Pivot - Colleges Push Back, Ozempic Price Promise, and White House vs. Anthropic

Episode Date: October 21, 2025

Kara and Scott discuss more schools saying no to Trump’s college “compact,” the No Kings protests, and the AWS outage. Then, Trump’s promise to slash Ozempic prices sends GLP-1 stocks tumbling. Plus, AI czar David Sacks picks a fight with Anthropic over AI regulation — and Peter Thiel warns of the Antichrist. We're going on tour! Get tickets at ⁠pivottour.com. ⁠Watch this episode on the ⁠⁠⁠Pivot YouTube channel⁠⁠⁠. Follow us on Instagram and Threads at ⁠⁠⁠@pivotpodcastofficial⁠⁠⁠. Follow us on Bluesky at ⁠⁠⁠@pivotpod.bsky.social⁠⁠⁠ Follow us on TikTok at ⁠⁠⁠@pivotpodcast⁠⁠⁠. Send us your questions by calling us at 855-51-PIVOT, or email ⁠[e-mail] Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Support for the show comes from user testing. You can stop with the guessing, because with user testing, you can test anything and learn everything from the people who matter most, your audience. Whether it's an ad campaign, a website prototype, or a brand new product feature, user testing helps you see and hear real reactions in just hours, not weeks. That means no guesswork and no wasted effort, just insights you can act on right away. Teams use user testing to move faster, make smarter decisions, and craft experiences people truly love. people, real reactions, real fast. Learn more at usertesting.com slash pivot. This episode is brought to you by Peloton.

A new era of fitness is here. Introducing the new Peloton Cross Training Tread Plus, powered by Peloton IQ, built for breakthroughs with personalized workout plans, real-time insights, and endless ways to move. Lift with confidence, while Peloton IQ counts reps, corrects form, and track. your progress. Let yourself run, lift, flow, and go. Explore the new Peloton cross-draining tread plus at one peloton.ca. Is it the matcha, or am I this energized from scoring three Sephora holiday gift sets? Definitely the sets. Full size and minis bundled together? What a steal. And that packaging? So cute. It practically wraps itself. And I know I should be giving them

away, but I'm keeping the summer Fridays and rare beauty by Selena Gomez. I don't blame you. The best holiday beauty sets are only at Sephora. Give sets from Summer Fridays, Rare Beauty, Way, and more are going fast. Get full-sized favorites and must-have minis bundled for more value. Shop before they're gone, in-store online at Sephora.ca. Okay, you said short story. Go ahead. Oh, my God, you're still...

Okay. Oh, my God. Where is this calling? Hi, everyone. This is Pivot from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network. I'm Kara Swisher. And I'm Scott Galloway. Guess where I am?

I like this game. Where are you? Las Vegas. Your favorite place, Vegas. What are you doing in Vegas? Oh, I'm giving a speech at a place you gave a speech at. I can't remember this, Stansbury. Anyway, I'm here to talk about AI, of course,

because that's the topic de jure of many of these events. Nice. I didn't do anything in Vegas last night. I went to sleep, and I watched the diplomat before that. That's what I did. Oh, really? The entire evening, yes. I love Vegas.

How does it feel? Mm-hmm. To what? Well, I mean, how does the mood? People say Vegas is dying because, people now have Vegas in their pocket with their phones and people have less money. You know, it was full. You know, I'm at AID at the, I guess it's the win, the one with all the trees that hang down.

You know how big is better than I do. But I'm staying at the Encore, that whole facility. And it was packed. I was surprised. It was very jolly. Although it wasn't, I wouldn't say the casino was packed, that's for sure. But it wasn't like unful, I guess. I don't know.

Is this the time of year for a day? be full? I think Vegas is pretty much a year-round place, I know, conventions and everything. Right. I've only been here at like CES, so it's always full. It's not like that, like, by any means like that whatsoever. I used to go there. My friendly Lotus and I would get ridiculously fucking high and decided at 2 a.m. that it was a good idea to go to Vegas, and we jump in his Volkswagen Jetta. Yeah. And head for five hours to... Cross the desert. To Vegas. Across the across the desert, and we'd stay at the golden nugget because they had this buffet for $9.99, you could basically eat for a good, you know, enough for a day or two.

Yeah. And we would always put $5 in the glove box, so we had enough gas to get home because we knew we'd lose all our money. Oh, and did you? Oh, yeah, that's part of the fun. Yeah, I was going to go out and bet last night, and I got tired, and I loved Kerry Russell, so. So I always used to, with Vegas, I would take my mother's boyfriend's cardigan because it was really, really plod. and nice, and I thought it made me look older. They let you in here.

They let like a 10-year-old in here, wouldn't they? I mean, they're kind of like. They're much more strict now. I think back then they would. Now they're very, they're very strict. My favorite was, there was a casino called Circus, Circus, to be family-friendly. Yeah, yeah, that's right.

Actually, I was, oddly enough, I texted Amanda, and I said, we're going to California for Christmas, we have like a couple of days, and it's either go to, like, L.A. and go to, like, a theme park, or I was like, why don't we come to Vegas and watch the Wizard of Oz in the sphere with the kids or something like that, literally. And she didn't reject the idea because she's never been to Vegas. She didn't totally reject the idea.

It's the best place in the world for 36 hours, and on an hour 37, it turns into the worst place in the world. Yeah, I thought we'd be kind of fun. Go to the buffet, and the kids would, like, it's so weird and strange. I thought they would enjoy it for, like, a short time. And it's so, you know, it sounds dumb, but it's kid-oriented because there's all the noises and things. And, you know, like, it's sort of a nursery school for adults, I guess.

I don't know. It's also Vegas is, and I know this firsthand, it's actually a wonderful place to retire because my mom, as you know, retired there during the middle of the week, say on a Tuesday or Wednesday, you can go see, you know, the Abba show or Cirque de Soleil and a dinner for like 14 bucks. Yeah. They have all these local resident discounts on their off nights. And, you know, you basically can see world-class theater concerts and they have very high on food for a pretty low cost of living.

It's actually, and it's the desert, which old people like. It's actually a really nice place to retire. Yeah, and plus strippers, right? I mean, you know. Yeah, well, no, I wouldn't know about that. I didn't do that. I used to go to that.

Yeah, I lost contact with her after 20 years, about a year ago. What's the club, the stripper club? Spirman Rhino. Yeah, that's where all the CES guys went, and I went to, and I ran into them, and they'd lose their minds when they'd see me in the strip club.

It was very funny. I haven't been to a strip club in 20 or 30 years. I have a general rule. I don't eat fast food or go to strip clubs in the city I live in. Okay, all right. Well, we can do it on every night in the tour and stuff. Yeah, that's not going to happen, Kara.

Anyway, I'm in Vegas, I'm leaving. I'm going to Korea this week. Korea? I'm going to Korea. She had to stop this. Why are you going to Korea? It's for the secret show, for the secret show. Oh, God.

It's the last episode. Oh, that's the Korea's where I know a bunch of women who take trips to Korea to look, not look Korean, but to look younger. I guess Korea, they're obsessed. with beauty and they're very good at it. Yeah, yeah, they are. So we're going to do a little bit. They're also one of the most aging populations

in the country that's doing the most about it. Like, I'm going to be in an ex-ectoskeleton or whatever. But they're planning a lot for their aging population in a really interesting way. So they're bringing you over to inspire young people to start having sex? I miss the gap there. I miss the connection.

Anyway, I'm going to put some shrimp semen lotion on my face. That's what I'm doing. and I'm going to bring some back for you. You know, there's a component of that that is appealing, but it's not. Yeah. Yeah, I'm not even going to go there. I feel like you're giving me so many softballs here. I'm giving them to you.

I'm throwing them up and you're not taking shrimp semen. You could do nothing with shrimp semen? That is not the facial I imagine nor want to see. All right. Okay, scallop semen. I don't know. They're going to have like all kinds. There's always the word semen in their, in their facials.

Yeah. I'm excited. I suppose only one in 20, it's one in 20 or one in 200, some scary low number of Koreans is going to have a grand kid because of basically as women, as women get more economically viable and quite frankly get smarter, more educated, they decide this whole kid thing kind of sucks for me and they stop having children. And essentially, that book in the 70s had said that the world was going to collapse on itself and that there was going to be a population bomb. Well, the bomb exploded, except it didn't explode, it imploded, and we're having trouble figuring out our Western nations and democracies maintain population growth. And the percentage of young people to old people is just shrinking every year. Right, which is why, hence, Kara's going to Korea to talk about.

Yeah, and old people of this habit of voting themselves more money, and before you know, young people are 24% less wealthy than they were 40 years ago as they are in the U.S., and old people are 72% wealthier, and our society is kind of turning upside, and young people have no hope. Okay, Elon. Got it. No, I'm kidding. No, I'm going to talk about this topic, and this is the topic.

This is the topic. Anyway, last time I was there, I was with Walt when we were deciding where to have our Asia conference, and Korea, we considered Seoul for a minute. I really do like Seoul, though. I don't know how many times you've been there, but I really like it a lot. Yeah, I haven't been there, and I haven't been there since business school. I'm kind of curious to go back and check it out. I'm going to get on a bullet train, you know, things like that.

It should be fun. Before or after, you've got to. Facial. All of it. All of it. I'm going to do. This is literally like, Korea. This is like a 12-step method to get me to stop watching you porn as I type in facial and I see you in Korea.

It's literally, okay, that's it. No more porn. I'm done. I'm cured. Anyway. I'm cured. I'm one of those people that doesn't drink and doesn't watch porn. This is the endless taping of TV.

I say you're paying. Speaking of people are abstain, I was, I met, I met. Literally, the woman of my dreams right after I moved to New York, I'm going to say her name because she's really a cool woman. Her name was, I'm Olivia Shantakai. This will get to her, and she will absolutely freak out. And she had a cosmetics line. She was smart. She was funny. She was spectacular. And I was in full-blown douchebag moot. Because you had hair. I had bought a house in the Hamptons with a sand beach volleyball court, which gives you a sense of the mode I was in. You're like a sex in the city character. I buy the house in the Hamptons. I am just optimized. I have a place in my Miami. I'm just optimized for the random sexual encounters that did not materialize me. Anyways. And I met this woman, Olivia, at a party, and I worked it so hard. I would find out, I would try to accidentally be at a party she was at. I lay on a little of the dog charm, a little, like,

reticent humor. And I had this whole rap about I was a professor and whatever. I was trying so hard. And finally, finally, I get her to go out on a day with me. And we went to this place, this is how clueless I was, we went to this place called Blue Water Grill, which might as will be like a corporation exploding into a restaurant because I didn't know where to take her. And we sat down and we started talking and the guy came over and he said, can I give you guys something to drink?

And I said to her, yeah, I said, I'll have a, yeah, I said, what would you like to drink? And she said, I don't drink. And literally instinctively, I go, it's not going to work. It's not going to work. You said that? Oh, yeah, I'm like, it's not going to work. She's like, what?

And I'm like, it's not going to work. We can be friends, but it's not going to work. And she's like, what? And I'm like, imagine this coming at you so. It's just not going to happen. It's just not going to happen. I've never dated a woman who doesn't drink. Oh, well, we never will date them.

So, who knows? If I had, me and Olivia, it could have been a great romance. Oh, my God. Where is this calling? So no drinking. No, I just can't date anyone that doesn't drink. It's just like, I have no interest. Well, your wife likes to enjoy the, enjoy herself.

She has a good time with her team of ladies. She's funny. Who's this? Your wife is fun. Your wife is a lot of fun. Oh, yeah. She's in the midst of a midlife crisis that puts everything. No, she's not.

She's having some fun. Let me just, let me just dial you into what happens when women hit a certain age. They were, they had their hot 20s, and they gave up their hot 20s because they got basically, guys found them and started procreating with them. And then they had the mess of kids. And then all of a sudden they wake up in the late 30s, early 40s, and they're like, oh, my God, I'm losing my hotness. My eggs are dying. I got to go fucking crazy. They go to music festivals.

It's called having a life. They hang out with younger men. They, like, go, they experiment with drugs. The midlife crisis of a woman in her late 30s, early 40s is the most underreported explosion of hormonal loss fear. Oh, my God, they go crazy. The guys, like, I don't do this, but when their husbands get together, they go golf and are in bed by 7 p.m. Yeah, that's true. And then, you know, talk about their gout and how much it sucks to get older and tax avoidance.

That's our big topic. And the women are out till, I'm not exactly, they're out till 6th in the morning. Yeah, I know. Your wife's a lot of fun. I went to sleep when we were all together, and they were all out, doing it, running around. Anyway, anyway, all right, we've discussed partying because I'm in Vegas when I did none of it in any case.

But we've got a lot to get to today, including Anthropic and David Sachs fighting over AI regulation in colleges pushing back against Trump, which is really interesting. I can't wait to hear your take. But first, almost 7 million people gathered to take part in no king's protest this weekend around the country. Over 2,700 events took place in 50 states.

The protests were peaceful with no arrests, no arrests being made in cities like D.C. and New York, which drew obviously the biggest crowds. Some sign highlights. Real clowns would run things better. I like taters, not dictators. Tylannol is safe from the tyranny. You sucked in Home Alone, too. Mike Johnson blocked me on Grindr, and, of course, Groper Cleveland. GOP lawmakers are calling the movement a hate America rally. Still, I think they won't stop and claiming it's a political cover for shut down. It looked pretty jolly to me. Of course, as usual, President Trump tried to suck up the oxygen in the room by posting an AI-generated video, dipitium-dropping feces, and what was just a poop? A big giant diarrhea from a fighter jet onto protesters. A lot of the mainstream you wouldn't say that that's what it was. I mean, I think it was just a distraction because

he didn't get any attention. Turnout was impressive. I don't know if it does much, but it was really quite amazing. It was like, that's a lot of people. And again, it was peaceful and seemed lovely and a good organizing thing, I suspect. Any thoughts? I think it's really important. I think that, you know, I was go back to World War II, and that is what was so disappointing about World War II initially was that so many people seemed to enable it or look the other way. And then the pushback by Americans, obviously Europe had an existinguished. threat that this guy was invading them. But America did have real controversy over whether to reenter Europe for the second time after they'd paid such a terrible cost in the First World War,

and a lot of people didn't really understand why that was our war, and we're about to do it again. And ultimately, their decision to move into the war was kind of a vision of FDR that, like, this will hit our shores eventually. And they weren't as much pushing back on anti-Semitism. Really, they weren't pushing back on anti-Semitism. And they were pushing back on fascism. And this is, in my view, America has become very fat and happy and lazy and has taken its prosperity, its alliances, and its freedoms for granted because the majority of us have been raised in an error where those things continue to get better. And so the natural assumption is it couldn't happen here and it'll keep getting better. And I think for the first time Americans are thinking, or first time in a while, are thinking, okay, maybe that isn't it guaranteed right. And the best summary of it to encapsulate, I think,

well, at least how I feel about it is the following. The No King's protest isn't about hating America, but about loving it enough to defend it. For generations, Americans have stood up when power grew too big, when truth got twisted, or when leaders forgot they served the people. This is one of those moments that defines who we are as Americans. We will stand together peacefully, not to divide the country, but to remind it who we are. And that's from this great philosopher, Eric Theodore Cartman from South Park.

So, but he said, I thought it just kind of perfectly encapsulated the moment. So to be clear, I'm not sure if that was AI. I did some research. And some people have attributed that quote to Heather Shreve Bueller. But regardless, it's a wonderful, it's a wonderful quote. And this stuff is important. And people say, well, I agree that, you know, these protests are better when there's a specific action required. But I think that when you saw those videos yesterday in your feet on social, you realize Americans are upset.

Americans are prone to action. Americans will take the time to give up their Saturday and put together a sign. The Americans on this side, it always comes across as a little hippie-dippy and a little bit like Mother Jones and Cynthia Nixon and with kombucha, you know, which I don't, you know, they come across. I don't think this one did, but go ahead. No, this one was less of that. It felt is very positive, very solid. There were some videos that really bothered me. The video flying around the Internet that really upset me was of that idiot who gets tripped

and hurts his face. And a lot of progressives are celebrating it and calling it karma. I don't think that's good for us or the nation. No. I saw a lot of people in inflatable animal costumes, which I thought. That's hilarious. That's what going on all over the cities. I like those means.

You know, lots of my friends who went, they said it started. I had the kids yesterday, or the day. the day of March. Several people said it started off kind of lefty, but then as the day grew, it was sort of all kinds of people and much more sort of people like moms and daughters and fathers and sons and stuff like that. And they said it seemed, it was seemed like very, like lots of different people. They were struck by. They go, you know, more than one or two protests every now and that are Marches. And so I thought, I thought the photos were amazing. And again, they did a lot of really good stuff on social around the contrast between Trump's military parade, if you recall

that kind of loser of a parade, and that. And it seemed, it didn't seem festive is the wrong word. It seemed, it didn't seem positive. It seemed positive. Yes, that's right. Yeah. And I thought it was like, it's great for, I bet they collect lots of names. You know, it sort of gets people energized for the fight. And then, of course, Trump had to do a stupid thing. And I think, honestly, just so weird. It was so weird to do that and thinking it's funny when you're, you know, a 79-year-old man. And I'm sure, part of me feels like the fact that he did a pooping thing, right? An elderly man to do a poop thing, either it's sort of self-harming himself by posting it or else whoever working for him is doing some brutal trolling of him.

I just thought it was such a weird selection. It's just more the same. It's just a total lack of respect for Americans if they don't agree with you. and, I don't know, trying to, and again, it's effective because we're talking about it, and it enters the new cycle. Well, actually, it enters the new cycle, but, like, all his little minions did one, too, of him not leaving office or him as a king. And I keep thinking, these people are, like, you know, 60, 52, 79.

Like, this is, like, you act like a, like a badly behaved seventh grader who no one he likes. I don't. It's just, people like that. I guess. I don't know if people like the poop thing. I don't think anybody like, I mean, maybe if you're 12, I guess. But, well, I doubt they did. Anyway, it was very impressive, and the media should have covered it more because I thought it was really lovely.

Now, as of this recording, six colleges have rebuffed the Trump administration's so-called compact for academic excellence in higher education ahead of the White House deadline. The agreement offers special access to federal funding in exchange for schools agreeing to a set of demands, including eliminating race and sexist factors and admissions and capping international enrollment. MIT, Brown, Penn, USC, UVA, and Dartmouth have all said no, arguing the deal would undermine free speech and academic independence. The White House initially approached nine universities and is now reaching out to more schools after a wave of rejections. Really interesting, I think, really interesting that they're doing this. I don't know as much about it. How did you feel about this as someone who's, you like some of it, but I think overall the government is getting its dirty myths and things that is none of their business. Yeah, some of it, I mean, some of it sort of come, it's not even what's in there. It's, it's, that's not important. What's important is whether or not the federal government should be threatening to withdraw funds unless they sign up to a series of standards, some of which include what sort of distills down to thought control or who you hire. And I think the majority of it could be, or a lot of it could be perceived, freeze tuition, although that's basically a price control, that's socialism. But who you hire and who you let in.

That sort of, I don't know, I have some issues with that, reducing the number of international students. I mean, just to riff on that for a moment, we keep talking about bringing American jobs back, and there is, there are few. For every 1% decrease in international enrollment, we lose a billion dollars. And that is, imagine, just to highlight how stupid, fucking stupid these tariffs are, international trade, wildly is asymmetrically beneficial towards us. We sell a Nvidia GPU hopper at $100,000. It's $55,000 of operating profit times a PE of 40. We get $2 trillion in market value. Mercedes sells in $100,000 Mercedes at 10% of operating margin trading in a multiple of eight. They get

$80,000 in shareholder value. And another great example of how asymmetric and beneficial to us are international trade is, there will be a small number of students, although it will triple or quintuple this year of American kids who decide to go to Instituto Impressa and Madrid. And they will spend money. They will spend their American dollars

and their parents' American dollars in Spain, which will grow the Spanish economy. We get hundreds of thousands of not millions of kids and families who come here. And at NYU, they're spending about $280,000 in tuition over four years. They're renting $3,000, $7,000 apartments.

They're buying Chipotle every goddamn day. And then there's the soft power if they like Americans, and they stay in contact with them when they go back to run the economic ministry of El Salvador or wherever. It says that it is so much high margin revenue for us and to discourage foreign students by putting a cap on the number that can come here, they're looking at it the wrong way, and that is the University of North Carolina says, okay, we're going to give you $650 million, but you have to let in 82%.

Now, what they should do is just expand the top line number with their endowment and let in more kids. But anyways, I don't mind that. What they need to do is the following, in my view. And I had dinner on Thursday night with the chancellor of UCLA, Huluo Frank, who's a really impressive guy. And I won't speak to the specifics of the conversation. My view is the first thing they need to do is coordinate, and that is they need to hold their tongues and elect a couple presidents of these universities to represent them all and then stand around

the fire, hold hands, and say, whatever this group decides, we are going along with. because how they lose is to be divided. To be pulled off one by one, yeah. That's exactly right. UCLA says, we'll take the money, and SC says, no, that's an authoritarian's playbook. You go along with me, I'll make you super rich. You don't go along with me. I'll illegally punish you.

The first thing is coordination. The second thing is litigation, because a lot of this is just wrong. A lot of this is, so they're trying to interpret visa rules arbitrarily, and there's a president, And there's the presidents against that at legal decision, the 2022 DACA rescission. There's constitutional protections here. The First Amendment against compelled speech or ideological litmus test for faculty or curricula. That's a violation of the First Amendment. The Tenth Amendment, spending clause, the federal funds are conditioned on political compliance.

They could file in sympathetic jurisdictions. They also need to weaponize, and they haven't done this, their alumni to make financial commitments such that they have the financial wherewithal, at least in the short term. Harvard is up, right? Harvard is actually up in donations. Well, also, the schools that have immediately pushed back here, it's no accident. They're the ones with the largest per capita or per student endowments because they can afford to push back. And then state level counterweights. They could have legislative shields, attorney general lawsuits, parallel funding.

And some, they need to use the courts, coordination, inspiration around fundraising, and litigation to delay this bullshit. But they all need to speak with one voice. It seems like. It seems like. I don't know who the others, the nine are. that's one, two, three, four, five of them. All of them should be part of this. They should be speaking with one voice.

It's sort of like the Pentagon thing last week. Just stop it. And also, I think they should go gangster. We have universities are a corrupt cartel. They have this enforcer of the corruption, which is the accreditation. There's a board made up of the incumbents that accredits universities. And you need accreditation, otherwise you don't qualify for federal student loans. And it's just insane.

They don't allow new universities. They don't accredit new ones. So what do you know, universities have not grown. They are not adding additional universities. Students are actually, there's a bit of a birth earth. There's a chill over international students. They think international applications from international students are going to go down 20 to 40%.

And for every student that comes here to a private university, that's literally probably like, let's think about it. That's probably $400,000 or $500,000, say the average family spends $15,000 when they come to America. It's like 20 or 30 families not coming here to go to Disneyland in Universal Studios and see the Grand Canyon. It's just really fucking stupid. It's a huge. And in addition, our PhD students, and I've gone on about this forever, we attract the best and brightest to make our weapons, our chemotherapy, our pharmaceuticals, our internet applications would spill over into huge job growth. So this is just, I mean, in addition to the economic end of it, this is the bottom line.

the accreditation institution should be in the enforcer here and say, we're speaking with one voice, bitch, and if you decide to go make a side deal with your buddies and the administration, yeah, maybe you're even legally complied. But we're going to make it hard for you to get accredited next year. Universities need to go a little bit gangster here and speak with one voice. Otherwise, they will be picked off one at a time. Very briefly, will they do that? No, because they're all administrators, and they lack the type of leadership. Okay, I don't want, a leader needs to emerge. A leader needs to emerge. Like, there's some very innovative people that I don't know who the new president of UVA is. I really think the president of Harvard has done a decent job. There needs to be, there needs to be a leader who steps up and says, calls all of them and says, we either fall together or stand together.

And you may have your own views on which parts of this you like or don't like. And there's a very solid argument for saying, I represent USC, so I'm going to have a dialogue. And this is what happens. The first university that cracks and agrees will get more, won't have to give up that much, and then they're going to come back for even more to number two. So they absolutely need to stand together. Right, right, right. I made it, I was like, in six schools out of nine.

But I agree. It is kind of ridiculous. And they keep winning legally. So it seems like, you know, I think the proclivity of a lot of these places. And then we're going to move on is let's just talk. Let's not fight. Let's talk. Yeah, let's dialogue.

Let's dialogue. That's what we do. It's typical. And so that's where they're getting it. And I thought, again, with the reporters the Pentagon did, I don't know what the result of that. We're just not going to agree. And then the people that agree are a motley, cruel, or shitty, whatever, not even journalists at the Pentagon. And they look ridiculous.

And I think in this case, if they stand together, as the Trump people typically fold, that's always seems to be their thing as they push and push. And then it's taco. It's essentially Taco Tuesdays. Okay, Scott, let's go on a quick break. We come back. This is an interesting story. Anthropic becomes a White House target.

Support for the show comes from Delete Me. Right now, the headlines are chalkful of data breaches and regulatory rollbacks, making us all vulnerable, but you can do something about it. Delete Me is here to make it easy, quick, and safe to remove your personal data online. Delete Me does all the hard work of wiping you and your family's personal information from data brokers' websites. You can sign up and provide Delete Me with exactly what information you want to delete it and their experts take it from there.

And Delete Me is always working for you, constantly monitoring and removing the personal information you don't want on the Internet. I've used Delete Me many times and I have to say, as always, I'm shocked by how much stuff I found out about myself on the internet. A lot of it inaccurate, but a lot of it accurate and brought together in ways that seemed really disturbing. See why wirecutter named Delete Me, their top pick for data removal services. Take control of your data and keep your private life private by signing up for Delete Me.

Now at a special discount for our listeners. Get 20% off your DeleteMe plan when you go to Join DeleteMe.com slash pivot and use the promo code Pivot at checkout. The only way to get 20% off is to go to Join DeleteMe.com slash pivot and enter code Pivot at checkout. That's join deleteme.com slash pivot code pivot. Support for the show comes from Sacks Fifth Avenue. Sacks Fifth Avenue makes it easy to shop for your personal style. Follow us here and you can invest in some new arrivals that you'll want to wear again and again.

Like a relaxed prodig blazer and Gucci loafers, which can take you from work to the weekend. Shopping from Sacks feels totally customized from the in-store stylist to a visit to sacks.com where they can show you things that fit your style and taste. They'll even let you know when arrivals from your favorite designers are in or when that Brunella Cuccinelli sweater you've been eyeing is back in stock. So, if you're like me and you need shopping to be personalized and easy, head to Sacks Fifth Avenue for the best follow rivals and style inspiration. Support for this podcast comes from Zeta. Marketers have been juggling too many tools for way too long. But imagine a world where all your marketing and advertising work together.

No silos, no wasted spend, just smarter growth. That's what Zeta makes possible. Zeta is a marketing platform that unifies both paid and owned channels in one system. This helps eliminate duplication, wasted spend, and slow execution. With Zeta, there are no more silos just accelerated growth. The Zeta marketing platform is an AI-powered solution that unites both owned and paid channels together in a single system, giving CMOs and CFOs a measurable path to predictable, profitable customers. So you can forget about the days of relying on third-party cookies,

as Zeta is built on first-party data so you can have reliable foundation for your, your marketing growth. Zeta is the AI marketing cloud, the platform that unites paid and own channels into one system giving CMOs and CFOs a measurable path to predictable and profitable customers. To learn more about Zeta services, go to ZetaGlobal.com slash pivot. That's ZetaGlobal.com slash pivot. One last time, that's ZETA global.com slash pivot. Scott, we're back. The latest feud over AI regulation is between Anthropic and the White House, specifically Trump's AIsar, David Sacks.

Sacks is accusing Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark of running a, quote, sophisticated regulatory capture strategy based on fear-mongering. Oh, did you look up all those words, David? This was in response to an essay, Clark wrote about balancing optimism and caution around AI. Sachs is also claiming Anthropics' position itself as a foe of the Trump administration. And while CEO Dara Amodi, who backed Kamala Harris, isn't bending the knee like other tech CEOs, Anthropics still as a number of government contracts and partnerships, really weird, a weird attack, I thought, and specifically calling him one as someone who's supposed to be this AI czar

and supposed to be pushing all the companies and everything. And, of course, those that have showed up for Trump and given him money and done all these things get all the juicy bits. It's sort of an insider game here with Sacks at the center of it. And I'm sure he's quite effective at getting what he wants around cyber and, I mean, crypto and this. But to attack one company for just making normal – they want to build a brand around safety to do that. It seems bizarre to me. I guess he just – he wants everybody to go along with the casino that's speaking in Las Vegas and the house is always in charge.

But I don't know. Any thoughts on this? You said something that so struck me in that every accusation is an admission. Is that what you said? Is it a confession? He wrote, Anthropic is running a sophisticated regulatory capture strategy based on fear-mongering. No, we have never seen regulatory capture like Big Tech showing up to the White House, and the tariffs are effectively a transfer from the 490 that have to figure out the

Sclerotic strategy to the 10, the Magnificent 10, that really aren't effective. by a tariff. And for him to say that because Anthropic has said, I'm not going to bend a knee on everything here. It's sort of, and also, let's be clear, he didn't write this. The White House wrote this. The White House, he's not going to do anything without the White House's approval. And so for some reason, Anthropic has gotten cross-eyed with the Trump administration, and he's sort of threatening him and threatening them. In addition, this just, at a very baseline level, we forget, the administration. is not supposed to speak to punish or reward individual companies.

Correct. That was what was so strange about it. They're supposed to pass laws that affect everybody or don't affect everybody. Or they take all AI companies on a tour of Asia with the Secretary of Commerce to try and build business. Or they say, here's an idea. Every AI company cannot have any technology that lets people under the age of 18 engage in synthetic relationships. You don't decide, okay, I don't have an investment, me and my venture firm and my buddies don't have an investment in Anthropic, so I'm going to go after them individually. This is, and if you look at, at a more broader level, if you look at jobs, what's happening

with jobs, job increases have gone to really big companies, and actually who's getting really hurt are small businesses, and small and medium-sized businesses are responsible for two-thirds of job growth in America. Why? Because small and medium-sized businesses have no seat at the table. They don't get to go to the White House and cut sweetheart deals and get big deals and big contracts. Like, that's the whole thing. I was thinking about all these businesses that don't get to go to Mar-a-Lago patio, as I said. And one of the things around this essay is read the essay that Jack wrote, Jack Clark wrote. It is essentially, like, I'm really excited about AI, but there's some things we should worry about. Like, literally, he's not a foe.

of the Trump administration. He's just making a normal thing that everyone, and by the way, there is a growing worry about all this, like among normal people, which Sachs never sets his foot near. And I think if you're a parent, if you're a business, everybody is, and the stock market feels very frothy based on the spend. Everyone understands what's happening here

from a stock market point of view. And all he was saying was, we should be cautious, like just because he wants to like have a little bit of regulation and put it in the hands of our elected officials, which would be Congress, to be passing some of this stuff. I think it's just, I was sort of really struck by how corrupt the situation has become.

And of course it puts Anthropics going to have to do government contracts. It's going to have to do, you know, just like this is where all the big money is for these things to grow into actual businesses. And so it's really the picking and choosing, again, Socialism. And then the weirdest thing this week was these stories of Peter Teals has some thoughts on A regulation. He's warning it could summon the Antichrist if we stop it. Like he's giving these speeches that are seem like we must do this. I'm not clear who the Antichrist is. I guess it's people who oppose the complete takeover of the government by

tech billionaires. Like I it was so, I don't even understand. He's gotten increasingly religious and good for him if he finds comfort and religion. Peter Thiel's gotten religious? Oh, yeah. Yeah, very much. There's a whole gang of them that are very, like, it's a, I think it's a brand of Catholicism. It's one of, it's a branch of it. And so, just the Antichrist?

Are you kidding me? Like, it's just the strange. So now it's becoming in terms of like a real existential fight for the future of humanity is how they're selling it. And I think believing it, actually. I don't think this is a faint. I don't. I think it's an actual belief system. It's all very strange.

It's, you do, I use both. I try to cross-reference and use them to check each other. I use chat GPT and I use Claude. And I like Claude better. I use Cloud more because I find it's better with the written word. But ChatGPT, I find it has more comprehensive data. What I have also noticed is that, and sometimes it bothers me, cry frankly, is Claude is more politically correct. If I'm doing research on the shooters of or the perpetrators of political violence, sometimes if you phrase the question wrong, it comes back and says, I can't provide information on attempted murders or whatever. And then, you know, and then last night I got very upset. It wouldn't give me any information on I wanted to see images of lesbian tech journalists getting facials in Korea. And it just wouldn't go there. Oh, you just got that. You just got that. That just registered.

Anyways, it is more politically correct. And so my sense is that at Anthropic, they're sort of trying to be the good guys. And this guy just sort of steps out of line and doesn't line up for the, you know, doesn't line up to be part of the mafia that David Sachs is clearly a soldier of the dawn in Washington. And the degree is sign up and you're going to make a shit ton of money at the expense of the lower four nine. And it seems like the head of Anthropa, good for him. It's not signed up and says, well, actually, I have some views and I have some concerns. Because the, you know, I think the collision personally between synthetic relationships and AI is just so fucking frightening. I just think it's, and they're not talking about it, I think it's going to make it seem like phones and social media were just an Easter parade. when all of a sudden we noticed that everybody

or a third of the people in our life have disappeared and are coming down for dinner no longer talking to us because they have decided that their synthetic relationship knows everything and knows them and it can run their lives. And anyways...

This is what Teal is much more profound. Let me read a quote because one of the things is the hostility towards technology is his focus and he... Let me just say, read this quote, because according to some Christian traditions, the Antichrist is a figure that will unify humanity under one rule, but this is remired, before delivering us to the apocalypse. For Teal, its evil is pretty much synonymous with any attempt to unite the world.

How might such an Antichrist rise to power, Teal asks, by playing it on our fears of technology and seducing us into decadence with the Antichrist slogan, Peace and Safety? In other words, it would yoke together a terrified speech by promising to rescue it from the apocalypse. And he's, like, blaming, like, Nick Bostrom, who's an AI Dumer, you know, who I'm not a fan of Bostrom either, but, like, he's, this is, like, so strange and defend it off. We have to stop people like this, I guess, like, like, anthropic. Like, any AI Dumer, and if there's any, it's just, it's so strange that, and disturbing that this guy is at the center of power and is influencing all these people.

And, of course, South Park made fun of him. Peter Thiel knows the anti- He's worried about the Antichrist, which was a very funny episode. I had some experience with this. I'm no joke. I had a dream, and the devil showed up in my dreams and whispered, I'm coming for you. And so I whispered back, I whispered back, that's gay. Why should we be worried about the most powerful people in the world that have an unbelievable command of God, like technology, who basically own the vice president, who are becoming increasingly theocratic.

I know. I mean, no worries there. No worries there. Well, I recommend South Park's Peter Thiel and the Antichrist. It's really funny. It was really, really funny. Anyway, it's worrisome, and that's enough. He's one odd duck.

Odd duck. Odd duck. I'd like to go to strip club with him. Have you ever partied with him? No, I've been to a party at his house, yes. I had an argument with him at it. Anyway, it was a long time ago. over something. I can't even remember. It was many moons ago, many iterations of Peter Thiel ago.

I'm exactly the same. This is an interesting story. GLP won drug stocks fell late lastly after Donald Trump said in an oval office presser to the price of Ozenberger, as he called the fat loss drug, would soon drop to $150 a month. Dr. Mehmet Oz, who's now running Medicare and Medicaid, quickly jumped into clarify that's not a done deal yet. The clarification didn't knew much to calm investors. Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly both lost billions in market value. The price of Ozambic is currently around $1,000 in a month talking about the implications. The price really goes down to $150. I'm of two minds. I think it should be $150. Like, right? Like it should be really inexpensive for people who, especially people are overweight to figure out a way because, again, with the secret thing,

actually every doctor I talked to talks about the importance of these drugs on the general population. Probably it's the Antichrist because it will unify us in health. But what do you think of this? You were one of the first people to talk about the implications of GLP-1 drugs, but the prices remain stubbornly high for an out-of-reach of most Americans on a monthly basis. Like, every year when I do my predictions deck, which I'm about to do in a month for the next year, I predict a technology of the year. And in 22 and 23, I said it was AI, first time I've done back-to-back on a technology.

And in 24, I said the technology that's going to have more impact. on a ground level than AI in 24 is GLP1 drugs. I think these things are nothing short of revolutionary. I mean, the fact that if you think about when we came off the Savannah, you know, we didn't have access to trans fats, we didn't have access to mating opportunities for replay, so we've become addicted to food, to porn, to gambling, because our instincts have just not caught up to institutional production.

And these things are literally scaffolding on our instincts. And when you go into the grocery store, you not only buy less food, you buy more lettuce and kale and yogurt, and you buy less cookies and soda. It's just, how does it know how to turn off the parts of your brain that says, I need to eat chocolate-covered almonds late night after my 5 milligram edible, which I did last night. Yeah, I had milk duds, but go ahead. I love milk. Ooh, those are really bad for you.

I know, but I love it. Anyways, the, yeah, you're not going to find those in Korea when you're getting your facial. I know, that's why I had them here less. I found them in La Vegas, but go ahead. There you go. So, oh, in the mini bar? No. Oh, God. That's my favorite thing when my son is we bond. We go back to the hotel and we raid the mini bar. You know.

Anyways, what was disappointing about GLP1, at least initially in the United States, was the region that had the greatest penetration of GLP1 was also, ironically. The richest. The thinnest. And thinnest and richest go one and together. It was ladies of lunch on the Upper East Side trying to lose that last 10. That is not who needs GLP1. I believe a decent government, program would be for Medicare to repeal the legislation that says Medicare cannot negotiate on drugs, we spend two to four times more on OZempic than they do in other nations, despite the fact that Nova Nordus produced, which is a European company, we have American produced GLP1 drugs. I would love to see just the federal government do what it's supposed to do, and that has help prevent a tragedy of the commons and use their purchasing power to take these drugs

down to 50 bucks a month, because then it becomes accretive. You will save more than that on food. And the one thing Americans share is not military service, it's not their ethnicity, it's not their religion. The one thing we share as Americans is that 70% of us are overweight or obese. And if you wanted to figure out a way to save $100 billion, $200 billion, a half a trillion dollars a year, you would get America down to Japanese-like levels of obesity. where only 4% of the Japanese are obese.

I think it's actually more than that because I have to say in doing all this series I'm doing, everyone's like, ultimately it's food, exercise, being rich and sleep and stuff like that, ultimately for longevity. But every expert I talk to is like, these drugs are miraculous in terms of getting us to the place we need. Besides the really cool stuff that's happening with cancer and AI, and, you know, CRISPR.

It's here. This is the thing that every single, and not just that, but around issues around stroke, around, and taking it in a small amount. Some of my doctors, like, you need to take a little bit in a small amount. Microdose. Right. I know a ton of people that aren't, that aren't fat, the microdose VLPL.

But it's more addiction, right, and drinking and cognitive stuff, all this stuff that is, like, around it. And, of course, it does worry some people, people that it could like make a left turn like fenn-fen or whatever. But most, every doctor I talk to is very much like not worried about this drug. It's a really interesting, it's a really interesting development. About two years ago, I got invited to a dinner to speak at a dinner and it was neuroscientists. And I thought, wow, I would like to be in there with a bunch of neuroscientists in case I ever get sick. It's not a bad idea to have relationships with

really good doctors. And so it was a dinner. There was about 16 neuroscientists and me there and the head of this hospital, and I think probably a couple people who funded the gold circle of, you know, whatever it was, Langone. And I noticed about an hour into the dinner, I noticed, I looked around the table, and all the plates were half eaten. All of them. No one had finished their meal. And I said, I can't help but I notice. But, and And then people had pushed away their food or asked it to be taken away. And I'm like, I said, this is very unusual.

No one's eating their food. And I said, can I ask a question? And obviously, it was off the record. I said, who here is on GLP1 drugs? And they all looked at each other sheepishly. And like eight of the 14 folks, it was 12 men and two women, raise their hands. And that is supposed to be the tell for if a drug works

is its adoption by the medical community itself. But these things, if you were to stop 10 people on the street in America and find 10 hardcore users of AI and 10 people on GLP1 drugs and query them about the impact on their life, emotionally, psychologically, economically, I think GL1 is having a much bigger impact on people than AI. But I'm talking about getting it down to the regular, you know, the people. We should give it out.

Well, that's the thing. I did an interview with a nurse who was 350 pounds and she went down, But what they did, and then I introduced you to her doctor, who's also a well-known weight loss doctor. And it was a nutritionally focused doctor, but it was combined with learning how to cook at fresh foods and exercise. Like it's the whole package. It's the whole package. And not just this is not, you just take the drug and that's it. And that's what was, I mean, I was, of all the interviews I've done for this thing, that interview was the most moving because I had dinner with her family.

And one thing that was really interesting is she said to me in the kitchen, she goes, I was embarrassed. I couldn't do things with them like they went to the Grand Canyon. It's a very fit family except for her. And they went and hiked and I couldn't do it. And I'd have two seats on an airplane. You know, the whole story of overweight people. And she goes, I was so embarrassed for them. I was embarrassing to them.

And I repeated it. She hadn't ever told her family. And they were heartbroken that she felt that way. It was a really, I was very moved. You know what I mean? And it wasn't like, because she tried everything. Like she tried all the diets and everything else. And I have to say, she has such a better life.

Like, and it's not someone who has a lot of money, very modest house in Massachusetts, nurse, hardworking, and knows about health, right? Is not someone who's not aware of the issues. and just, it seems like she's going to live a lot longer. That's just the facts, right? And so I was like the combination of the drug with lifestyle changes and the drug allows you to do the lifestyle changes more successfully

is a really interesting thing. But what do you think of Trump doing this? This is like crazy. Like, although it's kind of good. Like, in this case, I'm like, fine. I love this topic. So let me back up. The reason why Gavin Newsom will likely be president,

in 2028 is the same reason why we should have a federal program to get GLP1 drugs out to everyone that needs them after negotiating a ridiculously low price. And it's the following. America is an exceptionally and dangerously and unfairly looks this country. And one of the strongest forward-looking indicators of whether a child is going to suffer from adulthood depression is if they're overweight. And also the American Academy of Pediatrics, which is not permissuous around recommending drug intervention for children, has recommended, right, has embraced GLP1 for children. Because here's the bottom line, when you're obese in America, on many levels, you're fucked. You're going to have trouble finding a mate. You're going to

have trouble getting hired. People immediately look at you, and regardless of how many subscriptions to the Atlantic or the New York Times, they immediately subconsciously go weak. And it's unfair. And then you look in the mirror and you go, I'm weak and I have no control of my life. And in my view, after negotiating a radically low price and playing them off against each other, every household in America that is suffering from obesity, and not a woman looking to lose their last 10 pounds, but if a doctor says obesity is a presage for diabetes for you,

it is getting in the way your mental health, it is getting in the way of your ability to exercise, this shit should be everywhere. It's like fluoride and water. Put the GLP1 in, effectively, metaphorically, in water. This would be one of the most accretive things emotionally and financially we could do in the United States over 36 months.

One of the things that I am against is like what Pete Heggseth did fat generals. Like making it awful, figuring out ways for people to have a better life is different than using fat shaming and everything to do it. No, I'm not. I'm just like, that's what I'm. And then the second thing is what's interesting about the Trump administration,

RFK Jr. is against all this. And Oz is on the other side. So this should be a really interesting discussion, I think. It'll be interesting to see what happens here because RFK thinks you should just jog and eat, you know, kill your own animals. Well, yeah, but RFK is blessed with good genetics. And Emmett, Memet is a doctor. And he sees some people, you know, everybody has people who are overweight in their lives. And we immediately look at them and we and fairly think they're weak. A lot of them are in food deserts. A lot of them don't have the money to do anything but eat cheap calories, which are fat.

And quite frankly, a lot of them are just born really big. They're just, you know, they're born big. So we need empathy. Having said that, Kara, I do think there was a movement that was unproductive. And unfortunately, there's no, the pendulum is never at the middle where it's like, okay, let's have empathy for this people. Let's figure out programs that give them the capability. Let's give them GLP1 drugs.

But when the industrial food complex, including Coca-Cola and McDonald's, which, by the way, is the stock price of Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, McDonald's, KFC, they're all almost entirely correlated to obesity in the U.S. And so what did they do? And also, many of the major clothing brands are very much tied to plus-size clothing. What do they do? They started to romanticize and celebrate obesity. And I hate to say this, and I'll get negative comments. for it? You will. You're not finding your truth. You're finding a fucking ventilator in diabetes. So while we have to have empathy for this people, let's at least be honest and say, folks,

this is not something to romanticize and celebrate. No, but it was because of the hatefulness that went on for decades before. I think it's okay to. It was for money, Kara. No, maybe so. Maybe so. But the kind of, if you're, I've had heavy people with my family, it's hateful the kind of things people say. I agree with you. And now they have a tool. to help get people there. And it is no question the right thing to do. It's just that making people feel ugly about themselves is never a prescription to good health.

We agree with that. But should we have done away with the Presidential Fitness Awards that celebrates fitness because we think of it as fat-shaming? Trump doesn't exercise. Like, he's not... Look, if he ends up dropping the price, I'm good with that. Answer my question. I used to be very motivated to get the Presidential Fitness Award,

the third, the fourth. And I didn't get the fifth years because I had a gross spurt and I couldn't do the pull-ups. And it was very motivating for me to be fit and strong. Just one last thing. I'm virtue signaling right now. Pharmaceuticals, GLP-1 can do what, there was a drug that changed my life. Change my life. Harris Fisher.

And I'm still addicted to it. What's the definition of addiction? Something you continue to engage in despite the fact that damages your life. What's your own lesson? That's right. I'm addicted. And baby, if this addiction is wrong, I don't want to be right. Loving you is wrong. What are you getting that facial?

Anyways. All right. A drug, I had, until the age of 40, I had never taken an Advil. I just never took any sort of drug. I barely, I think I saw the doctor eight times up until the age of 40. Okay. I just didn't, my parents didn't have money. Okay.

Okay. A drug. literally changed my life. Any guesses, and it has to do with aesthetics. I don't know. Milk tuds? From the age of 13 to 19, if I was ever able to maneuver using a mix of humor, luck, and persistence, able to get a date, this is what you did on a date. A liquor. You would take a woman to a movie, and I remember going to see Greece. Okay. With Melanie Burke. Okay. Morino Burke. Excuse me, Morino Burke. And I was so excited. I went down to this ridiculous, preppy store. I saved up. I got my mom to give me a credit card. I couldn't spend more on $30. And I bought

nice corduroys and a polo, in a polo shirt with the actual polo logo on it. And I bought spary top siders. I was just so fucking ready. And I go into Greece. And every time I went into a movie on the few dates I had, I would have to purposely plan, do I go into the aisle first or do I let her go into the aisle first? And you know what that was based on? What? Which side of my face had fewer zits than the other? No. Okay. Every time I went to the movies, I would strategically plan which side am I going to sit on because my acne was so bad, I would have to think which side is it less grotesque. Oh, wow. And finally, my dermatologist, after soaking me for six years of money I did not have, said, maybe we should try this drug called Accutane.

Acutane, yeah. And in 11 weeks, I had perfect skin. Perfect skin. And if you want to talk about someone going through the most sensitive, insecure, self-conscious, time in their life, and they have white heads and just their face is riddled with acne up and down their back and their throat. And all you can think about when you're talking to someone is they're staring at my zits. And they hurt and they're painful. And then nine weeks, 11 weeks later, I have perfect, beautiful skin.

And all of a sudden girls are smiling. at me. And all of a sudden, I don't think about my skin. And all of a sudden, shaving isn't like land, isn't like navigating a fucking landmine. It's the only letter I've ever, the first letter I'd ever written to a corporation, I wrote to Hoffman Oroche and said, and said, this has absolutely changed my life. And now, and I did this about, I felt I was two months ago, about seven months ago. I was at a gas station in Antucket where they actually pump your gas. Okay. Go ahead. And there was a young man, and he had terrible cystic acne. And I said, look, I'm not, I'm probably overstayed my boundaries here.

I had terrible acne. I took a drug called Accutane and it cleared it up in 11 weeks and it changed my life. And now we have Scott, you know, celebrities are microdosing acutane now, just so you know. But my point is, I think that GLP1 can do that. I kind of think there's an equivalence between terrible acne and obesity. And if you can give people back their confidence, their sense of self, their, their, their, There, I mean, there's nothing more important to the young person. But let's not make people feel badly.

When you see this interview, she tried everything. But in any case, we think this is fascinating. We'll keep covering it. All right, Scott, let's go on a quick break. And when we come back, we'll talk about a major security hack. No, not the Lube. Support for the show comes from Vanguard. The lineup includes over 80 bond funds.

To all the financial advisors listening, let's talk about. bonds for a minute. Capturing value and fixed income is not easy. Bond markets can be massive, murky, and let's be real, a lot of firms are a couple of flashy funds your way and call it a day, but not Vanguard. Vanguard bonds are institutional quality. They're actively managed by a 200-person global squad of sector specialists, analysts, and traders. Lots of firms like to highlight their star portfolio managers, like it's all about the one brilliant mind making the magic happen. Vanguard's philosophy is a little different. They believe the best act, strategy should be shared across the team. That way, every client benefits from the collective

brainpower, not just what individuals take. So, if you're looking to give your clients consistent results year in and year out, go see the record for yourself at vanguard.com slash pivot. That's vanguard.com slash pivot. All investing is subject to risk, Vanguard Marketing Corporation distributor. Support for pivot comes from LinkedIn Jobs. As a small business owner, your work hours aren't dictated by the hands on a clock. Your business is on your mind 24 hours a day, seven days a week. So when you're hiring, you need a partner that works just as hard as you do.

That hiring partner is LinkedIn jobs. When you clock out, LinkedIn clocks in by making it easy to post your job, share it with your network and qualified candidates that you can manage all in one place. LinkedIn's new feature can help you write job descriptions and quickly get your job in front of the right people with deep candidate insights. Either post your job for free or pay to promote as promoted jobs, get three times more qualified applicants. At the end of the day, LinkedIn wants you to feel confident that you're getting the best

because the most important thing to your small business is the quality of candidates. And based on LinkedIn data, 70% of small business owners using LinkedIn, say that the platform helps them find high quality candidates. Plus, you can let your network know you're hiring by adding the hashtag hiring frame to your profile picture to get two times more qualified candidates. Find out why more than 2.5 million small businesses use LinkedIn for hiring today. Find your next grade hire on LinkedIn. Post your job for free at LinkedIn.com slash pivot. That's LinkedIn.com slash pivot to post your job for free. Terms and conditions apply.

Megan Rapino here. This week on a touch more, we've got WMBA champion. Jackie Young, aka IA Jack, on the show. We're so excited. We'll find out how she's been celebrating her third championship, how the ace has turned their season around and whether they're the greatest dynasty ever. Plus, we're handing out the most prestigious awards of the WMBA season, the Meggies. From best dress to gayest moments of the season, you do not want to miss it.

Check out the latest episode of a touch more wherever you get your podcast and on YouTube. Scott, we're back. with more news. Cybersecurity and network security company, F5, says nation-state hackers broke into its systems the summer X-filtrating files and stealing some source code. The breach has been blamed on state-back hackers from China. Over 80% of the Fortune Global 500, as well as universities and credit unions are F-5 customers. This is as big as solar winds that many of people I've talked to this week. Actually, F-5 is a publicly traded company, which would usually mean it's required to disclose

cyber attacks within four business days with the DHA allowed the company delay notification, which can do for attacks that post national security risks, really disturbing. And I'll note early Monday morning, a major AWS outage took down services like Amazon, Snapchat, and chat GPT. There's no indication of malicious, anything malicious at play. But again, every single cyberperson I talked to this week was like, this is bad. This is another bad. Our landscape is so porous for hackers from state-backed, especially from China. It was another disturbing thing that they didn't have to say anything, that people couldn't act.

And we are so exposed from a security point of view. This was a really bad attack for people to understand how dependent we are on these kind of things and how vulnerable. What I don't understand is, and it's easy to heckle from the cheap seats, is I've met some of our folks who run our secretary. security or our cyber defense, and they're very popular conferences, and by the way, most of them have been fired because they're not Republicans, which makes no fucking sense to me. But what they all say is that we actually have the best. And what I don't understand

is why isn't it like nuclear weapons in that sense that if they do something like this, shouldn't we be hitting them back three times as hard until we all come to sort of a detente? We may be. But they were in there. One of the things that's classic of these things, they've been in there for two years. And then they place things there and then disappear and erase where they were. And that's what they've been doing. And so, you know, there's very little known

because they keep everything quiet. And the question is, what should people know? What should we understand about it? Everyone considers this as big as solar winds, which happened in 2020, the end of 2020. And so, you know, I suspect lots of stuff is going on behind the scenes with this stuff. But again, the cuts by this administration, again, exposes us.

The solar winds happened in the Trump administration, right? It was the end of, it was before Biden, just before Biden got into office. And it's the same thing, the idea of, like, expose it. We have such an exposed everything between our infrastructure. The surface of attack is bigger here. The surface attack is bigger. And we do not have the people in place at the, in the government as much.

I mean, remember he fired Chris Crabbs, who's, I love Chris Crabbs and, you know, a lot of people. But we're, you know, all this is all interconnected, including with the federal government. And so the Chinese have been very successful. I suspect we have been hacking them to, et cetera, et cetera.

But, but there's broad risks here that I think we, as a country, we have not taken seriously given our dependence on this. And even the ones that aren't deemed malicious, like this one this morning, if AWS has a major outage, all the services get affected, whether it's the stuff we use day-to-day.

And so so much, it's such a, it's something we really do. We should talk about more, and it's complex, obviously. But our country is much more exposed than people realize. I'll just note that. Well, our tech infrastructure,

technology loves scale and compatibility, right? So everything's running on the same source code and it can be more fluid to more frictionless. And to their credit, we have 50 states and 50 different electoral procedures and 50 independent technologies tallying votes. And a lot of people or tech companies have said this should all be on one system. And the best defense against that is that, okay, it's feasible to one of us gets hacked, but it's very unlikely all 50 are going to get hacked because we're all on different systems. And just as technology loves scale, it creates more vulnerability because you have

entire power grids now that are essentially, if someone figures out how to hack that power grid, you know, you could have three states in the southeast go down. And what this requires, which we don't have, it requires skill and resources of which we have more than anyone in the world. What we don't have is the long game. So, for example, I think the greatest anti-terrorist precision attack in history was the pager attack against Hezbollah. That was years in the making. And what the Chinese do is the long game. My guess is a lot of, every time there's a real, there's a cyber attack, my guess is it was put in place or the wheels were put in motion two or three years ago. And unfortunately, because of this political back and forth and firing and hiring, it is much more difficult. And also just American mentality, focused on quarterly earnings.

American mentality does not play the long game. And the Chinese, you know, the Chinese have a 50-year plan. So they already have, they already have assets on the ground here. trying to implant listening devices, security code routers that maybe in two, three, five years, they activate because what you don't want to do to raise red flags, red flags are a function of not only the activity, but the cluster and the concentration of them. And so if it's just one or two small infiltrations, and then there's not a follow-up, people don't worry as much about it. There's so many ways that our short-term, quite frankly, thinking helps us, but on a lot of levels

that hurts us, and this is one of those ways. These guys aren't written for the long game. They'll start putting a place in infrastructure for cyber attacks that they won't be able to activate for five or seven or ten years. Yeah, absolutely. Anyway, one more quick break, and we'll be back for wins and fails. When you support Movember, you're not just fundraising. You're showing up for the men you love.

Your dad, your brother, your partner, your friends. It isn't just a men's issue. It's a human one. That's why Movember exists to change the face of men's health. From mental health and suicide prevention to prostate and testicular cancer research and early detection, Movember is tackling the biggest health issues facing men today. Join the movement and donate now at Movember.com. Scott, we're hitting the road, bringing pivot live to the people.

Seven cities, Toronto, Boston, New York, D.C., Chicago, San Francisco, and L.A., of course. You went to Oasis, you went to Beyoncé, you saw the remake of Wizard of Oz in the sphere. All those suck compared to the Pivot Tour. This is the biggest tour. Same people that are organizing our tour that organize Taylor Swift's tour, they are much more excited about our tour. All right, that's enough, Grandpa. It's going to be so good, and we're bringing our brand of whatever we do to the people, and we're excited to meet our fans.

We love our fans. For tickets, head to PivotTor.com. See you there. Everyone thinks we are in an AI bubble right now. But so what? Aren't we used to bubbles where people lose their minds financially and menadol straightens itself out eventually?

What if this one is different? The point is, all of these other booms nowhere near as unprofitable. This would be like if every Uber cost $10,000 and ran on giraffe blood. That's Ed Zitron, a writer and podcaster, and a critic of big tech in general and AI specifically. And I'm Peter Kafka, the host of Channels, the podcast about tech and media. You can hear my conversation with Ed Zitron right now on channels, wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts.

Okay, Scott, some wins and fails. We've got to be quick because Kara's got another interview soon. Why don't you start? Well, the obvious one here is, and we spent some time talking about it, I do think that the protests were an enormous win for America. We've all been just so desperate for some pushback and wondering where Americans are. Well, seven million turned out, and that's about 2% of the population. Supposedly, I don't know where this test comes from, but supposedly when you hit 3.5%, which would be 11 million, that's when real action starts. But I just

don't think there's any getting around it. A lot of Republican, congressmen, and senators must have noticed that and said, okay, this is, there's some real issues here. So I thought at a minimum, it just gave a lot of comfort to Americans that people value our democracy. They value peaceful protest, and they're resisting, and they're willing to give up their own time, and they really do value the blessings, the liberties, and the, you know, the prosperity. So look, that's my win. I thought it was really, really wonderful and inspiring. And I tried to take my kids to the tube station where their mother slept to talk about fascism. They wanted nothing to do with it. But there were protests in Germany. There were protests in the U.K. They were all incredibly peaceful, incredibly positive,

incredibly optimistic. It was just a good look for America, a very good look, for a democracy, a very good luck for people who want to resist against Trump. That's my win. That's an easy one. The fail is George Santos, the disgrace representative, his seven-year present sentence has been commuted by Trump after serving just three months. He pled guilty to wire fraud and aggravated identity theft. He, look, he lied, he committed crimes. He was an embarrassment to the government. But the thing that really chased me here, he's no longer required to pay back more than $370,000 and court-ordered restitution to his victims. So the people he lied to and stole from, he no longer has to pay them back. In addition, he was only the six lawmaker in

U.S. history to be expelled from Congress after an ethics report was released outlining his behavior in 2023. He was also the first to be expelled before being convicted of federal crimes or supporting the Confederacy. So just some of his claims. He claimed his grandparents were Holocaust survivors. They were not. He claimed that the CCP kidnapped his five-year-old niece. That is not true. He claimed to be Jewish than Jew-ish. He claimed he was a model for Vogue. That's my favorite. He claimed he had a university degree. By the way, he said he went on a volleyball scholarship. That guy hasn't jumped since 1988. He claimed he had a brain tumor. And some of the more outlandish things he said or did well after being in Congress, he spent campaign funds on Botox, Hermes,

and my favorite only fans. He started selling $200 custom videos on Camion. That's that bad. He had a staffer impersonate Kevin McCarthy's chief of staff to raise his money, and he committed ID theft by using donor's credit cards to make purchases. So, and what's so sad about this, he's just a scam artist. There are some people who are currently incarcerated who have applied for clemency, and some of them have done their best to compensate their victims, show that they're on the right track and are deserving of clemency. And because they're trying to get Marjorie Taylor Green back in camp, on camp, and she seemed to like George Santos, they move a guy who's showed no remorse, who is a fucking embarrassment to the Constitution, to America. They push this guy to the front of the line, and the people he stole from are shit out of luck such that the president can kiss Marjorie Taylor Green's ass. this is such an abuse of the whole, the basic understanding of what clemency is. The clemency impardoning is a wonderful thing. We get it wrong all the time in our justice system.

The justice system is a powerful, but it is a crude instrument. And we find out new evidence comes to light, or we find out that for whatever reason, strange laws resulted in a guy who stole an antenna from a K-Markets issued a life sentence. and these things are taken seriously and very talented people review these things. And we're just making a mockery of the system. Anyways, my fail is that Representative George Santos, his sentence was commuted because of the president's attempt

to get Marjorie Taylor Green to stop talking about the Epstein files. And by the way, my favorite sign was GOP, guardians of pedophiles. Anyway, my fail is these issues around these tech companies and safety. like pushing back against the idea there should be safety. But it's more than that.

There's a great story in the New York Times today about as tech companies build data centers worldwide to advance artificial intelligence, vulnerable communities have been hit by blackouts and water shortages. They're not just, the idea that we are against advancing technology at any, and then they say at any cost, is ridiculous. They're setting it up so that they'll,

they get all the juicy bits and they hurt people around the globe. 60% of the data centers, are outside of the U.S., and there's lots of projects coming all over the place around the world. But it takes enormous amounts of power for computing and water to cool the computers. And these people are, you know,

the famous one was must going into a community, I think, in Tennessee and polluting it because he wanted to get his thing up faster than anyone else. And all the governments are angling to get, to give them cheap land and tax breaks and things like that. But there is very little transparency around how they're building these data centers. And it's the same idea.

They don't care about safety of anybody because they themselves are doing things. And it's really hurting individual communities. And they go into vulnerable communities to be able to do what they need to do. And it's very dangerous. And they're not really investing in the communities because most of these things use very few people. And so these plans just sail through. And it's the same idea. If Anthropic wants to talk about safety or if we want to talk about safety, it doesn't mean we hate it.

it means that we care about the citizens more than lining the pockets of David Sacks and his friends. I have two very quick wins. I've got to give a credit to both Lorraine Powell Jobs and Ron Conway. He resigned from the Board of Salesforce's philanthropic arm over Mark Benios' original comments about bringing National Guard into San Francisco. Lorraine Powell Jobs also wrote an essay, Beware of philanthropists who want to control in exchange for their giving. And it was a great essay about that. I really give kudos to them for stepping out. rather a lot against Mark's stupid comments. He's now doesn't believe the National Guard needs to come. He walked himself back, but he tarnished himself.

So I give credit to that they didn't. Lots of people complain, but it's hard to go out on a limb if you're in that group of people, and they did. But I actually want to give the win to the diplomat. The new seasons downloaded to Netflix, and Carrie Russell is so good. It's such a good. And Allison Janney and Bradley Whitford. Everybody on that cast is amazing. This is so you have a crush on Carrie.

I love her. She's a fan of Pivot, by the way. I don't have a crush on her. Actually, I have a crush on the whole show because it's so diplomaty. I wanted to be in the State Department, so I love the whole. It's sort of like my home. Is she going to Korea with you? No, she's not.

But we're going to have like, she's a fan of pivot. No, I'm not. I just say Carrie Russell and you start smiling. No, no, no, no, you're wrong, not my type. But nonetheless. Even though you're 80, you still have hormones. No, I do not. She's not my type.

I've been taking that estrogen. I just want to say it's a great show. And lots of people like this show. Stop it. Everyone likes to you. As usual, you turn something beautiful into ugliness. But it's a great. Never seen it.

All right. It's great. You would love it. I watched four episodes of Slow Horses last night. Okay. If you like that, did you do like Homeland? Love Homeland. Okay, you'll love this.

The writer of this is Deborah Kahn. She's so talented. There was one line. This is why I love it. There's all these great lines. Besides, she doesn't comb her hair, etc. And they make jokes about it. But there's one line. Yeah, I'm sure she looks just awful. She's the one that like, yeah, but yeah, that's, let me guess. She's like really sloppy and still

looks like a nine out of ten, right? Eleven out of ten. Yeah, right. But she's really good. She's had a great career. She's had really interesting roles, including the Americans and things like that. But I don't want to talk about Carrie Dressel, because I think she's great. But I have to say there's a lot, there's a lot of lines in it. The writers are terrific. And they, and one reminding me of you, you, which is, you're about, they're talking about her husband, Hal, and I'm blanking on the actor's name who played, but, who's great too. But she goes, you're, you're about as subtle as a kidney stone, which I immediately thought of you, Scott. I appreciate that. You're, you're about as subtle as a kidney stone. Anyway, I love that show, and now you're making it ugly, which is very

sad. I have comments on all of this, or do you, do you have to go get a pedic here with Boutros, Boutros, Ghali? No, no, go ahead. Go ahead. Very quickly. Go ahead. It's impossible for me. Okay, first off, the data centers, the data centers are nothing but, again, another elegant transfer of wealth from middle class homes to big tech. How's that going to happen? They are picking these areas where they are quote unquote desperate for jobs or where the congressperson representing that area wants to get some of that AI money sent to their pack for regulatory capture for campaign fundraising. And the bottom line is these data centers might as well be dark during the day. They create very few jobs. What they do is they will create jobs to get built, but they create very few ongoing jobs. What they do is they are so power hungry that you are going to see 50, 100, 200, 300 percent increases in electricity costs in these areas. And what will end up happening is the government, these people will get outraged. So the government will step in and will subsidize the electricity costs or the grid, which is nothing but a transfer of wealth from taxpayers, especially people consuming electricity in those regions

to big tech firms. Everything in America right now is trying to prop up 10 firms to have been responsible for 77% of the S&P's gain this year, which is the only cloud cover that Donald Trump has to send federal troops into peaceful cities. This will be another elegant transfer of wealth. And then what was your second one? Carrie Russell. Oh, wait, Carrie Russell, the diplomat? Oh, no, Mark Benioff. Just so I can fill our YouTube comments with a bunch of hate. I love Lorraine Powell Jobs. I thought it was an elegant article. I think we're on Conway. It's fantastic. He invested in two of my companies.

This is how we lose 28. And that is, I get it. Mark Benioff said something stupid. He has since apologized. And now everyone is doing what Democrats do. They're more interested in a purity test. They're more interested in grabbing social virtue. They're more interested in getting their guardians of gotcha pin.

They're more interested in going after a white billionaire than they are around being effective. Mark Beniof is a huge ally for San Francisco. He is a huge ally for Democrats. he fucked up and he's being treated like an apostate and this is exactly what is wrong with Democrats.

Those states were before. They said things before and they didn't want to affiliate with him. If you're Mark Benioff and you have literally spent 20 years trying to be the most generous guy

in California, supportive of progressive policies, supportive of Democratic politics, and then all these Democrats wave in with their finger because he fucked up and he did fucked up and by the way he's apologized.

Let's just talk about the reality of this. Do you think Mark Benioff is now going to be really, really in it to win it and support Democratic candidates right now? Or is he thinking, you know what, guys,

go fuck yourselves. This is what Democrats do. We have decided, maybe you're my ally, but you're holding the gun wrong. So I'm going to go after you rather than the real enemy. Could we be any more fucking stupid?

And this is the typical Democratic... He asked for National Guard to come to San Francisco. He fucked up. And he's also been an enormous, an enormous supporter of democratic ideals and politics. And here's the thing. I'm not agreeing with you.

Sorry, one strike you're out. We're Democrats. And guess what? Jady Vance in 2028. This is exactly how we lose the election. No, I think we should. Democrats are much more concerned with grabbing social virtue than they are actually getting shitting down.

It's not. It's normal. There is such a pylon right now. There is such a pylon. Oh, yeah. Me and Trump were very tight. No, no, but the Trump world is you don't apologize for anything. And you did apologize.

He kind of did, but that's okay. Whatever he said, I'm sorry. Yes. He said my comments real time and I'm sorry. And now everyone's writing op-eds about how billionaires and philanthropy shouldn't rule the world. No, that op-ed was written by the way before, and I think it influenced him, by the way, FYI. Oh, my. There is so much, there is so much, there is so much hate right now out there from people who see an opportunity to pile on

and grab social virtue at no risk to themselves. You haven't done a fraction for the Democratic Party of your San Francisco's Mark Beni off. Bernie Sanders. He says, we shouldn't even go in with the billion is. The lady giving you a squid facial in soul. I interviewed Bernie Sanders and he's like, this is the problem with going with the rich people. I'm just saying he's just like it.

Oh, okay. That's going to help us. Demonize rich people. Not demonize him, but we, come on. Rich people have had far. Billioners shouldn't exist according to Bernie Sanders. No, no. rich people had far too much of an influence in both parties, far too much, far too much.

And that's what's got to end. That's Citizens United. Yes, I get it, but they've had far too much. But in the meantime, let's try and get as many billionaires on our side. No, I, no, we've got to, like, build a, we have to build a coalition of everybody. The same people saying maybe it would be smart to bring Elon Musk back into the Democratic Party are taking a great Democrat who fucked up and basically putting him, casting him on, He won't. They won't let him into the Trump gang anyway, so it doesn't matter. That said, we should have not, there's been too much billionaire influence of all the billionaires on all sides. And it has to stop. Anyway, we're not going to argue to this.

Okay. For Citizens United, you're saying we should, we should, I agree with you. We should do away with Citizens United. Okay. I'm up for it. Let's end on that. There's common ground. By the way, Mike Johnson, swear in Democratic representative, Griehalva, you squirming little bitch, put her in office. Oh, awful. Put her in office because you don't want the Epstein. What a lie. What a lie. The guy running the country right now is in an unmarked grave. Jeffrey Epstein is running the country right now. I swear. Put her in office. She was elected by people. I want the people to speak. Anyway, we want to hear from you. Send us your questions about business tech or whatever's on your mind. Go to nymag.com slash pivot to submit a question for the show or call 85551 Pivot. Elsewhere in the Karen Scott Universe this week on with the Carrey, I just said I spoke with Senator Bernie Sanders. Just as he got back from the No King's Rally, let's listen to what he had to say about pushing back against billionaires. Let's listen to him. Money is important.

I'm a politician. Do you don't need zillions of dollars to run a campaign? You need a certain amount and you can win. But that is, and then, of course, ultimately you've got to get rid of the Citizens United, which allows billionaires to buy elections. So he'll turn on billionaires. Just ignore it. Just say good for them.

If they want to contribute and play a role, that's fine. I appreciate that. I'm not, you know, there are a lot of decent people happen to be billionaires. They think that democracy and truth is important. God bless them. But the future of this country depends on working class people standing up and taking on the billionaire class, which is getting richer and richer. I agree with all of that. See, there you go. Now, see, you didn't think that that was the case. He's very reasonable. Anyway, and reminder. I like Bernie. I know, I do too. Lots of people do. It was amazing that a lot of Bernie bros went to Trump. I think they're coming back in a lot of

ways. A lot of his messages. He's coming around. Suddenly everyone's coming around to Bernie. And a reminder, we're going on tour. We'll be going to Toronto, Boston, New York, D.C., Chicago, San Francisco, and L.A. Visit pivetour.com for tickets. There's very few left, actually.

Okay, that's a show. Thanks for listening to Pivot. Be sure to like and subscribe to our YouTube channel. We'll be back on Friday. Scott, next time I see you, I will have had my shrimp semen facial, I'll let you know how it goes. Read us out. Today's show is produced by Lara Neiman, Zawain, Marcus, and Taylor Griffin. Ernie Nurtad entered you this episode.

Jim Mackle edited the video. Additional support from Brad Silvestor and Rosemary Ho. Thanks also to Drew Burroughs, Mia Silverio, and Dan Shulan. Nishak Kurow's Vox Media's executive producer of podcasts. Make sure to follow Pivot on your favorite podcast platform. Thanks for listening to Pivot from your magazine and Vox Media. You can subscribe to the magazine at nymag.com slash pod. We'll be back later this week for another breakdown.

of all things, tech, and business. Kara, I call my penis Bernie Sanders because it leans far left and stands up for everyone. That's good. That's bad.