't compare either of those to placebo or unvaccinated which would be the placebo in this case So they're just comparing these two head-to-head To see which works better not which works better Unfortunately be quite the opposite

now now Nicholas Holcher does a great job Wrapping all this up for everybody at focal points courageous discourse over on Substack. Alright. It's focalpoints.com. So, new study, Pfizer recipients face 37% higher risk of death than Moderna recipients. So, big study. Big study, study of 1.47 million Florida adults by MIT's Retzeph Levi and Surgeon General Joseph Latipo

finds significantly higher all-cause cardiovascular and COVID-19 mortality after Pfizer vaccination. Interesting. Now this is interesting because Pfizer had 30 micrograms of mRNA per shot and Moderna had 100. So if it was the mRNA component, they both had these lipid nanoparticles, the LNPs, kind of same, you know, secret formulations but more or less identical. The big difference to me is that Pfizer came contaminated with a hefty amount of DNA and SV40. Right, right, but Moderna had more of the mRNA on balance. more more mRNA. So okay so this is important a huge study 1.47 million people non institutionalized so they're not they're not in prisons they're not

no folks homes these are just people wandering around in the wild and they had 735 thousand and fifty Pfizer recipients and they perfectly mashed them up against 735 thousand and fifty Moderna recipients So this is this is important because what they did here that hasn't been done or they did this better than any study I've seen so far is they matched they were able to match people by age, by sex, by timing, by location. So when you do those cohort matchings it allows you to make direct comparisons right. So this is amazing and and matchings, it allows you to make direct comparisons, right? So this is amazing.

And they only did it through two doses. So that was it. You either had two doses of Moderna or two doses of Pfizer, and that's it. And then they lined all those people up and took a look what happened next. And then they just went for 12 months after the second dose. So people who got three, four doses excluded.

So we don't know. Anybody who was unvaccinated, not in the study. Okay. But what ought to happen if these things are at all, like if they're safe and effective, there should be zero difference in mortality between the two groups. Right. Zero. That makes sense. And the outcomes that they were looking for were all cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, COVID-19 mortality. So you can tease that out and then non COVID mortality.

And here's what they, here, here, let's just go with it. This is just jumping straight to the conclusions. Okay. The findings Pfizer vaccinated adults face a higher risk of all cause mortality. Um, 37% more or higher. Yeah. So, so, so just to put that in context Let's imagine for a moment that um out of a hundred thousand people I'm just gonna make numbers up so it's super easy to do in my head. Yeah, if we said oh out of I'll do it even 10,000 people they got a hundred thousand ten thousand out of ten thousand people a hundred people died Mm-hmm over that period of time after getting Moderna

137 people would have died I See after getting Pfizer Okay. Now what we don't know in that because they didn't tell us was what would the baseline have been? Sure, right, right. We don't know like 10,000 what would have been the normal ordinary expected rate of death? Yeah, but they weren't they weren't going there because that's a big Tricky sort of an area to go after They just wanted to say comparing these two things, you can clearly see a 37% difference is staggeringly high. And it tells us there's

something really different. Like if like if I just said, Evie, right now, you have to choose gun to your head, which one you take in? Like, I'll take the Moderna. Yes. I like my 37% better chance of not dying. Or the cardiovascular mortality, which is meaning that you have heart cells or if you die of a heart issue related to the vaccine, it's a 53% higher chance of that happening. Or did I say that incorrectly? Pfizer had 53% more cardiovascular issues. This is just mortality. So these are what are called binary or discrete endpoints. You either die or you don't. This isn't also parsing through there and saying well how many more people had heart disease that they're still living with. We won't know that because this is Florida public health records, which aren't the same thing as clinical records.

So they're not going in. You can't click through and find out each one of these cases, how they're faring from a clinical standpoint. It's very discreet because Florida at the highest level has two pieces of information. Did you get the vaccine and when? Did you die So that that's all they get to work with here. Way out. Yeah. Yeah. And then people that died of COVID-19 were 88% had an 88% greater chance of that. So Pfizer did not work as well against COVID as Moderna. That's interesting. Mm-hmm. Non-COVID-19 mortality. So I guess didn't die of COVID. Yep. Of or with. Yeah. Greater 35, 35%

greater mortality if if you took the Pfizer. This is startling. This is the kind of information we probably should have had in 2021 within a couple of months of introduction. And I bet we did. Did they push one more than the other? Oh, they push Pfizer really hard. I thought so. Real hard. That's what I remember.

They wanted everybody to get Pfizer. And again, coin flip time. If you're going to do this, you know, and it always comes up, snake eyes, to mix my metaphors, like every single time when they, when they recommended something something really strongly that was the worst thing for Public health outcome and individual health outcomes Unerringly they didn't get one thing right that I'm aware of not remdesivir not ventilators not ivermectin Not hydroxychloroquine not vitamin D not being outside in the sun with fresh air Not hanging out with your friends and buddies not being totally stressed Not giving these jabs to people who had zero risk from COVID. That would be everybody under the age

of 60 who's healthy, especially children, which by the way, they still give these vaccines. That one in particular Pfizer right at the top of the list for jabbing into infants arms, six months and older, millions of legs, actually they do it in their legs because their arms aren't big enough. You know what? That's just gross. And remember all those TV commercials too, it's like brought to you by Pfizer. So this is the data from this thing. This is what it looks like. Maybe. Yeah, you can see my pointer here. So this is Pfizer's, the so-called BNT 162b2. And then you have mRNA 1273, which is the Moderna. And you can see time of days from time of the second dose.

This is the cumulative risk, all cause deaths. You can just see more people are dying and it's a smooth separating curve. If you just went on longer and longer, they would get wider and wider, right? Same thing for COVID-19 deaths, non-COVID deaths, cardiovascular deaths, same story over and over again.

But from a public health standpoint, you could have detected this within a hundred days. Easy. Oh yeah. In a very, very statistically relevant manner. The CDC did not do this. The FDA did not do this. At a minimum, they should have done this and then people, you know, you give me this and they say, listen, we're gonna force you,

we're gonna mandate that you have to take this jab, which one you want? And I'm like, dude, I want the one with the lower death, if I have to. Exactly. Why didn't they do it though? Like, you have a slight about that, don't you? I don't know, but here's the,

now we can start to understand what the relative risk here was. Okay, so how bad would these have been compared to placebo? We don't know. Again, we still don't know. We don't know. But regarding all cause mortality, Pfizer recipients had a significantly higher 12 month all cause death rate than Moderna recipients, about 37% higher risk. Pfizer risk was 847.2 deaths per 100,000 people versus Moderna risk which was 617.9 deaths per 100,000 people. Okay so stop right there for a second. Let's just mentally divide those two

numbers in my head. A hundred and thirty different so that's a sorry two hundred and thirty so two hundred and thirty more people died for every hundred thousand people. Of course, millions and millions and millions and millions are being jabbed. So that's a lot of deaths. Every one of those a husband, a father, a mother, a wife, a child, every one of those are real human being with it's just this is this is a mass this the worst, most lethal medical intervention in all all of human history and this is what they prevented us from talking about and why we got censored in band That's right, which is disgusting. But can I just add something to this? this is just this is talking about death which in some cases is is the better thing that could happen to you in this instance because If you have severe immune issues as a result, do you remember

those people that like had those terrible tremors they couldn't control and horrible pain throughout their entire bodies like there are things worse than death and this isn't talking about any of those other side effects correct? No no no no this is just taking into account your heart stops you're all done but you know the what you're saying is right the damage from this is well beyond what we're even seeing here Yes, yes, because for everybody who dies, I'm gonna make a number up in my head ten more or a hundred more some other number Mm-hmm are just living with the consequences that aren't quite lethal but bad in a scale in a spectrum Oh that ruin their life lives in some cases And I just want to point out down here, the power of the study.

So the odds ratio, this is 95% confidence intervals. Like we're 95% sure that the range of this odds ratio is like around 37, 38%. 37% is the risk ratio. Odds ratio is 38%. But look at the confidence interval, 1.331 to 1.439. It does not go below one, which would say we're not certain not certain doesn't even get close to one this shows you just how powered this study was that's a very tight range we are 95% sure that this stuff that these charts are real these is a very high-powered study now

chirping crickets from the media about this. Oh, the same people. Everybody rushed to cover it, did they? Chirping crickets. Oh, right. So you wouldn't have heard this in mainstream news. You wouldn't have heard it anywhere or read it anywhere unless you were looking for it. No, but on Twitter sphere, we have all of our terrible, you know, pharma shills, doctors who did this study is not didn't consider it like they're just trying to but they're starting to sound real panicky and desperate yeah the walls are closing in on on their vaunted vax narrative and in particular so

imagine this compared to placebo and the biggest most outrageous war garble that's our that's what we do when you call the turkey call when you hear that warbling sound. It means that you're just in garbled or garbled territory. So all these people out there are terrified because Bobby Kennedy came out and announced we're going to go back and we're going to test every vaccine against placebo. And you would have thought he just said I'm going to steer an asteroid into the earth, right? You can't get off the leg of every child like something horrific something horrific And it's just like the most obvious thing and the first question is wait a minute. They're not

The answer is no None of these vaccines have been tested against placebo Which that in itself really needed to be written about and opined on. Don't you think? I'm shocked that the journalists didn't pick that up and rather they took the story of trying to slam him and slander him, you know? Mm-hmm. Because it was bringing the truth forward. Alright so these monsters need to have names and one of those names is Dr. Peter Marks. This is a really good little clip here from ICANN that's Dell big tree, but we're going to listen in now on a, um,

it's a recording done in 2021. It's w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w but listen carefully, Dr. Marks is like a Brady bunch collection of people at a zoom meeting during COVID. So of course they're all zoom meetings and Dr. Marks is in the center talking. Listen carefully to what he's saying. It's really monstrous. I mean, really bad. Gussing just, you know, concerns for athletes and things like this.

I think there's important things to see here. Now what people, parents really care about is what's the worst thing can happen. And we do know that for males under the age of about 30, there is an incidence, an increased incidence, it appears with the vaccines of about 30, there is an incidence, an increased incidence, it appears, with the vaccines of a rare side effect of an inflammation, mild inflammation of the heart

called myocarditis. Okay, we're just gonna have to start, let me start unpacking this for everybody. Rare is not a scientific term. It's not how we operate. One in 38,412 is a term, scientific term. Right, so rare is not a term. Second, there is no such thing as mild myocarditis.

They've been trying, they tried desperately to rebrand this at the time. Now we understand, looking back, because we have all the gadolinium and the imaging studies that what they called mild myocarditis came with micro-scarring, which is anything but mild because if you have enough micro scarring in a heart, it can lead to fibrillations and, you know,

seizures and cardiac death and all of that. This is September of 2021. So they have now nine months of surveillance data on this because really it was January 21 when the vaccine first came out. Nine months, plenty of time to have seen and collected this gathering storm of stuff. But listen to him trying to spin it here for all the other doctors on this vaunted vaccine committee. That's what evil looks like. This is it right here. It's all these people getting together, checking their brains at the door

and just doing what they think they need to do to stay relevant, relevant and empower. So, so again, but listen to the spin. It's rare. It's mild. There's no such thing as that's like saying mild brain death, you know, I have a mild case of pregnancy. It's like it just, it's not a, it's not a thing. It's not a medical term. It's not a thing. It's not a thing. It's not a thing. It's not a thing. Okay. That's happening in a small number of people somewhere on the order of in males about one in 5,000. That's true. And it's very mild.

Only about 2% have required of that number have actually required any significant medical intervention. Most are just they go to the hospital, they're looked at, observed, given a little bit of ibuprofen, a pain reliever, and they go home and they seem to be doing just fine in follow-up in the studies that we've been looking at. So that's probably the worst I have to say about this.

For these mRNA vaccines, there is incredible BS out there about like thousands of people dying, et cetera. That just ain't true. Yeah, it is. That's what the VAERS data showed anyway, lots and lots of people dying from this. But again, he's just throwing all these assertions out. Remember all the things that they tried to paint our side with your anti science and then they throw

out anti science stuff like rare, mild, they have all these studies that show they weren't they didn't do any comprehensive follow up studies on these people and I can show you thousands and thousands of cases of young people whose hearts were permanently damaged. Remember Kyle Warner, the professional bike racer, you know, the people at POTS, which even if it resolved a few years later was a couple years out of their life. These were serious things. Here he is minimizing. Oh, it's mild. It's mild. Most, most go home and they're fine. The studies we've done, which they didn't do, right? They were designed not to find the things that they didn't want to find. I mean, this is

just gross. I just have to say though, these people are monsters. Monsters. They are designed not to find the things that they didn't want to find I mean, this is just I just have to say though every these people are monsters Monsters they are monsters and you know It's gross is that all these individuals look like they have something way better to do than to listen to this conversation anyway Nobody's gonna ask any critical questions here. Do you see it? I don't and they're like out to lunch from all of the COVID 19 vaccines our folks Really care about this and it's very hard to find cases of deaths that are directly related to these vaccines. There are perhaps a handful, but in general,

the number of lives that are being saved is far, far, far greater. So listen, so get this. He says, well, perhaps there's a handful. He's talking, OK, we killed some people. But we saved far, far more people. This is the greater good argument. But it falls apart immediately upon inspection,

because it wasn't people dying of COVID. It was over the age of 70, morbidly obese with other comorbidities. And it went up exponentially from there with age. So more 90-year than 80 year olds, more 80 year olds than seven year olds. But once you got to 60 and you were healthy, nobody died from this.

That's true. Nobody. But rather you'd harm all these children. Yeah, why are, he's talking about, oh, we're injecting this into children. Some of them die, but tragic as that is, think how many we're saving. It's like, no, no, no, no,

none of them were dying from COVID. You're not saving any, zero is the save number, but you are killing them and injuring the ones who didn't outright die for life. There's no such thing as mild myocarditis. Once your heart scars, it's scarred for life. Yeah, those are cells that don't regenerate. They do not.

Nature in her infinite wisdom said, yeah, don't remake heart cells. Right. Thank you. Thank you. There's several things to point out there. The fact that he says there may be a handful of people that have died, that they're difficult to find, we're having difficulty finding the deaths, but there may be several, you know, or a handful. I think we passed this off far too lightly. The United States government is making a product and ensuring that it's safe. And if they go as far as mandated upon the public, which is what President Biden did, that means this statement that a handful of people have died means a handful of people

were murdered by the United States government. And at the moment you are making a decision, a greater good decision to say that we are happy murdering perfectly innocent people to achieve some outcome. This is why we need transparency in science. This is why we're demanding a petition be signed that all of the documents involved in vaccines, everything that comes through there is that all of the information be presented to the public.

If our government is going to make a decision to kill us, and I wanna give this some perspective. We watch these cases of a death row inmate, how hard they fight, top news, will they be killed, will they not, even after they murdered several people, whether it's just or not. What Peter Marsch has said is it's okay to murder perhaps an innocent child, a mother of a family, a military person, because that's just the way you know. And so when he says, you know, we don't know where to find them, I don't think it's very hard. The VAERS system, which is our major capture system, currently has 38,541 reported deaths

from just the COVID vaccines. They're there. They're not hard to find. They're there. And so 38,541. Maybe not all of them belong to the shot, but let's imagine half do. So the government just said, and he's a great point. He's like, you know, when it comes to like a death row inmate fights and fights and appeals

and this is and that's what movies about as a governor going to call it the last minute. This one every life we what if we get it wrong, we have to wrestle with it. But when it comes to public health, they just shrug and they go, oh, well, 17,000 people are going to do. You have to do in business like Tony Sprantle. What are you going to do? It doing business. It's like Tony Soprano, what are you gonna do? It's monsters, monsters these people. This is who we're up against, this darkness.

These people are not humans the way I understand humans. No compassion, no conscience, right? And for what? I don't know, for a couple bucks because, you know, I have an important job. Like every single person on that panel ought have been going, whoa, time out. Tell me again what the risk is of COVID to these children. And the answer would be zero. But then he would have flipped to the next thing. He would have said, well, but we wouldn't want grandma.

You wouldn't want to feel bad if grandma got COVID. And then you would say, does this vex, do these medical gene product things? Do they stop transmission? Well, no, they don't. Do they work or not? No, they don't stop transmission. They wear off quickly. You have to get multiple boosters. Officially, I think you're up to 12 or 15 now.

I forget what the number is, but it's over 10. Is that right? Yeah. If you're up to date. We're in the double digits? Yeah. Because it just keeps wearing off and every time you get it, your risk of having some bad outcome just skyrockets

Yeah, so and I've heard people say that the more they get the worse they feel but this is simple logic You simply do not give a medical intervention to somebody who does not have a risk from that thing That is not a vaccine. No, it's not so it's not preventative treatment either. It's not so it here's here's an analogy That'd be like saying hey the FDA and the CDC have determined that eventually some percentage of us are going to need heart bypasses. So therefore everybody gets a heart bypass preventatively today. Like, wait, no, I don't have occluded arteries right now. Like, and there's a huge risk from going in for heart bypass surgery. Some percentage of those people are going to be, you know,

that literally that's, that is the entire logic of this COVID thing. That's how absurd it is. It's why we struggle for words around this. Um, cause it's just, it's just ridiculous. Oh, that's interesting. Rocket boy T T Y Dr. Peter Marks. Nope. Um, up here is the same one. Yeah. Dr. Peter Marks marks the same Peter marks that ignored his team on gene therapy yes that one top FDA official Peter marks overruled staff review

team to approve uh so repta gene therapy for a third time that one okay he is a monster he is a truly terrible human being and, we're shot through with terrible human beings at this point in time. And just to round it out, I mean, look, something happened in the last 30 years. It's not like we're up like 10% or 15%. Look at these things. ADHD up 819%, right? Fibromyalgia up 7,272%. How about bipolar disorder in youth up 10,272%. How about bipolar disorder in youth? Up 10,833%.

That's just awful. All these things. Some of these are worse than death. Immune disorders, 1,600%. Worse than death, you're right. No, some of these are terrible, awful things. And this is actually why they're freaking out, why they don't want us to look at vaccines versus placebo. Because some of these things on this list are going to pop out as caused by maybe if not the vaccine antigen itself, the adjuvants they use like aluminum,

the mercury that's still in some of them or some combination of getting walloped with too many of these things at a critical moment of your developing immune systems, Genesis. Oh, it's awful. But a non evil, non satanic culture would look at this and go, hmm, we better figure this out. There's not only been no interest in this, you get banned, you get censored, you get shouted down, you will lose your job in certain institutions for even daring to notice this chart and ask a question about it. You know what I find particularly gross about it too?

Is that a lot of the individuals that are in positions of power, I would consider them to be like elders. Like they've held those jobs for a long time. They have a lot of experience. They've been around the block. And I wouldn't imagine that art, like if we had village elders, that they would be the ones,

if they really truly cared about their tribe, mandating people take these things that harm and maim and and just destroy People's lives like they're not I'm really disappointed Disappointed disappointed that you sound Canadian. All right, I'm sorry I'm sorry, I can't say the words I really want to say online because they're there. You know, I don't want to offend People sensibilities, but yeah, and please. Hold on this one. Sorry. This one. Hey, Major Hydraulic says, you know, I was

vaccinated two times for COVID. I feel so dumb. You should feel misled. You should feel betrayed. Don't feel dumb. I mean, the heavy full court pressure like we should, we should be able to trust the people who come in in a position of authority, right? I want to trust that when the fire department pulls up, because my house is on fire, that what comes out of the hose is water, not gasoline, right? And so that's how I see this. We were betrayed comprehensively, and I think there needs to be extraordinary consequences and punishments for this.

I mean, the worst you can this. I mean the worst that the worst you can imagine. I agree. Yep. Just like the Nuremberg trials, we got to do something like that. Yep. It's warranted I think in this. And by the way, you see all this stuff on here that came up. And now we finally have this too. All right. The experimental gene therapies cross the placental barrier. Oh great. Taiwanese scientists. Preprint, new preprint research pub, what is that? Public research pub is a preprint server. Okay. Published in February of 17th, 2025 by Taiwanese scientists demonstrate synthetic spike protein in polyethylene glycol, or PEG, from mRNA-1273 or Moderna, given to pregnant mice at doses similar to humans, crosses placenta and distributes

to fetus, born about risks of long-term genotoxicity on babies born from RNA itself was back translated, reverse transcriptase, it's back translated into DNA and then put into germline transmission means it got put into the actual germlines, the males spermatozoa and females eggs. The genetics of our human babies are forever changed. Which by the way is evil and it's warned about extensively in religious texts. Do not do that. Do not rewrite your, your, your Godlike image, your code. Don't do that.

Yep. God's got it covered. Just don't. No, this is evil that we have to keep talking about that. Cause there's more here. It truly is. It goes on to say spike mRNA entered maternal circulation and crossed the placenta to fetal blood within one

hour and transplants cental spike mRNA placental mRNA mainly accumulated in fetal livers dwelt in fetal centers and trunk soft tissues. So it looks like once this gets in, it goes everywhere. And that's really quickly as well within an hour It does so I just want to get keep talking about the evil of all of this So we know this right we know this and so the first thing you do is you pull them from the market instantly That's what you do all done all done done in one I want to just but we've known so this is from a Miller study and Miller at all back in

2011 is when it came out and it's looking at a couple of things here. Total number of infant deaths, this is across 30 nations. So this is big, giant epidemiological study, 30 nations, Norway, the UK, France, Germany, the US, Canada, right? 30 nations. And it asks, okay, what's your infant mortality rate in every country you come over has an infant mortality rate. But the second thing they regressed that against was said, well, how many vaccine doses do you give to infants? And it goes up this way. Now if vaccines caused infants to live longer or not die as much, the line would slope this

way from left to right downwards. It slopes upwards from left to right upwards the line it slopes the wrong way it does the more shots you get the more issues the more infant death you get we call it SIDS but more infant death right SIDS is one form of a way an infant can die sudden infant death syndrome that's a look at the P value point zero zero zero what the chance of this being due to random chance, you know, just randomly, we just give vaccines. They're actually good for us. But randomly the data came this way is one in a little over 10,000.

It's because it's less than that. So anyway, wow. We've had this data since 2011 again, full stop timeout, blow the whistle. We're all done. That's the end of that. I'm just shocked by this. done. That's the end of that. I was shocked by this. Yeah. That's a shocking chart. Yep. Oh, that makes me so angry too.

You know, I feel badly that I didn't know a lot of this and I, I got very basic things for my kids and thankfully like there weren't as many as there are now, but you know, my daughters have were given these injections. Yep. Me too. So we're going to talk about this next, but first we're going to hear a very quick message from our number one sponsor. Hello, Dr. Chris Martinson here. Look, we've built a world on cheap oil, endless growth and borrowed time. But the cracks are showing. Inflation's up, resources are thinning, and the old rules don't seem to apply anymore.

I've tracked this for years, from the crash course to today, and I'm not here to sugar coat it. At Peak Prosperity, I'm your information scout hunting down the facts, cutting through the noise, and showing you how to adapt. This isn't just information, it's a lifeline. The game is changing fast. Are you ready? Subscribe to Peak Prosperity now and let's get ahead of the curve.

So thanks for listening to that. We have wonderful services for the subscribers at Peak Prosperity and an incredible crew. And by the way, I'm getting so excited because we're having our our summit is coming up this September that's right and we're having it in New Hampshire again and just grows and grows every year I mean it sells out every year but I mean we you know that the interest in it mm-hmm and it's fantastic gonna have Paul Kiker there dr. Ken Barry myself excellent I hope we get Jim Consular to come there and it's just it's just it's amazing. It's amazing. It's a good time. And the best thing about it, I think Chris, is that the people that yeah, the people that come to it,

get to know each other and get to know that they're not all all alone in this world with all of this crap. Yeah, I think very encouraging and heartening. And it's it helps you feel more sane. But also, you have friends for life. A lot of our tribe, these folks have been with us for 10, 15 years now, right? Yeah, yeah, so it's not just a subscription to a new service, we are a tribe. It's a tribe, we're a tribe. Yeah, we're actually, we're a community,

and community is gonna be very important. Evie, we gotta talk about this now. Sorry. Yeah, I haven't heard about this. This is gonna be a little bit disturbing for folks. So Cash Patel came out and tweeted this thing and a lot of people under there, including myself, are kind of scratching their heads going, wait, where's our Epstein files? But leave that aside for a minute. He says, look, this is deeply disturbing, critically important to understand what's out there. Be aware there's these threats. It's really tragic. It's pretty bad stuff. He just wants everyone to know they're

cracking down. He's referring to this ABC News article that finally came out about this. Of course some people have been been on this for years talking about it. Since 2020 was the first time I found somebody talking about this, but now finally we're on it. Alright. So the case is that FBI officials say they are growing increasingly concerned about a loose network of violent predators who befriend teenagers through popular online platforms and then coerce them into escalating sexual and violent behavior. Okay look we have a lot of pressures in our society and some people are just sick and twisted and that's always been true in the internet

Sort of assists them in their efforts This goes way beyond that and this isn't just to point out some dark that happens on the internet, right? this is because there's some really important messages in here for parents and That's what we get to and I was putting it together and trying to think it through and then of course, of course Evie first thing that happens is after I've done a lot of research, I open up and I read Jeff Childers piece on it this morning. And if you aren't reading Jeff Childers stuff, folks, you have to read it.

This is coffee and covid. It's amazing off of his sub stack. And at any rate, OK, let's carry on. Deeply disturbing is an understatement. For whatever reason, the media isn't reporting the whole story. But the Trump administration has initiated one of the largest and most urgent federal law enforcement responses in history. The ABC article buried the lead, which was that the entire FBI is now involved in responding

to an altogether new and horrifying threat. The task force is led by Assistant Director David Scott, blah, blah, blah. The FBI has more than 250 such investigations currently underway with every single one of its 55 field offices across the country handling a 764 related case. Such a whole of FBI response is practically unprecedented The closest thing I could find to compare to it was the FBI's response to the media aftermath of 9-eleven So this could best be compared to an imminent national security emergency But no not about one nobody has ever heard of

So so let's the reason I find this important and I think this is worth elevating besides the fact this is a PSA for parents. Sure. Right. A wake up call is that there's a larger thread here. So I've been really been bothering me. Like why aren't they arresting all these people who clearly have shovel ready cases from the past? Right. Yeah. Committed sedition, treason, enemies of the country, right? Whooping up fake, you know, lawfare cases and throwing elections and doing all that stuff,

like, what, we're just gonna move on and pretend that didn't happen? Sorry, that's not gonna work. And then, okay, so now they're throwing down this, but what if this becomes the entree to saying, once you unpack this a little bit You're gonna find out this isn't just some angry little boys out there doing some stuff, right? This is funded and they're using state-of-the-art psychological techniques that I guarantee if you're honest

You can chase this back to an intelligence agency or a country. Yes on some level. Yes Maybe not all of it, but I'll bet you some of it because it's just too dark too. Well scripted too thoughtful Yep, I wonder if you're right So acceleration ism is is the name for this? So in 2020 Jeff Childers again right here writing He says a new disease festered along the dark edges of the pandemics digital petri dish. I love how he writes That's great. It's not clear what to call it an international international movement? A dark new philosophy? A satanic religion? A twisted political ideology? A cult of chaos? All those are appropriate but none is

complete. Whatever it is, its defining characteristic is that it escapes easy definition. Academics and law enforcement types generally refer to the dogma as accelerationism. So this is a good term. We're going to have to learn this one. Accelerationism because adherence singular goal, mostly young men and some women is to accelerate civilizations collapse in particular Western civilization through deliberately spreading literal evil and social chaos through kids. Gross.

And this is from one of the website chat rooms they inhabit, how to accelerate the collapse of the West, right? Look at that. And what are some ways to accelerate this collapse? So, Evie, you and I have been talking about this for a while and we're feeling around this. It feels like the West is under attack, that there are maligned forces that definitely want to attack the West, want to see it undermined, want to destroy it, want to destroy the nuclear family, the sense of having a boundary, a border, a national identity, want to. In particular, you will get in trouble if you're Christian. Jews

and Muslims get a free pass so far, but Christians are under attack, which you will note because nobody's gotten arrested for being a Muslim or Jew praying. Yeah, that's true And that's definitely happening in the UK and I guess here in the US as well. It has a religious flavor on this whole thing, yeah? I can see that. Okay, so carrying on. It already sounds like a bad, unbelievable joke or sci-yap,

but it gets worse, a lot worse. As the pandemic spread, so did a really horrible idea, a new rabid flavor of accelerationism, one that combines anarchic terrorism with nihilism, neo-nazism, and doing evil for the sake of evil, all inextricably intertwined with occult spirituality, including both figurative and literal Satan worship. Okay. We have been noticing this for quite a while

and observing, so this is at multiple levels though. So we see like the occult stuff that's been happening, right, and for whatever reason. They like doing this, right? It's at the big pageantry things that they put on for the Olympics. Right. It's when they're, you know.

All these little hidden symbols and things. Little hidden symbols around the black eye club, all that. Like, and we've just looked at and said, whatever you make of it at a minimum, they believe in it. And here it is, like coming through. Yeah, it's bubbling up, bubbling up. And wow, somehow like minded accelerationists group their way toward each other in the shady corners of the dark web group their way towards each other in the shady corners of the dark web. Groped their way towards each other somehow.

This is so good. Starting in COVID year one, a loose network of groups began to coalesce around specific areas of morbid interest. These accelerationist affiliate groups vary slightly by each leaning into different aspects of the poisonous brew of spiritual, ideological, and political bad ideas. Their names include things like Adam Waffen Division, The Base, The Order of the Nine Angles, 09A, 764, the focus of ABC's article, which was blandly named after the Texas zip code where its 15- old founders started it up in 2020. Yes. Wow. Yeah. A 15 year old, huh? Yeah. Okay. But here's the thing. You can start stuff up and operate like this and somehow nobody comes looking for you. Remember they rounded up all of the J6 protesters? That's right. You know,

cell phone records and interviews and like they got on that right away. They did. Because those were people saying, hey, I was a little unhappy about the fact that this election was obviously stolen. And so I want to ensure that he accurately describe the problem again from Jeff. Thank you, Jeff Childers. What he says is, what follows is as clinical a description as I can make it, because this stuff is really disturbing.

So he trimmed it down for us so we don't have to parade. Like, it's really bad. Is it? It's really bad. So he clinically described it here. Okay. And here's the process. All right. The 764 brand aims to destroy civil society through the corruption and exploitation of youth. The members spend their time online, posing as peers or allies in video games and on chat servers, especially in support forums for kids experiencing things like eating disorders or autism. Okay. They befriend the young people who are mostly but not always girls.

Okay. Now that maps that tracks in with a lot of other things that we're seeing out there. I'm not saying everybody's a 764 victim. What I am saying is that we've noticed that there's of the people who gets really swept up in the transgenderism, which is a to me an outgrowth of this. It's all sort of hatred of the feminine, hatred of the individual, hatred of family, hatred of culture, hatred of the West, hatred of self, of life, hatred of self, hatred of body. self of life hatred of self hatred of body so so it feels like an offshoot of that you know and maybe because we have so much

latitude for this crazy transgenderism stuff that's been going on which some of its legit but some of it is just dudes looking for an angle yeah you know yeah so anyway once they have gained the child's trust and learned enough personal details 764 members convinced the child's trust and learned enough personal details, 764 members convince the child to do or say something mildly embarrassing on video. That is all it takes. The rest is nauseatingly inevitable. With that bit of compromise in hand, the apparently innocent relationship immediately becomes

horrific. The groomer exposes himself as a terrifying member of the satanic group and orders the child to do something just a little more embarrassing under threat of sending the first video to the child's parents or their school. This creates an escalatory ladder with the child eventually performing the most horrific acts imaginable under the duress of exposure of all the previous violations. Oh my god this happened to my niece. You think so? I think it might have. Hmm well this is that this the sophistication of the escalatory ladder concept I don't think

that came out of a 15 year old's head right. At a minimum they modeled it after what they saw was say the Epstein files or something else, right? So this but this is the same thing happens It's like a doctor prescribed something to a child that maybe didn't do a whole lot of good for that child Now you own them. Mm-hmm the escalatory ladder next thing, you know They're collecting $40,000 bonuses for getting 68% of the people in their practice jabbed up Even though you have that huge table of awfulness that happens on the back end you own them this is called the moral erosion once you get somebody to commit a moral sin an abomination you own them so you start small easy

bite that's right no i what i meant to say is my niece told me about this happening at our school there's some stuff like this going on where what they did was they were able to infiltrate like kids phones or whatever and had access Somehow to their photos and then they'd say I'm gonna release These embarrassing pictures to all your friends if you don't send me a nude or something like that And the FBI was actually at one point I heard that it was investigating this kind of behavior, but it must have been the same group. It sounds exactly like this. It sounds a lot like it.

Right. Which is terrifying. Oh, indeed. So he says here, I realize some examples are necessary for you to understand the full scope of what's at play. Actual allegations from real cases include convincing girls to film themselves cutting words into their own skin. This is all, by the way, they have video of all this stuff really group

or member handle names and satanic symbols just carving them in their skin murdering family pets you convince them to do that abusing themselves producing CSAM which is child sexual assault materials abusing their young younger siblings and worse like this has already already happened. The 764 member wins. That's the EV's face right now. Wins by being cruelly creative and finally convincing the child to self-erase. That's commit suicide or even more horrific,

becoming a hollow vessel for recruiting their own friends and other children as new victims in a satanic multi-level marketing scheme. In their dark chat room 764 members compile and trade portfolios as their currency, a type of demonic currency evidence in their successful progression in the ruination of each child. These portfolios are added with satanic overlays, music, grotesque filters designed to enhance trading and bragging rights. So think of EV House, how disturbed and broken you have to be as a society where you don't produce like

one monster. You produce a whole ecosystem of monsters. We're busy trading portfolios of ruination. Like how angry and disturbed you have to be. Right? I don't know what to make of that at all. Sounds a lot like the Epstein files. To me. The 764 brand aims to destroy civil society through the corruption and exploitation of youth. Oops. My bad. My bad. Here we go. Okay, this is the right one. The all of FBI response is not unjustified. 764 and similar dark networks are not just persisting, they're mutating, expanding and spreading internationally. The FBI's own statements, open cases and recent arrests all point to a disturbing conclusion. The groups are adapting

and growing faster than law enforcement can dismantle them. DOJ confirms 764 now has ties in New Zealand, Australia, the UK and Eastern Europe, or Ukraine. That's Ukraine. Some groups are reportedly building tools to automate grooming and sorting victims. The dark side of AI. We're no longer dealing with a group or even a collection of groups. We're dealing with the Satanic template, a how-to script for orchestrated digital depravity. It's metastasizing into open source terrorism with a low barrier to entry. It is decentralized and scalable and now with AI deepfakes, better encryption and worsening youth mental health, every day it gets easier for them to destroy lives at scale.

So the question becomes, um, w w like, like we've, we've hit this point in the story where despair is so overwhelming that this actually is where dopamine comes from. This feels like fun, right? There's a level of hatred of self and humanity. This feels like, I can't explain this through normal progression of humans. Like, like we live at the easiest times possible. I know. Right? It can't be that these are people who just suffered depraved childhoods of starvation

and endless cold with lice. Well, could I make it... Could I throw something out there as a potential reason for this happening at this point? I think, as you said before in previous episodes, too, you know humanity kind of goes through cycles and We are coming up on a cycle where we've like you said we've had a lot of easy times People are disconnected from reality blah blah blah, but but also because of like video games as well, right? There's this disconnect deep disconnect when you see somebody on a screen, right? There's this disconnect, deep disconnect when you see somebody on a screen, right?

If you're practicing mutilating people in a video game for 10 or 15 years, what's watching somebody undress on the other side of a screen? You know what I mean? It has this like the objectification, the dehumanization, the desensitization. That's right. It's not real. And I think that might be, you know, contributing to it in some way. Mm-hmm I mean, I don't know. I'm curious what other people are gonna say about it. Well Who knows it feels like it has a deep statey kind of a fingerprint to me Isn't it potentially recruiting assassins people trapped in a situation with no escape rock star?

Two thousand one says and the Dan Dan is speaking for a lot of folks here. I'm so sad that I didn't know to pay more attention to my own children, what my own children did online starting around eight or nine. Yeah. Yep. That's right. Yeah. And they have technologies now even earlier and earlier. I mean, this could happen to younger and younger kids. Yeah. All right. So this gets down to the advice

for parents and Jeff Childers. This is all from Jeff Childers. 100% all credit goes there. He does such a great job framing this, but I love how he brought it home here and he said, the traditional talk to your kids advice, wholly inadequate in the face of this love crafty and threat. It's the PR equivalent of thoughts and prayers, vague, late, and wholly insufficient for what we're facing. Children are up against weaponized psychological warfare. Weaponized psychological warfare. And so this is, I see it in a continuation pattern because we've, that's what the COVID jab hysteria was about. It was weaponized psychological warfare. We've been running schemes and scams and grifts and propaganda on our own citizens for a really long time. It breaks people. It does. You can't be in a psychological torture chamber forever

without breaking. I think what we're seeing in 764 people broke. Yeah. Now we ought to be asking, why are we breaking our own people? Why are we doing that? Why are we doing that? Or who is trying to break our people? I think we have to have that talk. So and he says here as well, scripted grooming, organized international blackmail networks and occult cults masquerading as friends. This is important part. Parents need more than a talk. They need a protocol.

Parents of young children and older male children must assume the threat is a clear and present danger. 100%. It's not a matter of if, but maybe has happened at your niece's school, but when children will be targeted. Parents must presume that these predators already know what platforms their child uses, what they struggle with emotionally, how best to manipulate them. Direct messaging should be absolutely disabled. We cannot even trust friends because they may have been compromised. App installs should be allowed with parental permission only.

Logging and monitoring tools have become a requirement in today's world and for heaven's sake keep devices out of bedrooms at night when kids can use them unsupervised. Oh, indeed. Kids should be taught to recognize cult indoctrination language. Things like, you're so mature for your age or your parents don't get you. I know something no one else knows or let's just keep this between us. Do you remember, do you remember very quickly? Um, so back when it was like more of a thing, but there were these grotesque gentlemen who I make up and all that stuff. There was this thin faced guy, forget his name, but I watched a couple of his blogs where he was speaking directly to children

and he said those things. Oh, that creepy guy that was trying to, I don't know his name either. It looked like he was trying to put on makeup badly to look like a clown, but you know, but he was still like, I love you, your parents more than your even your parents. Yeah. Remember that? I do remember that. We'll have to go dig him out. That's what this stuff was exactly 100% what this was. And we were supposed to pretend this was okay. This was normal. You'd be shouted down if you said, Oh, gross. What is that? Right? Well, that's what this was. You're transphobic. Anyhow, just thought I'd break. He said all those things. He did. He did. Any pressure

to join a chat, send a photo or keep secrets. Parents must teach their children the refrain. If someone online ever pressures you to do anything, even if you think you'll get in trouble, I will protect you first and not punish you. And you got to not punish them. No, just full on protect. That's right. Bring out the mama bear, the papa bear. Yeah. And just ring fence this off. Most burdensome of all, parents must learn to use the most common platforms, Discord, Telegram, TikTok, Roblox, Minecraft, Twitch, and Reddit. Parents of at-risk children with existing anxiety disorders should strongly consider

creating device-free lifestyles. Just take those kids off the board. So. Yeah, take them off the board. That's such a good point though, that you have to really understand how to navigate those programs yourself. Yeah.

In order to really know what your kid is up to. It's a tall ask, right? Or you just say, sorry kids, you know, you're not gonna get any of those things. That's right. Right? Um. Finally, and much less importantly,

I devoted today's blog to this subject because we need to recognize what horrors Trump's new law enforcement officials are actually dealing with. Conservatives too often focus on what they aren't doing. Where are the arrests? Where are the Epstein files that we might miss in emerging bigger pictures? Okay, well, I'm only going to say I'm going to give some grace and latitude that, okay, they're going to back off on the Epstein files although some more files should get released nothing nothing new. The Clintons are in there Alan Dershowitz usual names right we already have the names where are the

rest but what if what if they're dealing with something where they're like there's this there's the larger organized pattern of darkness that's coming from somewhere and if we find out it's a state or a corporation or a certain billionaire group, I would say immediate, swift and severe justice cut off everything we possibly can destroy whoever it is. It's doing this because this is evil. We have no place for that. You're coming after destroy our children, destroy the fabric of our culture,

destroy the country. If you are doing those things, we ought to be every bit as severe as like remember They're all like oh, we're gonna hurt them the Houthis who are just like shooting at ships off of their own coast If that's intolerable to us, this should be ten times more intolerable. It's true. It ought to be really bad But right at home. So all of this fits for me into and we're just gonna finish up with this and then we'll cut over to the To the peak prosperity side part of this. But Edie, I just wanted to go over this part because this is fascinating. So this guy does a lot of really, really great work.

The new emerging king, he does great stuff with working with youths and all this stuff. And he ran an interesting experiment. And I wanted to hear his experiment because I think it fits into this larger sweep of this mental illness we're talking about. It's not organic. We're being targeted. This is weaponized psychological operations and it's had its impact. And here he's talking about it. I made two separate videos before the election. One of the videos said I was going to vote

for Kamala Harris. The other video said I was gonna vote for Donald Trump. And I just wanted to see the mixed reactions from people and how people would react because I do a lot of work from my hometown, do a lot of work from my community. I work with young boys. And I never said who I was voting for. But I made those two videos

because I want to show people how they are in reality. I made the Donald Trump video and I made the Kamala Harris video. Under the Kamala Harris video, you definitely had some Trump supporters like, well, we understand that you may have a different opinion or whatever, but we still support what you do. Maybe you'll wake up one day, et cetera, et cetera.

You know, things like that. It wouldn't nothing vile, wouldn't no bad comments and nothing. I made the Donald Trump video. I got people that unfollow me. I got people saying they can't support nothing I do no more. I got folk calling me all types of names, et cetera, et cetera. But what's crazy is all of the Kamala Harris supporters

have become what they accuse Trump supporters of being. When you say you support Donald Trump, y'all be ready to kill him. Y'all ready to burn him at the stake. You calling them all types of names, you unfollowing me, you don't care what they're doing for their community, nothing. If you support Trump, if you, I hate you so much, et cetera, et cetera.

But all the people under the post, all the Trump supporters when I said I was gonna vote for Kamala, it was all love anyway. They was like, well, we still support what you're doing. We still gonna donate. We still love the work even though you don't have to support Donald Trump, et cetera, et cetera. So I've only received hate from the people

that call themselves the tolerant side, the side that's supposed to be Donald Trump, et cetera, et cetera. So I've only received hate from the people that call themselves the tolerant side, the side that's supposed to be about love, the side that's supposed to be, that's not about hate. But it's crazy because any time somebody doesn't agree with you, all you spew is hate. All you give is hate. So it's funny how everybody who calls themselves Democrats, you have turned into what you accuse the Republicans of being.

There. Mic drop. Boom. Boom, right? So yeah, I just think that that captures it right there. And I'm going to suggest this isn't organic. This is too fast, too sudden. You and I both know families, friends, individuals, colleagues

who are struggling with this immediate sort of separation, the divorce that's happened, sometimes physical, literal divorce, because the mindsets can't occupy the same territory anymore. It's really become very stark. But I think that illustrated one key difference. I've noticed this when we do go to conservative gatherings, they are very welcoming. And when we go to so-called progressive gatherings, like as soon as they smell that you're not one of them, 100%, it's like this turn. It's really a turn on you. It gets a little scary. I felt that when we went to that Tesla protest take down thing.

I could feel that they were, you know, something that you and I were coming from a different place and I could feel their animosity. Yep. Well, we ran out of time out here on the public side, so we're not going to have a chance to talk about this, but, but I'll save it for next time. This is coming up on Friday. So come to two, if you're out here on the public side, come to Friday's signal hour at one o'clock. And we're going to talk about this because Canada has a big problem.

This was important, but that other stuff was even more important and took precedence and I wanted to make sure we talked about it. So with that, thank you everybody for being here out here with us on the Signal Hour. We'll see you next Friday at one o'clock. If you want to come back for that, it'll be just like this. Remember, take care of your kids, protect them. It's an evil world out there right now with evil people and they've got wicked, powerful tools to spread their hate, their division, their satanic stuff and all of that. And if you go outside and plant a garden, which is the perfect time to be doing that, you don't even have to worry about all the crap going on online. Just get yourself

outside and get your hands in the dirt and get your kids working out there with you and you don't even have to worry about that stuff. But thanks for joining us. It's always a pleasure to have you here.