Pivot - Bluesky's Moment, Crony Capitalism, and Guest Julie Scelfo

Episode Date: November 26, 2024

Kara and Scott discuss the "Glicked" effect on the box office, and Amazon's new $4 billion investment in Anthropic. Then, Elon Musk and Vivek Rameswamy bring their Silicon Valley buddies into the Department of Government Efficiency, while President-elect Donald Trump gets Wall Street's approval with his Treasury Secretary pick. Plus, Bluesky continues to surge, and Meta appears to be feeling the heat. Our Friend of Pivot is Julie Scelfo, the founder of Mothers Against Media Addiction or MAMA. Julie explains why she wants transparency, accountability, and legislation to protect kids online. Follow Julie at @JulieScelfo Follow us on Instagram and Threads at @pivotpodcastofficial. Follow us on Bluesky at @pivotpod.bsky.social Follow us on TikTok at @pivotpodcast. Send us your questions by calling us at 855-51-PIVOT, or at nymag.com/pivot. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Support for the show comes from Betterment. Do you want your money to be motivated? Do you want your money to rise and grind? Do you think your money should get up and work? Don't worry, Betterment is here to help. Betterment is the automated investing and savings app that makes your money hustle. Their automated technology is built to help maximize returns, meaning when you invest with Betterment, your money can auto adjust as you get closer to your goal, rebalance if your portfolio gets too far out of line, and your dividends are automatically reinvested. That can increase the potential for compound returns. In other words, your money is working like a dog while you can be sleeping like one and snoring like one, too. You'll never picture your money the same way again. Betterment, the automated investing and savings app that makes your money hustle. Visit betterment.com to get started.

Investing involves risk. Performance is not guaranteed. Support for this show comes from Constant Contact. If you struggle just to get your customers to notice you, Constant Contact has what you need to grab their attention. Constant Contact's award-winning marketing platform offers all the automation, integration and reporting tools that get your marketing running seamlessly, all backed by their expert live customer support.

It's time to get going and growing with Constant Contact today. Ready, set, grow. Go to constantcontact.ca and start your free trial today. Go to constantcontact.ca for your free trial. Constantcontact.ca. Support for Pivot comes from Solid-I, creating highly advanced AI's complicated, especially if you don't have the right storage or critical but often overlooked catalyst for AI infrastructures.

SolidIME is storage optimized for the AI era, offering bigger, faster, and more energy efficient solid-state storage. SolidIME delivers the capability to meet capacity, performance, and energy demands across your AI data workloads. AI requires a different approach to storage. Solidime is ready for everything the AI era demands. Learn more at storageforai.com. I see you. Get the fuck on. I'm gonna hand you a new one today. Oh, fuck. We're still talking about Wicked?

Jesus Christ. Hi, everyone. This is Pivot from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network. I'm Kara Swisher. And I'm Scott Galloway. And what were you doing ahead of this and where in the living fuck are you? I'm in Sao Paulo. Okay. And they have all these wonderful accoutrements. No, still, I got here at 6 a.m. from Vegas.

You didn't ask me how F1 was. I shall in a second. Anyways, I'm in what is my favorite hotel in the world, the Sao Paulo Rosewood, and they have all these cool Brazilian cultural items. I've been walking around and I was trying to entertain our producers who are increasingly non-plus by my humor. I was rubbing my belly and I had this big Brazilian thing, trying to entertain our producers who are increasingly non plus by my humor. Yeah.

And I was rubbing my belly and I had this big Brazilian thing, and then a guy I travel with came walking out. And he wasn't even fazed when he saw me rubbing my belly and shaving some sort of Brazilian music item. He basically looked and just kept on moving. Yeah. So your lover, your side piece, whatever. It's so nice.

One of the nice things about, let's be honest, there's a lot of nice things about being wealthy. Yeah. One of the things I love, if I find a friend that's not doing anything, I'll be like, come with me to Brazil. And most people will go, sure. Sure. Do they have to carry your bags?

And he's Brazilian, so he knows people here, so he can set up hookers. I mean, really cool restaurants for us. Okay. All right. Okay. And yeah, I love it down here. I love Sao Paulo. You're audibly eating fruit. What is that fruit? It's Brazilian. Everything, all right. Okay. Yeah, I love it down here. I love South Paula. And now you're audibly eating fruit. What is that fruit? Is that a little

something? It's Brazilian. Everything tastes better here. Everything, every, everyone's hotter and all the food tastes better in Brazil. What is that, a watermelon? It's watermelon. Whatever it is, it's lovely. Is it? I'm trying to eat more fruit. For the first time in my life I had. So you can be more regular, right? More regular with the fiber. Oh, I'm good. I'm good. Every seven days I take a dump. I'm like one of those alley-ood eskimos. That's probably a hate crime. I just had a friend ask me, just got surgery,

how to get a dump. You know what you do? I eat an apple a day and hot coffee in the morning. It works every time. Boom, right? Thank you. Yeah. Just a little bit of constipation advice for you. Well, how was F1? It was really- You kind of stuck it to them a little bit in your piece, advice for you. Well, how was F1? It was really-

You kind of stuck it to them a little bit in your piece, but go ahead, go ahead. You thought so? Little bit. Little bit. Little bit? Little too much, much. Little too ahead of their skis, that's what I got out of it, but go ahead.

Oh, really? Speaking of which, I actually had breakfast Saturday morning with Greg Maffei, who's the departing CEO. By the way, let me just say, John Malone has decided to take back the CEO spot at Liberty. The guy's 83. When will these people learn to move on? Seriously. I know Greg pretty well from Microsoft. He's in my first book.

I like him now. I didn't like him back then. I have to tell you, John Malone is the single smartest person we've ever had on our stages of our events, period. Oh, I don't doubt it. Period, like by far. Yeah, but at 83, he's decided to retake the helm as an operator? I don't know, he had some health issues, I thought.

That's what I heard. I know, but that's my point. By the way, Greg Maffei purchased F1 for $4.5 billion in 2017 and it's worth over 20. F1 has been an enormous success. And it was unbiased because I like Greg, but I think he's an exceptionally talented executive. I think John Malone, I don't know what happened here

if Greg is really retiring or if he was fired, but I would offer that John Malone, despite being agreeably, or I agree with you, the smartest person in the world, he fired the wrong guy. Zaslav has cut Sherolde value at Warner Brothers Discovery by 70 percent and managed to take a third of a billion dollars out of the company. They fired the wrong guy.

One guy has built value, one guy is destroying it. Should Malone be taking the helms of Warner Brothers Discovery? Interesting. Interesting. He owns a big bit of it and he has a lot of control over it, that's for sure. You know, this guy makes bets all over the place. He sort of reminds me of a Rupert Murdoch character, and Rupert was quite lively at 83. Much more aggressive than Rupert.

I would agree, that's what I mean. I'm saying Rupert was fine now and is like whatever. He basically invented cable TV. Yeah, exactly. I mean, he made these enormous investments in stealing the ground that everyone thought was crazy and he understands how to like maneuver the chess pieces. I agree with you. He is really the, he's probably the smartest guy

we don't talk about. He was also early AOL. I've run into him a zillion times, interviewed him many times and I have to tell you, and this is someone who's interviewed, you know, Steve Jobs was close in a different way. But boy. No, we're name dropping. No, I'm just saying.

Speaking of F1, oh my God. Who am I gonna compare him with? 240 miles an hour of name dropping. Okay, listen to me. I interviewed Steve Jobs. I don't know what to tell you. And the Swisher team is seven laps ahead on the name dropping F1.

Just because you never actually did these things, it's fine and you're jealous. But nonetheless, he is really quite something. I would not count him out at 83. I had heard that he had health issues, so that was the issue, but you know. I think you can count everyone out at 83. I'm an agist, I'm sticking with my old age.

Really? All right, okay, you keep doing that. I can't wait till you're 83 and we throw you onto the ice floe. You'll be questioning me around. Oh, really? Okay. Well, I'll make sure you have plenty of fruit so you can be regular. Tell me about F1.

Was it good? What happened? Yeah, last year was the first one in Vegas. I met a bunch of buddies of mine from LA and another buddy of mine from New York. And we went to this great party. My friend Scott Sartiano, who's this great entrepreneur who started Zero Bond, had a big party Saturday night,

which was incredible. You know, you probably never feel this way, but I was so tired, but it was such a great party. And the conflict of like, I'm never at great parties like this, but I'm so tired. And anyway, so I opted to go to sleep early, but the race was great. These other guys, Jason Strauss and Noah Tuberberg, have this amazing nightlife company

that did this incredible viewership deck from the Bellagio. And yeah, it's just, I had a great time though. Good, I'm gonna go to one. I'm gonna go to one. Yeah, no, I want you there to witness my debauchery and judge me. Can't wait to have you. Oh, I totally don't wanna go with you.

No, I'll go with you. It's not your scene. It's not your scene.. Oh, I totally don't want to go with you. No, I'll go with you. It's not your scene. I know, but I want to see it. There's a lot of ladies going to it. Friends of mine go in packs of ladies. 40 percent female fans. Yeah, packs of ladies.

I'm not a packed lady person, but whatever. I thought I'd try it out. I'm not incurring. I see you more at the Miami Book Fair. That's where I was. The Subaru Convocation or whatever. I had a great time there. I had a wonderful time. Oh, you did go to that. How was that?

Yes, it was wonderful. I was interviewed by Ben Mesrick who did the book that ultimately led to the social network. He did a bunch of books that always get made into movies, good movies actually, Dumb Money, stuff like that. We had a good time. It was packed, let me just tell you. Packed with young and old people and really vibrant and fun. It was at a Dade University,

Miami Dade or something. Miami Dade. Yeah, it was lovely and really fun. I was like, I can't believe I'm getting on this fucking plane. I was in New York and I was like, I should cancel it and then I didn't and I'm glad I didn't. It was really lovely. I was pleased to see so many people in person and I was like, oh, I should cancel it. And then I didn't, and I'm glad I didn't. It was really lovely. I was pleased to see so many people in person,

and I was surprised how many. It was fun. It was kind of funky and fun and packed. And the guy who owns Books & Books, Mitch something or other, he was terrific. So you and I had much different weekends. Oh yeah, you know, but I'm just saying it was great. Yeah, and I got back from New York and I posted about,

I did my pilot for CNN. I'm not supposed to say anything, but here I am. It was good. What are you piloting? What's the show? A show called Offscript. I already posted on social media. I'm sure the CNN people are losing their minds, but it's called Offscript and it's with Audie Cornish and Van Latham, who is so cool. He's my new Scott, essentially.

Oh, that's good to know. But he's handsomer and taller. He has as much hair as you do. He's more handsome. You're new Scott, but he's more handsome and taller. He has as much hair as you do. You're new, Scott, but he's more handsome and taller. Well, thank you for that, Kara. Thank you. He wears a cowboy hat. So he's great. And so it's interesting. I'm going to put some of the interviews in the feed, in my on feed.

What's the premise of the show? A little like a dinner party, a conversation, like us talking in kind of a cool setting. A little less, and I'm'm telling you it's good. No, you're wrong You're just gel. You're jelly when it's a big hit. You're gonna be stop it. You're so jelly Well, the good news is launching it launching on CNN right right out of the gates You're gonna have dozens and dozens of viewers dozens and dozens of viewers I know I've tried basically one thing at CNN and you tried six or seven different TV things.

Five, I'm 0 for 5. I'm just saying, if I have a hit here. You still wanna do TV, you're trying to beg me to come on TV. And I'm not begging you. I'm like no, the world has said I'm a facer podcasting. I am zero begging you. I think it's an interesting thing

and I think here's the thing, I read one of these dumb media reporters. Here's the thing. Here's the thing, I read one, it's like, it's an interesting thing. And I think here's the thing, I read one of these dumb media reporters. Here's the thing. Here's the thing. I read one, it's like, it's all over. I'm like, well, why? Can you make good stuff? Yes, you can.

If it switches over to digital, they cut the costs, right? I think there's some still juice in this lemon to squeeze. That's my, not in the current configuration, but I do. And I think calling anything like it's over is really dumb. That's my feeling. Let me just break it down and say what's actually going on here. This is called, this isn't a midlife crisis. This is midlife crises. And I check the box with beef and prostitutes. You check the box with TV. Same thing. You'll see. Same thing. You know what, everyone like- You're trying to impress somebody by making TV. I am not. I enjoy it.

I'm interested in the challenge of it. Everyone yelled at me when I did podcasting. Guess what everyone yelled at me when I picked Scott Galloway. You know what I said? Fuck it. I think this guy has some sun in it. Me and cable TV is. I'm just telling you. Every time people tell me I can't do something,

I'm like, go fuck yourself. I'm sticking with beef and pros. All right, listen, we got a lot to get to today, including Trump finishes filling out his cabinet and threads rolls out some changes as blue sky grows to the sky. Plus, our friend of pivot is Julie Skelfo, the founder of Mothers Against Media Addiction or MAMA, which is what all my four kids call me. But first, let's get to something that also annoys you. Glickit Weekend was a huge success. Wicked opened at $114 million domestically,

making it the biggest box office launch of a Broadway adaptation, which is incredible. The third biggest domestic debut of this year, I think Wolverine was one of them, Deadpool and Wolverine, but I forget the other one. Internationally, Wicked hit about $164 million. Glad to hear it's in its second weekend. It placed second, placed domestically with $55 million and $220 million worldwide.

Overseas, it had debuted before. Wicked is now all over the world. They're both all over the world. You didn't go to either, so you're gonna tell us all about it. Please do. I am gonna go see Gladiator this weekend. Yeah, movies are making a big comeback.

They're only down 10 percent this year. They are going to do $10 billion in box office revenue, whereas video games are going to do 180, and we still talk about movies. Right. Okay. Yeah. I'll probably see them both. I'll see Gladiator because I like the franchise. I'll see Wicked because you said it was great,

and I trust your judgment. It was. It was interesting. There's a guy who was forced to go to buy his girlfriend. He's like, why am I going to the stupid thing? Then she taped him at the end. He's like, that was beautiful. I'm hoping you're going to leave in the middle of it. I know you did with Barbie. You're going to leave. I miss the Defying Gravity song. Yeah.

But I'm excited to see both. I really am. I like both. Interestingly, Wicked was 72% women tickets and Gladiator was 62%. I thought that was pretty low of men buying tickets, not in groups. We don't hang out. Yeah. Let me just remind you, one in seven men can't name a single friend and one in four men doesn't have a best friend. Yeah. Anyway, I'm excited to see both. And I think they've done a beautiful, let me just

say once again, may reiterate John Chu who I just interviewed, did a great job, but Donna Langley who's running Universal, she's in line for something big like I say Disney, but something else. It was really well done. Gladier cost about a hundred million dollars more than Wicked. So it's gonna have to make that up.

It's 250 for Wicked for both, for two movie, each movie. There's another one coming out next year because it's a two-parter. But Gladiator costs a lot more as an individual movie to make. But Donna Langley, who runs Universal in this area, has really made a big bet here. It looks like she's paid off, including tons and tons of marketing, which I think you would have found interesting. It was all over the Olympics.

It's been all over everything. They've been just everywhere. This movie's been all, and so is Gladiator. It put stuff on TVs. It did a ton of marketing and it seems to have paid off. Well, you know how witch is right. How? In cursive.

I'm going to curse you. That's kind of cute. That is you. That's kind of cute. That is cute. That's kind of cute. Where'd you get that? Where'd you get that? That's a good one. That's actually somewhat clever.

Right. That was well done. Anyway, it is much smaller than videos, 100%, but I don't think it's comparable. It's a very nice, it brings back movie going a little bit, you're right, it's down quite a bit. Box office is down by this year 10%, something like that, some number of that. I've said this morning, I always like trying to draw to something resembling a learning here.

And so many young people want to be in media, and it's a wonderful business in terms of creative outlet. It's pretty simple. When you're picking media, the first litmus test should be what size screen does this media end up on? And there's an inverse correlation between the return on your invested capital and the size of the screen. If you're producing content or you're in the ecosystem

producing media for a giant screen, a movie theater, you could be an eight on a scale of one to 10, and you will get a return of five. If you're going into a smaller screen that's on the wall in your living room, you could be an eight and you'll get a six or seven or maybe an eight. Still a big business, still a real business, but the majority of capital, human and financial, in the entire TV industry has been sequestered, sucked up, usurped by the shareholders of Netflix for a variety of dynamics.

And then if you're creating content or media that goes on a small string on a phone, you can be a six and you're probably gonna get an eight in terms of return. So kids, don't let, you know, mama, don't let your kids grow up to be in film or TV. Have them figure out a way to develop compelling content that can be consumed on a mobile device. Yeah, or that you could take this stuff and make,

move it up. You have to be thinking of it all the time. You have to be thinking of it constantly. Yeah, but think about our medium. Our medium is basically a phone and then AirPods. And the smallest screen in the world, oh my God, I just saw something brilliant. What?

The smallest screen in the world are AirPods that go in your ears. Oh, I like it. That's good. See, in real time, this is what I bring out in you. There you go. I move away the chaff, and then we come to the heart of things. Interesting, Amazon is investing $4 billion in Anthropic.

Think of things that are going up and to the right. As part of the investment, Anthropic has agreed to make AWS its primary cloud and training partner. That's probably what this money was for, and used Amazon's in-house AI chips. Anthropic has been discussing raising funding at $40 billion valuation, as is Elon Musk's XAI.

OpenAI raised $6.6 billion in October, bringing its valuation to $157 billion. I think Musk's is higher than that now. But they're up and to the right. So this is Amazon's play here, Anthropic with Claude. Yeah, it's the same people. Microsoft is having weird tension. They don't want to be too reliant on the shit show

of corporate governance that is open AI. Amazon is anthropic. I mean, they're all sort of intertwined. It's intertwined. It's all going to the same players. But just the capital appetites of these companies, they're sort of reliant on the biggest players that can offer compute.

But just the voracious appetite of these companies to build bigger and bigger LLMs. I mean, if you read that, it's kind of these white papers from, it's his name Dario, the kid, or the guy from Anthropic and then Sam Altman. They basically put out these long thought pieces saying, I'm really fucking smart. Please invest $10 more billion in my company. We have never seen an industry that is this capital hungry. And I wonder, as excited as the market is, I wonder, there's gonna be a player here where the capital's gonna run out.

Yeah. Yeah. Because the amount of- Who do you think? Anybody? Well, it's kind of already happened. You know who the first victim was that couldn't raise the amount of capital they needed was inflection.

Yeah, that got sold to Microsoft. Yeah. So it was kind of a weird aqua hire courtesy of Reid Hoffman, but there's these things, they're talking about the next big model that these things go on. It could cost 10, 50, a hundred billion. I mean, Altman's using, throwing around the T word, trillion. I just wonder at what point one of these point one of these folks hits a wall. The investment I would like to make right now, and if you know the CEO, please introduce me.

I want to make an investment is Perplexity. I think their positioning around AI-driven search is a really elegant brand positioning. The guy is also a total attention whore, which I think is smart. The whole like, hey, New York Times, use me, I'll replace all your journalists. That's a total play for PR.

It's totally craven and it's totally smart. Yeah. Yeah. He's an interesting character. He really irritates a lot of people. I don't know. I don't even know the, I met the anthropocene, I think. I don't know. I got to get, I got to do some meetings. I got to do some meetings. I got to do some meetings. Do some original reporting.

I shall. That's what I do all the time, all day long, my friend. Speaking of which, there was this report that TikTok CEO Sho Chu is consulting Elon Musk about incoming administration. I talked to TikTok people. They said, this is overblown beyond belief. Everyone's relating everything to Elon Musk, talking to them, including the Chinese leaders, which have leverage over Musk, hoping to be beneficial in the Trump administration. I think this is all being over exploited, except for the people they're bringing in to their doge thing again, and I don't want to call it doge, Department of Government Efficiency. People involved in the early stages, investor Mark Andreessen, hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, former CEO, Uber CEO who was disgraced and fired,

Travis Kalanick and boring company, President Steve Davis. Davis is a long time Davis is a long time factotum of musks. Mark, well, we know Mark and Ackman, he's a loudmouth. They're all the loudmouths essentially, and Travis, that was a fascinating choice. Can you say more about what you put out a text? What does Travis have to do? What's going on here? They're all part of the same mob scene there.

It's Shervin Peshavar, if you remember him. He's in Miami. Emil Michael. Yeah, they're all part of the same crew. It's just the crew. It's literally like watching, Lucchese are coming in, essentially, allegedly. It feels like that and they bring with them some people who have talent, and some people who are really dumb or terrible, mostly terrible.

And some people, hangers on and some people, and there's a lot of those and all of whom are beholden to Musk and suck up to him. That's their thing in common, all of them. Or they want, or they're really thirsty like Bill Ackman. I know you like him, but he's so thirsty for being not who he is. Mark Andreessen, I think, is probably the most malevolent of this group.

Smart, obviously successful, but really an unpleasant character overall. Who amongst them do you like? Not this group. I don't know Steve Davis. I've heard he's smart. I mean, they're all, I mean, I like Travis Kalanick because he throws a great party and invited me like three years ago for Halloween.

Oh, did he? Okay, well, we did a lot of reporting on him and he ended up being fired. So, and justifiably so, he presided over a really toxic, well, you can go watch all the movies and read the books, he's just a toxic person. But you know, he's not stupid. Do you think that's fair?

Do you think that's fair? Yeah, I do. I think he created a toxic work environment. I mean, Getz is toxic. Do you really think Travis was toxic? Yes, you've not read, and you've clearly not read any of the reporting. You clearly have not read anything.

You have not read anything. As I said at the Miami Book Fair. As I I said. Yes, I do. Yes, I do. I think he, I think, compare him to Dharakos Rishahi. That's all I would say. Dharak, the D-Man. He's created a healthy, smart, he's great. He's great. And you know, the stuff that Travis was up to was all kind of-

I like the guy who runs Lyft too, David, the CEO of Lyft. He's a good guy. Yeah, fine. They're all great. They're all fine. Like this guy had to make it a hand waving Travis, bro fast. Like his, no, he's not. I'm sorry. Not Travis. Oh shit. Dara. Oh no, Brian, Brian Chesky. We like Brian. Lovely. Lovely. Um, everybody's has their faults,

but this guy just went out of his way to be a douchebag. Like really in a way that was really icky, you know, the whole thing with women, the anti-women stuff was heavy, heavy, heavy, heavy. And that may not bother you, but it bothered me. So- Is there an air hockey table involved? There's different-

No. There's something- No. Okay, hold on. I do think, I've been thinking a lot about the Department of Education recently because this meticulous bullshit that we want to eliminate what is probably the best forward-leaning investment in history,

and that's the Department of Education in my view. I think it's paid more dividends than NASA or whatever. There are different levels of mendacious, and I think one of the things we need in the senior year of high school for kids is one, a class on, and I love the word you, is adulting. My kid can do integers, but doesn't understand the interest rate on his Greenlight credit card.

We need to tell young people, to train them about sexuality in a more thoughtful, real world place, specifically how to express romantic interest while making someone feel safe. And three, I think we need to bring back civics and teach kids just how incredibly fortunate they are that the best decision they ever made was to be born in America.

And finally, I really do think we need much more thoughtful and concerted training and education around critical thinking. Because, all right, people are conflating people who've had scandals, who've been unfaithful outside of their marriage or whatever, or New York Magazine hit pieces on podcasters which made no fucking sense to me, or taking advantage of a White House intern,

that is worse. But it's not in the same goddamn league as having sex with a minor. And we tend to group all of these things into the same thing. They're not. Some activities are right. You know, people are human, people fuck up,

fine. And then people should be disqualified. Matt Gaetz couldn't get a job at a law firm, much less be attorney general. And neither could some of these people. And now they're running government stuff. Neither could some of these people. Right, right. But I'm just like, yeah, if Matt Gaetz is your bar, everything else, it's like saying don't be evil. Everything else to the left of it is like whatever, right?

Pam Bondi looks like fucking Thurgood Marshall because she's following Matt Gaetz. I know, I know. Exactly. That's exactly, and she certainly is not. She's, you know, there's all kinds of reporting on her behavior. But you know, these are all, they seem all very shifty and crony. One of the ones that is really, it's just now Brennan Carr, who's going to be the head of the FCC, thank God they don't have that much power, tells Maria Bartiromo,

he's going to make sure the government no longer treats Elon Musk unfairly. I'm not sure when that happened. What? And says he's going to take a look at blocking George Soros from buying radio stations. If this isn't crony capitalism, all these like, come on, like seriously. But Elon Musk can buy MSNBC and Twitter. No, he's not going to buy them. You know what I mean? It's like, who's the, these people. That should be the new name for your, you know, number 7 millionth rated TV show. It

should be called These People. That would be good. These people. These people. These people. And I just got every. You're welcome. I want a credit. Executive producer from executive producer Scott Galloway. I welcome your doubt because happened before when I started a blog, happened before when I started podcasting, happened before when I picked Scott Galloway. I'm good with your doubt. I love your doubt. Just don't conflate me with cable television.

I'm just saying I see something. I see something. Something I see. I don't know. After working my ass off for 30 years, I'm an overnight success because of Kara Swisher. There's some truth in that. No, there is some truth in that.

I'm sorry. That's what I'm saying is that I don't like, I have to listen to my own instincts here, so I'm gonna do that. It's part of an entire ecosystem. Gotta be honest, I'm thinking. Got to be honest, I was rolling with some pretty hot ladies in F1, and a bunch of times at the casino, people yell out,

hey, Prof G, and I felt like I should text you and say, thanks for this, thanks for this. Yeah, it's nice. So anyway, they're just like, I'm sorry. All I say to Charles Kalanick is our co-star Shaw, he has managed to turn that company thing, and he's spent a lot of time doing all kinds of stuff. At one point he was like, he wrote memos that was like,

you all should only fuck each other if you're not in the direct line thing. I can't fucking, he was so, he had so much like. He was a kid, he was immature. He was immature and stupid. I would describe him as immaturity. I wouldn't describe him, look, you know better than me. I don't think he was malicious.

I would describe him as very immature and shouldn't have been the CEO of a company of that importance. Perhaps. Perhaps. Speaking of MSNBC, people are in a panic that Elon's going to buy it because he tweeted it about buying it. It's ridiculous.

It's not. I've talked to the Comcast people. They're going to spin it off and then it'll be a shareholder thing. They're not going to turn around and sell it to Elon Musk. It's just not going to happen. I'm just, and he could buy shares in it once it's a public company in about a year, something like that. But from what I can, I kind of, I had some discussions with Comcast people.

It kind of makes sense to put it off in one thing and they'll either rise or fail based on what they make and have as much as they digitize it. That's my feeling, right? I don't, I don't know what else to say. We talked about this. This good bank, bad banks makes all the sense in the world. These are good assets. They still make a ton of money.

There's still a lot of seven-year-olds that buy a lot of insurance and reverse mortgages and in Buicks and still invest in mutual funds, thinking that some guy who looks old like them knows how to pick stocks, which they don't. So there's a lot of money to be made there. The thing is, they're declining assets, and what they need to do-

Yes, but they don't have, all I'm saying is they get all the money now, so they could do, they could actually make good things. They could shift around. Everyone thought one thing was, you could shift with this money. Before, they used to send all the money over to Peacock, or whoever.

Now they get to keep the money, and they can either figure out something forward to do with it or continue to milk it either way. It's not the worst thing in the world. It's not the worst thing in the world. Well, yeah, but they'll acquire other failing cable assets. It can make some cool stuff. It's still spin-off cash flow. Don't you think?

They'll consolidate the back end and they'll move to a stock that offers a dividend like a mature company, and they'll come up with new stuff, just as long as it's not crazy, stupid, expensive. They can't afford to be in the streaming market, that's why they're getting out. That's a race to the bottom being led by Netflix, which has 38 gallons of gasoline for everyone, everyone else has.

But there'll be, this is a smart, we talked about this, this is a smart move, it'll be good. The whole industry is going to be smaller, it's not going to be as high paying, it is leaking market share to other formats. We're about to have a much more competition. Basically, what do you call

an anchor that used to make three million dollars and left in a huff because they only offered her one million? A podcaster. You're going to see essentially every news anchor in America is about to have a podcast. Oh, don't I know it. Don't I know it.

I get called by all of them. Let me just give you some numbers here, though. You want to talk about income inequality. There are 3 million podcasts. 600,000 put out a podcast every week, right? I would venture that maybe generously 600 or one in a thousand, 0.1%, 0.1% make money. When I was on, and I like this story because it makes me look good.

When I was on crew at UCLA, we had ten oarsmen go to the Olympics, have a total of 2,800 since it became a varsity sport, meaning that approximately.3% I was three times more likely at the age of 19 to end up in the Olympics than having a top podcast. So this is how difficult it is to get to a sustainable podcast right now. It is more difficult. If you end up being a varsity athlete at a university, there's a greater likelihood you'll end up in the Olympics

than have a successful self-sustaining podcast. I did that on my own. Isn't that good? We should go to the Olympics. You and I will compete in shot put. Do shot put. That thing with the ice where you could do the sweeping thing and I could do the curling. No, here's the thing

Yeah, this is what I tell kids that are athletes My kids have the perfect amount of athletic ability and that is they're good enough to play on their teams But they're nowhere near good enough to have any delusions of grandeur that they're gonna get a college scholarship or play professional sports that is just the right amount of athletic skill because Because I was an athlete but I had absolutely no chance of doing anything. I didn't have those delusions. I got on with my life, and I went and got a job.

My friends who were world-class athletes, a couple of them went to the Olympics in Seoul. A couple of them ended up playing triple B ball. Now, two went on to be huge. Troy Eichmann and Reggie Miller were also my class, but those guys were freakish. But the majority of them, by the age of 28 or 29 were just starting their lives.

It's not, it is a really, really difficult way to make a living. And what I tell young people in sports is, unless you're getting bright flashing green lights, that you're gonna be in the 0.001%. I mean, some of the, Ed O'Bannon was like a, the guy was a god on the basketball court and he didn't, you know, he lasted one year on the pros.

It's a very, it's a very difficult way to make a living. But here's the good news. What I tell young people is the same skills you bring to sports, teamwork, knowing how to lose, grit, real discipline, competitive, like just an incredible drive. All of these things apply all of them to a profession knowing how to lose, grit, real discipline, competitive, like just an incredible drive. All of these things apply all of them to a profession that you get better at as you get

older, business, medicine. Because here's the wonderful thing. I go to the U S open every year and I was thinking about this. I would rather be Rafael Nadal or Roger Federer. If I could switch spots to be the number one or the number two in the world, I would do that.

But the number five guy, I'd rather be me. Because I get to buy my way into the US Open, and I'm not nervous. I get to enjoy it more than him. And this guy is the number five player in the world. Do you know who the number five player in the world is? No. Neither does anybody else, unless you're super into tennis. So here's the thing.

Find an industry that you get better at as you get older. Don't go into modeling. Don't go into tennis. So here's the thing, find an industry that you get better at as you get older. Don't go into modeling, don't go into sports. I would even say most of the creative industries, most people, that hormone leaves you when you're 30 and you start learning about the world and you stop being a genius. Find a profession you get better at as you get older. Good piece of advice by Scott Galloway. Very nice piece of advice. That's why you took a chance on me like cable news. I did. You're going to see. Cable news. I like your show with Chris Wallace. I like it. Why wouldn't they just reinvent you and have you be Chris Wallace?

I actually like this one better. I'll tell you why I like this one. It feels like a podcast video on video. That's what it has that vibe. So I find it was really fun to make. And some, I was also, and we'll play some later on, have I got news for you, which is showing very strong ratings actually, up 61%.

From 10 people to 16? I'm sorry, go ahead. No, it's doing rather well, Scott. And if you get a sponsor attached, you can do really, I will just tell you, on, for example, I just got all the numbers, we're way up in terms of revenues, and people listening, but the revenues

have gone up quite a bit in the last year. But you're making my point, and I did this chart, which I'm especially proud of. Do you realize we need somewhere between a third and a seventh of the people to reach 100,000 people as any cable news program? Yep, I agree. And so on somewhere between a third

and the seventh of the audience, we can make as much money. And if you get the same audience, which we do as a decent cable show, and you can do it with five people. Do you know how many people it takes? I mean, you see, you go into CNN, DC, every studio, how many, that show you're producing, or you, you go into CNN, DC, every studio. How many, that show you're producing,

or you're gonna do for CNN, how many people do you think touch, or spend a lot of time on that show to produce what is either 21 or 42 minutes of good content? I don't actually know, but it was a lot smaller than before, and that was good, because everyone was really lively.

So a dozen people in the control room, editing, sound, all that shit? Could be, you're right. that shit? You're right. At least. Yeah, you're right. We have more than just a few. And it was really interesting. I mean, he's absolutely right.

On is poised for next year to grow enormously and stuff like that. So you're absolutely right. And we're in a good spot. I like my podcast most of all. Which one? Which one do you enjoy the most? I'm curious. This one.

Yeah, me too. Thanks for saying that. I enjoy this one the most. This one. I agree. I like all the others, though. I really enjoy the others, though. Anyway, let's get to our first big story. President-elect Donald Trump will be picking a new SEC chair. I don't love focusing everything on this Trump picks because some of them are so asinine. Some are okay. But Gary Gensler announced last week he'll be stepping down and leaving the SEC on January

20th at a light of crypto bros everywhere. Trump has yet to reveal Gensler's replacement. This will be a really important replacement, but the pick will likely be someone friendlier to both Wall Street and crypto. Gensler's departure is no surprise to anyone. Bitcoin surged past $98,000. I forget what it is today, but Mark Cuban posted Gary Gensler is leaving the SEC

about two years too late. I believe his stance on crypto was the reason so many young crypto-owning men voted Republican, which is interesting. You know, Mark said, say we're crypto, not agnostic positive, but not like douche nozzle people positive. Mark or us?

So, no, I think we're all in the same place Mark is. I think the counselor really did try. I see why he was doing it, but at the same time he was unusually obstructive. You, I think you talked to him at one of our events about this. So what do you think they should do? I mean, Kamala Harris was much more embracing of it,

but not as much as Trump. So anybody you think they should do? I mean, Kamala Harris was much more embracing of it, but not as much as Trump. So anybody you think, and let me just, I'll get to Scott Besant or however you pronounce it a second, but who should be the head of the SEC? Cause you don't want like this crony capitalism that you might be seeing. Mark Cuban and Elon Musk had had cross purposes with the SEC for many years, obviously. But thoughts. I don't know, I would go, I mean, it'd be nice if you could find someone who's a little bit younger

and a little bit more in touch with some of the new technologies. Keep in mind, you know, no one likes the regulator in both times and everyone blames the regulation or under regulation when shit gets real and people lose their money. Yeah. And so I don't, you know, I'd love to see a guy like David Solomon. I think he understands the markets. I think he's forward looking. But at the same time, it's, this is a long-winded way, Kara, of saying, I don't know.

The crypto thing has garnered a disproportionate, other than Musk, you would argue that as an asset class, no asset class dominated this election in terms of swing voters like crypto. Crypto, there's some wonderful things about it. It has established itself as a tangible asset class, specifically Bitcoin. And visionaries like Michael Saylor, who have defied all odds in terms of corporate governance.

Miami, speaking Miami. Also issued billions of dollars in debt on the backs of the credit worthiness of a company in business intelligence and then went out and bought Bitcoin, which is just fucking crazy. And meanwhile, the stock's up nine and a half fold. I mean, this guy really is a visionary. Yeah. You know, I'd like to see someone who understands these technologies, but at the same time, the SEC, the problem with the SEC is the SEC

is mostly there, it's supposed to be there to protect investors. Now part of protection is not only regulation, but it's also ensuring that the markets are robust and people can make money and embracing risk. And generally speaking, America errs on the side of a lack of regulation such that we can let our horses run.

But the problem with the SEC over the last 20 or 30 years, I would argue I've had a lot of involvement with the SEC because I was an activist investor, is they're supposed to be there to protect investors. They're not. They're there to protect management. And that is they implement all these rules, where if you buy more than 5% of shares,

you have to disclose your intentions. They give management the benefit of the doubt. They basically have been weaponized by management to transfer money from shareholders and the general public to management. And so that needs, that needs to change, but you probably, I would think with the SEC wants someone who understands the law understands innovation because I mean, just slow your roll around the crypto thing, guys, because if all of a sudden these shitcoins come back and you convince a bunch of retail investors

to invest in this thing, you could see a lot of good people lose everything, everything. Right, exactly. So the notion that we just wanna embrace somebody who's just gonna try and, I mean, basically what crypto has said is, just put a guy in there that's gonna figure out a way

to irrationally artificially explode the value of my Bitcoin. And that's again, there's a common thing among cronyism and kleptocracy, and that is do what is ever is required to transfer money from the entrance to the people who don't have money yet to the incumbents that already own this shit. And that's not the way you operate America.

The way you operate America is created a playing environment such that young people can move up the ladder, they can save more than they can spend, and they can start investing in assets at a reasonable price instead of just pumping up the value of every market, housing, crypto, and stocks. Such the incumbents like me get richer and richer. Now, speaking of which,

in this it will be interesting to see who they pick. I think he'll end up picking someone. He seems to be very calm on the Wall Street picks, like, you know, very normal people. They're credible. They're credible. Donald Trump made a flurry of these nominations when we spoke last week. He nominated, the most important was Scott Besant for Treasury Secretary, claiming that Besant will make America rich again.

America is rich, dumb fuck. Just not the right people, right? It's just not everybody. It's just not evenly distributed. It's what William Gibson said about the future. Prosperity is here, it's just not evenly distributed. That's correct. The selection falls in an internal battle

in Trump world that advised their leg into a knife fight that would have been fun with Besant versus Howard Lutnick. Besant was once a protege of George Soros, as we said, was not a negativege of George Soros, as we said was not a negative thing, major Democratic donor, which is a concern for some Trump allies. But like Trump, Bascent favors tariffs and deregulation. I'm not sure how much he favors the tariff part. I suspect deregulation, certainly. He's also been an advocate for blockchain and digital assets, probably in probably a very normal way. Trump seems to be pleasing Wall Street with his choice, but not

sort of Elon Musk who was pushing for Lutnick probably because it can control them more. By the way, Becet would be the first openly gay Treasury secretary. I think that's kind of interesting. We should also point out to be fair. I think the LGBTQ community on a number of levels actually did pretty well in this election. Meaning?

Well, the first transgender woman elected to Congress. Yes, Democrat. Yep. There was a decent amount of victory and progress around the LGBT community in this election. Well, not the laws that are coming, Scott. I mean, again, I'll be living with you in London at some point. It's worrisome for keeping children's stories. Come on over, the weather's fine.

That's a lie. That's a lie. That's a lie. But talk about percent. I think you're wrong about gays and lesbians. I think Sarah McBride seems to be like in class, class act and compared to Nancy Mase, who's a horrible person.

Well, it's double edged because she was elected, right? Yeah. Right, that's right. I have nothing but regard for her. And I like how she's rolling. We'll see how she does. Besant, talk about Besant. Hedge run manager.

And the thing that shocked everybody is that, of course, they think thatcent. A hedge fund manager. And the thing that shocked everybody is that of course they think that Soros somehow is the enemy. He's not, he's very qualified. I like, you need someone. The thing that gives me hope or the respite, the consolation, the silver, not even line, the silver dotted silver line in all of this, is that Trump does appear to think, okay, when it comes to laws, it doesn't matter. When it comes to the Department of Education, oh, it doesn't matter.

But at least he's smart enough to know none of this shit matters if the economy isn't well run. The economy is the mothership. And I would argue their picks and the people they're vetting, including Scott Besant, he's an adult. He understands the markets. He's a very bright guy. So I'm heartened by this pick.

And Nali, you could argue this is the only pick. Typically, in a nod to the other party, they would give someone from the other party, Department of Transportation, just to try and pretend to be bipartisan to try and pretend to be bipartisan, that shit's gone out the window. And they're not only not, not only not bipartisan, they'll pick the fucking craziest person,

as long as you supported me, regardless of how ridiculous your lack of qualifications are. When it comes to the economic, running the economy, I think Trump says, at least he believes, okay, this shit's for real. And regardless of the fact this guy worked for Sor says, at least he believes, okay, this shit's for real. And regardless of the fact this guy worked for Soros,

and I wanna be clear, I know a lot of people who've worked at Soros Fund Management. It's not about their political views. It's about their ability to make money. And that's what he's decided here. He's gone for a brain over politics. So I think this is a great pick. I'm excited about it.

I was much calmed down by this one. And you know, Stephanie Ruhl was telling me this was the guy that was good. There was another one I forget who was. Pam Bondi, as you noted, is Trump's new choice for attorney general. Again, following the lowest bar of all, Matt Gaetz, stepping aside last week should have been no surprise. Bondi is a former Florida attorney general who later served as Trump's defense team during his first impeachment trial. She's worked as a lobbyist with clients including General Motors, Amazon, and Uber. She currently leads a legal arm of a right-wing think tank with ties to the Trump transition team. There was some kerfuffle about her dropping a case against Trump University and getting a $25,000 donation by Trump. She's certainly the more conventional choice, although she seems to be an election

denier. That's what it looks like. And by the way, her brother is an attorney who represented Tesla in the SEC fraud case against the left. These people's interconnectedness is just something to see. It's really something. Again, as you said, she's not as bad as him. So, oh well, here we are. She'll fly right through. But just back to the thing I noticed about the Sun was this morning the stock market opened up four or 500, you know what you're hearing in the markets right now?

A gigantic fucking exhale. They're like, when they said, okay, if they put, I mean, what are they gonna do? But the head of his paper route in charge of Treasury? Nobody liked Lutnick, I'll tell you that. No. I heard terrible things about Lutnick from Republicans, Democrats. They thought he was just a thirsty, a thirst trap for attention and was not qualified.

I think they think this guy is certainly qualified. Anyway, a few. That's right, a few. Anyway, Bonnie, we'll see. She'll pass through. We'll see what she can get done. Before we say goodbye to Matt Gaetz, I do want to share a clip from CNN's Have I Got Used For You, which is a very popular program up 61 percent,

where I was a panelist this weekend. The subject of Gaetz came up, who by the way is on Cameo now, so we can buy one if he wants. We got to do something. We got it. We wish we had him say? The dog and the jungle cat are my favorite. I would love to, I would see just have our, I'd like him to give my 17 year old boy dating advice

and just see what he comes back with. Oh no. Is that wrong? All right, go for it. Is that wrong? Yeah, it is wrong, but it's right. His favorite air hockey table? If that's wrong, I don't want to.

We gotta do something and see if he does it. We gotta think it up. He'll not do it. He's not stupid like George Santos. We wanted, these guys wanted someone to be attorney general who for 500 bucks will... Yeah, we'll say whatever. Anyway. He's so grotesque. He's gonna be on Danthings with the Stars next.

Or maybe he was already. Anyway, I think you'll enjoy the question I asked my fellow panelists and all lesbians, comedians, Amber Ruff and Jenny Hagel, and then there were Roy Wood Jr. and Michael R. Rafferty. I don't see sexual orientation. It doesn't matter to me. In any case, let's listen very quickly. Ladies, isn't Matt Gaetz the kind of guy you dated just before you became gay? Yes. He was the last exit ramp.

He was the one where you're like, if I, oh, let me try. Nope, can't do it. Anyway, it was fun. It was a really, actually it was a very fun show. It does sound fun. It goes on just before Bill Maher. I mean, they're trying to build something fun on

Saturday night and they rebroadcast Bill Maher, which is kind of a good idea. All right, Scott, let's go on a quick break. When we come back, another big week for Blue Sky as threads make some changes, and we'll speak with friend of pivot, Julie Eskelfo, about kids online safety legislation quite a controversial issue.

Support for Pivot comes from Fundrise. Investing in private market real estate is unique. You're not dealing with the yo-yoing whims of the stock market. Instead, you can create consistent income and unlock long-term earning potential. Take the current real estate market, for example. Interest rates are high, demand is low, and so are the prices. It's a situation that Fundrise is trying to make the most of,

which means you can too. The Fundrise flagship fund is a $1.1 billion private real estate portfolio. And right now, Fundrise is looking to expand it. It's a fund that's designed to deliver that long-term earning potential that makes real estate investing so unique. You can get in on a diversified portfolio of some of the tried and true real estate investment strategies.

You can add Fundrise flagship fund to your portfolio in minutes by visiting fundrise.com slash pivot. That's F-U-N-D-R-I-S-E.com slash pivot. Carefully consider the investment objectives, risk, charges, and expenses of the Fundrise flagship fund before investing. This and other information can be found in the fund's prospectus at Fundrise.com slash flagship. This is a paid advertisement. Support for this show comes from Arm. Have you ever thought about the technology that makes this podcast possible? advertisement. to find the AI revolution. That company is called Arm. Arm designs compute platforms

for the biggest companies in the world so they can create silicon solutions to power global technology. Arm became a NASDAQ 100 company in less than a year of its IPO and is proudly NASDAQ listed. Arm touches nearly 100% of the globally connected population.

99% of smartphones are built on Arm. Major clouds run on Arm, as well as all major mobile and PC apps. Now their engineers are tackling the insatiable demand for compute and power efficiency that AI is creating. AI-enabled ARM CPUs are able to provide the compute platform for the global AI revolution in the years to come. But for now, relax and enjoy this podcast.

It's very likely running on your very own ARM-powered device. Visit arm.com slash discover to learn more. Support for Pivot comes from Huntress. Huntress is one of today's fastest growing cybersecurity companies. Its platform is designed from the ground up to work for small to medium-sized businesses and promises enterprise-grade security driven by the technology, services, and expertise you need to defend against today's cyber threats. All at a price that makes sense. Today, it seems like even the most sophomoric hackers can still do a ton of damage to your small business. That's why Huntress built a fully managed, highly sophisticated security platform for its customers to guard against potentially devastating threats. Plus, you can rest assured knowing that the elite human threat hunters running their 24 by 7 security

operations center will offer real protection all day, every day. So if you want cutting edge cybersecurity backed by experts who monitor, investigate and respond to threats with unmatched precision, you can visit Huntress.com to learn more and start your free trial. Scott, we're back. Blue Sky's growth doesn't appear to be stopping with the platform crossing more than 21 million users. It keeps adding a million users a day, while the threads has five times more daily active users than Blue Sky ahead of the election.

That lead has now been reduced to 1.5 times, according to SimilarWeb. So people are really using it. Meta now seems to be feeling the heat, introducing new features suddenly. Oh, competition brings innovation and copying, including custom feeds around topics or people, mimicking Blue Sky's capabilities.

That's an old Meta trick. Let me just tell you, that's a Facebook original. So Blue Sky is still small compared to Threads, quite small, but it's growing fast. Adam Masseri, the head of Instagram, seemed to downplay Blue Sky numbers sharing that Threads has more than 15 million signups in November alone. Agreed. Threads have been seeing a million new users a day for the last three months. Agreed. But it's very exciting that a small little thing is doing really well. I'm gonna just give briefly Blue Sky's financials. Blue Sky was initially launched as a spin off of Twitter

under Jack Dorsey. The company has since cut ties with him. That was interesting, kicked his ass out. Now majority owned by its employees. On the latest episode of On with Kara Swisher, I assembled a panel of experts to talk Blue Sky threads and ex exodus decoders, Neel patel shared was he learned about blue skies financial? prospects from ceo jay graber let's listen very quickly and then i'd love your thoughts on the surge

So i interviewed jay on decoder earlier this year and i asked her i make money this is before the explosion Maybe she has new ideas now but a lot of their ideas are really interesting right she said we're gonna sell people algorithms Maybe she has new ideas now. But a lot of their ideas are really interesting, right? She said, we're going to sell people algorithms. We're going to allow people to compose lists and sell lists. There's some amount of how should we do paid tweets that everybody has in the back of their mind. This should be a native subscription platform.

So I think their idea is to sell user experience and then to build an ecosystem of basically B2B SaaS products where other people want to start blue sky servers. We'll see how it goes. They've got a long way to go. I've been contacted by so many very wealthy people about investing in this thing and very big names

that people I like actually, who are meeting with them and talking to them. So thoughts very first on the surge and then I'll get to the investment soon. You know more about this than I do. I just got on. It's the hottest new product introduction, and I know it didn't happen in 2024,

but this is the hottest new product in tech right now. No doubt. Its user base has gone from 30 million to 23 million in just two weeks. Its daily active usage is now greater than threads. Yeah, it's getting there. It's close. This is the hottest product in tech right now. And what I would ask you, I'll flip it back to you, and it's one simple question, why?

What about it is working? Well, you know, I think it's fun, it's actually fun. And look, I don't think you have to necessarily choose, I like both, I really do like Threads. When Amanda was joking about it, she said, Blue Sky's like the coolest bar you've ever been to, and why are you over at the cheesecake factory? And I'm like, the cheesecake is delicious.

Like, you know, I think that's probably right, a good metaphor. It's better for marketing, threads is better for marketing my stuff, honestly, and actually has a nice vibe too, and it's a little more like Instagram with text. I don't find the really funny videos that I like. I find them on threads much more.

I know it sounds dumb, chopping up food in creative ways or doing cool karate moves. It's a guy who mastering the art of camouflage to disappear in any setting, he's an artist who camouflages and then stands in front of things. I wouldn't have found that on Blue Sky. I would be uncool. So I'm fine with that. But I do like it. They're much funnier people. They are assembling a news forward group of people. A lot of

journalists, a lot of Pauls are coming over. They're replicating that part of Twitter, the news feeling, and that's something that threads had pushed away from, which is now, they're now moving back, letting people choose politics if they want, like politics and news. They were very much against it. And so days later, you'd see things that happened days before. So I think blue skies grab that. And I think that's why they're doing well, because some people like news out of these things. Some people like entertainment out of them.

And so I think, and it feels like old Twitter but not in a toxic way. I don't think it's an echo chamber. By the way, guess who's building the echo chamber? Elon Musk is building an echo chamber over on his service. And to pretend otherwise is ridiculous. I mean, one of the stories that just came out is that how he's minimizing links to stories so that people don't get to see them. He's creating an echo chamber too, and that's what some of these things are.

But I like them both. So let me ask you about the money part though. They've raised $15 million in Series A funding back in October and then there's already interest in a new investment route. Again, I've heard from lots of people. The CEO has said the platform is billionaire-proof because it's not one centralized feed of content.

Again, this echo chamber, I don't know, I think it's a nothing burger, but talk about why you would or would not invest in this. You're talking to a guy who invested in post. Oh, I mean, you're talking to a guy invested in post. Post, yeah. Look, there's social media. Why would you do it to make money? And there is an enormous, the rivers are reversing.

All the money that's gone into traditional media, that the weird thing about media spend is it is arguably the most resilient business in the world. For about 100 years, advertising or media spend or ad-supported media has been approximately one and a half percent of GDP. In a recession, it goes to 1.4 because with a lot of people,

I'll go back here, I got him, Tyler Johnston, the CMO of Dreyer's. He was my first client out of business school from my brand strategy for him profit. We went into a recession, it was 92, and he said, we're increasing our ad spending because this is just as all the bigger players are pulling back, this is a unique opportunity

for us to grab share at a lower price because ad rates have come down. So generally speaking, media spending is incredibly resilient, but it never goes that much greater or that much lower. What's different is where the money goes. Grabs. Oh my gosh, and the amount of capital still up for grab.

You know, we talk about CNN. CNN still does a billion dollars. I mean, there's a lot of money still up for grabs here. And now there's gonna be money up for grabs among the bigger players. And when you have an entity like that, if they raised money at a valuation of 15 million, that probably means it was sub a billion. You don't raise 15 million on a billion. You don't, you don't, you don't issue one and a half percent increase in shares.

That probably means it was at somewhere between 50 and 200 million. Oh my gosh. I mean, I'm immediately thinking this Kara Swisher know this guy, cause I want them to open up the round. increase in shares. That probably means it was at somewhere between 50 and 200 million. Oh my gosh. I mean, I'm immediately thinking this Kara Swisher, know this guy because I want him to open up the round so I can get in. This is- It's run by women, but go ahead. This is a company, they will do, I wish this was predictions day.

They will raise a round, they will announce a round in the next 90 days, if not sooner, at a billion dollars plus. This is the hottest product and the hottest category in the world, and that is a media company that can scale, that has network, network-like scaling ability, and everybody is talking about it. So yeah, why would you invest? So you could make a shit ton of money.

Yeah, I would think so. I think they're trying very hard to make sure that people know people can take their things with them. The CEO was a woman, Jay Graber, has been an advocate of decentralization empowerment. So you're going to get that kind of attitude towards it. It's not here for very heavy privacy rules. They love moderation. They toss people off.

They feel they're creating a whole different thing. Censorship. Oh, stop it. Censorship. Let me spread misinformation. You know who's censoring? Elon Musk. There's story after story today.

I will throttle content that I don't like. That's not censorship. That's correct, thank you. So that's really interesting. And then the COO is a woman. It's a woman run. It's a woman run. But it's not like precious in any way.

Look at us in there, King of the, King of the Woman, Amazonia slash, Subaru Loving slash, isn't that good? The right man wasn't around at the right time. Well, that was wrong. Okay. In any case, you get over there. There's, I'll put you in touch.

I don't know them. I don't know Jay Graber. I just think I like what I hear. It's like, we'll make what we feel like making you fuckers. And if you don't like it, get out of here kind of thing. I like it. You know what I like the best? They were going to make it as a sub-brand of Twitter and Jay refused,

and then it was spun out and then they jumped Jack D'Aversi. That's my favorite part of the whole equation. I love it. I like his- Jack who speaks in those hushed tones- Jack's gotten all strange. ... could easily build the biggest beard oil product in the world. Yeah. I'm going to give you the sense that I give a flying fuck about the world like Sam Altman

because I speak in hushed measured tones. In any case, we love blue sky, it's great. And Amanda, you're right. At the same time, I do like threads. I'm sorry, I'm not going to have to. I don't have to. Things I like, I like. If I feel good after using a product, I like it.

And I know it's Mark Zuckerberg, but I like what they've done there. And I like Reddit. I like there's all these really good products. Yeah, Reddit's, have you seen Reddit's stock price? Yes. Jesus Christ. I know. Isn't that crazy?

Jesus Christo. By the way, who said, whose prediction was that the third most traffic site in America was vastly undervalued at a $5 billion IPO value? Who said that? Scott Galloway. That's right. What's it at now? Fitts tripled. That bitch is tripled. Get us into Blue Sky. Galloway. Get's right. What's it at now? Fits tripled. That bitch is tripled. Get us into Blue Sky. Galloway. Get us into Beast Sky. All right.

Okay. We will do that. I will not do that at all, but let's bring in our friend of pivot. Julie Skelfo is the founder of Mothers Against Media Addiction or MAMA, that's my name with my kids. MAMA is a grassroots initiative working to protect kids from smartphone and social media addiction as well as to keep them safe online. Welcome, Julie.

Good morning. Hi. Hello. How are you doing? All right. So talk a little bit about the organization. There's certainly been a lot of legislation lately and everything else, and this is one of Scott's big topics. So talk, we've talked a lot on Pivot about COSA, the Kids' Online Safety Act.

It was passed the Senate in the summer. It's now stalled in the House. Social media companies have been waging expensive campaigns to gum up the works. At the same time, there are some issues with it. So let's talk about how you started the organization. You modeled against Mothers Against Drunk Driving, I guess, which was formed in the 80s. Yeah.

Well, I'm a long-time journalist. I've been a practicing journalist for 20 years. I used to be a staff writer at the New York Times. Before that, I was at Newsweek. And I basically was what you would call a bad news beat reporter. And I covered youth mental health and unfortunately suicide. And I was watching suicide rates go up and up and up in adolescents. And then these same problems were trickling down to kids at younger and younger ages.

And when suicide became the number two cause of death for 10-year-olds in the United States, you know, I've covered some pretty tough stories in my life, but that really shook me. I'm also a mom, and I'm like, what the heck are we doing? So I realized there was a lot of groups out there doing great work, but that in order to organize parents at scale, we needed sort of a model where millions of us could join together and get our voices heard. So that's MAMA, and we're a grassroots movement of parents fighting back against

media addiction and creating a world where real life experiences and interactions remain at the heart of healthy childhood. And we're focused on building chapters. Right. How many people? Now, Mothers Against Drowning had huge wins, right? They had huge wins all over the place. They had huge wins legislatively, and they also had huge wins in terms of changing the culture, right?

So that's really what we're about, is helping develop new norms, empowering parents to stand up and fight back against all the BS tech hype that we hear from, you know, the finance industry all the time, and give people the power to say, you know what, kids like deserve to be kids and grow up and acquire the basic building blocks of mental health, of social experience, and also the tools they need to be academically successful. You are speaking to the choir here, but talk about COSA, the good and the bad of it, because there was some issues around it.

Are you optimistic that it will eventually pass and become law? And what, if not, what's the most important legislation right now happening? So COSA has to pass by the end of this year. And the reason it has to pass by the end of this year is because it took basically five years of work by hundreds of people. And remember, it's not really controversial at this point.

We had 91 senators try partisan support, pass it. And in the House, it has bipartisan support. It has 64 co-sponsors, 32 Republican, 32 Democrat. The only two people in the country who seem not to want to pass it come from the state where just last week it was announced that Metta's building a $5 billion data processing center. So we're talking about the House majority leader, Mike Johnson, and we're talking about

Steve Scalise, both from Louisiana. So MAMA actually launched a chapter in Louisiana just last week. There's a lot of ticked-off parents there. I mean, it's like the one thing, can't we we all agree on is that we shouldn't exploit children for profit. And most people do agree with that. So I am optimistic that the most critical parts of COSA can get attached to the budget bill, but it's gonna take work.

And I know mama's working on it, members of mama, other groups, we all are expressing to our leaders that we expect this to get done. It's been too long. Scott? So thanks for your good and important work, Julie. So there's a direct, all the studies basically show

the same thing, including the most recent one from Oxford and that is there is a linear relationship between self-harm, anxiety, depression, and use of social media amongst adolescents. And finally, the data has been so overwhelming, it's hard for almost everyone to ignore, anyone to ignore. So if we have bipartisan support, it's not that Mike Johnson and Steven Scalise

are against it, it's that there's an entity behind them telling them to be against it and hiding behind something. Are those entities Apple, Google, Meta, all of the above? Who are the mendacious fucks actually getting representatives to delay and obfuscate this bipartisan race as you said, tripartisan bill? So we mamas try and use polite language, but to talk about the tech lobby, you can see all of the groups you just mentioned are part of it. And even groups like LinkedIn, Pinterest, you know, don't forget that when the age-appropriate

design code passed in California, that the tech lobby sued to prevent its implementation. I was at a roundtable with the first partner of California a couple weeks ago, and the representative of Metta was there. And during the discussion, it was a closed-door discussion, she said, oh, we absolutely know that age-appropriate design is critical to keep kids safe online. And then I said, oh, so, excuse me, does that mean you're going to drop your lawsuit? So you know, we know Issue 1 does incredible research in this space. We know that the tech lobby has spent $90 million in the last three years to block this.

We know that the tech lobby has put out these crazy talking points. They say to everybody on the left, oh, if you pass the Kids Online Safety Act or other legislation it's going to put LGBTQ lives at risk, which isn't true. They tell the people on the far right, oh, if you pass this legislation you're going to block pro-life content and you're going to censor conservative voices. So we now have- And just to press pause, there's nothing about this that would imply any level of content moderation, correct?

Not only is there nothing about it, but you have far-right conservative politicians saying those are tech lobby talking points. Don't listen to them, right? So we know it's a bunch of garbage. It's the duty of care thing, correct? Explain the duty of them, right? So we know it's a bunch of garbage. It's the duty of care thing, correct? Explain the duty of care, right? So a duty of care is like something really simple that says if you're making a product

that's gonna be used by children, we should have a duty of care to make sure kids will be safe on it. Really simple things like privacy settings by default at the most private. It still gives parents choice, right? You're Kim Kardashian, you want anybody in the world to be able to contact your child, be famous, fine, go in and change the settings.

But for the millions of the rest of us, the default settings are the most private, so that you don't have strangers soliciting your 10-year-old daughter for nude photos. Or like we saw on TikTok, where kids, teenagers are being offered money in order to strip, they're being encouraged to create child sexual abuse material. I mean, Scott, you referred to those studies, but it's not even just the studies, the outside studies. We have Metta's own data. They put out a press release on September 12th bragging about all this great stuff they were doing

to decrease the amount of suicide and self-harm content. And in the bottom paragraph of that press release, they acknowledged taking action on 12 million separate pieces of suicide and self-harm content this year, just between April and June. Okay? That's 48 million pieces of suicide and self-harm content just on those platforms. Like what the heck are we talking about here? Right. And let me, in that vein,

Metta announced Instagram teen accounts back in September, also built in privacy features. They also announced a new feature last week to allow users, including teens, to reset their recommendation algorithm. Do you see any movement by them? They're trying, it can feel just a way to cover their ass when it comes to protecting kids. Is it meta that's the problem? They have Instagram, obviously,

which is where more of the younger people are. But then there's TikTok and everything else. What do you think about these teen accounts? Is that them just covering their butt? Again, I think it's like smoke and mirrors, because all of these things that they're introducing are a way of putting the responsibility back onto parents and back onto kids.

It's absurd. We don't ask parents and kids to make sure that cars are safe and install their own seat belts. We don't ask parents and kids to make sure that the food supply is safe and that there's no ground glass in the baby formula. This is a systems-level problem. We need a systems-level solution. And it's not really controversial what needs to happen.

It's just that a few people who are very rich and control these companies and have unlimited amounts of money and now controlled information sources by which most people get their news, they're able to really control the conversation. So that's why we started Mama and that's why so many parents have been, you know, we don't have to convince anybody to join, right? We started this year hoping to be in six states by the end of the year. We're already in 17 states.

I think our waiting list is for 34 or more. We're moving as quickly as we can. But parents have had enough. Yep, Scott? Scott McPherson Let's be, it's, I mean, the reason for this, the thing fueling this is these companies registered about $11 billion a year advertising to people under the age of 18. So this is about money, nothing else.

And what I would ask you is, we were talking earlier, Julie, about the importance of critical thinking. One of these things is not like the other. There's several entities here. There's meta, which gets a disproportionate amount of blame, either deservedly or not deservedly. I've also thought that quite frankly, Tim Cook gets too much of a hall pass because quite frankly, he's more likable.

And then there's obviously alphabet, which also controls, I mean, the operating systems here could age gate. Obviously meta could do a better job of not trying to hide or wallpaper over the research, which indicates that they are in fact depressing teens. Stack rank for us, who you think from best to worst among the big platforms and operating systems have been most, most and least cooperative

trying to figure out a way to keep our children safe? You know, I can't create a hierarchy of who I think is problematic in this space. What I can tell you is that I think we need changes at every single level from all of these platforms. You know, we started MAMA with a three-part mission, parent education, getting smartphones out of schools, and demanding safeguards. And those safeguards need to happen both at the federal policy level and if Congress is

going to continue to be dysfunctional, we are optimistic that our state lawmakers are going to move forward and create policies that keep kids safe. We've already seen that in a number of states. And we also know the devices themselves need to be made safer. I mean, my kids have iPhones. I use the parent controls. I've told Apple how old my kids are. And yet they have an app store that promotes apps that their rating are only for 17 plus, and they're promoting those apps to my 14-year-old. Why are they doing that? You know, we take kids to see a G-rated movie. You don't expect them to show R-rated promos.

You know, so the changes can happen at every single level, and they need to happen at every single level. Well, why not just age gate? Wouldn't a simpler solution just be to age gate, to pass a law that says we age gate pornography, the military, alcohol, marijuana? Why wouldn't we just say no one under the age of 16 ever needs to be on a social media platform?

And if you aren't putting in place the platforms and technology to ensure no one under the age of 16 is in a social media platform, you've broken the law. Wouldn't age gating just be a simpler solve here? I think that is a great solution. I think there needs to be multiple solutions, right? So we're open to a variety of ways of tackling this. But you brought up this question of whether, you know, who's more to blame than someone else? I mean, we want to see products that are safer. We want to see apps that are safer.

We want to see transparency so that when these apps get rated, I mean, who's doing these ratings, right? Are they pediatricians? Are they educators? Are they people who work for the companies? There needs to be transparency so parents know what's going on. And there need to be policies in place to ensure that you can't exploit kids for money. Enough is enough.

One of the things, speaking of protecting kids online, Scott and I always say kids are under overprotected offline and underprotected online. But protecting them is in an offline way. You're also trying to get phones out of school, something that a lot of parents push back against, some do, not a lot. So talk about your argument that parents say phones are necessary for safety. Sometimes when kids are sick and there's always workarounds in these cases. Both Scott and I are big proponents of this.

As someone who has a lot of kids, I want no phones in schools whatsoever. It creates all kinds of distraction. Nobody's looking at each other. This is the place they have community. There's so many like, honestly, I don't even know why they're allowed in schools. Talk about that a little bit. MS. MCENANY Well, you know, I came to this work not only as a journalist, but as someone who studied this weird thing called media ecology. And that was a name that Neil Postman thought of many years ago to look at how different media environments shape human experiences. And when you add a new

technology to the environment, the effect isn't just additive, it's ecological. Everything about the world and the way we understand things really changes. And so as a society right now, I think we're all just completely addicted to the idea that more media and more technology is always better, even though digital technology has advanced to the point that the scale and volume of exposure is literally making us sick. And so Scott brought this up earlier. Like what's happening in schools, it's not just the smartphones, right? We hear from parents all the time that their kindergartners are being forced to use tablets,

that their first graders are being issued Chromebooks. These kids can't even carry an electronic. That's been on for a while. That's been going on. Right. But the volume and the scale of it is displacing other experiences that are critical for kids to grow up in a healthy way. So if the kids are doing math on the screen, they're not getting the building blocks they need to actually understand how math works.

If the kids are interfacing with their teacher, you know, through Google Classroom, I mean, you have the most elite schools in this country all insisting their kids use Google Classroom despite all the problems that exist on Google Classroom and the fact that kids have been able to access porn or information about how to hang themselves through that portal. So, you know, there's real problems here. And the culture change piece of this, the society piece of this, is that all of us need to start thinking differently about this tech. Yes, tech is good for some things.

It's helpful. It can be fun. It can solve certain problems. But it also can take things away. So that's really what we want to see is parents thinking about it differently, educators thinking about it differently, and lawmakers thinking about it differently. What do you say to parents who themselves are addicted to phones? Because that's what I always say, the problem in this room is not the kids, it's all of you.

It's like anyone 30 to 55, like or something, whatever, or beyond. But those don't have little kids. I mean, 100%. I mean, look, you know, we know that we're addicted to, but part of why I felt there was a need for mama and part it's sort of a branding thing, right? Like there's lots of nonprofit groups, but what's the, you know, you can have two white t-shirts roll off the same factory with different branding and one you'll pay five dollars for in a package at Kmart and another one you'll lay out 50 bucks for because it's got a certain brand identity

So, you know putting these Products aside and thinking about them differently so that we're not all just behold into whatever the tech company says Oh, you have to upgrade this this year this product or you're gonna somehow be left behind Is it really gonna make your life better? Sometimes it does sometimes sometimes it doesn't. So you have to think critically about that. Scott, last question. Well, just a two-part question. The first is, how are you funded? And two, if somebody says, okay, I agree with this

and I wanna do something right now, other than crying into TikTok or screaming on Twitter, what could they do right now that would help get COSA passed? Okay, so parents should not cry, they should not scream, they should get pissed. And then they should go to joinmama.org, sign up to be part of our group. We have a form there that they can send with just one click, they can send letters to their elected leaders in the Senate and in the House to explain how urgently they want co-s.

So that's the first thing that they should do. The second thing they should do is either join an existing MAMA chapter or start their own chapter. And the reason that we're organizing this way is because there can't just be one leader of the movement. So the people who are leading MAMA chapters are these incredible array of men and women who are already therapists, they're educators, they're teachers, they're knowledgeable.

I mean, we have a speech pathologist who joined us because she's so tired of the increase in students who need help because they're not acquiring the early building blocks of language the way they need. So don't cry, be pissed, go to joinmama.org and become part of the movement. And the second thing you can do is support us financially. I mean, we were funded with a seed grant from the Center for Humane Technology. We've had other foundations write us checks.

Tristan Harris. Yep, Tristan Harris. So we're still waiting for some of the really biggest philanthropies out there to recognize the urgent need to get tech under control. You know, they haven't connected all the dots. I love me some white papers, but people don't, you know, the average person doesn't want to keep reading white papers.

We started with Rand and Truth Decay. Then there was the Stanford Historian Education Group that warned what would happen if we didn't give people the knowledge to differentiate different types of information quality online. So now we're coming together as mama, and we are giving parents the tools they need to equip their children with the skills that they

have to have to be able to function in a society that's so permeated by media. Can I make a suggestion real quick? I'm on your site. Sure. I want to give money and I have ADD and you're about to lose me. There's no easy way to give money here. Okay well we'll fix it. We're a tiny team, Scott. We were hoping to, like I said. Big button, give now. It's not here. Okay, we'll get on that. That's what Scott says.

All right, by the way, by the way, mama.org is the Medical Alert Monitoring Association. Do you think I haven't tried to buy that website? Oh, I know, they're not giving it to you. Maybe one of it's all white. I was like, board of directors, all white men. I'm like, what is happening here? Yeah, you know, well're not giving it to you. Maybe one of it's all white. I was like, board of directors, all white men. I'm like, what is happening here? Yeah, you know, well, maybe some of your listeners can cough up some cash.

By the way, I haven't paid myself in two and a half years, and I've donated the money to get this started. I just needed to see the change here. And thankfully, a lot of donors are understanding the value, but that's not something we spent money on. I think, I don't know how much they want for that URL, but hopefully we'll have enough to buy it soon. Good luck, good luck, because I tried to get one and I never got it.

So just, you have to work with what you got. Do.net or whatever. Joinmama.org. But you will not take money from tech companies, correct? I will not take money from social media companies. There are just too many parents whose kids have died because of social media, and it would break their hearts, and I don't want their money. I am not anti-tech, and mama is not anti-tech.

So when you refer to tech, that's a very broad thing to say, and I wouldn't say that we'll never take money from any tech company. We are open to working with certain corporate partners that share our values. There's a few out there who remarkably recognize, I shouldn't say remarkably, the erosion of our information environment by all of the social media and so much garbage online. It's really making it hard for companies to do business. I mean, talk to people in marketing, talk to people in advertising. You have blue chip companies that are paying for advertising

on social media and then their ads are showing up next to ads for fentanyl. They're showing up next to ads for naked children. Who wants that? So we really have to clean up the media environment and I think ROM is a big part of that. Well, obviously, MED is one of them, but don't leave Google and Facebook out of the consideration

for problematic companies. Or Apple. Or Apple. I was saying Apple. I meant Apple. We're not. And you know, Karen, Scott, when you're ready to wear your mama hats, I mail them out to you.

I have them. I wear them. My kids were like thrilled with it, mostly because that's what they call me. Anyway, it's a very great organization. Julie, thank you so much. Thanks for your good and important work, Julie. Yeah, I appreciate you guys. Take care.

Scott, I thought you would like that. I do. I do like that. Give them a big, big donation. I like that stuff. Big old donation. Big old donation. I like that stuff. Our kids, I'm really confident.

Unfortunately, my kids had to endure this bullshit. The biggest source of tension and anxiety. Is this true? Yeah, probably. The biggest source of tension and anxiety. Is this true? Yeah, probably. The biggest source of tension and anxiety in my household is the fucking phone. I'm blessed with incredibly healthy, wonderful young men. But occasionally, something's up and our first thing is,

did something happen online? You don't know. Online? You just don't know. Yes. I agree. I am thrilled. Both my kids really did get off all the social media sites. They literally YouTube and Reddit just for watching. But I'll never forget when Louis came to me and I said,

are you on that? He's like, that makes me feel bad. I was like, I love you so much. He just understood that that was the cause of his unhappiness. It just amplified normal teen problems for sure. All right, Scott, one more quick break. We'll be back for wins and fails. Fox Creative.

This is advertiser content from Zelle. When you picture an online scammer, what do you see? For the longest time we have these images of somebody sitting crouched over their computer with a hoodie on, just kind of typing away in the middle of the night. And honestly, that's not what it is anymore. That's Ian Mitchell, a banker turned fraud fighter. These days, online scams look more like crime syndicates than individual con artists. And they're making bank.

Last year, scammers made off with more than $10 billion. It's mind blowing to see the kind of infrastructure that's been built to facilitate scamming at scale. There are hundreds, if not thousands, of scam centers all around the world. These are very savvy business people. These are organized criminal rings. And so

once we understand the magnitude of this problem, we can protect people better. One challenge that fraud fighters like Ian face is that scam victims sometimes feel too ashamed to discuss what happened to them. But Ian says one of our best defenses is simple. We need to talk to each other. We need to have those awkward conversations around what do you do if you have text messages you don't recognize? What do you do if you start getting asked to send information that's more sensitive? Even my own father fell victim to a, thank goodness, a smaller dollar scam, but he fell

victim and we have these conversations all the time. So we are all at risk and we all need to work together to protect each other. Learn more about how to protect yourself at vox.com slash zelle. And when using digital payment platforms, remember to only send money to people you know and trust. Support for this episode comes from AWS. AWS Generative AI gives you the tools

to power your business forward with the security and speed of the world's most experienced cloud. Support for our show comes from Sonos. The holidays are here. Well, maybe not technically, but they're coming fast and we all know we've already hit shopping season and if you're looking for the perfect gift, how about a brand new Sonos speaker? Great to listen to your favorite music or even your favorite podcasts.

We sound great on Sonos. Not only do Sonos speakers deliver incredibly high quality sound, they also went the extra mile to make their speakers look great. But enough talking points. So in sum, if I'm listening to music, the chances are it's coming from a Sonos speaker.

Whether I have this thing I carry around with me, I have these little Sonos speakers that I carry with me, I have a Sonos bar for my TV, I think the world of this company. I know the management team there, they're nice people and I think they make a fantastic product. Whether you're hosting or gifting, Sonos is the easiest way to elevate the season and a smart speaker from Sonos is a no-brainer. Sonos has great gifts for everyone on your list. Visit sonos.com forward slash pivot to wrap up your holiday shopping.

That's sonos.com slash pivot. Okay, Scott, let's hear some wins and fails. You go first today. I'm just doing two wins. I'm feeling good. I'm in Brazil. I'm just doing two wins. I'm feeling good. I'm in Brazil. I have nothing to feel failure about. We talked about the one win blue sky. Competition is great.

One of the things that will help our guests implement better safety rules is competition. At some point, people will have the ability to say to their kids, no, you can only be on blue sky. I'm not sure we're going to be able to keep our kids off of social media. I would like to see age gating, but the second best thing will be competition because someone will raise their hand and go,

here's a competitive positioning. Let's not be awful and have content that results in a greater propensity to self-harm. Somebody will produce a child seat that actually protects their kid from a head-on collision as it's supposed to. So I think competition is great. Blue Sky, we mentioned this,

it's grown from 13 million to 23 million users in just two weeks. Usage is up five-fold in the past two weeks. So this is, that's the biggest win in tech right now. Week on week or month on month, it's Blue Sky. My other win, and I talk about this a lot, I have really embraced the notion of making a huge effort to spend time with guys.

I'm generally a yes to everything right now with the right to counsel. I did it this weekend. My good friend Orlando Machante is literally meeting in Brazil. He's coming from Portugal. Every chance I get now on the back nine as I'm spending time with friends, my kids, my sons, 14 and 17. And this is a good thing. It's heartbreaking, but it's a good thing. They have that hormone coming over them going, dad is just not that cool. And I want to spend more time with my friends,

not him or his friends. And that's great. That's what they should be doing. But I'm reinvesting all of that human capital into brotherhood and comradery. And I'm just having the most rewarding time with friends. And it's nice, you're at this age too. We can kind of count our blessings and talk about our kids

and be more open and more vulnerable with each other. It's a different dimension, it's a different stage of friendship. And with men, when you're in your 20s and 30s, we tend to be much more competitive with each other and trying to outdo each other and signal our success. And we're just sort of like boys. And then it's just nice to get together after our kids or we can

celebrate our kids' victories. We can celebrate how blessed we are. We have, quite frankly, we have a little bit of money to do this shit we couldn't do when we were, when we were younger. And I'm just leaning in so much to male friendship. And my advice is the following. Your friends who you think are busy and important, they may be both of those things,

but they love hanging out with other guys, especially ones they have a history with and they can mock and be mocked and just sort of be kids again with. I'm just having such a good time with my friends and it's so rewarding that we're finally at a stage in our lives where we can really lean into that kind of fraternal. And what I would say to men is if you wake up and you find

out you're one of those guys that's a good person, has some success or not, but you just aren't making much of an effort with your friends, it's not going to happen for you unless you make the effort. And the effort is worth it. May I tell you, you can also be friends with women. Oh, thanks for that. Jesus Christ, Kara, really? Thank you. Just let this hang. Just let this be what it is. All right, okay.

All right, okay. You love your man friends, your man. I always support your posse. Wait, wait a minute, what are you talking about? I'm constantly trying to add to your posse. You can be friends with women. Oh, News 11, really? I'm just saying. Really.

Do you know what the most popular TV show ever was? Friends, where they were a whole group of them. I would like to see them. And I started fucking. I just want to hang out with Ross and whatever his name is. All right. I'm friends with gay men. That's the same thing. My son is going only with guys to go do something after Christmas, going skiing. I highly support it, obviously, and I'm particularly paying for that one.

So is Alex. Can I just tell you one thing, speaking of that? Alex is going with six male friends to Cancun at spring break. How do you think that's going on? That's awesome. Fraternity trip? I know. Yeah. Well, no, it's just his, yeah, he's friends from the fraternity. Yeah. I'm thrilled he's in a fraternity, f-way. Is he going to hang out with my favorite friend,

first name Tuh, second Kiela? I think so. It's important that everyone gets sick and throw up on tequila and not be able to smell it for 10 years, because then you know it was like really bad tequila. And I literally just said, just don't lose your liver.

Like don't like lose. Yeah, that's awesome. I know. I know. So don't say I don't support male things. I mean, my sons go on male trips all the time. Good, good, good, good. I'm just saying to Kelsons.

All right. Oh, positive. I'm sorry, I'm thrilled that both these Gladiator, that Glicket is doing well. Certain movies do hold a mood among people and I think these do. I think they're about, they're also, they're political in their own way, even though these are old, old, Wicked was 20 years ago, so it was Gladiator, the first one, 25 maybe. I think they talk about fighting back against autocracy and unfairness. There's a lot of political messages in them that are, including a lot of Broadway shows that I think are important and I like how they're delivered.

Both of them have a lot, there's a really good Slate article talking about how much they have in common. There's also things in common in these movies that I think are good to be reminded of, which is sort of individually fighting for your freedom. I just think, and I don't want, they're just fun too, but there are those elements in them that I think are beautifully delivered, especially by Paul Miscael and Cynthia Revo. I think they deliver them and are really strong and both entertaining and also important. So I like those and I'm going to stick by Glick it no matter what Scott says to me. And then negatively, this is just since special counsel

Jack Smith has asked the judge to dismiss the federal election interference charges against Donald Trump, largely because he wants to dismiss it, though, without presidents acknowledging that Justice Department policy prohibits prosecuting a sitting president. If she does that, then they can later bring charges against him after his second White House term. And then the thing is he could pardon himself, which nobody's ever done, but he does a lot of things nobody's ever done. And so it's sort of like, oh, he just bought himself, get out of jail free card.

And that's kind of gross to me. And I hate to say this, but the American public bottomed that card. That's correct. That's correct. That's right. He got himself one, but I will have to, um, again, story after story about non landslide, but I'm not going to go into it with you anymore. I'm not arguing the point. Um, but yes, he got himself one, but I will have to make him look, again, story after story about non-landslide,

but I'm not gonna go into it with you anymore. I'm not arguing the point, but yes, he did. I'll talk about it on my next guys trip. Okay, shut up. In any case. And you can talk about it on your new CNN show. Nobody's watching. I have gals and guys on my show.

Nobody's watching. Because I have transcended you. Anyway, I find this, it feels so crony, it feels so Russia, this stuff feels so Russia, the brologarx, the getting off- Brompharx. That's a- Brohemian Rhapsody. Brohemian Rhapsody.

Brologarx is in the Atlantic. There's a very good story about called the brologarx. I find them, I think this crony capitalism is giving me the shakes, I have to say. And that's what this is. It's crony capitalism that you advance, like whatever Brendan Carzine, I'll help Elon and hurt George Soros. Maybe they did this before in The Quiet, but it's grotesque in the public, I'll tell you that.

It's grotesque. And they're all such thirsty fucks that I don't know what else to say. Anyway, that's my feeling on that. I feel bad for law. Anyway, okay, Scott't know what else to say. Anyway, that's my failing on that. I feel bad for law. Anyway, okay, Scott, you've got to go. So we want to hear from you. Send us your question about business tech or whatever's on your mind.

Go to nymag.com slash pivot to submit a question with Joe or call 855-51-PIVOT. I'd also like to invite our listeners to join me for a special live recording of On with Kara Swisher presented by ELF ELF Cosmetics on December 3rd in New York City. I'll be chatting with 2B CEO Anjali Sood at the Whitney Museum. It's going to be a great conversation. I'm really interested in 2B.

Fancy. I know. I like 2Bs. Interesting. For tickets, visit voxmediaevents.com slash ELF. ELF. That's voxmediaevents.com slash ELF.F. That's voxmediaevents.com slash elf. Hope to see you there. Okay, Scott, that's the show. Have a happy Thanksgiving. We're gonna be off for Thanksgiving.

What are you doing? Oh, that's right. Yeah, what are you doing? I'm thankful for you, Kara, and the opportunities you presented. Thanks very much. I feel the same way about you and your little broligarcs, I do.

For more, please read us out and have a great time in Brazil. Today's show is produced by Lara Neyman, Zoe Marcus, Taylor Griffin, and Christine Driscoll. Ernie Drutat engineered this episode. Thanks also to Drew Burrows, Mia Severio, and Dan Shulon. Nishat Kuruha is Vox Media's executive producer of audio. Make sure you subscribe to the show wherever you listen to podcasts.

Thanks for listening to Pivot from New York Magazine and Vox Media. You can subscribe to the magazine at nymag.com slash pod. We'll be back next week for another breakdown of all things tech and business. Support for this episode comes from AWS. AWS Generated AI gives you the tools to power your business forward with the security and speed of the world's most experienced cloud. Autograph Collection Hotels offer over 300 independent hotels around the world, each exactly like nothing else.

Hand selected for their inherent craft, each hotel tells its own unique story through distinctive design and immersive experiences, from medieval falconry to volcanic wine tasting. Autograph Collection is part of the Marriott Bonvoy portfolio of over 30 hotel brands around the world. Find the unforgettable at AutographCollection.com