Plain English with Derek Thompson - The Spectacular Rise and Fall of Fake Meat in America
Episode Date: February 10, 2023For the past 50 years, Americans have basically responded to the case against eating animals by eating more animals. The share of Americans who call themselves vegan or vegetarian hasn’t increased i...n the past 20 years. But a few years ago, I was certain that we were near peak meat, thanks to the rise of plant-based “meat” products—like Impossible Burgers and Beyond Meat sausages. In 2019 and 2020, I looked like a genius, as meat-substitute products surged. But then came the crash. Beyond Meat’s publicly traded stock is down more than 80 percent from its all-time high. Impossible Burger has announced layoffs of more than 20 percent of its staff. So what happened? Today’s guest is Deena Shanker, who wrote a blockbuster story for Bloomberg on this very topic. We talk about the spectacular rise and fall of fake meat—and what it tells us about food, taste, politics, and technology. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Deena Shanker Producer: Devon Manze Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hey there, Humanoids. This is David Chewaker here with a very exciting announcement.
Your favorite wrestling podcast feed, The Ring of Wrestling Show, is now going daily.
And you can hang out with me and Kaz on Mondays and Thursdays for the Masked Man Show.
And you can join me, Peter Rosenberg, alongside Stack Guy Greg and Dip every Tuesday with cheap heat.
And on Fridays, I'll welcome a friend or special guest from the world of wrestling.
And on Wednesdays, we have a very special new show called Wednesday Worldwide that you're going to want to check out.
Paperview reaction, one-of-a-kind interviews, fantasy booking, talking about bagels.
That's what we do here on the Ring of Wrestling show.
Follow the show now on Spotify.
And do us a favor.
Give us five stars.
And do us another favor and stay major.
For the past 50 years, Americans have basically responded to the case against eating animals by consistently eating more animals.
We have heard again and again about the moral and ecological cost of eating meat from
viral documentary footage of slaughterhouses to activist organizations like PETA,
scientific reports on the fossil fuel cost of producing a medallion of beef.
And it hasn't made much of a difference.
The share of Americans who call themselves vegan or vegetarian has barely increased in the last 20 years.
With every passing decade, Americans have eaten more and more meat per capita.
And this doesn't make us unique, by the way, as most countries get richer,
They eat more and more meat.
But a few years ago, I was certain that we were near peak meat.
I saw the rise of plant-based meat products like impossible burgers and beyond meat sausages,
and I thought they seemed like a landmark moment in food history.
For decades, telling Americans what they should not eat, that had not worked.
But maybe using technology and innovation, entrepreneurship, to accept.
expand the menu, giving Americans more meat alternatives.
I thought maybe that would work.
And to a certain extent, this was mere projection.
I am a meat eater.
I really like steak.
But also, in the last few years, I have eaten a bit more impossible burgers
and a lot more beyond meat meatballs.
In 2019 and 2020, I looked pretty smart with this peak meat prediction.
Meat substitute products truly surged.
There was a moment where it seemed like every chain, Duncan, McDonald's, Burger King were experimenting with fake meat.
But the last two years have made my peak meat prediction look pretty silly.
Beyond Meat's publicly traded stock is down more than 80% from its all-time high.
Impossible has announced layoffs of more than 20% of its staff.
Restaurants have slashed their plant-based meat options.
So what happened?
Well, today's guest wrote a blockbuster story for Bloomberg on this very topic.
Dina Shanker has been covering the food industry for many years since we actually shared an office in New York about 10 years ago.
In this episode, we talk about the spectacular rise and fall of fake meat and what it tells us about food and taste and politics and technology.
I'm Derek Thompson. This is plain English.
Dina Shanker, welcome to the show.
Thank you so much for having.
having me. So let's tell this story properly. In 2009, Ethan Brown founds the company Beyond Meat.
What does he tell the world he's trying to accomplish? Ethan had what was at the time a really
revolutionary idea. He was going to mimic animal meat using plants. Now, of course, plant-based
protein has been around for thousands of years, but the idea that you could make a piece of food that
was essentially meat, that looked like meat, smelled like meat, tasted like it, cooked like it,
but you were going to make it only with plant materials was a really new idea at the time.
And a few years later, another Brown, a Stanford University biochemist named Pat Brown,
no relation to Ethan, founds impossible. This is 2011, and he makes some even grander
claims about the future of his company, including in a profile for the New Yorker magazine.
he says, we're going to take a double-digit portion of the beef market, we're going to send meat into a death spiral.
What are some of the most important differences between Brown 2, It Impossible, and Brown 1 at Beyond?
So Ethan wanted at Beyond, Ethan wanted to make his plant-based meat by kind of breaking down plants into their component parts and then reassembling them so that they would match what meat looks.
like what he called sometimes the core architecture or the blueprint of meat. Pat Brown at Impossible
had a different idea. His was that meat got its essential meatiness from something called heem.
Heem exists in all plants and meats, but it's in the highest concentration in beef. And so he said,
I'm going to make heem out of soy, and I'm going to use that. And I'm going to put it in my meat-like products to
make those really meaty.
So they were both going after the same goal, but in different ways.
Right.
He basically finds this, it's like an iron-based compound heem, right?
H-E-M-E, he finds a way to produce it with genetically modified yeast, and that gives
it its sort of like bloodiness.
I remember when I lived in New York, I lived in the East Village of New York in like 2012-ish
to 2014.
and across the street there was a Bear Burger.
And Bear Burger was one of the first companies
to sell Impossible Burgers.
And I remember biting into one and not hating it
and being shocked that I didn't hate it
and feeling like, oh, this thing,
it kind of looks like it's bleeding, right?
Is that sort of bleeding effect?
Does that come from Heem itself?
Or is that just a part of the general plant-based magic
in these alternative meats?
Yes, that does come from Heem.
And actually, Ethan,
at Beyond also wanted his burgers to bleed,
but he did it with beet juice.
So the idea that the burger would be bloody in the middle
was common to both of them, actually.
And give me a sense of the kind of promises
that the Browns were making,
not just to their investors,
but also at like TED Talks.
Because what I find so interesting about these kind of companies
is that, like, there are VC-based companies
that are raising money,
and then there are like TED Talk-based institutions
that are trying to raise prestige or excitement.
And they were really succeeding on both accounts, right?
They were mainstays in these kind of conferences
and they were raising hundreds of millions of dollars.
So what were the promises they were making?
How were they doing it?
That's right.
So they were really taking advantage of this conference circuit
and getting their message out
in front of these really, I think, educated groups of people
that for years have been hearing about
and talking about the press.
problems in our food system. And the way the problems in our food system were terrible for the
environment, terrible for our health. And there was always a question as to how we were going to
solve these problems. Now, here comes Ethan Brown, and he says, I have a solution. My plant-based
meat is going to help solve our health problems. And he would say on this stage, he would list
cancer, diabetes, heart disease. And it would also help our environment.
problems, natural resource depletion, climate change. And he made this great case for, oh, and of course,
animal welfare, which we also have all learned about sort of how gruesome factory farming can
really be. So that was, Ethan was going to solve all three. Pat really focused on the
environmental piece more than anything. He talked about the quote unquote ongoing wildlife Holocaust
that was happening because of humankind's insatiable demand for beef.
And it should be said that neither Brown was wrong when they were talking about the way our
demand for meat hurts the environment, our health, and animals.
These are all real problems.
What they were offering was a solution that was really sexy to a lot of people because it
didn't involve changes in policy.
it involved a new consumer product.
I think that's exactly it.
You know, people like, say,
Lina da Caprio,
these celebrity investors,
they want to bet on the future they want to live in.
They want to bet on a world
that has less animal cruelty,
that has less climate dispoliation,
but they also want to make money.
And so it was so thrilling about these companies
is that they seem to crack a code
that allowed them to do everything at once,
to save the planet, save the animals, and make a crap ton of money. So in 2019, Beyond Meat
goes public. And it is a total gangbuster. It is, as you reported, the most successful initial
public offering since the 2008 financial crisis. The most successful IPO in a decade. Can you help
me understand why? I mean, there's the sort of attitude, enthusiasm about it, the sort of the hope
that we're going to save the world. But they were all.
also notching some pretty significant commercial victories too, right?
That's right.
So Impossible and Beyond went different routes to sort of the mass consumer commercialization.
Basically, Beyond went first into supermarkets.
And the big first win for Beyond was when Whole Foods put Beyond burgers in their meat case
so that they would attract not the vegetarian who knows that veggie burgers are usually in
freezer, but that it would be the meat eater would go to buy their ground beef and they would see
this option and think maybe I'll try that. So that was a really big deal. Impossible went a different
round. They went through restaurants. And they didn't have a lot of product at first. And so they did
what was a really great way to get headlines without having a lot to sell, which is they went to
really fancy chefs. So the first chef that sold the Impossible Burger was David Chang at Mom
of Fukunishi in Manhattan. And David Chang is not just like a well-known chef. He's a well-known chef who
loves meat. And here he is, and he's endorsing this burger. And that was the route that Impossible
took was they went from David Chang to other high-end chefs. And beyond went supermarket chain
after supermarket chain. Pretty soon, though, it became clear that the real battle for attention
and wins was happening with fast food.
And we saw this back and forth,
like each one claiming new partners,
you know, Beyond got Carl's Jr.,
which, again, was like this really big deal
because Carl's Jr., you know, this was the same burger chain
that had those crazy commercials with like Paris Hilton,
like in a bikini eating a big juicy burger.
And they were going to sell the Beyond Burger.
What an endorsement, you know?
And Impossible got White Castle, which was a really big deal.
And then after Beyond went public, Beyond got Dunkin' Donuts with their sausage,
and Impossible got the really, really big win, which was the Impossible Whopper at Burger King.
And I'm not trying to create a moral equivalence here,
but there is a commercial analogy here to be made with something like blockchain, right?
A new technology comes online, and every company that can conceivably incorporate the blockchain
into their business says, oh, we've got a blockchain business.
We've got a blockchain option.
We've got a blockchain products.
And it's JP Morgan and it's stripe.
And it's just, it's everyone trying to get in on what they think is going to be this
emerging future within their sector.
And to be clear, this emerging future, a little bit like crypto and blockchain, has an
incredible 2020 from your piece.
Quote, Americans bought 5.3 million units of fresh meat alternatives in the eight weeks
ended April 25th, 2020.
Those are, you know, including the first six weeks of the pandemic.
That was three times the amount of a year earlier, according to Nielsen.
Suddenly, you write, Beyond's prediction in one of its investor pitch decks that fake meat
was on track to become the new fake milk was looking increasingly plausible.
Help me understand why you think 2020 was such a great year for this alternative meat sector.
So the first thing is that the Beyond Meat IPO in 2019 not only boosted beyond.
It paved the way for all these other companies to start introducing their own products.
There were startups that had new products.
There were big companies like ConAgra and Nestle that were either sort of like giving their old products new facelifts or introducing new ones.
Tyson even started getting into the plant-based market.
So you had in supermarkets, if you went to look for a plant-based meat product, you could get a new product every time.
There was just a constant flow of new products.
So when, you know, everybody got locked down from the pandemic and people had a different kind of disposable income because they weren't going out to restaurants, they weren't going on vacations.
And food really took on a really important new role in those months.
And so for a lot of people, this was a great opportunity to try plant-based meat.
One was a lot of people were trying to be healthier and everyone thought this is a really good way to do it.
People were also just bored and this gave them like something new to try.
And so you just had, and of course, there was a shortage of real meat in supermarkets.
You couldn't find the real thing.
And so you had all of these factors sort of converge into this huge opportunity for this category.
Right.
It was a perfect storm.
I remember in the first maybe six months of the pandemic, I loved going to bars, and suddenly
I couldn't go to bars anymore.
I had never really been a cocktail maker myself.
And suddenly I was like, okay, you know what?
I still want a migroney.
I still want a dirty martini.
I'm just going to learn how to make it at home.
And so I think a lot of people, whether it was for them, it might have been cocktails,
might have been board games.
They were trying new things.
There was like an explosion in novelty curiosity.
Let me figure out some thing I can add to my life so that even though I am not leaving my living room and life could not be more effing boring, it still feels like there's variety in my life.
And this new food category offered a perfectly easy way to inject variety into dinner.
You could say, you know, kids, we're going to, you know, have pasta again and pasta and meatballs.
But this time, it's going to be beyond meatballs.
And let's like compare and contrast what, you know, Tuesday's dinner feels like versus, you know, Thursday's pasta and asses.
actual meat meatballs. I think that that novelty demand was such a huge part of the boom.
At this time, or in the next year, as the world began to open up, but now tell me what's happened
to the alternative meat market since 2020. So the sales have just really fallen since then.
We had some numbers in our story that showed in supermarkets sales of refrigerated plant-based
meat, which is that section where they were really going head to head with the real animal meat,
those sales fell 14% by volume for the 52 weeks ending December 4th, according to IRA.
And in restaurants, sales of the or orders of the plant-based burgers were down 9% for the 12 months
ending November 2022. So what we've seen is that just sales are falling in restaurants,
and in supermarkets.
And this is what's so interesting in me,
because it's like one of these icarus narratives
where you have a revolution
that seems to be rising and rising
and then it suddenly crashes.
And like just within three years,
you have this sector
that includes the largest IPO in a decade
and then suddenly, as you just reported,
it's falling by about 10% within supermarkets
and about 10% in restaurants.
So I want you to help us figure out why.
One possibility is that alternative meat, fake meat, whatever you want to call it, it's basically a fad.
And when I say a fad, I mean it's something that consumers want to do a little bit for a little while, but then they want to stop.
And in this way, it kind of reminds me of another food startup, Blue Apron.
My wife and I tried Blue Apron.
We ordered the food.
We looked at the menus.
We did it for about four weeks.
Then we were like, okay, we're done.
If every single Blue Apron customer does what we did, Blue Apron cannot make a profit.
Its unit economics are completely screwed.
And it turns out that Blue Aprons Unit Economics have been rather screwed.
So first, let's discuss this sort of fattish element.
Do you have any data, any reporting that Americans who were buying alternative meat simply stopped?
Yeah.
So basically what we found is that the target market for these products,
which was always the meat eater, is not a frequent buyer.
And that means that the people that buy the most of it per capita are actually
vegans and vegetarians who are a very small and generally static percentage of the population.
And so meat eaters do eat these products sometimes,
but just not with any level of frequency that vegans and vegetarians.
do. Yeah, no, I didn't realize that until I read your reporting, but it's just so true. You cannot be
definitionally, you can't be a growth category if a non-growing portion of the U.S. population is
buying a steady share of your product. Like, there's just nowhere to grow. They wanted to be a meat
alternative. They wanted to be served in supermarkets, you know, next to beef. But the people who
eat beef, I guess just stopped buying the product after a few times. I wonder whether that leads us
to number two, which is that it's not just that people prefer the taste of hamburgers, but also
there were some health concerns, right? How did the promised health benefits of the alternative
meat product match up against some of the research about these products' health? So,
So Ethan Brown, as we discussed, made these really big health proclamations about his products.
And one of the things that Ethan has said is that it can even improve, like, athletic performance on that very same day.
And a lot of people came to the category with this idea that they were going to eat something healthy for them, that it was good for them.
Now, Pat Brown at Impossible, he handled this question differently.
He was not really coming out there and making these huge promises around health.
But when somebody asked him about health, he would always say something along the lines of like,
well, it's not a kale salad, but it's healthier than a regular burger.
What consumers took away at first was like, these are healthy.
Now, healthy and healthier are different.
And from my reporting, talking to the doctors that have looked at this most closely,
the best thing that they say is that it's probably healthier than a Burger King Burger.
That's the best thing that they say.
One of the doctors I spoke to, Dr. David Katz, who is himself a big advocate of plant-based diets,
and he really believes in them from a health perspective, animal welfare, environmental.
He says, at best, these burgers are a lateral move from a, from a, like a Burger King burger.
So what does this mean?
This means that if you're a consumer and you're trying to pick something healthy, maybe you're
learning that this isn't healthy.
Maybe it's healthier than a Big Mac.
Maybe, maybe.
But it's not healthy.
If you want to have something healthy, maybe you, maybe you hear from your doctor.
that you'd be better off with a piece of grilled chicken or lentils.
There's a lot of healthy food out there.
Nobody is saying that these foods,
nobody that isn't selling these foods is saying that these are healthy foods.
I think that's so important because I can, you know,
if I want to get on my soapbox here,
I can say, like, look, if fake meat is better for animals
and better for the environment and a lateral move from a health standpoint
and only a little bit less delicious than a whopper,
then on net, it's clearly better for the world
and people should eat it.
But that should is very different than is.
And in the real world,
people just aren't thinking about these moral categories, I think,
when they're worried about what am I going to feed myself
or my kids or my partner, my husband, my wife,
for dinner on Tuesday.
They're just thinking about these simple things
of taste and cost.
And it just seems like this product category
hasn't overcome those anxieties.
about taste and cost.
Another thing that we've seen
is that, as you've mentioned,
the corporate deals have really started to tumble.
Like, Duncan pulled the faux sausages,
Taco Bell, did this taste test
with Beyond's Carnie Asada,
but the reviews were mixed.
The McDonald's McPlant Burger
doesn't seem to be a mainstay.
What is the fact that companies
have not held on to these products
told you about the consumer reaction to them?
When these companies were first figuring out their way into the market,
when Beyond an impossible were first figuring out,
how are they going to reach the most consumers?
They were talking about supermarkets or restaurants,
and sort of which is going to hit more people.
So in some ways that it made total sense to try to go through Burger King or McDonald's,
right, because those have just massive customer bases.
You'll get in front of more people that way than you could ever imagine.
But like you said earlier in the show, that certainly depends on Burger King and McDonald's.
And it also leaves open the question of whether you're selling to the consumer that is most likely to buy your product.
These products do have consumers that want them.
I think the tests have shown that the consumers at the fast food restaurants are not those consumers.
You know, there have been some success stories.
The Impossible Whopper is still on the menu.
They've added another impossible burger at Burger King, but the sausage and the chicken that they've tried there just have not landed in a way that put them on the main menu.
And, you know, in a Bloomberg interview, Peter McGinnis, the current CEO of Impossible,
said during one of those tests that if it went well, it would get on the menu.
And then it did not get on the menu, which they don't usually tell us the results of the test,
but that was during the test, he said that.
And so you will still find people that really like their impossible chicken nuggets,
but maybe they weren't the ones that were buying that maybe they weren't going to Burger King to buy them.
And so these companies want, you know, one thing they really did achieve with these big deals was getting their name out there.
The awareness that comes with a Burger King deal is just unparalleled.
But that is not the same as selling tons of chicken nuggets at Burger King.
You know,
Conviety
You know
a new
And so
VATs
of VENTAS
with the form
of the
Pago
with the
world.
Has heard
The
Mereverion
of the world.
The incredible
system of
Shopify
facilita the
services in
the red
social and
in the
world.
That is
music for
your
ears.
No,
you're
more
your
business
will be
a super
success
with
Shopify.
Empe
your
period of
Prueva for a euro
a month
in Shopify.es
Barrecords.
Meanwhile,
there's this other
meat alternative
that has found
its way into the
hype cycle,
which is
cellular meat.
This has gotten
a lot of attention
from, again,
celebrities and
investors.
It checks the
boxes of
TED Talk morality
and investor
interest.
Bill Gates is
into it.
Leonard DiCaprio
is investing.
What is
cellular meat?
And where is
it in the
sort of
technological
cycle relative to the plant-based options we've been discussing.
So cellular meat is made by, in its simplest explanation, is they extract cells from living
animals like a cow, and then they grow those cells by adding components to, quote-unquote, feed it.
And then theoretically, they then grow enough cells to make something like a burger or a chicken breast.
Now, they have a lot of money.
They've raised over $2 billion to do this.
There are a lot of companies that are trying.
And a lot of them are making small amounts of product.
So far, none of them has said that they can do it at scale.
So that's one really big barrier.
There has not been any definitive study showing that it's actually better for the environment,
unless we're talking about beef, which beef looks like it will be better for the environment.
But there's so much energy and electricity and heating required to do this that right now it doesn't
look like the chicken made this way is going to be better for the environment than chicken
raised on a farm.
And so it's very expensive.
Trying to do these things for the first time is extremely expensive.
And then trying to do them over and over again will also cost a lot of money.
And on taste, you know, I've had some cell-based animal products, and I would just say that the chicken I had a couple years ago was okay.
And the salmon I had was actually really impressive.
But there certainly, they have a lot of work to do.
Like way more work than plant-based meat had.
when they first got started.
So where this will go is an open question.
And then, of course, do consumers want it?
That's something that we're seeing consumers have been rejecting plant-based meat for the reasons
we discussed and whether they will ultimately accept cell-based meat, which is more foreign
than plant-based meat, is just another big question.
Yeah, it raises something that.
I haven't talked about a lot, I guess, in last few minutes, which is a kind of ick factor.
You know, if you tell people, like, we made this meat from plants and it bleeds because we found
a way to imitate an iron-based compound that makes plants fake bleed. Like, for some people,
it's like, that's really cool. Like, what an incredible technological achievement. And for
other people, it's like, I'm sorry, you want me to feed this to my three-year-old? Like, are you nuts?
Like, that sounds absolutely disgusting. And so, like, it is very, very personal. It's up to every
individual to determine what is cool and what is disgusting. But I have to imagine that even if cellular
meat, I say this is a huge fan of the technology, even if it passes certain thresholds of taste and
cost, it's still going to be a chicken grown in a petri dish, you know, a beef grown in a lab.
And for some people, it's just going to take, I think, several years for them to get over the idea
that their ribeye comes from a scientist with a petri dish rather than an actual moo-moo cow in a
farm. I want to close with just two questions about what this all means. You draw a really interesting
comparison in your piece. You say, look, there's been a revolution in alternative milk. There's
been this revolution in almond milk and soy milk and oat milk. Why do you think milk alternatives have
thrived where meat alternatives have not? Milk alternatives seemed like a really good comparison
a few years ago.
But there's some major differences between milk and meat.
The first is that there was a built-in audience for the alternative dairy products,
and that's those people that are lactose intolerant.
So they physically cannot eat milk or drink milk, but they still want to have cereal in the
morning.
They still want to have their coffee.
The second thing that I think is also really important is that milk is very often an
ingredient. It is not the main course. So somebody might be perfectly happy, and they might prefer even
oat milk in their coffee because the coffee is the main ingredient. They just want something to make it
like a little creamy. But that same person might have a grilled cheese for lunch because they still
like cheese. They still like dairy. They're not rejecting dairy. And so those two differences,
I think are hugely consequential for this comparison
and were maybe overlooked a bit
in the early days of the rise of fake meat.
The complementarity part of it I think is so important.
I eat the vast majority of my plant-based meat
as meatballs and pasta.
And there, it's not about me focusing on the taste of the meat.
It's like this is one of like three or four flavors
in every single bite.
You got the pasta, you got the tomato, you got the salt.
And yeah, there's like a little bit of meatiness in there.
and that's kind of nice to have,
and it's cool that it didn't require the death of an animal.
But there again, it's much more like almond milk in cereal
than it is like an impossible meat patty being like the centerpiece of a hamburger.
What is the rise and fall of alternative meat or fake meat?
What does it taught you, like what are some of your big picture lessons about like,
business about hype.
Like going forward, as you report on, there's going to be new generations and new incredibly
exciting hype cycles in the general space of food, what's a lesson that you're taking
from this Icarus story?
One thing that I've learned from following this particular category, but also that I've
learned from my decade-ish of covering food, is that food is that food is really hard.
And a lot of businesses try to get into food to improve it in some way.
And it just, I think it's a lot harder than people expect from a, one is the margins are
really small.
The other is that consumers are fickle and don't necessarily make the choice in the
store that they say is the choice they'd like to make.
And that people have really strong feelings about food.
And so people might be willing to make certain sacrifices for the greater good in a lot of parts of their life.
But that doesn't always translate into their food choices.
And whenever anybody wants to get into the food business, I just strongly advise them to be really careful because I've seen so many food businesses get.
get ahead of themselves.
And I've also seen some succeed,
but I think food is really hard.
And people make their food choices
based on a lot of different factors
that are changing all the time.
And so it's a tough business.
It's a tough business for anyone.
I'm so glad you said that.
I think it's a really profound point,
that food is really hard.
And a part of why changing food is really hard
is that companies like impossible
and beyond meat,
They have what you can think of, as I've said, they have like a TED Talk identity and they have a dinner table identity.
And the TED Talk identity is like, is this business good? Is it good with a capital G? Is it doing good for the planet and good for the environment? Is it good for your body? Like, is it good? But then, like, there's the dinner table identity, which is like, does it taste good? Like, do I think it's kind of gross when I think about, you know, heem? Do I think it's delicious when I'm actually like chewing it? Do I feel like a food?
that is extremely processed, but does involve animals,
is something that I want to serve my five or six year old
every single day.
That's an incredibly complex stew of identity
to think about.
And I think that one big lesson for me
is that I personally, in rooting for this product category,
let my enthusiasm for the TED Talk identity
of alternative meat to eclipse the dinner table identity
of this product category.
It just, bottom line, it didn't taste good enough.
It didn't taste good enough to win the test at McDonald's.
It didn't taste good enough to stay on the menu at Duncan.
And it hasn't tasted quite good enough for meat eaters to buy it in growing numbers in supermarkets.
Dina Shanker, thank you so much for walking us to this story.
And I'll talk to you again soon.
Thank you.
Thank you for listening.
Plain English is produced by Devin Manzi.
If you like the show, please go to Apple Podcast or Spotify.
give us a five-star rating, leave a review,
and don't forget to check out our TikTok
at plain English underscore.
That's at plain English underscore on TikTok.
